Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Type: Schemes

  • Closing the gaps in early childhood eye care

    Closing the gaps in early childhood eye care

    Why in the News

    Many Indian children lose sight not because care is out of reach, but because the health contacts they already have fail to check their eyes. Untreated early eye disease can cause permanent loss of vision, because vision develops during a critical early period. The proposed remedy is to build eye checks into existing child health services rather than create a new system.

    Why must a child’s eyes be checked early?

    1. How vision develops: A baby’s visual system is immature at birth. Vision develops as the eye and the developing brain interact, and clear images must reach the brain during this critical period.
    2. Amblyopia: Without clear images in this period, the brain never learns to use the eye. The loss, called amblyopia (lazy eye), cannot be fully reversed afterwards.
    3. A missed case: A five year old girl arrived with dense bilateral cataracts (clouding of the lens in both eyes) and nystagmus (involuntary eye movement).
    4. Too late for surgery: Nystagmus showed the impairment dated from infancy, so surgery could no longer restore her full sight.
    5. The takeaway: An eye problem missed in the first years can become permanent, and nearly half of childhood blindness in India is preventable or treatable if caught in time.

    Is lack of access the only reason children lose sight?

    1. Inside the system: Access is still a major barrier, yet this girl’s vaccinations were up to date and she had seven documented health contacts by age five. None detected her impairment.
    2. Waiting for cooperation: Her parents, raising twins, had waited until she could “cooperate” in an eye examination.
    3. Poor integration: Vision screening is poorly linked to the vaccination schedule and to general paediatric screening, so routine visits include no eye check.
    4. Pieces not connected: India already has frontline health workers, immunisation services and school health programmes. The task is to connect them.

    What do the screening programme and Karnataka’s data show?

    1. Child health programme: The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK), a national screening programme, aims to identify and manage health conditions in children from birth to 18 years.
    2. Spectacle gap: Only 1.9 per cent of Karnataka’s screened school children received spectacles, though local studies put refractive errors (focusing faults that glasses correct) as high as 8 per cent.
    3. Referral drop: A study of RBSK coverage gaps found that only 47.4 per cent of children detected with problems received further care.
    4. Field evaluations: Independent evaluations in Tumkur found problems in handling younger children and in follow up care, citing parental non cooperation and logistical barriers.

    Challenges

    1. Untrained front line: Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers, village level health volunteers, in Tumkur said they lack the training to detect eye disease in children.
    2. Thin specialist access: Without training, ASHAs act only when parents complain, and then refer them to a paediatrician who visits the taluk hospital once a week.
    3. Referral and supply losses: Children drop out between the tiers of the referral system and spectacles arrive late, so screening does not end in glasses.
    4. Young children: Infants and toddlers cannot read a chart or respond reliably to conventional vision tests, so standard screening misses them.

    Way Forward

    1. Red reflex test: Add this under 30 second eye check, which needs no cooperation from the child, to the immunisation schedule. It finds cataract, retinoblastoma (eye cancer) and high refractive error.
    2. Train the front line: Train RBSK mobile health teams, primary health centre nurses, paediatric residents and ASHA workers to perform the test, so it becomes as routine as weighing a child, and to observe infants’ visual behaviour.
    3. Monitored referral: Set clear referral pathways, with digital links from frontline screening to appointments at district and tertiary eye care facilities.
    4. Tele-ophthalmology: Connect peripheral health workers with eye specialists remotely to cut the logistical barriers that make families drop out of care.

    Conclusion

    Child eye care in India fails at detection and follow through inside services children already use, not only at access. The test is whether every routine contact, from immunisation to school screening, ends in a recorded referral that is followed to treatment.

    Key numbers

    1. Visually impaired children worldwide (World Health Organization): About 19 million, of whom 1.4 million are blind.
    2. Blind children in India: About 3 lakh.
    3. Karnataka school screening, 2023 to 2024: 62,45,424 children aged 6 to 16 screened; about 1.2 lakh received spectacles.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS2, 15 marks] In a crucial domain like the public healthcare system, the Indian State should play a vital role to contain the adverse impact of marketisation of the system. Suggest some measures through which the State can enhance the reach of public healthcare at the grassroots level.”

  • To combat pollution, we need to cast a wider net beyond the city

    Why in the News

    Delhi’s winter air policy has to move from the city to the airshed, the whole region whose air mixes together, because the sources and weather that decide its air lie beyond city limits. A “Super El Nino” (an exceptionally strong Pacific warming) is expected to trap pollutants this winter, and city measures such as doubled parking charges do not reach those sources.

    What is an airshed based approach?

    1. Airshed: An airshed is the stretch of land over which air and its pollutants move and mix, whatever the administrative borders. Like a river basin, what enters upstream reaches everyone downstream.
    2. Satellite airshed: Where the full airshed is too large to administer, a smaller manageable zone is the working unit instead.
    3. NARFI: The approach is set out in the National Air Quality Resource Framework of India (NARFI), a monograph developed by the National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS) under the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser.
    4. The takeaway: Air and its pollutants cross city borders, so the airshed, not the city, is the unit for managing sources.

    Why has policy chased the wrong sources?

    1. Transport share: The System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research (SAFAR), India’s first air quality forecasting framework, found transport behind about 40% of Delhi’s PM2.5 (particles fine enough to enter the lungs and blood).
    2. Dust bias: The National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), the national air pollution plan, measures progress by the fall in PM10, coarser particles that are largely dust. Attention therefore stayed with dust, though fine particles harm health most.
    3. City level curbs: The Delhi Winter Action Plan relies on narrow road sweeping machines, doubled parking charges and work from home rules under the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), emergency curbs tightened as air quality worsens. All act inside the city.

