💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 referred to 31-member JPC

    Why in the news?

    The Lok Sabha adopted a motion referring the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) after sustained Opposition protest and coordinated appeals from Christian organisations. The referral has exposed a tension between the state’s claim to regulate foreign funded civil society and the property and hearing rights of the organisations that funding built. Minority run schools, colleges and hospitals sustained by money from abroad stand most exposed to the Bill’s asset takeover provisions.

    What is the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010?

    1. Governing statute: The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 regulates the acceptance and use of foreign contributions and foreign hospitality by individuals and associations. It replaced the earlier Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976.
    2. Registration mechanism: An organisation receiving foreign funds must register with the Ministry of Home Affairs and renew that registration every five years. Funds may be used only for the declared cultural, economic, educational, religious or social programme.

    What is a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC)?

    1. Ad hoc committee: A JPC is a temporary committee of members drawn from both Houses to examine a specific bill or matter in detail and report back. This one has 21 Lok Sabha members nominated by the Speaker and 10 Rajya Sabha members nominated by the Chairman, a total of 31 members.
    2. Reporting deadline: The committee must submit its report to the Lok Sabha by the last day of the first week of the coming Winter Session.

    What is the current status of the right to receive foreign contributions in India?

    1. Not a fundamental right: The Central government contends that the right to receive foreign contributions is not a fundamental right, and that access to foreign funds is a privilege the state may condition or withdraw.
    2. Renewal regime: About every registered body operates on a five year certificate, renewable on application, with the Ministry of Home Affairs holding discretion to refuse renewal on security grounds.
    3. Prior tightening: The 2020 amendments barred a registered body from transferring foreign funds to any other body, even one registered under the same Act, and cut the share of foreign funds usable for administrative expenses from one half to one fifth.
    4. Judicial check: The Kerala High Court on Tuesday set aside the Centre’s refusal to renew certificates of two NGOs, Save A Family Plan and Kerala Social Service Forum, holding that reasons must be specified in every order and that peaceful protest funding is not a national security threat.

    Constitutional provisions related to foreign funding regulation:

    1. Article 19(1)(c): Guarantees the right to form associations, which the regulation of their funding directly affects.
    2. Article 19(1)(a): Protects freedom of speech and expression, engaged where funding refusal follows an organisation’s support for protest.
    3. Article 14: Requires that any classification and any exercise of discretion in refusing renewal be non arbitrary and reasoned.
    4. Article 300A: Provides that no person shall be deprived of property save by authority of law, engaged by the automatic vesting of NGO assets in a designated authority.
    5. Entry 10, Union List: Places foreign affairs and matters bringing the Union into relation with foreign countries within Parliament’s exclusive competence, the basis for central regulation of foreign funds.

    What does the 2026 Bill change?

    1. Designated authority: The Bill creates a government designated authority to take over, manage or dispose of assets built from foreign funds when an organisation’s FCRA registration is suspended, cancelled or not renewed.
    2. Trigger on lapse: Registration can be lost not only by cancellation, but when renewal is refused, not applied for, or not granted before the old certificate expires.
    3. Automatic vesting: On that event the organisation’s foreign funds and everything built with them pass to the authority automatically, returning only if the body re registers within a period the government has yet to specify.
    4. Full takeover of part funded property: A building put up only partly with foreign money is taken over in full, and the organisation must separately apply to recover the share not paid for with foreign money.
    5. Limited appeal: An appeal to a district judge lies only against what the authority later does with the property, not against the refusal to renew, and the organisation has no right to be heard before that refusal.

    Why are minority religious institutions most alarmed?

    1. Scale of dependence: Christian organisations run thousands of schools, colleges and hospitals built and sustained with money from churches and congregations abroad, which the takeover provisions place at risk.
    2. Retrospective reach: A hospital built decades ago can be taken over today merely because a certificate has been allowed to lapse, contradicting the Home Minister’s assurance that the Bill will not apply retrospectively.
    3. Geographic spread of protest: Hundreds marched in Aizawl under a newly formed council of churches, organisations in Kerala objected, the Nagaland Chief Minister sought a parliamentary review, and the Tamil Nadu Assembly unanimously resolved for withdrawal.
    4. External pressure: A United States Congressman described the Bill as an attack on Christians and warned it could strain India United States relations, one trigger for the government’s rethink.
    5. Institutional welcome for referral: The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and the National Council of Churches in India welcomed the referral while asking that major and minor offences be distinguished before assets are taken.

    What are the major debates surrounding foreign funding regulation?

    1. Regulation versus autonomy: Church bodies concede that regulation of foreign funds is necessary and that action must follow against anti national activity, while resisting a design that punishes lapse of a certificate as harshly as proven wrongdoing.
    2. Discretion without reasons: Because the authority acts on the Centre’s instructions, the Centre can use opaque reasons to withdraw a licence, take over property, and then direct the body now holding it.
    3. Hearing and appeal gap: The absence of a pre decisional hearing and of any appeal against refusal to renew is the core fairness objection the JPC is asked to cure.
    4. Property proportionality: Full takeover of a building only partly financed by foreign money raises a proportionality question under the protection of property.

    Challenges to fair FCRA regulation:

    1. Reasoned order deficit: Refusals often rest on undisclosed intelligence inputs, leaving organisations unable to contest the specific ground, as the Kerala High Court flagged.
    2. Chilling effect on civil society: Uncertainty over renewal deters legitimate service delivery in health and education that depends on predictable foreign inflows.
    3. Asset valuation disputes: Separating the foreign funded share of a mixed asset invites prolonged litigation over apportionment and valuation.
    4. Federal friction: State Assemblies have resolved against the Bill, exposing a centre state fault line over regulation of institutions operating within States.
    5. Compliance burden on small NGOs: Frequent re registration and strict expense caps fall hardest on small organisations lacking dedicated legal and accounting capacity.
    6. Selective enforcement risk: Broad discretion creates room for targeting organisations by community or by their political positions rather than by conduct.

    Conclusion: The Bill’s central defect is that it lets the Centre seize the assets of a civil society body on the mere lapse of a certificate, without a hearing before refusal and without an appeal against it. The referral to a 31 member JPC defers passage rather than resolving the dispute. The committee must redraft the Bill to give organisations a hearing before renewal is refused and a right to appeal that refusal, with the report due by the first week of the Winter Session.

    Statutory Framework Governing Foreign Funding of NGOs:

    1. Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010: The principal Act requiring registration and prior permission for receipt of foreign contributions.
    2. Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020: Barred sub granting of foreign funds, cut the administrative expense cap to one fifth, and mandated a designated FCRA account at a specified State Bank of India branch.
    3. Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules, 2011: Prescribe the procedure for registration, renewal, reporting and use of foreign contributions.
    4. Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026: The pending Bill introducing the designated authority and automatic vesting of assets, now before the JPC.

