💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Economics

  • Finance Commission

    • The report of the Fifteenth Finance Commission, along with an Action Taken Report, was tabled in Parliament.
    • The Commission, headed by N K Singh, had submitted its Report to the President in December 2019.
    • The government had accepted the recommendations of the Commission “in substantial measure a/c to FM.

    The Finance Commission and its purpose

    • Article 280 of the Constitution requires that a Finance Commission be constituted to recommend the distribution of the net proceeds of taxes between the Centre and states, and among the states.
    • Much has changed since the First Commission was set up in November 1951 under the Chairmanship of K C Neogy, a former member of the Constituent Assembly and diwan of a princely state.
    • The President has appointed 14 more Commissions since then.

    Why need Finance Commission?

    • The framers of the Constitution were seeking to address the vertical imbalance between the taxation powers and expenditure and responsibilities of the federal government and the states, and the horizontal imbalance, or inequality, between states that were at different stages of development.
    • Ensuring inclusiveness is, therefore, a key mandate of the Finance Commission.
    • That means assigning weights to things like population, the fiscal distance between the top ranked states and the others, etc.
    • It is not that the best-performing state will be allocated the highest share — even if delivery execution and governance are better — rather, the effort will be to narrow the development gap between states.

    Constitution of the Finance Commission

    • The Finance Commission Rules, 1951, lay down the criteria for being members of the constitutional body.
    • Members:
    1. those having special knowledge of finance and accounts of government with wide knowledge and experience in financial matters and in administration,
    2. or with special knowledge of economics, and
    3. those who have been qualified to be appointed as a judge of a High Court

    Notable members

    • In the years following the reforms of the 1990s, Commissions have been headed by reputed economists and administrators — from A M Khusro, who headed the Eleventh Finance Commission, to Chakravarthi Rangarajan, Vijay Kelkar, and Y V Reddy, who were Chairmen of subsequent Commissions.
    • Senior politicians like K Brahmananda Reddy, Y B Chavan and N K P Salve had helmed earlier Commissions.
    • Before N K Singh, an economist and career administrator who subsequently joined politics, the last politician in this role was K C Pant, who then went on to be Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission.

    Changing role of the Finance Commission

    • What has changed dramatically since the 1950s, when the First Commission presented its recommendations on the transfer of resources between the Centre and the states, is the scale of distribution of tax proceeds.
    • From 10% of the total tax receipts of the Centre in 1950, it rose to a record 42% after the recommendations of the Fourteenth FC headed by Y V Reddy — a share that made previous awards look conservative, and sat well with the spirit of cooperative federalism.
    • The Fifteenth FC has recommended that this allocation be reduced by a percentage point to 41% in order to meet the security and special needs of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.
    • The other significant change has been in the equation between the central and state governments as a result of the recommendations of the Twelfth FC which reshaped lending by the federal government to states.
    • The Fourteenth Commission recommended the creation of a Fiscal Council; the Thirteenth had set out detailed measures on implementing GST with a grand bargain for states.
  • [pib] Draft National Logistics Policy

    The Union Minister of Commerce and Industry reviewed the draft National Logistics Policy and the proposed action plan for implementation of the policy prepared by the Department of Logistics, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

    The key feature of the draft policy

    • The draft National Logistics Policy has been prepared in consultation with the Ministries of Railways, Road Transport and Highways, Shipping and Civil Aviation.
    • Forty-six Partnering Government Agencies (PGAs)
    • Inputs were analysed in detail for consideration in the Policy.
    • Vision and Objectives for Logistics in India: To drive economic growth and trade competitiveness of the country through a truly integrated, seamless, efficient, reliable and cost-effective logistics network, leveraging best in class technology, processes and skilled manpower.
    • Key objectives of the national logistics policy:  Given the pivotal role of the logistics sector in the development of the economy and the need to incorporate learnings from global best practices, the policy outlines an ambitious set of objectives.

    The following are some of the key objectives for logistics in India, to be achieved in the next five years:

    1. Creating a single point of reference for all logistics and trade facilitation matters in the country which will also function as a knowledge and information sharing platform

    2. Driving logistics cost as a % of GDP down from estimated current levels of 13-14% to 10% in line with best-in-class global standards and incentivize the sector to become more efficient by promoting integrated development of logistics

