đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: International Relations

  • IAS prelims 2016 Solutions – International Affairs

    IMP: Civilsdaily IAS Prelims 2017 Test Series Module Launched – Click here


    • Seven Questions (9) from International Affairs
    • Four (6) from international organizations
    • All very easy, very doable
    • Every single question from CD newscards/ explains

    1. ‘Belt and road Initiative’ is sometimes mentioned in the news in the context of the affairs of

    (a)    African Union

    (b)    Brazil

    (c)    European union

    (d)    China

    • Very very simple
    • So much in news /newscards/ explains
    • China – 21st century maritime silk road and silk road economic belt <OROB/ One rOad One Belt>

    2. Which of the following is not a member of ‘Gulf Cooperation Council’?

    a)    Iran

    b)    Saudi Arabia

    c)    Oman

    d)    Kuwait

    • CD explains
    • GCC 6 nations sunni monarchies
    • Arabian peninsula
    • Can exclude Iran by either clue
    1. ‘European Stability Mechanism’, sometimes seen in the news, is an

    (a)    agency  created by EU to deal with the impact of millions of refugees arriving from Middle East

    (b)    agency of EU that provides financial assistance to eurozone countries

    (c)    agency of EU to deal with all the bilateral and multilateral agreements on trade

    (d)    agency of EU to deal with the conflict arising among the member countries

    Very much in news related to Greek bailout

    4.‘Doctors Without Borders (Medecins Sans Frontiercs)’, often in the news, is

    a) A division of World Health Organization

    b) A non-governmental international organization

    c) And inter-government agency sponsored by European Union

    d) A specialized agency of the United Nations

    • In news as US forces bombed their hospital in Afghanistan , a war crime
    • MSF was also in news as they provided assistance during Ebola crisis
    1. Consider the following statements:

    The India-Africa Summit

    1. Held in 2015 was the third such Summit
    2. Was actually initiated by Jawaharlal Nehru in 1951

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    • In news
    • If it was 3rd, 1st can not be in 1951
    • It was started by PM Manmohan Singh

    6. With reference to ‘Organization for the prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)’ consider the following statements:

    1. It is an organization of European Union in working relation with NATO and WHO
    2. It monitors chemical industry to prevent new weapons free emerging
    3. It provides assistance and protection to Stated Parties against chemical weapons threats.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1,2 and 3

    • 1 is clearly wrong, it’s an international organization not under EU. Tikdams
    • Eliminate 1

    7. Community sometimes mentioned in the news In the affairs of

    1. Kurd : Bangladesh
    2. Madhesi : Nepal
    3. Robingya : Myanmar

    Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

    (a) 1 and 2

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 2 and 3

    (d) 3 only

    • Very much in news
    • Kurds – Iraq due to ISIS attack/ Peshmerga force
    • Madhesi Nepal – Constitutional protest
    • Rohingya – Boat people

    You can add TPP and RCEP question which we solved in economy also in international relations w

  • BREXIT

    What has happened?

    A referendum – a vote in which everyone of voting age can take part was held to decide whether the UK should leave or remain in the European Union and Leave won. <what is the difference b/s referendum and plebiscite?>

    What is this UK, Britain, Ireland, Republic? What’s going on? Is Scotland a separate country?


    Without going into the history- 

    • Full name is United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland i.e Great Britain plus N.I.
    • Great Britain – It contains 3 somewhat autonomous regions – England, Wales and Scotland
    • Republic of Ireland separated from northern Ireland and UK in 1920s and is a separate country now <Belfast is capital of which Ireland and what is the capital of Wales and Scotland?>

    But why this referendum

    Conservative govt led by David Cameron had promised this referendum if they won the general election and as they won this referendum was held

    What is European Union?

    • It is an economic and political partnership involving 28 European countries <latest country to join EU?>
    • It is a single market (common market) allowing goods and people to move around, basically as if the member states were one country. So basically any French citizen can travel to Germany and work there without visa.
    • You can visit whole of EU with a single visa <no internal borders>

    I had to take a separate visa to travel to London. How about that?

    • So this common visa thing is applicable only to countries that are party to Schengen area <where is Schengen btw?>
    • There are 26 Schengen countries (22 EU + 4 Non EU)
    • 4 Non EU – Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein <btw Liechtenstein is a double land locked country. Look in the map and find out which other country is doubly landlocked, There’s only one other>
    • 6 EU not party – Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Ireland, Romania and the UK.

    So as UK is not party to Schengen, you had to take Visa.

    What about euro? I had to use pound in UK. Isn’t the Euro currency of EU?

    • Euro currency is used by Eurozone countries. Eurozone is subset of EU. Only 19 EU countries are part of it. Obviously UK is not party to it. 
    • Euro is also used by 4 other European countries – Vatican, Andorra, San Marino, Monaco

    Any history ? How did EU begin?

    • It grew out of a desire for peace in a war-torn and divided continent. It started in 1951 with European Coal and steel community of 6 countries by treaty of Paris <France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg>
    • 1957 – European Economic Community (EEC) or common market was formed by treaty of Rome,
    • 1973 – Britain, Denmark and Ireland joins the EEC <total 9 countries now>
    • 1992 – Maastricht treaty was signed and comes into force in 1993. Formal beginning of EU
    • 2002 – Euro replaces national currency in eurozone

    What does EU do?

    • Eu oversees co-operation among its members in diverse areas, including trade, the environment, transport and employment
    • Common security and foreign policy
    • coordinates policy on asylum, immigration, drugs and terrorism <that’s why so much concern over migration fro middles east and north Africa>
    • EU policies on workers’ rights and other social issues <UK not part of this social chapter either>
    • Promotes human rights, give aid to agriculture, fisheries etc

    Okay, sounds great but how does it all work?

