💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Why is India rethinking its Anaemia Policy?

    Central Idea

    • Anaemia questions are excluded from National Family Health Survey (NFHS-6) due to concerns about accuracy, emphasizing the need for precise estimates to address India’s growing anaemia burden.
    • NFHS-5 data reveals a significant increase in anaemia prevalence in India, underscoring the urgency of accurate estimates to effectively tackle this public health challenge.

    National Family Health Survey (NFHS)

    • NFHS is a large-scale, multi-round survey conducted in a representative sample of households throughout India.
    • Three rounds of the survey have been conducted since the first survey in 1992-93.
    • The International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) Mumbai, is the nodal agency, responsible for providing coordination and technical guidance for the survey.
    • IIPS collaborates with a number of Field Organizations (FO) for survey implementation.
    • The survey provides state and national information for India on fertility, infant and child mortality, the practice of family planning, maternal and child health, reproductive health etc.

    Each successive round of the NFHS has had two specific goals:

    1.      To provide essential data on health and family welfare needed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and other agencies for policy and programme purposes, and

    2.      To provide information on important emerging health and family welfare issues.

     Anaemia: A bigger menace

    • Anaemia is characterized by low red blood cells or haemoglobin levels, leading to symptoms like fatigue and weakness.
    • Iron deficiency is the primary cause, but deficiencies in folate, vitamins B12, and A also contribute.
    • Addressing nutritional deficiencies is crucial for prevention and treatment.

    Shift to DABS-I for Anaemia Assessment

    • The Health Ministry shifted anaemia assessment to Diet and Biomarkers Survey in India (DABS-I) for more accurate prevalence estimates.
    • DABS-I is a comprehensive dietary survey collecting individual data to assess food and nutrient adequacy nationwide.

    Reasons for Methodology Change

    • Concerns of Over-Diagnosis: Using WHO cut-offs may not suit the Indian population due to various factors that influence anaemia.
    • Inadequacy of WHO Cut-Offs: Country-specific cut-offs are needed as the WHO’s haemoglobin cut-offs may not reflect the Indian anaemia situation accurately.
    • Differences in Blood Sampling Methods: Venous blood sampling is more accurate than the capillary blood sampling used in previous surveys.

    Role of DABS-I Dietary Survey

    • DABS-I collects detailed dietary intake data to understand nutritional patterns and deficiencies contributing to anaemia.
    • It provides information on nutrient composition in foods from different regions, aiding targeted interventions.

    Prevalence of Anaemia in India

    • High Burden: Anaemia is a significant public health concern in India, with a high prevalence across different population groups.
    • Anaemia among Women: Data from national surveys indicate that a considerable percentage of women in India, particularly those in the reproductive age group, are affected by anaemia.
    • Anaemia among Children: Anaemia is also prevalent among children in India, with a substantial proportion experiencing this condition at a young age.

    Causes and Risk Factors

    • Nutritional Deficiencies: Iron deficiency is the primary cause of anaemia in India. Inadequate intake and absorption of iron, along with deficiencies in other key nutrients, contribute to the problem.
    • Socioeconomic Factors: Factors such as poverty, limited access to nutritious food, and inadequate healthcare contribute to the high prevalence of anaemia in certain socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.
    • Infections and Diseases: Certain infections, such as malaria and helminthiasis, and chronic diseases like kidney disease and cancer, can increase the risk of developing anaemia.

    Impact on Health and Well-being

    • Physical Symptoms: Anaemia can cause a range of physical symptoms, including fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath, and impaired cognitive function.
    • Maternal and Child Health: Anaemia in pregnant women increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and childbirth. It can also lead to low birth weight and developmental issues in infants.
    • Impaired Growth and Development: Anaemia among children can hinder their growth, development, and overall well-being. It may affect cognitive function, school performance, and future productivity.

    Government Initiatives and interventions

    • National Nutrition Programs: The Government of India has implemented various programs, such as the National Iron+ Initiative and the Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana, to address anaemia and improve maternal and child health.
    • Supplementation and Fortification: Iron and other micronutrient supplementation programs, along with food fortification initiatives, aim to enhance iron intake and combat anaemia.
    • Awareness and Education: Public awareness campaigns and educational programs focus on promoting nutrition, especially among vulnerable groups, and raising awareness about the importance of addressing anaemia.

    Challenges and Future Directions

    • Access to Healthcare and Nutritious Food: Improving access to quality healthcare services, affordable nutritious food, and clean drinking water is crucial in addressing anaemia in India.
    • Multisectoral Collaboration: Addressing anaemia requires collaboration across various sectors, including healthcare, nutrition, education, and social welfare, to develop comprehensive strategies and interventions.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation of anaemia prevalence, intervention effectiveness, and progress towards targets are essential to track improvements and identify areas that require further attention.

  • OPEC+ decision on Oil Supply cut

    opec

    Central Idea

    • Saudi Arabia has decided to decrease its oil supply to the global economy.
    • This unilateral action aims to stabilize the declining crude oil prices.
    • Previous efforts by major oil-producing countries within the OPEC+ alliance to cut supply did not yield desired price increases.

    What is OPEC+?

    • The non-OPEC countries which export crude oil along with the 14 OPECs are termed as OPEC plus countries.
    • OPEC plus countries include Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan, and Sudan.
    • Saudi and Russia, both have been at the heart of a three-year alliance of oil producers known as OPEC Plus — which now includes 11 OPEC members and 10 non-OPEC nations — that aims to shore up oil prices with production cuts.

    Reasons for OPEC+ Production Cuts

    • Russian war: Oil prices rose significantly following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
    • Previous major cut: The recent production cut is the largest since 2020 when OPEC+ members reduced outputs by 10 million barrels per day (bpd) during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    • Benefit to Middle Eastern states: The cuts are expected to boost prices, benefiting Middle Eastern OPEC+ members who have become significant oil suppliers to Europe after sanctions were imposed on Russia.