    Objectives of the Logistics Policy

    • Creating a National Logistics e-marketplace as a one-stop marketplace. It will involve simplification of documentation for exports/imports and drive transparency through digitization of processes involving Customs, PGAs etc in regulatory, certification and compliance services
    • Creating a data and analytics centre to drive transparency and continuous monitoring of key logistics metrics
    • Encouraging industry, academia and government to come together to create a logistics Center of Excellence, and drive innovation in the logistics sector
    • Creating and managing on an ongoing basis, an Integrated National Logistics Action Plan which will serve as a master plan for all logistics-related development.
    • Providing an impetus to trade and hence economic growth by driving competitiveness in exports
    • Doubling employment in the logistics sector by generating additional 10-15 million jobs and focus on enhancing skills in the sector and encouraging gender diversity
    • Improve India’s ranking in the Logistics Performance Index to between 25 to 30
    • Strengthening the warehousing sector in India by improving the quality of storage infrastructure including specialized warehouses across the country
    • Reducing losses due to agri-wastage to less than 5% through effective agri-logistics
    • Providing impetus to the MSME sector in the country through a cost-effective logistics network
    • Promoting cross-regional trade on e-commerce platforms by enabling a seamless flow of goods
    • Encouraging the adoption of green logistics in the country

    Policy thrust areas

    This policy defines the key thrust areas for logistics in India, which will be the focus of the relevant ministries as well as act as guidance to the state governments. The prioritized focus areas for logistics are detailed below:

    • Focusing on critical projects to drive an optimal modal mix and to enable first mile and last-mile connectivity
    • Driving the development of Multi-Modal Logistics Parks (MMLPs)
    • Driving interventions to reduce logistics cost and promote logistics efficiency for movement of key commodities
    • Creating a single-window Logistics e-marketplace
    • Setting up a Logistics Data and Analytics Center
    • Creating a Center of Trade facilitation and Logistics excellence (CTFL) and leveraging the expertise of multilateral agencies
    • Creating an Integrated National Logistics Action Plan and align with respective state development plans
    • Support strengthening of the warehousing sector
    • Enhancing transport and rolling stock infrastructure
    • Streamlining EXIM processes to promote trade competitiveness
    • Reducing dwell time for interstate cargo movement by road
    • Promoting standardization in the logistics sector
    • Ensuring seamless movement of goods at Land Customs Stations (LCS) and Integrated Check Points (ICP)
    • Generating employment, enhancing skilling and encouraging gender diversity in the logistics sector
    • Setting up a Startup acceleration fund

    Funding for logistics initiatives

    A non-lapsable Logistics fund will be created, to drive progress against the key thrust areas. The Logistics fund can be deployed for the following

    • Providing viability gap funding for select MMLP projects, first and last-mile projects and projects for poorly-serviced remote areas.
    • Incentivizing select logistics skilling programs and training institutes
    • Setting up a start-up acceleration fund to incentivize the development of new technology in logistics particularly the farm to plate space
    • Creating the Center for Trade Facilitation and Logistics Excellence (CTFL)  Setting up a big data-enabled logistics data hub and analytics centre
    • Creating a single-window logistics e-marketplace

    Institutional Framework & Governance for Logistics

    For this purpose, four committees/councils will be constituted:

    • National Council for Logistics, chaired by the Prime Minister
    • Apex inter-ministerial Committee, chaired by the Minister of Commerce and Industry
    • India Logistics Forum chaired by the Commerce Secretary with representation from key industry/business stakeholders and academia.
    • Empowered task force on logistics will be created, as a standing committee chaired by the head of the Logistics Wing.

     

  • Key Highlights of Economic Survey 2019-20

     

    The Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Economic Survey 2019-20 in the Parliament today. The Key Highlights of the Survey are as follows:

    Wealth Creation: The Invisible Hand Supported by the Hand of Trust

    [Covered in a separate newscard]

    Survey posits that India’s aspiration to become a $5 trillion economy depends critically on:

    1. Strengthening the invisible hand of the market.
    2. Supporting it with the hand of trust.

    Pro-business versus Pro-markets Strategy

    • Survey says that India’s aspiration of becoming a $5 trillion economy depends critically on:
    1. Promoting ‘pro-business’ policy that unleashes the power of competitive markets to generate wealth.
    2. Weaning away from ‘pro-crony’ policy that may favour specific private interests, especially powerful incumbents.
    • Pro-crony policies such as discretionary allocation of natural resources till 2011 led to rent-seeking by beneficiaries while competitive allocation of the same post 2014 ended such rent extraction.

    Strengthening the invisible hand by promoting pro-business policies to:

    1. Provide equal opportunities for new entrants.
    2. Enable fair competition and ease doing business.
    3. Eliminate policies unnecessarily undermining markets through government intervention.
    4. Enable trade for job creation.
    5. Efficiently scale up the banking sector.
    • Introducing the idea of trust as a public good, which gets enhanced with greater use.
    • Survey suggests that policies must empower transparency and effective enforcement using data and technology.

