💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS1

  • Ammonia Emission Reductions in Agriculture

    ammonia

    Introduction

    • Researchers have harnessed machine learning to provide precise estimates of ammonia emissions stemming from rice, wheat, and maize crops.
    • Their dataset allows for a crop-specific assessment of emission reduction potential, suggesting that effective fertilizer management in these crops could decrease atmospheric ammonia emissions from agriculture by up to 38%.

    Ammonia Emissions in Agriculture

    Ammonia (NH3) emissions primarily originate from agricultural activities, particularly livestock farming and the application of synthetic and organic fertilizers.

    1. Livestock Farming: Livestock, such as cattle, poultry, and swine, produce ammonia through the breakdown of urea in their urine and faeces. Confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are major contributors to ammonia emissions.
    2. Fertilizer Application: Ammonia is released when synthetic fertilizers containing ammonium-based compounds (e.g., ammonium nitrate) are applied to crops. Manure from livestock can also be used as organic fertilizer, contributing to ammonia emissions.

    Why it matters?

    • Environmental Impact: Ammonia emissions can lead to air pollution, especially in areas with intensive agriculture. It can react with other pollutants to form fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone, which has adverse effects on human health and the environment.
    • Acid Deposition: Ammonia can undergo atmospheric transformation and contribute to acid rain, which can harm aquatic ecosystems, forests, and infrastructure.
    • Nutrient Loss: Ammonia emissions represent a loss of valuable nitrogen nutrients from agricultural systems. This can reduce the efficiency of fertilizer use and contribute to nitrogen pollution in water bodies.

    Significance of Ammonia Emissions

    • Environmental Impact: Atmospheric ammonia is a significant environmental pollutant, affecting ecosystems and human health globally.
    • Crop-Related Emissions: A substantial portion of anthropogenic ammonia emissions, 51-60%, originates from crop cultivation. Rice, wheat, and maize are responsible for approximately half of these emissions.

    Machine Learning-Based Modeling

    • Researchers’ Approach: The study employed machine learning to model ammonia emissions from rice, wheat, and maize farming worldwide. This modelling considered various factors such as climate, soil characteristics, crop types, irrigation, tillage practices, and fertilization methods.
    • Dataset Development: To train the model, researchers curated a dataset comprising ammonia emissions data from over 2,700 observations, gathered through a systematic review of published literature.
    • Global Emission Estimate: The model’s estimates revealed that global ammonia emissions reached 4.3 teragrams (4.3 billion kilograms) in 2018.

    Emission Reduction Potential

    • Optimizing Fertilizer Management: By spatially optimizing fertilizer management according to the model’s guidance, ammonia emissions from the three crops could potentially be reduced by 38%.
    • Strategies: The optimized strategy involves deeper placement of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers into the soil using conventional tillage practices during the growing season.

    Crop-Specific Contributions

    • Reduction Potential: Under the proposed fertilizer management scenario, rice crops could contribute to 47% of the total reduction potential. Maize and wheat could contribute 27% and 26%, respectively.
    • Emission Projections: Without management strategies, ammonia emissions could increase by 4.6% to 15.8% by 2100, depending on future greenhouse gas emissions levels.

    Conclusion

    • This study showcases how machine learning can provide valuable insights into ammonia emissions from crop cultivation.
    • By optimizing fertilizer management practices, substantial reductions in ammonia emissions from rice, wheat, and maize crops can be achieved, contributing to environmental sustainability.

  • M Venkaiah Naidu writes: L K Advani, a leader who never craved power

    Advani's last hurrah? | Mint

    Central Idea:

    The article praises Lal Krishna Advani’s significant contributions to Indian public life, emphasizing his role in promoting Indian civilizational values, correcting historical distortions, and fostering national unity. It highlights his quiet yet effective leadership, dedication to a new India, and his instrumental role in the formation and growth of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The author commends the government’s decision to confer the Bharat Ratna, India’s highest civilian award, on Advani.

