đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Marriage as partnership: HC reframes role of ‘homemaker’

    Why in the News?

    An issue arose from a wife’s plea for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, after she left employment to care for the household and child. The trial court and appellate court denied relief, holding that her educational qualifications and certain bank transactions reflected financial independence. The Delhi High Court set aside these findings, holding that theoretical earning capacity cannot substitute proof of actual income and that unpaid homemaking constitutes a valid economic contribution within marriage.

    Does Homemaking Constitute Economic Contribution in Marriage?

    1. Recognition of Unpaid Labour: Treats household management, childcare, and relocation support as economic inputs sustaining earning spouse’s productivity.
    2. Reframing of Economic Partnership: Defines marriage as a partnership model with differently manifested contributions.
    3. Shift from Moral to Legal Recognition: Moves unpaid domestic work from social appreciation to enforceable legal entitlement.
    4. Enabling Function: Establishes that homemaker’s labour facilitates earning spouse’s professional continuity, including overseas employment.

    Can Educational Qualification Defeat a Maintenance Claim?

    1. Capacity vs Actual Income Distinction: Separates theoretical earning ability from proven earnings.
    2. Burden of Proof Principle: Requires evidence of stable taxable income to deny maintenance.
    3. Rejection of Assumptive Reasoning: Prohibits denial based solely on degrees or employability potential.
    4. Judicial Clarification: States that mere capability cannot ground refusal of maintenance.

    How Should Courts Evaluate Re-entry Barriers After Career Breaks?

    1. Career Disruption Recognition: Acknowledges difficulties in workforce re-entry after caregiving breaks.
    2. Gendered Labour Market Reality: Recognizes structural constraints affecting women’s employment continuity.
    3. Realistic Assessment Standard: Mandates evaluation based on present income, not hypothetical opportunities.
    4. Preventive Safeguard: Prevents penalization of spouses who left employment for household responsibilities.

    What Is the Scope of Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC and PWDVA?

    1. Social Justice Mandate: Ensures financial support for wives unable to maintain themselves.
    2. Interim Relief Provision: Enables monetary relief during pendency of proceedings.
    3. Fairness Mechanism: Treats maintenance as equitable adjustment within marital partnership.
    4. Protection Against Dependency Narrative: Rejects framing homemaking as voluntary economic withdrawal.

    Does the Judgment Reflect a Wider Judicial Trend?

    1. Comparative Precedents:
      1. Recognizes Kerala High Court view in Kannan Nair v. Kamala Amma, that acknowledged homemaking as a financial contribution during property rights disputes.
      2. Aligns with Delhi High Court ruling in Saurjan Saha v. Rumpa Saha, which rejected the demand for proof of negative income.
    2. Judicial Continuity: Consolidates recognition of unpaid domestic labour across maintenance and property jurisprudence.
    3. Doctrinal Evolution: Strengthens gender-sensitive interpretation of maintenance laws.

    How does recognition of unpaid domestic labour advance substantive gender justice within the institution of marriage?

    1. Structural Gender Inequality: Women disproportionately perform unpaid domestic labour, limiting financial independence and reinforcing economic dependency within marriage.
    2. Invisibility in Economic Metrics: Household and caregiving work remain excluded from GDP calculations despite enabling workforce participation of earning members.
    3. Substantive Equality Approach: Judicial recognition of homemaking as economic contribution advances Article 14-based equality beyond formal neutrality.
    4. Corrective Social Reform Role of Judiciary: Court intervention addresses entrenched patriarchal assumptions that equate worth with paid employment.
    5. Welfare-State Responsibility: Maintenance jurisprudence functions as a social justice mechanism ensuring dignity and economic security for non-earning spouses.

    Conclusion

    The ruling institutionalizes recognition of unpaid domestic labour within maintenance law. It separates earning potential from actual income and reinforces marriage as an economic partnership. The judgment strengthens substantive equality and aligns maintenance jurisprudence with constitutional guarantees of dignity and fairness.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Explain the constitutional perspectives of Gender Justice with the help of relevant Constitutional Provisions and case laws.

