💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: International Stories of Key Importance

  • [3rd January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Reflections as the world grows more ‘polarised’ 

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) Hatred is destructive of a person’s wisdom and conscience that can poison a nation’s spirit. Do you agree with this view? Justify your answer. (UPSC CSE 2020)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on ‘tolerance, assimilation and pluralism’ (2022) and ‘spirit and tolerance’ (2017).

    In the book Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know (2019) by Nolan McCarty examines the social, economic, and geographic causes of political divides in America due to polarisation. After Trump’s 2024 re-election, the U.S. seemed deeply divided politically and culturally. Reflecting this, Merriam-Webster named “polarization” its 2024 word of the year.

    Today’s editorial critically examines the polarisation USA’s election and how would impact India and the world. This content can be used in Mains’s answer to substantiate the polarization in elections.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    Donald Trump’s win in the 2016 U.S. presidential election made people think about a “divided” America, with growing political and social differences made worse by fake news in a time when facts often take a back seat.

    How does polarization affect global governance and cooperation?

    • Erosion of Social Fabric: Political polarization in the U.S. has escalated into a divisive force that threatens the fundamental social fabric of democracy. This ideological rift has become an existential clash over national identity and governance, complicating international cooperation and consensus-building efforts.
    • Fragmented Political Landscape: The increasing divide has made it challenging for political leaders to engage in collaborative governance, as parties become more entrenched in their views, leading to gridlock in policymaking.
      • The polarization is not just limited to domestic issues but affects how the U.S. interacts with other nations, as differing ideologies can hinder diplomatic relations and cooperative agreements.

    What role does misinformation play in exacerbating polarization?

    • Amplification through Social Media: Misinformation plays a critical role in deepening political polarization by creating echo chambers where individuals are exposed only to viewpoints that reinforce their beliefs.
      • This phenomenon is exacerbated by social media platforms that prioritize sensational content over factual accuracy, leading to distorted perceptions of reality and increased tribalism among users.
    • Erosion of Trust: The spread of fake news contributes to a significant decline in trust towards democratic institutions and experts. As misinformation proliferates, individuals become more sceptical of credible sources, which further polarizes public opinion and complicates consensus on key issues such as health care and governance.

    How would it impact India? 

    • Shifts in U.S.-India Relations: The outcome of polarized elections in the U.S. directly impacts diplomatic and strategic relations with India. For instance, a Trump administration may adopt a more transactional approach to U.S.-India relations, focusing on trade and immigration policies that could challenge India’s interests.  
    • Domestic Political Ramifications: The polarization seen in the U.S. can resonate within India, potentially exacerbating existing social and political divides.
      • As Indian political parties observe the strategies employed by their American counterparts, there is a risk of adopting similar divisive tactics that could deepen polarization in Indian society, affecting governance and social cohesion.

    How we can navigate the complexities of a fragmented political landscape? (Way forward)

    • Promoting Dialogue and Understanding: To address the challenges posed by polarization, fostering open dialogue between opposing sides is essential. Initiatives that encourage cross-party discussions can help bridge divides and promote understanding of differing perspectives.
    • Educational Outreach: Increasing public awareness about the effects of misinformation and the importance of critical thinking can empower citizens to discern credible information from false narratives. Educational programs aimed at enhancing media literacy are crucial in navigating today’s complex political environment.
    • Encouraging Bipartisan Solutions: Focusing on common goals rather than partisan differences can facilitate collaboration on pressing issues. Policymakers should seek bipartisan support for initiatives that benefit the broader population, thereby reducing the perception of an “us vs. them” mentality.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/reflections-as-the-world-grows-more-polarised/article69054883.ece

  • Ukraine ends supply of Russian gas to Europe

    Why in the News?

    For over 40 years, Russian gas has been transported to Europe through Ukraine, but these supplies are set to cease on January 1, following Ukraine’s Naftogaz decision not to renew its most recent five-year transit agreement with Russia’s Gazprom.