    Entrepreneurship at the Grassroots

    • Entrepreneurship as a strategy to fuel productivity growth and wealth creation.
    • India ranks third in number of new firms created, as per the World Bank.
    • New firm creation in India increased dramatically since 2014:
    1. 2 % cumulative annual growth rate of new firms in the formal sector during 2014-18, compared to 3.8 % during 2006-2014.
    2. About 1.24 lakh new firms created in 2018, an increase of about 80 % from about 70,000 in 2014.
    • Survey examines the content and drivers of entrepreneurial activity at the bottom of the administrative pyramid – over 500 districts in India.
    • New firm creation in services is significantly higher than that in manufacturing, infrastructure or agriculture.
    • Survey notes that grassroots entrepreneurship is not just driven by necessity.
    • A 10 percent increase in registration of new firms in a district yields a 1.8 % increase in Gross Domestic District Product (GDDP).

    Impact of education on entrepreneurship

    • Literacy and education in a district foster local entrepreneurship significantly:
    1. Impact is most pronounced when literacy is above 70 per cent.
    2. New firm formation is the lowest in eastern India with lowest literacy rate (59.6 % as per 2011 Census).
    • Physical infrastructure quality in the district influences new firm creation significantly.
    • Ease of Doing Business and flexible labour regulation enable new firm creation, especially in the manufacturing sector.
    • Survey suggests enhancing ease of doing business and implementing flexible labour laws can create maximum jobs in districts and thereby in the states.

    Divestment in public sector undertakings

    • The Survey has aggressively pitched for divestment in PSUs by proposing a separate corporate entity wherein the government’s stake can be transferred and divested over a period of time.
    • The survey analysed the data of 11 PSUs that had been divested from 1999-2000 and 2003-04 and compared the data with their peers in the same industry.
    • Further, the survey has said privatized entities have performed better than their peers in terms of net worth, profit, return on equity and sales, among others.
    • The government can transfer its stake in listed CPSEs to a separate corporate entity.
    • This entity would be managed by an independent board and would be mandated to divest the government stake in these CPSEs over a period of time.
    • This will lend professionalism and autonomy to the disinvestment programme which, in turn, would improve the economic performance of the CPSEs.

    Golden jubilee of bank nationalization: Taking stock

    • The survey observes 2019 as the golden jubilee year of bank nationalization
    • Accomplishments of lakhs of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) employees cherished and an objective assessment of PSBs suggested by the Survey.
    • Since 1969, India’s Banking sector has not developed proportionately to the growth in the size of the economy.
    • India has only one bank in the global top 100 – same as countries that are a fraction of its size: Finland (about 1/11th), Denmark (1/8th), etc.
    • A large economy needs an efficient banking sector to support its growth.

    The onus of supporting the economy falls on the PSBs accounting for 70 % of the market share in Indian banking:

    1. PSBs are inefficient compared to their peer groups on every performance parameter.
    2. In 2019, investment for every rupee in PSBs, on average, led to the loss of 23 paise, while in NPBs it led to the gain of 9.6 paise.
    3. Credit growth in PSBs has been much lower than NPBs for the last several years.

    Solutions to make PSBs more efficient:

    • Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for PSBs’ employees
    • Representation on boards proportionate to the blocks held by employees to incentivize employees and align their interests with that of all shareholders of banks.
    • Creation of a GSTN type entity that will aggregate data from all PSBs and use technologies like big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning in credit decisions for ensuring better screening and monitoring of borrowers, especially the large ones.

    Doubts regarding GDP Growth

    • GDP growth is a critical variable for decision-making by investors and policymakers. Therefore, the recent debate about accuracy of India’s GDP estimation following the revised estimation methodology in 2011 is extremely significant.
    • As countries differ in several observed and unobserved ways, cross-country comparisons have to be undertaken by separating the effect of other confounding factors and isolating effect of methodology revision alone on GDP growth estimates.
    • Models that incorrectly over-estimate GDP growth by 2.7 % for India post-2011 also misestimate GDP growth over the same period for 51 out of 95 countries in the sample.

    Fiscal Developments

    • Revenue Receipts registered a higher growth during the first eight months of 2019-20, compared to the same period last year, led by considerable growth in Non-Tax revenue.
    • Gross GST monthly collections have crossed the mark of Rs. 1 lakh crore for a total of five times during 2019-20 (up to December 2019).
    • Structural reforms undertaken in taxation during the current financial year:
    • Change in corporate tax rate.
    • Measures to ease the implementation of GST.
    • Fiscal deficit of states within the targets set out by the FRBM Act.
    • Survey notes that the General Government (Centre plus States) has been on the path of fiscal consolidation.

