💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Governance

Important aspects of Society

  • Niti Aayog moots policy measures to develop workers’ accommodation around factories

    Why in the News?

    NITI Aayog has proposed a set of policy interventions to enable the creation of mega workers’ accommodations near factories under its initiative called S.A.F.E (Site Adjacent Factory Employee) Accommodation-Worker Housing for Manufacturing Growth.

    About the S.A.F.E. (Site Adjacent Factory Employee) Initiative

    Overview
    • S.A.F.E. initiative by NITI Aayog aims to provide affordable dormitory-style housing for workers near industrial areas, especially migrant laborers, including women.
      • The housing will include essential amenities like water, electricity, and sanitation, improving workers’ living conditions and enhancing productivity.
    Key Features
    • Location: Housing will be near industrial hubs to minimize commute time.
    • Basic Amenities: Includes water, electricity, and sanitation.
    • Ownership: Non-transferable accommodations, strictly for worker use, ensuring worker welfare.
    Significance
    • Worker Welfare: Improves living standards and promotes gender inclusivity.
    • Productivity: Reduces commute time, enhancing productivity and reducing attrition.
    • Economic Growth: Attracts global investors and supports India’s manufacturing growth target of 25% GDP by 2047.
    Key Recommendations
    • Tax & GST Benefits: Reclassification for tax exemptions to make the initiative financially viable.
    • Zoning Laws: Amendments for mixed-use developments to integrate worker housing.
    • Viability Gap Funding (VGF): 30%-40% of project cost for financial support.
    • Environmental Clearances: Streamlining for faster approvals.
    • Financial Support: Public-private partnerships for development and management.

  • [19th December 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: Section 6A of the Citizenship Act — why it fails Assam?

    PYQ Relevance:
    Q) Consider the following statements: 
    1. Aadhaar card can be used as proof of citizenship or domicile. 
    2. Once issued, the Aadhaar number cannot be deactivated or omitted by the Issuing Authority. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (UPSC CSE 2018)
    (a) 1 only 
    (b) 2 only 
    (c) Both 1 and 2 
    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Mentor’s Comment:  UPSC Prelims have focused on ‘citizenship or domicile’ (in 2018), and  ‘only one citizenship and one domicile’ (2021).

    In October 2024, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled 4:1 to uphold Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. This law provides a special process for people from former East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) who settled in Assam, allowing them to become Indian citizens if they arrived before March 25, 1971. The judgment is important but raises questions about overlooked constitutional issues and the possible negative effects of the decision.

    Today’s editorial focuses on the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold the constitutional validity of Section 6A. You can use this content for the question asked on ‘Governance issues’ and ‘internal security issues’.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold the constitutional validity of Section 6A overlooks critical constitutional issues, especially those affecting Assam’s indigenous population.

    What is Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955?

    Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, was introduced as part of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 1985, following the Assam Accord. This provision specifically addresses the citizenship status of migrants from Bangladesh who settled in Assam.

    • Categories of Migrants:
    Pre-1966 Migrants: Individuals who entered Assam before January 1, 1966, are deemed Indian citizens from that date.
    1966-1971 Migrants: Those who entered between January 1, 1966, and March 25, 1971, can apply for citizenship after a mandatory registration process and a waiting period of ten years.
    • Cut-off Date: The cut-off date of March 25, 1971, was chosen because it coincides with significant historical events related to the Bangladesh Liberation War.
    • Exclusions: Section 6A explicitly excludes individuals who were already Indian citizens before the amendment and those expelled under the Foreigners Act, 1946.
    • Voting Rights: Migrants from the 1966-1971 category are denied voting rights for ten years from the date they are identified as foreigners.

    How does Section 6A impact the demographic and cultural landscape of Assam?

    • Cultural and Linguistic Displacement: The influx of migrants facilitated by Section 6A has led to significant demographic changes in Assam. Research indicates that between 1951 and 2011, the percentage of the Bengali-speaking population increased from 21.2% to 28.91%, while the proportion of Assamese speakers declined from 69.3% to 48.38%. This shift represents a cultural and linguistic displacement that threatens the distinct identity of the Assamese people.
    • Political and Economic Strain: The arrival of a large number of migrants has raised concerns about political representation and economic resources in Assam. The perceived threat to local culture and political rights has been a driving force behind movements advocating for stricter immigration controls.
    • Social Tensions: The demographic shifts have exacerbated social tensions between indigenous Assamese communities and migrant populations, leading to conflicts over resources, identity, and political power.

