💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (May Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Type: Explained

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Russia

    Why is there no peace in Ukraine

    Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Effect Of Policies & Politics Of World On India’S Interests,India & Its Neighborhood – Relations

    Introduction

    Since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, several attempts at negotiations, from Belarus to Turkey, have collapsed. With Russia consolidating control over Ukrainian territories and Ukraine facing military constraints, the conflict shows signs of becoming a prolonged war. The Trump plan, recent Russian advances, and fatigue in Western capitals have complicated the strategic landscape, placing Ukraine at a turning point.

    Why in the news

    The Ukraine-Russia war has again entered headlines as Russia captured Pokrovske, marking the first major territorial gain after a year of stalled frontlines. Simultaneously, a 28-point U.S. peace proposal surfaced, offering recognition of Russian control over key territories. Ukraine is facing troop shortages, battlefield pressure, and delays in Western aid, making negotiations both urgent and politically difficult. Recent territorial losses, a disputed peace plan, and growing pressure on President Zelensky have reopened global debate on whether a ceasefire is achievable.

    Battlefield Dynamics and Stalled Negotiations

    1. Russian Consolidation: Russia captured Pokrovske after holding back Ukrainian forces for nearly a year; repositioned units in Kharkiv and Kherson and intensified attacks on Avdiivka and Kupiansk.
    2. Ukrainian Strain: Ukraine faces troop shortages, heavy attrition, and reduced Western ammunition deliveries; unable to meet battlefield demands.
    3. Failed Negotiations History: Talks in Belarus (Feb 28, 2022), Turkey (March 2022), and subsequent engagements collapsed due to disagreements over territory, NATO membership, and security guarantees.
    4. Renewed Russian Push: Russia resumed rotated forces, strengthened defensive lines, and maintained pressure across the east and south.

    Why Have Earlier Peace Efforts Failed?

    1. Maximalist Positions:
      1. Ukraine demanded withdrawal to 1991 borders and refusal of territorial concessions.
      2. Russia insisted on recognition of annexed territories and long-term security guarantees.
    2. NATO Membership Dispute: Ukraine’s insistence on future NATO membership remained unacceptable to Russia.
    3. Shifting War Outcomes: Early battlefield gains for Ukraine pushed negotiations aside; later Russian consolidation hardened Moscow’s stance.
    4. Domestic Political Costs: Zelensky faced internal political risk if he conceded territory or NATO flexibility.
    5. Western Signalling: Changes in Western messaging during 2022, especially from UK PM Boris Johnson’s Kyiv visit, reinforced Ukraine’s resolve to fight rather than negotiate.

    What Does the New Trump Peace Plan Propose?

    1. Territorial Recognition: Recognizes Russian control of current occupied territories (Crimea, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson).
    2. Ceasefire Framework: Calls for an initial ceasefire based on “current positions”.
    3. Security Guarantees: Ukraine would receive “reliable security guarantees”, though details remain unspecified.
    4. NATO Question: Prohibits Ukraine from joining NATO but proposes alternative security arrangements.
    5. Referendum Clause: Suggests that Ukraine may hold referendums under international supervision in disputed areas.
    6. Western Package: Encourages Washington to commit additional security assurances if Ukraine accepts concessions.
    7. Controversy: Critics argue it endorses annexation and weakens Ukrainian sovereignty.

    How Is Ukraine Responding to the Proposal?

      1. Zelensky’s Dilemma:
    • Fear of Loss of U.S. Support if he rejects the plan outright.
    • Domestic Resistance to territorial concessions or NATO withdrawal.
    1. Political Stakes: Any acceptance of the Trump plan risks severe political backlash within Ukraine and among its security elite.
    2. Military Reality Check: With Russia advancing and Western aid reduced, Ukraine risks losing more territory if negotiations are delayed.
    3. Unclear U.S. Position: The White House has neither endorsed nor dismissed the plan; Washington sends mixed signals.

    What Is Russia’s Current Strategy?

    1. Gradual Territorial Expansion: Small but steady advances across Donetsk and Kharkiv fronts.
    2. Exhaustion Approach: Prolonging the war to drain Ukrainian manpower and Western support.
    3. Diplomatic Pressure: Leveraging the Trump plan to portray Ukraine as unwilling to negotiate.
    4. Military Reconfiguration: Rotations, reorganized brigades, and fortified defensive lines to prepare for prolonged combat.

    Conclusion

    The Ukraine war remains locked between military stalemate and political impossibility. With Russia consolidating gains and Western support fluctuating, the window for meaningful negotiations narrows. The Trump plan introduces a new, but highly contentious, framework. For now, peace remains elusive due to incompatible security demands, shifting battlefield realities, and the political constraints of both Kyiv and Moscow.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] The expansion and strengthening of NATO and a stronger US-Europe strategic partnership works well for India. What is your opinion about this statement? Give reasons and examples to support your answer.

