💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Type: Explained

These Newscards correspond to the explained section of various newspapers. They become immensely important for both prelims and mains and special attention needs to be paid to them

  • On interest rates, can’t be both dovish & hawkish

    Why in the News

    The Monetary Policy Committee of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) voted unanimously at its last meeting to hold the benchmark repo rate at 5.25 per cent, in a policy read as more dovish than expected. The minutes of that same meeting, released a few days ago, point the other way. Members drawn from the central bank displayed a distinct hawkishness, and the Bank’s own inflation projections imply negative real interest rates on a forward basis. The divergence is the problem: a stance described as neutral cannot be reconciled with projections that would stimulate activity, nor with a growth assessment the Bank itself calls resilient.

    What is a monetary policy stance?

    1. What it signals: The stance states the direction of the committee’s next expected move on the policy rate. That signal is separate from the rate set on the day.
    2. Accommodative: The committee signals that the next move is a cut, or that liquidity will stay supportive of demand.
    3. Neutral: The committee commits to no direction and keeps both a cut and a hike open at the following meeting.
    4. Tightening or withdrawal of accommodation: The committee signals that the next move is a hike, or the removal of surplus liquidity from the system.

    What is the real interest rate?

    1. Definition: The real interest rate is the nominal policy rate less expected inflation, so it measures what a lender actually earns once prices have risen.
    2. Why the sign matters: A negative real rate makes money cheaper than the rate at which prices are rising, which pushes households and firms toward borrowing and spending.

    What did the last policy decision signal?

    1. The stance retained: The committee kept the stance neutral alongside that hold.
    2. The tone: The policy read as more dovish than many analysts had expected at the time.
    3. The inference drawn: Analysts concluded that rate hikes were not imminent, even with inflation projected above target.

    How do the minutes of the same meeting read differently?

    1. A reversal in signal: The minutes suggest the current situation is unlikely to be maintained over the near term, and the divergence from the policy statement is striking.
    2. The internal members hardened: That hawkishness came from the members drawn from the central bank, not from the committee as a whole.
    3. How far each went: An assessment by economists at the State Bank of India reads the Governor’s minutes statement as showing an inclination toward policy tightening, records a Deputy Governor calling for a possible rate hike later in the year, and notes an Executive Director stopping just short of the same call.
    4. A different objection from outside: External members of the committee drew attention instead to the real interest rate.

    Can a neutral stance sit with negative real interest rates?

    1. The projections: The Bank has pegged inflation at 5.9 per cent in the third quarter, 5.5 per cent in the fourth quarter, and 5.3 per cent in the first quarter of the next financial year.
    2. What they imply: Against a repo rate of 5.25 per cent, those projections put real interest rates in negative territory on a forward basis.
    3. What negative real rates do: They stimulate economic activity, which is a different setting from the stance the committee has adopted.
    4. What neutral is supposed to mean: The Governor has previously stated that a neutral stance implies no support for economic activity and no support for controlling inflation.
    5. The growth assessment compounds it: The Bank describes growth as resilient, supported by domestic demand, sustained expansion in manufacturing and services activity, and robust exports, which removes the case for a stimulative real rate.

    What does the same uncertainty look like at other central banks?

    1. A shared condition: Central banks across the world are grappling with uncertainty over inflation and over the course of monetary policy.
    2. The United States: The Federal Reserve maintained interest rates in July, and the path of policy after that remains unclear.
    3. The same gap between decision and minutes: The minutes of that Federal Reserve meeting record that several participants favoured an increase of 25 basis points in the target range.

    What will decide the next move?

    1. The October meeting: By the time the committee meets next in October, there should be more clarity on agriculture and on the trajectory of inflation.
    2. The projections as the signal: The Bank’s revised inflation projections will show what it expects of underlying price pressures going forward.
    3. The consequence: Those expectations are what would produce an adjustment in the policy rate.

    Challenges to India’s flexible inflation targeting framework

    1. A headline target moved by food: Food and beverages carry close to half the weight in the Consumer Price Index, so the target responds to harvests that no policy rate can influence. Eg. Vegetable price spikes pushed headline inflation above the upper tolerance band in 2023 and 2024. Core inflation stayed subdued through the same period. Fix. Publish an explicit core inflation reference alongside the headline target, so the committee’s tolerance for supply shocks is visible in advance.
    2. An ageing consumption basket: The index in use rests on a consumption pattern captured years ago, so the measured basket drifts from what households actually buy. Eg. Services such as data, health insurance and education are underweighted relative to current household spending. Fix. Fix a statutory revision cycle for the index base year so the measure and the target are reset together.
    3. Exchange rate pressure competes with the target: Rate decisions taken for domestic prices collide with the management of capital flows. Eg. Record foreign portfolio outflows in 2025-26 forced heavy intervention to steady the rupee. Fix. State an explicit order of priority between the inflation target and exchange rate smoothing in the policy statement.
    4. No fiscal counterpart to the target: The framework binds the central bank alone, with no matching commitment on borrowing. Eg. Heavy government borrowing keeps longer tenor yields elevated regardless of where the repo rate is set. Fix. Pair each five year target reset with a stated debt to gross domestic product path under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003.
    5. Accountability stops at a report: A sustained breach obliges a report and nothing further. Eg. The report on a target breach goes to the Central Government and is not laid before Parliament. Fix. Require the report to be tabled in Parliament with a stated corrective path and a review date.

    Conclusion

    A unanimous hold read as dovish now sits alongside minutes that record internal calls for tightening and projections that imply negative real rates. The policy statement, the stance and the projections are describing three different settings, and only one of them can be the policy. The October meeting, with clearer information on agriculture and on the inflation trajectory, is where that inconsistency has to be resolved into either a rate move or a change of stance.

    “[2023] Consider the following statements :

    Statement-I: In the post-pandemic recent past, many Central Banks worldwide had carried out interest rate hikes.

    Statement-II: Central Banks generally assume that they have the ability to counteract the rising consumer prices via monetary policy means.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

    (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

    (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

    (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

  • Keep UPI free. Fund it from the savings it generates

    Why in the News

    Parliament has passed the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, rewriting Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. That section barred any charge on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and RuPay transactions. The amendment replaces the bar with an enabling provision, letting the government notify in future which payment modes may carry a charge. No charge is imposed today. The tension is that the cost of running UPI is real and the state’s compensating outlay is shrinking. The only fee instrument available for recovering that cost would be levied on the smallest transactions in the economy.

    What is the Merchant Discount Rate?

    1. Definition: The Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) is the percentage of a transaction value that a merchant pays for accepting a digital payment, deducted before the money reaches the merchant’s account.
    2. Card world origin: It is an inheritance from card payments, with the card issuer, the acquiring bank and the network each taking a slice. A physical card, a terminal and credit default risk give the fee something real to recover.

    What has the amendment to Section 10A actually changed?

    1. From prohibition to permission: A statutory bar on charging has been converted into a discretionary power to allow charging on notified modes.
    2. The trigger moves to the executive: Imposing a charge no longer needs Parliament, only a notification.
    3. The status quo is unchanged today: No charge has been imposed on any mode as of the amendment.
    4. Why it still matters: A right protected by statute and a right held at executive discretion are different guarantees for a merchant deciding whether to accept digital payment.

    What has UPI become?

    1. Volume and value: In 2025-26 UPI carried over 24,000 crore transactions, roughly 66 crore a day, worth about ₹314 lakh crore.
    2. Share: It accounts for some 85 per cent of India’s digital retail payments and nearly half of the world’s real time payments.
    3. Ticket size: The average transaction is about ₹1,300, and 86 per cent of merchant payments are below ₹500.
    4. Who transacts: Payments at that size are made to the vegetable seller, the auto driver and the kirana shop, so a charge is a levy on the smallest transactions of the poorest rather than on commerce in the abstract.
    5. What was achieved: No other country has made real time digital payment free, instant and universal, and the transition pulled hundreds of millions of Indians into the formal economy.

    Why is UPI treated as public infrastructure rather than a company’s product?

    1. Most used digital public good: After Aadhaar gave every Indian a digital identity, UPI is the most visible piece of digital public infrastructure, and the citizen reaches for it many times a day rather than once.
    2. A protocol, not a platform: It is an open, protocol based public good, a shared language for money instead of any single firm’s product.
    3. What the protocol did to banking: Before UPI each bank ran its own closed application. UPI asked banks only to open their programming interfaces to a shared protocol, so any application can move money between any two accounts at any two banks.
    4. External validation: The model is being studied and adopted by other countries.

    Why is the Merchant Discount Rate the wrong instrument for UPI?

    1. The recoverable costs do not exist: The point of sale machine is the customer’s own phone, running on data he has already paid for. There is no card, no terminal, no credit risk, and settlement is instant.
    2. The work done test: Telecom interconnection regulation pays a network only for the work it actually performs, and the same test applies to a payment rail.
    3. The work actually performed: When A pays B, A’s bank makes a debit entry, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) issues a settlement instruction, and B’s bank makes a credit entry. No cash moves at any point.
    4. What that work costs: NPCI runs the entire switch for about ₹500 crore a year, which is some two paise a transaction.

    The funding gap is real even where the fee is wrong

    1. Providers earn nothing directly: Banks and payment providers bear real costs, and under zero MDR they receive nothing from a UPI transaction itself.
    2. The bridge is being withdrawn: The government has covered the gap with an incentive, and the outlay is projected to fall to about ₹437 crore from about ₹3,631 crore two years ago.
    3. Traffic is moving the other way: The volume the incentive supports is multiplying and the incentive itself is shrinking. The shortfall widens each year without any policy decision being taken.

    Who actually captures the savings digitisation creates?

    1. Currency printing: The Reserve Bank spends some ₹5,000 crore to ₹6,400 crore a year merely printing currency notes, which is more than the government spends keeping UPI free, before storage and movement of cash is counted.
    2. Channel cost at the bank: A counter transaction costs a bank ₹40 to ₹50 and an automated teller machine (ATM) withdrawal costs ₹19 in interchange alone. A UPI transaction costs a small fraction of either.
    3. The float: By making an account as usable as cash, UPI keeps money in accounts rather than idle in pockets, and that low cost float is what banks earn a spread on and lend against.
    4. The mismatch: The beneficiary of digitisation is the state and the bank, and the party a merchant fee would tax is the merchant, so the instrument does not follow the benefit.

    What would a Merchant Discount Rate cost the transition?

    1. Price sensitivity: India is intensely price sensitive, and a digital payment costing even a rupee more than cash sends many users back to cash.
    2. Pass through at the counter: A merchant charged MDR passes it on as a stated surcharge for digital, or refuses digital payment altogether.
    3. Scale of the extraction: Even 0.3 per cent on merchant payments would take some ₹27,000 crore a year out of a thin margin retail economy.
    4. Reversal risk: Telling a hundred crore users that what was always free now costs money is the surest way to slow, and even reverse, a transition still forming, collecting a little and losing a great deal.
    5. A large merchant carve out will not hold: Confining the charge to large merchants offers no lasting protection, because thresholds slip and definitions widen.

    What funding model could cover the cost without charging the user?

    1. Return a share of the savings: The state, as steward of the public good and no longer obliged to print and move the cash UPI displaces, should return a small, defined share of its savings to those who run the rails.
    2. Formula, not discretion: The support should be transparent and formula based, funded specifically from savings in currency management.
    3. Not a subsidy: It is payment for value delivered, on the same principle by which the state pays a transmission company to carry electricity.
    4. The price stays off the citizen: The design keeps the charge out of sight of the user, so no price tag ever appears in front of the person paying.

    Challenges to keeping UPI free

    1. The support is a Budget line, not an entitlement: An annual allocation can be cut without any change in law, so the guarantee is only as durable as one fiscal year. Eg. The incentive allocation has been cut sharply across two consecutive Budgets. Fix. Convert the support into a formula linked to measured currency management savings, so the amount tracks the service rather than the fiscal cycle.
    2. Two applications carry most of the volume: Concentration lets a handful of private applications set the terms of access for banks and merchants. Eg. Two private applications account for roughly 80 per cent of UPI volume, and the market share cap on them has been deferred repeatedly. Fix. Fund interoperable merchant acquisition through smaller banks and the Bharat Interface for Money application to widen the base.
    3. Charged rails already run beside the free ones: Credit products routed over the same interface carry a fee, so the free character of the system is already partial. Eg. From June 2026 a merchant discount rate applies to large value RuPay credit on UPI transactions. Fix. Publish a single schedule stating exactly which flows carry a charge, so a merchant sees the boundary before accepting a payment.
    4. Fraud losses sit outside the pricing debate: The system’s real cost includes reimbursing victims, which no fee structure currently funds. Eg. Digital payment fraud losses have crossed ₹22,000 crore. Fix. Build a lagged credit window for high risk first time transfers, so a fraudulent transfer can be reversed before withdrawal.
    5. Downtime carries no consequence: Bank side outages take users off the network at peak hours with no compensation obligation. Eg. Server downtime at major banks has repeatedly disrupted time sensitive payments. Fix. Set a published per bank uptime standard with penalties credited directly to affected users.

    Conclusion

    The statutory prohibition on charging for UPI is gone and the power to permit a charge now sits with the executive, even though no charge exists today. The cost of running the rails is genuine and the compensating outlay is falling, so the funding question cannot be deferred much longer. The unresolved choice is between recovering that cost from the merchant, which taxes the smallest transactions and risks reversing adoption, and recovering it from the currency management savings the state already books because UPI exists.

    “[2018] Which one of the following best describes the term “Merchant Discount Rate” sometimes seen in news?

    (a) The incentive given by a bank to a merchant for accepting payments through debit cards pertaining to that bank.

    (b) The amount paid back by banks to their customers when they use debit cards for financial transactions for purchasing goods or services.

    (c) The charge to a merchant by a bank for accepting payments from his customers through the bank’s debit cards.

    (d) The incentive given by the Government to merchants for promoting digital payments by their customers through Point of Sale (PoS) machines and debit cards.

  • SC trims law practice requirement to 1 year for judicial service

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court has upheld the requirement of prior legal practice for entry into the judicial service. The same order cuts the mandated experience from three years to one. The decision came on review petitions filed against All India Judges Association v. Union of India (May 2025). That judgment had reintroduced a minimum practice condition for candidates applying to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division), reversing an earlier position that allowed fresh law graduates to sit the examination. The present order was passed by a majority of 2:1 in a three judge Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India. What is contested is whether one year at the Bar can supply the courtroom exposure that the three year rule was designed to guarantee, or whether the shortfall has simply been shifted into training the judiciary itself will now have to deliver.

    What has the Court now ordered on eligibility for judicial service?

    1. The principle survives: Prior legal practice remains a precondition for applying to the judicial service, so the 2025 position that a law degree alone is insufficient is undisturbed.
    2. The quantum is cut by two thirds: The required period of active legal practice falls from three years to one year.
    3. The margin was narrow: The majority opinion was delivered by two judges of a three judge Bench, with the Chief Justice of India authoring it.
    4. The vehicle was a review: The order was passed on review petitions filed against the May 2025 verdict, so it revisits that judgment rather than deciding a fresh challenge.