    Back2Basics: FCRA registration

    1. Administering ministry: Ministry of Home Affairs, Foreigners Division.
    2. Eligibility: Associations with a definite cultural, economic, educational, religious or social programme, normally in existence for at least three years.
    3. Prohibited recipients: Election candidates, judges, government servants, members of legislatures, political parties and media organisations are barred from accepting foreign contributions.
    4. Validity and renewal: Registration is valid for five years and must be renewed through a fresh application before expiry.

    Way Forward:

    1. Pre decisional hearing: Mandate notice and an opportunity to be heard before any refusal to renew or cancellation.
    2. Appeal against refusal: Provide a statutory appeal against the refusal itself, not only against later dealing with the property.
    3. Proportionate asset treatment: Restrict any takeover to the demonstrably foreign funded share of an asset, with independent valuation.
    4. Reasoned orders: Require every refusal to state specific, disclosable reasons, subject to security redaction reviewed by the appellate authority.
    5. Distinguish offences: Separate technical lapses, such as delayed renewal, from substantive violations before invoking asset consequences.

    “[2015 GS2 12.5m] Examine critically the recent changes in the rules governing foreign funding of NGOs under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 1976.”

  • Retail (CPI) inflation rises to 19-month high of 4.45% in July

    Why in the News?

    India’s CPI (Consumer Price Index) inflation rose to 4.45% in July, driven mainly by food and fuel prices, while remaining within the RBI’s tolerance band.

    What is CPI?

    • CPI = Consumer Price Index
    • Measures changes in retail prices of a fixed basket of goods and services.
    • India’s CPI was rebased to 2024.
    • Sector-wise data under the new series is available from January 2026.

    What Drove Inflation?

    • Food inflation: 5.52%.
    • Onion inflation: 22.54%.
    • Restaurants & accommodation: 7.7%.
    • Transport: 4.4%.
    • Personal care: 14.8%.

    What Remained Stable?

    • Core inflation: 3.9%, excluding food and fuel.
    • Health inflation: 1.3%.
    • Recreation: 1.6%.
      • Stable core inflation suggests limited demand-pull pressure, with the current rise largely driven by supply-side factors.

    Inflation Targeting in India

    • Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT):
      • Target: 4% CPI inflation
      • Tolerance band: 2% to 6%
      • Implemented by the RBI (Reserve Bank of India).
    • Important RBI Act Provisions
      • Section 45ZA: Inflation target.
      • Section 45ZB: Six-member MPC (Monetary Policy Committee).
      • Section 45ZN: Report to government if inflation target is missed for 3 consecutive quarters.

    Key Challenges

    • Food and weather-related supply shocks.
    • Crude oil price volatility.
    • Geopolitical disruptions.
    • Trade-off between inflation control and growth.
    • Monetary policy transmission lags.

    “[2022] In India, which one of the following is responsible for maintaining price stability by controlling inflation?

    (a) Department of Consumer Affairs

    (b) Expenditure Management Commission

    (c) Financial Stability and Development Council

    (d) Reserve Bank of India

  • Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health seeks relook at FDI in private hospitals

    Why in the news?

    A Parliamentary Standing Committee has recommended a review and rationalisation of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) limits governing the operation and acquisition of existing private hospitals, warning that aggressive corporatisation and an influx of foreign capital could push up healthcare costs. The recommendation exposes a tension between attracting capital to expand hospital capacity and protecting the affordability of medical care from a shift of healthcare from a public service into a purely capitalistic enterprise.

    What is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in hospitals?

    1. Definition: FDI is a non-debt-creating capital flow in which a foreign entity takes a lasting stake in an Indian enterprise, here in the ownership, operation or acquisition of hospitals.
    2. Current position: Hospitals in India permit 100% FDI under the automatic route, which the Committee flags for the acquisition and operation of existing facilities.

    Who examined the issue and in which report?

    1. Committee: The Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare.
    2. Report: Its 176th report on the Affordability and Accessibility of Healthcare Facilities in the Public and Private Sector.

    Why does the Committee want FDI limits reviewed?

    1. Consolidation risk: Foreign capital is facilitating the acquisition of cost-effective, mid-sized hospitals by larger corporate entities.
    2. Corporatisation: Such aggressive corporatisation is transforming healthcare from a public service into a purely capitalistic enterprise.
    3. Cost inflation: This has the potential to inflate the cost of medical procedures and trigger price increases across the healthcare ecosystem.
    4. Selective openness: Foreign capital should be encouraged in medical devices, consumables and specialised medicines for rare diseases, while its use in direct operation and acquisition of hospitals needs greater scrutiny.

    What is the evidence of a public-private cost gap?

    1. Cost divergence: Citing the 80th round of the National Sample Survey, the panel put the average cost of hospitalisation at Rs 50,508 in private hospitals against Rs 6,631 in government hospitals.
    2. Regulator role: A strong public healthcare system could act as a market regulator by offering an affordable alternative and exerting competitive pressure on private providers.
    3. Price standardisation: It called for mechanisms to standardise and cap the cost of essential treatments, diagnostics and routine procedures in private hospitals.

    What structural measures did the Committee recommend?

    1. Public multispeciality hospitals: Autonomous, efficiently managed public multispeciality hospitals in every revenue division to cut dependence on major cities for tertiary care.
    2. Redirected capital: Incentives to steer foreign investment toward local manufacturing of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals.
    3. Tier-2 and tier-3 push: Tax holidays and other incentives to attract private multispeciality hospitals in smaller cities and rural areas, with public-private partnerships for underserved regions.
    4. Cross-subsidisation: Private hospitals receiving government support to use revenue from higher-paying patients to help poorer patients.
    5. Reserved beds: Raising mandatory bed reservation for Below Poverty Line, Economically Weaker Section and AB-PMJAY beneficiaries from 10% to 20%.
    6. Fee scrutiny: Hospital-level ethics committees to examine professional fees.

    Why is aggressive corporatisation a two-sided problem?

    1. The capital case: Foreign investment can expand hospital capacity, technology and specialised care that public systems struggle to fund.
    2. The affordability case: Consolidation of mid-sized hospitals by large corporates can raise prices and weaken affordable options.
    3. The unresolved gap: Without a strong public alternative and price caps, foreign capital risks entrenching a high-cost private tier.

    Challenges to affordable healthcare in India

    1. Out-of-pocket burden: A large share of health spending is paid directly by households, pushing many into distress.
    2. Public-private divide: A wide cost gap between government and private care.
    3. Regional maldistribution: Concentration of tertiary hospitals in metros and large cities.
    4. Regulatory weakness: Limited standardisation and capping of procedure costs.
    5. Human resource shortage: Deficits of doctors, nurses and specialists in rural areas.
    6. Low public spending: Government health expenditure remains a small share of GDP.

