💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Governance

Important aspects of Society

  • Concerns of using Aadhaar in Welfare Schemes

    Aadhaar

    Central Idea

    • Moody’s Investor Service released a report titled ‘Decentralised Finance and Digital Assets,’ advocating for decentralized digital identity systems over centralised biometric systems like India’s Aadhaar.
    • The report raises concerns about security and privacy vulnerabilities associated with Aadhaar (being managed by Govt of India) and questions its effectiveness.

    India’s Response to Moody’s Report

    • In response to Moody’s report, the Indian government strongly defended Aadhaar, asserting that it is “the most trusted digital ID in the world.”
    • The government highlighted Aadhaar’s integration with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) database, emphasizing that workers can receive payments without biometric authentication.

    Aadhaar: Rationale and Objectives

    • Unique Identification: Aadhaar is a unique identification number provided to all Indian residents by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). It collects demographic details, biometric fingerprints, and iris scans during enrolment, aiming to create a unique identity for residents.
    • Fighting Corruption: Aadhaar’s primary objectives include curbing corruption in accessing welfare programs by eliminating “ghost” and “fake” individuals who fraudulently claim benefits.

    Aadhaar’s Role in Welfare Programs

    • Ration Distribution: Aadhaar is used to authenticate individuals accessing rations under the Public Distribution System, ensuring that beneficiaries receive their entitled portions.
    • Government-to-Citizen Transfers: The government employs Aadhaar for various cash transfer programs, claiming substantial savings by eliminating fraudulent beneficiaries.

    Aadhaar in Cash Withdrawals

    • Authentication Process: To enable payments through Aadhaar for MGNREGA, three steps are involved: linking Aadhaar to job cards, linking Aadhaar to bank accounts, and linking Aadhaar correctly with the National Payments Corporation of India for payment processing.
    • AePS Platform: Aadhaar-enabled Payment System (AePS) allows individuals to withdraw money from Aadhaar-linked bank accounts using biometric authentication.

    Concerns Surrounding Aadhaar

    • Quantity Fraud: Critics argue that Aadhaar fails to address issues like quantity fraud, where beneficiaries receive less than their entitled share. This type of corruption remains prevalent, with Aadhaar unable to detect or prevent it.
    • Authentication Challenges: Rural areas face authentication challenges due to unreliable internet, fading fingerprints, and inadequate phone connectivity for OTPs. Vulnerable groups, such as older women and people with disabilities, face exclusion.
    • Lack of Data Transparency: Information regarding authentication attempts and failures is not publicly available, hindering transparency.
    • Payment Failures: Errors at any stage of Aadhaar-based payments can lead to payment failures. Mismatches in data between job cards and Aadhaar databases can result in authentication failures.
    • Misdirection of Payments: Misdirected payments through Aadhaar are difficult to detect and resolve, creating issues when Aadhaar numbers are linked to the wrong bank accounts.
    • Financial Exclusion: Critics argue that Aadhaar-based authentication requirements can lead to financial exclusion for certain groups.

    Security Concerns

    • AePS Accountability: Banking correspondents using AePS operate without accountability frameworks, leading to potential misuse and unauthorized access to bank accounts.
    • Multiple Authentications: Some banking correspondents ask individuals to authenticate multiple times, providing them access to individuals’ bank accounts without consent.
    • Fraud and Scams: Several reports highlight instances of money withdrawal and enrollment in government programs without individuals’ knowledge through AePS.

    Current Impasse

    • Resistance to Mandatory Aadhaar: The government’s efforts to make Aadhaar-based payments mandatory in MGNREGA have faced resistance from workers and field officials.
    • Deletion of Job Cards: Reports indicate that the job cards of active rural workers have been deleted on grounds of being “ghosts,” raising concerns about data accuracy.
    • Apprehensions: Critics express apprehensions based on their experience with Aadhaar in welfare programs, emphasizing the need for pilots and evidence-based decision-making.

    Conclusion

    • The debate between centralized biometric systems like Aadhaar and decentralized digital identity solutions remains ongoing, with concerns regarding security, inclusivity, and transparency at the forefront of discussions.

  • An ageing India needs age-responsive TB care

    What’s the news?

    • TB, which affects over 25 lakh Indians every year and kills at least 1,000 every day, As India is on the cusp of a demographic shift, with the elderly population set to comprise a substantial portion of society, it is imperative to invest in the health of our elderly population and pay attention to their unique needs.

    Central idea

    • Advances in healthcare and increased life expectancy are propelling India’s demographic transition, with the elderly projected to constitute 12.5% of the population by 2030, up from 9% in 2011. This underscores the urgent need for age-responsive healthcare systems to address the complexities of TB care among the elderly, aligning opportunity with responsibility.

    What is tuberculosis (TB)?

    • TB is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
    • It primarily affects the lungs but can also affect other parts of the body, such as the kidneys, spine, and brain.
    • TB is transmitted through the air when an infected individual coughs, sneezes, or speaks, releasing tiny droplets containing the bacteria. When inhaled by others, these droplets can lead to infection.

    The Burden of TB among the Elderly

    • Recent findings from India’s National TB Prevalence Survey in 2021 reveal a concerning trend: the prevalence of TB among individuals aged 55 and above stands at 588 per one lakh population, significantly higher than the national average of 316.
    • This alarming disparity necessitates a dedicated focus on TB among the elderly and the formulation of age-specific TB guidelines.

