💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Agriculture

  • Cultivation of GI-tagged Onattukara Sesame

    Onattukara Sesame

    Context

    • Kerala is taking efforts to expand the cultivation of Geographical Indication (GI)-tagged Onattukara sesame, a unique and valuable agricultural product.
    • Onattukara sesame was granted the GI tag in January this year.

    Onattukara Sesame (Ellu )

    Description

    Region of Cultivation

    		 Primarily cultivated in the Onattukara region, covering Alappuzha, Kollam, and Pathanamthitta districts in Kerala, India.
    Medicinal Properties Onattukara sesame is known for its medicinal properties and high quality.
    Traditional Use Traditional ayurvedic doctors in the region have used Onattukara sesame oil for treating rheumatism and skin protection since the 18th century.
    Nutritional Value Rich in vitamin E and antioxidants. Contains essential fatty acids like oleic acid, linoleic acid, and palmitoleic acid.
    Varieties Grown in various varieties, including ‘ayali,’ Kayamkulam-1, thilak, thilathara, and thilarani, developed by ORARS, Kayamkulam.
    Market Potential Obtaining the GI tag is expected to increase its popularity and market value, leading to higher prices for sesame seeds and oil.
    Pricing Current prices: Sesame seeds – ₹200 to ₹250 per kilogram, Sesame oil – ₹500 to ₹600 per kilogram.

  • GI tag for Sea Buckthorn

    Sea Buckthorn

    Central Idea

    • The Geographical Indication Registry has officially granted the GI tag to ‘Ladakh Sea Buckthorn’.
    • It is the fourth GI tag after Apricot (Raktsey Karpo), Pashmina, and Ladakhi Wood Carving in Ladakh.

    About Sea Buckthorn

    • Sea buckthorn is a plant that grows in Europe and Asia.
    • In India, it’s found in the Himalayan region, especially in dry places like the cold deserts of Ladakh and Spiti.
    • This plant produces small orange or yellow berries that are sour but full of vitamins, especially vitamin C.
    • It can survive really hot and really cold temperatures, which makes it perfect for the cold deserts.
    • Every part of the plant—berries, leaves, twigs, roots, and thorns—are useful for medicine, food, fuel, and fencing.
    • It’s also a vital food source for many birds and provides nutritious food for animals like sheep, goats, donkeys, cattle, and camels in the cold desert regions.
    • It is often called the ‘Wonder Plant,’ ‘Ladakh Gold,’ ‘Golden Bush,’ or ‘Gold Mine’ of the cold deserts.

    Back2Basics: GI Tag

    • A GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.
    • Nodal Agency: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry
    • India, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), enacted the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 w.e.f. September 2003.
    • GIs have been defined under Article 22 (1) of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.
    • The tag stands valid for 10 years.

  • Uncertain future in a sea of poppies

    GOAF

    Central idea

    The article explores the multifaceted challenges arising from the intersection of cultural pride and economic shifts in opium cultivation in India. It delves into concerns surrounding the government’s policy shift, addressing potential impacts on livelihoods, national security, and transparency.

    Key Highlights

    • Cultural Significance of Opium Cultivation: Opium farming is a source of cultural pride, termed “agriculture of dignity” in the Mewar region, linking social status to this traditional trade and reflecting generations’ engagement.
    • Government Policy Shift in 2021: In 2021, the government allowed private players to produce Concentrate of Poppy Straw (CPS) alongside traditional opium gum, aiming to boost alkaloid yield and align India with global practices. However, this shift faces resistance from opium farmers.
    • Concerns about Private Players: Opium farmers express worries about the entry of private companies, fearing threats to livelihood, profits, and national security. Farmers argue that private involvement may lead to misuse of opium, increased drug trafficking, and rising costs of life-saving medicines.
    • Impact on Farmers and Traditional Practices: Opium farmers face economic challenges, citing stagnant procurement rates, increased input costs, and reduced poppy seed yield under the new system. The shift to CPS raises concerns about transparency, farmer consultation, and the potential decline in income for traditional opium cultivators.

