💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Economics

  • In news: International Tea Day

    The ‘International Tea Day’ gets thumbs up from the UN. Tea is the most consumed drink in the world, second only to water.

    It would be no surprise to expect a question based on worldwide tea production:

    Q. Among the following, which one is the largest exporter of rice in the world in the last five years? (CSP 2019)

    (a) China

    (b) India

    (c) Myanmar

    (d) Vietnam

    International Tea Day

    • While the UN has been aware of the popularity of the drink, May 21, 2020, became the first time when it recognized and gave an official nod to International Tea Day.
    • The UN General Assembly proclaimed May 21 as International Tea Day.
    • The day is aimed at promoting sustainable production, consumption and trade of tea.
    • As part of the celebrations, key players in tea production come together and make systematic plans for expansion of demand for tea, particularly in tea producing countries where per capita consumption is relatively low.
    • This day also reminds all actors at global, regional and national levels to ensure that the tea sector continues to play a role in reducing extreme poverty, fighting hunger and safeguarding natural resources.

    Tea

    • Tea is an aromatic beverage commonly prepared by pouring hot or boiling water over cured leaves of the Camellia sinensis, an evergreen shrub native to East Asia.
    • After water, it is the most widely consumed drink in the world.
    • There are many different types of tea; some, like Darjeeling and Chinese greens, have a cooling, slightly bitter, and astringent flavour.
    • Tea has a stimulating effect in humans primarily due to its caffeine content.
    • China is the leading producer of tea in the world. (Ref.)

    Its significance

    • In 2018, over 50 lakh tonnes of tea was consumed globally, according to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN.
    • The origin of tea plantations dates back to 5,000 years. Like many cultures, tea enjoys a special space in Indian culture.
    • With more than 100 varieties being consumed in the country, India is among the top four producers of tea.
    • Currently, tea is grown in more than 35 countries and supports 1.3 crore people including smallholder farmers around the globe.

    Back2Basics: Tea cultivation in India

    • India is the second producer of tea in the world and second in terms of land devoted to tea growing as well.
    • Much of India’s tea production is concentrated in the areas of Darjeeling, Nilgiri, Dooars, and Assam, which is the single largest tea growing region in the world. The top 5 growing states in India, ranked by production, are:

    1) Assam

    2) West Bengal

    3) Tamil Nadu

    4) Kerala

    5) Karnataka

  • Structural issues in agri-marketing

    The article discusses the structural issues that may not go away with the reforms announced by the government recently. Issues like inadequacies in APMC infrastructure, regulation of APMCs need are discussed in detail.

    What is the issue?

    • The Union government signalled the intention to enact a new central law.
    • The new law would override existing state regulations that restrict the farmer from legally selling to anyone other than a buyer licensed by the local Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC).
    • The decision to push for a central law comes after dissatisfaction with two decades of partial and uneven reforms by different states.

    So, will the change in the law solve the marketing problem?

    •  This will be overstating the power of legal reform in guaranteeing economic freedom and outcomes.
    • The problems farmers face are of two type-
    • 1) Problems that are a result of vested, monopolistic interests.
    • 2) Problems that are rooted in larger structural conditions that significantly weaken their terms of engagement in agricultural markets.
    • Type 1 may be addressed by regulatory intervention.
    • But type 2 will need location-specific policies, well-directed investment, and well-functioning agricultural institutions.
    • So, solving either of these problems require consensus, coordination and capacity in which the states will need to play a major role.

    Why do farmers sell their produce outside APMC mandis?

    • The dominant narrative is that farmers are forced to sell their produce only to licensed APMC traders.
    • But the reality is that even today the majority of Indian farmers sell their produce to small-scale and largely unlicensed traders and intermediaries.
    • This is true, especially of small and marginal cultivators.
    • But, if farmers are bound by law to sell in APMC mandis, why are so many of them selling outside?

    But, do we have enough mandis?

    • At least part of the answer to the question of why farmers sell outside mandis is that India still doesn’t have enough mandis.
    • Over the decades, most states in general, and specific regions in particular, have hugely under-invested in the basic infrastructure required to create viable, primary wholesale markets within easy physical reach of farmers.
    • The 2017 Doubling Farmers Income Report estimates that in addition to the current 6,676 principal and sub-market yards under APMCs India needs over 3,500 additional wholesale markets.
    • Approximately 23,000 rural periodic markets (or haats) have also suffered long-standing neglect.
    • So, the new allocation towards market infrastructure must be fully utilised to build up an appropriately designed physical marketing ecosystem, especially in remote regions.
    • Most importantly, unlike in the past, this process should engage deeply with farmers and traders in each location to avoid misdirected and misplaced infrastructure and assets.

