💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Global Groupings and Conventions

Important International institutions, agencies and fora- their structure, mandate.

  • UK signs CPTPP Trade Deal

    cptttp

    Central Idea

    • The UK has formally signed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), a major Indo-Pacific trade deal.
    • Joining the bloc is seen as the UK’s biggest trade deal since leaving the European Union.

    What is CPTPP?

    • The CPTPP, established in 2018, reduces trade barriers among 11 countries, including Australia, Canada, Japan, Mexico, and Vietnam.
    • Objectives of CPRPP include-
    1. Tariff Reduction and Market Opening: The agreement requires countries to eliminate or significantly reduce tariffs and make commitments to open services and investment markets.
    2. Addressing Competition and Intellectual Property: The CPTPP includes rules on competition, intellectual property rights, and protections for foreign companies.
    3. Expanding Membership: While the CPTPP aims to counter China’s regional dominance, China and other countries such as Taiwan, Ukraine, Costa Rica, Uruguay, and Ecuador have applied to join.

    Importance of CPTPP for the UK

    • Cutting Tariffs and Expanding Trade: The UK government anticipates reduced tariffs for UK exports to Asia Pacific countries. Joining the CPTPP expands trade opportunities, as the bloc represents 15% of global trade and a combined GDP of £12 trillion.
    • Post-Brexit Trade Strategy: After leaving the EU, the UK seeks to deepen trade ties with the Pacific region through its “Global Britain” strategy.
    • Seeking Faster-Growing Economies: The UK aims to establish trade deals with countries and blocs with faster-growing economies than the EU, given limitations in achieving agreements with major powers like China and the United States.

    Challenges and Criticisms

    • Economic Impact of Brexit: Critics argue that trade deals like the CPTPP will struggle to compensate for the economic damage caused by leaving the EU, which remains the UK’s largest trading bloc.
    • Long-Term Productivity Forecast: Brexit is projected to reduce the UK’s long-term productivity by 4%, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility.
    • Existing Trade Deals and Economic Boost: The UK already has trade deals with most CPTPP members, and the projected economic boost from joining the agreement is relatively modest at 0.08% annually.

    Recent Developments

    • Information Gathering Process: CPTPP members are assessing aspiring economies’ ability to meet the bloc’s high standards as part of the decision-making process for future membership.
    • Collective Decision-Making: The decision on new members and the timeline for their inclusion will be made collectively by existing CPTPP participants.

  • Global South: Origins and Significance

    gobal south

    Central Idea

    • The unwillingness of many leading countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America to stand with NATO over the war in Ukraine has brought to the fore once again the term “Global South.”

    What is Global South?

    • The term “Global South” refers to countries that are often described as ‘developing’, ‘less developed’, or ‘underdeveloped’.
    • It encompasses countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, which are characterized by higher levels of poverty, income inequality, and harsh living conditions compared to the “Global North”.

    Historical Background

    • Emergence of the Term: The term ‘Global South’ was first used in 1969 by political activist Carl Oglesby, who argued that the war in Vietnam represented a history of northern “dominance over the global south”.
    • Transition from Third World: Prior to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, these countries were commonly referred to as the ‘Third World’.
    • Momentum and Context: The term gained momentum following the end of the Cold War and the rise of the non-aligned movement.

    Features of the Global South

    • Lower-income Countries: The Global South primarily consists of lower-income countries located in Africa, Asia, and South America.
    • Geopolitical Background: Geopolitically, these nations have a history of imperialism and colonial rule.
    • Newly Industrialized Status: Many of these countries are in the process of industrialization and have been described as newly industrialized.
    • Prominent Countries: Prominent countries within the Global South include Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and Mexico, known for their large populations and economies.

    Need for Classification

    • Critique of Earlier Terms: The East/West binary and the categorization of countries as developed/developing were criticized for perpetuating stereotypes and favoring Western ideals.
    • Cold War Context: The First World, Second World, and Third World classifications were associated with Cold War alliances.
    • Broad and Inclusive Classification: The term ‘Global South’ provides a broader classification based on shared history of colonization and similar socioeconomic indicators.

    Global South amid Ukrainian War

    • South-South Cooperation: South-South cooperation has emerged as countries like India and China challenge the dominant global order led by the US.
    • Questioning the North as the Ideal: The rise of Asian countries questions the notion of the North as the ideal.
    • Criticism of Classification: The classification of the Global South has been criticized for its broadness and concerns about resource accumulation, as well as the neglect of Africa.