    Challenges

    • Threat to Livelihood and National Security: Opium farmers fear that private entry may endanger their profession and lead to increased drug-related issues. There is a possibility of drug mafia influence and security threats if alkaloids fall into the wrong hands.
    • Impact of Policy Shift on Farmers: Economic challenges for opium farmers, including reduced poppy seed yield and concerns about transparent practices under CPS. Farmers worry about income loss and express dissatisfaction with the lack of government consultation.
    • Safety and Security of Alkaloids: Opium farmers question the safety and security of alkaloids under private production. Fears that private involvement may compromise the integrity of life-saving medicines made from opium.
    • Division among Farmers and Lack of Transparency: Farmers express concerns about the government creating divisions with two production systems. Calls for transparent policies and farmer involvement, alleging a lack of transparency in the CPS mechanism.

    Key Phrases and Terms for answer enrichment

    • Swabhiman ki Kheti (Agriculture of Dignity): Opium cultivation holds cultural pride in the Mewar region, reflecting social status.
    • Afeem and Aulat Barabar (Poppy Plants and Children Deserve Similar Treatment): Highlights the cultural significance of opium, equating it with the care given to children.
    • Concentrate of Poppy Straw (CPS): New method introduced in 2021, allowing private players to extract alkaloids from poppy straw alongside traditional opium gum.
    • Make in India: Farmers question the government’s commitment to “Make in India” while allowing imports of poppy seeds.

    Analysis for mains answer

    • Cultural Pride vs. Economic Realities: Opium farming holds cultural significance, but economic challenges, policy shifts, and private entry threaten traditional practices.
    • Balancing Global Practices and Farmer Concerns: The government’s shift to CPS aligns with global norms but faces resistance from farmers concerned about income, transparency, and safety.
    • Security Concerns and Misuse of Opium: Farmers express worries about the potential misuse of opium and security threats, emphasizing the need for strict controls.
    • Need for Transparent Policies and Farmer Involvement: Farmers demand transparency, consultation, and the continuation of traditional practices, expressing dissatisfaction with the current policy.

    Key Data and Facts

    • Opium Farmers in India: About 1 lakh farmers across 22 districts in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh have licenses to cultivate opium.
    • Major Opium-Producing Districts: Mandsaur, Neemuch, and Chittorgarh contribute to 80% of India’s opium production.
    • Change in Government Policy (2021): Government policy shift in 2021 allows private players to produce CPS, aiming to boost alkaloid yield.
    • Economic Impact on Farmers: Opium farmers face economic challenges, citing stagnant procurement rates, increased input costs, and reduced poppy seed yield under the new system.

    Way forward

    • Policy Review and Farmer Consultation: Conduct a comprehensive review of the opium policy, ensuring active participation and consultation with opium farmers to address their concerns and incorporate their insights into the decision-making process.
    • Transparency Measures: Implement transparent mechanisms in the Concentrate of Poppy Straw (CPS) system, providing clear information on pricing, procurement, and production processes. This ensures accountability and builds trust among farmers.
    • Public-Private Collaboration: Establish a structured collaboration between the government and private entities to leverage expertise and resources. This collaboration should prioritize safeguarding national security, ensuring the integrity of medicinal opium production, and preventing misuse.
    • Diversification and Economic Support: Explore avenues for diversification in agriculture, providing support and incentives for opium farmers to engage in alternative crops. This can mitigate economic challenges and reduce dependency on a single agricultural practice.

    As the government’s 2021 policy allows private entry, concerns about livelihoods, security, and transparency emerge. Navigating the way forward requires a delicate balance, harmonizing cultural heritage, economic considerations, and global standards for a sustainable future.

  • PM-Kisan Bhai (Bhandaran Incentive) Scheme

    Central Idea

    • In a bid to empower small and marginal farmers and break the influence of traders in price determination, the Indian government is poised to launch the PM-Kisan Bhai (Bhandaran Incentive) scheme.

    PM-Kisan Bhai Scheme

    • This scheme aims to incentivize farmers to retain their produce for a minimum of three months post-harvest, granting them the autonomy to decide when and where to sell their crops.
    • It seeks to break the monopoly of traders in setting crop prices, giving farmers greater control over their produce.
    • This initiative grants farmers the autonomy to decide when to sell, in contrast to the current practice where most crops are sold around harvest, typically spanning 23 months.

