💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Financial Inclusion in India and Its Challenges

    IRDAI’s ambitious plan ‘Bima Trinity’

    | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Inclusive Growth & Issues

    bima

    Central Idea

    • The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in India aims to implement ambitious plans to improve the insurance sector.
    • The key objectives include offering affordable bundled policies that cover multiple risks and providing expedited claim settlements with value-added services.

    “Bima Trinity” – A Comprehensive Plan

    • The IRDA is collaborating with general and life insurance firms to develop a comprehensive plan called “Bima Trinity.”
    1. Bima Sugam
    2. Bima Vistar
    3. Bima Vaahaks

     (1) Bima Sugam – One-Stop Shop Platform

    • The IRDA is developing the Bima Sugam platform, which will integrate insurers and distributors onto a single platform.
    • This platform will serve as a one-stop shop for customers, simplifying the process of purchasing policies and accessing services.
    • Customers will be able to pursue service requests and settle claims through the same portal, enhancing convenience and efficiency.

    (2) Bima Vistar

    • The IRDA is working on the development of Bima Vistar, a bundled risk cover that encompasses life, health, property, and casualties or accidents.
    • This bundled policy aims to provide comprehensive protection against a wide range of risks.
    • Policyholders will have defined benefits for each risk, allowing for faster claim payouts without the need for surveyors.
    • Bima Vistar will offer defined benefits for each risk category, ensuring clarity and ease of understanding for policyholders.
    • If a loss occurs, the defined benefit will be promptly transferred to the policyholder’s bank account, eliminating unnecessary waiting periods.

    (3) Bima Vaahaks: Women-Centric Workforce

    • As part of the Bima Trinity plan, the IRDA envisions a women-centric workforce known as Bima Vaahaks.
    • Bima Vaahaks will operate at the Gram Sabha level and engage with women heads of households.
    • Their role will be to educate and convince women about the benefits of a comprehensive insurance product like Bima Vistar.
    • They will emphasize the usefulness of a composite insurance product like Bima Vistar during times of distress.
    • By highlighting the advantages and addressing concerns, these Bima Vaahaks will play a crucial role in empowering women and ensuring their financial security.

    Other developments

    • Leveraging Digitized Registries for Faster Claims: With the increasing digitization of birth and death registries in many states, the IRDA plans to integrate its platform with these registries. This integration would allow for seamless sharing of data and facilitate faster claim settlements.
    • Streamlined Claim Settlement Process: Policyholders can access the platform, retrieve their policy from the insurers’ repository, and provide the necessary documents, such as the death certificate. This swift claim settlement process revolutionizes the insurance industry by significantly reducing the time taken for policyholders to receive their claims.

    Expansion of Insurance Penetration

    (1) Legislative Amendments for Increased Investments

    • The IRDA plans to introduce legislative amendments to attract more investments into the insurance sector. These amendments would allow for differentiated licenses for niche players, similar to the banking sector.
    • The objective is to encourage more participation, ultimately making insurance more accessible and affordable for citizens.

    (2) Making Insurance Available, Affordable, and Accessible

    • The IRDA is focused on adopting a multi-level approach to make insurance available, affordable, and accessible to a larger population.
    • The aim is to address the low insurance penetration in the country and double the number of jobs in the sector.
    • The regulator believes that by implementing these changes, insurance can become more inclusive and reach citizens at the Gram Sabha (village council), district, and state levels.

    (3) Identifying Significant Protection Gaps

    • The IRDA acknowledges the existence of significant protection gaps in various lines of insurance, including life, health, motor, property, and crops.
    • These gaps highlight the need for comprehensive coverage and prompt claim settlements.

    Proposed Amendments for Regulatory Reforms

    The IRDA has proposed amendments to insurance laws to enable regulatory reforms that encourage increased investment and innovation.

    • Differentiated capital requirements: These amendments aim to introduce differentiated capital requirements for niche insurers, attracting more investment into the sector.
    • Other value-added services: Additionally, the proposed amendments will allow insurers to offer value-added services alongside policies, catering to the evolving needs and preferences of customers.
    • Encouraging new players and services: The proposed amendments will pave the way for the entry of new players in the insurance sector. Micro, regional, small, specialized, and composite insurers will have the opportunity to operate and cater to different geographical areas and population segments.

    Comparison with Banking Sector

    • The IRDA draws parallels between the proposed changes in the insurance sector and the existing diversity in the banking sector.
    • Similar to the banking sector, which includes various types of banks addressing different needs and geographies, the insurance sector can benefit from a diverse range of insurers.
    • Payment banks, small finance banks, cooperative banks, and other specialized institutions serve specific purposes and cater to distinct segments of the population.

    Way Forward

    The IRDA’s initiatives, including bundled policies and expedited claim settlements, have the potential to significantly enhance insurance accessibility and affordability in India. To move forward effectively, the following steps can be considered:

    • Collaborating with Insurers: The IRDA should work closely with insurance companies to refine and implement the Bima Trinity plan, ensuring the success of bundled policies and integrated platforms.
    • Technological Integration: Prioritizing the integration of birth and death registries with the IRDA platform to expedite claim settlements. Emphasizing technological advancements and partnerships for seamless data sharing and processing.
    • Awareness and Education: Launch a comprehensive awareness campaign in collaboration with insurers and stakeholders to educate the public, especially women, about the benefits of bundled policies and comprehensive insurance coverage.
    • Regulatory Reforms: Expediting proposed amendments to insurance laws to enable differentiated capital requirements and value-added services. Active engagement with relevant government bodies to ensure smooth implementation.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Establishing a robust framework for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of bundled policies, claim settlement processes, and insurance penetration in different regions.
    • Continuous Innovation: Encouraging insurers to continuously innovate and develop new products and services that address emerging risks and meet evolving consumer preferences in the rapidly evolving insurance landscape.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Judicial Reforms

    Why do judges seek ‘RECUSAL’ for themselves?

    | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

    Central Idea

    Recusals by judges have been a frequent occurrence in recent weeks, raising important questions about the circumstances under which judges should recuse themselves, the need for recording reasons for recusal, and the reliance on individual judges’ discretion.

    What is Recusal?

    • Recusal is the removal of oneself as a judge or policymaker in a particular matter, especially because of a conflict of interest.
    • Recusal usually takes place when a judge has a conflict of interest or has a prior association with the parties in the case.
    • For example, if the case pertains to a company in which the judge holds stakes, the apprehension would seem reasonable.
    • Similarly, if the judge has, in the past, appeared for one of the parties involved in a case, the call for recusal may seem right.
    • A recusal inevitably leads to delay. The case goes back to the Chief Justice, who has to constitute a fresh Bench.