    Regulatory reforms in mandis needed

    • Where APMC mandis do exist and have established themselves as dominant market sites, mandi committees have typically done everything in their power to restrict competition.
    • Obtaining a licence for a new entrant — has most often proved to be a bureaucratic nightmare and a costly affair.
    • This is where regulatory reform to remove conflicts of interests, enable the entry of new buyers, and facilitate the flow of trade both within and outside the mandi system is absolutely crucial.
    • No state has done enough in this direction, but here too there are cautionary lessons.

    Perils of complete deregulation: Example of Bihar

    • Complete deregulation, as we have seen in the decade following Bihar’s repeal of its APMC Act in 2006, does not necessarily transform agricultural markets and spur competition.
    • Even after all restrictions were lifted, there was little uptake in direct procurement by formal players in the state.
    • When corporations entered the maize market in a big way, they chose to buy from larger traders and aggregators and not from farmers.
    • Most farmers have seen little change in marketing practice and continue to sell to village traders as they had done before the repeal.
    • Where private markets have emerged — mainly for horticultural produce — they are constituted and run by local traders and commission agents.
    • But across the system, traders complain about deteriorating infrastructure.
    • And the regulatory vacuum has led to the proliferation of brokers to deal with counter-party risk in growing and dynamic commodity markets such as maize.

    Benefits of limited degree of regulation: MP and Karnataka example

    • Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka have undertaken some degree of regulatory reform instead of repeal.
    • In these states, we do observe, at least to some extent, the fruits of competition.
    • In the early 2000s, MP granted ITC a licence to set up procurement hubs outside mandi yards.
    • Establishment of ITC procurement hubs not only resulted in price competition, but also from electronic weighing and quick payments, as mandis upgraded in response.
    • But ITC’s procurement channel was understandably restricted to select commodities (and qualities), seasons and farms within its own commercial strategy.
    • These limitations revealed the mandi’s comparative advantage as a permanent multi-buyer, multi-commodity market for all local producers.
    • The key lesson to draw from studies of direct procurement and contracting is the need for a regulatory architecture that enables both new and existing systems to respond, adapt, and compete.

    Issue of intermediation

    •  Small traders and intermediaries exist — and persist — because they are able to respond — in cash, credit, time and place — to the multiple needs of farmers and firms across the interconnected domains of production, marketing, processing and consumption.
    • This is not to say that they do not exploit farmers when the opportunity arises.
    • So, the organised and technologically driven procurement and marketing systems will only work if they manage to address the real constraints that farmers face on the ground, especially access to credit, inputs, storage, transport, and timely payments.
    • Most of these constraints originate in the relations of land ownership and access and the limits and exclusions they impose on smallholding farmers and landless cultivators.
    • Simply put, farmers will not be in a position to exercise any newly granted regulatory freedom in the market if they cannot overcome these constraints.
    • Equally, while increasing competition for intermediaries is desirable, their elimination is a misguided — and indeed dangerous — objective if one does not respect or replace the roles and risks that they cover.

    Issue of re-regulation and new barriers to entry

    • Agriculture is at the very heart of the essential economy and our food system runs on the backs of small-scale producers, traders, commission agents, processors, wholesalers, retailers, and labourers.
    • Regulatory reform to increase competition must not degenerate into re-regulation that unduly favours large-scale consolidation and channel control by erecting new barriers to entry and operation for agro-commercial MSMEs.

    The UPSC asked a direct question about the APMC Act in 2014- ” There is also a point of view that Agriculture Produce Market Committees (APMCs) set up under the State Acts have not only impeded the development of agriculture but also have been the cause of food inflation in India. Critically examine.”

    Conclusion

    While going for the reforms government must consider the issues underlying the problems and try to address them. We must recognise and strengthen the diversity, dynamism, enterprise, and resilience of India’s agricultural markets.

     

     

  • Explained: Contract Farming and its benefits

    The Odisha government has promulgated an ordinance allowing investors and farmers to enter into an agreement for contract farming in view of the continuing uncertainties due to the pandemic.