    What are the legal and constitutional challenges associated with Section 6A?

    • Violation of Article 29: Critics argue that Section 6A violates Article 29, which protects the cultural and linguistic identities of distinct communities in India.
      • The Supreme Court’s ruling, which stated that the influx did not infringe upon the ability of Assamese people to conserve their culture, has been challenged as flawed reasoning that overlooks the erosion of cultural identity.
    • Temporal Unreasonableness: Section 6A lacks a temporal limitation, allowing individuals who entered before March 25, 1971, to apply for citizenship indefinitely.
      • This raises concerns about its relevance over time, as it fails to address contemporary issues related to migration.
    • Arbitrary Reasoning: The judgment has been criticized for arbitrary reasoning, particularly in how it justifies singling out Assam for special treatment while disregarding similar situations in other states like West Bengal and Meghalaya.
    • Flawed Mechanism for Identification: The process for identifying migrants under Section 6A is problematic, placing the burden on state authorities without a clear mechanism for voluntary self-identification by migrants. This has led to inefficiencies and confusion regarding citizenship status.

    What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Section 6A for future immigration policies in India?

    • Precedent for Future Laws: The ruling sets a precedent for how immigration laws may be framed in India, potentially allowing for similar provisions that distinguish between different states or communities based on historical migrations.
    • Potential for Increased Migration: By upholding Section 6A, there is concern that it may encourage further migration into Assam and other regions, as individuals may perceive opportunities for citizenship under similar provisions.
    • Focus on Cultural Protection: Future immigration policies may need to consider cultural protections more seriously, as the ruling highlights the tension between humanitarian needs and cultural preservation.
    • Need for Comprehensive Immigration Reform: The ruling underscores the necessity for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses both historical contexts and contemporary realities while ensuring the protection of cultural identities.
    • Impact on Political Discourse: The ruling may influence political discourse surrounding immigration in India, potentially polarizing opinions on citizenship rights and cultural identity among different communities.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/indias-urban-infrastructure-financing-needs-and-reality/article68906499.ece

  • [18th December 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: The legal gaps in India’s unregulated AI surveillance

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) “The emergence of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Digital Revolution) has initiated e-Governance as an integral part of government”. Discuss. (UPSC CSE 2020)

    Mentor’s Comment: 

    UPSC Mains have focused on the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution (Digital Revolution)’ (in 2020), and ‘different types of cyber crimes ’ (2021).

    In 2019, India announced plans to create the world’s largest facial recognition system for policing, which has since evolved into widespread deployment of AI-powered surveillance across railway stations and crime patrols. Plans for 50 AI satellites further expand this infrastructure. While integrating AI into law enforcement offers potential, it raises serious legal and constitutional concerns, including risks of “dragnet surveillance (Indiscriminate data collection beyond suspects, infringing on privacy rights).”

    Today’s editorial focuses on the legal frameworks, gaps, and issues surrounding AI surveillance in India and its impact on constitutional rights, especially privacy.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    A robust regulatory framework is crucial to effectively manage AI’s impact on civil liberties, ensuring rights protection and responsible usage.

    Existing Legal Frameworks Governing AI Surveillance in India

    • Constitutional Provisions: The right to privacy is enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in the landmark case K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017). 
    o This ruling recognized privacy as a fundamental right, extending to informational privacy and emphasizing the need for robust legal frameworks to address challenges posed by surveillance technologies.
    • Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA): Enacted in 2023, the DPDPA aims to regulate data privacy and consent management. However, it has been criticized for broad exemptions that allow government agencies significant leeway in processing personal data without consent, particularly concerning medical treatment during epidemics and employment-related data.
    • Lack of Specific AI Regulations: Currently, there is no comprehensive legislation specifically governing AI surveillance technologies in India. While the government has promised future regulation under the Digital India Act, no draft legislation has been made public yet, leaving a regulatory gap.