    Reasons for Judicial Recusal

    • Conflict of interest: Recusal often occurs when a judge has a direct conflict of interest or a prior association with the parties involved in a case. For instance, if a judge holds stakes in a company involved in the case, it would be reasonable to recuse themselves.
    • Earlier difference of opinion: Similarly, if the judge previously represented one of the parties in a case, recusal may be necessary.
    • Prevent bias: Some judges may recuse themselves based on apprehension of bias, while others may refuse to withdraw, considering the potential damage to the institution.
    • Absence of Codified Rules: India currently lacks codified rules specifically governing recusals, but the Supreme Court has addressed the issue through various judgments.

    Procedure for Recusal

    • Automatic and Plea-based Recusal: Recusal can happen automatically when a judge recognizes a conflict of interest or when a party raises a plea for recusal due to bias or personal interest.
    • Judge’s Discretion: The decision to recuse rests solely on the conscience and discretion of the judge; no party can compel a judge to withdraw.
    • Transfer of the Case: When a judge recuses, the case is transferred to the Chief Justice, who reassigns it to an alternate bench to ensure the continuity of proceedings.

    Recording Reasons for Recusal

    • Responsibility of Judges: Since there are no statutory rules, judges are responsible for recording their reasons for recusal.
    • Oral or Written Disclosure: Reasons for recusal can be specified orally in open court or through a written order, or they may remain undisclosed.

    Criticism

    • Lack of transparency: This regarding reasons for recusal has faced criticism, particularly when mass recusals occur in sensitive cases.
    • Motives undisclosed: Some judgments have argued for the need to indicate reasons to avoid attributing motives to recusals, while others express concerns that specifying reasons could lead to challenges and hinder the recusal process.
    • Inevitable delay: Recusal inevitably leads to delays in the proceedings as the case is transferred back to the Chief Justice, who must assign it to a fresh bench.

    Past Supreme Court Rules on Recusal

    • Factors for Impartiality: The Supreme Court has established various factors to determine the impartiality of a judge in previous judgments.
    • Reasonableness of Apprehension: The reasonableness of the party’s apprehension of bias is a crucial consideration when deciding whether recusal is necessary.
    • Definition of Judicial Bias: Judicial bias is defined as a predisposition that compromises a judge’s impartiality.
    • Real Danger Test: Pecuniary interests automatically disqualify a judge, while other cases require applying the “real danger” test to evaluate the possibility of bias.

    Issues with Recusal

    • Abdication of Duty: Recusal has been viewed as a potential abdication of a judge’s duty, raising concerns about maintaining institutional civility while fulfilling the independent role of judges as adjudicators.
    • Importance of Providing Reasons: Justice Kurian Joseph, in his separate opinion in the 2015 National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) judgment, emphasized the importance of judges providing reasons for recusal to enhance transparency.
    • Constitutional Duty for Transparency: Indicating reasons for recusal is a constitutional duty, reflecting the need for judges to be transparent and accountable.

    Practices in Foreign Jurisdictions

    • United States: It has well-defined laws and codes that explicitly detail grounds for recusal, such as financial interests, prior involvement as a lawyer or witness, and relationships with parties.
    • United Kingdom: It has adopted the “real danger” test to disqualify judges based on substantive evidence of bias, although this approach has faced criticism.

    Importance of Appearance of Bias

    • The European Convention of Human Rights emphasizes the significance of the “appearance of bias” to ensure fairness from the perspective of a reasonable observer.

    Way Forward

    • To ensure fairness and maintain public trust in the justice system, it is crucial to establish clear guidelines and rules for recusal in India.
    • Codifying principles, requiring judges to record reasons for recusal, and promoting transparency can address concerns about bias and uphold the integrity of the judiciary.
    • Learning from foreign jurisdictions, such as studying the comprehensive recusal laws in the United States, can provide valuable insights for developing a robust framework for recusal in India.
    • Enhancing transparency and accountability in the recusal process will contribute to a stronger and more trusted judicial system.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Wildlife Conservation Efforts

    Is Project Cheetah failing?

    | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    cheetah

    Following the death of three cheetah cubs this week, the Centre has appointed a new steering committee, comprising national and international experts, to oversee the implementation of Project Cheetah.

    What is Project Cheetah?

    • After being reported extinct in India for seven decades, the cheetah is set to make a comeback through ‘Project Cheetah’.
    • The Government of India reintroduced eight African cheetahs, consisting of five females and three males, at the Kuno National Park in Madhya Pradesh.

    Origin and Approval of Project Cheetah

    • Project Cheetah received approval from the Supreme Court of India in January 2020 as a pilot program to reintroduce the cheetah species to the country.
    • The initiative was first proposed in 2009 by Indian conservationists in collaboration with the Cheetah Conservation Fund (CCF), a non-profit organization headquartered in Namibia.
    • The CCF is dedicated to the preservation and rehabilitation of cheetahs in their natural habitats.

    Chronology of events

    • Medieval times: During the Mughal Period, they were extensively used for hunting, and Emperor Akbar owned a menagerie of 1,000 cheetahs. Various states in Central India, particularly Gwalior, had cheetahs for a long time.
    • 1947: The country’s last three surviving cheetahs were shot by Maharaja Ramanuj Pratap Singh, the ruler of a small princely state in Chhattisgarh. India’s last spotted cheetah died in the Sal forests of Chhattisgarh’s Koriya district in 1948, leading to the animal’s official extinction in India in 1952.
    • 1970s: The first concrete efforts to reintroduce the cheetah began in the 1970s during talks with Iran’s Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi. The plan involved swapping India’s Asiatic lions for Iran’s Asiatic cheetahs.
    • 2009: Another attempt was made to acquire Iranian cheetahs, but it was unsuccessful as Iran did not permit the cloning or export of its cheetahs.
    • 2012: The reintroduction project was halted in 2012 when the Supreme Court ordered a stay on it.
    • 2020: In 2020, South African experts surveyed four potential reintroduction sites: Kuno-Palpur, Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary, and Madhav National Park.

    Basis of recent translocation

    • Coexistence approach: India’s approach is unique as it aims to reintroduce the cheetah in an unfenced protected area using a coexistence approach.
    • Fenced protection: Fencing has been successful in other countries but limits population growth and range.
    • Perfect breeding area selection: Kuno NP’s core conservation area is largely free of human-made threats.

    Various challenges

    • Retaliatory killing: Anthropogenic threats like snaring for bush meat and retaliatory killings pose risks to the cheetahs.
    • Fencing issues: Maintaining cheetahs and their prey base in an enclosure is considered impossible.
    • Habitation stress: Captivity and changes in habitat induce anxiety and stress, hindering reproduction.
    • Acclimatization issues: The climate, prey species, and overall conditions in Kuno forest may not stimulate mating and reproduction.
    • Prolonged captivity: Concerns are raised about the prolonged captivity of cheetahs before translocation, which may have increased stress and vulnerability.

    Is the project a failure?

    (1) Understanding adaptation challenges

    • The deaths among cheetahs must be considered in light of their natural lifespan and the difficulties they face in adapting to Indian conditions.
    • Daksha, a female cheetah, died from injuries sustained during a violent mating attempt by two males, which aligns with known predator behavior.

    (2) Immediate assessment is an absurdity

    • The success of wildlife breeding programs is not an overnight phenomena. It is premature to judge at this juncture.
    • The increase in lion and tiger populations in Gir, Gujarat also took sustained efforts over decades.

    (3) Complexities and Publicity of the Project

    • The cheetahs’ arrival in India followed extensive government planning, Supreme Court hearings, negotiations with multiple countries, logistical challenges, and the PM’s involvement.
    • The project received significant publicity. This necessarily doesn’t mean that the PM has a Midas touch.

    Conclusion

    • The relocation program is considered an experiment, and every death and birth should not be seen as a definitive success or failure.
    • However, clear criteria and timelines must be established for project managers to determine if adjustments are necessary.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Civil Services Reforms

    Code of Conduct for Civil Servants: A Review

    | Governance | Mains Paper 2: Civil Service

    Central Idea

    • The civil services in India have witnessed a resurgence in popularity, with a growing number of candidates applying each year.
    • In this article, we delve into the various rules that govern civil servants and the restrictions they face throughout their career.

    Civil Services and Services Allocation

    • Successful applicants in the civil services examination can join various services based on their rank and personal preferences.
    • Three prominent services, known as All India Services, include the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), Indian Police Service (IPS), and Indian Forest Service (IFS).
    • Other services, known as Central Civil Services, are under the central government and do not have a state cadre system.

    Rules for Conduct of Civil Servants

    • Civil servants are governed by two sets of rules:
    1. All India Services Conduct Rules, 1968, and
    2. Central Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1964
    • These rules cover a wide range of issues, outlining the expected behaviour and conduct of civil servants.

    Issues with these rules

    (1) Vague and Specific Rules

    • The Conduct Rules include both vague and specific provisions.
    • Rule 3(1) emphasizes maintaining absolute integrity and devotion to duty without engaging in any behaviour unbecoming of a civil servant.
    • Rule 4(1) prohibits the use of one’s position or influence to secure employment for family members with private organizations or non-governmental organizations.

    (2) Restrictions on Political Affiliation and Expression of Opinion

    • Rule 5(1) prohibits civil servants from being members of political parties or organizations involved in politics.
    • Rule 7 restricts civil servants from making adverse criticisms of government policies or actions in public media or documents.

    (3) Prohibition on Dowry

    • Giving or taking dowry is strictly prohibited for civil servants under Rule 11(1-A).
    • Civil servants are required to report any gifts exceeding Rs. 25,000 received from near relatives or personal friends.

    Amendments and Updates to the Rules

    • The Conduct Rules are not static and have been amended and updated over time.
    • The government determines the political nature of organizations, impacting civil servants’ association with them.
    • Additional sub-rules were added in 2014, focusing on maintaining high ethical standards, integrity, political neutrality, and accountability.

    Coverage and Penalties

    • Civil servants are covered by these rules as soon as they join training, which is part of their probation period.
    • Violations of the rules can result in major penalties, including dismissal from the service.
    • The Prevention of Corruption Act (POCA) complements the Conduct Rules in addressing corruption issues.

    Challenges in Enforcement

    • While the rules outline penalties, enforcing them can be challenging.
    • Complaints with proper details are necessary for action to be taken.
    • Proper channels, such as the Central Vigilance Commission and investigation agencies, exist for filing complaints.

    Way Forward

    • Ensuring the effective implementation of the Conduct Rules requires streamlining the complaint process and encouraging transparency.
    • Regular review and updates of the rules can help address emerging challenges and ensure their relevance.
    • Training programs and awareness campaigns can enhance civil servants’ understanding of their responsibilities and the consequences of non-compliance.
    • Collaborative efforts between government bodies, civil society, and the public can foster a culture of accountability and ethical conduct among civil servants.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Civil Aviation Sector – CA Policy 2016, UDAN, Open Skies, etc.

    Ministry of Civil Aviation launches UDAN 5.1

    Prelims Only | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

    udan

    Central Idea

    • The Ministry of Civil Aviation has launched UDAN 5.1, an extension of the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) – Ude Desh Ka Aam Nagrik (UDAN), to enhance connectivity to remote areas of India.

    What is UDAN 5.1?

    • This round specifically focuses on helicopter routes, aiming to achieve last mile connectivity.
    • It allows operators to operate routes where one of the origin or destination locations is in a priority area, such as hilly regions, islands, or North East states.

    Features of the scheme

    • Expanded Scope of Operations: Operators can now operate routes where one of the origin or destination locations is in a priority area, compared to the previous requirement of both points being in priority areas.
    • Reduced Airfare Caps: Airfare caps for helicopter flights have been reduced by up to 25%, making flying in helicopters more affordable for passengers.
    • Increased Viability Gap Funding (VGF) Caps: VGF caps for operators using single and twin-engine helicopters have been substantially increased to enhance the financial viability of operating the awarded routes.
    • Coverage Expansion: UDAN 5.1 aims to cover a significantly larger number of routes compared to previous rounds, further extending the benefits of air connectivity to unserved regions.

    Importance of UDAN 5.1

    • Democratization of Air Travel and Last-Mile Connectivity: UDAN 5.1 reflects the deeper democratization of air travel, with a focus on providing last-mile connectivity to remote regions of India.
    • Consultations and Stakeholder Engagement: The current version of the scheme has been designed after extensive consultations with all stakeholders, including helicopter operators.

    Way Forward

    • Successful Implementation: Ensure effective implementation of UDAN 5.1, considering the expanded scope of operations, reduced airfare caps, and increased VGF caps.
    • Collaboration with Operators: Foster collaboration and engagement with helicopter operators to optimize last-mile connectivity and promote the growth of the helicopter segment in the civil aviation industry.
    • Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a robust monitoring and evaluation mechanism to assess the impact of UDAN 5.1 on remote regions, air travel affordability, and economic development.
    • Promoting Tourism: Leverage the increased helicopter penetration to boost tourism in remote areas, thereby supporting the hospitality industry and local economies.
    • Future Expansion: Continuously assess the potential for further expansion of the UDAN scheme, considering new routes and modes of transportation to improve connectivity to underserved regions of India.

     

    Back2Basics:All Versions of UDAN Scheme

    Launch Date Focus Category Distance Length Cap Viability Gap Funding Cap Exclusivity Period
    UDAN 1.0 April 27, 2017 Category 1 (19-78 Seats) 500 km 70% for Cat-1, 90% for Hilly States, J&K, Ladakh, NE and Island regions 3 years 10 years
    UDAN 2.0 November 16, 2018 Category 1 (19-78 Seats) 500 km Same as UDAN 1.0 3 years 10 years
    UDAN 3.0 November 8, 2019 Category 1 (19-78 Seats) 800 km Same as UDAN 1.0 3 years 10 years
    UDAN 4.0 December 3, 2020 Category 1 (19-78 Seats) 1,200 km Same as UDAN 1.0 1 year 10 years
    UDAN 5.0 September 1, 2021 Category 2 (20-80 Seats) and 3 (>80 Seats) No restriction 60% for Priority Areas, 20% for Non-Priority Areas 1 year 10 years

     

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • G20 : Economic Cooperation ahead

    Strengthening Disaster Risk Reduction: G20’s Role and Priorities

    op-ed snap | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Disaster Management

    Central Idea

    • The G20 nations, representing a population of 4.7 billion people, are exposed to significant risks from natural disasters and face substantial vulnerabilities. In the World Risk Index, four G20 countries are among the top 10 most vulnerable nations. The economic impact of disasters in the G20 countries alone amounts to an estimated annual average loss of $218 billion. It is imperative to prioritize disaster risk reduction measures to mitigate these losses and protect development gains.

    G20’s Role in Driving Global Goals

    • Platform for International Cooperation: The G20 provides a platform for international cooperation and collaboration among the world’s major economies. It brings together leaders from diverse nations to discuss global challenges, share best practices, and coordinate efforts to address common goals.
    • Influence and Economic Power: The G20 nations represent a significant share of the global economy, accounting for approximately 85% of global GDP and two-thirds of the world’s population. Their collective influence and economic power give them the capacity to drive global initiatives and mobilize resources to address pressing issues.
    • Promoting Policy Coherence: The G20 promotes policy coherence by fostering dialogue and coordination among its member nations. Through discussions, agreements, and joint statements, the G20 seeks to align policies and actions to address global challenges, including those related to disaster risk reduction.
    • Innovative Financing Mechanisms: The G20 has the ability to explore and promote innovative financing mechanisms for global goals. This includes mobilizing financial resources from governments, multilateral institutions, capital markets, insurance companies, philanthropies, and communities. By maximizing the impact of financial resources, the G20 can support initiatives related to disaster risk reduction and other priority areas.
    • Advancing International Frameworks and Agreements: The G20 plays a vital role in advancing international frameworks and agreements related to disaster risk reduction. For instance, the G20 can support the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which provides a global roadmap for reducing disaster risks and enhancing resilience.
    • Sharing Best Practices and Lessons Learned: Through the G20 platform, member countries can share best practices, experiences, and lessons learned in disaster risk reduction. This exchange of knowledge and expertise contributes to the development of effective strategies, policies, and approaches that can be replicated and scaled up globally.
    • Driving Innovation and Research: The G20 can drive innovation and research by promoting investment in research and development related to disaster risk reduction. This includes supporting scientific advancements, technological innovations, and data-driven approaches that enhance understanding, preparedness, and response to disasters.
    • Influencing Global Agendas: As major economies, the G20 nations have significant influence on global agendas. By prioritizing and advocating for specific issues, such as disaster risk reduction, the G20 can shape global discourse, policies, and actions, mobilizing international attention and resources towards addressing these challenges

    The vulnerability of G20 countries to disasters

    • Geographic Location: Several G20 countries are located in regions prone to specific hazards. For instance, countries like Japan, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey are situated in seismically active zones, making them vulnerable to earthquakes and tsunamis. Coastal nations, including the United States, China, India, Brazil, and Australia, face the risks of tropical cyclones, storm surges, and coastal flooding.
    • Climate Extremes: G20 countries experience a wide range of climate-related hazards. For instance, Canada and Russia face risks associated with extreme cold, while Australia and Brazil are susceptible to wildfires and droughts. Heatwaves and heavy rainfall leading to floods pose significant risks in countries like India, Germany, and South Korea.
    • Population Density: Several G20 countries have high population densities, increasing their vulnerability to disasters. The concentration of people and infrastructure in urban areas amplifies the potential impacts of hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and storms. Cities like Tokyo, Mexico City, Mumbai, Istanbul, and Shanghai face unique challenges due to their large populations and exposure to multiple hazards.
    • Infrastructure and Urbanization: Rapid urbanization and inadequate infrastructure planning can exacerbate vulnerability to disasters. Poorly constructed buildings, inadequate drainage systems, and improper land use practices can heighten the impacts of hazards. G20 countries with rapid urban growth, such as China and India, face challenges related to resilient urban development.
    • Socioeconomic Factors: Socioeconomic factors such as poverty, inequality, and limited access to resources can increase vulnerability to disasters. Countries with significant disparities in wealth distribution, such as India, Brazil, and South Africa, often face challenges in adequately addressing disaster risks and providing timely response and recovery.
    • Environmental Degradation: G20 countries also grapple with environmental degradation, which can exacerbate vulnerability to disasters. Deforestation, soil erosion, and loss of wetlands and natural buffers diminish the ability of ecosystems to mitigate and absorb the impacts of hazards. This is particularly relevant for countries like Brazil, Indonesia, and Russia, which are home to ecologically sensitive regions

    India’s Leadership in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)

    • Initiating a New Workstream in G20: India has taken a proactive step by initiating a new workstream within the G20 focused on disaster risk reduction. This highlights India’s recognition of the importance of international collaboration and concerted efforts to address disaster risks at a global level.
    • Five Priorities Outlined in the Working Group: In the first meeting of the G20 working group on disaster risk reduction, India put forth five priorities to guide the group’s efforts. These priorities include universal coverage of early warning systems, emphasis on disaster and climate-resilient infrastructure, improving financing frameworks, enhancing response capabilities, and applying ecosystem-based approaches to disaster risk.
    • Transforming Disaster Financing: India has spearheaded efforts to transform the way governments finance disaster risk reduction. Recognizing the limitations of traditional budget allocations, India has explored innovative financing tools and mechanisms. This includes creating reserve funds, dedicated lines of credit, and leveraging global resources to support disaster-resilient infrastructure development.
    • Targeted Efforts to Reduce Losses: India has made targeted efforts to reduce losses from disasters through comprehensive risk management strategies. By focusing on areas such as flood risk management, India has implemented measures to minimize the impacts of extreme weather conditions, protect lives, and enhance disaster preparedness.
    • Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI): India and the United States currently co-chair the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure. The CDRI aims to promote investments in resilient infrastructure and foster international collaboration to enhance disaster resilience globally. India’s leadership in this coalition reflects its commitment to driving resilience-building efforts.
    • Implementation of Sendai Framework: India has aligned its disaster risk reduction efforts with the Sendai Framework, a global framework for DRR. The 10-point agenda outlined by India’s Prime Minister after the adoption of the Sendai Framework guides the country in the implementation of comprehensive DRR strategies.

    Key Themes for Future Action

    • Reimagining Financing for Disaster Risk Reduction: Explore innovative financing tools, including reserve funds, dedicated lines of credit, and global resource mobilization. While green financing has gained momentum, greater attention should be given to disaster risk financing, especially for countries like India with increasing capital expenditure.
    • Differential Strategies for Extensive and Intensive Risks: Develop targeted approaches to reduce losses from frequent but moderate impact events (extensive risks) such as heatwaves, lightning, floods, and landslides. These events accumulate significant losses and necessitate specific risk reduction measures.
    • Convergence of Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation: Integrate efforts to address both disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Analytical and implementation capacities for disaster risk reduction should support climate change adaptation, ensuring synergies between flood management structures and adaptation efforts.
    • Priority Access to Early Warning Systems: Early warning systems, such as cyclone early warnings, should be treated as global public goods, accessible to all populations irrespective of their economic strength. The G20 can lead by example, setting up mechanisms to ensure universal access to early warning systems in line with the UN Secretary General’s initiative.
    • Multi-tiered and Multi-sectoral Effort: Disaster risk reduction requires an integrated approach across levels and sectors. Integration from local to global levels and horizontal collaboration across sectors will enhance readiness to manage unknown risks, considering the interlinkages and interdependence of the world

    Need for Convergence of Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation

    • Shared Risks and Drivers: Both DRR and CCA address risks associated with natural hazards and climate change impacts. Disasters are often exacerbated by climate change, while climate change can intensify the frequency and severity of disasters. Converging efforts allows for a comprehensive and integrated approach to address these shared risks and underlying drivers.
    • Synergies in Solutions: DRR and CCA strategies share common elements and can leverage synergies in their solutions. For example, building disaster-resilient infrastructure can contribute to climate change adaptation by considering future climate scenarios. Similarly, nature-based solutions, such as protecting and restoring ecosystems, can provide benefits for both disaster risk reduction and climate resilience.
    • Efficiency and Resource Optimization: Converging DRR and CCA efforts allows for the efficient use of resources, avoiding duplication and maximizing the effectiveness of interventions. Instead of implementing separate and parallel initiatives, integrated approaches can streamline efforts, optimize funding, and improve overall outcomes.
    • Integrated Risk Management: Combining DRR and CCA enables a holistic approach to risk management. By integrating climate projections, vulnerability assessments, and disaster risk assessments, decision-makers can develop comprehensive risk management strategies that address both current and future risks.
    • Co-benefits for Sustainable Development: Integrating DRR and CCA contributes to sustainable development goals. By reducing disaster risks and enhancing climate resilience, communities can protect livelihoods, preserve ecosystems, ensure food security, and promote social well-being. This integrated approach aligns with the broader agenda of sustainable development.
    • Policy and Institutional Integration: Convergence of DRR and CCA necessitates policy coherence and institutional coordination. Aligning strategies, frameworks, and institutions responsible for DRR and CCA facilitates better integration of risk reduction and adaptation measures. This coordination strengthens governance structures and enhances implementation effectiveness.
    • Adaptive Capacity Building: Addressing the interconnected challenges of disasters and climate change requires enhancing adaptive capacities at various levels. By combining efforts, stakeholders can work collaboratively to build capacities for disaster response, early warning systems, community engagement, and climate-resilient practices, thereby enhancing overall resilience.

    Conclusion

    • Disaster preparedness has been a priority of India for last few years. India has taken significant steps in transforming disaster risk reduction financing and targeted loss reduction efforts. Chairing the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure alongside the United States, India’s commitment to disaster preparedness is reflected in the creation of a new workstream under the G20. By leveraging their economic power, promoting policy coherence, and fostering international cooperation, the G20 can contribute to building a safer, more resilient, and sustainable world.

    Also read:

    India’s G20 Presidency and Disaster Risk Management

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • RBI Notifications

    Evaluating the RBI’s Recent Currency withdrawal Decision

    op-ed snap | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Indian Economy

    Currency

    Central Idea

    • When discussing the value of a currency, the focus often revolves around its exchange rate and purchasing power. However, there is a more fundamental aspect to consider is the confidence citizens have in its acceptance and stability as a medium of exchange and store of value. This confidence is deeply rooted in the trust placed in the central bank, such as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

    Rationale behind the decision to withdraw ₹2,000 notes from circulation while keeping them legal tender

    • Promoting Clean Note Policy: The withdrawal is part of the RBI’s initiative to promote a cleaner currency system. By encouraging the exchange of soiled or damaged notes, the RBI aims to improve the overall quality of currency in circulation.
    • Curbing Black Money: The decision is aimed at curbing the hoarding of black money, as higher denomination notes are often associated with illicit activities. By limiting the usage of ₹2,000 notes, the RBI intends to discourage the accumulation of unaccounted wealth.
    • Enhancing Transparency: The withdrawal is expected to increase transparency in financial transactions. By reducing the availability of high-value currency, the RBI aims to encourage a shift towards digital payments and traceable transactions.
    • Addressing Counterfeit Concerns: The withdrawal may help mitigate the risks associated with counterfeit currency. High-denomination notes are often targeted by counterfeiters, and by withdrawing ₹2,000 notes, the RBI aims to combat counterfeiting and maintain the integrity of the currency.
    • Managing Currency Supply: The withdrawal allows the RBI to better manage the supply and circulation of currency. By gradually replacing ₹2,000 notes with lower denomination currency, the RBI can ensure an adequate availability of notes for day-to-day transactions.
    • Aligning with Majority Usage: The decision is based on the observation that a significant majority of transactions in India involve lower monetary values. By withdrawing ₹2,000 notes, which are predominantly used for high-value transactions, the RBI aims to align the currency with the needs of the majority of the population.

    Potential Impact of this move on Business and Economy

    • Uncertainty and Business Sentiment: The move to withdraw ₹2,000 notes may create uncertainty among businesses, as sudden changes in the currency system can disrupt economic activities. This uncertainty can affect business sentiment and decision-making, potentially leading to a cautious approach in investments and expansion plans.
    • Cash-dependent Sectors: Certain sectors that heavily rely on cash transactions, such as small businesses, informal sectors, and rural areas, may face challenges in adjusting to the withdrawal. The availability of lower denomination notes to replace ₹2,000 notes and the need for individuals to exchange their existing notes can temporarily disrupt cash flow in these sectors.
    • Digital Payment Adoption: With the reduction in the availability of high-value currency, there may be a push for increased adoption of digital payment methods. The withdrawal can potentially accelerate the ongoing shift towards digital transactions, as individuals and businesses seek alternatives to cash transactions.
    • Impact on Consumption: The withdrawal can have implications for consumer spending patterns. If individuals perceive a scarcity of high-value currency, it may affect their spending behavior, particularly for larger purchases. This could lead to a short-term dampening of consumer demand and impact certain sectors of the economy, such as real estate and luxury goods.
    • Counterfeit and Black Money: The withdrawal of ₹2,000 notes aims to combat counterfeiting and curb the hoarding of black money. If successful, it can contribute to enhancing the integrity of the currency and promoting a more transparent financial system. However, the actual impact on eliminating black money and counterfeit currency will depend on the effectiveness of enforcement measures and the adoption of alternative means for illicit transactions.
    • Financial Inclusion: The withdrawal may pose challenges for individuals who have limited access to banking services or digital payment infrastructure. Efforts will be needed to ensure that the transition does not hinder financial inclusion and that adequate support is provided to vulnerable segments of the population.

    Concerns and arguments over the central bank’s reputation

    • Demonetization Fallout: The implementation of demonetization in 2016, where high-value currency notes were invalidated, received mixed reactions. Critics argue that the RBI’s involvement in the decision-making process and its execution raised questions about the central bank’s independence and its ability to manage the country’s monetary policies effectively.
    • Inflation Management: The RBI’s primary mandate is to maintain price stability and control inflation. However, the central bank has faced challenges in achieving its inflation targets consistently. Critics contend that the RBI’s monetary policy framework and communication strategies could be improved to ensure better alignment with its objectives and boost its reputation in inflation management.
    • Banking Sector Oversight: The RBI is responsible for overseeing the banking sector and maintaining financial stability. Some argue that the central bank could have been more proactive in detecting and addressing issues related to non-performing assets (NPAs) and the overall health of banks. The perceived delays in taking corrective measures and addressing governance issues have raised concerns about the effectiveness of the RBI’s regulatory oversight.
    • Communication and Transparency: The RBI’s communication and transparency have been points of discussion. Critics argue that the central bank could enhance its communication strategies, ensuring clearer and more consistent messaging about policy decisions and their objectives.
    • Autonomy and Independence: The reputation of the RBI rests heavily on its autonomy and independence from external influences. Concerns have been raised over potential encroachments on the central bank’s independence, such as the invocation of certain provisions of the RBI Act and debates around the RBI’s relationship with the government. Preserving the RBI’s autonomy is seen as crucial for maintaining its reputation as a credible and independent institution.

    What measures RBI must take to restore and maintain its reputation?

    • Transparency and Communication: The RBI should prioritize transparency in its operations and decision-making process. It should provide clear and timely communication regarding policy decisions, objectives, and the rationale behind its actions. Regular and effective communication can help build public trust and enhance understanding of the RBI’s role in maintaining a stable and resilient financial system.
    • Independence and Autonomy: The RBI should emphasize its independence from political interference. It should ensure that its decision-making process remains free from external pressures and is based on sound economic principles. Upholding its autonomy strengthens the perception of the RBI as a credible and reliable institution.
    • Consistency and Predictability: A clear and consistent approach to monetary policy, regulation, and supervision fosters stability and confidence in the financial system. Avoiding abrupt shifts or reversals in policy direction can enhance the RBI’s reputation for sound decision-making.
    • Accountability and Oversight: The RBI should establish robust mechanisms for accountability and oversight. This includes effective internal controls, external audits, and appropriate checks and balances to ensure that the RBI’s policies and actions align with its mandate and serve the best interests of the economy. Accountability helps maintain public confidence in the RBI’s operations.
    • Economic Stability and Financial Inclusion: The RBI should prioritize its mandate of maintaining economic stability while promoting financial inclusion. By implementing effective monetary policies, managing inflation, and ensuring a resilient financial system, the RBI can contribute to sustainable economic growth and reduce income disparities.
    • Continuous Learning and Adaptation: The RBI should emphasize continuous learning, research, and adaptation to evolving economic and financial challenges. Staying informed about global best practices, monitoring emerging risks, and proactively addressing new challenges will enable the RBI to enhance its effectiveness and reputation as a forward-looking institution.

    Conclusion

    • The recent actions of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), including the withdrawal of the ₹2,000 note and the aftermath of the 2016 demonetization, have cast doubt on the RBI’s judgment and ability to uphold public trust. By aligning its actions with the long-term interests of the Indian economy, the RBI can preserve the value of the currency and ensure stability in the financial system. Only then can the RBI regain its reputation and fulfill its role as a trustworthy and effective central bank

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    RBI to pull out ₹2000 notes from active circulation

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Human Rights Issues

    GANHRI defers accreditation of India’s NHRC

    | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Statutory, Regulatory & Various Quasi-Judicial Bodies

    india nhrc ganhri

    Central Idea

    The Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), a UN-recognized organization, has deferred the accreditation of India’s National Human Rights Commission (NHRC-India) for the second time in a decade.