    Note: Student you can use this content in Prelims for facts related to map and mains exam for substantiate the argument related to geopolitical tension in Europe.

    Do you know about the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod pipeline?

    • The Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod pipeline, also known as the Brotherhood pipeline, is a significant natural gas export route from Russia to Europe, primarily traversing Ukraine. The pipeline starts at the Urengoy gas field in northwest Siberia and extends southwest to Uzhhorod, Ukraine, near the Slovakian border.
    • It spans approximately 4,500 kilometers (2,800 miles), with about 1,160 kilometers (720 miles) located in Ukraine.
    • The pipeline was commissioned in 1984 and has been a crucial part of Russia’s gas export strategy to Europe.

    What is the volume of gas supplied through Ukraine?

    • Historical Context: At its peak, the pipeline system, including the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod pipeline, delivered approximately 201 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas to Europe in 2018. However, this volume has drastically decreased over the years due to geopolitical tensions and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
    • Recent Figures: In 2023, only about 15 bcm of gas was shipped through Ukraine, a significant drop from 65 bcm when the last five-year contract began in 2020.

    What are the Possible Impacts?

    • Economic Consequences for Ukraine: Ukraine is expected to lose up to $1 billion annually in transit fees due to the cessation of gas flows. To mitigate this loss, it plans to quadruple gas transmission tariffs for domestic consumers, which could burden its industry with additional costs exceeding $38.2 million per year.
    • Impact on Gazprom: Russia’s Gazprom is projected to lose around $5 billion in gas sales as a result of this halted transit.
    • European Energy Security: The European Union has prepared for this transition and does not anticipate immediate impacts on consumer prices.
      • Countries like Slovakia and Austria have secured alternative gas supplies from sources such as Norway and LNG imports from the U.S. and Qatar.
    • Hungary will continue receiving Russian gas through the TurkStream pipeline under the Black Sea.

    TurkStream pipeline

    • Energy Crisis in Moldova: The cessation has led to an energy emergency in Transdniestria, a breakaway region of Moldova that relies on these transit flows, resulting in cutoffs of heating and hot water supplies for residents

    Way forward: 

    • Enhanced Energy Diversification: Europe and Ukraine should continue to strengthen alternative energy supply routes, including LNG imports and renewable energy projects, to reduce reliance on Russian gas and ensure long-term energy security.
    • Support for Affected Regions: Provide immediate humanitarian and financial assistance to regions like Transdniestria and Moldova for energy infrastructure upgrades, while encouraging energy-efficient solutions to mitigate the crisis.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q What is the significance of Indo-US defence deals over Indo-Russian defence deals? Discuss with reference to stability in the Indo-Pacific region. (UPSC IAS/2020)

  • US imposes sanctions on entities in Iran, Russia

    Why in the News?

    The United States has imposed sanctions on entities in Iran and Russia, accusing them of attempting to interfere in the 2024 US presidential election.

    Understanding Sanctions: Purpose, Application, and Impact

    • Sanctions are strategic tools used to influence behavior, deter aggression, and enforce compliance with international norms.
    • Sanctions are commonly used to address counterterrorism, human rights abuses, nuclear proliferation, and election interference.

    Types of Sanctions

    1. Comprehensive Sanctions: Broad measures against entire countries (e.g., U.S. embargo on Cuba).
    2. Targeted (Smart) Sanctions: Focused on specific individuals or entities (e.g., asset freezes, travel bans).
    3. Common Forms:
    • Trade restrictions and arms embargoes.
    • Asset freezes and capital restraints.
    • Travel bans and reductions in foreign aid.

    How sanctions work?

    • United States:
      • Managed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
      • Targets include terrorism (e.g., al-Qaeda), nuclear programs (e.g., Iran), and election meddling (e.g., Russia).
      • Example: 2024 sanctions on Iranian and Russian entities for using AI to interfere in U.S. elections.
    • United Nations:
      • Imposed by the UN Security Council, requiring no veto from the five permanent members (U.S., UK, France, China, Russia).
      • Measures include asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes.
      • Example: Sanctions on North Korea to curb its nuclear weapons program.

