PYQ Relevance:
[UPSC 2018] The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China’s larger ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same.
Linkage: The Article state that China’s traditional strategy involves “building up Pakistan’s strategic and conventional capabilities through overt and covert help to counter India and keep it off-balance”. This question directly relates to the “China-Pakistan nexus” by focusing on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). |
Mentor’s Comment: The Indian Army has officially confirmed what experts had long suspected, China directly helped Pakistan during Operation Sindoor (May 7–10), marking a major change in their military relationship. For the first time, China supported Pakistan in battle by sharing real-time surveillance data, using advanced weapons together, and spreading information online — all without openly escalating the conflict. This has turned the idea of a “two-front war” into a “one-front reinforced” war, where China backs Pakistan more closely in a real conflict. China’s support included high-tech weapons, cyber tools, and diplomatic moves at the UN, while avoiding any clear criticism of the Pahalgam terror attack. The use of Chinese-made fighter jets, drones, and air defence systems by Pakistan during the fighting is a game-changer and means India needs to rethink its defence strategy.
Today’s editorial analyses the China-Pakistan military collusion and its impact. This topic is important for GS Paper II (International Relations) in the UPSC mains exam.
_
Let’s learn!
Why in the News?
The new “one-front reinforced” threat is now real, not just an idea. India must now rethink how it defends itself, update its military equipment, and clearly show its strength to others.
What are the strategic implications of China-Pakistan military collusion for India’s security?
- Increased Security Threat from a “One-Front Reinforced War”: A conflict with Pakistan now includes covert Chinese support, transforming it into a hybrid front rather than a standalone battle. India must prepare for simultaneous pressure on both borders, diluting its strategic flexibility. Eg: During Operation Sindoor (May 2025), China provided real-time ISR support and surveillance data to Pakistan.
- Enhanced Pakistani Military Capabilities via Chinese Technology: Pakistan’s use of advanced Chinese weapons systems improves its operational effectiveness and battlefield confidence. This deepens strategic asymmetry and reduces India’s military advantage. Eg: Pakistan deployed Chinese J-10C fighters and HQ-9 air defence systems, guided by China’s BeiDou satellites, during active operations.
- Erosion of India’s Strategic Autonomy and Deterrence: Collusion undermines India’s ability to execute punitive strikes without risking escalation or Chinese interference. India must now calibrate its response to avoid wider regional destabilisation. Eg: China blocked India’s diplomatic push at the UNSC post-Pahalgam attack and echoed Pakistan’s narrative, limiting India’s international manoeuvring space.
How has China’s role in India-Pakistan conflicts evolved over time?
- From Passive Diplomatic Support to Active Collusion: In earlier conflicts (1965, 1971, Kargil 1999), China offered only diplomatic or symbolic support to Pakistan without direct involvement. Now, China is actively enhancing Pakistan’s battlefield capabilities through technology and real-time support. Eg: In Operation Sindoor (2025).
- Use of Advanced Defence and ISR Systems: China has moved from supplying basic military hardware to enabling operational interoperability and network-centric warfare. Chinese platforms are now tactically integrated into Pakistan’s military exercises and combat. Eg: Deployment of Chinese J-10C fighters, PL-15 missiles, and BeiDou navigation for missile guidance shows deeper integration.
- Strategic Messaging and Digital Warfare Support: China now also supports Pakistan via propaganda, perception warfare, and digital influence operations. It helps shape global narratives and reduces diplomatic pressure on Pakistan. Eg: Chinese media amplified Pakistan’s ISPR propaganda during Operation Sindoor and resisted India’s push at the UNSC, aligning with Pakistan’s narrative.
What is a “One-Front Reinforced War”?
A “one-front reinforced war” refers to a conflict scenario where India fights on one primary front (e.g., against Pakistan), but this front is reinforced by active support from another adversary (e.g., China) without that second adversary being officially at war.
Why is the “one-front reinforced war” concept critical for India’s defence strategy?
- Unified Threat Vector: The China-Pakistan collusion has created a combined strategic front, making it harder for India to manage threats separately.
- Reduced Response Window: India faces a compressed decision-making timeline and resource overstretch, requiring faster and more coordinated defence responses. Eg: Despite the 2024 Ladakh disengagement, large Indian deployments are still needed on both the LAC and LoC.