    How is the shortened practice requirement compensated?

    1. A year at a judicial academy follows selection: A successful applicant carrying one year of legal practice undergoes a one year intensive training programme at the State judicial academy concerned.
    2. A clerkship year follows the academy: That training is followed by a final year of law clerkship with senior judicial officers and High Court judges.
    3. The total exposure is rebuilt to three years: One year of practice, one year of academy training and one year of clerkship together restore the three year period the 2025 judgment had demanded at the Bar alone.
    4. The locus of training shifts: Two of those three years are now delivered inside the judicial system rather than in independent practice.

    What happens to candidates who applied in the interregnum?

    1. A year has already elapsed: The majority noted that a full year has passed since the May 2025 judgment, during which recruitment continued under uncertainty.
    2. Interregnum applicants are deemed compliant: Candidates who applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in that period are treated as having completed the required one year of active legal practice.
    3. No proof will be demanded from them: They will not be asked to furnish certificates of proof of practice.
    4. The rule bites from a fixed date: The one year prior practice requirement comes into force in earnest from 1 April 2027.

    Does a one year requirement still deliver what Bar experience was meant to supply?

    1. The dissent rejects the reduction: One judge on the Bench dissented from the majority view on the shortened period.
    2. The stated ground is readiness: The dissenting opinion holds that experience at the Bar is essential for students coming straight out of college, which is an argument about courtroom judgement rather than about length of service.
    3. The majority’s answer is substitution, not agreement: The majority accepts that one year of practice is by itself insufficient, and supplies the balance through the two internal years set out above.
    4. The unresolved question is equivalence: Structured training gives uniform instruction, and practice gives exposure to litigants, adversarial pressure and case failure. The order does not establish that the two are interchangeable.

    Challenges to a prior practice requirement for judicial service

    1. It delays entry and shrinks the applicant pool: A compulsory year at the Bar pushes the earliest entry age up and deters graduates who cannot fund an unpaid year. Eg. Stipends for junior advocates in district courts frequently fall below minimum wage levels in the same district. Fix. Make the practice year count only where the candidate is paid a notified minimum stipend, funded through a Bar Council administered corpus.
    2. Proof of practice invites certification abuse: Practice is usually certified by a senior advocate or a judicial officer, which turns an eligibility condition into a patronage transaction. Eg. Certificates of practice have historically been contested in service litigation over district judiciary appointments. Fix. Replace discretionary certificates with an objective test of appearances recorded on the National Judicial Data Grid.
    3. It falls unevenly on first generation and women entrants: Candidates without family in the profession lack the chambers access that makes a practice year viable. Eg. Women have been the majority of successful candidates in several State judicial service examinations, a pattern that a mandatory chambers year puts at risk. Fix. Create funded court attachment schemes at every district court reserved for first generation law graduates.
    4. Vacancies are already the binding constraint: Adding a filter at entry slows recruitment into a cadre where roughly one fourth of sanctioned posts already lie vacant. Eg. Subordinate courts carry a pendency of about 49 million cases, with over 1.8 lakh cases pending for more than thirty years. Fix. Run recruitment cycles on a fixed annual calendar so the eligibility change does not compound the delay in filling posts.
    5. Training capacity has not been sized for the new load: The academy year now required of every recruit assumes faculty and residential capacity that most academies do not have. Eg. Several State judicial academies run induction courses of a few months rather than a full year. Fix. Fund academy expansion under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for judicial infrastructure before the rule takes effect in 2027.
    6. The reform addresses quality of entrants, not throughput: Better prepared judges do not by themselves raise disposal where procedure, adjournments and clerical load consume court time. Eg. The case clearance rate in subordinate courts stands at about 89 per cent, so pendency accumulates even with sitting judges at work. Fix. Appoint professional court managers at every district court complex to take administrative work off judicial officers.

    Conclusion

    The Court has retained the principle that a judicial officer should reach the bench with courtroom exposure. It conceded at the same time that a three year bar at the Bar was too heavy a filter for a cadre already short of judges. The compromise moves two of the three years inside the system, and defers the whole scheme so it applies in earnest from 1 April 2027. The next step is with the State High Courts and Public Service Commissions, which must align their service rules and academy capacity before that date.

    Subordinate judiciary in India

    1. Where it sits: The subordinate judiciary comprises the district and taluka level civil and criminal courts, and it is where the overwhelming majority of litigation begins and ends.
    2. The staffing position: India has roughly 21 judges per million people, against the Law Commission’s recommended benchmark of 50.
    3. Who controls it: The High Court of each State exercises administrative and disciplinary control over the subordinate courts within its jurisdiction.

    Constitutional framework governing the subordinate judiciary

    1. Article 233: Provides for the appointment of District Judges by the Governor in consultation with the High Court.
    2. Article 234: Governs the recruitment of persons other than District Judges to the judicial service, by the Governor in consultation with the State Public Service Commission and the High Court.
    3. Article 235: Vests administrative and disciplinary control over the subordinate judiciary in the High Court.
    4. Article 236: Defines “district judge” and “judicial service” for the purposes of this Chapter.
    5. Article 312: Empowers Parliament to create an All India Judicial Service on a Rajya Sabha resolution passed by a two thirds majority.

    Government initiatives for the subordinate judiciary

    1. eCourts Mission Mode Project, Phase III: Funds digitisation of case records, virtual courts and paperless court rooms across district judiciary establishments.
    2. Centrally Sponsored Scheme for Development of Infrastructure Facilities for the Judiciary: Finances court halls, residential units, lawyers’ halls and digital computer rooms at the district and subordinate level.
    3. Fast Track Special Courts: Dedicated courts set up to try offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and rape cases within statutory timelines.
    4. National Judicial Data Grid: A public dashboard publishing case pendency, disposal and age of cases for every district court, which makes court level performance comparable.

    Back2Basics: Civil Judge (Junior Division)

    1. The entry post: It is the lowest rung of the State judicial service and the post through which most judicial officers enter the district judiciary.
    2. How recruitment happens: Candidates are selected under Article 234 through an examination conducted by the State Public Service Commission or the High Court, in consultation with the High Court.
    3. What the court tries: A Civil Judge (Junior Division) exercises original civil jurisdiction up to a pecuniary limit fixed by State law, and the corresponding criminal post is Judicial Magistrate First Class.
    4. Career path: Promotion runs to Civil Judge (Senior Division) and then to the cadre of District Judge, with a share of District Judge posts filled by direct recruitment from the Bar.

    “[2025, GS2, 15 marks] Discuss the evolution of collegium system in India. Critically examine the advantages and disadvantages of the system on appointment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India and that of the USA.”

  • Modi-ism must evolve into institution-centred nation-building

    Modi-ism must evolve into institution-centred nation-building

    Why in the News

    The political and governing order built around the Prime Minister, given the name Modi-ism, is being tested against the constitutional settlement rather than only against its delivery record. The 2024 verdict returned the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) with 240 seats and made coalition partners necessary, which qualified a leader centred mandate without rejecting it.

    What is the governing order named Modi-ism?

    1. About: Modi-ism is the name given to the political and governing order built around the Prime Minister. It is a method of acquiring power, exercising authority and defining the nation.
    2. Named features: The order is built on eight elements: a commanding leader, a disciplined party organisation, civilisational assertion, centralised decision-making, technology-driven welfare, infrastructure-led development, high-energy national security and direct communication with citizens.
    3. Central promise: The promise is a strong leader, a purposeful state and a stronger India.

    What has the order actually delivered?

    1. Political transformation: The BJP moved from being a major national formation to the central axis of Indian politics. It expanded beyond its traditional geographical and social constituencies and made leadership itself the principal electoral proposition.
    2. The 2024 qualification: The BJP fell to 240 seats in 2024 and required its National Democratic Alliance (NDA) partners to form the government. The verdict chose continuity and restored the relevance of consultation, coalition and restraint.
    3. Delivery at scale: Infrastructure construction, digital public platforms, direct benefit transfers, financial inclusion, sanitation, housing, electrification and welfare delivery at scale strengthened the state’s capacity to reach citizens.
    4. Poverty measurement: NITI Aayog estimated multidimensional poverty at 11.28 per cent in 2022-23, against 29.17 per cent in 2013-14. The methodology is contested, the improvement in delivery is not.
    5. Political containment: The order contained the undue proliferation of regional politics to some degree.
    6. Source of appeal: The order speaks in the language of aspiration, national confidence and civilisational recovery. Citizens long frustrated by delay, indecision and fragmented authority respond to a government promising speed and scale.

    Why is effectiveness not a sufficient test of democratic government?

    1. The five charges: Critics allege that the order seeks to weaken pluralism, dilute socialism, replace rights with governmental charity, capture institutions and ultimately alter the Constitution.
    2. The counter position: Supporters dismiss these charges as partisan hostility or as resistance to India’s cultural resurgence. Both positions are too absolute, since constitutional character must be judged through the actual exercise of power rather than through slogans.
    3. Evidence against dismantling: Elections remain fiercely competitive, governments change in the States, Opposition parties govern substantial parts of the country, and courts continue to examine executive action and enforce fundamental rights.
    4. The Preamble ruling: In November 2024 the Supreme Court rejected petitions challenging the inclusion of the words socialist and secular in the Preamble.
    5. The real risk: A Constitution can be weakened without its words being formally deleted. Institutions may remain intact on paper as their independence, credibility and conventions erode.
    6. What sustains democracy: Democracy rests on five supports beyond periodic elections: restraints on power, respect for dissent, parliamentary accountability, federal balance and equal citizenship.

    What do the pluralism and socialism debates actually turn on?

    1. Pluralism: Religious freedom has not been legally abolished. Majoritarian mobilisation and inflammatory language make minorities feel conditionally accepted.
    2. The distinction drawn: Cultural nationalism is constitutionally legitimate. Cultural supremacy is not.
    3. Equal citizenship: The republic belongs without qualification to every citizen. Equal citizenship cannot depend on religion, political loyalty or conformity with a preferred account of national identity.
    4. What socialism does not mean: Constitutional socialism does not demand a return to the licence-permit raj, hostility to private enterprise or indiscriminate state ownership.
    5. What socialism does mean: It requires social and economic justice, equality of opportunity and protection against degrading deprivation.

    Why must welfare reach a citizen as a right rather than as a gift?

    1. The presentation problem: Statutory entitlements are politically presented as personal gifts from a leader. Food support, employment guarantees, housing, scholarships and social security are public obligations financed by citizens and delivered under law.
    2. The ordering principle: Rights-based governance must complement beneficiary politics rather than be displaced by it. A citizen must remain a rights-holder rather than a grateful beneficiary.
    3. What technology fixes: Technology reduces leakage and accelerates delivery.
    4. What technology creates: Citizens excluded by failed authentication, inaccurate databases or administrative discretion need accessible remedies.
    5. The four safeguards: Welfare requires enforceable standards, grievance redress, social audits and legislative scrutiny.

    What does the record on Parliament and appointments show?

    1. Speed of legislation: During the seventeenth Lok Sabha, 58 per cent of bills were passed within two weeks of introduction.
    2. Committee referral: Only 16 per cent of bills were referred to parliamentary committees.
    3. Budget scrutiny: Around 80 per cent of the Union Budget was voted without discussion between 2019 and 2023.
    4. Political funding: The Supreme Court decision striking down the electoral bond scheme established that secrecy in political funding had crossed a constitutional boundary.
    5. Election commissioner appointments: The law governing the appointment of election commissioners gives the executive a majority on the selection committee, which has raised concerns about perceived independence.
    6. The test for autonomy: Institutional autonomy depends on more than technical legality. It requires transparent appointments, procedural fairness and visible distance from partisan command, so independence is protected in public perception as well as in fact.

    What corrections would a shift to institution-centred nation-building require?

    1. Parliament: Parliament must recover serious deliberation, committee scrutiny and control over public expenditure.
    2. Federalism: Federal consultation must precede major decisions affecting the States.
    3. Appointments and agencies: Appointments to constitutional and regulatory bodies should command cross-party credibility. Investigative agencies must be demonstrably even-handed.
    4. Welfare and discourse: Welfare delivery must be joined to enforceable rights, and political discourse must replace habitual polarisation with constitutional fraternity.
    5. The next development phase: The eight stated goals are productive employment, competitive manufacturing, stronger small enterprises, higher farm incomes, quality public education, accessible healthcare, liveable cities and climate resilience.
    6. Party institutionalisation: No durable national party can remain indefinitely dependent on one personality. It needs empowered ministers, credible regional leaders, internal debate and an orderly culture of succession.

    Challenges to Institution-Centred Nation-Building

    1. Executive control of the legislative calendar: A ruling coalition can clear the chamber of dissent before a contested bill is taken up. Eg. In December 2023, 146 members were suspended across both Houses, the largest mass suspension since Independence, and the Telecommunications Bill, 2023 was passed with the near entire opposition absent.
    2. A vacant Deputy Speaker’s chair: Article 93 mandates the election of a Deputy Speaker, and the post has been left unfilled for years. Eg. The post lay vacant through the entire seventeenth Lok Sabha and into the eighteenth, so a member from the Speaker’s own panel of chairpersons presided over the no-confidence motion against the Speaker in March 2026.
    3. Discretionary gatekeeping on removal motions: Section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 uses the word may, so the presiding officer may refuse a removal motion even when the numerical threshold is met. Eg. In April 2026 a notice signed by 193 opposition members seeking removal of the Chief Election Commissioner was refused admission in both Houses without stated reasons.
    4. The Money Bill route: Certifying a bill as a Money Bill removes the Rajya Sabha’s power to amend it and places the certification beyond ordinary challenge. Eg. The Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 was passed as a Money Bill, and the correctness of that certification remains before a larger bench of the Supreme Court.
    5. Bypassed pre-legislative consultation: Draft legislation is often introduced without the public comment period the executive’s own policy prescribes. Eg. The Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy of 2014 requires draft bills to be placed in the public domain for thirty days, and this step is routinely skipped.
    6. Federal consultation deficit: Consultative federal forums exist on paper and meet rarely. Eg. The Inter-State Council, constituted under Article 263, met only once between 2016 and 2024.

    Conclusion

    Effectiveness alone cannot settle the constitutional character of a government, and a Constitution can be hollowed out without a word of its text being altered. The productive core of the order, decisive leadership, infrastructure, digital innovation, credible defence capability and measurable delivery, should continue. What must change is the shift from leader-centred mobilisation to institution-centred nation-building, carried by parliamentary deliberation, federal consultation, cross-party credibility in appointments and welfare delivered as enforceable right. The choice is between an order disciplined by the Constitution and one that seeks to rise above it.

  • How will Gaganyaan’s thermal shield protect the crew?

    Why in the News

    The Gaganyaan crew module will hit the atmosphere at 7,500 to 8,000 metres per second on return, with its exterior reaching 1,800 degrees Celsius while the structure must stay below 150 degrees Celsius. The shield chosen to hold that gap is a sacrificial ablative layer 30 to 35 millimetres thick, a choice driven by the mission’s single use design and India’s own re entry heritage rather than by peak performance.

