💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • Vulnerability is an essential element for defining disaster impacts and its threat to people. How and in what ways can vulnerability to disasters be characterized? Discuss different types of vulnerability with reference to disasters.

    As per UNDRR, vulnerability refers to the conditions determined by physical, social, economic and environmental factors or processes which increase the susceptibility of an individual, a community, assets or systems to the impacts of hazards.

    Vulnerability can be characterized as follow

    Exposure to Hazard – Settlements on riverbanks or seismic zones are more vulnerable. Eg- Joshimath (Uttarakhand)

    Adaptive or Coping Capacity – Ability to anticipate, respond, absorb and recover from a disaster. Eg- Access to savings, insurance, early warning systems.

    Socio-economic Conditions – Poverty, marginalisation and inequity increase susceptibility to harm. Eg- Disaster induced migration

    Governance and Institutional Readiness– Eg- Weak building regulation increases earthquake vulnerability.

    Environmental Degradation increases hazard impact. Eg- ‘Day Zero’ in Chennai due to wetland encroachment.

    Social Networks and Support Systems: – Communities with strong social cohesion, community organizations, and support networks are more resilient to respond to and recover from disasters.

    Health status and access to healthcare services influence vulnerability – Eg- Elderly and Children are more vulnerable to post disaster illness

    Types of Vulnerability with Reference to Disasters

    Physical Vulnerability – Related to infrastructure, buildings, land use, and physical exposure. Eg- houses in Zone V are highly earthquake-vulnerable.

    Social Vulnerability – Eg- Women in rehabilitation camps face violence and trafficking

    Economic Vulnerability – Lack of income stability, livelihood diversity, and financial buffers. Eg- Fisherfolk losing boats in cyclones.

    Environmental Vulnerability- Eg- Loss of mangroves in Sundarbans increases storm-surge impacts.

    Institutional Vulnerability – Weak governance, poor enforcement of safety norms, lack of coordination.

    Technological Vulnerability – Risks arising from industrial, nuclear, or infrastructural failures. Eg- Bhopal gas tragedy.

    Geographic Vulnerability – Eg- Himalayan towns exposed to landslides and GLOFs.

    Mapping vulnerabilities, enforcing inclusive governance, and capacity building at grassroot are essential for disaster resilience.

  • The banning of ‘Jamaat-e – islaami’ in Jammu and Kashmir brought into focus the role of over-ground workers (OGWs) in assisting terrorist organizations. Examine the role played by OGWs in assisting terrorist organizations in insurgency affected areas. Discuss measures to neutralize the influence of OGWs.

    Recently, MHA has declared ‘Jamaat-e-Islami Jammu Kashmir (JeI)’ as an ‘Unlawful Association’ under Section 3 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

    Role played by OGWs

    Intelligence Gathering – provide real-time information on troop movement, patrol timings and security vulnerabilities.

    Logistical Support – arrange shelter, vehicles, food, medical aid and safe houses for militants to evade detection.

    Radicalisation and Recruitment through religious networks, student groups and social media.

    Terror Financing – raise funds locally, manage extortion, run front organisations and facilitate hawala transfers.

    Facilitating Arms Movement – OGWs act as couriers, store arms, and help smuggle weapons across borders or LoC. Eg- collecting drone-dropped arms.

    Information Warfare – They generate pro-terror content, circulate videos and organise protests to delegitimise the state.

    Maintaining Militant-Local Community Linkages- create public sympathy for militants, and organise funerals or protests to build support. Eg- funeral of Burhan Wani

    Measures to Neutralise the Influence of OGWs

    Intelligence and Policing Measures

    Integrated Intelligence Grid (IIG) – Real-time coordination between police, IB, NIA and security forces to identify OGW networks.

    Use of Technology for Profiling – AI-based monitoring of suspicious financial transactions, travel patterns and digital communication.

    Strengthening Local Police and Community Intelligence – Eg- Village Defence Groups in Rajouri-Poonch.

    Tightening Border Surveillance – Use of drones, sensors, and night-vision to check infiltration and OGW courier routes.

    Legal and Institutional Measures

    Action through UAPA & NIA Act – Freezing bank accounts and shutting down front organisations.