    External Sector

    Balance of Payments (BoP):

    • India’s BoP position improved from US$ 412.9 bn of forex reserves in end March, 2019 to US$ 433.7 bn in end September, 2019.
    • Current account deficit (CAD) narrowed from 2.1% in 2018-19 to 1.5% of GDP in H1 of 2019-20.
    • Foreign reserves stood at US$ 461.2 bn as on 10th January, 2020.

    Global trade:

    • India’s merchandise trade balance improved from 2009-14 to 2014-19, although most of the improvement in the latter period was due to more than 50% decline in crude prices in 2016-17.
    • India’s top five trading partners continue to be USA, China, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Hong Kong.

    Exports:

    • Top export items: Petroleum products, precious stones, drug formulations & biologicals, gold and other precious metals.
    • Largest export destinations in 2019-20 (April-November): United States of America (USA), followed by United Arab Emirates (UAE), China and Hong Kong.
    • The merchandise exports to GDP ratio declined, entailing a negative impact on BoP position.
    • Slowdown of world output had an impact on reducing the export to GDP ratio, particularly from 2018-19 to H1 of 2019-20.
    • Growth in Non-POL exports dropped significantly from 2009-14 to 2014-19.

    Imports:

    •  Top import items: Crude petroleum, gold, petroleum products, coal, coke & briquittes.
    •  India’s imports continue to be largest from China, followed by USA, UAE and Saudi Arabia.
    •  Merchandise imports to GDP ratio declined for India, entailing a net positive impact on BoP.
    • Large Crude oil imports in the import basket correlates India’s total imports with crude prices. As crude price raises so does the share of crude in total imports, increasing imports to GDP ratio.

    Logistics industry of India:

    • Currently estimated to be around US$ 160 billion.
    • Expected to touch US$ 215 billion by 2020.
    • According to World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index, India ranks 44th in 2018 globally, up from 54th rank in 2014.

    Direct investments and remittances:

    • Net FDI inflows continued to be buoyant in 2019-20 attracting US$ 24.4 bn in the first eight months, higher than the corresponding period of 2018-19.
    • Net FPI in the first eight months of 2019-20 stood at US$ 12.6 bn.
    • Net remittances from Indians employed overseas continued to increase, receiving US$ 38.4 billion in H1 of 2019-20 which is more than 50% of the previous year level.

    External debt:

    • Remains low at 20.1% of GDP as at end September, 2019.
    • After significant decline since 2014-15, India’s external liabilities (debt and equity) to GDP increased at the end of June, 2019 primarily by increase in FDI, portfolio flows and external commercial borrowings (ECBs).

    Monetary Management and Financial Intermediation

    Monetary policy:

    • Remained accommodative in 2019-20.
    • Repo rate was cut by 110 basis points in four consecutive MPC meetings in the financial year due to slower growth and lower inflation.
    • However, it was kept unchanged in the fifth meeting held in December 2019.
    • In 2019-20, liquidity conditions were tight for initial two months; but subsequently it remained comfortable.

    Prices and Inflation

    Inflation Trends:

    • Inflation witnessing moderation since 2014
    • Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation increased from 3.7 per cent in 2018-19 (April to December, 2018) to 4.1 per cent in 2019-20 (April to December, 2019).
    • WPI inflation fell from 4.7 per cent in 2018-19 (April to December, 2018) to 1.5 per cent during 2019-20 (April to December, 2019).

    Drivers of CPI – Combined (C) inflation:

    • During 2018-19, the major driver was the miscellaneous group
    • During 2019-20 (April-December), food and beverages was the main contributor.
    • Among food and beverages, inflation in vegetables and pulses was particularly high due to low base effect and production side disruptions like untimely rain.

    Cob-web Phenomenon (Cyclical fluctuations in inflation) for Pulses:

    • Farmers base their sowing decisions on prices witnessed in the previous marketing period.
    • Measures to safeguard farmers like procurement under Price Stabilization Fund (PSF), Minimum Support Price (MSP) need to be made more effective.

    Volatility of Prices:

    • Volatility of prices for most of the essential food commodities with the exception of some of the pulses has actually come down in the period 2014-19 as compared to the period 2009-14.
    • Lower volatility might indicate the presence of better marketing channels, storage facilities and effective MSP system.

    Essential Commodities Act is outdated

    • The Centre’s imposition of stock limits in a bid to control the soaring prices of onions over the last few months actually increased price volatility, according to the ES.
    • The finding came in a hard-hitting attack in the report against the Essential Commodities Act (ECA) and other “anachronistic legislations” and interventionist government policies, including drug price control, grain procurement and farm loan waivers.
    • The Centre invoked the Act’s provisions to impose stock limits on onions after heavy rains wiped out a quarter of the kharif crop and led to a sustained spike in prices.
    • However the Survey showed that there was actually an increase in price volatility and a widening wedge between wholesale and retail prices.
    • The lower stock limits must have led the traders and wholesalers to offload most of the kharif crop in October itself which led to a sharp increase in the price volatility.