    Linkage: This PYQ aligns with the article’s focus on NATO’s revived strength and US-Europe unity shaped by the Ukraine war. It directly links to how these shifts hardened positions, prolonged conflict, and reshaped global security dynamics.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Innovations in Sciences, IT, Computers, Robotics and Nanotechnology

    Understanding concerns around Sanchar Saathi

    Explained | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Achievements Of Indians In S&T,Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Introduction

    The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has instructed smartphone manufacturers and importers to pre-install the Sanchar Saathi application on all new mobile devices. The app is designed to combat digital fraud, trace stolen devices, and prevent misuse of SIMs. But its mandatory installation has raised widespread concerns about privacy, surveillance, user consent, and constitutional rights. The government later clarified that the app is “optional,” but the directive mandating its pre-installation has created ambiguity.

    Why in the news

    Sanchar Saathi’s mandatory pre-installation order marks a major shift because devices in India have never required a state-controlled app by default. This reversal from voluntary to mandatory installation has generated concerns about surveillance risks, access to sensitive data, and violation of user consent. The scale is significant as India is the world’s second-largest smartphone market; even small changes affect millions. Legal experts view it as a possible infringement of the fundamental right to privacy.

    What the Government’s App Actually Does

    1. Blocking & Tracking: Allows blocking or locating lost/stolen phones anywhere in India using IMEI-based tracing.
    2. User Option to Block IMEI: Enables users to prevent stolen devices from being activated.
    3. Support to Law Enforcement: Assists police in identifying counterfeit devices and preventing black-market circulation.
    4. Fraud Prevention: Helps report fraudulent calls, messages, and online scams via unified channels.

    Why Has Sanchar Saathi Triggered Concerns?

    1. Ambiguity Around Consent
      1. Unclear Mandate: Pre-installation directive contradicts the Minister’s statement that the app is optional.
      2. User Autonomy: Mandatory installation affects user ability to choose, delete, or disable the app freely.
    2. Expanded State Power
      1. Exceptional Move: First time the government mandated a wide-scale state app on all devices.
      2. Precedent Risks: May normalise future mandates for state surveillance tools.
    3. Privacy Risks
      1. Data Access: App uses Android’s Mobile Security Framework enabling access to call logs, camera, SMS, and unique device identifiers.
      2. Opaque Permissions: Apple devices require permissions for photos, files, and camera.
      3. Potential Misuse: Centralised data collection may heighten misuse & monitoring risks.

    What Data Does Sanchar Saathi Collect?

    1. IMEI Data: Unique identifier used to block stolen devices.
    2. Call Logs & SMS Data: Access allowed when reporting fraud or using suspicious call detection features.
    3. Camera Access: Needed for uploading barcodes of mobile equipment (IMEI verification).
    4. Personal Information: Includes phone numbers, Aadhaar-linked data, and registration details.
    5. Problem: The app’s privacy policy bans sharing identifiable information except when required by law, but the phrase “required by law” remains broad and open-ended.

    Constitutional & Legal Concerns

    1. Lack of Consent: Forced Pre-installation undermines voluntary, informed consent, a core component upheld under the Puttaswamy judgment (2017).
    2. Three-fold Privacy Test: Experts argue mandatory pre-installation fails:
      1. Legality: No explicit statutory backing for a nationwide mandate.
      2. Necessity: No demonstrated need requiring compulsory installation.
      3. Proportionality: Data access far exceeds the minimum required for fraud detection.
    3. Surveillance & “Function Creep”
      1. Risk of Expansion: Potential to expand into unrelated data surveillance functions.
      2. No Independent Oversight: Absence of clear audit mechanisms, grievance redressal, or limits on retention periods.

    Way Forward 

    1. Clarity of the mandate: Issue a clear written policy stating the app’s status to remove confusion.
    2. Addressing Privacy Risks: Limit data permissions to essential functions and publish regular audit reports.
    3. Ensuring Consent & User Autonomy: Provide a visible and fully functional uninstall or disable option.
    4. Preventing Surveillance Overreach: Create independent oversight to monitor misuse and restrict function creep.
    5. Building Trust Through Transparency: Disclose data flows, retention rules, and access logs in the public domain.

    Conclusion

    Sanchar Saathi addresses real concerns of digital fraud and misuse of mobile devices. However, its mandatory pre-installation, broad data permissions, unclear safeguards, and inconsistent communication have created concerns about state overreach and privacy violations. The app’s utility must be balanced with constitutional guarantees, transparent policy design, and robust data protection mechanisms.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference, discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of a child in the womb to establish its paternity.