    Regulating NGOs, Religious Networks – Eg- FCRA audits of charity organisations

    Community and Preventive Measures

    De-radicalisation and Counselling of youth

    Heart and mind strategy – Eg- Operation Sadbhavana (Goodwill) of Indian Army

    Employment and Skill Development to mainstream youth. Eg- Udaan Scheme

    OGWs are the backbone of insurgency. A multi-layered approach is needed to break the support ecosystem of terrorism.

  • What is the CyberDome Project? Explain how it can be useful in controlling internet crimes in India

  • How is the government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?

    India’s traditional medicinal knowledge includes thousands of formulations and approximately 45,000 plant species, but faces biopiracy threats from multinational companies patenting indigenous resources without consent or compensation.

    Government Initiatives to Protect Traditional Knowledge

    Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL):

    Translates ancient medicinal texts from Sanskrit, Urdu, Tamil, Persian and other languages into English, French, German, Spanish, and Japanese for global patent examiners.

    Contains over 4.48 lakh formulations, including Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, Sowa Rigpa, and Yoga knowledge systems.

    CSIR-TKDL actively files pre-grant oppositions and third-party observations; 283 patent applications were refused, amended, or withdrawn using TKDL evidence.

    The Biological Diversity Act, 2002: Mandates that any foreign individual or commercial entity seeking to use India’s biological resources or traditional knowledge must obtain prior approval from NBA.

    National Biodiversity Authority: NBA is a statutory body implementing the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 to protect India’s biological resources and traditional knowledge.

    People’s Biodiversity Register (PBR): Administered by the NBA, PBR serves as a formal tool for recording and maintaining comprehensive localized data on biological resources and their medicinal uses.

    Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) agreements:

    Companies using Indian bio-resources must share royalties or benefits with the National Biodiversity Authority.

    These funds support local Biodiversity Management Committees and tribal communities.

    The Patents Act, 1970:

    States that an invention which is traditional knowledge, or an aggregation or duplication of known properties of traditionally known components, is not patentable.

    Mandates disclosure of the source and geographical origin of biological materials used in patents, with details shared with the NBA.

    Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001: Protects the rights of local communities and farmers over their traditional crop and medicinal plant varieties.

    By safeguarding indigenous medical heritage through the NBA and TKDL, India directly advances SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 15 (Life on Land) while protecting local community rights.

  • Elaborate the impact of National Watershed Project in increasing agricultural production from water-stressed areas.

    The NWP is a World Bank-assisted initiative that supports the watershed development component of India’s Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayi Yojana (PMKSY).

    Project Objectives

    Strengthen Institutions – for better planning, implementation, and monitoring

    Use Technology for Efficiency – using scientific tools like GIS, remote sensing etc

    Improve Water & Soil Management

    Support Rural Livelihoods

    Positive Impact on Agricultural Production in Water-Stressed Areas

    Improved Water Availability – Groundwater levels increased by 0.5-1.2 metres on average in treated watersheds (CWC evaluation).

    Increase in Cropping Intensity

    by 35-60% in many watershed districts (ICAR-NAAS study).

    Higher Crop Yields – Yield increased by 25-40% in millets, 30-60% in pulses, 20-35% in oilseeds (NRSC 2021).

    Diversification to High-Value Crops due to reliable water.

    Reduced Soil Erosion by 40-60% – enhancing long-term soil productivity.

    Growth in Livestock Productivity – Fodder production increased 3-5 times, boosting dairy income in dryland regions.

    Improved Household Income by 27-45%, poverty reduced 12-20% in watershed villages. (World Bank)

    Climate Resilience Strengthened – Enhanced capacity to withstand dry spells, delayed rainfall, and drought cycles.

    Limitations

    Uneven Implementation Across States

    Delays in Planning & Fund Release

    Weak Community Participation

    Poor Post-Project Maintenance

    Limited Integration With Micro-Irrigation

    Fragmented Convergence With Schemes like MGNREGA, PMKSY

    To scale its impact nationally, watershed programmes must be linked with micro-irrigation, FPOs, and market access.

  • What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make food grain distribution system more effective?

    India’s Public Distribution System is the world’s largest food transfer programme and India’s most far-reaching social safety net, accounting for around 50% of the overall social assistance budget.

