💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Climate Change

1. Global Warming and Issues
2. All about Pollution

  • Extinction of Gigantopithecus Blacki: Environmental Adaptation Challenges

    Extinction of Gigantopithecus Blacki

    Introduction

    • A recent study published in Nature sheds light on the extinction of Gigantopithecus blacki, the largest known primate species.
    • This research provides crucial insights into the species’ inability to survive environmental changes, contrasting with the adaptability of other similar primates.

    About Gigantopithecus Blacki

    • Species Description: Gigantopithecus blacki was a great ape species that inhabited China between 2 million and 330 thousand years ago.
    • Physical Attributes: Estimated to stand 3 meters tall and weigh between 200–300 kg, it is considered the largest primate ever to have existed on Earth.
    • Geographical Range and Extinction: The species experienced a significant reduction in geographical range before its extinction, with the most recent fossils indicating a marked decline.

    Research Methodology

    • Fossil Analysis: Researchers analyzed fossils from 22 caves in southern China, focusing on dental samples of G. blacki and its closest relative, Pongo weidenreichi.
    • Environmental Reconstruction: The study employed pollen and stable isotope analysis to reconstruct the environmental conditions during the species’ existence.
    • Diet and Behavior Assessment: Changes in diet and behavior within the extinction window were inferred from dental analyses.

    Findings on Environmental Changes and Adaptation

    • Initial Habitat: Around 2.3 million years ago, G. blacki thrived in dense forests with heavy cover.
    • Transition in Environment: During the extinction window (295–215,000 years ago), there was a shift to open forests, indicating significant changes in forest plant communities.
    • Dietary and Stress Responses: Dental analysis revealed a less diverse diet and reduced water consumption for G. blacki, alongside signs of increased chronic stress. In contrast, P. weidenreichi showed better adaptation to these environmental changes.
    • Fossil Record Decline: The number and geographical spread of G. blacki fossils declined relative to P. weidenreichi by 300 thousand years ago, supporting the hypothesis of its struggle to adapt.

  • To combat climate challenges, the Finance Commission needs to step up

    India sets new climate target: 45% less emission, 50 per cent electricity from non-fossil fuel-based- The New Indian Express

    Central Idea:

    The article emphasizes the pivotal role that fiscal federalism, particularly through Finance Commissions (FC), plays in India’s efforts to combat climate change by promoting forest conservation. It highlights the need for the 16th Finance Commission to adopt innovative approaches, such as incorporating climate vulnerability and emission intensity into tax distribution formulas, to align with India’s environmental goals.

    Key Highlights:

    • India actively participates in global initiatives to enhance forest cover, combat climate change, and build community resilience.
    • Finance Commissions have historically allocated funds for forest conservation, evolving from grants to a dedicated share of the central tax pool.
    • The 15th Finance Commission became the world’s largest payment for ecosystem services (PES) system, distributing funds based on both forest cover and density.
    • The 16th Finance Commission, appointed in 2021, is crucial for shaping tax distribution principles for 2026-31, coinciding with India’s commitments under the Paris Agreement.
    • The article suggests incorporating climate vulnerability and emission intensity as key parameters in the tax devolution formula to drive action toward India’s National Determined Contributions (NDCs).

    Key Challenges:

    • Balancing conservation efforts with opportunity costs, which can be substantial and potentially prohibitive.
    • Addressing pollution challenges, especially the need for funds to tackle issues like crop burning and mangrove restoration.
    • Adapting to changing climate patterns leading to forest fires, necessitating innovative solutions and funding.

    Key Terms:

    • Fiscal federalism: The distribution of fiscal responsibilities and resources between different levels of government.
    • National Determined Contributions (NDCs): Commitments made by countries under the Paris Agreement to mitigate climate change.
    • Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES): Systems where individuals or entities are compensated for protecting or enhancing ecosystem services.
    • Tax devolution: The distribution of tax revenues among different levels of government.

    Key Phrases:

    • “Largest payment for ecosystem services (PES) system in the world.”
    • “Tax devolution formula as a tool to align with India’s NDCs.”
    • “Finance Commission evolving from a fiscal arbitrator to an orchestrator of climate readiness.”

    Key Quotes:

    • “The 16th FC can be pivotal in creating a basis for market instruments like National Carbon Market and National Green Credit Market to succeed.”
    • “The Commission needs to metamorphose from a conventional fiscal arbitrator to an orchestrator of India’s climate readiness.”