- Need for Capability Boost: The “one-front” scenario highlights the urgency to upgrade conventional deterrence, invest in modern warfare tech, and adapt military doctrine. Eg: Pakistan acquiring Chinese J-35 stealth jets, KJ-500 AEW&C, and HQ-19 missile defence systems intensifies pressure on India to respond.
|
How should India respond to rising two-front challenges amid declining defence spending?
- Increase Defence Allocation and Modernise Capabilities: India must reverse the decline in defence expenditure (from 17.1% of central spending in 2014-15 to 13% in 2025-26) and invest in next-generation warfare capabilities. This includes drones, AI-enabled surveillance, cyber defence, and network-centric warfare systems.
- Adopt Asymmetric and Unpredictable Response Strategies: India should avoid predictable retaliation and adopt multi-domain deterrence, including economic, cyber, and covert measures. Eg: Strategic reconsideration of agreements like the Indus Waters Treaty, economic sanctions on critical Chinese firms, or calibrated cyber operations.
- Institutional and Diplomatic Realignment: India needs to bolster its international alliances and ensure seamless coordination between the armed forces, intelligence agencies, and foreign policy apparatus. Eg: Deepening defence ties with the Quad members, France, and Israel for intelligence sharing, joint exercises, and technology transfer.
Way forward:
- Strengthen Integrated Defence Capabilities: India must invest in network-centric warfare, ISR systems, drone technologies, and joint-force interoperability to counter a reinforced adversary. Enhancing real-time battlefield awareness and communication across services is key.
- Recalibrate Strategic and Diplomatic Posture: India should link China’s strategic collusion with Pakistan to its bilateral ties, signalling consequences for such behaviour. Simultaneously, boost alliances like QUAD, and explore unpublicised retaliatory options (e.g., Indus Waters Treaty leverage) to deter future collusion.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
India’s household savings rate fell to 29.7% of GDP in 2022–23, the lowest level in 40 years, down from 34.6% in 2011–12.
What led to the decline in household financial savings in India?
- Rise in Consumption Expenditure: After the COVID-19 pandemic, households increased spending on consumer durables, travel, and lifestyle, reducing the capacity to save.
- High Inflation: Persistent rise in prices of essentials like food, fuel, and healthcare eroded disposable income and limited savings.
- Shift Towards Riskier Financial Assets: Investments in mutual funds and equities increased, with SIP contributions rising significantly, while traditional savings like fixed deposits declined.
- Slow Income Growth and High Interest Rates (Fisher Effect): Stagnant wages and low nominal income growth, coupled with high interest rates and loan EMIs, reduced household savings potential.
- Rising Household Debt: Household liabilities reached 6.4% of GDP in FY24, due to more borrowing for housing, education, and personal loans.
- Reversal of COVID-Era Forced Savings: Savings spiked during lockdowns but dropped sharply as economic activity resumed and pent-up demand surged.
Why is the shift to financial assets important for capital formation?
- Improves Resource Mobilisation: Financial assets like deposits, mutual funds, and pension funds channel household savings into productive sectors, supporting investment and infrastructure growth.
- Enhances Financial Intermediation and Efficiency: Financial institutions act as intermediaries, allocating savings to sectors with higher returns and productivity, ensuring efficient capital use. Eg: Banks mobilise savings into loans for MSMEs, which contribute significantly to employment and GDP.
- Reduces Idle Capital and Boosts Formal Economy: Unlike physical assets (like gold and real estate), financial assets contribute to the formal economy, increasing credit availability and financial inclusion. Eg: Shift from gold to digital savings accounts increases liquidity and boosts credit growth in the economy.
How has rising household debt impacted financial stability?
- Increased Vulnerability to Economic Shocks: High debt levels reduce households’ ability to absorb income shocks (like job loss or medical emergencies), leading to loan defaults and stress on financial institutions. Eg: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many households defaulted on EMIs due to income loss, affecting NBFCs and banks.
- Reduced Net Financial Savings: Growing liabilities shrink the net financial savings rate, limiting the funds available for productive investments and weakening domestic capital formation. Eg: In FY24, household liabilities rose to 6.4% of GDP while financial savings fell to 5.1%, a four-decade low.
- Pressure on Banking and Credit Systems: High levels of unsecured loans (like personal and gold loans) increase credit risk, prompting regulatory tightening and affecting credit flow to the economy. Eg: RBI imposed stricter norms on personal loans in FY25 to prevent systemic risk from unsecured lending growth.