    Challenges faced by elderly TB patients

    • Delayed Diagnosis: TB symptoms, including cough, fatigue, and weight loss, are often misinterpreted as signs of old age or other illnesses. Consequently, TB diagnoses among the elderly are frequently delayed or overlooked.
    • Comorbidities: Many elderly TB patients have multiple comorbidities, especially diabetes, which complicates TB management. This leads to a higher pill count and an increased likelihood of side effects, affecting treatment adherence and outcomes.
    • Access to Healthcare: Elderly individuals, particularly those in rural and hilly areas, struggle to access healthcare facilities due to mobility challenges. This can lead to delays in seeking medical care.
    • Limited Information: Older individuals may have restricted access to reliable health information, as their social networks tend to shrink with age. This lack of information hampers their ability to recognize TB symptoms and seek timely medical attention.
    • Economic Dependence: Most individuals over the age of 60 are retired and financially dependent on savings or family. While there are some social welfare schemes for the elderly, they often have limitations and may not provide adequate financial support.
    • Stigma and Mental Health: TB-related stigma is a concern among the elderly, contributing to social isolation. Many elderly TB patients experience loneliness, anxiety, and a sense of purposelessness, negatively impacting their mental health.

    Strategies to address these challenges and provide elder-friendly TB care

    • Holistic Care Models: Transition from disease-specific care to holistic models that reduce the need for elderly patients to interact with multiple healthcare providers and facilities.
    • Health Professional Training: Build the capacity of healthcare professionals at all levels to better understand TB in the elderly and manage multiple comorbidities effectively.
    • Improved Case-Finding: Enhance case-finding mechanisms through effective sputum collection and transportation systems, mobile diagnostic vans, and active case-finding at geriatric OPDs and residential homes.
    • Technical Protocols: Develop technical and operational protocols that guide the diagnosis and treatment of TB in the elderly, including sample extraction, comorbidity assessment, and drug dosage adjustments.
    • Socio-Economic Support: Design and implement support protocols in consultation with elderly TB patients, including community care models, doorstep medicine delivery, peer support, counseling, and assistance with accessing social support schemes.
    • Data Collection and Analysis: Ensure rigorous gender and age-disaggregated data collection and analysis to identify TB trends among the elderly, with a dedicated age category in all TB reports.
    • Strengthen Collaboration: Foster collaboration within the healthcare system to build elderly-friendly care systems effectively.
    • Research Agenda: Promote research focused on TB in the elderly, exploring state-specific trends, substance use, drug resistance, co-morbidity patterns, TB preventive therapy uptake, and intersectionality with other equity aspects.

    Conclusion

    • On this International Day of Older Persons, India must reaffirm its commitment to the well-being of its elderly citizens. By implementing age-responsive TB care models, strengthening healthcare systems, and conducting focused research, we can pave the way for a healthier, more inclusive future for our aging population.

    Also read:

    India’s diabetes epidemic is making its widespread TB problem worse

     

  • The concerns of using Aadhaar in welfare

    What’s the news?

    • On September 21, Moody’s Investor Service released a report advocating for decentralized digital identity systems over centralized biometric systems like India’s Aadhaar

    Central idea

    • India has reacted strongly to the report released by Moody’s Investor Service, which advocates for decentralized digital identity systems over central biometric systems like Aadhaar. The government has refuted the claims made in the report and defended the Aadhaar system as the most trusted digital ID in the world.

    What is Aadhaar?

    • Aadhaar is a 12-digit unique identification number issued to all Indian residents by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).
    • It is based on biometric and demographic data, including fingerprints and iris scans, and serves as a standardized and secure means of identity verification.

    The Rationale for Aadhaar

    • Unique Identification: Aadhaar assigns a unique ID to every Indian resident, ensuring distinct and verifiable identities.
    • Corruption Reduction: Aadhaar combats welfare fraud by verifying recipients, reducing ghost and fake beneficiaries.
    • Efficient Services: Simplifies access to government services, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.
    • Financial Inclusion: Links Aadhaar to bank accounts, promoting banking services in underserved areas.
    • Digital Transformation: Enables secure online authentication for e-services, e-commerce, and payments.
    • Data Security: Emphasizes data security and privacy measures, including encryption and authentication protocols.
    • Integration: Supports government database integration, enhancing governance and policy implementation.
    • Welfare Savings: Eliminates duplicates, leading to substantial savings and improved subsidy targeting.

    Role in cash withdrawals

    • Aadhaar and Job Card Linking: First, a worker’s Aadhaar number must be linked to their job card, which is associated with the employment program, such as MGNREGA.
    • Aadhaar and Bank Account Linking: Second, the worker’s Aadhaar must be linked to their bank account. This linkage ensures that the Aadhaar number serves as the unique identifier for transactions related to this account.
    • Mapping with NPCI: The Aadhaar number must be correctly linked through the worker’s bank branch with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI). The NPCI acts as a clearing house for Aadhaar-based payments.
    • Cash Deposits: Once these linkages are established, any cash transferred by the government for benefits or payments gets deposited directly into the individual’s last Aadhaar-linked bank account.
    • Cash Withdrawals: Individuals can then withdraw money from their Aadhaar-linked bank account through private banking kiosks or by using private banking correspondents’ point of sale (PoS) machines. These transactions involve biometric authentication to confirm the individual’s identity.

