Introduction

India entered 2025 with expectations of active diplomacy backed by political continuity and economic scale. Planned bilateral visits, trade negotiations, and regional outreach were intended to reposition India amid global flux. However, the year unfolded with mounting challenges across economic security, energy security, global strategic stability, and regional security, forcing India into reactive diplomacy rather than agenda-setting leadership.

Did India’s Economic and Energy Security Strategy Falter in 2025?

1. Tariff escalation by the U.S.: Imposition of a 25% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods affected labour-intensive sectors such as apparel, gems and jewellery, and seafood.
2. Trade vulnerability exposure: Actions reversed expectations of a smooth India-U.S. reset under Trump’s second term.
3. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) withdrawal legacy: Continued absence of preferential market access compounded export stress.
4. Energy sanctions pressure: U.S. surcharge on Russian oil imports raised costs, making India the most heavily tariffed Russian oil buyer.
5. Investment uncertainty: Factory-level job losses and delayed contracts reflected tangible economic impact.
6. FTA stagnation: Despite negotiations with the U.K., Oman, and New Zealand, major agreements with the U.S. and EU remained unsigned.

Did China Engagement Deliver Strategic Stability?

1. Symbolic diplomatic engagement: High-profile Modi-Xi interactions restored optics but not substance.
2. Unresolved security guarantees: No rollback of Chinese military deployments or confidence-building mechanisms at the LAC.
3. Economic barriers intact: Restrictions on Chinese investment and trade regulations remained unchanged.
4. Consular incident escalation: Prolonged detention of an Indian airline passenger in Shanghai raised diplomatic credibility concerns.
5. Strategic ambiguity persistence: Engagement failed to translate into operational de-escalation.

Has India’s Russia Policy Reached Strategic Limits?

1. Energy dependence peak: Russian oil imports rose to $52 billion after sanctions eased.
2. Renewed sanctions pressure: New U.S. actions revived uncertainty over import sustainability.
3. Summit outcome gap: India-Russia summit ended without major agreements in defence, nuclear energy, or space cooperation.
4. Reputational costs: Alignment dilemmas increased amid geopolitical polarisation.
5. Strategic autonomy strain: Balancing Western pressure and Eurasian partnerships became costlier.

Is Global Strategic Space Shrinking for India?

1. Shift in U.S. strategic framing: 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy adopted a softer but ambiguous stance on China and Russia.
2. Reduced India emphasis: India’s role articulated mainly within Indo-Pacific security, not as a global strategic partner.
3. G-2 speculation: Trump’s references to Xi Jinping heightened concerns over marginalisation.
4. Rules-based order erosion: Gaza and Ukraine ceasefire proposals weakened accountability norms.
5. China’s governance push: Beijing’s Global Governance framework challenged existing international architectures.

Did Regional Security Challenges Expose Diplomatic Gaps?

1. Pahalgam terror attack: April attack demonstrated continued cross-border terrorist capability.
2. Operation Sindoor limitations: Militarily effective retaliation lacked sustained diplomatic backing.
3. Limited international support: Few countries openly endorsed India’s response.
4. Neighbourhood volatility: Political instability in Bangladesh and Nepal reduced predictability.
5. Pakistan dynamics: Rise of ultra-hardline leadership constrained crisis management options.

Has India’s Neighbourhood Policy Lost Momentum?

1. Bangladesh reversal: Post-protest regime change reversed engagement gains.
2. Nepal instability: Fragile transitional government limited cooperation.
3. Myanmar elections: India engaged with junta while also reaching out to deposed leadership without results.
4. Human rights dilemma: Calls for democratic values conflicted with strategic silence.
5. Reduced influence: India appeared reactive rather than agenda-shaping in South Asia.

What Lessons Does 2025 Offer for India’s Foreign Policy?

1. Limits of performative diplomacy: Summits and symbolism failed to deliver strategic gains.
2. Credibility deficit risk: Silence on sensitive issues weakened diplomatic trust.
3. Normative inconsistency: External democracy advocacy clashed with internal minority concerns.
4. Narrative recalibration: Shift from Vishwaguru to Vishwamitra lacked operational clarity.
5. Strategic self-reflection: Acknowledging double standards emerged as a policy necessity.

Conclusion

India’s foreign policy experience in 2025 underscores a widening gap between diplomatic ambition and strategic delivery. Economic coercion, unresolved security challenges, neighbourhood volatility, and shrinking multilateral space revealed the limits of symbolism-driven diplomacy. The year demonstrates that strategic autonomy cannot be sustained through optics alone and requires consistency, credibility, and outcome-oriented engagement. Recalibrating foreign policy around economic resilience, principled regional leadership, and realistic power alignment will be essential for restoring India’s influence in an increasingly transactional global order.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now