💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: Mains

  • The need for cooperation among various service sector has been an inherent component of development discourse. Partnership bridges bring the gap among the sectors. It also sets in motion a culture of ‘Collaboration’ and ‘team spirit’. In the light of statements above examine India’s Development process.

    The Indian Constitution envisions a Welfare State under the DPSP (Articles 36-51), mandating the State to ensure social, economic, and political justice through equitable development.

    Need for Cooperation Among Service Sectors

    Complex Interdependence – Development issues are multi-dimensional.

    Integrated Development Approach

    Inter-sectoral Coordination

    Efficiency and Resource Optimization

    Innovation and Knowledge Sharing

    Inclusive Governance and development through participation

    Accountability and Transparency

    India’s Development Process through Collaborative Partnerships

    Government-Private Sector Partnership (PPP) – Eg- Smart Cities Mission, Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission

    Inter-Governmental Collaboration – Eg- NITI Aayog’s Governing Council, PM Gati Shakti Master Plan

    Government-Civil Society Partnership – Eg- SEWA and PRADAN partner with government programmes for women’s empowerment and livelihoods.

    Public-Private-Community Partnerships (PPCP) – Eg- Swachh Bharat Mission combines government funding, corporate CSR, and community action.

    Technology and Data Collaborations – Eg- UPI integrate government, fintech, and private service sectors.

    Achievements

    Economic – Fastest growing Economy

    Infrastructure Efficiency through PPPs

    PPP projects worth under implementation (DEA, 2024).

    NH construction speed increased from 12 km/day (2014) to 37 km/day (2023).

    Financial Inclusion via Digital Collaboration

    UPI transactions exceeded ; serves 491 million individuals and 65 million merchants.

    JAM trinity enabled by eliminating subsidy leakages (BlueKraft, 2024).

    Water and Sanitation Progress through Multi-Stakeholder Models

    Jal Jeevan Mission: 15 crore households connected to tap water (2025).

    Swachh Bharat Mission: Rural open defecation reduced from 55% (2014) to near zero (2020).

    Decentralized Development through Cooperative Federalism

    15th Finance Commission devolved directly to PRIs and ULBs for local service delivery.

    Aspirational Districts Programme: 95% districts show improvement in health & education indicators (NITI Aayog, 2023).

    Self-Help Group (SHG) movement: 9.3 crore women linked to banks under DAY-NRLM, with credit linkage of (2024).

    Limitations

    Institutional Fragmentation – Overlapping jurisdictions and poor coordination between Centre, State, and local bodies. Eg- Delays in PM Awas Yojana (Urban)

    Capacity Deficit at Local Levels – lack of 3F’s

    Incomplete or outdated local datasets hinder data-driven decision-making.

    Weak Accountability – Eg- Inadequate social audit mechanisms

    Digital Divide – Eg- NFHS-5 (2021) showed only 43% of rural households have internet access, affecting e-governance uptake.

    Trust Deficit between Stakeholders – Eg- CSO perceived as anti-development or foreign influenced.

    Funding and Regulatory Constraints: Tightened FCRA norms and compliance burdens for NGOs.

    Way Forward for Collaborative Partnerships

    Adopt Best Practices

    Kerala’s People’s Plan Campaign

    Participatory Budgeting in porto alegre brazil

    Institutional Convergence and Coordination – Eg- Expand PM Gati Shakti model to social sectors like health and education.

    Capacity Building through Digital Governance – Eg- Kerala’s Information Kerala Mission digitized local governance workflows.

    Decentralized Governance based on principle of subsidiarity.

    Data Integration through NDAP, GIS platforms, and PRAGATI dashboards for evidence-based decisions.

    A coordinated, transparent, and participatory relations between various service sectors can truly make development inclusive, sustainable and rapid.

  • Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national lawmaker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.

    The Parliament of India is the temple of democracy and an MP would act as a national trustee. However, as per Former VP, Hamid Ansari, Parliament has turned into ‘chamber of anarchy’ due to declining role and productivity of members.

    Functions of MPs

    Legislative Function – Making, amending, and repealing laws.

    Deliberative Function – Debating national policies and public issues.

