💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • Fertiliser ministry seeks doubling of subsidy allocation amid price surge 

    Why in the News?

    India’s fertiliser subsidy bill is projected to surge to nearly ₹3.4 lakh crore in 2026-27, almost double the Budget Estimate of ₹1.71 lakh crore. Rising global urea prices due to the West Asia conflict and supply disruptions have sharply increased import costs, putting pressure on government finances.

    What is India’s Fertilizer Subsidy regime?

    India’s fertilizer subsidy regime is an essential government support system that protects farmers from volatile global market prices. The government compensates manufacturers for the gap between production/import costs and the artificially low Maximum Retail Price (MRP). The subsidy is administered via a Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system through Aadhaar-authenticated Point of Sale (PoS) machines. The system operates as a two-tier regime distributed through a rigid digital verification network.

    Dual-Track Subsidy Structure

    Urea Subsidy Regime

    1. Fixed Retail Price: Urea is sold at a government-controlled MRP.
    2. Variable Subsidy Support: The government compensates manufacturers and importers for the gap between the fixed MRP and actual production/import costs.
    3. Price Stability: Ensures affordable access to the most widely used fertiliser despite fluctuations in global prices.

    Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Scheme

    1. Coverage: Applies to Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilisers such as DAP and MOP.
    2. Fixed Nutrient Subsidy: Subsidy is provided per kilogram of Nitrogen (N), Phosphate (P), Potash (K), and Sulphur (S).
    3. Market-Based Pricing: Manufacturers determine retail prices while receiving government support based on nutrient content.
    4. Dynamic Adjustment: Subsidy rates are revised periodically to offset global price volatility.
    5. Recent Example: Union Cabinet approved ₹41,533.81 crore under NBS for the Kharif season to cushion farmers from fertiliser price shocks arising from the West Asia crisis.

    Fertiliser Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) Mechanism

    1. Aadhaar-Based Authentication: Fertiliser sales are authenticated through Aadhaar-enabled systems.
    2. Point-of-Sale (PoS) Verification: Subsidy claims are generated only after actual sale is recorded at retailer-level PoS devices.
    3. Retail-Linked Subsidy Release: Fertiliser companies receive subsidy payments only after verified transactions.
    4. Leakage Reduction: Strengthens monitoring and limits diversion, smuggling, and ghost beneficiaries.
    5. Real-Time Tracking: Enables end-to-end monitoring of fertiliser movement and consumption.

    How has the fertiliser subsidy burden evolved over recent years?

    Persistent Budgetary Slippage

    1. Underestimation: Government initially estimated ₹1.71 lakh crore subsidy requirement for FY27.
    2. Actual Requirement: Sources indicate expenditure may approach ₹3.4 lakh crore.
    3. Magnitude: Represents almost a 100% increase over the Budget Estimate.

    Why are global fertiliser prices rising sharply?

    1. Geopolitical Disruptions
      1. West Asia Conflict: Ongoing regional conflict has disrupted global supply chains.
      2. Supply Hoarding: Major suppliers, including China, are reportedly holding inventories amid uncertainty.
      3. Shipping Constraints: Closure and disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz have increased transportation costs.
    2. Surge in Import Prices
      1. Pre-conflict Prices: India’s recent urea imports previously cost around $410-420 per tonne.
      2. Current Prices: Cost-plus-freight prices increased to $935-959 per tonne.
      3. Magnitude: More than double the price observed a year earlier.
    3. Import Dependence
      1. External Vulnerability: Domestic production remains insufficient to fully meet national demand.
      2. Strategic Procurement: Government is exploring greater sourcing from Russia to meet requirements.

    How is India responding to emerging fertiliser shortages?

    1. Large-scale Import Tenders
      1. National Fertilizers Limited (NFL): Issued a global tender on May 27 to procure 17 lakh metric tonnes (LMT) of urea.
      2. Indian Potash Limited (IPL): Issued a tender in April for importing 25 LMT of urea.
    2. Domestic Production Expansion
      1. Production Push: Government seeks to ramp up domestic fertiliser production.
      2. Supply Assurance: Strategy aims to reduce import vulnerability and stabilise prices.
    3. Diversification of Sources
      1. Russia Option: Government is examining additional imports from Russia to supplement supplies.
      2. Supply Security: Diversification reduces dependence on a limited set of suppliers.

    What Fiscal Pressures Are Emerging from Rising Fertiliser Subsidies?

    1. Escalating Subsidy Burden: Fertiliser subsidy requirements for FY27 may rise to nearly ₹3.4 lakh crore against the Budget Estimate of ₹1.71 lakh crore, creating significant expenditure pressures.
    2. Frequent Budget Overruns: Actual fertiliser subsidy spending has consistently exceeded budgeted allocations, as seen in FY26 when expenditure reached ₹2.11 lakh crore against a revised estimate of ₹1.86 lakh crore.
    3. Widening Fiscal Deficit: Higher subsidy outgo increases government revenue expenditure and complicates efforts to maintain the fiscal deficit target of 4.4% of GDP.
    4. Reduced Fiscal Space: Rising subsidy commitments constrain the government’s ability to allocate resources towards capital expenditure, infrastructure, and social sector investments.
    5. Import-Driven Fiscal Vulnerability: Dependence on imported fertilisers exposes public finances to global price shocks, increasing subsidy liabilities during periods of geopolitical and supply-chain disruptions.

    Why has fertiliser become one of the ‘Three Fs’ of fiscal concern?

    In the context of India’s current macroeconomic challenges, the “Three Fs” refer to Fuel, Fertiliser, and Foreign Exchange (Forex).

    1. External Payment Pressure
      1. Fertiliser Imports: Payments are made largely in foreign currency.
      2. Fuel Imports: Rising energy costs increase import expenditure.
      3. Gold Imports: Foreign exchange outflows rise due to gold purchases.
    2. Rupee Pressure
      1. Current Account Impact: High import bills increase foreign exchange demand.
      2. Currency Stability: Greater dollar demand exerts pressure on the rupee.
    3. Fiscal Implications
      1. Subsidy Burden: Rising fertiliser costs require additional budgetary support.
      2. Twin Stress: Simultaneously affects fiscal deficit and external sector balances.

