💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: International Relations

  • World Economic Forum (WEF) Summit at Davos

    Introduction

    • The World Economic Forum (WEF) has begun its annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.

    World Economic Forum (WEF)

    • Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, WEF is an international not-for-profit organization, focused on bringing the public and private sectors together to address the global political, social, and economic issues.
    • It was founded in 1971 by Swiss-German economist and Professor Klaus Schwab in a bid to promote global cooperation on these most pressing problems.
    • The first meeting of WEF was held more than five decades ago in Davos, which has been the home of the annual gathering almost ever since, also becoming the shorthand for the event.

    Purpose and Essence of the WEF

    • Bringing Stakeholders Together: The WEF gathers leaders from business, government, and civil society to address global challenges and brainstorm solutions.
    • Scope Expansion: Initially focusing on European firms catching up with US management practices, the WEF’s scope broadened to encompass economic and social issues.

    Annual Meeting in Davos

    • Membership: In 1975, the WEF introduced a membership system for the world’s top 1,000 companies.
    • Global Diplomacy: Davos serves as a backdrop for international diplomacy, offering leaders a conducive environment to defuse tensions and engage in critical discussions.
    • Historic Meetings: Notable meetings in Davos have included North and South Korea’s first ministerial-level talks and discussions on German reunification.
    • Birth of the G20: The idea for the G20, comprising 20 countries and initially focusing on global finance, emerged from discussions at the WEF in 1998.

    Funding and Davos’s Serene Environment

    • WEF Funding: The WEF is primarily funded by partnering corporations, typically global enterprises with annual turnover exceeding $5 billion.
    • Davos Setting: Davos’s tranquil surroundings provide an ideal backdrop for the WEF’s mission to foster a more prosperous global economy.

    Beyond Discussions: WEF’s Impact

    • Global Rankings: The WEF publishes influential global rankings and indices, such as the Global Competitiveness Report and the Global Gender Gap Report.
    • Significance: WEF Summit serves as a dynamic platform where leaders and stakeholders converge to address pressing global issues, fostering cooperation and innovation on a grand scale.

  • Why are Indian soldiers in Maldives?

    maldives

    Introduction

    • With President Muizzu’s administration insisting on the withdrawal of Indian troops, a high-level core group has been set up to negotiate this process.
    • This situation raises questions about the reasons behind the presence of Indian troops and the factors fueling the ‘India Out’ campaign.

    Overview of the Current Situation

    • Official Statement: Maldives affirmed the policy of President Muizzu’s administration to remove Indian military personnel from the Maldives.
    • Negotiation Group: A core group, including Indian High Commissioner, met in Male to discuss the troop withdrawal, though the Indian government has not yet commented on these reports.

    Indian Military Presence in the Maldives

    • Troop Numbers: Contrary to the rhetoric of the ‘India Out’ campaign, only 88 Indian military personnel are stationed in the Maldives, primarily for training purposes.
    • Historical Context: Indian soldiers have been sent to the Maldives for training in combat, reconnaissance, and rescue-aid operations. The only time Indian troops were involved in active military operations was during the 1988 coup attempt, at the request of then-President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom.

    Factors behind the ‘India Out’ Campaign

    • Controversy over Helicopters: The gifting of two Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopters by India, used for humanitarian purposes, became a point of contention, portrayed as a military presence by certain political factions.
    • Perceived Lack of Transparency: The Solih government’s alleged opacity in dealings with India fueled suspicions.
    • Maritime Security Dependence: The Maldives relies on India for maritime security, collaborating to counter common threats.
    • Police Academy Speculations: The construction of a new police academy with Indian assistance led to rumours about its purpose and scale.
    • UTF Harbour Project Agreement: Speculations about the UTF (Uthuru Thila Falhu- Island) project being turned into an Indian naval base, despite official clarifications to the contrary.

    Conclusion

    • The insistence on the withdrawal of Indian troops from the Maldives and the ensuing ‘India Out’ campaign reflect a complex interplay of historical, political, and security factors.
    • While the Indian military presence has been primarily for training and humanitarian assistance, various internal and external elements have contributed to the current sentiment.
    • Understanding these nuances is crucial for comprehending the evolving relationship between India and the Maldives and the broader geopolitical implications in the region.

