💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Climate Change

1. Global Warming and Issues
2. All about Pollution

  • Should India take global leadership on climate change?

    Introduction

    Global momentum on climate change is waning. The U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the EU’s cautious stance, and Brazil’s focus on implementation have created a leadership vacuum. India, backed by consistent domestic policies and credible renewable achievements, is being viewed as a stabilising force in climate negotiations.

    Current Global Context and India’s Position

    • Leadership Vacuum: Developed economies show declining enthusiasm for climate leadership due to economic pressures and energy insecurity.
    • India’s Steady Role: India maintains policy continuity and cross-party consensus on climate goals, avoiding divisive politics.
    • Emerging ‘Axis of Good’: Expanding partnerships with Europe, Brazil, and developing nations for climate technology and forest cooperation.
    • Implementation Emphasis: COP30 expected to focus on execution of existing commitments rather than new pledges.

    The Financing Challenge and Implementation Gap

    1. Adaptation Finance Deficit: Global climate finance needs estimated at $1.3 trillion annually by 2035, highlighting dependence on private and multilateral funding.
    2. Means of Implementation: Finance, technology transfer, and capacity building remain central to effective execution.
    3. Blended Finance Approach: Encourages combining public, private, and philanthropic resources for adaptation sectors like agriculture and water.
    4. Pipeline Creation: Necessitates project,ready mechanisms at the national and state levels to attract investments.

    India’s Achievements and Strategic Leverage

    1. Emission Stabilisation: Power sector emissions plateaued as renewable integration expands.
    2. Renewable Leadership: Non,fossil fuel sources account for ~50% of installed power capacity.
    3. Decoupling Trend: Energy demand growth no longer proportional to emissions growth, indicating structural change.
    4. Green Industry Shift: Corporate groups (Adani, Reliance) invest heavily in green hydrogen, solar, and renewables driven by market value creation.

    Adaptation,Driven Growth and Dual,Benefit Projects

    1. Integrated Projects: Initiatives like PM,KUSUM use solar energy in agriculture, reducing diesel dependence and improving income security.
    2. Co,benefit Design: Projects combining adaptation (resilience) and mitigation (emission reduction) yield long,term sustainability.
    3. Sectoral Innovation: Solar,powered cold,chain storage and electric buses illustrate scalable, cost,efficient climate solutions.
    4. Aggregation Advantage: National,scale schemes can reduce costs, increase service access, and enhance local resilience.

    Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Adaptation Planning

    1. Current Commitment: 50% of power capacity from non,fossil sources by 2030; aligned with Paris Agreement goals.
    2. Green Hydrogen Linkage: Recognition of renewable energy’s role in hydrogen production can strengthen India’s NDC profile.
    3. Industrial Decarbonisation: Industry identified as a “hard,to,abate” sector; emphasis on electrification, alternative materials, and carbon markets.
    4. Adaptation Priority List: Proposal for a “wish list” of adaptation projects under carbon markets, adaptable by States.
    5. Carbon Market Strategy: Promotes participation in high value areas (solar + storage) rather than single,stream credits.

    Should India Lead Globally?

    1. Moral Credibility: Low per capita emissions and proactive domestic policy lend legitimacy to India’s global stance.
    2. Strategic Interest: Leadership enhances India’s role in shaping financial flows and green technology frameworks.
    3. Implementation Expertise: India’s experience with renewable deployment and welfare,linked schemes adds operational credibility.
    4. Risk and Responsibility: Global leadership must balance ambition with developmental imperatives for energy access and equity.

    Conclusion

    India’s leadership on climate change is neither symbolic nor premature, it is pragmatic, equity,driven, and implementation oriented. With stable governance, scalable models, and growing private participation, India can anchor the next phase of global climate action by ensuring that commitments translate into outcomes.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Describe the major outcomes of the 26th session of the Conference of the Parses (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)? What are the commitments made by India in this conference?

    Linkage: This question assesses understanding of India’s climate diplomacy from COP26 to future summits under the UNFCCC framework. The article extends this trajectory by highlighting India’s shift from pledge to performance, emphasizing implementation, adaptation finance, and renewable energy leadership ahead of COP30.

  • [17th October 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Ensure safeguards for India’s carbon market

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2015] Should the pursuit of carbon credit and Clean Development Mechanism set up under UNFCCC be maintained even though there has been a massive slide in the value of carbon credit? Discuss with respect to India’s energy needs for economic growth.

    Linkage: The article directly aligns with this PYQ as it examines how India can sustain carbon credit mechanisms while ensuring justice and inclusivity in its domestic carbon market. It stresses that ethical safeguards and equitable benefit-sharing are essential to reconcile climate finance with India’s growth needs.

