💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3-21.Role of External State and Non-state Actors in creating challenges to Internal Security.

  • N–SLN DIVEX 2026  

    Why in News

    • INS Nireekshak reached Colombo to participate in the 4th India–Sri Lanka Diving Exercise (IN–SLN DIVEX 2026).

    About the Exercise

    • Name: IN–SLN DIVEX 2026
    • Edition: 4th
    • Participants: Indian Navy and Sri Lankan Navy

    About INS Nireekshak

    • Type: Diving Support and Submarine Rescue Vessel
    • Role:
      • Deep-sea diving operations
      • Submarine rescue missions
      • Underwater engineering tasks
    [2024] Which of the following statements about ‘Exercise Mitra Shakti-2023’ are correct? 
    1. This was a joint military exercise between India and Bangladesh. 
    2. It commenced in Aundh (Pune). 
    3. Joint response during counter-terrorism operation was a goal of this operation. 
    4. Indian Air Force was a part of this exercise. 
    Select the answer using the code given below : 
    [A] 1, 2 and 3 [B] 1, 2 and 4 [C] 1, 3 and 4 [D] 2, 3 and 4

  • Maoist operations: What after March 31 milestone

    Why in the News?

    India’s anti-Maoist operations have reached a historic turning point with a government-set March 31 deadline, signaling near-elimination of Left Wing Extremism, a sharp contrast to decades when Maoists controlled vast “Red Corridor” regions. The scale of decline is striking, with affected districts shrinking from ~200 to ~38 and deaths falling significantly, indicating a major security success. However, the bigger concern now is whether this victory can be sustained through governance, as the persistence of inequality, displacement, and weak state presence could allow extremist ideologies to re-emerge in new forms.

    How has the State gained the upper hand over Maoists?

    1. Leadership decapitation: Neutralization of top CPI (Maoist) leadership weakened command structure; example, central committee disruption and fragmented local units
    2. Security operations intensity: High-intensity operations by CRPF and state police forces reduced insurgent mobility
    3. Infrastructure expansion: Construction of 15,000+ km roads and 9,000+ mobile towers improved state reach in remote areas
    4. Forward deployment: Establishment of 650+ fortified camps enabled continuous presence in core insurgency zones
    5. Decline in affected districts: Reduction from ~200 districts (early 2000s) to 38 districts (2025); only 7 districts remain highly affected
    6. Casualty reduction: LWE-related deaths reduced from 1000+ annually (2010 peak) to significantly lower levels

    What explains the decline of Left Wing Extremism?

    1. Integrated strategy: Combination of “clear, hold, develop” approach ensured security followed by governance penetration
    2. Policy continuity: Successive governments continued LWE strategy with refinements rather than abrupt changes
    3. Financial choking: Disruption of Maoist funding networks reduced operational capability
    4. Loss of ideological appeal: Declining resonance of violent revolution among tribal youth due to increased exposure and mobility
    5. Localized resistance: Weakening of traditional support base as local populations disengaged from Maoist networks

    Why is security success not sufficient for long-term stability?

    1. Legitimacy deficit: Military victory does not automatically translate into trust in state institutions
    2. Governance gaps: Weak delivery of welfare services in tribal areas risks renewed alienation
    3. Development paradox: Infrastructure expansion without inclusive growth may deepen inequalities
    4. Historical grievances: Issues like land alienation, displacement due to mining, and lack of forest rights remain unresolved
    5. Risk of relapse: Absence of state legitimacy may allow extremist ideologies to re-emerge in altered forms

    What structural issues continue to fuel Maoist ideology?

    1. Land inequality: Persistence of semi-feudal land relations in tribal belts
    2. Displacement: Large-scale displacement due to mining and industrial projects without adequate rehabilitation
    3. Governance exclusion: Limited participation of tribal communities in decision-making processes
    4. Social injustice: Continued marginalization of Adivasis in access to education, healthcare, and livelihoods
    5. State absence: In remote areas, Maoists previously acted as parallel governance structures, filling administrative gaps

    What is the risk of a new phase of radicalism?

    1. Ideological transformation: Shift from armed insurgency to non-violent but radical mobilizations
    2. Urban networks: Potential expansion into urban activism focusing on environmental justice, labor rights
    3. Fragmented resistance: Emergence of localized, issue-based protests rather than centralized insurgency
    4. Youth discontent: Educated but unemployed youth may become new carriers of dissent
    5. Digital mobilization: Increased use of social media for ideological propagation

    What policy shift is required after the March 31 milestone?

