Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: TRIPS.
Mains level: Paper 3- How Covid-19 could impact the intellectual property rights?
The article discusses the idea of creating a patent pool of the patents dealing with Covid-19. Such a patent pool will be effective in avoiding the possibility of the hostile response of societies towards patent rights. And also avoid the conflict between nations. corporations and international organisations.
Purpose of patent rights
- The purpose of creating and recognising patent rights is for the common public good, i.e., innovation should be made public in exchange for a limited monopoly.
- Thus, patents need to be disclosed to the public in order to enable further research.
- Should pandemics such as COVID-19be an exception to this?
- With the outbreak of COVID-19, there are several innovations.
- All these innovations may be the subject matter of patent applications around the world.
- It will be a few years before patents are even granted.
- However, friction already exists among various stakeholders.
- For instance, one country made attempts to obtain exclusive rights to a vaccine being developed.
- On the other hand, there are also collaborations taking place.
- However, the spirit of collaborative solutions is only on the anvil.
- The question that arises is whether the exclusivity that is recognised by patent rights will be detrimental to society.
- Will patents create roadblocks or is there a solution?
Possibility of conflicts over patent rights
- Governments and international organisations need to arrive at a consensus in advance to ensure that the system is ready.
- Procrastination would be disastrous.
- Creating hindrances through exclusivity claims, in the wake of a pandemic, will result in dividing countries, corporations and international organisations.
- This will not benefit patients and the world as a whole.
- If patent owners create impediments on the strength of patent rights, the world will start despising patents and that is not a situation IP owners ought to be in.
- Under the TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) regime, there are several tools such as compulsory licensing that are available to ensure access to medicines.
- However, beyond the laws, society needs to respect innovation.
- To protect the sanctity and integrity of patent systems, and in order to ensure that an anti-IP sentiment is not generated globally, answers need to be found within the existing regime.
- In exceptional circumstances such as these, there is a likelihood that societies may resort to extreme steps to protect themselves.
- Before such ideas are floated, solutions should be created.
The idea of creating a patent pool
- One method by which aggregation and dissemination of innovative products can be ensured is by creating a patent pool.
- Patent pools are usually effective in aggregating, administering and licensing patents related to specific areas of technology.
- Such pools are usually managed by a central agency and the patents which become part of the pool are readily made available for licensing.
- Some pools even publish the royalty rates payable for such licences.
- Anyone who wishes to obtain a licence will be able to approach the pool, agree to the terms, and begin to manufacture and sell the products.
- Such pools are prevalent in, for instance, standard essential patents related to telecom and digital innovations.
- At the moment, individual efforts are being made by research organisations to create their own pools.
- A more fruitful endeavour would be to create a global pool of COVID-19-related innovations, or innovations related to rare pandemics, in respect of vaccines and medicines.
- This could be managed by a trustworthy international organisation.
- All countries ought to have the right to implement these innovations without further permission from the patent-holders.
- This would not require countries resorting to provisions such as compulsory licensing, state acquisition, etc.
- Even if royalties are at a minimal level, the revenues would still be in billions of dollars owing to the large swathes of the population affected by the pandemic, who will need to be administered these products.
Way forward
- Creation of a pool and immediate licensing will ensure that there are hundreds of manufacturers across the world.
- As a result, vaccines and medicines will be quickly available.
- Such a pool needs the cooperation of not just countries and international organisations but also the hundreds of researchers, innovators, companies and universities involved.
- Doha Declaration: Pooling of patent resources is also in line with the Doha Declaration on Public Health which is a part of the TRIPS agreement.
- This declaration recognises the need for taking measures to ‘protect public health’ and ‘promote access to medicines’.
A direct question on the issue can be asked by the UPSC, for ex-“Though IPRs have been provided to respect and protect the innovations and ideas, but in the wake of corona crisis, some strict provisions need to be changed. In light of the above statement, discuss the limitations of the exclusivity clause under the patents rights. And how can it be overcome in emergency situations?”
Conclusion
Public-private partnerships (PPP) need to be scaled up. Creation of the ‘PPP-pandemic patent pool’ at a global level, to pool all innovations, is the way forward. Let us not wait any longer.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Convalescent plasma therapy.
Mains level: Paper 3- What is plasma therapy and issues involved in its adoption.
The article discusses the issues with convalescent plasma therapy. The therapy has been in the news as a cure to Covid-19. The lack of conclusive evidence is a major issue. There are certain risks involved in large scale adoption. All such issues are dealt with in detail here.
Importance of scientific research in dealing with Covid-19
- The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to governments, health professionals and the general public at large, around the world.
- Every response, administrative, social, economic or medical is being subjected to intense public scrutiny, as it rightly should be in the spirit of mature democracy.
- Scientific research in medicine is the only means to overcome novel and complex diseases such as COVID-19 and that too thrives on the same spirit of debate and criticism.
- Difficulty in establishing protocols: The difference is that the standards of evidence required, to generate consensus and arrive at the most optimal protocols, are far more rigorous and time-taking than in most other walks of life.
Issues with plasma therapy
- The convalescent plasma therapy, that is being currently studied by the Indian Council of Medical Research, through open-label, randomised controlled trial to evaluate it for both safety and efficacy.
- The problem with the therapy is of the lack of established protocols.
- What is involved in therapy? The therapy involves infusing patients suffering from COVID-19 with plasma from recovered patients.
- In theory, the antibodies of the recovered person may help that patient’s immune system fight the virus.
- While showing great promise, it is a line of treatment that is yet to be validated for efficacy and safety and cannot be deployed widely without caution.
- The current evidence to conclude anything about the true benefits of this therapy is very thin.
- Till date, there have been only three published case series for convalescent plasma in COVID-19 with a cumulative of 19 patients.
- Given the very small number of patients involved in these studies and a publication bias in medicine, we cannot conclude the therapy will work on all patients all the time or even believe that the convalescent plasma was the only reason for their improvement.
- The most important principle in medical ethics is “do no harm”.
- The transfusion of convalescent plasma is also not without risks, which range from mild reactions like fever, itching, to life-threatening allergic reactions and lung injury.
- To recommend a therapy without studying it thoroughly with robust scientific methods may cause more harm than good.
- Further, convalescent plasma therapy requires intensive resources, healthy COVID-19 survivors to donate, a blood bank with proper machinery and trained personnel to remove plasma, equipment to store it and testing facilities to make sure it has an adequate amount of antibodies.
Need for the Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT)
- To say with certainty whether a drug is truly effective or not, the gold standard in medicine is to conduct a randomised controlled trial.
- In RCT half the patients get the experimental drug and the other half do not.
- Only if patients in the first half show substantial improvement over those in the second half, it indicates the drug is beneficial.
Exploring other options and focusing on health infrastructure
- Too much focus on one approach can take away the focus from other important therapeutic modalities like the use of oxygen therapy, antivirals, and antibiotics for complicated hospital courses.
- To overcome the pandemic comprehensively, we should focus on strengthening health systems at all levels, including referral systems, supply chain, logistics and inventory management.
- We need to work on protecting our healthcare workers, improving prevention methods, promoting cough etiquettes, effective quarantining and accurate testing.
A direct question based on the therapy like- “What is convalescent plasma therapy and what are the issues involved in its adoption?” can be asked by the UPSC.
Conclusion
Even these times of collective uncertainty are no reason to lower scientific temper. Science should be driven by reason and evidence with hope as a catalyst but not by either fear or populism. Pushing one or the other therapy without evidence or caution can only set back our larger fight against COVID-19.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Deficit financing through the RBI. Deflation.
Mains level: Paper 3- Necessity of stimulus package and risks involved in it.
This editorial spells out the size of the stimulus package that would be required to restart the economy. It also discusses the possible sources that the government could tap to raise the revenue. Such huge expenditure is likely to result in the huge fiscal deficit which would necessitate that the stimulus is time-bound and transparent.
Prospects of substantially negative growth
- Arvind Subramanian has likened the current economic situation to a “pralay (deluge)”.
- A deluge in which the government should spend more than even what it ought to in a rainy day.
- India, the former chief economic adviser said that India must plan for a “substantially negative” growth this year that might require an additional fiscal expenditure of Rs 10 lakh crore.
- Corporate indebtedness was already high before the lockdown.
- Insolvency cases will mount further.
- Even companies facing no significant cash flow issues wouldn’t invest in uncertain public health as well as the demand-constrained environment.
- Banks, too, aren’t going to lend, no matter how much liquidity the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) may infuse.
- The burden of non-performing assets, which is set to get heavier in the coming months, makes it impossible for them to finance an economic recovery.
- Last, but not the least, are faced with layoffs and pay cuts, they would rather save and will be afraid to spend.
Importance of government spending in the current situation
- Under the circumstances, the onus for ensuring that the wheels of the economy start moving lies on the government.
- There’s no guarantee of it happening even with all lockdown restrictions being lifted.
- Without somebody to spend, the economy is in real danger of contraction, which will, in turn, worsen the problem of businesses going bust, joblessness and loan defaults that can spread to the entire financial services industry.
No “3F” constraints and risk of deflationary shocks
- The one consolation today is that India is not saddled with its traditional “3F” constraints — food, fuel and foreign exchange — which were triggers for inflation and balance of payments crises.
- On the contrary, public foodgrain stocks are at an all-time high, global oil prices have crashed and there is no run on the rupee, unlike during the “taper tantrum” period of May-August 2013.
- Risk of deflationary shock: The risks, if at all, are tilted more towards demand-side “deflationary shocks” than supply-side inflation concerns.
How will the government manage the resources?
- The finances of both the Centre and states are in a mess, with receipts from tax and non-tax sources hardly covering even existing expenditures.
- But governments enjoy sovereign borrowing powers that allow fund-raising at rates below that of triple A-rated instruments issued by private corporates, more so in the present risk-averse scenario.
- Also, there is the option of deficit financing (“printing money”) through the RBI subscribing to primary auctions of government securities.
- There are, of course, costs in such powers being exercised.
- Past precedents — whether the issuance of ad hoc Treasury Bills to the RBI prior to April 1997 or the stimulus package post the 2008 global financial crisis — do not inspire confidence.
A question based on the stimulus package and its consequences can be framed, for ex- “Do you agree with the view that a stimulus package by the government to restart the economy is necessary? What are the options with the government to raise the money for such a package? What could the consequences of such a package on the economy in the future?”
Conclusion
This is the time to design clear rules for departure from accepted norms of fiscal prudence. Any stimulus has to be transparent and time-bound.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: FRBM Act provisions.
Mains level: Paper 3-Legal provisions for the fiscal consolidation that needs to be changed for the the stimulus package in the wake of corona pandemic.
The article discusses the two legal provisions that need to be changed in order to provide a fiscal stimulus of the size that could save the economy from collapse. Other major concern after the package would be the inflationary pressure resulting from government spending.
The urgency of the fiscal package by the Centre
- The longer the Centre dithers over a big-bang fiscal package to counter the adverse economic fallout of covid-19, the closer it risks pushing India’s economy to the precipice of disaster.
- The nationwide lockdown has more or less paralysed commercial activity, our exit path looks dreadfully long-winded, and the distress being seen right now could just be an early sign of what is to come.
- The suffering of citizens will likely expand once the shutdown’s second-order effects, which operate with a lag, begin to kick in.
- Estimates of ₹10 trillion needed by way of fiscal relief, once seen as too much by some, could yet turn out to be too little.
- Either way, preparatory work in terms of legal enablers should be done alongside the arithmetic
Legal constraints in the way of the stimulus programme
- There are two major constraints that we need to be relieved of—if only temporarily—for a stimulus programme to take shape.
- The first is the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act of 2003.
- And the second is the amendment done in 2016 of the Reserve Bank of India Act to give legislative cover to a flexible inflation-targeting framework that set our central bank the task of keeping India’s retail price index within a certain band.
