💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open

Archives: News

  • How sustainable is India’s E20 push?

    Why in the news?

    The government has told Parliament that its ethanol blending programme has saved large sums of foreign exchange, while Opposition leaders have launched campaigns arguing that E20 harms vehicles and is being forced on people. The debate exposes a tension between the energy security and forex gains of blending 20 per cent ethanol into petrol and the costs it imposes on the country’s large legacy vehicle fleet and, potentially, on food security. The dispute now runs through disputed damage studies and feedstock diversion.

    What is E20?

    1. About: E20 is petrol blended with 20 per cent ethanol, meant to replace a fifth of transport petrol with domestically produced ethanol.
    2. Objective: The government targeted 10 to 11 billion litres of ethanol so that the money stays in the Indian economy rather than flowing out as a foreign exchange outgo on crude oil imports.

    What is ethanol and why does it affect engines?

    1. Polar solvent: Ethanol is a polar solvent that degrades older rubber compounds and plastics, hardening and cracking fuel hoses over time.
    2. Hygroscopic behaviour: Ethanol absorbs atmospheric moisture, and in parked vehicles the ethanol-water mixture separates and forms an acidic layer that corrodes tanks, damages fuel pumps, and clogs filters with sludge.

    What is the status of ethanol production?

    1. Capacity ramp-up: India’s distillery capacity now can produce some 18 to 20 billion litres from around 500 distilleries.
    2. Procurement contracted: For this ethanol year, which runs November to October, oil companies have contracted to procure some 10.5 billion litres of ethanol.
    3. Feedstock mix: Government figures show 45 per cent of ethanol for petrol blending will come from maize, Food Corporation of India (FCI) rice about 22 per cent, sugarcane juice 16 per cent, B-heavy molasses about 10 per cent, damaged foodgrains around 4.5 per cent, and C-heavy molasses 1.1 per cent.
    4. Maize expansion: India’s maize output grew 45 per cent in three years to 55 million tonnes in 2025-26, with more than 20 per cent of it going into ethanol.

    Will E20 spur corn imports from the United States?

    1. No import surge: There is no evidence of a surge in ethanol or maize imports in Ministry of Commerce statistics.
    2. Import ban: Direct ethanol import for petroleum blending is banned, even as the US corn lobby pushes India to increase corn imports.
    3. Sugar stocks stable: The closing stock of sugar was around 5 million tonnes and is expected to hold, indicating diversion to ethanol has not affected sugar availability.
    4. Conditional risk: In the event of monsoon failure, crop losses, and foodgrain shortages, diversion of FCI rice, sugarcane juice, and B-heavy molasses will come under stress. This raises the possibility of corn imports.

    Which vehicles are affected, and which are not?

    1. Newer fleet safe: Vehicles bought after April 2023, when the Bharat Stage 6 Phase 2 mandate took effect, were factory-engineered for E20 with ethanol-resistant elastomers, fluorinated fuel lines, upgraded pump seals, and recalibrated engine control units.
    2. Scale of newer fleet: These roughly 70 million vehicles are about 23 per cent of India’s active petrol fleet and face little cause for concern.
    3. Legacy fleet at risk: The remaining 77 per cent, nearly 240 million legacy two-wheelers and cars built for E5 or E10, are the genuine worry.

    Do the damage claims hold up? (the central tension)

    1. Consumer complaints: Consumer surveys by LocalCircles found 66 per cent of pre-2023 owners reporting mileage losses exceeding 10 per cent, and 55 per cent reporting increased maintenance.
    2. Institutional defence: IIT Kanpur’s Engine Research Laboratory maintains E20 causes no notable damage, with efficiency loss under 5 per cent, attributing most complaints to driving habits and traffic conditions.
    3. Field disputes: Independent mechanics and automotive communities dispute this, citing real-world fuel pump and injector failures traced to ethanol’s solvent and low-lubricity properties.
    4. Manufacturer data: The government told Parliament that one manufacturer serviced 2.84 crore vehicles in FY 2025-26, including about 1.5 crore legacy vehicles, without finding E20-linked engine damage, and reported an efficiency penalty of about 2 to 6 per cent in some E10-designed vehicles.

    Why has the rollout drawn criticism?

    1. Speed of transition: India reached the 10 per cent milestone in 2022 and ramped up to 20 per cent within three years, with very little information and advisories from manufacturers.
    2. Contrast with Brazil: Brazil’s transition to high ethanol levels happened over several decades in a stable manner, alongside vehicle modifications, taking the public into confidence.
    3. Information gap: The compressed rollout left legacy vehicle owners without clear guidance on effects and maintenance.

    Has ethanol blending eased the oil supply burden?

    1. Forex saving: The government said the programme has saved around 2 lakh crore rupees of foreign exchange and substituted some 32 million tonnes of crude oil imports.
    2. Import substitution: Substituting 10 billion litres of petrol with ethanol amounts to dispensing with about a month of crude imports.
    3. Price shielding claim: The government said that while crude prices rose 70 per cent during the war in West Asia, pump petrol prices rose only 7 to 8 per cent, though under-recoveries also increased.
    4. Cost ambiguity: Oil companies procure ethanol at around 70 rupees per litre, and with the base price of petrol at 55 to 60 per cent of the pump price, it is difficult to conclude independently that ethanol has kept prices down.

    Conclusion

    The central idea is that E20 delivers real forex and energy-security gains but shifts costs onto a legacy fleet of nearly 240 million vehicles whose damage claims remain contested between consumer surveys and institutional studies. What remains unresolved is a transparent, phased communication of effects and maintenance, and a food-security cushion if monsoon failure forces feedstock diversion. A Brazil-style stable transition would have taken the public into confidence.

    National Biofuel Policy: About

    1. About: The National Policy on Biofuels sets targets for blending ethanol in petrol and biodiesel in diesel to cut import dependence.
    2. Feedstock scope: It permits multiple feedstocks including sugarcane, damaged foodgrains, maize, and other surplus grains.
    3. Blending target: The policy advanced the 20 per cent ethanol blending target, which India pursued aggressively from 2022.

    Government Initiatives for Biofuels

    1. Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme: Mandates blending of ethanol with petrol and drives procurement by oil companies.
    2. Pradhan Mantri JI-VAN Yojana: Supports second-generation ethanol from agricultural residues.
    3. SATAT initiative: Promotes compressed biogas as a transport fuel from waste and biomass.