    What is a thermal protection system?

    1. What it does: A thermal protection system is the outer layer that keeps a re entering vehicle’s structure and interior within survivable temperature while its exterior is exposed to the heat of atmospheric entry.
    2. Why it is needed: Almost all of the crew module’s kinetic energy is dissipated into the atmosphere as heat energy, and the small portion directed back towards the module is still intense enough to melt it.
    3. What it protects: It maintains the module’s structural integrity and keeps the interior within the temperature limit the structure and the crew can tolerate.
    4. How it is classified: Systems are grouped by how they remove heat, into ablative, radiative and heat sink types.

    What is heat flux?

    1. Definition: Heat flux is the rate at which heat energy passes through a unit area of a surface, measured in watts per square metre.
    2. Why it varies on a capsule: It is highest at the point of the vehicle that meets the airflow first, which is why the nose cap carries the most demanding shield material.

    What is a boundary layer?

    1. Definition: The boundary layer is the thin region of gas immediately next to a moving vehicle’s surface, where the flow is slowed by contact with that surface.
    2. Why it matters in ablation: Gases escaping from the decomposing shield thicken and cool this layer, which blocks intense heat from being transferred into the module.

    Why is atmospheric re entry harder than ascent for a crewed mission?

    1. Ascent is controlled and gradual: A rocket accelerates slowly through the atmosphere on the way up specifically to keep the mechanical loads on the vehicle to a minimum.
    2. Re entry cannot be aborted: Once the descent begins there is no provision to abort the mission, so every system must work through to splashdown.
    3. The crew cannot intervene: There is only a limited role for the crew to intervene and correct any system non conformance during descent.
    4. The event is too fast for human correction: Atmospheric descent is incredibly fast and the deceleration forces change constantly, and human response times are simply too high to manually correct a sudden system abnormality.
    5. What follows from this: All systems must therefore be made robust enough to withstand the scorching conditions of re entry on their own, since design margin substitutes for intervention.

    What thermal conditions must the Gaganyaan crew module survive?

    1. Entry velocity: The crew module will hit the atmosphere at a speed of 7,500 to 8,000 metres per second on return from its orbit around the earth.
    2. Energy dissipation: More than 99 per cent of that kinetic energy will be dissipated into the atmosphere as heat energy.
    3. Exterior temperature: The exterior of the module will encounter temperatures as high as 1,800 degrees Celsius in some regions.
    4. Shield thickness: The thermal protection system is just 30 to 35 millimetres thick.
    5. Interior limit: That layer must keep the module’s temperature safely below 150 degrees Celsius while performing the task of maintaining structural integrity.

    How do ablative, radiative and heat sink systems each remove heat?

    1. Ablative: A single use system that removes heat energy by sacrificing its own layers through chemical and physical processes, absorbing extreme quantities of thermal energy and chemically decomposing into a protective layer of solid char and outgassing vapours.
    2. The decomposition physically carries heat away from the module as the material burns off, and the escaping gases create a cooler boundary layer that blocks heat transfer into the module.
    3. Carbon phenolic and silica phenolic are examples of ablative materials.
    4. Radiative: A system that absorbs the extreme heat of re entry and then releases it back into space as electromagnetic radiation, primarily in the infrared spectrum and also as visible light when it is extremely hot.
    5. It remains intact and withstands the heat without melting or degrading, which makes it suited to reusable re entry vehicles.
    6. Heat sink: A system that absorbs heat energy and raises its own temperature without melting or changing phase in any other way.
    7. Copper and aluminium are examples of heat sink materials.

    Why has the Indian Space Research Organisation chosen an ablative shield for the crew module?

    1. It matches the mission’s design philosophy: The Gaganyaan crew module is a single use vehicle, and an ablative system is a single use system, so the shield’s life and the module’s life are the same.
    2. It is proven and robust: The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) has selected it as a proven and highly robust solution rather than the highest performing one available.
    3. It tolerates fluctuating heat loads: Ablative heat shields can easily handle fluctuating heat loads to protect the structure underneath, which matters when the descent profile varies.
    4. Radiative systems are less forgiving: Any design error in a radiative system can quickly cause dangerous overheating, so its margin for error is narrower.
    5. It avoids a maintenance burden: An ablative system withstands an extreme thermal load without requiring complex or delicate surface maintenance between flights.
    6. It avoids the reusable system’s cost structure: By avoiding the expensive manufacturing, specialised inspection and complex installation processes associated with a reusable radiative system, ISRO has taken the safer and more cost effective option.

    Does choosing a single use shield trade away reusability for safety?

    1. What is given up: A sacrificial shield is consumed on every flight, so a new heat shield must be manufactured and installed for each mission rather than inspected and reflown.
    2. The recurring cost consequence: Per flight cost stays flat across a programme instead of falling with flight rate, which is the opposite of the economics a high cadence programme needs.
    3. Why the trade is correct for this mission: Reusability only pays back over a high flight rate, and a first generation crewed programme flying occasional missions never reaches that rate.
    4. Where the trade stops working: A sustained crew rotation programme to an orbital station changes the flight rate, at which point the reusable radiative option becomes the economically relevant one.
    5. The safety side of the trade: The ablative system’s tolerance of fluctuating heat loads and its independence from surface inspection are precisely the properties a programme flying its first crew needs most.

    What does India’s own re entry heritage contribute to the Gaganyaan shield?

    1. The first re entry mission: The Space Capsule Recovery Experiment, India’s maiden re entry mission, used a carbon phenolic ablative to protect the module’s nose cap, where heat flux was the highest.
    2. The crew module demonstration: The Launch Vehicle Mark-3 (LVM3) flew the Crew Module Atmospheric Re-entry Experiment (CARE) in 2014. That flight successfully demonstrated crew module re entry using an ablative thermal protection system.
    3. What that established: The 2014 mission established the foundational technology that is now being used in the Gaganyaan programme, so the shield is an inheritance rather than a new development.
    4. Why heritage reduces risk: Material characterisation, manufacturing process and flight data already exist for the ablative route, which removes the qualification uncertainty a new material class would carry.
    5. The programme position: The Gaganyaan crew module is built on this ablative heritage and on the lessons learned from both earlier missions.

    What does the SpaceX Crew Dragon comparison show about ablative shield design choices?

    1. United States, the Crew Dragon shield: The Crew Dragon capsule of SpaceX uses an ablative material named phenolic impregnated carbon ablator, or PICA, a lightweight carbon fibre matrix filled with a phenolic resin.
    2. The shared design logic: A crewed capsule operator with a very different cost structure has arrived at the same ablative class of solution, which indicates the choice follows from the capsule form rather than from budget constraint.
    3. The design feature that differs: PICA’s lightweight carbon fibre matrix trades density for mass saving, while carbon phenolic of the kind flown on India’s first re entry mission is denser and carries higher heat flux at the nose.
    4. The limit of this comparison: This is the single foreign system named in the evidence here, so it establishes that ablative shielding is the standard choice for crewed capsules, not a ranked comparison of national capsule programmes.

    Challenges to the Gaganyaan thermal protection system

    1. Ground testing cannot reproduce full re entry: No ground facility reproduces the combined velocity, heat flux and duration of an orbital re entry, so qualification relies on partial simulation and analysis. Eg. Arc jet plasma facilities test coupons at representative heat flux but not at the full 7,500 to 8,000 metres per second entry velocity.
    2. Bond line integrity over a curved surface: A 30 to 35 millimetre layer must adhere uniformly over the module’s full curvature, and a bond defect creates a local hot path into the structure. Eg. Shuttle era thermal protection failures originated in localised damage to the protective layer rather than in the material’s bulk performance.
    3. Predicting the recession rate: Ablative design depends on predicting how much material burns off, and an over prediction adds dead mass while an under prediction risks burn through. Eg. Nose cap regions carry the highest heat flux and therefore the largest uncertainty in recession estimates.
    4. Mass penalty on the launch vehicle: A sacrificial shield sized with margin is heavy, and every kilogram of shield reduces the payload the human rated launcher can carry. Eg. The human rated LVM3 has to lift the crew module, service module and shield together to a 400 kilometre orbit.
    5. Manufacturing repeatability: Each mission needs a newly manufactured shield, so process variation between production batches becomes a flight safety variable rather than a quality issue. Eg. Carbon phenolic layup is a manual intensive process where resin content and fibre orientation must be reproduced identically each time.
    6. Recovery environment after splashdown: A charred shield must survive water impact and sea recovery without compromising the crew compartment. Eg. India’s first re entry mission was recovered from the Bay of Bengal, which is the recovery zone the crewed programme also plans to use.
    7. Single point criticality: With no abort provision once descent begins and limited crew intervention, the shield has no backup system to fall back on. Eg. Human response times are too high to correct a sudden thermal abnormality during a descent where deceleration forces change constantly.

    Conclusion

    The Gaganyaan crew module’s protection against a 1,800 degrees Celsius re entry rests on a 30 to 35 millimetre ablative layer that sacrifices itself to carry heat away and hold the structure below 150 degrees Celsius. The choice of an ablative over a radiative system follows from the module’s single use design, its tolerance of fluctuating heat loads and the technology base established by India’s first re entry mission and the 2014 crew module demonstration. The programme’s current status is that the shield is qualified on this heritage, with the first uncrewed test flight launching shortly.

    Human Spaceflight Programme of India

    1. What it is: Gaganyaan is India’s human spaceflight programme, aimed at demonstrating the capability to launch a crew to low earth orbit and return them safely to Indian waters.
    2. Mission profile: The mission is designed to carry a crew of up to three to an orbit of about 400 kilometres for a mission duration of up to three days, followed by splashdown recovery.
    3. The launch vehicle: The launcher is a human rated version of the LVM3, designated the Human rated Launch Vehicle Mark-3 (HLVM3), modified with additional redundancy and a crew escape system.
    4. The orbital module: The crew module and the service module together form the orbital module, with the crew module being the pressurised habitable segment that returns.
    5. Institutional base: The Human Space Flight Centre was established at Bengaluru in 2019 to lead the programme, with the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre responsible for launch vehicle and re entry systems.
    6. The longer roadmap: India’s stated goals extend to the Bharatiya Antariksh Station by 2035 and a crewed lunar landing by 2040.

    Laws and Treaties Governing Space Activities

    1. Outer Space Treaty, 1967: Makes States internationally responsible for national space activities, whether carried on by governmental or non governmental entities, and bars national appropriation of outer space.
    2. Rescue Agreement, 1968: Obliges States to assist astronauts in distress and to return them and any recovered space objects to the launching authority.
    3. Liability Convention, 1972: Makes a launching State absolutely liable for damage caused by its space object on the surface of the earth or to aircraft in flight.
    4. Registration Convention, 1975: Requires launching States to maintain a national registry of space objects and to furnish details to the United Nations.
    5. Moon Agreement, 1979: Declares the Moon and its resources the common heritage of mankind, and India has signed but not ratified it.
    6. Indian Space Policy, 2023: Defines the roles of ISRO, the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre, NewSpace India Limited and non governmental entities in the Indian space ecosystem.
    7. Space Activities Bill, 2017: A draft domestic law to license and regulate private space activity in India, which was circulated for comment and never enacted.
    8. Satellite Communications Policy and spectrum rules: Govern authorisation of satellite services, with spectrum assignment handled under the Telecommunications Act, 2023.

    “[2025] Consider the following space missions:

    I. Axiom-4

    II. SpaDeX

    III. Gaganyaan

    How many of the space missions given above encourage and support microgravity research?

    (a) Only one

    (b) Only two

    (c) All the three

    (d) None

  • Beyond blasphemy: how laws can curtail the possibility of social reform

    Why in the News

    Section 295A and the provisions that succeeded it have been turned against writers, artists and reformers, with arrest, mob campaigns and pre emptive withdrawal delivering the harm long before any verdict. India simultaneously runs statutes that direct the State to attack religious and superstitious practice, so the same legal system both punishes criticism of religion and mandates it.

    What is Section 295A?

    1. What it penalises: Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punished deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.
    2. Successor provision: The corresponding offence is now Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
    3. What the offence turns on: Liability rests on the intent to outrage and not on the truth or falsity of what was said.
    4. How it operates in practice: The offence is cognisable, so a complaint can produce arrest and judicial custody before any court assesses whether malice existed.

    What is the heckler’s veto?

    1. Heckler’s veto: A heckler’s veto is the suppression of expression because a hostile audience threatens disruption or violence, so the objector rather than the law decides what may be said. Speech is stopped in order to keep the peace, which transfers the power of censorship to whoever protests loudest.

    What is a sacrilege law?

    1. Sacrilege law: A sacrilege law criminalises damage to or desecration of a religious text or object, as distinct from an offence aimed at outraging feelings through speech or writing. State level sacrilege provisions of this kind carry punishment extending to imprisonment for life.

    What does the law on outraging religious feelings currently cover in India?

    1. The core offence: Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 penalises deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings by insulting religion or religious beliefs, whether by words, writing, signs or visible representation.
    2. Adjacent offences: Section 298 covers injuring or defiling a place of worship with intent to insult a religion, Section 300 covers disturbing a religious assembly and Section 302 covers uttering words with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings.
    3. Group enmity provisions: Section 196 penalises promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, language or caste, and Section 197 covers imputations prejudicial to national integration.
    4. No standalone blasphemy statute: India has no offence of blasphemy as such, and the protection is assembled from provisions aimed at intent to outrage rather than at the content of any belief.
    5. State level escalation: Some States have enacted sacrilege provisions carrying punishment up to imprisonment for life, which sets the penalty far above the central provision.
    6. Judicial test applied: In Amish Devgan v Union of India (2020) the Supreme Court laid down a three part contextual test examining the content of the speech, the intent of the speaker and the harm caused or likely to be caused.
    7. Truth is not a defence: Courts have held that a wholly true statement can still outrage religious feelings, so accuracy does not absolve the speaker.

    Constitutional Provisions Related to Free Speech and Religious Freedom

    1. Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression.
    2. Article 19(2): Permits reasonable restrictions on that right on enumerated grounds, including public order, decency, morality, defamation and incitement to an offence.
    3. Article 25(1): Guarantees freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality and health.
    4. Article 25(2)(a) and Article 25(2)(b): Permit the State to regulate secular activity associated with religious practice, and to provide for social welfare and reform including throwing open Hindu religious institutions to all classes.
    5. Article 26: Gives every religious denomination the right to manage its own affairs in matters of religion, subject to public order, morality and health.
    6. Article 14: Requires that a penal classification rest on an intelligible differentia bearing a rational nexus to the object of the provision.
    7. Article 21: Protects life and personal liberty, which is what arrest and pre trial custody in a speech case directly curtails.
    8. Article 15(1) and Article 17: Bar discrimination on grounds of religion and caste and abolish untouchability, which are the constitutional basis for statutes attacking exploitative religious practice.
    9. Article 51A(h): Makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.
    10. Preamble: Declares India a secular republic, and secularism has been held to be part of the basic structure and therefore beyond amendment.