- Both of these were aimed at long-term economic stability but made no allowance for a robust fiscal response to the kind of crisis we now face.
- It would be best if these were tweaked appropriately by a special session of Parliament.
- If not, then ordinances should be issued to suspend specific restrictions for a while.
Projections of fiscal deficit
- Under the budget presented in February, the Centre’s fiscal deficit for 2020-21 was projected at 3.5% of gross domestic product (GDP).
- This included a half percentage point deviation from the FRBM glide path allowed by the law’s contingency clause.
- Total expenditure was placed at a little over ₹30.4 trillion, and receipts at ₹22.4 trillion-plus.
- With tax revenues and asset-sale realizations expected to fall short, the fiscal gap could widen to about ₹10 trillion even without any extra spending.
- Drastic cuts in expenditure could save some money, but even if a heavy axe is wielded on expenses, the government’s deficit this year would have to exceed twice the legal limit for a stimulus that saves the economy from collapse.
- If this turns out to be a year of negative growth, as some fear, effecting a revival will only get harder.
- For pre-emptive action, the government should use its parliamentary clout to permit a limitless deficit for 2020-21.
A question based on the limits placed by the FRBM Act and the changes brought by the amendment to the RBI Act which mandated RBI with managing the inflation could be asked by the UPSC.
Prospects of inflationary pressure and RBI’s mandate
- An effort to spend our way out of an economic morass could prove inflationary if too much cash ends up chasing too few goods and services.
- As we have undergone both demand and supply shocks, opinion is divided on whether prices will go haywire.
- This risk would depend on how much cash gets pumped around at what point in time and the pace at which supplies are restored.
- In other words, the inflation outlook is highly uncertain.
- But should prices threaten to rise, it would be counterproductive of the central bank to tamp them down by tightening credit.
- As of now, RBI’s mandate is to keep inflation at 4%, with a tolerance band of 2% on either side.
- This target is valid till March 2021, but needs to be reviewed right away to let the central bank focus on growth.
- The acceptable range could be widened and the time limit to achieve the goal lengthened as a special reprieve.
Conclusion
A few tweaks of the law must go alongside calculations of a stimulus package designed to relieve economic distress. The government should act on these quickly to save the day.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Poor health infrastructure of SAARC countries and other common problems.
The article discusses the various common features shared by the South Asians countries. One of them is the poor public healthcare infrastructure. So, the pandemic offers an opportunity to make the required policy changes. It also offers the opportunity for cooperation among the regional countries in dealing with Covid-19. These issues are discussed in the article.
South Asian countries: Common features, common problems
- South Asia, one of the world’s most populous regions, is also affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Both Karachi and Mumbai, among the world’s most densely populated cities, where we live and work, are being overwhelmed by cases.
- While the death rate in these places may not be as alarming as in Europe and the U.S., the collateral damage of the lockdown is taking its own toll.
- Common features of South Asia: While there are many differences amongst the countries of the region, there are also common features which impact the health of its people, some of them a result of our shared cultural and geopolitical history.
- The collective experience of dealing with COVID-19 may provide important lessons, which transcend national boundaries.
Poor healthcare system: a common problem
- South Asian countries have invested very little in health.
- This is reflected in our abysmally low health parameters.
- It is interesting that Britain, which formulated our health policies before independence, went on to form one of the world’s strongest public health systems, the National Health Service.
- Whereas its South Asian colonies chose to stray from that path.
- This resulted in a dysfunctional public healthcare
- Governments have also relinquished what ought to have been their primary duty, of health care provision, to the private sector.
- Having become an industry, the focus of healthcare in the private sector is on profit rather than on people’s needs.
- High treatment costs in private sector: Whilst privatisation has brought in advanced technology and expertise, the high costs of treatment in the private sector have resulted in impoverishment as most of the population has no insurance or third-party coverage, and pays out of pocket.
- The sector has also been poorly regulated.
- The result is that it is responsible for several excesses in its quest for profit.
Other common features of the region
- Hunger, malnutrition, poor sanitation and large-scale migration are features of this region.
- Existing infectious diseases like TB, HIV and malaria have been worsened by emerging ones like dengue, chikungunya, healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance.
- The region is also an epicentre of an epidemic of lifestyle diseases.
- Conflicts and expenditure on defence: Constant internal and external conflicts in South Asia not only consume a large portion of national budgets but also divert the attention of the public and policymakers from healthcare needs.
- Defence budgets take the largest share of national budgets, and obviously adversely impact social sector spending.
- Underfunded public health is going to hinder region’s capacity to fight COVID-19.
- The central role of religion: Religion continues to occupy a central space in the society and politics of the region.
- Though it offers succour to many, religious dogma can impact health policy and health-seeking behaviour.
- The refusal of devotees across Pakistan to avoid religious congregations during Ramadan despite the government’s orders has significantly fed the community spread of the virus.
Opportunity for policy changes to address healthcare problems
- COVID-19 has forced us to seriously reflect on our healthcare system.
- This is welcome if it results in policy change.
- Healthcare professionals and bodies must seize this opportunity to push our respective governments to address it seriously and not just as a pre-election strategy.
- A long-term commitment to universal health care, with not only a national but also a regional and global focus, is needed.
A question on this theme could be asked by the UPSC, for instance, “South Asian countries share the common problem of poor public healthcare infrastructure, which increases their vulnerability to the pandemic. But corona pandemic also offers an opportunity to improve the shortcoming in the health infrastructure and cooperation among the SAARC countries. Comment.”
Regional strategy and cooperation needed
- The SAARC heads of state have already offered help to one another.
- A regional strategy has a better chance of controlling the pandemic than isolated national-level efforts.
- The pooling of resources and sharing data may not only help flatten the curve but perhaps even develop into longer-term efforts towards effective treatment.
- It is being speculated that our populations are behaving differently; that the BCG vaccine may be a protective influence.
- Joint research into such areas can be a unifying point for SAARC.
Conclusion
It is in our collective interest to look at health security and not just national security. By the accident of their birth, South Asians have endured a lot. They merit better.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Money multiplier.
Mains level: Paper 3- Government spending to sustain the economy hit by the corona crisis.
The article discusses the fiscal response of the government to deal with the corona crisis. Fiscal response to the 2008 financial crisis was higher in terms of GDP percentage. Also, a comparison with emerging peer economic indicates that India might be running the tighter fiscal policy in the time of crisis. The article suggests higher spending by going beyond the traditional fiscal space.
A possible explanation for moderate fiscal response by the government
- The Indian government has till now come up with an insipid fiscal response to the ongoing economic crisis.
- Long battle: One view is that the government does not want to fire all its bullets in what threatens to be a long battle. It wants to time its interventions.
- Weak public finances: The other possible explanation for this fiscal timidity is that India has entered this crisis with weak public finances.
Comparison with finances at the 2008 financial crisis
- The combined official fiscal deficit of the Union plus state governments was at its lowest level in many decades.
- The economic boom of the preceding four years had led to higher tax collections pouring into the treasury.
- The massive increase in spending announced in the budget of February 2008 was with an eye on the national election scheduled a year later, rather than in anticipation of a coming storm.
- Then followed the second wave of fiscal expansion after the North Atlantic financial crisis hit Indian shores seven months later.
- Back then, India’s effective fiscal stimulus over two years was a substantial 4.3% of gross domestic product (GDP).
- In 2020, the crisis-driven spending plan announced by the government so far is less than 1% of GDP.
- There could yet be a big fiscal push in the coming days.
Tighter fiscal policy in crisis compared to other emerging economies
- Some of the budget estimates released a few days ago by the International Monetary Fund are telling.
- In 2018, the total fiscal deficit of the Indian government as a proportion of GDP was 2.4 percentage points higher than the average for Asian emerging markets.
- India is expected to end 2020 with a total fiscal deficit that will be 2.5 percentage points lower than Asia’s average.
- In other words, India ran a looser fiscal policy compared to the rest of Asia in normal times, but is likely to run a tighter fiscal policy than its regional peers in a crisis year.
- Something similar can be seen in estimates for public debt.
- Asian public debt as a proportion of GDP is expected to go up by nine percentage points in 2020.
- The comparable figure for India is 2.9 percentage points. (These estimates are being cited with full knowledge that forecasting models break down during extreme events.)
Funding extra expenditure through money creation
- Lack of traditional fiscal space should not hold the government back in a crisis situation.
- There are many options outside the consensus macro playbook.
- Money creation: A commonly cited option right now is funding extra expenditure through money creation rather than borrowing.
- The size of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) balance sheet as a percentage of nominal GDP is close to its 35-year average.
- There is scope for printing more money right now.
- Lower inflationary pressure: And the inflationary consequences are likely to be muted because of the lower velocity of money amid a demand collapse.
- Public finances in the future: Getting public finances back on track is a battle that lies in the future.
- A rapid recovery in economic activity would be the best solution.
- Otherwise, history tells us that countries have brought down their public debt numbers through some combination of financial repression, austerity, higher taxes and inflation.
- Some element of capital controls could also be back in play.
Need for increasing discretionary government spending
- The collapse in tax revenues as the economy is shut down will automatically lead to a rise in India’s fiscal deficit.
- However, there is a need for an increase in discretionary government spending as well.
- Economists have shown that spending multipliers are higher than tax multipliers in India.
- In other words, the increase in economic output for every unit increase in the fiscal deficit is higher when the government spends rather than changes tax rates.
- State’s spending Vs. Union spending: Spending by states gives more bang for the buck than equivalent spending by the Union government.
“Below the line measures” to support the economy
- Also, there are options other than direct spending to support the economy.
- Countries such as Germany, the UK, Italy, France and South Korea have complemented traditional fiscal expansions with “below the line” measures such as loans and guarantees to companies.
- In an excellent recent study, analysts estimate that more than half of Indian corporate balances sheets will be unable to meet expenses with zero revenues.
- They are careful to point out that their analysis is based on extreme assumptions that there is no fall in their wage bills, no revenues, and no access to fresh credit.
One of the common suggestions we have been coming across is the spending by the government by printing money. In this article, the second important suggestion is below the line measures. Take note of these measures and options available with the government.
Way forward
- The poor need income support for their very survival. That should be at the top of any democratic government’s list of
- However, protecting Indian companies from a financial collapse also matters, because otherwise, the economy will see a reduction in its capital stock, which will be needed both for a rapid recovery as well as job creation once the worst is over.
- There are contagion risks in financial markets as well, going by what has happened to some mutual funds that were invested in bonds.
Conclusion
These are extraordinary times that require extraordinary measures. The danger from a delayed fiscal programme is that hysteresis may set in, as companies run out of money and supply chains are broken, damaging our economic prospects in the medium term.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: SPR
Mains level: Paper 3- Importance of SPR , issues with it and need for the diversification.
This article highlights the opportunity that the sharp drop in the oil prices presents to India. It also highlights several issues with India’s strategic petroleum reserves and suggests ways to deal with them. We have covered an article from livemint on the same topic in the past week.
Negative price in the international market for WTI crude oil
- Oil prices continue to decline globally, with crude hitting multi-decade lows, as global demand evaporates.
- Earlier last week, in unprecedented price action, the near-month contract for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) sweet crude oil dropped to -$37.63 a bbl.
- A negative price has never before been registered for a major global crude oil benchmark.
- The extreme price action is a signal that there is a global oil glut with few places to store oil.
- Global oil markets have been severely disrupted.
- While WTI does not feature in India’s basket, Brent Crude Oil, which does, is trading around $25 a barrel, the lowest in 18 years.
Price of oil: The silver lining of the future recovery
- Even as India suffers from a lockdown, a silver lining for future recovery and reconstruction is the price of oil.
- Given India’s growth aspirations and lack of self-sustaining oil production, a sharp reduction in oil prices is a bonanza.
