💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Enabling people to govern themselves

    The article examines the issues exposed by the pandemic with the current system of governance in India as well as the global level. Strengthening the local governments is suggested as the need of the hour.

    How pandemic exposed the limits of systems

    • Governance systems at all levels, i.e. global, national, and local, have experienced stress as a fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • There was a breakdown in many subsystems in health care, logistics, business, finance, and administration.
    •  Solutions for one subsystem backfired on other subsystems.
    • For example, lockdowns to make it easier to manage the health crisis have made but it was disastrous for the economy.

    Following 3 are the problems exposed in the governance

    1) Mismatch in abilities and functions

    • Human civilisation advances with the evolution of better institutions to manage public affairs.
    • Institutions of parliamentary democracy did not exist 400 years ago.
    • Institutions of global governance, such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, did not exist even 100 years ago.
    • These institutions were invented to enable human societies to produce better outcomes for their citizens.
    • The pandemic has revealed a fundamental flaw in their design.
    • There is a mismatch in the design of governance institutions at the global level with the challenges they are required to manage.

    2) Interconnected issues

    • All 17 Sustainable Development Goal are interconnected with each other.
    • Environmental, economic, and social issues cannot be separated from each other.
    • Experts working in silos or by agencies focused only on their own problems cannot solve these problems.
    • As government responses to the novel coronavirus pandemic have revealed, a good solution to one can create more problems for others.

    3) Local solution requires local problems

    • Even if experts in different discipline arrives at silo-ed solutions at the global level, they will not be able to solve the systemic problems of the SDGs.
    • Because, their solutions must fit the specific conditions of each country, and of each locality within countries too, to fit the shape of the environment and the condition of society there.
    • Solutions for environmental sustainability along with sustainable livelihoods cannot be the same in Kerala and Ladakh.
    • Solutions must be local.
    • For the local people to support the implementation of solutions, they must believe the solution is the right one for them.

    Decentralisation of governance

    • Governance of the people must be not only for the people. It must be by the people too.
    • There are scientific explanations for why local systems solutions are the best.
    • Elinor Ostrom, the first woman to win the Nobel Prize in Economics, had developed the principles for self-governing communities from research on the ground in many countries, including India.
    • Indian Constitution requires devolution of powers to local government too.
    • During pandemic States in India, such as Kerala, have weathered the storm better than others.
    • A hypothesis is that those States and countries in which local governance was stronger have done much better than others.

    Consider the question “Examine the issues with the current system of governance which were exposed by the pandemic. Also explain why decentralisation could improve many problems the governance faces.

    Conclusion

    The government has to support and enable people to govern themselves, to realise the vision of ‘government of the people, for the people, by the people’. Which is also the only way humanity will be able to meet the ecological and humanitarian challenges looming over it in the 21st century.

    Original article:

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/enabling-people-to-govern-themselves/article32071943.ece

  • Breaking the politicians-criminals-bureaucrats nexus

    The root cause of impunity with which police perpetrated crimes lies in the in a nexus. The nexus between politicians, criminals and government functionaries needs to be broken down. This article suggests the ways to do that.

    The context

    • The recent custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu and encounter of a criminal by the UP police showed the police in a bad light.
    • However, when we dig deeper into the problem we realise that its root lies in the nexus of politicians, criminals and the government functionaries.

    Past attempt to break the nexus

    • In 1993, the Vohra Committee had submitted a report on the nexus between the criminals, politicians and government functionaries.
    • DIB suggested that an institution be set up to effectively deal with the menace.
    • There were discussions in parliament, but the matter ended there.
    • There was hardly any follow-up action.

    Criminalisation of politics

    • The number of members of parliament with criminal background has been going up with every successive election.
    • It was, according to the Association of Democratic Reforms, 30 per cent in 2009, 34 per cent in 2014 and 43 per cent in 2019.
    • The present UP Assembly has 36 per cent or 143 MLAs with criminal cases against them.
    • This lead to the administration turning a blind eye to the illegal activities of the criminals.
    • The nexus has proliferated and grown in strength down the years.
    • It creates an environment where the criminals who are part of the nexus are able to dodge the due processes of law.

