💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Distribution: weekly

  • The goal of making the rupee a global reserve currency

    Context

    India will celebrate 100 years of Independence in 2047.  This article makes the case that prosperity is possible and best accomplished by the goal of making the rupee a global reserve currency by India@100.

    What is the purpose of having forex reserves?

    • Official foreign exchange reserves of about $12 trillion across 150 countries are currently stored in eight currencies: 55 per cent in US dollars, 30 per cent in euros, and 15 per cent in six other currencies.
    • Protection in case of volatility: This concentration is inevitable given exploding trade, rising capital flows, and the less acknowledged motivation of protecting your reserves from your currency’s volatility.
    •  A reserve currency has to serve as a medium of exchange, a store of value, and a unit of account. 

    Steps India would require to take

    • Full capital account convertibility: To fulfil the ambition of becoming the reserve currency, the first step is full capital account convertibility, as suggested by the Tarapore Committee in 1997. 
    • Advocate rupee invoicing: Dollar investors in the last decade not experiencing the usual big bite out of rupee returns is useful for advocating trading partners to start rupee invoicing.
    • Offshore corporate rupee borrowing: Raising corporate rupee borrowing offshore and onshore will also help.
    • Digital currency: We need to accelerate our CBDC (central bank digital bank currency) plans.
    • Take payment networks to a global level: We need to take our UPI payment technology to the world, the dollar gets heft from global networks like Visa, MasterCard and Swift.
    • Raise tax to GDP ratio: Fiscal policy must raise our tax to GDP ratio, raise the share of direct taxes in total taxes, and keep our public debt to GDP ratio under 100 per cent.
    • Monetary policy: Monetary policy must control inflation while moderating central bank balance sheet size.
    • Economic policy: Economic policy must raise the productivity to reach goals in formalisation, urbanisation, financialisation (100 per cent credit to GDP ratio), industrialisation (less than 15 per cent farm employment), internationalisation (higher share of global trade) and skilling.
    • Institutional reforms: These goals must be complemented by reinforcing institutions that signal rule of law; cooperative federalism, press freedom, civil service effectiveness, and judicial independence.

    How it will help India?

    • Becoming a global reserve currency is helpful because it indirectly aligns fiscal, monetary, and economic policy.
    • Low-interest rate: The main advantage is the “exorbitant privilege” of lower real interest rates.
    • Edge over China: The 2 per cent renminbi share in global reserves — despite a 25 per cent increase last year — doesn’t reflect their status as the world’s second-largest economy and biggest trading nation.
    • China’s astounding economic success seems to be making China overconfident.
    • Chinese overconfidence creates an opportunity for India. 

    Conclusion

    Prosperity for all Indians by India at100 — a precondition for a country where the mind is without fear and the head is held high — needs bold reforms in the next 25 years. These reforms are best measured by the wholesome and achievable goal of the rupee becoming a global reserve currency by 2047. The journey is the reward.

  • Governors can pardon death row: Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court has held that the Governor of a State can pardon prisoners, including death row ones, even before they have served a minimum of 14 years of a prison sentence.

    SC Judgement: Section 433-A CrPC

    • The Governor’s power to pardon overrides a provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure — Section 433A.
    • This article mandates that a prisoner’s sentence can be remitted only after 14 years of jail.
    • Such power is in the exercise of the power of the sovereign, though the Governor is bound to act on the aid and advice of the State Government, the apex court observed.
    • Section 433-A of the Code cannot and does not in any way affect the constitutional power conferred on the President/Governor to grant pardon under Articles 72 or 161 of the Constitution.

    What does one mean by Pardon?

    • A pardon is a government/executive decision to allow a person to be absolved of guilt for an alleged crime or other legal offense as if the act never occurred.

    Why need Pardon?

    • Pardons can be granted when individuals are deemed to have demonstrated that they have “paid their debt to society”, or are otherwise considered to be deserving of them.
    • Pardons are sometimes offered to persons who were either wrongfully convicted or who claim that they were wrongfully convicted.
    • Pardons are sometimes seen as a mechanism for combating corruption, allowing a particular authority to circumvent a flawed judicial process to free someone that is seen as wrongly convicted.

    Pardoning powers in India

    • Under the Constitution of India (Article 72), the President of India can grant a pardon or reduce the sentence of a convicted person, particularly in cases involving capital punishment.
    • A similar and parallel power vests in the governors of each state under Article 161.