    Linkage: This PYQ links directly to debates on privacy, consent, and proportionality governing state access to sensitive personal data. It shows how intrusion into bodily or digital autonomy must meet strict constitutional tests.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Air Pollution

    Why pollution affects north Indian cities more than south and west

    Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    Introduction

    Over 2015-2025, no northern Indian city recorded “safe” air quality even once, with Delhi emerging as the most polluted city. In contrast, cities in the south and west maintained comparatively better AQI levels. This consistent divergence reflects entrenched geographical, meteorological, and structural constraints that trap pollutants in the Indo-Gangetic Plain while aiding dispersion along the coasts.

    Why in the news

    A new assessment titled Air Quality Assessment of Major Indian Cities (2015-2025) reported that Delhi continues to be the most polluted city, with AQI stagnating at unhealthy levels. The study shows sharp regional contrasts, revealing that only southern and western cities showed sustained air quality improvements, making this a significant environmental governance concern.

    Persistent Regional Air Quality Divide

    Why northern cities remain severely polluted

    1. Consistent high pollution: Northern cities experienced prolonged severe pollution episodes across the decade.
    2. Limited “healthy days”: None recorded AQI within safe thresholds in 2025.
    3. Stagnant improvement: Even when AQI dipped (e.g., 2019), levels remained far above healthy limits.

    How southern and western cities compare

    1. Cleaner AQI bands: Chennai, Chandigarh, Visakhapatnam, and Mumbai maintained AQI between 80-140.
    2. Steady progress: These cities displayed clear improvements between 2015-2025.
    3. Best performer: Bengaluru recorded the best AQI among all 11 cities.

    Why Delhi Emerges as the Worst Performer

    Data trends

    1. Peak AQI: Delhi saw its worst AQI in 2016 (over 250).
    2. Temporary dips: AQI improved in 2019 but did not meet healthy standards.
    3. Current status: AQI stagnated at 180.5 in 2025, indicating persistent failure to achieve safe limits.

    Structural challenges

    1. Urban surface roughness: Dense built-up surfaces inhibit wind flows and pollutant dispersion.
    2. Trapping effect: Reduced ventilation leads to prolonged retention of pollutants.

    Why Secondary Northern Cities Remain Highly Polluted

    Cities in focus: Lucknow, Varanasi, Ahmedabad, and Pune showed:

    1. Prolonged elevated AQI: Frequent high pollution days with slow improvement.
    2. Mixed progress: Improvements after 2019, but still above healthy limits.
    3. Heavy pollutant load: Emissions + weak dispersion exacerbate poor quality.

    Why Southern & Western Cities Perform Better

    1. Favourable winds: Sea breezes in coastal cities aid pollutant dispersal.
    2. Better atmospheric ventilation: Stronger monsoon winds and less winter stagnation.
    3. Urban characteristics: Less surface roughness compared to Delhi’s dense built-up terrain.

    Outcome

    1. Improved AQI stability
    2. Lower incidence of sharp pollution spikes

    Geography and Winter Inversion: The Deciding Factors

    Geographical lock-in

    1. Indo-Gangetic Basin: Landlocked region bounded by the Himalayas prevents outflow of pollutants.
    2. Pollutant entrapment: Cold northern boundary and flat terrain acts like a “pollution bowl”.

    Winter inversion

    1. Temperature inversion effect: Warm air traps cold, dense air near the surface and this leads to pollutants settling close to ground level.
    2. Seasonal peak: December-February shows intensified pollution due to reduced boundary layer height.

    Built environment factor

    1. Surface roughness: Urban canyons in Delhi slow wind speed, increasing stagnation.

    Seasonal Wind Patterns and Air Dispersion

    Why southern/western cities improve during monsoon

    1. Strong monsoon flows disperse pollutants effectively.
    2. Regular ventilation cycles prevent accumulation.

    Why northern cities worsen in winter

    1. Weak westerly winds
    2. Lower atmospheric mixing height
    3. Persistent fog, cold air trapping, and stagnation

    Conclusion

    The decade-long air quality analysis underscores a structural, region-specific pollution challenge rooted in geography, climate, and urban form. Northern cities, especially those in the Indo-Gangetic Basin, remain trapped in severe winter pollution cycles, while southern and western cities benefit from favourable winds and dispersion conditions. Any meaningful pollution mitigation strategy must therefore be region-sensitive and climatologically informed.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Describe the key points of the revised Global Air Quality Guidelines (AQGs) released by the World Health Organisation (WHO). How are these different from its last update in 2005? What changes in India’s National Clean Air Programme are required to achieve these revised standards?