    Key Highlights:

    • Advani’s life mission focused on promoting the glory of Indian thought and building a modern, united nation.
    • His extensive travels and yatras played a crucial role in shaping public opinion on critical issues.
    • Instrumental in founding the BJP, Advani, along with Atal Bihari Vajpayee, contributed to the party’s remarkable rise.
    • Advani’s commitment to a new India, drawing strength from its past and rising to its potential, is highlighted.
    • He vehemently opposed historical distortions, pseudo-secularism, and advocated for the right spirit of secularism and nationalism.

    Key Challenges: The article does not explicitly mention challenges. However, it may be inferred that Advani faced challenges in steering Indian thought away from historical distortions and in promoting a vision of nationalism that unifies all Indians.

    Key Terms/Phrases:

    • Bharat Ratna: India’s highest civilian award.
    • Yatras: Extensive travels or journeys for a specific purpose, often used in the context of political or religious outreach.
    • BJP: Bharatiya Janata Party, a prominent political party in India.
    • Pseudo-secularism: The article criticizes false narratives and distortions in presenting the concept of secularism.
    • Rath Yatra: A chariot procession, referring to Advani’s national movement in 1990.
    • Ram Mandir: Refers to the recently consecrated temple dedicated to Lord Ram.

    Key Quotes/Statements:

    • “Advaniji emerged as one of the leading voices of India during the 70 years of his public life.”
    • “His life’s mission has been to create awareness about the glory of Indian thought and build a modern united nation.”
    • “He spared no effort to correct historical distortions and insults to the idea of India.”
    • “Advaniji is more a man of deeds and less of words.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Advani’s role in launching a Rath Yatra from Somnath in 1990.
    • The successful partnership between Advani and Atal Bihari Vajpayee in founding and expanding the BJP.
    • Reference to the recently consecrated Ram Mandir and Advani’s contribution to unleashing the power of nationalism.

    Key Facts/Data:

    • Advani’s public life spanning 70 years.
    • The BJP’s parliamentary performance in 1984 and its subsequent rise to a national political force.
    • Advani’s role as the Home Minister and efforts to fortify internal security.

    Critical Analysis:

    The article presents a positive and appreciative view of Advani’s contributions, emphasizing his commitment to Indian values, secularism, and nationalism. It portrays him as a quiet yet effective leader, focusing on tangible results. The author applauds the government’s decision to confer the Bharat Ratna on Advani.

    Way Forward:

    The article does not explicitly suggest a way forward. However, it implies that Advani’s legacy will endure through the principles and morals he upheld, the leaders he mentored, and the impact of his contributions on shaping the idea of India.

  • Will Europe ever return ‘Looted’ Asian Artifacts?

    Artifacts

    Introduction

    • European museums have faced increasing pressure to return cultural artifacts to their countries of origin.
    • The restitution of these artifacts carries significant implications for diplomacy and international relations.

    France’s Pledge and Precedent

    • France’s Commitment: President Emmanuel Macron pledged support during the visit of Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet to return Khmer artifacts and expand the National Museum of Cambodia.
    • First European Leader: Macron became the first European leader to address demands for the return of looted antiquities in 2017, emphasizing France’s commitment to restoring cultural heritage.

    Cases of Repatriation

    • Musee Guimet’s Return: France’s National Museum of Asian art, Musee Guimet, agreed to return a seventh-century Khmer statue to Cambodia, taken during the colonial era.
    • Global Initiatives: Germany and France allocated funds for reviewing African heritage objects, possibly signaling similar efforts for Asian artifacts.
    • The Met’s Decision: The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York pledged to return sculptures to Cambodia and Thailand, setting a precedent for other institutions.

    Legal Basis and Challenges

    • UNESCO Convention: 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property
    • Non-binding: It is a key legal framework for repatriation, but it doesn’t apply retrospectively to colonial-era looting.
    • National Legislation: Some countries, like Austria, are proposing national laws for returning objects acquired during colonialism.