    Objectives of PDS

    Food security

    Stabilise foodgrain prices

    Prevent hunger and malnutrition

    Safety net during emergencies

    Reformative Steps to Strengthen India’s Food-Grain Distribution System

    National Food Security Act, 2013 – Expanded the PDS coverage to 67% of population

    End-to-End Digitalisation of PDS

    All 20.4 Cr household ration cards digitised

    Aadhaar seeding – over 47 million bogus ration cards removed (2013-21).

    Implementation of Warehouse Inventory Network and Governing System (WINGS) application to automate tagging of mills

    5.33 lakh e-PoS devices installed in all Fair Price Shops.

    One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) – Ensures nationwide portability of PDS benefits.

    Doorstep Delivery of Foodgrains in Punjab, Haryana, Delhi etc.

    Strengthening Storage & Supply Chain

    GPS-based tracking of trucks. Eg- Chhatisgarh

    Expansion of warehouses under PEG Scheme (Private Entrepreneurs Guarantee).

    Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) in Chandigarh, Puducherry, Dadra & Nagar Haveli.

    Decentralised Procurement in states like Punjab, Haryana, MP, Chhattisgarh, Telangana.

    Nutritional Improvements in PDS

    Introduction of fortified rice under NFSA, ICDS and PM-POSHAN.

    Some states (Tamil Nadu, Odisha) supply pulses, millets, oil and eggs through PDS.

    However, despite these steps there are few challenges

    As per study by Crisil using a ‘thali index’, up to 50% of rural and 20% of urban Indians cannot afford two balanced meals a day

    Even with PDS support, food deprivation remained 40% in rural and 10% in urban areas

    Weak supply chain management – Storage Losses due to poor warehousing and handling. Eg- 40% of the food wasted (1.5 lakh crore or 1% of the GDP)

    Open ended procurement leads to overflowing of FCI godowns

    Diversion – Eg- 28% of allocated foodgrains fail to reach beneficiaries as per HCES 2022-23.

    Inclusion and exclusion errors due to faulty beneficiary identification.

    Corruption and ghost beneficiaries – Over 47 million bogus ration cards cancelled between 2013-2021

    Corruption at Fair Price Shops (FPS) – Issues of under-weighing, overcharging etc

    Fiscal Burden – Food subsidy budget @ 2.1 lakh cr in 2025-26

    Way Forward

    Shanta Kumar Committee Recommendations on Revamping of PDS

    Direct Procurement by States

    Private Sector Involvement in procurement, storage, and distribution

    Diversify the food basket – Include millets, pulses, edible oil and iodised salt for nutritional security.

    Strengthen grievance redressal – Set up toll-free helplines, social audits and citizen charters at FPS level.

    Community monitoring – Involve self-help groups, local bodies and civil society in supervision.

    Universal PDS similar to Tamil Nadu’s model.

    Optimise buffer stock norms to reduce food grain wastage.

    The PDS remains a vital tool for India’s food security and realise SDG 1,2,3,and 12

  • How was India benefited from the contributions of Sir M.Visvesvaraya and Dr. M. S. Swaminathan in the fields of water engineering and agricultural science respectively?

    India’s foodgrains production has surged from 50.8 million tons in 1950-51 to over 357 million tons in 2025. Sir Visvesvaraya and Dr. Swaminathan played a prominent role in this transformation.

    Contribution of Sir M. Visvesvaraya in Water Engineering

    Modernisation of Irrigation Systems – Eg- Invented the automatic weir water floodgates, first installed at KRS Dam

    Major Dams and Multipurpose Projects – Designed the Krishna Raja Sagara (KRS) Dam, which irrigated 1.2 lakh+ hectares in Mandya region

    Developed water supply and drainage systems for Hyderabad, Pune, Nagpur, Belagavi

    Promotion of Scientific Water Management – Pioneered ideas like integrated river valley development

    Advocated planned economic development through irrigation, power generation, and industrialisation. Eg- Mysore Iron & Steel Works.

    International Projects– worked on water supply and drainage systems in the British Colony of Aden (now Yemen)

    His Mysore State Flood Report in 1909 provided crucial insights on flood management

    Contributions of Dr. M. S. Swaminathan in Agricultural Science

    Chaired the National Commission on Farmers and recommended policies like the MSP formula (C2 + 50%).

