💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Polity

  • Citizen’s Charter: Importance, Objective, Features, Problems faced in implementation, Guidelines

    In any nation, there is a need of good governance for sustainable development, both economic and social.

    The three major aspects highlighted in good governance are transparency, accountability and responsiveness of the administration.

    What is Citizen’s Charter?

    Citizens’ Charters initiative is a response to the mission for solving the problems which a citizen meets, day in and day out, while dealing with the organisations providing public services.

    The charter is the declaration of commitment to superiority in service to customers of the department. The citizen charter declares the standards for various services offered. It includes expectations of the Organisation from the Citizens for fulfilling its commitment. Citizen charter is available on India post website.

    The concept of Citizens’ Charter protects the trust between the service provider and its users.

    Citizens’ Charter was first expressed and implemented in the United Kingdom by the Conservative Government of John Major in 1991 as a national programme with aim to constantly improve the quality of public services for the people of the country so that these services respond to the needs and wishes of the users.

    Importance of Citizen’s Charter in India

    1. To make administration accountable and citizen friendly.
    2. To ensure transparency.
    3. To take measures to improve customer service.
    4. To adopt a stakeholder approach.
    5. To save time of both Administration and the citizen.

    Objective of the Citizens’ Charter

    Fundamental objectives of Citizens’ Charter are as follows:

    Goal of Citizens’ Charter is to empower the citizen in relation to public service delivery.  

    Six principles of the Citizens’ Charter movement as originally framed were:

    1. Quality: Improving the quality of services
    2. Choice: Wherever possible
    3. Standards: Specify what to expect and how to act if standards are not met
    4. Value: For the taxpayers’ money
    5. Accountability: Individuals and Organisations
    6. Transparency: Rules/ Procedures/ Schemes/Grievances

    Later on, these were elaborated by the Labour Government as following nine principles of Service Delivery (1998):

    1. Set standards of service
    2. Be open and provide full information
    3. Consult and involve
    4. Encourage access and the promotion of choice
    5. Treat all fairly
    6. Put things right when they go wrong
    7. Use resources effectively
    8. Innovate and improve
    9. Work with other providers
    10. The Indian Scenario

    Since many years, in India, noteworthy progress has been made in the field of economic development. This, along with a considerable increase in the literacy rate, (from 51.63% to 65.38% in the last decade) has made Indian citizens increasingly aware of their rights.

    Citizens have become more articulate and expect the administration not merely to respond to their demands but also to anticipate them. It was in this climate that since 1996 a consensus had evolved in the Government on effective and responsive administration.

    Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances in Government of India (DARPG) initiated the task of coordinating, formulating and operationalising Citizens’ Charters.

    Guidelines for formulating the Charters as well as a list of do’s and don’ts were communicated to various government departments/organisations to enable them to bring out focused and effective charters.

    For the formulation of the Charters, the government agencies at the Centre and State levels were advised to constitute a task force with representation from users, senior management and the cutting edge staff.

    Principally, an adaptation of the UK model, the Indian Citizens’ Charter has an additional constituent of ‘expectations from the clients’. Involvement of consumer organisations, citizen groups, and other stakeholders in the formulation of the Citizens’ Charter is highlighted to confirm that the Citizens’ Charter fulfills the needs of the users.

    Regular monitoring, review and evaluation of the Charters, both internally and through external agencies, are commanded.

    Till April, 2006, 111 Citizens’ Charters had been articulated by the Central Government Ministries/ Departments/ Organisations and 668 Charters by various agencies of State Governments & Administrations of Union Territories.

    Most of the national Charters are posted on the government’s websites and are open to public scrutiny. The organisations with Citizens’ Charters are advised to give publicity to their Charters through such means as print/ electronic media and awareness crusades.

    Salient Features of a Citizen’s Charter 

    The salient features of a Citizen’s Charter are:

    1. Agreed and published standards for service delivery;
    2. Openness and information about service delivery;
    3. ‘Choice’ and Consultation with users;
    4. Courtesy and helpfulness in service delivery; and
    5. Provision of redressal of grievances.

    Let us elaborate these points:

    Standards: The Charter should lay out explicit standards of service delivery so that users understand what they can reasonably expect from service providers. These standards should be time‐bound, relevant, accurate, measurable and specific. The actual performance vis‐à‐vis the standards adopted must be published and independently validated. The tendency among organizations to develop targets and standards based on their own convenience as opposed to the needs of the citizens must be avoided.