    Key Facts about Ethanol Blending

    1. Ethanol year: Runs from November to October.
    2. Grades of molasses: B-heavy and C-heavy molasses are distinct sugar-industry by-products used as feedstock.
    3. BS6 Phase 2: Took effect in April 2023 and coincided with factory engineering of vehicles for E20.

    Challenges to the E20 push

    1. Legacy fleet damage: Corrosion, hose degradation, and pump failures in pre-2023 vehicles.
    2. Efficiency loss: Lower energy density reduces mileage, disputed in magnitude.
    3. Food-fuel conflict: Diversion of rice, maize, and sugar feedstock risks food security in a bad monsoon.
    4. Water intensity: Sugarcane and maize cultivation for ethanol strains groundwater.
    5. Consumer information deficit: Rapid rollout without adequate advisories.
    6. Cost transparency: Different tax and costing regimes obscure whether ethanol lowers pump prices.

    Way Forward

    1. Phased communication: Issue clear manufacturer advisories on effects and maintenance for legacy vehicles.
    2. Feedstock diversification: Expand second-generation ethanol from residues to reduce grain diversion.
    3. Food-security buffer: Build safeguards to pause grain diversion during monsoon failure.
    4. Independent testing: Commission transparent, independent studies on legacy-vehicle impacts.
    5. Consumer redress: Provide guidance and support for owners of affected pre-2023 vehicles.

    PYQ Relevance

    “[2020] According to India’s National Policy on Biofuels, which of the following can be used as raw materials for the production of biofuels?

    1. Cassava

    2. Damaged wheat grains

    3. Groundnut seeds

    4. Horse gram

    5. Rotten potatoes

    6. Sugar beet

    (a) 1, 2, 5 and 6 only

    (b) 1, 3, 4 and 6 only

    (c) 2, 3, 4 and 5 only

    (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  • Tribal Council says Shompen concerns overlooked in the Great Nicobar Island project

    Why in the News?

    The Tribal Council of Great and Little Nicobar has raised concerns that the Great Nicobar Island (GNI) Project could lead to assimilation and disturbance of the Shompen, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG).

    What is the GNI Project?

    • Large infrastructure and township project in Great Nicobar.
    • Estimated cost: around ₹91,000 crore.
    • Includes a proposed power plant at Galathea, near Shompen settlements.

    Who are the Shompen?

    • Hunter-gatherer indigenous community.
    • Fewer than 300 members.
    • Recognised as a PVTG.
    • Their isolation makes contact, displacement and forced assimilation particularly sensitive.

    What are PVTGs?

    • PVTG = Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group: Identified based on characteristics such as:
    • Pre-agricultural technology
    • Low literacy
    • Stagnant or declining population
    • Economic backwardness
    • India recognises 75 PVTGs.

    Key Concerns

    • Assimilation: Proposal to shift the Shompen towards a modern lifestyle.
    • Displacement: Concern over possible settlement and relocation.
    • Consent: Questions regarding consultation over wildlife reserves and project decisions.
    • Health risks: Contact with isolated communities can expose them to diseases and other risks.
    • Assurance gap: Earlier assurance stated that the project would not disturb or displace the Shompen.

    Laws Protecting Tribal Rights

    • Forest Rights Act, 2006: Recognises individual and community forest rights.
    • PESA, 1996: Provides self-governance and consent provisions in Scheduled Areas.
    • Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Regulation, 1956: Restricts entry into tribal reserves.

    Government Initiatives

    • PM-JANMAN: Development of PVTG households and habitations.
    • Development of PVTGs Scheme: Habitat-specific support for 75 PVTGs.

    “[2009] In which one of the following places is the Shompen tribe found?

    (a) Nilgiri Hills

    (b) Nicobar Islands

    (c) Spiti Valley

    (d) Lakshwadeep Islands

  • China calls border generally stable after the 36th WMCC meeting

    Why in the news?

    China’s Foreign Ministry described the India-China border as generally stable, responding to reports of rising tensions in Arunachal Pradesh’s eastern sector. The statement followed the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on China-India Border Affairs, held the previous week. The exchange highlights how a diplomatic and military consultation mechanism, rather than a boundary settlement, is what currently manages face-offs along an undemarcated frontier.

    What is the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on China-India Border Affairs?

    1. About: The WMCC is an institutional mechanism, established in 2012, for diplomatic-level consultation and coordination on maintaining peace along the India-China border.
    2. Function: It provides a standing channel to communicate on border developments and defuse face-offs, and it does not itself negotiate the resolution of the boundary question.

    What is the Line of Actual Control (LAC)?

    1. About: The LAC is the notional line separating Indian-controlled and Chinese-controlled territory, and it is neither fully demarcated nor mutually agreed on the ground.
    2. Consequence: Because the boundary is undemarcated, patrols from the two sides at times face off against each other in areas of overlapping claims.

    What did the 36th WMCC meeting produce?

    1. Communication channels: The two sides agreed to maintain communication via diplomatic and military channels.
    2. Peace commitment: They agreed to jointly uphold peace and tranquillity in the border areas.
    3. Official framing: China’s Foreign Ministry described the situation as generally stable at the moment.

    What triggered the current concern in the eastern sector?

    1. Reported crossing: Reports last week suggested that Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops crossed the LAC at Pukar La and Ollo in the Taksing circle of Upper Subansiri.
    2. State-level denial: On 7 August the Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister denied reports of an incursion and said he would verify with the Army and local bodies.
    3. Indian framing: India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said the maintenance of peace and tranquillity in border areas was of utmost importance, and did not deny a reported rise in tensions since late July.
    4. Ground posture: The Army and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) are positioned to dominate the border and monitor Chinese activities.

    Why does the mechanism matter more than the label of stability?

    1. Undemarcated boundary: With no agreed line on the ground, incidents are inherent to patrolling and cannot be eliminated by declarations of stability.
    2. Existing protocols: Face-offs are resolved through existing mechanisms and protocols rather than through a settled boundary.
    3. Communication over settlement: The WMCC manages friction and keeps channels open, but it substitutes crisis management for a final resolution of the dispute.

    Conclusion

    The current status is that both sides publicly describe the border as generally stable and have agreed through the 36th WMCC meeting to keep diplomatic and military channels open. Reports of a PLA crossing in Upper Subansiri remain unconfirmed by officials. The next expected development is continued WMCC-level engagement and further border-area monitoring by the Army and the ITBP.

    Border Management with China: About

    1. Length and sectors: The India-China frontier runs about 3,488 km across three sectors, the western, middle, and eastern.
    2. Nature: The alignment follows the LAC, which is disputed and undemarcated in several stretches.
    3. Institutional layers: Border affairs are handled through the WMCC at the diplomatic level and the Special Representatives mechanism at the political level.

