💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Distribution: yearly

  • Recent GI tags awarded

    Central Idea

    • Many GI tags were awarded in this month. Let’s take a look:

    GI Tags in News:

    [1] Jaderi Namakatti

    Jaderi Namakatti gi tag

    • Jaderi namakatti are clay sticks that are white in colour, usually available in finger-like shape with a smooth texture.
    • They are used to adorn the foreheads of idols, men and temple elephants.
    • Jaderi is a small village in Tiruvannamalai district of Tamil Nadu.
    • There are around 120 families in Cheyyar taluk whose primary occupation has been making namakatti for more than hundreds of years now.

    [2] Basohli Pashmina

    Basohli Pashmina gi tag

    • Basohli Pashmina is a very old craft from the Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir. It’s famous because it’s super soft, very fine, and feels incredibly light.
    • Pashmina is a type of material that is hand-spun and known for being incredibly soft, fine, lightweight, and also warm.
    • You can make various things from Pashmina, like shawls for men and women, mufflers, blankets, and even baskets.
    • It comes from a type of mountain goat called Capra hircus. These goats are found on the Changthang Plateau in Tibet and parts of Ladakh.
    • In Ladakh, there are people called the Changpa, who are known for making Pashmina wool. They live on the Changthang plateau in Tibet and are nomadic, which means they move around a lot.

    [3] Marcha Rice

    • Grown in select pockets of six blocks in West Champaran district, Bihar, India. These blocks include Mainatar, Gaunaha, Narkatiaganj, Ramnagar, Lauriya, and Chanpatia.
    • It has received a Geographical Indication (GI) tag, indicating its unique qualities associated with the region where it’s grown.
    • Cultivated by the Marcha Dhan Utpadak Pragatisheel Samuh, a registered organization of paddy cultivators in West Champaran district.
    • Known for its distinct aroma and taste, Marcha Rice is a special indigenous variety of paddy.

    [4] Atreyapuram Pootharekulu

    Atreyapuram Pootharekulu gi tag

    • Atreyapuram Pootharekulu is a traditional sweet originating from Atreyapuram village, situated on the banks of the Godavari River in the Konaseema district of Andhra Pradesh.
    • The name ‘Pootharekulu’ translates to ‘coated sheets,’ although this description may appear somewhat vague.
    • This traditional sweet is known for its extraordinary delicacy and distinct taste.
    • It is created by layering paper-thin sheets of rice flour, which are delicately coated with ghee (clarified butter) and then folded to encase powdered jaggery or sugar dust.
    • Additionally, some variants of Pootharekulu may include finely chopped roasted dry fruits such as pistachios, almonds, and cashews.
    • The preparation of relies on a specific type of rice known as MTU-3626, referred to locally as Bondalu.
    • This rice variety is chosen for its unique taste and its ability to yield a sticky consistency, which is crucial for crafting this sweet.

    Back2Basics: GI Tag

    • A GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.
    • Nodal Agency: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry
    • India, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), enacted the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 w.e.f. September 2003.
    • GIs have been defined under Article 22 (1) of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.
    • The tag stands valid for 10 years.

  • War Crimes Laws invoked in Israel-Palestinian Conflict

    war crime

    Central Idea

    • The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinian forces, triggered by Hamas’ barbaric assault, has resulted in a distressing and increasing death toll on both sides.
    • This conflict operates within a multifaceted international system of justice that has evolved since World War II.

    Various War Crime Laws

    • 1949 Geneva Conventions: Internationally accepted rules of armed conflict emerged from these conventions, ratified by all UN member states and complemented by decisions at international war crimes tribunals.
    • “Law of Armed Conflict”: A series of treaties collectively known as the “Law of Armed Conflict” or “International Humanitarian Law” governs the treatment of civilians, soldiers, and prisoners of war. It applies to both government forces and organized armed groups, including Hamas militants.
    • ICC Jurisdiction: The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague holds the authority to bring charges against alleged perpetrators if domestic courts do not or cannot do so.