    Why are Sanctions Imposed?

    Sanctions aim to:

    • Coerce: Change policies or actions, such as dismantling nuclear programs.
    • Deter: Prevent future aggression or cyberattacks.
    • Punish: Impose costs for violating international norms.
    • Shame: Isolate violators diplomatically and economically.

    Impacts on Regional and Global Geopolitics

    • Economic Effects:
      • Sanctions can weaken economies, such as Iran’s reduction in oil exports or Russia’s challenges in energy markets.
      • However, some nations adapt; Russia’s economy grew by 3.6% in 2023, despite sanctions.
    • Shifting Alliances:
      • Targeted nations strengthen ties with others (e.g., Russia’s growing relations with China and Iran).
    • Trade Realignment:
      • EU sanctions on Russia accelerated Europe’s move to renewable energy sources.
    • Humanitarian Consequences:
      • Comprehensive sanctions can harm civilians, as seen in Iraq during the 1990s.

  • In news: Greenland

    Why in the News?

    US President-elect Donald Trump has once again expressed interest in buying Greenland, and Greenland has again stated it is not for sale.

    In news: Greenland

    Why is the US so much interested in Greenland?

    • Greenland is strategically located in the North Atlantic Ocean, between Europe and North America, and across the Baffin Bay from Canada.
      • The US maintains a large air base in Greenland, the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base).
    • From here, the US can monitor and counter missile threats from Russia, China, and North Korea.
    • Greenland is abundant in rare earth minerals, critical for manufacturing electronics, electric vehicles, and weapons.
    • Melting ice caps due to global warming are opening new shipping routes in the Arctic.
      • Greenland’s position is crucial for controlling these waterways, with the US seeking to limit Russian and Chinese influence in the region.

    Greenland: Everything you need to know

    Details
    About 
    • World’s largest island, located in the North Atlantic Ocean between Europe and North America; part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
    • An autonomous territory within Denmark, managing domestic affairs, while Denmark oversees defense, foreign policy, and some economic matters.
    • Population: ~57,000, primarily Inuit communities, concentrated along the coast.
    • Transitioned from a Danish colony to self-rule in 1979, gaining further autonomy in 2009.
    Geographical Features
    • Covers 2.16 million square kilometers, with ~80% under the Greenland Ice Sheet, a critical focus for studying climate change and sea-level rise.
    • Predominantly Arctic climate, with freezing temperatures most of the year; milder summers in the southern coastal areas.
    • Rich in rare earth minerals, iron ore, zinc, lead, and uranium, making it geopolitically significant.
    • Banned uranium mining in 2021 for environmental reasons.
    Political Features
    • Has its own parliament (Inatsisartut) and prime minister overseeing domestic policies; Denmark controls foreign relations and defense.
    • Closely tied to Denmark, with Danish subsidies accounting for ~60% of Greenland’s budget.
    • Some political groups advocate for full independence, though economic dependence complicates this goal.

     

    PYQ:

    [2014] Consider the following countries :

    1. Denmark
    2. Japan
    3. Russian Federation
    4. United Kingdom
    5. United States of America

    Which of the above are the members of the ‘Arctic Council ‘?

    (a) 1, 2 and 3

    (b) 2, 3 and 4

    (c) 1, 4 and 5

    (d) 1, 3 and 5

  • United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF)

    Why in the News?

    UN Secretary-General paid tribute to Brigadier General Amitabh Jha of India, who died serving with the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) in the Golan Heights.