    Reasons for repatriation

    • Soft Power Benefits: Repatriation can enhance a nation’s soft power, showcasing a commitment to international law, reconciliation, and better relations with affected countries.
    • Rebranding Opportunity: Returning artifacts is seen as an opportunity for Western governments to rebrand and mend historical wrongs, especially in regions like Southeast Asia.
    • EU’s Role: The European Parliament discusses the need for recognizing and addressing colonial legacies and restitution, potentially creating a permanent EU body on restorative justice.
    • Cooperation is Key: To gain recognition similar to the United States, European museums need to cooperate openly with the governments of the regions from which the artifacts originated.

    Conclusion

    • The return of cultural artifacts taken during colonialism is not only a legal and ethical issue but also a diplomatic endeavor.
    • European museums that engage in proactive repatriation efforts can build goodwill, foster cooperation, and enhance their soft power on the global stage.

  • Varanasi HC allows Hindu Prayers in Gyanvapi Premise

    Gyanvapi

    Introduction

    • The Varanasi District Court has issued an order permitting Hindu prayers to be conducted in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, a decision met with both support and opposition.
    • This development comes amid ongoing legal disputes concerning the worship rights at the site.

    Allowing Prayers: Court’s Ruling

    • Prayers Allowed: The Varanasi District Court has directed the district administration to facilitate the resumption of puja (worship) within the disputed southern cellar of the Gyanvapi mosque complex within seven days.
    • Background: The order followed an application filed by Shailendra Kumar Pathak, the priest of the Acharya Ved Vyas Peeth temple, seeking worship rights for visible and invisible deities in the basement of the mosque.

    Reaction and Legal Challenges

    • Legal Challenge: The Anjuman Intezamia Committee of Gyanvapi Masjid, advised by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), intends to challenge the court’s decision in the Allahabad High Court.
    • AIMPLB’s Stance: AIMPLB criticized the court’s ruling as “totally unacceptable” and drew parallels to past disputes like the opening of locks at the Babri Masjid in 1986. They expressed concerns about the targeting of old mosques after the establishment of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.

    Historical Perspective

    • Prior Worship: The petitioner claimed that Hindu priests associated with the Vyas family used to perform daily rituals in the cellar before 1993 when it was discontinued by government orders.
    • Contested Claims: A member of the Anjuman Intezamia committee contested the assertion, stating that there had never been any puja conducted in the cellar.

    Ongoing Legal Proceedings

    • Next Hearing: The next hearing on this matter is scheduled for February 8, allowing the defendants, including the Anjuman Intejamia Masajid Committee that manages the Gyanvapi mosque, to file objections.
    • Parallel Legal Challenge: Another order by the Allahabad High Court concerns a revision application challenging the Varanasi district judge’s refusal to direct the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a scientific survey of the mosque’s wazukhana area.

    Concerns and Historical Parallels

    • Ethical Concerns: The decision to permit puja in the Gyanvapi mosque’s basement raises ethical questions and concerns about religious rights.
    • Parallels to History: AIMPLB sees parallels between recent developments and past disputes, raising concerns about historical patterns of targeting old mosques.

    Conclusion

    • The Varanasi District Court’s ruling allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque’s southern cellar has ignited both legal challenges and discussions about religious rights and historical parallels.
    • The case continues to be a subject of significant debate and legal scrutiny.

  • India nominates 12 forts of Marathas for UNESCO World Heritage List

    maratha

    Introduction

    • India’s nomination for the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2024-25 is the “Maratha Military Landscapes of India.”
    • This nomination encompasses twelve distinct components, each holding a unique place in history and culture.
    • Together, they illuminate the strategic military prowess of the Maratha rulers during the 17th to 19th centuries.

    Maratha Military Landscapes

    • Selecting the Twelve: Maharashtra boasts more than 390 forts, with only twelve chosen for the Maratha Military Landscapes. Among them, eight are protected by the Archaeological Survey of India, including Shivneri, Lohgad, Raigad, Suvarnadurg, Panhala, Vijaydurg, Sindhudurg, and Gingee. Salher, Rajgad, Khanderi, and Pratapgarh are safeguarded by the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Maharashtra.
    • Diverse Fort Types: These forts encompass hill forts, hill-forest forts, hill-plateau forts, coastal forts, and island forts, each with its distinct historical and geographical significance.
    • Historical Significance: These forts, scattered across varied geographical and physiographic regions, exemplify the Maratha rulers’ exceptional fortification and military strategies.