    1. Governance consolidation: Ensures sustained delivery of welfare schemes in LWE-affected areas
    2. Administrative reform: Strengthens bureaucratic responsiveness in remote regions
    3. Inclusive development: Prioritizes tribal rights, land reforms, and livelihood generation
    4. Community participation: Enhances local governance through Panchayati Raj institutions
    5. Preventive approach: Focuses on addressing root causes rather than reactive security measures 

    Conclusion

    India’s success in weakening Maoist insurgency represents a major internal security achievement, but it marks only the end of the first phase. The real challenge lies in transforming coercive control into consensual legitimacy. Without addressing structural inequities and governance deficits, the vacuum left by Maoists may be filled by new forms of radicalism.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Naxalism is a social, economic and developmental issue manifesting as a violent internal security threat. In this context, discuss the emerging issues and suggest a multilayered strategy to tackle the menace of Naxalism.

    Linkage: With the March 31 LWE elimination deadline nearing, the issue gains renewed significance beyond security success. The PYQ links directly to this shift, highlighting the need to address underlying socio-economic and governance causes.

  • Centre unveils policy to tackle terror threats

    Why in the News?

    The Union Home Ministry has unveiled India’s first National Counter Terrorism Policy and Strategy (PRAHAAR). The policy seeks to criminalise all terrorist acts, disrupt terror financing, deny logistical support, and strengthen coordination across Central and State agencies. The policy marks a structural shift from reactive counter-terror responses to an integrated, ecosystem-based national security framework covering land, air, water, cyber, and financial domains. The move assumes significance amid rising cross-border terrorism, drone-enabled attacks, and digital radicalisation.

    What is the rationale behind this policy?

    1. The move follows the April 22, 2025 Pahalgam terror incident, which exposed vulnerabilities in intelligence coordination and emerging drone misuse. 
    2. Previously, counter-terror responses were largely reactive and dispersed across agencies without a single doctrinal framework. 
    3. The policy is significant because it integrates prevention, detection, prosecution, and financial disruption under one strategy, covering both state and non-state actors. 
    4. It also formally recognises technological threats such as encrypted platforms, cryptocurrency, and dark web logistics, marking a shift from traditional cross-border terror focus to hybrid and networked terror ecosystems.

    What is the doctrinal architecture of PRAHAAR: Pillar-wise Breakdown

    1. P-Prevention of Terror Attacks; Focus: Intelligence-led, proactive neutralisation. It includes
      1. Intelligence Primacy: Intelligence-guided counter-terror approach; threat neutralisation before execution.
      2. MAC & JTFI Framework: Real-time intelligence aggregation through Multi Agency Centre (MAC) and Joint Task Force on Intelligence under IB.
      3. OGW Disruption: Systematic dismantling of Over Ground Worker logistics and recruitment networks.
      4. Cyber Disruption: Targeting online propaganda, recruitment modules, encrypted communication misuse.
      5. Critical Infrastructure Security: Protection of power, railways, aviation, ports, defence, space, atomic energy sectors.
      6. Border Surveillance: Technological tools deployed across land, air and maritime frontiers.
      7. Core Shift: From reactive policing to preventive security architecture.
    2. R-Responses (Swift & Proportionate); Focus: Layered operational response model. It includes:
      1. Local Police as First Responder: Federal structure respected; decentralised operational response.
      2. State ATS & Special Counter terrorism (CT) Units: Specialised anti-terror forces in vulnerable States.
      3. NSG as National Nodal Force: National Security Guard for major attacks and capacity building.
      4. SOP-Based Coordination: Standard Operating Procedures for apex-level coordination via MHA.
      5. CAPF Deployment: Central Armed Police Forces assisting States in counter-terror operations.
      6. High Conviction Emphasis: NIA-led investigations ensuring deterrence through prosecution.
      7. Core Shift: Structured escalation matrix for response.
    3. A-Aggregating Internal Capacities; Focus: Whole-of-Government synergy. It includes:
      1. Modernisation Mandate: Continuous upgradation of weapons, surveillance tools, training modules.
      2. Standardisation Across States: Uniform anti-terror structures, investigation methodologies.
      3. BPR&D Role: Training and best practice dissemination for State Police & CAPFs.
      4. NSG Urban Combat Training: Specialised combat readiness for metropolitan threats.
      5. Resource Gap Identification: Institutional capacity audit and correction
      6. Core Shift: Elimination of silo-based security functioning.
    4. H-Human Rights & Rule of Law Based Processes; Focus: Constitutional legitimacy. It includes:
      1. Legal Framework Anchoring: The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967, as principal law; supported by BNS 2023, BNSS 2023, BSA 2023, PMLA 2002, Arms Act 1959, Explosives Act 1908.
      2. Judicial Oversight: Multi-tier judicial review up to the Supreme Court.
      3. Human Rights Act 1993: Protection against rights violations.
      4. International Commitments: Adherence to Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) 1948 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
      5. Due Process Safeguards: Appeals and legal redressal mechanisms ensured.
      6. Core Shift: Security operations embedded within constitutional democracy.
    5. A-Attenuating Conditions Conducive to Terrorism; Focus: Addressing root drivers. It includes:
      1. Graded De-radicalisation: Calibrated intervention based on degree of radicalisation.
      2. Community Engagement: Involvement of religious leaders, NGOs, moderate preachers.
      3. Prison Monitoring: Preventing indoctrination within correctional facilities.
      4. Youth Engagement: Constructive programs to prevent extremist recruitment.
      5. Socio-Economic Interventions: Addressing poverty, unemployment, housing and education gaps.
      6. Women & Youth Empowerment Schemes: Scholarships and loan support to reduce vulnerability.
      7. Core Shift: Terrorism treated as socio-psychological and developmental challenge, not merely law-and-order issue.
    6. A-Aligning & Shaping International Efforts; Focus: Transnational cooperation. It includes:
      1. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) & Extradition Treaties: Legal cooperation for evidence sharing and fugitive return.
      2. Joint Working Groups (JWG): Bilateral intelligence engagement platforms.
      3. UN Designation Support: Pursuit of global terrorist listings.
      4. Agency-to-Agency Cooperation: Intelligence sharing with foreign counterparts.
      5. Global ICT Misuse Countering: Addressing terrorist exploitation of digital ecosystems.
      6. Core Shift: Counter-terror extended beyond national jurisdiction.
    7. R-Recovery & Resilience (Whole-of-Society Approach); Focus: Post-attack stabilisation. It includes:
      1. Public-Private Partnership: Private sector participation in recovery.
      2. Civil Administration Leadership: Reconstruction and restoration.
      3. Psychological Rehabilitation: Doctors, psychologists, civil society involvement.
      4. Community Reintegration: Social healing and confidence rebuilding.
      5. Preventive Reinforcement: Strengthened security measures post-incident.
      6. Core Shift: From counter-terror to societal resilience model.