    Significance of the Global South

    • India’s Role: India aims to unite Global South countries to adopt an action-oriented approach.
    • Potential for Progress: Cooperation within the Global South can unlock significant potential for progress, including technical and ideas exchanges, sharing of manufacturing best practices, and more.
    • Common Concerns: Energy security, justice, and sustainable energy transition are common concerns for the Global South, which India aims to highlight.

    Challenges for Consolidation

    • Debate over Climate Reparations: The ongoing debate over climate reparations has triggered controversy, as some argue that China and India should contribute given their increasing industrialization and historical carbon emissions.
    • Impact of Russia-Ukraine War: The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has impacted the least developed countries (LDCs) and prompted them to align more closely with China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
    • Dominance of the US: Despite the shift to a multipolar world, the US still dominates international affairs, posing challenges for the consolidation of the Global South.

    Way Forward

    • Active Engagement: India must actively engage with regional politics within the developing world to champion the Global South.
    • Tailored Policy Approach: It is crucial to recognize the diversity within the Global South and develop a policy vision that addresses the varying needs and capabilities of its member countries.

    Conclusion

    • Collaboration between the Global South and India can lead to significant advancements in various fields.
    • India’s development partnerships prioritize consultation, outcome orientation, people-centric approaches, and respect for the sovereignty of partner countries.
    • Distinguishing India’s approach from that of China can help avoid debt traps and financially unsound undertakings, promoting sustainable development within the Global South.

  • What is High Seas Treaty?

    high seas treaty

    Central Idea

    • The Marine Biodiversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) or the High Seas Treaty was adopted by the UN on June 19.
    • It became the third agreement under UNCLOS, following the establishment of the International Seabed Authority (ISB) and the Fish Stocks Agreement (FSA).

    BBNJ/ High Seas Treaty

    • The idea of protecting the marine environment emerged in 2002, leading to the recognition of the need for an agreement in 2008.
    • In 2015, the UN General Assembly formed a Preparatory Committee to create the treaty.
    • Intergovernmental conferences (IGC) were held, resulting in the adoption of the treaty in 2023.
    • The treaty’s objective is to implement international regulations for the protection of marine life beyond national jurisdiction through international cooperation.

    Key Provisions of Treaty

    (1) Marine Protected Areas:

    • The treaty establishes marine protected areas to safeguard the oceans from human activities.
    • Decisions on protected areas require a “three-quarter majority vote” to prevent obstruction by a few parties.

    (2) Sharing Benefits from Marine Genetic Resources:

    • The treaty mandates sharing scientific information and monetary benefits through a “clear house mechanism.”
    • The mechanism ensures open access to information on marine protected areas, marine genetic resources, and area-based management tools.

    (3) Capacity Building and Marine Technology:

    • The treaty emphasizes capacity building and the use of marine technology for environmental impact assessment.
    • The Scientific and Technical Body will create standards and guidelines, assisting countries with limited capacity in carrying out assessments.

    Challenges and Controversies

    (1) Marine Genetic Resources:

    • The issue of sharing and exchanging information on marine genetic resources was a contentious point during negotiations.
    • Debates focused on monitoring information sharing and the potential hindrance to bioprospecting research.

    (2) Definition and Language:

    • The use of phrases like “promote” or “ensure” in different parts of the treaty, particularly regarding benefit sharing, sparked heated debates.

    (3) Adjacency Issue:

    • Negotiations were prolonged due to the need for provisions allowing coastal states to exercise sovereign rights over seabed and subsoil in areas beyond their jurisdiction.
    • The interests of landlocked and distant states further complicated decision-making.

    Opposition to the Treaty

    • Several developed countries opposed the treaty due to their support for private entities involved in advanced research and development of marine technology.
    • Russia and China also expressed reservations, with Russia ultimately withdrawing during the final stage of consensus building, arguing that the treaty lacks a balance between conservation and sustainability.

    Significance of the treaty

    (1) Environmental Preservation:

    • The High Seas Treaty is crucial for protecting marine biodiversity and addressing pressing issues such as overfishing and pollution.
    • It represents a significant step towards international cooperation in preserving the health and sustainability of our oceans.

    (2) Global Cooperation and Research:

    • The treaty promotes the sharing of scientific information and encourages collaboration among countries.
    • This will foster research initiatives and facilitate a better understanding of marine ecosystems, leading to more effective conservation measures.