    Maratha Military Ideology

    • The origins of Maratha Military ideology can be traced back to the 17th century during the reign of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (circa 1670 CE).
    • This enduring legacy continued through subsequent rules, including the Peshwa rule until 1818 CE.

    Nomination and Criteria

    The Maratha Military Landscapes of India is nominated in the category of cultural criteria, specifically under:

      1. Criterion (iii): Bearing exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or civilization.
      2. Criterion (iv): Exemplifying outstanding architectural or technological ensembles representing significant stages in human history.
      3. Criterion (vi): Tangibly associated with events, traditions, beliefs, and works of universal significance.

    India’s Rich UNESCO Heritage

    • Existing World Heritage Sites: India currently boasts 42 World Heritage Sites, comprising 34 cultural sites, seven natural sites, and one mixed site.
    • Maharashtra’s Contribution: Maharashtra contributes significantly to India’s heritage with six World Heritage Sites, including Ajanta Caves, Ellora Caves, Elephanta Caves, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai, and the Western Ghats of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala (in the natural category).
    • A Cultural Gem: The Maratha Military Landscapes of India, included in the Tentative List of World Heritage sites in 2021, stands as Maharashtra’s sixth cultural property nominated for inclusion in the prestigious World Heritage List.

    Back2Basics: UNESCO World Heritage Sites

    Description
    UNESCO World Heritage Sites Landmarks or areas selected by UNESCO for their cultural, historical, scientific, or other significant value, legally protected by international treaties.
    Importance World Heritage Sites represent collective and preservative interests of humanity, signifying remarkable accomplishments and intellectual history.
    Selection Criteria Sites must be already-classified landmarks, unique and significant culturally or physically, such as ancient ruins, historical structures, cities, monuments, etc.
    Conservation World Heritage Sites require practical conservation to protect them from risks like trespassing, uncontrolled access, or administrative negligence.
    World Heritage Committee Selects and monitors World Heritage Sites, manages the World Heritage Fund, and provides financial assistance. Composed of 21 states parties elected for a four-year term.
    Membership India is not a member of the World Heritage Committee.

    Note: “States parties” refer to the countries that have ratified the World Heritage Convention and participate in the decision-making process.

  • A blurred mapping of internal female migration

    Big strides on path for women migrant workers in eastern India - India News | The Financial Express

    Central Idea:

    The article highlights the often overlooked and underreported aspects of female migration in India, particularly in the context of internal migration. It emphasizes the need for a more accurate understanding of the challenges faced by migrant women, their motivations, and employment status, ultimately advocating for better-informed policies to address their specific needs.

    Key Highlights:

    • Migrant women in India are a significant but marginalized group, with national surveys providing an inaccurate portrayal of their motivations and employment status.
    • Existing data underestimates the number of migrant women engaged in casual or informal employment due to definitional issues and societal beliefs.
    • The article argues that the entry of women into the formal labor force is hindered by factors such as low education levels, lack of social networks post-migration, and the need for more human and social capital.
    • Despite a 101% increase in female migration for labor/employment between 2001 and 2011, there is a lack of targeted policies and political attention for this demographic.
    • The article suggests that policy-making needs to be more informed about the specific needs, motivations, and conditions of female migrants.

    Key Challenges:

    • Inaccurate representation in national surveys leading to a lack of understanding of the secondary motivations for migration among women.
    • Underreporting of employment status due to definitional issues and societal beliefs about women’s roles.
    • Barriers to entry into the formal labor force, including low education levels, lack of social networks, and the need for more human and social capital.
    • Marginalization of female migrant issues in policy-making due to their limited influence as a vote bank.