    Suggestions

    • 1) We must have a law which debars persons with serious criminal cases from entering the assemblies and the Parliament.
    • 2) The criminal justice system must be revamped as recommended by the Malimath Committee.
    • 3) The Supreme Court’s directions on police reforms must be implemented.
    • 4) An institution comprising representatives of the police/CBI/NIA, IB, IT department, Revenue Intelligence and Enforcement Directorate should be set up to monitor the activities of the mafia and criminal syndicates in the country.
    • 5) A Central act on the lines of MCOCA should be enacted to curb the activities of organised criminal gangs.
    • 6) The concept of federal crime, as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission, should be accepted.
    • Crimes with all-India ramifications or are trans-national in character, like those of terrorism and organised crimes, should be brought within the ambit of federal crimes.

    Consider the question “The nexus of criminals, politicians and government functionaries is at the root of many problems the country faces today. Examine the problems created by the nexus and suggest ways to deal with the problem.”

    Conclusion

    We must, without further delay, build an environment where police become an instrument of service to the people, where monsters like Dubey do not thrive and become a menace to society.

  • Padmanabhaswamy Temple Verdict by the Supreme Court

    Reversing the 2011 Kerala High Court decision, the Supreme Court upheld the right of the Travancore royal family to manage the property of deity at Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.

    Try this question from CSP 2016:

    Q.In the context of the history of India, consider the following pairs

    Term              Description
    1.  Eripatti Land, revenue from which was set apart for the maintenance of the village tank
    2. Taniyurs Villages donated to a single Brahmin or a group of Brahmins
    3. Ghatikas Colleges generally attached to the temples

    Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

    a) 1 and 2

    b) 3 only

    c) 2 and 3

    d) 1 and 3

    What did the apex Court say?

    • The court said that as per customary law, the shebait rights (right to manage the financial affairs of the deity) survive with the members of the family even after the death of the last ruler.
    • The ruling ends the legal battle the temple and members of the royal family have fought with the government for decades over control of one of the richest temples in the world.

    What is the case about?

    • The central legal question was whether the heirs of the last Ruler of Travancore could claim to be the “Ruler of Travancore” after the death of the ruler in 1991.
    • The court examined this claim within the limited meaning of that term according to the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 to claim ownership, control and management of the ancient Temple.

    Earlier cases of ownership: A background

    • All the temples which were under the control and management of the erstwhile Princely States of Travancore and Cochin were under the control of the Travancore and Cochin Devaswom Boards before 1947.
    • However, as per the Instrument of Accession signed, since 1949, the administration of the Padmanabhaswamy Temple was “vested in trust” in the Ruler of Travancore.
    • The state of Kerala was carved out in 1956 but the temple continued to be managed by the erstwhile royals.

    The legal battle

    • In 1971, privy purses to the former royals were abolished through a constitutional amendment stripping their entitlements and privileges.
    • The move was upheld in court in 1993 and the last ruler of Travancore who died during the pendency of this case continued to manage the affairs of the temple till then.
    • In 1991, when the last ruler’s brother took over the temple management, it created a furore among devotees who moved the courts leading to a long-drawn legal battle.

    Is the temple the property of the royal family?

    • The character of the temple was always recognised as a public institution governed by a statute.
    • The argument of the royal family is that the temple management would vest with them for perpetuity, as per custom.
    • Even though the last ruler executed a detailed will bequeathing his personal properties, he had not included the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple as his personal property or dealt with it in his will.

    What about the treasure in the vaults?

    • A consequence of who has administrative rights over the temple is whether the vaults of the temple will be opened.
    • In 2007, the heir claimed that the treasures of the temple were the family property of the royals.
    • Several suits were filed objecting to this claim and a lower court in Kerala passed an injunction against the opening of the vaults.
    • The Kerala High Court in the 2011 ruling passed an order that a board be constituted to manage the affairs of the temple, ruling against the royal family.

    What impact would this ruling have?

    • Since 2011, the process of opening the vaults has led to the discovery of treasures within the Padmanabhaswamy temple, prompting a debate on who owns temple property and how it should be regulated.
    • Despite being a secular country that separates religion from the affairs of the state, Hindu temples, its assets are governed through statutory laws and boards heavily controlled by state governments.
    • This system came into being mainly through the development of a legal framework to outlaw untouchability by treating temples as public land; it has resulted in many legal battles.