    [I] President

    1. Article 72 says that the president shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offense.
    2. The pardoning powers of the Indian President are elucidated in Art 72 of the Indian Constitution. There are five different types of pardoning that are mandated by law.
    • Pardon: means completely absolving the person of the crime and letting him go free. The pardoned criminal will be like a normal citizen.
    • Commutation: means changing the type of punishment given to the guilty into a less harsh one, for example, a death penalty commuted to a life sentence.
    • Reprieve: means a delay allowed in the execution of a sentence, usually a death sentence, for a guilty person to allow him some time to apply for Presidential Pardon or some other legal remedy to prove his innocence or successful rehabilitation.
    • Respite: means reducing the quantum or degree of the punishment to a criminal in view of some special circumstances, like pregnancy, mental condition etc.
    • Remission: means changing the quantum of the punishment without changing its nature, for example reducing twenty-year rigorous imprisonment to ten years.

    Cases as specified by art. 72

    • in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a court-martial;
    • in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;
    • in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.

    [II] Governor

    • Similarly, as per article 161: Governor of a State has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law.
    • It must be relating to a matter to which the executive power of the state extends.
    • President can grant pardon to a person awarded a death sentence. But a governor of a state does not enjoy this power.

    Nature of the Pardoning Power

    • Not absolute: The question is whether this power to grant pardon is absolute or this power of pardon shall be exercised by the President on the advice of Council of Ministers.
    • Aid and advice: The pardoning power of the president is not absolute. It is governed by the advice of the Council of Ministers.
    • Constitution is silent on this: This has not been discussed by the constitution but is the practical truth. Further, it does not provide for any mechanism to question the legality of decisions of President or governors exercising mercy jurisdiction.
    • Judicial review applicable: But the SC in Epuru Sudhakar case has given a small window for judicial review of the pardon powers of President and governors for the purpose of ruling out any arbitrariness.

    Some traditions

    • It is important to note that India has a unitary legal system and there is no separate body of state law.
    • All crimes are crimes against the Union of India.
    • Therefore, a convention has developed that the governor’s powers are exercised for only minor offenses.
    • While requests for pardons and reprieves for major offenses and offenses committed in the UTs are deferred to the President.

  • Poverty in India is on rise again

    In the absence of Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) data, the Periodic Labour Force Survey shows a rise in the absolute number of the poor in India.

    About Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES)

    • A CES is conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSO) every five years.
    • But the CES of 2017-18 (already conducted a year late) was not made public by the Government of India.
    • Now, we hear that a new CES is likely to be conducted in 2021-22, the data from which will probably not be available before end-2022.
    • India has not released its CES data since 2011-12.

    Key highlights

    • Unemployment had reached a 45-year high in 2017-18, as revealed by NSO’s Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS).
    • While the PLFS’s questions on consumption expenditure are not as detailed as those of the CES, they are sufficient for us to estimate changes in consumption on a consistent basis across time.
    • It enables any careful researcher to estimate the incidence of poverty (i.e. the share in the total population of those below the poverty line), as well as the total number of persons below poverty.

    There is unemployment induced poverty

    • There is a clear trajectory of the incidence of poverty falling from 1973 to 2012.
    • In fact, since India began collecting data on poverty, the incidence of poverty has always fallen, consistently.
    • It was 54.9% in 1973-4; 44.5% in 1983-84; 36% in 1993-94 and 27.5% in 2004-05.
    • This was in accordance with the Lakdawala poverty line (which was lower than the Tendulkar poverty line), named after a distinguished economist, then a member of the Planning Commission.

    Methodology of Poverty Line

    • In 2011, it was decided in the Planning Commission, that the national poverty line will be raised in accordance with the recommendations of an expert group chaired by the late Suresh Tendulkar.
    • That is the poverty line we use in estimating poverty in the table.
    • As it happens, this poverty line was comparable at the time to the international poverty line (estimated by the World Bank), of $1.09 (now raised to $1.90 to account for inflation) person per day.
    • The PLFS also estimates the incidence of poverty. It also collects the household monthly per capita consumption expenditure data based on the Mixed Recall Period methodology.