    About United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF)

    • The UNDOF is a peacekeeping mission established by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to oversee the implementation of a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Syria following the 1973 Yom Kippur War.
      • The Yom Kippur War (October 6-24, 1973) was fought between Egypt and Israel (in the Sinai) and Israel and Syria (in the Golan Heights).
    • It operates in the Golan Heights, a region of strategic importance and long-standing contention.
    • The UNSC formally established UNDOF under Resolution 350 to:
    1. Maintain the ceasefire.
    2. Supervise the disengagement of forces.
    3. Monitor the separation zones established by the agreement.
    • UNDOF became operational on June 6, 1974, with an initial deployment of approximately 1,200 personnel.
    • Its mandate is renewed every 6 months by the UNSC, emphasizing its ongoing role in maintaining stability.

    Structural Mandate and Functions

    UNDOF’s core responsibilities include:

    • Ceasefire Maintenance:
      • Monitor and ensure adherence to the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Syria.
    • Supervision of Disengagement:
      • Oversee the withdrawal of forces to their respective areas as per the 1974 Agreement on Disengagement.
    • Monitoring Areas of Separation and Limitation:
      • Area of Separation (AOS):
        • A demilitarized zone controlled by UNDOF, where no military activity is permitted.
        • Approx. 80 km long, ranging from 200 m to 8 km wide.
        • Marked by barrel lines for identification on the ground.
      • Areas of Limitation:
        • Zones on both Israeli and Syrian sides where the number of troops and types of weapons are restricted.

    Functions:

    • Observation and Reporting:
      • Monitor troop movements and ensure no violations of the agreement occur.
      • Regularly report to the UN Secretary-General and the UNSC on ground conditions.
    • Civilian Assistance: Facilitate the return of Syrian civilians to their homes in the AOS under the agreement.
    • Verification of Compliance: Conduct inspections to ensure adherence to restrictions in Areas of Limitation.
    • Confidence-Building Measures: Act as a neutral party to reduce tensions between Israel and Syria.
    • Liaison Services: Maintain open communication channels between Israeli and Syrian forces to prevent misunderstandings or escalation.

    PYQ:

    [2015] The area known as ‘Golan Heights’ sometimes appears in the news in the context of the events is related to:

    (a) Central Asia

    (b) Middle East

    (c) South-East Asia

    (d) Central Africa

  • [24th December 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: The GATT-ification of the World Trade Organization

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) What are the key areas of reform if the WTO has to survive in the present context of ‘Trade War’, especially keeping in mind the interest of India? (UPSC CSE 2018)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on topics like ‘WTO’ (2018) and ‘International Trading routes’ (2022).

    An Allianz Trade survey found that 82% of exporters are optimistic about turnover growth in 2024, 73% are also concerned about geopolitical risks and protectionism, highlighting the need for trade policies that promote growth while ensuring inclusivity and equity among nations.

    Today’s editorial likely critiques the current state of the World Trade Organization (WTO) by comparing it to its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This content can be used to present ‘Trade issues’ and ‘Free movement regimes’ in Global politics in your mains answers.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The trend of rising protectionism, especially when Donald Trump promised to impose high tariffs on imports from countries like China, Canada, and Mexico.

    • This shift raises concerns about increased consumer prices and disruptions in global supply chains, as countries focus more on supporting their domestic industries rather than cooperating internationally.
    About the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT):

    The GATT is a foundational international treaty established in 1947 to promote global trade by reducing tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers. Initially signed by 23 countries, GATT aimed to facilitate economic recovery after World War II, evolved through several negotiation rounds, and the key features included:
    • Non-Discrimination Principle: Member countries must apply tariffs equally to all members, ensuring fair trade practices.
    • Tariff Reductions: GATT successfully lowered average tariffs among member nations from over 20% to around 5%.
    • Trade Facilitation: It provided a framework for resolving trade disputes and encouraged multilateral negotiations to further reduce barriers.
    The Uruguay Round concluded with the Marrakesh Agreement in 1994, which established the WTO as a successor to GATT. The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established on January 1, 1995. By the time it transitioned into the WTO, GATT had become a crucial instrument for promoting global trade liberalization, covering approximately 90% of international trade.