    EU works through 4 main institutions

    1. European Commission – All powerful bureaucracy of member states <each country, one representative>, propose laws, implement laws, job is to promote European interest, not the interest of member countries, HQ in Brussels <where is Brussels>
    2. European Council – It’s a political body, leaders meet here
    3. European Parliament – Directly elected MPs <MEPs> vote on almost all the issues now days. It sits in Strasbourg <where is Strasbourg?>
    4. European court of rights – name explains everything <where is its headquarters?

    Why do Brits want to leave EU?

    1. Sovereignty – that Britain ceded its sovereignty, right to pass its own laws to bureaucrats sitting in Brussels <Doesn’t India lose its sovereignty by being member of UN?>
    2. Regulations – That Brussels imposed too many regulations that hurt British business interest
    3. Money – Billions of pounds of entry fee with very little to show in return <Britain don’t have many farmers to get agriculture subsidies>
    4. Open borders/ migration – even though Britain is not part Schengen, workers from rest of the EU can come their freely and work there. Large numbers from eastern europe came just to claim British benefits, social security and all <so called welfare tourism>
    5. Ever Closer Union – detested the idea of United states of Europe <closer political union, confederation sort of thing>

    Why did Cameron want UK to stay in EU?

    1. Single market – much easier to sell things while being member of single market
    2. Security
    3. Britain’s status in the world is enhanced as part of EU

    How is single market different from free trade area?

    • In FTA there are no tariffs except on some negotiated goods and services but in single market, even labour mobility is free
    • In Single market, you impose common tariffs on all imports, it;s like a single country for the purpose of trade and commerce
    • There are common standards etc. <environment, labour, quality etc.>

    What is European free trade association (EFTA)?

    • It is FTA of 4 European countries -Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein <do you recall they are all part of Schengen>
    • All of them have signed FTA with EU. Britain can sign similar FTA with EU now

    What happens now?

    • Britain would negotiate its exit <under Lisbon treaty>, But the fear is of contagion. Eurosceptic parties of other countries would also press for similar referendums.  
    • Plus as Scotland has voted overwhelmingly in favour of stay (68%), there would be fresh demand for referendum on Scottish independence. Similarly is the case with northern Ireland.

    Impact on India

    • No direct impact but expect turbulence in stock and forex market. Panicky investors may withdraw their hot money out of India
    • On positive side, India can sign FTA with Britain
  • Nuclear Diplomacy and Disarmament

    Here’s what we are going the explain in this writeup:

    • The Backstory
    • What is the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)?
    • What does India need to do to get in?
    • Does joining the MTCR make getting missile technology easier?
    • Does the MTCR actually stop the spread of missile technology?
    • Are there any sanctions for breaking MTCR rules?
    • Does the MTCR actually stop the spread of missile technology?
    • Why does India want to be in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)?
    • Why does the US want India in the NSG?
    • Why doesn’t Pakistan want India in?
    • And what is China’s problem?
    • Why then did China go along with the NSG waiver in 2008?
    • Why does India want to join Proliferation control regimes?
    • Why is India’s Bid for NSG being criticized?

    source

    The Backstory

    • Since 2008, India has been pushing forward to become an NSG member, where decisions are consensus based and not based on majority votes
    • It has also been looking for membership of other groups such as MTCR
    • India recently became the Member of MTCR, however its bid for getting membership of NSG was not successful because of opposition from China and 12 other NSG members

    #1. All about MTCR

    What is the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)?

    Established in April 1987, it is a voluntary association of 35 countries and 4 “unilateral adherents” that follow its rules: Israel, Romania, Slovakia, Macedonia.

    The group aims to slow the spread of missiles and other unmanned delivery technology that could be used for chemical, biological and nuclear attacks.

    The regime urges members, which include most of the world’s major missile manufacturers, to restrict exports of missiles and related technologies capable of carrying a 500 kg payload at least 300 km, or delivering any type of weapon of mass destruction.

    How does one become a member of MTCR?

    • Prospective members must win consensus approval from existing members. United States policy had been that members that are not recognised nuclear-weapon states — including India — must eliminate or forgo ballistic missiles able to deliver a 500 kg payload at least 300 km
    • The US, however, made an exception in 1998 for Ukraine, permitting it to retain Scud missiles and, in October 2012, South Korea was allowed to keep ballistic missiles with an 800-km range and 500-kg payload that could target all of North Korea
    • For India, the US have waived these terms, allowing it retain its missile arsenal

    Does joining the MTCR make getting missile technology easier?

    • There are no special concessions for MTCR members. But India hopes its MTCR membership will be one more reason for the US to consider exporting Category 1 UAVs, Reaper and Global Hawk, which have been key to counter-terrorism efforts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen
    • These drones have so far been sold to only one country, the UK, though unarmed versions have also been made available to Italy and South Korea
    • The US has been rethinking rules on exports, aware that competitors in Israel, Russia and China are working on similar products — and India wants to be at the head of the queue when the Reaper and the Global Hawk go on the market

    Are there any sanctions for breaking MTCR rules?

    • Rule breakers can’t be punished.
    • However, US law mandates sanctions for companies and governments that export MTCR-controlled items. The sanctioned entity can’t sign contracts, buy arms and receive aid for two years or more.

    Does the MTCR actually stop the spread of missile technology?

    • Yes and no. North Korea, Iran and Pakistan acquired ballistic missile technology from China. But then, China began to feel the pinch of US technology sanctions — and announced, in November 2000, that it would stop exporting ballistic missile technology.
    • Four years later, it applied for MTCR membership — but has been denied entry because of suspicion that some companies in the country are secretly supplying technology to North Korea.
    • Many others dropped missile programmes because of MTCR pressure: Argentina abandoned its Condor II ballistic missile programme (on which it was working with Egypt and Iraq) to join the regime. Brazil, South Africa, South Korea and Taiwan shelved or eliminated missile or space launch vehicle programmes. Poland and the Czech Republic destroyed their ballistic missiles.

    It is possible China may now seek some kind of bargain, whereby it is given entry to the MTCR in return for letting India get into the NSG, where it wields a veto.

    What after MTCR?