    Mentor’s Comment

    In an era when climate markets are rapidly gaining traction, India’s push to create its own carbon credit trading system represents a major step towards balancing growth and sustainability. However, as global experiences reveal, the promise of carbon markets often hides complex questions of equity, consent, and justice. This article examines how India can build a just, transparent, and credible carbon market, drawing lessons from global failures and aligning with its developmental and environmental priorities.

    Why in the News

    India is rolling out its Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), a landmark move that will create a domestic carbon market for emission trading and offset generation. The scheme comes amid a global boom in carbon credits, with 175–180 million credits retired annually. Yet, recent controversies such as the Northern Kenya Rangelands Carbon Project suspension by Verra (2023, 2025) have exposed how poorly governed carbon projects can violate community rights and reproduce colonial-style exploitation. This makes it crucial for India to institutionalize safeguards to prevent land alienation, ensure free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), and guarantee fair benefit-sharing, especially for farmers and marginalized communities who stand at the frontline of climate action.

    Introduction

    The industrial era’s growth model has pushed the Earth beyond its planetary boundaries, creating a need to decouple economic expansion from environmental degradation. For developing nations like India, degrowth is neither feasible nor just. The path forward lies in green growth, powered by cleaner energy, sustainable agriculture, and carbon crediting mechanisms that reward climate-positive behavior.

    However, as India builds its carbon market, it must ensure that climate justice is not sacrificed at the altar of climate finance.

    Growth and Sustainability, A Delicate Balance

    1. Decoupling growth from pollution: The industrial revolution model is no longer viable; India must grow while reducing emissions through renewable energy, micro-irrigation, and sustainable farming.
    2. Equitable development: Developing countries cannot afford “degrowth”; instead, they must innovate for green growth pathways that align prosperity with environmental protection.
    3. Indian examples: Rapid progress in solar energy and micro-irrigation exemplifies how growth and sustainability can reinforce each other.

    What Are Carbon Credits and Why Do They Matter?

    1. Definition: A carbon credit represents a certified reduction or removal of greenhouse gases (GHGs), measured in CO₂-equivalents.
    2. Generation sources: Created through mitigation activities like renewable energy or sequestration measures such as reforestation, agroforestry, and biochar.
    3. Global scenario: Annually, about 175–180 million credits are retired, with most originating from renewable energy and nature-based projects like REDD+.
    4. India’s initiative: The CCTS sets emission-intensity benchmarks for industries and includes voluntary offsetting mechanisms, managed through a national registry and trading platform.
    5. Emerging sectors: Draft methods for biomass, compressed biogas, and low-emission rice cultivation have already been released.

    The Promise and Peril of Carbon Projects

    1. Untapped agricultural potential: Despite 64 Indian projects listed under Verra, only four are registered, none have issued credits yet, largely due to weak farmer engagement and training gaps.
    2. Risk of exploitation: Without safeguards, carbon projects can mirror colonial plantation logic, especially as carbon prices rise.
    3. Global warning signs: The Northern Kenya Rangelands Carbon Project (2012) faced suspension for bypassing consent and misrepresenting community participation.

    Violations documented:

    1. Lack of FPIC from indigenous communities.
    2. Projects implemented on unregistered community land.
    3. Enforced by armed rangers; governance opaque.
    4. 2025 Kenyan court judgment confirmed absence of public participation.
    5. Parallel cases: The Lake Turkana Wind Project fenced 150,000 acres of community land — cutting herders off from water and grazing.
      1. Lake Turkana is the world’s largest permanent desert lake and the world’s largest alkaline lake. It lies mostly in northwestern Kenya, with its northern end extending into Ethiopia.

    India’s Vulnerability: A Warning from Kenya

    1. Community impact: Carbon projects on village commons, forest fringes, or grazing lands can disrupt traditional livelihoods without proper consent.
    2. Caste and equity issues: Agricultural carbon projects have shown tendencies to exclude marginalized caste farmers, offering minimal benefits.
    3. Regulatory gap: India’s CCTS prioritizes procedural compliance but neglects land rights, FPIC, and benefit-sharing — leaving space for exploitation.
    4. Potential consequence: Without reforms, India risks replicating extractive climate models that alienate vulnerable communities.

    Towards a Fair and Transparent Carbon Market

    1. Balanced regulation: Overregulation deters genuine actors, while underregulation invites exploitation. India needs a “light but firm” regulatory model.

    Core safeguards needed:

    1. Transparency: Mandatory disclosure of benefit-sharing agreements.
    2. Community consent: Institutionalize FPIC before project initiation.
    3. Adaptive regulation: Policies that evolve through stakeholder consultations.
    4. Trust building: Incorporate third-party audits and grievance redressal.
    5. Justice as the foundation: Climate action must empower, not exploit, those sustaining the land.

