💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Search results for: “”

  • 8th Nov| Daily Answer Writing Enhancement

    Topics for Today’s questions:

    GS-1           Population and associated issues

    GS-2           Constitution of India- historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.

    GS-3          Government Budgeting.

    GS-4          Aptitude and foundational values for Civil Service, integrity, impartiality and non-partisanship, objectivity, dedication to public service, empathy, tolerance and compassion towards the weaker sections.

    Question 1)

     

    Q.1 Conducting a caste census is important for better targeting of welfare services; however, such an exercise is fraught with challenges to social harmony and risks polarization. Discuss. (15 Marks)

     

    Question 2)

    Q.2 Do you think time has come for the implementation of Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the country? What are the arguments against it? (10 Marks)

    Question 3)

    Q.3 Instances have come to light where states with highest debt-to-GDP levels take fiscally profligate actions. In this regard, analyse how fiscal devolution is causing a lack of state-level fiscal responsibility and what needs to be done to improve it? (10 Marks)

    Question 4)  

    Q.4 Discussing the main challenges in upholding highest ethical standards in civil services, suggest effective measures to overcome such challenges. (10 Marks)

     

    HOW TO ATTEMPT ANSWERS IN DAILY ANSWER WRITING ENHANCEMENT(AWE)?

    1. Daily 4 questions from General studies 1, 2, 3, and 4 will be provided to you.

    2. A Mentor’s Comment will be available for all answers. This can be used as a guidance tool but we encourage you to write original answers.

    3. You can write your answer on an A4 sheet and scan/click pictures of the same.

    4.  Upload the scanned answer in the comment section of the same question.

    5. Along with the scanned answer, please share your Razor payment ID, so that paid members are given priority.

    6. If you upload the answer on the same day like the answer of 11th  February is uploaded on 11th February then your answer will be checked within 72 hours. Also, reviews will be in the order of submission- First come first serve basis

    7. If you are writing answers late, for example, 11th February is uploaded on 13th February , then these answers will be evaluated as per the mentor’s schedule.

    8. We encourage you to write answers on the same day. However, if you are uploading an answer late then tag the mentor like @Staff so that the mentor is notified about your answer.

    *In case your answer is not reviewed, reply to your answer saying *NOT CHECKED*. 

    1. For the philosophy of AWE and payment: 

  • Declining Consumer Demand and Reluctant Investors

    Consumer Demand

    Context

    • In September, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman was anguished that industry was holding back from investing in manufacturing despite a significant cut in corporate tax rates in 2019.

    Analyzing the corporate Investment since the pandemic

    • Less investment is not the result of losses: The slowdown in corporate investment did not happen because companies were making losses.
    • More profit but less investments by corporates: In fact, private companies, boosted by considerable tax cuts, made windfall profits. A State Bank of India analysis shows that tax cuts contributed 19% to the top line of companies during the pandemic. But this did not result in increased investments.
    • Dividends to shareholders: Before the pandemic, instead of investing in themselves, companies chose to reward shareholders with higher dividends.
    • Investment in equity and debt instead of Infrastructure: During the pandemic, they did not use the profits for paying out dividends; they retained a big chunk of the profits. However, instead of investing in buildings, plants and machinery, they invested in equity shares and debt instruments.
    • Corporate cited the slowdown in demand as reason for less investment: So, both before and after the outbreak, they shied away from capital investments. The hesitancy to invest can be explained by a slowdown in the demand side of the economy.
    • Corporates didn’t invest in long term returns sectors: Consumer demand started to decline the year before the pandemic and worsened after the COVID19 outbreak. This forced companies to use the increased profits to decrease their debts, pay dividends and invest in financial instruments instead of increasing productivity by making capital investments.

    Consumer Demand

    What is The current consumer’s demand situation?

    • Average Consumer sentiment index: Private companies invest when they are able to estimate profits, and that comes from demand. The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy’s (CMIE) consumer sentiment index is still below pre-pandemic levels but is far higher than what was seen 12-18 months ago.
    • Buoyant Aggregate demand: RBI’s Monetary policy report dated September 30 says, Data for Q2 (ended Sept) indicate that aggregate demand remained buoyant, supported by the ongoing recovery in private consumption and investment demand. It shows that seasonally adjusted capacity utilization rose to 74.3% in Q1 the highest in the last three years.
    • High household savings: Along with household savings intentions remaining high, might hold the key to the investment cycle kicking in.