    Implementation of the scheme

    • Initial Rollout: The scheme may be piloted in states such as Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh.
    • Two Key Components:
    1. Warehousing Rental Subsidy (WRS): Small farmers and farmer producer organizations (FPOs) can avail a WRS benefit of ₹4 per quintal per month for a maximum of three months, irrespective of warehousing charges.
    2. Prompt Repayment Incentive (PRI): The government proposes to extend a 3% additional interest subvention under the Kisan Credit Card (KCC) scheme for farmers pledging their produce and obtaining loans at subsidized interest rates.
    • The government has proposed that the storage incentive will be provided for a maximum of three months.
    • Besides, produce stored for 15 days or less will not be eligible for the subsidy.
    • The incentive will be calculated on day to day basis.

    Benefits offered

    • Resisting Price Dictation: With monetary support for storage during the harvest season, farmers can refuse prices dictated by buyers.
    • Access to a Wider Market: Promoting e-Negotiable Warehouse Receipt (eNWR) trade through platforms like e-National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) will connect farmers to a broader range of buyers across the country.

    Need for such a scheme

    • Pledge Finance Facility: While a pledge finance facility is currently available to farmers, its effectiveness is limited due to high carryover costs on farmers and credit risk to bankers.
    • Incentivizing Scientific Warehousing: The scheme aims to incentivize the storage of farmers’ produce in scientifically built warehouses, reducing interest rates on pledge finance.

  • Ashok Gulati writes: How subsidies for paddy in Punjab are choking Delhi

    Stubble burning: Why it continues to smother north India - BBC News

    Central idea 

    The Supreme Court addresses urgent concerns over Delhi’s severe air pollution, emphasizing the need to immediately halt stubble burning in neighboring states like Punjab. Stubble burning, contributing nearly 38% to pollution, poses health risks, and the court advocates for swift measures, including economic incentives, to shift farmers away from paddy cultivation.

    Key Highlights:

    • Supreme Court urges adjoining states to curb stubble burning as Delhi’s air quality index breaches 400.
    • Biomass burning, particularly stubble burning, contributes significantly to Delhi’s pollution, posing health risks and potential loss of 11.9 years of life for residents.
    • Urgent action required to control stubble burning in Punjab, which accounts for a major portion of pollution.

    Challenges:

    • Stubble burning persists despite attempts to stop, revealing a breakdown in law and order.
    • Inefficient alternatives and lack of farmer incentives contribute to the continuation of stubble burning.
    • Over-reliance on rice and wheat in the Public Distribution System leads to environmental harm and health issues.

    Key Phrases:

    • Decision Support System for air quality management.
    • Air Quality Life Index report by the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute.
    • Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy cultivation in Punjab.
    • Subsidy on paddy cultivation and its impact on farmers’ choices.

    Analysis:

    • Biomass burning, especially stubble burning, is a major contributor to Delhi’s pollution, overshadowing the impact of transport and construction.
    • The Supreme Court emphasizes the need to cut paddy cultivation in Punjab-Haryana and suggests alternatives to curb stubble burning.
    • Economic incentives and policy changes are crucial to wean farmers away from paddy cultivation and address environmental concerns.

    Key Data:

    • Biomass burning, mainly stubble burning, accounts for 37.85% of Delhi’s pollution.
    • Punjab farmers receive a subsidy of almost Rs 30,000/ha for paddy cultivation.
    • Loss of 11.9 years of life for Delhi residents due to pollution.

    Key Facts:

    • The water table in Sangrur, Punjab, has gone down by 25 meters in the last 20 years.
    • Stubble burning remains a significant challenge despite efforts by officials.

    Key words for mains answer value addition:

    • Stubble burning.
    • Public Distribution System.
    • Decision Support System.
    • Air Quality Life Index.
    • Greenhouse gas emissions.

    Way Forward:

    • Implement strong measures to control stubble burning, making the local Station House Office (SHO) responsible.
    • Incentivize farmers to switch from paddy to pulses, oilseeds, and millets to create a crop-neutral incentive structure.
    • Encourage private sector investment in ethanol plants based on maize to reduce reliance on paddy and lower air pollution from vehicular traffic.
    • Limit paddy procurement by state agencies in areas with fast-depleting water tables and where farmers continue stubble burning.
    • Promote a diversified market by offering nutritious crops through fair price shops, reducing reliance on rice and wheat and minimizing environmental impact.

