💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3

  • Peatlands and their importance

    Sustainably managing peatlands — peat-swamp forests found around the tropics — can protect humans from future pandemics, according to a new study.

    What are Peatlands?

    • Peatlands are terrestrial wetland ecosystems in which waterlogged conditions prevent plant material from fully decomposing.
    • Consequently, the production of organic matter exceeds its decomposition, which results in a net accumulation of peat.
    • Over millennia this material builds up and becomes several metres thick.
    • They occur in almost every country on Earth, currently covering 3% of the global land surface.
    • Peatland landscapes are varied – from blanket bog landscapes with open, treeless vegetation in the Flow Country of Scotland – a tentative World Heritage site – to swamp forests in Southeast Asia.

    Their importance

    • Peatlands are the largest natural terrestrial carbon store. This area sequesters 0.37 gigatonnes of CO2 a year.
    • In their natural, wet state peatlands provide vital ecosystem services.
    • By regulating water flows, they help minimise the risk of flooding and drought and prevent seawater intrusion.
    • In many parts of the world, peatlands supply food, fibre and other local products that sustain local economies.
    • They also preserve important ecological and archaeological information such as pollen records and human artefacts.

    Try this PYQ now:

    In the context of mitigating the impending global warming due to anthropogenic emission of carbon dioxide, which of the following can be the potential sites for carbon sequestration?

    1. Abandoned and Uneconomic coal seams
    2. Depleted oil and gas reservoirs
    3. Subterranean deep saline formations

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 1 and 3 only

    (c) 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

    Why conserve peatlands?

    • The protection and restoration of peatlands are vital in the transition towards a low-carbon and circular economy.
    • Damaged peatlands contribute about 10% of greenhouse gas emissions from the land-use sector.
    • CO2 emissions from drained peatlands are estimated at 1.3 gigatonnes of CO2 annually.
    • This is equivalent to 5.6% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
    • Draining peatlands reduces the quality of drinking water due to pollution from dissolved compounds.

    What is the new study?

    • Peatlands were rich in biodiversity, including many potential vertebrate and invertebrate vectors, or carriers of disease, the study said.
    • These included numerous vertebrates known to represent a risk of spreading zoonotic diseases, such as bats, rodents, pangolins and primates.
    • These areas also faced high levels of habitat disruption such as wild or human-made fires and wildlife harvesting that was perfect conditions for potential emerging zoonotic diseases.
    • The first reported case of Ebola in 1976 was from a peatland area.
    • The cradle of the HIV/AIDS pandemic was believed to be around Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, another area with extensive peatlands.

  • Putting India-U.S. trade ties on new footing

    After tumultuous years of Trump administration in trade policies, the article examines the new possibilities under the next U.S. President in trade ties with India.

    Approach towards WTO and India

    • The new U.S. administration will have more constructive stance on multilateral issues in the World Trade Organization (WTO).
    • The Trump administration went out of its way in seriously undermining WTO institutions when the organisation was already in need of reform and new direction.
    • The Biden administration is less likely to engage in unilateral tariff increases and more likely to pursue remedies in the WTO.
    • In case of India, the Trump administration it pursued an aggressive approach to resolve market access concerns through threats to eliminate India’s benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences programme.
    • However, the follow-through was weak.
    • The administration was on the brink of concluding a historic bilateral trade deal, yet it lost focus.

    5 likely developements

    • 1) It is clear that Mr. Biden plans to focus on domestic concerns first.
    • There may be trade aspects to some of these efforts, but they may have limited early relevance for a future U.S.-India trade policy.
    • 2) Two, as it turns to trade policy, the Biden administration is not likely to place India among its top few priorities.
    • Among top priorities will include formulating its approach with China, such as finding alternatives to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership to set new global standards that address China’s practices.
    • That said, India should be among the priorities at the next level down.
    • 3) The trade deal still pending with the Trump administration remains compelling.
    • There could be an early opportunity to conclude these negotiations and for the Biden administration to get credit.
    • A bilateral deal will not lead to serious consideration of FTA negotiations any time soon.
    • But this first trade agreement could pave the way for later additional small agreements.
    • 4) The existing Trade Policy Forum (TPF) met only once over the last four years.
    • It seems likely that the Biden administration will see the TPF’s value as a venue for more regular discussions on a range of trade issues.
    • 5) A reinvigorated TPF will present new opportunities for the two countries to take up a range of cutting-edge trade issues that will be critical in determining whether the U.S. and India can converge more over time or will drift further apart.
    • These include digital trade issues, intellectual property rights and approaches to nurturing innovation, better health sector alignment, and more regular regulatory work on science-based agricultural policies.