    Role and Jurisdiction of the ICC

    • Establishment: The ICC, a permanent war crimes tribunal, was established in 2002 in The Hague. It has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed in its 123 member states or by their nationals.
    • Notable Absences: Major global powers like China, the United States, Russia, India, and Egypt are not ICC members. Israel rejects the court’s jurisdiction and does not formally engage with it.
    • Ongoing Investigation: ICC prosecutors have been investigating allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied Palestinian territories since 2021, although no arrest warrants have been issued.

    Acts Potentially Violating War Crimes Law

    • Deliberate Targeting of Civilians: Human Rights Watch identified potential war crimes, including the intentional targeting of civilians, indiscriminate rocket attacks, and the hostage-taking of civilians by Palestinian armed groups.
    • Israeli Counter-Strikes: Israeli counter-strikes in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of numerous Palestinians, could also fall under scrutiny as potential war crimes.
    • Geneva Conventions Prohibitions: The Geneva Conventions explicitly prohibit acts such as taking hostages, murder, and torture, regardless of the conflict’s complexity.

    Application of the Geneva Conventions

    • Right to Respond: US President Joe Biden acknowledged Israel’s right and duty to respond to the conflict while emphasizing the importance of acting within the rule of law.
    • Siege Considerations: A siege may be considered a war crime if it disproportionately targets civilians rather than undermining Hamas’ military capabilities or if it is found to be disproportionate.
    • Proportionality: Attacks on military targets must be proportionate, meaning they should not result in excessive civilian casualties or damage compared to the expected military advantage.

    Conclusion

    • The Israel-Palestine conflict unfolds against a backdrop of intricate international legal frameworks and considerations.
    • Navigating the complexities of determining war crimes in this context requires a meticulous examination of actions on all sides, considering proportionality, deliberate targeting of civilians, and adherence to the Geneva Conventions.
    • As the conflict’s toll continues to rise, scrutiny of potential violations of international humanitarian law remains essential for justice and accountability.

  • India ranks 111/125 in Global Hunger Index, 2023

    Central Idea

    • India has been ranked 111th out of 125 countries in the Global Hunger Index-2023, a stark decline from its 107th position in 2022.
    • The index highlights a concerning statistic – India reports the world’s highest child wasting rate at a staggering 18.7 percent.
    • Interestingly, India’s neighboring countries, including Pakistan (102nd), Bangladesh (81st), Nepal (69th), and Sri Lanka (60th), have performed comparatively better in the index.

    Global Hunger Index (GHI)
    Publication Jointly published annually by Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe.
    Scale Measures hunger on a 100-point scale, with 0 as the best (no hunger) and 100 as the worst score.
    Purpose Comprehensively measures and tracks hunger globally, regionally, and at the country level. Aims to trigger action to reduce hunger worldwide.
    Indicators 4 key indicators for each country:

    1. Undernourishment (reflects inadequate food availability): Share of the population that is undernourished.

    2. Child Wasting (reflects acute undernutrition): Share of children under five with low weight for their height.

    3. Child Stunting (reflects chronic undernutrition): Share of children under five with low height for their age.

    4. Child Mortality (reflects inadequate nutrition and unhealthy environment): Mortality rate of children under five.

     

    Hunger in India: Fact Check

    • Serious Hunger Levels: India’s score of 28.7 in the Global Hunger Index-2023 places it in the “serious” category, according to the report.
    • Child Wasting: India’s child wasting rate, the proportion of undernourished children measured by weight relative to their height, stands at an alarming 18.7 percent, signaling acute undernutrition.
    • Undernourishment Rate: The rate of undernourishment in India is reported at 16.6 percent, further highlighting the gravity of the issue.
    • Child Mortality: Under-five mortality in India is recorded at 3.1 percent.
    • Anemia Among Women: The report underscores a significant concern, with 58.1 percent of women aged 15 to 24 in India being affected by anemia.