What steps can improve savings among rural and low-income groups?
- Promote Micro-Savings Products: Introduce low-ticket savings schemes tailored for daily or weekly contributions. Eg: The PM Jan Dhan Yojana encourages basic savings with zero-balance accounts.
- Provide Government-Backed Guarantees and Incentives: Offer interest subsidies, insurance cover, or guaranteed returns to build trust among low-income savers. Eg: The Kisan Vikas Patra and Public Provident Fund (PPF) offer guaranteed returns with sovereign backing.
- Expand Financial Literacy Campaigns: Run focused awareness drives on budgeting, saving, and investment options in local languages. Eg: RBI’s Financial Literacy Week and SEBI’s village workshops educate people on safe saving practices.
- Leverage Digital and Fintech Solutions: Use mobile wallets, micro-investing apps, and digital payment systems to make saving more accessible. Eg: Platforms like Paytm Payments Bank and Airtel Payments Bank offer micro-savings and insurance.
- Revamp and Strengthen Post Office Schemes: Modernise postal savings with better accessibility, digital interface, and doorstep banking. Eg: Rural Post Offices now offer core banking services, enabling safer and formal saving options.
- Introduce Default Saving Options (Behavioral Nudges): Implement opt-out pension schemes or auto-enrollment in saving plans for informal workers. Eg: The Atal Pension Yojana encourages informal sector workers to save for retirement through auto-debits.
Way forward:
- Develop a National Household Savings Strategy: Create a coordinated policy framework across ministries with clear targets, integrating financial literacy, product innovation, and social security measures for underserved populations.
- Encourage Inclusive Fintech Innovations: Promote user-friendly micro-investing platforms, AI-driven financial guidance, and blockchain-based savings tools to enable secure, transparent, and accessible savings for rural and low-income households.
Mains PYQ:
[UPSC 2017] Among several factors for India’s potential growth, savings rate is the most effective one. Do you agree? What are the other factors available for growth potential?
Linkage: The artilce explicitly state that India’s gross domestic savings rate fell to its lowest in four decades (29.7% of GDP in 2022-23). This question directly related to the importance of the savings rate for India’s growth, which aligns with the concern over falling household savings.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s multi-country diplomatic tour Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, and onward to Brazil and Namibia signals a strategic shift in India’s foreign policy toward deepening its engagement with the Global South.

What were the key outcomes of recent bilateral visits to Global South nations?
- Upgraded Strategic Partnerships: India and Ghana elevated their ties to a Comprehensive Partnership, focusing on making Ghana a “vaccine hub”for West Africa.
- Pharmaceutical Cooperation: In Trinidad and Tobago, India signed an MoU on Indian Pharmacopeia to improve access to quality and affordable generic medicines.
- Energy and Mineral Collaboration: In Argentina, India expanded cooperation on critical minerals and tapped into Argentina’s vast reserves of shale gas and oil.
Why is there a renewed focus on ties with the Global South?
- To Build an Alternative to the Global North-Dominated Order: India aims to create a more balanced and representative global system by deepening ties with developing countries. Engagements with Argentina, Ghana, and Trinidad & Tobago highlight efforts to diversify partnerships beyond traditional Western powers.
- Shared Historical and Political Bonds: Many Global South nations, like India, experienced colonial rule and have supported platforms like the Non-Aligned Movement. Eg: India and Brazil co-founded the IBSA and BRICS groupings to promote Global South interests.
What role do India-led initiatives play in global development efforts?
- Providing Affordable Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals: India supports access to low-cost generic medicines and vaccine equity. Eg: India’s pharma diplomacy during COVID-19 (under Vaccine Maitri) supplied vaccines to over 70 countries, strengthening health security.
- Promoting Clean and Renewable Energy Access: India provides leadership in expanding clean energy adoption among developing countries. Eg: The International Solar Alliance (ISA) supports solar projects in sunshine-rich yet energy-poor nations across Africa and Asia.
- Driving Digital Transformation in Governance: India shares its experience in digital identity, payment systems, and public service delivery to empower other nations. Eg: India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), including Aadhaar, UPI, and DigiLocker, is being adopted in countries like Sri Lanka and Kenya.