    Practice question for mains:

    Q. What is Contract Farming? Examine its potentials and feasibility from the perspective of farmers’ interests.

    Moving on with Odisha’s law

    • The Odisha ordinance is aimed at facilitating both farmers and sponsors to develop mutually beneficial and efficient contract farming system.
    • It is argued that the new system will lead to improved production and marketing of agricultural produce and livestock while promoting farmers’ interest.
    • The agreement will be entered into between the contract farming sponsor, who offers to participate in any component or entire value chain including preproduction, and the contract farming producer (farmers), who agree to produce the crop or rear the livestock.
    • Both the loans and advances given by the sponsor to the producer can be recovered from the sale proceeds of the produce.
    • And in no case realized, recovery can be through the sale or mortgage or lease of the land in respect of which the agreement has been entered into.

    What is Contract Farming?

    • Contract farming (CF) can be defined as agricultural production carried out according to an agreement between a buyer and farmers, which establishes conditions for the production and marketing of a farm product or products.
    • Typically, the farmer agrees to provide agreed quantities of a specific agricultural product.
    • These should meet the quality standards of the purchaser and be supplied at the time determined by the purchaser.
    • In turn, the buyer commits to purchase the product and, in some cases, to support production through, for example, the supply of farm inputs, land preparation and the provision of technical advice.

    Some business models in CF

    1) Informal model – This model is the most transient and speculative of all contract farming models, with a risk of default by both the promoter and the farmer. However, this depends on the situation: interdependence of contract parties or long-term trustful relationships may reduce the risk of opportunistic behaviour.

    2) Intermediary model – In this model, the buyer subcontracts an intermediary (collector, aggregator or farmer organisation) who formally or informally contracts farmers (a combination of the centralised/ informal models).

    3) Multipartite model – This model can develop from the centralised or nucleus estate models. It involves various organisations such as governmental statutory bodies alongside private companies and sometimes financial institutions.

    4) Centralized model – In this model, the buyers’ involvement may vary from minimal input provision (e.g. specific varieties) to control of most production aspects (e.g. from land preparation to harvesting). This is the most common CF model.

    Advantages of Contract Farming:

    To the farmers:

    • It helps in skilling of farmers as they learn to use various resources efficiently like fertilizer, pesticides and get in touch with new technology in some cases.
    • Farmers get the opportunity for diversification of crops.
    • Price risk is drastically reduced as many contracts specify prices in advance.
    • Contract farming can open up new markets which would otherwise have been unavailable to small farmers. The farmers can also get easy credit from the Bank under contractual agreements.
    • In the case of agri-processing level, it ensures a consistent supply of agricultural produce with quality, at the right time and lesser cost.

    To the Client:

    • They get uninterrupted & regular flow of raw material of high quality which helps in protection from fluctuation in market pricing.
    • Long term planning of business is possible as they have a dedicated supplier base of raw material.
    • Concept of contract farming can be extended to other crops also which helps to generate goodwill for the organisation.

    Limitations

    • Contract farming arrangements are often criticized for being biased in favour of firms or large farmers while exploiting the poor bargaining power of small farmers.
    • Problems faced by growers like an undue quality cut on produce by firms delayed deliveries at the factory, delayed payments, low price and pest attack on the contract crop which raised the cost of production.
    • Contracting agreements are often verbal or informal in nature, and even written contracts often do not provide legal protection in India that may be observed in other countries. Lack of enforceability of contractual provisions can result in a breach of contracts by either party.
    • Single Buyer – Multiple Sellers (Monopsony).
    • Adverse gender effects – Women have less access to contract farming than men.

    Also read

    What is contract farming? Critically analyze the features of the draft “Model Contract Farming Act – 2018”. (150 W)

    With inputs from Vikaspedia

  • Stimulus package aims to turn the crisis into opportunity

    Economic disruption caused by the corona crisis stems from both-demand side and supply side. So, the stimulus package announced was expected to address the issues on both sides. This article breaks downs the various elements of the package in demand-side as well as supply-side measures. We also know aggregate demand is not just consumption demand. So, this fact was also considered while deciding the demand-side measures.

    Twin mantra of stimulus package

    • 1) To ensure that human cost of the crisis is minimised, especially for those at the bottom of the pyramid.
    • 2) To convert this crisis into an opportunity by implementing bold structural reforms.
    • Such reforms will go beyond repairing the damage to the production capacities and enhance the overall supply response capabilities of the economy.

    Impact on demand side as well as supply side

    • The present crisis is far worse than both the Asian financial crisis of the late Nineties as well as the global financial crisis of 2008-09.
    • It has seriously impacted both the supply and demand side of the economy.
    • The government’s response has been to effectively address both these aspects.