    A report to bully India

    • Disputed Ranking: The Indian government has rejected the GHI 2023 ranking, citing serious methodological concerns and suggesting a malicious intent behind the report (considering elections).
    • Methodological Issues: The WCD Ministry asserts that the GHI 2023 report suffers from significant methodological issues. It contends that 3 out of 4 indicators used for calculation pertain to child health, which does not represent the entire population.
    • Sample size issue: It is questionable that only small sample size of 3,000 is used for the “Proportion of Undernourished Population” indicator for crores population in India.
    • Child Wasting Discrepancy: The ministry highlights a significant disparity between the child wasting rate as per the Poshan Tracker (consistently below 7.2 percent) and the 18.7 percent reported in GHI 2023.
    • Undue link with Child mortality: It also challenges the notion that child mortality is solely an outcome of hunger.

    Conclusion

    • India’s ranking underscores the persistent challenges in addressing hunger and undernutrition.
    • The report serves as a stark reminder of the critical need to comprehensively tackle these issues, especially child wasting and undernourishment, to ensure the well-being of the nation’s population.

  • Goa’s Cashew Industry receives GI Tag

    cashew

    Central Idea

    • The recent awarding of a Geographical Indication (GI) tag to Goa’s cashew industry has ignited hope and enthusiasm among cashew manufacturers and processors in the state.

    Goa’s Cashew Industry

    • Introduction of Cashew in Goa: Cashew was introduced to Goa in the 16th century by Portuguese colonizers. Initially, it was primarily cultivated for afforestation and soil conservation purposes.
    • Discovery of Edible Value: The true economic value of cashew nuts was discovered during Goa’s freedom movement in the mid-18th century. Goan prisoners exiled to Portuguese territory in Africa (Mozambique) recognized the edible potential of cashew nuts.
    • Growth of Cashew Industry: Cashew production evolved from a cottage industry to a large-scale enterprise, driven by demand, particularly in the USA. The first cashew factory in Goa began operations in 1926, and the first consignment of cashew kernels was exported in 1930.
    • Foreign Trade Contribution: By 1961, the cashew processing industry accounted for about 60% of industrial production in Goa. Cashew nuts, both locally grown and imported, were processed and exported to countries like the United States of America, Japan, Saudi Arabia, and West Germany.

    Understanding the GI Tag

    • A GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.
    • Nodal Agency: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry
    • India, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), enacted the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 w.e.f. September 2003.
    • GIs have been defined under Article 22 (1) of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.
    • The tag stands valid for 10 years.

  • CPEC: A Decade On and Challenges Ahead

    CPEC

    Central Idea

    • As China celebrates the 10th anniversary of its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2023, the progress of one of its flagship projects, the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), appears to have slowed down.
    • Despite its initial promise, challenges related to economic, security, and political factors have led to a reevaluation of the CPEC’s future.

    CPEC Overview

    • Inception: Signed in 2015, the CPEC aimed to facilitate Chinese goods’ transportation from Xinjiang through Pakistan to the Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea.
    • Investment: It involves significant Chinese investments in rail and road infrastructure and energy development in Pakistan.

    Reasons behind CPEC Slowdown

    (A) Economic Factors

    • Pakistan’s Economic Crisis: Pakistan’s deteriorating economic situation has impacted the viability of new CPEC projects.
    • China’s Economic Slowdown: China’s economic slowdown has also contributed to a reduction in new investments.

    (B) Overpromising and Under-delivering

    • High Expectations: CPEC faced criticism for generating high expectations but delivering limited tangible benefits to the Pakistani people.
    • Debt Burden: Pakistan has incurred substantial public debt and payments to Chinese companies, further straining its finances.

    (C) Political Instability in Pakistan

    • Imran Khan’s Ouster: The political instability following the ousting of former Prime Minister Imran Khan in 2022 has raised concerns about political stability.
    • Lack of Clarity: The uncertainty surrounding the timing of future elections adds to China’s worries.