    Stunning rise in Poverty

    • It is stunning fact that for the first time in India’s history of estimating poverty, there is a rise in the incidence of poverty since 2011-12.
    • The important point is that this is consistent with the NSO’s CES data for 2017-18 that was leaked data.
    • The leaked data showed that rural consumption between 2012 and 2018 had fallen by 8%, while urban consumption had risen by barely 2%.
    • Since the majority of India’s population (certainly over 65%) is rural, poverty in India is also predominantly rural.
    • Remarkably, by 2019-20, poverty had increased significantly in both the rural and urban areas, but much more so in rural areas (from 25% to 30%).

    Why is it intriguing?

    • It is important here to recall two facts: between 1973 and 1993, the absolute number of poor had remained constant (at about 320 million poor), despite a significant increase in India’s total population.
    • Between 1993 and 2004, the absolute number of poor fell by a marginal number (18 million) from 320 million to 302 million, during a period when the GDP growth rate had picked up after the economic reforms.
    • It is for the first time in India’s history since the CES began that we have seen an increase in the absolute numbers of the poor, between 2012-13 and 2019-20.
    • The second fact is that for the first time ever, between 2004-05 and 2011-12, the number of the poor fell, and that too by a staggering 133 million, or by over 19 million per year.

    Fuss over GDP growth

    • This was accounted for by what has come to be called India’s ‘dream run’ of growth: over 2004 and 2014, the GDP growth rate had averaged 8% per annum — a 10-year run that was not sustained thereafter.
    • By contrast, not only has the incidence of poverty increased since then, but the absolute increase in poverty is totally unprecedented.

    Reasons behind this Pauperization

    The reasons for increased poverty since 2013 are not far to seek:

    • GST: While the economy maintained some growth momentum till 2015, the monumental blunder of demonetization was followed by a poorly planned and hurriedly introduced GST.
    • Fall in investments: None of the engines of growth was firing after that. Private investment fell from 31% inherited by the new government, to 28% of GDP by 2019-20.
    • Fall in exports: Exports, which had never fallen in absolute dollar terms for a quarter-century since 1991, actually fell below the 2013-14 level ($315 billion) for five years.
    • Unemployment: Joblessness increased to a 45-year high by 2017-18 (by the usual status), and youth (15-29 years of age) saw unemployment triple from 6% to 18% between 2012 and 2018.
    • Fall in wages: Real wages did not increase for casual or regular workers over the same period, hardly surprising when job seekers were increasing but jobs were not at anywhere close to that rate.
    • Pandemic: Poverty is expected to rise further during the COVID-19 pandemic after the economy has contracted.

    Hence, consumer expenditure fell, and poverty increased.

    Back2Basics:

    Poverty Lines in India: Estimations and Committees

  • Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2021

    The Lok Sabha has hastily passed the Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2021 without any debate.

    Highlights of the Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2021

    The Bill seeks to dissolve certain existing appellate bodies and transfer their functions (such as adjudication of appeals) to other existing judicial bodies:

    Transfer of functions of key appellate bodies as proposed under the Bill:

    Acts

    Appellate Body

    Proposed Entity
    The Cinematograph Act, 1952 Appellate Tribunal High Court
    The Trade Marks Act, 1999 Appellate Board High Court
    The Copyright Act, 1957 Appellate Board Commercial Court or the Commercial Division of a High Court*
    The Customs Act, 1962 Authority for Advance Rulings High Court
    The Patents Act, 1970 Appellate Board High Court
    The Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 Airport Appellate Tribunal
    • Central government, for disputes arising from the disposal of properties left on airport premises by unauthorised occupants.
    • High Court, for appeals against orders of an eviction officer.
    The Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 Airport Appellate Tribunal Civil Court#
    The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 Appellate Board High Court

     

    Amendments to the Finance Act, 2017:

    • The Finance Act, 2017 merged tribunals based on domain.
    • It also empowered the central government to notify rules on: (i) composition of search-cum-selection committees, (ii) qualifications of tribunal members, and (iii) their terms and conditions of service (such as their removal and salaries).
    • The Bill removes these provisions from the Finance Act, 2017.
    • Provisions on the composition of selection committees and term of office have been included in the Bill. Qualification of members and other terms and conditions of service will be notified by the central government.

  • [pib] Sabki Yojna Sabka Vikas Campaign

    The Government has launched ‘Sabki Yojna Sabka Vikas’ campaign for inclusive and holistic preparation of the Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP).