    Linkage: The Delhi High Court judgment strengthens constitutional gender justice by recognizing unpaid domestic labour as an economic contribution under Articles 14, 15 and 21. It reflects judicial expansion of substantive equality through maintenance jurisprudence and case-law based interpretation.

  • AI hallucination in Andhra trial court’s order, SC bench flags ‘institutional concern’

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court termed reliance on AI-generated fake case law by a trial court in Andhra Pradesh as “misconduct” and flagged it as an “institutional concern.” The case involved citation of non-existent judgments generated through AI tools, prompting the Court to warn that decisions based on fabricated precedents will attract legal consequences.

    What is AI Hallucination?

    1. Definition: AI hallucination refers to the generation of false, fabricated, or non-existent information by generative AI systems while presenting it in a confident and coherent manner.
    2. In Legal Context: It includes creation of fake case citations, incorrect statutory references, or imaginary judicial precedents.
    3. Cause: Occurs because generative AI predicts text patterns probabilistically rather than retrieving verified data from authenticated legal databases.

    Role of AI in Judicial Process

    1. Research Assistance: Supports case-law searches, judgment summarisation, and drafting. Example: The Supreme Court’s AI tool SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court’s Efficiency) assists judges by compiling relevant precedents and legal materials for faster research.
    2. Administrative Efficiency: Facilitates transcription, translation, and document management under the e-Courts Project. Example: The Supreme Court’s SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software) uses AI-based machine translation to translate judgments into regional languages to enhance accessibility.
    3. Access to Justice: Expands digital availability of court records and improves procedural transparency. Example: Under the e-Courts Mission Mode Project (Phase III), virtual courts and online filing systems use technology-enabled processes to reduce pendency and improve citizen access.
    4. Risk Factor and Verification Requirement: Mandates human oversight to prevent reliance on fabricated outputs. Example: The recent Supreme Court observation in the Andhra Pradesh trial court matter highlighted that AI-generated fake citations, if unverified, can amount to misconduct and undermine judicial credibility.

    How does AI ‘hallucination’ challenge the integrity of judicial decision-making?

    1. Predictive Text Model: Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT operate on probabilistic language prediction rather than verified legal databases, leading to fabricated citations.
    2. Fabricated Case Law: In the Vijayawada trial court case, an AI-generated judgment cited “Subramani v. M. Natarajan (2013) 14 SCC 95,” which did not exist.
    3. Linguistic Fluency over Accuracy: AI tools prioritise coherent language construction, not factual validation.
    4. Judicial Consequence: The Supreme Court observed that reliance on fake judgments amounts to “misconduct” and entails legal consequences.

    Why did the Supreme Court treat this incident as an ‘institutional concern’ rather than an isolated lapse?

    1. Systemic Occurrence: The Court noted similar instances of AI-generated “non-existent” judgments across jurisdictions.
    2. Supreme Court Dismissal (Feb 13, 2026): A Special Leave Petition was dismissed after the petitioner cited non-existent judgments.
    3. Delhi High Court (Sept 2025): Petition withdrawn after opposing counsel pointed out fabricated precedents.
    4. Bombay High Court (Jan 2026): Imposed â‚č50,000 cost for citing a fake case; noted AI-generated drafting markers such as bullet formats and green-box highlights.
    5. Judicial Time Wastage: Courts described such reliance as “dumping” unverified material, resulting in waste of judicial time.

    What distinguishes ‘error in good faith’ from judicial misconduct in this context?

    1. High Court Approach: Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari accepted the trial judge’s explanation that AI was used in good faith; refused to set aside the order solely due to erroneous citations.
    2. Supreme Court’s Position: Held that reliance on fake judgments is not merely an error but misconduct affecting adjudication integrity.
    3. Legal Threshold: The apex court emphasised accountability where fabricated precedents influence judicial reasoning.
    4. Institutional Discipline: The Court signaled that judicial officers must independently verify sources before relying on AI outputs.

    What regulatory and policy responses have emerged within the judiciary?