    Information and openness: A key attribute of good service is the availability of relevant and concise information to the users at the right time and at the right place. The Charters should contain, in plain language, full and accurate information about services available, levels and quality of service to be expected, available channels for grievance redressal etc. Handbooks, guides, posters, websites are some of the channels through which information can be provided to citizens.

    Choice and consultation: The Charter should provide choice of services to users wherever practicable. There should be regular and systematic consultation with the users of the service to fix service standards and to ascertain quality of service delivery.

    Courtesy and helpfulness: The Charter can help embed a culture of courteous and helpful service from public servants. In addition, small initiatives such as ‘name badges’, ‘May I help you’ counters etc. can go a long way in building customer confidence.

    Grievance redressal and complaints handling: There is a strong link between the provision of quality service and effective handling of complaints. Firstly, by facilitating and responding to complaints, the causes for complaint can be reduced. Secondly, by identifying ‘trends’ in complaints, the service provider can resolve systemic and recurring problems.

    Problems faced in implementing the Charters

    As indicated, the Citizens’ Charters initiative in India had started in 1997 and the Charters formulated are in embryonic stage of implementation. Introduction of a new thought is always difficult in any organisation. Introduction and implementation of the concept of Citizens’ Charter in the Government of India was much more complicated due to the old bureaucratic set up/procedures and the rigid attitudes of the work force.

    The major obstacles encountered in this initiative were:

    1. The general perception of organisations which formulated Citizens’ Charters was that the exercise was to be performed because there was a direction from the top. The consultation process was minimal or largely absent. It thus became one of the routine activities of the organisation and had no focus.
    2. For any Charter to thrive the personnel responsible for its implementation should have proper training and orientation, as commitments of the Charter cannot be expected to be delivered by a workforce that is unaware of the spirit and content of the Charter. However, in many cases, the concerned staff was not sufficiently trained and sensitised.
    3. Sometimes, transfers and reshuffles of concerned officers at the critical stages of formulation/implementation of a Citizens’ Charter in an organisation severely destabilised the strategic processes which were put in place and hampered the progress of the initiative.
    4. Awareness campaigns to teach clients about the Charter were not conducted systematically.
    5. In some cases, the standards/time norms of services mentioned in Citizens’ Charter were either too negligent or too tight and were impractical and created an unfavourable impression on the clients of the Charter.
    6. The notion behind the Citizens’ Charter was not accurately understood. Information brochures, publicity materials, pamphlets produced earlier by the organisations were mistaken for Citizens’ Charters.

    Deficiencies in the Existing Citizens’ Charters

    1. Lack of awareness and knowledge and inadequate publicity, hence loss of trust among service seekers
    2. No training to the operative and supervisory staff
    3. Lack of infrastructure and initiative
    4. Hierarchy gap between the Officers and the Operative Staff-Need of team effort
    5. Different mind-sets of officers and the Staff- Insensitiveness on the part of the Supervisors and the Staff because they are yet to be sensitized
    6. Staff is not prepared to shoulder the responsibility due to lack of motivation and accountability
    7. Non-revision, complicated and restrictive rules & procedures

    Guidelines for the Citizens’ Charters in India

    1. List all Offices according to type of services they provide to public – Indicate their location, areas they cover, type of services being rendered to public, and phone numbers.
    2. There should be a separate Citizens’ Charter (i.e., Local Citizens’ Charters) for each office covering the services they provide. For example, there should be a separate Charter of the Directorate, its subordinate offices, Hospitals, Schools, etc. according to the particular services they provide.
    3. Mention Service Standards – Step-by-step-Procedure based on ‘Where to go; how to proceed’, simple and easy to fill-in Forms, specimen of duly-filled in forms, documents, fees, etc. required, reasonable time schedule, Do’s & Don’ts, etc., names, addresses and Tele. Nos. of concerned Officials, his alternate for each service, etc.
    4. Minimum documentation, self-attestation and self-declaration.
    5. No duplication – In case desired information and document submitted earlier like proof of residence (if there is no change), birth certificate, etc., it should not be asked again.
    6. If promised services are not provided as per specified time schedule, an effective grievance redressal mechanism (including the provision of compensation to the concerned citizen in order to introduce accountability) should be introduced.
    7. Provision of TATKAL (Immediate) Services if somebody is in urgent need (as in the case of Passport, Railways, etc.) to avoid touts, bribery, etc.
    8. Simultaneous changes in the Performa and other requirements to be effected along with the changes made in the Citizens Charter.
    9. Database of frequently required information, like ownership of property, vehicle, etc., tax and dues paid or pending, etc.
    10. If possible, the services and their related information may be presented in a tabular form.
    11. Salient features of each service should be prominently displayed in simple and easy language at all places likely to be visited by the service seekers.

