💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Challenge of Non-Communicable Disease in India

    What’s the news?

    • India, with its emerging leadership in global issues, faces the challenge of rising NCDs, including diabetes and heart diseases. The healthcare industry calls for collaboration to address this crisis, highlighting India’s progress in healthcare, its role as a Medical Value Travel hub, and its potential in AI-driven healthcare innovations.

    Central idea

    • In recent years, India has emerged as a prominent voice on the global stage, leading the way in critical areas such as climate change, electrification, manufacturing, and space exploration. India’s achievements include successfully landing a mission near the moon’s south pole and a successful G-20 presidency. However, as India aims to become a global leader, it must confront a looming health crisis of NCDs.

    What are Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)?

    • NCDs are also known as chronic diseases, which are not caused by infectious agents and are not transmissible from person to person.
    • NCDs are long-lasting and progress slowly, typically taking years to manifest symptoms.
    • Examples of NCDs include cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.
    • These diseases are often caused by modifiable risk factors such as an unhealthy diet, a lack of physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use, and environmental factors.
    • NCDs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for around 70% of all deaths.

    India’s NCD challenge

    • Diabetes and Hypertension Prevalence: India is facing a high prevalence of NCDs, particularly diabetes and hypertension, which affect millions of people.
    • Youth Health Issues: The burden of NCDs is increasingly affecting India’s youth, leading to heart attacks, cancer, respiratory problems, depression, and more.
    • Economic Consequences: If unchecked, India’s NCD burden could lead to an economic cost of nearly $4 trillion by 2030. This poses a significant roadblock to India’s development and is compared to an age tax on the country’s demographic dividend.

    India’s healthcare progress

    • Improved Health Metrics: India has witnessed notable improvements in key health metrics.
    • Infant Mortality: India has witnessed a remarkable improvement in infant mortality rates, which have decreased by four times from previous levels.
    • Maternal Mortality: Maternal mortality rates have shown remarkable progress as well, decreasing by seven times from earlier rates.
    • Average Life Expectancy: The average life expectancy of an Indian has increased by nearly 30%, rising from 55 years to over 70 years, reflecting the overall improvement in healthcare and quality of life in the country.
    • World-Class Healthcare Infrastructure: India is described as having world-class healthcare infrastructure. Investments have been made in modern hospitals, clinics, and medical facilities to provide high-quality healthcare services.
    • Clinical Excellence: India is noted for its pool of highly skilled clinical talent. These healthcare professionals are capable of delivering best-in-class clinical outcomes and providing healthcare services at a scale and cost that are favorable compared to the global average.

    India as a Medical Value Travel (MVT) hub

    • Global MVT Hub: India has emerged as a prominent global destination for MVT, attracting patients from around the world, particularly in specialized medical fields such as oncology, orthopedics, and robotic surgery.
    • Advanced Medical Technology: India has invested in state-of-the-art medical technology and facilities, including the introduction of proton beam therapy for cancer treatment, positioning itself as a regional leader in cancer care.
    • Highly Skilled Healthcare Professionals: India has a highly skilled and trained workforce of healthcare professionals known for their expertise in complex procedures, including joint replacements, spinal surgeries, and robotic-assisted surgeries.
    • Minimally Invasive Techniques: Many medical procedures in India are conducted using minimally invasive techniques, attracting patients seeking precise and less invasive treatments.
    • Cost-Effective Care: India offers cost-effective healthcare services, making it an attractive destination for patients seeking high-quality medical care at competitive prices.
    • Growth Potential: India’s MVT sector has significant growth potential, capable of creating employment opportunities and contributing to foreign exchange earnings.

    India’s potential for harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to transform the healthcare sector

    • AI in Healthcare Transformation: AI is rapidly reshaping healthcare worldwide, and India is poised to play a leading role in this transformation. India has a wealth of talented data scientists, engineers, and healthcare professionals capable of driving innovation in AI-driven healthcare solutions.
    • Diagnostic Advancements: AI can significantly impact diagnostics by enhancing accuracy and efficiency in medical diagnoses. AI-powered tools can lead to faster treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes. Moreover, AI can aid in predicting disease outbreaks, analyzing healthcare data, optimizing treatment plans, expediting healthcare procedures, and revolutionizing drug discovery.
    • India’s Progress in AI: India has already made strides in the application of AI in healthcare. However, to maintain and strengthen its leadership position, India must continue to invest in research and development, encourage collaborations between academia and industry, and create an ecosystem that fosters innovation.
    • Economic Potential: The AI expenditure in the country is expected to reach $11.78 billion by 2025 and could contribute $1 trillion to India’s economy by 2035.