    Concerns for India

    • Fuel price hike: Despite importing cheap Russian oil, India has not seen a decrease in fuel prices.
    • Fiscal challenges: Rising oil prices pose fiscal challenges for India, where heavily-taxed retail fuel prices have reached record highs, threatening the demand-driven economic recovery.
    • Reliance on West Asian supplies: India imports about 84% of its oil and depends on West Asian countries for over three-fifths of its oil demand.
    • Potential impact on consumption-led recovery: India, as one of the largest crude-consuming countries, is concerned that production cuts by OPEC+ nations could undermine the country’s consumption-led economic recovery and negatively affect price-sensitive consumers.

    Back2Basics: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)

    Description
    Founding September 14, 1960
    Member Countries Algeria, Angola, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela
    Goal Coordinate and unify petroleum policies among member countries, ensure stability and predictability in oil markets, secure fair returns on investment for member countries’ petroleum resources
    Production Quotas Set production limits for member countries to manage oil supply and stabilize prices
    Market Monitoring Monitor global oil market conditions, supply, demand, inventories, and prices
    OPEC Meetings Regular meetings held every six months for member countries to discuss and negotiate oil production and pricing policies
    Pricing Policy Historically used the “OPEC basket” concept – a weighted average price of crude oil blends produced by member countries
    Influence on Prices OPEC’s decisions and actions can impact global oil prices by increasing or decreasing production levels
    Diminished Influence OPEC’s influence on oil prices has reduced due to factors like the rise of non-OPEC oil production, changes in global energy markets, and geopolitical developments
    Non-OPEC Cooperation OPEC cooperates with non-OPEC countries, notably through the “OPEC+” group, which includes Russia, to collectively manage oil supply levels and enhance market stability

  • In news: Telangana Statehood Day

    telangana

    Central Idea

    • With assembly elections just months away, political parties across the board are celebrating the 9th anniversary of Telangana’s statehood today (June 2).

    Formation of Telangana

    • The article discusses the historical background and the struggle for statehood that led to the formation of Telangana, the newest state in India.
    • It provides a chronological account of the significant events and factors that shaped Telangana’s journey towards becoming an independent state.

    Why was Telangana separated from Andhra Pradesh?

    Telangana was separated from Andhra Pradesh primarily due to historical, cultural, and developmental reasons, as well as demands from the people of the region. Here are the key reasons behind the separation:

    • Historical and Cultural Differences: Telangana and Andhra Pradesh have distinct historical and cultural identities. Telangana had its own language, Telugu, but with a distinct dialect and cultural practices. The people of Telangana felt that their unique identity was not adequately recognized or represented within the larger Andhra Pradesh state.
    • Socio-economic Disparities: Telangana region, despite its rich natural resources, had been relatively underdeveloped compared to the coastal Andhra region. People in Telangana felt that their region’s development needs were neglected, resulting in socio-economic disparities and unequal distribution of resources and opportunities.
    • Demand for Local Control: The demand for separate statehood gained momentum due to the belief that local control and governance would be more effective in addressing the specific needs and aspirations of Telangana. The people of Telangana sought greater autonomy and decision-making power over their own affairs.
    • Political Representation: Some leaders and groups within Telangana felt marginalized in the political landscape of united Andhra Pradesh. They believed that a separate state would provide better opportunities for political representation and participation.
    • Water and Resource Sharing: Disputes over the sharing of water resources, particularly the Krishna and Godavari rivers, further strained the relationship between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. The perceived inequitable distribution of water resources added to the demand for a separate state.

    These factors, along with sustained movements and protests led by various political and social groups, culminated in the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh and the formation of the separate state of Telangana on June 2, 2014.

    Here is a complete timeline of the formation of the modern Telangana State

    PART I: Pre-Independence and Formation of Andhra Pradesh

    • Post-independence Hyderabad State (1948-1951): Hyderabad’s significance as a part of the Princely State and its dominance by the Urdu-speaking Muslim elite.
    • Brutalities under Nizam’s rule and the Razakars (1945-1948): The communist-supported rebellion and the violent response of the Nizam’s local militia, the Razakars, leading to atrocities on Telangana’s population.
    • Standstill Agreement and its violation (1947-1948): The signing of the Standstill Agreement with Hyderabad, the subsequent violation of its terms by the Nizam, and the intervention of India through “Operation Polo.”
    • Hyderabad’s status as a Part-B state (1951-1956): The inclusion of Hyderabad as a Part-B state with an elected chief minister after India’s independence and the end of Nizam’s rule.

    PART II: Linguistic Reorganisation and Creation of AP

    • Potti Sriramalu’s demand for a separate Telugu state (1952): The fasting protest by Potti Sriramalu, leading to unrest and eventually the formation of Andhra State.
    • Formation of Andhra State out of Madras state (1953): The division of the Madras state and the creation of Andhra State, comprising the north and north-eastern regions, in response to the demand for a separate Telugu state.
    • Formation of the States Reorganisation Committee (1953-1955): The establishment of the committee to address the issue of linguistic reorganisation and its subsequent recommendations.
    • Status of Telangana region in linguistic reorganisation (1955-1956): The debate over the merging of Telangana with Andhra or having it as a separate state, conflicting with the SRC’s recommendations.
    • Merging of Andhra State and Telangana (1956): The decision to merge Andhra State and Telangana against the SRC’s recommendation, resulting in the formation of Andhra Pradesh with Hyderabad as its capital.