    Concerns with Aadhaar’s Use

    • Ineffectiveness Against Quantity Fraud: Aadhaar does not address quantity fraud, a prevalent form of corruption in ration distribution, where beneficiaries receive less than their entitled amount. The system focuses on identity verification but lacks mechanisms to prevent this type of fraud.
    • Authentication Challenges: In rural areas, authentication can be challenging due to unreliable internet, fading fingerprints, and limited phone connectivity for one-time passwords (OTPs). Multiple trips to ration shops may be necessary, leading to delays and uncertainty.
    • Lack of Transparency: The lack of public data on authentication attempts and failures raises transparency and accountability issues. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) highlighted the absence of a system to analyze authentication errors.
    • Payment Failures: Any error in the Aadhaar-based payment process can result in payment failures. Issues like spelling discrepancies between job cards and Aadhaar databases can lead to authentication failures.
    • Coercion and Misdirection: Workers are often coerced into linking their Aadhaar with bank accounts without their consent, leading to wage diversion to unknown accounts. Misdirected payments, such as redirection to Airtel wallets, are challenging to detect and resolve.
    • Savings Claims: Claims of government savings through Aadhaar implementation have been questioned by researchers like Jean Drèze, Reetika Khera, Rahul Lahoti, and Anand Venkatnarayanan. They argue that the government’s assertions may be misleading and not supported by data.
    • Delays in Wage Payments: Despite government claims of reduced delays in wage payments under MGNREGA due to Aadhaar, recent research using extensive wage transaction data found no statistical evidence of these claims. Insufficient funds were suggested as a primary reason for payment delays

    Security Concerns with Aadhaar

    • Lack of Accountability: Banking correspondents operating the Aadhaar-enabled Payment System (AePS) often lack a robust accountability framework, raising the risk of misuse or unauthorized access to individuals’ bank accounts.
    • Unauthorized Biometric Authentication: Some banking correspondents may ask individuals to undergo multiple biometric authentications, potentially granting them unauthorized access to individuals’ bank accounts.
    • Misuse of Aadhaar-Enabled Transactions: Reports and studies have highlighted cases where individuals’ money was withdrawn without consent through AePS, or they were enrolled in government insurance programs against their will.
    • Security Breaches: Instances like the ₹10 crore scholarship scam in Jharkhand in 2020 exemplify security breaches and fraudulent activities associated with Aadhaar-based systems.

    Way forward

    • Data Security and Privacy: Strengthen data security measures to protect Aadhaar information. Ensure strict enforcement of data protection regulations and privacy standards.
    • Authentication Reliability: Improve the reliability of biometric authentication, especially in areas with limited connectivity. Develop backup authentication methods.
    • Process Streamlining: Simplify the process of linking Aadhaar with bank accounts and other services to reduce errors and misdirected payments. Provide clear information to individuals about the status and usage of their Aadhaar-linked accounts.
    • Addressing Corruption: Monitor and evaluate the impact of Aadhaar on reducing corruption in welfare programs. Implement additional measures to tackle specific forms of corruption, such as quantity fraud.
    • Independent Research and Evaluation: Support independent research to assess Aadhaar’s effectiveness and impact in various government programs. Use evidence-based findings to make informed policy decisions and improvements.
    • Accountability for Misuse: Establish mechanisms for holding individuals or organizations accountable for any misuse of Aadhaar data or fraudulent activities.

    Conclusion

    • Moody’s report has sparked a debate about the effectiveness and security of Aadhaar. While it has brought some benefits in streamlining welfare programs, it falls short in addressing key issues and poses significant security risks. The government must address these concerns and work towards a more secure and efficient digital identity system, considering decentralized alternatives as suggested by Moody’s.

  • Bridging Gender Gaps in Cancer Care: The Lancet Commission Report

    women cancer

    Central Idea

    • The Lancet Commission report ‘Women, Power and Cancer’ spotlights the gender disparities in cancer care that persist in India.

    Women dying of Cancer: Alarming Statistics

    • The report emphasizes that approximately 6.9 million cancer-related deaths among Indian women were preventable, and 4.03 million were treatable.
    • It revealed that a staggering 63% of premature cancer-related deaths in Indian women could have been prevented through risk reduction, screening, and early diagnosis.
    • 37% could have been averted through timely and optimal treatment.

    Understanding the Gender Gap

    • Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Despite men being at a higher risk of certain cancers affecting both genders, women continue to face a significant burden of cancer incidence and mortality. Globally, women account for 48% of new cancer cases and 44% of cancer-related deaths. This happens even though some of the cancers in women, such as breast and cervical cancers, are highly preventable and treatable.
    • Root Causes: The report attributes this gender gap in cancer outcomes to several factors, including limited access to timely and appropriate care due to disparities in knowledge, decision-making power, and financial resources. Women, irrespective of their socioeconomic status, often lack the necessary information and autonomy for informed decision-making in healthcare.
    • Financial Strain: Additionally, women are more likely than men to experience financial devastation due to cancer-related expenses, compounding the challenges they face.

    Challenges in Cancer Care for Women

    • Underrepresentation: The report underscores that women are underrepresented in leadership roles in the field of cancer care. They are also susceptible to gender-based discrimination and harassment, making it a complex environment for women to thrive.
    • Unrecognized Contributions: Shockingly, women constitute the largest unpaid workforce in cancer care, with their contributions estimated to be worth approximately 3.66% of India’s national health expenditure.