    Conclusion

    The future looks bright for U.S.-India trade under a Biden administration, but that does not mean it will be any easier. It will be critical for leadership on both sides to commit to strong efforts to put the trade relationship on a new footing, which will have to involve a ‘can-do’ attitude to solving problems.

    Back2Basics: Trade Policy Forum

    • It was established in 2005.
    • The Forum is part of the overall United States-India Economic Dialogue, replacing the Trade Policy Working Group pillar.
    • It  convenes on a regular basis.
    • The Forum provides an opportunity to work together to expand trade between the two countries.
    • The agenda could cover the following subjects: tariff and non-tariff trade barriers; foreign direct investment; subsidies; customs procedures; standards, testing, labeling and certification intellectual property rights protection; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; government procurement; and services.

  • Mistake in allowing industrial houses to own banks

    The article analyses the risks involved in allowing the corporate houses to own and operate the banks.

    Context

    • An internal working group of the RBI has recently made a recommendation to permit industrial houses to own and control banks.

    Encourage bank but not owned by banks

    • According to the report, the main benefit is that industry-owned banks would increase the supply of credit, which is low and growing slowly.
    • Credit constraints are indeed a real problem, and creating more banks is certainly one way of addressing the issue.
    • But this is an argument for encouraging more banks but it is not an argument for creating banks specifically owned by industry.
    • The other powerful way to promote more good quality credit is to undertake serious reforms of the public sector banks.

    Problems in allowing industrial houses in banking

    • The problem with banks owned by corporate houses is that they tend to engage in connected lending.
    • This can lead to three main adverse outcomes:

    1) Over-financing of risky activities

    • Lending to firms that are part of the corporate group allows them to undertake risky activities that are not easily financeable through regular channels.
    • Precisely because these activities are risky, they often do not work out.
    • And when that happens, it is typically taxpayers who end up footing the bill.
    • In principle, connected lending can be contained by the regulatory authority.
    • However, experiences in other nations show that regulating connected lending is impossible convincing most advanced countries that regulating connected lending is impossible.
    • Indonesia tried to regulate the practice: It banned the practice.
    • The only solution is to ban corporate-owned banks.
    • Regulation and supervision need to be strengthened considerably to deal with the current problems in the banking system before they are burdened with new regulatory tasks.

    2) Lack of exit

    • The economic landscape is littered with failed firms, kept alive on life support, making it impossible for more efficient firms to grow and replace them.
    • While some progress was initially made under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), this had stalled even before the pandemic, largely because existing promoters and owners mounted a stiff resistance.
    • If industrial houses get direct access to financial resources, their capacity to delay or prevent exit altogether will only increase.

    3) Increasing dominance

    • The Indian economy already suffers from over-concentration.
    • We not only have concentration within industries, but in some cases the dominance of a few industrial houses spans multiple sectors.
    • If large industrial houses get banking licences, they will become even more powerful, not just relative to other firms in one industry, but firms in another industry.

    Impact on regulator and government

    • The power acquired by getting banking licences will not just make them stronger than commercial rivals, but even relative to the regulators and government itself.
    • This will aggravate imbalances, leading to a vicious cycle of dominance breeding more dominance.

    Impact on quality of credit

    • Indian financial sector reforms have aimed at improving not just the quantity, but also the quality of credit.
    • The goal has been to ensure that credit flows to the most economically efficient users, since this is the key to securing rapid growth.
    • If India now starts granting banking licences to powerful, politically connected industrial houses we will effectively be abandoning that long-held objective.

    Impact on economy and democracy

    • Indian capitalism has suffered because of the murky two-way relationship between the state and industrial capital.
    • If the line between industrial and financial capital is erased, this stigma will only become worse.
    • Corporate houses that are already big will be enabled to become even bigger allowing them to dominate the economic and political landscape.
    • A rules-based, well-regulated market economy, as well as democracy itself — will be undermined, perhaps critically.

    Consider the question “What are the challenges and opportunities in allowing the industrial houses to own and operate the banks.”