    How can a Super El Nino trap Delhi’s winter air?

    1. El Nino: It is a periodic warming of the central Pacific Ocean that disrupts weather worldwide. It creates no pollution source but traps the pollutants that exist.
    2. Monsoon signal: It has already shaped a monsoon that ended with a 13% rainfall deficit, the highest in a decade. Delhi alone had a 17% surplus.
    3. Calm and dry air: A NIAS study found it can sharply cut wind speed over north India, so fine particles do not disperse. Western disturbances (winter systems that bring rain) are likely to be almost absent.
    4. Inversion layer: Milder days and cool nights under still air may lower the surface inversion layer, a lid of warm air over cold ground, so pollutants stay near the ground.

    Why is early November the critical window?

    1. Early burning: Early rains allowed early paddy sowing in Punjab and Haryana, so burning can begin in the first week of October.
    2. Evening burning: Fires have moved to the evening, and detection based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), a polar satellite sensor that sees a place only at fixed times, may miss a significant share.
    3. Firecrackers meet peak burning: Firecrackers arrive in the first week of November, when burning is near its peak. The days from 5 to 10 November have been Delhi’s worst of the last decade, and weaker winds may repeat that.

    Challenges

    1. Fragmented jurisdiction: An airshed spans several governments with different priorities, so no one authority enforces common targets.
    2. Weak local capacity: Cities lack trained staff, so programme funds go unspent.
    3. Farmer livelihoods: Residue management costs farmers Rs 2,000 to 3,000 per hectare with no assured market, so burning continues.

    Way Forward

    1. Wider airshed body: Evolve the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) into a model for airshed management beyond the National Capital Region (NCR).
    2. Metric reform: Measure NCAP progress by the fall in PM2.5 and by source, not by PM10 alone, so funding follows the most harmful pollutants.
    3. Evening fire detection: Add satellite detection that sees evening fires, beside MODIS.

    Conclusion

    Delhi’s winter air is set by sources and weather beyond the city, so the unit of action has to be the airshed. The next test is whether the coming festival and burning peak arrives with extra sources curbed and fires counted fully.

    Government Initiatives to Control Air Pollution

    1. CAQM: A statutory body under the Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas Act, 2021. It coordinates action across Delhi NCR and adjoining States, replacing the earlier Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority.
    2. Crop Residue Management Scheme: Since 2018 it has subsidised machinery that manages crop residue.
    3. Subsidy rates: The subsidy is 50% for farmers and 80% for cooperatives, panchayats and entrepreneurs.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS3, 10 marks] What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)? What is the potential role of CCUS in tackling climate change?”

  • Centre eases access to defence testing facilities for companies, waives charges for key projects

    Centre eases access to defence testing facilities for companies, waives charges for key projects

    Why in the News

    Testing a government-backed defence prototype at the Defence Ministry’s ranges has moved from a paid service with arbitration of disputes to a free service with conciliation. The Defence Minister has approved a revised Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that eases access to Ministry testing facilities for Indian defence companies, start-ups and innovators.

    What are proof ranges, and why do defence firms need them?

    1. What it is: A proof range is a secured area where weapons and ammunition are test-fired to prove they perform as designed. It works like a driving test track for weapons.
    2. Facility network: The SOP lists the proof ranges, field firing ranges and laboratory test facilities of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Government Quality Assurance agencies and the three Services.
    3. Access problem: Private firms rarely own such ranges, so they cannot prove a prototype without using state facilities.
    4. The takeaway: Testing is the step between a prototype and an order, so easier access shortens the path from an idea to a fielded weapon.

    What has the revised SOP changed?

    1. Charge waiver: The Ministry waives proof and testing charges for its developmental projects, such as Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX), the Technology Development Fund (TDF) and Make, which back Indian firms building defence equipment.
    2. Reserved slots: A three-day slot every quarter is reserved at proof ranges for proof firing of government-sponsored developmental projects.
    3. Self-initiated projects: The reserved slots also cover developmental projects that indigenous defence firms take up on their own initiative.
    4. Simpler paperwork: The SOP simplifies documentation to make the process more transparent and predictable for industry.
    5. Conciliation over arbitration: A conciliation agreement clause replaces the arbitration provision of the earlier SOP.

    What are conciliation and arbitration?

    1. Arbitration: A third party hears both sides and imposes a binding award that the parties must accept.
    2. Conciliation: A neutral helps the parties reach a voluntary settlement, so no outcome is imposed on either side.
    3. Why the switch: The Ministry expects conciliation to bring faster resolution of issues between industry and the authorities.

    Why does it matter for defence self-reliance?

    1. Atmanirbharta: The Ministry expects the change to support “atmanirbharta” (self-reliance) in defence, innovation and defence exports.
    2. Lower entry cost: Start-ups under iDEX and TDF work on limited grants, so waived fees lower the cost of proving a prototype.
    3. Predictable scheduling: A guaranteed quarterly slot lets a firm plan its development timeline around a known test window.
    4. Rewarding private initiative: Covering self-initiated projects supports firms that invest their own money, not only those holding government development contracts.

    Challenges

    1. Limited range time: A three-day quarterly window is short when many projects compete for the same range.
    2. Services’ own trials: Ranges belong to DRDO and the Services, whose own trials can take precedence over industry slots.
    3. Tests without orders: Passing a trial does not by itself guarantee a production order, so firms still carry the risk of developing a product nobody buys.
    4. Non-binding conciliation: With no binding award to fall back on, a dispute can stay open if either side refuses to settle.

