Q.2 The twin dangers that would inflict irreparable damage to the Indian judiciary, are the lack of diversity and the secrecy around the appointment of judges. Comment.

Mentor’s comment-
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
k.s.nandhini
k.s.nandhini
21 days ago

Razorpay: I8GfoK9Ze5ifgl

Screenshot_2022-01-02-14-04-59-721_com.miui.gallery.jpg
Screenshot_2022-01-02-14-05-02-135_com.miui.gallery.jpg
Staff @CD
Editor
5 days ago
Reply to  k.s.nandhini

Nandhini

Introduction is good.
Lack of diversity part is well addressed. Mention of data is good, however there have been judges from Dalit/OBC communities before 2020, so you can avoid that. Try to avoid putting wrong data.
In next part, also mention about flaws in the appointment process( judges appointing judges, can mention briefly third judges case, strike down of NJAC etc)
Other points are good.
Way forward and conclusion is fine.
Keep writing. 🙂

Marks
5
muskan garg
muskan garg
21 days ago

@staff

Kaagaz_20220102_164119400227-3.jpg
Kaagaz_20220102_164119400227-4.jpg
Staff @CD
Editor
5 days ago
Reply to  muskan garg

Muskan

Good attempt.
Introduction can be a bit more balanced, saying that SC has failed is a bit too harsh.
Next part about diversity is good, you can also include low representation from minority communities, LGBTQ etc
In appointment process,you can mention third judges case in first point. Explanation is fine, you have covered most points.
Way forward and conclusion is good.
Keep practicing. 🙂

Marks
6
project _osiris
project _osiris
20 days ago

Id000048618

IMG-20220103-WA0007.jpg
IMG-20220103-WA0008.jpg
Staff @CD
Editor
5 days ago

Hello

Introduction is fine. After that you have broadly mentioned the issues.
However, you can make two sub sections- one on lack of diversity, other on flaws in appointment process and address them in a more comprehensive manner.
In lack of diversity, other than women also mention lack of judges from backward communities, minorities, LGBTQ group etc
Use data to substantiate your arguments.
In next part about appointment process, talk about judges appointing judges in collegium system, allegations of nepotism, strike down of NJAC etc
Way forward is fine.
Try to write a concluding statement.
Keep practicing. 🙂

Marks
3