Introduction

The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA) represents a strategic pivot in India’s trade policy, prioritising bilateral, region-specific agreements over multilateral trade negotiations. Beyond tariff liberalisation, the agreement integrates investment, labour mobility, MSME participation, and services trade, positioning India within the Indo-Pacific economic architecture while safeguarding sensitive domestic sectors.

Why in the News?

India and New Zealand concluded a FTA in December, under which New Zealand will grant zero-duty access to 100% of India’s exports, while India will eliminate tariffs on 95% of imports from New Zealand, with 57% becoming duty-free from day one. New Zealand has also committed $20 billion in FDI by 2030, making this one of India’s most comprehensive trade agreements in recent years. The agreement is significant as it is India’s third FTA in one year, following deals with the UK and Oman. This contrasts sharply with stalled negotiations with the US and slow progress with the EU.

What are the key trade provisions of the FTA?

1. Zero-duty access: Grants New Zealand zero-duty access to 100% of India’s exports, enhancing competitiveness across merchandise sectors.
2. Tariff liberalisation: Eliminates tariffs on 95% of Indian imports from New Zealand, with 57% of products duty-free from the first day.
3. Merchandise trade scale: Covers bilateral trade currently valued at $1.3 billion, with scope for expansion through lower trade barriers.

What investment commitments has New Zealand made?

1. Foreign Direct Investment: Commits $20 billion in FDI by 2030, spread over 15 years.
2. Clawback safeguards: Introduces firm clawback mechanisms if investment milestones are not met.
3. Sectoral focus: Targets skill mobility, services, and employment generation across 18 sectors.

How does the FTA benefit India’s services and labour mobility?

1. Professional mobility: Enables India to supply skilled professionals in IT, engineering, yoga instruction, music education, healthcare, education, and construction.
2. Youth opportunities: Facilitates work permits up to 20 hours per week during study and extended post-study work visas.
3. Diaspora leverage: Builds on the 5% Indian-origin population in New Zealand, strengthening migration and professional linkages.

Which sectors has India deliberately kept outside the agreement?

1. Sensitive agriculture: Excludes dairy and agricultural products such as milk, cheese, cream, butter, yoghurt, onions, sugar, edible oils, spices, and nuts.
2. Domestic protection: Shields Indian farmers, pastoral livelihoods, and edible oil producers from import competition.
3. Political economy rationale: Addresses concerns related to farmer incomes and food security.

How does the agreement support MSMEs and labour-intensive sectors?

1. MSME integration: Expands opportunities for MSMEs in textiles, apparel, leather footwear, gems and jewellery, engineering goods, and processed foods.
2. Supply chain access: Facilitates entry into higher-income Oceanian markets such as Australia and the Pacific.
3. Employment impact: Strengthens labour-intensive manufacturing through assured market access.

Why is India accelerating FTAs with select partners?

1. Trade diversification: Reduces dependence on the US, EU, and China amid tariff volatility.
2. Geopolitical alignment: Reinforces Indo-Pacific partnerships through economic engagement.
3. Negotiation flexibility: Enables region-specific commitments beyond WTO constraints.
4. Policy coherence: Aligns with Make in India, export competitiveness, and MSME growth objectives.

What criticisms have emerged against the FTA?

1. Agriculture exclusion: Faces criticism in New Zealand for excluding dairy and agriculture, a key export sector.
2. Political opposition: Opposition parties in New Zealand argue the deal lacks fairness.
3. Indian concerns: Indian FTAs have been criticised for widening trade deficits, though such risks are moderated here through sectoral exclusions.

What is the way forward identified in the article?

1. Domestic competitiveness: Emphasises the need to improve quality standards, productivity, and cost efficiency.
2. Rules of origin: Calls for strong safeguards to prevent trade diversion.
3. MSME support: Requires targeted capacity building to ensure MSMEs benefit.
4. Implementation focus: Success hinges on effective execution rather than treaty signing.

Conclusion

The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement marks a calibrated shift in India’s trade and foreign policy, where economic openness is balanced with strategic caution. By securing near-total market access, long-term FDI commitments, and mobility for skilled services, while insulating sensitive agricultural sectors, India has signalled a move towards outcome-oriented, interest-based bilateralism. The agreement’s true significance lies not merely in tariff reductions, but in its role as a template for India’s future trade engagements in a fragmented global order, where trade agreements increasingly serve as instruments of economic resilience, geopolitical alignment, and domestic capacity-building.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2024] Critically analyse India’s evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics.

Linkage: The India-New Zealand FTA reflects India’s broader strategy of strengthening bilateral economic partnerships to secure strategic space in the Indo-Pacific. Similar to India’s engagement with CARs, the agreement integrates trade, investment, and geopolitical alignment.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now