    The Appellate Body was established in 1995 as part of the WTO under Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).
    • Aim: It serves to hear appeals from reports issued by panels in disputes between WTO member countries, acting as a higher court for trade-related legal issues.
    • Structure and Composition: The Appellate Body consists of 7 members, each appointed for a 4-year term by the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). 
    • Members can be reappointed for additional terms. A Chairperson is elected annually among the members to oversee the Appellate Body’s operations.

    About the Recent WTO Conference:

    • The WTO for its 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) in February 2024, raised critical issues such as dispute settlement reforms and the extension of the e-commerce moratorium.
    • This context highlights the need to reevaluate the WTO’s structure and effectiveness.

    How is the WTO experiencing a “GATT-ification”?

    • Existential Crisis: The WTO is set to miss its target of revitalizing a fully functional dispute settlement system by the end of 2024, with the Appellate Body (AB) remaining non-operational for over five years due to U.S. blockages in appointing members.
      • The obstruction began during the Obama administration, escalated under Trump, and continues under Biden, reflecting a bipartisan consensus against the AB.
      • Anticipations of a protectionist Trump 2.0 administration could further worsen the situation. Because, in 2018, he imposed a 25% tariff on various Chinese products, indicating a shift towards unilateral trade actions.
      • The real issue extends beyond the AB’s functionality; it involves the WTO’s relevance in global trade.
    • Challenges for Developing Nations: The informal nature of current discussions has hindered effective participation from many developing countries. India proposes transitioning discussions on reforms to formal WTO bodies to ensure inclusivity and representation from developing countries.
    • Uncertain Future: The future of the WTO’s dispute settlement system remains uncertain as the deadline approaches, with ongoing debates about restoring functionality and addressing broader institutional challenges.

    What is the present Unraveling of WTO Dynamics?

    • China’s Rise: China’s rise over the past two decades has significantly changed the global trade landscape. The U.S. facilitated China’s accession to the WTO in 2001, hoping it would adopt free-market principles and dismantle state-led industrial policies.
    • Expectations vs. Reality: Contrary to U.S. hopes, China did not dismantle its state-led policies and is perceived to have exploited the WTO system to its advantage. On the contrary, there is a belief in the U.S. that the WTO’s institutional controls limit its ability to address challenges posed by China.
    • The U.S. aims, as stated by international lawyer Daniel C.K. Chow, to undermine the WTO system, including the Appellate Body (AB), to gain more freedom in addressing the Chinese threat.
    • The U.S. can now implement trade remedial measures and develop industrial policies against China, even if they violate WTO laws, due to the lack of enforcement from the AB.

    Conclusion: The term ‘GATT-ification’, coined by Prof. Vidigal, highlights the shift in the international trading order and emphasizes that current negotiations cannot obscure the reality. The reversal shift to GATT-era diplomacy signifies a significant change in how international trade is governed, moving away from established multilateral frameworks toward more fragmented approaches.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-gatt-ification-of-the-world-trade-organization/article69019794.ece

  • In news: Panama Canal

    Why in the News?

    US President-elect Donald Trump criticized Panama for charging excessively for US ships’ use of the Panama Canal and threatened a US takeover of the canal.

    In news: Panama Canal

    About Panama Canal:

    Geographical Location:

    • Located in Central America, connecting the Atlantic Ocean (via the Caribbean Sea) to the Pacific Ocean.
    • 80 km long, spanning across the Isthmus of Panama.
    • Uses a system of locks to raise and lower ships across an elevation of 85 feet (26 meters).

    Historical Significance:

    • French started construction in 1881, led by Ferdinand de Lesseps, but failed.
    • Completed by the U.S. in 1914, under engineers George Washington Goethals and John Stevens.
    • Control was transferred from the U.S. to Panama in 1999 under the Torrijos-Carter Treaties (1977).
    • Present Significance:
      • Crucial for global trade, reducing travel time between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
      • Strategic military value, especially during the World Wars.
      • Major contributor to Panama’s economy through tolls and trade-related activities.

