💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Type: IOCR

  • Corruption Challenges – Lokpal, POCA, etc

    FATF Mutual Evaluation of India

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Important International Institutions

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

    Mains level: Not Much

    Central Idea

    • A team from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is currently conducting a mutual evaluation in India.
    • India’s mutual evaluation report is expected to be discussed during the FATF plenary meeting in June 2024.

    About Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

    • Foundation: FATF was founded in 1989 through the initiative of the G7 nations.
    • Secretariat: The FATF Secretariat is headquartered at the OECD headquarters in Paris, France.
    • Plenary Meetings: FATF conducts three Plenary meetings during each of its 12-month rotating presidencies.
    • Membership: As of 2019, FATF consists of 37 member jurisdictions.

    India’s Engagement with FATF

    • Observer Status: India became an Observer at FATF in 2006, marking the beginning of its association with the organization.
    • Full Membership: On June 25, 2010, India officially became the 34th country to attain full membership in FATF, signifying its active participation and commitment to the organization’s objectives.

    Understanding the Mutual Evaluation Process

    • Review Framework: The mutual evaluation process is an essential mechanism through which FATF assesses a country’s legal and institutional framework to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. It also evaluates the country’s implementation of measures to prevent these financial crimes.
    • Compliance Assessment: During this process, FATF scrutinizes a country’s adherence to its 40 recommendations regarding anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing. It also evaluates the practical effectiveness of these measures.
    • Outcome and Rating: The outcome of the mutual evaluation is documented in a report. This report highlights the country’s strengths, identifies weaknesses, and suggests areas for improvement. A rating is assigned based on the level of compliance and effectiveness.

    FATF’s Evaluation of India

    • Comprehensive Assessment: FATF’s evaluation of India encompasses various aspects, including the nation’s legal framework, regulatory system, law enforcement efforts, and international collaboration.
    • Alignment with Global Standards: Central agencies in India have been actively working to ensure that the country’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws align with international standards and that their practical implementation is effective.

    Significance of FATF Evaluation

    • Report Impact: The evaluation results in a comprehensive report detailing India’s strengths, weaknesses, and areas requiring improvement. This report includes a rating based on compliance and effectiveness.
    • Global Anti-Financial Crime Efforts: The mutual evaluation process is a crucial tool in the worldwide fight against money laundering and terrorist financing.
    • Financial Implications: The outcome can significantly affect a country’s access to international financial markets and its standing in the global community.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Africa

    India to host second Voice of Global South Summit

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Voice of Global South Summit

    Mains level: NA

    global south

    Central Idea

    • Prime Minister will inaugurate the second Voice of Global South Summit. This will be the second Voice of Global South Summit in less than a year hosted by India.

    What is the Voice of Global South Summit?

    • The VoGS Summit is a Indian initiative that has been designed to provide a common platform for the countries of the Global South to share their perspectives and priorities on several major issues.
    • It aims to find out solutions for common challenges faced by developing countries through talks.
    • Inspired by PM’s vision, ‘Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas Sabka Vishwas aur Sabka Prayas’, the summit follows India’s philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.

    How did the summit start?

    • The foundation of this unique initiative was laid considering the recent global developments that have severely impacted the developing world.
    • These include events such as Covid pandemic, mounting debt, ongoing Ukraine conflict, and challenges of food, energy security and others.
    • Often, the worries of developing countries do not gain adequate attention and space on the global stage.
    • The relevant existing platforms have proven to be deficient in handling the challenges and concerns of the developing nations.

    About Global South

    • Global South refers to countries in Asia, Africa, and South America, while Global North includes countries like the US, Canada, Europe, Russia, Australia, and New Zealand.
    • It’s a term used to categorize countries based on economic development and historical factors.

    Features of Global South

    • Mostly lower-income countries, often with colonial histories.
    • Not strictly limited to the Southern Hemisphere; many are in the Northern Hemisphere.
    • Used as a value-free alternative to “Third World.”
    • Major countries like Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and Mexico are part of the Global South.