    Conclusion

    India’s journey toward a low-carbon future cannot rely solely on markets, it must rest on ethics, equity, and empowerment. As the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) takes shape, the focus must move beyond procedural compliance to protecting land rights, ensuring free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), and guaranteeing fair benefit-sharing with those who nurture the environment. Learning from global pitfalls, India has the opportunity to design a carbon market that is transparent, just, and inclusive, turning climate finance into a true instrument of climate justice and sustainable development. Only then can India demonstrate that growth and green governance are not competing goals, but two sides of the same equitable future.

  • What are Climate Tipping Points?

    Why in the News?

    The Global Tipping Points Report (2025), authored by 160 scientists from 23 countries, warns that warm-water coral reefs have already crossed their thermal tipping point, triggering irreversible dieback.

    About Tipping Points:

    • Overview: Tipping Points are critical thresholds in Earth’s natural and climate systems beyond which self-reinforcing and often irreversible changes occur.
    • Mechanism: Once crossed, feedback loops accelerate transformation — e.g., melting permafrost releases methane, which increases warming and causes more melting.
    • Irreversibility: Even if greenhouse gas emissions are later reduced, many systems cannot revert to their original stable state.
    • Significance: Tipping Points determine long-term planetary stability, climate predictability, and biosphere resilience.

    Important Definitions:

    • Climate Tipping Point (IPCC): A critical threshold at which small changes in temperature or forcing cause a large, often irreversible shift in a climate subsystem.
    • Feedback Loop: A process where an initial change triggers further effects that amplify the original disturbance (positive feedback).
    • Hysteresis: The property of a system where reversing to its prior state requires conditions much different from those that caused the initial change.
    • Cascade Effect: A phenomenon where crossing one tipping point triggers others in connected Earth systems, leading to compounded impacts.
    • Thermal Tipping Point (for Coral Reefs): The temperature threshold (~1.2°C above pre-industrial) beyond which coral survival and recovery become impossible.

    Key Global Tipping Points Identified:

    • Ice Sheets: Collapse of Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, committing the planet to multi-metre sea-level rise.
    • Coral Reefs: Permanent dieback of warm-water reefs due to ocean warming and acidification, destroying marine biodiversity.
    • Amazon Rainforest: Shift toward a savannah ecosystem, reducing carbon storage and regional rainfall.
    • Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC): Potential shutdown below 2°C, disrupting global heat distribution and monsoon patterns.
    • Permafrost Thaw: Release of methane and CO, reinforcing global warming.
    • Boreal Forests & Mountain Glaciers: Increased risk of widespread dieback and loss of freshwater reserves.
    • Sub-Polar Gyre (SPG): Destabilization in North Atlantic circulation, altering marine ecosystems and heat flow.

    Highlights from the Latest Reports (Global Tipping Points 2025):

    • Study Scale: Conducted by 160 scientists from 23 countries, assessing multiple Earth-system thresholds.
    • Coral Crisis: Since January 2023, 84.4% of coral reefs across 82 nations have suffered bleaching — marking the fourth global mass event, the worst on record.
    • Temperature Thresholds: Exceeding 1.5°C global warming risks triggering multiple tipping points; 1.2°C already breached for warm-water reefs.
    • AMOC Collapse Risk: Could occur below 2°C, potentially plunging northwest Europe into severe winters and disrupting global food and water systems.
    • Amazon Dieback: Widespread collapse possible below 2°C, directly affecting 100+ million people dependent on its ecosystem.
    • Interconnected Risk: Earth’s systems form a tipping network — crossing one threshold may accelerate others, creating a domino-like cascade.
    • Policy Warning: Current Paris Agreement pledges and net-zero targets are inadequate to limit warming below 2°C.
    [UPSC 2024] One of the following regions has the world’s largest tropical peatland, which holds about three years’ worth of global carbon emissions from fossil fuels, and the possible destruction of which can exert a detrimental effect on the global climate.

    Which one of the following denotes that region?

    Options: (a) Amazon Basin (b) Congo Basin* (c) Kikori basin (d) Rio De La Plata Basin

     

  • India’s clean energy rise needs climate finance expansion

    Introduction

    India’s clean energy story has entered a defining phase. With 24.5 GW of solar capacity added in 2024, India now stands as the third-largest solar power contributor in the world, after China and the U.S. This achievement reflects not only technological progress but also the country’s growing global leadership in renewable energy. Yet, behind this success lies a serious constraint, the widening climate finance gap, estimated at over $2.5 trillion by 2030. Without adequate and innovative financing, India’s clean energy momentum risks slowing down, threatening its ability to stay on course for its 1.5°C-aligned climate targets.

    Why in the News

    India added 24.5 GW of solar capacity in 2024, emerging as the third largest contributor globally, after China and the U.S., a historic leap for a developing country. Recognised in the UN Secretary-General’s 2025 Climate Report alongside Brazil and China, India has shown that clean energy growth can power both employment (over 1 million jobs) and GDP (5% contribution). However, the optimism hides a crisis: a climate finance gap exceeding $2.5 trillion by 2030, threatening to stall India’s 1.5°C-aligned pathway. The stakes are massive — India’s global credibility, energy security, and development model now depend on how swiftly it can scale climate finance.