    (D) Security Concerns

    • Threats to Chinese Workers: Security threats to Chinese workers and projects, including attacks by militants, have raised alarm.
    • Expanding Threat Landscape: China faces a range of security threats, including Baloch insurgents, the Pakistani Taliban (TTP), and Islamic State-Khorasan province (IS-K).

    China’s Response and Concerns

    • Security Measures: China is increasingly concerned about security threats to its Belt and Road investments and has taken measures to safeguard its personnel and infrastructure.
    • Potential Political Fallout: China’s potential deployment of its security forces to protect its assets in Pakistan could have political implications.

    Conclusion

    • The CPEC, a vital component of China’s BRI, faces a complex set of challenges.
    • Economic pressures, overpromising, political instability in Pakistan, and security threats have contributed to its slowdown.
    • While some maintain optimism about the project’s future, addressing these multifaceted issues will be crucial for the CPEC to realize its full potential and continue as a significant driver of regional development.

  • India’s Evolving Diplomatic Stance on Palestine

    palestine

    Central Idea

    • India’s diplomatic position on the Israel-Palestine conflict has witnessed significant shifts over the years.
    • While PM recent expression of solidarity with Israel during a period of heightened conflict has sparked debate, it is essential to contextualize these developments in India’s historical foreign policy.
    • This article delves into India’s stance on the Israel-Palestine issue, the factors shaping its policies, and the implications of its evolving approach.

    Historical Background

    • India’s Early Stance: India’s initial position on the Israel-Palestine issue was shaped by leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi. In 1947, India voted against UN Resolution 181, advocating for the partition of Mandatory Palestine. Nehru favored a federal state with wide autonomy for Arabs and Jews, influenced by Gandhi’s opposition to a Jewish state.
    • Recognition of Israel: Despite recognizing Israel in 1950, India did not establish diplomatic relations until 1992. Factors such as a sizable Muslim population, Cold War dynamics, and the need to maintain Arab support influenced this delayed recognition.

    Impact of Establishing Diplomatic Relations

    • End of Cold War: India’s decision to establish diplomatic ties with Israel in 1992 marked a shift after the end of the Cold War. The government of P.V. Narasimha Rao took this bold step, focusing on national interests and strengthening economic relations, particularly in defense.
    • Ongoing Support for Palestine: India’s recognition of Israel did not signal abandonment of its principled support for Palestine. India continued to voice support for the Palestinian cause while developing closer ties with Israel.

    Contemporary Developments

    • India-Israel Relations: Presently, India enjoys a strong and multifaceted relationship with Israel. Prime Ministers Modi and Netanyahu have cultivated personal rapport, and both countries collaborate closely, especially in the defense sector.
    • Change in Rhetoric: India has adopted a more measured approach in its rhetoric regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, especially in international forums like the United Nations. Some argue that India’s pro-Palestine stance has not yielded commensurate benefits in terms of national interest.
    • Ideological Shift: India’s support for Israel’s response to attacks from Gaza is sometimes misinterpreted as anti-Islamic action. Israel’s approach to cross-border terrorism resonates with some in India, although the situations differ significantly.

    India’s Formal Position

    • Support for Two-State Solution: India officially supports the two-state solution, envisioning Israel and Palestine as peaceful neighbours coexisting harmoniously.
    • Official visits: PM Modi’s visit to Ramallah in 2018 underscored India’s commitment to this position.
    • Public perception: A large section of Indian society is supportive of the Palestinian cause due to religious affinities.

    Potential Implications of Current Escalation

    • Palestinian Reaction: While the Palestinians may express dissatisfaction with India’s growing proximity to Israel, it is unlikely to result in significant backlash. Popular sentiment may revive support for the Palestinian cause.
    • Arab World’s Perspective: Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, have shifted their focus from the Palestinian issue. They are increasingly open to normalizing relations with Israel. India’s stance is unlikely to disrupt its relationships with these nations.