- Solutions to Global Challenges: India offers digital public infrastructure, affordable pharmaceuticals, and disaster resilience frameworks tailored for developing nations. Eg: The Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) is being promoted as an India-led solution.
How is the diaspora being used to strengthen international relations?
- Acting as Cultural and Political Bridges: The diaspora helps promote India’s soft power by strengthening cultural, linguistic, and historical ties with host countries. Eg: In Trinidad & Tobago, India acknowledged the Indian-origin ancestry of its leaders to deepen people-to-people diplomacy.
- Boosting Economic and Technological Collaboration: Diaspora members often hold key positions in business, academia, and innovation, facilitating trade, investment, and knowledge exchange. Eg: Indian tech professionals in the U.S. and UK have helped foster technology partnerships and startup ecosystems.
- Mobilising Political Support for India’s Strategic Interests: A well-integrated diaspora can influence foreign policy and legislative advocacy in favour of India. Eg: Indian-American lawmakers have supported stronger India-U.S. defense and trade ties in the U.S. Congress.
Way forward:
- Institutionalise Diaspora Engagement through Dedicated Platforms: Strengthen initiatives like Pravasi Bharatiya Divas, Overseas Indian Facilitation Centre (OIFC), and Global Pravasi Rishta Portal to maintain structured dialogue and collaboration with the diaspora.
- Leverage Diaspora for Strategic Economic and Diplomatic Outreach: Encourage diaspora-led investments in priority sectors (like healthcare, education, digital tech) and empower diaspora communities to act as cultural ambassadors and policy influencers in multilateral forums.
Mains PYQ:
[UPSC 2019] The long-sustained image of India as a leader of the oppressed and marginalised Nations has disappeared on account of its new found role in the emerging global order”. Elaborate.
Linkage: This question directly related to India’s historical and contemporary role as a leader among “oppressed and marginalised Nations,” which is synonymous with the “Global South” or “developing world” that the five-nation tour focuses.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
India has expressed serious concerns over proposed changes to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA)—popularly known as the Plant Treaty.
About the Plant Treaty, 2001:
- Adoption: It was adopted by the FAO on 3rd November 2001 and came into force in 2004.
- Purpose: It governs the Multilateral System (MLS) for the access and benefit-sharing of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA).
- Key Features:
- Coverage of Crops: The MLS currently includes 64 essential food crops and forages listed in Annex I, which together meet around 80% of the world’s plant-based food needs.
- Access Mechanism: Access to these genetic materials is provided for research, breeding, and training purposes through a Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA).
- Benefit-Sharing Approach: The Treaty incorporates monetary and non-monetary benefit-sharing mechanisms, with a focus on supporting biodiversity in developing countries.
- IP Restrictions: It prohibits any intellectual property claims over the raw genetic materials accessed under the system.
- Recognition of Farmers’ Rights: It affirms farmers’ rights, such as the protection of traditional knowledge, equitable benefit-sharing, and participation in national decisions about PGRFA use and conservation.
- India’s Participation: India is a signatory and active participant and implements the Treaty alongside domestic legislation like the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001.
Proposed Amendments:
- Objective: The upcoming proposal aims to expand the scope of the MLS to include all PGRFA, not just those in Annex I.
- New Inclusions: The expansion would bring in indigenous varieties, non-commercial crops, and community-protected heirloom seeds under the MLS framework.
- Impact on India’s Obligations: If passed, the amendment would mandate countries like India to share all plant germplasm through the existing SMTA process.
- No Change in Benefit Terms: The amendment retains current benefit-sharing mechanisms, which critics argue are often non-monetary or merely symbolic.
- Concerns over IP Rights: The broadened scope may lead to intellectual property loopholes if traditional seeds are repackaged or genetically altered.
- Allegations of Biopiracy: Critics argue the proposal enables “backdoor biopiracy”, especially of the Global South’s rich seed diversity.
India’s Concerns:
- Loss of Seed Sovereignty: India fears it will lose discretion over which seeds to share, weakening its ability to protect unique plant biodiversity.
- Undermining of Farmers’ Rights: The proposal might override the rights granted to farmers under the Plant Treaty and India’s PPV&FR Act, which view them as custodians of seed heritage.
- Erosion of National Authority: The expansion could violate Articles 10 and 11 of the Treaty, which grant countries sovereign control over their genetic resources.