    • Admission to the MTCR would open the way for India to buy high-end missile technology
    • It will also make India’s aspiration to buy state-of-the-art surveillance drones such as the U.S. Predator, made by General Atomics.

    #2. All about NSG

    Why does India want to be in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)?

    Following India’s 1974 nuclear tests, the US pushed for setting up a club of nuclear equipment and fissile material suppliers.

    The 48-nation group frames and implements agreed rules for exporting nuclear equipment, with a view to controlling the spread of nuclear weapons; members are admitted only by consensus.

    India has been trying, since 2008, to join the group, which would give it a place at the high table where the rules of nuclear commerce are decided — and, eventually, the ability to sell equipment.

    Many countries that initially opposed its entry, like Australia, have changed stance; Mexico and Switzerland are the latest to voice support. India’s effort has been to chip away at the resistance, leaving only one holdout — China. But until China accepts India’s entry, there is no hope of membership.

    Why does the US want India in the NSG?

    The answer lies in the US effort to strengthen the global nuclear non-proliferation regime, whose centrepiece is the 1968 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT.

    The NPT defines “nuclear weapons states” as those that tested devices before January 1, 1967 — which means India cannot ever be one.

    India — like Israel and Pakistan — thus refused to sign the treaty. From 2005, though, President George W Bush’s administration sought ways to deepen strategic cooperation with India.

    Nuclear energy was a key means to strengthen cooperation, but since India wasn’t a member of the NPT, technology couldn’t be shared. Then, a way forward was found — the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement.

    India agreed to separate its civilian and military nuclear programmes, and put the civilian part under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards.

    India also changed its export laws to line up with the NSG, MTCR, Wassenaar Arrangement, and Australia Group — the 4 key nuclear control regimes.

    The US agreed to shepherd India’s entry into these regimes, which meant India would for all practical purposes be treated like an NPT member, even though it wasn’t one.

    Why doesn’t Pakistan want India in?

    The Pakistani argument is that giving India easy access to fissile material and technology for its civilian nuclear programme means it would have that much more material for its military nuclear programme.

    Thus, Pakistan says, the move to give India NSG membership is fuelling a nuclear arms race.

    But this argument falls apart because Pakistan is resolutely opposed to a key international agreement called the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT), which would cap the military nuclear stockpiles of all countries. The FMCT ought to put an end to Pakistan’s fears, but Islamabad has refused to sign.

    Why has China opposed India’s Bid for NSG?

    Chinese diplomats say Beijing wants NSG entry to be norm-based , in other words, whatever rules govern Indian entry should apply to others too.

    Norm-based entry would, presumably, help Pakistan gain entry, something many in the NSG are certain to resist because of the country’s record as a proliferator of nuclear-weapons technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea.

    Why then did China go along with the NSG waiver in 2008?

    Geopolitics!

    The 2008 one-time waiver allowed nuclear commerce between NSG members and India — the agreement that now allows Westinghouse, and its competitors in France or South Korea, to bid to set up civilian reactors in India.

    The waiver came only after President Bush rang President Hu Jintao and called in a favour. Back then, US-China relations were riding high — on the back of surging trade, and a common vision of how the international order should be structured.

    Today, President Barack Obama and President Xi Jinping are at odds over Chinese muscle-flexing in the South China Sea. The odds of a phone call changing the state of play are next to zero.

    Why does India want to join Proliferation control regimes?

    • India’s membership of the NSG and other proliferation control regimes notably the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the Australia Group, and the Wassenaar Arrangement is important in order to shatter the myth of it being an “outlier” to the non-proliferation regime as also to facilitate its trade, both imports and exports, of nuclear, missile and other related sensitive technologies.
    • Membership of these regimes will enhance India’s status in this critical area from merely an adherent to a rule maker.
    • It will also enable India to ensure that these regimes perform their mandated role of promoting non-proliferation effectively and not hurt its commercial interests.

    Why India’s recent NSG bid is being criticized?

    • Many experts believe that after the clean waiver of 2008 and the 2011 amendment of the NSG rules (that non-NPT countries would not be entitled to the transfer of the reprocessing and enrichment technology), there is not much merit in seeking a membership of the NSG.
    • The worst outcome of this aggressive bidding was that at NSG forum India’s nuclear regime got hyphenated with Pakistan. It has taken a great deal of effort on the part of successive governments in India to kill the idea of that hyphenation.
    • It suits China ideally to put India in the same bracket as Pakistan. However for India it is diminishing to get itself compared with rogue state like Pakistan who have a dismal track record with respect to Nuclear Proliferation.

    References:

  • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)

    Mega regional trade deals are in vogue in an otherwise fragile global economy. In an environment of falling aggregate demand, these trade deals are seen as a means to insulate economies from market uncertainties.

    Three important mega regional’s are currently under negotiation: the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership of Asia and the Pacific (RCEP), the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

    It is expected that these agreements, once concluded and implemented, will set the stage for a new generation of global trade and investment rules.

    In this article we will explain What is RCEP ,what will be its significance for India and what are the point of contention among countries in RCEP.

    • What is RCEP?
    • Key Features of RCEP
    • Comparison of RCEP with other regional Agreements
    • Significance of RCEP for India
    • Challenges in Final negotiation of RCEP
    • Challenges and concerns for India from Joining RCEP
    • Recent point of contention in RCEP negotiation

    source

    What is RCEP?

    • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between the ten member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam) and the six states with which include India, China, Australia, Japan, South Korea and New zealand.
    • In total, the grouping of 16 nations includes more than 3 billion people, has a combined GDP of about $17 trillion, and accounts for about 40 percent of world trade.
    • If negotiated successfully, RCEP would create the world’s largest trading bloc and have major implications for Asian countries and the world economy.

    Key features of the RCEP

    The RCEP seeks to achieve a modern and comprehensive trade agreement among members. The core of the negotiating agenda would cover trade in goods and services, investment, economic and technical cooperation and dispute settlement. The partnership would be a powerful vehicle to support the spread of global production networks and reduce the inefficiencies of multiple Asian trade agreements that exist presently.