    Need for Classification

    • Helps describe economic and geopolitical differences.
    • Overcomes the limitations of East/West or First/Second/Third World classifications.
    • Recognizes the shared history of colonization.
    • Acknowledges the emergence of economically powerful South countries.

    Indian Context

    • India aims to represent the underrepresented Global South in international forums.
    • Calls for reform in multilateral institutions like the UNSC, UN, and IMF.
    • Emergent economies like India and China seek cooperation with other Global South countries.
    • Challenges the dominance of the Global North in international affairs.

    Criticism of Classification

    • Some find the term too broad and vague.
    • Questions about whether elites of the Global South aim to challenge global capitalist structures.
    • Concerns about the neglect of Africa in the rise of Asia.

    Significance of Global South

    • India aims to unite Global South nations to address common concerns.
    • Potential for technical and idea exchanges and cooperation in various areas.
    • Highlighting shared concerns like energy security and sustainable development.

    Challenges for Consolidation

    • Debate over climate reparations and exclusion of India and China.
    • Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Least Developed Countries.
    • China’s increasing influence in the Global South through initiatives like the Belt and Road.

    Way Forward

    • India needs active engagement in regional politics within the Global South.
    • Recognize differentiation within the Global South in terms of wealth, needs, and capabilities.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-China

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and India

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)

    Mains level: Read the attached story

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)

    Central Idea

    • The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders’ Week is currently underway in San Francisco, bringing together leaders from the Asia-Pacific region to discuss pressing economic and trade issues.
    • Although India is not an APEC member, is participating at the forum.

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): An Overview

    • Founding: APEC, established in 1989, is a regional economic forum aimed at promoting regional economic integration and greater prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region. It consists of 21 member economies, termed “economies” due to their focus on trade and economic matters.
    • Member Economies: APEC’s member economies include Australia, Brunei, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Hong Kong (as part of China), the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Chinese Taipei (Taiwan), China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, Canada, the United States, Mexico, Peru, and Chile, strategically located around the Pacific Ocean.

    APEC’s Role over the Years

    • Champion of Free Trade: APEC has consistently advocated for free trade, reduction of trade tariffs, and economic liberalization.
    • Seoul Declaration: The 1991 Seoul Declaration marked the establishment of a liberalized free trade area around the Pacific Rim as APEC’s primary objective.
    • Economic Impact: APEC initiatives have contributed significantly to the development of a growing middle class in the Asia-Pacific region. APEC economies, comprising 2.9 billion citizens, account for approximately 60 percent of global GDP and 48 percent of global trade as of 2018.

    India’s Interest in APEC

    • Historical Interest: India expressed interest in joining APEC in 1991, coinciding with the initiation of economic reforms for liberalization and globalization.
    • Rationale: India’s interest in APEC is based on its geographical location, the potential size of its economy, and its trade interactions with the Asia-Pacific.
    • Challenges: APEC has maintained an informal moratorium on expanding membership, despite India’s interest. The US-India Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region in 2015 welcomed India’s interest in joining APEC but no formal progress has been made.

    Highlights of APEC Summit 2023

    • Biden-Xi Meeting: The meeting between US President Biden and China’s President Xi Jinping is a significant highlight. While it may not result in immediate changes in US-China relations, it reflects ongoing high-level engagements.
    • Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): The summit will focus on progress related to the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), initiated after the US withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Fourteen members, including Fiji and India, are part of the IPEF, with the rest being APEC members.

    Conclusion

    • The APEC Summit 2023 brings together leaders from the Asia-Pacific region to address economic and trade issues, with the Biden-Xi meeting and discussions on the IPEF among the key highlights.
    • Despite India’s historical interest in APEC, membership expansion remains a challenge, underscoring the importance of regional economic forums in shaping global economic policies and partnerships.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-United States

    India’s 2+2 Ministerial Dialogues: Partnerships and Objectives

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: 2+2 Dialogues Format

    Mains level: Read the attached story

    2+2

    Central Idea

    • Indian Defence Minister and External Affairs Minister recently hosted their US counterparts for the fifth annual 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue in New Delhi.