    Conclusion

    The Committee has urged the government to review and rationalise FDI in the operation and acquisition of existing private hospitals while redirecting foreign capital toward medical manufacturing. The current status is a tabled recommendation; the next milestone is the government’s response on FDI norms, price standardisation and expanded public hospital capacity.

    Healthcare Financing in India (Foundational Context)

    1. About: Healthcare in India is delivered through a mix of public facilities, private hospitals and insurance-funded care.
    2. Scale: Private hospitals dominate tertiary care, with hospitalisation costs several times higher than in government facilities.
    3. Structural fact: High out-of-pocket expenditure remains a defining feature of Indian health financing.

    Government Initiatives for Healthcare

    1. Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY: Health cover of up to Rs 5 lakh per family per year for eligible beneficiaries.
    2. Ayushman Arogya Mandirs: Primary health and wellness centres for screening and preventive care.
    3. National Health Mission: Support for public health infrastructure and human resources.
    4. Production Linked Incentive for pharma and medical devices: Boosts domestic manufacturing of medicines and equipment.

    Challenges in Health Financing

    1. High out-of-pocket spending, pushing households into poverty.
    2. Thin insurance penetration beyond publicly funded schemes.
    3. Cost opacity in private procedures and diagnostics.
    4. Weak public capacity in tertiary care outside metros.
    5. Skewed FDI use, favouring acquisition over greenfield capacity.

    Way Forward

    1. Calibrated FDI: Distinguish greenfield capacity from acquisition of existing hospitals.
    2. Price regulation: Standardise and cap essential procedure costs.
    3. Public capacity: Build autonomous public multispeciality hospitals in every revenue division.
    4. Manufacturing incentives: Redirect foreign capital to devices and pharmaceuticals.

    “[2020] With reference to Foreign Direct Investment in India, which one of the following is considered its major characteristic?

    (a) It is the investment through capital instruments essentially in a listed company.

    (b) It is a largely non-debt creating capital flow.

    (c) It is the investment which involves debt-servicing.

    (d) It is the investment made by foreign institutional investors in the Government securities.

  • Lok Sabha passes Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill, 2026; bars States from taxing mineral rights

    Why in the news?

    The Lok Sabha passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 without debate, barring State governments from imposing additional taxes, cesses or levies on mineral rights and giving the Centre greater control over regulating mineral-laden lands. The move exposes a fiscal federalism clash, since it curtails a State taxation power the Supreme Court had upheld in 2024 and shifts fiscal authority over a Concurrent-domain resource toward the Union.

    What does the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 do?

    1. Bars State levies: It prevents State governments from imposing additional taxes, cesses or levies on mineral rights.
    2. Central control: It gives the Centre greater control over regulating mineral-laden lands.
    3. Stated rationale: The Coal and Mines Minister argued that divergent fiscal levies by States had created uncertainty in the mineral sector.
    4. Feared effects cited: The government said such divergence could raise costs, encourage imports and undermine domestic supply chains.

    What is the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957?

    1. Purpose: The MMDR Act, 1957 is the principal law regulating the mining sector, governing the grant of mineral concessions, leases and the development and regulation of mines.
    2. Federal scheme: It empowers the Centre to frame rules for major minerals, while States frame rules for minor minerals and grant concessions for minerals in their territory.

    Current Status of State taxation power over minerals in India

    1. State entitlement: States levy royalty on extracted minerals and, since a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, hold constitutional competence to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands.
    2. The 2024 judgment: A nine-judge Bench held that royalty is not a tax and that States have legislative power to tax mineral rights, a power the present Bill now seeks to restrict.
    3. Revenue stakes: Mineral-rich States such as Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh rely on mining royalties and cesses as a significant own-revenue source.

    Constitutional Provisions related to mineral regulation and fiscal federalism

    1. Entry 54, Union List: Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent Parliament declares expedient in the public interest.
    2. Entry 23, State List: Regulation of mines and mineral development subject to the Union List entry.
    3. Entry 50, State List: Taxes on mineral rights subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament relating to mineral development.
    4. Entry 49, State List: Taxes on lands and buildings, the basis on which States tax mineral-bearing land.
    5. Article 246 and Seventh Schedule: Distribute legislative competence between the Union and the States across the three Lists.
    6. Article 265: No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law.

    Why does the Centre want to bar State levies?

    1. Uniformity: A single fiscal regime is intended to remove the uncertainty created by State-by-State levies.
    2. Cost competitiveness: The government links divergent levies to higher input costs for downstream industry and greater import dependence.
    3. Supply chain security: Uniform charges are framed as protection for domestic mineral supply chains, including critical minerals.

    Why do States and the Opposition see this as an assault on federalism?

    1. Overriding the Court: The Bill legislatively narrows a taxation power the Supreme Court affirmed for States in 2024.
    2. Erosion of own-revenue: Barring cesses and levies removes a fiscal lever that mineral-rich States use to fund local development.
    3. Centralising trend: Critics place it within a wider pattern of the Union tightening control over resources located in State territories.
    4. Process objection: The Bill was passed without debate amid protests, which the Opposition cited as a denial of scrutiny on a federalism-sensitive measure.

    Major debates surrounding mineral taxation federalism

    1. Royalty versus tax: Whether royalty is a tax and where the line lies between Union regulation of mineral development and State taxation of mineral rights.
    2. Parliamentary limitation: How far Parliament’s power under Entry 50 to limit State mineral taxation can extend before it hollows out the State entry.
    3. Distributive justice: Whether mineral-bearing States should retain fiscal upside from resources extracted within their borders.
    4. Investment climate: Whether uniform central levies genuinely lower costs or merely redistribute fiscal space from States to industry.

    Challenges to a centralised mineral fiscal regime

    1. Vertical fiscal imbalance: Reduced own-revenue deepens State dependence on central transfers.
    2. Litigation risk: A statutory override of a constitutional ruling invites fresh challenges before the Supreme Court.
    3. Regional equity: Resource-rich but income-poor States lose a development financing tool.
    4. Cooperative federalism strain: Bypassing State consent on a shared-domain subject weakens negotiated federalism.
    5. Compliance uncertainty: Transition from varied State levies to a single regime creates short-term ambiguity for operators.

    Conclusion

    The Lok Sabha has cleared a Bill that removes the States’ power to levy additional taxes on mineral rights and centralises regulatory control over mineral lands. The current status is passage in the Lower House amid Opposition protest; the next milestone is its consideration in the Rajya Sabha and likely constitutional scrutiny given its tension with the 2024 Supreme Court ruling on State taxation of minerals.

    What is Fiscal Federalism? (Foundational Context)

    1. About: Fiscal federalism is the division of taxation powers, expenditure responsibilities and transfers between the Union and the States.
    2. Rationale: It exists to match revenue-raising capacity with spending needs across tiers of government.
    3. Named typology: It addresses vertical imbalance between the Union and States, horizontal imbalance across States, and weak third-tier finances at the local level.