  • Pusa-2090: A Potential Solution to Stubble Burning  

    Pusa-2090

    Central Idea

    • In response to stubble burning challenge, the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) has developed Pusa-2090, an improved version of Pusa-44, offering similar yields but with a shorter maturity period.

    About Pusa-2090

    • Development: IARI developed Pusa-2090 by crossing Pusa-44 with CB-501, an early-maturing Japonica rice line known for stronger stems and higher grain production.
    • Advantages: Pusa-2090 offers the same high yields as Pusa-44 but matures in just 120-125 days, addressing the stubble-burning issue.
    • Field Testing: The variety has undergone successful trials in Delhi and Odisha, and Punjab farmers have reported promising results.
    • Economic Benefits: Pusa-2090’s potential to match Pusa-44’s yields with a shorter duration makes it an attractive option for farmers.

    Replacing Pusa-44

    • Pusa-44 in Punjab: In the current kharif season, Punjab has planted 5.48 lakh hectares with Pusa-44, accounting for over 17% of the state’s total paddy area.
    • Long Maturation Period: Pusa-44 takes 155-160 days to mature, delaying the availability of fields for the next wheat crop.
    • Stubble Burning: To prepare fields for the next crop, farmers resort to burning the remaining stubble after harvesting Pusa-44, contributing to air pollution.
    • Alternative Varieties: While there are alternative varieties like PR-126 with a shorter maturation period, their yields are lower than Pusa-44, impacting farmers’ income.

  • Kerala rolls out Organic Farming Mission  

    Central Idea

    • In a proactive move towards sustainable and climate-smart farming, the Kerala Government has launched the Organic Farming Mission.

    Kerala Organic Farming Mission 

    Objective Expand organic farming to 5,000 hectares in 5 years
    Annual Target Convert 1,000 hectares annually
    Governance Structure Governing council chaired by Agriculture Minister

    Executive committee with government and farm sector reps
    Area Allocation State Agriculture department’s farms allocate 10% for organic
    Long-term Commitment Beneficiaries commit to organic farming for at least 5 years
    Certification & Marketing Enhance certification, branding, and marketing

    Implement organic farming protocols aligned with standards
    Value Addition Focus on adding value to organic products
    Access to Resources Ensure access to quality seeds and production equipment

    Utilize various channels like small-scale units, collectives,Karshika Karma Sena, Kudumbasree, Krishisree Centre, Agro Service Centres
    Local Engagement Collaborate with Krishikoottam collectives and FPOs
    Complementary Mission Poshaka Samriddhi Mission dedicated to millet and vegetable production for sustainable agriculture

    Complementary Mission: Poshaka Samriddhi

    • In addition to the Organic Farming Mission, the Kerala Government created the Poshaka Samriddhi Mission in September 2023.
    • This initiative is dedicated to ramping up millet and vegetable production, furthering the state’s commitment to sustainable agriculture.

  • Ashok Gulati writes: How we tame food inflation, and at whose cost

    Central idea

    The article scrutinizes government policies aimed at curbing food inflation, focusing on the restrictive measures on basmati rice exports and their repercussions on farmers. It delves into the broader challenges hindering the achievement of ambitious agri-export targets, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers both consumer welfare and farmer well-being.

    Export Restrictions on Basmati Rice:

    • Minimum Export Price (MEP): Imposition of a high MEP ($1,200/tonne) limiting basmati rice exports.
    • Impact on Farmers: Low buying interest, reduced prices in Punjab-Haryana mandis, affecting farmers negatively.
    • Global Market Dynamics: Risk of losing export markets to Pakistan, the main competitor in basmati rice.
    • Beyond Basmati Rice: Similar restrictions on broken rice, non-basmati white rice, and parboiled rice.
    • Need for Stability: Call for a stable export policy over knee-jerk reactions to support India’s position as the largest global rice exporter.
    Prelims booster points

    ·         Parboiled rice is a type of rice that has been partially boiled in the husk.

    ·         The process involves soaking, steaming, and drying the rice before milling it.

    ·         Unlike regular white rice, parboiled rice retains more nutrients, as the process allows nutrients to move from the husk to the endosperm.

    ·         Parboiled rice has a firmer texture and is less sticky than white rice, making it a popular choice in certain dishes.

    ·         The parboiling process also gives the rice a golden or amber color.