    1. White Paper (Nov 2025): Supreme Court released “Artificial Intelligence and Judiciary,” identifying “fabrication of cases and hallucination” as primary risks.
    2. Risk Identification: AI may hallucinate judgments, citations, and legislative references that do not exist.
    3. Ethics Committees Proposal: Recommended establishing AI ethics committees within courts.
    4. Mandatory Verification: Directed that information obtained through AI tools must be independently verified.
    5. Kerala High Court (July 2025): Issued first formal AI policy permitting administrative use but mandating meticulous verification of legal citations; warned of disciplinary action.

    How does this development reflect the broader tension between technological adoption and constitutional accountability?

    1. Digital Transformation of Courts: Judiciary increasingly integrates AI for translation, transcription, and research assistance.
    2. Adjudicatory Legitimacy: Judicial authority derives from constitutional fidelity and precedential accuracy.
    3. Professional Responsibility: Lawyers and judges remain accountable for submissions irrespective of technological tools used.
    4. Rule of Law Implication: Fabricated precedents undermine stare decisis and the doctrine of binding precedent under Article 141.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court’s observations underline that technological integration in the judiciary must operate within the framework of constitutional discipline and professional accountability. While AI enhances efficiency, access, and research capacity, it cannot replace judicial reasoning or due diligence. The episode reinforces that the rule of law depends not merely on digital advancement but on verified precedent, ethical responsibility, and institutional integrity.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to the privacy of the individual in the use of AI in healthcare?

    Linkage: The question links AI’s utility with ethical and regulatory concerns, similar to judicial AI use where efficiency must be balanced with accountability and safeguards. The issue of AI hallucination in courts reflects the same tension between technological assistance and risks to institutional integrity.

  • Governor Bound by Cabinet Advice in Remission of Convicts: Madras High Court

    Why in the News?

    A Full Bench of the Madras High Court ruled that the Governor is bound by the State Cabinet’s advice while granting remission or premature release of convicts under Article 161 of the Constitution.

    Key Ruling of Madras High Court

    • Governor cannot exercise discretion
    • Must follow advice of Council of Ministers
    • Applies to:
      • Remission
      • Commutation
      • Premature release of prisoners
    • Court held: Governor cannot take a different view from the Cabinet

    Constitutional Provision

    Article 161

    Governor has power to:

    • Grant pardon
    • Reprieve
    • Respite
    • Remission
    • Commute sentence

    Applies to: Offences under State laws

    Why the Case Was Referred

    • Two conflicting High Court rulings (2024)
    • Division Bench referred issue to Full Bench (2025)
    • Full Bench gave authoritative clarification
    [2025] Consider the following statements with regard to pardoning power of the President of India: 
    1 The exercise of this power by the President can be subjected to limited judicial review. 
    2 The President can exercise this power without the advice of the Central Government. 
    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 
    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Amaravati Declared Capital of Andhra Pradesh After 12 Years

    Why in the News?

    Parliament passed the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026, officially declaring Amaravati as the sole capital of Andhra Pradesh, 12 years after the State bifurcation.

    Key Points

    • Parliament passed Bill to recognise Amaravati as capital
    • Amendment to Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014
    • Effective date: June 2, 2024
    • Rajya Sabha passed the Bill after Lok Sabha approval

    Background: Andhra Pradesh Bifurcation

    • Year: 2014
    • Andhra Pradesh split into: Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
    • Telangana received: Hyderabad as capital
    • Andhra Pradesh:
      • No permanent capital decided
      • Amaravati proposed later

    Andhra Pradesh Assembly Resolution

    • Date: March 28, 2026
    • Andhra Pradesh Assembly requested:
      • Statutory recognition of Amaravati
    • Union government amended AP Reorganisation Act
    [2021] With reference to Madanapalle of Andhra Pradesh, which one of the following statements is correct? (a) Pingali Venkayya designed the tricolour Indian National Flag here. (b) Pattabhi Sitaramaiah led the Quit India Movement of Andhra region from here. (c) Rabindranath Tagore translated the National Anthem from Bengali to English here. (d) Madame Blavatsky and Colonel Olcott set up headquarters of Theosophical Society first here.

