💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship (Dec Batch) + Access To XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Health Sector – UHC, National Health Policy, Family Planning, Health Insurance, etc.

Care as disability justice, dignity in mental health

Introduction

Mental health systems globally and in India continue to prioritise biomedical treatment and functional integration. They often overlook lived experiences of distress, social exclusion, and structural vulnerability. There is a need for a fundamental shift: from care as a technical service to care as disability justice, grounded in dignity, equity, and relational accountability.

Reframing Mental Health Care Beyond Treatment

  1. Dignity-Centred Care: Positions dignity, rather than cure or productivity, as the primary objective of mental health systems.
  2. Disability Justice Lens: Recognises mental illness as shaped by intersecting social, economic, and political structures.
  3. Relational Accountability: Frames care as embedded in relationships, not limited to institutional or clinical settings.

Limits of Dominant Psychosocial Disability Models

  1. Productivity Bias: Prioritises economic functionality and independence as markers of recovery.
  2. Reductionist Integration: Treats community inclusion as an end-state without addressing exclusionary social norms.
  3. Invisible Chronic Distress: Marginalises individuals whose suffering does not conform to biomedical recovery trajectories.

Structural Determinants of Mental Distress

  1. Material Deprivation: Highlights housing insecurity, income precarity, and food scarcity as persistent stressors.
  2. Social Abandonment: Identifies shame, rejection, and relational breakdown as under-recognised drivers of distress.
  3. Political and Cultural Loss: Notes erosion of cultural meaning, safety nets, and social identity as contributory factors.

Multiplicity of Explanations for Mental Illness

  1. Biological Factors: Includes neurotransmitter alterations and inflammatory markers.
  2. Psychological Factors: Covers trauma, grief, and interpersonal loss.
  3. Socio-Structural Factors: Integrates caste, gender, class, and institutional neglect into causation analysis.
  4. Intersectionality: Emphasises overlapping vulnerabilities rather than single-cause explanations.

Care as Relational and Material Practice

  1. Everyday Care Practices: Includes shelter, nutrition, social connection, and safety as therapeutic.
  2. Non-Linear Recovery: Rejects uniform timelines and outcome metrics.
  3. Shared Responsibility: Frames care as a collective moral obligation rather than individual compliance.

Justice-Oriented Mental Health Engagement

  1. Recognition of Harm: Acknowledges that distress often arises from unjust social arrangements.
  2. Ethical Accountability: Asks what society owes to those it has marginalised.
  3. Transformative Focus: Shifts emphasis from symptom management to social repair.

Implications for Education, Research, and Practice

  1. Curricular Reorientation: Calls for training that values lived experience and contextual care.
  2. Practice Diversity: Recognises non-specialist and community-based care providers.
  3. Interdisciplinary Learning: Supports integration of social theory, ethics, and practice.
  4. Systemic Support: Emphasises that professional competence requires institutional backing, not credentials alone.

Conclusion

Mental health care must be reimagined as an ethical, relational, and justice-oriented practice rather than a narrowly clinical intervention. By centering dignity and disability justice, the article calls for a paradigm shift that recognises suffering as socially produced and care as a shared societal responsibility.

Mental Health in India

  1. About 10.6% of Indian adults, roughly 11 out of every 100 adults, were living with a diagnosable mental health disorder, according to a 2015-16 National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS).
  2. The survey also revealed:
    1. 15% of India’s adult population experiences mental health issues requiring intervention
    2. The lifetime prevalence of mental disorders was 13.7%, indicating that around 14 out of every 100 people in India have experienced a mental disorder at some point in their lives
    3. Mental health disorders are more prevalent in urban areas (13.5%), compared to rural areas (6.9%).

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2024] In a crucial domain like the public healthcare system, the Indian State should play a vital role to contain the adverse impact of marketisation of the system. Suggest measures through which the State can enhance the reach of public healthcare at the grassroots level.

Linkage: The article directly links to GS-II (Social Justice, Health) by highlighting the limitations of market-centric and outcome-driven public healthcare in addressing mental health and disability. It also enriches GS-IV by framing mental health care as an ethical obligation grounded in dignity, compassion, and justice rather than mere service delivery.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.