  • ICJ: Doing Justice without power

    Introduction

    About the International Court of Justice (ICJ)

    Details
    Role Principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN).
    Establishment Established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations, began work in April 1946.
    Predecessor Successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) established by the League of Nations.
    Inaugural Sitting Held its first sitting at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, in February 1922.
    Seat Located at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands.
    Jurisdiction ICJ’s jurisdiction requires consent from both parties involved in a dispute. Its judgment is final and binding.
    Judges Comprises 15 judges elected to nine-year terms by the UN General Assembly and Security Council.
    Official Languages  English and French.
    India’s Representation Four Indians have been members of the ICJ, including Justice Dalveer Bhandari, R S Pathak, Nagendra Singh, and Sir Benegal Rau.
    Notable Indian Cases at ICJ
    • Trial of Veer Savarkar (1910) for extradition to Britain from France at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)
    • Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India, culminated 1960).
    • Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council (India v. Pakistan, culminated 1972).
    • Trial of Pakistani Prisoners of War (Pakistan v. India, culminated 1973).
    • Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India, culminated 2000).
    • Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India, culminated 2016).
    • Kulbhushan Jadhav (India v. Pakistan, culminated 2019).

    Enforcement Challenges

    • Binding Rulings: ICJ decisions are legally binding, but they lack enforcement mechanisms, relying on the UN Security Council (UNSC) to enforce judgments.
    • Political Influence: Enforcement often falls victim to the politics of UNSC’s permanent members, as seen in potential vetoes by the US, Israel’s strong ally.

    Challenges to Efficacy

    • Non-Participation: Powerful states may refuse to participate in ICJ proceedings, making compliance difficult. For instance, Russia declined to submit to the court’s jurisdiction during Ukraine-Russia conflict hearings.
    • Bureaucratic Delays: The ICJ’s slow bureaucratic process leads to years-long trials and judgments, making justice delayed justice denied.

    ICJ’s Relevance

    • Expanding Jurisdiction: The ICJ now handles diverse international law areas, including human rights and environmental violations, furthering the participation of states through dispute settlement clauses.
    • Successful Reparations: The court’s rulings on reparations, such as Uganda’s payment to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, demonstrate its impact.
    • Advisory Role: The ICJ’s advisory opinions contribute to peaceful conflict resolution, as seen in its opinions on nuclear weapons and the Israeli-Palestinian wall.

    Niche Position

    • Amid New Courts: Despite the emergence of new international courts and tribunals, the ICJ maintains a unique place in international judicial adjudication.
    • Fragmentation Concerns: Coexisting courts raise concerns about potential contradictions in rulings and the fragmentation of international law.
    • Guardian of World Order: The ICJ serves as a last resort when diplomacy fails, safeguarding the interests of the World Court.

    Conclusion

    • The ICJ, with its rich history and evolving role in international law, faces challenges in enforcing its rulings and ensuring swift justice.
    • However, its expanding jurisdiction, successful reparations, and advisory role in peaceful conflict resolution demonstrate its continued relevance.
    • Striking a balance between centralization and decentralization in international judicial adjudication will be crucial to upholding the integrity of the World Court.

  • Houthi Rebels and Regional Dynamics

    Houthi Rebels

    Introduction

    • The United States and the United Kingdom have initiated military strikes against Houthi groups in Yemen on January 11.
    • This action is a response to the Houthis’ continued aggression towards maritime vessels in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route.

    Background of the Conflict

    • Houthi Attacks on Shipping: Since November 2023, Houthi forces have targeted ships in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, disrupting one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes.
    • Israeli-Hamas Conflict: The Houthis’ actions are in response to the Israeli military’s bombardment of Gaza following an attack by Hamas on October 7, which resulted in significant casualties.