    How Does the Policy Restructure India’s Counter-Terror Governance Framework?

    1. National Framework Institutionalisation: Establishes India’s first unified counter-terror doctrine integrating Centre-State coordination.
    2. Ecosystem Approach: Targets not only terrorists but also financiers, handlers, recruiters, and facilitators.
    3. Multi-Domain Coverage: Addresses threats across land, air, water, cyber, and financial systems.
    4. Inter-Agency Coordination: Strengthens operational synergy among intelligence, enforcement, and financial monitoring agencies.
    5. Legal Backing: Aims to criminalise all forms of terrorist support infrastructure.

    How Does the Policy Address Cross-Border and State-Sponsored Terrorism?

    1. Recognition of Proxy Warfare: Identifies state and non-state actors targeting India through terrorism.
    2. Cross-Border Networks: Acknowledges foreign handlers coordinating logistics and recruitment.
    3. Global Jihadist Linkages: Notes influence of outfits such as Al-Qaeda and IS in inciting lone-wolf or cell-based violence.
    4. Punjab & J&K Linkages: Recognises drone-based smuggling of arms and narcotics across borders.
    5. Transnational Cooperation: Emphasises international collaboration to counter financing and safe havens.

    How Does the Policy Respond to Emerging Technological Threats?

    1. Drone Regulation: Identifies misuse of drones for smuggling arms and reconnaissance.
    2. Encrypted Platforms: Flags encrypted messaging apps as tools for coordination.
    3. Cryptocurrency Monitoring: Recognises dark web and crypto wallets as terror-financing channels.
    4. Cyber Radicalisation: Targets online propaganda and recruitment networks.
    5. Digital Forensics: Strengthens use of technical intelligence in disruption operations.

    How Does the Policy Strengthen Preventive and Pre-Emptive Mechanisms?

    1. Pre-Emptive Intelligence: Enhances predictive threat assessment models.
    2. Community Engagement: Involves civil society and religious leaders to counter radicalisation.
    3. Youth De-Radicalisation: Focuses on preventing extremist recruitment among youth.
    4. Capacity Building: Improves training of state police forces in counter-terror techniques.
    5. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and high-yield Explosives (CBRNE) Preparedness: Recognises risks of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive materials.

    How Does the Policy Reinforce Institutional Accountability and Federal Balance?