    Consumer Demand

    Statistic on demand and investment

    • New investment projects: The new investment projects announced as a % of GDP, since FY18, the share has remained below the 5% mark, compared to over 9% between FY05 and FY22.
    • Collection of corporate tax decreased: Corporate tax and income tax collected in India as a % of GDP after the cut in 2019, the share of corporate tax declined dramatically, while the share of income tax gradually increased.
    • Double burden on tax payers: The shift in tax burden from the corporates to the people came at a time of job losses and reduced income levels. This pushed more people into poverty.
    • Corporate profit increased after tax cut: Profit after tax earned by non-financial private companies in ₹ trillion after the tax cut, the profits of these companies rose to ₹4-5 trillion in the last two financial years from ₹1-2 trillion in many of the previous periods.
    • Increase and decrease in dividend to shareholders: Dividends paid by non-financial private companies as a share of profits earned after tax, Payouts to shareholders surged in FY20, the year before the pandemic, but reduced in the following years.
    • Profit retention increased: Retained profits as a % of profit after tax surged to 63% in FY22 the highest in a decade (limited companies were analyzed in FY22, so data are provisional).
    • Profits are invested in equities: In FY21, the debt-to-equity ratio came down to 0.86 the lowest in at least three decades. In FY22 (provisional data), it came down further to 0.71.
    • Year on year decline in capital investment: Year on year change in the investments of non-financial private companies in fixed assets such as buildings, plants, machinery, transport and infrastructure have declined in recent years. But the year on year change in investments in financial instruments such as equity, debt and mutual funds have surged.

    Consumer Demand

    Conclusion

    • Corporates are holding their pockets in hope of demand rise in future. However, this affects the post-pandemic recovery of economy. IMF and RBI was right to revise their growth forecast this year. Unequal recovery of economy have certainly affected the income levels of middle class. Government has taken a lot of step on supply side (corporate side and banking reform) but no intervention in revival of demand.

    Mains Question

    QAnalyze the corporate investment pattern before and after the pandemic? What are the reasons for decline in corporate investment in fixed assets in economy since the pandemic?

    Click and Get your FREE copy of Current Affairs Micro notes

     

  • India’s role in Russia-Ukraine war

    Ukraine war

    Context

    • As external affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar arrives in Russia this week for a bilateral visit, there is growing international interest in the potential Indian diplomatic contribution to ending the tragic war in Ukraine which is now in the ninth month and has shaken the world to its core.

    The story of Ukraine’s war and India’s Strategy so far

    • India’s balanced approach: India has reasons to be satisfied that there is a better appreciation of its position on Ukraine in the Western public discourse. In the last few months, the Western media and think tanks had been relentless in their criticism of the Indian approach to the crisis as lacking moral and strategic clarity in the face of Russia’s unprovoked aggression.
    • India didn’t criticize Russian nor endorse Russian aggression: Through the last nine months, Delhi was reluctant to explicitly criticize Russian aggression against Ukraine and insisted on a dialogue between the warring parties. At the same time, India refused to endorse Russian aggression, underlined the importance of respecting the United Nations Charter, emphasized the inviolability of territorial sovereignty, warned against the use of nuclear weapons, and sought to draw at tension to the economic impact of the war on the “Global South”.
    • America showed sensitivity to India’s position: In the Biden administration there was a measure of understanding of where Delhi was coming from and India’s long-standing equities in the relationship with Russia and the constraints it imposed on India. Official Washington never let the heat of the Ukraine crisis in Europe undermine the longer-term American imperative of engaging India to stabilize the Indo-Pacific. The same can’t be said about Europe, but then the continent was right in the middle of the gravest conflict since the Second World War. The European trauma from a shattered peace is real.
    • India’s role in grain shipment and nuclear power station: Recent reports in the US media recount the Indian diplomatic contribution at a few critical moments in the nine-month-long war-in helping overcome issues over the grain shipment deal from Ukraine and in reducing the growing risks of the war targeting the nuclear power station at Zaporizhzhia in eastern Ukraine.

    Ukraine war

    Can India take on a larger diplomatic role?

    • India’s role is limited: Good relations with Moscow and Washington do put South Block in an interesting position. But India is not the only channel of communication between the US and Russia. Nor are Washington and Moscow totally reliant on third parties.

