💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (May Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Type: op-ed snap

  • Agricultural Sector and Marketing Reforms – eNAM, Model APMC Act, Eco Survey Reco, etc.

    The price of food must figure in the policy

    op-ed snap | Agriculture | Mains Paper 3: Agriculture and related issues

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 3- High food prices in India and its implications

    Context

    The essential challenge of public policy for agriculture- the high price of food remains unsolved.

    Implications of high food prices

    • Increases poverty: A higher price of food increases poverty, especially as the rice and wheat supplied through the PDS constitute only a part of the total expenditure on food of the average Indian household.
    • Reduces the expenditure on other item: For the household, a high price of food crowds out expenditure on other items ranging from health and education to non-agricultural goods.
    • This prevents the market for non-agricultural goods from expanding.
    • This was one of the first discoveries in economics, made by the English economist David Ricardo about two centuries ago.

    Rising food prices in India

    • An indication of the elevation of the price of food in an economy is the share of food in a household’s budget.
    • In a global comparison we would find that this share is very large for India.
    • Data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (2016) show that this share ranges from over 30% for India to less than 10% for the U.S. and the U.K.
    • This is in line with Ricardo’s understanding of how economies progress i.e., as food gets cheaper, growth in the non-agricultural economy is stimulated.
    • Agricultural policy in India has remained quite unaccountable in the face of a rising relative price of food.
    • Impact on manufacturing sector: Arguably, the high price of food has been a factor in the disappointing lack of expansion of the manufacturing sector in India despite repeated efforts to bring it about.

    Changes needed in agricultural policy

    • Both from the point of view of food security for low-income households and the dynamism of the non-agricultural sector, agricultural policy cannot ignore the price at which food is produced.
    • Focus on improving the yield: The fact of low agricultural yield in India by comparison with the rest of the world has been known for long, and little is done about it.
    • Management of soil nutrients and moisture: A superior management of soil nutrients and moisture, assured water supply and knowledge inputs made available via an extension service would be crucial.
    • Raising yields will ensure profitability without raising producer prices, which will inflate the food subsidy bill.

    How government intervention created problems

    • Given the importance of food for our survival, this justifies public intervention in agriculture.
    • The issue is the design and scale of this intervention.
    • In the mid-sixties, when India was facing food shortage that could not be solved through trade, a concerted effort was made to raise domestic agricultural production.
    • Profitability through MSP: It introduced the strategy of ensuring farm profitability though favourable prices assured by the state.
    • Further, it entrenched the belief that it is the farmer’s right to have the state purchase as much grain as the farmer wishes to sell to the state agency.
    • Created grain stockpile: This has resulted in grain stockpiles far greater than the officially announced buffer-stocking norm.
    • These stocks have often rotted, resulting in deadweight loss, paid for by the public though taxes or public borrowing.
    • Supply more than demand: Finally, with all costs of production reimbursable and all of output finding an assured outlet, supply has outstripped demand. 
    • Damage to natural environment: This has led to unimaginable pressure on the natural environment, especially water supply.

    Consider the question “India faces the challenge of high food prices. Examine the ways in which high food prices affects the overall economy. How far is the India’s agriculture policy responsible for the problem?”

    Conclusion

    India needs an agricultural policy that ensures that farming is profitable but this cannot be at the cost of a high price of food. The ‘food problem’ should no longer be seen only in terms of the availability of food from domestic sources.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Conflation between duties and rights

    op-ed snap | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Indian Constitution – historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Fundamental duties

    Mains level: Paper 2- Relation between fundamental duties and fundamental rights

    Context

    There has been growing advocacy for the integration of duty with rights. On Constitution Day last month, many Union Ministers used the occasion to underline this proposal.

    What do rights come with duty mean?

    • It is a basic proposition that all rights come with duties.
    • But those duties are quite distinct from the meaning ascribed to them in the popular discourse.
    • When a person holds a right, she is owed an obligation by a duty-bearer.
    • For example, when citizens are promised a right against discrimination, the government is obliged to ensure that it treats everybody with equal care and concern.
    • Similarly, the guarantee of a right to freedom of speech enjoins the state to refrain from interfering with that liberty.