    Way forward

    • AI-Driven Healthcare Transformation: India should fully embrace the transformative potential of AI in healthcare. This involves integrating AI-powered solutions for diagnostics, treatment optimization, and healthcare procedures.
    • Investment in R&D: India should continue and increase investment in research and development to drive healthcare innovation. Funding and supporting research initiatives will be crucial for advancements in healthcare technology.
    • Collaboration Between Academia and Industry: Strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and the healthcare industry is essential. These collaborations can expedite the application of research findings to practical healthcare solutions.
    • Nurturing an Innovation Ecosystem: India should create an ecosystem conducive to healthcare innovation. This includes supporting healthcare startups, offering incentives for innovation, and facilitating the growth of healthcare technology companies.
    • Economic Potential of AI: Recognizing the economic potential of AI in healthcare, India should actively invest in AI-driven healthcare solutions. The expected growth in AI expenditure presents an opportunity to contribute significantly to the country’s economy.
    • Community Health Focus: Prioritizing community health is essential. Initiatives aimed at improving public health, creating awareness about preventive measures, and addressing healthcare disparities should be emphasized.
    • Public-Private Collaboration: Collaboration between the public and private sectors is critical. Joint efforts can lead to infrastructure development, the promotion of medical tourism, and the establishment of international healthcare accreditation bodies.
    • Leadership in NCD Prevention: India should take a leading role in addressing non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Comprehensive strategies, including prevention, early detection, and effective management, should be at the forefront of healthcare efforts.

    Conclusion

    • India stands at a critical juncture in its healthcare journey. By reimagining its healthcare model, India can position itself as a global leader in medical value travel, a powerhouse in AI-driven healthcare solutions, and a trailblazer in combating NCDs. With concerted efforts and a commitment to excellence, India can forge a healthier and more prosperous future for generations to come, truly realizing its destiny as a global leader.

    Also read:

    India’s Rising Burden of Diabetes: Urgent Actions Needed

  • Crafting a new chapter in parliamentary conduct

    What’s the news?

    • Disruptive behavior within India’s Parliament is on the rise, leading to concerns about declining decorum and public perception, as well as its impact on governance.

    Central idea

    • India’s Parliament faces a decorum crisis with growing disruptive behavior during special sessions, raising concerns of impending chaos. Lawmakers from various parties resort to disruption instead of constructive debate. It’s high time to address this issue and seek inspiration from the British parliamentary model, which once inspired our nation’s leaders.

    Initial Pride in the Parliamentary System

    • Britain’s Westminster model: In the early years following India’s independence, Indian politicians took great pride in the parliamentary system they had adopted. This system was modeled after Britain’s Westminster model.
    • Longing for Denied Benefits: India’s nationalists were determined to experience the democracy they had long been denied under British colonial rule. They believed that the British parliamentary system was the best model, and its adoption was a significant step toward achieving democratic governance.
    • Attlee’s Proposal: When Clement Attlee, a future British Prime Minister, visited India as part of a constitutional commission, he suggested the merits of a presidential system over a parliamentary one. However, this proposal was met with shock and horror by his Indian interlocutors, who strongly favored the parliamentary system.
    • Admiration for British Parliamentary Traditions: Many of India’s first-generation parliamentarians had received their education in England and held a deep admiration for British parliamentary traditions. They found authenticity in emulating these traditions.
    • Continuation of British Practices: India’s parliamentary practices continued to mirror British traditions. For example, Indian MPs still thump their desks in approbation, a practice similar to desk-thumping in the British Parliament. When voting on bills, the affirmative call is typically aye rather than yes, although hanh is gaining popularity on some Treasury benches.
    • A Compliment from a British Prime Minister: In an instance where an Anglophile Communist MP, Professor Hirendranath Mukherjee, proudly recounted how a visiting British Prime Minister, Anthony Eden, had remarked that the Indian Parliament was in every respect like the British one, This comment was regarded as a compliment, even by a Communist, and it emphasized the authenticity with which India had adopted British parliamentary traditions.