    Agriculture

    • Agricultural productivity is also constrained by lower level of mechanization in agriculture which is about 40 % in India, much lower than China (59.5 %) and Brazil (75 %).
    • With regard to the agri sector, the Survey argued that the beneficiaries of farm loan waivers consume less, save less, invest less and are less productive.
    • It added that the government procurement of foodgrains led to a burgeoning food subsidy burden and inefficiencies in the markets, arguing for a shift to cash transfers instead.

    Food Management

    • The share of agriculture and allied sectors in the total Gross Value Added (GVA) of the country has been continuously declining on account of relatively higher growth performance of non-agricultural sectors.
    • GVA at Basic Prices for 2019-20 from ‘Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing’ sector is estimated to grow by 2.8 %.

    Services Sector

    Increasing significance of services sector in the Indian economy:

    1. About 55 % of the total size of the economy and GVA growth.
    2.  Two-thirds of total FDI inflows into India.
    3. About 38 per cent of total exports.
    4. More than 50 % of GVA in 15 out of the 33 states and UTs.

    Social Infrastructure, Employment and Human Development

    • The expenditure on social services (health, education and others) by the Centre and States as a proportion of GDP increased from 6.2 % in 2014-15 to 7.7 % in 2019-20 (BE).
    • India’s ranking in Human Development Index improved to 129 in 2018 from 130 in 2017:
    • With 1.34 % average annual HDI growth, India is among the fastest improving countries
    • Gross Enrolment Ratio at secondary, higher secondary and higher education level needs to be improved.
    • Gender disparity in India’s labour market widened due to decline in female labour force participation especially in rural areas:
    • Around 60 % of productive age (15-59) group engaged in full time domestic duties.

    Sustainable Development and Climate Change

    • India moving forward on the path of SDG implementation through well-designed initiatives
    • SDG India Index:
    1. Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Chandigarh are front runners.
    2. Assam, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh come under the category of Aspirants.
    • India hosted COP-14 to UNCCD which adopted the Delhi Declaration: Investing in Land and Unlocking Opportunities.
    • COP-25 of UNFCCC at Mandrid:
    1. India reiterated its commitment to implement Paris Agreement.
    2. COP-25 decisions include efforts for climate change mitigation, adaptation and means of implementation from developed country parties to developing country parties.
    • Forest and tree cover:
    1. Increasing and has reached 80.73 million hectare.
    2. 56 % of the geographical area of the country.
    • The numbers of stubble-burning incidents in 2019 were the least in four years, the Economic Survey says.
  • Thalinomics: the Economics of a plate of food in India

     

    • The Economic Survey 2019-20 states that affordability of vegetarian Thalis improved 29 per cent from 2006-07 to 2019-20 while that for non-vegetarian Thalis by 18 per cent.
    • Affordability of Thalis vis-à-vis a day’s pay of a worker has improved over time, indicating improved welfare of the common person.
    • The Survey says that food is not just an end in itself but also an essential ingredient in the growth human capital and therefore important for national wealth creation.

    The term ‘Thalinomics’

    • The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of “Thalinomics: the Economics of a plate of food in India” – an attempt to quantify what a common person pays for a Thali across India.
    • Price data from the Consumer Price Index for industrial workers for around 80 centers in 25 States and UTs from April 2006 to October 2019 has been used for the study.
    • Using the dietary guidelines for Indians, the price of Thalis is constructed.
    • The Survey states that across India and also the 4 regions- North, South, East and West- it is found that the absolute prices of a vegetarian Thali have decreased significantly since 2015-16 though the price has increased in 2019.
    • This is owing to the sharp downward trend in the prices of vegetables and dal in contrast to the previous trend of increasing prices.
    • As a result, an average household of 5 individuals that eats two vegetarian Thalis a day, gained around Rupees 10887, on average per year, while a non-vegetarian household gained Rupees 11787, on average per year.

    Shift in Thali dynamics

    • The Survey states that 2015-16 can be considered as a year when there was a shift in the dynamics of Thali prices.
    • Many reform measures were introduced since 2014-15 to enhance the productivity of the agricultural sector as well as efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural markets for better and more transparent price discovery.
  • Strategy for boosting Wealth Creation

    • The big idea from the Economic Survey 2019-20 is the need to push towards increasing the number of wealth creators in the Indian economy.
    • The Survey states that to achieve the goal of becoming a $5-trillion economy, the invisible hand of markets will need the support of “the hand of trust”.