    Expert Insights

    • Healthcare-Seeking Behavior: A healthcare expert highlights the impact of gendered healthcare-seeking behavior. Women, particularly in disadvantaged sections of society, tend to exhibit lower healthcare-seeking behavior, impacting their overall health outcomes.
    • Societal Changes: Beyond medical knowledge, societal changes are crucial. Women often hesitate to consult medical professionals for conditions like breast or cervical cancer, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

    Significance of Screening

    • Preventable and Treatable Cancers: Breast and cervical cancers, two of the most common cancers in women, are highly preventable and treatable. Experts emphasize the importance of regular screenings.
    • Early Detection: Self-examination of breasts, annual clinical examinations by a medical professional, and mammography for women over 40 can aid in early breast cancer detection. For cervical cancer, regular screenings can identify pre-cancerous growth and the presence of the human papillomavirus.

    Government Interventions

    • Awareness Campaigns: Experts underscore the need for government-led awareness campaigns to promote cancer prevention and early detection, similar to those for other health initiatives.
    • Vaccination Programs: The government’s initiative to include vaccination programs for young girls is a positive step in reducing cancer incidence.
    • Primary Health Centers: Experts highlight the potential for primary health centers to play a more significant role in cancer diagnosis and early treatment, particularly for cervical cancer.

    Recommendations from the Report

    • Data Collection: Regularly collecting gender and social demographic data for cancer health statistics is crucial.
    • Policy Development: Developing, strengthening, and enforcing policies that reduce known cancer risks is essential.
    • Equitable Access: The report calls for equitable access to cancer research resources, leadership roles, and funding opportunities for women, addressing the gender imbalance in cancer care and research.

  • India’s Kidney Crisis

    What’s the news?

    • India faces a grave crisis in its healthcare landscape, particularly concerning the shortage of kidneys for transplantation.

    Central idea

    • India is grappling with a severe kidney crisis, marked by an alarming demand-supply gap in kidney transplantation. While kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), India’s regulatory framework presents formidable obstacles to innovative kidney exchange methods.

    India’s Kidney Crisis

    • In 2022, over two lakh patients required kidney transplants, but only about 7,500 transplants, a mere 3.4%, were performed.
    • This alarming disparity can be attributed to the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in India, which affects approximately 17% of the population.
    • CKD often progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), for which kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment in terms of quality of life, patient convenience, life expectancy, and cost-effectiveness.
    • However, India lags far behind developed countries like the United States, which performs about 20% of the needed kidney transplants.
    • Importantly, this gap is not solely due to a lack of medical facilities but is largely influenced by stringent regulations in India.

    Current kidney procurement methods in India

    • Deceased Donors:
    • Obtaining kidneys from deceased donors is one of the primary methods in India.
    • However, this method faces challenges due to low donation rates, specific conditions required for the nature of death, and the infrastructure needed to collect and store organs.
    • Families’ willingness to donate organs after a loved one’s death remains relatively low.
    • Living Relatives or Friends:
    • Another method for obtaining kidneys is through living relatives or friends.
    • Patients can request a kidney donation from a willing living individual who is a compatible match.
    • This approach requires compatibility in terms of blood type and tissue type, which can be a significant obstacle. It also involves complex emotional and ethical considerations.

    Challenges related to kidney procurement methods in India

    • Regulatory Barriers: Stringent regulations in India hinder innovative kidney exchange methods, such as kidney swaps and kidney chains. These regulations limit the participation of non-near-relatives in kidney swaps, and altruistic donations for kidney chains are often illegal.
    • Lack of Kidney Chains: Kidney chains, a method involving a series of altruistic donations, are nearly non-existent in India due to legal restrictions. In most Indian states, it is illegal to donate a kidney out of altruism.
    • Black Market for Kidneys: The stringent regulations around kidney exchange have led to the emergence of black markets for kidneys in India. The reference to selling a kidney is a mainstream expression, indicating the prevalence of such illegal operations.

    The need for regulatory reform

    • Stringent Regulations: Current regulations impede innovative kidney exchange methods, hindering non-near-relatives’ participation and banning altruistic donations in many states.
    • Missed Opportunities: India has missed chances to expand kidney supply through effective methods like kidney swaps and chains due to legal barriers.
    • Disparity in Regulations: Inconsistent regulations between swap transplants and direct donations raise questions about fairness.
    • Lack of Coordination: India lacks a national coordinating authority, making it difficult to create diverse donor-recipient pools.
    • Black Market Concerns: Stringent regulations have led to a black market for kidneys, endangering those involved.

    Key reforms so far

    • Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act 1994: This legislation laid the foundation for organ transplantation in India by recognizing the possibility of transplants from brain-stem death.
    • 2011 Amendment: In 2011, an amendment legalized swap transplants and initiated a national organ transplant program in India. This represented a significant step toward expanding transplantation options.
    • Reforms in February 2023: The government introduced reforms in February 2023, offering more flexibility in age and domicile requirements for organ registration. While noteworthy, the article suggests that these reforms fall short of addressing the core issue of inadequate kidney supply.