    Efforts to end war by west and Russia

    • Communications between the defence ministers: The defence ministers of the two countries have frequently talked to each other reminding each other of their redlines in the war. Meanwhile, the onset of winter will increasingly limit the possibilities for military operations in Ukraine and would give a chance to both sides to pause, regroup and rethink their strategy and tactics.
    • Putin’s strategy: Putin’s current focus on destroying the Ukrainian cities and the occasional threat to use nuclear weapons underline Russia’s weakness in the Ukraine war rather than strength. From a military perspective, there is no easy way for Russia to secure a “victory” in this war.
    • Limitations of Putin: Putin might have no option but to consider an honorable draw that will save his political face and secure some territorial gains in Ukraine. Can the same be said about the other Vladimir? (The Russians and Ukrainians both claim Vladimir or Volodymyr the Great of the 10th century as the founder of their nations).
    • Ukraine’s strategy: Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has led the country’s fight against Russian aggression with impressive determination. Unlike the Russian troops, the Ukrainian forces are trying to save their nation against aggression and have inflicted significant military defeats on the Russians.
    • Limitations of Ukraine: There is a question, can Zelenskyy succeed in liberating all territories occupied by Russia, including Crimea which Russia took by force in 2014? Zelenskyy might like to fight on until he realizes that goal, but there are second thoughts in the Western coalition that is backing him.
    • Western effort of sanctions on Russia: The West had bet that the massive sanctions it imposed after Moscow launched its war against Ukraine would bring the Russian economy to its knees. But Russia is still standing and the costs of the sanctions are beginning to have major effects on Western societies.
    • Rising energy cost and Ineffectiveness of sanctions: As the economic and energy costs of the war mount, there is growing political support in Europe for a quick resolution of the conflict. In the US, which has emerged as the main supporter of Ukraine, there are both Republicans and Democrats who are questioning the current American “blank cheque” for Ukraine. If the Republicans do well as they are expected to in this week’s midterm elections to the US Congress, the internal polarization could sharpen and cast a shadow over American foreign policy, including the Ukraine strategy.
    • USA is repairing its strategy: Although these developments need not be fatal to US strategy, Washington is beginning to recalibrate. In important private advice to Kyiv last week, Washington called for greater flexibility in Zelenskyy’s approach to negotiations with Putin.

    Ukraine war

    Conclusion

    • Ending the war in Ukraine is very crucial as global economy especially western, facing energy and inflation crisis. India has a limited impact as mediator in ending the war in Ukraine. West and Russia need to realise their futile pursuit of complete victory is hurting them more. Sooner the war ends better for world.

    Mains Question

    Q. What role India can play as mediator in Ukraine war? What are efforts by Russia and Western nations to end the war?

    Click and Get your FREE copy of Current Affairs Micro notes

  • (Watch LIVE) Anthropology Optional Webinar | Strategy and approach for scoring 300+ in UPSC 2023-24 Anthro optional | With IPS Shubham and Minakshi ma’am

    (Watch LIVE) Anthropology Optional Webinar | Strategy and approach for scoring 300+ in UPSC 2023-24 Anthro optional | With IPS Shubham and Minakshi ma’am

    8th Nov 2022, 1 pm IPS Shubham and Minakshi ma’am will be LIVE | Register below for the Anthropology webinar | Post-registration we will share toppers’ Anthro notes and will add to Anthro Telegram group


    Anthropology is one of the most popular and high-scoring optional subjects for UPSC CSE. Rankers like AIR 1, Anudeep Durishetty have been taking this optional and clearing the exam.

    Short and relatively static syllabus, easily covered and comprehended by both science and non-science grad students, and the time it takes to cover the syllabus (less than 3 months) make it a great optional.

    However, there are various challenges that are faced by students.

    1. Guidance is limited unlike other optionals like PSIR, geography, history, sociology etc.
    2. Conceptual clarity and command over the answer writing are required, just mugging up will not help to score marks in this optional. This is ignored by aspirants.
    3. Personalized mentoring is not available in this optional that’s why aspirants are facing difficulties with their answer writing and most of the time complete (ineffectively and insufficiently) the syllabus by self-studies.

    IPS Shubham sir and Minakshi ma’am will be taking up Anthropology webinar

    Through this webinar, we will clear all the doubts and guiding you in a strategic manner.