    Way Forward

    1. More range capacity: Add slots and facilities as the number of developmental projects grows.
    2. Transparent booking: Publish range availability and allocate slots through an open online system.
    3. Test-to-order link: Tie successful trials under iDEX, TDF and Make to assured procurement decisions.

    Conclusion

    Testing, long a cost and scheduling hurdle for private defence firms, is now cheaper and more predictable for government-backed prototypes. Whether the reserved slots translate into faster trials and more production orders is the measure to watch.

    Back2Basics: Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX)

    1. Launch: It was launched in 2018 by the Department of Defence Production, Ministry of Defence.
    2. Executing body: It is run by the Defence Innovation Organisation (DIO), a not-for-profit company founded by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL).
    3. How it works: It funds start-ups, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and individual innovators to solve problem statements set by the Services, through challenges such as the Defence India Startup Challenge.
    4. ADITI: Acing Development of Innovative Technologies with iDEX (ADITI) offers larger grants for critical and strategic technologies. See “Govt. to ease MSME, start-up entry into R&D in defence” (16 September 2026).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] Consider the following statements about Mission Sudarshan Chakra of India: 1. It aims to enhance India’s air defence, ballistic missile defence and aerial offensive capabilities. 2. Designed to enhance rapid, precise, and powerful defence responses, reinforcing India’s strategic autonomy. 3. One of the aims is to cover all public places of India by an expanded nationwide security shield by 2035. (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1 only ANSWER: A”

  • From the brink to a comeback, hope for India’s wildlife

    From the brink to a comeback, hope for India’s wildlife

    Why in the News

    A Great Indian Bustard chick has hatched in Kutch, Gujarat, after a decade, one of several recoveries showing threatened species can return from the brink of extinction. Highlighted during Wildlife Week (October 2 to 8), these gains last only where States sustain funding, science and community participation over many years.

    What is species recovery, and what framework does India have?

    1. What recovery means: Species recovery brings a population back from near extinction by restoring habitat and prey, breeding animals and returning them to the wild, much like rehabilitating a patient.
    2. Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats (IDWH): This Union scheme backs recovery of 24 identified species, with States doing research, habitat work, protection and community outreach. Eg. great Indian bustard, Sangai, dugong, hangul.
    3. Threat largely unmeasured: 1,012 assessed Indian animal species are threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, the global extinction-risk register. Assessments cover only 7.2% of documented species.
    4. National Red List Roadmap: India launched it at the IUCN World Conservation Congress in Abu Dhabi in 2025, aiming for National Red Data Books, registers of species at risk, for plants and animals by 2030.
    5. The takeaway: The IDWH list is only a starting point; a national risk picture must show where recovery goes next.

    How have threatened species recovered in India?

    1. Nilgiri tahr: Tamil Nadu’s Project Nilgiri Tahr surveys, radio-collars and maps the tahr across Tamil Nadu and Keralam with the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and IUCN. Counts rose from 1,303 to 1,364 in a year.
    2. Vultures: India’s ban on veterinary diclofenac, which had caused catastrophic vulture losses, was the crucial step:
      • the Jatayu Conservation Breeding Centre, Pinjore, run by the Haryana Forest Department and the Bombay Natural History Society, breeds white-rumped, long-billed and slender-billed vultures;
      • Tamil Nadu’s Segur Plateau remains an important habitat, with breeding populations in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve.
    3. Large mammals in protected landscapes: Protection with community support has helped:
      • Asiatic lions in Gujarat now occupy a wider part of Saurashtra;
      • greater one-horned rhinos thrive in Assam’s Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary, which has exceptionally high rhino density;
      • Meghalaya’s plan for the clouded leopard, its State animal, covers 14 priority landscapes.
    4. Dugong: Tamil Nadu set up India’s first dugong conservation reserve across 448.34 sq km of Palk Bay seagrass, where a WII baseline estimated 270 dugongs.
    5. Snow leopard: India’s first scientific population assessment estimated 718 snow leopards in 2024. In Himachal Pradesh’s Kibber, local women help forest teams set camera traps.

    Why do recoveries abroad show that sustained action and money work?

    1. Iberian lynx: In Spain and Portugal, restoring habitat and prey, captive breeding and release lifted mature lynx from 62 to 648 in about two decades.
    2. Oryx and saiga: The scimitar-horned oryx has returned to the wild in Chad, and the saiga antelope has recovered in Kazakhstan.
    3. Phoenix Species Project: Re:wild and the Bezos Earth Fund have committed $200 million to recover 100 of the world’s most threatened species, showing recovery needs dependable money.

    Challenges

    1. Neglected species: Species that receive little public attention struggle to attract funding.
    2. Plans not reaching the ground: Recovery plans fail unless political commitment shapes land use, infrastructure and livelihood decisions.
    3. Costs borne by communities: Fishermen who release dugongs caught in their nets can lose valuable gear.

    Way Forward

    1. Sustained State budgets: State leaders should prioritise recovery, bring departments together and fund it across successive budgets.
    2. State conservation funds: Pool government, industry, philanthropy and science, as Tamil Nadu’s Endangered Species Conservation Fund does for the mahseer, striped hyena, Madras hedgehog, lion-tailed macaque and hornbill.
    3. Field science and training: Place scientists close to the field, and train staff in surveys, conservation breeding and genetic analysis.
    4. Community partnership: Involve communities in surveys and ground decisions, and compensate losses, as Tamil Nadu does for fishermen’s nets.