    What concerns exist regarding diversion and misuse of subsidised fertilisers?

    1. Subsidy Leakage
      1. Industrial Diversion: Concerns exist that fertilisers intended for farmers are being diverted for industrial use.
      2. Monitoring Challenge: Excess distribution raises suspicion of leakage.
    2. Distribution Anomalies
      1. Requirement Mismatch: Officials indicated that if one sack is sufficient, some states distribute two sacks.
      2. Excess Allocation: Reports suggest distribution of five to seven sacks in certain areas.
      3. Policy Concern: Such quantities exceed agronomic requirements and indicate possible misuse.
    3. Administrative Response
      1. Inter-Ministerial Review: Matter is reportedly under discussion among agriculture, fertiliser, and finance ministries.
      2. Targeted Delivery: States have been advised to align distribution with actual crop requirements.

    What are the structural weaknesses in India’s fertiliser subsidy regime?

    1. Price Distortion
      1. Controlled Prices: Urea continues to be sold at roughly ₹300 per sack despite rising production and import costs.
      2. Subsidy Dependence: Large gap between market price and retail price necessitates substantial government support.
    2. Import Dependence
      1. Feedstock Constraints: Domestic fertiliser production remains dependent on imported raw materials and energy inputs.
      2. Supply Vulnerability: Global shocks are transmitted quickly into domestic subsidy expenditure.
    3. Nutrient Imbalance
      1. Urea Bias: Heavy subsidy on urea encourages excessive nitrogen application.
      2. Soil Health Concerns: Imbalanced nutrient usage reduces long-term soil productivity.
    4. Fiscal Sustainability Issues
      1. Budget Volatility: Fertiliser subsidies fluctuate significantly with global commodity prices.
      2. Opportunity Cost: Higher subsidy spending reduces fiscal space for capital expenditure and social investments.

    Way Forward: 

    1. Urea Subsidy Reform: Gradually align urea with the Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) framework to reduce price distortions and encourage balanced fertiliser use.
    2. Boost Domestic Production: Expand urea manufacturing capacity, revive idle plants, and promote green ammonia to reduce import dependence.
    3. Strengthen DBT and Monitoring: Enhance PoS-based tracking, Aadhaar verification, and supply-chain monitoring to curb diversion and subsidy leakages.
    4. Promote Alternative Fertilisers: Scale up nano urea, biofertilisers, and customised fertilisers to improve nutrient efficiency and lower subsidy requirements.
    5. Diversify Imports and Build Strategic Reserves: Secure long-term supply agreements with multiple countries and maintain buffer stocks to mitigate global supply shocks and price volatility.

    Conclusion

    India’s fertiliser subsidy challenge underscores the growing vulnerability of its agricultural support system to global commodity shocks and geopolitical disruptions. The projected surge in subsidy expenditure reflects structural issues such as import dependence, administered urea pricing, and subsidy leakages. Balancing farmer welfare with fiscal prudence has emerged as a critical policy priority.

    Value Addition

    One Nation One Fertilizer (ONOF) Scheme

    1. Uniform Branding: All subsidised fertilisers are marketed under the ‘Bharat’ brand.
    2. Examples: Bharat Urea, Bharat DAP, Bharat MOP.
    3. Standardisation: Ensures uniform product identity across states.
    4. Consumer Awareness: Simplifies fertiliser recognition for farmers.
    5. Quality Assurance: Strengthens trust in subsidised fertiliser distribution.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] What are the direct and indirect subsidies provided to the farm sector in India? Discuss the issues raised by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to agricultural subsidies

    Linkage: The PYQ examines the role, sustainability, and challenges of agricultural subsidies in India. The article focuses on the rising fertiliser subsidy burden, highlighting concerns related to subsidy efficiency, fiscal sustainability, and reform of agricultural support mechanisms.

  • First Export of GI-Tagged Tezpur Litchi to Dubai

    Why in the news?

    The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) facilitated the first export consignment of GI-tagged Tezpur Litchi from Assam to Dubai on 7 June 2026, boosting agricultural exports from the North Eastern Region.

    Key Highlights

    • Product Exported: GI-tagged Tezpur Litchi
    • Quantity: 1 metric tonne
    • Export Destination: Dubai
    • State: Assam
    • Facilitating Agency: APEDA
    • Significance: First international shipment of Tezpur Litchi.

    About Tezpur Litchi

    • Tezpur Litchi is renowned for its: Exceptional sweetness, Bright-red appearance, Distinctive aroma, Superior eating quality, High consumer preference
    • Major Varieties: Bombaya, Bilati, Elaichi, Piyaji, and Sahi

    [2018] With reference to organic farming in India, consider the following statements:
    1.‘The National ‘Programme for Organic Production’ (NPOP) is operated under the guidelines and ‘directions of the Union Ministry of Rural Development.
    2.‘The Agricultural and Processed Food Product Export Development Authority ‘(APEDA) functions as the Secretariat for the implementation of NPOP.
    3.Sikkim has become India’s first fully organic State.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    [A] 1 and 2 only

    [B] 2 and 3 only

    [C] 3 only

    [D] 1, 2 and 3

  • Small Hydro Power (SHP) Development Scheme

    Why in the news?

    The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) organised a National Workshop and launched the Small Hydro Power Development Scheme Guidelines (FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31) to accelerate the development of the SHP sector in India.

    About the Small Hydro Power Development Scheme

    • Implementing Ministry: MNRE
    • Scheme Period: FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31
    • Objective:
      • Revival and expansion of the Small Hydro Power sector.
      • Harness untapped hydro potential.
      • Promote renewable energy diversification.
    • Capacity Target: Installation of approximately 1,500 MW of new SHP capacity.
    • Total allocation: ₹2,584.60 crore
    • In India, Small Hydro Power Projects are hydroelectric projects with an installed capacity of up to 25 MW
    • These projects generally involve:
      • Run-of-the-river systems.
      • Minimal reservoir requirements.
      • Lower environmental impacts compared to large dams.

    [2024] Recently, the term “pumped-storage hydropower” is actually and appropriately discussed in the context of which one of the following?

    [A] Irrigation of terraced crop fields

    [B] Lift irrigation of cereal crops

    [C] Long duration energy storage

    [D] Rainwater harvesting system

  • Sound Waves for Energy-Efficient Next-Generation Computing

    Why in the news?

