Economic Indicators and Various Reports On It- GDP, FD, EODB, WIR etc

The Need for a New Economic Paradigm in India


From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: Global Solutions Summit

Mains level: Global economic and political divisions, Needs for new economic paradigm


Central Idea

  • In the pursuit of communal and caste politics, India’s focus on the economy has been overshadowed. However, the growing divide among classes is silently reshaping the Indian electorate, with more than 50% of the population being left behind by economic growth. It is essential to address the economic concerns of all citizens, regardless of caste and religion, and embrace a new paradigm of economics.

The Global Solutions Summit

  • Global Solutions Summit, 2023 held at Berlin.
  • The theme at the Global Solutions Summit this year, was a new paradigm for the economy.
  • Its backdrop was the rising tensions in the east between the United States and China, and the war in the west between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Russia
  • The dominant G-7 countries, representing only 15% of the world’s population, exert undemocratic pressure on other nations, raising concerns about global democracy.
  • The think tanks of the G-20 and other countries at the summit called attention to global problems of climate change, increasing economic inequalities within and among countries, and the effects of the financial and trade sanctions imposed by the most powerful nation, which are affecting the other 85% most of all.

Prevalence of Political and economic divisions in societies worldwide

Political Divisions

  • Ideological divisions: Political ideologies such as conservatism, liberalism, socialism, and populism can create stark divisions in society, with contrasting views on the role of government, individual rights, and social policies.
  • Partisan politics: Political parties and their supporters often exhibit deep divisions, especially during elections and policy debates, based on party affiliations, policy preferences, and competing interests.
  • Identity politics: Divisions along the lines of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, and other social identities can shape political landscapes, with groups advocating for their specific interests and rights.
  • Regional disparities: Regional differences in economic development, cultural norms, and historical grievances can lead to political divisions, with demands for greater autonomy or regional representation.

Economic Divisions

  • Income inequality: The unequal distribution of wealth and income can create divisions between the rich and the poor, with implications for access to resources, opportunities, and social mobility.
  • Urban-rural divide: Disparities between urban and rural areas in terms of economic opportunities, infrastructure, and public services can lead to economic divisions and political differences.
  • Global economic disparities: The divide between developed and developing countries, as well as within countries, contributes to economic divisions, with implications for trade, investment, and development policies.
  • Labour market divisions: Differences in employment opportunities, wages, and working conditions can create divisions between different sectors of the economy, such as skilled and unskilled workers or formal and informal sectors.

Evolution of Economic Systems

  • Traditional Economy: In traditional economies, production is based on customs, traditions, and barter systems. It typically revolves around subsistence agriculture, hunting, gathering, and small-scale artisanal activities. This system is prevalent in agrarian and indigenous societies.
  • Command Economy: Command economies emerged with the rise of centralized governments and planned economies. The state assumes control over the means of production, distribution, and resource allocation. Central planning and government directives determine economic activities and resource allocation. The Soviet Union under communism is an example of a command economy.
  • Market Economy: Market economies are characterized by decentralized decision-making and the interaction of supply and demand forces in determining prices, resource allocation, and production decisions. Private ownership of property, individual freedom, and competition play crucial roles. Free-market capitalism, as advocated by Adam Smith, is a key model of a market economy.
  • Mixed Economy: Most modern economies are mixed economies that combine elements of both market and command systems. In a mixed economy, the government intervenes to regulate markets, provide public goods and services, and address market failures. The extent of government intervention varies across countries and can range from social welfare programs to industrial regulations.
  • Socialist Economy: Socialist economies emphasize social ownership and collective decision-making in economic activities. The means of production are typically owned by the state or workers’ collectives. The aim is to reduce inequality and ensure equitable distribution of resources. Examples include the former Soviet Union and China under Mao Zedong.
  • Market Socialism: Market socialism blends elements of market economies with socialist principles. It allows for private ownership and market mechanisms but aims to maintain social equity through state intervention, wealth redistribution, and public ownership of key industries. Some Scandinavian countries, such as Sweden and Norway, incorporate aspects of market socialism.
  • Post-Industrial Economy: The post-industrial economy is characterized by a shift from manufacturing and heavy industry to service-based industries, information technology, and knowledge-based sectors. It is driven by innovation, technological advancements, and the growing importance of intellectual capital.