    Integrating rights with duties

    • Proponents of integration of duty with rights aim to treat otherwise non-binding obligations — the “fundamental duties” as Article 51A describes them on a par with, if not superior to, the various fundamental rights that the Constitution guarantees.
    • In an inversion of the well-known dictum, they see duties, and not rights, as trumps.
    • On Constitution Day last month, many Union Ministers used the occasion to underline this proposal.
    • The government puts forward an idea that our rights ought to be made conditional on the performance of a set of extraneous obligations.

    Issues with the proposal

    • This suggestion is plainly in the teeth of the Constitution’s text, language, and history.
    • To the framers of the Constitution, the very idea of deliberating over whether these rights ought to be provisional, and on whether these rights ought to be made subject to the performance of some alien duty, was against the republic’s vision.
    • Imposing duties a legislative prerogative: The Constitution’s framers saw the placing of mandates on individual responsibilities as nothing more than a legislative prerogative.
    • For example, the legislature could impose a duty on individuals to pay a tax on their income, and this duty could be enforced in a variety of ways.
    • If the tax imposed and the sanctions prescribed were reasonable, the obligations placed on the citizen will be constitutionally valid.
    • In this manner, Parliament and the State legislatures have imposed a plethora of duties — duties to care for the elderly and for children; duties to pay tolls and levies; duties against causing harm to others; duties to treat the environment with care, the list is endless.
    • Against Constitution: What is critical, though, is that these laws cannot make a person’s fundamental right contingent on the performance of a duty that they impose.
    • A legislation that does so will violate the Constitution.

    Background

    • The fundamental duties that are now contained in Article 51A were introduced through the 42nd constitutional amendment.
    • The Swaran Singh Committee, which was set up during the Emergency, and which recommended the insertion of the clause, also suggested that a failure to comply with a duty ought to result in punishment.
    • Ultimately, the amendment was introduced after the binding nature of the clause was removed.
    • In its finally adopted form, Article 51A encouraged citizens to perform several duties.

    Way forward

    • Know the precise nature of duties the rights create: The philosopher Onora O’Neill has argued with some force that we would do well to discuss the precise nature of duties that rights create.
    • Unless we do so, our charters of human rights may not by themselves be enough.
    • For example, we may want to ask ourselves if the promise of a right to free expression imposes on the state something more than a duty to forebear from making an unwarranted restriction on that liberty.
    •  Does it require the state to also work towards creating an equal society where each person finds herself in a position to express herself freely?

    Consider the question “How fundamental duties are related to the fundamental rights in the context of the Indian Constitution? What are the issues with making the enforcement of rights contingent on adhering to the duties?”

    Conclusion

    When we speak about the importance of obligations, it is these questions that must animate our discussions. Should we instead allow the language of fundamental duties to subsume our political debates, we would only be placing in jeopardy the moral principles at the heart of India’s republic.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-United States

    Fathoming the new world disorder

    op-ed snap | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 2- Transition from American unipolarity

    Context

    It may be too early to say how the American withdrawal from Afghanistan would shape regional geopolitics in Asia and the great power contest between the United States and its competitors. But it is certainly one of those developments that will have a far-reaching impact on global politics.

    Two narratives about the US withdrawal from Afghanistan

    • There are two dominant narratives about the American withdrawal.
    • Realignment in foreign policy: The first narrative is that the U.S. exited the country on its own will as it is undertaking a larger realignment in its foreign policy.
    • Failure to win the war: The other one is that the U.S. failed to win the war in Afghanistan and, like in the case of Vietnam, was forced to withdraw from the country.
    • Focus on China: The reorientation that is under way in American foreign policy, focused on China, certainly played a role in the Afghan withdrawal.
    • But that does not obscure the fact that the world’s most powerful military and economic power failed to win the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban even after fighting them for 20 years.

    Erosion of the US’s ability in shaping geopolitical outcomes

    •  The gradual erosion of the U.S.’s ability in shaping geopolitical outcomes in faraway regions has already shaken up the structures of American unipolarity.
    • Withdrawal from Afghanistan is not an isolated incident: The Afghan withdrawal was not an isolated incident.
    • In Iraq and Libya, it failed to establish political stability and order after invasions.
    • It could not stop Russia taking Crimea from Ukraine in 2014. In Syria, it was outmanoeuvred by Vladimir Putin.
    • Finally, the way American troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan and the return of the Taliban to power strengthened this perception of great power fatigue and emboldened America’s rivals to openly challenge the U.S.-centric “rules-based order.”