- Violation of Federal Principles: The lack of consultation with States is seen as a breach of India’s federal structure, as agriculture is a State subject under Schedule VII of the Constitution.
- Marginalization of Biodiversity Boards: The role of State Biodiversity Boards may be diminished, despite their importance in regulating local germplasm and community rights.
- Lack of Equitable Returns: India argues that the global system offers little real benefit, raising doubts about fairness and justice in benefit-sharing.
[UPSC 2014] Consider the following international agreements:
1. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
2. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification.
3. The World Heritage Convention. Which of the above has/have a bearing on the biodiversity?
Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
A new Nature Physics study suggests that warm volcanic rock surfaces may have concentrated organic molecules in watery cracks, triggering life-like chemistry—offering a clue to how protocells formed without membranes before life began.
What are Protocells?
- Overview: Protocells are primitive, cell-like bubbles believed to be early precursors of real biological cells. They were not fully alive but provided a space for early chemical interactions.
- Lack of Complexity: These structures lacked complex parts like organelles or DNA systems but could hold important molecules like RNA and amino acids together.
- Membrane Role: Protocells often formed simple membranes or boundaries, which allowed molecules to stay enclosed and interact more easily—helping early reactions like protein synthesis happen.
- Importance: Although not living, they offered a model of how basic chemistry could evolve into biology, bridging the gap between non-living and living systems.
History of Formation of Protocells:
- Early Earth Conditions: Over 3.5 billion years ago, Earth’s surface had warm water pools and volcanic cracks filled with organic molecules made by natural processes like lightning.
- Compartmentalization: The first step toward life was concentrating useful molecules in one place, so they could start reacting—this led to the idea of bubble-like protocells.
- Old Theories: In the 1920s, Oparin and Haldane proposed that life began in a “primordial soup” with spontaneous chemical reactions in early Earth’s oceans.
- Modern Insights: Newer research suggests cracks in volcanic rock or hydrothermal vents created temperature gradients and water flows that helped form protocells—no complex membranes were needed.
Key Findings in the 2025 Study:
- Lab Setup: Scientists created a 170-micrometre chamber with a warm top (40°C) and cool bottom (27°C), simulating early Earth rock cracks.
- DNA Test: They added DNA and a protein-making kit (PURExpress). Only in the warm-cool chamber did the DNA make green fluorescent protein (GFP), showing real protein synthesis.
- Molecule Gathering: Essential items like DNA, magnesium, and phosphate ions gathered more at the bottom—up to 70 times more concentrated than at the top.
- Cell-Like Behavior: Even without a membrane, the system kept useful molecules inside while letting waste escape, mimicking real cell selectivity.
- Big Implication: This experiment supports the idea that life could start in simple natural environments using just heat, flow, and basic chemicals—long before full cells appeared.
[UPSC 2018] Consider the following statements:
1. The Earth’s magnetic field has reversed every few hundred thousand years.
2. When the Earth was created more than 4000 million years ago, there was 54% oxygen and no carbon dioxide.
3. When living organisms originated, they modified the early atmosphere of the Earth. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only * (d) 1, 2 and 3 |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
As of 2025, India ranks as the world’s fourth most equal country in terms of income distribution, according to the World Bank’s Spring 2025 Poverty and Equity Brief.

About the World Bank’s Spring 2025 Poverty and Equity Brief:
- What It Is: The Poverty and Equity Brief is a biannual publication by the World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Global Practice Group.
- Data Coverage: It includes country-level statistics on poverty, inequality, and shared prosperity using household surveys, national datasets, and income tracking.
- Comparative Perspective: The brief allows comparison across income groups and regions, helping track Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
- Spring 2025 Focus: This edition emphasizes post-pandemic recovery, distributional equity, and the effectiveness of welfare policies in developing nations.
Key Parameters Involved:
- Gini Index: It measures how equally income is distributed.
- Score Range: 1 = complete equality; 100 = complete inequality.
- India’s Score: 25.5 in 2022–23, showing strong income equality.
- International Poverty Lines:
- $2.15/day (2017 PPP): Global standard for extreme poverty.
- $3.00/day: Threshold for lower-middle-income countries like India.
- Poverty Headcount Ratio: Reflects how many people live below the poverty line.
- India’s Status: 2.3% below $2.15/day and 5.3% below $3/day in 2022–23.