    Key Statements:

    • “The 15th FC effectively became the largest payment for ecosystem services (PES) system in the world.”
    • “The 16th FC can be pivotal in creating a basis for these market instruments to succeed.”

    Key Facts:

    • India’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 33-35% and building an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 by 2030.
    • The role of Finance Commissions in mobilizing and distributing funds to states for forest conservation and combating air pollution.

    Critical Analysis:

    The article underscores the evolving role of Finance Commissions in environmental conservation and suggests innovative approaches for the 16th FC. However, challenges such as balancing conservation with opportunity costs and addressing pollution issues require careful consideration.

    Way Forward:

    The 16th Finance Commission should prioritize incorporating climate vulnerability and emission intensity into tax devolution formulas. It must transform into a key player in India’s climate readiness by aligning economic growth with environmental imperatives, supporting clean energy initiatives, and addressing regional climate challenges.

  • Understanding the EU’s carbon border tax

    BASIC nations oppose 'Carbon Border Tax' - Civilsdaily

    Central Idea:

    The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) poses a significant challenge to India’s manufacturing sector. This policy aims to tax carbon-intensive imports into the EU, impacting key sectors like steel. India’s response involves considering legal challenges and negotiating with the EU while simultaneously developing its own carbon trading mechanisms.

    Key Highlights:

    • The CBAM is part of the EU’s strategy to achieve a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
    • It aims to be climate-neutral by 2050 – an economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.
    • India, a top exporter to the EU, is expected to be adversely affected, particularly in sectors like steel.
    • India is developing its own Carbon Credit Trading System (CCTS) to combat climate change and incentivize clean energy investments.

    Key Challenges:

    • India faces the challenge of protecting its industries from the potential negative impacts of CBAM.
    • Limited time to formulate and implement effective carbon taxation measures aligning with the Paris Agreement.
    • The EU’s failure to consider factors like cheap labor and alternative production modes influencing industry shifts.

    Key Terms:

    • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
    • Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions
    • Carbon Credit Trading System (CCTS)
    • Paris Agreement
    • Special and Differential Treatment provisions

    Key Phrases:

    • “Ill-conceived move” – Referring to the Commerce and Industry Minister’s criticism of the CBAM.
    • “Death knell for India’s manufacturing sector” – Describing the potential impact of the carbon tax on Indian industries.
    • “Common but differentiated responsibilities” – Principle agreed upon under the Paris Agreement.
    • “Carbon leakage” – The risk of carbon-intensive production moving from the EU to countries with lax environmental regulations.

    Key Quotes:

    • “Proposed carbon tax on imports is an ill-conceived move… death knell for India’s manufacturing sector.” – Commerce and Industry Minister.
    • “India has challenged the CBAM before the World Trade Organization under the special and differential treatment provisions.”

    Key Statements:

    • The CBAM is seen as a threat to India’s manufacturing sector and competitiveness in the EU market.
    • India is working on its own carbon trading mechanisms, including the CCTS and the Green Credit Programme Rules.

    Key Examples and References:

    • UK’s plan to enforce its own CBAM by 2027, adding to the challenges faced by India’s exports.

    Key Facts:

    • 27% of India’s exports of iron, steel, and aluminum products worth $8.2 billion went to the EU in 2022.

    Critical Analysis:

    • The EU’s focus on reducing carbon emissions should consider broader factors influencing industry shifts.
    • India’s challenge lies in balancing environmental concerns with protecting its industries and economic interests.

    Way Forward:

    • India should actively negotiate with the EU to explore pragmatic solutions, such as returning tax funds for green technologies.
    • Swift action is crucial for India to formulate and implement its own carbon taxation measures aligned with the Paris Agreement.

  • Outcomes of COP28: Progress and Challenges in Climate Action

    COP28

    Central Idea

    • Annual Climate Summit: The 28th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP28) was held in Dubai, under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
    • High Expectations: There were significant expectations for countries to take decisive steps in addressing the climate crisis.
    • Key Focus Areas: Discussions at COP28 revolved around mitigation, adaptation, finance, and the differing responsibilities of developed and developing nations.

    Early Developments: Loss and Damage Fund

    • COP27 Agreement Follow-up: After agreeing to create the ‘Loss and Damage’ (L&D) fund at COP27, COP28 focused on its operationalization.
    • Funding Challenges: Despite the need for substantial funding, contributions have been limited, with the U.S. pledging only $17.5 million.
    • Administration and Access Concerns: The World Bank’s role in overseeing the fund raised issues regarding access, legal autonomy, and responsiveness to emergencies.