    Sabki Yojna Sabka Vikas

    • Under Article 243 G of the Constitution, Panchayats have been mandated for the preparation and implementation of plans for economic development and social justice.
    • Thus, Panchayats have a significant role to play in the effective and efficient implementation of flagship schemes/programs on subjects of national importance for transforming rural India.
    • The objectives of the campaign broadly include strengthening of elected representatives and Self-Help Groups, evidence-based assessment of progress made.
    • The campaign aimed to help Gram Panchayats (GPs) in preparation of convergent and holistic GPDP through the identification of sectoral infrastructural gaps in respective areas.

    Back2Basics: Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP)

    • The Gram Panchayats are constitutionally mandated for the preparation of GPDP for economic development and social justice utilizing resources available with them.
    • The GPDP should be comprehensive and based on a participatory process involving the community particularly Gram Sabha.
    • It will be in convergence with schemes of all related Central Ministries / Line Departments related to 29 subjects listed in the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution.

  • Disruption of Parliament

    Context

    Last week, a newspaper reported that the government is considering curtailing the monsoon session of Parliament on account of disruptions.

    Reasons for disruptions

    • In 2001, a day-long conference was held in the Central Hall of Parliament to discuss discipline and decorum in legislatures.
    • The inputs of participants of conference helped identify four reasons behind the disorderly conduct by MPs.
    • Inadequate time: The first was dissatisfaction in MPs because of inadequate time for airing their grievances.
    • Unresponsive attitude: The second was an unresponsive attitude of the government and the retaliatory posture of the treasury benches.
    • Adherence to norm: The third was political parties not adhering to parliamentary norms and disciplining their members.
    • Lack of action: The absence of prompt action against disrupting MPs under the legislature’s rules.

    Suggestions

    • Enforcement of a code of conduct for MPs and MLAs: The Lok Sabha has had a simple code of conduct for its MPs since 1952.
    • Newer forms of protest led to the updating of these rules in 1989.
    • Accordingly, members should not shout slogans, display placards, tear away documents in protest, play cassettes or tape recorders in the House.
    • A new rule empowers the Lok Sabha Speaker to suspend MPs obstructing the Houses’ business automatically.
    • But these suggestions have not been enforced so far.
    • Increase in working days: As recommended by the 2001 conference, there should be an increase in the working days of Parliament.
    • The conference had also resolved that Parliament should meet for 110 days every year and larger state legislative assemblies for 90 days.
    • Successive governments have shied away from increasing the working days of Parliament.
    • Our legislature should meet throughout the year, like parliaments of most developed democracies.
    • The concept of opposition days: In the United Kingdom, where Parliament meets over 100 days a year, opposition parties get 20 days on which they decide the agenda for discussion in Parliament.
    • The main opposition party gets 17 days and the remaining three days are given to the second-largest opposition party.
    • Canada also has a similar concept of opposition days.
    • This can also be done in India.

    Conclusion

    More strengthening of our Parliament is the solution to prevent disruption of its proceedings. It is the only mechanism to ensure that disrupting its proceedings or allowing them to be disrupted ceases to be a viable option.

  • Preventive detention a necessary evil: Supreme Court

    Preventive detention, the dreaded power of the State to restrain a person without trial, could be used only to prevent public disorder, the Supreme Court held in a judgment.

    What is Preventive Detention?

    • Preventive detention means detaining a person so that to prevent that person from commenting on any possible crime.
    • In other words, preventive detention is an action taken by the administration on the grounds of the suspicion that some wrong actions may be done by the person concerned which will be prejudicial to the state.

    PD in India

    A police officer can arrest an individual without orders from a Magistrate and without any warrant if he gets any information that such an individual can commit any offense.

    • Preventive Detention Law, 1950: According to this law any person could be arrested and detained if his freedom would endanger the security of the country, foreign relations, public interests, or otherwise necessary for the country.
    • Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) 1968: Within the ambit of UAPA law the Indian State could declare any organization illegal and could imprison anyone for interrogation if the said organization or person critiqued/questioned Indian sovereignty territorially.

    What is the difference between preventive detention and an arrest?

    • An ‘arrest’ is done when a person is charged with a crime.
    • In the case of preventive detention, a person is detained as he/she is simply restricted from doing something that might deteriorate the law-and-order situation.
    • Article 22 of the Indian Constitution provides protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.