    Key Concerns Regarding Fiscal Federalism

    1. Shrinking divisible pool: Rising cesses and surcharges reduce the shareable tax pool with States.
    2. Eroded State autonomy: GST and central levies have narrowed independent State taxation.
    3. Resource control: Central assertion over minerals and land in State territories limits State fiscal levers.
    4. Weak local finances: Third-tier bodies remain underfunded and dependent.

    Constitutional Framework Governing Mineral Regulation

    1. Entry 54 (List I): Union regulation of mines and mineral development in the public interest.
    2. Entry 23 (List II): State regulation of mines subject to the Union entry.
    3. Entry 50 (List II): State taxes on mineral rights subject to parliamentary limitation.
    4. Article 246: Allocation of legislative competence across the three Lists.
    5. Article 265: Taxation only by authority of law.

    Way Forward

    1. Consultative design: Frame mineral fiscal policy through the GST Council model of negotiated federalism.
    2. Revenue neutrality: Compensate mineral-rich States for lost cesses through predictable transfers.
    3. Legal clarity: Reconcile the amendment with the 2024 ruling to avoid protracted litigation.
    4. District mineral funds: Strengthen use of mining revenues for affected local communities.

    “[2025] Consider the following statements:

    Statement I: In India, State Governments have no power for making rules for grant of concessions in respect of extraction of minor minerals even though such minerals are located in their territories.

    Statement II: In India, the Central Government has the power to notify minor minerals under the relevant law.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    (a) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I

    (b) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I

    (c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect

    (d) Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct

  • Govt exploring MDR to make UPI self-sustaining

    Why in the News?

    The government told Parliament that the current Unified Payments Interface (UPI) model is financially unsustainable, and that it is examining two routes to make the platform self-supporting without inflating the Budget. The trigger exposes a core tension: the zero-charge design that drove mass adoption now starves the ecosystem of the revenue needed for cybersecurity, fraud prevention and network upkeep.

    What is Unified Payments Interface (UPI)?

    1. Definition: UPI is a real-time payment system built by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) and the Indian Banks’ Association that lets money move instantly between two bank accounts through a mobile app. It was launched as a pilot in April 2016 and became fully operational in August 2016.
    2. Scale: More than 55 crore people use UPI and 703 entities, from banks to payment service providers, facilitate its transactions. Of the 28,174 crore digital transactions recorded in 2025-26, 86% ran on UPI.

    What is the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR)?

    1. Definition: MDR is the fee that banks, payment processors and gateways levy on a merchant for accepting a digital payment.
    2. Current position: MDR is charged on most debit card and all credit card transactions. UPI and RuPay debit card transactions were exempted in 2020, making them zero-cost for merchants.

    What Makes Up MDR?

    1. Interchange fee: Money sent to the customer’s card-issuing bank.
    2. Network fee: Charges paid to card networks like Visa or Mastercard.
    3. Processor fee: Markup kept by the payment gateway or processor for handling the tech

    Why is the current UPI model financially unsustainable?

    1. Cost recovery gap: The subsidy scheme reimbursing processors is far short of actual cost. There is a mismatch between the roughly Rs 2,000 crore allocation and the industry’s estimated operational cost of about Rs 20,700 crore a year.
    2. Coverage shortfall: The Standing Committee on Finance found the incentive covers merely 11% of the industry’s actual costs and 14% of potential MDR collections.
    3. Investment risk: The gap threatens critical spending on cybersecurity, fraud prevention and network infrastructure as volumes scale toward a projected 150 billion transactions per month.

    What options is the government exploring?

    1. Selective MDR: Restoring MDR on certain high threshold transactions and high turnover merchants, leaving small merchant payments untouched.
    2. Tiered incentives: A tiered incentive structure to phase out government support over the next few years.
    3. Legal enabler: An amendment to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 has already removed the bar on charging merchants a fee for receiving UPI payments.
    4. Industry proposal: Payment firms seek an MDR of 0.3% to 0.6% on payments above Rs 2,000 to large merchants, about 4% of person to merchant transactions but 68% of value.

    Conclusion

    The government has confirmed that UPI cannot indefinitely run on subsidies and is examining selective MDR and a tapering incentive structure to make it self-sustaining. The next milestone is a framework that funds the ecosystem through charges on large merchants while shielding small merchants.

    [UPSC 2026] Which one of the following statements about Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Central Bank Digital Currency (Digital Rupee) is NOT correct?

    (a) UPI is a real-time payment system but Digital Rupee is akin to sovereign paper currency

    (b) In case of UPI, settlement for end users happens instantly; in case of Digital Rupee, wallet balance gets transferred to another wallet

    (c) UPI transactions are recorded by banks and reflected in bank statements; in case of Digital Rupee, no data is captured in bank statements

    (d) In both the cases, the liability lies with the users and their respective banks.

    Answer: D

  • Citizens, not just daughters in need of forgiveness

    Why in the news?

    A remark by the Prime Minister offering “forgiveness” to young women who protested over examination irregularities has reopened a basic constitutional question. The framing casts the state as a benevolent patriarch and the women as daughters to be corrected, rather than as citizens exercising a right. The dispute is whether women who protest are treated as rights bearing citizens or as wards whose speech must first be polite.

    What does the right to free speech under Article 19 protect?

    1. Scope: Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and expression to every citizen, and this includes the right to protest and to dissent.
    2. Provocative speech included: The right covers expression that is impolite, provocative, or even offensive, not only measured or agreeable speech.
    3. Only reasonable restrictions: The right is limited solely by the reasonable restrictions in Article 19(2), such as public order, decency or morality, and defamation, incitement to an offence and not by a general demand for civility.

    Why is the “forgiveness” framing seen as paternalistic?

    1. State as patriarch: Offering forgiveness positions the state as a merciful patriarch dispensing pardon, rather than an authority answerable to its citizens.
    2. Infantilising women: Describing protesting women as “daughters” who spoke wrongly reduces them to misguided children in need of correction.
    3. Agency denied: It treats a woman’s political grievance as an error of conduct, shifting attention from the demand to the manner of its expression.

    How does the double standard operate?

    1. Men’s anger normalised: Aggressive language by men in protests, rallies, and legislatures is read as conviction and rarely becomes a national debate.
    2. Women’s anger moralised: The same expression by women is recast as a question of morality and cultural shock, which invalidates the underlying political claim.
    3. Burden shifts to the woman: The pattern mirrors sexual violence cases, where a woman’s character is examined before the offence itself is addressed.

    Can free speech protect angry dissent?

    1. Protest is born of frustration: Dissent by its nature arises from anger at the prevailing system, so citizens cannot be required to soften their anger before being heard.
    2. Civility is not a legal test: Politeness is a social norm, not one of the grounds on which Article 19(2) permits the state to restrict speech.
    3. The real offence was elsewhere: At the protests the demonstrable wrong was the assault, doxxing, and harassment of students, not the words some of them used.