    Departure from British parliamentary traditions and increasing leniency towards disruption

    • Change Over Decades: Over the course of seven and a half decades since India gained independence, significant changes have occurred in the functioning of its parliamentary system.
    • Emergence of Boisterous Behavior: India’s natural inclination towards boisterousness and assertiveness has reemerged in its legislative proceedings. This shift marks a departure from the decorum and traditions of the British parliamentary system.
    • Disruptions in State Assemblies: Some state assemblies have already experienced chaotic scenes, including instances where furniture was overturned, microphones were ripped out, and legislators threw slippers. Fisticuffs and torn garments have also been observed during scuffles among politicians in these assemblies.
    • Code of Conduct Violations: In the national legislature, the code of conduct, which is imparted to all newly-elected MPs, is frequently breached. This includes violations such as speaking out of turn, shouting slogans, waving placards, and marching into the well of the house.
    • Pepper Spray Incident: The situation reached an extreme point when a protesting MP released pepper spray within the parliamentary chamber. This act resulted in the hospitalization of some MPs and caused discomfort for the then-Speaker.
    • Impunity for Rule-Breaking: Lawmakers have exhibited a remarkable level of impunity in flouting the rules they are elected to uphold. Despite instances of MPs charging up to the presiding officer’s desk, wrenching his microphone, and tearing up his papers, they have often been quietly reinstated to their positions after a few months, accompanied by muted apologies.

    Concerns and consequences of disruptive behavior in India’s Parliament

    • Obstruction of Meaningful Debate: Disruptive behavior obstructs meaningful debate on important issues, preventing critical legislation from being discussed and passed.
    • Weakening of Governance: Prolonged disruptions impede the government’s ability to implement policies and address the needs of the population, leading to weakened governance.
    • Erosion of Parliamentary Decorum: Disruptive behavior has led to a noticeable erosion of parliamentary decorum and traditional standards of conduct.
    • Negative Public Perception: Disruptions have contributed to a negative public perception of the Parliament, potentially leading to disillusionment with the democratic process.
    • Decline in Accountability: Leniency towards disruptive behavior has undermined the accountability of elected representatives.
    • Loss of Legislative Productivity: Frequent disruptions have resulted in a loss of valuable legislative time and productivity.
    • Threat to Democracy: The disruptive behavior poses a threat to India’s democratic system by hindering the functioning of democratic institutions and diminishing their credibility.

    British parliamentary techniques that the Indian parliament must learn and implement

    • Opposition Day:
    • In the British parliamentary system, Opposition Day allows the opposition parties to select specific policy areas or issues they want to bring to the floor of the House for debate.
    • This practice provides the opposition with a designated platform to express their views, criticize government policies, and propose alternatives.
    • It promotes constructive debate on matters of political significance and ensures that the government must address issues raised by the opposition.
    • Prime Minister’s Question Time (PMQs):
    • PMQs is a significant and widely watched parliamentary event in the United Kingdom.
    • During PMQs, MPs have the opportunity to question the Prime Minister about various issues.
    • This practice enhances transparency, accountability, and scrutiny of the government’s actions and decisions.
    • It is known for spirited exchanges and serves as a key aspect of the British parliamentary system’s tradition of executive accountability.

    What else?

    • Speaker’s Role: The Speaker should reconsider the frequent rejection of adjournment motions and the practice of grouping proposed amendments to bills for voice votes without discussion.

    Conclusion

    • India’s Parliament stands at a crossroads, with its credibility and functionality at stake due to persistent disruptions. By adopting some of the practices of the British parliamentary system and ensuring a more inclusive and accountable parliamentary culture, India can reinvigorate its democratic institutions and preserve the sanctity of its democracy. It is imperative for the government and the opposition to come together on these fundamental matters to salvage the integrity of the Parliament and the nation’s democracy.

  • Supreme Court’s Integration with the National Judicial Data Grid

    National Judicial Data Grid

    Central Idea

    • On September 14th, the Supreme Court of India took a monumental stride by incorporating its case data into the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG).

    What is the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG)?

    • Comprehensive Repository: NJDG stands as a comprehensive online repository, housing orders, judgments, and case particulars from a vast network of 18,735 District and subordinate Courts and High Courts.
    • Real-time Access: This platform is an integral component of the eCourts Project, providing real-time updates and in-depth data down to the Taluka level.

    Administration of NJDG

    • E-Courts Initiative: NJDG was conceived as part of Phase II of the e-Courts project, a Centrally Sponsored Scheme designed to modernize the Indian judiciary.
    • Collaborative Effort: The National Informatics Centre (NIC) collaborated closely with the in-house software development team of the Computer Cell at the Supreme Court to bring NJDG to fruition.
    • User-Friendly Interface: NJDG boasts an interactive interface and an analytics dashboard, ensuring accessibility for legal professionals and the general public.