    Conclusion

    The conclusion is clear. Mixing industry and finance will set us on a road full of dangers — for growth, public finances, and the future of the country itself.

  • National Maritime Domain Awareness Centre (NMDAC)

    The Navy’s Information Management and Analysis Centre (IMAC), the nodal agency for maritime data fusion will soon become a National Maritime Domain Awareness (NMDA) centre.

    Try this question:

    Q“To be secure on Land, we must be Supreme at Sea”. In this context, discuss why India is primarily a Maritime Nation?

    What is IMAC?

    • The IMAC monitors movement of more than 120,000 ships a year passing through the Indian Ocean.
    • The cargo carried by these ships account for 66 per cent of world crude oil, 50 per cent of container traffic and 33 per cent of bulk cargo.
    • Thus, IMAC performs a very crucial role in collecting shipping information, analysing traffic patterns and sharing the inputs with the user agencies.
    • It tracks vessels on the high seas and gets data from the coastal radars, white shipping agreements, Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) transponders fitted on merchant ships, air and traffic management system and global shipping databases.

    Transforming to NDMAC

    • The IMAC will soon transform into a national NMDA centre, wherein it will be a multi-agency centre.
    • The NMDA project was launched in accordance with the vision of PM on SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region).
    • Approved by the Defence Acquisition Council in 2012, the IMAC became operational in 2014 and is located in Gurugram.
    • It is the nodal centre of the National Command Control Communication and Intelligence System (NC3I), which was established to link the Navy and the Coast Guard.

    Why such a move?

    • India has a coast line of about 7500 km and an Exclusive Economic Zone(EEZ) of over 2 million sq kms.
    • In addition, we are endowed with abundant oceanic wealth comprising a large number of island territories and vast sea bed area, over 97 % of our national trade is carried by sea routes.
    • It is therefore, imperative that we modernize the Navy which always has to be in a high state of preparedness.

  • [pib] SDG Investor Map for India

    Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

    UNDP and Invest India have launched the SDG Investor Map for India, laying out 18 Investment Opportunities Areas (IOAs) in six critical SDG (Sustainable Development Goals) enabling sectors.

    Try this PYQ:

    Q.The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE), a UN mechanism to assist countries transition towards greener and more inclusive economies, emerged at:

    (a) The Earth Summit on Sustainable Development 2002, Johannesburg

    (b) The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development 2012, Rio de Janeiro

    (c) The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2015, Paris

    (d) The World Sustainable Development Summit 2016, New Delhi

    SDG Investor Map for India

    • SDG Finance Facility platform at UNDP in partnership with Invest India, the investment promotion arm of the Government of India has developed this Map.
    • The map will help public and private sector stake-holders direct capital towards IOAs, and White Spaces (Areas of Potential) that can contribute to the sustainable development needs of the country.
    • The map has identified 18 IOAs and 8 White Spaces across 6 Priority Sectors including Education, Healthcare, Agriculture and Allied Services, Financial Services, Renewable Energy and Alternatives, and Sustainable Environment.

    Utility of this map

    • Investing in the SDGs at this point is crucial to ‘Building Back Better’ and making the economy and our societies more resilient and sustainable.
    • With the COVID-19 pandemic, the financing gap for the SDGs in India has only widened further and decades of development progress is nearly on the verge of reversal.
    • Enhanced productivity, technology adoption and increased inclusion are all critical factors that this map uses to identify the most attractive sectors for investors.

    Back2Basics: What are SDGs?

    • The SDGs or Global Goals are a collection of 17 interlinked goals designed to be a “blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all”.
    • They were set in 2015 by the United Nations General Assembly and are intended to be achieved by the year 2030.
    • They are included in a UN Resolution called the 2030 Agenda or what is known as Agenda 2030.
    • Countries are expected to take ownership and establish a national framework for achieving these Goals.
    • Implementation and success will rely on countries’ own sustainable development policies, plans and programmes.

  • Steps needed to achieve Comparative advantage in Manufacturing

    The article suggests the policy approach to achieve industrial growth while avoiding the isolationist approach in pursuit of AtmaNirbharBharat.

    Issue of policy binary

    • The goals of the Make in India initiative and now the AatmaNirbharBharat Abhiyan are driving a major shift in policy.
    • Import duties are being raised.
    • Production-linked incentives are being offered to firms across a wide canvas of 10 priority sectors.
    • At the same time, there is considerable unease at the rolling back of trade liberalisation.
    • This binary is not very useful.