    Emissions Reduction and Energy Transition

    • Global Stocktake Findings: The first global stocktake (GST) assessed progress towards the Paris Agreement goals.
    • Fossil Fuel Transition: A commitment was made to move away from fossil fuels in energy systems, to triple renewable and nuclear energy capacity by 2030.
    • Continued Use in Other Sectors: Fossil fuels remain in use in sectors like plastics, transport, and agriculture.
    • Transitional Fuels and Climate Justice: The acceptance of natural gas as a transitional fuel was seen as a compromise on climate justice.

    Financial Mechanisms for Climate Action

    • Developed Nations’ Responsibility: The GST framework emphasized the leading role of developed nations in climate finance.
    • Private Sector Involvement: The role of private investment in addressing financial gaps was acknowledged.
    • Green Finance Initiatives: New mechanisms, including a $3.5 billion boost to the Green Climate Fund, were established to support sustainable practices in developing countries.

    India’s Stance on Climate and Health Declaration

    • UAE Declaration on Climate and Health: This declaration, partnered with the World Health Organisation, was signed by 123 countries but not by India.
    • India’s Concerns: India refrained from signing due to potential impacts on its growing healthcare infrastructure and the need to prioritize healthcare requirements.

    Global Methane Pledge and India’s Position

    • Renewed Focus on Methane: The pledge received attention with over $1 billion in new grants for methane reduction projects.
    • India’s Non-Participation: India did not sign the pledge, focusing instead on carbon dioxide emissions and considering the livelihood implications of methane reduction in agriculture.

    Assessment of COP28: Achievements and Shortcomings

    • Positive Developments: Notable achievements included the climate and health declaration, emphasis on nature-based solutions, and commitments to sustainable food systems.
    • Contentious Issues: Disagreements persisted over fossil-fuel subsidies, the role of the World Bank in the L&D fund, and private sector engagement in climate action.
    • Mixed Outcomes: While renewable energy targets marked progress, unresolved issues regarding L&D, fossil fuel use, and transitional fuels indicated ongoing challenges.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Act: COP28 showcased the intricate balance between ambitious climate goals and the practical realities of economic and social factors.
    • Continued Dialogue: The outcomes reflect the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration to address the multifaceted aspects of climate change and sustainable development.

  • Climate action needs an updated lexicon

     

    Cyclone 'Michaung' likely to make landfall on today; rain alert in many states | Latest News India - Hindustan Times

    Central idea 

    The article discusses the impact of shifting baseline syndrome on our perception of environmental changes, particularly in the context of unprecedented rainfall in south Tamil Nadu. It emphasizes the importance of officialese, or official vocabulary, in effectively communicating climate scenarios, addressing challenges in aligning definitions with lived experiences. The article also explores the global implications of terminological precision in climate negotiations and highlights the need for updated language to navigate evolving climate realities.

    Key Highlights:

    • South Tamil Nadu experiences unprecedented rainfall, reversing a northeast monsoon deficit to a 5% excess within 24 hours.
    • Shifting baseline syndrome distorts perceptions of environmental changes, impacting our understanding of losses and resource availability.
    • Climate change introduces a future-oriented shifting baseline, challenging language and memorialization of evolving climate scenarios.

    Key Challenges:

    • The deceptive simplicity of defining ‘devastating’ events, influenced by shifting baseline syndrome and community memory.
    • Official vocabulary and definitions, such as those for extreme weather events, may not align with lived experiences and evolving climate realities.
    • The role of officialese in communication, accountability, and global negotiations faces challenges in updating and aligning with ground realities.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Shifting baseline syndrome
    • Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs)
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
    • Officialese
    • Medical certificate of cause of death (MCCD)
    • Loss and damage fund

    Key Quotes and Statements:

    • “What we consider to be ‘devastating’ is deceptively simple because of the shifting baseline syndrome.”
    • “As the impacts of climate change become clearer, we confront a different kind of shifting baseline, one that stretches into the future.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Reference to unprecedented rainfall in Thoothukudi and Tiruchendur compared to Chennai’s Cyclone Michaung-induced rainfall.
    • Examples of official vocabulary limitations, like classifying both Chennai and Thoothukudi under ‘extremely heavy’ rainfall despite varying impacts.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Rainfall data: Thoothukudi recorded 361.4 mm, Tiruchendur 679 mm, and Chennai 500 mm within specific periods.
    • Impact of shifting baseline syndrome on underestimating environmental losses over time.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Discussion on the challenge of aligning lived experiences with official definitions, impacting trust in institutions.
    • The importance of updating officialese to bridge the gap between evolving climate scenarios and language used in official reports.
    • Global implications of officialese in climate negotiations, particularly related to the ‘loss and damage’ fund.