    Linkage: This topic is important for UPSC as it highlights India’s deep regional air-quality disparities and the structural limits of current pollution-control policies. It links directly to GS-3 themes of air pollution, WHO AQGs, NCAP reforms, and the recurring winter inversion-driven smog episodes in north Indian cities.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Promoting Science and Technology – Missions,Policies & Schemes

    Why does India need bioremidiation

    Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields,Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    Introduction

    Bioremediation uses microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, algae, and plants to break down toxic pollutants like pesticides, plastics, heavy metals, and industrial chemicals into harmless by-products. With India experiencing severe air, water, and soil contamination, bioremediation provides a scalable and sustainable pathway to clean ecosystems. At the same time it will  generate opportunities in biotechnology and environmental consulting.

    What Is Driving India Toward Bioremediation?

    1. Rapid industrialisation: Intensifies contamination of air, water, and land, increasing demand for cost-effective clean-up solutions.
    2. High pollution load: Rivers continue to receive sewage and industrial effluents daily, causing persistent ecological and health risks.
    3. Limitations of traditional clean-up: Conventional methods are expensive, energy-intensive, and often shift pollutants to secondary waste streams.
    4. Biological advantage: Indigenous and extremophile microbes adapted to local temperatures, salinity, and soil conditions perform better than imported strains.

    How Do Different Types of Bioremediation Work?

    1. In situ bioremediation: Direct treatment at the contaminated site (e.g., bacteria sprayed on oil spills or contaminated soil treated on location).
    2. Ex situ bioremediation: Removal and controlled treatment of polluted soil or water in bioreactors or treatment facilities before returning it.
    3. Combination with biotechnology: Genetically modified microbes designed to degrade complex pollutants like plastics or toxins offer enhanced efficiency.

    How Is India Using Bioremediation Today?

    1. Government-supported pilot projects: DBT supports several programmes through its Clean Technology Programme, linking universities, research institutions, and industries.
    2. CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute initiatives: Mandate to develop and implement bioremediation solutions; contributes to policymaking.
    3. Indian Institute of Technology experiments: Development of microbial synthesised compounds to mop up oil spills and identify bacteria suitable for soil restoration.
    4. Emerging startups: Firms like Biotech Consortium India Limited (BCIL) and Ecominr India offer soil and water microbial solutions.

    What Are Other Countries Doing?

    1. Japan: Integrates microbial and plant-based systems into municipal solid waste strategy.
    2. European Union: Funds cross-country projects to remove toxins, clean up oil spills, and restore mining sites.
    3. China: Makes bioremediation a priority under soil pollution control frameworks and uses genetically improved bacteria for industrial waste.

    What Are the Risks and Challenges?

    1. Environmental risks: Introduction of genetically modified organisms must be strictly monitored to prevent unintended ecological effects.
    2. Lack of unified standards: Absence of national bioremediation protocols, biosafety guidelines, certification systems.
    3. Knowledge and skill gaps: Limited trained personnel, weak microbial testing frameworks, and poor site assessment capacity.
    4. Public scepticism: Low awareness about microbes as environmental allies may slow adoption.

    What Should India Do Next?

    1. Standard-development: Develop national protocols for microbial applications and bioremediation safety.
    2. Regional bioremediation hubs: Link universities, startups, and industries for field testing and faster scale-up.
    3. Government integration: Align bioremediation with Namami Gange, Swachh Bharat Mission, and industrial clean-up mandates.
    4. Public engagement: Raise awareness about biological solutions to restore trust in microbial technologies.

    Conclusion

    Bioremediation presents India with a scalable, sustainable, and scientifically grounded pathway to address its massive environmental burdens. While global examples offer templates for success, India must create strong regulatory frameworks, biosafety standards, and capacity-building ecosystems. Integrating microbes with national missions and industrial compliances can transform bioremediation from pilot projects into mainstream environmental governance.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] What are the impediments in disposing of the huge quantities of discarded solid wastes which are continuously being generated? How do we remove safely the toxic wastes that have been accumulating in our habitable environment?

    Linkage: This PYQ is highly relevant as it falls under GS3 pollution, waste management, and sustainable clean-up. The article links directly by showing how microbial systems overcome traditional waste-disposal barriers and safely break down toxic, accumulated solid waste.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Renewable Energy – Wind, Tidal, Geothermal, etc.

    In the era of AI and climate change, energy policy must navigate the trade-offs

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

    Introduction

    India’s energy policy historically prioritised universal access, affordability, and supply security, achieved through government-led institutions, public sector enterprises, and diversified import sources. However, climate change, AI-driven electricity demand, and the greening of global supply chains have disrupted this stable model. The new policy imperative is to navigate complex trade-offs between economic growth, technological innovation, environmental sustainability, and geopolitical risks.