    How has the provision been used against writers, artists and film?

    1. Angarey, 1932: A small collection of Urdu short stories attacking obscurantist customs and the sexual hypocrisy of some religious figures was banned soon after publication, and its authors faced threats.
    2. The Satanic Verses, 1988: The government banned import of Salman Rushdie’s novel, making India one of the first countries in the world to act against it, and a secular one at that.
    3. The Da Vinci Code, 2006: Seven Indian States banned the film and the book on the ground that they offended Christian sentiment, and two States lifted the ban only after High Court intervention.
    4. The Hindus: An Alternative History, 2014: Wendy Doniger’s book was withdrawn by Penguin India after a civil suit invoking Section 295A, so the withdrawal followed a civil filing rather than any conviction.
    5. Madhorubagan, 2015 and 2016: Perumal Murugan faced a criminal complaint and a mob campaign over the novel and announced his own death as a writer in 2015; a Madras High Court judgment of 2016 quashed the case and closed with the appeal to let the author be resurrected to what he is best at, write.
    6. M.F. Husain: The painter was hounded into exile and death abroad after decades of prosecutions and threats over his nude depictions of Hindu deities.
    7. Taslima Nasrin: Her writing has met comparable treatment through bans, threats and constraints on where she may live and publish.

    Why does the harm occur before any verdict?

    1. Rehana Fathima, 2018: Weeks after the Supreme Court lifted the traditional ban on women of menstruating age entering the Sabarimala temple, the Kerala activist was arrested under Section 295A over a Facebook photograph of herself dressed as an Ayyappa devotee.
    2. Cost imposed without trial: She spent over two weeks in judicial custody and was suspended by her employer within days of the arrest, all over an image rather than an argument.
    3. Amish Devgan, 2020: The television anchor called the Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti a lootera during a live debate, apologised within days for what he said was an inadvertent slip for a different historical name, and still faced seven separate first information reports across five States.
    4. Multiplicity as the punishment: The Supreme Court declined to quash any of the seven and merely clubbed them together in Ajmer, so the burden of defending across five jurisdictions was reduced rather than removed.
    5. Conviction is not the point: These cases rarely end in conviction and the prosecution more often goes nowhere, so the process itself operates as the penalty.
    6. Three channels of harm: The damage is delivered through arrest, through the heckler’s veto of an aggressive and sometimes violent audience, and through the pre emptive caution of publishers and film certifiers who calculate that no book or film is worth the trouble.

    Which laws run in the opposite direction?

    1. Constituent Assembly position, 2 December 1948: During the debate on whether personal law should be shielded from legislative reform, B.R. Ambedkar rejected the idea that religion could claim a veto over social legislation merely because a custom carried religious sanction.
    2. The reasoning he gave: He said he did not understand why religion should be given a vast, expansive jurisdiction covering the whole of life and preventing the legislature from encroaching upon that field, since this liberty exists in order to reform the social system, so personal law cannot be excluded from the jurisdiction of the State.
    3. Maharashtra, 2013: The Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and Other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act was passed after the assassination of the rationalist campaigner Narendra Dabholkar.
    4. What that Act criminalises: It penalises a long list of exploitative religious practices, ranging from claiming to cure disease through faith healing to inducing self flagellation.
    5. Karnataka, 2017: The State passed a comparable law against inhuman evil practices and black magic.
    6. Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987: It criminalises not only the act of widow immolation but its glorification, treating celebratory speech about a religious practice as itself an offence.
    7. The mirror image rather than the opposite: A law punishing praise of a religious practice uses the same technique as a law punishing criticism of one, since both make speech about religion a criminal question.
    8. What the coexistence exposes: Indian law has no coherent theory of when religious sentiment deserves protection, and what governs is a case by case political calculation about which practices are currently unpopular enough, or which constituencies currently powerful enough, to tip the balance.

    Why does the reformer fall on the wrong side of a blasphemy law?

    1. The State of Mysore versus Henry Rodrigues, 1961: A Catholic editor was tried under Section 295A over an article in his Konkani language magazine Crusader, titled “Honour to Mary or Dishonour?”, which accused Catholic priests of exploiting the credulous by falsely attributing miracles to the Virgin Mary.
    2. The defence offered: He argued that since the criticised beliefs and practices were superstitious and contrary to the Bible itself, the truth of his charge ought to absolve him.
    3. The court’s answer: Following an earlier Allahabad High Court ruling, the Mysore High Court rejected this outright, holding that even a wholly true statement can outrage religious feelings and that the provision punishes the intent to outrage rather than the accuracy of what is said.
    4. The insider treated as the stranger: A believer’s sincere and internally argued complaint against his own clergy was treated exactly as the law treats a stranger’s contempt.
    5. Jyotirao Phule: He spent the 1870s attacking Brahminical religious authority as the theological scaffolding of caste oppression, recasting Hindu myth in his tract Gulamgiri to expose it as a device for keeping the lower castes subjugated.
    6. Hamid Dalwai: A century later he founded the Muslim Satyashodhak Mandal explicitly on Phule’s model, marched a handful of Muslim women to the Maharashtra Assembly to demand an end to triple talaq and polygamy, and was ostracised and abused for it.
    7. The pair the law cannot separate: The offence does not distinguish a Phule or a Dalwai from a bigot baiting a rival faith for sport, since both are trying to make believers feel bad about what they believe.
    8. A line a police station cannot draw: What should separate them is whether the critic is trying to improve the community or merely humiliate it, and an officer recording a complaint is poorly placed to make that assessment.

    Major debates surrounding blasphemy and sacrilege law in India

    1. Public order against expression: A targeted law applied with judicial restraint and the safeguard of proven intent is defended as a proportionate response to sentiment that has repeatedly proved combustible, rather than as an assault on free thought.
    2. Restraint in principle against the record in practice: The historical record of Section 295A, and now of State sacrilege law, gives little confidence that restraint is what actually happens once a complaint is registered.
    3. Discussion, advocacy and incitement: Shreya Singhal v Union of India (2015) held that only incitement carrying a direct and proximate connection to public disorder may be criminalised, and that discussion and advocacy remain protected even where unpopular.
    4. Intent against effect: Whether liability should turn on what the speaker meant or on the disorder that followed, since the intent test is applied only after an audience has already reacted.
    5. Truth as a defence: Whether a demonstrably accurate factual claim about a religious practice should absolve the speaker, which the 1961 ruling denied outright.
    6. Proportionality of punishment: Whether imprisonment for life for an insult to a text can be reconciled with a Constitution whose secularism is held unamendable.
    7. New law against enforcement: In Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v Union of India (April 2026) the Supreme Court dismissed a batch of petitions seeking fresh hate speech legislation, holding that creating criminal offences belongs to the legislature and that the real problem is an enforcement deficit.
    8. Empirical gap: Data under these provisions is not published in a form that sets arrests, days in custody and withdrawn publications against convictions, so the argument runs on cases rather than on measured outcomes.

    Challenges to reforming laws on religious offence

    1. Cognisability delivers the punishment: An offence that permits arrest on a complaint produces custody before a magistrate examines whether malice existed. Eg. In Imran Pratapgarhi v State of Gujarat (2025) the Supreme Court extended the preliminary inquiry safeguard to first information reports in speech cases precisely to interpose a check before registration.
    2. Forum multiplicity: A single utterance can be prosecuted in every jurisdiction where a complainant chooses to file. Eg. Clubbing seven first information reports at Ajmer in 2020 consolidated the defence without removing the cost of defending in a distant State.
    3. Self censorship leaves no record: A publisher or certifier that withdraws before any order removes the work without producing a judicial decision that can be appealed. Eg. Penguin India withdrew and destroyed copies of The Hindus: An Alternative History in 2014 with no conviction and no court direction requiring it.
    4. Mob campaign as the real enforcement mechanism: The threat of disruption achieves what a prosecution cannot. Eg. Perumal Murugan withdrew from writing in 2015 after a mob campaign and a local shutdown, and resumed only after the Madras High Court judgment of 2016.
    5. State level bans without central legislation: Executive bans multiply at the State level and are reversed only through litigation. Eg. Seven States banned The Da Vinci Code in 2006 and two lifted the ban only after their High Courts intervened.
    6. Penalty escalation at the State level: A State provision can prescribe imprisonment for life for an offence against a text, which exceeds the penalty for many offences against the person. Eg. State sacrilege provisions carry punishment extending to imprisonment for life against a maximum of a few years under the central provision.
    7. Recodification carried the provision forward: The most recent opportunity to narrow the offence was not used. Eg. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 re-enacted Section 295A as Section 299 unchanged, instead of confining it to incitement to violence.

    Conclusion

    Section 295A and its successor punish the intent to outrage rather than the falsity of what is said, so a reformer criticising his own faith is caught by the same words as a bigot baiting a rival one. India runs that regime alongside statutes that direct the State to criminalise faith healing, black magic and the glorification of sati, which shows there is no settled principle about when religious sentiment deserves protection. What remains unresolved is whether these provisions will be narrowed to their original and defensible purpose of preventing incitement to actual violence, leaving criticism, satire and reform of religious practice to public argument rather than to the criminal courts.

    What is Secularism?

    1. About: Secularism is the principle that the State holds no religion of its own and treats every faith on the same footing in law and in the distribution of public benefits.
    2. Rationale: It exists to keep the coercive power of the State out of the hands of any religious majority or clergy, and to make citizenship independent of belief.
    3. Strict separation model: The State and religion operate in mutually exclusive spheres, with the State neither aiding nor interfering with any religion, which is the model associated with the United States and France.
    4. Principled distance model: The State keeps no religion of its own and retains the power to intervene in religious practice for social reform and equality, which is the model the Indian Constitution follows.
    5. Positive neutrality: Equal treatment is delivered through equal respect rather than equal indifference, so the State may fund, regulate and administer religious institutions on a non preferential basis.
    6. Constitutional location: The word secular was inserted in the Preamble by the Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976, and S.R. Bommai v Union of India (1994) held secularism to be part of the basic structure.
    7. Essential religious practices doctrine: Courts decide the reach of religious freedom by asking whether a practice is essential to the religion, which places the determination of religious content with the judiciary.

    Key Concerns Regarding Secularism in India

    1. State entanglement with religious administration: Endowment departments and statutory boards administer the institutions of some faiths and not others, so the State’s distance is uneven across religions.
    2. Judicial determination of religious content: The essential religious practices test requires judges to decide questions of theology, a function courts were not designed or equipped for.
    3. Asymmetric reform power: Article 25(2)(b) expressly permits the opening of Hindu religious institutions, and comparable reform in other communities has proceeded largely through litigation rather than legislation.
    4. Personal law plurality against Article 44: The directive for a uniform civil code remains unimplemented, so family law continues to differ by religion.
    5. Majoritarian capture of neutral language: A formally neutral provision protects the practices of the dominant community more effectively, since those practices attract fewer complaints and fewer prosecutions.
    6. No horizontal anti discrimination remedy: Discrimination on religious grounds by private landlords and employers has no general statutory remedy, since constitutional guarantees bind the State.

    Laws and Rules Governing Religious Offence in India

    1. Indian Penal Code, 1860: Chapter XV grouped the offences relating to religion and remained the governing law until 2024.
    2. Section 295A was inserted by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1927 following the Rangila Rasul prosecution.
    3. Sections 295 to 298 covered defiling a place of worship, disturbing a religious assembly, trespass on burial places and wounding religious feelings by word.
    4. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Replaced the Indian Penal Code with effect from 1 July 2024 and carried this chapter forward.
    5. Section 299 corresponds to Section 295A, Section 298 to Section 295, Section 300 to Section 296 and Section 302 to Section 298.
    6. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Provides for a preliminary inquiry before registration of a first information report in specified categories of offence, and for prior government sanction before a court takes cognisance of certain offences relating to religion.
    7. Cinematograph Act, 1952: Empowers the certifying authority to refuse or condition certification of a film on grounds mirroring Article 19(2), including public order and decency.
    8. Information Technology Act, 2000: Section 69A permits blocking of online content on grounds that track the restrictions in Article 19(2).
    9. Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987: Criminalises the act of sati, its abetment and its glorification, and provides for Special Courts to try these offences.
    10. Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and Other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act, 2013: Criminalises a listed set of exploitative practices including faith healing claims and induced self flagellation.
    11. Karnataka Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices and Black Magic Act, 2017: Enacts a comparable prohibition in that State.
    12. Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955: Penalises the enforcement of religious disabilities arising out of untouchability, including denial of temple entry.

    Back2Basics: Jyotirao Phule

    1. Life: Born in 1827 in a family of the Mali caste in present day Maharashtra, and died in 1890 in Pune.
    2. First school: Opened a school for girls at Bhide Wada in Pune in 1848, among the earliest such schools established by an Indian.
    3. Extension to the excluded castes: Opened a school in 1851 for children of the castes then treated as untouchable.
    4. Organisation founded: Founded the Satyashodhak Samaj, the Society of Truth Seekers, on 24 September 1873 in Pune, to secure social justice for the lower castes without priestly mediation.
    5. Principal writings: Wrote Gulamgiri in 1873, which read Hindu myth as a record of the subjugation of the lower castes, and Shetkaryacha Asud in 1883 on the condition of the cultivator.
    6. Vocabulary contributed: Popularised the term Dalit for the oppressed castes, which entered later political usage.
    7. Social work: Opened a home for widows and a centre for the prevention of infanticide, and supported widow remarriage.
    8. Title conferred: Given the title Mahatma in 1888 at a public gathering in Bombay.
    9. Partnership: Worked with Savitribai Phule, who taught at the Bhide Wada school and is counted among India’s first women teachers.
    10. Later influence: His model was invoked directly by Hamid Dalwai in founding the Muslim Satyashodhak Mandal in 1970.

    Way Forward

    1. Narrow the offence to incitement: Confine Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 to speech carrying a direct and proximate connection to violence, in line with the Shreya Singhal test.
    2. Make the offence non cognisable: Remove the power to arrest on a bare complaint, so that custody does not precede any judicial assessment of deliberate and malicious intent.
    3. Require prior sanction and preliminary inquiry: Make registration of a first information report conditional on a preliminary inquiry and on sanction by a designated senior officer, extending the Imran Pratapgarhi safeguard to every provision in this chapter.
    4. Consolidate multiple complaints by statute: Provide that all first information reports arising from a single publication or utterance are transferred to one jurisdiction as a matter of right, rather than case by case.
    5. Introduce a public interest defence: Allow truth combined with a reformist or scholarly purpose as a statutory defence, so an insider critic is separated from a speaker seeking only to humiliate.
    6. Cap the penalty: Bring State sacrilege provisions within a central ceiling so that an offence against a text cannot carry imprisonment for life.
    7. Protect the publisher and the certifier: Bar interim injunctions and pre publication restraints on books and films except on a judicial finding of imminent violence, so withdrawal is not the cheapest option.

