💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • What is the FAITH’ Trial?

    With the number of COVID-19 patients rising in India, a pharma company has announced a new randomized study to test the combined efficacy of two antiviral drugs under the ‘FAITH Trials’.

    Misleading names: One may get confused over the names given to these clinical trials. The name ‘FAITH’ and ‘Solidarity’ appear more like a judicial trial or some Human Rights violation related trials. UPSC can knock such areas in prelims.

    FAITH Trials

    • The two drugs: Favipiravir and Umifenovir will be tried as a potential COVID-19 treatment strategy.
    • This new combination clinical trial will be called FAITH – (FA vipiravir plus Um I fenovir (efficacy and safety) Trial in Indian Hospital setting).
    • The two antiviral drugs have different mechanisms of action, and their combination may demonstrate improved treatment efficacy by effectively tackling high viral loads in patients during the early stages of the disease.
    • This trial offers a comprehensive antiviral cover on pre-entry and post-entry life-cycle of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

    Dosages under the trial

    • Patients taking the drug will receive Faviprivir 1800 mg bid and Umifenovir 800 mg bid on Day 1.
    • Thereafter, they will receive Faviprivir 800mg bid and Unifenovir 800mg bid for the remaining course of treatment.
    • Duration of treatment will be 14 days and patients will be discharged after clinical cure and two consecutive negative tests.
    • While one group will be receiving Favipiravir and Umifenovir (with standard supportive care), the other group will receive Favipiravir along with standard supportive care.

    Other trials in news: The Solidarity Trial

    • “Solidarity” is an international initiative for clinical trials launched by the WHO, along with partners, to help find an effective treatment for Covid-19.
    • It was originally supposed to look at four drugs or drug combinations: Remdesivir, HCQ, Ritonavir/Lopinavir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir/Interferon beta 1a.
    • Now with HCQ trial enrolment stalled for at least the next few weeks, the Solidarity trial will proceed with the other three arms.

  • R&D: Path to self-reliant India

    What does it take to be self-reliant? (Hint: R&D!) This is the question this article tries to answer.  After independence, we had a good start in R&D. But what went wrong? What was the role played by globalisation? Did the globalisation deliver on its promise of technology transfer? And finally, what lies on the way forward for India? This article answers all such question.

    What went wrong: historical perspective

    • India chose the path of self-reliance in state-run heavy industries and strategic sectors after independence.
    • In the decades following independence, this choice of self-reliance had placed India ahead of most developing countries.
    • In the 1970s and 80s, however, India did not modernise these industries to climb higher up the technological ladder.
    • The private sector, which had backed the state-run core sector approach in its Bombay Plan, stayed content with near-monopoly conditions in non-core sectors in a protected market.
    • Little effort was made to modernise light industries or develop contemporary consumer products.
    • India’s industrial ecosystem was thus characterised by low productivity, poor quality and low technology, and was globally uncompetitive.

    What did India lose in the ‘lost decades’?

    • India completely missed out on the ‘third industrial revolution’.
    • Third industrial revolution comprised electronic goods, microprocessors, personal computers, mobile phones and decentralised manufacturing and global value chains during the so-called lost decade(s).
    • Today, India is the world’s second-largest smartphone market.
    • However, it does not make any of these phones itself.
    • India manufactures only a small fraction of solar photovoltaic cells and modules currently used, with ambitious future targets.

    What happened to ‘self-reliance’ after India embraced globalisation?

    • At the turn of the millennium, when India embarked on liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation.
    • So, the very concept of self-reliance was rubbished.
    • This happened in the belief that it was like reinventing the things already invented and wasting money on it.
    • And when advanced technologies could simply be bought from anywhere at lower costs. 
    • Two related ideas have prevailed since then, and neither delivered the desired results.

    So, what are these two basic ideas?

    1. Unsuitability of PSUs in the globalised world

    • The first idea was that public sector undertakings (PSUs) are, by definition, inefficient and sluggish for the competitive globalised scenario.
    • No effort was made to engender either real autonomy or a transition to new technological directions.
    • Instead, PSUs with capability and scale were undermined or abandoned, along with many nascent research and development (R&D) efforts, for instance, in photovoltaics, semiconductors and advanced materials.