    Government’s four-fold response to address supply-side problems

    1. Ensuring food security

    • To ensure that the government declared agriculture and all related activities as essential services.
    • This permitted the successful harvesting and efficient procurement of the critical Rabi crop.
    • It also implied pumping in Rs 78,000 crore as new purchasing power in the hands of the farmers.

    2. Preventing cash/liquidity crunch

    • Preventing the pressing cash/liquidity crunch was necessary to avoid insolvencies and bankruptcies.
    • An immediate moratorium was announced on their debt servicing obligations to commercial banks.
    • This measure was reinforced for MSMEs, for whom an additional credit line of Rs 3 trillion without any fresh collateral was extended.
    • MSMEs could also avail of new equity from the Rs 50,000 crore fund of funds and take advantage of the subsidiary debt facility announced by the FM.
    • These measures provided succour to a large number of businesses, especially those in the services sectors like hospitality, entertainment and retail.
    • The Rs 90,000 crore credit package made available to state discoms should also be included in this set of measures.
    • It will prevent bankruptcies of state electricity utilities and the power producers, which would have had disastrous results.

    3. Reforms in agriculture and manufacturing sector

    • The third set of measures were directed to significantly improve the ecosystem for private producers, both in agriculture and manufacturing.
    • Long-pending reforms to give farmers the much-needed freedom to choose their clients and for traders and exporters of agro-products to maintain necessary stocks have now been announced.
    • Defence production and exports will get a new fillip with the liberalisation measures.
    • Greater space will be given to private businesses in sectors in which public sector enterprises hitherto had either a monopoly or a predominant presence.

    4. Credit to street vendors

    • Finally, this is a measure that does not have a large fiscal footprint, but touches the lives and livelihoods of more than 50 lakh families.
    • Under which street vendors all over the country have been given a credit of Rs 10,000 each for re-stocking and use as working capital.

    Understanding the aggregate demand

    •  It is important to point out that aggregate demand is made up of- i) consumption, ii) investment iii) demand for intermediate goods.
    • So,  the cash-in-hand of consumers is not the only means for reversing the declining demand in the economy.
    • Therefore, additional credit lines provided to MSMEs, vendors or farmers will contribute to the strengthening of aggregate demand.

    Government’s response to address demand-side problems

    • A significant number of measures were announced to hike consumption demand directly as well.
    • Among these are:
    • Rs 1.73 lakh crore for improving the incomes and welfare of the most vulnerable, including the 20 crore female Jan Dhan account holders who will receive monies directly into their bank accounts.
    • Rs 50,000 additional incomes in the hands of those whose TDS and TCS were reduced by 25 per cent.
    • Rs 40,000 crore additional allocation for MNREGA, which will provide jobs and succour to those returning to their villages from metros and cities.
    • Rs 30,000 crore for construction workers.
    • Rs 17,800 crore transferred to 12 crore farmers and Rs 13,000 crore transferred to states to finance the costs of running quarantine homes and shelters for migrant workers.
    • These measures, which will directly benefit different categories of individuals, will surely raise the flagging demand — the necessary condition for triggering a fast-paced recovery in economic activity.

    Consider the question “The stimulus package announced by the government in the wake of pandemic sought to address both the demand side as well as supply-side problems. Examine the various components of package and other reforms announced in the economy.”

    Conclusion

    Combined with the significant number of bold structural reform measures, which hold the potential to make Indian firms attain global scales and competitiveness and give the much-needed freedoms, flexibility and financial strength to our beleaguered farmers, “the package” promises to promote India’s economic recovery in the post-COVID-19 period.

  • India and China after pandemic

    The article broadly discusses the impact of the pandemic on the Indian economy. While the package has been declared to alleviate the economic pain, the government faces the challenge of finding the resources to plug the gaps. Though pandemic erupted from China, it successfully controlled it. This along with the its calibrated approach towards strategic progression is going to stand China in good stead.

    Grappling with the “unknown unknowns”

    • Several weeks before the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, India’s Minister for External Affairs delivered a lecture.
    • In the lecture, he had observed that “what defines power and determines national standing is also no longer the same. Technology, connectivity and trade are at the heart of the new contestations.”
    • He did mention a point about “known unknowns”.
    • But the pandemic has forced us to face the “unknown unknowns”.
    • Within a few weeks, his prediction would be overtaken by a tectonic shift in the global situation thanks to a virus and a pandemic.