    PART III: Struggle for Telangana and Creation of Telangana State

    • Pre-Independence protests for Mulki Rules (1952-1947): The protests demanding the enforcement of Mulki Rules, which ensured job reservations for Telangana domiciles, even before India’s independence.
    • Protests and birth of Telangana Praja Samiti in 1969: The widespread protests in 1969, leading to the establishment of the TPS and the call for a separate Telangana state.
    • Repeal of Mulki Rules Act in 1973: The introduction of the 32nd Amendment to the Constitution by Indira Gandhi, repealing the Mulki Rules Act and impacting the Telangana movement.
    • Revival of the Telangana movement by KCR in 2001: KCR’s resignation from the Telugu Desam Party and the formation of the Telangana Rashtra Samithi, rejuvenating the demand for a separate Telangana state.
    • KCR’s fast-unto-death and the promise of Telangana statehood (2009): KCR’s fast-unto-death in 2009 following the death of Andhra Pradesh’s Chief Minister, Y S Rajsekhara Reddy, leading to the Congress party’s promise of creating Telangana.
    • Formation of Telangana state in 2014: The culmination of the struggle with the formation of Telangana as a separate state in 2014, with Hyderabad serving as the capital for a period of ten years.

    Back2Basics: States Reorganization in India

     

    Explanation
    Background and Introduction The States Reorganisation Act, 1956 reformed India’s state boundaries based on linguistic lines.

    It is the most extensive change in state boundaries after India’s independence.

    The act came into effect along with the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.
    Pre-Independence Political Integration British India was divided into Provinces of British India and Indian States.

    Princely states were encouraged to accede to either India or Pakistan after independence.

    Bhutan remained independent, Hyderabad was annexed by India, and Kashmir became a subject of conflict between India and Pakistan.
    Integration of Princely States Between 1947 and 1950, the princely states were politically integrated into the Indian Union.

    Some states were merged into existing provinces, while others formed unions or remained separate states.

    Government of India Act 1935 served as the constitutional law until the adoption of a new Constitution.
    Classification of States and Territories The Constitution of India, effective from 1950, classified states and territories into Part A, Part B, Part C, and Part D categories.

    Part A states were former governors’ provinces, Part B states were former princely states, and Part C states included chief commissioners’ provinces and some princely states.

    Part D consisted of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
    Linguistic Movements and Demands The demand for linguistic states began before independence, with the first movement in Odisha in 1895.

    Political movements for linguistic states gained momentum after independence.

    Creation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953 marked a significant development in organizing states based on language.
    States Reorganisation Commission Linguistic Provinces Commission was set up in 1948 but rejected language as a basis for dividing states.

    States Reorganisation Commission was established in 1953 to reorganize Indian states.

    Headed by Fazal Ali and had recommendations overseen by Govind Ballabh Pant.
    Enactment and Changes States Reorganisation Act was enacted on 31 August 1956.

    Constitution underwent an amendment, and the terminology of Part A and Part B states was changed to simply “states.”

    Also introduced the classification of Union Territories.
    Effects and Reorganization States Reorganisation Act of 1956 resulted in the reorganization of states and territories.

    Took effect on 1 November 1956.

    Had a significant impact on dividing India into states and Union Territories.

  • Revised Guidelines for Deemed University Status

    university

    Central Idea

    • The University Grants Commission (UGC) has released revised guidelines allowing higher education institutions to apply for deemed university status.
    • The new guidelines aim to establish more quality-focused deemed universities by simplifying the eligibility criteria.

    University Grants Commission (UGC)

    • UGC is a statutory body under the University Grants Commission Act, of 1956.
    • It is charged with the task of coordinating and maintaining standards of higher education in India.
    • It provides recognition to universities and also allocates funds to universities and colleges.
    • It is headquartered are in New Delhi, and it also has 6 regional centres.
    • All grants to universities and higher learning institutions are handled by the UGC.
    • In 2015-16, the Union government initiated a National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) under UGC to rank all educational institutes.

     

    Why in the news?

    • Light but tight regulatory framework: The guidelines are based on the principle of a “light but tight” regulatory framework envisioned in the National Education Policy 2020.

    What is Deemed University?

    A Deemed University is a status granted to higher educational institutions in India by the Department of Higher Education (DHE) under the Ministry of Education based on the recommendation of the University Grants Commission (UGC).

    State University Deemed University
    Establishment Created by state government through legislative assembly act Granted autonomy by the UGC based on academic and research merits
    Funding Fully funded by the state government Self-funded
    Fee Structure Regulated and streamlined according to government guidelines Freedom to set their own fee structure
    Curriculum Regulated and aligned with UGC guidelines Autonomy to design their own courses and curriculum
    Research Research programs and activities aligned with government norms Emphasis on research with credible research output
    Infrastructure Facilities and infrastructure as per government provisions State-of-the-art infrastructure
    Affiliated Institutes Can have affiliated colleges and institutes Generally have a single institution
    Admission Process Follows state government guidelines for admissions Can set their own admission policies and criteria
    Degree Granting Authorized to award degrees and diplomas Authorized to award degrees and diplomas
    Flexibility Governed by UGC regulations and guidelines Autonomy in decision-making and flexibility in operations

     

    New changes introduced-

    Eligibility Criteria and Changes

    • Previous eligibility criteria: Under the 2019 guidelines, institutions with an existence of at least 20 years were eligible to apply for deemed university status.
    • Revised eligibility criteria: The revised guidelines replace the previous criteria with requirements such as multi-disciplinarity, NAAC grading, NIRF ranking, and NBA grading.
    • Criteria for application: Institutions with valid accreditation by NAAC, NBA accreditation for eligible programs, or ranking in the top 50 of specific categories in NIRF for the last three years can apply for deemed university status.

    Cluster of Institutions and Distinct Institution Category

    • Cluster of institutions: A cluster of institutions managed by multiple sponsoring bodies or a society can also apply for deemed university status.
    • Distinct Institution category: The guidelines introduce the “Distinct Institution” category, exempting institutions focusing on unique disciplines, addressing strategic needs, preserving Indian cultural heritage or the environment, dedicated to skill development, sports, languages, or other disciplines determined by the Expert Committee.

    Changes in Faculty Strength and Corpus Fund

    • Increased faculty strength: The revised guidelines increase the required faculty strength from 100 to 150.
    • Increased corpus fund for private institutions: The corpus fund requirement for private institutions has been increased from Rs 10 crore to Rs 25 crore.