  • [2nd April 2026] The Hindu OpED: A textbook, criticism, the Court and contempt

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2023] “Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy.” Comment.Linkage: It examines core GS-II themes of judicial independence, separation of powers, and institutional accountability in a constitutional democracy. It connects directly to the debate on contempt powers vs free speech, highlighting how excessive judicial sensitivity may undermine democratic legitimacy and public trust.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The recent controversy over an NCERT textbook and the Supreme Court’s reaction revives a long-standing debate, whether courts should respond to criticism through coercive powers or through institutional restraint. The issue holds significance for constitutional governance, public trust, and the limits of judicial authority.

    What is the issue at hand?

    1. NCERT Textbook Controversy: A Class VIII NCERT textbook discussed the functioning and criticism of the judiciary, including issues like delays and accountability.
    2. Supreme Court Intervention: The Supreme Court reacted by shelving the textbook, questioning the authors, and setting up a committee to review its content.
    3. Use of Contempt Lens: The Court appeared to treat the content as potentially “scandalizing the judiciary”, bringing it within the ambit of criminal contempt.
    4. Academic Freedom vs Judicial Authority: The action triggered debate on whether academic critique of institutions can be restricted under contempt law.
    5. Shift from Past Approach: Contrasts with earlier judicial stance of tolerating criticism (“broad shoulders” doctrine).
    6. Larger Constitutional Question: Highlights tension between Article 19(1)(a) (free speech) and contempt powers under Articles 129 & 215.

    What constitutes contempt of court, and where does ambiguity arise?

    1. Statutory Basis (Contempt of Courts Act, 1971): Defines contempt under Section 2; operationalizes powers granted under Articles 129 and 215 of the Constitution; distinguishes between civil contempt [Section 2(b)] and criminal contempt [Section 2(c)].

    Civil Contempt: What is it and how is it applied?

    1. Definition: Willful disobedience of any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ, or other process of a court; or willful breach of an undertaking given to a court (Section 2(b), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971).
    2. Core Element: Willfulness: Requires intentional and deliberate non-compliance; mere inability or accidental failure does not qualify.
    3. Purpose: Ensures enforcement of court orders and maintains the authority of judicial decisions.
    4. Nature: Remedial and coercive rather than punitive; seeks compliance.
    5. Examples:
      1. Non-compliance with Court Orders: Government authority fails to implement a High Court directive on compensation despite clear directions.
      2. Violation of Undertaking: A builder gives an undertaking to not alter a structure but proceeds with illegal construction.
      3. Service Matters: Authorities ignore reinstatement orders of an employee passed by a tribunal/court.

    Criminal Contempt: What is it and how is it applied?

    1. Definition: Publication (by words spoken/written, signs, visible representation) or acts which:
      1. Scandalize or tend to scandalize, or lower the authority of any court;
      2. Prejudice or interfere with due course of any judicial proceeding;
      3. Obstruct administration of justice in any manner (Section 2(c), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971).
    2. Purpose: Protects integrity of judicial process and public confidence in the judiciary.
    3. Nature: Punitive; focuses on acts affecting justice delivery, not just disobedience.
    4. Examples:
      1. Scandalizing the Court: Publishing allegations of bias or corruption against judges without substantiated evidence.
      2. Trial by Media: Media reporting that prejudges guilt of an accused during ongoing trial, influencing public perception.
      3. Interference with Proceedings: Threatening witnesses or attempting to influence judges during a case.

    Scandalizing the Court: Where does ambiguity arise?

    1. Vague Threshold: No clear standard for what constitutes “lowering authority.”
    2. Subjective Interpretation: Depends on judicial perception of criticism vs attack.
    3. Colonial Legacy: Originated in British law; increasingly questioned in modern democracies.
    4. Example: Strong academic critique of judicial functioning may be interpreted either as legitimate criticism or contempt.