    Impact on India’s economy

    • What distinguishes the present pandemic from earlier ones is its economic impact.
    • The economic impact is perhaps even more threatening than the human costs involved.
    • In the case of India, all forecasts have had to be shredded.
    • Job losses have been massive, specially in urban areas.
    • India’s exports in the month of April, for instance, were the worst in the past 30 years.

    Finding resources for the stimulus package

    • Well before pandemic India had been witnessing a persistent economic downward slide.
    • Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s announcement of a ₹20-lakh crore stimulus package was, hence, timely.
    • Even though economists now believe that in real terms it amounts to around 2% of GDP rather than 10% .
    • Finding resources for even this stimulus package will, however, not be easy.
    • The Centre’s finances are not in the best of health. It has already had to resort to a second tranche of $1 billion loan from the World Bank to support COVID-19 relief measures.
    • The finances of States are, to say the least, in a perilous state.
    • Questions are, thus, bound to be raised as to whether adequate funds would be forthcoming for relief purposes.

    China’s calibrated approach: Strategic progression

    • Since its early recovery, China has followed a calibrated approach — one that stems from a policy of deliberate strategic progression conceived over the years.
    • It may be worthwhile to understand the facts so as to underscore the gap that currently exists between China and India.
    • In 2015, China’s President, Xi Jinping, had floated the idea of “a Community of Common Destiny of Mankind”.
    • In this, he outlined China’s viewpoint on aspects such as economic globalisation and the information technology revolution.
    • The Belt and Road Initiative — which encompasses policy, infrastructure, trade, financial, and people-to-people connectivity, and, implicitly also, security ties — was an adjunct to it.
    • The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (2017), thereafter, gave its assent, considering it essential to enable China to achieve pre-eminence status within the global order.
    • Ever since, China has focused on-
    • i) attaining economic and technological progress.
    • ii) defining how power would be determined in the new globalised era through devising new international norms in many emerging domains such as cyber, space, artificial intelligence, etc.
    • China also set about rewriting international rules, premised not so much on governing where global goods are made, but on setting standards that define production, exchange and consumption.
    • China Standards 2035 plans to set new standards with regard to the Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and define next-generation information technology and biotechnology infrastructure.
    • China is hoping, to reap the “early bird” advantage, even as other industrial nations struggle to recover from the devastation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • Internationalisation of Chinese standards would provide China a clear advantage by providing it an opportunity to set the standards in emerging industries such as high-end equipment manufacturing, unmanned vehicles, new materials, cybersecurity and the like.
    • This would enable it gain a dominant position in the global economy.

    India must plan well to cope with the China challenge

    • Mounting an effective challenge to China at this time would require a well-conceived and carefully calibrated plan of action by India.
    • As of now, this is not evident.
    • India and China will certainly emerge from the pandemic more diminished than previously, but to varying extents.
    • Each country will, no doubt, suffer an economic setback.
    • But while both nations would be among the very few that would still have a positive growth rate in the near future.
    • Which is 1% in the case of China and 1.8% in the case of India, according to the International Monetary Fund.
    • Given the size of China’s economy, it does not translate into a massive shift in India’s favour.

    Consider the question “Economies across the world have been bruised by the corona pandemic. There have also been talks of India being the beneficiary of changes in the global supply chains. In light of this, examine the issues and challenges that India may face in this regard.”

    Conclusion

    India would more than welcome some of the entities exiting China, but there are no “green shoots” to suggest that such a shift has, or is, about to take place. Many alternatives are available to these companies and it would be excessively optimistic on our part to hold on to the belief that India is the only alternative choice for most of them.

  • [pib] Scheme for formalization of Micro Food Processing Enterprises (FME)

    The Union Cabinet has given its approval to a new Centrally Sponsored Scheme – “Scheme for Formalization of Micro food processing Enterprises (FME)” for the Unorganized Sector on All India basis.

    Practice question for mains:

    Q. Discuss the scope and significance of Food Processing Industries in India.  Also discuss how can it benefit India becoming the global food store.

    Background

    • There are about 25 lakh unregistered food processing enterprises which constitute 98% of the sector and are unorganized and informal.
    •  Nearly 66 % of these units are located in rural areas and about 80% of them are family-based enterprises.
    • This sector faces a number of challenges including the inability to access credit, high cost of institutional credit, lack of access to modern technology, inability to integrate with the food supply chain and compliance with the health & safety standards.
    • Strengthening this segment will lead to a reduction in wastage, creation of off-farm job opportunities and aid in achieving the overarching Government objective of doubling farmers’ income.