    Present Geopolitics:

    • Trump raised concerns about China’s influence in the region, especially Panama’s role in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
    • In recent years, Chinese companies have been involved in infrastructure projects around the Panama Canal, including logistics and energy sectors.
    • Panama’s 2018 signing of the BRI furthered its ties with China, a development that some view as a challenge to US influence in the region.

  • Syrian Crisis and its implications for Iran and regional geopolitics

    Why in the News?

    The fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria significantly challenges Iran’s regional influence, disrupting Tehran’s efforts to sustain its “Shiite crescent” strategy across the Middle East.

    The “Shiite crescent” strategy refers to Iran’s geopolitical ambition to establish a contiguous sphere of influence among Shia-majority regions, extending from Iran through Iraq and Syria to Lebanon, thereby enhancing its regional power.

    syria

    What are the Bilateral Ties between Iran and Syria?

    • Strategic Partnership: Since the establishment of the Islamic Republic in 1979, Syria has been Iran’s key ally, facilitating Iranian influence throughout the Levant. This partnership allowed Iran to support Hezbollah in Lebanon and maintain a foothold against Sunni Arab states.
    • Corridor for Influence: Syria served as a vital corridor for Iranian resources and military support to its proxies, reinforcing Tehran’s “Shiite crescent” strategy aimed at linking Iran with its allies across the region.
    • Historical Context: The relationship strengthened under Bashar al-Assad, despite being challenged by regional Sunni powers. The Assad regime’s reliance on Iranian support became more pronounced during the Syrian civil war, which began in 2011.

    What are the challenges for Tehran?

    • Loss of Influence: The fall of Assad represents a major setback for Iran, as it loses a critical ally needed to sustain its influence in the region. This diminishes Tehran’s ability to project power through its network of proxies and disrupts its strategic depth in the Levant.
    • Operational Setbacks: Iran’s military presence in Syria had already been compromised by Israeli operations targeting Hezbollah leaders and other Iranian-affiliated groups. The loss of Assad exacerbates these challenges, leaving Tehran to reassess its military and diplomatic strategies.
    • Increased Regional Competition: With Assad gone, regional powers like Turkey and Gulf states are likely to vie for influence in Syria, further complicating Iran’s position and diminishing its regional leverage.

    What are the Geopolitical implications for the countries in the region?

    • Power Vacuum: The collapse of Assad creates a power vacuum in which regional players such as Turkey, Iran, and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states will compete to fill, recalibrating their strategies to safeguard national interests.
    • Increased Tensions: Sunni Arab states may heighten efforts to counter Iranian influence, potentially leading to escalated sectarian tensions and a resurgence of militant groups like ISIS seeking to exploit the instability.
    • Israel’s Strategic Posture: Israel is expected to adopt a more aggressive stance against Iranian-affiliated groups in Syria and Lebanon, aiming to prevent any reconstitution of Iranian influence along its borders.
    • Western Involvement: The U.S. and European nations may intensify their involvement through diplomatic channels and interventions to curb Iranian expansion while preventing militant organizations from re-emerging in the region.

    What are the steps taken by Indian government?  

    • India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEEC): Launched during India’s G20 presidency, this corridor aims to enhance connectivity and trade between India, the Middle East, and Europe. It seeks to integrate various countries, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel, and European nations, facilitating faster movement of goods and improving maritime security.
    • Joint Action Plan with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): India and the GCC have adopted a Joint Action Plan for 2024-2028, which encompasses cooperation in various sectors such as health, trade, energy, agriculture, and transportation.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Diplomatic Ties: Engage with key regional actors like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Turkey to promote stability in Syria and counterbalance Iranian influence while safeguarding India’s energy and trade interests in the Middle East.
    • Counter-Terrorism Collaboration: Enhance intelligence-sharing and counter-terrorism cooperation with allies to mitigate the risks of militant groups like ISIS exploiting the instability in Syria.
    • Support Reconstruction Efforts: Participate in Syria’s post-conflict reconstruction through investments in infrastructure, showcasing India’s soft power and gaining strategic goodwill in the region.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to its situation? (UPSC IAS/2018)

  • UNGA declares December 21 as World Meditation Day

    Why in the News?