    Executive Oversight Function – Question Hour, motions, committees

    Financial Function – Approving the Budget, Demands for Grants, and financial bills.

    Representative Function – Voicing citizens’ concerns and constituency interests.

    Indicators of Decline in Individual Parliamentarian’s Role

    Legislative Function

    Marginalization of Private Members’ Bills – Only 14 passed since 1952.

    Lack of thorough scrutiny of bills- During the term of the 17th LS, 58% of the Bills introduced were passed within two weeks of their introduction. Eg- the J&K Reorganisation Bill, 2019

    Weak research and knowledge support – Inadequate access to legislative data and expert analysis undermines quality of debates.

    Deliberative Function

    Decline in sitting days – From 120+ days (1950s) to around 55 days in 17th LS, curtailing deliberation

    Declining attendance- In 2021, average attendance dropped to 71% in the Lok Sabha and 74% in the Rajya Sabha.

    Frequent disruptions and adjournments – During the 17th Lok Sabha, MPs were suspended on 206 instances, across both Houses of Parliament. In Winter Session 2023, 146 MPs were suspended for serious misconduct in the House.

    Party whip system – Strict control discourages independent viewpoints and policy reasoning.

    Financial Function

    Between 2019 and 2023, on average, about 80% of the budget has been voted on without discussion. In 2023, the entire budget was passed without discussion.

    Decline in budget scrutiny – Detailed examination of Demands for Grants often guillotined without debate.

    Weak engagement with financial committees – Falling participation in PAC, Estimates Committee, etc.

    Executive Oversight Function

    Question Hour functioned for 60% of scheduled time in LS and 52% in Rajya Sabha.

    Underutilized parliamentary committees – Low attendance and poor follow-up dilute scrutiny of executive performance.

    Resort to Money Bill route undermines RS. Eg- Aadhar Act

    Consequences of the Decline in Individual Parliamentarian’s Role

    Reduced Accountability – Rushing bills like the Women’s Reservation Bill, 2023 limits scrutiny and weakens executive oversight.

    Criminalization of politics – as per ADR data, 46% of MPs elected in 2024 have criminal cases pending.

    Poor Legislative Quality – Farm Laws (2020) passed with minimal debate led to backlash and repeal.

    Legislative Stagnation – Delay in passage of important bills due to disruption

    Judicial Intervention – Weak legislative performance prompts courts to step in (e.g., NGT, social justice rulings).

    Ordinance Culture – Fewer sittings have led to rising ordinances (11 in 2020), bypassing Parliament.

    Public Disillusionment – Citizens lose faith in Parliament’s deliberative and representative role.

    Democratic Imbalance – Executive consolidation weakens checks and balances, harming deliberative democracy.

    Diminishing role of opposition MPs – Reduced speaking time and political polarization undermine effective oversight.

    Way Forward-

    Increase Working Days- Eg- NCRWC (2002) recommended Parliament meet for at least 110 days a year; currently, it averages 60-70 days.

    Enhancing Parliamentary Decorum- Encourage a culture of respect, professionalism, and active participation in debates.

    Enhance Research Support for MPs- Eg- UK Parliament’s Research Service aids MPs in informed decision-making

    Engaging Responsible Opposition– allowing opposition to set agenda on lines of UK House of Commons

    Mandatory referral of Bills to Committee

    As former Vice President M. Venkaiah Naidu aptly stated, “Disorder, disruption, and delay should not replace debate, discussion, and decision, which form the edifice of parliamentary democracy.”

  • “The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India.” Discuss.

    The Attorney-General of India (Article 76), is the highest law officer of the Union Government. He plays a vital role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring constitutional governance.

    Constitutional Position and Functions

    As legal adviser

    Legal Adviser to the Government (Article 76(2)) on matters referred to him by the President.

    Advisory Role in Legislation – Consulted in drafting Bills, Presidential references (Art. 143), and interpreting constitutional provisions.

    Ex-Officio Role – Participates in Parliamentary proceedings (without voting rights) to clarify legal positions.

    Facilitator of Constitutional Mechanism – By advising the President and other governmental bodies, the AG ensures the constitutionality of laws and executive actions, thus maintaining the integrity of the Constitution.