    Wealth Creation

    • Essentially, this means that regulation and rules in the economy should be such that they make it easy to do business but not turn into crony capitalism.
    • The Survey states: “The invisible hand needs to be strengthened by promoting pro-business policies to:
    1. Provide equal opportunities for new entrants, enable fair competition and ease doing business,
    2. Eliminate policies that unnecessarily undermine markets through government intervention,
    3. Enable trade for job creation, and
    4. Efficiently scale up the banking sector to be proportionate to the size of the Indian economy.”

    How can this be done?

    • The Survey introduces the idea of “trust as a public good that gets enhanced with greater use”.
    • In other words, it states that policies must empower transparency and effective enforcement using data and technology to enhance this public good.
    • A key element here is the need to increase the opportunities for new entrants.
    • “Equal opportunity for new entrants is important because… a 10 per cent increase in new firms in a district yields a 1.8 per cent increase in Gross Domestic District Product (GDDP)”.
    • According to the Survey, the right policy mix can boost job creation.

    Levers for furthering Wealth Creation

    The Survey identifies several levers for furthering Wealth Creation, which are:

    • entrepreneurship at the grassroots as reflected in new firm creation in India’s districts;
    • promote ‘pro-business’ policies that unleash the power of competitive markets to generate wealth as against ‘pro-crony’ policies that may favour incumbent private interests;
    • eliminate policies that undermine markets through government intervention, even where it is not necessary;
    • integrate ‘Assemble in India’ into ‘Make in India’ to focus on labour intensive exports and thereby create jobs at a large scale;
    • efficiently scale up the banking sector to be proportionate to the size of the Indian economy and track the health of the shadow banking sector;
    • use privatization to foster efficiency. The Survey provides careful evidence that India’s GDP growth estimates can be trusted.

    Is this push for wealth creators new?

    • This is an extension of what PM said during his Independence Day speech in August last year, where he stressed on the need for the country to view “wealth creators” differently.
    • Those who create wealth for the country, those who contribute in the country’s wealth creation — they all are serving the nation as well.
    • We should not look at wealth creators with apprehension and doubt their intentions; we should not look down upon them.
    • The PM had also said there was a need in the country to give such wealth creators due respect and credit.
    • He had said that this change is required because “If no wealth is created, no wealth can be distributed”.

    Focus on Ethical Wealth Creation

    • The Survey emphasised on the importance of ‘Ethical Wealth Creation’, as the key to making India $5 trillion economy by 2025.
    • Krishnamurthy V. Subramanian, the Chief Economic Adviser of Ministry of Finance has done a commendable job in producing a thought-provoking masterpiece on ‘ethical wealth creation.
  • Integrating “Assemble in India” into Make in India

    Giving a new dimension to ‘Make in India’, the Economic Survey 2019-20 suggested that the government should integrate ‘Assemble in India for the world’ into ‘Make in India’ to boost exports and generate jobs.

    Assemble in India

    • Survey says India has unprecedented opportunity to chart a China-like, labour-intensive, export trajectory.
    1. By integrating “Assemble in India for the world” into Make in India, India can:
    2. Raise its export market share to about 3.5 % by 2025 and 6 % by 2030.
    3. Create 4 crore well-paid jobs by 2025 and 8 crore by 2030.
    • Exports of network products can provide one-quarter of the increase in value added required for making India a $5 trillion economy by 2025.

    How to harness the situation?

    • The US-China trade war is causing major adjustments in global value chains and firms are scouring alternative locations for operations.
    • Even before the trade war began, China’s image as a low-cost location for final assembly of industrial products was rapidly changing due to labour shortages and increases in wages.
    • These developments present India an unprecedented opportunity to chart a similar export trajectory as that pursued by China and create unparalleled job opportunities for its youth.
    • As no other country can match China in the abundance of its labour, we must grab the space getting vacated in labour-intensive sectors.

    Key suggestions made by the Survey

    Survey suggests a strategy similar to one used by China to grab this opportunity by:

    1. Specialization at large scale in labour-intensive sectors, especially network products.
    2. Laser-like focus on enabling assembling operations at mammoth scale in network products.
    3. Export primarily to markets in rich countries.
    4. Trade policy must be an enabler.
  • Yellow Rust

     

    Yellow Rust was detected in wheat crops in parts of Punjab and Haryana.