    Statutory and Agreement Framework Governing the India-China Border

    1. 1993 Agreement: Provided for maintaining peace and tranquillity along the LAC.
    2. 1996 Agreement: Established military confidence-building measures in the border areas.
    3. 2005 Protocol: Set modalities for implementing military confidence-building measures.
    4. 2012 mechanism: Created the WMCC as a standing consultation channel.
    5. 2013 Agreement: The Border Defence Cooperation Agreement laid down procedures to avoid escalation during face-offs.

    Government Initiatives for Border Areas

    1. Border Area Development Programme (BADP): Funds development of villages near international borders to improve access and living conditions.
    2. Border Infrastructure and Management (BIM) Scheme: Supports roads, fencing, floodlighting, and observation infrastructure along the borders.
    3. Vibrant Villages Programme: Targets comprehensive development of border villages, including those along the northern frontier, to check outmigration.

    Challenges in Border Management

    1. Undemarcated LAC: Differing perceptions of the line cause recurring patrol face-offs.
    2. Terrain and access: High-altitude terrain complicates infrastructure and rapid mobilisation.
    3. Infrastructure asymmetry: Faster construction on the Chinese side pressures Indian logistics.
    4. Grey-zone activity: Salami-slicing and forward patrolling test Indian positions below the threshold of conflict.
    5. Coordination: Multiple agencies guarding different stretches require tight inter-force coordination.

    Way Forward

    1. Accelerate infrastructure: Complete border roads, tunnels, and forward connectivity to match logistics needs.
    2. Strengthen mechanisms: Use WMCC and Special Representatives channels consistently to de-escalate.
    3. Border-area development: Expand BADP, BIM, and the Vibrant Villages Programme to anchor populations.
    4. Surveillance: Enhance ITBP and Army monitoring with technology-based domain awareness.

    “[2024 GS3 15m] India has a long and troubled border with China and Pakistan fraught with contentious issues. Examine the conflicting issues and security challenges along the border. Also give out the development being undertaken in these areas under the Border Area Development Programme (BADP) and Border Infrastructure and Management (BIM) Scheme.”

  • India examines the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement binding Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan

    Why in the news?

    Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan have signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a trilateral mutual defence pact that borrows the collective security logic of Article 5 of the NATO charter. The signing exposes a central question for New Delhi: whether the pact gives Pakistan a shield to escalate against India, or whether it is a loose instrument of strategic hedging without the integration of a real military alliance. India’s foreign ministry says it is tracking the situation carefully.

    What is the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement?

    1. About: A mutual defence pact among Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan, signed in 2026, that treats an armed attack on any one member as an attack on all.
    2. Design borrowing: It borrows elements of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) charter, including its collective security clause, marking a shift away from the US security umbrella toward regional self-reliance.

    What is Article 5 of the NATO charter?

    1. Collective defence clause: It commits every member to treat an armed attack against one member as an attack against all, and to assist in response.
    2. Why it matters here: The Mecca pact replicates this trigger among three states, which raises the question of how Turkey reconciles it with its existing NATO obligations.

    What is Operation Sindoor?

    1. About: An Indian military operation against terror infrastructure that serves as the reference case for how the three signatories behaved during an India-Pakistan confrontation.
    2. Behaviour observed: Turkey provided Pakistan diplomatic and rhetorical support and sold drones, but stopped short of tangible military assistance, and Saudi Arabia stayed silent.

    What are the three power centres the pact combines?

    1. Pakistan: A declared South Asian nuclear power contributing a powerful conventional military and a functional nuclear arsenal, though it is unclear whether Islamabad has offered a nuclear umbrella.
    2. Saudi Arabia: Provides political and financial clout as leader of the Sunni world and controller of one of the world’s largest oil reserves.
    3. Turkey: The successor of the Ottoman Empire, contributing a powerful military, NATO operational experience, and a highly capable defence industry.
    4. Stated adversaries: The unstated targets are Iran, leader of the Shia world with proxies including Hezbollah and Hamas across Yemen, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, and Israel, an intelligence powerhouse and undeclared nuclear power.

    What is the pattern of prior cooperation among the three?

    1. Bilateral base: Pakistan has provided military training and technical assistance to Saudi Arabian forces for decades.
    2. September 2025 pact: Riyadh and Islamabad signed a bilateral Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement, which evolved into the trilateral Mecca Agreement with Ankara’s participation.
    3. Force deployment: Pakistan deployed some 8,000 troops, a squadron of JF-17 fighter aircraft, drones, and HQ-9 air defence systems to Saudi Arabia.
    4. Financial and naval ties: Riyadh has repeatedly provided financial bailouts to Islamabad, and Turkey and Pakistan have exchanged warships and training aircraft.

    Why does the pact worry India directly?

    1. Cold War precedent: Pakistan has a long record of hitching its wagon to pacts to oblige Western powers and gain geopolitical advantage against India, joining the Southeast Asia Treaty Organisation (SEATO) in 1954 to secure advanced weaponry for its struggle over Jammu and Kashmir.
    2. Global South rivalry: Saudi Arabia and Turkey are seen as piggybacking on Pakistan to seek a bigger strategic role in Asia and to challenge India’s ambition to lead the Global South.
    3. Forum coordination: The bloc can coordinate positions in international forums such as the United Nations (UN) and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on issues including Kashmir and maritime security.
    4. Technology integration: Turkish defence industry output, funded by Saudi capital and deployed in Pakistan, can enhance Rawalpindi’s capabilities in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), electronic warfare, and naval platforms.

    Is this an “Islamic NATO” or strategic hedging? (the central tension)

    1. Case against alarm: Calling it an Islamic NATO is premature because NATO’s efficacy relies on a unified command, pre-assigned forces, and deep interoperability, while the Mecca pact lacks an integrated military headquarters, joint command mechanisms, and institutionalised doctrine.
    2. Divergent priorities: Saudi Arabia is focused on hedging against Iran and Houthi threats, Turkey on defence exports and Islamic-world leadership, and Pakistan on economic bailouts and leverage against India.
    3. Legal limit on the trigger: Mutual defence treaties apply strictly to unprovoked external aggression, so Indian counter-terrorism strikes against Pakistani terror infrastructure do not constitute a treaty trigger.
    4. Saudi restraint: Riyadh’s relationship with New Delhi has evolved into a multi-billion-dollar strategic partnership spanning energy, trade, and intelligence, and the Saudi Crown Prince has no interest in being dragged into a South Asian military conflict.