    Houthi Group and Regional Dynamics

    • Who Are the Houthis?: The Houthis are a Shia militant group engaged in the civil war in Yemen, controlling significant parts of the country, including the capital Sana’a.
    • Regional Rivalries: The conflict reflects long-standing regional rivalries, with Iran backing the Houthis and Saudi Arabia supporting the Yemeni government. The Houthis’ involvement in the Israel-Hamas war is also seen as part of these broader regional dynamics.

    Concerns for Global Trade

    • Impact on World Trade: Approximately 12% of global trade passes through the Red Sea and Suez Canal, making the security of this route critical.
    • Alternative Routes: Due to safety concerns, some ships have been rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope, leading to increased transit times and fuel costs.

    Implications for the Region

    • Operation Prosperity Guardian: Launched by the US, this coalition aims to ensure maritime security in the region, but partner countries have shown reluctance to contribute significantly.
    • Risks of Wider Conflict: There are concerns about the conflict spreading beyond Israel and Gaza, with the potential for unpredictable outcomes in the Middle East.
    • Impact on Yemeni Peace Negotiations: The strikes may affect ongoing peace negotiations in Yemen, mediated by Oman and the United Nations.

  • What happened in Bhutan’s elections?

    Introduction

    • In a significant political development, Tshering Tobgay and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) emerged victorious in Bhutan’s recent runoff election, marking a pivotal moment in the country’s young democracy.
    • Bhutan’s election not only reflects the evolving political dynamics within but also has broader implications for the region, particularly in terms of Bhutan’s relations with India and China.

    Bhutan’s Democratic Evolution

    • Fair Elections: Unlike some neighbouring countries, Bhutan’s elections have been largely free from tampering or political violence.
    • Monarchy to Democracy: Since transitioning from a monarchy to a parliamentary democracy in 2008, Bhutan has seen its democratic processes evolve, with increased party participation and voter choice.
    • Challenges: Despite progress, concerns about media censorship and discrimination against minorities persist.

    Economic Context of the Elections

    • Economic Challenges: Bhutan faces economic difficulties, including a struggling tourism sector, high youth unemployment, and significant emigration for better opportunities.
    • Tobgay’s Economic Focus: Tobgay’s campaign centred on addressing these economic issues, promising investment and solutions to curb the emigration trend.

    India’s Role and Regional Implications

    • India-Bhutan Relations: India remains Bhutan’s largest donor and ally, playing a crucial role in Bhutan’s economic recovery and infrastructure development.
    • Hydroelectric Potential: Bhutan’s untapped hydroelectric resources present opportunities for energy trade with India.
    • China Factor: Recent years have seen heightened tensions between India and China over Bhutan, especially in the disputed Doklam region.
    • Tobgay’s Pro-India Stance: Tobgay is perceived as pro-India, which aligns with India’s strategic interests in the region. His election has been positively received by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

     Conclusion

    • Tshering Tobgay’s election victory in Bhutan is a testament to the country’s maturing democracy and its ability to navigate complex economic and geopolitical challenges.
    • As Bhutan continues to balance its relationships with major powers like India and China, Tobgay’s leadership will be pivotal in shaping the nation’s future trajectory, both domestically and in the broader South Asian context.

  • Social Media row between India and Maldives over Tourism

    maldives

    Introduction

    • Trigger: PM Modi’s social media posts promoting tourism in Lakshadweep led to a contentious exchange between Maldivian politicians, government officials, and Indian social media users.
    • Context: The posts highlighted Lakshadweep’s beauty but did not mention the Maldives or other island nations.
    • Maldivian Reaction: Following PM Modi’s posts, some Maldivian social media users, including government officials, responded with offensive and derogatory comments targeting Indians and the Prime Minister.

    Escalation of the Issue

    • Sensational Headlines: Local Maldivian news websites sensationalized the issue, falsely claiming that India was campaigning against Maldivian tourism.
    • Government Officials’ Involvement: High-ranking Maldivian officials engaged in the social media dispute, exacerbating the situation.