    Yellow Rust

    • Yellow Rust disease appears as yellow stripes of powder or dust on leaves and leaf sheaths of the wheat crop. This yellow powder comes out on clothing or fingers when touched.
    • This occurs when the rust colonies in the leaves drain the carbohydrates from the plant and reduce the green leaf area.
    • In India, it is a major disease in the Northern Hill Zone and the North-Western Plain Zone and spreads easily during the onset of cool weather and when wind conditions are favourable.
    • Rain, dew and fog favour the disease’s development.

    Impact of the disease

    • The disease can spread rapidly under congenial conditions and affects crop development, and eventually the yield.
    • Yield due to the disease can affected by between 5 and 30 per cent.
    • According to the IIWBR advisory, if farmers observe yellow rust in patches in their wheat fields, they should spray fungicides.

    Other facts: Pusa Yashasvi

    • Last year, a new variety of wheat called HD-3226 or Pusa Yashasvi was released by the Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
    • It had higher levels of resistance against major rust fungi such as the yellow/stripe, brown/leaf and black/stem.
  • Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT)

     

    Finance Minister announced abolition of DDT to be paid by companies in her budget speech.

    What is DDT?

    • A dividend is a return given by a company to its shareholders out of the profits earned by the company in a particular year.
    • Dividend constitutes income in the hands of the shareholders which ideally should be subject to income tax.
    • However, the income tax laws in India provide for an exemption of the dividend income received from Indian companies by the investors by levying a tax called the DDT on the company paying the dividend.

    Who were required paid DDT?

    • Any domestic company which is declaring/distributing dividend is required to pay DDT at the rate of 15% on the gross amount of dividend as mandated under Section 115O of the Income Tax Act.
    • DDT was also applicable on mutual funds.

    Why it is scrapped?

    • Every MNE investing in India is faced with the question of tax-efficient repatriation of profits that accumulate here.
    • The dividend that the holding company would receive would have already suffered substantial tax in India, although indirectly.
    • The foreign company would normally be required to pay tax on the dividend so received in its home jurisdiction.
    • DDT being a tax in the Indian company and the foreign company not paying taxes directly on such dividend income in India, it would not be able to claim foreign tax credit in its home jurisdiction.
    • This resulted in a double whammy for foreign companies as, at a group level, they suffered double taxation.
  • [op ed of the day] Stay with stimulus

    Context

    The stimulus needs to continue and the reforms will help to keep the economy going. If gross savings and investment rates keep on falling it is difficult to revive the economy.

    What was expected in the last budget?

    • Increase in pubic investment: The first thing, it said, was to increase public investment and not play statistical or token announcement games.
    • The upswing in manufacturing growth, from negative to slightly less than 3 per cent (not industrial growth, because that includes mining and electricity), needed consolidation.
    • Real outlays in infra did not go up: Real outlays on the infrastructure needed to go up, but they did not.
      • So the push to private demand and a virtuous cycle of growth was missed.
      • The implicit numbers in the Budget math comprise growth of around 7 per cent, assuming a 5 per cent inflation rate.

    Prospects of the Agri-sector

    • A good sign in Agri in midterm: For agriculture, in the medium-term, we are alright. Kharif grain production was 6.4 per cent higher than the previous five-year average output.
      • Kharif oilseeds output around eleven lakh tonnes above the earlier year.
      • This was, however, based on a delayed monsoon which caused problems and anxieties in the second quarter of this year.
    • Nightmare of government unloading grain in the market: Foodgrains are doing well and we have huge food stocks.
      • But, instead of a blessing, the government turned public operations in grain into a nightmare by announcing that FCI will unload grain at a reserve price less than MSP.
      • Rabi acreage recovered and is now 8 per cent more than last year, but the policy of government operations to reduce the market price of grain by its intervention is a nightmare.
    • This is bound to affect input growth in the expanded acreage in the winter crops.

    Wrong policy in Agriculture

    • Terms of trade against agriculture: The terms of trade are going against agriculture, according to CACP (Commission for Agricultural Costs & Prices) estimates, and selling of the grain will make it worse.
    • While the fundamentals are alright, to wallop the farmer with a “cut in the reserve price” would harm the farmers.
    • The rabi report of CACP will say that the terms of trade have gone down more.

    Conclusion

    The Government should continue with the stimulus and opt for the reforms in the economy only to keep the economy going. If the gross savings and investment rates keep falling it would be difficult to revive the economy. If savings keep up, the government will have actual space to divert some real resources to infrastructure investment.

     

     

     

     

  • Explained: Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act

    Context

    • As the years have rolled by, fiscal deficit has become a key factor to watch out for in every Budget presentation.
    • It is considered the most important marker of a government’s financial health.
    • A government that abides by the FRBM rules enjoys greater credibility among the rating agencies and market participants – both national and international.

