đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Governance

Important aspects of Society

  • Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI) 3.0

    States and UTs have started the implementation of the Intensified Mission Indradhanush 3.0, a campaign aimed to reach those children and pregnant women who have been missed out or been left out of the routine immunisation.

    Do not get confused with the Mission Indradhanush for Public Sector Banks launched in 2015. It aims at revamping the functioning of the Public Sector Banks to enable them to compete with the Private Sector Banks.

    Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI) 3.0

    • IMI 3.0 is aimed to accelerate the full immunization of children and pregnant women through a mission mode intervention.
    • The campaign is scheduled to have two rounds of immunisation lasting 15 days (excluding routine immunisation and holidays).
    • It is being conducted in pre-identified 250 districts/urban areas across 29 States/UTs in the country.
    • Beneficiaries from migration areas and hard to reach areas will be targeted as they may have missed their vaccine doses during the pandemic.

    About the Mission Indradhanush

    • Mission Indradhanush seeks to drive towards 90% full immunisation coverage of India and sustain the same by the year 2020. It was launched in December 2014.

    Aims and objectives

    • It aims to immunize all children under the age of 2 years, as well as all pregnant women, against eight vaccine-preventable diseases.
    • The diseases being targeted are diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, poliomyelitis, tuberculosis, measles, meningitis and Hepatitis B.
    • In 2016, four new additions have been made namely Rubella, Japanese Encephalitis, Injectable Polio Vaccine Bivalent and Rotavirus.
    • In 2017, Pneumonia was added to the Mission by incorporating the Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine under Universal Immunisation Programme

    Try this question from CSP 2016:

    Q.‘Mission Indradhanush’ launched by the Government of India pertains to:

    (a) Immunization of children and pregnant women

    (b) Construction of smart cities across the country

    (c) India’s own search for the Earth-like planets in outer space

    (d) New Educational Policy

  • What are Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases (NAFLD)?

    The Union Govt has integrated the Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke.

    Try this MCQ:

    Q.A Company marketing food products advertises that its items do not contain trans-fats. What does this campaign signify to the customers?

    1. The food products are not made out of hydrogenated oils.
    2. The food products are not made out of animal fats/oils.
    3. The oils used are not likely to damage the cardiovascular health of the consumers.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) Only 1

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

    NAFLD

    • NAFLD is the abnormal accumulation of fat in the liver in the absence of secondary causes of fatty liver, such as harmful alcohol use, viral hepatitis, or medications.
    • According to doctors, it is a serious health concern as it encompasses a spectrum of liver abnormalities.
    • It can cause non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL, simple fatty liver disease) to more advanced ones like non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and even liver cancer.

    Why such a move?

    • NAFLD is emerging as an important cause of liver disease in India.
    • Epidemiological studies suggest the prevalence of NAFLD is around 9% to 32% of the general population in India with a higher prevalence in those with overweight or obesity and those with diabetes or prediabetes.
    • Researchers have found NAFLD in 40% to 80 % of people who have type 2 diabetes and in 30% to 90% of people who are obese.
    • Studies also suggest that people with NAFLD have a greater chance of developing cardiovascular disease.
    • Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in NAFLD.

  • [pib] One Nation One Standard Mission

    It’s time to embark on Mission “One Nation One Standard” and make India the leader in setting global benchmarks in setting standards, highlighted the Food and Consumer Affairs Minister.

    One Nation One Standard

    • The purpose of setting standards and enforcing them is not to bring back “inspection raj” but to ensure that quality products are made available to consumers.
    • The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the only national body that frames standards, has come out with more than 20,000 standards for various products and services so far.
    • Besides this, there are about 50-odd agencies that have framed about 400 standards in the country.
    • There are multiple standards in the country for a single product/service. The new mission is to converge such standards with the BIS.

    Main objectives:

    • No one should feel the need to go abroad to get the quality certification.
    • Lab testing in India should be of world standards. Modern equipment and the latest technologies would be used there.

    Why such a move?

    • Having uniform national standards will help in making it mandatory for more products.
    • The government proposes to set Indian standards in line with the global benchmarks, just like other countries enforce their standards on imported products.
    • The Centre, through this move, wants foreign goods coming into India to comply with Indian standards.