    Maldivian Social Media Campaign

    • #VisitMaldives Hashtag: In response to India’s promotion of Lakshadweep, Maldivian officials and supporters pushed the ‘#VisitMaldives’ hashtag, featuring local resorts and beaches.
    • Territorial Claims: Some Maldivian users falsely claimed that Lakshadweep is not Indian territory but belongs to the Maldives.

    Accusations Against India

    • Alleged Competition: Maldivian social media users accused India of trying to compete with the Maldives as a tropical vacation destination.
    • Racist Remarks: The posts led to a range of racist comments against Indians and Indian tourists.

    Maldives’ Dependency on Tourism

    • Significant Indian Tourist Numbers: Indians form a large group of tourists visiting the Maldives, with over 200,000 travelers in 2023.
    • Economic Impact: Tourism is crucial for the Maldives, accounting for over 28% of its GDP.

    Indian Response

    • Boycott Calls: Some Indian users called for a boycott of Maldivian hotels and resorts.
    • Highlighting Bilateral Cooperation: Others emphasized India’s assistance to the Maldives and aspects of bilateral cooperation.
    • Celebrity Support: Bollywood celebrities and Indian sportspersons initiated a ‘Visit Lakshadweep’ campaign in response to the controversy.

    Roots of Anti-India Sentiments

    • Historical Campaign: Anti-India sentiments have been present since the ‘India Out’ campaign, which started in 2020 and was promoted by former president Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayyoom.
    • Muizzu Government’s Stance: The current Maldivian government, under President Mohamed Muizzu, has been fulfilling campaign promises, including withdrawing Indian military personnel from the Maldives.

    Criticism Within the Maldives

    • Opposition’s Stance: Not all in the Maldives support the government’s stance, with some politicians and diplomats criticizing the derogatory comments.
    • Lack of Diplomatic Experience: Critics argue that some government officials lack experience and understanding of diplomacy.

    Maldivian Government’s Reaction

    • Official Statement: The Maldives’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement distancing the government from the derogatory remarks.
    • Cyber Attack Suspicions: Following the incident, several Maldivian government websites, including the foreign ministry, were suspected to be under cyber-attack.

    Conclusion

    • Surprise and Disappointment: The incident has surprised many in India and the Maldives, given the history of diplomatic support and cooperation.
    • Unlikely to Affect Relations: Analysts believe the conduct of a few individuals is unlikely to impact broader India-Maldives bilateral relations.
    • Need for Diplomatic Sensitivity: The episode underscores the importance of maintaining respectful and diplomatic communication between neighboring countries.

  • Suspending the Free Movement Regime: India’s Border Policy with Myanmar

    Free Movement Regime

    Central Idea

    • On January 2, the Indian government announced plans to scrap the Free Movement Regime (FMR) along the Myanmar border.
    • Residents in border areas, previously able to cross freely, will now require visas.

    About Free Movement Regime

    • Initiated in the 1970s, the FMR allowed people living within 16 km of the India-Myanmar border to travel up to 16 km into the other country without a visa.
    • India shares a 1,643 km-long border with Myanmar, which passes through the States of Arunachal Pradesh (520 km), Nagaland (215 km), Manipur (398 km), and Mizoram (510 km).
    • This regime recognized the deep-rooted familial and ethnic connections between communities on either side of the unfenced border.
    • The FMR was last revised in 2016, aligning with India’s Act East policy. However, it was suspended in Manipur since 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Reasons for the Policy Shift

    • Security and Illegal Activities: The FMR has been under scrutiny for facilitating illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and insurgency.
    • Refugee Influx Post-Coup: Following Myanmar’s military coup in February 2021, over 40,000 refugees entered Mizoram, and around 4,000 entered Manipur, exacerbating security concerns.
    • Local Government Stance: Manipur’s Chief Minister urged the Ministry of Home Affairs to cancel the FMR and complete border fencing, linking ethnic violence in the state to the free movement across the border.

    Implications of Scrapping the FMR

    • Impact on Local Communities: Ending the FMR could significantly affect the daily lives of border residents, who depend on cross-border access for various needs.
    • Cultural and Social Disruption: The policy change might strain the cultural and social fabric of communities with shared ethnicities across the border.