    Rights of an Arrested Person in India

    A/c to Article 22(1) and 22(2) of the Indian constitution:

    • A person cannot be arrested and detained without being informed why he is being arrested.
    • A person who is arrested cannot be denied to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice. This means that the arrested person has right to hire a legal practitioner to defend himself/ herself.
    • Every person who has been arrested would be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours.
    • The custody of the detained person cannot be beyond the said period by the authority of magistrate.

    Exceptions for Preventive Detention

    Article 22(3) says that the above safeguards are not available to the following:

    • If the person is at the time being an enemy alien
    • If the person is arrested under certain law made for the purpose of “Preventive Detention”

    Constitutional provision

    • It is extraordinary that the framers of the Indian Constitution, who suffered most because of the Preventive Detention Laws, did not hesitate to give Constitutional sanctity.
    • B.R. Ambedkar was of the opinion that the freedom of the individual should not supersede the interests of the state.
    • He had also stated that the independence of the country was in a state of inflancy and in order to save it, preventive detention was essential.

    Issues with preventive detention

    • Arbitrariness: The police determinations of whether a person poses a threat are not tested at a trial by leading evidence or examined by legally trained persons.
    • Rights violation: Quiet often, there is no trial (upto 3 months), no periodic review, and no legal assistance for the detained person.
    • Abuse: It does not provide any procedural protections such as to reduce detainees’ vulnerability to torture and discriminatory treatment, and to prevent officials’ misusing preventive detention for subversive activities.
    • Tool for suppression: In the absence of proper safeguards, preventive detention has been misused, particularly against the Dalits and the minorities.

    What has the apex court recently rule?

    • Preventive detention is a necessary evil only to prevent public disorder.
    • The court must ensure that the facts brought before it directly and inevitably lead to harm, danger or alarm, or feeling of insecurity among the general public or any section thereof at large.
    • The State should not arbitrarily resort to “preventive detention” to deal with all and sundry “law and order” problems, which could be dealt with by the ordinary laws of the country.
    • Whenever an order under a preventive detention law is challenged, one of the questions the court must ask in deciding its legality is: was the ordinary law of the land sufficient to deal with the situation?
    • If the answer is in the affirmative, the detention order will be illegal.

    Upholding the Article 21

    • Preventive detention must fall within the four corners of Article 21 (due process of law) read with Article 22 (safeguards against arbitrary arrest and detention) and the statute in question, Justice Nariman ruled.
    • The Liberty of a citizen is a most important right won by our forefathers after long, historical, and arduous struggles.

    Conclusion

    • The constitutional philosophy of personal liberty is an idealistic view, the curtailment of liberty for reasons of State’s security; public order, disruption of national economic discipline, etc.
    • They are envisaged as a necessary evil to be administered under strict constitutional restrictions.
    • India is a large country and many separatist tendencies against the national security and integrity existed and existing and a strict law is required to counter the subversive activities.
    • The number of persons detained in these acts is not a very large and due attention is made before preventive detention.
    • Having such kind of acts has a restraining influence on the anti-social and subversive elements.
    • The state should have very effective powers to deal with the acts in which the citizens involve in hostile activities, espionage, coercion, terrorism, etc.

  • Pakistan grants statehood to Gilgit-Baltistan

    Pakistan has finalized draft legislation to incorporate Gilgit-Baltistan, the region known before 2009 as Northern Areas, as a province of the country.

    Gilgit-Baltistan: History of the region

    • Gilgit was part of the princely state of Jammu & Kashmir but was ruled directly by the British, who had taken it on lease from Hari Singh, the Hindu ruler of the Muslim-majority state.
    • When Hari Singh acceded to India on October 26, 1947, the Gilgit Scouts rose in rebellion, led by their British commander Major William Alexander Brown.
    • The Gilgit Scouts also moved to take over Baltistan, which was then part of Ladakh, and captured Skardu, Kargil and Dras.
    • In battles thereafter, Indian forces retook Kargil and Dras in August 1948.

    Accession with Pakistan

    • In November, 1947, a political outfit called the Revolutionary Council of Gilgit-Baltistan had proclaimed the independent state of Gilgit-Baltistan.
    • It declared GB was acceding to Pakistan only to the extent of full administrative control, choosing to govern it directly under the Frontier Crimes Regulation.
    • It was a law devised by the British to keep control of the restive tribal areas of the northwest.
    • Following the India-Pakistan ceasefire of January 1, 1949, Pakistan entered into an agreement with the “provisional government” of “Azad Jammu & Kashmir”.
    • Much of its parts had been occupied by Pakistani troops and irregulars and were later taken over by Pak defence and foreign affairs.
    • Under this agreement, the AJK government also ceded administration of Gilgit-Baltistan to Pakistan.