    1. Central-State Synergy: Promotes coordinated response while respecting federal structure.
    2. Role of NIA: Strengthens investigative mandate of the National Investigation Agency in major terror cases.
    3. Legal Standardisation: Ensures uniform procedures across states.
    4. Process Standardisation: Encourages similar and synergistic response frameworks.
    5. Parliamentary Oversight Potential: Opens scope for legislative scrutiny of implementation effectiveness.

    What Are the Regulatory and Legal Implications of the Policy?

    1. Criminalisation Framework: Broadens scope to include logistical and financial support.
    2. Financial Disruption: Targets funding channels through financial intelligence units.
    3. Safe Haven Denial: Focuses on dismantling recruitment and shelter networks.
    4. Surveillance Expansion: Raises concerns on balancing security with privacy rights under Article 21.
    5. Counter-Terror Cell Coordination: Enhances role of specialised Counter Terrorism Cells.

    Conclusion

    The National Counter Terrorism Policy marks a transition from fragmented counter-terror responses to a structured, ecosystem-based security doctrine. Its effectiveness will depend on inter-agency coordination, federal cooperation, technological capability, and safeguards against misuse. Institutional balance between national security and civil liberties remains central to sustainable implementation.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Give out the major sources of terror funding in India and the efforts being made to curtail these sources. In the light of this, also discuss the aim and objective of the ‘No Money for Terror (NMFT)’ Conference recently held at New Delhi in November 2022.

    Linkage: This question directly maps to GS Paper 3 (Internal Security), particularly terror financing, money laundering, and transnational security cooperation. It links with India’s PRAHAAR doctrine and NMFT initiative, highlighting the financial disruption pillar of counter-terror strategy and global coordination against terror funding networks.

  • Centre unveils policy to tackle terror threats

    Why in the News?

    The Union Home Ministry has unveiled India’s first National Counter Terrorism Policy and Strategy (PRAHAAR). The policy seeks to criminalise all terrorist acts, disrupt terror financing, deny logistical support, and strengthen coordination across Central and State agencies. The policy marks a structural shift from reactive counter-terror responses to an integrated, ecosystem-based national security framework covering land, air, water, cyber, and financial domains. The move assumes significance amid rising cross-border terrorism, drone-enabled attacks, and digital radicalisation.

    What is the rationale behind this policy?

    1. The move follows the April 22, 2025 Pahalgam terror incident, which exposed vulnerabilities in intelligence coordination and emerging drone misuse. 
    2. Previously, counter-terror responses were largely reactive and dispersed across agencies without a single doctrinal framework. 
    3. The policy is significant because it integrates prevention, detection, prosecution, and financial disruption under one strategy, covering both state and non-state actors. 
    4. It also formally recognises technological threats such as encrypted platforms, cryptocurrency, and dark web logistics, marking a shift from traditional cross-border terror focus to hybrid and networked terror ecosystems.