    Key lessons

    The following pitfalls need to be avoided:

    1. Since Citizen’s Charters are likely to raise the aspirations of the users of the service, the departments should guard against the tendency to promise more than they can deliver. A realistic assessment of the capabilities of the service provider must be taken into account in drafting the Charter.
    2. A critical review of the current systems and processes in the department should be undertaken to examine whether they are likely to have an adverse impact on the Charter.
    3. Implementing the Charters without the staff owning them will defeat the purpose of the Charter. Motivating the staff and involving them in the preparation of the Charter are extremely important.
    4. The Charters will remain merely a paper exercise of limited value if there is no consultation with the users. Departments should ensure user involvement at all stages of preparation and implementation of the Charter.
    5. Independent audit of results is important after a period of implementation of the Charter.
    6. Complex systems for lodging complaints or poor access to officers for redressal of grievances defeat the purpose and the spirit of the Charter.

    To summarize, A Citizens’ Charter denotes the promise of an organisation towards standard, quality and time frame of service delivery, grievance redressal mechanism, clearness and accountability.

    Based on the foreseen expectations and aspirations of public, Citizens’ Charters are to be drawn-up with care and concern for the concerned service users.

    They allow the service seekers to avail the services of the government departments with minimum inconvenience and maximum speed.

    FAQs

    Why is Citizen’s Charter relevant for the UPSC syllabus?

    It is crucial for topics like governance, public administration, and accountability, covered in GS papers and optional subjects.

    Can questions on Citizen’s Charter appear in the UPSC Prelims?

    Yes, questions may appear in the Polity section, focusing on its principles and role in service delivery.

  • Comparison of the Indian Constitutional Scheme with that of other countries

    A constitution is a set of rules through which a country or state operates.

    Some countries have unwritten constitutions which means there is no formal constitution written in one particular document. Their constitutional rules are originated from a number of sources.

    Britain sources its constitution from a number of important statutes, or laws, as well as principles decided in legal cases and conventions. New Zealand and Israel are two other countries that do not have formal written constitutions.

    Other nations have formal written constitutions in which the structure of government is defined and the respective powers of the nation and the states are written in one single document. These systems may also include unwritten conventions and constitutional law which can inform how the constitution is interpreted.Australia, India and the United States are examples of countries with a written constitution.

    Australia, India and the United States are examples of countries with a written constitution.

    Some constitutions may be modified without any special process. The documents that make up the New Zealand Constitution may be amended simply by a majority vote of its Parliament.In other

    In other countries, a special procedure is adopted before their constitution can be changed. Australia has a constitution which requires a referendum in order to change it.

    Indian Constitution has many sources that include the imaginative ambitions of the nationalist leaders, the actual working of the Government of India Act, 1935, and the experience gained from the genuine working of some of the Constitutions of significant countries of the world.

    Its sources include not only the sources upon which the founding fathers of our Constitution drew but also the developmental sources such as the judicial decisions, constitutional amendments, constitutional practices and others.

    Importance of Constitution

    The role of a Constitution is to make certain that the government operates efficiently and in a fair and responsible manner. It does this in three ways:

    • It holds the government to the law.
    • It provides the distinction of power so that no one part of the government is any more powerful than another.

    It provides a series of checks and balances so that when laws are made or amended, the government follows the correct procedure to pass a Bill.

    Constitution of India-At a glance

    The Indian Constitution is inimitable in its contents and spirit. India, also called Bharat, is a Union of States. It is an Independent Socialist Secular Democratic Republic with a parliamentary system of government.

    The Republic is governed in terms of the Constitution of India which was accepted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 and came into force on 26th January, 1950.

    The Constitution offers for a Parliamentary form of government which is federal in structure with certain unitary characteristics.

