đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Type: Prelims Only

  • Specie in news: Saiga Antelope

    Saiga Antelope

    Central Idea

    • The Saiga Antelope has been reclassified from ‘Critically Endangered’ to ‘Near Threatened’ by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

    About Saiga Antelope

    Details
    Scientific Name Saiga tatarica
    Physical Characteristics Notable for its distinctive bulbous nose; relatively small, with a thin build and long, thin legs
    Habitat Primarily found in the steppe region of Central Asia and Eastern Europe
    Population Distribution Predominantly in Kazakhstan and Russia, with smaller populations in Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Mongolia
    Conservation Status IUCN Red List: Near Threatened

    CITES: Appendix II

    Major Threats Poaching for horns (used in traditional medicine), habitat loss, and disease outbreaks like pasteurellosis
    Diet Herbivorous, feeding on a variety of grasses and plants
    Breeding Known for its rapid population growth under favorable conditions; breeds in large herds
    Migration Notable for long-distance seasonal migrations
    Cultural Significance Featured in the folklore and culture of the local steppe communities
  • Bhagat Singh’s Bombing of Delhi Central Assembly

    bhagat singh

    Central Idea

    • A serious security breach occurred in the Indian Parliament when two individuals jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber, releasing yellow smoke.
    • Police sources indicated that the act, involving a total of six individuals, was apparently inspired by the revolutionary Bhagat Singh.

    Bhagat Singh’s Historic Act in 1929

    • Central Assembly Incident: Over 94 years ago, Bhagat Singh, along with Batukeshwar Dutt, threw bombs and pamphlets in Delhi’s Central Assembly, challenging the British Empire.
    • Objective: Their act was not aimed at causing harm but to protest against the lack of autonomy under the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms and to voice against repressive measures.

    1929 ‘Indian Parliament’ and Revolutionary Motives

    • Political Climate: The period saw Indian nationalists dissatisfied with the limited power under British rule, leading to revolutionary movements.
    • HSRA’s Stance: The Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA), led by Chandrashekhar Azad and involving Bhagat Singh, sought to oppose the facade of an Indian Parliament run by the British.
    • Pamphlet’s Message: The HSRA aimed to ‘make the deaf hear’, using their act as a symbolic protest against the British administration.

    Fateful Day: April 8, 1929

    • Viceroy’s Proclamation: The incident coincided with the Viceroy’s enactment of controversial bills, despite opposition in the Assembly.
    • Well-Planned Action: Bhagat Singh and Dutt conducted reconnaissance and executed their plan while dressed in khaki, throwing bombs and pamphlets into the Assembly.
    • Immediate Arrest: Following their slogan-shouting and bomb-throwing, both revolutionaries were arrested as per their plan.

    Aftermath: Trial and Sentencing

    • Response to Criticism: Bhagat Singh and Dutt defended their actions, emphasizing the sanctity of human life and the moral justification of their cause.
    • Trial and Sentencing: A month later, both were sentenced to life imprisonment. Bhagat Singh later faced additional charges leading to his execution in 1931.

    Conclusion

    • Echoes of History: The recent security breach in the Lok Sabha, inspired by Bhagat Singh’s act, reflects a continued legacy of protest in India.
    • Legacy of Bhagat Singh: The incident serves as a reminder of Bhagat Singh’s enduring influence in Indian history, symbolizing resistance and the fight for justice.
    • Contemporary Relevance: While the motives of the recent perpetrators are still under investigation, their actions highlight ongoing issues in India, from regional concerns to farmers’ rights, resonating with Bhagat Singh’s revolutionary spirit.
  • US, EU slap Countervailing Duties on 4 Indian goods

    Central Idea

    • The US and the European Union have imposed countervailing duties (CVDs) on select Indian products such as paper file folders, common alloy aluminum sheet, and forged steel fluid end blocks.
    • These measures are in retaliation against India’s Remission of Duties and Taxes on Export Products (RoDTEP) scheme, initiated in January 2021.

    About Countervailing Duties (CVDs)

    Details
    Definition Tariffs imposed to neutralize the adverse effects of subsidies provided by a foreign government to their export industries.
    Purpose To protect domestic industries from unfair competition due to imports subsidized by the exporting country’s government.
    Investigation & Imposition Requires a domestic investigation to confirm the presence of subsidies and their impact on domestic industries.
    WTO Compliance Imposition of CVDs must comply with World Trade Organization rules.
    Types of Subsidies Includes direct transfers of funds, tax concessions, loan guarantees, and provision of goods/services at a discount.
    Calculation The duty amount is typically equivalent to the value of the foreign subsidy.
    Duration Not permanent; imposed for a specific period and subject to review and removal.
    Global Use Frequently used by countries like the United States, European Union, Canada, and India.
    Controversy and Disputes Can lead to trade disputes, viewed by some as protectionist or unjustified.
    Impact on Prices May result in higher prices for affected goods in the importing country due to increased import costs.