  • Chabahar Rail Project

    The Iranian government has decided to proceed with the construction of Chabahar Rail Project on its own, citing delays from the Indian side in funding and starting the project.

    What is the issue?

    • Four years ago, India and Iran signed an agreement to construct a rail line from Chabahar port to Zahedan, along the border with Afghanistan.
    • The Iranian Railways will proceed without India’s assistance, using approximately $400 million from the Iranian National Development Fund.
    • The development comes as China finalizes a massive 25-year, $400 billion strategic partnership deal with Iran, which could cloud India’s plans.

    The Chabahar Rail Project

    • It is a 628 km Chabahar-Zahedan line, which will be extended to Zaranj across the border in Afghanistan.
    • The entire project would be completed by March 2022.
    • It was meant to be part of India’s commitment to the trilateral agreement between India, Iran and Afghanistan to build an alternate trade route to Afghanistan and Central Asia.

    Why did Iran omit India from the project?

    • Despite several site visits by engineers, and preparations by Iranian railways, India never began the work, ostensibly due to worries that these could attract U.S. sanctions.
    • The U.S. had provided a sanctions waiver for the Chabahar port and the rail line to Zahedan, but it has been difficult to find equipment suppliers and partners due to worries they could be targeted by the U.S.
    • India has already “zeroed out” its oil imports from Iran due to U.S. sanctions.

    The contentious partnership with China

    • Iran and China are close to finalising a 25-year Strategic Partnership which will include Chinese involvement in Chabahar’s duty-free zone, an oil refinery nearby, and possibly a larger role in Chabahar port as well.
    • The cooperation will extend from investments in infrastructure, manufacturing and upgrading energy and transport facilities, to refurbishing ports, refineries and other installations.
    • It is also rumoured that the Chabahar port will be leased to China surpassing India.
    • Iran had proposed a tie-up between the port at Gwadar and Chabahar last year and has offered interests to China in the Bandar-e-Jask port 350km away from Chabahar, as well as in the Chabahar duty-free zone.

    Back2Basics: India-Iran Partnership over Chabahar Port

    • In 2016, India signed a deal with Iran entailing $8 billion investment in Chabahar port and industries in Chabahar Special Economic Zone.
    • The port is being developed as a transit route to Afghanistan and Central Asia.
    • India has already built a 240-km road connecting Afghanistan with Iran.
    • All this were expected to bring cargo to Bandar Abbas port and Chabahar port, and free Kabul from its dependence on Pakistan to reach the outer world.
    • Completion of this project would give India access to Afghanistan and beyond to Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Russia and Europe via 7,200-km-long multi-modal North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).

  • Smart Cities Mission and the public health

    “Smart Cities Mission” lacks the focus on public health. This article highlights the consequences of this. The article suggests strengthening the of local governments and provisions for the livelihood through an urban employment guarantee scheme.

    “Smart Cities Mission”: Progress so far

    • The ‘Smart Cities Mission’, a flagship programme of the government, completed five years, in June 2020.
    •  The Mission had sought to make 100 selected cities “smart”.
    • Cities are being developed under “Area-Based Development” model.
    • Under this model, a small portion of the city would be upgraded by retrofitting or redevelopment.
    • Many of the projects undertaken under the ‘Smart Cities Mission’ are behind schedule.
    • According to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, of the 5,151 smart city projects, only 1,638 projects have been completed.
    • In terms of expenditure, of the total investment of ₹2,05,018 crore, only projects worth ₹26,700 crore have been completed.

    Lack of focus on Public health in Smart Cities Mission

    • ‘Smart Cities Mission’ has given little importance to basic services such as public health.
    •  An analysis shows that only 69 of over 5,000 projects undertaken under the Mission were for health infrastructure.
    • These projects are for an estimated cost of ₹2,112 crore, amounting to just around one per cent of the total mission cost.
    • Hence, public health seems to be a major blind spot in India’s smart city dreams.

    Public Health: Essential local government function

    • ‘Smart Cities Mission’ had the stated aim of improving the quality of life of urban residents.
    • Further, public health is an essential local government function in India’s constitutional scheme.
    • As per the 74th Amendment ( 12th Schedule), “public health” is one of the 18 functions that are to be devolved to the municipalities.
    • However, public health infrastructure of cities has often been neglected over the years.