    Lessons for India to transform its own organ transplantation landscape

    • Altruistic Donations: Emulate countries like the US and the Netherlands in legalizing and encouraging altruistic kidney donations to expand the donor pool.
    • National Registries: Follow Spain and the UK by establishing national-level registries for kidney chains and swaps to streamline coordination.
    • International Collaboration: Explore international partnerships as seen in Spain to broaden the donor and recipient network.
    • Continuous Improvement: Commit to ongoing regulatory enhancements, inspired by the success of the United States in facilitating kidney swaps and chains.
    • Patient-Centric Approach: Prioritize patient-centered policies, drawing from global models, to improve patient access and quality of life.

    Conclusion

    • Reforming India’s kidney transplant laws is not only a matter of urgency but also a humanitarian imperative. Along with the domestic reforms, learning from global best practices is the key to addressing this critical issue and ensuring a brighter future for kidney transplant recipients in India.

    Also read:

    Organ transplant rules In India: A Significant Step

  • Tobacco Warnings on OTT Platforms: A Closer Look at the Debate

    tobacco

    Central Idea

    • The Central government’s regulations mandated long-duration smoking warnings for films and TV series on OTT platforms like Hotstar, Amazon, and Netflix.
    • Streaming websites voiced objections, raising concerns about user experience.

    Recent Development

    • According to a recent report, the government has agreed to find “pragmatic solutions” for stricter tobacco warnings on OTT platforms.
    • A closed-door meeting saw streaming executives engage with Health Ministry and Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry officials.

    Why Smoking Warnings in Indian Entertainment?

    • Linking Health Impact and Public Perception: The introduction of smoking warnings in Indian entertainment stems from the connection between smoking’s health impact and its portrayal to the public. The goal is to communicate clear information about the health risks associated with smoking and discourage its use.
    • Regulation Evolution: The Indian government has a history of regulating how smoking is portrayed. The Cinematograph Act of 1952 prohibited the “glamorization” of tobacco in movies, and the Cable Television Networks Amendment Act of 2000 banned tobacco and alcohol advertising on cable TV.

    Historical Context

    • Factors Leading to Consensus: Several factors contributed to a growing national consensus on tobacco control, including increased health awareness, new laws and enforcement, judicial rulings (e.g., the 2008 ban on public smoking), civil society efforts, global support for tobacco control, and the influence of the World Health Organization.
    • COTPA and Health Ministry Notification: Under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), signed into law in May 2003, the Health Ministry introduced a notification prohibiting the display of tobacco products in cinema and television programs.
    • Content Rules: This notification required films and shows produced before it to include health warnings regarding smoking as a prominent scroll at the bottom of the screen. It also recommended prohibiting smoking in public places and using pictorial health warnings covering 85% of tobacco product display areas.
    • Legal Challenges: Legal challenges arose as some filmmakers and actors argued that these rules violated their freedom of speech. The Delhi HC quashed the notification in 2009, but the Supreme Court later upheld the rules.

    Introduction of Health Spots

    • Consensus-Building Efforts: Amid legal disputes, I&B Ministry appointed a new minister, leading to attempts to reach consensus. In 2011, the Health Ministry introduced new rules after consultations with I&B Ministry, aiming to make them more practical and implementable.
    • Health Spots in Old Content: For films and shows made before these rules, anti-tobacco health spots or messages were required at the beginning and middle of television programs, made available to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
    • Requirements for New Content: New films and TV shows with smoking scenes were to provide an “editorial justification” to the CBFC, include anti-tobacco health spots, display a prominent static message during tobacco product scenes, and feature an audio-visual disclaimer on the ill effects of tobacco use.

    Implementation Challenges

    • A study revealed that while many movies implemented at least one element of the film rules on tobacco imagery, few fully complied.
    • Compliance with other aspects of COTPA, such as restrictions on selling cigarettes near schools, has also been lacking.

    Debate over OTT Smoking Warnings

    • Content Library Concerns: I&B Ministry which regulates streaming platforms, expressed concerns about implementing warnings in existing content, foreign content, and health spots. It suggested displaying an appropriate health warning when users log in.
    • OTT Industry Concerns: In May, India ordered OTT platforms to insert static health warnings and anti-tobacco disclaimers. OTT executives raised concerns about the potential need to edit vast amounts of existing content, impacting user experience and creators’ freedom of expression.

  • Parliamentary Panel findings on the New Education Policy, 2020

    panel nep

    Central Idea

    • The Parliament Standing Committee on Education presented a report during a special parliamentary session focused on the “Implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020 in Higher Education.”

    Report Highlights

    • Salient NEP Features: The report examined the key aspects of NEP’s application in higher education and assessed the progress achieved thus far. The committee engaged with representatives from State governments, Union Ministries, higher education institutions, and stakeholders to compile the report.
    • State’s Role: The report emphasized the significance of State governments, as approximately 70% of the country’s 1,043 universities operate under State Acts. Furthermore, 94% of students are enrolled in State or private institutions, while only 6% attend Central higher educational institutions.

    Key Issues Discussed

    • Rigid Disciplinary Separation: The committee addressed issues such as the inflexible division of disciplines in higher education.
    • Limited Access in Disadvantaged Areas: It acknowledged the limited access to higher education in socio-economically disadvantaged regions.
    • Language of Instruction: The report highlighted the dearth of higher education institutes (HEIs) offering education in local languages.
    • Faculty Shortage: The committee noted the shortage of faculty members in HEIs.
    • Lack of Autonomy: Concerns about institutional autonomy and insufficient emphasis on research were also raised.
    • Regulatory System: The report identified the regulatory system as ineffective and criticized low standards of undergraduate education.