    The Economic Momentum of India’s Clean Energy Transition

    1. 24.5 GW solar addition (2024): Makes India the third-largest solar contributor globally, marking a defining milestone in renewable energy leadership.
    2. Global recognition: The UN 2025 Climate Report identifies India as a leading developing nation in scaling solar and wind energy.
    3. Employment boost: Renewable energy employed over 1 million people in 2023, with off-grid solar alone employing 80,000 (2021).
    4. GDP contribution: Renewables added 5% to India’s GDP growth, underscoring its macroeconomic importance.
    5. International Solar Alliance (ISA): India’s leadership in creating ISA has positioned it as a norm-setter in global clean energy diplomacy.

    Where Lies the Climate Finance Gap?

    Massive funding shortfall:

    1. $1.5 trillion required (IRENA) by 2030 for a 1.5°C pathway.
    2. $2.5 trillion+ estimated by the Ministry of Finance for national targets — double the earlier projections.
    3. Finance distribution gaps: Needed for battery storage, green hydrogen, grid strengthening, sustainable agriculture, and transport transition.

    Green bonds surge:

    1. Cumulative GSS+ debt issuance: $55.9 billion (2024), up 186% since 2021.
    2. Green bonds: Account for 83% of total sustainable issuance.
    3. Private sector dominance: 84% of green bond issuance.
    4. Key concern: MSMEs and agri-tech innovators face barriers in accessing concessional finance and risk-sharing tools.

    How Can India Unlock Climate Finance?

    1. Public finance as catalyst: National and State governments must use budget allocations and fiscal incentives to de-risk green investments.
    2. Blended finance models:
      • Credit enhancement tools (partial guarantees, subordinated debt) to improve risk-return profiles.
      • Performance or loan guarantees to unlock finance for Tier II & III cities.
    3. Domestic institutional capital:
      • Mobilising funds from EPFO, LIC, pension and insurance funds for green portfolios.
      • Requires regulatory reforms, ESG frameworks, and green project pipelines.

    Policy Innovations and Carbon Market Potential

    • Carbon Credit Trading Scheme: Offers a new finance stream, provided it remains transparent, regulated, and equitable.
    • Adaptation and Loss & Damage Financing: Focus must extend beyond mitigation to resilience building.
    • Tech-driven climate finance: 
      • Use of Blockchain for finance tracking.
      • AI-based risk assessment for green portfolios.
      • Tailored blended finance suited to India’s socio-economic landscape.

    Private Sector and Sovereign Initiatives in Climate Finance

    1. Sovereign Green Bonds: Successful issuance has crowded-in private capital for green projects.
    2. SEBI-regulated Social Bonds: Directed funds to education, healthcare, and climate action.
    3. Solar Park Scheme: Competitive auctions have encouraged private investment in large-scale solar infrastructure.

    Conclusion

    India’s clean energy transition stands at a defining crossroad — its success no longer depends on technology or intent, but on finance. The renewable boom has demonstrated economic and employment dividends, but without a parallel rise in climate finance mechanisms, it risks plateauing. To sustain momentum, India must blend innovation, public-private synergy, and institutional capital. The clean energy rise must now be matched by a climate finance revolution.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Do you think India will meet 50 percent of its energy needs from renewable energy by 2030? Justify your answer. How will the shift of subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables help achieve the above objective? Explain.

    Linkage: The article complements the 2022 question by highlighting that India’s progress toward meeting 50% renewable energy by 2030 hinges on bridging its $2.5 trillion climate finance gap. It emphasizes that shifting fiscal support and private capital from fossil fuels to renewables is crucial to sustain this transition.

  • Geoengineering Proposals for Polar Regions found flawed

    Why in the News?

    A University of Exeter study found five major polar geoengineering methods ineffective and risky, failing criteria for responsible climate intervention.