     India’s Response to the Duties

    • Government and Exporters’ Defense: The Indian government and affected exporters have actively defended against the subsidy allegations. Their defense covered various programs and schemes at both the Central and State levels in India.
    • Method of Defense: The defense was presented through written and oral responses during the investigations.

    Potential WTO Dispute

    • India’s Stance on Dispute Resolution: Minister of State for Commerce and Industry indicated India’s openness to bilateral resolution.
    • WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Any party could approach the WTO Dispute Settlement mechanism if they believe a WTO member has adopted measures inconsistent with WTO agreements.

    Conclusion

    • Growing Trade Tensions: The imposition of CVDs by the US and EU signifies escalating trade tensions with India, particularly concerning the RoDTEP scheme.
    • Impact on Indian Exports: These duties could potentially impact Indian exporters, affecting trade dynamics between India and these global economic powers.
    • Prospect of WTO Involvement: The possibility of this dispute reaching the WTO highlights the complexities of international trade laws and the need for careful navigation of global trade policies.

    Back2Basics: RoDTEP Scheme

    Details
    Introduction Announced in 2020, replacing the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS).
    Objective To refund taxes and duties on exported products not covered under any other scheme, enhancing export competitiveness.
    Scope and Coverage Covers various sectors, beneficial for a wide range of industries, including those not covered under MEIS.
    Rebate Rates Varies based on the taxes and duties incurred on the production and distribution of the exported product.
    Eligibility Exporters must comply with criteria including the condition that goods must be manufactured in India.
    Claim Process Rebate claimed as a transferable duty credit/electronic scrip, maintained in an electronic ledger.
    Implementation Implemented by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and Customs Department.
    Impact Aims to make Indian exports more competitive globally by offsetting domestic taxes and levies.
    Compliance with WTO Designed to comply with India’s commitments under the WTO framework.
    Process Fully digital and transparent process for claiming rebates, reducing the compliance burden on exporters.
  • Places in news: Kambalakonda WLS

    Kambalakonda

    Central Idea

    • The Eastern Ghats Biodiversity Centre situated along the Kambalakonda Wildlife Sanctuary’s periphery, near PM Palem in Visakhapatnam, features a new Nature Interpretation Centre.

    About Kambalakonda WLS

    Details
    Location Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India
    Establishment Declared in 1970 under the Wildlife Protection Act of India
    Area Approximately 71 square kilometers (27 square miles)
    Ecosystem Dry evergreen forests and scrubland
    Biodiversity Home to Indian leopards, deer species, wild boar, jackals, reptiles, birds, and medicinal plants
    Flora Predominantly dry evergreen forests with moist deciduous patches
    Tourism and Recreation Offers trekking, bird watching, and nature walks
    Accessibility Easily accessible from the city of Visakhapatnam
  • [pib] Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Summit

    gpai

    Central Idea

    • The Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Summit began in New Delhi on December 12, inaugurated by Prime Minister.
    • India, along with 28 member countries, is working towards a consensus on a declaration document focusing on the proper use of AI, establishing guardrails for the technology, and its democratization.

    GPAI and India

    • Founding Member: India joined GPAI as a founding member in June 2020, aiming to bridge the gap between AI theory and practice.
    • International Collaboration: The initiative fosters collaboration among scientists, industry professionals, civil society, governments, international organizations, and academia.
    • Previous Summits: Prior GPAI summits were held in Montreal, Paris, and Tokyo.
    • India’s Stance: IT Minister highlighted India’s focus on sustainable agriculture and collaborative AI, building on the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) approach used in Aadhaar and UPI systems.

    Content of the Proposed Declaration

    • Themes and Focus: The declaration is expected to cover AI’s use in sustainable agriculture, healthcare, climate action, and building resilient societies.
    • Regulatory Aspects: It will align with past agreements and global ideas on AI regulation.
    • India’s Contribution: India’s emphasis is on evaluating AI in sustainable agriculture and promoting collaborative AI.

    Global Conversation on AI Regulation

    • EU’s AI Act: The European Union passed the AI Act, introducing safeguards and guardrails for AI use, especially in law enforcement, and setting up mechanisms for complaints against violations. It imposes strong restrictions on facial recognition and AI’s potential to manipulate human behavior.
    • AI Safety Summit in the UK: Major countries agreed on a declaration for global action to address AI risks, acknowledging the dangers of misuse, cybersecurity threats, biotechnology, and disinformation risks.
    • US Executive Order: The Biden Administration issued an order to safeguard against AI threats and oversee safety benchmarks for generative AI bots like ChatGPT and Google Bard.
  • [pib] Exercise VINBAX 2023

    Exercise VINBAX

    Central Idea

    • The Indian Armed Forces contingent, consisting of 45 personnel, has arrived in Hanoi, Vietnam, to participate in the fourth edition of the Joint Military Exercise VINBAX-2023.