    Details of the Scheme for FME

    • The Union Cabinet has sanctioned an outlay of Rs.10,000 crore.
    • The expenditure will be shared by GOI and the States in the ratio of 60:40.

    Salient features

    • It will be a Centrally Sponsored Scheme. Expenditure to be shared by the Government of India and States at 60:40.
    • 2, 00,000 micro-enterprises are to be assisted with credit linked subsidy.
    • The scheme will be implemented over a 5 year period from 2020-21 to 2024-25.
    • Cluster approach.
    • Focus on perishables.

    Support for Individual micro-units:

    • Micro enterprises will get credit-linked subsidy @ 35% of the eligible project cost with a ceiling of Rs.10 lakh.
    • The beneficiary contribution will be a minimum of 10% and balance from the loan.
    • On-site skill training & Handholding for DPR and technical upgradation.

    Implementation strategy

    • The scheme will be rolled out on All India basis.
    • Seed capital will be given to SHGs (@Rs. 4 lakh per SHG) for the loan to members for working capital and small tools.
    • Grant will be provided to FPOs for backward/forward linkages, common infrastructure, packaging, marketing & branding.

    Administrative and Implementation Mechanisms

    • The Scheme would be monitored at Centre by an Inter-Ministerial Empowered Committee (IMEC) under the Chairmanship of Minister, FPI.
    • A State/ UT Level Committee (SLC) chaired by the Chief Secretary will monitor and sanction/ recommend proposals for expansion of micro-units and setting up of new units by the SHGs/ FPOs/ Cooperatives.
    • The States/ UTs will prepare Annual Action Plans covering various activities for implementation of the scheme, which will be approved by the Government of India.
    • A third-party evaluation and mid-term review mechanism would be built in the programme.
    • The State/ UT Government will notify a Nodal Department and Agency for implementation of the Scheme.

    Establishment of a National Portal & MIS

    • A National level portal would be set-up wherein the applicants/ individual enterprise could apply to participate in the Scheme.
    • All the scheme activities would be undertaken on the National portal.

    Benefits of the Scheme

    • Nearly eight lakh micro-enterprises will benefit through access to information, better exposure and formalization.
    • Credit linked subsidy support and hand-holding will be extended to 2,00,000 micro-enterprises for expansion and upgradation.
    • It will enable them to formalize, grow and become competitive.
    • The project is likely to generate nine lakh skilled and semi-skilled jobs.
    • The scheme envisages increased access to credit by existing micro food processing entrepreneurs, women entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs in the Aspirational Districts.
    • Better integration with organized markets.
    • Increased access to common services like sorting, grading, processing, packaging, storage etc.

  • [pib] Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS)

    The Union Cabinet has given its approval for the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) for MSMEs and MUDRA borrowers.

    Practice question for Mains :

    Q. Discuss how the nationwide lockdown to control the coronavirus outbreak has led to the resurfacing of inherent bottlenecks in India’s MSME Sector.

    About ECLGS

    • Under the Scheme, 100% guarantee coverage to be provided by National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Limited (NCGTC) for additional funding of up to Rs. 3 lakh crore to eligible MSMEs and interested MUDRA borrowers.
    • The credit will be provided in the form of a Guaranteed Emergency Credit Line (GECL) facility.
    • The Scheme would be applicable to all loans sanctioned under GECL Facility during the period from the date of announcement of the Scheme to 31.10.2020.

    Aims and objectives

    • The Scheme aims at mitigating the economic distress faced by MSMEs by providing them additional funding in the form of a fully guaranteed emergency credit line.
    • The main objective is to provide an incentive to Member Lending Institutions (MLIs), i.e., Banks, Financial Institutions (FIs) and NBFCs to increase access to, and enable the availability of additional funding facility to MSME borrowers.
    • It aims to provide a 100 per cent guarantee for any losses suffered by them due to non-repayment of the GECL funding by borrowers.

    Salient features

    • The entire funding provided under GECL shall be provided with a 100% credit guarantee by NCGTC to MLIs under ECLGS.
    • Tenor of the loan under Scheme shall be four years with a moratorium period of one year on the principal amount.
    • No Guarantee Fee shall be charged by NCGTC from the Member Lending Institutions (MLIs) under the Scheme.
    • Interest rates under the Scheme shall be capped at 9.25% for banks and FIs, and at 14% for NBFCs.

    Benefits of the scheme

    • The scheme aims to mitigate the distress caused by COVID-19 and the consequent lockdown, which has severely impacted manufacturing and other activities in the MSME sector.
    • The scheme is expected to provide credit to the sector at a low cost, thereby enabling MSMEs to meet their operational liabilities and restart their businesses.
    • By supporting MSMEs to continue functioning during the current unprecedented situation, the Scheme is also expected to have a positive impact on the economy and support its revival.