    Three geopolitical challenges facing the US

    • [1]Aggressive Russia: Russia has amassed about 175,000 troops on its border with Ukraine.
    • Western intelligence agencies claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin could order an invasion of Ukraine.
    • Russian sphere of influence: From the migrant crisis in Belarus to the troop mobilisation in Ukraine, Russia is unmistakably sending a message to the West that the region stretching from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, is a Russian sphere of influence.
    • [2] Iran issue:  Iran, which has stepped up its nuclear programme after the Trump administration unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 nuclear deal, has refused to hold direct talks with the U.S. 
    • Iran insists that the U.S. should first remove the sanctions and give assurance that a future President would not violate the terms of the agreement.
    • [3] Assertive China: China is sending dozens of fighter jets into the so-called Taiwan Air Defence Identification Zone almost on a weekly basis, triggering speculation on whether Beijing was considering taking the self-ruled island by force.
    • As the U.S. is trying to shift its focus to the Indo-Pacific region to tackle China’s rise, China is becoming more and more assertive in its periphery, seeking strategic depth.

    Implications

    • Limited choice: The pivot to Asia has limited America’s options elsewhere. For example, what could the U.S. do to deter Mr. Putin from making the next military move in Europe.
    • With regard to Iran, if the U.S. blinks first and lifts the sanctions, it could be read as another sign of weakness.
    • If it does not and if the Vienna talks collapse, Iran could continue to enrich uranium to a higher purity, attaining a de facto nuclear power status without a bomb (like Japan), which would be against America’s declared goals in West Asia.
    • The Afghan withdrawal and the downsizing in West Asia suggest that America’s strategic focus has shifted towards China.

    Conclusion

    This transition, from American unipolarity into something that is still unknown, has put America in a strategic dilemma: Should it stay focused on China, preparing itself for the next bipolar contest; or continue to act as a global policeman of the liberal order that is under attack from multiple fronts?

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • India-UK ties

    op-ed snap | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 2- Partnership in technological domain with UK

    Context

    When Delhi thinks of technological cooperation with major powers, the US, Europe and Japan come to mind. The missing link in India’s technological mind space, however, is the United Kingdom.

    How India can benefit from technology partnership with Britain

    • Britain was the first nation to industrialise and has a long tradition of scientific research and technological development.
    • With top-ranking universities and the golden triangle of science and innovation — London, Oxford and Cambridge — Britain is one of the world’s top technology powers.
    • WIPO ranking: This year, the World Intellectual Property Organisation ranked Britain fourth in the global innovation index.
    • India is far behind at the 46th position.
    • India, then, could gain in a technology partnership with Britain.

    Overview of the India-UK bilateral ties

    • Pakistan angle: India’s foreign policy community can’t shake off the Pakistan prism in viewing London.
    • To be sure, London’s advocacy of Pakistan has always irritated Delhi.
    • Instead of complaining about London’s South Asian policy, Delhi now simply ignores London’s claims for a special role in India’s political disputes with Pakistan.
    • By focusing on the positive, Delhi is betting it can reduce the traditional negative elements in the engagement with the UK.
    • At the same time, Delhi recognises the enormous strategic possibilities with Britain and is willing to invest political capital to build on those synergies.
    • Meanwhile, the steady relative decline of Pakistan — its economy is now about a tenth of India’s — and Delhi’s deepening strategic partnership with Washington are also encouraging London to rethink its past approach to the Subcontinent.
    • India is fully conscious of UK’s enduring global salience.
    • External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has often highlighted Britain’s continuing weight in the world as the fifth-largest economy, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a major financial centre, and a leading hub of higher education and technology.
    • Britain also enjoys a global maritime reach and a measure of political influence across the world.