    As Lawyer of GoI

    Representation in Courts on behalf of the Union. Eg- in the Triple Talaq and Rafale Deal cases.

    Right of Audience in all Indian courts, even without being a party.

    Defends Union Actions – Represents the government in public interest litigations, constitutional disputes, and international arbitration matters. Eg- M.C. Setalvad (1950-1963) – Defended the constitutionality of preventive detention laws under Article 22 in A.K. Gopalan case

    Limitations

    Unlike the U.S. Attorney General, who heads the Department of Justice and oversees federal law enforcement, the Indian AG has no administrative or prosecutorial powers.

    No Fixed Tenure – Holds office at the President’s pleasure.

    Conflict of Interest – Can practice privately, though not against the government.

    Lacks constitutional safeguards or autonomy like the CAG or EC.

    Uncertain Service Conditions – Remuneration and terms decided by the executive.

    Limited Accountability – Not answerable to Parliament for advice or actions.

    Way Forward

    UK – Shawcross Principle– Ensures the AG’s independence in prosecutorial decisions

    Provide a minimum fixed term to safeguard the AG’s independence from executive pressure.

    Require periodic reporting to Parliament on key legal opinions and government litigation.

    Code of Ethics to ensure the AG upholds constitutional morality and political neutrality.

    Strengthening this office’s autonomy, institutional capacity, and ethical standards is vital for preserving the rule of law.

  • “Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power.” In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power?

    Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution, but this power is not absolute. The SC, through the Basic Structure Doctrine, has clarified that while Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, it cannot alter or destroy its essential features.

    Limitations on the Amending Power of Parliament

    Procedure under Article 368 – Constitutional amendments must strictly follow special majority and, where applicable, state ratification (for federal provisions).

    Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973) – Parliament cannot alter, abrogate, or destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

    Minerva Mills, 1980 – The limited amending power itself is part of the Basic Structure.

    Balance Between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs – Parliament cannot give unlimited precedence to one over the other, preserving constitutional harmony.

    Separation of Powers – Parliament cannot encroach upon the independence of the judiciary or the executive-legislative balance. Eg- NJAC

    Federal Structure – Amendment cannot centralize power to the extent of destroying federalism or state autonomy. (S.R. Bommai Judgment)

    I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) – Even laws under the Ninth Schedule are open to judicial review if they violate Basic Structure.

    Thus, parliament cannot destroy or expand its amending power beyond constitutional limits. It is subject to Basic Structure

    Supremacy of the Constitution

    Republican and democratic form of government

    Secularism

    Federalism

    Judicial Review and Rule of Law

    Separation of Powers

    Limited amending power (Minerva Mills)

    Analysis

    The power of amendment under Article 368 is an instrument to ensure the Constitution’s continuity, and dynamic adaptation, not institutional annihilation. In a democracy governed by the Rule of Law, no organ can arrogate to itself absolute power, for that would negate the very idea of constitutionalism.

  • “The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self- government has had a limited impact on the patriarchal character of the Indian Political Process.” Comment.

    73rd and 74th CAA are the embodiment of grass-root democracy and democratic decentralization in India.

    Positive Impact on Women’s Political Participation

    Increased Representation- Over 14 lakh women representatives currently serve in local bodies (MoPR, 2024).

    Leadership Development- Eg- Sulata Deo started her career as Sarpanch and became MP from Odisha

    Enhanced Service Delivery- Women-led Panchayats prioritize water, sanitation, education, and health issues. Eg- Chhavi Rajawat (Rajasthan)

    Social Change Catalysts by challenging gender stereotypes in public decision-making.

    Women leaders have strengthened Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and livelihood initiatives, promoting inclusive development. Eg- Bina Devi (“Mushroom Mahila”)

    Persistent Patriarchal Barriers in Women’s Political Participation at the Local Level

    Political Barriers

    Proxy Representation- The “Sarpanch Pati” phenomenon – husbands or male relatives exercise real power.

    Political parties rarely nominate women beyond the mandated quota, restricting vertical mobility in politics.

    Tokenism- Representation often confined to fulfilling quotas rather than genuine empowerment or participation in governance.