    How could the interlocking alliances backfire?

    1. World War I analogy: A matrix of interlocking military alliances of exactly this kind triggered World War I, and repeating that blunder would be a serious risk.
    2. Unreconciled obligations: If Israel strikes a Saudi facility and Turkey responds under the Mecca pact, it is unclear whether the 32 NATO countries would be treaty-bound to support Turkey.
    3. Operational hedging: Saudi Arabia’s passivity when Pakistan clashed with Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s non-involvement when Saudi Arabia faced Iranian and Houthi strikes, show these pacts often pair political rhetoric with operational hedging.

    How has the military balance on India’s borders shifted?

    1. Strike corps repurposed: The Indian Army converted a 60,000-strong strike corps configured for the India-Pakistan border into a mountain strike corps for the China border.
    2. Divisions reassigned: Two mountain divisions raised over the last two decades were assigned entirely to the China border.
    3. Earmarking change: Where 70 per cent of the Indian Army was once earmarked for the Pakistan border, only about 55 per cent is today.

    What should India’s calibrated response be?

    1. Discreet engagement: Engage Saudi Arabia candidly through high-level channels to secure assurances that the pact’s defensive clauses apply only to the West Asian theatre and cannot be weaponised by Pakistan.
    2. Firm deterrence: Maintain a firm deterrence doctrine so that Indian responses to state-sponsored terrorism remain resolute and unaffected by third-party arrangements.
    3. Gulf partnerships: Double down on bilateral economic, trade, and strategic partnerships with Saudi Arabia and the broader Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
    4. Technology watch: Monitor Turkey-Pakistan military-industrial co-development and prioritise indigenous research to neutralise advanced drones, electronic warfare, and naval platforms.
    5. Procurement reform: Fast-track defence procurement, which has been slowed by bureaucratic caution since the Bofors scandal.

    Conclusion

    The Mecca Agreement is best understood less as a binding warfighting alliance and more as an instrument of strategic hedging for a volatile region, fusing Saudi capital, Turkish technology, and Pakistani manpower into a collective deterrence shield. The central idea is that its danger to India lies not in an immediate collective-defence trigger but in the technology integration and diplomatic bloc it creates. A pragmatic Indian strategy combines firm counter-terrorism deterrence, deep economic engagement in the Gulf, and targeted defence innovation at home.

    West Asian Security Architecture: About

    1. US umbrella in retreat: The United States has signalled limits on its security guarantees to West Asian allies, prompting states to seek self-reliance.
    2. Israeli posture: Israel has demonstrated through its bombing of Iran-linked targets that it will accept no restraints on its perceived security interests.
    3. Realignment: Riyadh, Ankara, and Islamabad have come together in response, marking a shift away from dependence on Washington.

    Back2Basics: Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)

    1. Convening body: An intergovernmental organisation of Muslim-majority states that coordinates political and economic positions.
    2. Relevance: The Mecca bloc can use the OIC to coordinate positions on issues including Kashmir.
    3. India’s stance: India is not a member and has consistently rejected OIC pronouncements on Kashmir as interference in internal affairs.

    Challenges for India from the pact

    1. Diplomatic bloc formation: A formal political grouping can coordinate against Indian interests at the UN and OIC.
    2. Capability transfer: Turkish drone, electronic warfare, and naval technology reaching Pakistan raises the conventional threat.
    3. Two-front pressure: Deeper Pakistan alignments complicate India’s management of simultaneous China and Pakistan borders.
    4. Gulf balancing: India must protect its expanding Saudi and Gulf partnerships without endorsing the pact.
    5. Escalation ambiguity: Uncertainty over how the collective clause would be read in a crisis raises the risk of miscalculation.

    Way Forward

    1. Bilateral reassurance: Secure written or channelled Saudi and Emirati assurances that the pact excludes India-Pakistan sub-conventional conflict.
    2. Deterrence signalling: Communicate that counter-terror responses will remain resolute and unlinked to third-party pacts.
    3. Indigenous capability: Accelerate counter-drone, electronic warfare, and naval research, seeking foreign partners ahead in these fields.
    4. Economic anchoring: Deepen Gulf trade and energy ties to make India indispensable to Riyadh’s long-term economic vision.
    5. Procurement speed: Streamline defence acquisition to close capability gaps quickly.

    “[2023 GS2 15m] ‘The expansion and strengthening of NATO and a stronger US-Europe strategic partnership works well in India.’ What is your opinion about this statement? Give reasons and examples to support your answer.”

  • Parliamentary panel questions govt on de-dollarisation agenda for the 18th BRICS Summit

    Members of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs have asked the government whether it will push a de-dollarisation agenda at the 18th BRICS Summit, which New Delhi hosts in September 2026. The question exposes a tension between the pursuit of greater financial sovereignty and the risk of provoking US retaliation. India holds the rotating chairship of BRICS through 2026, which makes the host nation’s posture on the dollar a live diplomatic choice rather than an abstract one.

    What is de-dollarisation?

    1. About: De-dollarisation is a deliberate reduction in the use of the US dollar for international trade invoicing, cross-border settlement, and foreign exchange reserves.
    2. Mechanism: Countries settle bilateral trade in their own national currencies or through a shared settlement arrangement, bypassing dollar clearing and dollar-denominated payment channels.

    What is BRICS?

    1. About: BRICS is an intergovernmental grouping originally of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, later expanded to admit new members, that coordinates positions on trade, finance, and reform of global governance.
    2. Chairship: The chairship rotates annually among members, and India assumed it on 1 January 2026 and leads the bloc until the end of the year.

    What is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)?

    1. About: A CBDC is a digital form of a country’s sovereign currency issued and backed by its central bank, distinct from private cryptocurrencies.
    2. Relevance here: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has repeatedly advocated linking the official digital currencies of BRICS countries to facilitate cross-border trade and tourism payments.

    Why is the parliamentary panel pressing the government?

    1. Direct question posed: The panel asked whether the government plans to push a de-dollarisation agenda at the summit New Delhi hosts in September.
    2. Financial sovereignty framing: Members questioned why the government was not pursuing greater financial sovereignty that could help countries bypass US sanctions.
    3. Host-nation leverage: They sought to know whether India, as the host nation, would push a BRICS-led de-dollarisation agenda.
    4. Stalled precedent cited: Members noted that India’s effort to establish a local currency trade mechanism with Russia had not taken off.

    What is the case for reducing dollar reliance?