    The Power of Data

    • Monitoring and Management: NJDG serves as a potent tool for monitoring and managing case backlogs, ultimately alleviating the burden of pending cases.
    • Supreme Court’s Example: Analyzing data from the Supreme Court in 2023, it reveals a total pendency of 64,854 registered cases, with 5,412 new cases received and 5,033 cases disposed of in the last month. This underscores that the backlog primarily consists of legacy cases, managed at a rate comparable to the annual influx of new cases.
    • Identifying Bottlenecks: NJDG aids in identifying specific bottlenecks in the judicial process. For instance, a surge in land dispute cases in a particular state prompts policymakers to consider strengthening relevant laws.
    • Insights from the Chief Justice: Chief Justice Chandrachud noted that year-wise pendency data indicates the Supreme Court has less than a hundred cases pending from before 2000, allowing the Chief Justice to prioritize the resolution of the oldest cases.
    • Specialized Insights: NJDG also facilitates the generation of insights into specific areas of law. For instance, it links Land Records data from 26 States with NJDG to track land dispute cases effectively.

  • Establishment of GST Appellate Tribunals across India

    Central Idea

    • The Finance Ministry has formally established 31 Appellate Tribunals spanning 28 States and eight Union Territories for the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
    • This significant move aims to address the increasing number of taxpayer disputes with the Revenue Department.

    What is GST Appellate Tribunal?

    • The GST Appellate Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body proposed to be established to resolve disputes related to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India.
    • It will function as an independent body to hear appeals against orders passed by the GST authorities or the Appellate Authority.
    • The tribunal will be composed of a national bench and various regional benches, headed by a chairperson appointed by the central government.
    • The proposed tribunal is expected to help expedite the resolution of disputes related to GST and reduce the burden on the judiciary.

    Under GST, if a person is not satisfied with the decision passed by any lower court, an appeal can be raised to a higher court, the hierarchy for the same is as follows (from low to high):

    1. Adjudicating Authority
    2. Appellate Authority
    3. Appellate Tribunal
    4. High Court
    5. Supreme Court

    Need for such Tribunal

    • Unburden judiciary: GST Appellate Tribunal will help resolve the rising number of disputes under the 68-month-old indirect tax regime that are now clogging High Courts and other judicial fora.
    • Improve efficiency of GST System: Overall, the establishment of the GST Appellate Tribunal is expected to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the GST system in India.
    • Independent mechanism: The proposed Tribunal will provide an independent and efficient mechanism for resolving disputes related to GST.
    • Avoid tax evasion: It will help to expedite the resolution of disputes, reduce the burden on the judiciary, and promote greater certainty and predictability in the GST system.

    Issues with present litigation

    • Compliance issues: The GST system is relatively new in India, having been implemented in 2017, and there have been several issues with compliance and interpretation of rules and regulations.
    • Complex adjudication hierarchy: The current dispute resolution mechanism involves multiple layers of adjudication, starting with the GST officer and as mentioned above.
    • Time consuming process: This process can be time-consuming, costly, and burdensome for taxpayers, especially small and medium-sized enterprises.

    Significance

    • The creation of these tribunals had been in the pipeline since the implementation of the GST regime on July 1, 2017.
    • The number of pending appeals by taxpayers related to central GST levies had surged to over 14,000 (June 2023).

  • M Visvesvaraya: India’s pioneering Civil Engineer

    Visvesvaraya

    Central Idea

    • September 15 marks the birthday of Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya (1861-1962), celebrated for his pivotal role as a civil engineer and administrator during colonial India.

    About M. Visvesvaraya

    • Early life: Born on September 15, 1861, in the village of Muddenahalli, Karnataka, Visvesvaraya commenced his educational journey in his hometown.
    • Academic Pursuits: He pursued a Bachelor of Arts degree at the University of Madras and later embarked on a diploma course in civil engineering at the College of Science in Pune.

    Career Achievements

    • Engineering Pioneer: After completing his engineering studies at Poona College of Science, Visvesvaraya commenced his career as an Assistant Engineer in the Public Works Department (PWD) of the Government of Bombay at the age of 22.
    • Notable Projects: Among his initial projects was the construction of a pipe syphon across one of Panjra river’s channels.
    • Dewan of Mysore: In 1909, he assumed the role of Chief Engineer in the Mysore service, eventually becoming the 19th Dewan of Mysore.
    • Voluntary Retirement: In 1918, Visvesvaraya took voluntary retirement due to his disagreement with the proposal to allocate state jobs based on caste.
    • Committees and Contributions: Following retirement, he chaired or participated in various committees, including the Bombay Technical and Industrial Education Committee, Bombay University Committee for Promoting Chemical Industries, and the Cauvery Canal Committee.

    Significant Works

    • Block System of Irrigation: In 1899, he introduced the block system of irrigation in the Deccan canals, enhancing the equitable distribution of irrigation benefits among numerous villages.
    • Water Quality Improvement: Visvesvaraya tackled the issue of “muddy and discolored” water in Sukkur, a city on the banks of the Indus River.
    • Invention of Automatic Gates: He invented automatic gates for regulating water flow in reservoirs, securing a patent for this innovation.
    • Implementation at Krishnaraja Sagar Dam: The Krishnaraja Sagar Dam in Karnataka became the first to adopt these gates in the 1920s.