    At the launch of negotiations in 2012, the leaders of each relevant country endorsed the “Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.”

    The key points of this document are as follows:

    (A) Scope of negotiations

    • RCEP will cover trade in goods, trade in services, investment, economic and technical co-operation, intellectual property, competition, dispute settlement and other issues.
    • As expected, ASEAN will be in the “driver’s seat” of this multilateral trade arrangement (though the idea was initially given by Japan), and has been repeatedly endorsed by India.
    • The joint statement issued at the end of the first round of negotiations also reiterated “ASEAN Centrality” in the emerging regional economic architecture.

    (B) Commitment levels

    The RCEP will have broader and deeper engagement with significant improvements over the existing ASEAN+1 FTAs, while recognizing the individual and diverse circumstances of the participating countries.

    (C) Negotiations for trade in goods

    Negotiations should aim to achieve the high level of tariff liberalization, through building upon the existing liberalization levels between participating countries.

    (D) Negotiations for trade in services

    The RCEP will be comprehensive, of high-quality and consistent with WTO rules and all service sectors will be subject to negotiations.

    (E) Negotiations for investment

    Negotiations will cover the 4 pillars of promotion, protection, facilitation and liberalization.

    (F) Participating countries

    Participants will be ASEAN members and FTA Partners. After the completion of the negotiations, countries other than the 16 states may join.

    source

    Significance of RCEP for India

    • India is not a party to two important regional economic blocs: The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. New Delhi fears the TPP, although years away from reality, could mean losing some textile and drugs exports to countries like Vietnam, which has embraced both the TPP and the RCEP.
      • TPP is set to change the landscape of global trade. For India, it is most likely to affect sectors like leather goods, plastics, chemicals, textiles and clothing.
      • The RCEP would enable India to strengthen its trade ties with Australia, China, Japan and South Korea, and should reduce the potential negative impacts of TPP and TTIP on the Indian economy.
    • The RCEP agreement would complement India’s existing free trade agreements with the Association of SouthEast Asian Nations and some of its member countries, as it would deals with Japan and South Korea.
    • It would be the world’s largest trading bloc covering a broad spectrum of issues such as trade in goods, services, investment, competition, intellectual property rights, and other areas of economic and technical cooperation.
    • From India’s point of view, the RCEP presents a decisive platform which could influence its strategic and economic status in the Asia-Pacific region and bring to fruition its act east policy.
    • RCEP will facilitate India’s integration into sophisticated “regional production networks” that make Asia the world’s factory. The RCEP is expected to harmonize trade-related rules, investment and competition regimes of India with those of other countries of the group. Through domestic policy reforms on these areas, this harmonization of rules and regulations would help Indian companies plug into regional and global value chains and would unlock the true potential of the Indian economy. There would be a boost to inward and outward foreign direct investment, particularly export-oriented FDI.
    • India enjoys a comparative advantage in areas such as information and communication technology, IT-enabled services, professional services, healthcare, and education services. In addition to facilitating foreign direct investment, the RCEP will create opportunities for Indian companies to access new markets. This is because the structure of manufacturing in many of these countries is becoming more and more sophisticated, resulting in a “servicification” of manufacturing.

    Challenges in Final negotiation of RCEP

    Finalizing the RCEP will not be a cakewalk for India and other countries involved in the negotiations as there are a range of issues that could act as spoilers.

    • Huge economic disparities among the negotiating countries are likely to pose a challenge
    • An inevitable source of trust deficit between China and the rest which has the potential to constrain regional economic cooperation is China’s aggressive postures on territorial disputes with Japan and India and with ASEAN member countries on the South China Sea disputes.This can pose as a hurdle in final negotiation of RCEP
    • The existing 5 ASEAN+1 and 23 ratified bilateral FTAs, varying greatly in their terms, pose a significant hurdle to RCEP negotiations.
    • The lack of commonality across FTAs and varying internal policies of countries would prove to be a difficult task to harmonize and consolidate under RCEP.

    Challenges and concerns for India from Joining RCEP

    For New Delhi, following challenges lie ahead.

    • First, tariff barriers, which have been a matter of discontent in bilateral FTAs, particularly in the case of the ASEAN-India FTA, will be central to the negotiations in the upcoming rounds of RCEP negotiations.
    • Non-trade issues such as environment and labor are likely to be prickly as well and need greater attention. Many Countries in RCEP want a stricter norms and standards on environment and labor issues while India’s interest lie in liberal environment and labor norms as this makes Indian industry competitive. India therefore should bat for liberal environment and labor norms while negotiating in RCEP.
    • India must take steps to strengthen its Medium, Small and Micro Enterprises (MSME) sector, equipping it not only to survive the free flow of trade, but also to become a set of more competitive players. Higher investments in R&D and achieving international standards in terms of delivery are needed.
    • An internal commerce ministry estimate that signing the 16-country Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) trade agreement will result in a revenue loss of as much as 1.6% of GDP
    • Finally, a major difficulty for India will be negotiating terms with China. India has to be firm and calculative in terms of taking tough policy decisions, while working tirelessly on capacity building of its domestic industries.

    Recent point of contention in RCEP negotiation

    • Recently in the 12thround of RCEP talks The members of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) have, in a sort of ultimatum, asked India to either to consent to eliminate tariffs on most products quickly or leave the talks on the proposed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that is being negotiated by RCEP itself.
    • The members of RCEP are irked by what they think as India’s obstructionist, defensive and half-hearted approach” that is “delaying” the result of the talks
    • Some member countries, particularly 10- members ASEAN bloc, want India to take a long-term approach and consent to eliminate deities (except in agriculture and industrial goods) on a higher threshold within a decade to help India get the benefit of the opportunities arising out of Global Value Chain.

    References:

  • Everything that you should know about the World Trade Organization (WTO)

    World Trade Organization (WTO) as the name suggests, is the organization dealing with the global rules of trade between nations. Its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible.

    But why do nations trade? Whatever happened to Swadeshi and self sufficiency? 