    So, what was the result of this attitude towards PSUs?

    • The private sector displayed little interest in these heavy industries and showed no appetite for technology upgradation.
    • With entry of foreign corporations, most Indian private companies retreated into technology imports or collaborations.
    • Even today, most R&D in India is conducted by PSUs.
    • And much of the smaller but rising proportion of private sector R&D is by foreign corporations in information technology and biotechnology/pharma.
    • Conclusion: Given the disinclination of most of the private sector towards R&D and high-tech manufacturing, significant government reinvestment in PSUs and R&D is essential for self-reliance.

    2. Foreign companies were expected to bring new technologies in India

    • The second idea was that inviting foreign direct investment and manufacturing by foreign majors would bring new technologies into India’s industrial ecosystem.
    • This was thought to obviate the need for indigenous efforts towards self-reliance.

    So, what happened on the ground?

    • But mere setting up of manufacturing facilities in India is no guarantee of absorption of technologies.
    • There is no evidence from any sector that this has taken place or has even been attempted.
    • The fact is, foreign majors jealously guard commercially significant or strategic technologies in off-shore manufacturing bases.
    • Conclusion: The key problem of self-reliance is therefore neither external finance nor domestic off-shore manufacturing, but resolute indigenous endeavour including R&D.

    Let’s look at experience of other Asian countries towards self-reliance

    Three models emerge from Asian countries.

    1. Focus on technology and industries

    •  Japan’s post-war success, was seen as a template by some countries to follow.
    • These include countries like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong
    • These countries took huge technological and industrial strides in the 1970s and 80s.
    • South Korea emerged as a global powerhouse in manufacturing, but also in indigenously developed technologies.
    • Taiwan developed technologies and manufacturing capacities in robotics and micro-processors.
    • While Singapore and Hong Kong adapted advanced technologies in niche areas.
    • These self-reliant capabilities were enabled, among other factors, by planned state investments in R&D including basic research (3-5% of GDP), technology and policy support to private corporations, infrastructure and, importantly, education and skill development (4-6% of GDP).

    2. Focus on off-shore manufacturing and not on self-reliance

    • Countries like Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam have focused on off-shore manufacturing lower down the value chain and without the thrust on self-reliance.
    • This is useful for job creation but is an unsuitable model for a country of India’s size and aspirations.

    3. China: Transition from low-end manufacturing to dominant role in supply chains

    • China is, of course, unique in scale and in its determination to become a superpower not just geopolitically but also in self-reliant S&T and industrial capability.
    • China advanced purposefully from low-end mass manufacturing to a dominant role in global supply chains.
    • It has now decided on shifting to advanced manufacturing.
    • It has set itself a target of becoming a world leader by 2035 in 5G, supercomputing, Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous vehicles, biotech/pharma and other technologies of the ‘fourth industrial revolution’.

    Way forward for India

    • India may well have missed the bus in many of technologies in which the U.S., Europe and China have established perhaps insurmountable leads.
    • Yet, self-reliant capabilities in electric and fuel cell vehicles, electricity storage systems, solar cells and modules, aircraft including UAVs, AI, robotics and automation, biotech/pharma and others are well within reach.
    • Large-scale concerted endeavours would, however, be required, since self-reliance will not happen by itself.
    • State-funded R&D, including in basic research, by PSUs and research institutions and universities needs to be scaled-up significantly, well above the dismal 1% of GDP currently.
    • Upgraded and reoriented PSUs would also be crucial given their distinctive place in the ecosystem.
    • Private sector delivery-oriented R&D could also be supported, linked to meaningful participation in manufacturing at appropriate levels of the supply chain.
    • India’s meagre public expenditure on education needs to be substantially ramped up including in skill development.

    Consider the question “The path to the self-reliance of any country goes through robust capabilities in the R&D. Comment”

    Conclusion

    Self-reliance would need a paradigm shift in our approach toward many things. First and foremost is the R&D. Potential of the PSUs has to be tapped to their fullest in the realms of R&D. The second area of focus should be education. These two areas are the key to achieve self-reliance and should be the focus of policymakers.