    Executive Councils and Academic Bank of Credits

    • Creation of executive councils: Private universities seeking deemed university status will be required to create executive councils, similar to central universities.
    • Mandatory registration on Academic Bank of Credits: Deemed universities must register on the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC) and can offer twinning programs, joint degree programs, and dual degree programs.

    Off-Campus Centers and Future Plans

    • Off-campus centers eligibility: Deemed universities with a minimum ‘A’ grade or ranked from 1 to 100 in the “universities” category of NIRF rankings are eligible to establish off-campus centers.
    • Future removal of “deemed to be university” term: The UGC chairperson stated that the term “deemed to be university” will be removed once the Higher Education Commission of India is established through an act of Parliament.
    • Current number of deemed institutions: Currently, there are around 170 deemed institutions in the country.

    Back2Basics:

    NAAC NIRF NBA
    Full Form National Assessment and Accreditation Council National Institutional Ranking Framework National Board of Accreditation
    Governing Body University Grants Commission (UGC) Ministry of Education, Government of India All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)
    Purpose Assessing and accrediting higher education Ranking higher education institutions Accrediting technical education programs in engineering
    Assessment Criteria Quality parameters and predefined criteria Teaching, learning, research, graduation outcomes, etc. Criteria and standards for quality technical education
    Accreditation Grades A, A+, B, B+, C – –
    Focus Evaluating institution’s quality and performance Ranking institutions based on various parameters Accrediting engineering programs for quality technical education
    Scope All higher education institutions in India All higher education institutions in India Technical education programs in the field of engineering

  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): Balancing Trade and Environment

    Carbon

    Central Idea

    • The European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has raised concerns in India due to its potential impact on the country’s carbon-intensive exports to the EU. While India has criticized CBAM as protectionist and discriminatory, the debate highlights the delicate relationship between trade and environmental considerations.

    Carbon

    Understanding The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

    • CBAM is a key climate law introduced by the European Union (EU). It is designed to address the issue of carbon leakage and create a level playing field for EU industries by imposing carbon-related costs on certain imported products.
    • In 2005, the EU implemented the Emissions Trading System (ETS), a market-based mechanism aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
    • Under the ETS, industries within the EU are allocated allowances for their GHG emissions, which can be traded among themselves.
    • However, the EU is concerned that imported products may not account for embedded emissions due to less stringent environmental policies in exporting countries.
    • This disparity could put EU industries at a competitive disadvantage and potentially lead to carbon leakage, where European firms relocate to countries with less strict emission norms.
    • To address these concerns, the CBAM imposes carbon-related costs on imports of specific carbon-intensive products. The products currently included are cement, iron and steel, electricity, fertilizers, aluminium, and hydrogen.
    • The CBAM requires importers to pay a price linked to the average emissions cost under the EU’s ETS. If the imported products have already paid an explicit carbon price in their country of origin, a reduction can be claimed.

    Advantages of CBAM in addressing climate-related challenges

    • Addressing Carbon Leakage: CBAM helps address the issue of carbon leakage, which occurs when domestic industries relocate to countries with less stringent climate policies, leading to increased global emissions. By imposing carbon-related costs on imported products, CBAM aims to discourage carbon-intensive industries from shifting production to countries with lower environmental standards, thereby reducing carbon leakage.
    • Encouraging Global Climate Action: CBAM incentivizes countries with carbon-intensive industries to adopt more stringent climate policies. The mechanism sends a signal that products exported to the EU market should meet similar environmental standards as EU-produced goods. This encourages exporting countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and transition to cleaner production processes, contributing to global climate action.
    • Levelling the Playing Field: CBAM aims to create a level playing field for EU industries by ensuring that imported goods face similar carbon costs as domestic products. This helps prevent unfair competition, as it aligns the cost of carbon across different markets. It incentivizes domestic industries to invest in cleaner technologies and processes, knowing that imported goods will also be subject to equivalent carbon-related costs.
    • Revenue Generation for Climate Initiatives: CBAM has the potential to generate revenue for the EU, which can be used to fund climate initiatives and support the transition to a low-carbon economy. The funds collected through CBAM can be reinvested in research and development, renewable energy projects, or supporting industries in their decarbonization efforts.
    • Aligning Trade and Climate Objectives: CBAM highlights the interlinkage between trade and environmental concerns. It creates an opportunity to align trade policies with climate objectives, fostering greater coherence between economic growth and sustainability. CBAM encourages countries to consider the carbon intensity of their exports and provides an impetus for the adoption of climate-friendly practices in international trade.

    Key issues associated with CBAM

    • Trade Protectionism: CBAM has been accused of being protectionist in nature. Critics argue that it could create barriers to trade and hinder the export capabilities of countries, particularly those with carbon-intensive industries. By imposing carbon-related costs on imports, CBAM may give an advantage to domestic industries and discriminate against foreign competitors.
    • Discrimination and Non-Discrimination Principles: CBAM may face challenges in adhering to the principles of non-discrimination within the WTO. While it is designed to be origin-neutral, in practice, it could potentially discriminate between goods from different countries based on varying carbon pricing policies or reporting requirements. This could lead to disputes and challenges under WTO rules.
    • Complexity and Implementation Challenges: CBAM implementation involves complex calculations and mechanisms to determine the carbon-related costs of imported products. Setting up effective monitoring, reporting, and verification systems to ensure compliance could be challenging, both for the EU and exporting countries. The administrative burden and costs associated with implementing CBAM may also pose practical difficulties.
    • Potential for Double Regulation: Some argue that CBAM may lead to overlapping regulations and duplicate efforts. Exporting countries may already have their own carbon pricing mechanisms or environmental regulations in place. CBAM’s imposition of additional costs on top of these existing measures could be seen as redundant and burdensome.
    • Impact on Developing Countries: Developing countries, which often have carbon-intensive industries, may face disproportionate negative effects from CBAM. These countries might struggle to comply with the stringent requirements and costs associated with CBAM, hindering their economic development and ability to compete in global markets.
    • Incomplete Accounting of Emissions: CBAM focuses on explicit carbon prices, which may not fully account for the implicit costs associated with products from different countries. This incomplete accounting could result in arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination and may not effectively incentivize countries to adopt more stringent environmental policies.