- Normally, reduced oil prices would translate into surplus for the consumers and a fiscal bonus for the government through increased tax collections.
- However, given that the demand for petrol has slumped, those gains will not accrue right away.
- Opportunity for India: India should look at this as an opportunity to strengthen its energy security by buying oil and filling up our Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR).
- Considering that India was the third-largest consumer of energy in the world, as well as the third-largest importer of oil in 2018, we are particularly vulnerable to oil price fluctuations.
- The dramatic reduction in oil prices offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us to fill up our reserves in an extremely cost-effective way.
India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Programme
- Currently, we do maintain an emergency stockpile of oil reserves: Under the existing Strategic Petroleum Reserves programme, India claims to have 87 days of reserves.
- Out of this, refiners maintain 65 days of oil storage and the rest of the reserves are held in underground salt caverns maintained by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL).
- The existing and planned capacity for the underground reserves is 10 and 12 days of import cover for crude oil respectively.
Following point highlights the importance and various issues with India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR). SPR plays an important role in India’s energy security. A question based on its role may be asked by the USPC “Assess the importance of Strategic Petroleum Reserves for India and what are the issues associated with that need to be improved?”
Issues with the strategic reserves
- First, capacity does not directly translate into utilisation, which is partly because oil is an expensive commodity most days of the year.
- In 2019, the average closing price of a barrel of crude was $57.05.
- In 2018, it was $64.90, and in 2017, U$50.84.
- Of the existing 10 days of capacity, only about 50 per cent is utilised.
- The second issue is with regard to the refinery holdings.
- In India, the SPR arrangement between the oil refineries and the Union or state governments is not specified well, though most of the refineries that hold stock are publicly-owned companies.
- In fact, a breakdown of which refineries hold SPR and in what form (crude or refined) or information about where they are located is not publicly available.
Need for transparency in relation to SPR
- The first step, therefore, should be to introduce transparency and accountability in relation to the SPR.
- The procedures, protocols and facts about Indian SPR storage require greater public and parliamentary scrutiny, just like India’s other strategic reserves (for instance, foreign exchange).
- For this, there should be timely and reliable dissemination of information.
- Instead, it is now shrouded in secrecy.
- The ambiguity surrounding mobilisation process: The lack of transparency around our SPR holdings is compounded by the ambiguity surrounding the mobilisation process.
- SPR reserves are meant to be used in emergencies, where time is likely to be of the essence.
- The SPR mobilisation process could be made more efficient by laying out designated roles for different agencies to avoid redundancies in times of crisis.
- There should be role and process clarity regarding SPR mobilisation.
- For instance, to begin with, there should be clarity on who (or which agency) can define an emergency and therefore order a mobilisation.
Diversification of SPR
- Further, in order to mitigate risks better, India should look to diversify its SPR holdings.
- Diversification can be 1)Based on geographical location (storing oil either domestically or abroad), storage location (underground or overground) and 2) Product type (oil can be held in either crude or refined form).
- Storage and transportation costs could be saved by diversifying geographically.
- 3) Diversification could also be in the form of ownership — either publicly owned through ISPRL or by private oil companies, such as ADNOC of Abu Dhabi.
- The private companies could fill up the SPR when prices are low and take advantage of price arbitrage.
- This could achieve a degree of price stability and reduce the cost for India to buy such large quantities of oil.
- The only requirement for this to work is to have a clear contract with the private companies about the mandatory minimum level of stock that they should preserve for use in emergency times.
Storing oil abroad
- With oil dirt-cheap, if we can purchase more than we can store in our existing facilities, why not go abroad for more storage space?
- For instance, one option could be to operationalise, modernise, and add to the oil tanking facilities at Trincomalee in Sri Lanka.
- Another opportunity would be to enter into a strategic partnership with Oman (Ras Markaz) for oil storage.
- Partnership with Oman would also help India avoid the potential bottleneck of the straits of Hormuz.
- Geopolitical risk factor: Since many of these places could potentially be vulnerable to geopolitical risks, only a small part of India’s overall SPR strategy should involve storing abroad.
Conclusion
Energy is and will remain vital to India’s aspirations for growth. The sharp fall in the price of oil presents an opportunity for the Union government to increase its SPR stockpile and achieve a degree of energy security.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Changes in the post-Covid-19 world in geopolitics and the geoeconomics.
The article discusses the changes that the world will experience in the global order in the aftermath of Covid-19. The major changes will be on the economic and geopolitical front. Various changes are discussed in the article. We have read some article on the same topic and the basic theme is the same. Role of China and the US, failure of the international institutions are some of the common themes.
Failure of international institutions
- The existing international institutions such as the United Nations, the United Nations Security Council and the World Health Organization (WHO) are seen to have failed to measure up to the grave challenge posed by the pandemic.
- The UN Security Council is under attack for being slow in dealing with a situation that appears, at least on the surface, far graver than any military threat in recent decades.
- The WHO has been tarred with the charge of bias and of grossly underestimating the nature of the epidemic.
- That prestigious global institution should have been singled out for attack at this time speaks volumes about the mood prevailing across the world.
Economic shock
- There are many other aspects of the COVID-19 crisis that will drastically impact the globe.
- Negative growth: On the economic front, the World Bank has already predicted negative growth for most nations. India’s growth forecast for the current fiscal year has been put at 5% to 2.8%.
- Contraction of the economy and the loss of millions of jobs across all segments will further complicate this situation.
One of the most important factors that we realised in the corona crisis in the role of the state. Take note of this factor. A question can be asked on the role of the state, for ex. “The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into focus the important role of the state in our lives. comment.”
The important role of the state in focus
- What is likely to change even more dramatically are certain other aspects relating to political management and security. Both terms are set to gain new meanings.
- The role of the state as an enforcer of public goodwill almost certainly become greatly enhanced.
- The dominant imperative would be to not put limits on the role of the state even where the situation may not be as grave as the present one.
- Many pieces of legislation of yesteryears that had been relegated to the archives — they were perceived to be anachronistic in a modern democratic set-up — may get a new lease of life.
- Some pieces of legislation such as the Disaster Management Act already reflect this reality today.
- Other pieces of legislation could follow in its wake.
- This trend is already becoming evident to some extent across the world. Europe has shown a willingness to sacrifice personal liberties in favour of greater state control.
- Post COVID-19, the world may have to pay a heavy price in terms of loss of liberty. An omnipotent state could well become a reality.
Following are the changes in geo-economics and geo-politics that post-covid world would see.
Role of China under scrutiny
- Far-reaching changes can also be anticipated in the realm of geo-economics and geopolitics. The world needs to prepare for a sea change.
- One nation, viz. China, is presently seeking to take advantage of and benefit from the problems faced by the rest of the world in the wake of the epidemic.
- Negligence on the part of China: China remains totally unfazed by the stigma that the current world pandemic owes a great deal to its negligence.
- More importantly, it is seeking to convert its ‘failure’ into a significant opportunity.
- This is Sino-centrism at its best, or possibly its worst.
- China now seeks to benefit from the fact of its ‘early recovery’.
- It wants to take advantage of the travails of the rest of the world, by using its manufacturing capability to its geo-economic advantage.
- Seeking geopolitical advantage: Simultaneously, it seeks to shift from being a Black Swan (responsible for the pandemic), to masquerade as a White one, by offering medical aid and other palliatives to several Asian and African countries to meet their current pandemic threat.
- In turn, it seeks to gain a geopolitical advantage by this action.
Hostile takeover bids by China
- There are enough reports of China’s intentions to acquire financial assets and stakes in banks and companies across the world amid crisis.
- Shares in HDFC: India seems to have woken up only recently to this threat after the Peoples’ Bank of China acquired a 1% stake in India’s HDFC.
- Across the world, meanwhile, the clamour against China’s hostile takeover bids is becoming stronger.
- Several countries apart from India, such as Australia and Germany, have begun to restrict Chinese foreign direct investment in companies and financial institutions in their countries.
- These countries recognised the inherent danger of a possible Chinese hostile takeover of their critical assets.
China taking advantage of RCEP and Belt and Road initiative
- Restricting hostile takeovers may not be adequate to checkmate China.
- It is poised to dominate the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
- Which will enable China to exploit market access across the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, East Asian nations, Australia and New Zealand.
- Together with its Belt and Road Initiative, China is ostensibly preparing the way for a China-centric multilateral globalisation framework.
The diminishing role of the US’s and Europe
- The geopolitical fallout of this pandemic could be still more serious.
- One distinct possibility is that COVID-19 would effectively put paid to the existing global order that has existed since the late 1940s.
- The United States which is already being touted in some circles as a ‘failing’ state, will be compelled to cede ground.
- Weakened economically and politically after COVID-19 has ravaged the nation, the U.S.’s capacity to play a critical role in world affairs is certain to diminish.
- The main beneficiary of this geopolitical turnaround is likely to be China, a country that does not quite believe in playing by the rules of international conduct.
- Weakened Europe: Europe, in the short and medium-term, will prove incapable of defining and defending its common interests, let alone having any influence in world affairs.
- Role of Germany: Germany, which may still retain some of its present strength, is already turning insular.
- Both France and the post-Brexit United Kingdom will be out of the reckoning as of now.
Problems in West Asia and the possible role of Israel
- In West Asia, both Saudi Arabia and Iran are set to face difficult times.
- The oil price meltdown will aggravate an already difficult situation across the region.
- There may be no victors, but Israel may be one country that is in a position to exploit this situation to its advantage.
India: Economic and geopolitical challenges
- In the meantime, the economic downturn greatly reduces India’s room for manoeuvre.
- In South Asia, India faces the prospect of being isolated, with the Chinese juggernaut winning Beijing new friends and contacts across a region deeply impacted by the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Likewise, India’s leverage in West Asia — already greatly diminished — will suffer further.
- With oil prices going down and the Indian expatriate community (who are among the hardest hit by this downturn) out on a limb.
- Reduction in remittances: Many of the latter may seek repatriation back to the host country, substantially reducing the inflow of foreign funds to India from the region.
A question based on the changes in the global order in the post-pandemic world could be asked by the UPSC, for ex- “In the post-Covid-19 world, we are experiencing several changes. What are the changes in the geo-politics that are likely to affect India’s interests?”
Conclusion
In the post-Covid-19 world, we are about to see many changes on the economic and geopolitical front. India should prepare itself for the emerging challenges on various fronts.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Provision and suggestions to reduce the impact of corona crisis on the poor.
This focus of this article is on the universal delivery of food and cash transfer amid corona pandemic. There are some estimates of the cost of universal cash transfer and food delivery in the article and suggestion to ensure universal delivery.
Universal food and cash delivery is needed
- The immediate need for universal food and cash delivery is by now obvious and urgent.
- Across the country, there are reports of people — migrant workers, local workers, peasants, pastoralists, fisherpeople, vendors, ragpickers, and the destitute — facing extreme hardship, even starvation, because their livelihoods have been extinguished by the lockdown.
- These have created further an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, as millions of households with depleted savings have no way to access food and other basic necessities over the coming weeks.
- The threat of infection from COVID-19 makes even harder their coping mechanisms.
- In these dire circumstances, it is essential for the state to directly provide the basic means of survival to anyone who needs it.
- This must be in both cash and kind. Food access is the most important.
- But because of the closure of economic activity and the absence of any livelihood opportunity, this must be combined with cash transfers to tide over this period and the immediate aftermath.
- Food transfers must be provided for at least six months, and cash transfers for at least three months, though these can be extended depending on the period of lockdown.
- Because of the severity of the crisis and the high probability of widespread hunger and descent into poverty, these transfers must be universal, made available to every person who needs them, without relying on exclusionary criteria, existing lists or biometric identification.
The points mentioned below give us the ideal of food-grain stocks with India. And there are also the estimates of how much would be required if we decide to go for universal delivery of food. The data given below is important from Mains perspective.