    Conclusion

    • The adoption of the High Seas Treaty marks a significant milestone in international efforts to protect marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdictions.
    • While challenges and controversies prolonged the negotiation process, the treaty sets the stage for enhanced global cooperation and the implementation of regulations to safeguard our oceans for future generations.

    Back2Basics:

    International Seabed Authority (ISA) Fish Stocks Agreement (FSA)
    Purpose Regulate and manage activities in the international seabed and ocean floor beyond national jurisdiction Ensure the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks
    Legal Framework Established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) International treaty adopted by the United Nations
    Established Date 1994 1995
    Resource Focus Non-living resources (seabed minerals) and living resources (deep-sea ecosystems) Fish stocks (shared resources occurring in EEZs and beyond national jurisdiction)
    Cooperation Emphasizes cooperation among states and establishment of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) Promotes cooperation among states for sustainable fisheries management
    Conservation Manages resources for the benefit of humankind as a whole, adhering to the common heritage of mankind principle Aims to conserve and sustainably manage fish stocks for present and future generations
    Licensing Issues licenses and contracts for seabed mineral exploration and exploitation N/A (Focuses on the management and conservation of fish stocks)
    Data Collection Promotes scientific research and international cooperation in the deep seabed area Encourages data collection, reporting, and scientific assessment of fish stocks
    Dispute Settlement Provides mechanisms for dispute settlement and peaceful resolution of conflicts Includes provisions for dispute settlement and peaceful resolution of conflicts
    Membership Consists of member states and the European Union Open to states committed to sustainable fisheries management
    Headquarters Located in Kingston, Jamaica N/A (Operates under the United Nations framework)

     

  • Iran dragged to International Court of Justice (ICJ)

    iran icj

    Central Idea

    • The UK, Canada, Sweden, and Ukraine have jointly initiated legal proceedings against Iran at the International Court of Justice, the highest court of the United Nations.
    • The case pertains to the tragic downing of a Ukrainian passenger jet in 2020, resulting in the loss of all 176 passengers and crew members.
    • Iran recently acquired the membership of SCO.

    About the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
    Establishment Also called World Court, was established in 1945.

    Began its operations in 1946.

    Located in The Hague, Netherlands.
    Purpose To settle legal disputes between member states and provide advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized UN organs and specialized agencies.
    Composition 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.

    Judges serve for a term of 9 years and can be re-elected.
    Judicial Independence Operates independently of the UN.

    Its decisions are binding on the parties involved in a dispute.

    Member states are obligated to comply with ICJ judgments.
    Jurisdiction Over cases submitted to it by sovereign states.

    Can only hear cases if both parties involved in the dispute have consented to its jurisdiction.

    Provides advisory opinions to UN organs and specialized agencies.
    Cases Disputes over territorial boundaries, maritime rights, human rights violations, interpretation of treaties, and state responsibility.

    It has jurisdiction over both contentious cases and advisory proceedings.
    Legal Systems Applies two primary sources of law:  International treaties and customary international law.

    Considers general principles of law and judicial decisions as subsidiary sources.
    Proceedings ICJ proceedings are public unless the court decides otherwise or the parties involved agree on privacy.
    Binding Nature of Judgments ICJ judgments are legally binding on the parties involved in a dispute.

    If a state fails to comply with a judgment, the matter can be brought to the attention of the UN Security Council for further action.
    Enforcement Mechanism ICJ lacks its own enforcement mechanism, and it relies on the voluntary compliance of states with its judgments.

    However, the UN Security Council has the power to take measures to enforce ICJ rulings.
    Accessibility Accessible to all member states of the UN.

    Non-member states can also become parties to cases.

    Tragedy and International Response

    • Flight PS752: Details of the Ukrainian passenger jet, which was en route from Tehran to Kyiv on January 8, 2020.
    • Shooting Down: The plane was shot down shortly after takeoff.
    • Nationalities: The victims included individuals from Canada, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Afghanistan, and Iran, spanning a wide age range.

    Iran’s Admission and Subsequent Actions

    • Failed Arbitration Request: Iran’s lack of response to arbitration request led to the filing of the case.
    • Initial Denials: Iran initially denied responsibility for the downing but later admitted that the Revolutionary Guard had mistakenly shot down the plane using two surface-to-air missiles.
    • Blaming the Operator: Iranian authorities attributed the incident to an air defense operator who allegedly mistook the Boeing 737-800 for an American cruise missile.
    • Judicial Response: An Iranian court sentenced an air defense commander to 13 years in prison for his alleged role in the downing.
    • Critique of the Trial: The countries filing the case criticized the prosecution, referring to it as a “sham and opaque trial.”