    Geoengineering in Polar Regions: Study Findings

    Method Description Intended Benefit Key Findings & Limitations
    Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) Artificially releasing aerosols (SO₂, sulphur particles, TiO₂, CaCO₃) into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. Reduce surface temperatures by blocking solar radiation.
    • Ineffective in polar winters (no sunlight) and of limited use in summers (ice already highly reflective).
    • Sudden termination can cause “termination shock” with rapid global warming.
    • Potential to disrupt global weather cycles, harming food and water security.
    • No global governance on costs or liability. Estimated cost: $55M/year per country (if 30 nations share).
    Sea Curtains / Sea Walls Massive buoyant barriers anchored to seafloor to block warm currents from reaching ice sheets. Slow melting of glaciers by insulating them from warm water.
    • Technically near-impossible in remote seas like Amundsen (Antarctica).
    • Extremely high costs — >$1 billion/km.
    • Threatens marine circulation, fish migration, and nutrient cycles.
    • Installation in harsh polar seas only possible for few months a year; requires custom-built ships.
    • Risk of toxic materials leaching into ocean.
    Sea Ice Management (Microbeads) Sprinkling glass microbeads over sea ice to increase albedo (reflectivity) and thicken ice. Preserve summer ice, slow down warming.
    • Requires 360M tonnes of beads annually — equal to world’s plastic production.
    • Major logistical and emissions challenges.
    • Beads dissolve quickly, reducing effectiveness.
    • Some studies show beads absorb sunlight, causing net warming.
    • Costly: $500B/year for Arctic deployment; requires 100M pumps, huge energy draw.
    Basal Water Removal Pumping subglacial meltwater from under Antarctic glaciers. Reduce glacier sliding, thus slowing sea-level rise.
    • Flawed logic: subglacial water is constantly replenished by frictional/geothermal heating.
    • Highly emissions-intensive and energy-consuming.
    • Requires continuous monitoring, maintenance, and heavy infrastructure.
    • Long-term sustainability questioned.
    Ocean Fertilisation Adding nutrients (e.g., iron) to stimulate phytoplankton growth, enhancing CO₂ absorption. Sequester more carbon in oceans.
    • No control over which phytoplankton species dominate, creating food chain imbalances. 
    • Could harm marine biodiversity and alter global nutrient cycles.
    • Needs deployment at massive, impractical scale.
    • Risk of side-effects outweighs uncertain benefits.

     

    [UPSC 2020] Consider the following activities:

    1. Spreading finely ground basalt rock extensively on farmlands

    2. Increasing the alkalinity of oceans by adding lime

    3. Capturing carbon dioxide released by various industries and pumping it into abandoned subterranean mines in the form of carbonated waters

    How many of the above activities are often considered and discussed for carbon capture and sequestration?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three* (d) None

     

  • Ganga River is drying faster than in 1,300 years: Report

    Why in the News?

    A recent study by researchers from IIT Gandhinagar and the University of Arizona warns that the Ganga River is drying at a rate unseen in more than a millennium.

    About Drying of the Ganga River: New Study Findings

    • Overview: Reconstructed streamflow since 700 AD using tree-ring records (Monsoon Asia Drought Atlas) and hydrological models. Validated against historic droughts and famines such as the Bengal famine.
    • Findings:

      • Between 1991 and 2020, multiple droughts lasted 4–7 years, the rarest in the past 1,300 years.
      • The 2004–2010 drought was the most severe in 1,300 years.
      • Post-1990s drying was 76% more intense than the worst 16th-century drought.
    • Causes:

      • Weaker monsoons from Indian Ocean warming and aerosol pollution.
      • Groundwater over-extraction reducing river baseflow.
      • Land-use change disrupting natural recharge.
    • Climate Models: Most fail to reproduce the drying trend, raising doubts about optimistic rainfall projections.
    • Implications: Severe threats to agriculture, 600 million livelihoods, Bay of Bengal ecosystems, and the 40% GDP share of the basin. Calls for adaptive water management.

    ganga

    About the Ganga River:

    • Length: ~2,525 km, the longest river in India.
    • Origin: Gangotri Glacier in Uttarakhand at 3,892 m elevation as Bhagirathi.
    • Formation: Named Ganga at Devprayag after meeting Bhagirathi and Alaknanda.
    • Course: Flows through Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal before entering Bangladesh as Padma and emptying into the Bay of Bengal through the Sundarbans Delta.
    • Basin: Covers about 8.61 lakh sq. km, which is 26.4% of India’s area.
    • Tributaries:

      • Left bank: Ramganga, Gomti, Ghaghara, Gandak, Burhi Gandak, Koshi, Mahananda.
      • Right bank: Yamuna, Tons, Karamnasa, Sone, Punpun, Falgu, Kiul, Chandan, Ajoy, Damodar, Rupnarayan.
    • Population: Supports over 600 million people, making it the world’s most densely populated river basin.
    • Cultural Importance: Sacred in Indian culture; declared National River in 2008.
    • Economic Role: Central to agriculture, fisheries, and trade, contributing about 40% of India’s GDP.
    • Ecological Significance: Home to snow leopard, elephants, and Ganga dolphin; includes Corbett, Dudhwa, and Sundarbans reserves.
    • Conservation Efforts: Ganga Action Plan (1985) and Namami Gange Programme (2014); persistent issues of pollution, over-extraction, and climate change.
    [UPSC 2024] With reference to the Himalayan rivers joining the Ganga downstream of Prayagraj from West to East, which one of the following sequences is correct?