    What is the doctrinal architecture of PRAHAAR: Pillar-wise Breakdown

    1. P-Prevention of Terror Attacks; Focus: Intelligence-led, proactive neutralisation. It includes
      1. Intelligence Primacy: Intelligence-guided counter-terror approach; threat neutralisation before execution.
      2. MAC & JTFI Framework: Real-time intelligence aggregation through Multi Agency Centre (MAC) and Joint Task Force on Intelligence under IB.
      3. OGW Disruption: Systematic dismantling of Over Ground Worker logistics and recruitment networks.
      4. Cyber Disruption: Targeting online propaganda, recruitment modules, encrypted communication misuse.
      5. Critical Infrastructure Security: Protection of power, railways, aviation, ports, defence, space, atomic energy sectors.
      6. Border Surveillance: Technological tools deployed across land, air and maritime frontiers.
      7. Core Shift: From reactive policing to preventive security architecture.
    2. R-Responses (Swift & Proportionate); Focus: Layered operational response model. It includes:
      1. Local Police as First Responder: Federal structure respected; decentralised operational response.
      2. State ATS & Special Counter terrorism (CT) Units: Specialised anti-terror forces in vulnerable States.
      3. NSG as National Nodal Force: National Security Guard for major attacks and capacity building.
      4. SOP-Based Coordination: Standard Operating Procedures for apex-level coordination via MHA.
      5. CAPF Deployment: Central Armed Police Forces assisting States in counter-terror operations.
      6. High Conviction Emphasis: NIA-led investigations ensuring deterrence through prosecution.
      7. Core Shift: Structured escalation matrix for response.
    3. A-Aggregating Internal Capacities; Focus: Whole-of-Government synergy. It includes:
      1. Modernisation Mandate: Continuous upgradation of weapons, surveillance tools, training modules.
      2. Standardisation Across States: Uniform anti-terror structures, investigation methodologies.
      3. BPR&D Role: Training and best practice dissemination for State Police & CAPFs.
      4. NSG Urban Combat Training: Specialised combat readiness for metropolitan threats.
      5. Resource Gap Identification: Institutional capacity audit and correction
      6. Core Shift: Elimination of silo-based security functioning.
    4. H-Human Rights & Rule of Law Based Processes; Focus: Constitutional legitimacy. It includes:
      1. Legal Framework Anchoring: The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967, as principal law; supported by BNS 2023, BNSS 2023, BSA 2023, PMLA 2002, Arms Act 1959, Explosives Act 1908.
      2. Judicial Oversight: Multi-tier judicial review up to the Supreme Court.
      3. Human Rights Act 1993: Protection against rights violations.
      4. International Commitments: Adherence to Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) 1948 and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
      5. Due Process Safeguards: Appeals and legal redressal mechanisms ensured.
      6. Core Shift: Security operations embedded within constitutional democracy.
    5. A-Attenuating Conditions Conducive to Terrorism; Focus: Addressing root drivers. It includes:
      1. Graded De-radicalisation: Calibrated intervention based on degree of radicalisation.
      2. Community Engagement: Involvement of religious leaders, NGOs, moderate preachers.
      3. Prison Monitoring: Preventing indoctrination within correctional facilities.
      4. Youth Engagement: Constructive programs to prevent extremist recruitment.
      5. Socio-Economic Interventions: Addressing poverty, unemployment, housing and education gaps.
      6. Women & Youth Empowerment Schemes: Scholarships and loan support to reduce vulnerability.
      7. Core Shift: Terrorism treated as socio-psychological and developmental challenge, not merely law-and-order issue.
    6. A-Aligning & Shaping International Efforts; Focus: Transnational cooperation. It includes:
      1. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) & Extradition Treaties: Legal cooperation for evidence sharing and fugitive return.
      2. Joint Working Groups (JWG): Bilateral intelligence engagement platforms.
      3. UN Designation Support: Pursuit of global terrorist listings.
      4. Agency-to-Agency Cooperation: Intelligence sharing with foreign counterparts.
      5. Global ICT Misuse Countering: Addressing terrorist exploitation of digital ecosystems.
      6. Core Shift: Counter-terror extended beyond national jurisdiction.
    7. R-Recovery & Resilience (Whole-of-Society Approach); Focus: Post-attack stabilisation. It includes:
      1. Public-Private Partnership: Private sector participation in recovery.
      2. Civil Administration Leadership: Reconstruction and restoration.
      3. Psychological Rehabilitation: Doctors, psychologists, civil society involvement.
      4. Community Reintegration: Social healing and confidence rebuilding.
      5. Preventive Reinforcement: Strengthened security measures post-incident.
      6. Core Shift: From counter-terror to societal resilience model.

    How Does the Policy Restructure India’s Counter-Terror Governance Framework?

    1. National Framework Institutionalisation: Establishes India’s first unified counter-terror doctrine integrating Centre-State coordination.
    2. Ecosystem Approach: Targets not only terrorists but also financiers, handlers, recruiters, and facilitators.
    3. Multi-Domain Coverage: Addresses threats across land, air, water, cyber, and financial systems.
    4. Inter-Agency Coordination: Strengthens operational synergy among intelligence, enforcement, and financial monitoring agencies.
    5. Legal Backing: Aims to criminalise all forms of terrorist support infrastructure.

    How Does the Policy Address Cross-Border and State-Sponsored Terrorism?

    1. Recognition of Proxy Warfare: Identifies state and non-state actors targeting India through terrorism.
    2. Cross-Border Networks: Acknowledges foreign handlers coordinating logistics and recruitment.
    3. Global Jihadist Linkages: Notes influence of outfits such as Al-Qaeda and IS in inciting lone-wolf or cell-based violence.
    4. Punjab & J&K Linkages: Recognises drone-based smuggling of arms and narcotics across borders.
    5. Transnational Cooperation: Emphasises international collaboration to counter financing and safe havens.

    How Does the Policy Respond to Emerging Technological Threats?

    1. Drone Regulation: Identifies misuse of drones for smuggling arms and reconnaissance.
    2. Encrypted Platforms: Flags encrypted messaging apps as tools for coordination.
    3. Cryptocurrency Monitoring: Recognises dark web and crypto wallets as terror-financing channels.
    4. Cyber Radicalisation: Targets online propaganda and recruitment networks.
    5. Digital Forensics: Strengthens use of technical intelligence in disruption operations.