    Allegations against Iran  

    • Lack of Preventive Measures: The plaintiffs argue that Iran failed to take necessary measures to prevent the intentional commission of an offence.
    • Inadequate Investigation and Prosecution: Iran is accused of conducting an impartial, transparent, and fair criminal investigation, which is inconsistent with international law.
    • Destruction of Evidence: Allegations claim that Iran withheld or destroyed crucial evidence related to the incident.
    • Harassment of Families: Iran is accused of threatening and harassing the families of the victims who sought justice.
    • Failure to Report: Iran neglected to report crucial details of the incident to the International Civil Aviation Organization.

     

  • What is Intergovernmental Negotiations Framework (IGN)?

    Central Idea

    • The Intergovernmental Negotiations Framework (IGN) meetings, which aim to reform the United Nations Security Council, are now being webcasted for the first time in history.

    What is IGN?

    • The Intergovernmental Negotiations framework (IGN) is a collective effort by various nation-states within the United Nations to advance the reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).
    • This article provides an overview of the composition of the IGN and highlights the progress made in achieving consensus among its members.

    Evolution of the Reform Agenda

    • The issue of reforming the UN Security Council has been under discussion since 1993, with successive reports published in 2001 and 2007.
    • The current agenda for this issue within the UN General Assembly can be accessed online.

    Composition of the IGN

    • The IGN consists of several international organizations representing different perspectives on UN Security Council reform, including:
    1. African Union
    2. G4 nations (Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan)
    3. Uniting for Consensus Group (UfC), also known as the “Coffee Club”
    4. 69 Group of Developing Countries
    5. Arab League
    6. Caribbean Community (CARICOM)
    • Each group presents unique positions regarding the reform of the UN Security Council, reflecting the diverse interests and perspectives of its member states.

    Establishment of Consensus

    • On July 27, 2016, the United Nations General Assembly adopted an “oral decision” by general acclamation, approving the “elements of convergence” declaration.
    • This declaration outlined the status of the consensus achieved by the IGN members at that time.

     

  • China-Pakistan Nuclear Deal: Implications for Global Nuclear Commerce

    pakistan china nuclear

    Central Idea

    • The recent agreement between China and Pakistan for a 1,200 MW nuclear power plant in Pakistan’s Chashma nuclear complex has significant implications.
    • This article examines the details of the deal, China’s involvement in Pakistan’s nuclear projects, the energy situation in Pakistan, and the broader implications for the global nuclear trade.

    Chashma Nuclear Complex: The Latest Deal

    • Deal Signed: Pakistan signs agreement for a 1,200 MW nuclear power plant at the Chashma nuclear complex.
    • Financial Concessions: China provides “special concessions” for financing the construction amid Pakistan’s financial crisis and ongoing IMF bailout negotiations.
    • Largest Reactor: The new plant (C-5) will be the largest reactor at the Chashma complex and utilize China’s Hualong One reactor technology.

    China’s Nuclear Projects in Pakistan

    • Existing Plants: China has constructed four phases of the Chashma nuclear complex, with four reactors of approximately 325 MW each.
    • Operational Plants: Pakistan currently operates six China-built nuclear plants, including four at Chashma and two at the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP).
    • Energy Solution: The KANUPP-3 reactor, powered by a Chinese Hualong One reactor, recently went fully online, providing relief to Pakistan’s energy crisis.
    • BRI and CPEC: The KANUPP-3 project is part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

    Pakistan’s Energy Situation

    • Energy Deficit: Pakistan faces a persistent energy deficit, financial crisis, and rising import bills.
    • Need for Renewables and Nuclear: The country urgently needs to increase the share of renewables and nuclear energy to reduce dependence on imported fuel.
    • Current Energy Mix: Thermal sources account for 61%, hydropower 24%, nuclear 12%, and wind and solar only 3% of Pakistan’s energy mix.
    • Capacity Increase: Pakistan aims to boost nuclear capacity, which has increased by 39% annually to reach 3,530 MW.