    Possibilities for partnership in the technological domain

    • While a trade agreement between Delhi and London is said to be imminent, it is in the technological domain that the prospects are immense but under-explored.
    • There is insufficient awareness in India’s strategic community of the British moves to put science and technology at the very heart of its political, economic, security and foreign policies.
    •  London announced a raft of measures this year starting with a major report on “Global Britain in a Competitive Age: An Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development, and Foreign Policy”.
    • One of the broad themes stand out from these initiatives, which is forming a coalition of like-minded countries.
    • London wants to build a coalition of like-minded countries to reshape the global governance of technology.
    • This includes strengthening technological ties with the traditionally close partners in the Anglosphere — US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand — as well as other partners like Japan and India.
    • All these elements of British policy mesh with India’s own economic, political, and security interests.
    • The British technology initiatives are also aligned with the technological agenda of the Quad — or the Quadrilateral forum that brings together Australia, India, Japan, and the US.

    Consider the question “In India’s partnership with the UK, it is the technological domain where prospects are immense but underexplored. Comment.”

    Conclusion

    For Delhi, the essence of the new alliance with Britain is fourfold — generate domestic prosperity, enhance national security, climb up the global technology hierarchy, and contribute to the construction of a free, open, and democratic global technological order.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Back2Basics: Major themes of the policy report on “Global Britain in a Competitive Age”

    • [1] Leverage technology to “level up” the regional and social inequalities in Britain.
    • [2] Ensure Britain’s privileged position as a leading science power.
    • [3] Focus on technological innovation to drive Britain’s future economic growth.
    • [4] Build internal security resilience against new technological threats.
    • [5] Modernise the intelligence apparatus with the help of new technologies.
    • [6] Integrate technology into the national defence strategy as new capabilities like AI become as consequential as battle-tanks, ships and fighter jets.
    • [7] Project technological power to counter malevolent actors in the international system.
    • [8]A coalition of like-minded countries.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Coronavirus – Economic Issues

    The stepping stones in the post-pandemic world

    op-ed snap | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: UNCTAD

    Mains level: Paper 3- Opportunities for India in post-Pandemic world

    Context

    The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted lives and livelihoods across the world. Governments, global institutions, industry, academia and non-profit organisations around the world have joined hands to tackle the global challenge and help countries rebuild their economies.

    Criticality of international cooperation and role for India

    • The novel coronavirus pandemic has once again highlighted the criticality of international cooperation in combating current and future challenges.
    • Areas of cooperation: Key among these include economic growth, building competitiveness of the investment climate, ensuring sustainable development paths and adapting to technology acceleration.
    • Strengthening global partnership: Building resilience to cope with the threats posed by pandemics and other man-made and natural disasters has necessitated strengthening global partnerships now more than ever.
    • Global partnerships help in building mutual trust and understanding by agreeing upon common rules and standards and sharing of best practices.

    Areas to focus on

    [1] Challenge of long term sustainability of growth process

    • While the world economy is rebounding strongly, the long-term sustainability of the growth process needs to be strengthened.
    • Exit from the massive stimulus packages itself may pose risks of economic and financial instability.

    [2] Challenges of supply chain management:

    • The pandemic severely disrupted global supply chains and set the global trade trajectory on a downward path.
    • Even as the world emerges from the pandemic, facilitating medical supplies and essentials will continue to remain a top priority and for this, supply chains will need to be kept flowing.
    • For this year, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) indicates an increase of 22.4% in the value of global merchandise trade compared with 2020.
    • World trade is expected to stand about 15% higher than before the COVID-19.
    • FDI flows in developing economies also increased significantly, totalling $427 billion in the first half of 2021.
    •  Cooperation on trade facilitation for enhancing open and transparent markets, technical assistance and reduction of complex process and arrangements must be promoted.

    [3] Increasing competitiveness

    • Competitiveness will be key in facilitating growth and inclusive development.
    • New opportunities and avenues across potential high growth sectors such as manufacturing and start-ups must be leveraged.
    • An ecosystem of entrepreneurship and innovation with targeted policies and interventions will contribute to enhancing productivity and generating employment.

    [4] Structural changes with the emergence of digital economy

    • Certain structural changes are likely to become permanent in the future and this is especially true of the digital economy
    • Equitable adaptation: The rise of telemedicine, remote work and e-learning, delivery services, etc. necessitates equitable adaptation to advanced technologies and tools, building robust infrastructure, and occupational transitions.
    • Skill development and worker training, investments in education and vocational training, and capacity building would be some key areas of focus for filling technology gaps and nurturing new and existing talent.
    • Investment in innovation: At the same time, investments in innovation will be crucial, especially during a crisis.