    Researchers from the Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST) have discovered a new mechanism to generate and control spin currents using sound waves, opening avenues for low-power computing, spintronics, and quantum technologies.

    Key Highlights

    • Researchers developed a method to generate magnon-based spin currents using Surface Acoustic Waves (SAWs).
    • The study was published in Physical Review B.
    • It offers a pathway towards Energy-efficient electronics, Quantum computing, Next-generation communication technologies.

    Why is this Important?

    • Limitations of Conventional Electronics: Traditional electronics use: Movement of electric charge (electrons)
    • Problems: Heat generation, Energy loss, Reduced efficiency at smaller scales

    What is Spintronics?

    Spintronics (Spin Electronics) is a technology that uses the Spin of electrons. Along with their charge to process and store information.

    Advantages

    • Lower power consumption.
    • Faster processing speeds.
    • Reduced heat generation.
    • Higher data storage density.

    What are Magnons?

    Magnons are Quanta of spin waves or collective disturbances in the magnetic ordering of a material.

    What are Surface Acoustic Waves (SAWs)?

    Surface Acoustic Waves are Sound waves that travel along the surface of a material.

    Characteristics

    • Cause tiny mechanical vibrations.
    • Commonly used in: Mobile communication filters, Sensors, Signal processing devices.

    [2022] Which one of the following is the context in which the term “qubit” is mentioned?

    [A] Cloud Services

    [B] Quantum Computing

    [C] Visible Light Communication Technologies

    [D] Wireless Communication Technologies

  • Infrastructure at the Core of India’s Development (PIB)

    Why in the news?

    The Government highlighted major infrastructure achievements over the past 12 years across transport, logistics, water, housing, energy, and digital sectors, emphasizing their role in achieving Viksit Bharat 2047.

    1. Railways

    • Railway budgetary support increased from ₹32,000 crore (2014-15) to ₹2.78 lakh crore (2026-27).
    • Railway electrification:
      • About 20% before 2014
      • 99.6% by March 2026
      • 69,873 route km electrified.
    • Vande Bharat trains: 162 services operational (April 2026).
    • Vande Bharat Sleeper: launched in January 2026.
    • Amrit Bharat Express: 60 services operational.
    • Mumbai-Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Corridor
      • Length: 508 km
      • Design speed: 320 kmph.
    • Amrit Bharat Station Scheme (2023): 208 stations redeveloped out of 1,338 identified.
    • Kavach:
      • Indigenous Automatic Train Protection System.
      • Operational on 3,103 route km.
      • Installed on 4,277 locomotives.
    • Train accidents declined from 135 (2014-15) to 16 (2025-26).

    Important Railway Projects

    • Chenab Bridge (2025): World’s highest railway arch bridge. Height: 359 m above Chenab River.
    • Anji Khad Bridge: India’s first cable-stayed railway bridge.
    • Pamban Bridge (2025): India’s first vertical-lift railway sea bridge.
    • Bairabi-Sairang Railway Line: Connects Mizoram. Length: 51.38 km.

    Roads and Highways

    • India’s road network: 63.73 lakh km and Second largest globally.
    • National Highways:
      • 91,287 km (FY14)
      • 1,46,566 km (March 2026).
    • Four-lane and above highways: 18,371 km to 45,516 km.
    • Access-controlled expressways: 3,644 km operational.

    PMGSY

    • Rural habitations connected: 99.6% eligible habitations.
    • Completed roads: 4.11 lakh km (2014-26).
    • Bridges completed: 10,293.

    Bharatmala Pariyojana

    • Approved: 2017.
    • Roads completed: 22,590 km.

    Landmark Projects

    • Z-Morh (Sonamarg) Tunnel, Sudarshan Setu, Maitri Setu over Feni River, Atal Tunnel, Dr. Syama Prasad Mukherjee Tunnel, Dhola-Sadiya Bridge.

    2. Civil Aviation

    • Operational airports: 74 (2014) and 165 (2026).
    • Investments: Over ₹1.4 lakh crore.

    UDAN

    • Launched: 2016.
    • Routes operational: 665 routes.
    • Connected: 95 airports/heliports/water aerodromes.
    • Beneficiaries: Over 1.64 crore passengers.
    • Modified UDAN (2026): Outlay: ₹28,840 crore.

    Digi Yatra

    • Facial recognition-based travel.
    • Operational at 38 airports.

    GAGAN

    • Operational since 2015.
    • World’s first equatorial Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS).

    3. Metro and RRTS

    • Metro network: 248 km (2014) to 1,155+ km (2026).
    • India has the third-largest metro network.
    • Metro cities: 5 to 26.

    Notable Developments

    • Kolkata: India’s first underwater metro tunnel.
    • Kochi: India’s first Water Metro.
    • Namo Bharat: Delhi-Meerut RRTS.

    4. Ports and Waterways

    • Major port capacity: 873 MMTPA (2014) to 1,726 MMTPA (2026).
    • Cargo handled: 581 MMT to 915 MMT.
    • Vessel turnaround: 94 hours to 48.8 hours.

    Sagarmala Programme

    • Launched: 2015.
    • Projects completed: 78.

    Inland Waterways

    • National Waterways: 5 (2014) to 111 (2026).
    • Operational waterways: 32.
    • Cargo movement: 29 MMT to 218 MMT.

    Jal Marg Vikas Project

    • On National Waterway-1.
    • Stretch: Varanasi to Haldia.

    Arth Ganga

    • Community jetties: 66 operational.

    5. Industrial Infrastructure

    • Industrial parks mapped: 4,220.
    • Plug-and-play parks: 272 operational.
    • Industrial smart cities approved: 20.

    BHAVYA Scheme

    • Approved: March 2026.
    • Objective: Develop 100 plug-and-play industrial parks.

    6. Logistics

    PM GatiShakti

    • Launched: 2021.
    • GIS platform integrating: 58 Ministries/Departments.
    • Data layers: 3,202+.

    National Logistics Policy

    • Launched: 2022.
    • India’s Logistics Performance Index rank: 54 (2014) to 38 (2023).

    Digital Logistics Platforms

    • ULIP (2022).
    • Logistics Data Bank (2016).
    • NETC FASTag (2016).