    1. RBI framework: The central bank has argued that linking BRICS digital currencies could reduce reliance on the US dollar amid rising geopolitical tensions.
    2. Sanctions insulation: A shared settlement mechanism would let member economies transact even when cut off from dollar clearing systems.
    3. Payment efficiency: Direct local currency settlement lowers conversion costs in cross-border trade and tourism payments.

    Why does a de-dollarisation push carry risks?

    1. US retaliation threat: The US President has repeatedly warned BRICS countries against creating an alternative currency or challenging the dollar’s dominance, threatening punitive tariffs.
    2. Weak internal record: India’s own local currency trade mechanism with Russia has not taken off, exposing the practical difficulty of moving away from the dollar.
    3. Host-nation exposure: As chair and host, a visible Indian push would identify New Delhi with the agenda and concentrate any retaliatory response on it.

    Conclusion

    The panel has flagged the gap between the RBI’s advocacy for a BRICS payments architecture and the government’s caution on committing to de-dollarisation. The immediate status is that the government has not confirmed whether it will table the agenda. The next milestone is the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi in September 2026, where India’s posture as chair will become clear.

    About BRICS

    1. Origin: The term BRIC was coined in 2001, the first leaders’ summit was held in 2009, and South Africa joined in 2010 to make it BRICS.
    2. Expansion: The bloc admitted new members from 2024 onward, widening its economic and geographic weight.
    3. Institutions: BRICS created the New Development Bank (NDB), headquartered in Shanghai, and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) to provide financing and liquidity support.
    4. Weight: The grouping represents a large share of the world’s population and a substantial share of global output, giving it standing in debates over multilateral reform.

    Back2Basics: New Development Bank (NDB)

    1. Convening body: Established by BRICS members to fund infrastructure and sustainable development projects.
    2. Headquarters: Shanghai, China.
    3. Function: Lends to member and partner economies, part of the bloc’s push to build financial institutions parallel to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    “[2025] Consider the following statements with regard to BRICS:

    I. The 16th BRICS Summit was held under the Chairship of Russia in Kazan.

    II. Indonesia has become a full member of BRICS.

    III. The theme of the 16th BRICS Summit was Strengthening Multilateralism for Just Global Development and Security.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) I and II

    (b) II and III

    (c) I and III

    (d) I only

  • Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls; Telangana Congress warns 73 lakh voters face removal

    Why in the news?

    The Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee urged the Election Commission to re verify the 73 lakh voters proposed for deletion under the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the State. The controversy has exposed a tension between an inclusion driven history of the franchise and a revision that critics say works on a presumption of exclusion. The draft voters’ list is due on 17 August.

    What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?

    1. Definition: The Special Intensive Revision is an exercise by the Election Commission to intensively update and verify electoral rolls, involving field verification of existing electors.
    2. Deletion mechanism: Electors flagged as ineligible or unverified are proposed for deletion and published in a draft roll for objection.
    3. Onus on the elector: The revision requires electors to establish continued eligibility, which critics read as a presumption of exclusion.

    What is the Election Commission of India?

    1. Constitutional authority: The Election Commission of India is the constitutional body under Article 324 responsible for superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections.
    2. Composition: It presently functions as a multi member body of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners.
    3. Roll preparation: It prepares and periodically revises the electoral rolls on which the franchise depends.

    What is the current status of the franchise and roll revision in India?

    1. Universal adult franchise: Every citizen aged 18 and above is entitled to be registered as a voter, an entitlement extended from age 21 originally.
    2. Historical inclusion drive: In the first election of 1952 the Commission worked to register 80 million eligible women, though 2.8 million were struck off for refusing to be recorded by name rather than as the wife or daughter of a man.
    3. Gender gap closed: The gender gap in voting closed by 2019, marking the maturation of electoral equality into lived equality.
    4. Draft roll timeline: In Telangana the draft roll is scheduled for 17 August, with 73 lakh electors proposed for deletion under the SIR.

    Constitutional provisions related to elections and the electoral roll:

    1. Article 324: Vests superintendence, direction and control of elections and roll preparation in the Election Commission.
    2. Article 325: Bars exclusion from the electoral roll on grounds of religion, race, caste or sex, and provides one general roll for every constituency.
    3. Article 326: Establishes elections to the House of the People and State Assemblies on the basis of adult suffrage.
    4. Article 327: Empowers Parliament to make provision on all matters relating to elections, including preparation of electoral rolls.

    What are the concerns raised in Telangana?

    1. Scale of proposed deletion: The Telangana Congress flagged 73 lakh voters proposed for deletion and sought detailed re verification before any removal.
    2. Genuine electors at risk: It maintained that genuine electors should not be removed without thorough scrutiny.
    3. Opportunity to establish eligibility: It demanded that every genuine voter be given a chance to establish eligibility before deletion.
    4. Draft roll deadline pressure: With the draft list due on 17 August, the window to correct wrongful deletions is compressed.

    Why does the revision reopen the inclusion versus exclusion tension?

    1. Presumption of exclusion: The current SIR appears to work on the presumption of exclusion, in contrast to the 1952 drive that worked to include the eligible.
    2. Own name weaponised: Ownership of one’s own name, which historically announced gender electoral equality, has been turned against women in online attacks on female protesters.
    3. Gendered doxxing: Women who joined recent protests were doxxed, with names, numbers and addresses uploaded and abuse directed at them.
    4. Paternalistic framing: Public remarks singling out the conduct of women protesters divided the participants along gendered lines while ignoring identical conduct by men.
    5. Erosion of an old promise: The revision and the online abuse together strain the founding promise of equality regardless of gender.

    What are the major debates surrounding electoral roll revision?

    1. Purity versus inclusion: A roll must exclude ineligible entries while not disenfranchising genuine electors, and the SIR is contested on which side it errs.
    2. Burden of proof: Placing the onus on the elector to prove eligibility risks excluding the poor, the mobile and the marginalised.
    3. Timeline adequacy: A compressed objection window after a large proposed deletion raises due process concerns.
    4. Federal and political friction: State units allege that mass deletions fall unevenly, injecting the revision into electoral competition.

    Conclusion: The SIR in Telangana has proposed 73 lakh voters for deletion, and the State Congress has demanded re verification before any removal. The dispute turns on whether the revision presumes inclusion or exclusion of the eligible voter. The draft rolls are due on 17 August, after which the objection and correction process will determine the final deletions.