    Conclusion

    India has shown that threatened species can return when protection, science and local stewardship last for years. Whether States keep paying once the first gains arrive will decide which species follow.

    Key numbers

    1. India’s share of global biodiversity: 2.4% of world land area; nearly 8% of flora and 7.5% of fauna.
    2. Megadiversity: one of 17 megadiverse countries, with parts of 4 of the world’s 36 biodiversity hotspots.
    3. Endemism: around 28% of India’s plants and over 30% of its animals are found nowhere else.
    4. IUCN Red List coverage: 7,516 Indian animal species assessed.
    5. Vultures, Madhya Pradesh census: 8,397 (2019) to 12,981 (2025).
    6. Asiatic lions, Gujarat: 674 (2020) to 891 (2025).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Indian Flying Fox is placed under the “vermin” category in the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Statement-II: The Indian Flying Fox feeds on the blood of other animals. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both statement I and Statement II are correct and statement II explains statement I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I (c) Staement- I is correct , but Statement II is incorrect* (d) Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct ANSWER:”

  • Break the chain

    Break the chain

    Why in the News

    Leprosy was declared “eliminated as a public health problem” in India two decades ago, yet only 148 districts have stopped its spread against a projected 300. The 2025-26 National Leprosy Elimination Programme (NLEP) report shows new cases running well above projections, which puts the targets of the National Strategic Plan (NSP) and Roadmap for Leprosy 2023-2027 at risk.

    What does “elimination” mean, and why did leprosy persist?

    1. What it is: Leprosy is a slow bacterial disease that damages the skin and nerves. “Elimination” meant fewer than 1 registered patient per 10,000 people, a measure called prevalence.
    2. Elimination milestone: India crossed that mark by 2005. The World Health Organization (WHO) then declared that India had eliminated leprosy “as a public health problem”.
    3. Complacency followed: The government folded the dedicated leprosy surveillance programme into the general health system. Rising disability in the early 2010s forced a return to door-to-door screening.
    4. Shorter treatment: Newer multi-drug therapy (MDT) regimens let patients finish treatment and leave the register sooner. As a result, recorded prevalence fell even as infection kept spreading.
    5. The takeaway: India met a target that counted patients on registers, so the disease kept spreading unseen in the community.

    What did the 2025-26 programme achieve?

    1. Mass screening: Health workers screened over 70 crore people in highly endemic areas and detected 24,367 cases.
    2. ASHA workers: Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), the village-level community health workers, flagged nearly 40 lakh suspected cases. Of these, 48,027 were confirmed.
    3. Preventive drug: A single dose of rifampicin, an antibiotic that stops infection turning into disease, reached 91.1% of 16.9 lakh likely contacts.
    4. New tools: The government has started digital surveillance. It is also considering the Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) vaccine to clear the bacteria faster in highly infectious patients.

    Where and why does transmission persist?

    1. Child cases: Indian children made up around 46% of all child leprosy cases reported worldwide in 2025. Cases in children signal recent, ongoing infection.
    2. Uneven burden: Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha and Maharashtra carry a disproportionate share of the national burden.
    3. Late care-seeking: Stigma keeps patients away from clinics, so many already have nerve damage when they first seek care.
    4. Misdiagnosis: Many doctors are unfamiliar with leprosy and mistake it for an ordinary skin condition, which delays treatment.

    Why do falling prevalence figures mislead?

    1. Mixed record: Prevalence and the grade-2 disability rate (visible deformity of hands, feet or eyes) have fallen over the decade, but transmission to new people continues in many pockets.
    2. Verification pending: Districts reporting “interruption of transmission” still await field verification, so even that count is unconfirmed.
    3. Projections overshot: New cases, called incidence, ran 41% above projections overall and 91.6% above among children.
    4. Disability overshoot: The grade-2 disability rate overshot its projection by 34%, a sign that cases are still found late.
    5. Transmission goal: The NSP makes cutting transmission its main aim, in line with the WHO’s approach.

    Challenges

    1. Long incubation: Leprosy takes about five years, sometimes 20, to show symptoms, so infection spreads before diagnosis.
    2. Stigma in law: Old laws carried discrimination against patients. Eg. Leprosy was a ground for divorce until the Personal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019.
    3. Drug resistance risk: Mass use of rifampicin needs monitoring, because resistant bacteria would weaken both treatment and prevention.
    4. Diluted focus: In the general health system, leprosy competes with many diseases for frontline workers’ time.

    Way Forward

    1. Transmission first: Make interrupting transmission the primary goal and treat prevalence as a secondary outcome.
    2. Hold the targets: Resist easing detection or revising elimination targets, and raise investment to meet the existing 2026-27 projections.
    3. Hotspot focus: Concentrate effort where late diagnosis and transmission persist, by place and social setting.
    4. Doctor training: Train primary-care doctors to recognise leprosy’s nerve signs and refer suspected cases early.

    Conclusion

    India’s leprosy record has been judged by patients on registers, which can fall while the disease keeps spreading. Whether the next programme report shows new cases falling, not just registers shrinking, is the test to watch.

    Back2Basics: National Leprosy Elimination Programme (NLEP)

    1. Origin: It began as the National Leprosy Control Programme in 1955 and became the NLEP in 1983, when multi-drug therapy was introduced.
    2. Structure: It is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme under the National Health Mission, offering free diagnosis and free MDT.
    3. Current goal: The NSP aims for zero transmission by 2027, ahead of the Sustainable Development Goals deadline of 2030.
    4. Awareness: The Sparsh Leprosy Awareness Campaign runs each year from Anti-Leprosy Day, 30 January.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS2, 15 marks] In a crucial domain like the public healthcare system, the Indian State should play a vital role to contain the adverse impact of marketisation of the system. Suggest some measures through which the State can enhance the reach of public healthcare at the grassroots level.”