    Global Perspective

    • International Learning: Visvesvaraya travelled abroad to study various aspects of other countries’ systems. During a visit to Italy, he examined soil erosion problems and irrigation and drainage works.
    • Advocating for Indian Contributions: He challenged the perception that only British officers were capable of overseeing advanced engineering works, emphasizing that Indian expertise was valuable when supported by qualifications and dedication.

    Vision for Progress

    • Inspirational Speech: In a speech delivered on March 16, 1912, at Central College Bangalore, Visvesvaraya emphasized the need for India to adopt modern practices, scientific precision, inventiveness, discipline, and economic fundamentals for progress.
    • Promoting Self-Examination: He encouraged a secular self-examination, comparing local conditions in India with global counterparts.
    • Authorship: Visvesvaraya authored two influential books, “Reconstructing India” (1920) and “Planned Economy of India” (1934).

    Impact on Education

    • Education as a Catalyst: Visvesvaraya recognized the critical role of education in shaping an economy during his visit to Japan in 1898.
    • Founding the University of Mysore: As the Dewan of Mysore in 1916, he played a pivotal role in establishing the University of Mysore, emphasizing that educational institutions should mirror real-life conditions.

  • Why Dominant Caste are Demanding Reservation in India?

    maratha quota

    Central Idea

    • A Maratha activist has been on a 17-day hunger strike demanding reservation for the Maratha community in jobs and education.
    • The demand for a Maratha quota is expected to gain momentum as Lok Sabha and Assembly elections approach.

    Historical Context of Maratha Reservation Demand

    • Maratha Background: The Marathas, historically identified as a “warrior” caste, comprise mainly peasant and landowning groups, constituting nearly one-third of Maharashtra’s population. They have been a politically dominant community in the state.
    • Demand for Reservation: The demand for Maratha reservation dates back to the early 1980s when Mathadi Labour Union leader Annasaheb Patil led the first protest rally in Mumbai.

    Recent Developments

    • OBC Status: The Marathas seek to be identified as Kunbis (Farmers), which would entitle them to benefits under the quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs). This demand arose after the Supreme Court, in May 2021, struck down the quota for Marathas under the state’s Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) Act, 2018.
    • Bombay High Court Decision: In June 2019, the Bombay High Court upheld the Maratha quota under the SEBC Act but reduced it to 12% in education and 13% in government jobs, in compliance with the 50% reservation limit set by the court.
    • Supreme Court Ruling: In May 2021, the Supreme Court declared the Maharashtra law providing reservation to Marathas unconstitutional, citing it breached the 50% reservation cap set in the Indra Sawhney (Mandal) judgment of 1992.
    • Impact on EWS Quota: Following the SC’s decision on the 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), the Maharashtra government stated that poor Marathas could not benefit from the EWS quota until the Maratha reservation issue was resolved.
    • Government Response: In response to protests and clashes, the government issued a Government Resolution (GR) promising Kunbi caste certificates to certain Maratha community members and referred to an older GR from 2004 pledging reservation for eligible Maratha-Kunbis and Kunbi-Marathas.

    OBC Opposition to Maratha Demand

    • OBC Organizations: OBC organizations have opposed the Maratha demand for OBC reservations due to quota shrink. They argue that Marathas, as a dominant community, should not share the OBC quota, which is already limited in Maharashtra compared to the national quota.
    • Reservation Distribution: Currently, reservations in the state are divided among various categories, including Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, OBCs, Special Backward Classes, and others.

    Political Impact

    • Polarization: The Maratha reservation issue has led to a sharp Maratha-OBC polarization in politics. Traditionally, Marathas leaned towards the Congress and NCP, while the BJP and Shiv Sena garnered OBC support.
    • Changing Dynamics: Recent political developments, including splits within parties and alliances, have complicated the political landscape, making the issue even more complex.

    Conclusion

    • The Maratha reservation issue remains a highly contentious and politically charged topic in Maharashtra, with implications for both social and political dynamics in the state.

  • Monoclonal Antibody

    Central Idea

    • India has reached out to Australia in its efforts to procure monoclonal antibody doses for combating the Nipah virus outbreak in Kerala.
    • The monoclonal antibody has successfully passed phase-one trials and has been administered to 14 individuals globally.

    Why use it for Nipah?

    • Currently, there is no effective treatment for Nipah virus infection apart from symptom relief.
    • The virus carries a high mortality rate ranging from 40% to 75%, making it a formidable threat.
    • In comparison, even during the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the case fatality ratio (CFR) remained at around three percent.

