💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • India and USA are two large democracies. Examine the basic tenets on which the two political systems are based.

    The United States as the first republic and India as the mother of democracies share a common philosophical foundation of liberty, equality, and constitutionalism, expressed through distinct institutional frameworks.

    Similar Basic Tenets

    Constitutional Supremacy: Constitution is the supreme law governing all institutions.

    Popular Sovereignty: Political authority derives from “We, the People” in both systems.

    Rule of Law: Enforced through Article 14 (India) and Fifth Amendment (USA), ensuring equality before law and due process.

    Representative Democracy: Based on universal adult franchise and periodic elections.

    Separation of Powers: Distinct organs maintain balance-Articles 50, 53-74 (India) and Articles I-III (US Constitution).

    Judicial Independence: Judiciary acts as guardian of the Constitution with review powers.

    Fundamental Rights: Part III (Arts. 12-35) in India parallels the Bill of Rights (1791) in the USA protecting civil liberties.

    Differences in Political Systems

    The shared democratic ideals of both nations affirm universal constitutional principles, while their institutional differences reflect unique historical and socio-cultural contexts.

  • How is the Finance Commission of India constituted? What do you about the terms of reference of the recently constituted Finance Commission? Discuss.

    The Finance Commission of India (FC), established under Article 280 of the Constitution, is a quasi-judicial body. It plays a vital role in maintaining the fiscal federal balance envisioned by the Constitution.

    Constitution of the Finance Commission

    Constitutional Provision- As per Article 280(1), the President of India constitutes the Finance Commission every five years or earlier if necessary.

    Composition-

    Consists of a Chairperson and four other members, appointed by the President.

    Their qualifications and terms of service are determined by the Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951.

    Tenure- The Commission usually has a tenure of five years, extendable by Presidential order.

    Terms of Reference (ToR) of the Recently Constituted Finance Commission

    The 16th Finance Commission was constituted in December 2023, chaired by Dr. Arvind Panagariya.
    Its recommendations will apply for the period 2026-2031.

    Division of Tax Proceeds

    Recommend the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Union and the States under Chapter I, Part XII of the Constitution.

    Determine the allocation of shares among individual States from the total divisible pool of central taxes.

    Principles for Grants-in-Aid

    Lay down the principles governing grants-in-aid to States from the Consolidated Fund of India.

    Recommend the amounts to be provided to States as grants under Article 275, for purposes other than those specified in the provisos to clause (1).

    Enhancing State Funds for Local Bodies

    Suggest measures to increase the Consolidated Fund of States to supplement resources of Panchayats and Municipalities.

    Base these recommendations on the inputs of respective State Finance Commissions, ensuring fiscal strengthening of local governance.

    Evaluation of Disaster Management Financing

    Review existing funding mechanisms for Disaster Management, particularly those created under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

    Recommend improvements in the structure, sharing pattern, and utilization of National and State Disaster Response Funds.

    Any Other Matters Referred by the President

    Examine and recommend on additional fiscal issues to ensure “sound finance,” including fiscal consolidation, resource augmentation, and expenditure efficiency.

    Challenges Ahead

    Data Gaps and Quality Issues- Relies on outdated and inconsistent official data, affecting fiscal assessments.

    Political Factors- Faces pressure to balance conflicting interests of Centre, States, and political stakeholders.

    Overlap with GST Council- GST decisions affect revenue flows and reduce FC’s fiscal autonomy.

    Limited Role in Local Governance- Depends on weak or irregular State Finance Commissions for data and recommendations.

    FCs have no enforcement power, as their recommendations are advisory in nature.

    Way Forward

    Ensuring state representation in decision making

    Permanence- Make FC a permanent body for continuous review and coordination. (Rajamannar Committee)

    Addressing Emerging Issues and Challenges – Factor in digital transformation and green financing for sustainable growth.

    Build data-driven analytical capacity with reliable and updated fiscal databases.

    The Finance Commission remains the keystone of India’s fiscal federalism, ensuring both equity and efficiency in resource distribution.

  • The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has a very vital role to play. Explain how this is reflected in the method and terms of his appointment as well as the range of powers he can exercise.

    CAG is established under Article 148 of the Constitution as the supreme audit authority of India. Ambedkar called it as most important officer under the Constitution of India

    Importance of the office of CAG

    Guardian of Public Purse – CAG ensures all government expenditure is sanctioned by law and used appropriately.