    The constitutional head of the Executive of the Union is the President. As per Article 79 of the Constitution of India, the council of the Parliament of the Union consists of the President and two Houses known as the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and the House of the People (Lok Sabha).

    Article 74(1) of the Constitution provides that there shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister as its head to help and advise the President, who shall exercise his/her functions in accordance with the advice.

    The real executive power is vested in the Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister as its head.

    Comparison of Indian Constitution with that of other countries

  • Appointment to various Constitutional posts, powers, functions & responsibilities of various Constitutional Bodies

    Under the Constitution, the President has power to make numerous constitutional appointments. But in reality he exercises this power on the proposal of the Cabinet. Cabinet decides who is to be appointed and at what place.

    The President appoints Governor of States, ambassadors and members of a number of Commissions. The unseen finger behind all these appointments is, however, of the Cabinet. To be specific, the Prime Minister discusses with his other colleagues before the making of such appointments. Actually, cabinet accepts the appointments made by the Prime Minister.

    The Constitutional Bodies in India are created by the Constitution which assists the Government to operate properly. Each of these permanent or semi-permanent organizations is accountable for the administration of specific functions. Some additional bodies help them by providing advisory functions.

    Constitutional Bodies in India are the permanent or semi-permanent organization within the machinery of government. These bodies are responsible for the administration of specific functions. The functions of these bodies are usually executive type. Furthermore, different types of organization or commissions are used for advisory functions. The bodies are of national importance and help in the effective function of the government. India is a Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic country. These constitutional or independent bodies have extensive administrative functions. The head of these bodies are either appointed by the President of India or the Prime Minister serves as the chairman.

    Appointments to various constitutional posts

    A Constitutional body is formed under detailed instructions given in the Constitution. It is compulsory for the government to set up such a body and it cannot dispense off with it easily when it becomes uncomfortable. Such bodies or institutions are written into the Constitution of a nation and cannot be eliminated without amending that part of the Constitution which sometimes also requires

    Such bodies or institutions are written into the Constitution of a nation and cannot be eliminated without amending that part of the Constitution which sometimes also requires the consent of the states.

    The Constitution of India specifies the setting up of following major constitutional bodies and has given appointment to various constitutional posts. The major constitutional bodies in India are as under:

    1. Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
    2. State Public Service Commission/Joint State Public Service Commission
    3. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India
    4. Election Commission of India
    5. Finance Commission of India
    6. National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC)
    7. National Commission For Scheduled Tribe

     

     

     

  • 19 September 2017 | Prelims Daily with Previous Year Questions & Tikdams

    Q.1) Consider the following statements regarding the ‘Unified Payments Interface (UPI)’:
    1. It is built over Immediate Payment Service (IMPS)
    2. It is regulated by the Reserve Bank of India(RBI).
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    a) Both are correct
    b) 1 only
    c) 2 only
    d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Q.2) Consider the following statements regarding the ‘Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D)’:
    1. It was established while drafting the Indian Police Act of 1861.
    2. It works as a Federal law enforcement.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    a) Both are correct
    b) 1 only
    c) 2 only
    d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Q.3) Which of the statements given below is/are correct regarding the ‘National Library of India’:?
    1. It under the Department of Culture, Ministry of Tourism & Culture, GoI.
    2. It is situated in Kolkata.
    Select the correct option using the codes given below.
    a) Both are correct
    b) Neither 1 nor 2
    c) 1 only
    d) 2 only

    Q.4) Consider the following statements regarding the ‘Special Purpose Vehicle’:
    1. It used to isolate financial risk.
    2. It is a special type of Parent Company that makes its obligations secure even if the subsidiary company goes bankrupt.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    a) Neither 1 nor 2
    b) 2 only
    c) 1 only
    d) Both are correct

    Q.5) Regarding ‘Digi locker’, sometimes seen in the news, which of the following is / are correct?
    1.It is an digilocker system offered by the govt under digital India programme
    2.It allows you to access your e-documents irrespective of your physical location
    Select the correct answer using the code given below
    a) 1 only
    b) 2 only
    c) Both 1 and 2
    d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Q.6) Recently, linking of which of the following rivers was undertaken?
    a) very and Tungabhadra
    b) avari and Krishna
    c) anadi and soni
    d) mada and tapti