    Try this PYQ:

    Consider the following statements:

    1. The Standard Mark of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is mandatory for automotive tyres and tubes.
    2. AGMARK is a quality Certification Mark issued by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Back2Basics: Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)

    • BIS is the National Standards Body of India working under the aegis of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution.
    • It is established by the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 which came into effect on 23 December 1986.
    • The organisation was formerly the Indian Standards Institution (ISI), set up under the Resolution of the Department of Industries and Supplies in September 1946.
    • The ISI was registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.
    • A new Bureau of Indian standard (BIS) Act 2016 has been brought into force with effect from 12 October 2017.
    • The Act establishes the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) as the National Standards Body of India.

  • Why does India need Conclusive Land Titling?

     

    Land ownership in India

    • In India, land ownership is determined through various records such as sale deeds that are registered, property tax documents, government survey records, etc.
    • Land ownership is broadly defined by access to a land title.  Land Title is a document that determines the ownership of land or immovable property.
    • Having a clear land title protects the rights of the titleholder against other claims made by anyone else to the property.

    What is the news?

    • In 2020, even as laws for farm reform and labour code reform were being enacted, the government’s think tank, NITI Aayog, took steps to initiate land reforms.
    • A Model Bill on Conclusive Land Titling was sent to States and Union Territories last June seeking their comments.
    • In September, after many States failed to send in their feedback, the Centre warned that their agreement would be presumed.

    What is Conclusive Land Titling?

    • In a conclusive titling system, the government provides guaranteed titles and compensation in case of any ownership disputes.
    • Achieving this will require shifting to a system of registered property titles (as opposed to sale deeds) as the primary evidence of ownership, and having clear and updated land records.

    How does the current system work?

    • India currently follows a system of presumptive land titling.
    • This means that land records are maintained, with information on possession, which is determined through details of past transactions.
    • Ownership, then, is established on the basis of current possession. Registration of land is actually a registration of transactions, such as sale deeds, records of inheritance, mortgage and lease.
    • Holding registration papers does not actually involve the government or the legal framework guaranteeing the ownership title of the land.

    What will change in the new system?

    • On the other hand, under a conclusive land titling system, land records designate actual ownership.
    • The title is granted by the government, which takes the responsibility for accuracy.
    • Once a title is granted, any other claimant will have to settle disputes with the government, not the titleholder.

    Why is conclusive land titling needed?

    • The main advantage is that a conclusive system will drastically lower litigation related to land.
    • According to a 2007 World Bank study on ‘Land Policies for growth and poverty reduction’, land-related disputes accounted for two-thirds of all pending court cases in India.
    • A NITI Aayog study on strengthening arbitration estimated that disputes on land or real estate take an average time of 20 years in the courts to be resolved.

    A move for EODB

    • Right now, because land titles are based on transactions, people have to keep the entire chain of transaction records, and a dispute on any link in that chain causes ambiguity in ownership.
    • Once conclusive titling is in place, investors who want to purchase land for business activities will be able to do so without facing the constant risk that their owners may be questioned and their entire investment may go to waste.
    • Land disputes and unclear titling also create hurdles for infrastructure development and housing construction, leading to costly delays and inefficiency.

    Multiple benefits

    • In cities, urban local bodies depend on property taxes that can be levied properly only if there is clear ownership data available.
    • In rural areas, the need is even more acute. Access to agricultural credit is dependent on the ability to use the land as collateral.
    • Without being able to prove their ownership of land and access formal credit from banks, small and marginal farmers are often left at the mercy of unscrupulous moneylenders.

    What does the model Bill propose?

    • The Bill circulated by the NITI Aayog in 2020 calls for Land Authorities to be set up by each State government, which will appoint a Title Registration Officer (TRO),
    • TRO will prepare and publish a draft list of land titles based on existing records and documents.
    • This will be considered a valid notice to all potential claimants interested in the property, who will have to file their claims or objections within a set period of time.
    • If disputing claims are received, the TRO will verify all the relevant documents and refer the case to a Land Dispute Resolution Officer (LDRO) for resolution.

    Major hurdles

    • The biggest challenge is that land records have not been updated for decades, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.
    • Land records are often in the name of the grandparents of the current owner, with no proof of inheritance.
    • Unless they are based on updated records, conclusive land titles could create even more problems.
    • Comprehensive village-level surveys with community involvement are a necessary precursor to the land titling process.
    • Relying on current records or even satellite imagery will not provide the same accuracy as actual, on-the-ground, local surveys.