    Understanding 2+2 Dialogues

    • Purpose: 2+2 dialogues involve the participation of high-level representatives, typically the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defence, from two nations. This format aims to expand the scope of dialogue and collaboration between these countries.
    • Rationale: Such dialogues enable comprehensive discussions on strategic concerns, mutual sensitivities, and political factors. They facilitate a deeper understanding of each other’s geopolitical perspectives and contribute to the development of stronger, more integrated strategic relationships in an ever-changing global environment.

    India’s 2+2 Partners

    • United States: The United States is India’s foremost and oldest partner in the 2+2 format. The inaugural 2+2 dialogue took place in September 2018 during the Trump Administration.
    • Australia: India engages in 2+2 meetings with Australia, further enhancing bilateral security and defence cooperation.
    • Japan: The 2+2 talks with Japan commenced in 2019, with the objective of bolstering strategic depth in security and defence cooperation.
    • United Kingdom: In October 2023, India initiated its first 2+2 dialogue with the United Kingdom, signifying the growing importance of this partnership.
    • Russia: India and Russia also engage in 2+2 dialogues, fostering a mutually beneficial understanding on various regional and international issues.

    Significance of 2+2 Dialogues

    • Defence and Strategic Agreements: These dialogues have led to significant bilateral agreements and partnerships. India and the United States, for instance, have signed Troika Pacts like:
    1. Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA)
    2. Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA)
    3. Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) for deep military cooperation.
    • Addressing Regional Concerns: In the face of common regional concerns, such as China’s increasing assertiveness, 2+2 dialogues have become vital mechanisms for India and its partners to align their strategic interests. This includes cooperation within the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) forum with Japan, Australia, and the United States.
    • Expanding Traditional Alliances: India also values its 2+2 dialogues with Russia, acknowledging shared worldviews and goals in promoting a multipolar world order.

    Conclusion

    • India’s participation in 2+2 Ministerial Dialogues with key global partners underscores its commitment to fostering robust and multifaceted strategic relationships.
    • These dialogues are pivotal in addressing regional and global challenges, strengthening military cooperation, and promoting shared interests in a dynamic world order.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Climate Change Negotiations – UNFCCC, COP, Other Conventions and Protocols

    Loss and Damage Fund (LDF) talks leave developing nations at new disadvantage 

    IOCR | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 1: Important Geophysical Phenomena

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Loss and Damage Fund (LDF)

    Mains level: Read the attached story

    loss and damage fund

    Central Idea

    • In the escalating climate crisis, the terms “adaptation” and “loss and damage” (L&D) have taken center stage.
    • While the concept was embraced at COP 27, recent meetings of the Transitional Committee (TC) to operationalize the fund have encountered major roadblocks.

    Birth of the L&D Fund

    • Historic Pollution Accountability: The call for affluent nations to acknowledge their historical pollution accountability dates back over 30 years.
    • COP 19 Agreement: In 2013, at COP 19 in Warsaw, Poland, member countries formalized the creation of the L&D fund. It aimed to provide financial and technical support to economically developing nations grappling with L&D due to climate change.
    • Subsequent Developments: COP 25 introduced the Santiago Network for L&D, and COP 26 established the Glasgow Dialogue on finance for L&D. COP 27 in November 2022 saw the creation of the L&D fund and a Transitional Committee (TC) tasked with operationalizing the fund.

    Challenges in Creation of the L&D Fund

    • Contentious Issues: TC meetings have grappled with contentious issues such as hosting the fund at the World Bank, the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR), climate reparations, and eligibility criteria for developing nations.
    • Developed vs. Developing Nations: These disagreements have deepened the divide between developed and developing nations, hampering progress.