How much will be the cost of universal food delivery?
- Consider first free universal provisioning of 10 kg of grain (wheat or rice) per person per month.
- This is likely to be availed of by at most around 80 per cent of the population.
- With an estimated population of 1.3 billion, providing this for six months would require 62.4 million tonnes of grain.
- This is a maximal estimate — the actual requirement would be lower.
- Stocks with the FCI: The FCI is currently holding 77 million tonnes of foodgrain stocks, compared to buffer stock norms of 24 million tonnes.
- It is expected to procure another 40 million tonnes from the current rabi harvest.
- It could easily release and allow the free distribution of foodgrain of 5 million tonnes and still have foodgrain stocks of 54.5 million tonnes, if the expected rabi procurement targets are met.
- Cost of storing grains: Furthermore, it is costly for the FCI to store this grain. The current costs of storage are estimated to be Rs 5.60 per kilogramme per year or Rs 2.80 for six months.
- This means that by releasing 4 million tonnes to feed the hungry of India over the next six months, the FCI would actually be saving Rs 17,472 crore, assuming that these idle stocks would have persisted.
- But even if these were sold, the costs are the revenue that would have been earned.
- This is difficult to estimate but by using Finance Minister’s estimates in Budget we get a (maximal) figure of Rs 1,17,000 crore.
Cost of universal cash transfer
- In addition, a proposed cash transfer of Rs 7,000 per month for three months to every household, assuming again that 80 per cent of households would receive this.
- With five persons per household, this expenditure would be Rs 4,36,800 crore.
- The two transfers together amount to Rs 5,53,800 crore, or around 9 per cent of currently estimated GDP.
Financing the expenditure through fiscal deficit
- This sum of Rs. 5,53,800 is not a forbidding sum.
- A great part of the responsibility to make these resources available vests with the Union government.
- But whatever taxes are introduced in a supplementary budget that has become unavoidable, the expenditure incurred has to be financed immediately through a fiscal deficit.
- Given the massive deflationary pressures and a complete collapse of economic activity, there is a strong case for financing the additional public expenditure through deficit financing or borrowing directly from the RBI.
- This is required both for coping with the pandemic and for softening the blow of the lockdown.
Following two suggestions are important suggestions for the delivery of food and cash in case we don’t have reliable data.
How to ensure universal delivery of food?
- The question arises of how universal delivery of these food and cash transfers is to be ensured.
- Existing lists are inadequate for the purpose because they significantly underestimate and exclude those who should be beneficiaries.
- For example, at least 100 million people are excluded from access to food under the National Food Security Act based on the 2011 Census.
- The most effective way of dealing with the food emergency is to provide food delivery at doorsteps or neighbourhood collection points to anyone who asks for it, with a simple marker such as the indelible ink used during elections to serve as the indicator of receipt.
How to endure universal delivery of cash?
- For cash transfers, the matter is more complicated.
- In rural India, MGNREGA job cards and pensions cover most households and allow bank payments.
- The urban poor include migrants, contract and casual workers mostly in small and medium enterprises, daily wagers, domestic workers, self-employed persons like street vendors, sex workers and ragpickers, and the destitute including homeless people.
- But there is no comprehensive record of the urban poor because the state has instituted no effective mechanisms to secure labour rights or social security rights to most urban workers.
- The urban poor build and service the city, surviving without rights and a hostile or indifferent state.
- The legally-mandated registration of inter-state migrants and construction workers in practice excludes most because their employers with the connivance of the state don’t wish to be bound to secure their rights.
- The humanitarian emergency created by the pandemic and lockdown entails universal cash transfers again to every adult who presents herself to designated officials in decentralised offices.
- For those who have accessible bank accounts, the funds can be credited to these accounts.
- For others, the Odisha system, whereby pensions are disbursed as cash in hand at pre-specified times, maybe a useful model to follow.
- This also can be adopted with indelible ink as proof of receipt.
Employment schemes after cash transfers
- The income transfers must quickly give way to an expanded rural employment guarantee scheme, and a new urban employment programme.
- These urban employment programs include caregiving and building water supply, sanitation and shelter for the urban poor.
- Private hospitals also need to be nationalised at least for the duration of the pandemic.
Conclusion
The working and poor people should not be made to bear the burden of the pandemic. There is a need for a bold resolve, by central and state governments, to literally reach the last person, rural or urban, with the food and cash they require to survive with dignity.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Consumption expenditure.
Mains level: Paper 3- The lack of employment opportunities is one the biggest challenges facing eastern states and Covid-19 pandemic has made it the pressing issue. What are the reasons for the problem? Suggest the ways to deal with the problem.
The article discusses the issue of migrant labourers and the problems eastern states could face due to the return of labourers and the lack of employment opportunities in these states. The return of migrant labourers may lead to the mechanisation in the states where they worked. A relief-cum-stimulus package at least 5% of the GDP is suggested by the author.
IMF’s projections for the economy
- The IMF’s projections for GDP growth for this year seem to be either in the negative or below 2 per cent for almost all major countries of the G-20 group.
- India could do a little better compared to the other BRICS nations, but its growth will most likely be below 2 per cent.
- This, of course, is under an optimistic scenario.
- Many experts reckon that India could also go into negative GDP growth this year if it does not reboot the economy properly and in time.
The problem of collapse in demand
- The Centre and the Reserve Bank of India are trying to remove all roadblocks so that factories and farms can resume operations.
- The focus is largely on the supply side — how to ease restrictions and how to increase liquidity in the system for resuming production.
- It may not take too long as the real problem is the collapse in demand.
- And that demand may not pick up easily as the virus is likely to stay with us for quite some time.
- We could have lockdowns again if there is a surge in infection.
- This will surely limit our travel and restrict our shopping for non-essentials.
- However, there is one demand that can easily revive — that of food.
Why food demand matters?
- The NSSO survey of consumption expenditures for 2011-12 revealed that about 45 per cent of the total expenditure of an Indian household is on food.
- For the poor, the NSSO reckoned, this figure was about 60 per cent.
- We do not have information about the consumption patterns in 2020, guess is that about 35-40 per cent of the expenditure of an Indian household is on food and for a poor household, this figure is around 50 per cent.
- Herein, lies the scope to reboot the economy.
Labour shortage and mechanisation
- The sudden announcement of the nationwide lockdown gave labours no time to go back to their families.
- They lost their jobs and incomes and having spent whatever little savings they had, these workers have been reduced to penury.
- The Centre and states, despite their best efforts, have not managed to address the problem of hunger of these workers.
- Even civil society has not managed to bridge the gap.
- The migrant labourers may well have lost their trust in the state, and once the lockdown is lifted, most of them are likely to rush back to their families in villages.
- And, it could be some time before they are back in the cities — that is, if they return at all.
- So, farms and factories, especially the MSMEs in the relatively developed states of western, southern and north-western India are likely to face labour shortages for many months, perhaps years.
- This could lead to more mechanisation of farms and factories in these states.
- In Punjab, for example, most of the wheat harvesting is already done by combined harvesters.
- Now even paddy harvesting could be done by mechanised harvesters.
The double challenge for states which are home to migrants
- However, eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, and Odisha, from where much of the migrant labour comes, will face a double challenge.
- Their agriculture, with tiny farm holdings, is already saddled with a large labour force — this comprises 45 to 55 per cent of the total labour force of these states.
- Non-farm income from wages and salaries, through migrant labour, was an important source of income for households in these states.
- This is now severely hit. In all probability, the per capita rural incomes of these states could shrink, at least in the short run.
- This could lead to poverty and increase hunger and malnutrition.
- How does one then reboot the economy and also address hunger and malnutrition?
The lockdown and the subsequent plight of the migrant labourers brought to the fore uneven development in the country. The points mentioned below suggest the ways to address this problem. A question based on this issue could be asked by the UPSC, for ex- “The issue of migrant labourers amid Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the uneven development in the country. In this context, state the reasons which led to the uneven development of various regions of the country. Suggest ways to address the problem”.
The requirement of a special investment package for eastern states
- A special investment package — like the Marshall Plan of USA in 1948 — for the eastern belt of India is required.
- Investment should be used to build better infrastructure, agri-markets and godowns, rural housing, primary health centres, schools and enhances people’s skills.
- The package will go a long way to revive the economy and augment the incomes of the migrant workers.
- Rising incomes will generate more demand for food as well as manufactured products, giving a fillip to the growth engines of agriculture as well as the MSME sector.
- Building better supply chains for food directly from farm-to-fork, led by the private sector, will enhance the export competitiveness of agriculture.
- It will also ensure a higher share of farmers in the consumers’ rupee.
- Long-term demand-driven growth: Such broad-based development in a relatively underdeveloped region of the country will lay the foundations of a long-term, demand-driven, growth of the industry in India.
- The all India relief package of Rs 1.7 lakh crore announced by the central government earlier, which is about 0.8 per cent of the country’s GDP, is too small to reboot the economy.
Conclusion
If India has to bounce back quickly, it needs a much bigger relief cum stimulus package — certainly not below 5 per cent of GDP. And, it should focus more on the eastern belt, where the issue is that of survival.
Back2Basics: Marshall Plan, 1948
- The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Program, was a U.S. program providing aid to Western Europe following the devastation of World War II.
- It was enacted in 1948 and provided more than $15 billion to help finance rebuilding efforts on the continent.
- The brainchild of U.S. Secretary of State George C. Marshall, for whom it was named, it was crafted as a four-year plan to reconstruct cities, industries and infrastructure heavily damaged during the war and to remove trade barriers between European neighbours – as well as foster commerce between those countries and the United States.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Policy making and balancing the conflicts between various stakeholders.
This article deals with how the different sections of a society assign different weightage to the various factors they are faced with in life. In the case of Covid-19, one section of society which is well-off might care more about the possible loss of life while other section might end up attaching more weightage to the loss of livelihood than to the possible loss of life due to infection. The article discusses this issue in detail.
Difference between risk and uncertainty
- Since the days of Frank Knight, economists have differentiated between the two.
- Risk has a known probability distribution.
- For uncertainty, the probability distribution is unknwon.
- COVID-19 makes us confront uncertainty, not risk.
- For uncertainty, there is a subjective probability distribution, which can, and does, vary from individual to individual.
So, how the subjective probability distribution is devised by a person?
- Through information and experience, one already possesses.
- There are various rationality assumptions used by economists. They are often violated.
- Otherwise, behavioural economics wouldn’t have come into existence.
- Typically, given a situation, when your decision doesn’t agree with someone else, you say they are being irrational.
- However, with uncertainty, the problem may not be with rationality assumptions, but with differences in subjective probability distributions.
Lack of data for various factors
- Because of COVID-19, there is a certain risk of getting infected. Let’s call this the infection rate — total infections divided by the total population.
- We don’t know this infection rate for India or for any other country for that matter.
- No country has done universal testing.
- No testing for random sample: No country has done universal testing for a proper random sample either.
- The ICMR has told us more than 75 per cent of Indian patients will be asymptomatic.
- Who do we test? Those who show symptoms, those who have been in contact with confirmed patients and those who suffer from severe respiratory diseases.
- Most countries do something similar.
- Sampling bias: In other words, when we work out an infection rate based on those tested, there is a sampling bias.
- This isn’t a proper infection rate.
- The only country where we have had something like a random sample is Iceland.
- There, the infection rate was 0.8 per cent.
- Data for death rate: There are similar caveats about the death rate.
- If we mechanically divide the number of deaths by the number of confirmed cases for India, we will get a death rate just over 3 per cent.
- The global figure is a little less than 7 per cent.
- But neither of these is a death rate for the total population since only those with severe symptoms are included in infection numbers.
- Three per cent or seven per cent are over-estimates.
- In a controlled environment like Diamond Princess, death rate as a ratio of total passengers, and not those infected, was less than 0.4 per cent.