    Why is invoking contempt for criticism problematic in a democracy?

    1. Freedom of Speech: Protects criticism of institutions, including judiciary, as part of democratic accountability.
    2. Chilling Effect: Discourages academic, journalistic, and public discourse.
    3. Institutional Legitimacy: Derives from reasoned judgments, not coercive suppression.
    4. Example: Academic criticism of courts historically contributed to judicial reforms and transparency.

    What is the constitutional basis of judicial authority and its real source of power?

    1. Public Trust: Constitutes the real foundation of judicial authority.
    2. Constitutional Mandate: Grants courts power, but legitimacy depends on public confidence.
    3. Judicial Conduct: Ensures respect through fairness, objectivity, and restraint.
    4. Outcome: Strengthens institutional credibility without reliance on punitive measures.

    Should courts adopt a ‘broad-shouldered’ approach to criticism?

    1. Judicial Restraint: Encourages tolerance of criticism unless it directly obstructs justice.
    2. Historical Precedent: Statements by Chief Justice S.P. Bharucha emphasized ignoring non-malicious criticism.
    3. Constructive Criticism: Strengthens accountability and transparency.
    4. Example: Public debates on judicial corruption led to institutional introspection.

    Where should the line be drawn between criticism and contempt?

    1. Factual Accuracy: Ensures criticism is based on correct information.
    2. Intent: Distinguishes between malicious attacks and good-faith critique.
    3. Impact on Justice Delivery: Evaluates whether criticism obstructs proceedings.
    4. Outcome: Balances free speech with judicial integrity.

    Could the present controversy have been handled differently?

    1. Academic Engagement: Ensures dialogue with authors before punitive action.
    2. Rectification Mechanism: Allows clarification or correction instead of suppression.
    3. Proportional Response: Avoids escalation into contempt proceedings.
    4. Outcome: Preserves both judicial dignity and academic freedom.

    What broader challenges does the judiciary face today?

    1. Corruption Concerns: Includes isolated instances affecting institutional image.
    2. Infrastructure Constraints: Limits efficiency in justice delivery.
    3. Accountability Mechanisms: Remain weak due to absence of effective oversight tools.
    4. Impeachment Limitations: Makes removal of judges difficult and rare. 

    Conclusion

    Judicial authority must rest on public trust, reasoned judgments, and institutional integrity, not on frequent invocation of contempt powers. A calibrated approach that tolerates criticism while safeguarding judicial processes is essential for sustaining democratic legitimacy.

  • Early screen use stunts vital social growth of children, experts warn

    Why in the News?

    Early screen exposure among children is emerging as a structural transformation in childhood itself, rather than merely a behavioural concern. The issue reflects a shift in parenting practices, learning environments, and socialization processes, intensified by post-pandemic digital dependence. The article highlights how excessive screen exposure during the critical developmental window (0-5 years) disrupts neurocognitive growth, weakens social skills, and creates patterns resembling behavioural addiction.

    How does early screen exposure disrupt the critical developmental window of childhood?

    1. Critical Developmental Window: Early years (0-5) shape brain architecture through neuroplasticity; disruption leads to long-term deficits.
    2. Neuroplasticity Impact: Brain wiring depends on sensory and social inputs; screen-based interaction provides limited stimulation.
    3. Foundational Skill Loss: Weakens language acquisition, emotional bonding, and behavioural learning during formative years.

    How does the displacement effect explain developmental deficits caused by screens?

    1. Displacement Effect: Screen time replaces essential developmental activities rather than adding new value.
    2. Reduced Physical Exploration: Limits crawling, touching, and environmental interaction; example: children engaging with screens instead of tactile play.
    3. Decline in Social Learning: Reduces imitation, observation, and conversational engagement with caregivers.

    What evidence establishes a link between screen exposure and mental health outcomes?