    Outcome of TC4 and TC5 Meetings

    • TC4 Impasse: The fourth meeting of the TC concluded without a consensus on how to operationalize the L&D fund, reflecting divisions on key issues.
    • TC5 Draft Recommendations: An impromptu fifth meeting of the TC led to draft recommendations forwarded to COP 28. Developing nations conceded to the fund being hosted by the World Bank temporarily, but developed nations, including the U.S., remained non-committal regarding primary donor status and rejected references to CBDR, equity, and liability in the draft.
    • Lack of Clarity: The draft does not specify the fund’s size due to pressure from certain developed nations.

    A blow to climate multilateralism

    • Erosion of Trust: The outcome underscores a severe trust deficit between affluent and emerging economies concerning historical responsibilities, deepening the rift between wealthy and impoverished nations.
    • Failure to Fulfill Commitments: The unwillingness of wealthy nations to fulfill intended commitments undermines global climate negotiations, cooperation, and climate justice.
    • Humanitarian Consequences: The watering down of the L&D fund can lead to humanitarian crises, food shortages, displacement, conflict, and exacerbate the suffering of vulnerable communities.
    • Economic and Environmental Impact: It also has economic consequences, with potential financial crises and environmental degradation, exacerbating global economic instability.
    • Security Implications: Climate-induced instability may lead to security implications as conflicts emerge in vulnerable nations, threatening to spill across borders.

    L&D as Part of Climate Justice

    • Balancing Adaptation and L&D: Adaptation and L&D are not mutually exclusive but coexist on the continuum of climate resilience.
    • Moral and Financial Responsibility: Addressing L&D is a moral and financial responsibility of affluent nations, ensuring climate justice, equity, and solidarity.
    • Global Climate Action: Failure to meet these obligations can derail global climate action, adding pressure to future COP talks.

    Conclusion

    • The protracted impasse surrounding the Loss and Damage fund reflects a troubling lack of consensus and trust between nations, hindering climate justice and cooperation.
    • As the world grapples with the consequences of climate change, balancing adaptation and addressing L&D remains paramount.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Indian Ocean Power Competition

    Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) Initiative

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: IPMDA Initiative, QUAD

    Mains level: NA

    Central Idea

    • The Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) initiative, recently unveiled by the Quad grouping (India, Australia, Japan, and the U.S.), underscores a shared commitment to uphold a free, open, inclusive, and rules-based Indo-Pacific.

    What is IPMDA Initiative?

    • IPMDA Initiative was announced at the Quad Leaders’ Summit in Tokyo, 2022.
    • It primarily aims to track dark shipping.
    • Dark ships are vessels with their Automatic Identification System (AIS) – a transponder system – switched off so as not to be detectable.
    • It focuses on tracking other tactical-level activities: to respond to climate and humanitarian events and to protect their fisheries, which are vital to many Indo-Pacific economies.

    Significance of IPMDA for India

    • IPMDA represents a substantial effort to bolster security and stability in the Indo-Pacific, a region of paramount global geopolitical significance.
    • India’s Navy, currently possessing over 140 ships and submarines, is on course to achieve a formidable fleet of 170 to 180 vessels by 2028.

    Lessons from Recent Events

    • Recent global events, including the border standoff with China in eastern Ladakh, conflicts in Ukraine, and turmoil in West Asia, underscore the need for resilience and readiness in the face of uncertainties.
    • Indian Navy recognizes the importance of integrated joint operations and a holistic approach to national defense, and a well-coordinated defense strategy involving all three Services.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Promoting Science and Technology – Missions,Policies & Schemes

    What is Bletchley Park Declaration?

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Bletchley Park Declaration

    Mains level: Global consensus building on AI Regulation

    Bletchley Park Declaration

    Central Idea

    • The recent AI Safety Summit held at Bletchley Park, the historic site of World War II code-breakers, brought together nations, computer scientists, and tech leaders to address the challenges and opportunities posed by artificial intelligence (AI).
    • India, a significant participant alongside countries like the US, UK, and China, played a pivotal role in shaping the global AI governance landscape.