    What is the current Status of the freedom of speech and expression in India

    1. Who it protects: Article 19(1)(a) extends to all citizens, and its protection of protest and criticism has been repeatedly affirmed by the judiciary.
    2. Settled limits: Speech may be restricted only under the eight grounds in Article 19(2), including the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, public order, decency or morality, defamation, contempt of court, friendly relations with foreign states and incitement to an offence.
    3. Recognised expansions: Courts have read the right to include the right to know, the right to protest peacefully, and expression through diverse media.

    What are the constitutional Provisions related to speech, agency, and equality

    1. Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees the freedom of speech and expression.
    2. Article 19(2): Lists the reasonable restrictions that alone may limit that freedom.
    3. Article 21: Protects personal liberty and autonomy, the basis on which courts uphold a woman’s right to choose her partner, faith, and way of life.
    4. Articles 14 and 15: Guarantee equality before the law and bar discrimination on the ground of sex, underpinning equal citizenship for women.

    What are the major debates surrounding free speech and women’s agency

    1. Civility versus liberty: Whether provocative or offensive protest speech can be curbed in the name of decorum, or only under Article 19(2).
    2. Paternalism versus autonomy: Whether the state and courts may protect women in ways that override their own choices, as critiqued through the Hadiya case.
    3. Unequal citizenship: The argument, drawn from political theorist Carole Pateman, that the formal citizenship of men counts for more than that of women because of patriarchal privilege.

    Conclusion

    The central claim is that women who protest are citizens exercising a right, not daughters awaiting pardon. Treating their speech as a question of civility, while men’s aggression passes as conviction, denies them equal citizenship and misreads a right that protects even uncomfortable expression. The remedy is to treat women as full rights bearing individuals and to judge protest speech only against the limits the Constitution actually sets.

    Back2Basics:

    Hadiya case (2018)

    1. What it was: The Kerala High Court annulled the marriage of an adult woman on the assumption that she was weak and vulnerable.
    2. What the Supreme Court held: It set aside the annulment and restored her fundamental right to make choices about her life, faith, and partner.
    3. Why it matters: It is a leading illustration of courts correcting a paternalistic denial of a woman’s autonomy under Article 21.

    Fundamental Rights in India (Foundational Context)

    1. About: Fundamental Rights in Part III of the Constitution are justiciable guarantees that an individual can enforce against the state.
    2. Rationale: They protect individual liberty and dignity and place limits on state power, and form part of the basic structure.
    3. Key concerns: Recurring tensions include balancing liberty against public order, the scope of reasonable restrictions, and the unequal enjoyment of rights across gender and class.

    Way Forward

    1. Judge speech by Article 19(2) alone: Restrict protest speech only on the constitutional grounds, not on norms of politeness.
    2. Protect protestors from harassment: Act against the doxxing, assault, and vilification of demonstrators rather than policing their tone.
    3. Recognise women’s agency: Frame women in public life as citizens with political and personal autonomy, not as dependents to be protected.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2014] What do you understand by the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.

    Linkage: The PYQ is directly relates to the constitutional scope of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). The article extends this debate to angry dissent, provocative speech, reasonable restrictions and women’s right to political expression.

  • NASA invites ISRO to join its mission for lunar outpost

    Why in the News:

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has invited the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) to join its Moon Base programme, the effort to return humans to the Moon and set up a permanent settlement near the lunar South Pole. The invitation was extended at the ninth meeting of the India and United States Civil Space Joint Working Group, deepening a partnership that already spans the Artemis Accords and a joint radar satellite.

    What was announced and what is the Moon Base programme?

    1. The invitation: NASA invited ISRO to join its Moon Base programme, building on the two countries’ partnership under the Artemis Accords.
    2. The venue: The offer was made at the ninth meeting of the India and United States Civil Space Joint Working Group, held in Bengaluru on 5 and 6 August.
    3. The programme: The Moon Base programme aims to establish humanity’s first outpost on another celestial body, near the South Pole of the Moon.
    4. Wider setting: The meeting advanced civil and commercial space cooperation under a strategic technology initiative aligned with the February 2025 Joint Leaders’ Statement.

    What are the Artemis Accords?

    1. Definition: The Artemis Accords are a United States led set of non binding principles to govern the peaceful civil exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon.
    2. India’s role: India signed the Accords in 2023 as the 27th country, and a total of 70 countries are now part of them.
    3. Relevance: The Moon Base invitation and agreed open scientific data sharing are being pursued under this framework.

    What deepening ties does the invitation reflect?

    1. NISAR mission: The two agencies last year launched the NASA and ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) mission, a dual frequency radar satellite and a first of its kind joint venture.
    2. Human spaceflight: An Indian astronaut flew to the International Space Station in 2025 through an Axiom mission, a result of a strategic framework for human spaceflight cooperation.
    3. Data cooperation: Both sides agreed to advance open scientific data sharing and discussed joint missions to the Moon and beyond.
    4. Outer space governance: They reaffirmed commitment to United Nations guidelines on the long term sustainability of outer space activities.

    What are India’s own lunar and human spaceflight programmes?

    1. Gaganyaan: ISRO is pursuing its human spaceflight programme to send Indian astronauts to low Earth orbit.
    2. Moon landing target: India has stated plans to achieve a human landing on the Moon by 2040.
    3. Chandrayaan legacy: India’s earlier lunar missions established its capability, including a South Pole region landing.
    4. Complementary strengths: NISAR’s success is seen as a base for more complex joint missions, including the lunar base and human spaceflight.

    Back2Basics: NISAR Mission

    1. Full form: NASA and ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar mission.
    2. Nature: A joint Earth observation satellite using dual frequency radar, a first of its kind.
    3. Purpose: Monitors changes in land surface, ice sheets, ecosystems and natural hazards.
    4. Significance: Regarded as a landmark joint venture that could enable more complex India and United States space missions.

    Government Initiatives / Programmes in Indian Space

    1. Gaganyaan: India’s human spaceflight programme to send astronauts to low Earth orbit.
    2. Chandrayaan Programme: Series of lunar missions advancing India’s Moon exploration.
    3. IN-SPACe: Regulator and promoter enabling private sector participation in space.
    4. Indian Space Policy 2023: Framework opening the sector to non governmental entities.

    Key Facts about India and Global Space Cooperation

    1. Artemis signatory: India was the 27th country to sign the Artemis Accords in 2023, now numbering 70 countries.
    2. Working group: The invitation came at the ninth India and United States Civil Space Joint Working Group in Bengaluru.
    3. Moon landing goal: India targets a human landing on the Moon by 2040.
    4. South Pole focus: The Moon Base aims for humanity’s first outpost near the lunar South Pole.