Need to reform the GDP-centric model

  • Inadequate Measure of Well-being: GDP (Gross Domestic Product) measures the monetary value of all final goods and services produced within a country’s borders. However, it fails to capture important aspects of well-being, such as the distribution of wealth, social indicators, environmental sustainability, and quality of life.
  • Overemphasis on Economic Growth: The GDP-centric model places excessive focus on economic growth as the primary indicator of success. While economic growth is important, it should not be the sole measure of a nation’s progress.
  • Ignoring Income Inequality: GDP growth does not necessarily translate into equitable distribution of wealth and income. It often perpetuates income inequalities, as the benefits of growth may disproportionately accrue to a few privileged individuals or groups.
  • Unsustainable Resource Consumption: The GDP-centric model often encourages unsustainable patterns of resource consumption and production. It fails to account for the environmental costs and depletion of natural resources associated with economic activities.
  • Neglecting Non-Monetary Factors: The GDP-centric approach overlooks non-monetary factors that contribute to overall well-being, such as health, education, social capital, cultural heritage, and quality of life. These factors are critical for human development and should be considered alongside economic indicators to provide a comprehensive assessment of progress.
  • Inaccurate Reflection of Informal Economy: The GDP-centric model struggles to capture the contributions of the informal economy, which often represents a significant portion of economic activity in many countries. Informal sector workers and their economic contributions remain largely unaccounted for in traditional GDP calculations.
  • Need for Alternative Metrics: There is a growing need for alternative metrics and indicators that capture a broader range of factors affecting well-being, such as the Human Development Index (HDI), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and well-being indices. These metrics consider social, environmental, and economic dimensions to provide a more holistic understanding of progress.

Need for a New Economic Paradigm in India

  • Rising Inequality: India faces significant income and wealth inequalities, with a large portion of the population left behind by economic growth. The current economic system has failed to adequately address these inequalities and provide equal opportunities for all citizens.
  • Unemployment and Job Creation: India has been grappling with high unemployment rates and a lack of sufficient job opportunities, especially for its burgeoning youth population. The existing economic model needs to be reimagined to prioritize job creation, skill development, and entrepreneurship to harness the demographic dividend effectively.
  • Sustainable Development: Environmental degradation, climate change, and resource depletion are pressing challenges for India. A new economic paradigm should prioritize sustainability and integrate environmental considerations into economic decision-making.
  • Social Welfare and Human Development: While economic growth is essential, it must be accompanied by investments in social welfare and human development. Access to quality education, healthcare, housing, and social security are critical for the well-being of citizens. A new economic paradigm should prioritize human development indicators alongside economic indicators to ensure the holistic development of the population.
  • Agricultural Distress: India’s agricultural sector faces various challenges, including farmer distress, low productivity, and lack of market access. The new economic paradigm should address these issues by promoting sustainable agriculture, improving rural infrastructure, enhancing farmers’ income, and ensuring food security.
  • Digital Transformation and Innovation: India is experiencing a digital revolution, with rapid technological advancements and a growing digital economy. The new economic paradigm should leverage the potential of digital transformation and innovation to drive inclusive growth, improve governance, and enhance competitiveness in the global economy.
  • Governance and Transparency: Enhancing governance, promoting transparency, and curbing corruption are essential for sustainable economic development.


  • India urgently needs a new economic paradigm that addresses the concerns of its citizens. The focus should shift towards inclusivity and social justice, rather than perpetuating economic inequalities. Reforms must prioritize the well-being of all, and economists should revaluate their current models to create a more equitable and sustainable future for India.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

Also read:

Assessing the Indian Economy: A Fuzzy Picture with Bright Spots

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship New Batch Launch
💥Mentorship New Batch Launch