    Back2Basics: Bombay Plan

    • The Bombay plan was a set of proposal of a small group of influential business leaders in Bombay for the development of the post-independence economy of India.
    • This plan was published in two parts or volume- first in 1944 and second in 1945.
    • The prime objectives of the plan were to achieve a balanced economy and to raise the standard of living of the masses of the population rapidly by doubling the present per capita income within a period of 15 years from the time the plan goes into operation.

     

  • Applying the lessons learned from GST to One Nation One Ration Card (ON-ORC)

    Never before we felt the necessity of portable benefit schemes as we did in the wake of the pandemic. Portable ration card could have mitigated the suffering of migrant workers to some extent. But it was not to be. This article examines the challenges in implementing the idea of ON-ORC and offers the solution to these challenges by drawing on the lessons learned from GST. At the same time, the shortcoming of GST can also be avoided in the ON-ORC.

    What is One Ration Card (ON-ORC)?

    • In the present system, a ration cardholder can buy foodgrains only from an Fair   Price Shop that has been assigned to her in the locality in which she lives.
    • However, this will change once the ONORC system becomes operational nationally.
    • Under the ONORC system, the beneficiary will be able to buy subsidised foodgrains from any FPS across the country.
    • The new system, based on a technological solution, will identify a beneficiary through biometric authentication on electronic Point of Sale (ePoS) devices installed at the FPSs.
    • This would enable that person to purchase the number of foodgrains to which she is entitled under the NFSA.

    Portable welfare benefit and attempts so far to achieve it

    •  The idea of portable welfare benefits means a citizen should be able to access welfare benefits irrespective of where she is in the country.
    • In the case of food rations, the idea was first mooted under the UPA government by a Nandan Nilekani-led task force in 2011.
    • The current government had committed to a national rollout of One Nation, One Ration Card (ON-ORC) by June 2020, and had initiated pilots in 12 states.

    Progress on intra-state and inter-state portability

    • While intra-state portability of benefits has seen good initial uptake, inter-state portability has lagged.
    • The finance minister has now announced the deadline of March 2021 to roll out ON-ORC.

    So, to ensure a smooth rollout, let’s review the challenges thus far

    1) The fiscal implications:

    • ON-ORC will affect how the financial burden is shared between states.

    2) The larger issues of federalism and inter-state coordination:

    • Many states are not convinced about a “one size fits all” regime because i) they have customised the PDS through higher subsidies, ii) higher entitlement limits, and iii) supply of additional items.

    3) The technology aspect:

    • ON-ORC requires a complex technology backbone that brings over 750 million beneficiaries, 5,33,000 ration shops and 54 million tonnes of food-grain annually on a single platform.

    How the lessons learned from GST can be applied to deal with the above 3 challenges?

    1. Fiscal challenge

    • Just like with ON-ORC, fiscal concerns had troubled GST from the start.
    • States like Tamil Nadu and Gujarat that are “net exporters” were concerned they would lose out on tax revenues to “net consumer” states like UP and Bihar.
    • Finally, the Centre had to step in and provide guaranteed compensation for lost tax revenues for the first five years.
    • The Centre could provide a similar assurance to “net inbound migration” states such as Maharashtra and Kerala that any additional costs on account of migrants will be covered by it for the five years.

    2. We could have a National council for ON-ORC

    • GST also saw similar challenges with broader issues of inter-state coordination.
    • In a noteworthy example of cooperative federalism, the central government created a GST council consisting of the finance ministers of the central and state governments to address these issues.
    • The government could consider a similar national council for ON-ORC.
    • To be effective, this council should meet regularly, have specific decision-making authority, and should operate in a problem-solving mode based on consensus building.

    3. Technological aspect: PDS Network

    • GST is supported by a sophisticated tech backbone, housed by the GST Network (GSTN), an entity jointly owned by the Centre and states.
    • A similar system would be needed for ON-ORC.
    • The Nilekani-led task force recommended setting up of a PDS network (PDSN).
    • PDSN would track the movement of rations, register beneficiaries, issue ration cards, handle grievances and generate analytics.
    • Since food rations are a crucial lifeline for millions, such a platform should incorporate principles such as inclusion, privacy, security, transparency, and accountability.
    • The IM-PDS portal provides a good starting point.