    “[2016] Consider the following statements: The Mangalyaan launched by ISRO

    1. is also called the Mars Orbiter Mission

    2. made India the second country to have a spacecraft orbit the Mars after USA

    3. made India the only country to be successful in making its spacecraft orbit the Mars in its very first attempt

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Monsoon revived, but why there’s cloud over the farm

    Why in the News?

    The southwest monsoon’s revival in July, despite a strengthening El Nino, has sharply narrowed the gap in area sown under kharif crops this season. The relief exposes a deeper tension between a recovering kharif and the mounting risks to the rabi season and to food inflation from El Nino’s lagged effect and a surge in global vegetable oil prices.

    Why did a sowing gap open and how did July reverse it?

    1. Weak start: Rainfall in June was 38 percent below the long period average, making it the sixth driest June in India since 1901, with not a single low pressure system forming.
    2. Early shortfall: By 6 July farmers had planted only 350.85 lakh hectares, which was 20.8 percent below the 442.80 lakh hectares sown in the same period of 2025.
    3. July turnaround: In July the country recorded four low pressure systems against a normal of three. These moved slowly, producing about 24 affected days against a normal of 14, lifting all India July rainfall to 2.4 percent above the average.
    4. Recovery: By 7 August the 967.92 lakh hectares covered was only 1.8 percent lower than last year, with the pulses gap down to 1.8 percent, cotton to 0.4 percent, and oilseeds exceeding last year’s level.

    What is El Nino and why does its effect lag?

    1. Definition: El Nino is the abnormal warming of surface waters in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean off Peru and Ecuador that suppresses monsoon rainfall over India.
    2. Lagged impact: El Nino’s effect on rainfall and temperatures comes with a lag of one to two months and can play out over five to six months or more.
    3. Current phase: It intensified from a weak to moderate phase in June into a moderate to strong event in July, and global agencies expect it to turn very strong during October to December.

    Why is the worst not yet over?

    1. Late kharif needs rain: Crops need rainfall during August and early September for flowering and grain formation that determine yields. Meteorological Department has predicted a fresh low pressure system around 12 August.
    2. Delayed hit: Because El Nino’s rainfall suppressing effect lags, its worst impact is still to come.
    3. Rabi at risk: A strengthening El Nino raises temperatures, and a short warm winter harms wheat, mustard and potato yields, so the real threat is to the rabi season.

    What does the FAO Food Price Index show?

    1. Index high: The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) food price index touched 131.1 points in July, up 1 percent from July 2025 and the highest since the 131.4 of January 2023, a three and a half year high. This means food prices are now at their highest level in about 3½ years.
    2. Vegetable oils drive it: The vegetable oils index reached 195.7 points, up 17.3 percent year on year and the highest since June 2022.
    3. Mixed components: The cereals index was 113.8 points, up 6.9 percent, while dairy fell 24.8 percent, sugar fell 8 percent, and meat rose just 0.8 percent.
    4. Causes: The rise is attributed to El Nino, heatwave hit crop yields in Europe, and supply disruptions from conflicts in West Asia and Ukraine.

    Why are vegetable oils the real concern for India?

    1. Import exposure: The combined value of India’s imports of oilseeds, pulses and cotton was close to 25 billion dollars in 2025-26, which El Nino could push to a new high.
    2. Biofuel diversion: Firming vegetable oil prices stem mainly from diversion of palm, rapeseed and soyabean oil toward biofuel as petroleum prices harden.
    3. Fuel substitution: These oils are used to make fatty acid methyl esters, a substitute for petroleum diesel, linking food and fuel markets.
    4. Buffer available: The government held 92.6 million tonnes of rice and wheat on 1 July against a required minimum of 41.1 million tonnes, plus over 4 million tonnes of pulses, which can be offloaded to contain inflation.

    Conclusion

    The July monsoon revival has rescued the kharif season, cutting the sowing gap to under 2 percent even as El Nino strengthened. The central worry has shifted to the rabi season and to food inflation, since El Nino’s temperature and rainfall effects lag and global vegetable oil prices are at multi year highs. Ample public grain stocks give the government room to manage food inflation, but the rabi outlook and edible oil import bill remain the open risks.

    Back2Basics:

    Foundational Context: Climate Change and Food Security

    1. About: Food security means reliable physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food, which climate variability directly threatens.
    2. Tropical vulnerability: Tropical countries face greater exposure because agriculture is rain dependent and heat sensitive.
    3. India context: A large share of India’s cropped area is rainfed, tying output to monsoon performance.
    4. Transmission channels: Erratic rainfall, heat stress, pest incidence and global price shocks each transmit climate risk to food systems.

    FAO Food Price Index

    1. Convening body: Published by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
    2. What it measures: A weighted average of world prices of a basket of food commodities against a base period value taken as 100 for 2014 to 2016.
    3. Components: Tracks separate indices for cereals, vegetable oils, dairy, meat and sugar.
    4. Frequency: Released monthly.
    5. Recent reading: Touched 131.1 points in July, a three and a half year high.

    Government Initiatives for Agriculture and Edible Oils

    1. National Mission on Edible Oils Oil Palm: Mission to raise domestic oil palm and edible oil production and cut import dependence.
    2. PM-AASHA: Umbrella scheme assuring remunerative prices to farmers, especially for oilseeds and pulses.
    3. Price Stabilisation Fund: Buffer stock mechanism to moderate volatility in pulses and other commodities.
    4. Minimum Support Price: Price assurance to encourage sowing of pulses and oilseeds.

    Key Facts about the Monsoon and Kharif Season

    1. Sixth driest June: June 2026 was the sixth driest June since 1901.
    2. July rainfall: All India July rainfall was 2.4 percent above the long period average.
    3. Import bill: Oilseeds, pulses and cotton imports neared 25 billion dollars in 2025-26.
    4. Grain stocks: 92.6 million tonnes of rice and wheat held on 1 July against a 41.1 million tonne minimum.

    Challenges in Indian Agriculture

    1. Rainfall dependence: A large rainfed area leaves output exposed to monsoon swings.
    2. Import reliance: High dependence on imported edible oils and pulses exposes India to global prices.
    3. Climate volatility: El Nino and heatwaves disrupt both kharif and rabi seasons.
    4. Price transmission: Global food and fuel price shocks feed domestic inflation.
    5. Storage and logistics: Post harvest losses and uneven buffer management persist.
    6. Yield gaps: Low productivity in pulses and oilseeds constrains self sufficiency.

    Way Forward

    1. Raise oilseed output: Expand area and yields under the edible oils mission to cut imports.
    2. Diversify cropping: Promote pulses and climate resilient varieties in rainfed regions.
    3. Strengthen buffers: Use public grain and pulse stocks proactively to contain inflation.
    4. Improve forecasting: Sharpen monsoon and El Nino forecasting for sowing decisions.
    5. Invest in irrigation: Extend micro irrigation to reduce rainfall dependence.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Discuss the consequences of climate change on the food security in tropical countries.