    Father of the Green Revolution – Introduced high-yielding varieties of wheat and rice. Eg- “Swarna” rice variety

    Achieving Food Self-Sufficiency – foodgrain production rose from ~72 million tonnes (1965) to over 130 million tonnes (1980s), ending “ship-to-mouth” dependence.

    Promotion of Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Agriculture – Advocated genetic conservation, bio-fortification, and evergreen revolution principles

    He played an instrumental role in developing the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act of 2001.

    Institutional Building

    ICAR modernisation – Director-General from 1972 to 1979.

    Setting up MS Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF)

    Promoting biotechnology. Eg- research on cryogenetics in potato crops.

    Together, they shaped India’s progress in water management, agriculture, and national development.

    Agriculture Technology

  • How far is Integrated Farming System (IFS) helpful in sustaining agricultural production?

    Integrated farming system refers to the integration of multiple components of agriculture in a single farm unit to enhance productivity, sustainability and resilience while optimising resource use.

    Resource Use Efficiency by recycling farm by-products into inputs.

    Improved Soil Health through addition of organic matter. Eg- Vermi-composting + green manuring in rice-vegetable-livestock systems.

    Water use efficiency – Eg- .

    Reduction in Pests & Diseases due to practices like crop rotation, intercropping, and mixed cropping.

    Higher Productivity per Unit Area compared to monocropping due to synergistic systems.

    Income Security – Multiple income sources reduce climate and market vulnerability. Eg- crop loss can be offset by milk/poultry/fish income.

    Doubling Farmers income – Eg- paddy cultivation + fish farming + poultry in Tamil Nadu saw income rise by over 100%. (ICAR study)

    Employment Generation – Labour demand increases year-round due to diversified activities

    Enhanced Biodiversity by offering homes for a variety of plant and animal species. Eg- Agroforestry

    Challenges in IFS

    Small and Marginal Land Holdings (86%) restricts integration of enterprises like ponds or livestock.

    High Initial Investment requirement in biogas units, sheds and fish ponds require capital.

    Limited Knowledge & Skills at village level – IFS demands multi-disciplinary expertise.

    Lack of Market Linkages and assured procurement channels for surplus milk, fish, vegetables

    Policy Gaps – Schemes operate in silos rather than landscape-based integrated planning.

    Way Forward

    Promote climate and region-wise IFS models (dryland, coastal, hill).

    Financial Support – low-interest loans + integrated crop-livestock insurance.

    Rural Agri-Logistics Nodes under Gati Shakti Framework to develop cold chains, aggregation centers

    Extension Support through Krishi Sakhis, FPOs and Agri-Startups for training and backward-forward linkages.

    Raising R&D Investment to 1% of GDP

    Budget 2025-26 emphasised Agriculture as the ‘first engine’ for India’s development journey. IFS can be the backbone of this journey.

  • The public expenditure management is a challenge to the Government of India in context of budget making during the post liberalization period. Clarify it.

    Post-1991 liberalisation transformed India’s economy from a state-controlled to a more market-driven system. This expanded public spending needs while simultaneously demanding fiscal discipline.

    Need for Public Expenditure

    Provision of Public Goods – Eg- spending on health, education

    Social Welfare & Equity – Eg – Poshan 2.0, PM-Jan Arogya Yojana.

    Infrastructure Development – Eg – National Infrastructure Pipeline.

    Poverty Alleviation & Employment – Eg – MGNREGA wage payments.

    Reducing Regional Imbalances – Eg – Aspirational Districts Programme.

    Counter-cyclical spending during downturns. – Eg – Pandemic stimulus packages.

    Human Capital Development – Eg – PM Kaushal Vikas Yojana.

    Technological & R&D Support – Eg – Funding for ISRO, Digital India.

    Major challenges in Public Expenditure management

    Interest Payment obligations – The budgetary estimate for 2025-26 – Rs 12.76 lakh crore on interest payments forming 25 % of the government’s total expenditure.

    Low Tax Buoyancy: The tax-to-GDP ratio in India is around 10-12%, lower, while for OECD its 33%.

    Expanding Welfare Commitments – Growth in health, education, pensions, MGNREGA raises recurring liabilities.

    FRBM Constraints – FRBM mandates FD of 4.4% of GDP, limiting fiscal space.

    Poor Budgetary Forecasting : Budgets often overstate revenue projections (15 out of 20 years since fiscal 1998) and understate expenditures (12 out of 20 years since fiscal 1998).