    Objectives of the special masterclass-webinar: 

    1. Strategy and a basic plan to complete the entire anthropology optional syllabus within 3 months.
    2. Trend analysis of Anthropology Optional over 5 years in UPSC CSE.
    3. Precise and most relevant booklist and sources.
    4. How to make notes and use current affairs?
    5. How Anthropology optional syllabus can be used for GS and Essay part of UPSC prep?
    6. How optional answer writing is different from GS answer writing?
    7. How to structure the anthropology optional preparation and answers?
    8. Anthropology optional previous year questions, discussion and their model answers.
    9. Q and A with aspirants.

    Do and don’t of ethics paper. The most common mistakes will also be discussed.



    What The Hindu mentioned about Civilsdaily Mentorship

    The Hindu has acknowledged the success rate of CD’s Smash mains Mentorship

    Quora Digests:

    Register below for the Anthropology webinar | Post-registration we will share toppers’ Anthro notes and will add to Anthro Telegram group

  • New Category of Reservation, EWS

    Reservation

    Context

    • The Supreme Court has now upheld the validity of the 103rd constitutional amendment. For instance, economic criterion was provided for this new category of affirmative action.

    What is the verdict of supreme court?

    • SC/ST Excluded in new clause: The Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and non-creamy layer Other Backward Classes were excluded from the newly inserted clauses of Article 15(4) and 16(4).
    • The ceiling of 50 per cent reservation was breached: The cap of 50% is breached and the individual rather than the group became the basis of backwardness.

    Reservation

    Do you know?

    • Indra Sawhney Vs. Union of India -Issued 50% Cap on Caste-based reservation: In the case the Supreme Court held that reservation for beneficiaries should not exceed 50% of India’s population. It was this case that issued a cap limit on caste-based reservations.

    The Backgrounder: What are concerns over the reservation verdicts so far?

    • Judiciary is reluctant supporter of reservation: A closer look at the judicial response to reservation policies from Dorairajan (1951) to MR Balaji (1963) to Indra Sawhney (1992) to M Nagaraj (2006) shows that the Indian judiciary has not been quite supportive of such policies.
    • New conditions for new category of reservation: In many cases, it created new conditions in the implementation of such policies by introducing several exclusions/doctrines/rules etc. In fact, Parliament had to amend the Constitution through the 77th amendment to overturn Indra Sawhney judgment against reservation in promotions.
    • Reservation in promotion cancelled: The 85th constitutional amendment was passed to undo the Virpal Singh Chauhan (1995) and Ajit Singh (1999) judgments that had introduced the “catch up rule” under which general candidates, who are promoted after SC/ST candidates, will regain their seniority over earlier promoted SC/ST candidates.
    • Concerns about dilution of merit: Basically, Indian courts have been emphasising merit and have been concerned about the dilution of “merit”. In several reservation matters, the courts have been more interested in protecting the interests of general categories.
    • 90% population is eligible under EWS: As a matter of fact, the EWS reservation is for the erstwhile general candidates: The Rs 8-lakh family income provision covers over 90 per cent of our population.

    Reservation

    What is the significance of this recent Judgement?

    • New category on economic basis: The majority verdict is right in saying that though reservation on economic basis is new it has not made the Constitution unrecognizable. Justice Trivedi said the legislature best understands the needs of the people. The majority does have a point in holding that the basic structure doctrine does not bind Parliament from laying down the economic criterion. Such a basis does not impinge on the equality code of the Constitution.
    • Poverty as an injustice: Justice Maheshwari has quoted a number of judgments in which poverty was mentioned as a fundamental source backwardness. Justice Maheshwari held that poverty is not merely a stage of stagnation but a point of regression.
    • Identity of constitution will not change: India’s affirmative action programme far was catering to only historical injustices and social backwardness. The extension of this benefit to others, in the opinion of Justice Maheshwari, won’t change the identity of the Constitution.
    • Towards the justice: The court observed that the new reservation is in furtherance of the Preamble’s goal of achieving justice – social, economic and political.
    • Consistent with FR’s and DPSP’s: The other judges were also of the view that any provision that is consistent with fundamental rights and directive principles cannot be held to be in the teeth of the basic structure doctrine.
    • Constitutional amendment upheld: Constitutional amendments are rarely struck down since this can be done only on the narrow ground of the amendment being violative of the basic structure of the Constitution. Since 1973, when the basic structure doctrine was propounded, over 70 amendments had been passed but only five have so far been struck down. The NJAC was the last one in 2016.