    Bletchley Park Declaration

    • Global Agreement: The Bletchley Park Declaration aims to establish a shared understanding of the risks and opportunities posed by “frontier AI.”
    • Partners: The summit led to a groundbreaking agreement signed by 28 major countries, including India, the US, China, and the European Union.
    • Frontier AI Defined: Frontier AI refers to highly advanced generative AI models with potentially dangerous capabilities that can pose significant risks to public safety.

    India’s Stance

    • Global Action: India emphasized the importance of international cooperation to address AI risks effectively, aligning with the views of other participating nations.
    • Prioritizing Safety and Trust: Indian Minister of State for IT, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, highlighted the need to ensure that AI represents safety and trust. India’s perspective has evolved from initially hesitating to regulate AI to actively formulating risk-based regulations.
    • Global Framework: India’s PM had earlier called for a global framework on “ethical” AI tools, signalling a shift towards proactive regulation.

    Global Opinion on AI Governance

    • Diverse Responses: The AI policy response varies across nations. The EU has proposed a comprehensive AI Act, while the UK adopts a “light-touch” approach to foster innovation. The US positions itself between these extremes, focusing on safety and ethics.
    • Regulatory Scrutiny: Policymakers worldwide have increased regulatory scrutiny of generative AI tools, prompted by concerns related to privacy, bias, and intellectual property rights.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Afghanistan

    Pakistan’s Illegal Deportation of Afghan Refugees

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: 1951 Refugee Convention

    Mains level: Refugee crisis in the world

    afghan refugee

    Central Idea

    • Pakistan’s government has recently implemented an order mandating the expulsion of all foreigners, with a significant impact on Afghan refugees, the largest refugee group in Pakistan.
    • This move has raised questions about the fate of Afghan migrants returning to a country facing numerous challenges, including a collapsed economy, natural disasters, food insecurity, and human rights issues under Taliban rule.

    Afghan Refugees in Pakistan

    • Historical Background: Afghan refugees have sought shelter in Pakistan since the late 1970s, primarily due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Subsequently, they fled during the Afghan civil war in the 1990s and the Taliban regime’s rule.
    • Afghan Refugee Population: Pakistan is home to over 4 million Afghans, with an estimated 1.7 million lacking proper documentation.
    • Deportation Deadline: The government set a deadline of October 31 for illegal migrants to leave Pakistan, after which they would face arrest and expulsion.
    • Deportation Process: Hours before the deadline, authorities began rounding up undocumented migrants, demolishing some homes to compel them to leave.
    • Border Crossings: Thousands of Afghans crossed into Afghanistan through border crossings, including Torkham and Chaman.

    Reasons for Deportation

    • Economic Concerns: Pakistan cites economic strain as a key reason for deportation, asserting that undocumented migrants who do not pay taxes strain its limited resources.
    • Security Concerns: Authorities claim that Afghan migrants have been involved in terror attacks, street crimes, and organized crimes like drug trafficking. They are accused of participating in attacks against the government and the army.
    • Political Timing: The deportation coincides with Pakistan’s caretaker government, insulating it from potential political or electoral repercussions.

    Refugee Convention,1951

    • The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is one of the cornerstone instruments of refugee protection. It defines who a refugee is and outlines their rights and responsibilities.
    • It also provides a non-refoulement principle, which prohibits states from returning refugees to a country where they would face persecution.
    • The 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees expanded the geographic scope of the 1951 Convention and removed the temporal and geographic limitations, making the Convention universally applicable.

    Challenges for Returnees

    • Uncertain Future: Afghan migrants returning to Afghanistan face an uncertain future amid economic collapse, earthquakes, food shortages, and human rights violations under Taliban rule.
    • Education and Employment: Women and girls returning to Afghanistan may be denied education and job opportunities.
    • US-Affiliated Migrants: Those who worked for the US before the Taliban’s takeover are particularly vulnerable.