- The true infection rate and true death rate are not alarming numbers.
How the lack of data is reflected in subjective probability distribution?
- There are slices in India’s population pyramid with rural/urban and other spatial differences too.
- Consider two extreme types-type A and type B.
- Type A, who are globalised in information access and morbidity.
- Life expectancy is 80 plus and there are lifestyle diseases like diabetes and high blood pressure.
- This co-morbidity increases possible death rates and thanks to globalised access to information, certainly increases perceptions about death rates, making them out to be higher than they are.
- Some of them have fixed incomes, regardless of what happens to lockdown.
- The high probability assigned to loss of life: In terms of maximising expected payoffs with a subjective distribution, high probability is attached to loss of life and low probability to loss of livelihood.
- How type B forms a subjective probability?
- Type B, someone whose life expectancy is 60, without a fixed income stream and whose health concerns are tuberculosis and water-borne diseases, not COVID-19.
- Nor is access to information that globalised.
- The high probability assigned to loss of livelihood: High subjective probability will be attached to loss of livelihood and low probability to death from COVID.
- Both types reflect subjective probabilities. Neither is “irrational”.
- The tension between the two: Type A would like the lockdown to continue indefinitely, until the long tail of the infection curve tapers off, perhaps beyond September.
- Type B would like lockdown to be eased soon, with necessary restrictions in hotspots.
- There is indeed tension between lives and livelihood.
- Even if health outcomes and information access are like Type A, but income is contingent on growth, preferences might mirror Type B.
The issues highlighted here can be broadly used in the various scenario where there is uncertainty involved and various stakeholders perceive the probable outcomes in entirely different ways. Various points here can be used to answer the question based on policy making.
Balancing the differential individual preferences in public policy
- One set of individuals imposes its choice on the rest.
- Type A disproportionately influences policy.
- This determination of aggregate preferences is a dynamic process.
- Therefore, sooner or later, Type B contests this and as the lockdown is prolonged and livelihood costs mount, discontent surfaces, as it has across a range of countries.
- There were also welfare economics notions that pre-dated social choice theory, such as compensation principles of Kaldor, Hicks and Scitovsky.
- The point can be made using the two stereotypes. Specifically, Type A need to compensate Type B for their losses.
- To state it starkly, livelihood losses suffered by Type B need to be compensated by the government through redistributive measures and this has to be financed by higher taxes imposed on Type-A.
- The right question for the Type A is not whether they want the lockdown to continue, but whether they are willing to pay a COVID-tax to support lockdown extension.
A question based on policy formation issues explained here can be framed, for ex. “Risk has a known probability distribution. For uncertainty, the probability distribution is unknown. COVID-19 makes us confront uncertainty, not risk. In this context, there is a debate between saving lives and saving livelihoods. In such a scenario, what can be the most probable solutions that public policy must delve into, in order to maintain the balance between this uncertainty and risk.”
Conclusion
Extending or ending the lockdown decision represent the public policy dilemma. Without a revival in growth, the tax-paying capacity of Type B is limited and with job losses, some Type As become Type Bs. The choice is starker.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Do you agree with the view that coordination at global level was lacking in fight against Covid-19?
The article discusses the three stages involved in successfully dealing with the pandemic. In the next part, it goes on to explain the factors that determine the success or failure of the governments. In the last week, we read about the success story of Kerala and underlying reasons. This article is also written on similar lines.
Stages in the pandemic response
- Disease outbreaks, even global pandemics, are scarcely new. The playbook for dealing with them, therefore, is well understood and has been honed by practices and lessons gleaned from hard-fought battles.
- A first stage is an early clear-eyed recognition of the incoming threat, and, in the case of COVID-19 at least, requires the unpalatable decision to lock down society.
- Ideally, this is done with full consideration of how to support the most vulnerable members of society, especially in a country such as India, where so many survive hand-to-mouth.
- This is a phase aimed at buying time, of flattening the epidemic curve, so that public health facilities are not overwhelmed.
- And, for using this time, paid for by collective sacrifice, to secure the personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical supplies necessary to save lives.
- The second phase of the pandemic response is slowly to ease the burden on the economy by permitting a measured return of business activity so that livelihoods and supply chains can be restored.
- This stage can only be safely executed if accompanied by a war-footing expansion of testing capacity so that new infections can be identified and isolated at once, allowing contact tracing to be implemented by masses trained to do this crucial and painstaking work in communities across the country.
- The final stage, which for COVID-19 seems a lifetime away, is a mass vaccination programme and then the full rebuilding of economic and social life.
- None of this is easy, but, like an examination in a dreaded subject, one’s only hope is early and persistent preparation and, at crunch time, remembering the lessons learned.
The above-mentioned stages are sort of a template that seems to have gained acceptance for dealing with the pandemic. A question based on it, like “What are the various stages involved in government’s response to deal with a pandemic?”
Following three factors make the difference between successful and failed response
1. Leadership problems in global politics
- The defensive finger-pointing, opportunistic politicking and xenophobic posturing are shown by some leaders amid pandemic.
- This is not a crisis that can be tackled without robust and multidimensional international cooperation between nations.
- We are watching in real-time the benefits of intellectual collaboration that does not stop at national borders.
- From the epidemiologists to the medical community identifying more effective treatments, to the research scientists racing to find a vaccine, we are benefiting from collaboration.
- But the nationalistic turn in global politics over the past two decades has reduced investment in and undermined the legitimacy of the very institutions that facilitate international partnership at the very time they are needed most.
- Prime Minister Narendra Modi did well to convene the leaders of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) nations in mid-March to discuss the possibility of a regional response.
- But that video-conference call also highlighted that there have been no summit-level meetings of SAARC since 2014.
- Similarly, United States President Donald Trump demanded that the U.S. end funding of the World Health Organization (WHO).
- This not only endangers American lives by cutting off his own administration’s access to vital international data.
- But also directly affects India which receives significant funding and expertise from WHO with ~10% of its overall WHO financing in 2019 coming directly from the U.S.
2. The whole-of-the-government strategy
- Pandemic response requires a whole-of-government strategy, for which political will and legitimate leadership are vital to convene and maintain.
- Germany and Kerala provide two powerful though different examples of this in action.
- In Germany, in spite of a high level of federalism that gives its States (Länder) a lot of power, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ability to mobilise the entire system has allowed Germany to emerge as a success story in Europe.
- In Kerala, State Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan convened a State response team at the earliest possible moment and has provided the full weight of his office in support of a coordinated public health strategy that has been accepted by the State’s citizens who have learned to trust the government in such situations.
- Yet these two examples stand out in part for how rare they are.
- Consider again the cautionary tale of the U.S. where some State Governors have yet to issue stay-at-home orders.
3. The robust public health system
- We are seeing first hand the consequences of starving public health systems of necessary funds and resources.
- The comparative advantage of the private sector is efficiency; the need of the hour in pandemic response is redundancy, or, more precisely, excess capacity.
- Most hospitals do not need invasive ventilators normally, just as they do not need vast stocks of PPE and extra intensive care units beds, but these are essential goods right now as we brace ourselves for a flood of sick patients into hospitals.
- Watching the advanced health-care system of northern Italy buckle under the unimaginable pressures to which it was exposed over the past six weeks should be a cautionary tale for all countries that thought turning health care over to private actors was responsible governance. It is not.
- Again, consider Kerala, which has consistently ranked at the top of State rankings for health expenditures.
- Kerala has, a well-functioning local public health system capable of implementing the test-isolate-trace protocols critical for fighting COVID-19.
Conclusion
With the central role of leadership and governance underlined in the successful dealing with the pandemic, leadership across the world need to come together to coordinate at all levels in dealing with the problems that are not bound by any border.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: 10 % condition for FDI.
Mains level: Paper 3-What are the implications of two dominant players in IT and telecom respectively coming together for data privacy and net neutrality?
Facebook’s decision to acquire a 9.99 per cent stake in the parent company of Reliance Jio could have several implications. It could impact retail stores which we are trying hard to protect by restricting FDI in retail. Second, it could have implications for net neutrality. Third, it would have implications for data privacy.
Implications for the country’s retail landscape
- Recently, Reliance Industries and Facebook announced that the California-based social media giant will acquire a 9.99 per cent stake in Jio Platforms limited, the holding company of Reliance Jio, for $5.7 billion (Rs 43,574 crore).
- At its core, the idea is to create an ecosystem around JioMart, enabling customers to access the local Kirana stores using WhatsApp, combining both offline and online retail.
- This ability to connect millions of local businesses with end consumers, and provide them a seamless online transaction experience could radically alter the country’s retail landscape.
- Both firms have stressed on the new opportunities for businesses of all sizes, and especially for the millions of small businesses across the country.
- With the ongoing lockdown in the country only reaffirming the importance of the local Kirana store — major online delivery channels have struggled to reach consumers during this period — integration is bound to be an enticing proposition.
Opportunities for cross-selling
- A scaling up of this model will also provide opportunities for cross-selling — significantly increasing the upside for firms and increasing the valuation of its retail arms.
- At present, though, the reach of WhatsApp Pay is limited — just over a million Indians are reported to currently have access to the pay feature.
- But this sort of model is popular in other Asian economies such as China, Korea and Japan where apps like WeChat have a wide range of product offerings, which induces consumer stickiness.
- This arrangement also allows Jio to greatly expand its product offering to its more than 370 million-odd subscriber base.
- The deal may also open up the entire WhatsApp consumer base of around 400 million — to Reliance, including those on other telecom platforms such as Airtel and Vodafone.
The following concern could arise from the deal and the UPSC can frame a question based on these concern, like ” Recently a global IT giant acquired a significant stake in an Indian telecom giant. Discuss the various issues which could arise from coming together of such dominant players.”
What are the concerns in such deals?
- Implications for consumer welfare: Given the dominant market position of the players, concerns over the market structure and its implications for consumer welfare are bound to arise.
- Questions over net neutrality: The tie-up also raises questions on net neutrality with the possibility of preferential treatment being granted.
- Data privacy issue: Third, given the data privacy issues highlighted in the past by the Cambridge Analytica episode, for instance, there are apprehensions over the enormous amounts of data that will be collected by these entities.
- This concern gains significance especially when India still does not have a personal data protection law.
Conclusion
Whenever two dominant players of respective fields come together, it gives rise to concern. The government must keep watch on the implications and how such a deal plays out in the future. If the concerns raised turn out to come true, maybe India should come out with the antitrust law of its own.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: WTO benchmark, Brent crude.
Mains level: Paper 3- What are the implications of oil price fluctuations for Indian economy?
This article discusses the factors that contributed to oil prices falling below zero, and where the prices are headed in the near future. There are suggestions for India to make the most of this oil crisis. In the last week, we covered the same topic but its focus was on increasing the storage capacity. This article also covers the geopolitical implications of oil prices remaining low for long.
What negative price of the benchmark US crude WTI mean?
- The collapse in the price of WTI reflected a technical peculiarity of futures trading.
- Paper traders would normally have had two options- 1) To let their contract expire and take physical delivery 2) To pass on the contract to someone else.
- The US was running out of crude oil storage capacity and traders knew they could not “risk” taking delivery.
- There was no physical space to hold the product.
- So their only option was to sell the contract.
- On the last day before the contracts expired, the traders in desperation “paid” to offload their risk.
- There was no physical transaction of oil.
- The current future price is back in positive territory.
The world running out of oil storage capacity
- The world and not just the US was fast running out of storage capacity.
- Production in excess of demand: This was because oil production was way in excess of demand.
- The latter had crashed by almost 30 million barrels a day or mbd (the equivalent of OPEC’s entire production) because of the COVID-induced lockdown of transportation and industry.
- The price of the other crude benchmarks had also dropped but not the same extent — the North Sea Brent fell, for instance, to $15/bbl, a level not seen since 1999.