     

    Challenges in Achieving Agri-Export Targets:

    • Policy Impact: Restrictions on wheat exports, 40% export duty on onions, hindering the goal of doubling agri-exports.
    • Historical Performance: Comparison of UPA’s $43.27 billion agri-exports in 2013-14 with the current estimate of less than $50 billion in 2023-24.

    Consumer Bias vs. Farmer Welfare:

    • Implicit Tax on Farmers: Critique of policies favoring domestic consumers, indirectly taxing farmers.
    • Urban Consumer Bias: Need for differentiated policies catering to the vulnerable sections rather than blanket measures.

    Agricultural Competitiveness and Investment:

    • Competitiveness Importance: Agriculture exports as a measure of competitiveness and surplus generation.
    • Investment Gap: Low investment in agriculture R&D (0.5% of agri-GDP) as a hindrance to competitiveness.
    • Populism Challenge: Balancing subsidies, loan waivers, and “revdis” with the need for substantial investments.

    Environmental and Economic Sustainability:

    • Impact on Soil Health: Excessive focus on subsidies and populist measures could lead to imbalanced fertilizer usage and soil degradation.
    • Long-Term Economic Health: The article hints at the economic burden of subsidies, emphasizing the need for a sustainable economic model.

    Global Image and Diplomacy:

    • Export Market Dynamics: Consideration of global perceptions and diplomatic relations impacted by abrupt export policy changes.
    • Positioning Against Competitors: The unintended consequence of favoring policies potentially benefiting competitors like Pakistan in the global market.

    Way Forward:

    • Policy Revision: Consideration to revise export restrictions for better market access.
    • Investment Boost: Doubling or tripling investments in agriculture R&D for enhanced competitiveness.
    • Balanced Policies: Striking a balance between populism and sector health for sustainable growth.
    • Reflecting Power: A nation’s strength lies in innovation, production, and competitive exports.
    • Call for Change: Urgent need to revisit policies for better-designed, outcome-driven agricultural strategies.

  • Approval of Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) rates for Rabi and Kharif seasons in 2022-23 by the union cabinet.

    Central idea

    The article discusses the recent approval of Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) rates for Rabi and Kharif seasons in 2022-23 by the union cabinet. It explains the NBS regime, its objectives, and challenges, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to address economic, environmental, and distribution issues.

    Understanding Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Regime:

    • Subsidized Fertilizers: Farmers get fertilizers at lower rates based on nutrients like Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potash, and Sulphur.
    • Additional Subsidy: Fertilizers with extra nutrients like molybdenum and zinc receive added subsidies

    Key Features of Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS):

    • Targeted Subsidy: Fertilizers are subsidized based on the nutrients they contain, such as Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potash (K), and Sulphur (S).
    • Additional Subsidy for Fortified Fertilizers: Fertilizers containing secondary and micronutrients, like molybdenum (Mo) and zinc, receive extra subsidies.
    • Annual Determination of Rates: The government announces subsidy rates for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers annually, considering factors like international and domestic prices, exchange rates, and inventory levels.
    • Promotion of Balanced Fertilization: NBS aims to achieve an optimal balance (N:P:K = 4:2:1) in fertilization, improving soil health and crop yields.
    • Implementation Authority: Administered by the Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers since April 2010.

    Rationale for Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS):

    • Efficient Resource Allocation: NBS ensures subsidies are directed to farmers based on nutrient requirements, promoting judicious use of fertilizers.
    • Optimal NPK Fertilization: By encouraging a balanced nutrient ratio (N:P:K = 4:2:1), NBS aims to enhance soil health, leading to increased crop yields and farmer income.
    • Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The policy supports environmentally sustainable practices by preventing imbalanced fertilizer usage, reducing soil degradation, and minimizing nutrient runoff.
    • Food Security: Subsidized P&K fertilizers availability during Kharif season supports agricultural productivity, contributing to food security in India.
    • Long-Term Soil Health: NBS promotes a long-term approach to soil management, addressing nutrient deficiencies and ensuring the fertility of agricultural land.

    Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) Rates Approval:

    • Rabi Season 2022-23: Subsidy rates given for essential nutrients like Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potash, and Sulphur.
    • Kharif Season 2023: Approval for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) Fertilizers.