    [5] Climate change

    • Matter of urgency: Climate change has now acquired urgency from policymakers around the world, as seen in the recent COP26 at Glasgow.
    • International alliances and cooperation on building sustainable solutions, green technology, resource efficiency, sustainable finance, etc., must be promoted to fast-track meeting the sustainable development goals and for ensuring all-round development.

    Opportunities for India

    • Attaining faster growth path: India’s recent reforms, role in combating the pandemic, and startup vibrancy, among other factors, have attracted global attention and can help it attain a faster growth path, provided its integration with the world economy and trade gains strategic intensity.
    • Reliable and trusted player: With multiple strategic shifts, India’s role as a reliable and trusted player in the comity of nations stands enhanced.

    Way forward

    • In the post-pandemic world, it will be critical for India to improve on its investment climate and systematically target its export capabilities across sectors and regions.
    • Ease of doing business and new free trade agreement with major markets will help it integrate closely with the world through trade and investment partnerships.

    Conclusion

    The time for India is here and it must leverage international partnerships for ensuring a robust and sustained economic growth path.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Electronic System Design and Manufacturing Sector – M-SIPS, National Policy on Electronics, etc.

    The challenges in being a chip hub

    op-ed snap | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields,Indigenization Of Technology

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 3- Semiconductor chip manufacturing in India

    Context

    India is aiming to manufacture silicon semiconductor chips.

    Efforts to set up chip fabrication plant

    • India has intensified efforts to set up a semiconductor fabrication plant with the help of Taiwan, the market leader.
    • For this the government is investing over $7.5 billion.
    • The Tata Group is in talks with three States — Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Karnataka — to invest over $300 million to set up a semiconductor manufacturing facility.
    • In 2014, NASSCOM wanted to promote a National Technology Corridor along coastal A.P. stretching through the Visakhapatnam, Rajahmundry and Vijayawada region.
    • Given the abundance of water, sand (raw material for making silicon ingots), road, rail, ports and airport connectivity, the industry body wanted to push and promote the design and manufacturing of electronic chips.

    Challenges

    • IP and design: While welcoming such moves by the government and technology experts, local players in the segment say that chip making itself will not be enough.
    • Other aspects such as designing and Intellectual Property are required to make a mark.
    • Designing is what brings value to the chips.
    • If the Intellectual Property lies with the foreign entity, we end up manufacturing the basic material which does not serve the purpose.
    • Need to promote SoCs: Rather, we need an ecosystem to promote SoCs (System on a Chip) which makes more sense.”
    • There are several firms in India which are now making SoCs, which is a good sign.
    • Connect related industries: The bigger challenge and immediate need for the Indian government is to connect related industries in India to create the ecosystem, industry players say.

    Consider the question “What are the challenges India may face as it aims to manufacture silicon semiconductor chips?”

    Conclusion

    The initiative is an uphill task as many factors need to come together for India to make a mark in the niche chip making and designing industry. Also, upcoming firms should be able to sustain themselves in the market when subsidies from the government are withdrawn.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Judicial Reforms

    Judges cannot be shielded from citizens’ questions

    op-ed snap | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 2- Judicial pendency

    Context

    Recently, the Chief Justice of India, in his own mild way, protested against the attack on judges. One can understand his pain and agony, but he too knows that judges do not, and should not live in ivory towers.

    Questioning and analysing actions of the judiciary

    • As the judiciary is one of the pillars of democracy, and the Constitution entrusts judges with the task of protecting the constitutional rights of the people, especially the right to life and liberty, the consumer of justice has every right, and would be fully justified in critically examining, and commenting upon each and every word of the judges spoken or written, howsoever unpalatable it may be.
    • It appears that it is in the above spirit that MP Shashi Tharoor, speaking in Parliament on the High Court and Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill said that the judiciary had failed to stem the tide of militant majoritarianism.
    • He alleged that the “judiciary’s inaction almost always favours those in power”. 
    • He has raised pertinent questions, and has brought out the glaring failings of the judiciary in matters concerning the protection of the constitutional rights of citizens. 
    • Pendency of important cases such as the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution, the Citizenship Amendment Act, electoral bonds, and many petitions under the preventive detention laws highlights this issue.