    Why in the news?

    India’s energy policy is at a crossroads as AI adoption, climate imperatives, and rising electricity demand collide for the first time at such scale. The article highlights a major policy dilemma: India’s rapid infrastructural expansion and AI-linked power consumption (e.g., Amazon’s data centre requirement causing Maharashtra to extend a coal plant licence) is clashing with renewable targets. This marks a significant shift from earlier decades when India only chased universal access and affordability. Today, the challenge is more complex, balancing energy security, economic growth, technology competitiveness, and environmental degradation simultaneously. The piece reveals how institutional fragmentation, import dependence on lithium/solar components from China, and new energy demands from data centres are re-shaping India’s energy calculus.

    How has India’s energy approach evolved over time?

    1. Universal Access Achieved: India electrified all villages; 80% of the poor now receive subsidised fuel.
    2. Diversified Supply Sources: Imports now come from the US, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, and soon Guyana, not just the Middle East.
    3. Governance Continuity: Post-Independence PSE structure ensured accountability; Nehru’s model remained dominant for decades.
    4. Shift to Private Actors: Reforms allowed private sector participation, reducing exclusive PSE control.
    5. Fragmented Institutional Structure: Multiple ministries and regulators divide responsibility, limiting coordinated energy transitions.

    Why are new trade-offs emerging in India’s energy landscape?

    1. Economic Growth vs. Environmental Degradation: Rising demand from infrastructure, manufacturing, and consumers collides with pollution and ecological limits.
    2. Technological Innovation vs. Energy Mix: AI and green manufacturing require high reliability and large electricity reserves.
    3. Speed of Transition vs. Social Costs: Rapid shifts affect livelihoods of coal-linked communities.
    4. Domestic Needs vs. Global Climate Commitments: India must meet developmental aims while honouring decarbonisation pledges.
    5. Self-reliance vs. Global Dependence: Lithium, solar cells, and key minerals remain import-dependent, especially from China.

    How do data centres and AI intensify energy challenges?

    1. High Electricity Demand: AI training models and data centres require massive power inputs.
    2. Policy Example Highlighted: Maharashtra extended a thermal plant licence and delayed the shutdown of a 500 MW unit mainly to serve Amazon’s data centre load.
    3. Conflict with Renewables: Renewable supply intermittency makes it difficult to guarantee continuous uptime for AI workloads.
    4. Absence of Grid Upgradation: Without advanced transmission and storage infrastructure, clean energy cannot reliably support such heavy loads.
    5. Corporate Commitments: Most IT companies pledge renewable sourcing but depend on a grid unable to meet that demand consistently.

    How does China’s dominance in green-energy supply chains complicate decisions?

    1. Global Solar Dominance: China controls 80% of photovoltaic manufacturing.
    2. Lithium-ion Control: 80% of global lithium-ion processing is China-centric.
    3. Cheaper Supply, High Dependence: India relies heavily on China for panels, cells, and critical mineral processing.
    4. Strategic Risks: Over-dependence raises concerns about supply disruptions and competitiveness.
    5. Manufacturing Dilemma: India must choose between accelerating competitiveness through imports or slowing transition to build domestic capabilities.

    What institutional and policy shifts are required to navigate these trade-offs?

    1. Governance Reform Needed: India’s energy responsibilities scattered across multiple ministries require rationalisation.
    2. Integrated Resource Management: Indigenous fuels, renewables, and storage must be coordinated under a unified strategy.
    3. Balanced Administrative Processes: Policies must simultaneously account for environmental costs, economic needs, and grid stability.
    4. Dual-track Approach: Supporting clean energy while ensuring conventional capacity remains stable during transition.
    5. Holistic Decision-making: Manufacturing, infrastructure, climate targets, and technological competitiveness need collective planning rather than siloed decisions.

    Conclusion

    India’s energy policy is transitioning from a supply-security model to a complex balancing act involving climate goals, technological competition, environmental constraints, and geopolitical dependencies. The coming decade will require stronger governance, resilient domestic manufacturing, upgraded grid capacity, and a careful negotiation of new trade-offs amplified by AI and climate change.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy is the sine qua non to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Comment on the progress made in India in this regard.