    Also, there are certain shortcomings in GST which we could avoid in ON-ORC

    We should learn from the shortcomings and challenges of the GST rollout. For example:

    1) Delay in GST refunds led to cash-flow issues.

    • Similar delays in receiving food rations could be catastrophic.
    • Therefore, ON-ORC should create, publish and adhere to time-bound processes.
    • The time-bound processes could be in the form of right to public services legislation that have been adopted by 15 states, and rapid grievance redress mechanisms.

    2)  Increase in compliance burden for MSMEs, especially for those who had to digitise overnight.

    • Similar challenges could arise in ON-ORC.
    • PDS dealers will need to be brought on board, and not assumed to be compliant.
    • Citizens will need to be shielded from the inevitable teething issues by keeping the system lenient at first.
    • This can be done by providing different ways of authenticating oneself and publicising a helpline widely.

    Consider the question “One Nation-One Ration Card(ON-ORC) could solve many problems faced by the beneficiaries when they move across the country. Examine the challenges the ON-ORC could face. Suggest ways to deal with these challenges.”

    Conclusion

    If done well, ON-ORC could lay the foundation of a truly national and portable benefits system that includes other welfare programmes like LPG subsidy and social pensions. It is an opportunity to provide a reliable social protection backbone to migrants, who are the backbone of our economy.

  • China’s Mars Mission: Tianwen-1

    China’s space program is now slated to achieve a new milestone. In July, the country will launch its first Mars mission, the ‘Tianwen-1’, which is expected to land on the Red Planet’s surface in the first quarter of 2021.

    UPSC may ask an MCQ asking: Which of the following is/are the space missions related to Mars? It may throw up 4-5 options (which we all get confused at after few months) like Cassini , InSight , Messanger, Voyager etc.

    Tianwen-1 Mission

    • The mission is named after the ancient Chinese poem ‘Questions to Heaven’, the Tianwen-1.
    • It is an all-in-one orbiter; lander and rover will search the Martian surface for water, ice, investigate soil characteristics, and study the atmosphere, among completing other objectives.
    • It will carry 13 payloads (seven orbiters and six rovers) that will explore the planet.
    • It will be the first to place ground-penetrating radar on the Martian surface, which will be able to study local geology, as well as rock, ice, and dirt distribution.
    • China’s previous ‘Yinghuo-1’ Mars mission, which had piggybacked on a Russian spacecraft, had failed after it could not leave the Earth’s orbit and disintegrated over the Pacific Ocean in 2012.

    Why all are curious about Mars exploration?

    • After the Moon, the most number of space missions in the Solar System has been to Mars.
    • Despite being starkly different in many ways, the Red Planet has several Earth-like features– such as clouds, polar ice caps, canyons, volcanoes, and seasonal weather patterns.
    • For ages, scientists have wondered whether Mars can support life.
    • In the past few years, Mars missions have been able to discover the possible presence of liquid water on the planet, either in the subsurface today or at some point in its past.
    • This has made space explorers more curious about whether the planet can sustain life.
    • Newer NASA missions have since transitioned from their earlier strategy of “Follow the Water” to “Seek Signs of Life”.

    Back2Basics: Various missions on Mars

    • The USSR in 1971 became the first country to carry out a Mars landing– its ‘Mars 3’ lander being able to transmit data for 20 seconds from the Martian surface before failing.
    • The country made it’s second and Mars landing two years later in 1973.
    • The second country to reach Mars’s surface, the US, holds the record for the most number of Mars landings.
    • Since 1976, it has achieved 8 successful Mars landings, the latest being the ‘InSight’ in 2019 (launched in 2018).
    • India and the European Space Agency have been able to place their spacecraft in Mars’s orbit.
    • India’s Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) or ‘Mangalyaan’ was able to do so in September 2014, almost a year after its launch from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Andhra Pradesh.
    • The Chinese mission now is expected to take off around the same time when NASA is launching its own Mars mission– the ambitious ‘Perseverance’ which aims to collect Martian samples and bring them back.

  • Species in news: Cicadas

    A brood of periodical cicadas, noisy insects that breed underground for as long as 13-17 years are expected to emerge into some states of the US this year.