    Conclusion

    • India’s evolving stance on the Israel-Palestine issue reflects its pragmatic approach to foreign policy.
    • While it maintains support for Palestine, India has strategically developed robust relations with Israel, grounded in national interests.
    • The recent expression of solidarity with Israel amid conflict highlights the complexities of India’s diplomatic balancing act in the region.

  • Finfluencers: What You Need to Know

    Finfluencers

    Central Idea

    • A recent front-page advertisement in a business daily, featuring a financial influencer (finfluencer), YouTube’s logo, and the IT Ministry’s logo, has stirred controversy and raised concerns about the role of finfluencers and their impact.

    Understanding Finfluencers

    • Finfluencers are individuals with a significant presence on social media platforms who offer financial advice, share personal experiences related to money management, and discuss various investment topics.
    • Their general discussion includes stocks, budgeting, property, cryptocurrency, and financial trends.
    • Finfluencers often have a large following, and their advice and recommendations can influence the financial decisions of their audience.
    • However, concerns arise regarding their qualifications and the potential risks associated with their recommendations.

    Why discuss them?

    • The advertisement in question featured a popular finfluencer, alongside the tagline, “Trust only the real experts,” and logos of YouTube and the IT Ministry.
    • It directed viewers to a YouTube playlist on online safety and content verification.
    • The advertisement generated criticism due to the perceived endorsement of expertise by finfluencers or a specific social media platform.
    • Given ongoing regulatory scrutiny of finfluencers, this raised concerns about the message being conveyed.

    Regulatory Context

    • The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the country’s markets regulator, has been examining the activities of finfluencers.
    • Investors have expressed concerns about unsolicited stock tips and investment advice provided by finfluencers without proper registration as investment advisers.
    • Many finfluencers lack clear educational or professional qualifications in finance, raising questions about their competence to provide financial advice.
    • The absence of transparency regarding financial relationships between finfluencers and promoted entities is also concerning.

    Government’s Response

    • The MEITY clarified that the advertisement did not endorse any individual or platform.
    • He emphasized the need for private platforms to exercise caution when using government logos in advocacy ads to avoid misinterpretation.

    Broader Industry Concerns

    • ASCI’s Guidelines violated: The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has issued guidelines for social media influencers and advertisers regarding virtual digital assets (VDAs), including cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
    • Non-Compliance: ASCI’s recent half-yearly report highlighted cases of non-compliance by social media influencers with advertising guidelines.
    • Celebrity endorsements: A prominent Bollywood actor was among those found in violation, particularly in advertisements related to financial instruments and cryptocurrencies.

    Conclusion

    • The controversial advertisement featuring a finfluencer has ignited a debate about the role and responsibilities of financial influencers in India.
    • Regulatory authorities are increasingly focusing on the activities of finfluencers, and the industry is grappling with questions of transparency, qualifications, and investor protection.
    • The ongoing scrutiny reflects the evolving landscape of financial advice and investment in the digital age.

  • Operation Ajay to evacuate Indian nationals from Israel

    Central Idea

    • India has initiated Operation Ajay to evacuate its citizens who wish to return from conflict-ridden Israel.
    • External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar announced this operation, emphasizing the safety and well-being of Indian nationals abroad.

    Operation Ajay

    • Evacuation Plan: Special chartered flights and other arrangements are being organized for the return of Indian citizens from Israel.
    • Second Evacuation: This marks the second evacuation operation this year, following Operation Kaveri, which brought back several thousand Indian citizens from strife-torn Sudan in April-May.

    Significance: Indian Jewish Community

    • The Indian Jewish community, with an ancestry spanning over 2000 years in India, has a unique history.
    • India has been a welcoming home to them, where they thrived without encountering anti-Semitism, making it a distinct place on the global map.
    • However, the landscape changed with the independence of India in 1947 and the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948.
    • This transformation marked the beginning of a new chapter in India-Israel relations, leading to the migration of Indian Jews to their religious homeland.