    Impact of AI Surveillance on Civil Liberties and Privacy Rights in India

    • Potential for Overreach: The deployment of AI-powered surveillance systems raises concerns about “dragnet surveillance,” where data is indiscriminately collected from individuals beyond just suspects or criminals. This can lead to significant infringements on citizens’ rights.
    • Data Breaches and Misuse: Incidents like the Telangana Police data breach highlight vulnerabilities in data collection practices, where sensitive information from social welfare databases was accessed without transparency or accountability.
    • Imbalance in Legal Framework: The existing legal framework appears skewed towards state surveillance capabilities at the expense of individual rights. The DPDPA’s provisions place heightened scrutiny on individuals while granting broad powers to the government, raising concerns about potential misuse of personal data.

    Measures to Enhance Regulatory Oversight of AI Surveillance Technologies

    • Comprehensive Regulatory Framework: Establishing a detailed regulatory framework that addresses the implications of AI surveillance on civil liberties is essential. This framework should include clear guidelines on data collection practices, specifying what data is collected, its purpose, and retention periods.
    • Transparent Consent Mechanisms: Implementing stringent consent requirements with narrow exemptions is crucial. This should involve independent judicial oversight for processing personal data to ensure that citizens’ rights are protected.
    • Adopting a Risk-Based Approach: India could benefit from adopting a risk-based regulatory approach similar to the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which categorizes AI activities based on their risk levels and imposes restrictions on high-risk technologies.
    • Public Accountability and Oversight: Regular transparency reports and independent audits should be mandated for all agencies utilizing AI surveillance technologies to ensure accountability and build public trust in these systems.
    • Legislative Action: Prompt legislative action is needed to fill existing regulatory gaps and establish clear guidelines governing the use of AI in law enforcement, ensuring that civil liberties are not compromised in the pursuit of technological advancement.

    Conclusion: To safeguard civil liberties while leveraging AI surveillance, India must enact comprehensive legislation, adopt risk-based regulations, and enforce stringent consent mechanisms with judicial oversight. There is a need for prompt legislative action is critical to ensure a balanced approach between technological progress and citizens’ rights protection.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/the-legal-gaps-in-indias-unregulated-ai-surveillance/article68996389.ece#:~:text=Though%20the%20DPDP%20Act%20addresses,of%20data%20sharing%20is%20crucial

  • India’s firmer attempts at mineral diplomacy

    Why in the News?

    Reliance on critical mineral imports, especially from China, poses strategic concerns. To address this, the Indian government is advancing its Mineral Diplomacy to enhance security and reduce strategic vulnerabilities.

    What is Mineral diplomacy? 

    Mineral diplomacy refers to a nation’s strategic efforts to secure critical mineral supplies through international partnerships, trade agreements, and resource-sharing initiatives, ensuring economic stability and reducing geopolitical vulnerabilities.

    India’s Mineral Diplomacy of 2024

    Aim: To coordinate efforts in securing access to critical minerals both domestically and internationally. It focuses on enhancing resource mapping, accelerating exploration activities, and developing resilient supply chains for minerals vital to India’s industrial and green energy targets.

    Key Features:

    • International Partnerships: India is actively engaging with resource-rich countries, particularly in Africa, to secure essential minerals. This includes participation in the Mineral Security Partnership (MSP) and bilateral agreements like the India-Australia Critical Minerals Investment Partnership, which are designed to fortify supply chains and position India as a key player in global mineral diplomacy.
    • Domestic Reforms: The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2023 allows private sector participation in exploring critical minerals. This reform is expected to boost domestic supply and reduce reliance on imports, aligning with India’s goal of achieving self-sufficiency.
    • Geopolitical Context: As global competition for critical minerals intensifies, India’s mineral diplomacy is not just about securing resources but also about establishing itself as a significant player in the clean energy economy.
      • India is emphasizing responsible mining practices to differentiate itself from competitors like China.
    • Focus on Recycling: The mission prioritizes recycling critical minerals from electronic waste and used batteries, ensuring resource efficiency and sustainability amidst limited reserves.
    • Investment in Technology: India plans to leverage advanced technologies such as AI and machine learning for geological mapping to enhance exploration efforts.

    What are the strategic objectives of India’s Critical Mineral Mission 2024?