    Issues in functioning of collegium system

    • As regards the functioning of the collegium system, judges are transferred without any seeming justification, and in some cases re-transferred, justifying neither their initial transfer nor the re-transfer.
    • Some elevations of judges raise eyebrows, while some are ignored.
    • Should the collegium not be more transparent than it has been in the past in the matter of the elevation and transfers of judges?

    Conclusion

    Judges cannot be shielded from citizens’ questions. After all, as a consumer of justice, the citizen has a right to know.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • RBI Notifications

    Why crypto currency legislations needs careful consideration

    op-ed snap | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 3- Regulating cryptocurrencies and challenges ahead

    Context

    The government has decided to introduce a bill that seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India.

    Background of the bill

    • In 2018, the three-judge bench of the Supreme Court set aside the RBI circular that prevented crypto exchanges from dealing with the formal financial system on grounds of proportionality.
    • Purpose of the bill: The current bill now attempts to define the rules of the game so that the RBI, tax authorities, SEBI and other agencies have much better legal guidance in deciding the course of action with respect to VCs in their respective domains.
    • The rules can, therefore, range from a ban to controlled interaction with the formal financial system.

    Issues involving cryptos

    • Issues involving cryptos can be seen at three levels, each of which is equally important.
    • The first is its impact on sovereignty.
    • The second is its interaction with financial markets.
    • Third is the value proposition that the entire concept of crypto brings to the economic debate.
    • Incorporation of price stability mechanism: Some of the variants of cryptos such as the stable coin clearly indicate that these are attempts to create systems of money that incorporate features of price stability that imply a parallel monetary system.
    • Diluting the sovereign function of money creation: Unrestricted co-opting of VC clearly dilutes the sovereign function of money creation, clearly impacting the revenues of RBI.
    • Concerns pertaining to money laundering, terrorist threats and narco-trading also come under this category given the high value and anonymity offered by cryptocurrencies.

    Challenges in cryptocurrencies interaction with the formal system

    • As of now cryptos have been recognised as assets or commodities and as a medium of exchange. Their role as units of account or legal tender is rather limited.
    • They may offer a store of value given their short supply. From a banking point of view, certain issues do arise.
    • Since VCs are not legal tenders, they cannot be used in the discharge of debt.
    • Thus, banks cannot accept VCs to close a loan account.
    • Second, can banks lend in fiat by accepting VCs as collateral assuming the VC is an asset?
    • Incompatible with the fractional system of banking: At a deeper level, the very idea of VCs and the way they are designed are incompatible with the fractional system of banking.
    • The fluctuations in interbank liquidity require that money supply adjusts to system requirements.
    • If money supply undergoes compositional change in favour of VCs, this ability will be curtailed thus accentuating the crisis.
    • In financial markets, crypto such as ICOs bring another set of issues.
    • The ICO is a creature that disrupts the very concept of limited liability in corporate finance.
    • ICOs are, at times, designed in such a way that the beneficial owner identity is concealed.
    • SEBI is yet to convey a position on various issues surrounding this idea.
    • Issues with making VCs medium of exchange: VCs have emerged as a medium of exchange and many countries have permitted VC ATMs.
    • But how does this proposition fare given that considerable advances have been made in the payment systems domain in India.
    • Is it worthwhile that additional competition is introduced in a market that is hyper-competitive?
    • It will have impact on existing investments in mobile payment and UPI technology.
    • Impact on poor states: It is well known that the Indian population exhibits significant behavioural divergences in their savings and credit behaviour across regions.
    • Such wide behavioural changes have profound implications on bank strategies and product designs.
    • In the past, there have been several instances of states having low per capita income being more prone to chit fund investments that have negatively impacted the savings of many poor households.
    • The issue of consumer protection needs to be addressed and the current laws may have to be reviewed considering this innovation.

    Conclusion

    The bill must meet many important objectives. While there are obvious concerns of money laundering and benami transactions, there are equal concerns with respect to company laws, payment systems and banking, securities and other commercial laws.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Back2Basics: About Stablecoin

    • Stablecoins bridge the worlds of cryptocurrency and everyday fiat currency because their prices are pegged to a reserve asset like the U.S. dollar or gold.
    • This dramatically reduces volatility compared to something like Bitcoin and results in a form of digital money that is better suited to everything from day-to-day commerce to making transfers between exchanges.