    Fiscal Populism – eg loan waivers to farmers

    Rise in Off-Budget Expenditure – Eg: Food subsidy via FCI, UDAY bonds by states.

    Rise in Public Administration Costs – Eg: 8th Pay Commission can increase salary & pension burden.

    Need for Infrastructure Investment in transport, energy, and urbanisation, but fiscal space remained limited. Eg- As per WB, $2.2 trillion by 2030 is needed

    Public Sector Inefficiencies – Persistent losses in PSUs require budgetary support, reducing room for developmental expenditure.

    External Challenges

    Volatile Crude Oil Prices due to geopolitical instability. India imports 85% of its crude.

    Rising International Commitments under Paris Agreement, SDGs, Sendai Framework etc. Eg- Renewable energy targets.

    Rupee depreciation increases the cost of external debt servicing and capital imports.

    Rising Protectionism and Trade Wars have impacted exports. Eg- Trump H1B visa restrictions

    Increased Defence spending due to External Threat. Eg- 5% increase in defence spending in 2025 than 2024.

    Way Forward for Effective Fiscal Policy in India

    Establish an independent fiscal council to provide unbiased analysis of fiscal policy and enhance transparency and accountability. (15th FC Report)

    Scrutiny of Populist Policies and Outcome-Oriented Budgeting (NITI Aayog)

    Leveraging PPP for mobilizing private sector investment for infrastructure projects. (Economic Survey)

    Reforming Social Welfare Programs: Eg- Shanta Kumar Committee estimated that reforms in PDS could

    Cut down administrative costs by 10-15% through e-governance. (2nd ARC)

    Enhance Tax Buoyancy – to achieve a medium-term growth trajectory of 6.5-7.0% and realize Viksit Bharat vision, tax buoyancy needs to be in the 1.2-1.5 range. (EY Report)

    Improve Centre-State Fiscal Coordination – Encourage states through capex-linked incentives, as in Union Budget 2023-24’s 50-year interest-free loans.

    Strategic Disinvestment – Use proceeds to fund infrastructure, logistics, transport, not for recurring expenditure. (NITI Aayog)

    Efficient expenditure is critical for sustainable budgeting and Viksit Bharat 2047.

  • Enumerate the indirect taxes which have been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST) in India. Also, comment on the revenue implications of the GST introduced in India since July 2017.

    The Goods and Services Tax (GST), implemented on 1 July 2017, unified India’s fragmented indirect tax system into a single, destination-based tax, aimed at creating a ‘one nation, one tax’ System.

    Indirect Taxes Subsumed under GST

    Revenue Implications of GST Since July 2017

    Rising Revenue Collections – Eg – Average monthly collections rose from to .

    Formalisation – E-invoicing, ITC matching and GSTN integration improved compliance, pushing MSMEs into the formal economy

    Reduction in Cascading – Unified tax with seamless input credit reduced the tax-on-tax effect, improving supply-chain efficiency and indirectly boosting revenues.

    Support for Manufacturing: Correcting inverted duty structures enhances domestic value addition, strengthens export competitiveness, and boosts revenue.

    Ease of Compliance – lower rates under GST 2.0 combined with better compliance can increase GST collections in the medium term.

    Challenges

    Post GST 2.0 revenue shortfall of . Due to reduced rates and zero-rating of many goods.

    PRS Report– the aggregate revenue under GST has declined from 6.5% of GDP in 2015-16 to 5.5% of GDP in 2023-24. (below the 7% GST-to-GDP ratio projected by the 15th FC)

    Initial Revenue Volatility – States faced shortfalls despite compensation, indicating

    High Compliance Burden – Multiple monthly, quarterly, and annual returns, e-invoicing, and ITC reconciliation increase administrative load, especially for SMEs.

    State Revenue Concerns – Dependence on compensation cess and delays in payments strain state finances

    Evasion and fraud through fraudulent activities like fake invoices persist.

    Nearly half of the economy remains outside the GST framework. Eg- petroleum products, real estate, and electricity duties are excluded from GST.

    For higher, predictable and efficient revenue generation, the need is to

    Include petroleum and electricity under the GST

    Anti-Evasion Measures: Eg- Utilizing advanced data analytics

    Bring emerging sectors- crypto-assets, carbon credits under GST