    WTO Consistency and CBAM potential discrimination

    • WTO’s non-discrimination principle: The World Trade Organization (WTO) operates on the principle of non-discrimination, treating ‘like’ products from different countries equally.
    • Origin-neutral CBAM: While CBAM appears origin-neutral in design, its application could potentially discriminate between goods based on inadequate carbon pricing policies or burdensome reporting requirements for importers. Whether the products affected by CBAM are truly ‘like’ is a key consideration.
    • For instance: While steel products may seem similar, different production methods lead to varying carbon intensity. This raises the question of whether processes and production methods should be relevant for comparing products. Critics argue that CBAM violates WTO law by discriminating based on embedded emissions

    General Exceptions under WTO and potential application for CBAM

    • Exceptions allow countries to deviate from trade rules: The General Exceptions, outlined in Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), provide a set of policy grounds under which WTO members can justify trade measures that would otherwise violate their WTO obligations. These exceptions allow countries to deviate from certain trade rules for specified policy reasons.
    • Justification for exception: Article XX of the GATT lists various policy justifications, including public health, conservation of natural resources, and protection of the environment. The use of these exceptions is subject to meeting specific requirements, known as the chapeau. The chapeau sets out conditions that must be satisfied to justify a trade measure.
    • In the context of the CBAM: A WTO member implementing CBAM measures might seek to invoke the General Exceptions in Article XX of the GATT to justify any potential inconsistency with non-discrimination obligations.
    • For example: A country might argue that CBAM measures are necessary for the conservation of exhaustible natural resources or the protection of the environment, thereby justifying any deviation from non-discrimination principles.

    Carbon

    What are the concerns raised in India?

    • Impact on Export of Carbon-Intensive Products: India fears that CBAM implementation could severely affect its export of carbon-intensive products, particularly in sectors like aluminium, iron, and steel. These sectors may face significant challenges in accessing the EU market if they are subjected to additional economic costs due to CBAM.
    • Protectionism and Discrimination: India has criticized CBAM as being protectionist and discriminatory. It argues that the mechanism may create trade barriers and hinder the export competitiveness of Indian industries. India fears that CBAM could give an unfair advantage to EU domestic industries at the expense of Indian exporters.
    • Potential Economic Disruption: The implementation of CBAM may disrupt India’s trade flows and economic stability. The imposition of additional costs on carbon-intensive products exported to the EU market could lead to reduced demand, loss of market share, and potential negative impacts on employment and economic growth in India.
    • World Trade Organization (WTO) Challenge: India has contemplated the possibility of challenging CBAM at the WTO’s dispute settlement body. It raises concerns about the compatibility of CBAM with WTO rules, particularly regarding non-discrimination and trade-related principles
    • Interplay between Trade and the Environment: The concerns raised by India highlight the broader issue of the interplay between trade and environmental considerations. While acknowledging the need for environmental protection, India emphasizes the importance of ensuring that environmental measures do not become a smokescreen for trade protectionism.

    Facts for prelims

    What is Regional Trade Agreement (RTA)?

    • RTA is a treaty between two or more countries in a particular region that aims to reduce or eliminate trade barriers, such as tariffs and quotas, to facilitate increased trade between the member countries.
    • RTAs can take various forms, such as Free Trade Agreements, Customs Unions, Common Markets, and Economic Unions.

    What is Free Trade Agreement (FTA)?

    • FTA is a specific type of RTA that eliminates tariffs and other trade barriers on goods traded between the member countries.
    • FTAs may also include provisions on trade in services and investment, but they are primarily focused on reducing tariffs on goods

    Conclusion

    • The implementation of the EU’s CBAM has sparked concerns in India, primarily due to its potential impact on carbon-intensive exports. Analyzing its WTO consistency and potential justifications under the General Exceptions clause is crucial. In the ongoing India-EU free trade agreement negotiations, India should actively engage with the EU to safeguard its interests regarding CBAM while remaining open to the possibility of a WTO challenge.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    India-EU Free Trade Agreement

     

  • In news: Helmand Water Conflict

    helmand

    Central Idea

    • Iran and Afghanistan have been engaged in a prolonged disagreement over the sharing of water from the Helmand River.
    • Violent confrontations have occurred in the border region between the two countries in the recent past.

    About Helmand River

    • The Helmand River is the longest river in Afghanistan, spanning approximately 1,150 kilometers (715 miles) in length.
    • It originates near Kabul in the western Hindu Kush mountain range.
    • The river flows in a south-westerly direction through desert areas before emptying into Lake Hamun, which straddles the Afghanistan-Iran border.
    • Lake Hamun, fed by the Helmand River, is the largest freshwater lake in Iran.
    • The Helmand River is a vital water source for both Afghanistan and Iran, supporting agriculture, livelihoods, and ecosystems in the region.

    Row over Helmand River and Lake Hamun

    • Afghanistan’s longest river: The Helmand River holds great importance for Afghanistan as it is the country’s longest river, originating near Kabul and flowing through desert areas.
    • Iran’s largest freshwater lake: Lake Hamun, located on the Afghanistan-Iran border, is Iran’s largest freshwater lake and has been historically sustained by the Helmand River.
    • Drying up due to drought: The Lake has experienced a drastic decline in water levels and has largely dried up, attributed to factors such as drought and the construction of dams and water control infrastructure.
    • Economic Importance: Lake Hamun plays a vital role in the regional ecosystem and supports agricultural activities, livelihoods, and economic sectors in the surrounding areas.