  • Ramani Judgement

     

    Why the Ramani judgement matters

    • The verdict went beyond a mere refusal to convict Ramani for criminal defamation.
    • The verdict vindicated Ramani by accepting Ramani’s truth as a defence to the charge of defamation.
    • The verdict urged society to “understand that sometimes a victim may for years not speak up due to mental trauma,” and underlined that a woman has a right to speak up about the abuse, even after decades.
    • It pointed out that since sexual harassment typically takes place in private, women’s testimonies cannot be dismissed as untrue or defamatory simply because they are unable to provide other witnesses to back their allegations.
    • Institutional mechanisms have systemically failed to protect women or provide justice, the verdict reasoned.
    • Therefore, survivors are justified in sharing their testimonies on media or social media platforms as a form of self-defence.

    Right to dignity

    • The Ramani verdict points out that sexual abuse violates the constitutionally recognised rights to dignity (Article 21) and equality (Articles 14 and 15), and that (a man’s) right to reputation cannot be protected at the cost of (a woman’s) right to dignity. 
    • The Ramani verdict is a huge moral vindication of the #MeToo movement and will serve to deter powerful men from using the defamation law to silence survivors.

    Problem of institution

    • Sexual harassment is a problem of institutions rather than of individuals alone.
    • The world over, employers deploy sexual harassment as a means to discipline and control women workers.
    • In India and Bangladesh, at least 60 per cent of garment factory workers experience harassment at work.
    • In Guangzhou, China, a survey found that 70 per cent of female factory workers had been sexually harassed at work, and 15 per cent quit their jobs as a result.
    • For factory workers, domestic workers, street vendors, sanitation and waste workers, construction workers, sex workers, labour laws or laws against sexual harassment exist only on paper.

    Conclusion

    The women who spoke were unanimous that individual complaints were not an option, they needed unions to fight collectively. Women workers fighting sexual harassment, need more support and attention.

  • Big tech regulation and problems

    Article highlights the issues with the growing dominance of social media giants and challenges involved in regulating them.

    Issues to consider

    1) Conflict of interest

    • Many of the big tech companies were not, as they claimed, mere platforms.
    • This is because they began to curate and generate their own content, creating possible conflicts of interest.

    2) Monopoly power

    • There is a suspicion that big tech companies were acquiring more monopoly power leading to lack of free competition.
    • There is a conjunction of technology and finance here.
    • The more companies were valued, the more they needed monopoly rent extraction to be able to justify those valuations.

    3) Lack of accountability in algorithms

    • There was an irony in an opaque algorithm being the instrument of a free, open and equitable society.

    4) Mixed implications for distribution of wealth

    • While the companies had immense economic impact, their distributive implications were more mixed.
    • They empowered new players, but they also seem to destroy lots of businesses.
    • These companies themselves became the symbol of inequality of economic and political power.

    5) Lack of accountability and standards in regulating free speech

    • Big tech companies set themselves up almost as a sovereign power.
    • This was most evident in the way they regulated speech, posing as arbiters of permissible speech without any real accountability or consistency of standards.
    • The prospect of a CEO exercising almost untrammelled authority over an elected president only served to highlight the inordinate power  these companies could exercise.

    6) Effects of big tech on democracy and democratisation

    •  The social legitimacy of California Libertarianism came from the promise of a new age of democratic empowerment.
    • But as democracies became more polarised, free speech more weaponised, and the information order more manipulated, greater suspicion was going to be cast on this model.
    • All democracies are grappling with this dilemma.

    Big tech in Indian context

    • India will justifiably worry about its own economic interests.
    • India will be one of the largest bases of internet and data users in the world.
    • The argument will be that this should be leveraged to create iconic Indian companies and Indian value addition.
    • India can create competition and be more self-reliant in this space.
    • Pushing back against big tech is not protectionism, because this pushback is to curb the unfair advantages they use to exploit an open Indian market.
    • India can also justifiably point out that in China keeping out tech companies did not make much of a difference to financial flows or investment in other areas.

    The real challenge

    • It will be important to distinguish between regulations that are solving some real problems created due to Big tech, and regulation that is using this larger context to exercise more control.
    • It will be easier to address those issues if the government showed a principled commitment to liberty, commitment to root out crony capitalism, an investment in science and technology commensurate with India’s challenges, and a general regulatory independence and credibility.

    Consider the question “What are the challenges posed by the dominance of social media giants? Suggest the measures to deal with these challenges.”

    Conclusion

    We should not assume that just because big tech is being made to kneel, the alternative will be any better.

  • Mission ‘Lal Lakir’

    The Punjab state cabinet has approved the implementation of mission ‘Lal Lakir’.