    India has played a leading role in co-sponsoring and guiding the unanimous adoption of a UN General Assembly draft resolution to declare December 21 as World Meditation Day.

    • The theme for 2024 is- “Inner Peace, Global Harmony”.

    About the World Meditation Day

    • It is a global observance that was officially recognized following the adoption of a UN General Assembly resolution on December 6, 2024. However, the 21st of December has been designated as the date for this annual observance.
    • It is also symbolic, of falling on the Winter Solstice (December 21), which is associated with new beginnings, reflection, and spiritual growth in Indian tradition.
      • The date is also exactly six months after the International Day of Yoga on June 21, which marks the Summer Solstice.

    The objective behind this Decision

    • Promote Well-Being: To globally encourage meditation for enhancing mental health and overall wellness.
    • Encourage Inner Reflection: Recognizing December 21 as a time for self-reflection and meditation, especially during Uttarayana in Indian tradition.
    • India’s Global Leadership: Reinforces India’s commitment to global wellness, following its leadership in declaring International Day of Yoga.

    PYQ:

    [2012] With reference to the religious history of medieval India, the Sufi mystics were known to pursue which of the following practices?

    1. Meditation and control of breath

    2. Severe ascetic exercises in a lonely place

    3. Recitation of holy songs to arouse a state of ecstasy in their audience

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Trump to impose ‘additional’ tariff on China

    Why in the News?

    President-elect Donald Trump announced his intention to impose tariffs on the United States’ three largest trading partners—Canada, Mexico, and China—once he assumes office.

    What specific tariffs is Trump proposing on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico?

    • 25% Tariff on Imports: President-elect Donald Trump announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on imported goods from the United States’ three largest trading partners: Canada, Mexico, and China.
    • Additional 10% Tariff on China: He also proposed an additional 10% tariff specifically targeting imports from China, citing the country’s failure to address the flow of fentanyl into the United States.

    What are the underlying reasons for these tariff increases?

    • Trade Imbalance: The tariffs aim to address perceived trade imbalances and protect American manufacturing jobs.
    • Fentanyl Crisis: The additional tariff on China is a direct response to the ongoing opioid crisis in the U.S., particularly related to fentanyl trafficking. Trump emphasized China’s lack of action in curbing the drug’s flow into the U.S. as a justification for the tariffs.
    • Political Strategy: The tariffs may also serve as a political manoeuvre to reinforce Trump’s stance on trade issues and drug-related policies as he prepares to take office.

    What potential economic impacts could arise in the Asian region (esp India) from these tariffs?

    • Increased Costs for Importers: Indian companies that rely on imports from these countries may face higher costs due to increased tariffs, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers.
    • Supply Chain Disruptions: The tariffs could disrupt existing supply chains, particularly in industries that rely on components from Canada, Mexico, and China, affecting production schedules and costs.
    • Investment Shifts: Businesses might reconsider their investment strategies in light of new tariffs, potentially leading to a shift in manufacturing bases or sourcing strategies away from affected countries.
    • Opportunities for Indian Manufacturers: Conversely, Indian manufacturers might find opportunities to fill gaps left by increased tariffs on imports, potentially boosting local production and employment.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Trade and Strategic Engagement with the U.S.: India should proactively address trade imbalances by diversifying imports from the U.S., aligning with American regulatory standards, and offering enhanced market access in key sectors like technology and defence.
    • Position as a Reliable Alternative to China: Leverage initiatives like Make in India to attract U.S. investments, promote joint ventures, and emphasize India’s strategic importance as a trusted partner in global supply chains.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q What are the key areas of reform if the WTO has to survive in the present context of ‘Trade War’, especially keeping in mind the interest of India? (UPSC IAS/2018)