    “[2014, GS2, 12.5] What do you understand by the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.”

  • US: Will impose toughest sanctions in history on Iran

    Why in the News

    The United States Treasury Secretary announced on 20 August 2026 that Washington will impose the toughest sanctions in history on Iran, to be layered on an existing naval blockade, with the stated objective of collapsing the Iranian government. The United States President separately warned that any country whose financial institutions, businesses, airports or government entities provide any type of lifeline to Iran will itself face economic consequences. That warning converts a bilateral war into a compliance problem for every third country that trades with Iran.

    What are secondary sanctions?

    1. Definition: Secondary sanctions penalise persons and firms in third countries for dealing with a sanctioned state, even where that dealing is lawful in their own jurisdiction. They extend a national measure into an extraterritorial one.
    2. How they bite: The penalty is exclusion, since a firm that trades with the target loses access to the sanctioning state’s financial system, markets and correspondent banking.
    3. Why the currency matters: Their reach depends on the sanctioning state’s currency being used for settlement, which is why United States measures affect countries that have no dispute with Washington.

    What is a naval blockade?

    1. Definition: A naval blockade is the use of warships to prevent vessels entering or leaving a state’s ports or coastline. It operates through force, unlike sanctions, which operate through law and financial exclusion.

    What does the announced sanctions package actually threaten?

    1. Stated severity: The United States Treasury Secretary said Washington will impose the toughest sanctions in history on Iran.
    2. Combination with the blockade: He described the approach as combining the existing blockade on Iran with the new sanctions, rather than replacing one with the other.
    3. Stated objective: He said the approach would work in Iran and that Washington was going to collapse the government there.
    4. Announced framing: The United States President promised economic warfare and isolation on an unprecedented scale, although details were scant.
    5. Detail still pending: The Treasury Secretary said he would hold a press conference on Monday to set out the specifics.

    Why does the lifeline warning make this a problem for third countries?

    1. The categories named: The warning covers any country that allows its financial institutions, businesses, airports or government entities to provide any type of lifeline to Iran.
    2. The threatened consequence: Such a country would itself face economic consequences, stated as tremendous in scale.
    3. The timing: The warning was issued on Wednesday, ahead of the sanctions announcement, which places third countries on notice before the measures are published.
    4. Breadth of the categories: Airports and government entities extend the threat beyond banking to transport and to state to state dealings.
    5. Absence of a threshold: No minimum value or category of transaction was specified, so the scope of what counts as a lifeline remains undefined.

    Why have the two ceasefires failed to hold?

    1. Origin of the war: The United States began the war alongside Israel nearly six months before the sanctions announcement.
    2. Two attempts: The United States and Iran twice announced ceasefire deals, in April and in June.
    3. Their stated purpose: Both aimed to restore the free flow of shipping through Hormuz as a path towards ending the conflict.
    4. Both collapsed: Both deals quickly crumbled, even as Israel largely withdrew from the fighting.
    5. Leadership transition in Tehran: A 40 day commemoration ceremony for the former Iranian Supreme Leader was held in Karbala on 20 August 2026, attended by Iran’s Parliament Speaker.

    What is Iran’s counter-position?

    1. Characterisation of the measures: Iran’s foreign ministry condemned the fresh United States economic and trade sanctions, saying they targeted ordinary Iranians.
    2. The legal charge: The ministry described the measures as economic terrorism and as crimes against humanity.
    3. Attribution of motive: The Iranian Foreign Minister called the announcement an attempt to divert American public opinion from domestic financial problems, including record debt and rising interest rates.
    4. The wider claim: He argued that American economic terrorism threatens the global economy and the national sovereignty of countries around the world.
    5. The retained lever: Tehran continues its own economic pressure campaign by keeping the Strait of Hormuz largely closed.

    Why has Oman become the pivot of the Hormuz question?

    1. A separate negotiation: Iran has been negotiating an agreement on managing the Strait of Hormuz with Oman, and has said several times in recent weeks that an agreement was close.
    2. The American response: The United States President responded to those negotiations on Monday by warning that he might bomb the Gulf state if it gets in the way.
    3. The anomaly in that threat: Oman is a longstanding United States security partner, which makes the threat a warning to an ally rather than to an adversary.
    4. Oman’s stated position: The Omani Foreign Minister said lasting security in the strait required a permanent peace in the region and rejected further escalation.
    5. Its diplomatic posture: He made the statement after meeting his Japanese counterpart, which places the strait’s management within a wider set of energy importing interests.

    What does the escalation mean for India?

    1. Energy route exposure: A large share of India’s crude, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) imports transits the Strait of Hormuz, so the strait’s closure raises India’s landed energy costs regardless of who supplies the cargo.
    2. Precedent of forced exit: India stopped importing Iranian crude in May 2019 after United States waivers under the sanctions regime lapsed, ending what had been one of its largest supply relationships.
    3. Connectivity investment at risk: India signed a ten year contract in May 2024 to operate the Shahid Beheshti terminal at Chabahar port in Iran, an asset whose viability depends on the sanctions environment.
    4. Corridor implications: The International North South Transport Corridor to Russia and Central Asia runs through Iranian territory, so secondary sanctions affect a route India built to bypass Pakistan.
    5. Existing exposure to secondary measures: India has already navigated the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, 2017 over its purchase of the S-400 air defence system, which shows the compliance question is not new.

    Challenges to a sanctions-led approach

    1. Poor record at producing regime change: Comprehensive sanctions rarely dislodge governments and often consolidate them. Eg. Cuba has been under a United States embargo since 1962 without a change of political system.
    2. Humanitarian burden falls on civilians: Restrictions on banking and shipping obstruct food and medicine even when formally exempted. Eg. Iran’s foreign ministry stated that the measures targeted ordinary Iranians and amounted to crimes against humanity.
    3. Evasion through parallel networks: Targets build shadow fleets, front companies and barter arrangements that blunt enforcement. Eg. United States sanctions on Hezbollah have repeatedly targeted courier networks and exchange houses used as fronts for cash movement.
    4. Erosion of the sanctioning currency’s role: Extraterritorial reach pushes third countries to settle trade outside the dollar. Eg. India has implemented the Special Rupee Vostro Account framework for invoicing, payment and settlement of international trade in rupees.
    5. Alliance friction: Threats against partners weaken the coalition needed for enforcement. Eg. The United States President warned he might bomb Oman, a longstanding American security partner, over its Hormuz negotiations with Iran.
    6. Counter escalation by the target: A sanctioned state with a chokepoint can impose costs on the sanctioning coalition’s own economies. Eg. Iran keeps the Strait of Hormuz largely closed, which carries 20 percent of global oil and 20 percent of global LNG.
    7. Legal contestation of extraterritoriality: Third states dispute the authority of one country to regulate transactions between two others. Eg. The European Union’s Blocking Statute was updated in 1996 and again in 2018 to shield European firms from United States extraterritorial sanctions on Iran.

    Conclusion

    The United States has moved from military coercion to declared economic warfare against Iran, pairing an existing naval blockade with sanctions described as the toughest in history and aimed openly at collapsing the government in Tehran. The lifeline warning extends the measures to third countries, while Iran retains its own lever by keeping the Strait of Hormuz largely closed and negotiating its management with Oman. The next milestone is the United States Treasury Secretary’s announced press conference on Monday setting out the details, with the Iran Oman understanding on the strait the other outstanding variable.

    About Economic Statecraft

    1. About: Economic statecraft is the use of economic instruments, positive and negative, to change another state’s behaviour without resorting to force.
    2. Rationale: It exists because military action is costly and diplomatic protest is weak, so states seek an intermediate instrument that imposes real cost while remaining below the threshold of war.
    3. Positive inducements: Aid, trade preferences, market access and investment offered to secure a policy change.
    4. Comprehensive sanctions: Blanket restrictions on trade and finance with an entire economy, which impose broad cost but weak targeting.
    5. Targeted or smart sanctions: Asset freezes, travel bans and entity listings aimed at named individuals, firms and sectors, designed to spare the general population.
    6. Primary sanctions: Prohibitions binding on the sanctioning state’s own persons, firms and jurisdiction.
    7. Secondary sanctions: Penalties on third country persons for dealing with the target, which give a national measure global reach.
    8. Multilateral sanctions: Measures mandated by the United Nations Security Council under Chapter VII, binding on all member states.

    Key Concerns Regarding Economic Statecraft

    1. Sovereignty and extraterritoriality: Secondary sanctions require states to enforce another state’s foreign policy inside their own jurisdiction. Eg. The French bank BNP Paribas paid about $8.9 billion to United States authorities in 2014 for processing transactions involving Sudan, Iran and Cuba.
    2. Humanitarian spillover: Financial de-risking by banks blocks exempted humanitarian trade because compliance officers avoid any exposure to a sanctioned jurisdiction. Eg. The Swiss Humanitarian Trade Arrangement was created in 2020 because ordinary banking channels would not carry payments for food and medicine to Iran.
    3. Fragmentation of the payments system: Repeated use of currency dominance as leverage accelerates the construction of alternative settlement channels and reduces future leverage. Eg. Russia built the System for Transfer of Financial Messages in 2014 as a domestic substitute for international bank messaging channels.
    4. Weak exit mechanism: Sanctions are politically easy to impose and hard to lift, so they persist beyond the objective they were designed to achieve. Eg. The Jackson Vanik amendment of 1974 remained applicable to Russia until its repeal in 2012, long after the emigration restrictions it targeted had ended.
    5. Measurement problem: There is no agreed method to establish that a policy change was caused by sanctions rather than by other pressures, which makes evaluation contested. Eg. Iranian oil exports fell sharply after the reimposition of sanctions in 2018 while the nuclear programme expanded, leaving both outcomes attributed to the same measures.

    Laws and Instruments Governing Sanctions

    1. Charter of the United Nations, 1945: Article 41 empowers the Security Council to decide measures not involving the use of armed force, including complete or partial interruption of economic relations, which are binding on all member states.
    2. International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 1977: The principal United States statute allowing the President to declare a national emergency and regulate or block transactions with foreign persons.
    3. Iran Sanctions Act, 1996: Originally the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act, it introduced penalties on foreign firms investing in Iran’s energy sector, establishing the secondary sanctions template.
    4. Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, 2010: Widened the reach of energy sector sanctions and brought refined petroleum supply to Iran within their scope.
    5. Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, 2017: Codified sanctions against Iran, Russia and North Korea and limited the President’s discretion to waive them.

    India’s Measures to Manage Sanctions and Energy Risk

    1. Special Rupee Vostro Account framework: A Reserve Bank of India mechanism for invoicing, payment and settlement of international trade in rupees, reducing dependence on third currency settlement.
    2. Chabahar port agreement: A ten year contract signed in May 2024 to operate the Shahid Beheshti terminal, giving India a sea route to Afghanistan and Central Asia that bypasses Pakistan.
    3. International North South Transport Corridor: A multimodal ship, rail and road route linking India to Russia and Central Asia through Iran, shortening transit time against the Suez route.
    4. Strategic Petroleum Reserve: Underground crude caverns at Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru and Padur operated by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited to cushion supply interruptions.
    5. Supplier diversification: Term and spot procurement spread across Russian, West Asian, West African and American grades to reduce dependence on any single sanctioned or chokepoint dependent source.

    Key Facts about United States Iran Relations

    1. 1979 Islamic Revolution: Ended the monarchy and was followed by the seizure of the United States embassy in Tehran and the severing of diplomatic relations.
    2. 1984 designation: The United States designated Iran a state sponsor of terrorism, which triggered a standing set of trade and aid restrictions.
    3. Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, 2015: Concluded in July 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 group, it limited Iran’s enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief.
    4. 2018 withdrawal: The United States withdrew from the agreement in May 2018 and reimposed sanctions under a maximum pressure strategy.
    5. India’s exit from Iranian crude: India ended imports of Iranian crude oil in May 2019 after United States waivers expired.
    6. Strait of Hormuz weight: The strait carries about 20 million barrels of oil a day, 20 percent of global oil and 20 percent of global LNG.

    Back2Basics: Strait of Hormuz

    1. Designation: A maritime chokepoint connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.
    2. Littoral states: Iran lies on the northern shore and controls seven of the eight islands in the strait, while Oman controls the southern entrance through the Musandam exclave.
    3. External presence: The United States Fifth Fleet, headquartered in Bahrain, acts as the external guarantor of transit through the strait.
    4. Energy weight: It carries the highest concentration of energy flow of any chokepoint in the world.
    5. Comparative chokepoints: The Strait of Malacca carries 23.7 percent of global seaborne trade and 80 percent of China’s energy imports, Bab el Mandeb carries 8.7 percent of global trade as the sole southern gateway to the Suez Canal, and the Suez Canal itself carries 12 percent of global maritime commerce with closure adding 9 to 17 sailing days.

    Challenges in the West Asian Security and Energy Order

    1. Chokepoint dependence with no land alternative: Pipeline bypasses cover only a fraction of the volume that moves by sea. Eg. Closure of the Strait of Hormuz affects 20 million barrels a day, which no existing pipeline network can absorb.
    2. Non state armed actors controlling shorelines: Sea lanes can be closed by groups that hold coastline without holding a state. Eg. The Houthis control the eastern Yemeni shore of Bab el Mandeb in practice.
    3. Proxy networks that survive sanctions on the principal: Financial pressure on a state does not disable the armed groups it funds. Eg. The United States redesignated Hezbollah for service to the Iranian government under the command of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force.
    4. Overlapping external guarantors: Multiple outside powers with competing objectives raise the risk of miscalculation. Eg. The United States threatened to strike Oman over its Hormuz talks while relying on Omani mediation with Iran.
    5. Absence of a regional security architecture: There is no equivalent of a regional organisation with dispute settlement authority for the Gulf. Eg. The management of the Strait of Hormuz is being negotiated bilaterally between Iran and Oman rather than through any regional body.
    6. Energy revenue concentration in importing economies: Importing states have limited fiscal room to absorb a price shock. Eg. Every $1 per barrel increase raises India’s oil import bill by up to $2 billion on an annualised basis.
    7. Recognition and legitimacy disputes: Contested political authority complicates any negotiated settlement. Eg. Iran’s own leadership transition was marked by a 40 day commemoration for the former Supreme Leader in August 2026.

    Way Forward

    1. Seek carve outs early rather than after listing: India should engage the United States Treasury on humanitarian, food and connectivity carve outs before the sanctions text is notified.
    2. Protect the Chabahar exemption: Press for the continuation of the project specific exemption that has allowed the Shahid Beheshti terminal to operate, given its Afghanistan and Central Asia connectivity function.
    3. Accelerate non dollar settlement channels: Expand the Special Rupee Vostro Account framework and rupee invoicing so that legitimate trade is not hostage to correspondent banking access.
    4. Diversify the maritime route, not only the supplier: Build term contracts with Atlantic basin and West African producers whose cargoes do not transit Hormuz.
    5. Support de-escalation through the Oman channel: Back a negotiated framework for managing the strait, since reopening it does more for importing economies than any adjustment to sanctions design.
    6. Insulate the corridor investments: Structure International North South Transport Corridor participation through non sanctioned entities and multilateral instruments to limit exposure.
    7. Build reserve depth ahead of escalation: Complete Phase II of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve so that a sanctions driven supply interruption does not translate immediately into a price shock.