- The reason was that unlike the WTI, which is traded in the US and therefore dependent on US inland storage capacity, the other crudes have access to seaborne storage (oil tankers).
- This latter capacity is, however, fast filling up and the price of these crudes may also hit historic lows.
So, where the oil prices are headed?
- Oil prices will be volatile downwards until demand picks up and/or supply is further cut.
- Demand will depend on the curve of post-COVID economic recovery.
- Supply will rest on the outcome of further discussions amongst OPEC, Russia and, ironically, the US.
- OPEC and Russia had earlier this month agreed to cut production by 10 mbd.
- But clearly, this is not enough and further cutbacks have to be agreed on.
- Whatever the scenario for economic recovery or supply constraints, there is a slim likelihood of crude oil prices reaching the average price levels of 2019 ($64) over the next 12 months or so.
- More likely, they will be volatile downwards with $50 as the ceiling and with no floor.
- This “low for longer” price outlook raises two issues for India’s policy-makers.
As India depends on imports for over 80% of its oil requirements, oil prices have wide implications for the financial health of India. Safe oil supply lines are essential for its energy security. Both these points are important from the UPSC point of view. Following two points deal with these two factors.
Two issues that India’s policy-makers need to consider-
1. Disruption of oil supply lines and problems of diaspora
- Every oil producer with no exception will face a budgetary crisis.
- Some, like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait will finance their social and economic commitments by cutting costs, increasing debt and drawing down on their sovereign reserves.
- Others like Iran, Iraq, Nigeria and Venezuela, who have no such cushion and whose credit ratings are junk, will confront deepening political and social crises.
- Economic plan: India should build into its economic plans the possibility that its traditional oil supply routes could get disrupted.
- And that its diaspora, whose remittances are of significance, could face disproportionate hardship as these economies retrench.
India has the largest diaspora in the world and sends as much as $80 billion back home as remittances. So, any impact on diaspora in oil economies has implication for India from this perspective as well.
2. Empower the oil traders and remove bureaucratic control
- On the day prices hit negative territory, it is unclear whether the trading experts in our oil PSUs had the flexibility to even contemplate “buying” the WTI futures contract for June, taking delivery, shipping it to India and storing it someplace.
- It is also not clear whether they had the authority to lock in low prices through forward contracts.
- Storage capacity and WTI quality mismatch: There is a shortage of storage capacity in India and a mismatch between the quality of WTI and the requirements of our refineries.
- India cannot leverage the current market conditions of low and volatile oil prices to our national advantage unless we empower the traders and leave them unencumbered from bureaucratic control.
- Most importantly, protect them from the three Cs ( CVC, CBI and CAG) in case their trade goes awry.
Conclusion
This oil market crisis could be made to work to our advantage. We must not waste this opportunity. There is a need to remove the bureaucratic hurdles in our PSUs, increasing storage capacity and sound financial planning by the government to make the most of this oil crisis.
Back2Basics: What is WTI and Brent crude benchmark?
- West Texas Intermediate (WTI), also known as Texas light sweet, is a grade of crude oil used as a benchmark in oil pricing.
- This grade is described as light crude oil because of its relatively low density, and sweet because of its low sulfur content.
Brent Crude
- Brent Crude is a trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as one of the two main benchmark prices for purchases of oil worldwide.
- This grade is described as light because of its relatively low density, and sweet because of its low sulphur content.
Futures contract
- In finance, a futures contract is a standardized legal agreement to buy or sell something at a predetermined price at a specified time in the future, between parties not known to each other.
- The asset transacted is usually a commodity or financial instrument.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Various article to ensure the independence of judiciary.
Mains level: Paper 2- Do you agree with the view that post-retirement appointment of the judges undermine the confidence in judiciary? Give suggestions to deal with the problem.
The article discusses the issue of retired judges accepting government post after retirement. Such appointments have several implications. It undermines confidence in the independence of the judiciary. It also influence pre-retirement judgements delivered by the judges. The article also offers some solutions to this problem.
The provisions in the Constitution to secure the independence of the judiciary
- The Constitution has been conceived to provide a pride of place to the judiciary.
- Constitutional appointees to the Supreme Court have been guaranteed several rights in order to secure their independence.
- Salary: The salaries of judges and their age of retirement are all guaranteed in order to secure their independence.
- Removal: They cannot be easily removed except by way of impeachment under Articles 124(4) and 217(1)(b).
- They have the power to review legislation and strike it down.
- They can also question the acts of the executive.
- All this makes it clear that the framers of the Constitution envisaged an unambitious judiciary for which the only guiding values were the provisions of the Constitution.
Issue of judges accepting post-retirement jobs
- It was thought that on retirement from high constitutional office, a judge would lead a retired life.
- Nobody ever expected them to accept plum posts.
- But the clear demarcation between the judiciary and executive got blurred as many judges over the years began to accept posts offered by the government.
- A few years ago, a former Chief Justice of India (CJI) was made a Governor by the ruling party.
- Now, we have the case of a former CJI, Ranjan Gogoi, being nominated by the President to the Rajya Sabha and taking oath as Member of Parliament.
- Pre-retirement judgements under cloud: During his tenure as CJI, Justice Gogoi presided over important cases such as Ayodhya and Rafale where all the decisions went in favour of the government.
- This gave rise to the impression that his nomination was a reward for these ‘favours’.
- Thus his appointment — and that too within a few months of his retirement — not only raised eyebrows but came in for severe condemnation from varied quarters.
- Loss of confidence: People are fast losing confidence in the so-called independent judiciary.
- In 2013 Arun Jaitley, who was also a senior Advocate, ironically said that legislature was creating post-retirement avenues for Judges in every legislation.
- He also said that post-retirement job influences pre-retirement judgements.
- It is in this context that the appointment of Mr Gogoi has to be perceived.
Did Constitution makers intend to nominate Judges?
- Mr Gogoi’s view that membership of the Rajya Sabha was not a job but a service, and that once the President nominated him the call of duty required him to accept it, only created the impression that the judiciary is pliant.
- A bare reading of Article 80(3) of the Constitution only envisages the President to nominate “persons having special knowledge in literature, science, art and social service” as members to the Rajya Sabha.
- It is difficult to imagine that the Constitution-makers had in mind a retired CJI when framing this provision.
A direct question based on the issue can be asked, like “What are the implications of post-retirement appointments of the judges? Give suggestions to deal with this problem”. So, take note of the various issues and their solutions discussed here.
Way forward
- If post-retirement appointments are going to undermine confidence in the judiciary and in a constitutional democracy.
- Enact law or amend Constitution: It is time to have a law in place either by way of a constitutional amendment or a parliamentary enactment barring such appointments.
- This is the only way to secure the confidence of the people and prevent post-retirement appointments.
- Increase pension: Judges can be compensated by being given their last drawn salary as a pension.
- Retirement age can be increased: Also, the age of retirement for judges can be increased by a year or two.
- This will undo the damage caused by post-retirement jobs.
Conclusion
The appointments of persons who have held constitutional office will undermine the very constitutional values of impartiality in the dispensation of justice. So, enacting a law to bar such appointments or amendment to the Constitution would be the step in the right direction.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Reproduction number-with respect to pandemic.
Mains level: Paper 3- What was the extent of damage caused by the Covid-19 to the India economy?
The theme of the article is the restarting of the Indian economy. Striking the right balance between livelihood and the spread of the virus is important for India. While India has been doing well on the curbing of the spread of the virus, its economy remains in the complete shutdown. So, we must restart our economy and this article offers some suggestions to do so and some trends that our economy is showing are discussed here.
Striking the balance between the economy and the spread of the virus
- One critical problem is striking the right balance between curbing the spread of the virus and keeping the economy functioning.
- We cannot have the poor, the labourers and the migrants bear the brunt of the effort to contain the spread of the virus.
- And nor do we want to weaken the foundations of the economy so much that we emerge from the pandemic onto an economic wasteland.
- The choice between lives and economy is also a choice between lives and lives.
Appreciation of India’s effort to curb the virus
- India’s effort to curb the spread of the virus has received appreciation — not just the state of Kerala, which has got accolades from around the world, but the country as a whole.
- The incidence of COVID-19 remains low in India.
- Of every 10 million people, there are as yet 5 lives lost in India.
- Comparison with the world: This is vastly lower, not just compared to Belgium, which tops the list with 5,180 fatalities for every 10 million people, but many other nations, such as the United States with 1,370 fatalities, Spain with 4,550, Italy with 4,080 and the UK with 2,550 fatalities.
One of the many puzzles associated with the Covid-19 is variation shown by it in fatality rate across the globe. Following are some figures about it.
Worldwide variation in the fatality rate
- To be fair, the low fatality, per 10 million population, is not specific to just India.
- We have comparably low figures currently in almost all African and South Asian nations.
- Thus, it is seven for Bangladesh, three for Sri Lanka, nine for Pakistan, two for Tanzania, one for Nigeria, and 0.3 for Ethiopia.
- No one fully understands these huge differences between Europe and North America, on the one hand, and Africa and South Asia, on the other.
- Isolation of nation, not a factor: This cannot be because these nations are more isolated.
- Bangladeshis are among the most globally scattered people and Ethiopia has huge interactions with China, but the fatality rates are low in both countries.
- Why is this so? The short answer is we do not know.
Defeating the virus by keeping reproduction number below one
- It is important to realise that the risk cannot be cut to zero — nothing in life is a zero-risk activity.
- To defeat the virus, the aim has to be to keep the “reproduction number”, or R-0, down to less than one.
- R-0 refers to the number of people, on average, who get infected by each infected person.
- When R-0 reaches less than one in any given region, such as is the case in Kerala, we know that the incidence of the disease is winding down in that region.
Following points are important from the UPSC perspective. A question can be framed on the economic damage of the Covid-19, opportunities provided by it, its implications for the vulnerable section of the society, unemployment, international trade, changes in the economic policies of the government etc.
Coming out of lockdown: Economic policy challenge
- The economic policy challenge is about how to come out of the lockdown.
- This has to be done carefully, but quickly.
- The stringency of India’s lockdown at top: A study by researchers at the University of Oxford, of the stringency of lockdowns in 73 countries, places India right on top.
- For a short while, this is worth it, and also impressive for a populous nation like India.
- Not desirable position: The top rank on the stringency index is not something any country will want to occupy for long.
- That will have a devastating effect on the poor and damage the nation’s long-run economic prospects.
Trends in the Indian economy
- Unemployment rate at an all-time high: There are studies showing that India’s unemployment rate is now at 24 per cent, an all-time high.
- Biggest ever capital outflow in a month: March also saw the biggest outflow of capital from the nation ever recorded in one month — roughly $15 billion left the nation.
- This also happens to be the largest capital outflow from any emerging economy in March.
- Clearly, global players are reacting to the fact that the economy is not functioning.
- Rupee at an all-time low: These sentiments have weakened the Indian rupee, which is now at an all-time low.
- Some of these problems are inevitable in this dystopian world; we can deal with these problems for a short while.
- Global trade: If these trends persist, India would end up ceding space to other nations in global trade, exports and business, and the suffering will be huge on the working classes.
Way forward in opening the economy
- Once this phase of the lockdown ends on May 3, we will have to start opening businesses, allowing the private sector, especially the informal enterprises and small firms, to operate.
- Rule of behaviour: There will have to be rules of behaviour in place, such as social distancing, masks, hand-washing, but we have to begin to facilitate poor labourers to reach their place of work, and our farms and factories to function.
- Focus on participation, not permission: We have to encourage the rules of behaviour to continue by “participation” and not by bureaucratic “permission”.
- India has a long history of the “permit raj”, where all businesses were beholden to the bureaucracy for what they did.
- This had a tendency to strangle all but a few big firms and had held up the nation’s economic growth for long.