    What is ICO?

    • ICO stands for “initial coin offering,” and refers to a formerly popular method of fundraising capital for early-stage cryptocurrency projects.
    • In an ICO, a blockchain-based startup mints a certain quantity of its own native digital token and offers them to early investors, normally in exchange for other cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin or ether.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Minimum Support Prices for Agricultural Produce

    What true MSP means

    op-ed snap | Agriculture | Mains Paper 3: Agriculture and related issues

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 3- Legal basis for MSP

    Context

    Amid the demand for a guarantee of MSP, many commentators fail to understand the true spirit of the demand for a legal MSP.

    How demand for legal backing for MSP is misinterpreted?

    • Mandatory enforcement of price above MSP: The demand has been interpreted as a mandatory enforcement of trade in agricultural produce, including private trade to be necessarily at or above the MSP for that crop.
    • Nationalisation of agricultural trade: Another interpretation is the nationalisation of agricultural trade whereby the government promises to buy all the crop produced at MSP.
    • Commentators have been using these two interpretations to project large estimates of government expenditure needed to implement.
    • They fail to understand the true spirit of the demand for a legal MSP.

    Current nature of MSP

    • It is not an income support program: By definition MSP is not an income support programme.
    • Intervention to stabilise prices: It is designed to be used as government intervention to stabilise prices, to provide remunerative prices to farmers.
    • Public procurement program to meet requirements of NFSA: Currently, it is no more than a public procurement programme to meet the requirements of the National Food Security Act (NFSA).
    • Only rice and wheat procured: As against the official announcement of MSP for 23 crops, only two, rice and wheat are procured as these are distributed in NFSA.

    Larger context of demand for legal backing to MSP

    • Droughts and declining commodity prices: In addition to the twin droughts of 2014 and 2015, farmers have also suffered from declining commodity prices since 2014.
    • Impact of demonetisation and GST: The twin shocks of demonetisation and hurried rollout of GST, crippled the rural economy, primarily the non-farm sector, but also agriculture.
    • Impact of pandemic: The slowdown in the economy after 2016-17 followed by the pandemic has ensured that the situation remains precarious for majority of the farmers.
    • Increased input prices: Higher input prices for diesel, electricity and fertilisers have only contributed to the misery.
    • In this context, the demand for ensuring remunerative prices is only a reiteration of the promise by successive governments to implement the Swaminathan Committee report.

    What should be the true nature of MSP?

    • Intervene to stabilise price: A true MSP requires the government to intervene whenever market prices fall below a pre-defined level, primarily in case of excess production and oversupply or a price collapse due to international factors.
    • It does not require the government to buy all the produce but only to the extent that creates upward price pressures in the market to stabilise prices at the MSP level.

    Way forward

    • Mechanism for market intervention: What is needed is a mechanism to monitor the prices.
    • While such a mechanism already exists, a policy for requisite market intervention is missing.
    • Use MSP as incentive to achieve nutritional security and reduce import dependence: MSP can also be an incentive price for many of the crops which are desirable for nutritional security such as coarse cereals, and also for pulses and edible oils for which we are dependent on imports. 
    • Include pulses, edible oil and millets in PDS: Despite repeated demands from food activists, there has not been any progress in including pulses, edible oils and millets in PDS.
    • A guaranteed MSP then is nothing more than restoring the true spirit and functions of MSP, applicable to a broad range of crops and all sections of farmers.

    Issues

    • The current MSP regime has no relation to prices in the domestic market.
    • Its sole raison d’être is to fulfil the requirements of NFSA making it effectively a procurement price rather than an MSP. 
    • It is basically a lack of understanding of what agriculture needs and above all a lack of political commitment to ensure remunerative prices to farmers.

    Conclusion

    An efficient and functional MSP is certainly the least that the government can do to protect a sector which remains the largest employer and a refuge for the poor and vulnerable as was seen during the pandemic.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Goods and Services Tax (GST)

    Goods and Services Tax as an unfinished agenda

    op-ed snap | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Not much

    Mains level: Paper 3- Challenges to GST

    Context

    Seen purely from a revenue point of view and as a fiscal policy tool, India’s GST is still on a rocky road.