    Back2Basics: Election Commission of India

    1. Constitutional basis: Article 324, with the Commission established on 25 January 1950.
    2. Composition: Chief Election Commissioner and such number of Election Commissioners as the President fixes, currently a multi member body.
    3. Tenure and removal: The Chief Election Commissioner is removable only by the process applicable to a Supreme Court judge, securing independence.
    4. Functions: Superintends roll preparation, conducts elections to Parliament, State legislatures and the offices of President and Vice President, and resolves disputes on splits and mergers of recognised parties.
    5. Statutory backing: The Representation of the People Acts of 1950 and 1951 govern roll preparation and the conduct of elections.

    Way Forward:

    1. Verification before deletion: Require field verification and notice to the elector before any name is struck off.
    2. Accessible appeal: Provide accessible objection and appeal mechanisms with adequate time after the draft roll.
    3. Protect vulnerable electors: Design safeguards so that the poor, migrants and women identified by their own names are not wrongly excluded.
    4. Transparency of criteria: Publish the deletion criteria and category wise data to allow public scrutiny.
    5. Grievance redress: Establish a time bound grievance channel for wrongful deletions before the final roll.

    “[2017] Consider the following statements:

    1. The Election Commission of India is a five-member body.

    2. Union Ministry of Home Affairs decides the election schedule for the conduct of both general elections and bye-elections.

    3. Election Commission resolves the disputes relating to splits/mergers of recognized political parties.

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 2 and 3 only

    (d) 3 only

  • Parliament passes Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026 renaming State Keralam

    Why in the news?

    Parliament passed the Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026, renaming the State Keralam and amending the First Schedule of the Constitution. The Rajya Sabha cleared the Bill by voice vote, over two years after the State Assembly unanimously resolved for the change. The measure has surfaced pending name change proposals from other States, including West Bengal’s request to become Bangla.

    How is a State renamed under the Constitution?

    1. Article 3 power: Parliament may by law alter the name of a State, and such a bill can be introduced only on the recommendation of the President.
    2. State legislature reference: The President must refer the bill to the concerned State legislature for its views within a specified period, though those views are not binding.
    3. First Schedule amendment: Renaming requires an amendment to the First Schedule, which lists the States and Union Territories, effected under Article 4 as an ordinary law.

    What is the Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026?

    1. Core change: The Bill changes the name of the State from Kerala to Keralam and makes the consequential amendment to the First Schedule.
    2. Origin: It continues the Kerala Assembly’s 2024 resolution urging the Union government to rename the State Keralam.
    3. Passage: The Lok Sabha passed it on Tuesday and the Rajya Sabha by voice vote on Wednesday, with all MPs supporting the rename.

    What is the current status of State name changes in India?

    1. Precedents: Madras became Tamil Nadu, and several States and cities have been renamed over the decades.
    2. Pending proposals: West Bengal’s proposal to become Bangla has been pending for eight years, and members sought renaming of other States, cities and railway stations.
    3. Ordinary majority: A First Schedule amendment for renaming is passed as an ordinary law, not requiring the special majority reserved for other constitutional amendments.
    4. Linguistic basis: Keralam is the Malayalam name of the State, and the change reflects respect for regional language identity.

    Constitutional provisions related to State renaming:

    1. Article 3: Empowers Parliament to form new States and to alter areas, boundaries or names of existing States.
    2. Article 4: Provides that laws under Articles 2 and 3, including consequential First Schedule and Fourth Schedule amendments, are not deemed constitutional amendments under Article 368.
    3. First Schedule: Lists the States and Union Territories and their territories, amended to record the new name.
    4. Article 3 proviso: Requires presidential recommendation and reference to the State legislature before introduction.

    What does the Bill do procedurally?

    1. Amends the First Schedule: Substitutes Keralam for Kerala in the constitutional list of States.
    2. Consequential amendments: Makes the necessary changes so that references in law read as Keralam.
    3. Voice vote clearance: Passed in the Upper House by voice vote with cross party support during the Monsoon Session.

    How does renaming differ from creating or altering a State?

    1. Name only: Renaming changes only the label, leaving territory, boundaries and administrative structure intact.
    2. Same Article, different effect: Article 3 covers both renaming and territorial reorganisation, but renaming carries no boundary or population change.
    3. No special majority: Both are enacted by simple majority under Article 4, unlike amendments under Article 368.

    What are the major debates surrounding State renaming?

    1. Federal courtesy: Members urged that the Union work closely with States and respect regional languages, framing the change within cooperative federalism.
    2. Pending parity: The eight year delay on West Bengal’s Bangla proposal raised the question of consistent and timely treatment of State requests.
    3. Symbolic versus substantive: One member argued the Centre should change its behaviour on disaster funding, not just the name, contrasting symbolic recognition with substantive support.

    Conclusion: Parliament has passed the Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026, renaming the State Keralam and amending the First Schedule under Article 3. The change gives effect to the Kerala Assembly’s 2024 resolution and reflects the State’s Malayalam identity. The next step is presidential assent, after which the First Schedule stands amended.

    Back2Basics: First Schedule and States reorganisation

    1. First Schedule: Lists the 28 States and 8 Union Territories with their territorial extents.
    2. States Reorganisation Act, 1956: Reorganised State boundaries largely on linguistic lines, the framework within which Kerala was formed.
    3. Renaming precedents: Madras to Tamil Nadu (1969), Mysore to Karnataka (1973), Uttaranchal to Uttarakhand (2007), and Orissa to Odisha (2011).
    4. Process anchor: Article 3 read with Article 4 governs formation, alteration and renaming of States.
  • Supreme Court clarifies scope of police custody under Section 187(2) BNSS

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court held in The State of Andhra Pradesh vs Suda Suresh Veera Venkata Naga Raju that Section 187(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 enlarges the window during which police custody may be sought. The ruling has exposed the difference between the new code and the old regime, under which police custody was confined to the first 15 days of remand alone. Police custody is now available in parts, though in aggregate not exceeding 15 days, during the first 40 or 60 days of detention.

    What is Section 187(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?

    1. Governing provision: Section 187 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the criminal procedure code that replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, governs the detention of an accused when investigation cannot be completed in 24 hours.
    2. Enlarged window: Under Section 187(2), a magistrate may authorise detention not exceeding 15 days in the whole, or in parts, at any time during the initial 40 days or 60 days of a total detention period of 60 or 90 days.

    What is default bail?

    1. Definition: Where investigation is not completed within the stipulated period, the accused becomes entitled to release, widely known as default bail.
    2. Time limits under Section 187(3): Judicial detention may extend up to 90 days for offences punishable with death, life imprisonment or imprisonment of 10 years or more, and up to 60 days for any other offence.