    Key Terms:

    • Female Labour Force Participation Rate (FLFPR)
    • Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS)
    • Casual labor
    • Human and social capital
    • One Nation One ration card
    • e-Shram
    • Affordable rental housing complexes

    Key Phrases:

    • “Female migration for labor/employment increased by 101% between 2001 and 2011.”
    • “Migrant women are proportionally less employed than non-migrant women.”
    • “Entry to the formal labor force is challenging for migrant women due to the need for more human and social capital.”
    • “Dismal recovery of women’s labor activity after the pandemic.”
    • “Policy-making poorly informed about the needs, motivations, and conditions of female migrants.”

    Key Quotes:

    • “There is little dialogue surrounding female migrant issues.”
    • “Despite recent polls, political parties do not campaign to gain migrant women’s votes.”
    • “Women choose forms of employment that allow them to handle domestic duties while contributing to the household’s production or finances.”
    • “A change in narrative is required, starting with increased collection of female-specific data.”

    Anecdotes:

    • Anecdotal evidence suggests that migrant women often engage in casual employment, indicating underestimation of their involvement in various sectors.
    • Women may view unpaid family work or self-employment as an extension of domestic commitment, leading to misreporting of employment status.

    Key Statements:

    • “National surveys convey an inaccurate picture of female migration, especially regarding motivations and employment status.”
    • “Entry to the formal labor force is hindered by factors such as low education levels and lack of social networks.”
    • “Female migrants remain largely invisible, facing significant hurdles and marginalization.”
    • “Political parties do not address the needs of female migrants, resulting in poorly informed policy-making.”

    Way Forward:

    • Compile more information in national surveys regarding socio-economic conditions post-migration, including access to social security benefits.
    • Advocate for the collection of time-use data for migrants to better understand the employment patterns of female migrants.
    • Increase awareness about the challenges faced by female migrants to encourage progressive policymaking.
    • Address barriers to entry into the formal labor force by focusing on education, social networks, and human and social capital.
    • Encourage a change in narrative and prioritize the needs of female migrants in policy-making.

  • What is Humboldt’s Enigma and What does it mean for India?

    Humboldt’s Enigma

    Introduction

    • The question of where biodiversity is concentrated has intrigued explorers and naturalists for centuries. Humboldt has tried to answer this question.

    Humboldt’s Insights

    • Alexander von Humboldt: A polymath of the 18th century, Humboldt recorded diverse natural observations, proposing a relationship between temperature, altitude, humidity, and species distribution.
    • Mountain Exploration: During his exploration of South America, Humboldt studied plant distribution on mountains, noting variations with elevation.
    • Chimborazo Mountain: Humboldt used Chimborazo Mountain in Ecuador as an example, illustrating the concept of mountain diversity.

    What is Humboldt’s Enigma?

    • Sun’s Energy: Tropical areas receive more solar energy, fostering greater primary productivity and biodiversity due to the availability of ecological niches.
    • Mountain Exception: Mountains, despite being outside the tropics, have been an exception to the rule, posing Humboldt’s enigma.

    Biodiversity Drivers

    • Earth’s History, Geography, and Climate: These factors are the primary drivers of mountain diversity.
    • Geological Processes: Mountains serve as ‘cradles’ for new species due to geological processes like uplifts, creating new habitats.
    • Climatic Stability: Climatologically stable mountains act as ‘museums,’ preserving species over time.
    • Coastal Tropical Sky Islands: Examples like the Shola Sky Islands in the Western Ghats exhibit both cradle and museum characteristics.

    Eastern Himalaya: An Anomaly

    • Diversity Beyond Tropics: Eastern Himalaya boasts exceptional diversity, challenging the conventional tropical biodiversity paradigm.
    • Multiple Factors: Climate dissimilarity and geological heterogeneity contribute to high biodiversity.
    • Climate Variability: Different temperature and rainfall levels on the same mountain support diverse biomes.

    Unresolved Questions

    • Complexity of Biodiversity: Numerous factors drive diversification and Humboldt’s enigma in different regions, leading to over a hundred hypotheses.
    • Data Limitations: Fine-scale species occurrence data are lacking, hindering precise explanations.
    • Call for Research: India’s under-studied areas need more extensive research, including the use of genetics, to understand true biodiversity.
    • National Initiatives: Programs like the National Mission on Himalayan Studies and Biodiversity need strengthening to support basic research.