    Linkage: India’s challenge of meeting AI-driven energy demand while pursuing clean, modern and reliable power directly reflects SDG energy goals. The article’s concerns on grid gaps and import dependence highlight why this theme remains central to GS-3 energy policy.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Banking Sector Reforms

    How the rupee’s fall is ‘real’ this time

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Effects Of Liberalization On The Economy, Changes In Industrial Policy and their effects on Industrial Growth,Indian Economy

    Introduction

    The rupee’s depreciation in late 2024 and 2025 has raised concerns not merely because of its nominal slide but because the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) also shows a downward trend. Unlike previous years, when inflation differentials kept the rupee “overvalued,” the REER for 2024-25 has fallen below 100, indicating undervaluation and revealing deeper currency pressures.

    Why in the news

    The rupee breached the ₹89-per-dollar mark for the first time, closing at ₹89.46, marking a significant psychological barrier. More importantly, the rupee has weakened not only nominally but also in real effective terms, a sharper and broader fall than seen in recent years, including against the euro, pound, yen and yuan. This constitutes a shift from earlier patterns where inflation-adjusted metrics often showed the rupee as stable or overvalued. The current fall is “real,” signaling deeper macroeconomic pressures.

    How have the rupee’s effective exchange rates behaved recently?

    1. NEER trends: The Nominal Effective Exchange Rate (NEER) fell from a peak of 106.19 (2022) to 103.53 in October 2024, showing broad-based weakening.
    2. REER trends: The Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) also declined from 109.86 (Nov 2024 high) to 97.05, pushing it below the 100-mark, indicating undervaluation.
    3. Shift from past pattern: For years, REER stayed above 100 due to India’s higher inflation, which normally made the rupee appear stronger, this trend has reversed.

    Why is the current fall described as “real” rather than just nominal?

    1. Inflation-adjusted depreciation: The rupee has weakened even after adjusting for inflation differentials with 40 trading partners, capturing “true” competitiveness loss.
    2. CPI-driven REER insight: Higher CPI inflation in India (5.2% Oct 2024) versus trading partners like the US (3%), Japan (3%), and Euro Area (2%) historically kept REER high, but the nominal fall is now so steep that REER has slid below 100.
    3. Undervaluation signal: A REER below 100 means the rupee is undervalued relative to its long-term average, a reversal from the usual overvaluation.

    What explains the rupee’s weakening across multiple currencies?

    1. Broad-based decline: Rupee weakened against the dollar, euro, pound, yen, and yuan, not just one currency.
    2. Comparative movements: Between Nov 1-28, rupee depreciated:
      1. Against EUR: ₹90.18 to ₹93.36
      2. Against GBP: ₹103.32 to ₹106.37
      3. Against JPY (100 units): ₹54.62 to ₹57.18
      4. Against yuan: ₹11.82 to ₹12.49
    3. Higher import costs: Rising global inflation and domestic CPI have jointly exerted pressure.

    How does the RBI’s shift to a ‘stabilised arrangement’ matter?

    1. IMF reclassification (Nov 2024): India moved from “floating” to “stabilised arrangement”, meaning RBI intervenes more actively to limit volatility.
    2. Operational effect: RBI’s increased forex operations indicate greater management of rupee movements.
    3. Significance: Signals persistent depreciation pressure requiring defensive central bank actions.

    What macroeconomic factors are pushing REER below 100?

    1. Persistent CPI inflation: Even modest inflation differentials now fail to offset nominal weakness.
    2. Import-price pass-through: Costlier imports make domestic inflation elevated, weakening competitiveness.
    3. Global monetary tightening: Stronger dollar and higher yields globally reduce EM currency strength.

    Conclusion

    The current weakness of the rupee is not merely a nominal slide but a deeper, inflation-adjusted depreciation. With both NEER and REER falling sharply, and REER moving below 100 for the first time in years, the pressure is structural. Combined with higher domestic inflation and global monetary tightening, the rupee’s fall now reflects broader competitiveness concerns rather than short-term volatility.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] How would the recent phenomena of protectionism and currency manipulations in world trade affect macroeconomic stability of India?

    Linkage: Protectionism and currency manipulation directly affect exchange rate stability and India’s external sector, a core GS-III theme. They link to rupee depreciation, import costs, inflation, and RBI’s intervention needs.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Disasters and Disaster Management – Sendai Framework, Floods, Cyclones, etc.

    SC ruling on post-facto clearances sets environmental law back by decades

    Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia,Disaster Management

    Introduction

    The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a preventive system requiring environmental clearance before a project begins. In 2025, the Supreme Court’s Vanashakti judgment banned all post-facto clearances as unconstitutional. In a new 2:1 ruling, the Court has now recalled that decision, warning that continuing the ban would cause “devastating” consequences and jeopardise major public investments. This marks a clear shift away from earlier strictures on environmental approvals.

    Why in the news?