- Shared Prosperity Premium:
- Measures if the bottom 40% of the population are doing better or worse than average.
- High premium means inclusive growth.
Key Highlights from the Spring 2025 Report:
- India’s Gini Score: Among Most Equal
- With a score of 25.5, India is the 4th most equal country, after Slovak Republic (24.1), Slovenia (24.3), and Belarus (24.4).
- India outperforms China (35.7) and all G7 and G20 nations.
- Improved from 28.8 in 2011, showing a steady decline in inequality.
- Major Poverty Reduction Milestone
- Between 2011 and 2023, 171 million people moved out of extreme poverty.
- Share of population under $2.15/day fell from 16.2% to 2.3%.
- Share under $3/day fell to 5.3%, marking a significant decline.
[UPSC 2007] Consider the following statements:
1. The repo rate is the rate at which other banks borrow from the Reserve Bank of India. 2. A value of 1 for Gini Coefficient in a country implies that there is perfectly equal income for everyone in its population.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only* (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
French authorities have opened up the Seine River to public swimming for the very first time since 1923.

About the Seine River:
- Overview: it is a major waterway in northern France, flowing through some of the country’s most important cultural and economic regions.
- Length and Rank: It is approximately 777 km(483 miles) long, making it the second-longest river in France after the Loire.
- Source and Elevation: It originates from the Langres Plateau in the Burgundy region, near the town of Source-Seine, at an elevation of about 444–471 meters above sea level.
- Course Through France: It flows northwest, passing through regions such as Burgundy, Champagne, and Île-de-France, and cities like Troyes, Melun, Corbeil, and Paris.
- Path Through Paris: In Paris, the Seine winds through the city center for about 13 kilometers, forming the famous islands Île de la Cité and Île Saint-Louis.
- Tributaries: It is joined by several important tributaries, including the Marne, Yonne, Aube, and Oise rivers.
- Drainage Basin and Rainfall: Its drainage basin spans 76,000–79,000 square kilometers, receiving moderate rainfall of 650–750 mm annually, and covering much of northern France.
- Mouth and Termination: The river empties into the English Channel between Le Havre and Honfleur, on the Normandy coast.
- Economic Role: The Seine supports commercial navigation and shipping, especially through the ports of Rouen and Le Havre, and provides about 50% of Paris’s drinking water.
[UPSC 2020] Consider the following pairs: River Flows into
1. Mekong Andaman Sea 2. Thames Irish Sea 3. Volga Caspian Sea 4. Zambezi Indian Ocean Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 3 and 4 only* (d) 1, 2 and 4 only |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Why in the News?
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has launched the “3 by 35” initiative, urging countries to raise taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and sugary drinks by at least 50% by 2035 to fight rising chronic diseases.
About the ‘3 by 35’ Initiative:
- Launch and Objective: The ‘3 by 35’ initiative was launched by WHO in 2024 urging countries to raise real prices of tobacco, alcohol, and sugary drinks by at least 50% by 2035 through health taxes.
- Public Health Goal: The primary aim is to reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, which currently cause over 75% of global deaths.
- Impact Projection: According to WHO estimates, a 50% price increase in harmful products could prevent 50 million premature deaths over the next 50 years.
- Revenue Mobilization Target: The initiative aims to help countries generate $1 trillion in public revenue over the next decade to strengthen national health systems and fund universal health coverage (UHC).
- Global Technical Support: A global alliance of experts and institutions backs the initiative by offering policy advice, real-world case studies, and implementation support.
Key Features:
- Focus on Health Taxes: Promotes the use of excise taxes to increase the prices of tobacco, alcohol, and sugary beverages, discouraging harmful consumption and improving population-level health.
- Evidence-Based Tools: Provides technical guidance, economic models, and case studies to support country-specific reforms in taxation policy.
- Alignment with UHC: Positions health taxes as sustainable revenue sources for public health financing, especially targeting low- and middle-income countries.
- Equity-Oriented Design: Targets products disproportionately consumed by vulnerable groups, making the initiative also a tool for social equity and justice.
[UPSC 2013] Consider the following statements:
1. India ranks first in the world in fruit production. 2. India ranks second in the world in the export of tobacco. Which of these statements is/are correct?”
Options: (a) Only 1 (b) Only 2 (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2* |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now