    Linkage: The PYQ directly addresses the impact of climate change and climatic variability on food security in tropical countries. El Niño, erratic monsoons, heat stress and global food prices show how climate risks affect India’s kharif, rabi and food inflation.

  • SC panel on Aravallis must hear more people

    Why in the News?

    Civil society groups and mining affected communities have alleged that the Supreme Court appointed High Powered Committee (HPC) on the Aravallis left out several districts and did not adequately hear local people during its consultations. The dispute exposes the tension between expert led regulation of mining and genuine participation of the communities whose lands and livelihoods the decision will affect.

    What is the High Powered Committee on the Aravallis?

    1. Origin: The Supreme Court of India constituted a high-powered expert committee headed by Kanchan Devi to review the definition and delineation of the Aravalli hill range, guide mining regulations, and protect the fragile ecosystem from continuous environmental degradation.
    2. Mandate: It is to submit a report that will shape decisions on mining and conservation across the range, with an August 31 deadline.
    3. Consultation window: The panel held a 21 day period for stakeholders to submit comments, which has now ended.
    4. Field visits: It conducted field visits in Gurgaon, Alwar, Ajmer and Udaipur between 6 and 10 August.

    Why are activists challenging the consultation process?

    1. Villages left out: The Aravalli Virasat Jan Abhiyan claims the HPC did not visit any mining affected villages to understand ground realities.
    2. Urban centric hearings: Public hearings were held at urban centres that affected villagers could not reach, and information was not publicised in local newspapers, on radio, or at panchayat offices.
    3. Lobby dominance: Around 80 percent of representations in Ajmer were pro mining, with a similar pattern elsewhere, and those speaking against mining were allegedly threatened.
    4. Access failures: A scheduled Udaipur meeting for 10 August was moved to the evening of 9 August, making it hard for many to attend, and requested visits to villages hit by limestone mines and stone crushers did not happen.
    5. Central demand: The group wants the HPC to seek an extension of the August 31 deadline and hold meaningful consultations across all 64 districts in Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat.

    What is an Eco Sensitive Zone?

    1. Definition: An Eco Sensitive Zone is an area notified around protected areas or ecologically fragile landscapes where activities such as mining are regulated or prohibited to act as a shock absorber.
    2. The National Wildlife Action Plan (2002-2016) recommended that State governments identify areas within 10 km of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries for declaration as Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZs).
    3. The recommendation was to be implemented under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, under the framework of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
    4. Relevance: Regulation of mining in the Aravallis turns on how such protective boundaries and restrictions are drawn and enforced.

    Why does the Aravalli range matter for mining regulation?

    1. Ecological role: The Aravallis are India’s oldest mountain range and act as a barrier against desertification spreading eastward from the Thar.
    2. Mining pressure: Limestone mines, stone crushers and other extraction have degraded stretches of the range.
    3. Legal history: Courts have repeatedly intervened to restrict illegal and unregulated mining in the range.
    4. Livelihood stakes: Rural and Adivasi communities depend on the hills, so decisions affect both ecology and livelihoods.

    Why does the mining lobby versus affected communities tension shape the outcome?

    1. Capture risk: Hearings dominated by pro mining representations risk producing a report that understates ground level harm.
    2. Precedent invoked: Activists demand a systematic outreach approach similar to the one adopted a decade ago by the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, which held direct public hearings.
    3. Intimidation: Alleged threats to those opposing mining undermine the credibility of the consultation.
    4. Deadline pressure: A fixed August 31 deadline discourages the fuller consultation the communities are demanding.

    Conclusion

    The current status is a contested consultation process, with affected communities demanding a deadline extension and direct village level hearings before the HPC finalises its report to the Supreme Court. The dispute turns on whether expert regulation of Aravalli mining can be legitimate without hearing the people most affected by it. The next milestone is whether the committee seeks an extension or submits its report by August 31 as scheduled.

    Back2Basics:

    Foundational Context: Mining in India

    1. About: Mining is the extraction of minerals from the earth and is regulated as a hazard prone activity with significant environmental impact.
    2. Scale: India produces a range of major and minor minerals, with states such as Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand holding large reserves.
    3. Environmental impact: Mining causes deforestation, dust and air pollution, groundwater depletion, and land degradation.
    4. Governance: Mineral development is regulated under central law with clearances layered across environment, forest and pollution statutes.

    Statutory Framework Governing Mining and the Aravallis

    1. Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: The principal law regulating the mining sector and grant of mineral concessions.
    2. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: Enables environmental clearances and the notification of Eco Sensitive Zones.
    3. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Requires clearance before diverting forest land for mining.
    4. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: Regulates dust and emissions from mining and crushing.
    5. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010: Provides the forum for adjudicating mining and environmental disputes.

    The Aravalli Range

    1. Designation: India’s oldest fold mountain range, running across Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan and Gujarat.
    2. Location and extent: Stretches roughly 690 kilometres from Delhi to Gujarat, with Guru Shikhar as its highest peak.
    3. Ecological function: Acts as a natural barrier checking the eastward spread of the Thar desert and supports groundwater recharge.
    4. Distinguishing feature: Hosts unique biodiversity and forms the watershed for several rivers.
    5. Current concern: Threatened by illegal mining, stone crushing and encroachment.

    Government Initiatives for Aravalli and Land Restoration

    1. Aravalli Green Wall Project: Initiative to create a green belt along the range to combat land degradation and desertification.
    2. Compensatory Afforestation Fund: Funds afforestation to offset forest land diverted for mining and other uses.
    3. National Afforestation Programme: Supports regeneration of degraded forest land.
    4. Desertification action: India’s commitments under the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification guide land restoration.

    Key Facts about the Aravallis and Mining

    1. Districts covered: The HPC’s mandate spans 64 districts across five states.
    2. Oldest range: The Aravallis are among the oldest mountain systems in the world.
    3. Deadline: The committee faces an August 31 report deadline.
    4. Precedent: The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel is cited as a model of participatory consultation.

    Challenges in Aravalli Conservation

    1. Illegal mining: Unregulated extraction continues despite court orders.
    2. Weak consultation: Affected rural and Adivasi communities are inadequately heard.
    3. Enforcement gaps: Overlapping jurisdictions weaken monitoring of mining bans.
    4. Encroachment: Construction and settlement erode the range.
    5. Desertification risk: Degradation of the range threatens its role as a desert barrier.
    6. Intimidation of activists: Reported threats deter local opposition to mining.

    Way Forward

    1. Direct village outreach: Hold public hearings in affected villages, not only urban centres.
    2. Extend timelines: Allow adequate consultation before finalising a decision of this scale.
    3. Strengthen enforcement: Deploy satellite monitoring and strict penalties against illegal mining.
    4. Protect participants: Ensure safety for community members opposing mining.
    5. Restore degraded land: Scale up afforestation and green wall efforts across the range.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] Mineral resources are fundamental to the country economy and these are exploited by mining. Why is mining considered an environmental hazard? Explain the remedial measures required to reduce the environmental hazard due to mining.