    The Supreme Court’s recent endorsement of post-facto environmental clearances marks a sharp break from earlier rulings where such permissions were held illegal. For the first time, industries operating without prior approval may regularise their violations by paying penalties. This undermines the preventive purpose of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), weakens compliance in a country already facing severe pollution challenges. The ruling enables violators to bypass mandatory safeguards like public hearings and ecological assessments, allowing large-scale industries to operate first and seek approval later.

    Understanding Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances

    Meaning and Basic Idea

    • Retrospective approvals: Permissions granted after a project has already started construction, expansion, or operation without the mandatory prior Environmental Clearance (EC).
    • Departure from preventive logic: Converts a forward-looking safeguard into a mechanism to regularise completed violations.

    Intended Purpose: Rare exceptions: Initially justified only for unusual situations where procedural lapses occurred without deliberate violation.

    Actual Use: Regularisation tool: Gradually used to “legalise” ongoing or completed activities that had bypassed due environmental scrutiny.

    Legal Context

    1. EPA, 1986 as foundation: The Environment (Protection) Act establishes prior approval as the norm for activities affecting the environment.
    2. EIA 1994 & 2006 notifications: Both frameworks emphasise that major projects, industrial, mining, construction, must undergo assessment before commencement.

    Supreme Court’s Stand in the Vanashakti Judgment (2025)

    Key Findings

    1. Invalidation of government provisions: Struck down specific notifications and office memoranda that enabled retrospective clearances.
    2. Violation of environmental principles: Held that such clearances contradict the precautionary principle, which seeks to prevent harm at the outset.

    Judicial Observations

    1. Labelled as serious illegality: The Court stated that post-facto approvals erode environmental rule of law.
    2. Restriction on future permissions: Directed that no further mechanisms be created to enable or replicate retrospective ECs. 

    How Does the Ruling Change India’s Environmental Safeguards?

    1. Shift from Prevention to Regularisation: India’s environmental law is built on prior approval, but the ruling legitimises post-violation approvals. This weakens deterrence and changes the core architecture of environmental governance.
    2. Dilution of Public Hearings: Many industrial activities will now bypass public consultations, one of the most important safeguards under the EIA process.
    3. Weakening of the No-Fault Liability Principle: Earlier, industries operating without clearance faced closure; now they may continue operating after paying monetary penalties.
    4. Increased Environmental Risk: Projects threatening forests, rivers, and air quality gain legal pathways to operate retrospectively, exacerbating existing ecological crises.

    How Has Policy Drift in Recent Years Enabled Post-Facto Approvals?

    1. Draft EIA Notification 2020: Attempted to institutionalise post-facto approvals and reduce public participation, an approach the ruling now indirectly validates.
    2. Forest Conservation Act Amendments (2023): Redefined “forests” to exclude large tracts of land, enabling diversion without scrutiny and bypassing earlier safeguards.
    3. Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Dilution (2018): Relaxed no-development zones and allowed extensive construction in vulnerable coastal areas.
    4. Expansion of Exemptions: Over 45 industrial categories have been exempted from prior clearances in the past decade.
    5. Legalisation of Violations: Historical decisions like TN Godavaraman protected forests strictly, but recent changes enable easier diversion and commercial use.

    Why Is the Ruling Especially Concerning for India’s Current Environmental Crisis?

    1. Extreme Pollution Levels: With 83 of the world’s 100 most polluted cities in India, any weakening of safeguards directly harms public health.
    2. Children’s Health Impact: Delhi’s children lose up to 10 years of lung function, highlighting the urgency of strict compliance.
    3. Carcinogenic Exposure: Farmers in Punjab and Haryana inhale toxic particulates every winter, worsening respiratory health.
    4. Hospital Overload: Urban hospitals deal with chronic respiratory disease surges every winter.
    5. Climate-Driven Disasters: Cyclones, erosion, and floods already strain ecosystems; weaker laws increase vulnerability.

    How Does the Ruling Affect Democratic Accountability?

    1. Reduced Public Participation: By enabling post-facto approvals, the ruling sidelines communities, especially those in pollution-affected regions.
    2. Bypassing Transparency: Industries may avoid public hearings and statutory scrutiny.
    3. Weakening of Citizen Rights: The apex court’s earlier stance held the environment as part of Article 21’s right to life; this shift undermines that framework.
    4. Centralisation of Power: State-level mechanisms become redundant if industries secure clearances retrospectively.

    What Long-Term Risks Does the Judgment Create?