    Way Forward:

    • Advocacy for localized officialese that reflects State-level laws and community context.
    • Emphasis on the need for new official words to describe unprecedented climate events to ensure effective communication and global cooperation.
    • Acknowledgment of the human toll in defining ‘devastation,’ including challenges in medical certifications and disaster responses.

  • How the Hottest Summer ever affected the Arctic?

    arctic

    Central Idea

    • Unprecedented Warmth: The Arctic experienced its warmest summer on record in 2023, warming nearly four times faster than the global average since 1979.
    • NOAA’s Comprehensive Study: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Arctic Report Card, a peer-reviewed analysis by 82 scientists from 13 countries, details the critical impacts of this warming.

    Key Findings and Consequences of the Arctic Warming

    [1] Thawing of Subsea Permafrost

    • Accelerated Thawing Process: Warmer ocean temperatures are causing a faster thawing of subsea permafrost, which contains organic matter.
    • Release of Greenhouse Gases: This thawing leads to the decay of organic matter and the release of methane and carbon dioxide, intensifying global warming and ocean acidification.
    • Research Challenges: The extent of greenhouse gas release from subsea permafrost and its future impact on global warming remains uncertain due to limited research.

    [2] Food Insecurity

    • Decline in Salmon Populations: In Western Alaska, populations of Chinook and chum salmon were 81% and 92% below the 30-year mean, respectively.
    • Size Reduction and Species Variation: The size of adult salmon has decreased, and while Chinook and chum salmon declined, sockeye salmon numbers were 98% above the 30-year mean.
    • Impact on Indigenous Communities: These changes have led to fishery closures and significant cultural and food security impacts in Indigenous communities.

    [3] Raging Wildfires

    • Canada’s Severe Wildfire Season: Canada experienced its worst wildfire season, with over 10 million acres burned in the Northwest Territories.
    • Evacuations and Air Quality Impact: The fires led to mass evacuations and affected air quality, reaching as far as the southern United States.

    [4] Severe Flooding

    • Mendenhall Glacier Thinning: The Mendenhall Glacier in Alaska has thinned dramatically, causing annual floods.
    • Significant Flooding Event: In August 2023, a glacial lake burst through its ice dam, leading to unprecedented flooding and severe property damage in Juneau.

    [5] Greenland Ice Sheet Melting

    • Rare Melting Events: The highest point on Greenland’s ice sheet experienced melting for only the fifth time in 34 years.
    • Continued Mass Loss: Despite above-average winter snow accumulation, the ice sheet lost approximately 350 trillion pounds of mass between August 2022 and September 2023.
    • Contribution to Sea-Level Rise: Greenland’s ice sheet melting is the second-largest contributor to global sea-level rise.

    Conclusion

    • Immediate and Long-Term Impacts: The record-breaking temperatures in the Arctic have immediate consequences for local communities and long-term implications for global climate patterns.
    • Need for Further Research: Enhanced research is crucial to understand the full scope of Arctic warming and to develop effective mitigation strategies.
    • Global Responsibility: The findings highlight the urgent need for concerted global efforts to address climate change and its far-reaching impacts.

  • Is India doing enough to tackle climate change?

     

     

    Key Highlights:

    • Shift in Focus: COP28 saw a historic shift as all 198 signatories agreed to “transition away” from all fossil fuels, moving beyond the earlier emphasis on coal.
    • India’s Role: India played a crucial role in modifying language at COP26 and supported the UAE Consensus at COP28, signaling a departure from coal-centric agreements.

    Key Challenges:

    • Loopholes and Criticism: The COP28 outcome faced criticism for not achieving a complete fossil fuel phase-out, with concerns about loopholes such as nuclear abatement and carbon capture.
    • Developing Country Struggles: Developing countries, lacking expertise, face challenges in effectively de-carbonizing sectors and raising ambition due to financial constraints.

    Key Terms:

    • COP28: The 28th United Nations’ Conference of the Parties.
    • UAE Consensus: The agreement to transition away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.
    • Loss and Damage Fund (LDF): Operationalized at COP28, the fund addresses climate impacts but currently falls short in funding.

    Key Phrases:

    • “Transitioning away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.”
    • “Compromise after 30 years” regarding the LDF funding.
    • “Deep, rapid, and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.”