    Linkage: The PYQ directly connects with the environmental hazards of mining and remedial measures for sustainable mineral extraction. The Aravalli case highlights illegal mining, ecological degradation, weak enforcement and the need for participatory conservation.

  • Ladakh’s glaciers are slowing as the mountains warm

    Why in the News?

    A new study in the journal The Cryosphere reports that glaciers in the Zanskar region of Ladakh are moving more slowly than they did 30 years ago, as sustained warming thins them and reduces their driving force. The slowdown carries long term implications for the Indus basin, where glacier melt sustains river flows during dry summer months.

    Why are the Zanskar glaciers slowing down?

    1. Thinning mechanism: When a glacier loses more ice than it gains over many years it becomes thinner, and thinner ice exerts less driving force, causing it to flow more slowly.
    2. Warming link: The study connects mass loss, thinning and reduced flow, showing that thinning is not only a consequence of warming but also weakens the glacier’s ability to move.
    3. Downstream effect: Slower flow means the lower parts of a glacier receive less replenishment from higher elevations, making continued shrinkage more likely.
    4. Local variation: Glacier geometry, debris cover and conditions at the snout influence how quickly each glacier responds.

    What is peak water?

    1. Definition: Peak water is the point at which increased melting from a shrinking glacier temporarily raises river runoff before the water supply begins to decline.
    2. Why it matters: More melting may boost flows in the near term, but once glaciers lose a substantial fraction of their stored ice, their meltwater contribution to rivers is expected to drop.

    What did the study find?

    1. Study design: The researchers examined how glacier flow changed from 1992 to 2023 across 12 glaciers in the Zanskar Himalaya using satellite derived surface velocities.
    2. Velocity decline: Glaciers slowed by 2.4 metres per year per decade on average.
    3. Faster thinning: The pace of surface thinning increased from around 0.22 metres per year between 2000 and 2005 to around 0.57 metres per year between 2015 and 2020.
    4. Sample caveat: The 12 glaciers studied are representative, but the Zanskar basin hosts around 1,755 glaciers, so caution is needed before extending the findings to all of Ladakh.

    What are the implications for the Indus basin?

    1. Summer flows: Glacier melt contributes significantly to Indus river flows during the dry summer months, so long term storage decline threatens that supply.
    2. Multiple dependencies: River flows also depend on snowfall, rainfall, groundwater and water management, so slowing glaciers alone will not immediately cause shortages.
    3. Sectors at risk: Continued thinning and slowdown signal declining long term water storage, with implications for water security, agriculture, hydropower and downstream ecosystems in coming decades.

    Why do the study’s own limitations qualify its conclusions?

    1. Sub surface blind spot: Satellite surface velocity observations cannot directly reveal processes beneath the glacier, such as subglacial hydrology or basal sliding, which strongly influence motion.
    2. Data gaps: Long term field measurements of ice thickness, mass balance and bed conditions remain limited in the region, making full attribution of observed changes difficult.
    3. Exceptions to the trend: Some glaciers can temporarily accelerate due to increased meltwater at the bed, glacier surges, or interactions with proglacial lakes.

    What does the global comparison show?

    1. European Alps and Alaska: Similar glacier slowdowns have been reported, driven by the same thinning and reduced driving stress mechanism.
    2. Canadian Arctic and Andes: These regions show comparable slowdowns linked to warming.
    3. Tibetan plateau: Parts of the plateau display the same dominant mechanism of thinning leading to slower flow.
    4. Shared lesson: Glacier slowdown is becoming widespread globally, though local glacier characteristics still shape individual behaviour.

    Conclusion

    The study establishes that Zanskar glaciers are not only losing mass but slowing down, with thinning reducing their capacity to move and replenish lower reaches. This points to a long term decline in stored water that will eventually reduce Indus basin flows after a phase of peak water. The findings underscore the need for sustained ground based monitoring to validate satellite data and to prepare downstream communities for shifting water availability.

    Back2Basics:

    Foundational Context: The Cryosphere and Himalayan Glaciers

    1. About: The cryosphere comprises the frozen parts of the Earth, including glaciers, snow cover, permafrost and ice, that store and release freshwater.
    2. Third Pole: The Hindu Kush Himalaya holds the largest ice mass outside the polar regions and is often called the Third Pole.
    3. Function: Himalayan glaciers act as natural reservoirs, releasing meltwater in warmer months to sustain rivers, agriculture and ecosystems in otherwise arid areas.
    4. Climate indicator: High altitude glaciers respond distinctly to warming, making them valuable natural indicators of environmental change.

    The Zanskar Region and Indus Basin

    1. Location: The Zanskar region lies in Ladakh and hosts some of the largest and most extensive glaciers in the Himalaya.
    2. Climatic setting: Its glaciers receive most of their snowfall from mid latitude westerly disturbances during winter and sit at high altitude.
    3. Indus basin: The Indus rises in the Tibetan plateau and flows through Ladakh, with glacier melt feeding its dry season flows.
    4. Significance: The basin supports water security, agriculture and hydropower across northern India and beyond.

    Key Facts about Himalayan Glacier Monitoring

    1. Study journal: The findings appear in the journal The Cryosphere.
    2. Zanskar glacier count: The basin hosts around 1,755 glaciers, of which 12 were studied.
    3. Observation record: The study covers more than 30 years, from 1992 to 2023.
    4. Peak water: A key concept describing the temporary runoff increase before long term decline.

    Challenges in Glacier Conservation and Monitoring

    1. Data scarcity: Long term field measurements of ice thickness and mass balance are limited in high altitude terrain.
    2. Warming pace: Rising temperatures accelerate thinning and mass loss.
    3. Black carbon: Soot deposition on ice lowers reflectivity and speeds melting.
    4. Glacial lake hazards: Meltwater expansion raises the risk of glacial lake outburst floods.
    5. Downstream dependence: Millions rely on glacier fed rivers, amplifying the impact of any decline.

    Way Forward

    1. Expand ground monitoring: Add measurements of ice thickness, mass balance and meltwater discharge to validate satellite data.
    2. High altitude weather stations: Install continuous observation stations to capture varied mountain climate conditions.
    3. Basin water planning: Prepare Indus basin water management for the eventual decline after peak water.
    4. Reduce black carbon: Cut regional emissions that hasten glacier melt.
    5. Regional cooperation: Share transboundary glacier and river data across the basin.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] How will the melting of Himalayan glaciers have a far-reaching impact on the water resources of India?

    Linkage: The PYQ directly relates to the impact of Himalayan glacier melt on India’s water resources. Zanskar glacier slowdown and thinning highlight the emerging risks to Indus basin flows, water security and long-term freshwater availability.