    Broader Implications

    • NSG Prohibitions and Exemptions: China’s nuclear commerce with Pakistan raises concerns regarding the Nuclear Suppliers Group’s prohibition on technology transfer to non-NPT signatory countries. China argues that earlier deals with Pakistan exempt the Chashma 3 and Chashma 4 reactors from NSG restrictions.
    • Comparison with India-U.S. Nuclear Deal: Unlike the India-U.S. nuclear deal, China has not sought NSG waivers, and Pakistan has not made similar commitments, which raises questions about the fairness and consistency of global nuclear governance.
    • Erosion of Global Rules: The China-Pakistan nuclear deals contribute to the erosion of global rules governing nuclear commerce and highlight the need for a robust international framework to ensure non-proliferation and safety standards.
    • Future of the NSG: The actions of China and Pakistan challenge the relevance and effectiveness of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, which needs to address emerging complexities in the global nuclear trade.

    Back2Basics: Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)

    nuclear

    • NSG is a multinational body consisting of 48 member countries.
    • Established in 1974, its primary objective is to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and related technology.

    Purpose of the NSG:

    • Non-Proliferation Focus: The NSG aims to contribute to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons through the implementation of guidelines for nuclear exports and nuclear-related exports.
    • Response to Nuclear Tests: The group was formed in response to India’s nuclear test in 1974 and seeks to prevent the misuse and spread of nuclear technology.

    NSG Guidelines:

    • Export Criteria: The NSG sets guidelines for its member countries to regulate their nuclear trade activities.
    • NPT Requirement: Recipient countries must be parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), reinforcing the commitment to non-proliferation.
    • IAEA Safeguards: Full-scope International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards implementation is mandatory for countries receiving nuclear exports.

    Prohibition and Control:

    • Non-NPT Countries: The NSG guidelines prohibit the transfer of nuclear technology and materials to countries that have not signed the NPT.
    • Peaceful Use: The restrictions aim to ensure that nuclear technology and materials are used solely for peaceful purposes, preventing their diversion for military use.
    • Export Control Collaboration: Member countries cooperate to maintain strict control over nuclear-related transfers, preventing proliferation risks.

    Role in Non-Proliferation:

    • Global Non-Proliferation Efforts: The NSG strengthens international non-proliferation efforts through consensus-based decision-making and the establishment of robust export controls.
    • Nuclear Commerce Regulation: By regulating nuclear trade, the NSG promotes transparency, accountability, and adherence to high standards of nuclear non-proliferation.
    • Nuclear Safety and Security: The NSG collaborates with other international organizations and non-member countries to enhance nuclear safety and security worldwide.

  • NATO+5 Status and India

    nato

    Central Idea

    • As Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits Washington, the US Senate is set to introduce legislation that aims to grant India ‘NATO plus five’ defence status.
    • However, India’s External Affairs Minister has already rejected this framework for India.

    What is NATO Plus?

    • NATO Plus is a coalition consisting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and five countries, namely Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel, and South Korea.
    • The primary objective of this group is to enhance global defense cooperation.
    • Membership in NATO Plus would offer several advantages to India, including seamless intelligence sharing among member countries, access to cutting-edge military technology without delays, and a strengthened defense partnership with the United States.

    North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

    • NATO is an alliance composed of 31 North American and European countries with shared values and interests.
    • The organization was established through the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty, also known as the Washington Treaty, on April 4, 1949.
    • The main purpose of NATO is to safeguard peace and ensure the territorial integrity, political independence, and security of its member states.
    • Article Five of the treaty stipulates that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against all members, and the alliance will provide assistance, including the use of armed forces if necessary.
    • NATO’s headquarters is located in Brussels, Belgium.

    Why is the US keen to introduce India to NATO?

    The US is keen to introduce India to NATO for these reasons:

    • Counterbalancing China: India’s inclusion in NATO would help counterbalance China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific.
    • Strengthening defense ties: It would deepen defense cooperation between the US and India.
    • Enhancing regional stability: India’s participation would contribute to regional stability and improve defense capabilities.
    • Expanding NATO’s reach: Including India would expand NATO’s global presence and address security challenges in the Indo-Pacific.
    • Promoting a rules-based order: It aligns with shared values of democracy, human rights, and freedom of navigation.