    Institutional Barriers

    Institutional and Bureaucratic Dominance undermine elected women’s authority, especially in resource allocation and project execution.

    Limited Decision-Making Power- exclusion from key committees or budgetary discussions.

    Economic Barriers

    Economic Dependence on male family members limits independence in political and developmental decisions.

    Social barriers

    Women representatives face verbal abuse, threats, and social ostracism, especially when asserting authority.

    Cultural and Social Norms- restrict women’s mobility and participation in public life. Eg- purdah system.

    Lack of education and political training weakens women’s administrative confidence and negotiation skills.

    Intersectional Barriers- Women from SC/ST and minority communities face additional layer of discrimination.

    Way Forward

    Mandate political parties to allot a fixed percentage of tickets to women beyond local bodies to ensure vertical mobility in politics.

    Mentorship and role model initiatives led by successful women sarpanchs to inspire grassroots participation.

    Capacity Building– Establish State Institutes of Rural Development (SIRDs) as nodal agencies for PRI training.

    Manishankar Aiyar Committee recommendations.

    Create Panchayat Ombudsman for grievance redressal.

    Adopt activity mapping for clear delineation of 3Fs – Funds, Functions, Functionaries.

    “I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.” – Ambedkar

    True empowerment lies in transforming participation into power, ensuring women are policy-shapers, not placeholders.

    Elections

  • ‘Too little cash, too much politics, leaves UNESCO fighting for life.’ Discuss the statement in the light of US’ withdrawal and its accusation of the cultural body as being ‘anti-Israel bias’.

    UNESCO, established in 1945, promotes education, culture, heritage, and scientific cooperation as pillars of global peace.

    Context of US Withdrawal

    The United States withdrew from UNESCO in 2017, accusing it of anti-Israel bias.

    The trigger was UNESCO’s 2011 recognition of Palestine as a full member, and resolutions declaring East Jerusalem and Hebron as occupied Palestinian territories.

    The US described this as “politicization of culture”

    The US also objected to inefficient governance within the organization.

    It rejoined in 2023 but again withdrew in 2025 citing bias against Israel.

    Impact of the US Withdrawal

    Geopolitical Power Shift- Creates space for China’s greater influence within UNESCO.

    The US was UNESCO’s largest contributor (22% of its budget) – withdrawal caused program cuts.

    Cultural preservation, education, and global literacy programs suffered from lack of funds.

    Political polarization among members eroded UNESCO’s credibility and neutrality.

    Developing nations’ initiatives faced delays due to resource shortages.

    Highlights US unpredictability and undermines credibility of multilateral institutions

    Way Forward

    Depoliticize cultural resolutions and heritage conservation.

    Diversify funding sources to reduce reliance on a few donors.

    Strengthen transparency and consensus-based decision-making.

    Strengthen South-South and regional cooperation for promoting capacity-building in developing nations

    UNESCO’s revival requires inclusive governance and financial sustainability to rebuild global trust, credibility and address the ‘crisis of confidence’ in multilateralism.

  • On what grounds a people’s representative can be disqualified under the Representation of People Act, 1951? Also mention the remedies available to such person against his disqualification.

    The RPA, 1951 provides the statutory framework for conducting elections and maintaining the integrity of India’s democratic process.

    Grounds for Disqualification under RPA, 1951

    Disqualification on Conviction for Certain Offences – Section 8

    bribery, undue influence, promoting enmity (IPC 153A, 295A), or corruption.

    If the sentence is two years or more, the disqualification is immediate and lasts six years after release.

    Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013) – Section 8(4) was struck down, making disqualification automatic on conviction.

    Disqualification for Dismissal from Government Service – Section 9 – Disqualification for five years if dismissed for corruption or disloyalty to the State.

    Disqualification for Office of Profit – Section 10 – Holding an office of profit under the government (not exempted by law)

    Disqualification for Government Contracts – Section 9A

    Disqualification for Failure to Lodge Election Expenses – Section 10A

    Remedies Available Against Disqualification

    Judicial Appeal – If conviction is stayed, disqualification ceases to operate (Lok Prahari v. Union of India, 2018).

    Under Articles 103 & 192, President or Governor’s Decision acts on the advice of the Election Commission.