    FRBM Act

    • The FRBM is an act of the parliament that set targets for the Government of India to establish financial discipline, improve the management of public funds, strengthen fiscal prudence and reduce its fiscal deficits.
    • It was first introduced in the parliament of India in the year 2000 by Vajpayee Government for providing legal backing to the fiscal discipline to be institutionalized in the country.
    • Subsequently, the FRBM Act was passed in the year 2003.

    Features of the FRBM Act

    • It was mandated by the act that the following must be placed along with the Budget documents annually in the Parliament:
    1. Macroeconomic Framework Statement
    2. Medium Term Fiscal Policy Statement and
    3. Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement

    Fiscal Indicators

    It was proposed that the four fiscal indicators be projected in the medium-term fiscal policy statement viz.

    1. Revenue deficit as a percentage of GDP,
    2. Fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP,
    3. Tax revenue as a percentage of GDP and
    4. Total outstanding liabilities as a percentage of GDP

    Why FRBM is back in debate?

    • Not letting the fiscal deficit go completely out of control has been one of the standout achievements of the incumbent NDA government.
    • However, as India’s economic growth has decelerated, there have been growing pressures on the government to breach the FRBM orthodoxy and spend in excess of fiscal deficit targets to reboot domestic growth.
    • Others, however, continue to caution that the “real” fiscal deficit is already far more than the official number, and as such, there is no room for further increasing the expenditure by the government.

    Which of these narratives is true?

    • Actually, neither. But to understand that one has to first understand what are the different types of deficits and why does it matter to limit them.

    Different types of deficits

    • Fiscal is the excess of what the amount the government plans to spend over what the government expects to receive.
    • Obviously, to make up this gap, the government has to borrow money from the market.But all government expenditure is not of the same kind.
    • For instance, if the expenditure is for paying salaries then it is counted as “revenue” expenditure but if it goes into building a road or a factory – that is, something that in turn increases the economy’s capacity to produce more – then it is characterized as “capital” expenditure.
    • The fiscal deficit is another key marker and it maps the excess of revenue expenditure over revenue receipts.
    • The difference between fiscal deficit and revenue deficit is the government’s capital expenditure.

    What FRBM says on deficits?

    • As a broad rule, it is considered fiscally imprudent for a government to borrow money for “revenue” purposes.
    • As a result, the FRBM Act of 2003 had mandated that, apart from limiting the fiscal deficit to 3% of the nominal GDP, the revenue deficit should be brought down to 0%.
    • This would have meant that all the government borrowing (or fiscal deficit) for the year would have funded only capital expenditure by the government.

    Why prefer capital expenditure over revenue expenditure?

    • In any economy, when the government spends money or cuts taxes it has an impact on the economic activity of the country.
    • But this impact (also called the “Multiplier” effect) is quite different for revenue expenditure and capital expenditure.
    • In other words, when the government spends Rs 100 on increasing salaries in India, the economy grows by a little less than Rs 100.
    • But, when the government uses that money to make a road or a bridge, the economy’s GDP grows by Rs 250.
    • The question then is: How to get governments to switch from revenue expenditure to capital expenditure? That’s where the FRBM Act comes in handy.

    What is the significance of an FRBM Act?

    • The popular understanding of the FRBM Act is that it is meant to “compress” or restrict government expenditure. But that is a flawed understanding.
    • The truth is that FRBM Act is not an expenditure compressing mechanism, rather an expenditure switching one.
    • In other words, the FRBM Act – by limiting the total fiscal deficit (to 3% of nominal GDP) and asking for revenue deficit to be eliminated altogether – is helping the governments to switch their expenditure from revenue to capital.
    • This also means that – again, contrary to popular understanding – adhering to the FRBM Act should not reduce India’s GDP, rather increase it.

    Here’s how: When you cut on revenue deficit – that is, reduce your borrowings for funding revenue expenditure – and instead borrow to only spend on building capital, you increase the overall GDP by 2.5 times the amount of money borrowed. So adhering to FRBM Act is a win-win.

    What has been India’s record on adhering to FRBM Act?

    • Between 2004 and 2008, the Indian government had made giant strides on reducing both revenue deficit and fiscal deficit.
    • But this process was reversed thereafter thanks largely to the Global Financial Crisis and a domestic slowdown.
    • Since then, there have been several amendments to the Act essentially postponing the targets.
    • But the worst development happened in 2018 when the Union government stopped targeting revenue deficit and instead focussed only on fiscal deficit.

    Way Forward

    • There is a need to revert back to the original FRBM Act if 2003 by recognising and prioritizing the reduction in revenue deficit.
    • Doing this will help the government boost the kind of expenditure that actually increases the GDP.