    India’s Critical Mineral Mission aims to secure a stable supply of essential minerals for its economic and technological growth. The strategic objectives include:

    • Reducing Import Dependency: By decreasing reliance on imports, particularly from China, India seeks to enhance its mineral security and mitigate economic risks associated with geopolitical tensions.
    • Enhancing Domestic Production: The mission focuses on boosting domestic exploration and production capabilities for critical minerals, thereby fostering self-sufficiency.
    • Facilitating Recycling and Sustainable Practices: Emphasis is placed on recycling critical minerals to ensure a sustainable supply chain while addressing environmental concerns.

    How is India leveraging international partnerships to enhance its mineral supply chains?

    India is actively engaging in international partnerships to enhance its mineral supply chains through several strategic initiatives:

    • Bilateral Agreements: India has established partnerships with resource-rich countries like Australia, Argentina, and Kazakhstan to secure supplies of lithium and cobalt. For instance, KABIL signed a memorandum of understanding with Australia for lithium and cobalt projects.
    • Joint Ventures: The formation of joint ventures, such as IREUK Titanium Limited with Kazakhstan, aims to develop production capabilities within India, thus integrating into the global supply chain.
    • Multilateral Engagements: India is participating in multilateral initiatives like the Quad and the G-7 to align with global best practices in mineral security and facilitate knowledge sharing.

    What challenges does India face in its mineral diplomacy efforts?

    Despite the positive outcomes of India’s mineral diplomacy, several challenges hinder its effectiveness:

    • Lack of Private Sector Participation: The absence of a clear roadmap for private sector involvement in the critical minerals supply chain limits India’s ability to leverage domestic capabilities fully.
    • Weak Diplomatic Capacity: Insufficient diplomatic resources and expertise in mineral diplomacy pose challenges in forming sustainable international partnerships.
    • Need for Comprehensive Strategy: A cohesive strategy that integrates private sector roles and addresses supply chain vulnerabilities is essential for enhancing India’s mineral security efforts. The current lack of such a strategy hampers effective engagement with international partners.

    Way forward: 

    • Develop a Comprehensive Critical Minerals Policy: Formulate a cohesive strategy integrating private sector participation, incentivizing domestic exploration, and addressing supply chain vulnerabilities.
    • Strengthen Mineral Diplomacy Capacity: Expand diplomatic resources and expertise in mineral partnerships, focusing on resource-rich nations and multilateral platforms. Establish specialized teams to negotiate sustainable agreements, ensuring secure and diversified supply chains.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q A number of outside powers have entrenched themselves in Central Asia, which is a zone of interest to India. Discuss the implications, in this context, of India’s joining the Ashgabat Agreement, 2018. (UPSC IAS/2018)

  • Why Railways Amendment Bill 2024 was introduced?

    Why in the News?

    Amid intense debates between the government and the opposition, the Lok Sabha passed the Railways (Amendment) Bill, in 2024.

    What were the significant key features of the bill?

    • Repeal of the Indian Railway Board Act, 1905: The Bill repeals the 1905 Act, which governed the establishment and powers of the Railway Board. Provisions from the 1905 Act are now incorporated into the Railways Act, of 1989, for a unified legal framework.
      • It combines the provisions of the 1905 Act and the 1989 Act, reducing legislative redundancy and simplifying governance.
    • Constitution of the Railway Board: It empowers the central government to determine:
      • The number of Railway Board members.
      • Qualifications, experience, and terms of service for the Chairman and members.
      • Method of appointment for these positions.
    • Streamlining Legal Provisions: It consolidates provisions for easier administration and reduces the need for cross-referencing between multiple laws.
      • It enables the central government to prescribe updated qualifications and service terms for Railway Board members, potentially improving leadership quality.
    • Administrative Integration: It maintains the Railway Board’s central authority while aiming for operational efficiency and uniformity in governance.
      • It aligns with recommendations for a modernized railway structure, paving the way for potential decentralization and private sector participation.
    • Development Goals: The Bill is in line with India’s broader infrastructure and economic development objectives, which depend heavily on an efficient railway system.

    Why did the Government Bring the Bill?