    Disagreements between Iran and Afghanistan (Taliban)

    • Fouling of the 1973 Helmand River Treaty: The agreement signed in 1973 between Iran and Afghanistan to regulate the allocation of river water has not been fully ratified or effectively put into practice.
    • Iran accuses Afghanistan of violating water rights: Iran has consistently accused Afghanistan of infringing upon its water rights, claiming that it receives significantly less water than agreed upon in the 1973 treaty.
    • Afghanistan blames climatic factors for reduced water flow: Afghanistan has refuted Iran’s allegations, citing climatic factors such as reduced rainfall and diminished river water volumes as the primary causes of the current situation.
    • Concerns over Afghanistan’s dam and irrigation projects: Tehran expresses concerns over Afghanistan’s construction of dams, reservoirs, and irrigation systems along the Helmand River, fearing that these initiatives negatively impact water flow into Iran.

    Tehran-Taliban Relations: A recent recap

    • Previous ties between Iran and the Taliban: Prior to the Taliban’s capture of Kabul, Iran maintained diplomatic relations with the group, driven by shared opposition to the presence of US forces in the region.
    • Lack of formal recognition of the Taliban government: Despite refraining from formally recognizing the Taliban government, Iran has pragmatically engaged with the ruling group in Afghanistan to protect its interests, including the preservation of Lake Hamun.
    • Border clashes since the Taliban’s takeover: Following the Taliban’s rise to power, there have been repeated incidents and clashes along the Iran-Afghanistan border.

    Why is Taliban furious this time?

    • Taliban’s interest in promoting agriculture: The Taliban seeks to prioritize agricultural development, which influences their approach to water management and distribution.
    • Tehran’s sudden attention to Sistan-Baluchistan after protests: Following nationwide protests, including Sistan-Baluchistan, Iran’s government has shown increased attention to the region due to its disadvantaged status and reliance on water resources from Lake Hamun.

    Major hurdles in the resolution

    • Lack of interest: Both Iran and the Taliban show little interest in addressing the mismanagement of water resources and environmental challenges in the region.
    • Short-term focus on internal problems: Both Iran and the Taliban prioritize short-term solutions and focus on internal issues rather than actively resolving the water dispute.

    Current situation in Sistan-Baluchistan

    • Mounting public anger: The region of Sistan-Baluchistan in eastern Iran experiences growing public anger and frustration, largely driven by water shortages and other economic and social challenges.
    • Water shortages and other problems: Sistan-Baluchistan faces severe water shortages, contributing to economic and social difficulties in one of Iran’s poorest areas.
    • Setting up an inquiry commission: In an effort to address the recent border clash, Iran and Afghanistan have agreed to establish a commission of inquiry to investigate the incident.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • NCERT drops Periodic Table from Class X book

    ncert curriculum periodic table

    Central Idea

    • Changes notified by NCERT: The NCERT notified changes in its June 2022 circular, omitted the Periodic Table from 10th class books. This has been widely debated in academic circles.
    • New textbooks hit the market: The textbooks with the deletions and changes have now been released in the market.

    What is Periodic Table?

    Description
    History Developed by Dmitri Mendeleev in 1869. He arranged elements based on their atomic masses and predicted the existence of undiscovered elements.
    Organization Elements are arranged based on their atomic numbers, electron configurations, and properties.
    Periods There are seven periods (rows) in the table, representing different principal energy levels.
    Groups The table has 18 groups (columns), with elements in the same group sharing similar properties.
    Main Groups Elements in groups 1, 2, and 13 to 18 are referred to as main group elements.
    Transition Metals Groups 3 to 12 consist of transition metals, known for their variable oxidation states.
    Lanthanides The first row of the f-block contains the 15 lanthanide elements.
    Actinides The second row of the f-block contains the 15 actinide elements.
    Periodic Trends Various trends exist across the table, such as atomic radius, ionization energy, and electronegativity.
    Periodic Law The chemical and physical properties of elements repeat in a periodic manner based on their atomic numbers.
    Modern Versions Modern versions incorporate atomic numbers and reflect our understanding of atomic structure.
    International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) IUPAC is the international organization responsible for the standardization of chemical nomenclature, symbols, and the Periodic Table.
    Database Management Several organizations and databases manage and maintain comprehensive information about the elements, their properties, and the Periodic Table. Examples include the IUPAC, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC).

     

    Why this matters?

    • NCERT textbooks as a cornerstone: NCERT textbooks are considered a cornerstone for guiding the publication of State board textbooks, affecting nearly 60 State boards.
    • Concerns for non-science stream students: With a significant number of students opting for Arts and Commerce streams, they may lose the opportunity to learn crucial basic Chemistry concepts now only accessible in Class XI.

    Controversial Deletions and Omissions by NCERT

    • Fundamental knowledge of chemistry: Experts argue that leaving out the periodic table and logical organization of elements from the textbooks hinders students’ understanding of fundamental chemistry concepts.
    • Rationalization of contents due to the pandemic: The NCERT claims that the exercise of reducing the content load on students is carried out across all classes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • Previous controversial deletions: Earlier, NCERT dropped Darwin’s theory of evolution from Class X textbooks and deleted chapters from Political Science textbooks, including Democracy and Diversity, Popular Struggles and Movements, Political Parties, and Challenges to Democracy.

    Additional controversial omissions

    • Exclusion of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad: Any mention of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, a freedom fighter and India’s first Education Minister, has been deleted from the textbooks.
    • Omission of J&K’s accession to India: The fact that Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India on the basis of autonomy has been removed from the revised Class XI textbook.
    • Further omissions in the CBSE syllabus: The history of Mughal courts, references to the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat, the Naxalite movement, and mention of Dalit writers were also omitted from the CBSE syllabus.

    Reasons cited for curriculum revamp

    • Multiple sets of authors: Textbooks have undergone changes over the years, written by different sets of historians. There have been no controversies regarding these changes.
    • Celebration of diversity and assimilation: Exclusively holding on to one set of textbooks is contrary to the spirit of a civilization that celebrates diversity and assimilation.
    • NCF’s efforts for inclusive representations: The National Curriculum Framework (NCF) aims to bring a plurality of voices and more inclusive representations of marginalized and previously excluded history.