    “[2018, GS2, 15] In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to this situation?”

  • Why are South Asians missing from global health databases

    Why in the News

    Genome wide association studies between 2005 and 2025 drew more than 86 per cent of their participants from European ancestry populations, while South Asians accounted for less than 1 per cent. That skew is now being carried into the reference atlases used to train artificial intelligence models in medicine, which converts a historical sampling gap into a bias that reproduces itself at clinical scale across South Asia and the wider low and middle income world.

    What is an integrated biobank?

    1. Definition: An integrated biobank is a large repository that stores biological samples from consenting participants alongside linked data about them, and makes both available to researchers.
    2. What it integrates: It combines participants’ genomic information with electronic health records, environmental exposures and lifestyle data, so that genetic variation can be read against real health outcomes.

    What is a genome wide association study?

    1. Definition: A genome wide association study (GWAS) scans the genomes of many individuals to find genetic variants that occur more often in people with a particular disease than in people without it.
    2. What it produces: It yields a list of variants statistically associated with a trait or disease, which is the raw material for downstream risk prediction tools.

    What is a polygenic risk score?

    1. Definition: A polygenic risk score combines the effects of many genetic variants associated with a disease to estimate a person’s overall genetic risk for it.
    2. Why ancestry matters to it: The score’s weights are derived from the population it was built in, so applying it to a population with a different variant frequency structure changes its accuracy.

    What is a single cell atlas?

    1. Definition: A single cell atlas is a reference map that catalogues the gene activity of individual cells across tissues and organs, rather than of a tissue sample as a whole.

    What is a low and middle income country?

    1. Definition: Low and middle income countries are the economies classified by the World Bank below the high income threshold on gross national income per capita, a grouping used in global health to identify where disease burden and research funding diverge.
    2. Why the category is used here: The under representation problem is stated at the level of this group, with India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka as instances inside it rather than as separate cases.

    What are potential years of life lost?

    1. Definition: Potential years of life lost is a measure of premature mortality that counts the years a person would have lived had they reached a reference life expectancy.
    2. What it captures that a death count does not: It weights a death at a young age more heavily than a death in old age, which is why it shifts burden sharply towards countries with high early mortality.

    What is G6PD deficiency?

    1. Definition: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is an inherited enzyme disorder that can cause a form of anaemia when red blood cells break down under oxidative stress from certain drugs, infections or foods.

    What is metabolic syndrome?

    1. Definition: Metabolic syndrome is a clustering of obesity, raised blood sugar, abnormal cholesterol and high blood pressure that together raise the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.

    How large is the ancestry gap in global genomic databases?

    1. The genome wide association study record: The GWAS Catalogue is maintained by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI). It records that more than 86 per cent of participants in these studies between 2005 and 2025 were of European ancestry.
    2. The South Asian share: South Asians accounted for less than 1 per cent of participants over that same twenty year period.
    3. The gap at the country income level: Over 90 per cent of the world’s potential years of life lost occurred in low and middle income countries. About 10 per cent of global health research funding addressed the health needs of those countries.
    4. The share of humanity excluded: More than 20 per cent of the world is being neglected in multi modal data integration, and the exclusion denies those populations the opportunity to attain the maximal possible health.
    5. The pattern repeats in newer tools: A study published in Cell Genomics reviewed more than 13,500 samples across three major single cell resources and found a striking and pervasive European over representation alongside under representation of Asian and Latino individuals.
    6. The three resources reviewed: The study covered the Human Cell Atlas, the Human Tumour Atlas Network and the PsychAD Consortium.
    7. South Asians absent from the biobanks too: South Asians remain largely absent from integrated biobanks such as the U.K. Biobank, which are the repositories that transformed biomedical research.

    Why does a European skewed dataset produce worse clinical tools for South Asians?

    1. The burden runs the other way: South Asians face higher rates of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and asthma than people of European ancestry, so the tools built on European heavy data are least accurate for the population that needs them most.
    2. The diabetes case: More than one in ten adults globally now live with diabetes, the risk is higher for people of South Asian ancestry and it appears earlier than in many other populations.
    3. India’s projected burden: The number of people with diabetes in India alone is projected to reach 125 million by 2045.
    4. Risk scores lose accuracy across ancestry: A 2023 study found that polygenic risk scores for multiple sclerosis were less accurate when applied to South Asian populations.
    5. Functional predictions are untested: Most predictions about how variants affect gene expression or cell function are inferred from European datasets, and it is not known which of those predictions hold in South Asians.
    6. The consequence for drug discovery: This limits the ability to understand disease mechanisms and to identify drug targets relevant to South Asian populations.
    7. Thresholds themselves need recalibration: Diagnostic thresholds, risk scores and prediction models developed predominantly from European populations require validation and, where necessary, recalibration using South Asian data.

    Why can South Asia not be treated as a single genetic block?

    1. One of the most diverse populations on earth: South Asia constitutes one of the most diverse human populations in the world, shaped by thousands of years of migration, cultural diversity, endogamy and consanguineous marriages.
    2. Lumping erases the differences: Much existing research groups South Asians, Southeast Asians, West Asians and other Asian populations together, obscuring important differences between them.
    3. Variation within the region: G6PD deficiency varies considerably across South Asia, with some ethnic groups in Pakistan and Afghanistan carrying the trait at much higher rates than others.
    4. Variation within a single population: A study from Sri Lanka found that cardiometabolic risk did not fit into a single metabolic syndrome profile, and within the same population men and women showed distinct patterns of obesity, blood sugar, cholesterol and blood pressure.
    5. The scale of Indian variation: The GenomeIndia Project has already identified more than 40 million genetic variants unique to the Indian population.
    6. Who must be sampled: India cannot realistically be treated as one genetic block, and inclusion must extend to distinct endogamous and tribal groups rather than a few urban cohorts, since many of the harmful variants found there are not seen anywhere else.

    Why is the data missing in the first place?

    1. Infrastructure followed the money: Research funding, institutions, registries, biobanks and large population cohorts have historically been built and sustained where the money already was.
    2. What that left behind: Low and middle income countries were left with inadequate laboratory infrastructure, inadequate biobanking facilities and too few trained personnel to run comparable studies at scale.
    3. The imbalance is not only financial: It shapes whose problems are studied, whose questions are prioritised and whose evidence informs health policy and practice.
    4. Ancestry classification practice: Where non European participants are recruited, they are frequently pooled into broad continental categories, which means the data collected does not resolve the differences it was collected to capture.

    Why is genomic research hard for South Asian countries to prioritise?

    1. Competing immediate needs: For most South Asian countries genomic research is difficult to prioritise against more immediate and pressing public health demands.
    2. Infectious disease: Communicable disease control absorbs public health budgets and personnel that a genomics programme would otherwise draw on.
    3. Maternal and child health: Maternal and child health programmes command prior claim because their outcomes are measurable within a single planning cycle.
    4. Non communicable diseases: Treatment and screening for non communicable diseases compete for the same budget line that genomic infrastructure would need.
    5. The mismatch in horizons: Genomic infrastructure returns value over a decade or more, while the health systems being asked to fund it are assessed on annual outcome indicators.
    6. Why deferring is costly: Every year the region defers, the reference atlases and the models trained on them are built further without it, which raises the cost of correction later.

    What genomic cohorts already exist in South Asia and why do they not add up?

    1. GenomeIndia: India’s national population reference cohort.
    2. Phenome India: An Indian longitudinal cohort linking health, lifestyle and clinical measurements across participants.
    3. Longevity India: An Indian cohort focused on ageing and the biological determinants of long life.
    4. Sri Lankan Twin Registry Biobank: A Sri Lankan registry and biobank built around twin pairs, which permits separation of genetic and environmental effects.
    5. Pakistan Genome Resource: A Pakistani national genomic resource built on population sampling.
    6. Why they do not combine: These independent cohorts and biobanks are mostly focused on individual diseases or specific populations, and often use different systems for collecting and storing data, which makes it difficult to bring them together for large genetic studies.
    7. The Indian case specifically: India has several sizeable cohorts, but no harmonised system yet exists that lets researchers within and across borders work across them easily.

    What does the U.K. Biobank model demonstrate that South Asian cohorts currently cannot?

    1. United Kingdom, the integrated design: The U.K. Biobank links each participant’s genomic information to electronic health records, environmental exposure data and lifestyle data in a single resource, which is the feature that allows genotype to be read against outcome.
    2. What that integration produced: Repositories of this design accelerated drug development, informed clinical guidelines and shaped public health policy across multiple countries, not only in the country that built them.
    3. The contrast with South Asia: South Asian cohorts are disease specific or population specific and are stored on divergent systems, so no equivalent linkage across genomics, clinical records and exposure exists in the region.
    4. The limit of this comparison: The U.K. Biobank is the single substantive institutional model in the evidence here, so it establishes what an integrated design makes possible, not a ranked set of alternative national models to choose between.

    What does the regional proposal recommend?

    1. The authorship: A perspective in the Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, written by scientists across India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, sets out the regional response.
    2. The core warning: The region risks being excluded from the genomic revolution unless it builds the infrastructure itself, rather than waiting for inclusion in datasets built elsewhere.
    3. Regional collaboration between existing assets: The proposal is to build greater collaboration between existing biobanks and cohorts, rather than to construct a new central repository from scratch.
    4. Interoperability: The aim is a system in which existing datasets can speak to each other, which is the specific technical gap that keeps Indian cohorts from being analysed together.
    5. Inclusion of overlooked populations: Populations that have historically been overlooked, including distinct endogamous and tribal groups, are to be brought into the sampling frame.
    6. Retained control over data use: South Asian researchers and institutions are to retain a meaningful role in how their data are used.
    7. Benefit sharing: The researchers generating the data are to share in the scientific benefits, which addresses the extraction pattern rather than only the data gap.

    Why does the gap compound rather than stay constant?

    1. The atlases became reference maps: Single cell atlases are now the reference maps for biology and medicine, so an error in the map propagates into everything read against it.
    2. They are now training data: Those same atlases are increasingly used to train the artificial intelligence models that will shape future research and care.
    3. Scale changes the nature of the problem: If the underlying data continues to be skewed, the artificial intelligence models and clinical tools built on top of it will reproduce and repeat those biases at a much larger scale.
    4. From a research gap to a clinical one: A skewed research dataset produced inaccurate studies, a skewed training dataset produces inaccurate bedside tools deployed on populations that were never in the data.
    5. The window is closing but not shut: It is late for the region to build its own infrastructure, and it is still not too late.

    Challenges to building a South Asian genomic data infrastructure

    1. Non interoperable data standards: Existing cohorts use different collection, phenotyping and storage systems, so pooling requires retrospective harmonisation that the original consent may not permit. Eg. India’s several sizeable cohorts have no harmonised system that lets researchers work across them.
    2. Consent and benefit sharing for community level data: Genomic data from an endogamous or tribal group carries group level implications that individual consent does not cover. Eg. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 governs access and benefit sharing for biological resources, and its application to human genomic data drawn from identified communities is unsettled.
    3. Sustained financing beyond donor cycles: Climate and health workforce experience across the region shows that capacity built on project funding disappears when the project ends. Eg. Genomic surveillance capacity expanded rapidly during the pandemic and contracted once the emergency funding lapsed.
    4. Cross border data transfer rules: Regional pooling requires moving identifiable health data across national jurisdictions with differing data protection regimes. Eg. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 permits the Central Government to restrict transfer of personal data to notified countries.
    5. Shortage of trained personnel: Bioinformatics, genetic counselling and biobank management skills are scarce relative to the sequencing capacity being installed. Eg. Genetic counsellors in India number in the low hundreds against a population carrying a large inherited disease burden.
    6. Risk of genetic discrimination: Widening genomic data collection without a statutory bar exposes participants to insurance and employment consequences. Eg. The Delhi High Court in United India Insurance vs Jai Parkash Tayal, 2018 held the exclusion of genetic disorders from health insurance cover unconstitutional, in the absence of any general anti discrimination statute.
    7. Sampling reaching only urban cohorts: Recruitment gravitates to tertiary hospitals and metropolitan volunteers, reproducing inside India the same skew the region objects to globally. Eg. Inclusion of distinct endogamous and tribal groups has been identified as the specific gap in Indian sampling, not the overall sample size.

    Conclusion

    The under representation of South Asians in global genomic databases is no longer only an equity problem in research, it is becoming an engineering problem in clinical artificial intelligence. With more than 86 per cent of genome wide association study participants of European ancestry and South Asians below 1 per cent, the reference atlases now being used as training data carry that skew forward at scale. The response has shifted from asking for inclusion in datasets built elsewhere to building interoperable regional infrastructure that keeps control and benefit with the researchers generating the data. What remains unresolved is financing, since the region must fund a decade long investment against infectious disease, maternal and child health and non communicable disease needs that compete for the same budget.

    “[2026] Which of the following statements with regard to Genome India Project is/are correct?

    1. It is a part of the Human Genome Project.

    2. The project is funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.

    3. Its primary aim is to build a catalogue of genetic diversity of the Indian population.

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 2 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

  • Vande Mataram: Religious imagery, political debate

    Why in the News

    The Congress Working Committee has decided that only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram will be sung at party programmes, citing a resolution passed by the same body in 1937. Parliament has since made it an offence to intentionally prevent the singing of the National Song, so a compromise negotiated inside the freedom movement now sits against a statutory protection and an executive protocol.

    What is Vande Mataram?

    1. Composition: Vande Mataram, meaning mother, I bow to thee, was composed in Sanskritised Bengali by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in 1875.
    2. Placement in a novel: Six years later it was included in his novel Anandamath, which tells the story of the late eighteenth century Sanyasi Rebellion.
    3. Status: It is the National Song of India, a designation distinct from that of the National Anthem, Jana Gana Mana.
    4. Length: The full composition runs to six stanzas, of which the first two are the portion conventionally sung in public.

    What was the Sanyasi Rebellion?

    1. Sanyasi Rebellion: The Sanyasi Rebellion was a series of armed uprisings in Bengal in the late eighteenth century directed against East India Company rule and against the regional Muslim administrators. Anandamath is set in that revolt, which is the narrative frame in which Vande Mataram first appeared.

    Why do the later stanzas carry religious imagery?

    1. The first two stanzas: The first two stanzas describe the beauty of the motherland, its fertility, its waters and its greenery.
    2. The turn in the later stanzas: The later stanzas liken the motherland to the divine mother and speak of installing the mother’s statues in temples.
    3. The fifth stanza: The fifth stanza compares the motherland to the ten armed Durga, and to the goddesses who dwell on lotuses and bestow knowledge and expression, which are references to Lakshmi and Saraswati.
    4. The text itself: The Sanskritised Bangla lines run “Tvam hi Durga dasa-praharana-dharini, Kamala kamala-dala-viharini, Vani vidya-dayini, Namami tvam namami kamalam”.
    5. The translation: These translate roughly as “You are Durga, bearing ten weapons; You are Lakshmi, who dwells upon the lotus; You are Saraswati, the giver of knowledge; I bow to you, I bow to you”.
    6. The objection recorded: The Muslim League was against some of these references and held that bowing to the mother amounts to idolatry.