    PRAGATI

    • Launched: 2015.
    • Projects reviewed: 382.
    • Value: ₹85 lakh crore.

    7. Water Infrastructure

    Jal Jeevan Mission

    • Launched: 2019.
    • Rural tap coverage: 17% at launch to 81.94% (June 2026).
    • Households covered: 15.86 crore.

    Other Initiatives

    • PMKSY (2015), Namami Gange (2014), Ken-Betwa Link Project (2021, FloodWatch India App, and Dam Safety Act, 2021.

    8. Housing

    PMAY-U

    • Launched: 2015.
    • Houses sanctioned: 125.31 lakh.
    • Houses completed: 98.10 lakh.
    • PMAY-U 2.0: One crore additional beneficiaries by 2028-29.

    PMAY-G

    • Launched: 2016.
    • Houses completed: 3.06 crore.

    SWAMIH Fund

    • Launched: 2019.
    • Corpus: ₹15,531 crore.

    AMRUT

    • Launched: 2015.
    • Projects sanctioned: ₹2.79 lakh crore.

    9. Energy

    • Installed capacity: 248 GW (2014) to 532.74 GW (2026).
    • Power shortage: 4.2% to 0.03%.

    Renewable Energy

    India is: 3rd largest clean energy capacity holder and 4th largest installed wind energy producer.

    Important Schemes

    • PM Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana (2024).
    • GOBARdhan Scheme (2018).
    • Saubhagya Scheme (2017).

    International Initiatives

    • International Solar Alliance: 125 member countries.
    • Global Biofuels Alliance: 33 countries and 14 organisations.

    10. LPG and Clean Cooking

    • LPG coverage: 55.9% (2014) to 107.2% (2026).
    • LPG consumers: 14.51 crore to 33.39 crore.

    PM Ujjwala Yojana

    • Launched: 2016.
    • Additional 25 lakh connections approved in FY26.

    11. Digital Infrastructure

    • Internet connections: 25.15 crore to 100.29 crore.
    • Broadband:6.1 crore to 99.56 crore.
    • Monthly data usage: 61.66 MB to 24.01 GB.

    PM-WANI

    • Launched: 2020.
    • Wi-Fi hotspots: 4.10 lakh+.

    5G

    • Available in 99.9% districts.
    • 5.08 lakh BTS installed.

    JAM Trinity

    • Jan Dhan, Aadhaar and Mobile.

    UPI

    • March 2026: 2,264 crore transactions and ₹29.53 lakh crore value.
    • Operational in UAE, Singapore, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, France, Mauritius, and Qatar.

    Important Digital Platforms

    • DigiLocker, UMANG, Common Service Centres, eHospital, PM e-Vidya, DIKSHA, SWAYAM.

    [2025] Consider the following statements:
    I. Indian Railways have prepared a National Rail Plan (NRP) to create a future ready railway system by 2028.
    II. Kavach’ is an Automatic Train Protection system, development in collaboration with Germany.
    III. ‘Kavach’ system consists of RFID tags fitted on track in station section.
    Which of the statements given above are not correct?

    [A] I and II only

    [B] II and III only

    [C] I and III only

    [D] I, II and III

  • The boost centre’s solar power schemes need

    Why in the News?

    India’s flagship decentralised solar schemes, PM Surya Ghar Yojana and PM-KUSUM, have achieved only about 13 GW capacity against a target of 40 GW. This has prompted the Parliamentary Estimates Committee to examine implementation bottlenecks.

    Background

    1. Solar Dominance: Solar power now accounts for nearly 30% of India’s installed electricity generation capacity.
    2. Rapid Capacity Addition: India added more than 50 GW of solar capacity during the last two years.
    3. Global Position: India added more solar power in 2025 than any country except China.

    Why is Decentralised Solar Power Becoming Central to India’s Energy Transition?

    Decentralised solar power (DRE) generates electricity at or near the point of consumption rather than relying on large, centralized power plants. This approach eliminates long-distance transmission losses and empowers local communities by providing affordable, continuous, and reliable energy

    1. Rising Electricity Demand: Increasing temperatures, urbanisation and economic growth are pushing electricity demand upwards.
    2. Land Constraints: Availability of land for large utility-scale solar parks is becoming increasingly limited.
    3. Climate Resilience: Distributed generation strengthens energy security during periods of high demand and climatic stress.
    4. Peak Demand Management: Solar power significantly contributed to meeting daytime peak demand during April-May 2026.
    5. Hydropower Constraints: Hydropower capacity expansion has stagnated, reducing its ability to meet incremental demand.
      1. Stagnating Share: Hydropower’s share in India’s installed power capacity has declined from around 25% in the early 1990s to about 10% today, despite growth in overall electricity demand.
      2. Limited Capacity Addition: India added only about 5 GW of large hydropower capacity between 2014 and 2024, compared to over 100 GW of solar capacity during the same period.
      3. Current Capacity: India’s installed hydropower capacity stands at roughly 48-49 GW, while solar capacity has crossed 100 GW.
      4. Climate Vulnerability: Erratic monsoons, changing river flows, environmental clearances, rehabilitation issues, and long gestation periods have slowed hydropower expansion.
      5. Energy Transition Implication: With hydropower unable to expand rapidly enough to meet rising demand, solar, particularly decentralised solar, is increasingly expected to meet incremental electricity requirements.

    What are the Key Features of PM Surya Ghar Yojana and PM-KUSUM?

    PM Surya Ghar Yojana

    1. Household Coverage: Targets rooftop solar installation in 1 crore households.
    2. Free Electricity: Provides electricity benefits of up to 300 units per month.
    3. Capital Subsidy: Offers direct subsidy support for rooftop solar equipment.
    4. Decentralised Generation: Encourages household-level electricity production and grid integration.

    Progress

    TargetAchievement
    1 crore households connected40.52 lakh households
    30 GW installed capacity12 GW

    PM-KUSUM

    The Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthan Mahabhiyan (PM-KUSUM) is an initiative by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE). It provides farmers with heavy subsidies for solar agricultural pumps and solar power plants, designed to generate income, provide daytime irrigation, and replace expensive diesel or grid power

    1. Farmer-Centric Design: Supports farmers in establishing decentralised solar infrastructure.
    2. Solar Plants on Unused Land: Enables installation of small solar plants on unused agricultural land.
    3. Solar Water Pumps: Supports both standalone and grid-connected solar irrigation pumps.
    4. Additional Income: Allows sale of surplus electricity to the grid.
    5. Cost Reduction: Reduces diesel and conventional electricity expenses.