    Election Petition (Section 80, RPA, 1951) in the High Court within 45 days of result declaration.

    Analysis

    Thus, the disqualification provisions ensure the trinity of Ethics, Accountability and Fairness of electoral process.

  • Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation.

    Major ICT-Based Projects/Programmes in India

    Digital India: The umbrella programme for transforming India into a digitally empowered society.

    BharatNet: connected over 2.15 lakh Gram Panchayats with 42.36 lakh route km of optical fiber.

    e-NAM: A pan-India electronic trading portal for agricultural commodities.

    UMANG App: provide access to 1,500+ central and state government services.

    DigiLocker: cloud-based platform for issuance and verification of digital documents/certificates.

    e-Courts: Aimed at digitizing the Indian judiciary to reduce case pendency and improve access.

    U-WIN: Digital platforms for tracking universal immunization.

    ONDC: Open Network for Digital Commerce, democratizing e-commerce for MSME.

    Bhashini: AI-led language translation platform to overcome linguistic barriers.

    Major Issues in ICT Projects

    Digital Divide – Eg: Rural internet penetration 59.06% vs urban 131.45% (TRAI Q1 2025).

    Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities- Eg: cybercrime losses in 2024 – 206% rise (I4C, MHA 2025).

    Data Privacy Concerns – Weak enforcement of data protection exposes citizens to misuse risks.

    Poor Digital Literacy – Eg: Only 38% women have ever used internet (NFHS-5, MoHFW).

    Inadequate Infrastructure – Internet connectivity, electricity, devices remain insufficient in remote regions.

    Capacity Constraints – lower level government staff lack training in digital tools, data analytics, AI skills.

    Targeting and verification errors exclude genuine beneficiaries from welfare schemes. Eg: PM-Kisan validation errors stranded 2.18 crore families (Dvara Research).

    Departmental Silos – Ministries operate in isolation; lack integrated digital data ecosystems for governance.

    Faulty validation processes. Eg: Aadhaar-PDS biometric failures linked to Simdega starvation death, Jharkhand (NHRC).

    Linguistic Barriers – English-dominant interfaces exclude regional language users from accessing services.

    Measures for Effective Implementation

    Bridge Digital Divide – Saturate rural connectivity through BharatNet expansion and affordable smartphones distribution.

    Strengthen Cybersecurity Framework – Implement zero-trust architecture, ICT audits, dedicated CERT-In response teams.

    Strengthen DPDP Act 2023 – Enforce verifiable consent, data minimisation, breach reporting through Data Protection Board.

    Mass Digital Literacy Drive – Scale PMGDISHA and Mission Karmayogi to all citizens and government employees.

    Citizen Co-creation – Engage citizens through MyGov, hackathons, and pilot testing before scaling projects.

    Inter-Ministerial Convergence – Adopt PM Gati Shakti model integrating data across ministries on single GIS platform.

    Outcome-Based Monitoring – Real-time dashboards, third-party audits, beneficiary feedback for course correction.

    Public-Private Partnerships – Engage startups, fintechs, and academia for innovation and last-mile delivery.

    Adopt Global Best Practices – Estonia’s X-Road, Once-Only Principle for seamless inter-departmental data sharing.

    For Viksit Bharat 2047, robust ICT governance demands inclusion, security, capacity, and citizen-centric design.

  • ‘The time has come for India and Japan to build a strong contemporary relationship, one involving global and strategic partnership that will have a great significance for Asia and the world as a whole.’ Comment.

    Shinzo Abe in his book “Towards a beautiful nation” termed India as Japan’s natural ally as they have no conflict of strategic interest and share common goals to build a free and open Indo-Pacific.

    Reasons for strong India-Japan Relations

    Geopolitical – Cold war 2.0, G-2

    Geoeconomic – Weaponisation of supply chains by China, Trump’s Tariff Wars

    Defence and Security – China’s boiling frog strategy in Indo Pacific

    Connectivity – China’s debt trap diplomacy through BRI. Eg- Sri Lanka crisis

    Multilateralism – UNSC reforms (both are members of G-4)

    Building a Strong India-Japan Partnership for Stability in Asia

    Strengthen Strategic and Security Cooperation

    Institutionalize Indo-Pacific Defence Cooperation- Expand 2+2 ministerial dialogues, enhance joint military exercises (Malabar, JIMEX) and intelligence sharing.