    Q.7) In the cities of our country, which among the following atmospheric gases are normally considered in calculating the value of Air Quality Index?
    1.Carbon dioxide
    2.Carbon monoxide
    3.Sulfur dioxide
    4.Methane
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
    a) 2 and 3 only
    b) 3 and 4 only
    c) 4 and 5 only
    d) 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Q.8) With reference to ‘Astrosat’, the astronomical observatory launched by India, which of the following statements is/are correct?
    1.Other than USA and Russia, India is the only country to have launched a similar observatory into space.
    2.Astrosat is a 2000kg satellite placed in an orbit at 1650km above the surface of the Earth.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
    a) 1 only
    b) 2 only
    c) Both 1 and 2
    d) Neither 1 nor 2


    IMPORTANT STUFF: 

    1. Daily newscards have been enriched with back2basics and note2students – Make notes daily

    2. Join Full Year Prelims TS – prelims.civilsdaily.com

    3. Solutions will be uploaded at 11.30 p.m. Click here for Solutions

    4. For attempting previous Prelims Daily Questions – Click here

  • Surrogacy Bill

    Note4Students:

    Recently union cabinet has approved the draft Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016. This bill has been debated vigorously in newspapers. Many op-eds have come in the newspaper since the bill has been drafted.

    Context

    Recently union cabinet has approved the draft Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016. The bill aims to protect the woman from victimization at the hands of those whose need for a child may tempt them to overlook the exploitation rampant in the current commercial surrogacy ecosystem. The draft surrogacy Bill aims at regulating commissioning of surrogacy in the country in a proper manner. The situation demands such a bill so urgently because by 2012, India had become the ‘surrogacy capital’ of the world.

    What is surrogacy?

    When an another woman carries and gives birth to a child for a couple who want to have a baby but are unable to do so, because of infertility or some other reasons, it is called surrogacy. When the couple is medically unfit to conceive then the surrogate mother is artificially inseminated. Such case is called Biological Surrogacy. Whereas in gestational surrogacy the fertilised egg is placed into the uterus of the surrogate mother.

    Background:

    India is the first country to legalise commercial surrogacy in 2002. By 2012, India had become the ‘surrogacy capital’ of the world with surrogacy tourism valued at approximately $500 million annually. In India it became a way of earning livelihood and are often abused. It has been done usually for a payment with help of agents and doctors in the market. Currently there is no proper regulation on surrogacy in India. While estimates of the size of the surrogacy market vary wildly, it is one in which the woman carrying an embryo has been in a grey zone, with uncertain legal and compensatory protection. Compensation is not the only situation where surrogate mothers are exploited. For instance, A Japanese couple began the process with a surrogate mother in Gujarat, but before the child was born they split and there were no takers for the child. Another instance in 2012, an Australian couple commissioned a surrogate mother, and arbitrarily chose one of the twins that was born. In the light of these experiences, the 228th report of the Law Commission of India recommended prohibiting commercial surrogacy. In Jan Balaz vs. Anand Municipality & Ors., the Gujarat high court had to adjudicate upon a case relating to the issue of citizenship of twin children who were born out of surrogacy in India when the commissioning parents’ home state of Germany had refused to grant citizenship to the children.

    Key features of the Legislation

    1. The Bill will regulate surrogacy in India establishing a National Surrogacy Board at the Central level and State Surrogacy Board and appropriate authorities in the state and Union Territories to ensure effective regulation.
    2. It prohibit commercial surrogacy and allow for altruistic surrogacy to the needy infertile couples.The Bill bars foreigners, homosexual couples, people in live in relationships and single individuals from becoming surrogacy.
    3. Only childless, straight Indian couples married for a period of 5 years, having proven fertility problems are eligible for surrogacy. (Between the age group 23-50 years for women and 26-55 years for men who do not have a surviving child are eligible for surrogacy.)NRIs and PIOs who hold Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cards have also been barred from opting for surrogacy Eligible couples will have to turn to “close relatives”, not necessarily related by blood for altruistic surrogacy – no exchange of money between the commissioning couple and the surrogate mother. (The Bill, which borrows heavily from UK’s altruistic surrogacy Bill).
    4. Women acting as surrogates can do so only once in her life time.
    5. All Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics will have to be registered with the Authorities.10 months during which pregnancies underway now can be seen through and babies delivered.
    6. The child born through surrogacy will have the rights of a biological child.
    7. Undertaking surrogacy for a fee, advertising it or exploiting the surrogate mother will be punishable with imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh.
    8. It promises to ensure parentage of children born out of surrogacy is legal and transparent.