Conclusion
India stands at an important juncture. A misstep at such moment could turn the course of history for the nation. So, the right steps at various fronts from containing the spread to the reopening of the economy are required from the government.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Ways and means advances, limit on the states for borrowing.
Mains level: Paper 3- Discuss the ways to ensure that the States do not face lack of resource in fight against Covid-19?
The article elaborates on the central role played by the States in the fight against Covid-19. The article emphasises the role that States can play in the implementation of the various measures to tackle the epidemic and economic revival of the country. It also highlights the lack of resources at the States’ disposal and reasons for the lack such as revenue loss in the lockdown and lower devolution by the Central Government. In the end, there is a suggestion to increase the borrowing limit of the States’.
Time to relax fiscal constraints on the States
- The speed of economic revival will depend on how long it will take to revive economic activities and the volume of stimulus through public spending the government is able to provide.
- It now appears that the lockdown will be lifted in stages and the recovery process will be prolonged.
- The country is literally placed in financing a war-like situation.
- The government will have to postpone the fiscal consolidation process for the present, loosen its purse strings and finance its deficits substantially through monetisation.
- This is also the time for the government to announce relaxation in the States’ fiscal deficit limit to make them effective participants in the struggle.
The following points highlight the importance of States in dealing with the crisis. The federal structure of India comes to the fore here. The UPSC can aks question on this theme, for example, “Discuss the important role played by the States in dealing with the Covid-19 and how it underscores the federal character of the Indian polity?”
The important role played by the States
- Prioritise health spending: It is also important for the States to realise the importance of health and prioritise spending on health-care services.
- Being closer to the people, the States have a much larger responsibility in fighting this war.
- Public health, as well as public order, are State subjects in the Constitution.
- Acts invoked for lockdown: Some States were proactive in dealing with the COVID-19 outbreak by involving the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, even before the Government of India declared a universal lockdown invoking the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
- Of course, the Centre under Entry 29 of the Concurrent List has the powers to set the rules of implementation which states, “Prevention of the extension from one State to another of infectious or contagious diseases or pests affecting men, animals or plants”.
- Implementation at the ground level: While Central intervention was done to enable, “consistency in the application and implementation of various measures across the country”, the actual implementation on the ground level will have to be done at the State level.
- Furthermore, States are better informed to decide the areas and activities where relaxations should be done as the coronavirus curve is flattened.
- Coordination: Hopefully, there will be better coordination between the Union and State governments instead of claiming credit and apportioning blame.
Covid-19 has made clear the neglect and poor state of health in India. The UPSC can frame the question based on the health infrastructure and expenditure on it. The question can be framed on the following lines “Covid-19 has highlighted India’s lack of preparedness and the poor health infrastructure in the country. What are the reasons for it? Give suggestions to improve it.”
Neglect of the health-care sector in the country
- The pandemic has underlined the historical neglect of the health-care sector in the country.
- Expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP: The total public expenditures of Centre and States works out to a mere 3% of GDP.
- In 2017-18, in per capita terms, the public expenditure on medical and public health varied from an abysmal ₹690 in Bihar and ₹814 in Uttar Pradesh to the highest of ₹2,092 in Kerala.
- The centrally sponsored scheme, the National Health Mission, is inadequately funded, micromanaged with grants given under more than 2,000 heads and poorly targeted.
- The focus of “Ayushman Bharat” has been to advocate insurance rather than building wellness centres.
Economic revival by the States
- Besides protecting lives and livelihoods, States will have to initiate and facilitate economic revival, and that too would require substantial additional spending.
- Hand holding small and medium enterprises which have completely ceased production, providing relief to farmers who have lost their perishable crops and preparing them for sowing in the kharif season are other tasks that require spending.
- In fact, States have been proactive. Kerala came out with a comprehensive package allocating ₹20,000 crores to fight the pandemic.
- Almost all States have taken measures to provide food to the needy besides ramping up health-care requirements.
Lack of resources and revenue loss suffered by the States
- While the requirement of States for immediate expenditures is large, they are severely crippled in their resources.
- In the lockdown period, there has virtually been no economic activity and they have not been able to generate any revenue from State excise duty, stamp duties and registration fees, motor vehicles tax or sales tax on high-speed diesel and motor spirit.
- The revenue from Goods and Services Tax is stagnant and compensation on time for the loss of revenue has not been forthcoming.
- As the recovery process will be staggered, it is doubtful whether tax revenues will register any positive growth in 2020-21.
- Not surprisingly, the State has decided to monetise land through auctions to get money besides regularising unauthorised constructions by paying high fees.
Lower tax devolution from the Centre
- The position regarding tax devolution from the Centre is even more precarious.
- To begin with, the tax devolution in the Union Budget estimate is lower than the Commission’s estimate by ₹70,995 crores.
- In fact, the Budget estimate for 2020-21 itself is a huge overestimate when seen against the 11-month actual collections in 2019-20.
- The required growth to achieve the Budget estimate is 33.3% over the annualised actual collection.
- The projections are that the growth of nominal GDP in 2020-21 will be just about 4%.
- And if the tax revenue increases by the same rate, devolution to the States would be lower by ₹2.2-lakh crore than the Finance Commission’s estimate.
- This results in a loss of ₹9,173 crores for Tamil Nadu, ₹9,000 crores for Andhra Pradesh, ₹8,000 crores for Karnataka, ₹4,671 crores for Telangana, and ₹4,255 crores for Kerala.
- Supplementary report by the Finance Commission: There is a strong case for the States to go back to the Finance Commission with a request to make and give a supplementary report.
Of late, the poor fiscal health of the States has been in the news. Following are some of the factors that are responsible for it. A question can be asked with relation to this problem like “The States are facing fiscal constraints owing to the lack of revenue. What are the reasons for it? What are the options available to help the States to deal with such a situation?”
Problems faced by the States in raising resources
- There is only a limited scope for expenditure switching and reprioritisation now.
- Limited space for borrowing: Their borrowing space too is limited by the fiscal responsibility and budget management limit of 3% of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP).
- High yield no the State bonds: Faced with an acute fund crunch, Kerala floated 15-year bonds but was faced with a huge upsurge in the yield to 8.96%.
- Increase in the WMA limit: The announcement by the Reserve Bank of India on the increase in the limit of ways and means advances by 60% of the levels prescribed in March 31 could help States to plan their borrowing better.
- But that is too little to provide much relief.
Conclusion
It is important for the Central government to provide additional borrowing space by 2% of GSDP from the prevailing 3% of GSDP. This is the time to fiscally empower States to wage the COVID-19 war and trust them to spend on protecting lives, livelihoods and initiate an economic recovery.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 3-What economic measures and reforms are needed to deal successfully with the crisis.
The article discusses three fronts on which actions are required viz- health, economy and geopolitics. How much the global economy is going to be affected? how the US-China rivalry would affect the recovery? what the lack of global coordination means? all such questioned are discussed here. It also suggests actions that India should take to deal with the crisis.
Many unknowns than knowns about Covid-19
- The virus currently has many more unknowns than knowns.
- We don’t know for sure how it spreads, whether people can get re-infected, whether it is mutating, whether the hot weather kills it, and what the real fatality rate is.
- We don’t know for sure how far we are from an anti-viral.
- We know that we are at least 18 months away from having a vaccine that works and is available at scale.
- Till an anti-viral is found, economic activity will be constrained, and this will affect people, industries and countries in disparate ways.
The extent of damage to the global economy
- Loss of ten trillion dollars: The global economy is set to lose close to ten trillion dollars because of the “self-induced coma” it has been put into — to use Paul Krugman’s evocative phrase.
- Loss of effectiveness of monetary policy: The preceding global financial crisis (GFC) has exhausted the efficacy of monetary tools.
- In addition, corporates globally are leveraged to the tune of $12 trillion.
- The slump in demand: The accompanying oil price collapse, beginning due to a spat between producers Saudi Arabia and Russia have been compounded by a precipitous slump in demand.
- The Chinese economy can’t help as it did during the GFC, as it is hemmed in itself.
- Even if it could, there is too much global suspicion of China to allow it to do so. So, countries will largely be on their own.
Tensions between the US and China
- The tensions between the US and China have escalated into a full-scale superpower crisis after the virus spread.
- Since 2010, there has been great concern in the US about China’s rise.
- China’s muscular foreign policy together with its aggressive stance on multiple issues, most importantly on technology and technology standards, has created conflict.
- The coronavirus is spreading in the US in an election year and smashing its economy.
- The virus infected over three-quarter of a million people in the country and killed more than 40,000.
- After this, China could be seen as enemy number one in the US.
No global coordination
- No wonder then that at a time when the world yearns for global coordination, there is almost none — in healthcare responses and economic coordination.
- Multilateral agencies, especially the WHO and UN, suffer a complete loss of credibility.
- India needs to chart its own course in these turbulent times.
- If India takes the requisite actions it may come out well.
Following suggestions are important from the UPSC perspective. The suggestions deals with three fronts-health, economic and geopolitics.
How India could come out of the crisis?
- India needs to act at three levels — health, economic and geopolitical.
1. Actions at the health level
- The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has done well to stem the spread of the infection.
- It has sensitised the public, introduced the concept of social distancing and isolation in the most challenging situations.
- Now it must test at scale and isolate.
2. Actions at the economic level
- Indians cannot afford to stay locked much longer.
- We are too poor and too many of us live on a day-to-day basis — not even on a paycheck to paycheck basis.
- Economic activity will be subdued in the near-term, but it must be “unlocked”.
- The current IMF projections suggest that India will have the highest growth rate in the world this year.
- Oil prices have collapsed, really helping our balance of payments.
- Our food stocks are plentiful, the rabi crop has been good, and the prognosis for the monsoon is positive.
- Low inflationary pressure: This, together with the fact that aggregate demand is down, will dampen inflationary impulses.
- The “new RBI” has acted boldly and strongly.
- It has taken prompt actions to reduce rates, increase liquidity, adjust prudential norms, allow moratoriums, and protect financial entities.
- Indian is better placed: The weakened rupee will help our exports and with a debt to GDP ratio of about 73 per cent, along with better growth prospects, India is relatively better placed than several other countries.
- We should, therefore, not unduly worry about our credit rating. This both allows and actually requires the government to act on the fiscal front.
- The government needs to implement the following four steps to spur the economy.
- (1) It should do so by “printing money” given the moderated inflation
- (2) It needs to provide additional direct benefit transfers of Rs 2,000 every month for three months to Jan Dhan accounts, together with foodgrains release from the FCI, to the tune of around Rs 65,000 crore, to alleviate people’s miseries.
- (3) It needs to protect MSMEs directly by providing them working capital (with an RBI backstop) and, like in the UK, provide 80 per cent of the salary to employees of the “GST-paying MSMEs” for six months.
- (4) It needs to launch a massive public works programme outside the Budget as suggested by the chairman of CII’s National Committee of Infrastructure and PPP, Vinayak Chatterjee.
- This fund should be earmarked for infrastructure and a quarter of its budget should be set aside for strengthening and upgrading primary health centres.
- The allocation should not be less than Rs 200,000 crore.
- Push through pending reforms: The government should take advantage of the crisis to push through much needed pending reforms in agriculture-especially those pertaining to APMC), power-pricing and discoms, banks-government ownership at 30 per cent and bad banks.
- Revenue from private gold: Given the paucity of tax revenues, the government could also consider having the PM making an appeal for private gold from people and temples.
- It could target 1,000 tonnes of gold worth $30 billion and offer a five per cent tax-free return repayable ($1.5 billion a year) after 10 years, in rupees or gold.
3. Actions at the geopolitical level
- India can come out ahead if we act now.
- Super-power rivalries will create opportunities to replace China as a major supplier to the US and Japan.