    • The government aims to repeal the Indian Railway Board Act of 1905 and integrate its provisions into the Railways Act of 1989, simplifying the legal framework governing Indian Railways and reducing reliance on multiple laws.
    • The government argues that this integration will enhance the efficiency and development of railways, allowing for better governance and decision-making within the Railway Board.
    • Since its inception, the Railway Board has operated under the 1905 Act. The new Bill seeks to modernize this structure by aligning it with contemporary governance practices.

    What did MPs Say About the Bill?

    • Support from Government MPs: The ruling party MPs praised the Bill as a significant step towards modernizing and strengthening Indian Railways, asserting that it would enhance the functions and independence of the Railway Board.
    • Concerns from Opposition MPs: Opposition members argued for an independent Railway Board free from government control and highlighted that the Bill does not address critical issues like:
      • Concerns About Privatization: The Opposition party is worried that the new Bill could lead to the privatization of Indian Railways, making it less accessible to poorer people.
      • Loss of Independence: Many Members of Parliament (MPs) are concerned that more government control over appointments to the Railway Board could reduce the independence of Indian Railways.
      • Restoration of Discounts: Several MPs are calling for the return of fare discounts for senior citizens, journalists, and economically weaker groups, which were stopped during the pandemic.
    • Calls for Inclusivity: Some MPs raised concerns about representation within the Railway Board, questioning whether marginalized groups would be adequately represented in appointments.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Railway Board Autonomy: Establish an independent regulatory framework to ensure the Railway Board operates with greater autonomy, focusing on safety, operational efficiency, and decentralization at zonal and divisional levels.
    • Inclusive Representation and Expertise: Mandate merit-based appointments to the Railway Board, ensuring adequate representation of marginalized groups (SCs, STs, OBCs, and women) while emphasizing domain expertise for effective governance.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q The setting up of a Rail Tariff Authority to regulate fares will subject the cash strapped Indian Railways to demand subsidy for obligation to operate non-profitable routes and services. Taking into account the experience in the power sector, discuss if the proposed reform is expected to benefit the consumers, the Indian Railways or the private container operators. (UPSC IAS/2014)

  • [pib] National Mental Health Programme (NMHP)

    Why in the News?

    The National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) is a flagship initiative by the Government of India aimed at addressing the growing mental health challenges in the country.

    About National Mental Health Programme (NMHP):

    Details Initiated in 1982 and restructured in 2003, the NMHP aims to modernize mental health facilities and upgrade psychiatric wings in medical institutions.
    Features and Signficance The program has 3 components:
    1. Treatment of mentally ill
    2. Rehabilitation
    3. Prevention and promotion of positive mental health.
    Aims and Objectives 
    1. Prevention and treatment of mental and neurological disorders and their associated disabilities.
    2. Use of mental health technology to improve general health services.
    3. Application of mental health principles in total national development to improve quality of life.
    Structural Mandate The District Mental Health Programme (DMHP), based on the Bellary Model, focuses on community mental health services at the primary healthcare level, spanning 716 districts.

    DMHP provides outpatient services, counselling, psycho-social interventions, and support for severe mental disorders.

    • Priority given to mental morbidity and treatment.
    • Primary healthcare services at village and sub-center levels.
    • Services at the Primary Health Center (PHC) and District Hospital levels.
    • Facilities at Mental Hospitals and Teaching Psychiatric Units.

     

    Back2Basics: The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

    • It replaced the Mental Healthcare Act, 1987, which was criticized for failing to recognize the rights of mentally ill individuals.
    • It ensures the Right to Access to Healthcare and aims to ensure the rights and dignity of those with mental illness.
    • It decriminalized suicide, stating that attempts are presumed to be under severe stress and shall not be punished.

  • [pib] Ayushman Arogya Mandirs

    Why in the News?

    • In February 2018, the Centre had launched the initiative to establish 1,50,000 Ayushman Arogya Mandirs (AAMs), formerly known as Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), by December 2022.
      • As of 31st July 2024, 1,73,881 Ayushman Arogya Mandirs have been set up and are fully operational, exceeding the original target.