    Maritime Security- Establish a Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) network in the Indian Ocean to ensure secure Sea Lanes of Communication (SLOCs).

    Regional Architecture- Coordinate policies within Quad, ASEAN, and East Asia Summit to promote regional security and crisis management.

    Deepen Economic and Connectivity Linkages

    Sustainable Infrastructure under the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor (AAGC) as a transparent alternative to China’s BRI.

    Develop joint critical mineral and semiconductor supply chains under the Japan-India Industrial Competitiveness Partnership (IJICP).

    Energy and Technological Cooperation – Partner in hydrogen energy, solar manufacturing, and battery storage technologies to drive Asia’s clean transition.

    Soft Power and People-to-People Ties – Encourage joint humanitarian and disaster relief operations (HADR) to reinforce India-Japan goodwill across Asia.

    Building a Strong India-Japan Partnership for Stability in the World

    Promote a Rules-Based Global Order

    UN Reforms- Work jointly for UN Security Council reform

    Global Governance- Align efforts in WTO, IMF, and World Bank to make global institutions more representative and equitable.

    Global Economic Leadership

    Promote rule based economic order to counter weaponisation by trade by US and China

    Technology and Trade Norms- Co-develop standards in AI ethics, data protection, and digital economy governance.

    Climate Action- Jointly lead green finance mechanisms and global partnerships on carbon neutrality, leveraging Japan’s technology and India’s markets.

    Collaboration in Global Commons

    Maritime Freedom- Cooperate to safeguard open seas in the Western Pacific and Africa’s eastern coast.

    Space and Cyber Cooperation- Develop joint frameworks for space situational awareness and cybersecurity, ensuring safe use of global commons.

    As Prof. C. Raja Mohan notes, India and Japan can be “anchor democracies in the Indo-Pacific”, balancing China’s rise

  • There is a growing divergence in the relationship between poverty and hunger in India. The shrinking of social expenditure by the government is forcing the poor to spend more on Non- Food essential items squeezing their food – budget.- Elucidate.

    While extreme poverty fell to 2.35% (World Bank, 2024), undernourishment (12%) and child wasting (18.7%) persist (SOFI 2025).

    Growing Divergence between Poverty and Hunger

    Decline in Monetary Poverty: About 24.82 crore individuals escaped multidimensional poverty in the last 9 years. (NITI Aayog)

    Persistence of Hunger and Malnutrition:

    Despite surplus food production, India’s GHI score (25.8) remains in the “serious” category.

    Indicators such as stunting (32.9%), wasting (18.7%), and anemia (57% women) reveal continued deprivation.

    Shift from Absolute Hunger to Hidden Hunger: 57% of women and 67% of children are anemic

    Shrinking of Social Expenditure by the Government

    Education expenditure: ~2.9% of GDP (NEP recommendation 2020).

    Decline in allocation for MGNREGA

    Impact on Poor Households:

    Health: Out-of-pocket health spending forms 40% of total health expenditure (NHA 2023).

    Indian Middle class is 1 Hospital Bill Away from poverty

    Education: Rising private tuition and school costs strain household budgets.

    Learning poverty – Over 70% of Class 3 students cannot read age-appropriate texts (ASER 2025)

    Utilities and fuel: Increasing electricity, rent, and LPG costs raise non-food spending.

    Proliferation of slums – 17% urban population living in slums

    Way Forward

    Social Determinants Approach: Integration of hunger and poverty with nutrition, sanitation (Swachh Bharat), and clean energy (Ujjwala Yojana).

    Nutrition-Sensitive Policies: Diversify PDS with millets, pulses, fortified foods, and region-specific nutrition interventions.

    Adopt data-driven local interventions under Aspirational Districts Programme to target high-burden regions.

    Adopt Brazil’s Bolsa Família conditional cash transfer scheme

    Scale State level best practices like TN’s inclusion of Eggs in MDM

    This can help achieve SDG 1, 2 and realise Atmanirbhar Bharat.