    Benefits if India’s ever joins

    Joining NATO + 5 would offer several advantages to India, including:

    • Enhanced security cooperation: India would benefit from increased security cooperation and intelligence sharing with NATO and its five partner countries, namely Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel, and South Korea.
    • Access to advanced military technology: India would gain access to the latest military technologies and equipment through streamlined transfer processes, allowing for quicker modernization of its defense forces.
    • Strengthened defense partnership: Becoming a member of NATO + 5 would further strengthen India’s defense partnership with the United States and other NATO allies, leading to closer collaboration on various defense initiatives.
    • Improved regional security: India’s participation in NATO + 5 would contribute to regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, by fostering cooperation among like-minded countries to address common security challenges.
    • Enhanced deterrence against adversaries: Being part of this defense framework would enhance India’s deterrence capabilities against potential adversaries, particularly in light of increasing security threats in the region.

    Details of the Bill

    • The proposed legislation seeks to upgrade India-U.S. defence ties by adding India to this arrangement, enabling the transfer of defence equipment with minimal bureaucratic interference.
    • The move comes following a recommendation from a U.S. House of Representatives committee on China, suggesting India’s inclusion in the club.

    India’s Response

    • India’s External Affairs Minister stated that the proposed template does not apply to India, appreciating the sentiment but clarifying that it was not suitable for the country.
    • The distinction between India and the proposed framework is well understood by the Biden administration.

    Reasons for India’s Denial

    India is unlikely to join ‘NATO-Plus’ for the following reasons:

    • Non-aligned policy: India has traditionally pursued a non-aligned foreign policy, which prioritizes strategic autonomy and avoids formal military alliances.
    • Regional partnerships: India prefers forging strategic partnerships with countries in the Indo-Pacific region based on shared interests, rather than joining broad-based military alliances.
    • Unique security challenges: India faces specific security challenges in its region and tailors its defense priorities accordingly, making a broad military alliance less suitable for its needs.
    • Diverse foreign policy objectives: India pursues a multi-faceted foreign policy approach, focusing on a range of objectives beyond security alliances, such as economic cooperation and climate change.
    • Avoiding provoking China: India seeks to manage its relationship with China pragmatically and avoid actions that could escalate tensions, making joining a US-led military alliance potentially provocative.

  • China blocks Indian proposal to blacklist Pakistani terrorist at UN

    unsc

    Central Idea

    • China yet again blocked a proposal by India and the US at the United Nations to designate Pakistan-national Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Sajid Mir as a global terrorist on the UN Security Council’s 1267 list..

    What is the UNSC 1267 list?

    • The UNSC resolution 1267 was adopted unanimously on 15 October 1999.
    • It came to force in 1999, and strengthened after the September, 2001 attacks.
    • It is now known as the Da’esh and Al Qaeda Sanctions Committee.

    What is UNSC 1267 committee?

    • It comprises all permanent and non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).
    • The 1267 list of terrorists is a global list, with a UNSC stamp.
    • It is one of the most important and active UN subsidiary bodies working on efforts to combat terrorism, particularly in relation to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State group.
    • It discusses UN efforts to limit the movement of terrorists, especially those related to travel bans, the freezing of assets and arms embargoes for terrorism.

    How is the listing done?

    (1) Submission of Proposal

    • Any member state can submit a proposal for listing an individual, group, or entity.
    • The proposal must include acts or activities indicating the proposed individual/group/entity had participated in the financing, planning, facilitating, preparing, or perpetrating of acts or activities linked to the said organizations.

    (2) Actual decision

    • Decisions on listing and de-listing are adopted by consensus.
    • The proposal is sent to all the members, and if no member objects within five working days, the proposal is adopted.
    • An “objection” means rejection for the proposal.

    (3) Putting and resolving ‘Technical Holds’

    • Any member of the Committee may also put a “technical hold” on the proposal and ask for more information from the proposing member state.
    • During this time, other members may also place their own holds.
    • The matter remains on the “pending” list of the Committee.
    • Pending issues must be resolved in six months, but the member state that has placed the hold may ask for an additional three months.
    • At the end of this period, if an objection is not placed, the matter is considered approved.

    Why is India furious this time?

    • Recently PM Modi and Xi Jinping attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Samarkand.
    • The grouping had agreed to take strong and consolidated action against terrorism in the region.
    • Despite this, China has exposed its double standards on the issue of terrorism for consistently stopping the listing of Pakistan-based terrorists.
    • This is again very surprising movement by China by putting a ‘Technical Hold’.