    Taliban’s Response

    • Criticism and Request for Time: The Taliban has criticized the deportations and asked for more time to prepare for the returnees.
    • Humanitarian Efforts: Afghan authorities are establishing temporary camps near the border to provide food, shelter, healthcare, and SIM cards to returnees. The Taliban has expressed a willingness to assist them in finding jobs.

    Conclusion

    • This deportation is a contentious move driven by economic and security concerns.
    • The international community, including the Taliban, is grappling with the challenges posed by this situation, particularly as winter approaches and Afghanistan faces additional hardships.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • Climate Change Negotiations – UNFCCC, COP, Other Conventions and Protocols

    CBAM will kill EU Manufacturing: Commerce Minister

    IOCR | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 1: Important Geophysical Phenomena

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

    Mains level: Read the attached story

    cbam

    Central Idea

    • Commerce and Industry Minister has strongly criticized the European Union’s (EU) proposed Carbon Tax on imports, deeming it “ill-conceived” and warning of potential consequences for the EU’s manufacturing sector.
    • He asserted that even if the plan, set to take effect in 2026, proceeds, India will counter it by imposing its own carbon tax.

    What is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)?

    Proposed by European Union (EU)
    Purpose To reduce carbon emissions from imported goods and prevent competitive disadvantage against countries with weaker environmental regulations
    Objectives Reduce carbon emissions from imported goods

    Promote a level playing field between the EU and its trading partners

    Protect EU companies that have invested in green technologies

    How does CBAM work?

    Coverage Applies to imported goods that are carbon-intensive
    Integration Covered by the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS), which currently covers industries like power generation, steel, and cement
    Implementation CBAM taxes would be imposed on the carbon content of imported goods at the border, and the tax rates would be based on the carbon price in the EU ETS
    Exemptions Possible exemptions for countries that have implemented comparable carbon pricing systems
    Revenue Use Revenue generated from CBAM taxes could be used to fund the EU’s climate objectives, such as financing climate-friendly investments and supporting developing countries’ climate efforts

    Who will be affected by CBAM?

    Details
    Countries Non-EU countries, including India, that export carbon-intensive goods to the EU
    Items Initially covers iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertilisers, and electric energy production
    Expansion The scope of the CBAM may expand to other sectors in the future

    Advantages offered

    • Encourages non-EU countries to adopt more stringent environmental regulations, reducing global carbon emissions.
    • Prevents carbon leakage by discouraging companies from relocating to countries with weaker environmental regulations.
    • Generates revenue that could be used to support EU climate policies.

    Challenges with CBAM

    • Difficulty in accurately measuring the carbon emissions of imported goods, especially for countries without comprehensive carbon accounting systems.
    • Potential for trade tensions with the EU’s trading partners, especially if other countries implement retaliatory measures.

    Consequences for EU Manufacturing

    • Auto Sector Impact: The minister suggested that the European auto sector could be one of the first casualties, particularly affecting steel and aluminum usage.
    • Opportunity for India: Goyal saw this as an opportunity for India to develop a robust auto sector, leveraging cost advantages in the global market.

    India’s Response and Carbon Tax Strategy

    • Counteractive Measures: India intends to neutralize the impact of the EU’s carbon tax by imposing its own.
    • Investing in Green Energy: Revenue from the Indian carbon tax would be channelled into the country’s green energy transition, which, indirectly, could help exporters transition to cleaner energy and reduce their carbon footprint.
    • Negotiations with EU: The government is engaged in dialogues with EU counterparts regarding the levy’s fairness and pricing disparities.

    Conclusion

    • The EU’s proposed Carbon Tax and India’s counterstrategy highlight the complexities of international trade, environmental concerns, and the potential consequences for various industries.
    • India’s strong stance underscores its commitment to safeguarding its economic interests while engaging in constructive negotiations with the EU to ensure a fair and mutually beneficial outcome.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now

  • The Crisis In The Middle East

    UNGA Vote on Gaza War, and why India abstained

    IOCR | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Note4Students

    From UPSC perspective, the following things are important:

    Prelims level: UNGA Resolutions

    Mains level: India's stance on Palestinian War

    unga hamas israel

    Central Idea

    • The recent United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) vote on a resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian truce in the Israel-Hamas conflict saw India abstaining from the vote.