    • Different factor endowments – simplest and obvious logic is every country does not possess everything. As we do not have sufficient oil reserves, we can’t do anything but import oil. But we also import things we can produce from simplest of things such as toys to complex things such as mobile phones.
    • Choice -from consumers perspective, it gives them more choices <you can buy iphones or Samsung galaxy, micromax or freedom 251>.
    • Market– Similarly it gives bigger market to industries (economies of scale, a concept that cost decreases as the size of an industry increases) <from sale in India to sale to the whole world>
    • Specialization – If countries didn’t trade, or traded only those things which they did not have (essentially raw materiel), they will have to produce everything. It will hamper specialization. Every country will become jack of all trade, master of none. Trade allows countries to specialize in things they do the best based on their comparative and competitive advantage.<If India is good at producing apples and China at oranges, India should only produce apples and exchange them for oranges>
    • Competition and efficiency – Also domestic industries will not face any competition from outside world, less competition, less incentive to become efficient or to innovate , consumers suffer. Thus trade forces industries to become more efficient.
    • Reduction in hostility – Apart from these economic reasons, as countries trade, they become interdependent on each other and thus chances of hostilities or major wars decrease. New ideas also flow along with trade.

    Discussion so far suggests that in an ideal world we should all promote free trade as it increases efficiency and benefits consumers. But the world is not ideal. There are some problems with free trade and hence need for protecionism


     

    • In developing economies, industries may not even get a chance to grow because they face competition from more established foreign firms <thus the argument for protecting nascent industries by higher tariffs>
    • Trade can lead to over-specialisation <workers at risk of losing their jobs should world demand fall> <suppose India produced only apples and suddenly some virus infest the crop, there wouldn’t be anything else to sell to the world or someone produces better variety of apple somewhere else, Indian apples would lose market> <recall situation of Cuba when sugar prices fell>
    • What if other country started cheating, subsidizing exports to capture the market abroad and when all domestic industries are killed, increasing the prices <every country must play by the same rules>

    It’s clear that trade can not be totally free in a not so ideal world. Countries need some policy levers to allow domestic industries to grow and diversify their economies. Also there’s need for a watchdog/referee who can adjudicate when other countries start cheating.

    Let’s now discuss barriers to trade


     

    In spite of all the benefits of trade, we all know countries regularly resort to measures which discourage trade (especially imports) to protect domestic industries <hence called protectionist measure> even though they might hurt consumers <problem of silent majority v/s vociferous minority discussed in chapter 2 of economic survey>

    Tariff barriers- custom duties which make imported goods costlier than domestically manufactured goods <it’s imposed to earn revenues for the govt, protect interest of domestic industry>

    Non tariff barrier– Here countries do not impose custom duties but retard flow of trade in other ways.

    Quantitative restrictions- Crude way of doing it is imposing quantitative restrictions on goods imported <quotas, say only up to 100 m tonne of sugar can be imported> or making licenses compulsory to export goods to home country or that only certain licenses can import goods or embargo <banning trade of certain goods with certain countries>

    Standards setting and administrative delays– But countries now employ sophisticated ways to retard flow of trade. Customs official can simply delay clearance of cargo <hence trade facilitation agreement> or can set standards <product using child labor/ environmentally degrading techniques will not be allowed, the problem with TPP> or simply cheat by providing export subsidies or domestic subsidies.

    Two kinds of trade barriers that are allowed for protection of health, safety, environmental protection but are often misused

    1. Technical barriers to trade-technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures can be set for the protection of human health and safety, or protection of the environment.
    2. Sanitary and Phyto Sanitary Measures – It allows countries to set their own standards for food safety and animals and plant health standards.

    But both the measures specify that standards must not be arbitrary i.e they must be scientific. Also they should not be discriminatory.

    WTO’s role is to reduce these barriers to trade, set rules of the game and adjudicate when one member country accuses other of cheating.

    Let’s learn about WTO in detail


    When? 1995

    Headquarter: Geneva, Switzerland <where are the HQs of IMF and World Bank? Answer in comments> 

    Members: 164 <Afghanistan the most recent member> < latest member of IMF?>

    Origin:

    • US, UK and a few other countries set up, an interim organisation about trade named GATT (General Agreement on Tariff and Trade) in 1947
    • GATT was biased in favour of the developed countries and was called informally as the Rich men’s club.
    • So, the developing countries insisted on setting up of the International Trade Organisation (ITO)
    • That’s the reason, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was set up in 1964 as an alternative, on recommendation of UN committee
    • Next development comes in Uruguay Round of GATT, it sought to expand the scope of the organisation by including, services, investment and intellectual property rights (IPR)
    • Agreements were ratified by the legislatures of 85 member-countries by year-end 1994.
    • On such rectification, the WTO started functioning from Jan 1, 1995 < Marrakesh Agreement>

    Why GATT failed to perform? Any Limitations?

    • Institutional structure – Only the set of rules and multilateral agreements, it lacked institutional structure
    • Limited scope – It didn’t cover trade in services, Intellectual Property Rights(IPR) etc.
    • Dispute Resolution Mechanism and Non-tariff barriers – No
    • Representation for developing and new states – No (Western monopoly)

    Objectives of the WTO

    • Raising standards of living and incomes, ensuring full employment, expanding production and trade, optimal use of world’s resources, at the same time extending the objectives to services and making them more precise
    • Introduces the idea of sustainable development in relation to the optimal use of world’s resources, and the need to protect and preserve the environment in a manner consistent with the various levels of national economic development
    • Recognises the need for positive efforts designed to ensure that developing countries, especially the least developed ones, secure a better share of growth in international trade
    • WTO continues the decision-making practice followed under the GATT Decisions will be taken by a majority of votes cast on the basis of one country, one vote . In fact rarely is voting undertaken. Decisions are mostly based on consensus. <What is the basis of voting in IMF? Answer in comments>