    Progress

    TargetAchievement
    14 lakh solar water pumps10.9 lakh
    2.5 lakh solar irrigation pumps15,000
    30 GW decentralised solar capacity1.2 GW

    How Successful Have These Flagship Programmes Been?

    1. Combined Budget: Approximately ₹95,000 crore.
    2. Combined Capacity Created: About 13 GW as of 31 May 2026.
    3. Target Capacity: 40 GW by the end of the current financial year.
    4. Achievement Gap: Only around one-third of the targeted capacity achieved.
    5. PM-KUSUM Delay: Initially targeted for completion by 2022 but extended until the end of the current financial year due to pandemic-related disruptions.
    6. Best Performing Component: Standalone off-grid solar water pumps under PM-KUSUM.

    How is Performance Highly Uneven Across States?

    PM Surya Ghar Better Performers

    StateInstallationsHouseholds ConnectedSubsidy (₹ crore)
    Gujarat6,81,1809,77,7549,277
    Maharashtra6,04,5229,42,37823,149
    Uttar Pradesh5,62,6565,77,10319,095
    Kerala2,52,8032,58,959382
    Rajasthan2,15,8422,23,06630,597

    PM Surya Ghar Underperformers

    StateInstallationsHouseholds ConnectedSubsidy (₹ crore)
    West Bengal1,6951,7581,868
    Punjab14,47016,64120,693
    Karnataka19,79330,39527,725
    Bihar20,27220,90515,405
    Tamil Nadu72,98885,74315,701

    How Do Power Subsidies Affect Solar Adoption?

    1. Distorted Economic Incentives: Free or highly subsidised electricity reduces the financial attractiveness of investing in rooftop solar systems.
    2. Reduced Payback Benefits: Consumers receiving subsidised electricity perceive limited savings from solar installations, resulting in lower adoption rates.
    3. High Upfront Cost Sensitivity: Households are less willing to incur substantial initial costs for solar systems when electricity is already available at little or no cost.
    4. Subsidy-Driven Consumer Behaviour: Existing subsidy regimes encourage continued dependence on grid electricity rather than self-generation through rooftop solar.
    5. Policy Contradiction: Simultaneous promotion of rooftop solar and provision of free electricity creates conflicting incentives for consumers.
    6. Official Recognition: The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy informed the Parliamentary Estimates Committee that free electricity schemes have emerged as a major constraint to PM Surya Ghar implementation.

    Evidence from States

    1. Punjab: Provides 300 free units to households and free electricity for agricultural tubewells; annual power subsidy expenditure exceeds ₹20,000 crore.
    2. Karnataka: Electricity subsidy bill stands at approximately ₹27,000 crore.
    3. Tamil Nadu: Electricity subsidy expenditure is around ₹15,700 crore.

    Why Does the Upfront Cost Remain the Biggest Barrier?

    1. High Initial Investment: Solar installations often require investment of several lakh rupees.
    2. Delayed Returns: Benefits accrue gradually through reduced electricity bills and sale of surplus power.
    3. Affordability Challenge: Many households and farmers struggle to mobilise upfront capital despite long-term savings.
    4. Credit Constraints: Access to affordable financing remains limited.
    5. Committee Recommendation: Parliamentary Estimates Committee recommended mechanisms that reduce upfront payment burdens.

    Why Have Some States Succeeded Despite Offering Subsidised Power?

    1. Additional Incentives: Gujarat, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh supplemented central support with state-level incentives.
    2. Policy Convergence: State support reduced effective installation costs.
    3. Consumer Confidence: Additional incentives improved economic viability.
    4. Administrative Efficiency: Faster approvals and implementation improved adoption rates.
    5. Evidence of Success: These states account for nearly 70% of the total rooftop solar installations achieved under PM Surya Ghar.

    What are the Long-Term Economic Benefits of Decentralised Solar Power?

    1. Subsidy Rationalisation: Reduces long-term dependence on recurring electricity subsidies.
    2. Fiscal Savings: Full implementation of PM Surya Ghar could save approximately ₹75,000 crore annually in electricity-related expenditure.
    3. Consumer Empowerment: Converts consumers into electricity producers.
    4. Grid Stability: Reduces transmission losses and distribution burden.
    5. Energy Security: Diversifies generation sources and reduces fuel dependence.
    6. Climate Commitments: Supports India’s renewable energy and net-zero objectives.

    What is the Growing Link Between Solar Power and Electricity Demand?

    1. Demand Surge: Rising temperatures are increasing electricity consumption.
    2. Climate Variability: Lower rainfall forecasts may reduce hydropower availability.
    3. Summer Demand Peaks: Solar generation is increasingly meeting daytime peak loads.
    4. Future Energy Mix: Solar is expected to become India’s second-largest source of electricity generation, overtaking hydropower.
    5. Decentralisation Advantage: Distributed generation can cushion local supply-demand imbalances.

    Conclusion

    India’s clean energy transition increasingly depends on decentralised solar generation alongside utility-scale renewable projects. While PM Surya Ghar and PM-KUSUM have demonstrated their transformative potential, persistent barriers such as high upfront costs and distortionary electricity subsidies continue to constrain adoption. Bridging this gap through targeted incentives, affordable financing and subsidy reforms will determine whether decentralised solar power can become a major pillar of India’s energy security and climate strategy.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] Describe the benefits of deriving electric energy from sunlight in contrast to the conventional energy generation. What are the initiatives offered by our Government for this purpose?

    Linkage: The PYQ focuses on solar energy as a sustainable alternative to conventional power sources and government efforts to promote its adoption. PM Surya Ghar and PM-KUSUM are among India’s flagship initiatives for promoting decentralised solar energy. The article evaluates their achievements, implementation challenges, and significance for India’s energy security and clean energy transition.

  • IMI-Resistant Mustard Hybrids

    Why in the news?