    A stand-alone species being mentioned in the news for the first time may find their way into the prelims. Make special note here.

    What are Cicadas?

    • Cicadas are insects that spend most of their lives underground and emerge from the soil mainly to mate.
    • Once out of the ground, their life span is fairly short, somewhere between two-four weeks.
    • At present, there are about 15 active broods of these cicadas as some have gone extinct.
    • The insects are found in America’s as well as New Zealand and Australia.
    • The name 13 and 17 year refers to the number of years that cicada nymphs take to reach adulthood.
    • It is not clear why their development period is so long, researchers suspect that it may be linked to avoiding predators above the soil.

    How are the fed?

    • During this time underground the nymphs feed on sap from plant roots.
    • After this developmental period, the cicada nymphs construct a “cicada hut” and burrow their way out from the soil and climb onto any nearby tree or vegetation.

  • Char Dham Project

    The Chamba Tunnel constructed by the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) under Chardham Project was recently inaugurated.

    Make a note of all projects and circuits under Swadesh Darshan and PRASHAD Scheme.

    What is the Char Dham Project?

    • The Char Dham project consists of widening and repairing 889-kilometres of national highways leading to revered shrines of Kedarnath, Badrinath, Gangotri and Yamunotri.
    • It is a proposed two-lane expresses National Highway with a minimum width of 10 metres in the state of Uttarakhand.
    • The project includes 900 km national highways will connect whole of Uttarakhand state.

    Chamba Tunnel

    • The Chamba tunnel is 440 m long and is a Horseshoe type tunnel with 10-metre carriageway width and 5.5m vertical clearance.
    • The BRO achieved this major milestone by digging up a 440 m long Tunnel below the busy Chamba town on Rishikesh-Dharasu road Highway (NH 94).

    Back2Basics: Border Roads Organisation (BRO)

    • The BRO develops and maintains road networks in India’s border areas and friendly neighbouring countries and functions under the Ministry of Defence.
    • It is entrusted for construction of Roads, Bridges, Tunnels, Causeways, Helipads and Airfields along the borders.
    • Officers from the Border Roads Engineering Service (BRES) and personnel from the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF) form the parent cadre of the Border Roads Organisation.
    • It is also staffed by officers and troops drawn from the Indian Army’s Corps of Engineers on extra regimental employment.
    • The BRO operates and maintains over 32,885 kilometres of roads and about 12,200 meters of permanent bridges in the country.

  • The perils of the liquidity push

    Whether to focus on demand side or supply side is the dilemma policymakers dealing with the financial crises have always faced. If we look closely, the focus of the package announced by the government is on the supply side and pushing liquidity in the economy. This article examines the various measure announced in the package and elaborated why such measures are likely to fail.

    Focus on credit and liquidity in the package

    • The government has relied heavily on measures aimed at pushing credit to banks, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) and businesses big and small.
    • These are expected to use borrowed funds to lend to others, make payments falling due, compensate employees even while under lockdown, and otherwise spend even while not earning.
    • The thrust is to get the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other public financial institutions to infuse liquidity and increase lending by the financial system.
    • RBI offered the financial institution capital for longer periods at a repo or policy interest rate that has been cut by more than a percentage point to 4%.

    Let’s understand liquidity and its role in crisis

    • The Prime Minister in his speech calling for a “self-reliant India” identified, besides land, labour and laws, “liquidity” as among the areas of focus of the package.
    • What is liquidity: In economic and business parlance, liquidity refers to ease of access to cash.
    • A liquid asset is one that can be easily sold for or replaced with cash.
    • And a liquid firm or agent is a holder of cash, a line providing access to cash, or assets that can be easily and quickly converted to cash without significant loss of value.
    • In periods of crisis, individuals, small businesses, firms, financial institutions and even governments tend to experience a liquidity crunch.
    • Relaxing that crunch is a focus of the government’s crisis-response package.
    • So, the government has given a much larger role to enhancing liquidity than it does either to direct transfers.