    Reservation

    Critical analysis of judgement

    • Goes to Individual and not group reservation: Economic disadvantage is individual, unlike caste discrimination. It carries no social stigma. The Court has gone against the earlier precedents on this point, which is why Justice Bhat was not able to persuade himself to agree with this reasoning, particularly when SC/ST/OBC categories have been excluded.
    • Argument over level playing field for open category: The majority was of the view that such an exclusion was inevitable for the true operation and effect of new policy. If existing beneficiaries are not excluded, it would amount to excessive benefit and advantage. Justice Maheshwari said that in the vertical reservation provided to these groups also, others are excluded. He said that those who are themselves receiving the benefit of others’ exclusion cannot object to their exclusion in the reservation policy made for others.
    • Debate on SC/ST exclusion: Justice Bhat observed that since the bulk of the poorest people belong to SC/ST/OBC groups, their exclusion is not right. The majority was also of the view that Parliament is entitled to experiment with new policies.
    • 50% ceiling breached: The majority also cited a number of earlier judgments on the 50 per cent ceiling such as NM Thomas (1976), in which Justices Fazal Ali and V R Krishna Iyer observed that the arithmetical limit cannot be pressed too far. In Vasanth Kumar (1985), Justice Chinnappa Reddy observed that “for a court to say that reservation should not exceed 40 per cent, 50 per cent or 60 per cent would be arbitrary and the Constitution does not permit us to be arbitrary”.
    • Indira Sawhney judgement is overturned: Even Indra Sawhney had kept a small window for the government to go beyond the 50 per cent ceiling. The real question is would the Court have permitted such a breach at the all-India level if the same had been done for the existing beneficiaries of the reservation policy.
    • justice to general categories is not injustice to others: Justice Maheshwari admitted so when he observed that the 50 per cent limit was for the benefit of general candidates and it causes no injustice to the reserved categories. Justice Bhat, though, felt this may open the floodgates.

    Conclusion

    • Justice should not only be done but should also be appear to have been done. Economical weaker section reservation was an effort to pacify the dissatisfaction among general categories against reservation. However, the merit system will be compromise or not only time will tell.

    Mains Question

    Q. Does exclusion of SC/ST from EWS reservation is justifiable? How EWS reservation will impact the merit system in India? 

    Click and Get your FREE copy of Current Affairs Micro notes

  • [Burning issue] World Energy Outlook Report 2022

    energy

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

    Context

    • Recently, the International Energy Agency released its flagship World energy outlook report. The report analyses the current and future energy of the world and specific regions.
    • In this context, this edition of the burning issue is highlighting the key observations made in the report about the energy scenario of the world and the relevant way forward.

    About the WEO Report

    • The World Energy Outlook report is the International Energy Agency’s annual publication
    • and is recognized as the authoritative source for global energy projections and analysis.
    • The report presents detailed projections of production, energy demand, trade and investment, and fuel by fuel region-wise.
    • It offers crucial insights into the world’s energy demand and supplies under various scenarios and the implications for energy security, climatic goals, and economic growth.

    Three Possible Scenarios

    The Outlook has explored three scenarios that provide a framework for thinking about the future of energy and exploring the implications of various policy choices, investment trends, and technology dynamics. The scenarios are:  

    • Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS): which looks not at what governments say they will achieve, but at what they are actually doing to achieve the targets and objectives they have set out, and assesses where this leads the energy sector.  
    • Announced Pledges Scenario (APS): which examines where all current announced energy and climate commitments – including net zero emissions pledges as well as commitments in areas such as energy access – would take the energy sector if implemented in full and on time.  
    • Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario: which maps out a way to achieve a 1.5 °C stabilization in global average temperature and meet key energy‐related UN Sustainable Development Goals. 

    Key findings of the report – World View

    (A) Global energy crisis and the world economy:

    • Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sparked a global energy crisis. According to the report, Russia’s actions have turned a rapid economic recovery from the pandemic into full‐blown energy turmoil.
    • The crisis has stoked inflationary pressures and created a looming risk of recession, as well as a huge USD 2 trillion windfalls for fossil fuel producers above their 2021 net income.

    (B) Is the crisis a boost, or a setback, for energy transitions?

    • With energy markets remaining extremely vulnerable, today’s energy shock is a reminder of the fragility and unsustainability of our current energy system. A key question for policymakers is whether the crisis will be a setback for clean energy transitions or will catalyze faster action.
    • Climate policies and net zero commitments were blamed in some quarters for contributing to the run‐up in energy prices, but there is scant evidence for this.
    • In the most affected regions, higher shares of renewables were correlated with lower electricity prices, and more efficient homes and electrified heat have provided an important buffer for some – but far from enough – consumers.