    Strengthening Local Governments

    • Success of Kerala in containing the pandemic has shown how a decentralised political and administrative system can be effective.
    • It is important to strengthen local government capacities.
    • Investment in urban public health systems is needed.
    • Promoting programmes that improve the livelihoods of urban vulnerable communities should be the priority.
    • Programs such as the National Urban Livelihoods Mission and National Urban Health Mission, need to be strengthened.

    Focus on Urban Employment

    • It is time to consider the introduction of a national urban employment guarantee programme.
    • Kerala has been running such a scheme since 2010.
    • States such as Odisha, Himachal Pradesh and Jharkhand have also recently launched similar initiatives in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis.

    Consider the question “Covid pandemic has highlighted the lack of focus on public health in our Smart Cities Mission. Suggest the measures to make our cities resilient and source of livelihood. 

    Conclusion

    As Indian cities face an unprecedented challenge, it is important to get the priorities of urban development right and invest in programmes that improve the health and livelihoods of its residents.

  • Policing the police

    Custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu and death of a criminal in UP has brought to the fore the issue of illegalities carried out by the police. This article discusses the ways in which people face such illegalities and need for the reforms.

    Issue of illegalities by police

    • It is common practice in police stations to ignore the statute, laid down processes and Supreme Court guidelines.
    • So frequent is the brazen disobedience to the law that a lot of illegality seems to have morphed into accepted practice.

    Following are the ways in which police illegalities are carried out

    1) Custodial deaths

    •  The National Crime Records Bureau records 853 custodial deaths between 2010 to 2018.
    • At 1,636, the National Human Rights Commission puts the death figure much higher.
    • For this, just 3 policemen have been convicted.

    2) Issues of encounters

    •  The Supreme Court is clear that in each encounter case, an FIR must be registered and the matter probed independently.
    • If false, an “encounter” is premeditated murder.
    • Encounter threaten the basis of the rule of law.

    3) Avoiding registering complaint

    • Avoiding registration of complaint is the most common problem faced by the people.
    •  Even when the complaint is registered its magnitude is often diluted.
    • It is difficult for women, in particular, to get crimes registered.
    • So, in 2013, the law itself had to be changed.
    • Now a policeman who refuses to register a complaint of a sexual assault faces a two-year sentence.
    • The crime rate in India in 2018, it stood at 383.5 per 1,00,000 population.
    • By contrast, the crime rate in the US was over 2,500 per 1,00,000 .
    • This difference in crime rate highlights the reluctance by the police to registering crime.
    • This low crime rate on paper makes a fine excuse for governments to leave vacancies unfilled, go short on equipment and upgrades.
    • At 158, India’s police to population ratio which is police staff per 1,00,000 citizens, is one of the worst in the world. 

    4) Detention without cause

    •  People with prior records form a pool of easy pickings, as do the powerless.
    •  Often it is because the local public wants a quick arrest and the police want a scapegoat.

    5) Discrimination in arrest and investigation

    •  In the Tuticorin custodial murder, it took six days, the Madras High Court’s dogged intervention and a national hue and cry before six policemen could be arrested.
    • While police act swiftly in some cases, it goes soft against in other cases.

    Mechanisms and Checks and balances

    • There are many checks and balances from taluka to the national level to avoid police transgressions.
    • Internally, there are disciplinary mechanisms.
    • Outside, there are the courts.
    • Every state has human rights commissions, special interest bodies like the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, women, and minorities commissions, and some have the police complaints authorities.
    • The Supreme Court’s clear directions coupled with the criminal code provide ample safeguards against excess.

    Why these checks and balances fail

    • In real life, internal mechanisms are overindulgent of illegal behaviour, obscure and dilatory.
    • The first responder lower courts are constrained by capacity and circumstance.
    • Very few of the over one hundred guardian bodies dotted around the country work effectively

    Issues with the Guardian bodies

    • Many bodies are without any functions and powers.
    • Others are deliberately left understaffed and under-resourced.
    • The Andhra Pradesh SHRC has no chairperson nor members.
    • Gujarat, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Kerala and Tamil Nadu SHRCs function with acting chairs.
    • The few institutions that have the power and resources restrain their own functioning through terminal timidity.