  • Small, medium enterprises get Rs 10,000 cr fund boost

    Why in the News

    Small and medium enterprises seeking to grow have moved from equity funds built mainly for start-ups and micro firms to a dedicated growth-equity fund of their own. The Union Cabinet has approved the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Growth Fund (SGF) with an outlay of Rs 10,000 crore. It targets the gap in long-term risk capital that has kept many SMEs dependent on loans.

    What is the SME Growth Fund, and why is it needed?

    1. What it is: The SGF invests patient growth equity, money held for years in exchange for part ownership, in high-potential SMEs with proven viability. It acts like a partner buying into a shop, not a lender demanding fixed repayments.
    2. Origin: The fund was first announced in the Union Budget 2026-27 to incentivise enterprises that meet select criteria. The Ministry of Finance brought the proposal to the Cabinet.
    3. Equity gap: Most existing equity funds back early-stage firms and largely serve micro enterprises, leaving a structural gap in growth-stage equity for small and medium firms.
    4. Beyond credit: Credit access has improved, but firms lack long-term risk capital to scale, innovate, expand abroad, adopt advanced technology or make acquisitions.
    5. The takeaway: The state is now supplying ownership capital, not just loans, to help viable SMEs grow into larger firms.

    How will the fund be structured and targeted?

    1. AIF route: The Centre will commit the full amount to an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) a pooled vehicle set up under the SGF framework that will make the actual investments.
    2. Manufacturing focus: A majority of investments will go to small and medium manufacturing enterprises.
    3. Cluster focus: The fund will also back SMEs in industrial clusters in Tier-II and Tier-III cities.
    4. Regional aims: Cluster investment is meant to support balanced regional industrial development, strengthen local supply chains and create quality jobs.
    5. Sector scope: The fund seeks champion enterprises across manufacturing, services, technology, innovation-driven sectors and strategic value chains.

    What outcomes are expected, and what does industry see?

    1. Scale and exports: The Centre expects firms to expand capacity and adopt advanced technology, which lifts productivity and export competitiveness.
    2. Capital gaps: The India SME Forum identifies two severe capital gaps among SMEs:
      • over-dependence on debt financing;
      • weak integration with global value chains.
    3. Mid-sized champions: The Forum expects the fund to mobilise institutional capital and create globally competitive mid-sized firms.
    4. Supplier cycle: Stronger manufacturers place larger, steadier orders with smaller suppliers, as the Forum’s president argues:
      • suppliers invest in machinery, quality and skills;
      • more firms meet the standards of large buyers;
      • domestic value addition rises and import dependence falls.
    5. Growth over survival: A former president of the Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) says the fund lets SMEs focus on growth rather than financing worries.

    Challenges

    1. Small corpus: The amount is modest against the scale of SME equity needs, so few firms can be backed.
    2. Promoter reluctance: Many family-run SMEs resist sharing ownership and control with outside investors.
    3. Thin exit routes: Equity investors need exits, and SME listing platforms remain shallow and volatile.
    4. Selection bias: The viability test may favour firms in established clusters over smaller Tier-III units.
    5. Overlapping funds: Several government-backed funds for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) already exist. Eg. The Self-Reliant India Fund announced in 2020.

    Way Forward

    1. Professional management: Appoint independent fund managers with published investment criteria.
    2. Exit depth: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and stock exchanges should deepen SME listing platforms so investors can exit.
    3. Cluster linkage: Coordinate investments with the Micro and Small Enterprises Cluster Development Programme for shared testing and design facilities.
    4. Outcome reporting: Publish yearly data on jobs, exports and value addition at investee firms.

    Conclusion

    The fund moves SME policy from lending towards ownership capital, and no date has yet been announced for setting up the AIF or making first investments. Whether it draws private capital alongside the government and reaches firms outside the big clusters is the measure to watch.

    Back2Basics: Alternative Investment Fund (AIF)

    1. What it is: A privately pooled fund that collects money from investors to invest under a defined policy.
    2. Regulation: Governed by the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012.
    3. Three categories: Category I covers venture capital, SME, social venture and infrastructure funds. Category II covers private equity and debt funds. Category III covers hedge funds.
    4. Investor base: AIFs serve institutions and wealthy investors, with a minimum investment of Rs 1 crore for most investors.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025] With reference to investments, consider the following: I. Bonds II. Hedge Funds III. Stocks IV. Venture Capital How many of the above are treated as Alternative Investment Funds? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) Only three (d) All the four ANSWER: (b)”

  • From India to Global South, a Gujarat water-governance model

    Why in the News

    New Delhi has hosted the ninth India International Water Week on climate-resilient water management. A new case study says India’s reforms, first tested in Gujarat, offer the Global South (developing countries) four lessons: lead with governance, manage resource and service together, root action in communities, and build for scale.

    What does the case study find about water security?

    1. What water governance is: Water governance is the leaders, budgets, institutions and communities deciding how water is shared and maintained. Like a school, it needs teachers, not just a building.
    2. The study: ‘From Gujarat to India: Water Lessons for the World’ traces water reforms from 2001 to 2026 using official data and practitioner consultations.
    3. Central finding: Water security is as much a challenge of governance and institutions as of engineering.
    4. Gujarat as laboratory: Gujarat’s initiatives from 2001 to 2014, under then Chief Minister Narendra Modi, piloted later national programmes:
      • Swachh Bharat Mission (sanitation) and Namami Gange (cleaning the Ganga);
      • Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) (household tap water) and Jal Shakti Abhiyan (water conservation);
      • Atal Bhujal Yojana (community groundwater management) and Per Drop More Crop (efficient farm irrigation).
    5. The takeaway: India’s shift from suffering climate shocks to preparing for floods and droughts rests on institutions, not hardware.