    (C) Policy responses are fast‐tracking the emergence of a clean energy economy

    • New policies in major energy markets help propel annual clean energy investment to more than USD 2 trillion by 2030.
    • Clean energy becomes a huge opportunity for growth and jobs, and a major arena for the international economy. As markets rebalance, renewables, supported by nuclear power, see sustained gains; the upside for coal from today’s crisis is temporary.
    • The increase in renewable electricity generation is sufficiently fast to outpace growth in total electricity generation, driving down the contribution of fossil fuels for power competition.

    (D) Fossil fuel peak into view now

    • For the first time, a WEO scenario based on prevailing policy settings has the global demand for each of the fossil fuels exhibiting a peak or plateau.
    • In the STEPS, coal use falls back within the next few years, natural gas demand reaches a plateau by the end of the decade, and rising sales of electric vehicles (EVs) mean that oil demand levels off in the mid‐2030s before ebbing slightly to mid‐century.
    • Global fossil fuel use has risen alongside GDP since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century: putting this rise into reverse while continuing to expand the global economy will be a pivotal moment in energy history.

    (E) Led by clean electricity, some sectors are poised for a faster transformation

    • Investments in clean electricity and electrification, along with expanded and modernized grids, offer clear and cost‐effective opportunities to cut emissions more rapidly while bringing electricity costs down from their current highs.
    • Today’s growth rates for the deployment of solar PV, wind, EVs and batteries, if maintained, would lead to a much faster transformation than projected in the STEPS, although this would require supportive policies not just in the leading markets for these technologies but across the world.
    • Supply chains for some key technologies – including batteries, solar PV and electrolyzers – are expanding at rates that support higher global ambition.

    (F) Efficiency and clean fuels get a competitive boost

    • Today’s high energy prices underscore the benefits of greater energy efficiency and are prompting behavioral and technology changes in some countries to reduce energy use.
    • Demand for cooling needs to be a particular focus for policymakers, as it makes the second‐ largest contribution to the overall rise in global electricity demand over the coming decades (after EVs).
    • In the STEPS, cooling demand in emerging and developing economies rises by 2 800 terawatt‐hours by 2050, which is the equivalent of adding another European Union to today’s global electricity demand.
    • This growth is reduced by half in the APS because of tighter efficiency standards and better building design and insulation bolstered by stronger policy support – which are brightening the prospects for many low‐emissions fuels.

    However, there is a FLIP SIDE too

    (A) Rapid transitions ultimately depend on investment

    • A huge increase in energy investment is essential to reduce the risks of future price spikes and volatility and to get on track for net zero emissions by 2050.
    • From USD 1.3 trillion today, clean energy investment rises above USD 2 trillion by 2030 in the STEPS, but it would have to be above USD 4 trillion by the same date in the NZE Scenario, highlighting the need to attract new investors to the energy sector.
    • Governments should take the lead and provide strong strategic direction, but the investments required are far beyond the reach of public finance. It is vital to harness the vast resources of markets and incentivize private actors to play their part.
    • Shortfalls in clean energy investment are largest in emerging and developing economies, a worrying signal given their rapid projected growth in demand for energy services.

    (B) What if transitions don’t pick up?

    • If clean energy investment does not accelerate as in the NZE Scenario then higher investment in oil and gas would be needed to avoid further fuel price volatility, but this would also mean putting the 1.5 °C goal in jeopardy.
    • In the STEPS, an average of almost USD 650 billion per year is spent on upstream oil and natural gas investment to 2030, a rise of more than 50% compared with recent years. This investment comes with risks, both commercial and environmental, and cannot be taken for granted.