    Consider the question “Issue of the illegalities by the police raises the question of guarding the guardians. Examine the ways in which police illegalities are manifested and suggest ways to deal with the issue.”

    Conclusion

    The number and regularity of heinous crimes by the police calls out for root and branch repair of the police and the many guardian agencies tasked with keeping them lawful.

  • Election Commission (EC)’s power to delay elections

    Political parties are increasingly voicing concerns over holding elections in Bihar amid a pandemic.

    This newscard contains some interesting facts related to conduct and postpone of elections.

    EC’s power to hold elections

    • The EC is mandated under law to hold elections at any time within six months before the five-year term of the Lok Sabha or Legislative Assembly expires.
    • The polls are timed in a way that the new Assembly or Lok Sabha is in place on the day of the dissolution of the outgoing House.
    • In the case of early dissolution, EC has to ensure, as far as possible, a new Lok Sabha or Assembly is in place within six months of the dissolution.

    Powers to delay

    • An election once called usually proceeds as per schedule. However, in some exceptional cases, the process can be postponed or even scrapped after its announcement under extraordinary circumstances.
    • Under Section 153 of the Representation of the People Act, the poll panel can “extend the time” for completing an election.
    • But such extension should not go beyond the date of the normal dissolution of the Lok Sabha or the Assembly.
    • In 1991, the Commission, under this provision read with Article 324 of the Constitution, postponed the ongoing parliamentary elections after then PM’s assassination during his campaign in Tamil Nadu.
    • As recently as March this year, elections to 18 Rajya Sabha seats were postponed by the Commission due to the COVID19 pandemic.

    So can EC postpone elections in Bihar under Section 153 of the RP Act?

    • Powers under Section 153 can be exercised only after an election schedule has been notified.
    • If the EC wants to postpone Bihar elections, it will have to be done through its extraordinary powers under Article 324.
    • The Commission will have to inform the government of its inability to hold polls on time.
    • The government and the President will then decide the future course — to impose President’s Rule or allow the incumbent Chief Minister to continue for six months.

    Back2Basics

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/explained-presidents-rule-in-maharashtra/

  • National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) signed MoU with NCRB

    The National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) has signed an MoU with the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) to access the centralised online database on FIRs and stolen vehicles. The MoU would enable the NATGRID to get information about details of a suspect as mentioned in the FIR such as his/her father’s name, telephone number and other details.

    Practice question for mains:

    Q.What is NATGRID? Discuss its role in facilitating criminal investigation and intelligence by various agencies.

    About NATGRID

    • NATGRID initially started in 2009 is an online database for collating scattered pieces of information and putting them together on one platform.
    • It links intelligence and investigation agencies.
    • At least 10 Central government agencies, such as the Intelligence Bureau, Research and Analysis Wing and others have access to the data on a secured platform.
    • NATGRID is exempted from the Right to Information Act, 2005 under sub-section (2) of Section 24.

    Utility of NATGRID

    • The NATGRID enables multiple security and intelligence agencies to access a database related to immigration entry and exit, banking and telephone details, among others, from a common platform.
    • The 10 user agencies will be linked independently with certain databases which will be procured from 21 providing organisations including telecom, tax records, bank, immigration etc. to generate intelligence inputs.

    Back2Basics: National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)

    • The NCRB is a government agency responsible for collecting and analysing crime data as defined by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Special and Local Laws (SLL).
    • NCRB is headquartered in New Delhi and is part of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).
    • NCRB was set-up in 1986 to function as a repository of information on crime and criminals so as to assist the investigators in linking crime to the perpetrators.
    • Mission: To Empower Indian Police with IT and criminal Intelligence to enable them to uphold the law and protect people & to provide leadership and excellence in crime analysis particularly for serious and organized crime.

    Crime and Criminal Tracking Networks and Systems (CCTNS)

    • The CCTNS is a project for creating a comprehensive and integrated system for effective policing through e-Governance.
    • The concept was first conceived in the year 2008 by the then Home Minister in the aftermath of the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
    • The system includes a nationwide online tracking system by integrating more than 14,000 police stations across the country.
    • The project is implemented by NCRB.

  • For the sake of sound fiscal federalism

    Faultlines in the Centre-State fiscal relations have widened due to Covid. This article examines how States are not getting what they should as per the 14th Finance Commission report.