    What are UNGA Resolutions?

    UNGA Resolutions and Voting
    What is it? Cover diverse global issues, including disarmament, climate change, and humanitarian aid.
    Types Include regular, consensus (adopted without a vote), and procedural resolutions.
    Who can initiate? Originates from member states, UN committees, or regional groups after negotiations and debates.
    Nature of Enforcement Non-binding but hold moral and political influence on member states and UN bodies.
    Significance Shape international norms, public opinion, and state behavior despite lacking legal enforcement.
    Features of UNGA Resolutions Discussed and adopted during annual sessions, with possible special sessions when required.
    Equal Voting Rights Each member state has an equal vote, ensuring equality regardless of size or influence.
    Majority Requirements Typically adopted with a two-thirds majority of present and voting member states (e.g., 128 votes if all 193 are present).
    Varied Majority Types Some require a simple majority, while others, like UN Charter amendments, need a two-thirds majority of all member states.
    Abstentions Member states can abstain, signifying neutrality without supporting or opposing.
    Challenges and Divisions Resolutions may face opposition or receive no votes, leading to international discussions and divisions.

    Resolution over Israel-Hamas War

    • The resolution, titled “Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations,” was proposed by Jordan on behalf of the Arab League and co-sponsored by approximately 40 countries.
    • It called for an immediate humanitarian truce, cessation of hostilities, and unhindered humanitarian access to Gaza.
    • However, it did not specifically refer to the cowardly terror attacks by Hamas, which resulted in numerous Israeli casualties and hostages.
    • Ultimately, the resolution passed with 120 votes in favor, 14 against (including US and UK), and 45 abstentions, with India among the abstaining nations.

    India’s Abstinent

    • India defended its abstention by citing the absence of “explicit condemnation” of the October 7 terror attacks in Israel in the resolution.
    • Since India’s concerns regarding these omissions were not addressed in the final text of the resolution, abstaining was the chosen course of action.
    • The government emphasized that there should be no ambiguity when it comes to condemning terrorism and that its position on this matter remains “steadfast and consistent.”
    • Key elements of India’s statement include-
    1. Condemnation of violence, including the October 7 attacks by Hamas.
    2. Acknowledgement of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and support for international de-escalation efforts.
    3. Concern about the security situation and a call for all parties to exercise restraint.
    4. Reiteration of India’s support for a negotiated two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine issue.
    5. Encouragement for diplomacy and dialogue to create conditions for peace negotiations.

    Why so furore over India’s action?

    • India’s abstention differed from its previous vote in favour of a UNGA resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza in 2018 and other similar votes in the past.
    • Opposition parties in India criticized the government for refusing to take a stronger stand on the humanitarian issue.
    • They argued that India’s abstention stood alone among countries in the Global South, South Asia, and BRICS, all of which had voted in favour of the resolution.

    Significance of India’s action

    • Balanced Position: India’s abstention mirrors its approach to other global conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, where it seeks to maintain a diplomatic balance between opposing sides.
    • Not Legally Binding: Unlike UN Security Council resolutions, UNGA resolutions are not legally binding, meaning that Israel and the US are not obligated to act on it.
    • Weight and Moral Authority: Despite its non-binding nature, the resolution carries significant moral weight, with 120 votes in favour signifying support for international law and proportionate use of force.
    • India’s Principled Stand: India reiterated its support for a negotiated two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine issue and called for diplomacy and dialogue to resolve the conflict.

    Conclusion

    • India’s abstention in the recent UN General Assembly vote reflects its balanced and nuanced approach to international conflicts.
    • While it has drawn criticism from some quarters, it underscores India’s commitment to principles of diplomacy and its focus on a negotiated resolution to complex global issues.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

    Attend Now