    About the Ayushman Arogya Mandirs (AAMs):

    Details
    • Launched to provide comprehensive health services covering preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative care for all age groups.
      • First AAM was launched in Bijapur, Chhattisgarh on April 18th, 2018.
    • In FY 2018-19, over 17,000 AAMs were operationalized, surpassing the target of 15,000.
      • Currently, there are 1.6 lakh such centres across India.
    • National Health Policy of 2017 envisioned AAMs as the cornerstone of India’s health system.
      • In 2023, the Union Health Ministry renamed AB-HWCs as Ayushman Arogya Mandirs with the tagline ‘Arogyam Parmam Dhanam’.
    Aims and Objectives
    • To provide universal, free-of-cost, and accessible primary healthcare services to both rural and urban populations.
    Features and Significance
    • Services provided include preventive, promotive, curative, palliative, and rehabilitative care.
    • AAMs offer a comprehensive 12-package set of services.
    • Sub-Health Centres (SHC) and Primary Health Centres (PHC) are being transformed to offer broader healthcare services.
    Structural Mandate Implemented via 2 Components:

    1. Comprehensive Primary Health Care: The mission plans to establish 1,50,000 AAMs in rural and urban areas to provide comprehensive primary healthcare services.
    2. Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY): The scheme provides a health insurance cover of Rs. 5 lakh per year to more than 10 crore vulnerable families for secondary and tertiary care.

     

    PYQ:

    [2022] With reference to Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission, consider the following statements:

    1. Private and public hospitals must adopt it.
    2. As it aims to achieve universal health coverage, every citizen of India should be part of it ultimately.
    3. It has seamless portability across the country.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Centre wants States to make Snakebites a Notifiable Disease

    Why in the News?

    The Union Health Ministry has urged states to make snakebites a Notifiable Disease, meaning both private and public hospitals must report it to the government.

    Snakebites Menace in India:

    • Snakebites are a significant public health concern in India, with approximately 3 to 4 million cases reported annually.
      • It causes an estimated 58,000 deaths every year, according to the 2020 Indian Million Death Study.
    • States such as Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Rajasthan, and Gujarat report the highest number of snakebites.
    • The National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Snakebite Envenoming (NAPSE), launched by the government earlier in 2024, aims to halve snakebite deaths by 2030 and includes making snakebites notifiable.

    What are Notifiable Diseases?

    • Notifiable diseases are those that must be reported to the government for effective public health monitoring and management. These are typically:
      • Infectious diseases likely to cause outbreaks.
      • Diseases that result in deaths or require quick action to prevent wider transmission.
    • Legal Basis:
      • According to WHO’s International Health Regulations, 1969, disease reporting is mandatory for global surveillance.
      • The primary law governing notifiable diseases is the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 which outlines the reporting requirements for diseases considered a public health threat.
        • However, the specific list of notifiable diseases can vary across different states and is typically determined by the respective state governments under their individual public health acts.
    • Common examples of notifiable diseases include tuberculosis, HIV, cholera, malaria, dengue, and hepatitis.

    Why snakebite is considered a Notifiable Disease?

    • Snakebites can cause severe health issues, including paralysis, fatal hemorrhages, and tissue damage, making it crucial for timely intervention.
      • Victims need immediate antivenom treatment to prevent death and long-term effects.
    • In 2009, the WHO added snakebite to its list of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD), acknowledging its widespread impact on public health.
    • Making snakebites a notifiable disease will enhance surveillance, help track case numbers, and improve treatment strategies across the country.
    • It will ensure the availability of adequate antivenoms in regions where snakebites are frequent.
    • Medical staff will receive training to handle snakebite cases effectively, reducing mortality rates.

  • [pib] Jan Aushadhi Kendra’s by PACS

    Why in the News?

    • The Government has empowered Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS) to operate Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Kendras (PMBJK), aiming to provide generic medicines at affordable prices to underserved rural areas.

    About Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Kendras (PMBJK) by PACS:

    Details
    • PMBJKs were established in November 2008.
    • Government-established outlets that provide affordable, quality generic medicines.
    • Operated by PACS (Primary Agricultural Credit Societies) in rural areas.
      • PACS are empowered to run these Kendras to ensure accessibility in remote regions under the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP).
    Aims and Objectives To provide affordable medicines, promote healthcare equity, and reduce medical expenses for farmers, while generating local employment and ensuring PACS’ financial sustainability through the sale of medicines and allied products.
    Structural Mandate and Implementation
    • Administered by the Department of Pharmaceuticals under the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers;
    • Bureau of Pharma PSUs of India (BPPI) is the implementation agency.