    Not being incorporated as a province

    • In 1974, Pakistan adopted its first full-fledged civilian Constitution, which lists four provinces —Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pakthunkhwa.
    • Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Gilgit-Baltistan were not incorporated as provinces.
    • One reason ascribed to this is that Pakistan did not want to undermine its international case that the resolution of the Kashmir issue had to be in accordance with UN resolutions that called for a plebiscite.
    • In 1975, PoK got its own Constitution, making it an ostensibly self-governed autonomous territory.
    • This Constitution had no jurisdiction over the Northern Areas, which continued to be administered directly by Islamabad (the Frontier Crimes Regulation was discontinued in 1997)
    • In reality, PoK too remained under the control of Pakistani federal administration and the security establishment, through the Kashmir Council.

    Reasons behind

    • The main difference was that while the people of PoK had rights and freedoms guaranteed by their own Constitution, which mirrors the Pakistan Constitution.
    • However the people of the minority Shia-dominated Northern Areas did not have any political representation.
    • Although they were considered Pakistani, including for citizenship and passports, they were outside the ambit of constitutional protections available to those in the four provinces and PoK.

    Why GB is in focus now?

    • Pakistan began considering changes to its administrative arrangements with increasing Chinese involvement in strategic development ventures.
    • GB was vital to those projects, given that it provides only land access between the two countries.
    • Since 2009, it has had a namesake legislative assembly.

    Suppression of a movement

    • There is anger against Pakistan for unleashing sectarian militant groups that target Shias, but the predominant sentiment is that all this will improve once they are part of the Pakistani federation.
    • There is a small movement for independence, but it has very little traction. Some factions argue for its accession with India.
    • While some reports have suggested that Pakistan’s decision is under pressure from China, wary that Gilgit-Baltistan’s ambiguous status might undermine the legality of its projects there.

    Significance for India

    • Gilgit-Baltistan is an integral part of India by virtue of the legal, complete and irrevocable accession of Jammu & Kashmir to the Union of India in 1947.
    • The area’s strategic importance for India has increased in light of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor agreement.
    • India is also concerned of a two-front war (with China as well as Pakistan) after the standoff in Eastern Ladakh last year.

  • [pib] Haldibari- Chilahati Rail Link

    The freight trains have started commuting via the restored Haldibari (India) – Chilahati (Bangladesh) rail link.

    Haldibari- Chilahati Rail Link

    • The Haldibari – Chilahati rail link between India and then East Pakistan was operational till 1965.
    • The distance between Haldibari Railway Station till the international border is 4.5 km, while that of Chilahati is around 7.5 km till the ‘zero points’.
    • This was part of the Broad-Gauge main route from Kolkata to Siliguri during the partition.
    • Trains traveling to Assam and North Bengal continued to travel through the then East Pakistan territory even after partition.
    • However, the war of 1965 effectively cut off all the railway links between India and then East Pakistan.
    • The link was reopened in 2020 for the movement of passenger and goods traffic.

    Other railway links between India and Bangladesh

    As of now, five links connecting India with Bangladesh have been made operational which include:

    • Petrapole (India) – Benapole (Bangladesh)
    • Gede (India) – Darshana (Bangladesh)
    • Singhabad (India) – Rohanpur (Bangladesh)
    • Radhikapur (India) – Birol (Bangladesh)
    • Haldibari (India) – Chilahati (Bangladesh)

  • [pib] Kuthiran Tunnel

    The Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways has inaugurated the Kuthiran Tunnel in Kerala

    Kuthiran Tunnel

    • Kuthiran Tunnel is a Twin-tube tunnel at Kuthiran in Thrissur District of Kerala.
    • It is located on National Highway 544, owned and operated by the National Highways Authority of India.
    • It is Kerala’s first-ever tunnel for road transport and South India’s Longest 6-lane road tunnel.
    • Kuthiran gradient is situated in the Kuthiran Hills, situated in the western part of Anaimalai Hills. The hills are a notified Peechi- Vazahani wildlife sanctuary.
    • It will drastically improve connectivity to Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.
    • The road will improve connectivity to important ports and towns in North-South Corridor without endangering wildlife.