    1. Dose-Response Relationship: Higher screen usage leads to proportionately worse mental health outcomes.
    2. Longitudinal Evidence: Study tracking over 3 lakh children shows increased socio-emotional problems with rising screen exposure.
    3. High Usage Data: Adolescents spend ~8.5 hours daily on screens, indicating excessive exposure levels.
    4. Behavioural Addiction Patterns: Case study: children in Ghaziabad showed extreme distress when screens were withdrawn.
    5. Psychological Symptoms: Includes hallucinations, diminished attention, and emotional instability.

    How does excessive screen use affect socialization and interpersonal competence?

    1. Non-verbal Communication Loss: Reduces ability to interpret tone, facial expressions, and body language.
    2. Empathy Deficit: Weakens emotional understanding due to lack of real-world interaction.
    3. Social Capital Erosion: Limits development of interpersonal skills essential for relationships and cooperation.
    4. Silent Social Spaces: Observation: cafeterias and public spaces shifting from active interaction to isolated screen use.

    How has the transformation in parenting practices contributed to rising screen dependency?

    1. Digital Pacification: Screens used as tools to calm or distract children instead of active engagement.
    2. Convenience Parenting: Reduces effort required for physical or emotional interaction.
    3. Pandemic Acceleration: Lockdowns increased reliance on screens as primary engagement medium.
    4. Early Exposure Shift: Infants exposed to YouTube and digital content instead of traditional toys and interaction.

    What risks emerge from prolonged and unsupervised screen exposure in children?

    1. Addiction Risk: Continuous usage leads to dependency and withdrawal symptoms.
    2. Emotional Dysregulation: Reduces capacity to manage stress and emotions.
    3. Algorithmic Exposure Risk: Platforms expose children to inappropriate or harmful content without parental awareness.
    4. Isolation Effect: Decreases peer interaction, increasing loneliness and detachment.

    What measures can address the adverse developmental and social impacts of screen exposure?

    1. Time Regulation: Limits screen exposure, especially below 5 years.
    2. Supervised Access: Ensures content filtering and guided engagement.
    3. Experiential Learning Promotion: Encourages play-based, peer-based, and sensory learning.
    4. Parental Awareness: Promotes active parenting and reduced reliance on digital devices. 

    Conclusion

    Early screen exposure is reshaping childhood by disrupting critical developmental processes and socialization patterns. Excessive use, especially in early years, leads to cognitive, emotional, and social deficits. A balanced approach that limits screen time and prioritizes real-world interaction is essential to ensure healthy child development.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children.

    Linkage: This highlights changing patterns of primary socialization in family and the impact of digital technology on child development. It directly connects to screen exposure replacing human interaction, leading to deficits in emotional bonding, empathy, and social skills.

  • Digital Push in Rural India: eGramSwaraj & SabhaSaar Milestones

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Panchayati Raj announced major milestones:

    • â‚č3 lakh crore digital payments via eGramSwaraj
    • SabhaSaar AI tool expanded to 23 Indian languages

    These developments strengthen digital governance and transparency in rural India.

    What is eGramSwaraj?

    • Digital platform for Gram Panchayat governance
    • Part of e Panchayat Mission Mode Project
    • Integrated with Public Financial Management System (PFMS)

    What is SabhaSaar? 

    • AI powered voice to text meeting summarisation tool
    • Launched: 14 August 2025
    • Used for Gram Sabha meetings
    [2017] Local self-government can be best explained as an exercise in: (a) Federalism (b) Democratic decentralization (c) Administrative delegation (d) Direct democracy

  • Supreme Court: Voter Roll Exclusion Does Not End Voting Rights Permanently

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that voters excluded from electoral rolls during Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in West Bengal do not lose their voting rights permanently.