    How Does the Policy Strengthen Preventive and Pre-Emptive Mechanisms?

    1. Pre-Emptive Intelligence: Enhances predictive threat assessment models.
    2. Community Engagement: Involves civil society and religious leaders to counter radicalisation.
    3. Youth De-Radicalisation: Focuses on preventing extremist recruitment among youth.
    4. Capacity Building: Improves training of state police forces in counter-terror techniques.
    5. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and high-yield Explosives (CBRNE) Preparedness: Recognises risks of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive materials.

    How Does the Policy Reinforce Institutional Accountability and Federal Balance?

    1. Central-State Synergy: Promotes coordinated response while respecting federal structure.
    2. Role of NIA: Strengthens investigative mandate of the National Investigation Agency in major terror cases.
    3. Legal Standardisation: Ensures uniform procedures across states.
    4. Process Standardisation: Encourages similar and synergistic response frameworks.
    5. Parliamentary Oversight Potential: Opens scope for legislative scrutiny of implementation effectiveness.

    What Are the Regulatory and Legal Implications of the Policy?

    1. Criminalisation Framework: Broadens scope to include logistical and financial support.
    2. Financial Disruption: Targets funding channels through financial intelligence units.
    3. Safe Haven Denial: Focuses on dismantling recruitment and shelter networks.
    4. Surveillance Expansion: Raises concerns on balancing security with privacy rights under Article 21.
    5. Counter-Terror Cell Coordination: Enhances role of specialised Counter Terrorism Cells.

    Conclusion

    The National Counter Terrorism Policy marks a transition from fragmented counter-terror responses to a structured, ecosystem-based security doctrine. Its effectiveness will depend on inter-agency coordination, federal cooperation, technological capability, and safeguards against misuse. Institutional balance between national security and civil liberties remains central to sustainable implementation.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Give out the major sources of terror funding in India and the efforts being made to curtail these sources. In the light of this, also discuss the aim and objective of the ‘No Money for Terror (NMFT)’ Conference recently held at New Delhi in November 2022.

    Linkage: This question directly maps to GS Paper 3 (Internal Security), particularly terror financing, money laundering, and transnational security cooperation. It links with India’s PRAHAAR doctrine and NMFT initiative, highlighting the financial disruption pillar of counter-terror strategy and global coordination against terror funding networks.

  • India Releases First Anti Terror Policy PRAHAAR

    Why in the News

    The Ministry of Home Affairs on February 23, 2026 released India’s first comprehensive anti terror policy titled PRAHAAR, outlining a national counter terrorism strategy addressing conventional and emerging threats including cyber attacks and drone based terror.

    What is PRAHAAR?

    • PRAHAAR is India’s first formal National Counter Terrorism Policy and Strategy.
    • It provides a unified framework to:
      • Counter cross border sponsored terrorism
      • Address cyber terror and digital radicalisation
      • Protect critical infrastructure
      • Strengthen coordination between Centre and States
      • Enhance prosecution and legal preparedness

    Nature of Threat Identified

    • Cross Border Terror

        • Sponsored terrorism from across the border
        • Activities by global terror groups like Al Qaeda and Islamic State
        • Use of sleeper cells

    • Emerging Technological Threats

        • Criminal hackers and hostile nation states
        • Cyber attacks on critical sectors
        • Use of encryption, dark web, crypto wallets
        • Drones and robotics for terror activities

    • CBRNED Risks

      • Threat of misuse of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosive and Digital materials.

    Critical Sectors Identified

    • Protection strengthened in: Power, Railways, Aviation, Ports, Defence, Space, and Atomic energy
    [2023] Consider the following statements: 1. According to the Constitution of India, the Central Government has a duty to protect States from internal disturbances. 

    2. The Constitution of India exempts the States from providing legal counsel to person being held for preventive detention. 

    3. According to the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002, confession of the accused before the police cannot be used as evidence. 

    How many of the above statements are correct? 

    (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None

  • How hate groups and terrorist organizations use gaming platforms to recruit children

    Why in the News?

    Extremist organisations are using mainstream gaming platforms such as Roblox and Minecraft to recruit children. Counter-terrorism agencies in the United States, Australia, and Europe have documented cases of minors being radicalised through simulated violent worlds. The problem is expanding: investigations across 40 countries reveal a sharp rise in terror-linked online activity since 2021.

    How are gaming platforms being exploited for extremist recruitment, and what governance gaps enable this shift?