    Exercise VINBAX-2023

    • Inception: VINBAX was established in 2018, with its inaugural edition held in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
    • Annual Event: This training event is conducted annually, alternating between India and Vietnam. The last edition took place at Chandimandir Military Station in August 2022.
    • Collaborative Partnership: The exercise aims to foster collaborative partnerships and promote interoperability between the two nations.
    • Focus on Peacekeeping: It is aligned with Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter on Peace Keeping Operations.
    • Training Emphasis: The focus is on the deployment and employment of an Engineer Company and a Medical Team in a Command Post Exercise cum Field Training Exercise format.

    Activities and Training Modules

    • Tactical Exchange: The exercise will facilitate the exchange of tactics, techniques, and procedures between the contingents.
    • Engineering and Medical Drills: Participants will share modern methods for constructing roads, culverts, helipads, ammunition shelters, and observation posts. Combat engineering and medical drills are also part of the training.
    • Validation Exercise: The exercise will conclude with a Validation Exercise to showcase the standards achieved by both contingents.
  • Red Sprites: Atmospheric Wonders above Thunderstorms

    Red Sprites

    Central Idea

    • ESA astronauts recorded a red sprite over a thundercloud as part of the Thor-Davis experiment at Danish Technical University.

    What are Red Sprites?

    Details
    Type Transient Luminous Event (TLE)
    Appearance Reddish-orange flashes, often in clusters, with shapes resembling tendrils, jellyfish, or carrots
    Altitude Typically occur at altitudes between 50 to 90 kilometers (31 to 56 miles)
    Duration Extremely brief, lasting only a few milliseconds
    First Documented First photographed in 1989, though pilots had reported sightings for decades
    Formation Triggered by positive lightning discharges from thunderclouds to the ionosphere
    Color Explanation Red coloration due to the excitation of nitrogen molecules; lower parts can appear blue
    Observation Challenges Ephemeral nature and often obscured by thunderclouds; typically observed from aircraft or high-altitude platforms
    Scientific Significance Provides insights into electrical and chemical processes in the upper atmosphere
    Related Phenomena Part of a group that includes blue jets and elves, all linked to thunderstorm activity
    Research Importance Investigated for understanding the Earth’s electromagnetic environment and atmospheric electrical balance
  • Legislative Development in Election Commission Appointments

    election commissioner

    Central Idea

    • The Rajya Sabha passed a bill that revises the process for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs), replacing the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991.

    Election Commission Appointments Bill:Key Features

    • Appointment Process: The President will appoint the CEC and ECs based on recommendations from a Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, a Union Cabinet Minister, and the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha.
    • Search Committee Role: A Search Committee led by the Cabinet Secretary will suggest candidates to the Selection Committee.
    • Eligibility Criteria: Candidates must have held a post equivalent to the Secretary to the central government.
    • Salary and Conditions: The CEC and ECs will receive salaries and benefits equivalent to the Cabinet Secretary, a change from the previous equivalence to a Supreme Court judge.

    Constitutional Context

    • Constitutional Provisions: Article 324 of the Constitution allows the President to appoint the CEC and ECs but does not specify the appointment process.
    • Supreme Court Directive: In March 2023, the Supreme Court mandated a selection process involving the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India, until Parliament legislates otherwise.

    Key Issues and Analysis

    • Independence Concerns: The government-dominated Selection Committee could impact the Election Commission’s independence.
    • Validity despite Vacancies: The Selection Committee’s recommendations will be valid even with vacancies, potentially leading to government control in appointments.
    • Salary and Status: Aligning the CEC and ECs’ salary with the Cabinet Secretary, determined by the government, may affect their independence compared to a salary fixed by Parliament.
    • Exclusion of Candidates: Limiting eligibility to senior bureaucrats may exclude other qualified individuals, particularly those with judicial experience.
    • International Practices: The appointment processes for election commissions in countries like South Africa, the UK, the US, and Canada vary, with some involving judicial members or parliamentary approval.

    Concerns over Independence and Selection Process

    • Government Influence: The Bill’s provisions for a government-majority Selection Committee and the acceptance of recommendations despite vacancies could lead to executive dominance in appointments.
    • Salary and Removal Parity: The change in salary equivalence and the lack of parity in the removal process of the CEC and ECs compared to Supreme Court judges raise concerns about the Commission’s independence.