    India-specific observations in the report

    • Coal and gas production to peak: India’s coal generation and oil imports are going to peak in 2030, while gas imports will double around the same time.
    • Challenge of electricity sufficiency: The primary challenge for the country is going to be about meeting its rising electricity demand. It said India will have to find out ways to meet this increasing demand with renewables and nuclear on a scale that is large enough to reduce the use of “unabated coal‐fired generation”, which provides nearly three‐quarters of the electricity supply currently.
    • 2nd Largest coal producer now: It revealed that India became the world’s second‐largest coal producer in 2021 (in energy terms), overtaking Australia and Indonesia, and that it plans to increase domestic production by more than 100 million tonnes of coal equivalent (Mtce) by 2025 from the current levels.
    • Again rise in coal demand: Coal demand in India rose rapidly between 2010 and 2019, mainly as increases in electricity demand were largely met through coal‐fired power. Coal use in India dropped by 7 percent in 2020 due to the pandemic, but increased by 13 percent in 2021, therefore already surpassing the 2019 levels.
    • Rising energy demand: India becomes the world’s most populous country by 2025 and, combined with the twin forces of urbanisation and industrialisation, this underpins rapid growth in energy demand, which rises by more than 3 percent per year in the stated policies scenario (STEPS) from 2021 to 2030. It sees the largest increase in energy demand of any country,
    • Possible energy security: Even though India continues to make great strides with renewables deployment and efficiency policies, the sheer scale of its development means that the combined import bill for fossil fuels doubles over the next two decades in the STEPS, with oil by far the largest component. This points to continued risks to energy security. 
    • Oil imports to peak soon: Coming to oil imports, the IEA found that in the APS, India’s oil imports will peak in the 2030s and fall below the current level by 2050.

    What should be done for a better energy transition

    • Affordable transition: A focus on affordable, secure transitions based on resilient supply chains from non-renewables to renewables should be made. A new energy security paradigm is needed to maintain reliability and affordability while reducing emissions. The Outlook includes ten principles that can help guide policymakers through the period when declining fossil fuel and expanding clean energy systems co‐exist.
    • Scale up clean energy technologies: Synchronise scaling up a range of clean energy technologies with scaling back fossil fuels.
    • Promote energy efficiency also: Tackle the demand side and prioritize energy efficiency. The energy crisis highlights the crucial role of energy efficiency and behavioral measures to help avoid mismatches between demand and supply.
    • Inclusive energy economy: Reverse the slide into energy poverty and give poor communities a lift into the new energy economy.
    • Bring down the cost: Collaborate to bring down the cost of capital in emerging markets and developing economies. The cost of capital is a signal of the real and perceived risks associated with the investment, and it is higher in many emerging markets and developing economies than elsewhere.
    • Promote supply chain resilience: Ensure diverse and resilient clean energy supply chains. High and volatile critical mineral prices and highly concentrated supply chains could delay energy transitions or make them more costly.
    • Foster the climate resilience of energy infrastructure: The growing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events present major risks to the security of energy supplies.

    Conclusion

    • The energy crisis promises to be a historic turning point towards a cleaner and more secure energy system. The alignment of economic, climate and security priorities has already started to move the dial toward a better outcome for the world’s people and the planet.
    • Much more remains to be done, and as these efforts gather momentum, it is essential to bring everyone on board, especially at a time when geopolitical fractures on energy and climate are all the more visible. This means redoubling efforts to ensure that a broad coalition of countries has a stake in the new energy economy.
    • The journey to a more secure and sustainable energy system may not be a smooth one. But today’s crisis makes it crystal clear why we need to press ahead.

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

  • Supreme Court, in a majority verdict, upholds the EWS Quota

    ews

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in a 3:2 majority decision, upheld the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment, which provides 10% reservation in government jobs and educational institutions to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society.

    What else?

    • The judgment excludes the “poorest of poor” among Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) and Other Backward Classes (OBC) from its scope.

    What was the 103rd Amendment?

    • The 103rd Amendment inserted Articles 15(6) and 16(6) in the Constitution to provide up to 10 per cent reservation to the economically weaker sections (EWS) among non-OBC and non-SC/ST sections .
    • In other words, the amendment had changed the Constitution and introduced a quota for the poor among the so-called ‘forward castes’ or ‘general category’.

    Quota available to EWS

    • The quota is available in:
    1. Admissions to higher educational institutions and
    2. Initial recruitment in central government jobs
    • The amendment also empowered state governments to provide reservation on the basis of economic backwardness.

    On what basis was the quota challenged?

    Ans. Violation of Basic Structure

    • Violation of basic structure: Essentially, the challenge was based on the argument that the 103rd amendment violated the “basic structure” of the Constitution.
    • Socially disadvantage: The primary argument in this case stemmed from the view that the special protections guaranteed to socially disadvantaged groups is part of the basic structure.
    • Sole economic criterion: The 103rd Amendment departs from this by promising special protections on the sole basis of economic status.