    What are the ‘4 Ps’ of leading with governance?

    1. Delhi Declaration: The Prime Minister and the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General set out the ‘4 Ps’ in the Delhi Declaration of October 2018.
    2. Political leadership: Leaders keep water a priority. Eg. Universal tap water and a cleaner Ganga.
    3. Public financing: Public and private money funds both the capital costs of building systems and the recurring costs of running them.
    4. Partnerships: Governments at all levels work with community groups, knowledge bodies and multilateral development banks (lenders owned by many countries) such as the World Bank.
    5. People’s participation: Communities take local water decisions. Eg. Villages resolving to become open-defecation free or preparing village water security plans.

    Why manage the water resource and the service together?

    1. Source and supply linked: Taps and canals fail if water does not flow, so sources and services must be developed together.
    2. Plan before demand: Fast-growing African cities will soon need more water, and planning now costs less than retrofitting.
    3. Water reuse: Treated used water can meet non-potable (non-drinking) needs of data centres and semiconductor fabrication units.
    4. Reuse market: India’s annual sales of treated used water are projected to reach about ₹73,000 crore by 2047, at current prices.

    How do communities and scale complete the model?

    1. Community ownership: Access improves where Pani Samitis (village water committees) run a reliable service with local funds and outside support.
    2. Chintan Shivirs: Gujarat’s deliberation camps tied water policy to community needs. The Ministry of Jal Shakti repeated this through a Departmental Summit on Water in September 2026.
    3. Global shortfall: The world is off track on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6, safe water and sanitation for all. It needs about $500 billion more investment a year.
    4. Scale shown by JJM: JJM’s nationwide rollout shows India can plan and deliver at scale.

    Challenges

    1. Fragmented institutions: The Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) for groundwater, the Central Water Commission (CWC) for surface water and local bodies overlap in function.
    2. Low recycling: India treats and recycles only about 30% of its wastewater. Eg. Israel recycles about 90%.
    3. Transferability: The model leans on top-level political priority, which weaker administrations struggle to replicate.

    Way Forward

    1. Unified water body: Merge CWC and CGWB functions into a National Water Commission, as the Mihir Shah Committee (2016) recommended.
    2. Reuse mandates: States should make new data centres and factories use treated water for non-potable needs.
    3. Funded village committees: Give Pani Samitis assured funds and power to levy user charges for upkeep.

    Conclusion

    India’s water gains came from treating water as a governance priority, not an engineering task alone. Its future depends on keeping taps flowing, recycling far more used water, and being adapted rather than copied abroad.

    Water stress in India

    1. Freshwater share: India has 18% of the world’s population but only 4% of its freshwater resources.
    2. Falling availability: Per capita water availability has fallen to about 1,486 cubic metres a year, below the 1,700 cubic metre threshold of the Falkenmark Water Index.
    3. People affected: Around 600 million people face high to extreme water stress.
    4. Constitutional position: Water is a State subject under Entry 17 of the State List, subject to Union regulation of inter-State rivers under Entry 56 of the Union List.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS1, 10 marks] “Water resources are both an asset and a source of conflict in South Asia.” Examine this statement giving examples.”

  • Team depth to individual gaps: India’s Asian Games report card for LA 2028

    Why in the News

    India’s flagship elite sports fund is meant to back future champions, yet only about 2% of its spending since the 2022 Hangzhou Asian Games went to athletes who won gold at Nagoya. India finished fourth at the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games, and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports has announced a performance review focused on the Los Angeles 2028 Olympics.

    What is TOPS, and how is elite sport funded?

    1. What it is: The Target Olympic Podium Scheme (TOPS) is the Sports Ministry’s flagship fund for Olympic hopefuls. Like a scholarship, it pays for chosen athletes’ customised training, foreign exposure, coaches and equipment.
    2. Who gets in: A TOPS team monitors athletes and inducts them into a Development Group or a Core Group, based on performance, potential and medal prospects.
    3. Wider funding: The Annual Calendar for Training and Competitions (ACTC) funds camps, tournaments, coaches’ salaries and other competition expenses across federations.
    4. What went wrong: Most of this money missed the athletes who finally won gold, so the system spots winners late.
    5. The takeaway: Funding that arrives after an athlete has broken through cannot build the next generation of champions.

    What did Nagoya reveal about where the money went?

    1. TOPS spending: Of ₹97.84 crore spent under TOPS since Hangzhou, only ₹2.05 crore went to athletes who won gold at Nagoya.
    2. ACTC spending: Only one-eighth of ACTC spending since 2023 was linked to Nagoya golds.
    3. Kumkum Mohod: She became India’s first individual Asian Games champion in women’s recurve archery without being part of TOPS.
    4. Shooting golds: Mixed team champion Suruchi Singh joined TOPS only recently, and partner Kamaljeet Singh is not on it. Trap champion Neeru Dhanda remains in the developmental group.
    5. Three golds, little support: The archery and two shooting golds above together drew only ₹3.5 lakh of TOPS funding.

    What do team and individual results show?