    Recommendations

    • Expansion of Multidisciplinary HEIs: The committee recommended that by 2030, every district in India should have at least one multidisciplinary higher education institution.
    • Enrolment Ratio Increase: It called for increasing the Gross Enrolment Ratio in higher education, including vocational education, from 26.3% in 2018 to 50% by 2035.
    • Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Groups (SEDGs): Actions proposed included allocating suitable funds for SEDGs, setting higher enrolment targets for SEDGs, improving gender balance in HEI admissions, offering more financial assistance and scholarships, ensuring inclusive admission processes and curricula, enhancing employability potential of higher education programs, and developing courses taught in regional languages and bilingually.
    • Infrastructure for Physically Challenged: Specific infrastructural enhancements were recommended to support physically challenged students, along with strict enforcement of non-discrimination and anti-harassment rules.
    • NEP Implementation in Jammu and Kashmir: The committee commended Jammu and Kashmir for its prompt implementation of NEP in all higher educational institutions from the 2022 academic session. It noted positive changes in teaching methods leading to enhanced lifelong learning opportunities for students.

    Funding Enhancement and Diversification

    • Effective Use of HEFA: The committee suggested improving the Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) to enhance funding for HEIs.
    • Diversified Funding Sources: It advised HEFA to diversify funding sources beyond government allocations by exploring partnerships with private sector organizations, philanthropic foundations, and international financial institutions.
    • Loan Interest Rates: The committee recommended reviewing and adjusting interest rates on loans provided by HEFA to make them more competitive and affordable for HEIs.

    Concerns about MEME Program

    • Feasibility Challenges: The panel raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing the multiple entry and multiple exit (MEME) system in Indian institutions.
    • Predictability Issues: MEME’s flexible structure, effective in Western educational institutions, might pose challenges in the country. Predicting student entry and exit numbers could disrupt the pupil-teacher ratio.

  • Safeguarding India’s Digital Youth: A Call for Ethical AI Regulation

    What’s the news?

    • India is poised to take center stage in the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the upcoming Global AI Summit and the GPAI Global Summit.

    Central idea

    • As AI is projected to contribute significantly to India’s economy, accounting for 10% of its GDP by 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has rightly called for a global framework on the ethical expansion of AI. In this context, it is imperative that India address the unique challenges concerning children and adolescents in the AI landscape.

    What is the Digital India Act, 2023?

    • The act is new legislation that aims to overhaul the decades-old Information Technology Act of 2000.
    • The Act covers a range of topics such as AI, cybercrime, data protection, deepfakes, competition issues among internet platforms, and online safety.
    • The Act also aims to address new complex forms of user harm that have emerged in the years since the IT Act’s enactment, such as catfishing, doxxing, trolling, and phishing.

    Key features of the Digital India Act

    • Creating new regulations around newer technology, including 5G, IoT devices, cloud computing, the metaverse, blockchain, and cryptocurrency
    • Reclassifying online intermediaries into separate categories instead of one general intermediary label, each with its own set of regulations
    • Removing safe harbor immunity for online intermediaries for purposeful misinformation or other content violations from third parties
    • Creating digital standards and laws regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technology
    • Criminalizing cyberbullying, identity theft, and unauthorized sharing of personal information without consent.

    Addressing the Governance Challenge through the Digital India Act

    • Establish a regulatory framework that aligns industry incentives with the well-being of young users.
    • Implement measures to combat exploitative AI practices, ensuring the safety and mental health of children and adolescents.
    • Provide guidance and tools for families to navigate the digital landscape responsibly.
    • Promote inclusivity and fairness by addressing biases and discrimination in AI systems.
    • Revise data protection provisions to strike a balance between privacy and personalization, recognizing the unique needs of young users.

    Way Forward: Rethinking Child-Centric AI Regulation

    • International Best Practices:
    • India can draw on international best practices to develop child-centric AI regulations.
    • UNICEF’s guidance for policymakers on AI and children, aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, provides a framework for creating an enabling environment that prioritizes children’s well-being, inclusion, fairness, non-discrimination, safety, transparency, explaining ability, and accountability.
    • Age-Appropriate Design:
    • Learning from California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, Indian authorities can push for transparency in digital services by configuring default privacy settings, assessing the impact of algorithms and data collection on children, and using age-appropriate language for user-facing information.
    • Research on AI’s benefits and risks for Indian children and adolescents should inform the development of an Indian Age-Appropriate Design Code for AI.
    • Engaging Young Voices:
    • Establishing institutions for regular dialogue with children and adolescents is crucial.
    • Similar to Australia’s Online Safety Youth Advisory Council, these institutions could comprise individuals between the ages of 13 and 24.
    • Such entities will help regulators better understand the threats young people face while interacting with AI systems and preserve the benefits they derive from digital services.

    Conclusion

    • In the era of rapidly evolving AI, India’s regulatory approach must prioritize openness, trust, and accountability over rigid prescriptions. As India progresses towards comprehensive Internet regulation and seeks to lead in global AI governance, safeguarding the interests of its young citizens should remain at the forefront of its policy agenda.

    Also read:

    Laying the foundation for a future-ready digital India

  • Mediation Act, 2023

    What’s the news?

    • During the recent monsoon session of Parliament, both Houses passed the Mediation Bill, 2023, now known as the Mediation Act, 2023.