    Here is a timeline of how China disrupts the global efforts against terrorism:

    • 2009: After the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, India moved an independent terror designation proposal against Masood Azhar but China blocked the move.
    • 2016: After seven years, India proposes listing of Masood Azhar as a global terrorist and is supported by the US, the UK and France. China blocks the move again.
    • 2017: The trio moves a third proposal only to be blocked by China again.
    • 2019: After the attacks on the CRPF personnel in J-K’s Pulwama, India calls 25 envoys of different countries to highlight the role Islamabad plays in funding, promoting and strengthening global terrorism. India moves the fourth proposal demanding Masood Azhar’s listing. China lifted its technical hold.
    • June 2022: China blocked a proposal by India and the US to list Pakistan-based terrorist Abdul Rehman Makki as a ‘Global Terrorist’
    • August 2022: China blocks India-US joint proposal to list Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) deputy chief Abdul Rauf Azhar as UNSC designated terrorist.

    Conclusion

    • China’s actions expose its double speak and double standards when it comes to the international community’s shared battle against terrorism.
    • This clearly depicts its care for its vassal state Pakistan.

    Back2Basics: United Nations Security Council

    • The UNSC is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations and is charged with the maintenance of international peace and security.
    • Its powers include the establishment of peacekeeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions, and the authorization of military action through Security Council resolutions.
    • It is the only UN body with the authority to issue binding resolutions to member states.
    • The Security Council consists of fifteen members. Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, and the United States—serve as the body’s five permanent members (P5).
    • These permanent members can veto any substantive Security Council resolution, including those on the admission of new member states or candidates for Secretary-General.
    • The Security Council also has 10 non-permanent members, elected on a regional basis to serve two-year terms. The body’s presidency rotates monthly among its members.

  • UK launches Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS)

    developing

    Central Idea

    • The launch of the Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS) by the United Kingdom presents a significant opportunity for India and 65 other poor and developing nations.

    Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS)

    • The DCTS is a preferential trading program introduced by the United Kingdom.
    • It replaces similar arrangements that were in place during the UK’s membership in the European Union.
    • The scheme aims to support trade and economic growth for 65 poor and developing countries.

    Key Features:

    • Tariff Reduction: DCTS removes or reduces tariffs on imports from eligible countries.
    • Simplified Trading Rules: The scheme simplifies trade procedures to facilitate smoother transactions.
    • Enhanced Market Access: It provides improved market access for participating countries’ products.
    • Favorable Terms: UK businesses can save costs through reduced or eliminated tariffs on imports.
    • Product Coverage: The scheme covers various goods, including clothing, food, and children’s toys.

    Focus on Sustainability and Good Governance

    • Responsible Trade Practices: Participating countries are expected to adhere to international conventions related to human rights, labor standards, anti-corruption measures, climate change, and environmental protection.
    • Mutual Benefits: The scheme promotes sustainable development and creates a mutually beneficial partnership between the UK and developing countries.

    Benefits for Participating Countries

    • Trade Opportunities: DCTS creates opportunities for businesses and supports livelihoods.
    • Job Creation: The scheme aims to generate employment by diversifying local and international supply chains.
    • Economic Growth: It contributes to sustained economic growth in participating countries.
    • Market Expansion: DCTS helps countries access the UK market and expand their export capacities.

    Impact on India

    • Trade Opportunities for India: The DCTS presents significant trade opportunities for India.
    • Labour-Intensive Sectors: Indian exporters in sectors like textiles, leather goods, and metals can benefit.
    • Market Access: The scheme reduces trade barriers and expands market access to the UK for Indian goods.
    • Interim Measure: DCTS serves as an interim measure while negotiations for a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the UK and India continue.
    • Future Potential: The DCTS sets the stage for deeper economic ties and a future FTA between the UK and India.

  • Global Nuclear Arsenal Expansion Race

    nuclear arms stockpile

    Central Idea

    • China’s nuclear arsenal: China increased its nuclear arsenal from 350 warheads in January 2022 to 410 warheads in January 2023, according to SIPRI.
    • Potential ICBM parity: SIPRI suggests that depending on how China structures its forces, it could have a comparable number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) to the U.S. or Russia by the end of the decade.
    • Concerns over stated aim: SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme questions the alignment between China’s expanding nuclear arsenal and its declared goal of maintaining minimum nuclear forces for national security.

    India and Pakistan’s Nuclear Arsenal Growth

    • India’s nuclear arsenal: SIPRI estimates indicate that India’s nuclear arsenal grew from 160 warheads in 2022 to 164 warheads in 2023.
    • Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal: SIPRI estimates that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal increased from 165 warheads in 2022 to 170 warheads in 2023.
    • Emphasis on longer-range weapons: India seems to be placing growing importance on longer-range weapons capable of reaching targets across China, while Pakistan remains the primary focus of India’s nuclear deterrent.