    Options: (a) Ghaghara – Gomati – Gandak – Kosi

    (b) Gomati – Ghaghara – Gandak – Kosi*

    (c) Ghaghara – Gomati – Kosi – Gandak

    (d) Gomati – Ghaghara – Kosi – Gandak

     

  • A climate-health vision with lessons from India

    Introduction

    At the Global Conference on Climate and Health (July 2025, Brazil), 90 countries shaped the Belém Health Action Plan, which will guide the climate-health agenda at COP30 (Nov 2025). Ironically, India, despite having some of the most instructive welfare experiences linking climate and health, was not officially represented, a missed opportunity to emerge as a global exemplar.

    India’s non-health interventions like the Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN), Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA), and Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) offer rich lessons for operationalising an integrated climate-health framework. They reveal that intentional, intersectoral action can yield multiple dividends: improved nutrition, reduced pollution, restored ecosystems, and healthier communities.

    Why is this news significant?

    India’s absence at Belém stands out because for the first time a global platform is drafting a climate-health action plan. While India has often been viewed through the prism of its energy transition challenges, this moment presented a chance to highlight its homegrown welfare successes with global resonance. The paradox is striking: even without designing policies as “climate policies,” India has reaped climate-health co-benefits, unlike many countries still struggling to integrate the two. Yet, persistent failures like high LPG refill costs in PMUY and siloed governance highlight the scale of unfinished work.

    What is the Belém Health Action Plan (BHAP)?

    • The BHAP is a strategic framework being finalized ahead of COP30 (Nov 2025, Belém, Brazil) intended to integrate health into climate change adaptation.
    • It emphasizes health equity, climate justice, and social participation alongside strengthening health systems to be resilient in face of climate change.

    Key Features / Action Lines

    Some of its priority action lines include:

    • Surveillance & Monitoring:
      • Linking climate/environmental data with health surveillance, early warning systems (for heatwaves, epidemics, etc.).
      • Real-time data, local / community-level monitoring.
    • Evidence-Based Policy Strategy & Capacity Building:
      • Training health workforce, integrating mental health & psychosocial support measures.
      • Gender-responsive, inclusive policies, recognizing most vulnerable groups (women, Indigenous people, persons with disabilities).
    • Innovation & Production:
      • Resilient infrastructure and services (e.g. climate-adapted health facilities), sustainable supply chains.
      • Focus on blended financing and mobilizing investments to make health systems adaptive and equitable.
    • Cross-cutting priorities:
      • Health equity & climate justice: ensuring that adaptation efforts do not further marginalize vulnerable groups.
      • Leadership & governance: accountability, social participation from civil society, clear institutional roles.

    What lessons do India’s welfare programmes offer for climate-health synergy?

    1. PM POSHAN: Covers 11 crore children in 11 lakh schools, linking nutrition, agriculture, and education. Promotion of millets strengthens climate-resilient food systems.
    2. Swachh Bharat Abhiyan: Improved sanitation, public health, and environmental sustainability, while embedding dignity and cultural symbolism via Gandhi’s vision.
    3. MNREGA: Enhanced livelihood security while simultaneously restoring degraded ecosystems through water conservation and afforestation.
    4. PM Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY): Transition to clean cooking fuel cut household air pollution — a leading cause of respiratory illness — while reducing carbon emissions.

    How has leadership and community engagement shaped outcomes?

    1. Political leadership: Direct involvement of the Prime Minister gave Swachh Bharat and PMUY inter-ministerial traction and public legitimacy.
    2. Community engagement: PM POSHAN leveraged parent-teacher committees, Swachh Bharat invoked cultural pride in cleanliness, ensuring local ownership.
    3. Cultural anchoring: Climate action framed as health protection resonates more deeply than carbon metrics.

    What structural challenges persist in implementation?

    1. Administrative silos: Divergent sectoral mandates limit integrated outcomes.
    2. High refill costs in PMUY: Oil marketing interests often outweigh beneficiary affordability.
    3. Social barriers: Gender norms and cultural practices limit uptake of clean fuel and sanitation.
    4. Output vs. outcome gap: Programmes measure immediate coverage but not long-term health-climate impact.

    What framework does India’s experience suggest for climate-health governance?

    1. Strategic prioritisation: Frame climate action as immediate health security, not distant environmental risk.
    2. Procedural integration: Embed health impact assessments into energy, transport, and urban policies.
    3. Participatory implementation: Leverage ASHA workers, SHGs, Panchayats as health-climate advocates.

    Why is this vision critical for the future?

    1. High stakes: Delinking climate and health crises leads to fragmented solutions with escalating costs.
    2. Transformative potential: An intersectoral, whole-of-society approach could position India as a global leader in climate-health governance.
    3. Clear choice: Continue piecemeal efforts or pioneer a bold model aligning welfare with planetary health.

    Conclusion

    India’s welfare architecture has shown that policies designed for social welfare can unintentionally become climate-health interventions. The challenge now is to make this synergy intentional and institutionalised, with robust political framing, procedural integration, and community mobilisation. At a time when the world is drafting a global climate-health action plan, India’s absence from the table is a wake-up call: to convert scattered lessons into a coherent model of governance that others can emulate.

    Value Addition

    Key Concepts

    1. Climate-Health Nexus: Environmental policies often have unintended health impacts; health policies also influence climate outcomes.
    2. Co-Benefits Approach: One intervention (e.g., PMUY for clean cooking fuel) yields multiple dividends (better health, women’s empowerment, reduced emissions).
    3. Whole-of-Society Approach: Intersectoral coordination between ministries, communities, and local bodies ensures impact.
    4. Output vs Outcome Gap: Many Indian schemes achieve outputs (LPG connections, toilets built) but outcomes (sustained use, cleaner air, health equity) remain weak.

    Important Data / Reports

    1. WHO Report (2021): Air pollution causes 7 million premature deaths annually worldwide.
    2. Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change (2022): South Asia faces one of the highest global burdens of climate-related health risks.
    3. India’s National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2021): Despite welfare schemes, 35.5% of children under 5 are stunted and 32.1% are underweight, showing links between nutrition, climate resilience, and health.
    4. UNDP (2023): Every $1 invested in resilience and adaptation yields $4 in avoided losses.
    5. Global Conference on Climate & Health (Belém Plan, 2025): First global blueprint on climate-health integration.

    PYQ Linkage:

    [UPSC 2017] ‘Climate Change’ is a global problem. How India will be affected by climate change? How Himalayan and coastal states of India will be affected by climate change?

    Linkage: India’s welfare schemes like PM POSHAN, PMUY, Swachh Bharat and MNREGA demonstrate that non-health interventions can mitigate climate impacts while improving public health. The Himalayan and coastal states, most vulnerable to warming, floods, and sea-level rise, can benefit from such intersectoral, resilience-building models. Thus, India’s climate-health vision provides practical pathways to address both regional vulnerabilities and national climate commitments.

  • Topography, climate change: Behind heavy rains in Himalayas

    Introduction

    Extreme rainfall in Uttarakhand over the past week has triggered multiple landslides, swelling rivers and leading to the loss of at least 15 lives. While such events have always occurred in the Himalayan belt during the monsoon, the frequency, intensity, and unpredictability of these disasters have sharply increased in recent years. This phenomenon is closely linked to climate change, altered monsoon dynamics, and the fragile geology of the region.

    Why in the News?

    Uttarakhand and parts of Himachal Pradesh have witnessed back-to-back extreme rainfall events over the last month, leading to landslides, mudslides, flash floods, and large-scale disruption. The striking fact is not just the death toll, but the scale of surplus rainfall, 34% above normal in August and 67% above normal in early September. Such heavy rainfall, while common in coastal states like Kerala or Meghalaya, is catastrophic in the Himalayas where steep slopes, loose soil, and fragile ecosystems amplify the risks.

    Why is rainfall unusually high in Uttarakhand this season?

    1. Active monsoon systems: Consecutive low-pressure systems from the Bay of Bengal have travelled farther north than usual, dumping large amounts of rain in the Himalayan belt.
    2. Surplus rainfall data: Northwestern India received 34% surplus rainfall in August and over 67% surplus rainfall in early September.
    3. Record-breaking events: Udhampur (J&K) recorded 630 mm in 24 hours, equivalent to a year’s rainfall in Rajkot, Gujarat; Leh recorded 59 mm in 48 hours, highest since 1973.

    Why are hilly regions more vulnerable to disasters?

    1. Fragile geology: Extreme rainfall triggers landslides, mudslides, and flash floods as rainwater drags soil, rocks, and debris downhill.
    2. River choke-points: When streams are blocked, water gushes into settlements, destroying roads and bridges.
    3. Comparative impact: While 300 mm of rain in Goa or Kerala drains into the sea, the same amount in Uttarakhand leads to catastrophic slope failure.
    4. Recent examples: Landslides across Mandi, Kullu, Dharali, Tharali, and Jammu in the past two weeks illustrate cascading effects.

    How is climate change altering monsoon dynamics?

    1. Southward shift of western disturbances: Once dominant in winters, these systems are increasingly interacting with the summer monsoon, intensifying rainfall events in the Himalayas.
    2. Global warming: Rising temperatures are linked to changing wind patterns and higher atmospheric moisture.
    3. Arctic connection: Melting Arctic sea ice may be influencing jet streams, further complicating rainfall behaviour.
    4. Future risks: Longer dry spells interspersed with intense rainfall events are likely to define Himalayan monsoons.

    What does this mean for Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh?

    1. Human cost: Frequent deaths, loss of livelihoods, and displacement.
    2. Economic disruption: Road blockages, tourism losses, and damage to hydro projects.
    3. Policy challenge: Need for climate-resilient infrastructure, stricter land-use regulations, and predictive weather modelling.