    India is set to begin large-scale cultivation of imidazolinone-resistant (IMI-resistant) mustard hybrids during the 2026-27 rabi season to tackle the parasitic weed Orobanche (Phelipanche), which significantly reduces mustard yields.

    Key Highlights

    • Mustard is a major oilseed crop in India.
    • India imported around 16 million tonnes of edible oil and Worth nearly ₹1.6 lakh crore in 2024-25.
    • The new hybrids are resistant to IMI herbicides
    • Main target Orobanche/Phelipanche, a root parasitic weed.

    What is Orobanche?

    https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/Qei5WJuL-Rr_xTIzlCInNirTBQpRVL3O34CGG6B68RBWV0IAE1OJC19nfEHxPF8pd4N3UBIyCrDEXg4K_8VjNBKQchGiadQ9D4C-Nh_wdl2OaRZ_ZT9no0h2Jadoxh9AhOsPBZJHloSRD_kA2CRmo_W98rssDji6_lHfc2ADRkM4lB-50F4ZX-LttuPjq6Wt?purpose=fullsize
    • A parasitic weed that attaches to mustard roots. Draws water and nutrients from the host plant
    • Causes major yield losses in mustard cultivation.
    • Difficult to remove manually because it grows below the soil surface.

    What are IMI-Resistant Mustard Hybrids?

    • These are mustard varieties resistant to imidazolinone herbicides.
    • Developed Through: Mutation Breeding. Not a genetically modified (GM) crop. Scientists select and preserve naturally occurring mutations.

    Scientific Basis

    • The resistance is linked to changes in the Acetolactate Synthase (ALS) enzyme
    • Normally, IMI herbicides inhibit the ALS enzyme. The plant dies.

    In resistant hybrids:

    • A DNA mutation changes ALS structure.
    • Herbicide cannot inhibit the enzyme.
    • Crop survives while weeds die.

    Advantages

    • Effective control of Orobanche.
    • Reduces labour requirement for manual weeding.
    • Helps improve mustard productivity.
    • Supports reduction in edible oil imports.
    • Useful in labour-scarce periods during the rabi season.

    [2018] With reference to the Genetically Modified mustard (GM mustard) developed in India, consider the following statements :
    1. GM mustard has the genes of a soil bacterium that give the plant the property of pest-resistance to a wide variety of pests.
    2. GM mustard has the genes that allow the plant cross-pollination and hybridise.
    3. GM mustard has been developed jointly by the IARI and Punjab Agricultural University.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    [A] 1 and 3 only
    [B] 2 only
    [C] 2 and 3
    [D] 1, 2 and 3

  • Zojila Tunnel

    Why in the news?

    The strategically important Zojila Tunnel achieved its final breakthrough on June 9, 2026, with Union Minister Nitin Gadkari overseeing the final blasting from the Kargil side. The tunnel will provide all-weather connectivity between Kashmir and Ladakh.

    Key Highlights

    • Length: 13.14 km
    • Altitude: 11,578 feet
    • Cost: Over ₹6,800 crore
    • Connects: Baltal (Kashmir) and Meenamarg/Drass (Ladakh)
    • Travel time reduced: From 3 hours to 20 minutes
    • Constructed by: Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Ltd
    • Tunnel type: Single-tube, bi-directional, two-lane road tunnel
    • Geological Zone: Seismic Zone IV

    Strategic Importance

    • Ensures all-weather connectivity between Kashmir and Ladakh.
    • Critical for the movement of Troops, Defence equipment, and Supplies to the Line of Actual Control (LAC)
    • Reduces dependence on the snow-prone Zojila Pass.
    • Enhances India’s strategic preparedness in border regions.

    Construction Method

    • The tunnel was constructed using the: New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM)

    Key features of NATM:

    • Sequential excavation
    • Immediate support using: Shotcrete and Rock bolting
    • Continuous geotechnical monitoring
    • Suitable for fragile Himalayan geology

    Q. With reference to India’s projects on connectivity, consider the following statements::
    1. East-West Corridor under Golden Quadrilateral Project connects Dibrugarh and Surat.
    2. Trilateral Highway connects Moreh in Manipur and Chiang Mai in Thailand via Myanmar.
    3. Bangladesh- China- India- Myanmar Economic Corridor connects Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh with Kunming in China.
    How many of the above statements are correct?

    [A] Only one

    [B] Only two

    [C] All three

    [D] None

  • [8th June 2026] The Hindu OpED: From borderland to India’s strategic resource frontier

    Mentor’s Comment

    India’s search for critical minerals has brought the Northeast into the national strategic spotlight. Government narratives increasingly portray states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, and Mizoram as resource-rich frontiers capable of supporting India’s clean energy transition and industrial ambitions. This highlights a significant shift in how India views the Northeast. Traditionally it was framed through the lens of borders, security, insurgency, and connectivity.

    Why is the Northeast Emerging as India’s Strategic Resource Frontier?

    1. Critical Mineral Demand: Expanding demand for lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel, and rare earth elements is reshaping global industrial and geopolitical competition.
    2. Energy Transition: Batteries, electric vehicles, renewable energy technologies, and energy storage systems depend heavily on critical minerals.
    3. Technological Manufacturing: Semiconductors and advanced manufacturing require secure access to strategic minerals.
    4. Defence Applications: Defence technologies increasingly rely on mineral-intensive supply chains.
    5. Strategic Autonomy: Reduces dependence on external suppliers and strengthens supply-chain resilience.
    6. Resource Potential: Geological surveys indicate significant mineral potential across several Northeastern states.

    How Has Government Discourse on the Northeast Changed?

    1. Borderland Narrative: The Northeast was historically discussed through issues of insurgency, territorial security, border management, and connectivity.
    2. Security-Centric Approach: Infrastructure projects were often justified as instruments of strategic access and territorial integration.
    3. Resource Frontier Narrative: The region is increasingly portrayed as a source of strategic minerals critical for national development.
    4. Expanded Strategic Significance: Discussions now combine security, resource access, industrial policy, and geopolitical competitiveness.
    5. National Economic Integration: Resource development is becoming central to how the region is represented in national policymaking.

    What Is the Scale of Critical Mineral Exploration in the Northeast?