    So, let’s look at steps taken by the government to ensure liquidity

    1. LTRO and issues with it

    • Among the first steps taken by the RBI was the launch of special and ‘targeted’ long term repo operations (TLTROs).
    • LTROs allowed banks to access liquidity at the repo rate to lend to specified clients.
    • One round of such operations, which was relatively more successful, called for investment of the cheaper capital in higher quality investment grade corporate bonds, commercial paper, and non-convertible debentures.
    • What went wrong? That funding allowed big business, varying from Reliance and L&T to financial major HDFC, to access cheap capital to substitute for past high-cost debt or finance ongoing projects.
    • There is little evidence that this is triggering new investment decisions.

    2. Focus on saving NBFCs and why it failed to give the desired result?

    • The second round was geared to saving NBFCs, whose balance sheets were under severe stress even before the COVID-19 strike.
    • NBFCs were finding it difficult to roll over the short-term debt they had incurred to finance longer-term projects.
    • Banks were wary about lending to these NBFCs.
    • Banks feared that their clients could default in amounts that would bring the viability of these institutions into question.
    • Those fears were confirmed when Franklin Templeton announced that it was shutting down six of its funds.
    • Franklin Templeton set off redemption requests across the NBFC sector, as investors rushed to take back their money.
    • This happened at a  time when the ability of these institutions to mobilise funds to meet these demands had been impaired.
    • Not surprisingly, banks were unwilling to respond when liquidity was infused to target lending to the NBFCs.

    3. More intermediaries and credit guarantee by the government

    • Building on these initial liquidity infusion efforts, the COVID-19 package identified more intermediaries.
    • These intermediaries include the Small Industries Development Bank of India, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, and the National Housing Bank.
    • The intermediaries were expected to refinance lending by the banks to different sections.
    • To persuade the banks and other intermediaries to take up these offers when the clients they must lend to MSME, street vendors, marginal farmers, etc. are themselves stressed, in some instances the government offered them partial or full credit guarantees in case their clients defaulted.
    • The government also sought to persuade the RBI to lend directly to NBFCs against their paper.

    Why the above 3 measure won’t succeed?

    • These measures, which are only marginally effective even in the best of times, will not work during this crisis.
    • Consider a bank or NBFC lending to small business.
    • With economic activity either at a complete stop or at a fraction of the normal, those who can access credit would either not borrow or only do so to protect themselves and not use the funds either to pay their workers or buy and stock inputs.
    • Even after the lockdown is lifted, the compression of demand resulting from the loss of employment and incomes would be considerable.
    • It would be aggravated by the fact that spending by a fiscally conservative government would fall sharply because of a collapse in revenue collections.
    • Faced with sluggish demand, firms are unlikely to meet past and current payments commitments and help the revival effort, just because they have access to credit.
    • This would mean that credit flow would actually not revive.
    • This danger is even greater because the government has been measly with its guarantees.
    • The government doesn’t want to accumulate even contingent liabilities that do not immediately affect the fiscal deficit.

    Increasing the disposable income

    • Another component of the “liquidity” push is the measures that temporarily increase the disposable income of different sections.
    • Such measures include advance access to savings like provident fund contributions, lower tax deduction at source, reduced provident fund contributions and moratoriums on debt service payments for a few months.
    • These measures are expected to provide access to cash inflows and reduce cash outflows, to induce agents to meet overdue payments or just spend to enhance the incomes of others.
    • These are marginal in scope, if relevant at all.
    • They have been combined with non-measures like adding on pending payments such as income tax refunds to spike “liquidity provision”.

    Way forward

    • What is needed now is government support in the form of new and additional transfers to people in cash and kind, and measures such as wage subsidies, equity support and spending on employment programmes.
    • That, as many have acknowledged, would require debt financed spending by the government, with borrowing at low-interest rates from the central bank or a “monetisation” of the deficit.
    • Unfortunately, obsessed as it is with fiscal conservatism and tax forbearance, the government is unwilling to take that route.

    Consider the question “Every stimulus package provokes a debate for its emphasis on either supply-side or the demand side. Examine the provision in the stimulus package announced by the government which focuses on the supply side. What are the issues with supply-side focus in the package?”

    Conclusion

    Overall, the “transmission” of the supply side push from these monetary policy initiatives for relief and revival is bound to be weak. Given the circumstances, the liquidity push, even if partially successful, would only culminate in eventual default, as borrowers use the debt to just stay afloat in the absence of new revenues.