    Key Quotes:

    • Harjeet Singh: “The outcomes have been unprecedented and historic.”
    • Karthik Ganesan: “It’s a maze of words. What is clear is that subsidies for fossil fuels must go.”

    Key Statements:

    • Developing countries insist on technology transfer and removal of trade barriers for effective renewable energy transition.
    • India faces a dilemma in balancing economic growth, environmental concerns, and contributions to global climate initiatives.

    Key Examples and References:

    • India’s role in modifying language at COP26 and supporting the UAE Consensus at COP28.
    • Comparison of the economic value of coal and solar sectors in India.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • The LDF has raised $700 million, falling short of the trillions needed to address climate impacts.
    • India is the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases with a significantly smaller per capita emission rate.

    Critical Analysis:

    • The COP28 outcome is criticized for loopholes and a lack of ambition, emphasizing the need for a balance between economic growth and environmental concerns.
    • The dichotomy of India’s role as a regional power, emerging economy, and its responsibility to contribute to global climate initiatives is highlighted.

    Way Forward:

    • Developing countries must focus on technology transfer and removing trade barriers for effective renewable energy transition.
    • India needs to reassess its economic paradigm, prioritizing environmental concerns and adopting a sustainable growth model.
    • Continued engagement, contribution, and learning from large countries like India are essential for global climate justice movements.

  • COP28 : Understanding CCS and CDR

    ccd ccs

    Central Idea

    • At the COP28 climate talks in Dubai, discussions have centered on carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon-dioxide removal (CDR) technologies.
    • The interpretation of ‘abatement’ is crucial in understanding the role and limitations of CCS and CDR in climate action.

    Understanding CCS and CDR

    • CCS: This involves capturing CO₂ emissions at their source, such as in the fossil fuel industry and industrial processes, and storing them to prevent atmospheric release.
    • CDR: Encompasses natural methods like afforestation and technological approaches like direct air capture for absorbing and storing atmospheric CO₂.
    • COP28 Discussions: The term “unabated fossil fuels” in the draft texts refers to fossil fuel combustion without CCS. The texts advocate phasing out such fuels and enhancing emission removal technologies.

    Scale and Efficacy of CCS and CDR

    • IPCC’s AR6 Report: Heavily reliant on CDR for meeting the 1.5 degrees C temperature limit, assuming significant CO₂ sequestration by 2040.
    • Challenges: Direct mitigation to reduce emissions is daunting, making CDR crucial.
    • CCS Limitations: Effective CCS requires high capture rates, permanent storage, and minimal methane leakage from upstream processes.

    Concerns and Implications of CCS and CDR

    • Land Use for CDR: Large-scale CDR methods, especially technological ones, require significant land, raising equity, biodiversity, and food security concerns.
    • Impact on the Global South: CDR projects in the Global South could infringe on indigenous land rights and compete with agricultural land use.
    • Financial and Ethical Questions: The cost and responsibility of implementing CDR at scale raise questions about who should bear these burdens.

    Pitfalls of CCS and CDR

    • Potential for Increased Emissions: CCS and CDR could inadvertently create leeway for continued or increased greenhouse gas emissions.
    • IPCC Emission Scenarios: To limit warming to 1.5 degrees C, significant reductions in coal, oil, and gas use are required by 2050, with or without CCS.
    • Gas Emissions Pathways: Higher reliance on CCS and CDR could lead to emission pathways with a greater contribution from gas.

    Conclusion

    • Critical Decade Ahead: The next decade is pivotal in determining the viability and scalability of CDR methods.
    • Balancing Act: While CCS and CDR offer potential solutions for emission reduction, their implementation must be carefully managed to avoid unintended consequences and ensure equitable and effective climate action.
    • Future of Climate Negotiations: The discussions and decisions at COP28 regarding CCS and CDR will significantly influence the trajectory of global climate action and the pursuit of the 1.5 degrees C target.

  • Dubai Consensus for ‘transition away’ from Fossil Fuels

    dubai consensus

    Central Idea

    • The Dubai Consensus, a significant resolution towards reducing fossil fuel dependency, was adopted in COP 28, Dubai.