    What are Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs)?

    • Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a class of therapeutic proteins that have revolutionized medicine and healthcare.
    • They are used in a wide range of applications, from treating diseases to diagnosing conditions and conducting scientific research.

    Structure of mAbs

    • Monoclonal antibodies are proteins produced by a single type of immune cell, known as a B cell.
    • They are called “monoclonal” because they are derived from a single, cloned parent cell.
    • These antibodies have a specific Y-shaped structure consisting of two identical heavy chains and two identical light chains.
    • The variable region of the antibody binds to a specific antigen with high precision.

    Applications of Monoclonal Antibodies

    • Monoclonal antibodies have a wide range of applications in medicine, science, and diagnostics:
    • MAbs are used to treat various diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases, and more.
    • They are used in diagnostic tests, such as ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), to detect specific molecules like antigens or antibodies.
    • Scientists use mAbs to study and manipulate biological processes. They can be labeled with fluorescent markers for imaging and are crucial tools in cell biology and molecular biology research.
    • Monoclonal antibodies labelled with radioactive isotopes or fluorescent markers can be used for diagnostic imaging techniques like PET (positron emission tomography) scans.
    • They can target specific molecules on cancer cells, minimizing damage to healthy cells during cancer treatment.

    Challenges and Advancements

    • Despite their significant benefits, monoclonal antibodies can have limitations, such as high production costs and the potential for immune responses.
    • Advances in technology, such as the development of humanized antibodies (antibodies with human components to reduce immune reactions), have addressed some of these challenges.

  • USCIRF to hold hearing on Religious Freedom in India

    Central Idea

    • The US Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has announced that it will hold a hearing on religious freedom in India on September 20.
    • India has previously rejected USCIRF reports that alleged violations of religious freedom in the country.

    What is the USCIRF Report?

    • The USCIRF report assesses the status of religious freedom around the world.
    • It provides a comprehensive analysis of the state of religious freedom in countries across the globe, highlighting issues of concern and making recommendations for action by the US government.
    • The report is an important tool for raising awareness of violations of religious freedom and advocating for greater protection of this fundamental human right.

    Allegations against India

    (1) Policies

    • It is alleged that the Indian government at the national, state, and local levels promoted and enforced religiously discriminatory policies, including:
    1. Laws targeting religious conversion
    2. Interfaith relationships
    3. Ban over wearing of hijabs and cow slaughter
    • This has negatively impacted Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Dalits, and Adivasis.

    (2) Laws of Suppression

    • The report also alleges that the national government continued to suppress critical voices, particularly of religious minorities and those advocating on their behalf through-
    1. Surveillance / Harassment / Cow Vigilantism
    2. Accusation of Sedition
    3. Demolition of Property
    4. Detention under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA)
    5. Targeted banning of NGOs ex. Missionaries of Charity under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA)
    6. Constitution

    India’s response

    • India has slammed USCIRF for “misrepresenting” facts and described it as an “organisation of particular concern”.
    • The Indian government rejected the biased and inaccurate comments.
    • The Foundation of Indian and Indian Diaspora Studies (FIIDS) slammed USCIRF for its biased report and failure to acknowledge the cultural and economic significance of cows to Indians.

    Why such reports often falsely target India?

    • Lack of objectivity: There have been instances in the past where these reports have been criticized for being one-sided and lacking objectivity.
    • US lobby against everyone: It is important to note that reports like USCIRF’s are based on the organization’s own assessments.
    • Inherent bias against India: Such allegations are prevalent ever since India attained its Freedom.
    • Self-proclaimed father of democracy: US has infamous for selectively promoting democracy and human rights, and for supporting authoritarian regimes that align with its strategic interests.
    • Anti-regime: Such reports often overlook the efforts made by the present regime in India towards promoting religious tolerance and communal harmony.

    Way forward

    • Urgent action: India needs to take prompt and necessary steps to address religious freedom issues and take everyone’s faith in the government and democratic process.
    • Nuanced understanding: International organizations and foreign governments must make a conscious effort to understand the complexities of India’s social, political, and economic landscape before making any recommendations or issuing reports.
    • Avoid sweeping generalizations: It is important to avoid sweeping generalizations and presenting a one-sided view of the situation, which can be detrimental to India’s reputation and lead to misunderstandings.
    • Self-reflection by the US: The US must address its own issues related to religious freedom and human rights violations, and not just sermon other countries.