    Diverse Indian Jewish Groups

    Indian Jews can be categorized into four main sects, each with its own historical origins and cultural traditions:

    1. Cochin Jews: Tracing their arrival to India back to 50 CE, they primarily settled in the southern region.
    2. Bene Israel: The largest group among Indian Jews, they settled in and around Maharashtra and Konkan.
    3. Baghdadi Jews: This group, part of the most recent wave of Jewish migration, established communities in port cities like Calcutta, Bombay, and Rangoon.
    4. Bnei Menashe: Settled in the North East, they are another significant segment of Indian Jews.

    Complex Reception in Israel

    The migration of Indian Jews to Israel was not without challenges. Israeli society struggled to embrace them due to several factors:

    • Internal Divisions: The four Indian Jewish groups had substantial differences and disagreements among themselves. These internal divisions, combined with bias from Jews of European origin, complicated the reception of Indian Jews, especially in the initial years of migration.
    • Discrimination: The Bene Israel, primarily from Maharashtra, faced significant discrimination upon their arrival in Israel. Reports in the 1950s highlighted instances of racism and unequal treatment, including job and housing discrimination.
    • Differing Motivations: Indian Jews’ motivations for migrating varied. While the Cochin Jews were seen as driven by religious reasons, the Bene Israel were often perceived as seeking better economic prospects, leading to different treatment based on perceived motives.
    • Economic Disparities: The economic differences among the four groups fueled animosity. Some attributed the Cochin Jews’ messianic aspirations to poverty, while the Baghdadi Jews considered the Bene Israel as lacking proper religious traditions.

  • New Royalty Rates for Strategic Minerals, Lithium and REEs

    minerals

    Central Idea

    • The Centre has approved royalty rates of 3% each for lithium and niobium and 1% for Rare Earth Elements (REEs).
    • These changes enable competitive royalty rates for these strategically vital minerals (critical minerals) and open the doors to private sector participation through concession auctions.

    What are Critical Minerals?

    • Critical minerals are elements that are crucial to modern-day technologies and are at risk of supply chain disruptions.
    • These minerals are used in making mobile phones, computers, batteries, electric vehicles, and green technologies like solar panels and wind turbines.
    • Minerals such as antimony, cobalt, gallium, graphite, lithium, nickel, niobium, and strontium are among the 22 assessed to be critical for India.
    • Many of these are required to meet the manufacturing needs of green technologies, high-tech equipment, aviation, and national defence.

    Implications of the Amendment

    • Alignment with Global Benchmarks: The amendments, involving specifying new royalty rates, bring India’s royalty rates in line with global standards. This is crucial to attract bidders’ in future mineral auctions.
    • Competitive Royalty Rates: The Second Schedule of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, previously set a 12% royalty rate for unspecified minerals, which was significantly higher than international benchmarks. The revised rates are 3% for lithium and niobium, and 1% for REEs, based on price benchmarks, enhancing the attractiveness of mining in India.
    • Domestic Mining Promotion: Lower royalty rates and commercial exploitation opportunities aim to encourage domestic mining, reduce imports, and stimulate related industries like electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage solutions.
    • Energy Transition Commitment: Access to critical minerals is integral to India’s commitment to energy transition and achieving net-zero emissions by 2070, aligning with global environmental goals.

    Economic significance of the move

    (A) Lithium

    • Import Dependence: India currently imports all its required lithium. The government’s push for lithium mining extends beyond Jammu & Kashmir to explore lithium extraction from Rajasthan and Gujarat’s brine pools, as well as Odisha and Chhattisgarh’s mica belts.
    • Economic Offensive: This initiative is part of India’s economic strategy to reduce dependency on China for lithium-ion energy storage products, given China’s dominant position in the market.
    • EV Growth: With EVs on the cusp of disruption, securing a lithium supply chain is strategically vital. The global lithium battery market has seen significant growth in recent years.