    Conclusion

    • Humboldt’s enigma represents one facet of mountain biodiversity, offering opportunities for study and insights into global climate and landscape change issues.

  • Early nutrition impacts cognitive development

    Indonesia Accelerates Fight Against Childhood Stunting

    Central Idea:

    Early childhood stunting not only impacts a child’s height but also influences cognitive development, potentially leading to lower educational achievements. The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying mechanisms of this impact, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like India. It discusses a recent study in Ethiopia and Peru, highlighting the negative correlation between stunting at age 5 and later cognitive skills, specifically executive functions. The findings underscore the critical role of early childhood nutrition in determining cognitive development and educational outcomes.

    Key Highlights:

    • Stunting at around age 5 is linked to lower executive functions, including working memory and inhibitory control, in later childhood.
    • Traditional cognitive-achievement tests may not fully capture inherent cognitive skills, and stunting’s impact may extend beyond cognitive deficits to include behavioral factors like delayed school enrollment.
    • The article highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms through which stunting affects educational achievements, especially in the context of low- and middle-income countries.

    Key Challenges:

    • Existing research often focuses on specific cognitive-achievement test scores, making it challenging to fully understand the complex relationship between early human capital investments, such as nutrition, and cognitive development.
    • Achieving a comprehensive assessment of cognitive skills is complicated by the interplay of cognitive abilities, educational access, and other behavioral factors.
    • The article stresses the need to move beyond traditional cognitive-achievement tests and focus on a deeper understanding of the mechanisms linking early human capital investments to cognitive development.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Early childhood stunting
    • Cognitive development
    • Executive functions
    • Behavioral factors
    • Household fixed effects
    • Poshan Abhiyaan
    • Integrated Child Development Services
    • Jal Jeevan Mission
    • Swachh Bharat Mission
    • Mother’s Absolute Affection Programme
    • Complementary feeding
    • Anganwadi worker

    Key Quotes:

    • “Stunting at approximately age 5 is negatively related to executive functions measured years later.”
    • “Empirical studies have shown that women’s height and educational attainment are strong predictors of child stunting in India.”
    • “Improvements in sanitation reduce the incidence of diarrhoea and stunting.”
    • “Promoting early breastfeeding, along with continued breastfeeding for two years, is essential for optimal child development.”

    Key Statements:

    • The study in Ethiopia and Peru establishes a negative correlation between stunting at age 5 and later cognitive skills, emphasizing the long-term impact of early childhood stunting.
    • The article stresses the need to move beyond traditional cognitive-achievement tests and focus on a deeper understanding of the mechanisms linking early human capital investments to cognitive development.

    Key Examples and References:

    • Sánchez et al.’s study in ‘World Development’ linking early under-nutrition to executive functions in Ethiopia and Peru.
    • The role of initiatives like Poshan Abhiyaan, Integrated Child Development Services, Jal Jeevan Mission, and Swachh Bharat Mission in addressing stunting in India.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • The study in Ethiopia and Peru provides evidence of the negative relationship between stunting at age 5 and executive functions.
    • Empirical studies highlight the predictive role of women’s height and educational attainment in child stunting in India.

    Critical Analysis:

    The article effectively highlights the limitations of traditional cognitive-achievement tests in assessing the impact of early human capital investments on cognitive development. It emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of the complex factors contributing to lower educational achievements, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The study’s focus on executive functions and the link between stunting and cognitive skills adds valuable insights to the existing literature.

    Way Forward:

    • Expand initiatives like the Mother’s Absolute Affection Programme to provide comprehensive lactation support and create breastfeeding-friendly environments.
    • Implement and scale up community-based complementary feeding programs to educate parents about the importance of a diverse diet for children.
    • Consider adding an extra Anganwadi worker to each center to enhance preschool instructional time, potentially improving developmental outcomes and creating employment opportunities.