    Bulwark of Democracy along with ECI and SC

    Promotes Accountability – Eg: 2G Spectrum scam (2010)

    Strengthens Parliamentary Oversight – CAG reports form the basis for examination by Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and COPU.

    Ensures Financial Propriety – Audits whether expenditure follows financial rules, principles, and economy norms.

    Auditor of Federal Finances – Audits accounts of both Union and State Governments under Articles 149-151.

    Promotes Good Governance – Performance audits drive improvements in scheme design, implementation, and outcomes.

    Reflection of importance in method and terms of appointment

    Appointed by the President of India under Article 148(1) by warrant under his hand and seal.

    Oath of Office under Third Schedule to uphold the Constitution. The oath symbolises the solemn responsibility and independence of the office.

    Fixed Tenure – CAG holds office for 6 years or until age 65, whichever is earlier (Section 3, CAG Act 1971). Fixed tenure shields from executive pressure and ensures continuity.

    Removal Same as Supreme Court Judge- This stringent removal procedure protects CAG from arbitrary action by executive.

    Salary Charged on Consolidated Fund, not voted by Parliament (Article 148(3)).

    Service conditions cannot be varied to CAG’s disadvantage during tenure (Article 148(4)).

    No Eligibility for Further Government Office

    Reflection of importance in powers vested

    Comprehensive audit authority across federal levels. – CAG audits all expenditure from Consolidated Fund of India, Consolidated Funds of States, and UTs with legislatures.

    Audit of Contingency Fund and Public Account – Ensures complete coverage of government finances.

    Audit of Public Sector Undertakings- Eg: Audits LIC, ONGC, FCI, BHEL, Indian Railways under Companies Act provisions.

    Audit of Autonomous Bodies substantially financed by governmentEg: ICAR, CSIR

    Performance Audit evaluating economy, efficiency, effectiveness of schemes. Eg: Performance audits on MGNREGA, NHM, PMAY, Swachh Bharat Mission.

    CAG Standardises government accounting practices by prescribing form in which accounts of Union and States shall be maintained (Article 150).

    Independent Investigation Powers – CAG can call for any document, information, books, accounts from any government office without restriction.

    Discretionary Powers – Section 23, CAG (DPC) Act 1971 allows CAG to issue directions on accounting and audit principles.

    “The CAG is the conscience-keeper of public finance, ensuring not only lawful but also wise spending.” – 2nd ARC

  • Policy contradictions among various competing sectors and stakeholders have resulted in inadequate ‘protection and prevention of degradation’ to environment. ” Comment with relevant illustration.

    While environmental protection is constitutionally mandated (Article 48A, 51A(g)), it is marked by overlapping sectoral priorities and fragmented institutional mandates.

    Policy Contradictions Among Various Competing Sectors

    Energy vs. Environment – Expansion of coal-based thermal power leads to deforestation, displacement, and carbon emissions. Eg- Coal block allocations in Hasdeo Arand (Chhattisgarh)

    Agriculture – MSP policy promotes water-intensive crops like paddy and sugarcane, leading to water scarcity, salinity, and soil degradation. Eg- Over-extraction of groundwater in Punjab and Haryana.

    Industry vs. Environmental Regulation – Ease of Doing Business reforms relax environmental clearances (EIA 2020 draft allows post-facto approvals).

    Infrastructure vs. Ecosystem Stability – Eg- Projects like Bharatmala, Char Dham Highway, and river-linking projects lead to habitat fragmentation and increased disaster vulnerability.

    Tourism – Unregulated eco-tourism and pilgrimage infrastructure stress fragile ecosystems. Eg- Joshimath Crisis.

    Urban Development – Unplanned urbanisation encroaches upon natural drainage systems. Eg- Chennai floods (2015) due to wetland encroachment; Bengaluru lake pollution.

    Policy Contradictions Among Various Competing Stakeholders

    Central vs. State Governments – Conflict between industrial promotion by states and environmental clearance norms by Centre.

    Government vs. Local Communities – Top-down project approvals often ignore Gram Sabha consent under Forest Rights Act (2006). Eg- Niyamgiri Case

    Corporate Interests vs. Civil Society – Private sector prioritizes profit, while NGOs and activists demand sustainability. Eg- Industrial pollution in Sterlite Copper Plant (Thoothukudi).

    Judiciary vs. Executive – Eg- NGT banned illegal constructions in Aravalli Hills (Gurugram, 2018) and Delhi Ridge

    Inter-Ministerial Contradictions – Eg- MoEFCC seeks conservation, while the Ministry of Coal or Power pushes extraction projects.

    Way Forward

    Integrated Policy – Establish a National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD) under NITI Aayog. Model it on the UK’s Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.

    Whole-of-Government Approach – Institutionalize inter-ministerial task forces for projects with ecological sensitivity.

    Implement committee recommendations like Madhav gadgil Committee on Western Ghats

    Green Budgeting – Integrate ecosystem valuation and environmental costs into budgets.

    Create National Environmental Information Grid (NEIG) for real-time monitoring of forests, emissions, and water resources.

    Community Participation – Ensure FRA and PESA provisions are respected in all forest and mining projects through joint monitoring committees including tribal representatives.

    These measures can help align the developmental process with SDG-13 (Climate Action) and India’s Panchamrit targets.

  • Appropriate local community-level healthcare intervention is a prerequisite to achieve ‘Health for All ‘ in India. Explain.

    The goal of ‘Health for All’, as envisioned in the Alma-Ata Declaration (1978) and reinforced through National Health Policy 2017, emphasizes universal, equitable, and accessible healthcare.

    Importance of Local Community-Level Healthcare Interventions

    Accessibility and Inclusivity – Brings primary healthcare closer to grassroot and reduces dependency on overburdened tertiary hospitals. Eg- Ayushman Bharat – Health and Wellness Centres (HWCs)

    Preventive and Promotive Health – Community health workers (e.g., ASHA, Anganwadi, ANM) enable early detection, immunization, maternal and child care.

    Local interventions are more trust-based, improving adoption of health services. Eg- ASHA workers act as a bridge between local communities and formal healthcare systems

    Cost-Effectiveness – Community-based preventive healthcare reduces out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE). (Presently at 40%)

    Empowering Local Governance – Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) ensure decentralized planning and monitoring.

    Integration of Traditional and Modern Systems – Incorporates AYUSH practices alongside allopathy to widen reach and enhance preventive health.

    Empowering Women and Local Workforce – ASHAs and Anganwadi workers-over 10 lakh women-act as frontline caregivers.

    Community health networks enable rapid disease surveillance and emergency response. Eg- ASHAs and PRIs played a critical role in contact tracing during COVID-19

    Continuous community engagement increases awareness of disease prevention, hygiene, family planning, and nutrition.

    Key Challenges

    Shortage of trained manpower and high attrition among ASHA and ANM workers.

    Inadequate infrastructure at Sub-Centres and PHCs.

    Weak inter-sectoral convergence (between health, sanitation, and nutrition departments).

    Limited community participation due to lack of awareness and ownership.

    Way Forward

    Strengthen Primary Health Infrastructure: Upgrade all 1.5 lakh HWCs with telemedicine and diagnostics.

    Capacity Building: Continuous training and performance-based incentives for ASHA and ANM workers.

    Community Ownership: Empower Panchayats and SHGs in planning and monitoring local health outcomes.

    Technology Integration: Use eSanjeevani, digital health IDs, and mobile-based health tracking.

    Social Determinants Approach: Integrate health with nutrition, sanitation (Swachh Bharat), and clean energy (Ujjwala Yojana).

    Achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by strengthening local healthcare will help realize the vision of “Swasth Bharat – Samriddh Bharat.”

  • India’s relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back.” Discuss.

    India and Israel relations, though formally established only in 1992, have evolved from a transactional defense relationship into a multidimensional strategic partnership.

    Depth and Diversity in India-Israel relations

    Geopolitical Convergence

    2017 Modi visit to Israel (first ever by an Indian PM) and reciprocal visits institutionalized the partnership through Joint Working Groups and 2+2 dialogues.

    Strategic autonomy- India has successfully balanced ties with Israel, Palestine, and Gulf states

    Indo-Abrahamic Bloc- India’s participation in I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE, US), reflect shared Indo-Pacific interests.

    Defense and Security Cooperation

    Defense Procurement- Israel is one of India’s top three defense suppliers. Eg- Heron and Searcher UAVs, Barak missiles, and Spyder air defense systems.

    Counterterrorism Cooperation- Intelligence-sharing and joint training have strengthened India’s counterterrorism capabilities post-26/11.

    Maritime Security- Joint initiatives in the Indian Ocean and Red Sea strengthen India’s position in West Asian maritime architecture.

    Technology, Agriculture, and Water Cooperation

    The India-Israel Agricultural Project (IIAP) has established over 30 Centers of Excellence across Indian states.

    Water Management- Collaboration in drip irrigation, desalination, and wastewater recycling.

    The India-Israel Industrial R&D and Technological Innovation Fund (I4F) supports joint projects in AI, quantum computing, water tech, etc.

    Economic and Trade Relations

    Bilateral Trade- Increased from $200 million in 1992 to over $10.7 billion in 2023, with focus shifting from diamonds to pharmaceuticals, defense electronics, and agri-tech.

    Negotiations for a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to deepen commercial linkages.

    India and Israel have signed a fresh bilateral investment treaty.( first OECD country to adopt India’s new investment treaty model.)

    People-to-People and Cultural Ties – Shared democratic values, historical goodwill, and academic and cultural exchanges

    Major Areas-of Friction

    India maintains a principled support for Palestine and the two-state solution. Eg- India abstained from a UNGA resolution on Gaza ceasefire in October 2023.

    India walk a tightrope between its strategic embrace of Israel and economic entrenchment in the Gulf. – Harsh V. Pant (ORF)

    Non-defense trade remains modest and over-reliant on diamonds and agriculture.

    The India-Israel Free Trade Agreement, under negotiation since 2010 (14 rounds held), remains inconclusive.

    Domestic Political Issues – left-leaning and minority groups, criticize deepening ties with Israel.

    Way Forward

    Partnership based on Enlightened Self interest

    Joint Collaboration for development projects in Africa and South Asia under platforms like I2U2.

    As Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu stated, “The sky is the limit for India-Israel cooperation” – symbolizing deep mutual trust and strategic alignment.

  • E-Governance is not only about utilization of the power of new technology, but also much about critical importance of the ‘use value’ of information Explain.

    The World Bank defines e-governance as the use by government agencies of information technologies that can transform relations with citizens, businesses, and other arms of government.

    E-Governance as Utilization of the Power of New Technology

    Digital Platforms like e-Office, UMANG, DigiLocker, CPGRAMS, and GeM.

    Automation and Paperless Processes: Eg- e-Procurement, e-Courts.

    Connectivity and Infrastructure Expansion: Eg- Digital India, BharatNet, and 5G rollout.

    Data Integration and Interoperability: Eg- Unified databases such as Aadhaar and SECC.

    Smart Technologies and AI Use: Eg- IndiaAI Mission, Smart Cities.

    Citizen-Government Interface: Eg- Mobile governance and MyGov platform.

    Importance of the ‘Use Value’ of Information

    Use Value – The relevance, accessibility, and usability of information by citizens, administrators, and policymakers to make informed decisions and ensure accountability.

    Informed Decision-Making: Data-driven policies depend on real-time, accurate information. Eg- Aadhaar-linked welfare, PM-KISAN, JAM Trinity

    Platforms like RTI Portal, NJDG, and CPGRAMS ensure information availability, empowering citizens to hold government accountable.

    Targeted Service Delivery: Use of information helps identify beneficiaries and prevent inclusion exclusion errors. Eg- SECC data.

    Citizen Empowerment: Information accessibility through UMANG, DigiLocker, and MyGov enables citizens to interact directly with the state.

    Evidence-Based Governance- Dashboards like PRAGATI and Aspirational District Programme use information analytics for performance monitoring.

    Crisis Management and Responsiveness: During COVID-19, platforms like CoWIN and Aarogya Setu turned data into real-time governance tools for vaccine delivery and tracking.

    Reduction in Asymmetry and Corruption: Public disclosure reduces discretion and builds public trust. Eg- GeM portal, PFMS

    Technology enables e-governance; the use value of information sustains it.

  • In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India?

    In Abhiram Singh vs UoI, SC has held that elections are the biggest secular and democratic event. EVMs were introduced to improve transparency and efficiency of the electoral process.

    Challenges before the Election Commission of India (ECI)

    Technical and Operational Challenges

    Allegations of EVM tampering and demand for Postal Ballot system.

    EVMs are produced by PSU’s BEL and ECIL– concerns about source code security and potential government misuse.

    Large-scale deployment increases risk of technical failure, power supply issues, and storage vulnerability.

    Institutional and Procedural Challenges

    Political polarisation has led to accusations of bias against ECI decisions (timing of elections, model code enforcement).

    Lack of transparency- Limited access for political parties and civil society to audit or inspect EVM functioning.

    Opposition parties demand 100% VVPAT verification or return to ballot papers, which the ECI has resisted citing impracticality.

    Legal and Regulatory Challenges

    Use of EVMs is governed by Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, not by a specific EVM legislation.

    Judicial scrutiny and legal disputes- Repeated petitions challenge credibility of EVMs and VVPAT counting procedures.

    Despite SC directives (2024) to improve VVPAT counting transparency and preserve paper trail records – compliance remains partial.

    Public Perception and Political Trust Deficit

    Decline in citizen confidence- Lack of understanding of EVM functioning leads to misinformation and conspiracy theories.

    Political blame culture- Losing parties often question EVM integrity, politicising the institution’s credibility.

    Social media misinformation- Viral false claims about EVM manipulation erode voter trust. Eg- “Black Box” Allegations (2024)

    ECI’s Stand

    EVMs are standalone, non-networked machines; cannot be hacked remotely.

    Rigorous mock polling, sealing, randomisation, and observer monitoring prevent manipulation.

    Technical Expert Committee (TEC) from IITs and DRDO regularly reviews EVM integrity.

    Way Forward

    Conduct independent third-party audits (IITs, NIC) of EVM software and random samples.

    VVPAT Verification – Increase sample size or audit entire constituency in disputed cases.

    Launch voter education campaigns explaining EVM and VVPAT mechanisms

    Enact a dedicated “Electronic Voting Regulation Act” ensuring independent oversight

    Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of democracy (Art. 324). Enhancing the transparency in use of EVM’s is thus essential.

  • Whether National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) can enforce the implementation of constitutional reservation for the Scheduled Castes in the religious minority institutions? Examine.

    The NCSC, established under Article 338, is a constitutional body mandated to safeguard the interests and rights of Scheduled Castes (SCs).

    Constitutional and Legal Position on reservation for the SC in the religious minority institutions

    Article 15(4) & 16(4)- Empower the State to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, including SCs.

    Article 30(1)- Grants minority communities the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

    Article 338(5)- Authorizes NCSC to investigate, monitor, and report on safeguards provided for SCs.

    Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950- Restricts SC status to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, excluding Muslims and Christians.

    Key Judicial Pronouncements

    T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)- Minority institutions have the right to autonomy in administration under Article 30, though subject to reasonable regulation.

    P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2005)- State cannot impose reservation policy on unaided minority institutions.

    Analysis

    The NCSC can recommend or monitor steps for reservation in institutions, but it cannot enforce such provisions in minority institutions, as-

    Article 30(1) guarantees minorities autonomy in managing their educational institutions.

    Judicial precedents protect minority institutions from mandatory reservation.

    NCSC’s powers are recommendatory, not binding.

    Furthermore, since Scheduled Castes of minority religions (Muslims and Christians) are not constitutionally recognized as SCs, NCSC has no jurisdiction over them.

    The matter instead falls under the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) or policy domain of the Parliament, not NCSC’s enforcement powers.

    Any change in this framework requires constitutional amendment and judicial validation to balance SC Rights with Articles 29-30 protections.

  • Under what circumstances can the Financial Emergency be proclaimed by the President of India? What consequences follow when such a declaration remains in force?

    The framers of the Indian Constitution, drawing from the experience of political and economic instability during colonial times, provided for Financial Emergency under Article 360.

    Circumstances for Proclamation

    The President may proclaim a Financial Emergency if he is satisfied that the financial stability or credit of India, or any part thereof, is threatened.

    Such a proclamation must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within 2 months (30 days if Lok Sabha is dissolved).

    Once approved, it remains in force until revoked by the President; no maximum time limit is prescribed.

    Consequences of Financial Emergency

    Union Control over State Finances – The Union can direct States to follow financial discipline and reduce expenditure.

    Reservation of Money Bills – All State Money Bills must be reserved for the President’s approval.

    Reduction of Salaries – The President may direct reduction in salaries and allowances of persons serving the Union or State, including judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.

    Executive Directions – Union may issue binding directions to States regarding financial propriety.

    Centralisation of Fiscal Powers – Parliament acquires a dominant role in fiscal management, subordinating State autonomy.

    Though never invoked in India, the provision of Financial Emergency underscores the precautionary design of the Constitution.