    Conclusion

    • India’s historical diversity and pluralism: India has a long history of diversity, pluralism, and peaceful coexistence among different communities.
    • Constitutional guarantees: The Constitution guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens, regardless of their religion, caste, or creed.
    • Media as a strong pillar: The country has a vibrant democracy and a free and independent media that regularly scrutinizes the government and its policies. This eliminates the scope for anyone’s oppression.
    • Nation-building: All communities have contributed significantly to the country’s cultural and social fabric. Success of India is often unwelcomed by the US. People should not fall prey to foreign propaganda.

  • Relevance of Constitution Benches in the Supreme Court

    Constitution Bench

    Central Idea

    • CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, took a moment to address a lawyer’s misconceptions regarding the purpose of Constitution Benches in the Supreme Court.

    What is a Constitution Bench?

    • The constitution bench is the name given to the benches of the Supreme Court of India.
    • The Chief Justice of India has the power to constitute a Constitution Bench and refer cases to it.

    Constitution benches are set up when the following circumstances exist:

    1. Interpretation of the Constitution: Article 145(3) provides for the constitution of at least five judges of the court which sit to decide any case “involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation” of the Constitution of India.
    2. President of India seeking SC’s opinion: When the President has sought the Supreme Court’s opinion on a question of fact or law under Article 143 of the Constitution. Article 143 of the Constitution provides for Advisory jurisdiction to the SC. As per the provision, the President has the power to address questions to the apex Court, which he deems important for public welfare.
    3. Conflicting Judgments: When two or more three-judge benches of the Supreme Court have delivered conflicting judgments on the same point of law, necessitating a definite understanding and interpretation of the law by a larger bench.
    • The Constitution benches are set up on ad hoc basis as and when the above-mentioned conditions exist.
    • Constitution benches have decided many of India’s best-known and most important Supreme Court cases, such as:
    1. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, 1950 (Preventive detention)
    2. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India, 1972 (OBC reservations) etc.
    3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, 1973 (Basic structure doctrine) and

    Critique and Response

    • A Lawyer’s Concern: A litigant had expressed concerns in a letter to the top court’s Secretary General, suggesting that the court was investing excessive time in Constitution Bench cases, neglecting public interest petitions that directly impact common individuals.
    • Court’s Defense: CJI challenged this notion, emphasizing that not all Constitution Bench cases revolve around the interpretation of the Constitution.
    • Examples Matter: He provided an example of a recent Constitution Bench case concerning whether a person holding a light motor vehicle license can operate a commercial vehicle. This directly affects the livelihood of countless drivers across the nation.

    CJI Dispelling Misconceptions

    • Not Just “Fancy” Matters: CJI clarified that the Supreme Court doesn’t convene Constitution Benches solely for matters detached from the everyday concerns of ordinary citizens.
    • Voice of the Nation: He highlighted instances like the Article 370 abrogation challenge, where the court engaged with the “voice of the nation.” Stakeholders from the Valley actively participated in extensive hearings.

    Arguments against such hearings

    • People’s Perspective: The Advocate clarified that his objection wasn’t against the court hearing Constitution Bench matters but rather the court’s engagement in public policy issues without adequate public input.
    • Court’s Response: CJI countered this argument, citing the Article 370 case as an example where groups of individual interveners from the Valley actively presented their perspectives to the court.

    Conclusion

    • Balancing Act: CJI’s remarks underscore the delicate balance between addressing constitutional matters and matters of public interest, highlighting that both have their place in the Supreme Court’s agenda.
    • Inclusive Justice: The exchange between the Chief Justice and the lawyer reflects the importance of ensuring that the court’s decisions consider the perspectives and concerns of the broader public, especially in cases with significant societal impact.

  • India vs Bharat Debate

    India

    What’s the news?

    • The recent official invitation from Rashtrapati Bhavan referring to the President of India as the President of Bharat has ignited a fervent debate and raised questions about the country’s official nomenclature.

    Central idea

    • The controversy arises from the use of the term President of Bharat in the official invitation sent out by Rashtrapati Bhavan. Constitutionally, there is no provision for a president of Bharat. This seemingly innocuous change has triggered a larger conversation about the nation’s identity, politics, and historical context.

    Historical Context

    • Constituent Assembly Debates:
      • During the Constituent Assembly’s deliberations for the Indian Constitution, the question of the country’s official name arose.
      • Diverse opinions were expressed regarding whether to adopt Bharat or India as the preferred name.
    • Preference for Bharat:
      • Some constituent assembly members favored Bharat as the official name.
      • They cited its deep-rooted historical and cultural significance, drawing from ancient Indian texts and traditions.
    • Preference for India:
      • Conversely, other assembly members leaned toward retaining ‘India’ as the official name.
      • They argued that India was a name already recognized internationally, particularly during the colonial era.
    • B.R. Ambedkar’s Compromise:
      • To reconcile these differing views, B.R. Ambedkar, the chairperson of the drafting committee, introduced a compromise.
      • He proposed the inclusion of Bharat in Article 1 of the Constitution to accommodate both names.
    • Intent of the Compromise:
      • The compromise aimed to respect the historical and cultural significance of ‘Bharat’ while preserving the international recognition of India.
      • It sought to acknowledge linguistic diversity and cultural heritage within the constitutional framework.