    Background

    • The GST was launched by India on the midnight of July 1, 2017.
    • Benefits of GST: Hailed as a landmark reform in India’s tax history, it was expected to improve tax-GDP ratio, end tax cascading, enhance efficiency, competitiveness, growth, and ensure lower prices.
    • Fiscal federalism: It was also projected as a watershed in India’s fiscal federalism.
    • the States have forgone a substantial part of their own tax revenue.
    • States were in turn guaranteed a GST compensation assuring 14% growth in their GST revenue during the initial five years.
    • India’s GST architecture: India’s GST architecture is built on the firm foundations of a GST Council and the GST Network (GSTN).
    • GST Council as due federal process: The first is the key decision-making body, chaired by the Union Finance Minister with a Minister of State in charge of Finance and the Finance Ministers of States as members.
    • This is envisaged as a due federal process to protect the interests of the States.

    Unresolved issues

    [1] Revenue neutrality not achieved

    • India’s GST paradigm stands on two key pillars: revenue neutrality and GST compensation for the States.
    • The assured revenue neutrality remains a mirage and many States have experienced a declining tax-GDP ratio.
    • Decline in tax to GDP ratio of state: In the case of major 18 States, the ratio of own tax revenue to GDP has declined.
    • While the share of the Centre in total GST increased by 6%, that of States put together lagged behind with only a 4.5% increase.
    • Stark differences between the Revenue Neutral Rates (RNR) for the producing States and consumption State have been observed. States producing exempted food grains also lost out.
    • Since the rates were lower under GST vis-à-vis the VAT regime, revenue neutrality was not adhered ab initio.
    • The problems were compounded with massive evasion following the dismantling of check posts, and later on fake invoices, that grew by leaps and bounds.
    • Experience of other countries: The South African experience illustrates how zero-rating and large exemptions have defeated revenue goals.
    • Canadian experience shows that GST could be improved by limiting zero rating, tax-exemptions and harmonising tax rates.
    • The resilience of the economy at the time of rolling out of GST is critical for its wider reception as the Australian experience shows.

    [2] Not conducive to co-operative federalism

    • While the States collectively forewent 51.8% of their total tax revenue, the Centre surrendered only 28.8%.
    • Yet, GST is shared equally between the Centre and States despite two expert committees recommended for a higher share for the States.
    • Given the revenue neutrality failure and the host of other issues, many of the States are left with no option except to depend on GST compensation.
    • This is not conducive to sustainable co-operative federalism.

    [3] Need for revenue sharing formula for IGST

    • Although IGST is a key source of revenue for many of the States, the clearing house mechanism and the process therein remains unknown territory.
    •  It was pointed out that GST is discriminatory to manufacturing States, indicating the need for a revenue sharing formula that duly incentivises exporting States by sharing IGST revenue among three parties instead of two.

    [4] Other issues

    • Swift functioning of Input tax credit: The Malaysian experience demonstrates the need for swift and transparent functioning of the input tax credit system through a flawless IT infrastructure.
    • We operate in an almost information vacuum especially with respect to IGST along with several glitches in the digital architecture.
    • GSTN is now in the doldrums.
    • Data monopoly: It neither makes effective use of the massive and invaluable data being generated nor shares them to enable others to make use of them.
    • Such practice in “data monopoly” was a fact of history in India’s statistical system and has to go sooner rather than later.
    • Australia, having several similarities with India, in terms of Centre and the subnational units, and destination-based, multi-stage tax with input credit provisions, has not been revenue-buoyant.
    • It is a matter for consideration whether widening exemptions and the replacing of income-tax by GST in the case of small and medium enterprises are advisable measures in the Indian context.

    Consider the question “What are the challenges facing the GST in India? What India can learn from the experience of other countries’ experience.”

    Conclusion

    Despite many years of efforts in evolving an Indianised GST system and over 50 months of adjustments with over a thousand notifications, with accompanying uncertainties in the first year and the novel coronavirus pandemic and the lockdown still in the saddle, GST continues to be an unfinished agenda. But how far and how long?

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor