Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Type: Prelims Only

  • MHA bars renewable projects within 1 km of the border

    Why in the News

    The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) notified national security guidelines barring renewable energy projects within 1 km of the international border. The measure sets the security interest of border zones against the rapid build out of clean energy capacity.

    What do the new border guidelines mandate?

    1. 1 km ban: No solar, wind, or hybrid project is permitted within 1 km of the international border.
    2. Clearance zone: Projects up to 50 km from the border need prior security clearance.

    Which additional restrictions apply?

    1. Foreign staffing: Personnel from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and China face restrictions in these zones.
    2. Land transfer: Curbs apply to land transfer near sensitive stretches.

    Why is border area management the core concern?

    1. Line of Control and LAC: The guidelines cover both the Line of Control (LoC) and the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
    2. Surveillance risk: Large installations near the border can aid hostile mapping or interference.

    What is the trade off created?

    1. Clean energy loss: High irradiance border districts lose out on renewable investment.
    2. Execution friction: Layered clearances can slow project timelines.

    “[2016, GS3, 12.5 marks] Border management is a complex task due to difficult terrain and hostile relations with some countries. Elucidate the challenges and strategies for effective border management.”

  • India marks 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh on the official map

    Why in the News

    India officially marked 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh with standard names on Survey of India maps, responding to China’s attempts to rename locations in the State.

    What is the Cartographic Dispute?

    • China: Calls Arunachal Pradesh Zangnan and periodically assigns Chinese names to locations.
    • India: Rejects China’s claims and maintains that Arunachal Pradesh is an integral part of India.

    Strategic Locations

    • Long Ju: Site of a 1959 India China boundary confrontation.
    • Thag La: Strategic ridge associated with the 1962 India China War.

    Why Does Naming Matter?

    • LAC: Reinforces India’s position along the disputed Line of Actual Control.
    • Sovereign record: Official mapping creates a formal cartographic record of India’s territorial claims.
    • Information warfare: Place naming is also a tool of strategic signalling and narrative competition.

    What Remains Unresolved?

    • The India China boundary dispute remains unsettled despite diplomatic and military negotiations.
    • Cartographic measures do not by themselves alter the ground position or resolve the boundary.

    Back2Basics: Survey of India

    • Status: India’s national mapping agency and one of the oldest scientific departments of the Government of India.
    • Ministry: Department of Science and Technology.
    • Role: Prepares official topographic and boundary maps.

  • Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkiye sign the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement

    Why in the News

    Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Türkiye signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement on 7 August 2026, committing to collective defence. The pact is significant because it brings together Saudi Arabia’s Gulf influence, Türkiye’s NATO military capabilities and Pakistan’s nuclear capability.

    What is the Agreement?

    • Collective defence: An armed attack on one member is treated as an attack on all.
    • Nature: Presented as a defensive pact, amid escalating West Asian tensions.
    • It builds upon the earlier Saudi Pakistan Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement.

    Strategic Significance

    • Pakistan: Brings nuclear capability and significant military capacity.
    • Türkiye: A NATO member with one of the alliance’s largest militaries.
    • Saudi Arabia: Provides major energy, financial and geopolitical influence.
    • Regional security: Could increase coordination among three major Muslim powers.

    Why Does it Matter for India?

    • Pakistan factor: Could strengthen Pakistan’s strategic position beyond South Asia.
    • West Asia: India must balance relations with Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Iran, Israel and Gulf partners.
    • Energy security: Instability in West Asia can affect India’s crude supplies and prices.
    • Indian diaspora: Regional conflict can affect the large Indian community in the Gulf.
    • Strategic balancing: India may need deeper engagement with Gulf partners and other regional powers.

    Key Uncertainties

    • The precise operational obligations of the collective-defence clause remain unclear.
    • It is uncertain whether the pact would automatically apply to a Saudi Pakistan conflict scenario involving India.
    • Differences among the three countries could constrain the pact’s practical implementation.

    Prelims Value Addition

    • NATO Article 5: Collective-defence principle where an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all.
    • Important distinction: Mecca Agreement ≠ NATO
    • It is a trilateral defence pact, not a NATO-style integrated military alliance.
    • Strategic triangle:
      • Pakistan = Nuclear capability
      • Türkiye = NATO + military capability
      • Saudi Arabia = Energy + financial influence

  • RDI deep-tech fund: most beneficiaries linked to selection panel

    Why in the News

    An investigation found that 15 of the 22 companies receiving the first round of assistance from the Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Fund had investment links with members of the fund’s selection committee. The panel approved Rs 2,192 crore in soft loans, raising concerns over conflict of interest and transparency.

    What is the Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Fund?

    • Definition: A Rs 1 lakh crore fund to support private sector research in strategic and deep tech sectors.
    • Focus Areas: Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Technology, Space, Defence, Robotics, Clean Energy, Semiconductors and Digital Healthcare.
    • Financial Support: Collateral free loans up to 50% of project cost, at 2 to 4% interest for up to 15 years.
    • Custodian: Managed through a Special Purpose Fund under the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF).
    • Fund Managers: Loans are disbursed through Second Level Fund Managers (SLFMs), currently the Technology Development Board (TDB) and Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC).

    How are companies selected?

    • Investment Committees: Each SLFM forms an independent investment committee to evaluate proposals.
    • Composition: The TDB committee had 12 members, largely from private equity and technology, with one non voting government representative.
    • Eligibility: Projects must have achieved at least Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4, meaning laboratory validation is complete.
    • Selection Criteria: Scientific, technological, financial and commercial viability, with decisions taken by majority vote.

    What did the investigation reveal?

    • Conflict Links: 15 of 22 beneficiaries had investment ties with 7 committee members.
    • Funding Concentration: These firms received over Rs 1,377 crore of the total approved amount.
    • Chairman’s Role: Nine selected firms were linked to the committee chairman, who reportedly also held a personal stake in one beneficiary.
    • Committee’s Defence: Members stated that interests were disclosed and they recused themselves from related decisions.
    • Governance Concern: The episode has renewed demands for stronger safeguards in the use of public funds.

    Existing safeguards

    • Mandatory disclosure of financial interests by committee members.
    • Recusal from decisions involving associated companies.
    • Background verification of applicants by fund managers.
    • Expert driven selection to improve technical assessment.
    • However, only two SLFMs currently operate the scheme, concentrating decision making and highlighting the need for greater transparency.

    Back2Basics: Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Fund

    • Launched: 2025
    • Corpus: Rs 1 lakh crore
    • Nodal Framework: Operates under the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF)
    • Objective: Provide long term, low cost financing for private sector research in deep tech and strategic sectors.
    • Implementing Agencies: Technology Development Board (TDB) and Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) as Second Level Fund Managers.
    • Key Feature: Collateral free loans covering up to 50% of project cost through independent investment committees.

  • SC order on mining around Ramsar wetland sites

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court has clarified that its earlier direction restricting mining within a 10 km radius of the Asan Wetland Conservation Reserve now applies to all Wetland Conservation Reserves across India. Mining in such areas will require prior approval from the competent authority.

    What did the Supreme Court clarify?

    • Nationwide Application: The 10 km mining safeguard around the Asan Wetland Conservation Reserve will now apply to all Wetland Conservation Reserves.
    • Uniform Principle: The Court held that the protection should apply uniformly across the country.
    • Case Background: The clarification came while hearing an application filed by the Himachal Pradesh Government.
    • State’s Argument: Himachal Pradesh contended that Wetland Conservation Reserves do not have a statutory buffer zone unlike national parks.
    • Further Direction: The Court asked the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) or the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) to examine whether the Asan Wetland extends into Himachal Pradesh.

    What is the Asan Wetland Conservation Reserve?

    • Location: Situated at the confluence of the Asan and Yamuna rivers in Uttarakhand.
    • Ramsar Status: Declared a Ramsar Site in 2020.
    • Ecological Importance: Supports migratory waterbirds and rich aquatic biodiversity.
    • Judicial Protection: Mining within a 10 km radius requires prior clearance from the NBWL or MoEFCC.

    What are Ramsar Sites?

    • Definition: Wetlands designated under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (1971) for their international ecological importance.
    • India’s Membership: India became a party to the Convention in 1982.
    • Current Status: India has 101 Ramsar Sites, the highest in Asia.
    • Significance: Ramsar designation commits countries to maintain the ecological character of wetlands but does not itself create a separate statutory protection regime.

    What is the legal position on mining near wetlands?

    • No Statutory Buffer: The Ramsar Convention and the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 do not prescribe a fixed buffer zone around wetlands.
    • 2010 Rules: Earlier rules listed prohibited activities and required prior approval for activities within the wetland’s zone of influence.
    • 2017 Rules: Replaced the earlier framework with a decentralised system led by State Wetland Authorities.
    • Judicial Safeguard: The Supreme Court’s ruling fills this regulatory gap by requiring prior clearance for mining near Wetland Conservation Reserves.

    [2022] Consider the following pairs: Wetland/Lake — Location
    1. Hokera Wetland — Punjab
    2. Renuka Wetland — Himachal Pradesh
    3. Rudrasagar Lake — Tripura
    4. Sasthamkotta Lake — Tamil Nadu
    How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
    (a) Only one pair

    (b) Only two pairs

    (c) Only three pairs

    (d) All four pairs

  • JD(U) tells Centre not to renew 1996 Farakka water treaty without safeguarding Bihar

    Why in the News

    The 1996 Farakka Water Treaty between India and Bangladesh is set to expire on 12 December 2026. The JD(U) has urged the Centre not to renew the treaty unless Bihar’s long term water security and developmental needs are adequately addressed.

    What is the 1996 Farakka Water Treaty?

    • Definition: A bilateral agreement between India and Bangladesh for sharing the Ganga’s dry season flow at the Farakka Barrage.
    • Objective: To allocate Ganga waters during the lean season between the two countries.
    • Duration: Signed in 1996 for 30 years, expiring on 12 December 2026.

    What is the Farakka Barrage?

    • Location: Built across the Ganga River in West Bengal.
    • Purpose: Diverts water into the Hooghly River.
    • Objective: Flushes silt to maintain the navigability of Kolkata Port.

    Why has Bihar opposed the treaty’s renewal?

    • Reduced Water Availability: Bihar argues that diversion at Farakka reduces lean season water availability within the state.
    • Development Concerns: Seeks greater consideration of Bihar’s long term irrigation, drinking water and development needs.
    • Demand for Renegotiation: JD(U) has called for safeguards before any extension of the treaty.
    • Federal Dimension: Highlights the need to balance state interests with India’s international water sharing commitments.

    Why is the treaty sensitive for India and Bangladesh?

    • Shared Rivers: India and Bangladesh share numerous transboundary rivers, making water sharing politically significant.
    • Dry Season Scarcity: Limited lean season flows often lead to competing demands.
    • Related Issue: The Farakka dispute exists alongside the unresolved Teesta Water Sharing Agreement, another key bilateral concern.

    [2013, GS2, 10 marks] The protests in Shahbag Square in Dhaka in Bangladesh reveal a fundamental split in society between the nationalists and Islamic forces. What is its significance for India?

    [2017] With reference to river Teesta, consider the following statements:
    1. The source of river Teesta is the same as that of Brahmaputra but it flows through Sikkim.
    2. River Rangeet originates in Sikkim and it is a tributary of river Teesta.
    3. River Teesta flows into Bay of Bengal on the border of India and Bangladesh.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    [A] 1 and 3 only

    [B] 2 only

    [C] 2 and 3 only

    [D] 1, 2 and 3

  • Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls faces fresh SC scrutiny

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court agreed to consider a plea alleging misuse of Form 7 during Uttar Pradesh’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. In Karnataka, nearly half of Bengaluru’s voters are flagged for possible deletion ahead of the draft roll. The draft roll is due on 17 August 2026.

    What is the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls?

    1. Definition: the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a house to house exercise by the Election Commission to update and verify electoral rolls.
    2. Enumeration: electors are mapped and verified, and doubtful entries are flagged for review.
    3. Draft stage: a draft roll is published, followed by a claims and objections phase before finalisation.

    What is Form 7 and how is it alleged to be misused?

    1. Form 7: a statutory mechanism under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, for limited and bona fide objections to inclusion, or deletion on narrow grounds.
    2. Allegation: a Congress Member of Parliament cited documented evidence of bulk, fraudulent and targeted deletion attempts.
    3. Targeting: the plea says objections hit minority and marginalised electors, including those already verified during the revision.
    4. Mechanical filing: Booth Level Officers reportedly received pre filled Form 7 applications with identical grounds and no credible basis.
    5. Respondents: the Election Commission and the Chief Electoral Officer of Uttar Pradesh are named respondents.

    What is the ASDDO flag in Karnataka?

    1. Full form: Absent, Shifted, Dead, Duplicate or Other.
    2. Scale: of Bengaluru’s 1.03 crore voters, 49.42 lakh are flagged under this category.
    3. State total: across Karnataka, 1.11 crore voters, one fifth of the 5.54 crore mapped, are flagged.
    4. Hotspots: ten Bengaluru constituencies show flagged deletions above 50 percent, led by Bommanahalli at 57.08 percent.

    [2017] For election to the Lok Sabha, a nomination paper can be filed by
    (a) Anyone residing in India.
    (b) A resident of the constituency from which the election is to be contested.
    (c) Any citizen of India whose name appears in the electoral roll of a constituency.
    (d) Any citizen of India.

  • FIRs cannot be withdrawn, three routes for relief under BNSS

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court has clarified that State Governments cannot simply withdraw or cancel FIRs against student protesters through executive orders. Criminal proceedings can end only through procedures provided under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

    What is a First Information Report (FIR) under the BNSS?

    • Definition: An FIR is the first written record of information relating to a cognizable offence received by the police.
    • Purpose: It sets the criminal investigation in motion under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
    • No Executive Power: A government cannot cancel or erase an FIR through an executive order. Only the subsequent criminal proceedings can be terminated through legal procedures.

    Route 1: Closure Report

    • Provision: If the police find insufficient evidence during investigation, they may submit a closure report before the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 193 of BNSS.
    • Judicial Scrutiny: The Magistrate is not bound to accept the report and may order further investigation or take cognizance.
    • Key Case: Abhinandan Jha v. Dinesh Mishra (1967) affirmed the Magistrate’s independent powers.

    Route 2: Withdrawal from Prosecution

    • Provision: Under Section 360 of BNSS, the Public Prosecutor, with the court’s consent, may withdraw from prosecution before judgment.
    • Independent Decision: The request must reflect the prosecutor’s own assessment and not merely government instructions.
    • Court’s Role: The court must ensure the withdrawal is in good faith and public interest.
    • Victim’s Rights: The victim must be given an opportunity to be heard.
    • Key Case: Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar (1986).

    Route 3: Quashing by the High Court

    • Provision: Section 528 of BNSS preserves the High Court’s inherent powers to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.
    • Direct Remedy: An accused person may directly approach the High Court for quashing of criminal proceedings.
    • Limited Use: Courts have consistently held that this power should be exercised sparingly, particularly while investigation is ongoing.

    Important Judicial Precedent

    • Baroda Dynamite Case (1980): The Supreme Court upheld withdrawal of prosecutions arising from the Emergency period.
    • Principle: Withdrawal may be justified where it promotes public peace, reconciliation and good governance, provided legal safeguards are followed.

  • Extending creamy layer to SC, ST is Parliament’s call: Govt to top court

    Why in the News

    The Centre has told the Supreme Court that the creamy layer principle cannot be extended to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) through judicial directions. It argued that any such change requires a decision by Parliament, as reservation for SCs and STs is based on historical and social discrimination rather than economic status.

    What is the Creamy Layer Principle?

    • Definition: Excludes the socially advanced and economically better off members of a reserved category from availing reservation benefits.
    • Origin: Introduced for Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
    • Current Position: The principle does not apply to SCs and STs, whose reservation is based on historical discrimination and social exclusion.

    What did the Centre argue before the Supreme Court?

    • Parliament’s Authority: Only Parliament can decide whether to extend the creamy layer principle to SCs and STs.
    • Constitutional Basis: Any exclusion must follow the procedure under Article 341(2) (and similarly Article 342 for STs).
    • Need for Evidence: Any income based classification should be preceded by a comprehensive empirical study.
    • Separation of Powers: Courts should not direct the executive to frame such a policy without legislative backing.
    • Reservation Basis: SC and ST identification depends on historical social disadvantage, not merely economic criteria.

    Key Judicial Precedents

    • State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024): Held that sub classification within SCs and STs for equitable distribution of reservation benefits is constitutionally permissible.
    • E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2005): Held that altering the SC list requires legislative action under Article 341.
    • Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008): Clarified that the creamy layer principle does not apply to SCs and STs.

    What is the core issue?

    • Equitable Distribution: Petitioners seek greater benefits for the poorest sections within SCs and STs.
    • Social Justice vs Economic Criteria: The Centre maintains that SC/ST reservation addresses historical social stigma, not poverty alone.
    • Institutional Question: The case raises the issue of whether such reforms should come through judicial intervention or Parliamentary legislation.

  • Why households pledge gold instead of selling it

    Why in the News

    India’s gold market is witnessing a structural shift as investment demand and gold backed loans grow rapidly, while jewellery demand declines. The trend has also highlighted the limited success of the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), 2015 in mobilising idle household gold.

    What is the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), 2015?

    • Objective: Mobilise idle gold held by households and institutions into the formal financial system.
    • Mechanism: Individuals and institutions deposit physical gold with authorised banks and earn interest on the deposits.
    • Challenges: Limited participation due to taxation concerns, sentimental attachment to gold and procedural complexities.

    How is India’s gold demand changing?

    • Overall Demand: Total gold demand increased 2% year on year to 282 tonnes in the first half of the year.
    • Jewellery Demand: Fell 17.1% to 141.2 tonnes, among the weakest first quarter levels since 2000.
    • ETF Investment: Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) recorded a net inflow of 20 tonnes in the first quarter.
    • Bars and Coins: Demand rose 21.3% in volume and 105.5% in value during the first half of FY27.
    • Price Rise: Domestic gold prices have increased more than fivefold over the past decade.

    Why are households pledging gold instead of selling it?

    • Collateral Preference: Households increasingly use gold as collateral for loans rather than selling it.
    • Gold Loan Growth: Outstanding gold loan portfolios reached about Rs 5.4 lakh crore by June 2026.
    • Retail Loans: Bank loans backed by pledged jewellery touched about Rs 4.3 lakh crore by February 2026.
    • Limited Recycling: Despite record high prices, households continue to retain gold, resulting in low recycled supply.
    • External Stability: Household gold holdings and central bank gold purchases have supported India’s external balance and moderated pressure on the rupee.

    What are the concerns?

    • Financial Stability: Rapid expansion of gold loans requires close regulatory monitoring.
    • RBI Measures: Borrowers must fully repay principal and interest before the same gold can be repledged.
    • Price Risk: A sharp decline in gold prices could affect lenders through lower collateral values.

    [2016] What is/are the purpose/purposes of Government’s ‘Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme’ and ‘Gold Monetization Scheme’?
    1. To bring the idle gold lying with Indian households into the economy.
    2. To promote FDI in the gold and jewellery sector.
    3. To reduce India’s dependence on gold imports.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.
    (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3