    Principles of the trading system

    A) Non-discrimination –

    1) Most favoured nation (MFN) rule

    • The MFN rule requires that a WTO member must apply the same conditions on all trade with other WTO members
    • i.e. a WTO member has to grant the most favorable conditions under which it allows trade in a certain product type to all other WTO members.
    • Grant someone a special favour and you have to do the same for all other WTO members
    • Then how do Free Trdae Agreements (FTAs) work? Well as eveywhere, devil is always in detail, FTAs are exempt from this rule.
    • Did you know that Pakistan has not yet granted India MFN status though we have grated them that status <for long time, there’s talk of Pakistan granting us non discriminating market access (NDMA) as Pakistanis feel, if they grant us MFN status, they would be favouring us the most, hahaha>

    2) The National Treatment Policy

    National treatment means that imported goods should be treated no less favorably than domestically produced goods  <after the foreign goods have entered the market> and was introduced to tackle non-tariff barriers to trade (e.g. technical standards, security standards, discriminating against imported goods)

    B) Reciprocity

    • Granting of mutual concessions in tariff rates, quotas, or other commercial restrictions
    • It implies that these concessions are neither intended nor expected to be generalized to other countries <contrast MFN and reciprocity.>

    C) Binding and enforceable commitments –

    • The tariff commitments made by WTO members in a multilateral trade negotiation and on accession are enumerated in a schedule (list) of concessions
    • These schedules establish “Ceiling bindings”: a country can change its bindings, but only after negotiating with its trading partners, which could mean compensating them for loss of trade <i.e can’t increase tariff beyond these levels>
    • If satisfaction is not obtained, the complaining country may invoke the WTO dispute settlement procedures

    D) Transparency –

    • The WTO members are required to publish their trade regulations, to maintain institutions allowing for the review of administrative decisions affecting trade, to respond to requests for information by other members, and to notify changes in trade policies to the WTO
    • These internal transparency requirements are supplemented and facilitated by periodic country-specific reports (trade policy reviews) through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM)
    • WTO system tries also to improve predictability and stability, discouraging the use of quotas and other measures used to set limits on quantities of imports

    E) Safety valves –

    • In specific circumstances, govts are able to restrict trade
    • WTO’s agreements permit members to take measures to protect not only the environment but also public health, animal health and plant health <sanitary and phytosanitary measure, TBT>

    Let’s come to main part of WTO -AGREEMENTS

    <There were many agreements agreed and ratified, but we found only some which are important for us, so let’s analyse them in brief>


     

    1) Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (SCM)

    It deals with the provision of subsidies, and the use of countervailing measures to offset injury caused by subsidized imports

    Definition of subsidy has 3 basic elements:

    1. Financial contribution
    2. By a Government or any public body within the territory of a Member
    3. Which confers a benefit.

    All three of these elements must be satisfied in order for a subsidy to exist SCM applies to non-agricultural products.

    It follows the traffic lights approach and classifies subsidies in 3 categories: <scroll up and look at barriers to trade infograph gain>

    Red:

    Subsidies with high trade-distorting effects, such as export subsidies, and those that favour the use of domestic over imported goods are prohibited. [If suppose, Brazil gives subsidy to its product Exported to India, Then India can ban such items from country]

    Green:

    Subsidies that are not specific to an enterprise or industry or a group of enterprises or industries are non-actionable.
    [No action at all – actionless]

    Amber:

    • Subsidies that are neither red nor green belong to the amber category.
    • They are actionable by the trading partners if their interests are adversely hit.
    • The affected country can seek remedy through the dispute-settlement procedures or go for countervailing duties.
      [Here, India can go either for countervailing duties or dispute-settlement procedure]

    2) General Agreement on Trade in Services – GATS

    The creation of the GATS was one of the landmark achievements of the Uruguay Round, whose results entered into force in January 1995.

    Objectives: same as broad objectives of WTO

    What services are covered under GATS?

    • GATS applies in principle to all service sectors, with 2 exceptions.
    • GATS excludes services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority i.e. services that are supplied neither on a commercial basis nor in competition with other suppliers. Eg.- social security schemes and any other public service, such as health or education, that is provided at non-market conditions.
    • Air traffic rights and services directly related to the exercise of such rights are also exempt

    Four modes under GATS <refer to the infograph above>

    Mode 1: Cross-border supply – There’s no movement of natural persons, no legal presence Eg-  an architect can send his architectural plan through electronic means

    Mode 2: Consumption abroad – movement of natural perosns to avail services elsewhere, eg.- a tourist using hotel or restaurant services abroad

    Mode 3: Commercial presence – legal presence in another country, eg.FDI, joint ventures

    Mode 4: Presence or movement of natural persons – here movement of natural person to provide services , eg. India techies going to USA

    It’s clear India wants liberalization in mode 1 and mode 4 <our BPO industry plus software industry, techies going to US> while developed world want liberalization in mode 3 <100% automatic FDI>

    Let’s understand all 4 modes with an example

    • Suppose Apple <USA company> establishes a subsidiary in India. This is supply of services through Mode 3 i.e. Commercial Presence
    • An architect of the Apple sends blueprints over the Internet to another firm in India- this is Mode 1 i.e. Cross Border Supply
    • An Engineer from the said Apple is deputed to work in the subsidiary in India for a limited period for managerial operations – this is Mode 4 i.e. Movement of Natural Persons
    • Certain trainees from the subsidiary in India visit USA and consume both education and tourism services  – this is Mode 2 i.e. Consumption Abroad for USA

    3) TRIPS

    The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, sets down minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property (IP) regulation as applied to nationals of other WTO Members.