    Central Idea

    • The discourse surrounding India’s litigation system invariably leads to discussions on alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Given the delays and escalating costs associated with Indian court proceedings, the significance of ADR cannot be overstated. While arbitration and conciliation have traditionally dominated these discussions, the recent passage of the Mediation Act of 2023 signals a pivotal shift towards recognizing the importance of mediation.

    About the Mediation Act, 2023

    • During the monsoon session of Parliament, the Mediation Bill, 2023, was passed in both Houses, subsequently receiving the President’s assent and being referred to as the Mediation Act, 2023.
    • This Act builds upon India’s existing legal framework, which encourages courts to refer disputing parties to ADR, including mediation, if settlement possibilities exist. However, the Act takes a significant step forward by obligating parties to engage in pre-litigation mediation, regardless of prior agreements.
    • To facilitate this process, the Act mandates courts and relevant institutions to maintain a panel of mediators.

    Potential benefits of the Mediation Act, 2023

    • Reduction of Frivolous Claims: The Act’s requirement for pre-litigation mediation is expected to reduce the filing of frivolous claims in Indian courts. Parties will be compelled to explore amicable settlements through mediation before resorting to litigation, which can help filter out cases that lack merit.
    • Efficient Dispute Resolution: The Act’s provision for completing mediations within 180 days from the parties’ first appearance promotes efficient dispute resolution. This can lead to quicker resolutions compared to potentially protracted court proceedings, saving time and resources for all parties involved.
    • Expertise and Neutrality: The Act mandates that mediations be conducted by empaneled mediators who are neutral and possess expertise in the field. This ensures that parties receive professional guidance from unbiased experts, enhancing the prospects of a fair and impartial resolution.
    • Reduced Burden on Indian Courts: By encouraging pre-litigation mediation, the Act aims to reduce the caseload of Indian courts. This could result in expedited court proceedings for cases that do proceed to litigation, relieving the burden on the judiciary and potentially reducing court backlogs.
    • Promotion of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): The Act aligns with the broader goal of promoting ADR mechanisms in India. It recognizes mediation as a valuable tool for reducing court congestion and promoting efficient dispute resolution, aligning with international best practices.
    • Institutional Mediation: The Act’s emphasis on institutional mediation can enhance the professionalism and accessibility of mediation services in India. This institutional framework can provide parties with the necessary infrastructure and support for effective dispute resolution.
    • India as a Global Hub for Dispute Resolution: The Act’s provisions, along with the emphasis on ADR, aim to position India as a global hub for various aspects of commercial dispute resolution. This aligns with international best practices and can attract international businesses seeking efficient dispute resolution services.

    Concerns associated with the act

    • Coercion and sincerity: There may be concerns about parties feeling compelled to engage in mediation even if they are not genuinely interested in pursuing a settlement. Mandatory mediation may raise questions about the sincerity of the parties’ participation.
    • Delays in Urgent Cases: While the Act allows for urgent interim relief from the court in exceptional circumstances, there may still be concerns about potential delays in urgent cases due to mandatory pre-mediation proceedings.
    • Mediator Availability: Ensuring a sufficient pool of qualified mediators may be a challenge. The Act’s requirement for empaneled mediators could lead to a shortage of available mediators, potentially causing delays in mediation processes.
    • Balancing Neutrality and Expertise: Striking the right balance between mediator neutrality and expertise can be challenging. Concerns may arise regarding mediator bias or perceived bias in some cases.
    • Implementation Challenges: Implementing the Act effectively and ensuring compliance by all parties and institutions may pose challenges. Adequate training, infrastructure, and support for mediators and mediation service providers will be essential for successful implementation.

    Alignment of Mediation and Commercial Arbitration

    • Similar Legal Framework: The Mediation Act, 2023, effectively positions mediation on par with commercial arbitration in India. Both forms of dispute resolution share a similar legal framework with several common elements.
    • Stringent Timelines: Both mediation and commercial arbitration, as governed by their respective legislation, impose stringent timelines for the conduct of proceedings. This ensures that disputes are resolved efficiently and within defined timeframes.
    • Mandate for Confidentiality: Both mediation and arbitration proceedings mandate confidentiality. This confidentiality requirement ensures that the details of the dispute and the resolution process remain private, which can be advantageous for businesses and individuals involved in sensitive matters.
    • Court Referral: The Act, similar to legislation governing arbitration, obligates Indian courts to refer disputing parties to either mediation or arbitration. This reflects a broader trend toward encouraging alternative dispute resolution mechanisms before resorting to litigation.
    • Appointment of Neutrals: Both mediation and arbitration involve the appointment of neutral third parties. In mediation, this is the mediator, while in arbitration, it’s the arbitrator. These neutrals play a crucial role in facilitating the resolution process and ensuring impartiality.
    • Enforceability: Both mediation and arbitration legislation emphasize the enforceability of agreements. The Act ensures the enforceability of mediated settlement agreements, while arbitration legislation ensures the enforceability of arbitral awards.
    • Council Establishment: The Act proposes the establishment of the Mediation Council of India, which mirrors the proposed Arbitration Council of India. This underscores the recognition of mediation as a significant dispute resolution mechanism alongside arbitration.