    Key Observations by Supreme Court

    • Voting rights cannot be “washed away forever”
    • Excluded voters must be given fair opportunity to appeal
    • Tribunal process must ensure fair adjudication
    • Electoral authorities must provide reasons for deletion

    Case Background

    • Special Intensive Revision (SIR) conducted in West Bengal
    • Many voters removed from electoral rolls
    • 19 tribunals constituted by Election Commission
    • Tribunals headed by:
      • Former High Court Chief Justices
      • Former High Court Judges
    • Purpose: Hear appeals of excluded voters

    Supreme Court Directions

    The Court directed:

    • Election Commission must provide:
      • Reasons for deletion
      • Remarks of adjudicating officers
    • Ensure transparent review process
    • Tribunal hearings to ensure justice for wrongly excluded voters

    Supplementary Electoral Lists

    • Final voter list published: Feb 28, 2026
    • Supreme Court allowed:
      • Supplementary lists to include eligible voters
    • Fourth supplementary list already published

    Constitutional Significance

    • Voting Rights linked to:
      • Article 326 — Adult Suffrage
      • Representation of the People Act, 1950
    • Key Principle: An eligible voter cannot be denied voting rights arbitrarily
    [2017] Right to vote and to be elected in India is a (a) Fundamental Right (b) Natural Right (c) Constitutional Right (d) Legal Right

  • Indian Navy Conducts IMEX TTX 2026 at Kochi

    Why in the News?

    The Indian Navy conducted IMEX TTX 2026 at the Maritime Warfare Centre, Kochi, involving multiple Indian Ocean region countries to address maritime security challenges.

    What is IMEX TTX 2026

    • IMEX: Indian Ocean Naval Symposium Maritime Exercise
    • TTX: Table-Top Exercise
    • Type: Simulated maritime security exercise
    • Location: Maritime Warfare Centre, Kochi
    • Conducted by: Indian Navy
    • This exercise focused on planning and decision-making in maritime security scenarios.

    Participating Countries

    • Countries that participated: Bangladesh, France, Indonesia, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Myanmar, Seychelles, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, and Timor-Leste
    • This highlights multinational cooperation in Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

    Why This Exercise is Important

    India Chairs Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS)

    • India assumed IONS Chairmanship (2026–2028)
    • After 16 years
    • IMEX TTX 2026 strengthens India’s leadership role

    About Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS)

    • Multilateral naval cooperation forum
    • Launched in 2008
    • Initiative of Indian Navy
    • Aim: Maritime security cooperation
    [2017] Consider the following in respect of Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS): 1 Inaugural IONS was held in India in 2015 under the chairmanship of the Indian Navy. 2 IONS is a voluntary initiative that seeks to increase maritime co-operation among navies of the littoral states of the Indian Ocean Region. Which of the above statements is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • India Faces Challenge in Meeting 2030 Maternal Mortality Target

    Why in the News?

    A recent study published in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Women’s Health highlights that India may struggle to meet the SDG target of reducing Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) below 70 per 1 lakh live births by 2030.

    Key Findings of the Study

    India’s Progress in Maternal Mortality

    • 1990: 1.19 lakh maternal deaths
    • 2015: 36,900 deaths
    • 2023: 24,700 deaths

    Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR):

    • 1990: 508 deaths per lakh live births
    • 2023: 116 deaths per lakh live births

    India has made significant progress, but rate of improvement has slowed.

    Global Scenario

    • Global maternal deaths (2023): 2.4 lakh
    • India accounts for ~10% of global maternal deaths
    • Out of 204 countries:
      • 100 countries achieved SDG target (<70 MMR)
      • 104 countries yet to achieve
    • Countries struggling like India: Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Pakistan

    India’s Position

    • India falls in MMR range: 100–140
      (SDG target: Below 70)
    • However, India remains among countries with largest improvement since 1990, along with: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Morocco, Nepal, and Rwanda

    State-wise Disparity 

    States pulling India’s MMR down: Assam and Uttar Pradesh

    SRS Data:

    • India: 122 (2015-17) → 88 (2021-23)
    • Assam: 215 → 110
    • Uttar Pradesh: 197 → 141
    • Southern states are closer to achieving SDG target.
    [2023] Consider the following statements in relation to Janani Suraksha Yojna: 1 It is a safe motherhood intervention of the State Health Departments. 2 Its objective is to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality among poor pregnant women. 3 It aims to promote institutional delivery among poor pregnant women. 4 Its objective includes providing public health facilities to sick infants up to one year of age. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) Only three (d) All four