    Way forward

    • Border Fencing: The government plans to fence about 300 km of the border, with a tender expected soon.
    • Regulatory Revisions: Experts suggest refining the FMR to better regulate movement while maintaining cross-border ties.
    • Infrastructure and Trade: Enhancing infrastructure and formalizing trade at designated entry points could mitigate some negative impacts.
    • Community Engagement: Involving border communities in decision-making is crucial for effective and sensitive border management.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Security and Community Needs: The decision to end the FMR requires a nuanced approach that considers both national security and the rights of border communities.
    • Diplomatic Engagement: Strengthening diplomatic relations with Myanmar is key to managing this transition effectively.
    • Future Challenges: As India navigates this policy change, it faces the challenge of securing its borders while respecting the socio-economic realities of border populations.

  • India, Pakistan conduct Annual Exchange of List of Nuclear Installations

    pakistan

    Central Idea

    • India and Pakistan has exchanged a list of their nuclear installations that cannot be attacked in case of an escalation in hostilities.

    Non-Nuclear Aggression Agreement

    • The Non-nuclear aggression agreement is a bilateral and nuclear weapons control treaty between India and Pakistan, on the reduction (or limitation) of nuclear arms.
    • Both pledged not to attack or assist foreign powers to attack on each others nuclear installations and facilities.
    • The treaty was drafted in 1988, and signed by PM Rajiv Gandhi and his counterpart Benazir Bhutto on 21 December 1988; it entered into force on January 1991.
    • The treaty barred its signatories from carrying out a surprise attack (or to assist foreign powers to attack) on each other’s nuclear installations and facilities.
    • Starting in January 1992, India and Pakistan have annually exchanged lists of their respective military and civilian nuclear-related facilities.

    Need for the treaty

    • In 1986-87, the massive exercise, ‘Brasstacks’ was carried out by the Indian Army, raising fears of an Indian attack on Pakistan’s nuclear facilities.
    • Since then, the Foreign ministries of both countries have been negotiating to reach an understanding towards the control of nuclear weapons.

    Significance of the agreement

    • The treaty barred its signatories from carrying out a surprise attack (or to assist foreign powers to attack) on each other’s nuclear installations and facilities.
    • The treaty provides a confidence-building security measure environment.

    Other: Sharing of Prisoners information

    • Both nations simultaneously share the list of prisoners in each other’s custody.
    • These lists are exchanged under the provisions of the Agreement on Consular Access signed in May 2008.
    • Under this pact, the two countries should exchange comprehensive lists on January 1 and July 1 every year (i.e. twice a year).

  • Genocide Convention invoked in Israel-Palestinian War

    Central Idea

    • South Africa has petitioned the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to declare Israel in breach of the 1948 Genocide Convention.

    Genocide Convention, 1948

    Details
    Full Name Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
    Adoption Date December 9, 1948
    Primary Aim To prevent and punish the crime of genocide
    Definition of Genocide Acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group
    Key Provisions Includes killing or causing harm to members of a group, deliberately inflicting destructive conditions, imposing measures to prevent births, and forcibly transferring children
    Punishable Acts Genocide, conspiracy, incitement, attempt, and complicity in genocide
    Implementation and Enforcement States must enact legislation to give effect to the Convention’s provisions and provide penalties for perpetrators;

    Genocide recognized as a crime under international law
    Historical Context Created post-Holocaust and World War II as a global commitment against atrocities
    Legal Framework Impact Established legal basis for defining and prosecuting genocide, influencing international criminal law
    India’s Involvement Ratified by India on August 27, 1959;

    Principles incorporated into India’s domestic legal system

    South Africa’s Stance and Actions

    • Preventive Obligation: Following its application to the ICJ, South Africa stated its obligation to prevent genocide, seeking urgent provisional measures to halt violence in Gaza.
    • Israel’s Response: Israel has strongly condemned South Africa’s accusations, terming them as “blood libel.”
    • Potential Impact of ICJ Ruling: Even if the ICJ issues provisional measures, Israel, like Russia in the Ukraine case, may choose to ignore them.