    1. Team depth: 13 of 21 golds came in team events, some of which are not Olympic events. Eg. Cricket, kabaddi, hockey, archery, athletics relays and shooting.
    2. Individual gap: 19 of 27 silvers came in individual events, from athletes who reached finals but could not convert silver into gold.
    3. Strongholds slipping: Badminton won no individual medal for the first time in 12 years. Weightlifter Mirabai Chanu’s silver was India’s first weightlifting medal at the Games since 1998, with no obvious successor.
    4. Bright spots: The women’s recurve archery team ended South Korea’s 28-year run as champion. Women’s hockey, after specialised penalty-corner and goalkeeping clinics, beat China for gold and qualified for Los Angeles.
    5. Combat sports: Aman Sehrawat and Sujeet Kalkal won wrestling gold, and boxing returned to the top of the podium.

    Is the problem talent spotting or medal counting?

    1. Talent identification: The same pattern appeared at the Paris Olympics. The question is whether the system spots future winners early enough for money to reach them before they win.
    2. Ministry’s position: The Ministry calls the performance encouraging and says TOPS follows “a dynamic and continuous evaluation process”. Its review will identify gaps where results fell short.
    3. Medals as the wrong yardstick: The Athletics Federation of India (AFI) argued that improvement in performance, not the medal count alone, should guide Olympic preparation.

    Challenges

    1. Late selection: Funding follows proven results, so emerging athletes go unsupported during their breakthrough years.
    2. Non-Olympic medals: Team golds in non-Olympic events flatter the tally ahead of Los Angeles.
    3. Silver-to-gold gap: Individual athletes reach finals but lack the edge to win them.

    Way Forward

    1. Wider Development Group: The Sports Ministry should induct junior and national-level medallists into TOPS earlier, using performance trends, not only podium finishes.
    2. Spending audit: Track TOPS and ACTC spending against results by athlete and discipline.
    3. Final-stage coaching: Fund specialised mental and technical coaching for athletes who repeatedly finish second.
    4. Replicate clinics: Extend the women’s hockey model of foreign expert clinics and injury rehabilitation to other sports.

    Conclusion

    India’s Asian Games result shows a funding system that rewards athletes after they rise, not before. The Ministry’s review will show whether TOPS selection shifts toward spotting talent earlier.

    Key numbers

    1. Medal tally: 21 gold, 27 silver, 37 bronze (85 in all).
    2. Against targets: Short of the 100-medal target, and 21 medals below the record Hangzhou 2022 haul.
    3. ACTC spending since 2023: ₹702.86 crore, of which 12.5% was linked to Nagoya golds.
    4. Athletics and shooting: 39 medals (athletics 24, shooting 15), down from 51 at Hangzhou.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] Consider the following statements regarding ‘Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam’: 1. Provisions will come into effect from the 18th Lok Sabha. 2. This will be in force for 15 years after becoming an Act. 3. There are provisions for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes Women within the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only* (d) 1 and 3 only Answer: C”

  • GOBARdhan eyes 10-fold increase in CBG output: Puri

    Why in the News

    Compressed biogas (CBG) producers will now get both capital assistance and a guaranteed buyer from the Centre, with output targeted to rise from 0.4 to 4 to 6 million standard cubic metres per day. The Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas formally launched the ₹23,731 crore GOBARdhan scheme to drive this ten fold increase.

    What is compressed biogas, and what does GOBARdhan do with it?

    1. What CBG is: CBG is methane rich gas made by processing organic waste and compressing it, so it works like CNG but comes from waste rather than gas fields.
    2. Feedstock: The scheme targets agricultural residue, animal dung, food waste and other biomass.
    3. Why it was introduced: The government wants to turn agricultural and organic waste into a new source of domestic energy.
    4. Farmers as suppliers: The Minister said the programme would turn farmers from “Annadatas” (food givers) into “Urjadatas” (energy givers), since their waste becomes saleable fuel input.
    5. The takeaway: Pairing a plant subsidy with an assured market tackles the two reasons CBG plants have struggled, high upfront cost and uncertain sales.

    How is the support structured?

    | Component (lifecycle stage) | Support | Main beneficiary | |—|—|—| | Greenfield CBG plants (plant build) | ₹1.25 crore per tonne per day (TPD) of eligible CBG capacity | New CBG producers | | Brownfield capacity (plant expansion) | 50% of the greenfield rate, for capacity added through fresh investment | Plant owners expanding output | | Upgrade of existing biogas plants (asset conversion) | ₹0.60 crore per TPD, with a ₹5 crore project ceiling | Biogas plant operators shifting to CBG | | Assured offtake (offtake and demand) | Up to 100% of eligible output bought at an administered price of ₹2,110 per mmBtu (million British thermal units, a unit of heat energy used to price gas), about ₹98 per kg | All CBG producers |

    1. Project ceiling: Total capital assistance for one project is capped at ₹30 crore, counted across the scheme’s “two eligible capital-support components”, so large plants cannot draw unlimited subsidy.
    2. Why offtake matters: The assured offtake is offered to make CBG projects commercially viable, because a plant sure of selling its output at a fixed price can raise loans against that income.

    What does the scheme aim to achieve?

    1. Cleaner energy mix: The output rise is meant to help lift natural gas, a cleaner burning fuel, to a 15% share of the energy basket by 2030.
    2. Fossil fuel replacement: The scheme aims to replace about 10 million tonnes of fossil fuel with clean gas, cutting over 40 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions.
    3. Organic manure: Plants would also yield around 250 million tonnes of organic manure for farmers as a by product.
    4. Import savings: Domestic gas would save more than ₹40,000 crore in fuel imports.