  • CoAST India (Collaboration/Covid Action Support Group) Platform

    India Observatory has come up with a GIS-enabled dashboard called CoAST India to monitor migrants in India.

    Here, UPSC may create an illusion on:

    India Observatory – open-source database (misleading name): It may be asked in relation to some ISRO project.

    CoAST India – COVID related info (again misleading): UPSC may ask it in context to Cyclone Warning Systems.

    CoAST India

    • The platform is a map reflecting the movement of migrants in real-time on their long journeys, often on foot, along with facilities and relief organisations on their routes.
    • It is a collaboration with Anand-based Forest Ecological Security (FES) as its main nodal point.
    • It draws information from 55 organisations on the ground, mostly in villages, and aims to make such data available so that it would enable governments and small local civil society groups to be of assistance.
    • The map matches time and spatial data, on administrative facilities in the area, transportation and healthcare facilities of an area and summaries, on the fly, in real-time of people passing by.

    Features of the portal

    Four elements are sought to be brought together in this portal:

    • Location of migrants and vulnerable people, their specific needs,
    • Location of key infrastructure on the way which can double up as a rest-centre, or
    • Quarantine space and location of relief and
    • Rehabilitation providing NGOs and civil society organisations

    About India Observatory

    • The Foundation for Ecological Security (FES), an NGO working on conserving natural resources at the grassroots, has brought together a unique ecosystem of tools – open data platform India Observatory – to help understand the status of local-level resources and facilitate the action plans for conserving them.
    • The data made available on India Observatory platform has been pooled from various sources and dates as far back as the 1960s.
    • India Observatory was set up in December 2019, with FES focused on ecological issues about forests, water bodies, conservation, etc. that needed “a bird’s eye view or a satellite’s vision”.
    • It is a research unit at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

  • Species in news: Puntius Sanctus fish

    Velankanni in Tamil Nadu has thrown up a new species of small freshwater fish.

    Last year one species from our newscard: Species in news: Hump-backed Mahseer made it into the CSP 2019.  The ‘Puntius Sanctus’ fish in the newscard creates such a vibe yet again.

    A stand-alone species being mentioned in the news for the first time (and that too from Southern India) find their way into the prelims. Make special note here.

    Q. Consider the following pairs

    Wildlife Naturally found in
    1. Blue-finned Mahseer Cauvery River
    2. Irrawaddy Dolphin Chambal River
    3. Rusty-spotted Cat Eastern Ghats

    Which of the pairs given correctly matched? (CSP 2019)

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

    Puntius Sanctus

    • The silver-hued fish has been named Puntius Sanctus — ‘Sanctus’ is Latin for holy — after the popular pilgrim town.
    • Encountered in a small waterbody in Venlankanni, Puntius Sanctus is small, it grows to a length of 7 cm.
    • It found to use both as food and as an aquarium draw.
    • “The Puntius species are known locally as ‘Paral’ in Kerala and ‘Kende’ in Tamil Nadu.

  • Time to evaluate and merge income support schemes

    Both States and Center have income support schemes for the farmers. Coincidentally, they both suffer from common problems such as the exclusion of tiller from the benefit and identifying the landless labourers. This article floats the idea of merging all the support schemes in favour of an umbrella scheme. So, what are the solutions and how will an umbrella scheme be more beneficial? Read to know…

    Not much ‘new cash’ in the relief package

    • On May 12, the PM announced that his government’s relief-cum-stimulus package would be Rs 20 lakh crore, almost 10 per cent of India’s GDP.
    • But when Finance Minister unveiled the package, sector by sector, many wondered where the “new cash” was?
    • So, it became clear that additional relief and stimulus in the system is just about 1 per cent of the GDP — not 10 per cent.
    • Much of the rest is directed towards increasing liquidity and deferring some loan payments, but not much additional cash.