    Areas of intellectual property that it covers are –

    • Copyright and related rights, Trademarks including service marks
    • Geographical indications (GI) including appellations of origin <Did you remember, Pakistan also claim GI for their Basmati Rice, but recently India got GI tag for Indo-Gangetic plains basmati rice for 6 states>
    • Industrial designs, patents including the protection of new varieties of plants
    • Layout-designs of integrated circuits; and undisclosed information including trade secrets and test data

    3 Main features of Agreement includes –

    Standards –

    • Agreement sets out the minimum standards of protection to be provided by each Member
    • Each of the main elements of protection is defined, namely the subject-matter to be protected, the rights to be conferred and permissible exceptions to those rights, and the minimum duration of protection

    Enforcement – 

    Set of provisions deals with domestic procedures and remedies for the enforcement of intellectual property rights

    Dispute settlement – 

    The Agreement makes disputes between WTO Members about the respect of the TRIPS obligations subject to the WTO’s dispute settlement procedures

    Read story with Explainer on IPRs here, story on WTO and TRIPS here 

    4) Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)

    Objective:

    • To reform trade in the sector and to make policies more market-oriented.
    • This would improve predictability and security for importing and exporting countries alike

    The new rules and commitments apply to:

    1)Market access : various trade restrictions confronting imports

    2)Domestic support:  subsidies and other programmes, including those that raise or guarantee farmgate prices and farmers’ incomes

    Under this, Subsidies are categorized into 3 boxes –

    Green Box –

    • In order to qualify for the Green Box, a subsidy must not distort trade, or at most cause minimal distortion
    • These subsidies have to be govt-funded (not by charging consumers higher prices) and must not involve price support
    • They tend to be programmes that are not directed at particular products, and include direct income supports for farmers that are not related to <decoupled> current production levels or prices.

    <Like in India farmer is supported for specific products and separate support prices are there for rice, wheat etc. An example of Amber box subisdy. On the other hand income support is uniformly available to farmers and crop doesn’t matter, Green box>

    • Green box subsidies are therefore allowed without limits, provided they comply with relevant criteria
    • They also include environmental protection and regional development programmes, research and development subsidies etc
    • Developed countries have shifted most of their subsidies to green box, hence even though they provide more subsidies than us, they still get away with it

    Blue Box –

    • Only Production limiting Subsidies under this are allowed. They cover payments based on acreage, yield, or number of livestock in a base year <such as subisdies for leaving the land fallow>
    • Targets price are allowed to be fixed by govt and if market prices are lower, so farmer will be compensated with difference between target prices and market prices in cash. This cash shall not be invested by farmer in expansion of production
    • Loophole here is that there no limit on target prices that can be set and those are often set far above market prices deliberately.
    • USA currently isn’t using this method, instead here EU is active.

    Amber Box –

    • All domestic support measures for agriculture, considered to distort production and trade (with some exceptions) fall into the Amber Box and this is Aggregate measure of support (AMS) i.e AMS is trade distorting subsidy in monetary terms
    • It required member countries to report their total AMS for the period between 1986 and 1988, bind it, and reduce it according to an agreed upon schedule <de minimis level>

    What is De-Minimis provision?

    • Under this provision developed countries are allowed to maintain trade distorting subsidies or ‘Amber box’ subsidies to level of 5% of total value of agricultural output. For developing countries this figure was 10%
    • So far India’s subsidies are below this limit, but it is growing consistently
    • This is because MSP are always revised upward whereas Market Prices have fluctuating trends
    • In recent times when crash in international market prices of many crops is seen, government doesn’t have much option to reduce MSP drastically
    • By this analogy India’s amber box subsidies are likely to cross 10% level allowed by de Minimis provision and hence the Bali deal for public stock holding and MSP <India is seeking permanent solution to this problem>

     

    3) Export subsidies:

    • These can be in form of subsidy on inputs of agriculture, making export cheaper or can be other incentives for exports such as import duty remission etc.
    • These can result in dumping of highly subsidized (and cheap) products in other country. This can damage domestic agriculture sector of other country
    • These subsidies are also aligned to 1986-1990 levels, when export subsidies by developed countries was substantially higher and Developing countries almost had no export subsidies that time

    Special safeguard mechanism (SSM)

    • A tool that will allow developing countries to raise tariffs temporarily to deal with import surges or price fall
    • is meant to protect the interests of resource-poor and subsistence farmers in the developing nations
    • Critics claim that SSM could be repeatedly and excessively invoked, distorting trade
    • In turn, the G33, a major SSM proponent, has argued that breaches of bound tariffs should not be ruled out if the SSM is to be an effective remedy
    • SSM is quite important in a scenario in which west has significant powers to subsidize their production and in turn, exports

    Special Products

    • At the 2005 WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong, members agreed to allow developing countries to designate an appropriate number of tariff lines as Special Products (SPs) based on food security, livelihood security and rural development
    • They would be given extra flexibility in market access for these products
    • For instance if wheat is important for food security and livelihoods, India many not fully open up this sector but obviously USA wouldn’t agree on that

    Special and Differential Treatment (S&D)

    Special treatment under WTO to Developing and least developed countries. Special safeguard mechanism (SSM) is a demand under this.

    • longer time periods for implementing Agreements and commitments
    • measures to increase trading opportunities for developing countries
    • provisions requiring all WTO members to safeguard the trade interests of developing countries
    • support to help developing countries build the capacity to carry out WTO work, handle disputes, and implement technical standards, and
    • provisions related to least-developed country (LDC) Members

    A few more points before concluding the topic

    Plurilateral agreements – For the most part, all WTO members subscribe to all WTO agreements. After the Uruguay Round, however, there remained four agreements, originally negotiated in the Tokyo Round, which had a narrower group of signatories and are known as plurilateral agreements <contrast with multilateral agreements>

    1. Trade in civilian aircraft
    2. Govt Procurement
    3. Dairy products <terminated in 1997>
    4. Bovine Meat <terminated in 1997>

    Single Undertaking Principle – Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. Negotiations proceed simultaneously, not sequentially, and all Members must accept all the results

    Dispute Settlement Process

    1. You don’t like what other country is doing, raise a complaint with WTO
    2. 1st step is mediation, talk with the other country, see if problem can be resolved
    3. No resolution, a dispute settlement panel is formed, hears both parties, gives it’s verdicts
    4. Not satisfied with it’s orders, appeal with the appellate body, decision is final
    5. What if country doesn’t comply with the orders? well there’s very little that WTO can do. Other country is free to take retaliatory measures

     

    WTO timeline



    Further Readings –

  • USTR’s Special 301 Report & India’s Priority Watchlist status

    source: USTR

    If you have been following our coverage on this story – Intellectual Property Rights in India  along with the CD explains article written on the same link, you would be aware of a latest development –

    After releasing our National IPR Policy, our commerce minister, Nirmala Sitharaman maintained that –

    India does not recognise “unilateral measures” such as the U.S. Special 301 Report that tries to create pressure on countries to enhance IPR protection beyond the World Trade Organisation’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of IPRs (TRIPS).