    Must read

    [Burning Issues] Fiscal Push for MSME Sector of India (Part I)

  • [pib] Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PM-MSY) for boosting fisheries sector

    The Union Cabinet has approved the “Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana”.

    Practice question for Mains:

    Q. Only after the Indian Independence, has fisheries together with agriculture been recognized as an important sector. Examine the scope & challenges of aquaculture in India.

    About the PMMSY

    • The PMMSY aims to bring about the Blue Revolution through sustainable and responsible development of the fisheries sector in India.
    • With the scheme, highest ever investment of Rs. 20050 crores are being made in the fisheries sector.
    • It will be implemented over a period of 5 years from FY 2020-21 to FY 2024-25 in all States/Union Territories.

    Aims and objectives of PMMSY

    • Harnessing of fisheries potential in a sustainable, responsible, inclusive and equitable manner
    • Enhancing of fish production and productivity through expansion, intensification, diversification and productive utilization of land and water
    • Modernizing and strengthening of the value chain – post-harvest management and quality improvement
    • Doubling fishers and fish farmers incomes and generation of employment
    • Enhancing contribution to Agriculture GVA and exports
    • Social, physical and economic security for fishers and fish farmers
    • Robust fisheries management and regulatory framework

    Implementation strategy

    The PMMSY will be implemented as an umbrella scheme with two separate components namely:

    (a) Central Sector Scheme and

    (b) Centrally Sponsored Scheme

    • Majority of the activities under the Scheme would be implemented with the active participation of States/UTs.
    • A well-structured implementation framework would be established for the effective planning and implementation of PMMSY.
    • For optimal outcomes, ‘Cluster or area-based approach’ would be followed with requisite forward and backward linkages and end to end solutions.

    Back2Basics: Fisheries sector of India

    • Fisheries and aquaculture are an important source of food, nutrition, employment and income in India.
    • The sector provides livelihood to more than 20 million fishers and fish farmers at the primary level and twice the number along the value chain.
    • The Gross Value Added (GVA) of the fisheries sector in the national economy during 2018-19 stood at 1.24% of the total National GVA and 7.28% share of Agricultural GVA.
    • The sector has immense potential to double the fishers and fish farmers’ incomes as envisioned by government and usher in economic prosperity.
    • Fisheries sector in India has shown impressive growth with an average annual growth rate of 10.88% during the year from 2014-15 to 2018-19.

  • Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyaya Yojana in Chhattisgarh

    The Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyaya Yojana has been approved by the Chhattisgarh state govt. on 19th death anniversary of the former Prime Minister, yesterday.

    Practice question for Mains:

    Q. Various income support mechanisms for farmers are more of a populist measure with no impact on ground zero. Critically examine.

    Rajiv Gandhi Kisan Nyaya Yojana

    • It is a new income support programme under which Farmers in Chhattisgarh would get up to ₹13,000 an acre a year.
    • Rice and maize farmers would get ₹10,000 an acre while sugarcane farmers would get ₹13,000. The money would be distributed in four instalments.
    • In the first instalment, ₹1,500 crores would be distributed among 18 lakh farmers, more than 80% of the small and marginal.
    • The scheme would cover rice, maize and sugarcane farmers to begin with, and would expand to other crops later.

    Benefits of the scheme

    • This will help farmers through the agricultural cycle and hopefully help with extension activities.
    • The injection of cash among the rural population would generate a demand that shielded Chhattisgarh from the economic slowdown last year.
    • This will reduce distress migration, and enhance food security for the State.

  • Exploring the avenues to fill the budgetary gaps

    What are the options available with the government to fill up the budgetary gaps created by the stimulus package? Well, one seems to be exercising its disinvestment or privatisations plans. But like always disinvestment comes with its own set of issues. The next could be raising the taxes and duties on the fuels. But this will defeat the very purpose of the package. Third option is borrowing. But borrowing in the external currency is another problem story. Let’s figure this all out with this article….