    GANHRI (Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions)
    Purpose Promote and protect human rights globally
    Year Established 1993
    Headquarters Geneva, Switzerland
    Members National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) from various countries
    Key Functions – Promoting and strengthening NHRIs worldwide

    – Advocating for human rights at national, regional, and global levels

    – Facilitating cooperation and sharing of best practices among NHRIs

    – Providing capacity-building support to NHRIs etc.
    Organizational Structure – President: Elected from GANHRI members for a specified term

    – Bureau: Assists the President in overseeing GANHRI’s work

    – Sub-Committees: Focused on specific thematic or regional issues
    Key Documents – Paris Principles: Provide guidance for the establishment and operation of NHRIs

    – GANHRI Strategy: Outlines the organization’s strategic objectives and actions

     

    Reasons for India’s Deferment

    The GANHRI’s letter to the NHRC cited several reasons for the deferment of accreditation, including:

    • Political Interference: The NHRC-India faced objections related to political interference in appointments, compromising its independence.
    • Police Involvement: Involving the police in probes into human rights violations raised concerns about impartiality and fair investigations.
    • Lack of Cooperation: The NHRC’s poor cooperation with civil society was criticized, hindering its effectiveness in protecting human rights.
    • Lack of Diversity: The GANHRI highlighted the lack of diversity in staff and leadership positions within the NHRC.
    • Insufficient Protection of Marginalized Groups: The NHRC was found to have taken insufficient action to protect marginalized groups, contrary to the U.N.’s principles on national institutions (the ‘Paris Principles).

    Concerns highlighted against India

    • Many NGOs such as Amnesty International, Front Line Defenders etc. wrote a joint letter to GANHRI expressing their objections to NHRC India’s ‘A’ rank.
    • They highlighted the commission’s failure to protect marginalized communities, religious minorities, and human rights defenders.
    • The letter emphasized that the NHRC’s functioning has regressed since 2017, undermining its independence and adherence to the Paris Principles.

    Paris Principles and Accreditation Criteria

    The United Nations’ Paris Principles, adopted in 1993, serve as international benchmarks for accrediting National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs). The Paris Principles outline six main criteria that NHRIs must meet:

    • Mandate and Competence: NHRIs should have a clear mandate and the necessary expertise to protect human rights effectively.
    • Autonomy from Government: NHRIs must operate independently from government influence or control.
    • Independence: NHRIs should have their independence guaranteed by a statute or constitution.
    • Pluralism: NHRIs should ensure diversity and inclusivity in their staffing and leadership positions.
    • Adequate Resources: NHRIs should have sufficient resources to carry out their mandated functions effectively.
    • Powers of Investigation: NHRIs should possess adequate investigative powers to address human rights violations.

    Background of NHRC-India

    • The NHRC-India was established under the Protection of Human Rights Act enacted by Parliament in 1993.
    • It has held ‘A’ status accreditation since the beginning of the NHRI accreditation process in 1999, which it retained in 2006, 2011, and 2017, despite a previous deferment.
    • This status allows participation in the work and decision-making of GANHRI, the Human Rights Council, and other U.N. mechanisms

    Response from India

    • The NHRC clarified that the deferment by the Sub Committee on Accreditation (SCA) does not affect its current ‘A’ status accreditation and associated privileges.
    • The reaccreditation process is still ongoing, and the SCA has recommended advocating with the government and Parliamentarians for legislative amendments to improve compliance with the Paris Principles.
    • The NHRC assured that they have addressed most of the issues raised by the SCA and will submit a response shortly as part of the ongoing process.

    Way Forward

    To address the concerns raised by GANHRI and human rights organizations, the NHRC-India should take the following steps:

    • Strengthen Independence: Ensure that the NHRC operates independently without political interference, safeguarding its credibility and effectiveness.
    • Promote Diversity: Take measures to enhance diversity in staffing and leadership positions within the NHRC to ensure a broader representation of society.
    • Improve Protection of Marginalized Groups: Develop comprehensive strategies and policies to provide effective protection and support to marginalized communities, religious minorities, and human rights defenders.
    • Address Legislative Amendments: Actively engage with the government and Parliamentarians to advocate for necessary legislative amendments that align with the Paris Principles and enhance compliance with international human rights standards.

    Conclusion

    • By implementing these measures, the NHRC-India can strengthen its functioning, regain the confidence of GANHRI and human rights organizations, and ensure the effective protection of human rights in India.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • WTO and India

    WTO reforms a top priority: India

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    wto

    Central Idea

    • India has stressed the urgent need for prioritizing reforms within the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
    • India has been advocating for WTO reforms and improved dispute settlement mechanisms during G20 discussions.

    About WTO

    Functions and Principles
    Establishment 1 January 1995
    Functions
    • Negotiating trade agreements
    • Enforcing trade rules
    • Providing technical assistance and capacity building
    • Sharing trade-related information and conducting research
    Fundamental principles
    • Non-discrimination
    • Reciprocity
    • Transparency
    • Predictability and stability
    Membership 164 member countries representing over 98% of global trade
    Decision-making
    • Decisions made by consensus among member countries
    • General Council is the highest decision-making body

     

    Prioritizing WTO Reforms

    • India’s Push for Reforms: India has been actively advocating for reforms within the World Trade Organisation.
    • Better Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Alongside reforms, India is pushing for improved dispute settlement mechanisms within the WTO.
    • Reaffirming Foundational Principles: The discussions aim to reaffirm the principles enshrined in the Marrakesh Agreement and the multilateral trade agreements, emphasizing the importance of an open, fair, inclusive, and transparent WTO.

    Reforms that India is seeking

    • Structural Reforms: There is an urgent need for reforms within the WTO to address issues such as transparency, shorter time frames, the establishment of a permanent panel body, and special and differential treatment for developing countries.
    • Benefit for Developing Countries: Developing countries, including India, can benefit from these reforms if proposals specific to their needs are accepted.
    • Trade Facilitation for Services: While the WTO has made progress with the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) concerning goods, there is a need for reforms in trade facilitation for services. India, as a major service provider, stands to benefit from improved cross-border movement of people.
    • Inclusivity: It is crucial to establish procedures and practices that are more inclusive, particularly for developing countries.
    • Peace Clauses: Adoption of “peace clauses” for developing countries’ implementation of current agreements can formalize commitments by major trading powers to allow grace periods and exercise due restraint.
    • Evolving Negotiation Modes: The single package approach used in the Uruguay Round is not effective in the Doha Round, necessitating the exploration of new negotiation modes.
    • Strengthened Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The dispute settlement mechanism within the WTO requires strengthening and expediting to enhance its effectiveness.
    • Separation of Political and Human Rights Issues: There is a need to separate political and human rights issues from trade disputes under Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) norms.

    Crossroads for WTO

    • Stalled Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The multilateral trade negotiations, including the Doha Round, have reached an impasse, with limited progress in overall rule-making.
    • Challenges from Alternative Trade Pacts: Alternative trade pacts, such as mega-regional arrangements, have emerged and posed challenges to the position of trade multilateralism.
    • Disagreements on Market Access and Protection: The impasse in the Doha Round primarily stems from differences between highly industrialized countries and large developing countries regarding market access and protection of vulnerable economic sectors.

    Importance of Addressing WTO Reforms

    • Vital Role of WTO: The Minister emphasized that addressing WTO reforms is of utmost importance as the organization plays a crucial role in ensuring fairness and transparency in global trade.
    • Backbone of Multilateral Trading System: The WTO forms the backbone of the multilateral trading system and its reforms are necessary to strengthen its functioning.

    India’s Aspirations in International Trade

    • Global Leadership Ambition: India has expressed India’s aspiration to emerge as a global leader in the international trade landscape.
    • E-commerce Market Potential: India is poised to become the world’s second-largest e-commerce market, reflecting its transformation driven by open markets, global integration, and a strong entrepreneurial spirit.

    Way Forward

    • The urgent need for WTO reforms necessitates concerted efforts and global attention to ensure the fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of the multilateral trading system.
    • India’s active participation in advocating for reforms, along with its ambition to become a global leader in international trade, reflects its commitment to fostering a thriving and inclusive global trade environment.
    • It is essential for countries to collaborate and engage in constructive dialogue to address the challenges and opportunities in the evolving global trade landscape.

    Back2Basics: WTO Agreements and Accords

    • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT): The GATT is the predecessor to the WTO and was in effect from 1948 to 1994. It aimed to reduce trade barriers and promote international trade through negotiations and tariff concessions.
    • Agreement on Agriculture (AoA): This agreement aims to establish fair and market-oriented agricultural trading systems. It addresses issues such as market access, domestic support, and export subsidies related to agricultural products.
    • Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): The TRIPS agreement sets minimum standards for protecting intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
    • Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs): This agreement prohibits certain investment measures that restrict trade or are inconsistent with the GATT’s principles.
    • Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS): The SPS agreement sets out rules for food safety and animal and plant health standards to ensure that countries do not use sanitary and phytosanitary measures as unjustified trade barriers.
    • Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT): The TBT agreement aims to ensure that technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade.
    • Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM): The SCM agreement regulates the use of subsidies and provides a framework for countervailing measures to address unfair trade practices arising from the use of subsidies.
    • Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA): The TFA aims to simplify and streamline customs procedures, enhance transparency, and improve efficiency in international trade, with a focus on reducing trade costs and facilitating cross-border trade.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Judicial Reforms

    CJI criticizes Forum Shopping Practice

    | Ethics | Mains Paper 4: Ethics

    Central Idea

    • The CJI, DY Chandrachud expressed his disapproval of forum shopping, a practice in which litigants or lawyers deliberately choose a specific judge or court that they believe will provide a more favorable judgment.

    Understanding Forum Shopping

    • Forum shopping refers to the intentional selection of a court or judge by litigants or lawyers with the expectation of obtaining a favourable outcome.
    • It involves strategically moving a case to a particular jurisdiction based on a perception of better judgment.
    • Lawyers consider the appropriate forum as part of their litigation strategy, sometimes opting for higher courts like the Supreme Court to gain wider attention for their case.
    • However, deliberately avoiding a specific judge or manipulating the process to obtain favourable treatment is generally discouraged.

    Concerns and Criticisms

    The practice of forum shopping raises several concerns, including:

    • Injustice to the Other Party: Forum shopping can result in unfair treatment and injustice to the opposing party, as it undermines the principle of impartiality and equal access to justice.
    • Overburdening Certain Courts: Concentrating cases before specific judges or courts can overload their workload, causing delays and hindering the judicial process.
    • Interference with Judicial Process: Forum shopping interferes with the smooth functioning of the judicial system, as cases may be filed and refiled in multiple jurisdictions, leading to unnecessary duplication of efforts.

    Approaches in Common Law Countries

    • Countries following the common law tradition, including the US and UK, have criticized forum shopping and adopted measures to discourage or prohibit the practice.
    • One such measure is the principle of “forum non-conveniens,” which grants courts discretionary powers to refuse jurisdiction when another court or forum would be more appropriate to hear the case.
    • This allows the court to dismiss a case in the interest of justice and fairness, redirecting it to the appropriate venue.
    • The Supreme Court, in its ruling in ‘Chetak Construction Ltd. vs. Om Prakash (1988),’ emphasized that a litigant should not be allowed to choose the forum and called for stern action against any attempt at forum shopping.

    Supreme Court’s View on Forum Shopping

    • In a 2022 ruling, the Supreme Court reiterated its condemnation of forum shopping, citing its previous 2017 ruling in ‘Union of India & Ors. vs. Cipla Ltd.’
    • The court established a “functional test” to determine whether forum shopping is occurring.
    • The test considers the functional similarity between different courts or whether a litigant is employing subterfuge to manipulate the system.

    Way Forward

    To address the issue of forum shopping, it is essential to:

    • Create Awareness: Raise awareness among litigants, lawyers, and the general public about the negative consequences of forum shopping and the importance of upholding judicial integrity and fairness.
    • Strengthen Ethical Standards: Emphasize the ethical obligations of lawyers to uphold the integrity of the legal profession and discourage forum shopping practices.
    • Streamline Jurisdictional Rules: Develop clear guidelines and rules regarding jurisdictional issues to prevent unnecessary disputes and ensure cases are heard by the appropriate courts.
    • Judicial Training and Monitoring: Provide training and guidance to judges on identifying and addressing instances of forum shopping, while also monitoring court proceedings to detect any potential manipulation.

    Conclusion

    • By implementing these measures, the legal system can discourage forum shopping, uphold the principles of justice and fairness, and maintain the integrity of the judicial process.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.