    In summary, addressing child stunting in India requires a multifaceted approach, including comprehensive nutrition initiatives, sanitation improvements, and strategic investments in education and childcare services. The article underscores the need for evidence-based policies to enhance early childhood nutrition and cognitive development.

  • Why was January 26 chosen to be India’s Republic Day?

    republic day

    Since 1950, January 26, Republic Day has marked the day India’s Constitution came into effect.

    However, the Constitution was prepared the way before the chosen date, adopted officially by the Constituent Assembly on November 26, 1949.

    Why do we celebrate our Republic Day on January 26, then?

    • The answer lies in the history of the Indian freedom struggle during which the date held significance since 1930.
    • On January 26, 1930, the historic “Poorna Swaraj” declaration was officially promulgated, beginning the final phase of India’s freedom struggle where the goal would be complete independence from British rule.

    Republic Day: The context of the 1920s

    • The Non-Cooperation Movement ended unceremoniously in February 1922 after the Chauri Chaura incident.
    • Mahatma Gandhi, at the time, felt that the country was “not yet ready” for his non-violent methods of protest.
    • Thus, the 1920s did not see further mobilisation at the scale that was seen during the Non Cooperation Movement and the anti-Rowlatt Satyagraha.

    Precursor to the Poorna Swaraj Demand

    • 1920s saw the rise of revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh and Chandrashekhar Azad.
    • It witnessed the coming of age of a new generation of Congress leaders such as Nehru, Subhash Chandra Bose, Vallabhai Patel and C Rajagopalachari,
    • Hence the 1920s laid the ground for the future course of India’s freedom struggle.
    • Notably, in 1927, British Authorities appointed the Simon Commission – a seven-man, all European team under Sir John Simon – to deliberate on political reforms in India.
    • This sent a wave of outrage and discontentment across the country.

    Nehru Report and its protagonism for Dominion Status

    • For the first time since 1922, protests against the Simon Commission spread nationwide, with chants of “Simon Go Back” echoing across the country.
    • In response, the INC appointed its own commission under Motilal Nehru.
    • The Nehru Report demanded that India be granted dominion status within the Empire.
    • In the Balfour Declaration of 1926, dominions were defined as “autonomous communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs.
    • Dominions were to be united by a common allegiance to the Crown and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations.

    Do you know?

    In 1926, countries like Canada, Australia and New Zealand were granted dominion status.

    Internal disagreement within the Congress over Dominion Status

    • Crucially, even within Congress, the (Motilal) Nehru Report did not enjoy universal support.
    • Young leaders such as Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru wanted India to break all ties with the British Empire.
    • They argued that under dominion status, while India would enjoy a certain level of autonomy, the British Parliament and Crown would still have the ability to meddle in Indian affairs.
    • Importantly, for both Bose and Nehru, attaining dominion status would make India party to colonial exploitation elsewhere in the British Empire, mainly Africa.
    • With a far more radical worldview than their predecessors, Bose and Nehru looked at anti-colonialism not only as a local political issue for India but in a more global lens.
    • However, Gandhi was still very much for dominion status, arguing that it would be a welcome step in India’s anti-colonial struggle. His views would soon change.

    Irwin’s retreat from the Dominion status promise

    • In 1929, Viceroy Irwin had vaguely announced that India would be granted dominion status in the future.
    • Known as the Irwin Declaration, it was warmly welcomed by Indians but faced massive backlash back in Britain.
    • The British population was still pro-Empire and India was seen as the Empire’s Crown Jewel.
    • Importantly, as the world economy went into a recession, India was arguably Britain’s most valuable colony with its vast land, resources, and population crucial for its economy.
    • Thus, under pressure from back home, Irwin went back on his word.

    Realizing the bluff

    • In a meeting with Gandhi, Muslim League’s Jinnah and a few other leaders, he said that he could not promise India dominion status any time soon.
    • This would be a turning point as the Congress grew increasingly united on the issue.
    • With the British unable to follow through on even reasonable reforms, Indians supported increasingly “radical” goals – a fully independent republic being one of the first.