    Containing the fiscal deficit through privatisation

    • Government is apparently hopeful that money could come partly from the new privatisation programme.
    • Finance Minister recently said that privatisation — a policy that has already gained momentum in the last budget, would now be the order of the day.
    • According to the new Public Sector Enterprises Policy (PSEP), a list of strategic sectors will be notified where there will be no more than four public sector enterprises.
    • The PSEP is a strategic move intended to rationalise the public sector.
    •  Before the COVID-19 crisis, the government needed the privatisation money partly because its revenue from GST among other things was declining.
    • And this void could only partly be filled by alternative sources of tax revenues such as that on fuel.
    • Today, the government needs this money in order to contain the fiscal deficit.
    • So, the privatisation programme has suddenly been expanded.
    • The Centre has set a budget target of Rs 2.1 lakh crore from disinvestment in the current fiscal year.

    Progress made so far on disinvestment process

    • Towards the end of 2019, the government approved the privatisation of BPCL and the Shipping Corporation of India.
    • In addition to selling stakes in the Container Corporation of India, THDC and NEEPCO.
    • The government had initially planned to complete its “strategic disinvestment” in BPCL and Air India by the end of this fiscal year.
    • It now wants it completed earlier. Some estimate say that the government’s disinvestment in BPCL, SCI and CONCOR could fetch it Rs 78,400 crore.
    • Should India’s flying Maharaja also find a buyer, the government could raise over Rs 1,05,000 crore.

    Issues with privatisation

    • The revenue from privatisation is a one-off benefit and generally, only profit-making units are sold at a good price.
    • Privatisation is a two-way street — it requires a buyer and a seller. Who will be the buyers?
    • Excessive political interference with the private sector makes owning an ex-government entity risky.
    • A handful of Indian capitalists who are already at the helm of oligopolies may be in a position — financially and politically — to buy the big PSUs.
    • If they were allowed to grow even more by acquiring public entities, sectors of the economy would be under the influence of quasi-monopolies.
    • This could foster crony capitalism and may even result in the making of oligarchs.

    Where else can the government find the money it needs?

    1. Increasing tax and duties on fuel

    • Government has already increased the excise duty on petrol and diesel by Rs 3 per litre — the steepest hike since 2012.
    • The government imposed additional taxes while global crude oil prices fell.
    • As oil prices can only go up after the last round of negotiations between Russia and Saudi Arabia, the Indian government will not be in a position to use this source of revenue again.
    • Such a move would contradict the very idea of a relief and stimulus package anyway. Why?
    • An increase in the excise duty or tax would affect purchasing power, when the package is supposed to help the poor and to boost demand.
    • Low demand and lowest investment rate:  Even before the present crisis, industrialists complained that 25 per cent of their productive capacity was idle.
    • And that’s why their investment rate had never been this low, in the 21st century at least.

    2. Borrowing money and issues with it

    • Even if some privatisation helps India financially, it seems that the country will need to borrow money.
    • External borrowing, however, is problematic. There are three issues with external borrowing-
    • 1) The only way governments pay back external borrowings is by wisely using borrowed capital to drive high GDP growth and generating revenues.
    • Which is unlikely to happen any time soon as a recession is round the corner.
    • 2) The rupee is at its lowest level compared to the US dollar.
    • Any more devaluation will only make it harder for the government to pay back its debt.
    • Since external borrowings must be paid back in borrowed currency, exports and foreign reserves or gold reserves are generally the only two reliable options.
    • The third one being borrowing more to pay back the previous debts — a slippery slope to pay government debt.
    • However, India should account for the inevitable global slump in international demand and a consequent drop in its exports.
    • Other countries may also move towards “atmanirbharta” and over-regulate imports.
    • 3)  Indian industries are already a bit debt-laden.
    • Following factors compelled industries to resort to overseas borrowing-
    • i)The risk in the banking sector, tight liquidity in debt markets,
    • ii) Comparatively lower international borrowing rates
    • iii) The RBI’s ECB rationalising measures.
    • More overseas borrowing, combined with the industry’s high debt status, could lead to rating agencies downgrading India’s investment prospects — deterring foreign investments in the process.

    3. Foreign reserves and other options

    • On the positive side, India’s foreign reserves stand at an all-time high which could be strategically used to finance its needs.
    • The rest may have to come from privatisation, taxation, loans and more international aid.
    • Already, India is receiving more funds from the World Bank, the ADB and the Japanese ODA.
    • India may help others, but it needs aid too.

    Consider the question- “The government had to declare the relief and stimulus package in the wake of corona crisis. This expenditure leads to budgetary gaps. What are the options with the government to close this gap? Examine the issues associated with these options.”

    Conclusion

    The government must weigh each option with due consideration and explore all the possible avenues. Options like privatisation or borrowing must be exercised with caution. As these decisions could have severe consequences for the economy in the future.