    Try this MCQ:

    Q.The SVAMITVA Scheme sometimes seen in the news is related to:

    Urban Employment/ Land records management/ Child Adoption/ None of these

    Mission ‘Lal Lakir’

    • ‘Lal Lakir’ refers to land that is part of the village ‘abaadi’ (habitation) and is used for non-agriculture purposes only.
    • The mission is aimed at facilitating villagers to monetize property rights and availing benefits provided by government departments, institutions and banks in all villages across the state.
    • As no record of rights is available for such properties within the ‘Lal Lakir’, the same cannot currently be monetized as per the real value of the property and no mortgages can be created on such properties.
    • There are households within the ‘Lal Lakir’, which do not own property other than the areas within the ‘Lal Lakir’, and are thus at a disadvantage.

    An extension to SVAMITVA

    • Under the mission, the right of record of properties within ‘Lal Lakir’ in the villages of the state will be prepared with the cooperation of the government of India under the SVAMITVA scheme.
    • SVAMITVA stands for Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas.
    • This will enable mapping the land, households, habitation and all other areas falling within ‘Lal Lakir’.
    • It will go a long way in improving the living standard of villagers and boosting their self-esteem.

    Back2Basics: SVAMITVA

    • SVAMITVA stands for Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas.
    • Under the scheme, the latest surveying technology such as drones will be used for measuring the inhabited land in villages and rural areas.
    • The mapping and survey will be conducted in collaboration with the Survey of India, State Revenue Department and State Panchayati Raj Department under the Ministry of Panchayati Raj.
    • The drones will draw the digital map of every property falling in the geographical limit of each Indian village.
    • Property Cards will be prepared and given to the respective owners.

  • Reform lessons for education

    The article deals with state of the education and its relation with employment in India.

    Improving higher education system

    • Improving India’s higher education justice and worker productivity needs the broadening of our education ambition.
    • Our focus on Gross Enrollment Ratio should also be anchored to Employed Learner Ratio -proportion of our 55 crore labour force in formal learning.
    • For enrolling five crore new employed learners, India needs five regulatory changes.

    Reflecting on global and domestic education experience

    • Multi-decade structural changes include  organisations that are less hierarchical, lower longevity, shorter employee tenures, higher competition.
    • There is also change in the form of work: capitalism without capital, soft skills valued more than hard skills, 30 per cent working from home etc.
    • There change in the form of education in which Google knows everything, so tacit knowledge is more valuable than codified or embedded knowledge.
    • These shifts are complicated by a new world of politics, third-party financing viability, and fee inflation.

    India faces financing failure in skill

    • We have 3.8 crore students in 1,000-plus universities and 50,000-plus colleges.
    • We confront a financing failure in skills:
    • Employers are not willing to pay for training of candidates but a premium for trained candidates.
    • Candidates are not willing to pay for training but for jobs.
    • Financiers are unwilling to lend unless a job is guaranteed, and training institutions can’t fill their classrooms.

    Steps need to be taken

    • For many people the income support of learning-while-earning is crucial to raising enrollment.
    • Many students lack employability and workers lack productivity because learning is supply-driven.
    • Learning-by-doing ensures demand-driven learning.
    • The de facto ban on online degree learning with only seven of our 1,000-plus universities licensed for online offerings.
    • That needs to be changed.
    • High regulatory hurdles creates an adverse selection among entrepreneurs running educational institutions.

    Five regulatory changes

    • First, modify Part 3 of the UGC Act 1956 and Part 8 of the UGC Act to include skill universities.
    • Second, remove clauses 3(A), 3(B), and clause 5 of UGC ODL and Online Regulations 2020 and replace them with a blanket and automatic approval for all accredited universities to design, develop and deliver their online programmes.
    • Third, modify clause 4(C)(ii) of UGC online regulations 2020 to allow innovation, flexibility, and relevance in an online curriculum as prescribed in Annex 1-(V)-3-i) that allows universities to work closely with industry on their list of courses.
    • Fourth, modify clauses 13(C)(3), 13(C)(5), 13(C)(7), 18(2) of UGC online regulations 2020 to permit universities to create partner ecosystems for world-class online learning services, platforms, and experience.
    • Fifth, introduce Universities in clause 2 of the Apprentices Act 1961 to enable all accredited universities to introduce, administer and scale all aspects of degree apprenticeship programs.
    • These five changes would enable enrolling five crore incremental employed learner.

    Conclusion

    Reforming education requires thinking horizontally, holistically, and imaginatively. The reforms suggested here should be carried out considering these aspects.

  • Proposed amendments to the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015

    The Union Cabinet has approved a slew of amendments to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

    What are the key features of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015? Discuss the proposed amendments by the WCD ministry.