    Steps needed to gain competitive advantage

    1) Infrastructure

    • It would still take India many years to develop its physical infrastructure to the levels required for international competitiveness.
    • Until then, large industrial parks for textiles, electronics, toys or shipbuilding need to be developed by state agencies with soft financing.
    • Competitive logistics are essential.
    • This was critical for the success of the information technology (IT) industry where world-class infrastructure was created within the software parks.
    • High-speed broadband real-time connectivity to the US market was provided through public investment.
    • This was done well before general telecom modernisation began.

    2) Closing the financing gap

    • Long-term financing for world-class infrastructure is still a gap.
    • The central government can either use one of its existing financial institutions or create a new development financial institution to provide long-term low-interest rate debt.
    • The sovereign needs to provide risk-mitigation through an implicit guarantee. It can afford to do so.

    3)  Prevent real exchange rate appreciation

    • Before considering specific increases in import duties, real exchange appreciation should be undone.
    • This would have the effect of raising tariffs across the board.
    • It is high time the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) agreed on this objective.

    4) Change the regime for SEZ

    • Allow SEZ to sell into the domestic area with import duties at the lowest applicable rate with any trading partner and the same value-addition norms.
    • Tax exemption on profits could be dispensed with while continuing to provide a duty-free import regime.
    • This would create a level-playing field for production vis-à-vis competitive locations overseas.
    • Large zones would have to be developed by the state.
    • The private sector can be partners in the process, but achievement of scale is only possible by the state.
    • Production for the domestic as well as the global market would become easier.

    5) Encourage domestic value addition

    • Domestic value-addition can be incentivised by-
    • 1) Reducing duties to zero for all primary raw materials and inputs.
    • 2) then progressively higher rates for intermediates with the highest rate for the finished product.
    • In short, have just the opposite of the inverted duty structure we have had for computers.
    • This would change investment and production decisions if other costs of production in India have been made competitive.

    6) Commitment of procurement of full production

    • In some industries, commitment of procurement of full production for a few years would suffice to get investment.
    • Bids could be invited for solar panels, or for battery storage for the grid, for annual supply for, say, five years with the condition that full value-addition has to be done in India.
    • Such commitment would provide for amortisation of the capital investment and make it a risk-free investment.
    • If the bid size is large enough, the best global firms would come and invest.
    • If the bids are repeated, prices would come down and a competitive industry structure would be created.

    7) Encourage public investment

    • Public investment in firms should not be ruled out altogether.
    • In some cases, it may be the best way to create competitive capacity.
    • Maruti Suzuki is a good example in India.
    • Volkswagen was set up by a state government in Germany, which is still a substantial shareholder.
    • This is a policy instrument that can be used to create competitive advantage.

    8) Creation of fund

    • There should also be willingness to create a fund that looks at modest returns, but aims at creating national and global champions through start-ups.

    Conclusion

    The foundation of China’s incredible success was laid by Deng Xiaoping with the maxim on economic policy that one should not bother about the colour of the cat as long as it caught mice. India’s policies have tended to be doctrinaire. We need a heavy dose of pragmatism to achieve our full potential.

    Source:-

    https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/industrial-growth-the-right-policy-mix-for-success/2136735/

  • Solar Power Tariffs in India

    India’s solar power tariffs have hit a new record low of ₹2 per unit.

    Can you relate this?

    We have such a lower cost of solar energy. Then why do we rely on coal powered thermal power plants?

    Solar energy scenario in India

    • India has an ambitious target to increase its solar power base – by 2022, it wants to quadruple its current solar capacity to 100GW.
    • A number of industrial-scale solar energy plants have come up in the past few years.
    • The government-backed company Solar Energy Corp. of India (SECI) has been auctioning solar energy capacity to various private developers using a bidding process that favours the cheapest tariffs.

    Low tariff may seem lucrative

    • The record low solar tariffs are mainly due to the “reverse bidding” process, which selects the cheapest bidder.
    • India is now said to be considering a ceiling on solar tariffs – a cap of ₹2.5 ($o.035) and ₹2.68 ($0.038) per unit – for solar power companies that use both domestic and imported equipment.
    • India imports over 90 per cent of solar equipment including cells and modules from overseas, mainly from China and Malaysia.
    • The govt. now is in proves to impose a 25 per cent safeguard duty on solar equipment imports to protect domestic manufacturers, which could further put pressure on the razor margins of solar developers.