    Historical Roots of South Africa’s Position

    • Longstanding Criticism of Israel: South Africa has a history of criticizing Israel, including suspending diplomatic relations and expressing solidarity with Palestine.
    • Colonialism and Empathy for Palestine: South Africa’s own history of colonialism and apartheid has fostered empathy towards the Palestinian cause.
    • Influential Figures: Leaders like Nelson Mandela have historically supported Palestinian rights.
    • Resistance to Western Influence: South Africa’s stance is partly influenced by a desire to resist Western-dominated worldviews, evident in its approach to global issues like the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

    Economic and Political Considerations

    • Trade Relations with Israel: Despite being Israel’s largest African trading partner, South Africa has maintained its support for Palestine.
    • Shift in African Nations’ Stance: While many African countries have softened their stance towards Israel, South Africa remains steadfast due to the ANC’s anti-discrimination roots and resistance to Western hegemony.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Trade and Ideology: South Africa’s actions reflect a complex interplay of historical empathy, political ideology, and economic considerations in its foreign policy.
    • Global Implications: This move at the ICJ underscores the ongoing tensions in international relations, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and broader geopolitical dynamics.

  • Arun Prakash writes: Indian Navy in a threatening Red Sea

    Greece to join US-led coalition to protect Red Sea shipping from Houthis | Houthis News | Al Jazeera

    Central idea 

    The central idea focuses on the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping, emphasizing the importance of navies and diplomatic efforts to maintain stability in the Indian Ocean. Historical trade warfare context and the need to address challenges like drone warfare underscore the urgency in safeguarding international trade routes. India’s proactive role and diplomatic leverage play a crucial role in ensuring regional stability.

    Key Highlights:

    • Houthi rebels, post the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, pose a threat to Red Sea merchant-shipping traffic.
    • Alfred Mahan’s emphasis on navies as a means to protect foreign trade and commerce for national prosperity.
    • Indian Ocean’s vital role in global economy with 1,00,000 annual merchantmen, carrying 80% of the world’s oil.
    • Indian Navy’s proactive role as a “preferred security partner” in maintaining good order at sea.

    Key Challenges:

    • Rising threat to Red Sea shipping by Houthi rebels affecting global trade.
    • Historical instances of trade warfare impacting security and prosperity.
    • Critical choke points in the Indian Ocean vulnerable to interdiction by states, pirates, and terrorists.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Choke points: Narrow passages in the Indian Ocean constricting shipping traffic.
    • Tanker war: Strategy targeting merchant ships to impact trade, as seen in the Iran-Iraq conflict.
    • Flag state: State in which a ship is registered, exercising exclusive jurisdiction over vessels.

    For Djibouti, It's All About Location

    Key Quotes:

    • “The necessity of a navy… springs from the existence of peaceful shipping…”
    • “The Indian Navy’s self-assigned role of ‘preferred security partner’ in the region.”

    Anecdotes:

    • Eight-year-long Iran-Iraq conflict saw a “tanker war” impacting merchant ships in the Persian Gulf.
    • Houthi rebels launching attacks on US Navy units and merchant shipping in the Bab al Mandab Strait.

    Key Statements:

    • Indian Navy’s commendable alacrity in responding to emergent situations in the Red Sea.
    • US launching operation “Prosperity Guardian” to safeguard Red Sea shipping.

    Key Examples and References:

    • Germany targeting Allied merchant shipping in 20th-century global conflicts.
    • Houthi attacks in the Bab al Mandab Strait affecting merchant ships seeking safe passage.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Importance of maintaining good order at sea for India’s own interest and international commitment.
    • Challenges posed by ongoing Yemeni civil war affecting shipping in the Red Sea.
    • Complexity of the conflict involving Saudi Arabia-Iran proxy clash and multilateral dimensions.

    Way Forward:

    • India leveraging its good standing with Iran and Israel to urge moderation and restraint.
    • Addressing the challenges posed by drone warfare and evolving effective counter-measures.
    • Ensuring diplomatic efforts to prevent the west Asian conflagration from spreading to the Indian Ocean.