    How did Vande Mataram become associated with the freedom struggle?

    1. Swadeshi movement: The song gained popularity during the Swadeshi movement of 1905 to 1908 and became closely linked with the freedom struggle.
    2. Political rather than devotional use: It functioned as an anti imperialist cry rather than as a devotional composition, which is how Mahatma Gandhi later described its purpose.
    3. Individual endorsement: Subhas Chandra Bose supported the song wholeheartedly and argued for its use.
    4. Fault line opened by that popularity: Its adoption as a national rallying song placed the Muslim League’s objection to its later stanzas at the centre of a dispute inside the Congress.

    Why did the Congress limit public rendition to two stanzas in 1937?

    1. Opinion sought from Tagore: Several leaders, including Subhas Chandra Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru, wrote to Rabindranath Tagore to seek his opinion on the question.
    2. Tagore on the first portion: Tagore wrote that the spirit of tenderness and devotion in its first portion, and the emphasis it gave to the beautiful and beneficent aspects of the motherland, made a special appeal, so much so that he found no difficulty in dissociating it from the rest of the poem.
    3. Tagore’s concession: He conceded that the whole poem read with its context is liable to be interpreted in ways that might wound Moslem susceptibilities, and held that a national song consisting only of the first two stanzas need not remind us of the whole every time.
    4. The October 1937 resolution: The Congress Working Committee decided that when Vande Mataram is sung at national gatherings, only the first two stanzas should be sung.
    5. The reason recorded: The resolution stated that the other stanzas are little known and hardly ever sung, and that they contain certain allusions and a religious ideology which may not be in keeping with the ideology of other religious groups in India.
    6. Gandhi in July 1939: Writing in Harijan on 1 July 1939, Mahatma Gandhi called it an anti imperialist cry, said it had never occurred to him that it was a Hindu song or meant only for Hindus, and said he would not risk a single quarrel over singing it at a mixed gathering.
    7. Gandhi’s second statement: Later in the same month he wrote that if at any mixed gathering any person objected to the singing of Vande Mataram, even with the Congress expurgations, the singing should be dropped.

    How was the song’s status settled in the Constituent Assembly?

    1. Demand for anthem status: After Independence there was a demand that Vande Mataram be adopted as the national anthem, and the issue produced friction in the Constituent Assembly.
    2. 14 August 1947: At the Assumption of Power ceremony, Sucheta Kripalani sang the first verse of Vande Mataram as the opening item.
    3. 26 August 1947: H V Kamath rose in the Assembly to say that a number of members had entered the Assembly Chamber only after the song had been sung, and asked the Chair to look into the matter.
    4. Nehru’s objection: Jawaharlal Nehru preferred Jana Gana Mana, and among the reasons he cited was that Vande Mataram would be difficult to set to an orchestra.
    5. 5 November 1948: Seth Govind Das argued that Vande Mataram could be the National Anthem, since the history of the independence struggle is associated with it, and that any difficulty of orchestration could be overcome by experts in orchestral music.
    6. 24 January 1950: The President of the Constituent Assembly declared that Jana Gana Mana is the National Anthem, subject to such alterations in the words as the Government may authorise, and that Vande Mataram, which has played a historic part in the struggle for Indian freedom, shall be honoured equally with Jana Gana Mana and shall have equal status with it.
    7. What the declaration left open: The declaration conferred equal status without prescribing how much of the composition constitutes the National Song, and that gap is what the present dispute occupies.

    What has changed in the legal position now?

    1. Executive protocol: The Ministry of Home Affairs on 28 January notified the first set of protocols for singing Vande Mataram, directing that all six stanzas shall be sung during official functions.
    2. Statutory protection extended: Parliament has passed the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Act, 2026, which amends Section 3 of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.
    3. What the amendment does: It extends to Vande Mataram the same legal protection that the National Anthem, Jana Gana Mana, already enjoys.
    4. The offence created: It makes it an offence to intentionally prevent the singing of the National Song, or to cause a disturbance to an assembly engaged in its singing.
    5. Passage through the House: The Lok Sabha cleared the Bill in about 15 minutes on 30 July amid protests, with one Opposition party participating in the discussion.
    6. Push behind the change: The ruling party has made a sustained push for rendition of all six stanzas and has long accused the Congress of appeasement politics over the song’s truncation.

    Why is the truncation politically contested?

    1. The party decision: The Congress Working Committee has restricted rendition at its own programmes to the first two stanzas, citing the 1937 resolution and the backing Mahatma Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore gave that position.
    2. The appeasement charge: The decision has been attacked as vote bank appeasement and as a violation of the law enacted by Parliament on rendition of the full song.
    3. The parliamentary approval argument: The Congress position is that Parliament held only a discussion in December 2025 and never adopted a resolution declaring the full song the National Song, so the change rests on a notification without parliamentary approval.
    4. The 1950 baseline invoked: The Congress reads the declaration of 24 January 1950 as covering the first two stanzas, and treats that as the settled position the notification departs from.
    5. The public and private distinction: Its legal position is that the amended law addresses national and official functions and is silent on functions held by a party or in a private setting.
    6. Trigger events: The row followed the rendition of the song at the party’s Independence Day programme and later at an event in Goa.

    Does a statutory mandate settle or reopen the question of the National Song?

    1. Convention survived because it was uncodified: The two stanza practice held for nine decades precisely because it was never written into law, so neither side had to concede the point of principle.
    2. Codification forces a choice: A protocol prescribing all six stanzas converts a question of custom into a question of compliance, which removes the ambiguity the compromise depended on.
    3. The objection is revived, not removed: Mandating the later stanzas restores the exact content the 1937 compromise was built to set aside.
    4. Two different instruments: A protocol notified by a ministry and an offence created by an amendment are separate instruments, and neither is a parliamentary vote on the song’s extent.
    5. The offence is framed as obstruction: The amendment penalises preventing or disturbing the singing rather than prescribing a number of stanzas, so the protocol and the penal provision do not cover the same ground.
    6. Equal status without equal prescription: The National Anthem carries a settled text and a prescribed playing time of about 52 seconds for the full version and about 20 seconds for the short version. The National Song carries neither a fixed extent nor a prescribed duration, which is why the extent question could remain open for so long.

    Challenges to enforcing a full-stanza protocol on the National Song

    1. Reach limited to official functions: A protocol for official functions cannot govern the internal programme of a political party or a private gathering. Eg. The Congress decision applies to its own party events, which fall outside the scope of the notified official function protocol.
    2. Proving intention: The offence turns on intentional prevention, and distinguishing a scheduling decision from deliberate obstruction is left to the investigating officer at the first instance. Eg. Not scheduling the later stanzas at an event and actively stopping their rendition would attract the same complaint.
    3. Federal divergence on the same day: State governments run their own official functions and have taken opposite positions. Eg. One State government skipped the rendition of Vande Mataram at its official Independence Day function, and three others sang the full composition on the same day.
    4. No prescribed duration: A six stanza rendition materially lengthens every official function without any notified time standard to plan around. Eg. The Home Ministry protocol of 28 January directs all six stanzas at official functions without notifying any corresponding duration for the rendition.
    5. Absence of a parliamentary vote: A change of this kind executed by notification invites a challenge to its authority rather than to its content. Eg. Parliament held a discussion in December 2025 without adopting a resolution on the extent of the National Song.
    6. Compliance without belief: A mandate can secure attendance and silence but not participation, which leaves the enforcing authority judging demeanour. Eg. The row began over what was described as a gesture during a rendition rather than over any refusal to hold one.

    Conclusion

    Vande Mataram’s status has rested since 24 January 1950 on a declaration of equal honour that never fixed how much of the composition constitutes the National Song. A Home Ministry protocol of 28 January directing all six stanzas at official functions, and the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Act, 2026, have now answered that question administratively and penally. The Congress Working Committee has restated the 1937 two stanza position for its own programmes, and the contested point is whether the extent of the National Song can be fixed by notification rather than by a resolution of Parliament.

    National Symbols of India

    1. National Flag: A horizontal tricolour of deep saffron, white and dark green in equal proportion, with a navy blue Ashoka Chakra of 24 spokes at the centre, in the ratio of 3 to 2, adopted on 22 July 1947.
    2. National Anthem: Jana Gana Mana, written and set to music in Bengali by Rabindranath Tagore, with the Hindi rendering adopted by the Constituent Assembly.
    3. National Song: Vande Mataram, drawn from Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s novel Anandamath.
    4. State Emblem: Adapted from the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath and adopted on 26 January 1950, with the motto Satyameva Jayate drawn from the Mundaka Upanishad.
    5. National Calendar: The Saka calendar was adopted on 22 March 1957, with Chaitra as its first month, corresponding to 22 March in a normal year.
    6. Other designations: The tiger is the national animal, the peacock the national bird, the lotus the national flower, the banyan the national tree, the mango the national fruit, the Ganga the national river, the Gangetic dolphin the national aquatic animal and the elephant the national heritage animal.

    Constitutional and Statutory Framework Governing National Symbols

    1. Article 51A(a): Makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem.
    2. Article 19(1)(a) read with Article 19(2): Places any compulsion to sing, and any restriction on refusing to sing, within the test of reasonable restriction on free expression.
    3. Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971: Penalises insult to the National Flag, the Constitution of India and the National Anthem.
    4. Section 2 covers burning, mutilating, defacing, defiling or otherwise showing disrespect to the National Flag or to the Constitution.
    5. Section 3 covers intentionally preventing the singing of the National Anthem or causing disturbance to an assembly engaged in singing it.
    6. Section 3A, inserted in 2003, provides enhanced punishment on a second or subsequent conviction.
    7. Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950: Bars improper commercial and professional use of specified names and emblems.
    8. State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005: Regulates the use of the State Emblem by persons and authorities.
    9. Flag Code of India, 2002: Consolidates the instructions on display and hoisting of the National Flag, amended subsequently to allow machine made and polyester flags and display at night.

    Key Facts about the National Anthem and the National Song

    1. First rendition of Vande Mataram: Sung at the 1896 Calcutta session of the Indian National Congress, set to a tune composed by Rabindranath Tagore.
    2. First rendition of Jana Gana Mana: Sung on 27 December 1911 at the Calcutta session of the Indian National Congress.
    3. Common adoption date: Both were placed on record together by the Constituent Assembly on 24 January 1950.
    4. Single author for both: Rabindranath Tagore wrote the National Anthem and also composed the tune to which the National Song was first publicly sung.
    5. Anniversary year: The year 2025 marked 150 years since the composition of Vande Mataram in 1875.
    6. Source novel: Anandamath, in which the song appears, was published in 1882 and is set in the Sanyasi Rebellion of the late eighteenth century.

    Back2Basics: Swadeshi Movement (1905 to 1908)

    1. Trigger: The Viceroy announced the Partition of Bengal on 19 July 1905, and it took effect on 16 October 1905.
    2. Stated and actual grounds: Administrative convenience was the stated reason, and the effect was to divide Bengal along religious lines and split the base of its nationalist politics.
    3. Formal launch: The boycott of foreign goods was formally proclaimed at a meeting in the Calcutta Town Hall on 7 August 1905.
    4. Methods used: Boycott of British goods and institutions, promotion of indigenous industry, national education, volunteer corps known as samitis, public meetings and processions.
    5. Congress positions: The Calcutta session of 1906, presided over by Dadabhai Naoroji, adopted swaraj as the goal, and the movement’s disputes led to the Surat split of 1907.
    6. Leaders associated: Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Lala Lajpat Rai, Aurobindo Ghosh and Surendranath Banerjea led it in different regions.
    7. Institutions created: The Bengal National College and the National Council of Education were founded in 1906, alongside indigenous enterprises such as the Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works.
    8. Cultural expression: Vande Mataram became the rallying song of the movement, which is how it entered the national political vocabulary.
    9. Decline and reversal: The movement declined by 1908 under repression and prosecutions, and the Partition was annulled in 1911, when the capital was also moved from Calcutta to Delhi.

    Challenges in Regulating National Symbols in India

    1. Compulsion against conscience: Requiring participation collides with religious belief and with the right to remain silent. Eg. In Bijoe Emmanuel v State of Kerala (1986), the Supreme Court held that children who stood respectfully but did not sing the National Anthem on religious grounds could not be expelled from school.
    2. Judicial position has shifted: Directions on compulsory rendition have been imposed and then withdrawn, leaving no stable standard. Eg. The Supreme Court’s 2016 direction making the National Anthem compulsory in cinema halls was made optional again in January 2018.
    3. Private complaint driven prosecution: Offences of this kind are triggered by individual complaints, which allows the law to be used to harass rather than to protect. Eg. Complaints under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 have been filed against persons for remaining seated, with the question of intention decided only at trial.
    4. Vagueness of disrespect: The statutory language of showing disrespect has no fixed content, so identical conduct produces different outcomes. Eg. Section 2 of the 1971 Act lists burning and mutilation alongside the open ended phrase otherwise showing disrespect.
    5. Commercial misuse of the flag: Relaxations meant to increase public use have widened the space for improper commercial handling. Eg. The Flag Code amendments allowing machine made polyester flags and night display increased circulation of flags that are then discarded improperly.
    6. Federal divergence in observance: States conduct their own official functions and set their own protocols, so a Union notification does not produce uniform practice. Eg. Union protocols on the National Flag apply uniformly, and observance of the National Song at State official functions has varied between State governments on the same date.
    7. Symbols as electoral instruments: Enforcement decisions are read as political positioning rather than as neutral administration. Eg. The present dispute over stanzas has been argued in terms of appeasement and vote banks rather than in terms of the statute’s text.

    Way Forward

    1. Settle the extent by resolution: Place the question of how much of the composition constitutes the National Song before Parliament, since a notification cannot resolve a claim about parliamentary authority.
    2. Publish a full protocol: Notify the text, order and playing time of the National Song in the same form as exists for the National Anthem, so compliance is measurable rather than inferred.
    3. Confine the offence to obstruction: Limit prosecution to acts that prevent or disturb an ongoing rendition, and exclude non participation, in line with the Bijoe Emmanuel position.
    4. Require prior sanction for prosecution: Make registration of a case under the amended provision conditional on sanction by a designated authority, to prevent complaint driven harassment.
    5. Separate official from private observance: State expressly that the protocol governs national and official functions, which removes the ambiguity that the present dispute turns on.
    6. Teach the full text with its history: Include the composition, the 1937 resolution and the 1950 declaration in school curricula, so the song is understood as a negotiated national settlement rather than as a loyalty test.