    Impacts of such low tariff

    • With the steep drop in prices, there are also concerns about the quality of the equipment being deployed, raising questions about future regulation and related costs.
    • The infrastructure of many solar plants in India didn’t meet many environmental stress factors and technical standards, according to a study.
    • India also has a target of increasing its rooftop solar capacity to 40,000 megawatts (MW) by 2022 similar to trends in many European countries.
    • But, here too, prohibitive costs of solar equipment have kept many residential property owners from switching to rooftop solar despite a government subsidy.

    Back2Basics: SECI

    • It is a company of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India, established to facilitate the implementation of the National Solar Mission (NSM).
    • It is the only Central Public Sector Undertaking dedicated to the solar energy sector.
    • The company’s mandate has been broadened to cover the entire renewable energy domain and the company will be renamed to Renewable Energy Corporation of India (RECI).
    • It is responsible for the implementation of a number of govt. schemes, major ones being the solar park scheme and grid-connected solar rooftop scheme etc.
    • It has a power-trading licence and is active in this domain through the trading of solar power from projects set up under the schemes being implemented by it.

    Reverse bidding Process

    In a reverse auction, the buyer puts up a request for a required good or service. Sellers then place bids for the amount they are willing to be paid for the good or service, and at the end of the auction the seller with the lowest amount wins.

  • NPCI caps UPI transactions on third-party apps at 30%

    The article deals with the recent NPCI decision to cap the number of transactions by third party application providers (TPAPs).

    Context

    • The National Payments Corp of India (NPCI), in its recent guidelines imposed a 30% volume-based cap on the share of transactions by TPAPs and payment service providers (PSPs), effective from January 2021.

     5 issues with the volume-based cap

    1) It undermines cashless economy

    • The growth and recognition of UPI would not have been possible had a cap been in place.
    • Typically, customers limit themselves to one or two TPAPs of their choice.
    • A transaction cap that forces users to use multiple apps may result in more transaction failures and dilute UPI’s popularity and impact.
    • Lack of accessibility and user-friendliness would push users away from UPI towards other payment methods, or even cash.

    2) It’s an anti-consumer decision

    • Open markets and user choice have been crucial factors in the exponential increase seen in UPI adoption and its transactions.
    • A volume-based cap would compel TPAPs to either limit the number of transactions on their platforms or stop enrolling new users, which in turn would restrict the customer’s use of UPI.
    • TPAPs will likely be forced to redact customer incentives like cashbacks, coupons and the like.
    • This could go against consumer interests by reducing choice.

    3) It will also make the Indian market less attractive for investors:

    • The cap would raise compliance and regulatory costs for players in the sector, which could deter new investors from entering.
    • It would also adversely affect the growth potential of existing UPI players.

    4) No regulatory impact assessment

    • The idea of a volume-based cap does not appear to have undergone an assessment of its impact on the sector.
    • As a general principle, before any such rule is imposed, an RIA (Regulatory Impact Assessment) needs to be undertaken.
    • Systemic risks are not restricted to UPI and are common in all financial systems; yet, a similar cap has not been suggested for, say, retail bank transactions.

    5) Impact on Atmanirbhar Bharat

    •  In order for Indian businesses to grow and compete at the global level, we need to integrate business processes with the global economy.
    • Indian start-ups, in particular, need tools and infrastructure that lets them gain an international edge.
    • Atmanirbhar Bharat envisions a self-reliant India that thrives on innovation, technology and entrepreneurship.
    • But this vision cannot be fulfilled if our policies restrain the growth of a cashless economy.

    Conclusion

    India’s UPI ecosystem is nascent, but has demonstrated significant growth and has had a positive impact on the economy by providing the backbone needed to move towards cashless commerce. Any policy decision by regulators at this point should aim at catalysing innovation in this space. Stifling it would serve India badly.

  • MQ-9B Sea Guardian Unarmed Drone

    The Indian Navy has inducted two MQ-9B Sea Guardian unarmed drones procured from the U.S. on lease.

    Try this question from CSP 2018:

    Q.What is “Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)”, sometimes seen in the news?