    Allegations of Distortions in history textbooks

    • Deliberate distortions: Some sections of the media allege that the corrections and improvements made in the NCERT history textbooks are deliberate distortions or rewriting of history.
    • Sense of entitlement: The charge of rewriting history under a specific ideology betrays a sense of entitlement, suggesting that only one set of historians had the knowledge to determine what should be taught.
    • Autonomy breach: While autonomy in academic and intellectual activities is crucial, the notion that institutional autonomy has been undermined and academic freedom is under stress is a one-sided and pointless exercise.

    Way forward

    • Logical revision: There is an urgent need for a comprehensive revision of NCERT textbooks, not only in history but in all subjects, to incorporate new knowledge and discoveries.
    • Prudent use of existing textbooks: Until a detailed plan and advice for a comprehensive revision of books and syllabi is formulated, NCERT has chosen to use the existing textbooks.
    • Presenting facts lucidly: Textbooks should present facts lucidly, allowing students to acquire the knowledge they seek.
    • Avoid politicizing: Academics and politicians should refrain from politicizing school textbooks and instead focus on telling students the stories of the past without weaving in half-truths or erasing vast chunks of history.
    • Addressing gaps and inclusivity: Continuous revision of the curriculum is necessary to address gaps, make textbooks relevant, and ensure inclusivity.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • BRICS FM meeting in South Africa

    brics

    Central Idea

    • External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is in Cape Town, South Africa, to participate in a meeting of foreign ministers from the BRICS countries.
    • The foreign ministers’ meeting aims to finalize the agenda for the upcoming BRICS summit, scheduled to be held in South Africa in August.

    What is BRICS?

    Explanation
    About BRICS is a grouping of the world’s leading emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
    History The term BRIC was coined in 2001 by British Economist Jim O’Neill to describe the four emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The grouping was formalized in 2006, and South Africa joined in 2010.
    Composition BRICS comprises the four emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, with South Africa joining later.
    Footprints BRICS represents 41% of the global population, 24% of global GDP, and 16% of global trade.
    Chairmanship Rotates annually among the members, with India holding the chair in 2021.
    Initiatives
    1. New Development Bank: NDB funds infrastructure and sustainable development projects.
    2. Contingent Reserve Arrangement: CRA provides mutual support and strengthens financial stability among BRICS nations.
    3. BRICS Payment System: Aims to create an alternative payment system to SWIFT.
    4. Customs agreements: BRICS signed agreements to coordinate and ease trade transport.
    5. Satellite: A constellation of remote sensing satellites has been launched in collaboration with BRICS nations.

     

    Key agenda of this meet

    • Geopolitical consolidation and potential expansion: Two key items on the agenda attracting attention are the plan to expand the membership of BRICS and the discussion of a common currency.
    • Friends of BRICS meet: South Africa, as the chair this year, is hosting a Friends of BRICS meeting with foreign ministers from Africa and the Global South.

    Potential Expansion of BRICS

    • Countries in queue for BRICS membership: Around 19 countries are reportedly seeking to join BRICS, including Argentina, Nicaragua, Mexico, Uruguay, Venezuela, Nigeria, Algeria, Egypt, Senegal, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey, Syria, Iran, Kazakhstan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Indonesia, and Thailand.
    • Inclusion of big oil producers: The list of potential new members includes major oil-producing countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, the UAE, Nigeria, and Venezuela.

    China’s Role in BRICS

    • China driving expansion: China is leading the effort to expand its membership of BRICS and is promoting the idea of creating a bigger space for the Global South.
    • Focus on multilateralism: China emphasizes multilateralism as it criticizes US hegemony, using the theme of “multilateralism” rather than “multipolarity” in discussions about BRICS.
    • Challenging the Western geopolitical view: The conflict in Ukraine has strengthened the China-Russia partnership and transformed BRICS into an aspiring bloc that challenges the western geopolitical narrative.

    India’s Position in BRICS

    • India’s participation in BRICS and the G7: India’s involvement in both BRICS and the G7 demonstrates its engagement with multiple groupings and does not indicate alignment with an anti-Western coalition.
    • Non-Western group: India views BRICS as a non-western group and believes it should remain so, focusing on its role as a platform for Global South countries to express solidarity.
    • New challenges for India: Some analysts argue that as BRICS expands and more members join, it could sidelines India’s influence within the group.

    What about BRICS Common Currency?

    • Proposal for a common currency: Russia proposed the idea of a common currency at the BRICS summit in Beijing last year. Leaders established a committee to study its feasibility.
    • Cautious reception and challenges: The proposal for a common currency received cautious feedback, with concerns about its viability and complexities such as different economic and political systems among member countries.
    • Insulation from the dollar: The idea of a common currency presents an opportunity to reduce reliance on the US dollar, but not all members are convinced it is the right time.
    • Difficulties in currency trade: Negotiations between India and Russia for trading in their respective currencies have encountered difficulties, with Moscow preferring dollar payments due to limited imports from India.

    China’s stance on the US dollar

    • Retreating US dollar hegemony: China has expressed discontent with the “hegemony of the US dollar” and aims to promote the use of the Yuan as a trading currency in Central Asia.
    • No open voices abandoning the dollar: Despite its criticisms, there is no evidence to suggest that China is ready to completely abandon the US dollar at present.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • Row over Mekedatu Project

    mekedatu

    Central Idea

    • Announcement of dam and reservoir: The Deputy CM of Karnataka announced plans for the construction of a dam and reservoir called Mekedatu near the state’s border with Tamil Nadu.
    • Objections raised by Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu expressed strong objections to the project, arguing that it goes against the rulings of both the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal and the Supreme Court.
    • Warning of protests: Political parties in Tamil Nadu have warned of potential protests and opposition if the construction of the Mekedatu dam proceeds.

    What is Mekedatu Project?