    (B) Rare Earth Elements

    • Global Supply Challenges: Rare earth elements, primarily sourced from or processed in China, pose challenges in the EV supply chain. Securing supplies can be difficult, and China’s dominance has raised concerns.
    • Usage in Motors: Rare earth elements are crucial in EV motors, particularly permanent magnet motors. Elements like neodymium, terbium, and dysprosium are used in magnets for generating a constant motor flux, enhancing motor efficiency.
    • Environmental Concerns: Mining rare earth elements often involves environmentally damaging open-pit operations, raising environmental and ecological concerns.

    (C) Niobium for Industry

    • Corrosion Resistance: Niobium, known for its resistance to corrosion due to a surface oxide layer, is used in various industries. It strengthens alloys, particularly stainless steel, making them ideal for applications in aerospace, construction, and pipelines.
    • Superconducting Properties: Niobium’s superconducting properties find applications in magnets for particle accelerators and MRI scanners.
    • Global Sources: The main source of niobium is the mineral columbite, found in several countries, including Canada, Brazil, Australia, and Nigeria.

    Conclusion

    • India’s decision to amend mining laws for strategic minerals is a significant step toward aligning with global standards, promoting domestic mining, and securing supplies for emerging industries like EVs and energy storage.
    • It underscores India’s commitment to sustainable energy transition and reduced import dependency while addressing environmental concerns in mining rare earth elements.

  • Supreme Court’s divided on Abortion: A Complex Legal Dilemma

    Central Idea

    • A Division Bench of two judges of the Supreme Court grappled with divergent views regarding the abortion of a 26-week pregnancy and the government’s stance to protect the “unborn child.”
    • The judges, unable to reach a consensus, opted to refer the case to the CJI to convene a three-judge Bench for further deliberation.

    Woman’s Plight for Abortion

    • A mother of two with her youngest child just a one-year-old infant, she asserted her desire for a medically induced abortion due to her mental health condition and her inability to care for a third child.
    • Her lawyer stressed the court should prioritize the mother’s well-being.
    • He emphasized the threat to her privacy and dignity and her conscious decision to not proceed with the pregnancy.

    Government’s Stance

    • Legal Argument: The Additional Solicitor General contended that the woman did not possess an “absolute right of autonomy” to exercise her reproductive rights in a manner that would compromise the rights of the unborn child.
    • MTP Act of 2021: Reference was made to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act of 2021, which extended the abortion deadline to 24 weeks in “exceptional circumstances,” primarily to save the mother’s life or in the case of fatal foetal deformity.

    Legal Debate

    • Bodily Autonomy vs. Foetal Rights: The core of the debate centred on whether, once a viable baby exists, the woman’s right to bodily autonomy or integrity should yield to the Act, curbing her fundamental right to choose.
    • Court’s Earlier Decision: On October 9, the Bench had initially permitted the medical termination in line with the woman’s wishes, following a report from an All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) medical board.

    Government’s Reversal

    • Government’s Appeal: Subsequently, the Union government filed an application, citing an expert doctor’s opinion received on October 10, which advocated for giving the child a chance to survive.
    • State’s Responsibility: The argument was that a categorical medical opinion had emerged, offering hope for the child’s survival, and placing a responsibility on the state.

    Judicial Opinions

    • Justice Kohli’s Stance: One judge aligned with the government’s position that the woman should not be allowed to terminate the pregnancy.
    • Justice Nagarathna’s Dissent: In contrast, the other judge dissented, asserting that the woman’s decision should be respected, considering her socio-economic circumstances, mental health, and the young age of her second child.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s divided opinion on this intricate abortion case underscores the challenging balance between a woman’s right to make decisions about her body and the state’s interest in protecting the unborn.
    • As the case proceeds to a three-judge Bench, it raises broader questions about the legal and ethical complexities surrounding reproductive rights and foetal interests in India’s legal landscape.