    Centre-state tussle

    • The tussle for the rights of States has been focused on Article 356.
    • Partial behaviour by the Governors, regional party governments were politically destabilised.
    • Little was done to implement the report of  Justice R.S. Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State relations.
    • The new faultline in the Centre-State relation could be over the way report of 14th Finance Commission is being implemented.
    • This began well before COVID-19, but the pandemic and its economic disruption have brought things to an edge.

    Issues over the implementation of 14th Finance Commission report

    • The 14th Finance Commission report in 2015 promised devolution of more finances to the States.
    • As part of the process, States would have new responsibilities, especially in the social sector.
    •  The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime was also justified as a grand bargain that would eventually leave all States better off.
    • In reality, tax devolution to States has been consistently below 14th Finance Commission projections.
    • One reason for this has been the economic slowdown, and lower-than-expected GST collections.
    • The shortfall in GST collection for 2018-2019 was 22% when compared to projections.
    • Payments to the States have been delayed as well.
    • There is a ₹6.84 lakh crore gap between what the 14th Finance Commission promised to States and what they have received.
    • States undertook programmes and projects spending 46% more than the Central Government; today the figure is 64%.
    • Despite spending less than the states the Centre’s fiscal deficit exceeds the consolidated State deficit by 14%.

    Need to revisit the FRBM provisions

    • Due to pandemic, the fiscal deficit for States, collectively, is inevitably going to breach the projection of 2.04%.
    • As per provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, the GSDP can actually accommodate a fiscal deficit of 3%.
    • Now, post-pandemic, this limit will be crossed.
    • The FRBM has an “escape clause” that allows for a one-time relaxation of the fiscal deficit threshold upto 0.5% in a time of exigency.
    • The escape clause has been utilised by the Centre but it has proven woefully insufficient in addressing the current crisis.
    • Fiscal policymakers and technocrats agree that the rigidity of the FRBM has to be revisited.
    • It should allow for greater flexibility and consultation as to when and how the “escape clause” can be applied.
    • The Centre has gone in for subjective interpretation, imposing conditions that are outside the scope of the FRBM.

    Consider the question “Fiscal tensions have emerged as  a new front in the Centre-State relations. Suggest the steps the Centre should take to address it.”

    Conclusion

    Centre government needs to be more considerate of the financial woes of the State and try to deliver on the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission report.

  • Quorum not needed for routine standing committee meetings

    The opposition parties in the Rajya Sabha has contradicted the holding the virtual meetings of standing committees to ensure quorum during deliberations.

    Try this question from CSP 2018:

    Q.With reference to the Parliament of India which of the following Parliamentary Committees scrutinizes and reports to the House whether the powers to make regulations, rules, sub rules, bylaws, etc. conferred by the Constitution or delegated by the Parliament is being properly exercised by the Executive within the scope of such delegation?

    (a) Committee on Government Assurances

    (b) Committee on Subordinate Legislation

    (c) Rules Committee

    (d) Business Advisory Committee

    What is Quorum?

    • A quorum is the minimum number of members of a deliberative assembly necessary to conduct the business of that group.
    • The requirement for a quorum is protection against totally unrepresentative action in the name of the body by an unduly small number of persons.
    • Article 100 (3) of the Constitution of India stipulates that at least 10% of the total number of members of the House must be present to constitute the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament.
    • Article 189 (3) and (4) provides for similar provisions for State Legislatures.
    • For example, if the House has a total membership of 500, at least 50 members must be present for the House to proceed with its business.

    What did RS Secretariat say over the requirement of quorum?

    • Parliamentarian these days are unable to travel to Delhi for obvious COVID reasons.
    • The Rajya Sabha secretariat has said that quorum was essential only when the committees are making decisions or adopting reports and not during routine deliberations.

    Back2Basics: What are Standing Committees?

    • Standing Committee is a committee consisting of Members of Parliament.
    • It is a permanent and regular committee which is constituted from time to time according to the provisions of an Act of Parliament or Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business.
    • The work done by the Indian Parliament is not only voluminous but also of a complex nature, hence a good deal of its work is carried out in these Parliamentary Committees.
    • Standing Committees are of the following kinds :
    1. Financial Standing Committees (FSC)
    2. Department Related Standing Committees (DRSC)
    3. Others Standing Committees (OSC)