    (a) An Israeli radar system

    (b) India’s indigenous anti-missile programme

    (c) An American anti-missile system

    (d) A defence collaboration between Japan and South Korea

    MQ-9B Sea Guardian

    • The Guardian, which is the maritime variant of the Predator MQ-9 UAV, has a maximum endurance of 40 hours and a maximum flying altitude of 40,000 feet.
    • It has 360-degree maritime surveillance radar and optional multimode maritime surface search radar.
    • The drone can perform over-the-horizon long-endurance, medium-altitude Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions.
    • The recently released Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020 has introduced an option for leasing military platforms.
    • The Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-Spatial Cooperation (BECA) has simplified such high- technology cooperation.

    About BECA

    • BECA will help India get real-time access to American geospatial intelligence that will enhance the accuracy of automated systems and weapons like missiles and armed drones.
    • Through the sharing of information on maps and satellite images, it will help India access topographical and aeronautical data, and advanced products that will aid in navigation and targeting.
    • This could be a key to Air Force-to-Air Force cooperation between India and the US.
    • BECA will provide Indian military systems with a high-quality GPS to navigate missiles with real-time intelligence to precisely target the adversary.
    • Besides the sailing of ships, flying off aircraft, fighting of wars, and location of targets, geospatial intelligence is also critical to the response to natural disasters.

  • Allowing corporate houses in banking

    The article argues against the suggestion of allowing the corporate houses in the banking sector in India.

    Context

    • An Internal Working Group of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recommended that corporate houses be given bank licences.

    Background of the idea

    • In February 2013, the RBI had issued guidelines that permitted corporate and industrial houses to apply for a banking licence.
    • No corporate was ultimately given a bank licence.
    • None of the applicants had met ‘fit and proper’ criteria.
    • In 2014, the RBI restored the long-standing prohibition on the entry of corporate houses into banking.
    • The RBI’s position on the subject has remained unchanged since 2014.

    Advantages

    • Corporate houses will bring capital and expertise to banking.
    • Moreover, not many jurisdictions worldwide bar corporate houses from banking.

    Risks involved

    • As the report notes, the main concerns are interconnected lending, concentration of economic power and exposure of the safety net provided to banks
    • Corporate houses can easily turn banks into a source of funds for their own businesses.
    • In addition, they can ensure that funds are directed to their cronies.
    • They can use banks to provide finance to customers and suppliers of their businesses.
    • Adding a bank to a corporate house thus means an increase in concentration of economic power.
    • Not least, banks owned by corporate houses will be exposed to the risks of the non-bank entities of the group.
    • If the non-bank entities get into trouble, sentiment about the bank owned by the corporate house is bound to be impacted.

    Suggestion by IWG and issues with them

    • The Internal Working Group (IWG) believes that before corporate houses are allowed to enter banking, the RBI must be equipped with a legal framework to deal with interconnected lending and a mechanism to effectively supervise conglomerates that venture into banking.
    • But there are following 4 issues with such suggestion-
    • 1) Tracing interconnected lending will be a challenge.
    • 2)The RBI can only react to interconnected lending ex-post, that is, after substantial exposure to the entities of the corporate house has happened.
    • It is unlikely to be able to prevent such exposure.
    • 3) Any action that the RBI may take in response could cause a flight of deposits from the bank concerned and precipitate its failure.
    • 4) Pitting the regulator against powerful corporate houses could end up damaging the regulator.

    Issues in allowing NBFC owning corporate house in banking

    • Under the present policy, NBFCs with a successful track record of 10 years are allowed to convert themselves into banks.
    • The Internal Working Group believes that NBFCs owned by corporate houses should be eligible for such conversion.
    • This promises to be an easier route for the entry of corporate houses into banking.
    • The Internal Working Group argues that corporate-owned NBFCs have been regulated for a while.
    • However, there is a world of difference between a corporate house owning an NBFC and one owning a bank.
    • Bank ownership provides access to a public safety net whereas NBFC ownership does not.
    • The reach and clout that bank ownership provides are vastly superior to that of an NBFC.
    • The objections that apply to a corporate house with no presence in bank-like activities are equally applicable to corporate houses that own NBFCs.

    Consider the question “What are the concerns and challenges in allowing the corporate houses in the banking sector in India?” 

    Conclusion

    India’s banking sector needs reform but corporate houses owning banks hardly qualifies as one. If the record of over-leveraging in the corporate world in recent years is anything to go by, the entry of corporate houses into banking is the road to perdition.