    Dubai Consensus

    • Key Clause: The resolution emphasizes transitioning away from fossil fuels to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, aligning with scientific recommendations to limit global temperature rise.
    • Balance between Countries: The text reflects a compromise between developed and developing nations on climate action and responsibility.
    • Dilution of Language: Earlier drafts with terms like ‘phase-out’ were softened due to opposition from oil-dependent countries.
    • Coal Usage: The final text moderated its stance on coal, crucial for countries like India, calling for a phase-down rather than a rapid phase-out.
    • Methane Emissions: The consensus introduces a focus on reducing methane emissions by 2030, a potent greenhouse gas.
    • Natural Gas as a ‘Transition Fuel’: The text’s reference to natural gas as a transitional fuel could favor gas-producing countries and overlook the need for developed countries to close the finance gap in climate adaptation.

    New Funding Commitments and Future Goals

    • Diverse Opinions: While some nations expressed dissatisfaction with the agreement’s scope, others highlighted the lack of financial support for developing countries.
    • Financial Pledges: COP 28 saw commitments to the Loss and Damage Fund and pledges to decarbonize the global economy.
    • Focus on Renewable Energy: The resolution signals a move towards phasing out fossil fuels and boosting renewable energy and efficiency.

    India’s Historical Position on Climate Change

    • Emission Statistics: India, a major developing country, has historically contributed 3% of greenhouse gases (1850-2019), compared to higher percentages from the US and EU.
    • Per Capita Emissions: India’s per capita emissions are below the global average, but its development needs and population growth have made it the third-largest emitter.
    • Balancing Development and Emissions: India has been navigating the pressure to reduce emissions while addressing its developmental needs, particularly its reliance on coal.

    India’s Commitments and Challenges

    • Net Zero by 2070: India has committed to achieving a net-zero state by 2070, alongside expanding its renewable energy capacity.
    • Glasgow COP 2021 Agreement: Under pressure, India agreed to a ‘phase-down’ of coal use, highlighting the need for equitable treatment of all fossil fuels, including oil and gas.
    • Import Dependency: As a net importer of oil and gas, India has raised concerns about the focus on coal while other fossil fuels remain under-addressed.

  • What does Unabated Fossil Fuels mean?

    Central Idea

    • At the ongoing COP28 climate summit, the term “unabated” fossil fuels has become a focal point in discussions about climate change mitigation.
    • The draft climate agreement mentions phasing down unabated coal, and US climate envoy John Kerry emphasized the need to phase out all unabated fossil fuels.

    Understanding ‘Unabated’ Fossil Fuels

    • Definition: “Unabated” fossil fuels refer to the use of coal, oil, and natural gas without reducing the associated CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions.
    • Contrast with ‘Abated’: “Abated” fossil fuels involve efforts to decrease emissions to an acceptable level, though the specifics of this level are not clearly defined.
    • IPCC’s Definition: The UN IPCC defines unabated fossil fuels as those without substantial reduction interventions for greenhouse gas emissions, suggesting capturing significant percentages of CO2 and methane.

    Role of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies

    • CCS Technologies: These technologies capture emissions from power stations or industrial facilities and store them underground.
    • Polarized Views: Oil and gas producers view CCS as essential for emission reduction, while climate activists and experts argue its effectiveness is limited.
    • EU and Nations’ Stance: The EU and several nations stated that CCS should not replace significant fossil fuel cuts and must not be overused.

    Effectiveness of Carbon Capture and Storage

    • IEA Report: The International Energy Agency reports that modern CCS technologies can capture about 90% of CO2.
    • IEEFA Study: A study by the IEEFA found that many flagship CCS projects underperformed or failed.
    • Climate Analytics Analysis: This analysis indicated that reliance on CCS could lead to substantial greenhouse gas emissions, potentially doubling CO2 emissions in 2023 if capture rates are lower than expected.

    Cost and Sustainability of CCS

    • High Costs: CCS technologies are expensive, with alternatives like wind, solar, and batteries being more cost-effective than retrofitting coal plants with CCS.
    • Sustainability Concerns: Scenarios achieving the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C limit show a near-complete phase-out of fossil fuels by 2050, with minimal use of fossil CCS.

    Implications for COP28 and Beyond

    • Potential COP28 Declaration: The summit’s final declaration might include phasing out or down of unabated fossil fuels, raising concerns about continued fossil fuel use with CCS.
    • Risks of ‘Abated’ Fossil Fuels: Experts like Claire Fyson from Climate Analytics warn that promoting ‘abated’ fossil fuels could misdirect climate finance and greenwash emissions from fossil fuel use.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Act: The COP28 discussions highlight the complexities of balancing fossil fuel use, technological solutions like CCS, and achieving climate targets.
    • Need for Caution: The debate underscores the need for cautious approaches to fossil fuel use and CCS, ensuring they align with broader climate goals and do not undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.