    What is the current status of pre-trial custody rights in India?

    1. Twenty four hour rule: Section 58 of the BNSS provides that a person arrested without warrant cannot be detained beyond 24 hours without a magistrate’s authorisation under Section 187.
    2. Fifteen day cap on police custody: Police custody remains capped at 15 days in aggregate, but may now be spread across the early investigation period rather than the first 15 days alone.
    3. Right to counsel: Section 38 of the BNSS entitles an arrested person to meet an advocate of choice during interrogation, though not throughout interrogation.
    4. Recording safeguard: Audio visual recording of the actual interrogation and of any discovery or recovery satisfies the transparency requirement.

    Constitutional provisions related to arrest and detention:

    1. Article 22(1): Guarantees the right to be informed of grounds of arrest and to consult a legal practitioner of choice.
    2. Article 22(2): Requires production before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours of arrest.
    3. Article 21: Protects life and personal liberty, permitting deprivation only by a just, fair and reasonable procedure established by law.
    4. Article 20(3): Protects against self incrimination, relevant to the presence of counsel during interrogation.

    What did the Supreme Court hold?

    1. No absolute outer limit: A magistrate cannot place an absolute and non extendable outer limit on custody, since such a limit forecloses recourse to Section 187(2) of the BNSS.
    2. Purpose of the change: The enlarged window is intended to meet situations where fresh facts, discoveries or leads emerge during the course of investigation.
    3. Additional custody granted: The Court permitted 7 days of additional police custody so that the total police remand would not exceed 15 days.
    4. Facts of the case: In a custodial death case the victim’s body remained untraced, the original CCTV hard disks were yet to be discovered, and recoveries under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam were imminent.

    How does the new remand window differ from the old code?

    1. Old Section 167 CrPC: Detention in police custody could not be granted beyond the initial 15 days in the whole under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
    2. Alteration within the window: Even under the old code, during the first 15 days a magistrate could alter custody from judicial to police and back.
    3. New flexibility: Under the BNSS police custody may be sought in parts across the first 40 or 60 days, keeping the aggregate at 15 days.

    What did the Court hold on the presence of an advocate?

    1. Not continuous: Section 38 does not contemplate the continuous, ongoing physical presence of an advocate for the entirety of each interrogation session.
    2. Line of sight: The advocate may remain present within the site of interrogation from where he can see the accused, but not throughout the questioning.
    3. Recording over escort videography: Instead of uninterrupted videography of the accused in transit, audio visual recording of the interrogation and of any recovery meets the requirement.

    What are the major debates surrounding the enlarged custody window?

    1. Liberty versus investigation: Spreading police custody across 40 or 60 days risks repeated custodial spells, weighed against the need to pursue late emerging leads.
    2. Magistrate’s discretion: The ruling limits a magistrate’s power to foreclose future custody, raising the question of how liberty is protected during the extended window.
    3. Counsel access: The line of sight standard for the advocate leaves open how effectively the right against coercion is protected during interrogation.

    Way Forward:

    1. Reasoned remand orders: Require magistrates to record specific reasons linking each spell of police custody to investigative need.
    2. Guard against repeat custody: Frame guidelines to prevent the enlarged window becoming a route to successive custodial spells.
    3. Effective counsel access: Clarify practical standards for an advocate’s presence to protect against coercion.
    4. Mandatory recording compliance: Ensure audio visual recording of interrogation and recovery is uniformly implemented and preserved.
    5. Judicial training: Orient magistrates on the new remand architecture to balance liberty with investigation.

    Conclusion:

    The Court has clarified that police custody under the BNSS is capped at 15 days in aggregate but may be sought in parts through the first 40 or 60 days of investigation, not the first 15 days alone. The ruling reflects the legislative intent to accommodate fresh discoveries during a probe. The interpretation now governs how magistrates authorise and structure police remand under the new code.

    Back2Basics:

    BNSS, BNS and BSA

    1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as the substantive criminal law.
    2. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governing procedure, arrest, investigation and trial.
    3. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 governing admissibility of evidence.
    4. Effective date: The three codes came into force on 1 July 2024.
    5. Zero FIR and e-FIR: The BNSS recognises registration of a First Information Report irrespective of jurisdiction and enables electronic reporting.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2026] Which of the following statements about a Zero First Information Report (Zero FIR) under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 is/are correct?

    1. A Zero FIR can be lodged at a police station, even though the place of commission of a cognizable/non-cognizable offence is outside the territorial jurisdiction of that police station. 2. The Officer-in-Charge of the police station where a Zero FIR has been lodged may, with the permission of the competent authority, initiate a preliminary enquiry. 3. Under Zero FIR, it is obligatory for the informant to furnish information electronically.

    (a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 and 3 (c) 1 and 3 (d) 1 only

    Answer: D

  • NCSC to review Union de-reservation proposals of last three years

    The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has decided to comprehensively review all proposals from the Centre over the last three years to dereserve government posts. The decision has exposed a running clash between the Commission and Union departments over the practice of filling reserved vacancies as unreserved ones, particularly in promotion vacancies. The Commission holds that such proposals are often incomplete and fail to show alternate efforts to fill reserved posts.

    What is de-reservation?

    1. Definition: De-reservation is the practice of filling a reserved vacancy as an unreserved one, permitted only in exceptional circumstances.
    2. General ban: Department of Personnel and Training rules impose a general ban on dereserving posts, with very specific exceptions.
    3. Direct recruitment exception: A direct recruitment vacancy may be dereserved only where a Group A service vacancy cannot be allowed to remain vacant in public interest.

    What is the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC)?

    1. Constitutional body: The NCSC is a constitutional body established under Article 338 to safeguard the interests of Scheduled Castes against exploitation and to ensure their social, economic and educational advancement.
    2. Composition: It consists of a Chairperson, a Vice Chairperson and three other members appointed by the President.
    3. Advisory role on de-reservation: Any de-reservation proposal must first be examined by the Commission before it proceeds further.

    What is the current status of reservation in India?

    1. Category wise quotas: Scheduled Castes hold 15 per cent, Scheduled Tribes 7.5 per cent, Other Backward Classes 27 per cent for the non creamy layer, and Economically Weaker Sections 10 per cent.
    2. Ceiling position: The judicially settled ceiling on reservation is 50 per cent, subject to exceptions such as the EWS quota upheld by the Supreme Court.
    3. Promotion reservation: Reservation in promotions for SCs and STs is permitted subject to data on backwardness, inadequate representation and administrative efficiency.
    4. Backlog and de-reservation: Reserved vacancies that remain unfilled generate a recurring pressure to dereserve, which the Commission is now examining across the last three years.

    Constitutional provisions related to reservation:

    1. Article 338: Establishes the NCSC and empowers it to investigate and monitor safeguards for Scheduled Castes, with the powers of a civil court.
    2. Article 16(4): Enables reservation in appointments for backward classes inadequately represented in state services.
    3. Article 16(4A): Enables reservation in promotions with consequential seniority for SCs and STs inadequately represented.
    4. Article 335: Requires that SC and ST claims be considered consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration.
    5. Article 341: Empowers the President to specify the castes deemed Scheduled Castes for a State or Union Territory.

    Why is the NCSC reviewing de-reservation proposals now?

    1. Recurring incompleteness: The Commission found that de-reservation proposals are often incomplete and do not reveal the alternate efforts made to fill the reserved posts.
    2. Consistent rejection: In four of the five Full Commission meetings held since 2024, de-reservation featured high on the agenda, and none of the proposals was agreed to by the NCSC.
    3. Spread of proposals: Proposals came for posts in public sector undertakings and in the Ministries of Law and of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Narcotics Control Bureau, the Central Reserve Police Force and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
    4. Objection window extended: Nudging by the Commission led the Department of Personnel and Training to double the time SC and ST Commissions get to object, from two weeks to one month.
    5. Systemic remedy sought: The June 4 Full Commission meeting resolved to examine recurring issues and formulate recommendations for effective implementation of the reservation policy.

    What is the procedure for de-reservation?

    1. First scrutiny: A proposal is examined first by the National Commissions for SCs, STs or OBCs, whichever is applicable.
    2. Committee of Secretaries: It then goes to a Committee of Secretaries of the concerned Department, the Department of Personnel and Training and the Social Justice Ministry.
    3. Final authority in direct recruitment: The final decision rests with the Minister of Personnel and Training.
    4. Weaker check in promotions: For promotion vacancies, the recruiting Department or Ministry retains the final say even though it must submit a proposal to the National Commissions and the Department of Personnel and Training.
    5. Alternatives suggested: The Commission proposed that departments explore deputation or short term contracts to fill reserved vacancies with eligible SC candidates rather than dereserving them.

    What are the major debates surrounding de-reservation?

    1. Public interest versus social justice: The Group A public interest exception is contested where it is used to bypass the effort to find eligible reserved candidates.
    2. Weak promotion safeguard: The Commission’s objection carries less weight for promotion vacancies, where the recruiting Ministry retains the final say.
    3. Efficiency argument: Departments invoke administrative efficiency under Article 335, while the Commission stresses the mandate to fill reserved posts first.
    4. Data transparency: The dispute turns on whether departments disclose the alternate efforts and backlog data that justify de-reservation.

    Conclusion: The NCSC has decided to review all Union de-reservation proposals of the last three years and to formulate recommendations on their recurring shortcomings. The immediate friction is the Commission’s finding that such proposals hide the alternate efforts made to fill reserved posts. The next step is the Commission’s examination of the flagged proposals and its recommendations to secure effective implementation of the reservation policy.

    Back2Basics: National Commission for Scheduled Castes

    1. Governing provision: Article 338 of the Constitution.
    2. Origin: Created in its present form by the 89th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003, which bifurcated the earlier combined Commission for SCs and STs.
    3. Composition: Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and three other members appointed by the President by warrant.
    4. Powers: Investigates and monitors safeguards, inquires into specific complaints, and has the powers of a civil court while inquiring.
    5. Reporting: Submits reports to the President, which are laid before Parliament.

    Way Forward:

    1. Mandatory disclosure: Require every de-reservation proposal to attach the record of alternate efforts and the backlog position.
    2. Strengthen promotion check: Give the Commission a binding role in promotion vacancy de-reservation, not merely a consultative one.
    3. Backlog drives: Conduct special recruitment drives to clear reserved vacancy backlogs before considering de-reservation.
    4. Time bound examination: Use the extended one month window to ensure substantive scrutiny rather than lapse by default.
    5. Deputation and contract routes: Institutionalise deputation and short term contracts to keep reserved posts within the reservation policy.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2018 GS2 10m] Whether National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) can enforce the implementation of constitutional reservation for the Scheduled Castes in the religious minority institutions? Examine.”

  • Inquiry committee finds charges proved against Justice Yashwant Varma; removal under Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

    Why in the News?

    A three member inquiry committee found all three charges proved against former judge Justice Yashwant Varma over unexplained burnt currency found at his official residence. The key issue is whether Parliament can continue the removal process after his resignation.

    Judicial Removal Process

    Under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968:

    1. Motion: Signed by 100 Lok Sabha or 50 Rajya Sabha members.
    2. Admission: Speaker/Chairman may admit or reject it.
    3. Inquiry Committee: Supreme Court Judge, Chief Justice of a High Court, and Distinguished jurist
    4. Parliamentary approval: Motion must pass in both Houses by:
      • Majority of total membership, and
      • 2/3 of members present and voting
    5. Final removal: President issues the removal order.

    Constitutional Provisions

    • Article 124(4): Removal of Supreme Court judges for proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
    • Article 124(5): Parliament can regulate the inquiry procedure.
    • Articles 217 & 218: Apply the removal framework to High Court judges.
    • Article 121: Parliament cannot discuss a judge’s conduct except during a removal motion.

    Varma Inquiry: Three Charges

    1. Unexplained cash: Burnt currency found at his official residence.
    2. Evidence preservation: Failure to preserve the material evidence.
    3. Evasive explanations: Committee found his explanations misleading and unsupported.

    Key Constitutional Issue

    • Removal motion was admitted before his resignation.
    • The law does not expressly clarify whether proceedings can continue after resignation.
    • The issue therefore exposes a legal gap concerning post resignation proceedings and consequences for pension and other benefits.

    “[2019] Consider the following statements:

    1. The motion to impeach a Judge of the Supreme Court of India cannot be rejected by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as per the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

    2. The Constitution of India defines and gives details of what constitutes “incapacity and proved misbehaviour” of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India.

    3. The details of the process of impeachment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India are given in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

    4. If the motion for the impeachment of a Judge is taken up for voting, the law requires the motion to be backed by each House of the Parliament and supported by a majority of total membership of that House and by not less than two-thirds of total members of that House present and voting.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 2 (b) 3 only (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 3 and 4