    1. Exploration Expansion: Geological Survey of India undertook 43 critical mineral exploration projects in northeastern states during the 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 field seasons.
    2. Minerals Covered: Exploration focused on graphite, vanadium, lithium, rare earth elements, nickel and cobalt.
    3. Geographical Spread: Activities expanded across Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Assam, Nagaland and Manipur.
    4. Manipur Projects: Recent exploration initiatives involve nickel, cobalt and chromium deposits.
    5. Long-Term Potential: Geological surveys have consistently pointed toward significant mineral prospects in the region.

    Why Does the ‘Resource Frontier’ Narrative Oversimplify the Northeast’s Reality?

    1. Frontier Concept: The term suggests empty spaces waiting for discovery, development, and extraction.
    2. Historical Assumption: Frontiers are often portrayed as regions awaiting integration into the national economy.
    3. Social Reality: The Northeast already contains complex social, political, cultural, and economic systems.
    4. Existing Institutions: Local governance structures, customary institutions, and traditional land-management systems are already deeply embedded.
    5. Identity and Memory: Land carries historical, cultural, and political significance beyond its economic value.
    6. Political Meaning: Resource extraction enters territories that already possess established histories and institutions.

    Why Are Land and Ownership Questions Central to Resource Development?

    1. Customary Land Systems: Many communities maintain long-standing customary ownership arrangements.
    2. Authority Structures: Land is closely linked to local political authority and governance.
    3. Identity Linkages: Ownership often forms part of community identity and historical memory.
    4. Representation Concerns: Resource decisions raise questions regarding who participates in decision-making.
    5. Trust Deficit: Development projects are frequently assessed through local perceptions of trust and inclusion.
    6. Beyond Economics: Land debates encompass social legitimacy, rights, and political recognition.

    How Do Existing Regional Conflicts Influence Resource Politics?

    1. Manipur Experience: Years of violence and displacement have intensified debates over land and territorial arrangements.
    2. Ecological Vulnerability: Communities increasingly raise concerns regarding environmental impacts of extraction.
    3. Ownership Disputes: Resource projects often intersect with unresolved questions of land rights.
    4. Political Inclusion: Communities evaluate projects through the lens of representation and participation.
    5. Conflict Sensitivity: Resource development in fragile regions may acquire meanings beyond economic development.

    Can Resource Development Create New Governance Challenges?

    1. Institutional Capacity: Extraction may proceed faster than institutions capable of managing its consequences.
    2. Uneven Development: The Northeast has historically experienced uneven infrastructure and economic growth.
    3. Connectivity Mismatch: Infrastructure projects have sometimes emerged without corresponding economic ecosystems.
    4. Participation Deficit: Strategic priorities have often overshadowed local participation and consultation.
    5. Social Risks: Rapid extraction may reproduce tensions if benefits are unevenly distributed.
    6. Governance Imperative: Resource development requires strong institutions, transparency, and social safeguards.

    Why Is Inclusion as Important as Extraction?

    1. Benefit Sharing: Local communities seek meaningful economic participation.
    2. Employment Opportunities: Resource projects can address long-standing developmental deficits.
    3. Political Legitimacy: Inclusive governance strengthens acceptance of projects.
    4. Community Ownership: Participation improves trust and reduces conflict.
    5. Sustainable Development: Long-term success depends on balancing strategic objectives with local aspirations.

    Conclusion

    The Northeast’s emergence as a critical mineral hub presents India with a strategic opportunity to strengthen resource security, support the energy transition, and reduce external dependence. However, the region cannot be treated merely as a repository of minerals waiting for extraction. Sustainable success will depend on reconciling national developmental priorities with local aspirations, customary land rights, ecological safeguards, and participatory governance. The real challenge is not only to extract resources from the Northeast, but to ensure that its people become equal stakeholders in the region’s transformation from a borderland to a strategic resource frontier.

  • Is a text AI-aided? Science, limits of detection tools 

    Why in the News?

    Allegations of AI-generated writing surfaced after three winners of the Commonwealth Short Story Prize were flagged by AI-detection tools, including Pangram, which classified one story as “100% AI-generated.” The controversy has reignited debate over whether AI detectors can reliably distinguish human-written content from AI-generated text. 

    Why is the Human vs AI Binary Becoming Obsolete?

    1. Collaboration Model: Increasingly, writing exists on a spectrum ranging from fully human-written to AI-assisted and heavily AI-generated.
    2. Hybrid Authorship: Writers often use AI for brainstorming, editing, structuring, or refining content.
    3. Future Challenge: Determining acceptable levels of AI assistance may become more important than identifying AI use itself.
    4. Example: The article cites categories such as lightly assisted, moderately assisted, and heavily assisted writing

    What is the machine learning foundation behind AI detection?

    1. Machine Learning (ML): Uses large datasets and statistical patterns to train systems to distinguish AI-generated text from human-written text.
    2. Training Data: Requires massive datasets containing both AI-generated and human-written content.
    3. Pattern Recognition: Learns recurring features such as vocabulary, sentence structure, punctuation, and stylistic patterns.
    4. Classification Function: Assigns probability scores indicating whether content appears AI-generated or human-authored.
    5. Example: Models may learn that AI systems frequently use formal verbs such as “delve”, “imperative”, or “devolve”.

    How are AI detectors trained to recognise AI-generated writing?

    1. Dataset Feeding: Large volumes of labelled human and AI text are fed into detection models.
    2. Statistical Learning: Models identify correlations and recurring linguistic features.
    3. Annotation-Based Training: Human annotators and data vendors classify examples to create training datasets.
    4. Behavioural Modelling: Since many frontier AI systems are trained on internet text, detectors attempt to identify common writing behaviours reproduced by these systems.
    5. Industry Dependence: Most training datasets are created by large technology firms, researchers, and annotation platforms.

    How is AI Detection Different from Plagiarism Detection?

    1. Plagiarism Detection: Identifies copied content by matching text with existing sources.
    2. AI Detection: Attempts to infer whether a text resembles AI-generated writing based on statistical patterns.
    3. Key Difference: AI detection relies on probability, whereas plagiarism detection relies on direct textual matches

    Linguistic signals that AI detectors rely upon

    Which ‘AI tells’ are commonly identified by detectors?