    Cash-transfer schemes by the state governments: Chhatisgarh and other states

    • In this context, the Chhattisgarh government deserves compliments for launching the Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyay Yojana (RGKNY).
    • RGKNY is an income transfer scheme at Rs 10,000/acre for paddy farmers and Rs 13,000/acre for sugarcane farmers.
    • The state’s chief minister has said that the scheme will be extended to farmers of other crops — in fact, to landless labourers as well.
    • On the face of it, RGKNY will help put money directly into the hands of farmers and poor agricultural labourers.
    • In kharif 2018-19, Telangana announced a cash transfer scheme of Rs 4,000/acre, per season — this was raised to Rs 5,000/acre per season in kharif 2019-20.
    • There is a live portal that gives the details of the scheme and its progress.
    • In the rabi season of 2018-19, the Odisha government launched the KALIA scheme-Krushak Assistance for Livelihood and Income Augmentation- on a somewhat similar pattern.
    • West Bengal’s Krishak Bandhu and Jharkhand’s Mukhya Mantri Krishi Aashirwad Yojana are the other income support schemes worth mentioning.

    2 Issues with income support policies and solutions

    1. The beneficiary is not always tiller of the land

    • Ideally, the money of the policies should go to the real tiller.
    • But in large parts of the country, there is no record of tenancy.
    • The government data shows only 10 per cent tenancy in the country.
    • While several micro-level studies indicate that it could be anywhere between 25-30 per cent.
    • In fact, in many regions like the Godavari belt, it could be even more than 50 per cent.
    • It does not make much sense to put money into the accounts of absentee landlords.

    So, what is the solution to this problem?

    • 1) The best way would be to change the tenancy laws.
    • Open up land lease markets, ensuring that the owner of the land has full rights to take his land back after the expiry of the lease period.
    • The current law, favouring “land to the tiller”, is loaded against the owner.
    • As a result, much of tenancy in the country remains oral.
    • 2) In the absence of such legal changes in land lease laws, the only way forward is to fully inform the tiller that the owner has got income support.
    • And then appeal to the owner to pass on this benefit to the tiller — or adjust the land rent accordingly.
    • Information and persuasion campaigns in radio and newspapers would increase the chances of the benefits being passed on to the real tillers.

    2. Identifying the landless labourers working on the farms

    • The other issue is identifying the landless labourers working on farms.
    • Majority of them are temporary and seasonal workers.
    • And leaving the task of identification to panchayats and patwaris can open doors for large leakages and corruption.

    What is the solution to this problem?

    • There have been talks in the past for synchronising MGNREGA with farm operations.
    • The synchronising will have two benefits-
    • 1)It will contain the cost of farming.
    • 2) It will ensure that those engaged in this employment guarantee scheme do useful and productive work.
    • The legal framework of the MGNREGA scheme does allow this on farms owned by people of SC/ST communities, and on the lands of marginal farmers.

     Merging Income Support Schemes: The way forward

    • The time has come to think seriously about merging income support schemes.
    • The merger will include the PM KISAN and state-level schemes, with the MGNREGA and price-subsidy schemes — food and fertiliser subsidies given by Centre and power subsidies given by state government.
    • These schemes amount to Rs 5 lakh crore — that’s a good sum of money to start a basic income cover for poor households.
    • Markets could then be left to operate freely.
    • This approach can cover landless labourers, farmers, and poor consumers — these categories overlap.
    • Let there be an expert group to look closely into the functioning of each one of these schemes and create an umbrella scheme to take care of the poor and the needy.

    Consider the question-“Examine the issues with the income support schemes for farmers by the States as well as the Central government. Do you think that an umbrella scheme after merging all the support schemes will be helpful in overcoming such issues?”

    Conclusion

    Though income support schemes by the state government and the Centre are a welcome move, however, when one looks at the issues with these schemes an umbrella scheme after merging all the present schemes will go a long way in solving the problems which almost all these schemes face today.

    Back2Basics: PM- KISAN

    • Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN)is a Central Sector Scheme with 100% funding from the Government of India.
    • It is being implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer’s Welfare.
    • Under the scheme, the Centre transfers an amount of Rs 6,000 per year, in three equal instalments, directly into the bank accounts of the all landholding farmers irrespective of the size of their land holdings.
    • It intends to supplement the financial needs of the Small and Marginal Farmers (SMFs) in procuring various inputs to ensure proper crop health and appropriate yields, commensurate with the anticipated farm income at the end of each crop cycle.
    • The entire responsibility of identification of beneficiary farmer families rests with the State / UT Governments.