    Key arguments by the Judges

    [A] Majority Opinion

    Three judges, Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, Bela Trivedi, and S B Pardiwala, have upheld the validity of the 103rd amendment.

    1. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari: He has ruled that reservation based only on economic criteria does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution, and that the exclusion of classes covered in Article 15(4) and 16(4) — that is OBCs and SC/STs — in the 103rd amendment does not damage the basic structure.
    2. Justice Bela Trivedi: She has concurred with Justice Maheshwari. She ruled that treating EWS as a separate class would be a reasonable classification, and that treating unequals equally would violate the principle of equality under the Constitution.
    3. Justice Trivedi: He said that 75 years after independence, it was time to revisit the system of reservation in the larger interest of society.
    4. Justice S B Pardiwala: He concurred with Justice Maheshwari and Justice Trivedi. He observed that “Reservation is not an end, it is means, it should not be allowed to become a vested interest.

    [B] Minority (Dissenting) Opinion

    1. Justice Bhat: He has ruled that while reservation on economic criteria is per se not violative of the Constitution, excluding SC/ST/OBC from the purview of EWS is violative of basic structure. He has struck down Articles 15(6) and 16(6) for being discriminatory and violative of the equality code.
    2. CJI Lalit: He said he concurs entirely with the judgment of Justice Bhat.

    What about the 50% ceiling on quotas?

    • The judgment appears to have struck down the ceiling of 50%.
    • Justice Maheshwari said that reservations for EWS does not violate basic structure on account of 50% ceiling limit because ceiling limit is not inflexible.

    How the judiciary deviated from its earlier judgments?

    • However, the dissenting opinion says that permitting breach of 50% would result in compartmentalization, and the rule of right to equality will become right to reservations.
    • The apex court has repeatedly underlined the 50% ceiling on reservations imposed by the landmark Indra Sawhney judgment of 1992.
    • On that basis, attempts by a number of states have been struck down.
    • Several of those issues can now be reopened. Now states can rebel with their populist moves to provide reservations to some communities. Ex. Nomadic Tribes case in Maharashtra.

    What is the EWS Quota?

    • The EWS criteria for employment and admission was notified on January 31, 2019 by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) based on the 103rd Amendment.
    • Under the 2019 notification, a person who was not covered under the scheme of reservation for SCs, STs, and OBCs, and whose family had a gross annual income below Rs 8 lakh, was to be identified as EWS.
    • The notification specified what constituted “income”, and excluded some persons from the EWS category if their families possessed certain specified assets.

    Broad issues with EWS quota

    • Reduction within general category: The EWS quota remains a controversy as its critics say it reduces the size of the open category, besides breaching the 50% limit on the total reservation.
    • Arbitrariness over income limit: The court has been intrigued by the income limit being fixed at ₹8 lakh per year. It is the same figure for excluding the ‘creamy layer’ from OBC reservation benefits.
    • Socio-economic backwardness: A crucial difference is that those in the general category, to whom the EWS quota is applicable, do not suffer from social or educational backwardness, unlike those classified as the OBC.
    • Metropolitan criteria: There are other questions as to whether any exercise was undertaken to derive the exceptions such as why the flat criterion does not differentiate between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas.
    • OBC-like criteria: The question the court has raised is when the OBC category is socially and educationally backward and, therefore, has additional impediments to overcome.
    • Not based on relevant data: In line with the Supreme Court’s known position that any reservation or norms for exclusion should be based on relevant data.
    • Breaches reservation cap: There is a cap of 50% on reservation as ruled in the Indira Sawhney Case. The principle of balancing equality ordains reservation.

    Way forward

    • Preserving the merit: We cannot rule out the sorry state of economic backwardness hampering merit in our country.
    • Rational criteria: There has to be collective wisdom to define and measure the economic weakness of certain sections of society in order to shape the concept of economic justice.
    • Judicial guidance: Judicial interpretation will pave the wave forward for deciding the criterion for EWS Quota.
    • Targetted beneficiaries. The center needs to resort to more rational criteria for deciding the targeted beneficiary of this reservation system. Caste Census data can be useful in this regard.
    • Income study: The per capita income or GDP or the difference in purchasing power in the rural and urban areas, should be taken into account while a single income limit was formulated for the whole country.

     

    Click and get your FREE Copy of CURRENT AFFAIRS Micro Notes

More posts