    Global Nuclear Weapons Inventory

    • Total global inventory: As of January 2023, the global inventory of warheads reached 12,512.
    • Warheads in military stockpiles: Approximately 9,576 warheads were held in military stockpiles for potential use, representing an increase of 86 warheads compared to January 2022.
    • Dominance of Russia and the U.S.: Russia and the U.S. collectively possess nearly 90% of all nuclear weapons.
    • Stability in nuclear arsenals: The size of Russia’s and the U.S.’ nuclear arsenals remained relatively stable in 2022, although transparency regarding nuclear forces declined due to the Ukraine conflict, as noted by SIPRI.

    Reasons for increased stockpile

    • Shifting power dynamics: China’s significant expansion of its nuclear arsenal has implications for global power dynamics, potentially challenging the traditional dominance of the U.S. and Russia in the nuclear arena.
    • Regional security concerns: China’s increased nuclear capabilities raise concerns among neighboring countries, particularly those involved in territorial disputes or security rivalries in the Asia-Pacific region.
    • Global arms race: China’s nuclear arsenal growth may fuel an arms race in the region, leading to increased tensions and instability.

    Nuclear Dynamics in South Asia

    • Strategic rivalry between India and Pakistan: The nuclear arsenals of India and Pakistan continue to expand, reflecting the ongoing strategic competition and deterrence dynamics between the two countries.
    • Escalation risks: The increase in nuclear capabilities in South Asia raises the potential for miscalculation and escalation, heightening the risk of a nuclear conflict in the region.
    • Implications for regional stability: The growth of nuclear arsenals in India and Pakistan has wider implications for regional stability and the effectiveness of non-proliferation efforts.

    Challenges to the Global Disarmament ideals

    • Declining transparency: The decline in transparency regarding nuclear forces in Russia and the U.S., coupled with the overall increase in global warhead stockpiles, poses challenges to nuclear arms control and disarmament efforts.
    • Erosion of trust: The lack of transparency and increased stockpiles undermine trust between nuclear-armed states, making it more difficult to achieve meaningful progress in disarmament negotiations.
    • Need for renewed dialogue: The growing nuclear arsenals underscore the importance of revitalizing international dialogue on disarmament and strengthening existing arms control agreements.

    Legacy issues

    • Notion of Nuclear ‘Haves’ and ‘Have-Nots’: The proponents of disarmaments are themselves nuclear armed countries thus creating a nuclear monopoly.
    • Concept of Peaceful Nuclear Explosion (PNE): conducted for non-military purposes such as mining.

    India’s commitment for de-nuclearization

    • Universal commitment and non-discriminatory framework: India advocates for nuclear disarmament based on principles of equality, non-discrimination, and global security.
    • Working paper on Nuclear Disarmament: India submitted a working paper on Nuclear Disarmament to the UN General Assembly in 2006, presenting its perspectives and proposals for achieving global disarmament.
    • Participation in Nuclear Security Initiatives: India actively engages in the Nuclear Security Summit process and supports efforts to enhance global nuclear security through participation in international conferences organized by the IAEA.
    • Membership in the Nuclear Security Contact Group: India is a member of the Nuclear Security Contact Group, contributing to discussions and initiatives aimed at strengthening international cooperation on nuclear security.
    • Support for Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT): India expresses readiness to support negotiations on a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty, considering it an important step towards disarmament by banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons.
    • Concerns regarding the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT): India has not joined the CTBT due to several concerns, but it remains open to addressing these concerns and exploring possibilities for future accession to the treaty.
    • Leadership in Preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Proliferation: India actively leads efforts to prevent terrorists from acquiring WMDs, piloting an annual UNGA Resolution on “Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction” since 2002, which receives consensus adoption.

    Way forward

    • Strengthening non-proliferation efforts: The expansion of nuclear arsenals highlights the need for robust non-proliferation mechanisms and adherence to international agreements such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
    • Managing nuclear risks: As the number of nuclear-armed states increases, effective risk management and confidence-building measures become crucial to prevent accidental or intentional use of nuclear weapons.
    • Balancing deterrence and disarmament: The international community faces the challenge of striking a balance between maintaining credible deterrence and pursuing disarmament goals to ensure global security.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024