    Merits of the Legislation

      1. The proposed Bill will help in preventing exploitation of women especially those from rural, poor and tribal belts.
      2. The rights of both surrogate mother and child are ensured by the new legislation.
      3. By bringing in altruistic surrogacy model and allowing a woman to be a surrogate only once in her lifetime, the government aims to ensure better health and life of the surrogate mother.
      4. It proposes punishment with imprisonment of not less than 10 years along with a fine up to Rs.10 lakhs in case of exploitation and other irregularities.
      5. Adoption is an underutilized option will be promoted along with the couple’s happiness.

    Demerits of the Legislation

    1. The right to life includes the right to reproductive and right to parenthood. So the state should not decide the modes of parenthood.
    2. Sudden interruption would just pushed the $500 million industry underground. Thus the very purpose of the bill- to protect surrogate mothers from exploitation would be defeated. The bill is will affect the thriving medical tourism in the country and people associated with it.
    3. Restricting limited, conditional surrogacy to married Indian couples and disqualifying other persons on the basis of nationality, marital status, sexual orientation or age does not appear to qualify the test of equality (article 14 and 21), or of being a reasonable classification, satisfying the objective sought to be achieved. This plausibly violates the ‘right to reproductive autonomy’ as laid down in B.K. Parthasarathy vs Government of Andhra Pradesh.
    4. The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), working under the ministry of health and family welfare, finalised the National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of Artificial Reproductive Technology (ART) Clinics in India, 2005. In that it had not been mentioned such prohibitions.
    5. Due to less opportunity Doctors migrate to foreign countries. This legislation may further push the situation.
    6. If altruistic surrogacy is enforced, the commissioning parents have to find some non-legal means to pay the woman who has spent a year or more of her life trying to ensure the birth of a healthy baby or babies.
    7. The proposed provisions in the Bill might act as a ground that breeds underground surrogacy. It is not necessary that all the medical clinics will adhere to law. There will be corruption and unethical practices and exploitation of poor women.
    8. But it lacks in addressing different medical conditions like a women has medical problem to conceive. It is illogical to make her wait for 5 years.
    9. The surrogate mother must be a ‘close relative’ of the intending couple.  The Bill does not define the term ‘close relative’. Restricting only a blood relative to be a surrogate mother is illogical and unreasonable. Restricting only a blood relative to be a surrogate mother is illogical and unreasonable.
    10. For an abortion, in addition to complying with the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, the approval of the appropriate authority and the consent of the surrogate mother is required.  The Bill does not specify a time limit for granting such an approval.  Further, the intending couple has no say in the consent to abort.

    Way Forward/Conclusion

    1. A blanket ban on such medical tourists makes no sense at all especially when we issue visas to them for other forms of medical tourism. Many countries including the UK that have experimented with altruistic surrogacy have realized that this only tends to push the whole transaction underground. A woman who bears a child for another one is actually performing a service and needs to be compensated for it.
    2. It has to be understood that a woman who enters into surrogacy is not out of will but because she is pushed towards it for a decent livelihood. Therefore, altruistic surrogacy will lead them to look for other means of living to sustain themselves.
    3. The law should respect the rights of the citizens.
    4. The economic aspects and scientific aspects should be considered along with the social and legal aspects.
    5. The need of the hour is to regulate the unregulated surrogacy market to ensure and protect the rights of surrogates by ensuring the rights of the commissioning parents and children born as a result of such arrangements. The government should rethink the proposed law on surrogacy to safeguard the constitutional rights of the stakeholders considering the social, legal and ethical dynamics of this sensitive subject for the formation of a progressive regulatory framework

    Questions

    Q) What is the significance of the proposed Surrogacy Bill in India? Explain the challenges still remaining in the sector.

    Q) Surrogacy is an Altruistic work. It cannot be made commercial as it will be unethical and it is against the values of the Indian society and exploitative nature of the commercial surrogacy industry. Express your views with arguments (PAPER IV- Ethics).

    Q) Recently the government has proposed a legislation on Surrogacy. Due to many reasons it gave rise to mixed response. Analyse the provisions of the bill and explain its suitability in the present situation of Indian society.

    Sources:

    PRS India Website

    Big Picture Discussion

    The Hindu News

    Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    The Wire