  • The Gen Z that wasn’t at Jantar Mantar

    Why in the News

    The Gen Z visible at the Jantar Mantar protest was young, articulate and quotable, and drew wide attention online. A far larger part of the same cohort was absent from those photographs, working as delivery riders, security guards, warehouse packers and unemployed graduates. The gap between the two groups sets up the question of whether a generation that has been given aspiration has also been given the means to act on it.

    What is the demographic dividend?

    1. The concept: A demographic dividend is the growth advantage a country gains when the share of its working age population rises relative to its dependent population. The advantage arises from a temporary shift in age structure, not from population size.
    2. Why it is conditional: The advantage converts into output only where the additional working age population is employed at rising productivity. Absent that, a larger workforce raises the number of job seekers without raising income.
    3. How India has used the term: For two decades the demographic dividend has been described as an asset that pays out automatically. A young population is better understood as capital advanced against a future that has to be built to repay it, and unlike a dividend, it can default.

    What is a reference group?

    1. The concept: A reference group is the set of people against whom an individual measures their own life, as set out by sociologist Robert Merton. Satisfaction depends on the comparison, not on the absolute level of income.
    2. What changed the group: A farmhand can now compare himself with a Dubai apartment or a weekend in Silicon Valley, delivered more reliably than a crop forecast.

    What is the capacity to aspire?

    1. The concept: The capacity to aspire, as framed by anthropologist Arjun Appadurai, is not merely wanting a different future. It is knowing the routes that lead to it.
    2. The asymmetry it exposes: The capacity to imagine has been democratised at internet speed. The capacity to navigate has not.

    What is the gig or platform economy?

    1. The arrangement: Work is allocated by a digital platform on a task by task basis, and the worker is classified as an independent partner rather than an employee. The platform can deactivate a worker without ever meeting him.
    2. What it prices: The platform prices risk more precisely than labour, so incentives rise when it rains rather than when skill accumulates.

    Which Gen Z was absent from the protest?

    1. The delivery rider: A 22 year old delivering dinner to someone watching the protest on a phone, financing a motorcycle on debt he does not fully understand.
    2. The security guard: A worker stationed outside a building, protecting a lifestyle he can see but cannot enter.
    3. The village youth: A young man who can watch a Stanford lecture for free and has no idea what job he will do next year, whose imagination has migrated while his life chances have not.
    4. The three the category quietly merges: A liberal arts student in Delhi, a warehouse packer outside Gurugram and a UPSC aspirant in Bihar are treated as one cohort because they were born within the same 15 years.
    5. What they actually share: They share visibility without access, not a common set of opportunities.

    Why has inequality become harder to bear without becoming larger?

    1. The level is not the change: India has never lacked inequality. What has changed is the technology of experiencing it.
    2. Comparison is no longer rationed: The farmer knew the landlord lived better. He did not begin breakfast watching the landlord’s holiday in the Maldives.
    3. The comparison set is now global: The smartphone has given a young population the entire planet to measure itself against.
    4. Consumption has become identity: The sneaker, the café and the start up vocabulary function as signifiers of having arrived rather than as possessions.
    5. The mismatch of speeds: Desire now travels at the speed of a 5G network. Social mobility still moves at the pace of a passenger train.

    Why does the platform economy break the link between work and status?

    1. The old bargain was legible: Selling labour converted time into standing over a working life, through tenure, wage progression and recognised skill.
    2. The mechanism was removed, not replaced: The platform economy dropped that conversion and substituted the vocabulary of entrepreneurship for it.
    3. Hours convert into more hours: A worker classified as a partner finds that additional hours produce additional hours rather than advancement, described as autonomy.
    4. Deactivation replaces dismissal: Loss of livelihood arrives as an algorithmic status change, without a hearing, a notice period or an identified decision maker.
    5. The scaffolding is missing: Aspiration has been mass produced without the institutions that let a person act on it.

    If a salary cannot deliver status, what does?

    1. A second economy opens: When the economic route to status narrows, an economy of dignity opens in its place.
    2. The substitutes on offer: Religion, nationalism, caste and an online tribe can supply the standing a salary does not.
    3. The switching cost is near zero: A young man cannot change his salary. He can change his avatar.
    4. The consequence for politics: A society that cannot offer its young enough ladders should not be surprised when identity begins to function as one.
    5. What the protest actually demonstrated: The protesters possessed something rarer than anger, which is a vocabulary for it. Most anger never reaches that stage.

    Why should the demographic dividend be read as a loan rather than a payout?

    1. A dividend is unconditional, a loan is not: Treating youth as an asset that pays out automatically removes the obligation to build the employment and training system that repays it.
    2. The default condition is identifiable: Loans default when the future they were advanced against is not built, which in this case means a labour market that cannot absorb the graduates it produces.
    3. The window is finite: The favourable age structure lasts for a fixed period, after which the dependency ratio rises again and the opportunity closes.
    4. The test is not happiness: The operative question is whether a generation believes the future is negotiable, not whether it reports itself content.
    5. The distinction that matters: Every generation tolerates hardship that looks like a corridor. The trouble begins when it starts looking like a closed room.
    6. The unfinished journey: The protesters had travelled from disappointment to language and from anger to demand. Millions of their contemporaries are still between the first two.

    Challenges to realising India’s demographic dividend

    1. Employability lags enrolment: Degree attainment has risen faster than the skills employers price, so unemployment rises with education level rather than falling. Eg. Urban youth unemployment in the 15 to 29 age group stood at 13.6% even as the overall unemployment rate stayed at 3.1%.
    2. The workforce is concentrated in low productivity work: A large share of workers remains in self employment and casual labour, where earnings do not accumulate into savings or standing. Eg. Self employment accounted for 56.2% of employment and casual labour for 20.2%.
    3. Agriculture holds labour it cannot pay for: The sector employs a share of the workforce far above its contribution to output, which caps rural incomes. Eg. Agriculture employs about 43% of the workforce and contributes around 15% to 16% of output.
    4. Female participation limits the size of the dividend: A dividend calculated on the working age population is not realised where half of it stays outside the labour force. Eg. Female labour force participation stood at 40.0% against 79.1% for men.
    5. Social security does not follow the worker: Platform and informal workers move between employers and locations faster than benefit entitlements can be established. Eg. Portable benefits for gig workers were introduced only through the e-Shram linkage under the four labour codes effective 21 November 2025.
    6. The dividend is unevenly distributed across States: States that completed the demographic transition earlier are ageing while the working age surge continues elsewhere, so the labour surplus and the job supply sit in different places. Eg. Kerala’s multidimensional poverty rate of 0.55% sits alongside Bihar’s 33.76%, and the two States are at opposite ends of the age structure.
    7. Aspiration outruns the migration corridor: Young workers who move for work enter cities without housing, portable schooling or urban welfare registration. Eg. Migrant workers were excluded from ration entitlements outside their home State until One Nation One Ration Card portability was rolled out.

    Conclusion

    The visible Gen Z at Jantar Mantar had converted disappointment into a demand, and that conversion is what made it photographable. The larger part of the cohort holds the same grievance without the vocabulary or the platform to state it, which is why absence rather than presence is the more accurate measure of the generation. The demographic dividend framing has obscured this by treating a young population as a payout rather than as a claim that must be earned. What remains unaddressed is the machinery that converts aspiration into mobility, namely employable skills, formal jobs and portable social protection.

    What is Inclusive Growth?

    1. About: Inclusive growth is economic growth that raises the incomes and capabilities of every group in the population, not only aggregate output.
    2. Rationale: It exists because headline growth can rise while the bottom half of the distribution gains little, leaving poverty, unemployment and inequality intact alongside a rising gross domestic product.
    3. The three domains it is studied across: Overall inequality, poverty, and unemployment.
    4. The three dimensions in the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD):
    5. Participation: All groups are able to contribute to the growth process.
    6. Benefit sharing: All groups gain from growth in proportion to their contribution.
    7. Equity: Historical disadvantages are actively redressed through policy.
    8. Where it entered Indian planning: The Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007 to 2012) was titled “Rapid and More Inclusive Growth” and the Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012 to 2017) was titled “Faster, Sustainable, and More Inclusive Growth”.

    Key Concerns Regarding Inclusive Growth

    1. Trickle down has not operated: Headline expansion in gross domestic product has not translated into proportionate gains for the bottom half of the distribution.
    2. Growth has been jobless in composition: High informal employment shares and structural underemployment persist alongside robust manufacturing and services output.
    3. Regional disparity accumulates: Gains concentrate within urban clusters and industrialised States, widening per capita income divergence across regions.
    4. Redistribution capacity is weak: The effective tax burden on ultra high net worth individuals is often lower than on middle income households, which limits the fiscal space for welfare intervention.
    5. Wealth inequality compounds across generations: Wealth transfers through inheritance in a way income does not, so the wealth distribution is more concentrated than the income distribution and stays that way.
    6. Group based exclusion cuts across income: Gender, caste, region and rural or urban location each produce separate deprivation patterns that an income only measure does not capture.

    Key Facts about India’s Youth and Labour Market

    1. Labour force participation: The labour force participation rate stands at 59.3%, with 79.1% for men and 40.0% for women.
    2. Worker population ratio: The worker population ratio stands at 57.4%, with 76.6% for men and 38.8% for women.
    3. Unemployment: The overall unemployment rate is 3.1%, at 2.4% in rural areas and 4.8% in urban areas.
    4. Youth unemployment: Unemployment in the 15 to 29 age group is 9.9%, down from 10.3% in 2024, with urban youth unemployment at 13.6% against 14.3% earlier.
    5. Employment composition: Self employment accounts for 56.2%, casual labour for 20.2% and regular wage or salaried employment for 23.6%.
    6. Income concentration: The top 10% capture 58% of national income and the bottom 50% earn 15%, per the World Inequality Report 2026.
    7. Wealth concentration: The top 10% hold 65% of national wealth and the top 1% alone holds 40%.
    8. Human development: India ranked 130 of 193 on the Human Development Index with a value of 0.685, and inequality erases 30.7% of that value, bringing the Inequality adjusted Human Development Index to 0.475.
    9. Multidimensional poverty: The national multidimensional poverty headcount fell from 29.17% in 2013-14 to 11.28% in 2022-23, with 24.82 crore people moving out of multidimensional poverty.

    Laws and Rules Governing Gig and Platform Work in India

    1. Code on Social Security, 2020: Provides the first statutory definition of a gig worker and a platform worker in Indian law and empowers the Centre to frame welfare schemes for them.
    2. It provides for an aggregator contribution towards a social security fund, set as a share of the aggregator’s annual turnover subject to a ceiling linked to payments made to workers.
    3. The four labour codes, effective 21 November 2025: Consolidate the earlier labour statutes and introduce a universal minimum wage floor, extend social security to gig workers and provide portable benefits through the e-Shram registry.
    4. Rajasthan Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2023: The first State law dedicated to platform workers, providing for a welfare board, mandatory registration of workers and aggregators and a welfare fee levied on transactions.
    5. Karnataka platform based gig workers welfare law, 2025: Establishes a welfare board and a transaction level welfare fee, and provides for notice and a reasoned order before a worker is terminated from a platform.
    6. Unorganised Workers’ Social Security Act, 2008: The earlier framework for welfare schemes for unorganised sector workers, operating through National and State Social Security Boards.

    Government Initiatives for Youth Employment and Skilling

    1. Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana 4.0 (2022 to 2026): The flagship short term skilling scheme, under which 1.4 crore youth have been trained.
    2. National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme: Supports stipend linked apprenticeships in establishments, with over 10 lakh registered apprentices.
    3. e-Shram: The national database of unorganised and platform workers, used as the registry through which portable social security benefits are delivered.
    4. Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana: Provides collateral free credit to micro enterprises, with disbursement across 43 crore loans since 2015, largely to micro entrepreneurs and women.
    5. PM SVANidhi: Provides working capital loans to street vendors, with 68 lakh loans disbursed.
    6. Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Adhiniyam, 2025: Replaces the earlier rural employment guarantee with a 125 day wage guarantee together with skill and livelihood diversification components, effective 1 July 2026.
    7. Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: Provides the basic banking access on which wage, benefit and credit delivery to young and informal workers rests, with 58.63 crore accounts.

    Challenges in Achieving Inclusive Growth in India

    1. The informal economy absorbs most new entrants: Job creation happens largely outside registered enterprises, where wages, hours and safety are unenforced. Eg. Around 56% to 57% of workers remain self employed rather than in wage employment.
    2. Regional divergence is widening rather than closing: Poorer States add the most working age population while investment concentrates in already industrialised States. Eg. Bihar records a multidimensional poverty headcount of 33.76% and Jharkhand 28.81%, against Kerala at 0.55%.
    3. The rural and urban gap persists in deprivation, not only income: Access to health, schooling and sanitation remains structurally weaker in rural areas. Eg. Rural multidimensional poverty stands at 15.96% against urban at 5.27%.
    4. Caste concentrates assets independently of policy: Ownership of productive wealth remains skewed towards groups that already held it. Eg. Upper castes, at just over a quarter of the population, control 88.4% of billionaire wealth and own nearly 55% of total wealth.
    5. Women’s work is undercounted and underpaid: Unpaid care work keeps women out of measured employment and depresses earnings when they enter it. Eg. Women earn about 61% of men’s hourly earnings excluding unpaid work, and only 32% when unpaid work is included.
    6. The tax system does not redistribute at the top: Low effective tax burdens on the very wealthy constrain the fiscal room for public services that would raise mobility. Eg. The World Inequality Report 2026 finds the effective tax burden on the very wealthy often lower than on middle income households.
    7. Human development trails income growth: Gains in output have not translated into proportionate gains in health, education and gender outcomes. Eg. India’s Gender Inequality Index value is 0.403 with a rank of 102, and the country falls in Group 5 on the Gender Development Index.

    Way Forward

    1. Tie skilling to placement outcomes rather than enrolment counts: Fund training providers on verified employment retention at six and twelve months instead of on numbers trained.
    2. Extend the platform worker welfare model nationally: Convert the State level transaction fee and welfare board design into a uniform national mechanism under the Code on Social Security, 2020 so benefits do not stop at a State border.
    3. Make social protection portable by default: Link e-Shram registration to health, accident and pension entitlements that travel with the worker across employers, platforms and States.
    4. Create a formal job track in labour intensive manufacturing and construction: Direct incentives towards sectors that absorb workers with school level education, rather than towards capital intensive sectors that add output without adding jobs.
    5. Raise female labour force participation through care infrastructure: Expand crèche provision, safe transport and hostel capacity, which are the binding constraints on entry rather than willingness to work.
    6. Publish district level youth employment data: Report youth unemployment and employment composition at the district level so the mismatch between where young workers live and where jobs are created becomes visible to planners.
    7. Strengthen redistribution at the top of the distribution: Widen the base for capital and inheritance related taxation to fund the education, health and urban services that determine mobility.

    “[2014, GS3, 12.5] “While we flaunt India’s demographic dividend, we ignore the dropping rates of employ ability.” What are we missing while doing so? Where will the jobs that India desperately needs come from? Explain”