    Juvenile Justice Act, 2015

    • The JJ Act, 2015 replaced the Indian juvenile delinquency law, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
    • It allows for juveniles in conflict with Law in the age group of 16–18, involved in Heinous Offences, to be tried as adults.
    • The Act also sought to create a universally accessible adoption law for India.
    • The Act came into force from 15 January 2016.

    Key features

    • Change in nomenclature from ‘juvenile’ to ‘child’ or ‘child in conflict with law’, across the Act to remove the negative connotation associated with the word “juvenile”
    • Inclusion of several new definitions such as orphaned, abandoned and surrendered children; and petty, serious and heinous offences committed by children;
    • The Act mandates setting up Juvenile Justice Boards and Child Welfare Committees in every district. Both must have at least one woman member each.
    • Special provisions for heinous offences committed by children above the age of sixteen years – Under Section 15, special provisions have been made to tackle child offenders committing heinous offences in the age group of 16-18 years (in response to the juvenile convict in Nirbhaya Case).
    • Separate new chapter on Adoption to streamline adoption of orphan, abandoned and surrendered children – To streamline adoption procedures for orphan, abandoned and surrendered children, the existing Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) is given the status of a statutory body.
    • Inclusion of new offences committed against children – Sale and procurement of children for any purpose including illegal adoption, corporal punishment in child care institutions, use of child by militant groups, offences against disabled children and, kidnapping and abduction of children.
    • Penalties for cruelty against a child– offering a narcotic substance to a child, and abduction or selling a child has been prescribed.
    • Mandatory registration of Child Care Institutions

    What are the news amendments?

    The amendments are aimed at strengthening the Child Protection set-up to ensure the best interest of children.

    (A) More powers to the DM

    • These include empowering the DMs and the additional DMs to monitor the functioning of agencies responsible for implementing the JJ Act.
    • The District Child Protection Units will function under the DMs.

    (B) Evaluating shelter homes

    • Before someone sets up a shelter home for children and sends their proposal for registration under the JJ Act to the State, a DM will have to assess their capacity and conduct a background check.
    • A DM could also independently evaluate the functioning of the Child Welfare Committee, Special Juvenile Protection Units and registered childcare institutes, the Minister stated.

    (C) Members of committees

    • The proposed amendments also define the eligibility parameters for the appointment of members of the Child Welfare Committees.
    • These committees are tasked to decide on children in need of care and protection and mandate their background checks.

    (D) Definition of Children

    • It is also proposed to expand the definition of children in need of care and protection and include those children who have been victims of trafficking or drug abuse or child labour.
    • It would also include those children who have been abandoned by their guardians.

  • vaccine hesitancy

    Reluctance to take the vaccine has several implications. The misinformation around the vaccines needs to be fought through several measures. 

    Understanding vaccine hesitancy

    • According to the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy is defined as a reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccine services.
    • To date, two vaccines have been approved for inoculation in India: Pune-based Serum Institute’s Covishield and Hyderabad-based Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin.
    • An adequate supply of vaccines is in place at least for the first phase, but the trickier part is to persuade the population for vaccination.
    • Like Western nations, vaccine hesitancy has been a cause of concern in the past in India as well.
    • Social media has seen a rising number of self-proclaimed experts who have been making unsubstantiated claims.
    • The debates around hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines include concerns over safety, efficacy, and side effects due to the record-breaking timelines of the vaccines, competition among several companies, misinformation, and religious taboos.

    Need to adopt libertarian paternalism

    • It is suggested that we adopt the idea of libertarian paternalism, which says it is possible and legitimate to steer people’s behaviour towards vaccination while still respecting their freedom of choice.
    • Vaccine hesitancy has a different manifestation in India, unlike in the West.
    • According to the World Economic Forum/Ipsos global survey, COVID-19 vaccination intent in India, at 87%, exceeds the global 15-country average of 73%.

    Way forward

    • Instead of anti-vaxxers, the target audience must be the swing population i.e., people who are sceptical but can be persuaded through scientific facts and proper communication.
    • The second measure is to pause before you share any ‘news’ from social media.
    • It becomes crucial to inculcate the habit of inquisitive temper to fact-check any news related to COVID-19 vaccines.
    • The third measure is to use the celebrity effect — the ability of prominent personalities to influence others to take vaccines.
    • Celebrities can add glamour and an element of credibility to mass vaccinations both on the ground and on social media.

    Consider the question “What is vaccine hesitancy? Suggest the measures to deal with it”

    Conclusion

    The infodemic around vaccines can be tackled only by actively debunking myths, misinformation and fake news on COVID-19 vaccines.