    Goswami Committee (1990) Recommendations

    • Background: The Goswami Committee on Electoral Reforms (1990) made significant recommendations regarding the Election Commission’s functioning.
    • Appointment Process: The Committee suggested that the CEC should be appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha. For ECs, it recommended a similar process but included the CEC in the consultative process.
    • Importance of Independence: The Committee emphasized the need for the Election Commission’s independence from executive influence to ensure free and fair elections.

    Conclusion

    • Ensuring ECI’s Autonomy: While the Bill aims to formalize the appointment process for the CEC and ECs, maintaining the Election Commission’s autonomy and independence is crucial for upholding democratic principles.
    • Need for Deliberation: The concerns raised about the Bill highlight the need for careful consideration to ensure that the Election Commission remains an impartial and effective guardian of electoral integrity in India.
  • Karan Singh’s Proclamation of 1949

    karan singh

    Central Idea

    • On December 11, the Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370, affirming that Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) did not retain sovereignty after joining the Union of India.
    • CJI D Y Chandrachud, writing for himself and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, cited a 1949 proclamation by Yuvraj Karan Singh (successor of J&K titular Maharaja) as a key factor in this decision.

    Karan Singh’s 1949 Proclamation

    • Repeal of the Government of India Act, 1935: The proclamation declared the repeal of the Government of India Act, 1935, which previously governed J&K’s constitutional relationship with India.
    • Adoption of the Indian Constitution: It stated that the Indian Constitution would govern J&K’s relationship with the Union of India and abrogate inconsistent constitutional provisions in the state.

    Reason behind the Proclamation

    • Karan Singh’s Perspective: Speaking to The Indian Express, Karan Singh, aged 92, explained that the proclamation was necessary to eliminate ambiguity regarding J&K’s integration with India.
    • Instrument of Accession’s Ambiguity: He noted that while his father, Hari Singh, signed the Instrument of Accession like other rulers, J&K retained a measure of autonomy, leading to questions about its complete integration.

    Supreme Court’s Findings

    • Essence of the Judgment: The Court stated that J&K did not retain any form of sovereignty upon joining India.
    • Significance of the 1949 Proclamation: The Court highlighted that Karan Singh’s proclamation superseded all constitutional provisions inconsistent with the Indian Constitution, effectively surrendering J&K’s sovereignty.

    Alignment with the Centre’s Argument

    • Centre’s Stance: The Union government argued that the 1949 proclamation acknowledged the supremacy of the Indian Constitution and surrendered sovereignty to it, where the sovereign is ‘We the people of India’.
    • Court’s Agreement: The Supreme Court’s ruling aligns with this argument, affirming the complete integration of J&K into India.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s decision clarifies the constitutional status of J&K post the abrogation of Article 370, confirming its full integration into the Indian Union without any retained sovereignty.
    • The ruling underscores the historical context of J&K’s accession and the role of the 1949 proclamation in shaping its constitutional relationship with India.
  • What are Foreigners’ Tribunals?

    Central Idea

    • Since 1966, Foreigners Tribunals (FTs) in Assam have identified 32,381 people as foreigners.

    Foreigners Tribunals in Assam

    • Unique Quasi-Judicial Bodies: FTs are specific to Assam, tasked with determining whether a person is illegally staying as a “foreigner” in India.
    • Backdrop of Assam’s NRC: With the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has outlined guidelines for detecting, detaining, and deporting illegal foreign nationals.
    • Amendment to Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964: The MHA has amended this order, allowing district magistrates in all States and Union Territories to establish tribunals.
    • Shift in Power: Previously, only the Central Government had the authority to constitute such tribunals.

    Need for Foreigners Tribunals

    • Legal Process for Foreigners: In other regions, foreigners apprehended for illegal stay are tried under the Passport Act, 1920, or the Foreigners Act, 1946, with penalties including imprisonment and eventual deportation.
    • Detention Centers: Post-sentence, the accused are held in detention centers until their country of origin agrees to accept them.

    Recent Amendments and Their Implications

    • Changes in Tribunal Constitution: The 1964 order initially allowed only the Central Government to refer cases to the Tribunals. The amendment now permits State Governments, UT administrations, District Collectors, and District Magistrates to do so.
    • Empowerment of Individuals: The amended Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 2019, enables individuals to approach Tribunals, a change from the earlier provision where only the State could challenge a suspect.
    • Context of NRC: With the final NRC publication, this amendment aims to provide adequate opportunities for those not included in the list.
    • Procedure for Non-Listed Individuals: Persons not found in the final NRC can approach the Tribunals. District Magistrates can also refer cases of individuals who haven’t filed claims against their NRC exclusion.
    • Issuance of Fresh Summons: These individuals will receive new summons to prove their citizenship.