    Declaration of Poorna Swaraj

    • The Lahore Session of the INC convened in December 1929.
    • On December 19, the historic “Poorna Swaraj” resolution was passed in the session.
    • This declaration of Independence was officially promulgated on January 26, 1930.
    • The Congress urged Indians to come out and celebrate “independence” on that day.
    • The Indian tricolour was hoisted across the country by Congress party workers and patriotic songs were sung as the country reconfigured its strategy for Independence.
    • It is with this declaration that India’s national movement “shifted from the language of charity to the language of justice.”

    Republic Day in post-Independence India

    • From 1930 till India finally won its independence in 1947, January 26 was celebrated as “Independence Day” or “Poorna Swaraj Day” with Indians reaffirming their commitment towards sovereignty on that day.
    • However, India won independence from the British on August 15, exactly two years after the Japanese surrendered to the Allies to end World War II.
    • When leaders had to decide on a day to promulgate India’s new constitution, January 26 was thought to be ideal.
    • Not only did this date already hold nationalist significance, the Constitution in many ways reflected the “Poorna Swaraj” declaration of two decades back.

     

  • Why was January 26 chosen to be India’s Republic Day?

    Introduction

    • On January 26, India celebrates Republic Day, marking the day when its Constitution came into effect in 1950.
    • However, the roots of this celebration trace back to January 26, 1930, when India made the historic “Poorna Swaraj” declaration, signifying its quest for complete independence from British rule.

    Context of the 1920s

    • Non-Cooperation Movement: The 1920s witnessed the aftermath of the Non Cooperation Movement and the Chauri Chaura incident, which prompted Mahatma Gandhi to temporarily halt non-violent protests.
    • Rise of Leaders: This period saw the emergence of notable leaders like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhash Chandra Bose, Vallabhai Patel, and C. Rajagopalachari, setting the stage for India’s future freedom struggle.

    Simon Commission and Nehru Report

    • Simon Commission: In 1927, British authorities appointed the Simon Commission to discuss political reforms in India, sparking nationwide protests with slogans like “Simon Go Back.”
    • Nehru Report: In response, the Indian National Congress (INC) established its own commission under Motilal Nehru, advocating dominion status for India within the British Empire.

    Internal Disagreements: Dominion or Republic?

    • Dominion Status Debate: While the Nehru Report called for dominion status, leaders like Subhash Chandra Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru favored complete independence, fearing that dominion status would align India with colonial exploitation in the British Empire.
    • Change in Gandhi’s Views: Initially supporting dominion status, Mahatma Gandhi’s stance evolved as he began advocating for complete independence.

    Irwin Declaration and Backtracking

    • Irwin Declaration: In 1929, Viceroy Irwin vaguely promised dominion status for India, which sparked hope among Indians but faced opposition in Britain.
    • Backtracking: Under pressure from Britain, Irwin retracted his promise during a meeting with Indian leaders, leading to growing unity within the INC for complete independence.

    Declaration of Poorna Swaraj

    • Lahore Session of INC: In December 1929, during the Lahore Session of the INC, the “Poorna Swaraj” resolution was passed, calling for complete independence from British rule.
    • Official Promulgation: On January 26, 1930, this declaration of independence was officially announced, marking a pivotal moment in India’s freedom struggle.
    • Nonviolent Protest: The resolution also affirmed the Gandhian principles of nonviolent protest, which became integral to the subsequent struggle for independence.

    Republic Day in Post-Independence India

    • Celebrating Independence: From 1930 until India’s independence in 1947, January 26 was celebrated as “Independence Day” or “Poorna Swaraj Day,” symbolizing India’s commitment to sovereignty.
    • Constitution Adoption: When India adopted its Constitution, leaders chose January 26 for Republic Day, as it held historical significance and aligned with the ideals of complete independence as articulated in the “Poorna Swaraj” declaration.
    • Symbolism: Today, Republic Day commemorates India’s journey to self-rule and reflects the principles enshrined in its Constitution.