    Constitutional Perspective

    • Official Nomenclature: President of India: Article 52 of the Indian Constitution clearly states that there shall be a President of India. This is the official nomenclature of the head of state as established by the Constitution.
    • Article 1 of the Constitution: Article 1 of the Constitution reads, India, that is, Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
    • Hindi Translation Clarification: The word Bharat is used in the Hindi translation of the Constitution, but it does not appear as an independent word in the original Constitution in languages other than Hindi.
    • Clarificatory Phrase That is:
      • The phrase that is in Article 1 is considered clarificatory, explaining or further clarifying the preceding word, India.
      • Therefore, the interpretation is that Article 1 signifies that India, known as Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
    • Translation as a Clarification:
      • Article 394A (2) emphasizes that the translation of the Constitution is meant to have the same meaning as the original.
      • This reinforces the point that Bharat is a translation of ‘India’ in the Hindi version, and India is the authentic name of the country unless changed through a legal process.

    The potential ramifications of renaming India Bharat

    • International Confusion: The use of Bharat alongside India in official communications may cause confusion in international diplomacy, trade agreements, and diplomatic relations as foreign governments and entities may encounter varying references.
    • Legal Implications: Changing the country’s name could require the revision of existing laws, treaties, and agreements to accommodate the new name, potentially leading to complex legal challenges.
    • Administrative Challenges: Renaming entails substantial administrative efforts, including updating official documents, government websites, passports, currency, and various bureaucratic aspects. This can result in logistical challenges and significant costs.
    • Cultural and Historical Significance: India has deep cultural and historical significance, and changing it may disrupt these connections and create a sense of alienation among certain sections of the population.
    • Unity and Inclusivity: Renaming should consider the sentiments of diverse communities within the country to maintain national unity and inclusivity. A hasty or unilateral decision could create divisions.
    • Global Reputation: A country’s global reputation is closely linked to its name. Changing it can impact how the world perceives and interacts with the nation, potentially requiring time to establish a new global identity.
    • Economic Impact: The renaming process can have economic consequences, including rebranding costs for businesses, potential disruptions in trade, and impacts on tourism and foreign investments.

    Arguments Against the Rename

    • Confusion in Official Communication: The potential for confusion arises if Bharat is used interchangeably with ‘India’ in official communication. Maintaining a single, consistent name is essential for clear diplomatic relations and international agreements.
    • Official Name: Republic of India: The official name of the country is the Republic of India in official communication with foreign countries and international bodies. Using Bharat alongside India could lead to inconsistency and misunderstanding in international dealings.
    • Foreign Government Confusion: Foreign governments might be perplexed if India is referred to differently in various agreements, sometimes as the Republic of India and sometimes as the Republic of Bharat.

    Way forward

    • Constitutional Clarity: Ensure any change in the official name of the country follows a formal constitutional amendment process. This requires an amendment to Article 1, which currently defines the country as India, that is, Bharat, which shall be a Union of States.
    • Historical Context: Take into account the historical context and significance of the name India in the country’s identity. Recognize that India has historical continuity and international recognition.
    • Linguistic Consistency: Recognize linguistic diversity within India while maintaining consistency across different languages and scripts used within the country. Bharat is primarily used in the Hindi version of the Constitution.
    • International Relations: Consider the potential implications for India’s international relations and reputation. Maintain a single, consistent name in official communication with foreign countries and international bodies to avoid confusion and maintain diplomatic clarity.
    • Public Sentiment: Engage with the public and seek their input and feedback on this significant decision. Public sentiment and consensus should be considered in any decision to change the official name.
    • Historical Symbolism: Acknowledge that renaming may carry broader symbolism beyond a linguistic change. Addressing issues related to colonial symbols and administrative structures should be part of a comprehensive approach.
    • Legislative Process: Follow the legislative process outlined in the Indian Constitution for any changes to the country’s name, ensuring transparency and adherence to constitutional principles.

    Conclusion

    • The controversy surrounding the use of Bharat in official communication requires constitutional clarity and consensus-building. In the spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, it is essential to ensure that any changes reflect the unity and inclusivity that India stands for.