    • Location and purpose: The Mekedatu dam project is planned to be constructed in Ramanagaram district, approximately 100 km south of Bengaluru. Its primary purpose is to address the drinking water needs of Bengaluru and replenish the regional groundwater table.
    • Proposed capacity and estimated cost of the dam: The dam is proposed to have a capacity of 48 TMC (thousand million cubic) feet and is estimated to cost Rs 6,000 crore.
    • Background and previous developments of the project: The idea of the Mekedatu dam has been under consideration for several years. In 2014, the Karnataka government invited expressions of interest for the project and allocated funds for a detailed project report in the following year.

    Opposition to the Project

    • Widespread protests and state-wide bandh in TN: When the project was initially proposed, Tamil Nadu witnessed widespread protests against it. These protests culminated in a statewide bandh, supported by various stakeholders.
    • Resolutions passed by TN Assembly against the project: The Tamil Nadu Assembly, representing the voice of the people, passed unanimous resolutions expressing strong opposition to the Mekedatu project in December 2018 and January 2022.
    • Political actions and legal involvement in the dispute: Various political leaders and parties in Tamil Nadu have taken actions, including raising the issue with the central government and approaching the Supreme Court to challenge the project’s legality.

    Arguments against the Project

    • Concerns over modification of river flow: Critics of the Mekedatu project argue that constructing reservoirs on the Cauvery River would modify its natural flow, potentially leading to adverse effects downstream.
    • Violation of the final award of the water disputes tribunal: Tamil Nadu contends that the proposed dam violates the final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, which determined the water-sharing arrangements between the two states.
    • Impact on water flow in catchment areas: Tamil Nadu raises concerns that the project’s implementation would impound the flow in catchment areas, affecting the availability of water downstream and potentially leading to water scarcity in the state.

    Justifications and proposals

    • Ensuring adequate flow to TN: Karnataka argues that the construction of the Mekedatu dam will not hinder the stipulated quantum of water release to Tamil Nadu nor be utilized for irrigation purposes.
    • Allocation of funds and willingness to negotiate: The Karnataka government has earmarked Rs 1,000 crore for the project, indicating its commitment. It also expresses willingness to engage in discussions and negotiations with Tamil Nadu to address concerns and find a resolution.
    • Clearance of feasibility study: The Central Water Commission cleared a feasibility study for the Mekedatu project in 2018, providing additional support for Karnataka’s justifications and indicating the project’s viability.

    Historical context of the dispute

    • Past opposition and protests against the dam: The Mekedatu dam has been a subject of contention and opposition for several years. Tamil Nadu has witnessed widespread protests, reflecting public sentiment against the project.
    • Political actions and involvement of state delegations: Political leaders from Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have been actively involved in addressing the issue. Delegations from both states have approached the central government seeking support or intervention.
    • Legal challenges and the role of the Supreme Court: Tamil Nadu’s approach to the Supreme Court against the Mekedatu project highlights the legal dimension of the dispute. The involvement of the court plays a crucial role in considering the arguments and reaching a resolution.

    Environmental and Economic considerations

    • Potential benefits of the dam for water supply: Proponents of the Mekedatu project argue that it will address the pressing drinking water needs of Bengaluru, ensuring a stable water supply for the growing city.
    • Concerns about environmental impact and ecosystem disruption: Critics raise concerns about the potential environmental impact of constructing the dam and reservoir. They highlight potential disruptions to local ecosystems and the natural flow of the river.
    • Evaluating the economic viability of the project: Given the significant estimated cost of the Mekedatu project, there is a need to evaluate its cost-effectiveness and long-term economic viability, considering factors such as funding sources, returns on investment, and sustainable utilization of resources.

    Way forward

    • Importance of negotiation and finding common ground: The conflict surrounding the Mekedatu project emphasizes the importance of dialogue, negotiations, and finding mutually acceptable solutions that address the concerns of both Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.
    • Role of the Supreme Court and other mediators in resolving conflicts: The involvement of the Supreme Court and other mediators can play a crucial role in facilitating discussions, mediating conflicts, and reaching a resolution that adheres to legal frameworks and considers the interests of both states.
    • Promoting inter-state cooperation for sustainable water management: The dispute underscores the need for robust inter-state cooperation and collaboration on water management issues. It is crucial to ensure sustainable and equitable utilization of shared water resources, respect legal frameworks, and address the concerns of all stakeholders involved.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

  • UAE withdraws from Combined Maritime Forces (CMF)

    Central Idea

    The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has announced its withdrawal from the U.S.-led Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), a maritime coalition responsible for securing Gulf waterways crucial to global oil trade.

    What is Combined Maritime Forces (CMF)?

    Establishment 2002
    Location Bahrain
    Objective Promoting security, stability, and prosperity across maritime regions
    Member Nations Over 30 member nations
    Primary Task Forces Combined Task Force 150 (CTF 150), Combined Task Force 151 (CTF 151), Combined Task Force 152 (CTF 152)
    Operations Counter-terrorism, counter-piracy, maritime security, and cooperation
    Collaborations United Nations, European Union, NATO, and regional partners
    Contributions Naval assets including warships, aircraft, and maritime patrol vessels
    Focus Areas Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Indian Ocean, Arabian Gulf, and surrounding areas

     

    Reasons for UAE’s withdrawal

    • UAE has not provided specific reasons for its withdrawal from the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) in the official statement.
    • One potential factor could be a desire to distance themselves from perceived dependencies or entanglements with the US.
    • This could be part of a broader strategy by the UAE to assert its own regional influence, pursue independent foreign policies, or rebalance its relationships with China and Iran.

    Recent incidents and tensions in Gulf Waters

    • In late April and early May, Iran seized two tankers, one of which was empty and travelling between the UAE ports of Dubai and Fujairah.
    • Iran was also accused of launching a drone attack on an Israeli-owned tanker in November 2022, escalating tensions with the United States.
    • As a response to increasing harassment by Iran, the US announced the deployment of reinforcements to the Gulf, a vital route for a significant portion of the world’s sea-borne oil.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!