    So, this is a classic case of Uncle Sam bullying the minions with its internal reports!

    • The Report: Comes under US Trade Act 1974, Section 301 and is prepared by office of USTR
    • Office of US Trade Representative (USTR) has to prepare a list of countries, whose IPR regime has negative impact on American products in their markets
    • The resultant? Lo and behold, it’s the Special 301 report which rants about –
      • Weak and incompetent IPR regimes of a list of countries
      • Elaborate on their inadequate IPR policies and press for a censure

    The Special 301 report eventually ends up classifying countries into 3 groups:

    1. Priority Foreign Countries (PFC) – Red Flag! Most egregious offenders (Hello Ukraine!),
    2. Priority Watch List (PWL) – Serious offenders (India is here),
    3. Watch List (WL) – Less serious offenders
    The PWC number is *13

    Being in the PWL, India does not have much to fear and that probably is the reason why we could make bold statements like the one above! We have been a PWL since the inception of the report, which begs an inquiry into what’s the issue with India’s IPR and USTR?

    What does the 2016 Special 301 report has to say about India?

    +ives

    #1. In 2016, the United States continues to prioritize making progress on IPR issues through the High Level Working Group on Intellectual Property (IP Working Group), established by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi

    #2. The 2015 passage of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Bill may provide an important new tool for new patent and trademark applications

    #3. Acknowledged and applauded the establishment of India’s first anti-piracy policy unit in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh’s anti-piracy campaign, which resulted in the arrest of 11 individuals

    #4. Welcomed the deliberate and transparent process employed in India’s evaluation of a compulsory license application in 2015

    -ives

    1. Doesn’t have separate Anti-Camcording law to combat video piracy.
    2. Doesn’t have special takedown procedures against piracy websites
    3. Indian Patents Act prohibits “ever greening” of patents. As a result, Novartis lost patent of anti-cancer drug “Glivec”. USTR interprets it as an obstacle to IPR of MNCs.
    4. India permitted a domestic company NATCO to produce cheaper generic version of Bayer Pharma’s patented drug Nexvar. USTR interprets such “Compulsory licensing” as an obstacle to IPR of MNCs.
    5. India’s Drug Price Control Order 2013, permits certain Indian manufactured drugs to be sold at higher price. Same relaxation not given to foreign companies.
    6. India is the top supplier of counterfeit pharmaceuticals to USA. Patent holder lose billions of dollar each year due to counterfeit / pirated products.

    Should India (really) worry about the Priority Watchlist tag?

    1. Special 301 report violates WTO principles. It permits US government to take unilateral actions against any country. Despite the fact that USA, India, China – all have agreed to sort disputes through WTO dispute resolution mechanism
    2. Americans have just kept the carrot dangling, by keeping India in the ‘Priority Watch List’, so that the threat remains. And, OCRs are nothing but keeping the pressure on, so US will continue to play their games with Modi or whoever else comes in power. Americans only concerned with maximizing their profit. (Hardeep Singh Puri, Ex-UN representative)

    MCQs

    Q1. One of the reasons why USTR included India under the “priority watchlist” in its Special 301 report:

    1. Indian laws permit ever greening of patents by domestic companies but deny the same to Foreign companies.
    2. India is the biggest supplier of counterfeit medicines to USA.
    3. Sun Pharmaceutical’s plant in Punjab was violating quality guidelines set by US-FDA.
    4. None of above

    Q2. Which of the following statements are correct?

    1. US Trade Act permits their government to impose sanctions on “Priority foreign countries” listed under USTR’s special 301 report.
    2. Apart from India, Ukraine is also in “priority foreign country” list
    3. Despite Ukraine being a “Priority foreign country” under Special 301 report, USA has deferred sanctions on Ukraine, given the ongoing Crimean crisis.

    Correct choice

    1. Only 1 and 2
    2. Only 2 and 3
    3. Only 1 and 3
    4. All of them

    Q3.Correct statements about “Compulsory License” in Patent law?

    1. It is an Authorization given to a third party to manufacture a patented invention at cheaper price, without original patent owner’s willful consent.
    2. As such, Compulsory License is not permitted under Indian Patents Act, but SC has permitted it in Nexvar case for larger public interest.
    3. Both A and B
    4. Neither A nor B

    Q4. Incorrect statements about “Ever Greening” in Patent law?

    1. It is a practice of extending patents on pharmaceutical products by making slight changes to a drug molecule.
    2. Indian Patent Act prohibits ever greening but permits compulsory licensing.
    3. Both A and B
    4. Neither A nor B

    Q5. Indian Patent Controller General gave compulsory license to NATCO to manufacture Bayer pharma’s anti-cancer drug “Nexvar”, because _____.

    1. Bayer pharma was “evergreening” the patent of the drug molecule.
    2. Bayer pharma had forged clinical trial records to obtain the patent.
    3. Bayer pharma had obtained patent only for Germany and not for India.
    4. Bayer pharma was selling patented drug at an unaffordable price to Indian patients.

    Q6. Novartis lost patent right over its anti-cancer drug Glivec in India, because ____.

    1. Novartis was selling imported drug at an unaffordable price to Indian patients.
    2. Novartis had forged clinical trial records to obtain the patent.
    3. Novartis had obtained patent only for Switzerland and not for India.
    4. Novartis was “ever-greening” the patent of the drug molecule.

    Published with inputs from Gaurav