    Conclusion

    The Uttarakhand landslides are a grim reminder that the Himalayas, often called the “third pole”, are at the frontline of climate change. Extreme rainfall patterns, when coupled with unregulated urbanization and fragile geology, amplify disaster risks. Building climate-resilient infrastructure, enhancing early warning systems, and ensuring ecological sensitivity in planning are essential for safeguarding lives and livelihoods in these vulnerable mountain states.

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2017] ‘Climate Change’ is a global problem. How India will be affected by climate change? How Himalayan and coastal states of India will be affected by climate change?

    Linkage: The Uttarakhand landslides highlight how Himalayan states are increasingly vulnerable to climate change–induced extreme rainfall, cloudbursts, and landslides due to fragile geology. Similarly, coastal states face rising sea levels, cyclones, and saline intrusion, threatening lives and livelihoods. Thus, climate change amplifies both mountain hazards and coastal vulnerabilities, making India’s geography uniquely exposed.

  • Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)

    Why in the News?

    Brazil, the host of COP30, has proposed the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) to finance the conservation of standing forests.

    What is Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)?

    • Nature: A global blended finance fund that pays Tropical Forest Countries (TFCs) per hectare of forest conserved.
    • Adjustments: Deductions made for deforestation or degradation.
    • Equity Provision: At least 20% of payments reserved for Indigenous Peoples & Local Communities (IPLCs).
    • Monitoring: Payments tracked via satellite systems and managed by a TFFF Secretariat.
    • Relation to REDD+: Complements but does not replace REDD+; no carbon credits or project-based offsets.

    Financial Mechanism:

    • Core Instrument: Tropical Forest Investment Fund (TFIF) under a Multilateral Development Bank (likely World Bank).
    • Funding Sources:
      • Sponsors (20%): High-income countries and philanthropies, via concessional loans/grants.
      • Market Investors (80%): Institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, university endowments.
    • Investment Strategy: Invests in liquid public bonds (US Treasuries), corporate bonds (Apple), green/blue bonds; excludes fossil fuels.
    • Returns & Payments: Earnings from investment funds result-based payments to TFCs, with 2% annual increase for inflation.

    Key Hurdles:

    • Financing Burden: Global South may indirectly finance its own conservation as TFIF invests in their markets with higher borrowing costs.
    • Credit Rating Dependence: Returns hinge on ratings by Fitch, S&P, Moody’s.
    • Geopolitical Risk: Reliance on World Bank (US dominance) may skew control.
    • IPLC Gap: Despite pledges, historically Indigenous Peoples & Local Communities (IPLCs) receive <1% of climate aid.
    • Forest Definitions: Disputes over canopy thresholds (20–30%) may disadvantage sparser forest nations.

    Back2Basics: REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus)

    • Launch: 2008 as a UN collaborative initiative (FAO, UNDP, UNEP); now >65 partner countries.
    • Framework: Under UNFCCC; incentivizes developing nations to cut emissions and improve forest carbon stocks.
    • ‘+’ Component: Adds conservation, sustainable management, and carbon stock enhancement.
    • Objectives: Financial incentives for verified actions in (1) reducing deforestation, (2) reducing degradation, (3) conservation, (4) sustainable management, (5) carbon enhancement.
    • Mechanism: Countries prepare national strategies, monitor/report, and get results-based payments for verified emission reductions.

     

    [UPSC 2025] Which one of the following launched the ‘Nature Solutions Finance Hub for Asia and the Pacific’?

    (a) The Asian Development Bank (ADB)*

    (b) The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

    (c) The New Development Bank (NDB)

    (d) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)

     

  • In news: Pugad Island

    Why in the News?

    The Philippine island of Pugad in Manila Bay is facing an existential threat as rising sea levels and rapid land subsidence combine to submerge homes and livelihoods.

    About Pugad Island:

    • Overview: Small 7-hectare island in Manila Bay, situated at the mouth of the Angat–Pampanga River Delta, under Hagonoy municipality, Bulacan province, Philippines.
    • Population: Home to about 1,636–2,056 residents, living in a single clustered village of roughly 384 houses.
    • Livelihoods: Community depends on fishing and aquaculture, with families cultivating clams, mussels, and whiting fish in converted fishponds.
    • Living Conditions: Houses built mainly from bamboo and old metal sheets, with poor sanitation, minimal healthcare facilities, and only elementary-level schooling.
    • Flooding Challenge: Regularly hit by high-tide and monsoon floods, made worse by land subsidence (11 cm/year) and sea-level rise (three times global average).
    • Environmental Hazards: Loss of mangroves, urban encroachment, and exposure to typhoons increase risks of disaster and displacement.
    [UPSC 2018] Which of the following has/have shrunk immensely/dried up in the recent past due to human activities?

    1.Aral Sea 2.Black Sea 3.Lake Baikal

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 2 only (d) 1 and 3*