    Objective of NBS Policy:

    • Balanced Fertilization: Aims for an optimal balance (N:P:K=4:2:1) to enhance soil health and crop yield.
    • Increased Income: Boosts farmers’ income through improved productivity.
    • Reducing Subsidy Burden: Expects rational fertilizer use to ease the subsidy burden on the government.

    Significance of NBS Subsidy:

    • Agricultural Support: Ensures affordable availability of DAP and other P&K fertilizers during Kharif for better agricultural productivity.
    • Resource Allocation: Crucial for efficient allocation, directing subsidies where needed for sustainable agriculture.

    Challenges with NBS Policy:

    • Economic and Environmental Costs: High subsidy burden strains the economy, leading to imbalanced fertilizer use and environmental issues.
    • Black Marketing and Diversion: Subsidized urea faces illegal sale and smuggling to non-agricultural users.
    • Leakage and Misuse: Inefficient distribution can lead to fertilizer misuse or non-delivery to intended farmers.
    • Regional Disparities: Uniform policy may not cater to diverse regional needs, impacting nutrient application and productivity.

    Way Forward for NBS Policy:

    • Uniform Policy: A necessary step for essential nutrients (N, P, K) with considerations for regional variations.
    • Cash Subsidy Alternative: Long-term shift to a per-acre cash subsidy for flexible fertilizer purchase.
    • Balancing Act: Striking a balance between price control, affordability, and sustainable nutrient management for NBS success.

     

  • Cotton Curse: Tired of losses, farmers giving up cotton on a large scale

    Cotton

    Central idea

    Cotton farmers in North India are grappling with severe pink bollworm attacks, leading to a shift to alternative crops like paddy and horticulture due to consistent losses. The article highlights the declining cotton cultivation area and production in Punjab and Haryana, with farmers opting for crops with lower risks and costs.

    Mains Relevance for UPSC:

    • Illustrates the challenges faced by farmers and the agricultural sector.
    • Discusses the need for government intervention in sustainable agriculture.
    • Highlights the importance of technological advancements in addressing agricultural issues.

    Key points discussed in this article

    • Pink Bollworm Crisis: Unprecedented pink bollworm attacks devastate cotton crops in the northern cotton zone, leading to significant losses for farmers.
    • Shift to Alternative Crops: Faced with continuous losses, farmers are abandoning cotton cultivation, opting for alternative crops like paddy and horticulture with lower risks and costs.
    • Environmental Concerns: The shift to water-intensive crops raises environmental concerns, particularly in regions like Punjab and Haryana, highlighting the need for sustainable farming practices.
    • Demand for Technological Solutions: Farmers demand improved seeds resistant to pink bollworm attacks, emphasizing the necessity for technological advancements in agriculture.

    Concerns and Demands:

    • Environmental Repercussions: Shifting to water-intensive crops like paddy poses environmental challenges, requiring a balance between short-term gains and long-term sustainability.
    • Farmer Demands: Farmers are demanding improved seeds that are resistant to pink bollworm attacks, emphasizing the need for technological solutions.
    • Lack of Initiatives: The absence of specific initiatives raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of agriculture in the region.

    Critical Analysis of article for good marks in UPSC mains:

    • Economic Considerations: While cotton has a higher MSP, the shift to paddy is driven by lower investment costs, reflecting the economic considerations influencing farmers’ choices.
    • Environmental Trade-offs: The article implies a trade-off between immediate economic gains and the potential ecological consequences of shifting to water-intensive crops.
    • Shifting Landscape: The agricultural landscape is undergoing a transformation, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the farming community.

    Key Challenges:

    • Pest-Induced Losses: Despite regular pink bollworm attacks, the severity this year is unprecedented, leading to substantial crop losses.
    • Environmental Shift: Farmers are opting for water-intensive crops like paddy, raising concerns about increased groundwater exploitation and potential environmental repercussions.
    • Regional Constraints: In regions like Rajasthan, where soil and water conditions are unsuitable for paddy, farmers feel compelled to stick with cotton farming despite challenges.

    Way Forward:

    • Sustainable Farming Practices: Encourage farmers to adopt sustainable practices that address environmental concerns associated with water-intensive crops.
    • Government Intervention: The government should play a proactive role in providing advanced and resistant seed varieties to mitigate pest-related challenges.
    • Awareness Programs: Conduct awareness programs to educate farmers about the benefits and challenges of diversifying into suitable alternative crops.