    Implementation:

    • PACS receive technical and administrative support from the Department of Pharmaceuticals.
    • PACS leverage their existing infrastructure, including land, buildings, and storage, to run the Kendras.
    • PACS-run Kendras receive a 20% incentive on monthly purchases, capped at Rs. 20,000 per month.
    • Kendra owners receive a 20% margin on MRP (excluding taxes).
    • They can sell allied medical products.
    Features and Significance
    • Affordable Medicine Distribution: Ensures that generic medicines are affordable in rural areas.
    • Economic and Healthcare Benefits: Reduces medical costs and improves healthcare outcomes for farmers.
    • Alignment with National Health Policy: Supports equitable healthcare access, especially in remote areas.
    • Strengthening Rural Infrastructure: Utilizes PACS’ infrastructure to boost rural healthcare.

     

    PYQ:

    [2015] Public health system has limitations in providing universal health coverage. Do you think that private sector could help in bridging the gap? What other viable alternatives would you suggest?

  • Draft UGC Regulations, 2024

    Why in the News?

    • The University Grants Commission (UGC) released the Draft UGC (Minimum Standards of Instructions in the Award of UG and PG Degrees) 2024 to bring sweeping reforms in India’s higher education sector.
      • The new regulations will apply to all Central, State, Private, and Deemed Universities across India.

    Back2Basics: University Grants Commission (UGC)

    • UGC was inaugurated in 1953 by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, then Minister of Education.
    • it was established as a statutory body in November 1956 under the UGC Act 1956.
      • The Sargeant Report (1944) recommended a University Grants Committee, established in 1945, initially handling all universities by 1947.
      • Post-independence, the University Education Commission (1948) under Dr. S Radhakrishnan proposed reorganizing the committee along the lines of the UK’s University Grants Commission.
    • A proposal to replace UGC with the Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) is under consideration.
    • UGC handles:
      • Providing funds to higher education institutions.
      • Coordination, determination, and maintenance of academic standards.

     

    About the Draft UGC Regulations, 2024:

    Aims and Objectives
    • To reform India’s higher education system.
    • To introduce flexibility, multidisciplinary learning, and inclusivity in higher education while removing disciplinary rigidities.
    Key Provisions and Features
    • Biannual Admissions: Institutions can admit students twice a year (July/August and January/February).
    • Multiple Entry and Exit: Students can enter or exit their programs multiple times, with continuous assessments, recognition of prior learning, and the possibility to pursue two programs at the same time.
    • Flexibility for Students: Students can choose any discipline for UG and PG programs, irrespective of their background, subject to clearing entrance exams (e.g., CUET or university-specific exams).
    • Minimum Attendance Requirement: Institutions will set the minimum attendance based on program-specific requirements and statutory approvals, in line with the NEP 2020.
    • UG Degree Credits: At least 50% of credits must be earned in the major discipline for an undergraduate degree. The remaining 50% credits can be from skill courses, apprenticeships, or multidisciplinary subjects.
    • Duration of Degrees: UG degrees can be completed in 3 to 4 years, depending on the course structure. PG degrees will typically take 1 to 2 years, though they can be longer or shorter based on the program.
    Accelerated and Extended Degree Programs:
    • ADP (Accelerated Degree Programs): Allows students to complete their degree in a shorter duration while covering the full curriculum.
    • EDP (Extended Degree Programs): Extends the duration for students who need more time to complete the program.
      • Up to 10% of the sanctioned intake can be earmarked for ADP. Students can choose ADP or EDP by the end of the first or second semester.
      • ADP/EDP degrees will include a note specifying the adjusted duration, while ensuring the full academic content is covered.
    • Postgraduate Eligibility: Students completing a four-year undergraduate degree (Hons./Research, BTech, BE) will be eligible for a two-year postgraduate program.

     

    PYQ:

    [2012] Which of the following provisions of the Constitution does India have a bearing on Education?

    1. Directive Principles of State Policy
    2. Rural and Urban Local Bodies
    3. Fifth Schedule
    4. Sixth Schedule
    5. Seventh Schedule

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

    (a) 1 and 2 only
    (b) 3, 4 and 5 only
    (c) 1, 2 and 5 only
    (d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5