    1. Uncommon Vocabulary: Frequent use of words and phrases rarely encountered in ordinary conversation.
    2. Dash Usage: Excessive use of em dashes (—), often highlighted as a stylistic indicator.
    3. Structured Formatting: Frequent use of bullet points accompanied by descriptive headings.
    4. Neat Conclusions: Tendency to end content with highly organised summary paragraphs.
    5. Negative Parallelism: Repeated rhetorical structures such as “Not X, but Y.”
      1. Example: “These headphones are not just hearing devices, but sound-cancelling devices.”

    Why are these indicators not reliable proof of AI authorship?

    1. Overlap of Styles: Human writers can naturally employ the same stylistic features.
    2. Professional Writing Norms: Academic and journalistic writing often uses structured formatting and formal language.
    3. False Attribution Risk: Presence of a pattern does not establish authorship.
    4. Statistical Nature: Detection relies on probabilities rather than certainty.

    What are the inherent limitations of AI detectors?

    1. Low-Entropy Text: Text that is highly predictable and information-poor provides fewer linguistic signals, making AI detection less accurate.
      1. Example: Short responses, formulaic writing, or heavily edited text may be difficult to classify reliably
    2. Insufficient Signals: Short or highly edited content may not contain enough indicators for reliable classification.
    3. Probability-Based Judgments: Models provide likelihood estimates rather than definitive proof.
    4. Absence of Ground Truth: Detectors cannot directly observe whether a human or AI produced the text.
    5. Generalisation Problem: If a detector has not been specifically trained on outputs from a model such as Claude, it can only make an educated guess rather than a definitive classification.
    6. Implication: Detection tools struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI models.

    How does editing affect detection accuracy?

    1. Mixed Authorship Challenge: Human-written text edited by AI, or AI-generated text edited by humans, creates ambiguity.
    2. Slight Modifications: Even limited editing can alter detectable patterns.
    3. False Positives: Human-written content may be incorrectly flagged as AI-generated.
    4. False Negatives: AI-generated content may evade detection after revision.

    Reliability of current AI-detection technologies

    Can AI detectors provide definitive evidence of AI use?

    1. False Positive Rate: Pangram reports a false-positive rate of 0.01%, equivalent to 1 error per 10,000 cases.
    2. Independent Validation: The figure has reportedly been supported by some independent studies.
    3. Operational Reliability: Suitable for risk assessment but not for conclusive judgment.
    4. Expert Assessment: Developers acknowledge that models cannot achieve 100% accuracy.

    Why is perfect detection technologically difficult?

    1. Continuous AI Evolution: New language models constantly improve linguistic sophistication.
    2. Human-AI Convergence: AI-generated text increasingly resembles human writing.
    3. Spam Detection Analogy: Similar to email spam filters, detection systems reduce risk but cannot eliminate errors.
    4. Adaptive Behaviour: AI systems learn to avoid patterns commonly targeted by detectors.

    Implications for writers and publishers

    How can false positives affect genuine authors?

    1. Reputational Damage: Writers may face allegations despite producing original work.
    2. Creative Discouragement: Fear of misclassification may discourage experimentation in writing styles.
    3. Publishing Risks: Manuscripts may be rejected based on uncertain evidence.
    4. Trust Deficit: Excessive dependence on detection tools can undermine confidence in evaluation systems.

    What challenges do publishers face in the AI era?

    1. Verification Difficulty: Establishing authorship becomes increasingly complex.
    2. Transparency Requirements: Growing demand for disclosure regarding AI assistance.
    3. Editorial Standards: Need for clear policies defining acceptable AI use.
    4. Reader Trust: Publishers must maintain credibility while adapting to technological change.

    Should AI assistance be treated differently from AI authorship?

    1. Spectrum of Use: Writing may be fully human-written, AI-assisted, moderately AI-assisted, or heavily AI-generated
    2. Collaborative Creation: Many authors increasingly use AI for brainstorming, editing, and research assistance.
    3. Policy Challenge: Institutions must determine acceptable levels of AI involvement.
    4. Binary Classification Problem: Human-versus-AI framing often oversimplifies modern writing practices.

    How does the issue intersect with ethics and regulation?

    1. Accountability: Establishes responsibility for content creation and originality.
    2. Intellectual Property: Raises questions regarding ownership of AI-assisted works.
    3. Academic Integrity: Challenges traditional plagiarism and authorship norms.
    4. Due Process: Prevents punitive actions based solely on probabilistic detection tools.Transparency: Encourages disclosure-based approaches rather than purely detection-based approaches.

    Should Transparency Replace Detection as the Primary Governance Tool?

    1. Disclosure-Based Regulation: Encourages authors to declare AI use.
    2. Reduced False Accusations: Minimises harm caused by false positives.
    3. Practical Governance: More feasible than attempting perfect detection.
    4. Institutional Trust: Builds confidence among publishers, educators, and readers.

    Conclusion

    AI-detection tools can serve as useful indicators but not definitive arbiters of authorship. The future of AI governance in publishing and academia will depend less on achieving perfect detection and more on developing credible standards for disclosure, accountability, and ethical human-AI collaboration.

    Value Addition

    AI Governance Frameworks

    UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (2021)

    1. Promotes transparency, accountability, fairness, and human oversight.
    2. Calls for responsible deployment of AI technologies.

    OECD AI Principles

    1. Supports trustworthy AI.
    2. Emphasises explainability and human-centric design.

    G7 Hiroshima AI Process

    1. Develops international guardrails for advanced AI systems.
    2. Focuses on safety, transparency, and risk management.

    EU AI Act

    1. Adopts a risk-based regulatory framework.
    2. Imposes transparency obligations for certain AI applications.

    AI and India

    IndiaAI Mission

    1. Strengthens domestic AI capabilities.
    2. Supports compute infrastructure, datasets, innovation, and skill development.

    Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

    1. Provides safeguards for personal data used in AI ecosystems.

    National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence

    1. Identifies AI applications in education, healthcare, agriculture, smart mobility, and governance.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of AI in healthcare?

    Linkage: The PYQ examines the opportunities and challenges associated with Artificial Intelligence and its growing societal impact. The article highlights the limitations of AI systems and the need for transparency, accountability, and responsible AI governance.