    Challenges

    1. Scattered feedstock: Farm residue is seasonal and dispersed, so plants struggle to secure year round supply. Eg. The Sustainable Alternative Towards Affordable Transportation (SATAT) initiative missed its plant target.
    2. Weak manure market: Organic manure competes with subsidised chemical fertiliser, so a key by product may not sell.
    3. Grid distance: Plants far from city gas pipelines must truck compressed gas, adding cost.
    4. Price risk: A fixed administered price can turn into a subsidy burden if imported gas becomes cheaper.
    5. Operation and maintenance: Small biogas plants often fall idle once technical support ends.

    Way Forward

    1. Feedstock aggregation: Farmer producer organisations should run baling and collection hubs under the crop residue management scheme.
    2. Manure offtake: Fertiliser companies should co-market fermented organic manure alongside chemical fertilisers.
    3. Pipeline links: The Petroleum Ministry should fund last mile connections from CBG plants to city gas networks.
    4. Blending obligation: Enforce the phased CBG Blending Obligation on city gas distribution networks so demand grows with supply.
    5. Commissioning tracker: Publish plant wise commissioning and output data so slippage shows early.

    Conclusion

    The scheme turns biogas into an energy security instrument backed by both capital and a guaranteed buyer. Whether plants are actually commissioned and fed with year round feedstock will decide if the output target is met.

    Key numbers

    1. Value added to GDP: over ₹75,000 crore (scheme estimate).
    2. Jobs: more than 1.5 lakh (scheme estimate).
    3. Current share of natural gas in the energy basket: 6 to 7%.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025] Consider the following statements: Statement I: Of the two major ethanol producers in the world, i.e., Brazil and the United States of America, the former produces more ethanol than the latter. Statement II: Unlike in the United States of America, where corn is the principal feedstock for ethanol production, sugarcane is the principal feedstock for ethanol production in Brazil. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I (b) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I (c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct (d) Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct Answer: D”

  • PM E-DRIVE Scheme

    PM E-DRIVE Scheme

    Why in the News?

    • The PM Electric Drive Revolution in Innovative Vehicle Enhancement (PM E-DRIVE) Scheme was launched in September 2024 and implemented from October 2024.
    • Its implementation has been extended up to 31 March 2028, with a total outlay of ₹11,900 crore.

    Key Highlights

    • Implemented on a pan-India basis.
    • Supports:
      • EV demand incentives
      • Charging infrastructure
      • E-buses
      • Vehicle testing agencies
      • Domestic EV manufacturing and localisation
    • Targets approximately 28.30 lakh EVs.
    • 26.59 lakh EVs sold as of June 2026.
    • Promotes cleaner mobility and reduction of transport-related environmental impacts.

    EV Categories Covered

    • e-2Ws
    • e-3Ws, including registered e-rickshaws, e-carts and L5
    • e-Ambulances
    • e-Trucks
    • e-Buses
    • EV charging infrastructure
    • Upgradation of vehicle testing agencies

    e-2W Incentive

    • Incentive: ₹2,500/kWh
    • Maximum incentive: ₹5,000 per vehicle
    • Applicable to vehicles priced up to ₹1.5 lakh ex-factory.
    • Allocation: ₹2,767 crore.
    • Target: 45.79+ lakh registered e-2Ws.

    e-3Ws

    • Target sales for registered e-3W L5 achieved.
    • L5 sub-component closed on 26 December 2025.
    • Support for e-rickshaws and e-carts continues until March 2028.

    E-Buses and Charging Infrastructure

    • ₹4,391 crore allocated for 14,028 e-buses.
    • 14,000 e-buses allocated as of August 2026.
    • 13,800 e-buses allocated to seven cities: Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Pune, and Surat
    • ₹2,000 crore earmarked for nationwide EV Public Charging Stations (EV PCS).
    • ₹851 crore approved for 8,147 chargers to 3 oil marketing companies and 10 States as of 28 September 2026.
    • ₹780 crore allocated for modernisation and upgradation of vehicle testing agencies.

    Demand Incentive Mechanism

    • Eligible buyers receive an upfront reduction in purchase price through e-vouchers.
    • The incentive amount is subsequently reimbursed to the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) by the Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI).

    Domestic EV Manufacturing

    • Supports India’s domestic EV manufacturing ecosystem.
    • Promotes localisation of EV models.
    • Registered OEMs have obtained certificates of compliance with the Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP) from MHI testing agencies.
    • Upgraded testing agencies will be equipped to handle new and emerging technologies.

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • Launch: September 2024
    • Implementation: October 2024
    • Extended until: 31 March 2028
    • Total outlay: ₹11,900 crore
    • EVs supported: approximately 28.30 lakh
    • EVs sold: 26.59 lakh as of June 2026
    • e-2W incentive: ₹2,500/kWh, capped at ₹5,000/vehicle
    • e-2W price ceiling: ₹1.5 lakh ex-factory
    • ₹2,000 crore for nationwide EV public charging stations
    • ₹780 crore for vehicle testing agency modernisation

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • PM E-DRIVE is not limited to EV purchase incentives; it also covers charging infrastructure, e-buses and testing agencies.
    • The ₹2,500/kWh e-2W incentive is subject to a ₹5,000 per vehicle cap.
    • ₹4,391 crore relates to e-buses, while ₹2,000 crore is earmarked for EV public charging stations.
    • L5 e-3W support and e-rickshaw/e-cart support should not be treated as identical sub-components: the L5 target was achieved and that segment closed on 26 December 2025, while support for e-rickshaws and e-carts continues until March 2028.