    1. Immersive Simulation: Enables recreation of real-world terror attacks within game environments; example: simulation of the Christchurch mosque shooting.
    2. Private Servers: Facilitates closed-group indoctrination without public scrutiny; platforms allow creation of restricted-access worlds.
    3. Gamified Propaganda: Embeds violent extremist narratives within interactive gameplay.
    4. Algorithmic Reinforcement: Promotes similar content once initial extremist content is accessed.
    5. Weak Age Verification: Allows minors aged 9-12 to access unmoderated spaces.

    What constitutional and child protection obligations arise in regulating online radicalisation of minors?

    1. Right to Protection (Article 21): Ensures state obligation to protect life and personal liberty of minors from digital harm.
    2. Best Interest Principle: Strengthens state responsibility under child protection jurisprudence.
    3. Freedom of Speech Limits (Article 19(2)): Permits reasonable restrictions on incitement to violence.
    4. Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: Enables state intervention where minors are victims of online grooming, exploitation, or psychological harm through digital platforms.
    5. Information Technology Act, 2000 and Intermediary Guidelines, 2021: Mandate due diligence by platforms to ensure safe digital ecosystems and removal of unlawful or harmful online content.

    How effective are existing regulatory mechanisms in addressing platform-enabled extremism?

    1. Platform Moderation Tools: Provides content filtering and AI-based detection but remains reactive.
    2. Encryption Barriers: Limits proactive monitoring in private chats and servers.
    3. Cross-border Jurisdiction Issues: Weakens enforcement due to global server locations.
    4. Law Enforcement Intervention: Includes arrests such as UK-based cases involving bomb manuals.
    5. Regulatory Gaps: Fails to anticipate gaming ecosystems as recruitment hubs.

    What institutional accountability mechanisms must platforms adhere to under digital governance norms?

    1. Due Diligence Obligations: Requires proactive removal of unlawful content.
    2. Transparency Reporting: Ensures disclosure of extremist content removal statistics.
    3. Risk Assessment Protocols: Mandates evaluation of systemic risks to minors.
    4. Design Accountability: Requires embedding child-safety safeguards in platform architecture.
    5. Coordination with Counter-Terror Agencies: Facilitates intelligence sharing.

    How does digital radicalisation of children alter the nature of internal security challenges?

    1. Decentralised Recruitment: Eliminates dependence on physical contact networks.
    2. Early-age Indoctrination: Reduces threshold age of radicalisation to below 12 years.
    3. Loneliness Exploitation: Targets socially isolated minors.
    4. Gamification of Violence: Normalises extremist ideology through interactive immersion.
    5. Low-cost Global Reach: Enables transnational propaganda dissemination.

    Conclusion

    Gaming ecosystems now function as recruitment spaces for extremist organisations. The shift from physical indoctrination to immersive digital radicalisation lowers age thresholds and expands cross-border risks. Regulatory frameworks must integrate child protection, platform accountability, and counter-terror coordination to address this evolving threat landscape.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024]  Social media and encrypting messaging services pose a serious security challenge. What measures have been adopted at various levels to address the security implications of social media? Also suggest any other remedies to address the problem.

    Linkage: Gaming-based radicalisation of minors reflects the expanding misuse of digital platforms and gaps in cyber regulation.

  • Frontier Nagaland Territorial Authority (FNTA) Agreement 

    Why in the News?

    A historic agreement was signed in New Delhi on 5 February 2026 between the Government of India, Government of Nagaland and the Eastern Nagaland Peoples’ Organisation, paving the way for the creation of the Frontier Nagaland Territorial Authority (FNTA).

    About the Agreement

    • Signed in the presence of Amit Shah and Neiphiu Rio
    • Applies to six districts of Eastern Nagaland: Tuensang, Mon, Kiphire, Longleng, Noklak and Shamator
    • Represents a negotiated settlement through dialogue
    • Does not affect Article 371A of the Constitution

    What is FNTA

    • A territorial authority for Eastern Nagaland
    • Created to address long standing political and developmental demands
    • Aimed at accelerated and inclusive regional development

    Key Provisions

    • Devolution of powers over 46 subjects to FNTA
    • Creation of a mini Secretariat for FNTA
    • Headed by Additional Chief Secretary or Principal Secretary
    • Development outlay shared proportionally based on population and area
    • Union Ministry of Home Affairs to bear initial establishment expenditure
    • Fixed annual financial allocation by Government of India

    Institutional and Constitutional Aspects

    • FNTA functions within the constitutional framework of Nagaland
    • Article 371A remains fully protected
    • Enhances financial autonomy and decision making
    • Focus on infrastructure, economic empowerment and resource utilisation
    [2024] The North Eastern Council (NEC) was established by the North Eastern Council Act, 1971. Subsequent to the amendment of NEC Act in 2002, the Council comprises which of the following members: 1. Governor of the Constituent State 

    2. Chief Minister of the Constituent State 

    3. Three Members to be nominated by the President of India 

    4. The Home Minister of India 

    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 

    (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1, 3 and 4 (c) 2 and 4 (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

  • Bhairav Battalion: India’s New Combat Ready Force for High Speed Operations

    Why in the News?