    Parliament’s Message

    • The Act conveys a clear message to Indian industry: in commercial matters, courts should no longer be the default venue for dispute resolution.
    • Parties are encouraged to resolve disputes amicably through mediation or commercial arbitration, with access to Indian courts considered a last resort.
    • This paradigm shift will foster camaraderie between mediation and arbitration, alleviating the burden on the judiciary.

    Conclusion

    • The Mediation Act, 2023, marks a transformative moment in Indian dispute resolution. It positions mediation as a powerful tool to amicably settle disputes, alongside commercial arbitration. By encouraging parties to explore alternative avenues for resolution and prioritizing institutional mediation, India aims to not only ease the burden on its courts but also emerge as a global leader in commercial dispute resolution.

    Also read:

    Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism – NCA, Lok Adalats, etc.

  • Propelling India’s development the right way

    What’s the news?

    • The op-ed acknowledges India’s technological achievements, emphasizing the need to revive state support, particularly in emerging sectors. It underscores the urgency of addressing persistent inequalities and promoting inclusive economic growth for a more prosperous future.

    Central idea

    • Aim for the moon is often synonymous with bold ambition, verging on recklessness. India’s foray into space research in the 1960s was initially met with skepticism, given its status as a young and struggling nation. Today, India boasts remarkable achievements in space exploration. However, these accomplishments raise a pertinent question: How do these feats align with the persistent poverty and destitution afflicting millions of Indians?

    Historical Foundations of India’s Scientific and Technological Capabilities

    • Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs): Between 1951 and 1961, India founded five Indian Institutes of Technology. These institutions rapidly gained global recognition as centers of academic excellence. They played a critical role in nurturing a talent pool of engineers and scientists who would later contribute to India’s technological advancements.
    • Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs): In 1961, India inaugurated the first two Indian Institutes of Management. These institutions aimed to foster managerial talent, aligning with India’s broader goals of building expertise and human capital in various fields.
    • Public Sector Units (PSUs): Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, India established numerous public sector units across diverse industrial sectors. These sectors included steel production, fertilizer manufacturing, machine tools, electric machinery, drug production, and petrochemicals. These PSUs not only bolstered industrialization but also served as vital testing grounds for emerging technologies.

    India’s Moonshot Development Strategy

    • The moonshot development strategy aimed to leverage modern industrialization to address developmental challenges.
    • Early visionaries like Vikram Sarabhai envisioned satellite technology for nationwide communication, agricultural improvements, and healthcare education.
    • Nevertheless, this approach faced criticism for its heavy reliance on public investment and the alleged misdirection of resources toward capital- and technology-intensive industries instead of labor-intensive sectors.

    How have inequalities posed significant hurdles to India’s progress and development?

    • Lack of Effective Government Intervention:
    • India’s development strategy’s lackluster record was not due to excessive government emphasis on technology but rather because the government could not effectively address inequalities and ensure social development.
    • One of the missed opportunities was the failure to implement a successful program of land redistribution.
    • Ownership Disparities: Ownership of assets remains significantly low among socially oppressed communities, including Dalits and the Scheduled Caste (SC) population. This lack of asset ownership creates barriers to accessing education and economic opportunities.
    • Education Underinvestment: India has consistently underinvested in basic education for the masses. This educational deficit further exacerbates inequalities and limits opportunities for those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.
    • Replicated Inequalities in the Labor Market: The historical inequalities in social and economic spheres translate into labor market disparities. Better-paying jobs tend to be concentrated among privileged groups with greater access to higher education, further deepening the divide.
    • Employment Disparities: The data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey highlights significant disparities in employment. In 2021–22, a higher percentage of SC workers (38.2%) were engaged in casual employment, which often involves manual labor, compared to workers from other general category castes (11.2%).
    • Contrast with East Asian Countries: East Asian countries like Japan and China implemented land reforms and other measures in the 1950s that created a relatively egalitarian social structure. This laid the foundation for progressive economic and social changes in the subsequent years.
    • Impact on Industrial and Economic Growth: Inequalities have negatively impacted industrial and economic growth in India. The skewed domestic demand, driven by the upper-income classes, has hindered the growth of manufacturing sectors producing high-quality, mass-consumption goods like food products and garments.
    • Narrow Social Base for Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurship in India has emerged from a narrow social base, limiting the diversity and inclusivity of the entrepreneurial ecosystem.

    Way forward

    • Reinstate state support:
    • India should recognize the strengths and weaknesses of its post-independence development strategy.
    • The audacious attempt to build technological and industrial capabilities with generous state support was the right approach.
    • India must reinstate such efforts, especially in rapidly growing economic sectors like semiconductors and biotechnology.
    • Abandoning industrial policy in a globalized economy, as done after 1991, is a mistake, especially when countries like the United States and China actively support their industries.
    • Make Economic Growth Inclusive:
    • India needs to redouble efforts to ensure that economic growth is inclusive and broad-based.
    • Access to education, particularly higher education, should be made accessible to all, including marginalized communities.
    • Strengthen human and social capabilities:
    • While technology has played a significant role in India’s development, it’s equally important to focus on building human and social capabilities.
    • Empowering the billion-strong population with the skills and capabilities required for upward mobility is crucial.
    • Achieving this would be equivalent to a significant leap in economic progress.

    Conclusion

    • India’s journey toward technological prowess should coexist with a commitment to alleviate inequality and ensure inclusive growth. A moonshot approach to development, grounded in state support for technological advancement, is imperative. By reconciling these objectives, India can pave the way for a prosperous and equitable future.