Conclusion
The battle to deal with the corona disaster has to be fought on many fronts. India must form a strategy and act on various front i.e. health, economic and geopolitical- to be victorious at the end.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Various geopolitical factors that influence the recovery of the world in post-pandemic period/How India could play a crucial role in forming the global coalition for faster recovery?
This article discusses the various factors with geopolitical significance. These factors would shape the post-pandemic recovery on a global scale. Though these factors have been touched upon in the previous op-eds, they are dealt with in detail here.
Post-pandemic strategic environment for the recovery
- It’s the post-pandemic strategic environment that will dictate how soon the world recovers from this unexpected shock.
- It must start with the international geopolitical angle, with many assumptions.
- With some clarity in this domain, we can prepare ourselves better for the recovery phase of a near post-war situation.
- Shortly, even as the world continues to reel under the pandemic threat, there will be more endeavours on enhancing human security through better strategic management of the world.
- So, what will all that be about? It could be a major conference.
- Major conference with agenda for revival: The situation is similar to the elusive efforts towards the creation of new world order after the end of the Cold War in 1989.
- Will the world consider a major conference with the agenda being a revival after the coronavirus?
- The 2015 Paris Summit of the United Nations, which was convened to save the world from the rapid impact of climate change, could not muster a consensus.
- Will a potential 2020 “pandemic conference” succeed in getting big powers to jettison their geopolitical ambition?
China’s role has significance for India. The UPSC asks questions touching the economic or security aspect of China for India. So, the role played by China in the post-pandemic world is important from Mains perspective. Take note of the issues discussed below.
The US-China rivalry
- The US-China rivalry will remain the core issue, with several other regions and nations aligning with the one who can bring them short to medium-term advantages.
- Contingent upon how badly the US is finally affected, its current confused leadership is unlikely to inspire and its efforts at internal stabilisation may compromise US power.
- A major turn in political fortunes in the US and its bumbling on pandemic management could throw open opportunities for others to exploit.
- The US will perceive itself far more insecure than it was even after 9/11.
Accusations over China’s role in the pandemic
- There is likely to be a huge effort to slander China — accusing it of being the originator of the scourge — and isolate it economically and politically.
- The allegations on the use of biological warfare are the ones which will cause turbulence in relationships.
- Ironically, China is also in a unique position to help the world bounce back.
- Against the backdrop of these accusations regarding culpability, we need to be ready for changes in the norms of international cooperation and behaviour.
- Cold war situation: A cold war of sorts could well be on the cards for some time, hampering a full recovery.
- It will be brutal in the cyber world — fake news on social media will prevent international cooperation in crucial fields such as scientific research, patents.
- And this could perhaps even slow down the ability to prevent the next pandemic.
The crucial role of the US
- Subject to the US’s economic capability after the pandemic, the ability to find a consensus to put on hold defence spending for the sake of human security will be the key.
- But the trust deficit between nations will probably hamper this to a great extent.
- The key anchor of globalisation — the US-China trade relationship — will change even more.
- China cannot be replaced by the US as a major industrial producer (even for the US market).
- Other countries or blocs — ASEAN, Bangladesh and India — will all chip in but that will still not be enough.
- Nor can any country buy as much grain from the US as China does.
- So, an economic relationship will continue but will be politically fractured as both parties search for alternatives, which don’t exist on a scale that both of them need.
The growing influence of China
- China’s recovery is likely to be the fastest.
- Its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) may now go uncontested by the US-led efforts to create alternatives.
- The Chinese ability to influence politics among smaller nations in Asia and Africa could bring it strategic advantages.
- But this influence is unlikely to be enough to replace America unless the recession-hit US remains defensively oriented.
- Potential for conflict: Knowing the US propensity to bounce back, China’s efforts will have to remain energetic and that is where the potential for conflict is likely to rise.
- Of course, it is not as if the US would abandon its interests for an era of only-inward economic healing.
- Its eye on the future will remain firmly in place.
The decline in the credibility of the UN
- Role of WHO: The UN has lost credibility with the World Health Organisation taking the worst hit any UN agency has suffered in years.
- Its future is contingent upon how it manages the geopolitical fallout of the pandemic.
- The sooner it can get the world leaders on board, the better.
Instability in Iran and Afghanistan
- The collapse of the economy: Iran has been hit badly and with the US unrelenting on sanctions, its economy could collapse with frightening results as far the Middle East is concerned.
- The threat for peace in the region: A big nation in instability mode with internal turbulence and leadership challenges could spread greater threats of an undefined kind.
- The US may abandon Afghanistan with less commitment towards keeping its economy sustainable.
- Possibility of IS revival: It could be a sure recipe for internal instability, which could see the Islamic State emerge a major player.
- Russian advantage: Everything in the Middle East points towards Russian advantage and domination.
Opportunities for India
- India without recession: Economically hit but probably one of the few nations without a recession, India’s strong central leadership could be a big advantage.
- International cooperation: Prime Minister Narendra Modi would need to use all his influence to cobble together international cooperation to pull the world from the abyss it could sink into.
- His credibility is already higher than most international leaders and could spell a leadership role for India not in conflict with China but in cooperation with it.
- It is India’s established multilateral foreign policy that could eventually come to the assistance of the world.
Conclusion
Successful and swift recovery of the world hinges on international cooperation among the nation. This provides India with an opportunity to stitch together international cooperation in dealing with the aftermath of the crisis.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now
Note4Students
From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :
Prelims level: Not much.
Mains level: Paper 2- Need to revisit the state's role in political, social and economic aspect of the society.
The role of the state has come in the focus in the corona crisis. This article describes how the dominant role once played by the state declined over time and what implications it has for society. In the next part of the article, need to revisit the political system of the country is emphasised.
Paradigm shift due to Covid-19
- We are unlikely to return to pre-coronavirus homeostasis after the war against it is won.
- No section or sector is going to remain untouched and unaltered by the devastation the novel coronavirus is now unleashing.
- Its annihilation in the near future is not on the cards.
- Vaccines are going to be slow in coming; therefore, its taming is not immediate.
- The second wave of an outbreak is a realistic probability.
- Unlike the other threats: Unlike other threats to humanity such as global warming and nuclear armageddon, this threat is now, not in the future.
- It is here simultaneously for everyone, not for someone else and somewhere else; its casualties are around us, not in faraway battlefields or polar regions and coastal areas.
- No country can rescue another; it is each one fending for itself.
Possibility of a deep recession in the world
- If the lockdown continues, the world economy will contract by as much as 6% according to the International Monetary Fund.
- If it is not extended, the loss of human lives could be of unacceptable proportions.
- The global community will be fortunate if it does not spiral into depression.
- Both demand and supply contractions are likely to be severe.
- They are not going to be short-lived. Political systems, economic architectures and cultural mores are on trial.
Time to build a new paradigm
- Work patterns, production and distribution practices are up for
- Denial and wishing away unpleasant, yet probable, realities by governments, global organisations and public intellectuals will only compound economic, social, political and human costs.
- Build a new paradigm: We must now be quick in seizing lessons from the present crisis and get ready to embark on measures to build a new paradigm of life, work and governance.
Role of state in focus once again
- The enlarged economic role of the state in the aftermath of the Second World War came under major assault since the 1980s.
- Leaders who asked ‘where is society?’ rode to power on the promise of cutting down the government’s role.
- Systems that were alternatives to capitalism fell out of favour.
- Entrepreneurs heading unicorns and ‘soonicorns’ have become the new demigods.
- Minimum governance became the mantra.
- India too without much consideration joined this creed.
- Role of state in focus: But COVID-19 is beginning to challenge the political economy of this creed.
- Very soon the full scores of the performance of state and non-state actors in the COVID-19 stress test will be available across the globe.
- The Indian state will also have to give answers as far as its report card is concerned.
How the state’s role declined in India?
- India embarked on the path of reducing the role of the state, initially, with such caveats as ‘safety net’ and ‘reform with a human face’.
- Gradually, those caveats fell by the wayside.
- The Indian state’s role in health care, education, creation and maintenance of infrastructure and delivery of welfare has shrunk or become nominal, half-hearted, inefficient, and dysfunctional.
- Of course, it is true that it did not give a great account of itself in these sectors even before the 1991 departure.
- Disappointment with the dismal performance in its economic and administrative functions in the backdrop of a changing global ideological ecosystem encouraged a sharp de facto downsizing of the Indian state’s role.
- Acceptance among the upper section of society: Its retreat from vital functions and abdication of its social responsibility have gained acceptance and legitimacy among the articulate upwardly mobile.
- While retreat and abdication found influential and forceful evangelists, the selective retreat had few advocates.
- This departure, however, was not vigorously interrogated.
- Supporters of the departure, on the other hand, had little engagement in giving shape to the new policy.
- Nor did they worry about calibrating the architecture of the emerging role for the state.
- As a result, ‘private sector’ became the new holy cow in place of the ‘state sector’.
- What made matters worse is the culture of a simplistic and shallow discourse of public policy that took hold in civil society.
- It mindlessly privileges the agenda of corporates. It transacts in the idiom of stock exchanges and international rating agencies.
Who is affected due to declined role of the state?
- Today, those who bear the brunt of the consequences of shrunken and unresponsive state are the farmer and farm labour, the migrant worker, the unemployed, those in the unorganised sector, the rural poor, and the small entrepreneur.
- They are paying the highest price for the necessary but unbearable lockdown.
- They are either stranded far away from home or confined to their homes with no work and incomes, unsupported by the state.
- Underfunded public health systems are unable to serve them.
- But the dominant strand of public discourse is out of its depth. It has no time for these concerns.
- Worse, this discourse can be gamed from time to time.
- And the alternative discourse is too feeble to draw the attention of the government to the grave implications of COVID-19 for the weak in our society.
State’s responsibility towards the marginalised
- The state’s first responsibility is marginalised.
- The marginalised are also the crucial part of our economy. They lubricate its wheels and generate demand.
- Demand-side needs to be revived: Announcing stimulus packages that address the supply side alone without beefing up the demand side will be self-defeating to corporates.
- Prioritising the needs of corporate entities will lead to convulsions in our body politic in the wake of COVID-19.
- The state is in danger of forfeiting legitimacy if it does not ensure the survival and revival of the marginalised sections.
From the Mains perspective, following points are important to highlight the importance of the state’s role in ensuring the welfare of society and why there is a need to revisit the current system owing to certain problems in it.
Time to revisit the political economy of the Indian state and its role
- The country should begin a vigorous discourse on redefining every aspect of its involvement in our collective political, economic and social life.
- The relation between the state and economy, its role in allocating resources and addressing questions of inequality, its duty to provide basic human needs, the extent of the market’s role in providing services such as health, education, civic amenities needs to be revisited.
- The responsibility of the state and private enterprise towards deprived sections need urgent attention.
- Re-examining the political structure: We should re-examine the efficacy of our political structures too.
- The equation between citizens and government and what its implications are for individual freedom, privacy and national security.
- Also, the equation between the legislature and executive needs to be re-visited.
- Financial powers: The balance of administrative and financial power between provinces and the union on the one hand and provinces and local bodies on the other should be reconsidered.
- Election of the representatives: The way we elect our representatives to legislatures must also come under the lens.
- The issue of weakened local authorities and enfeebled legislatures need attention.
- For, they are at the coalface, delivering the state to the citizen.
- The way legislatures are elected and governments are made and unmade must be scrutinised.
- Our outrage at the power of big money in our electoral system has not arrested its growth.
- The role of serving and retired members of higher judiciary ought to be a part of the debate.
- We had an opportunity for intensive debate when the Justice Venkatachaliah Commission submitted its report in 2002 to review the working of the Constitution.
Conclusion
The opportunity that COVID-19 provides should not be squandered and must be utilised to have a fresh look at the various issues regarding our social, economic and political life. And states responsibility towards marginalised.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
Attend Now