    The Indian Army has operationalised a new rapid response combat unit called the Bhairav Battalion, reflecting a major shift towards fast, technology driven and multi domain warfare, especially along sensitive border areas.

    What is the Bhairav Battalion

    • A new age infantry formation raised in 2025
    • Designed for high speed, short notice and independent operations
    • Created after studying lessons from modern conflicts such as the Russia Ukraine war and India’s own border challenges
    • Focuses on hybrid warfare combining conventional combat with drones, electronic disruption and rapid manoeuvre
    [2025] With reference to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), consider the following statements: 

    I. All types of UAVs can do vertical landing

    II. All types of UAVs can do automated hovering

    III. All types of UAVs can use battery only as a source of power supply

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All the three (d) None

  • National IED Data Management System (NIDMS)  

    Why in the News?

    Union Home Minister Amit Shah virtually inaugurated the National IED Data Management System (NIDMS) at the National Security Guard garrison in Manesar, calling it a next generation shield against terrorism.

    What is NIDMS

    • A national online digital platform and centralised repository of data related to Improvised Explosive Device (IED) incidents
    • Designed to support investigation, pattern analysis, and deterrence strategies against terror attacks
    • Provides single click access to IED related data across India
    • Nodal Agency: National Security Guard (NSG)
    • Launched by the Ministry of Home Affairs

    Key Objectives

    • Strengthen counter terrorism investigations
    • Identify patterns in modus operandi and explosives
    • Enable scientific and evidence based prosecution
    • Improve inter agency coordination

    Key Features

    • Two way data platform
      • Agencies can upload fresh IED incident data
      • Agencies can access historical data
    • Comprehensive database: Chronicles all bomb blasts since 1999
    • One nation one data repository: Uniform access for central and state agencies
    • Fully secure national digital platform
    • Enables standardisation, integration, and secure sharing of IED data

    Agencies Covered

    • National Investigation Agency
    • State Anti Terrorism Squads
    • Central Armed Police Forces
    • State and Union Territory police forces
    • Intelligence and investigation agencies

    Integration with Other Security Databases

    NIDMS will interlink with existing national security platforms:

    • CCTNS connecting over 17,700 police stations
    • ICJS 2 integrating data from 22,000 courts
    • e Prisons database with over 2.2 crore prisoners
    • e Prosecution database with around 2 crore cases
    • e Forensics with more than 31 lakh samples
    • NAFIS with over 1.2 crore fingerprints
    [2020] In India, the term “Public Key Infrastructure” is used in the context of: 

    (a) Digital security infrastructure 

    (b) Food security infrastructure 

    (c) Health care and education infrastructure 

    (d) Telecommunication and transportation infrastructure

  • Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)

    Why in the News?

    The Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, extended greetings to all personnel of the Sashastra Seema Bal on its Raising Day.

    About Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)

    • Formerly known as Special Service Bureau
    • Established: 15 March 1963
    • Background: Formed after the Sino Indian Conflict of 1962
    • Force Type: Central Armed Police Force (CAPF)
    • Administrative Control: Ministry of Home Affairs

    Mandate and Area of Responsibility

    • Guards India’s international borders with Nepal and Bhutan
    • Promotes border security awareness among border populations

    Roles and Functions

    • Prevents smuggling, illegal immigration, and transnational crimes
    • Checks unauthorised entry and exit along the border
    • Assists in border area development
      • Construction of schools, toilets, roads, and public infrastructure
    • Performs law and order duties, counter insurgency operations, and election duties
    • Participates in UN peacekeeping missions when assigned by the central government

    Prelims Pointers

    • Border responsibility: Nepal and Bhutan only
    • Under Ministry of Home Affairs, not Defence Ministry
    • Origin linked to 1962 Sino Indian War
    • Combines border guarding with community oriented development
    [2023] With reference to Home Guards, consider the following statements: 

    1. Home Guards are raised under the Home Guards Act and Rules of the Central Government. 

    2. The role of the Home Guards is to serve as an auxiliary force to the police in maintenance of internal security. 

    3. To prevent infiltration on the international border/coastal areas, the Border Wing Home Guards Battalions have been raised in some States. 

    How many of the above statements are correct? 

    (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None