    1. Systematic Legal Erosion: A decade-long pattern of exempting industries and diluting norms is now legitimised judicially.
    2. Encouragement of Violations: Industries may prefer paying a penalty over compliance, cheaper and faster.
    3. Increased Ecological Degradation: Forests, rivers, coasts, and air quality may deteriorate further due to weakened oversight.
    4. Regulatory Capture: Industries gain disproportionate influence over environmental decision-making.
    5. Undermining Global Climate Commitments: India’s commitments under the Paris Agreement require stronger, not weaker, compliance frameworks.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court’s endorsement of post-facto clearances marks a turning point in India’s environmental jurisprudence. While the ruling attempts to balance economic development and compliance, it risks normalising illegality and weakening safeguards that exist to protect public health, ecological integrity, and constitutional rights. At a time of worsening pollution and climate vulnerability, India needs stronger, not diluted, environmental governance.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2014] What role do environmental NGOs and activists play in influencing Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) outcomes for major projects in India? Cite four examples with all important details.

    Linkage: With post-facto clearances weakening formal EIA safeguards, NGOs become vital watchdogs ensuring accountability. This topic links directly to environmental governance, EIA dilution, and current judicial-policy debates.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Disasters and Disaster Management – Sendai Framework, Floods, Cyclones, etc.

    India’s disaster response, a slippery slope for federalism

    Explained | Geography | Mains Paper 3: Disaster Management

    Introduction

    The Wayanad tragedy of July 2024, claiming nearly 300 lives and destroying thousands of homes, revealed deep weaknesses in India’s disaster financing structure. Though Kerala estimated losses at ₹20,820 crore, the Union approved only ₹260 crore, signalling a widening disconnect between State needs and Union allocations. As climate disasters intensify, India’s disaster-risk financing model shows visible drift, raising questions on fiscal federalism, institutional design, and equity.

    Why in the news

    The Wayanad landslides (July 2024) brought focus to an unprecedented gap between State-estimated losses (₹20,820 crore) and Union-approved relief (₹260 crore). For the first time, the mismatch was so steep that the State sought a special memorandum to claim recovery support. This experience, mirroring similar delays in Himachal, Uttarakhand, Assam, and Odisha, highlights growing centralisation of disaster financing, outdated relief norms, and procedural bottlenecks that slow down urgent aid.

    Where is the drift in India’s disaster financing framework?

    1. Two-tier structure: SDRF (shared) and NDRF (Union-funded) forms the legal basis under Disaster Management Act, 2005; however, practice diverges from cooperative design.
    2. Outdated norms: Relief amounts, like ₹6 lakh for death and ₹1.2 lakh for fully damaged houses, have not kept pace with current needs.
    3. Limited use flexibility: States face constraints using SDRF funds beyond notified categories, leaving gaps during reconstruction needs.
    4. Delayed releases: Sequential approvals (State-Centre-High-level committees) slow down disbursal even during severe calamities.

    Why does classification and discretion weaken the system?

    1. Ambiguous disaster definition: The Act gives no clarity on what qualifies as a ‘severe’ disaster for NDRF aid, leaving room for variable central discretion.
    2. Procedural-not automatic triggers: India relies on approvals; unlike global practices using rainfall thresholds, satellite data, or actuarial triggers.
    3. Bias in allocations: Finance Commission criteria use population and geography proxies; actual vulnerability (poverty, hazard exposure) gets underestimated.

    How did the Wayanad episode reveal institutional deficiencies?

    1. Unspent SDRF balances: Kerala had ₹780 crore in SDRF and earlier deposits but faced constraints using them due to rigid rules.
    2. Cuts in interest support: ₹529 crore Centre interest-free support was withdrawn, reducing flexibility.
    3. Mismatch in severity classification: Landslides treated as “severe disaster” only after delays, reducing timely access to NDRF.
    4. Comparative delays: Similar underfunding seen in Himachal, Uttarakhand, Assam, Nagaland, and Karnataka after recent floods.

    How can global models inform India’s reforms?

    1. US FEMA: Catastrophe declarations based on clear, measurable thresholds; faster releases.
    2. Mexico FONDEN: Automatic fund release beyond rainfall limits; rules-based framework.
    3. Philippines model: Quick-response funds tied to rainfall-fatality indices.
    4. Australia: Funds tied to State expenditure and accountability.
    5. African/Caribbean insurance pools: Satellite-data triggers reduce discretion and delays.

    What is needed to restore India’s federal spirit?

    1. Sixteenth Finance Commission: Expected to overhaul financing architecture, align relief norms to actual costs, revise allocation formulas, and integrate vulnerability indicators.
    2. Unified disaster authority: A national, airshed-like authority beyond NCR to manage transboundary disaster risks.
    3. Stable fiscal autonomy: Allow States greater control over disaster funds without excessive approvals.
    4. Rules-based financing: Objective, measurable triggers (rainfall intensity, satellite data, loss-to-GSDP ratio) to reduce delays.

    Conclusion

    India’s disaster-response financing, originally structured for cooperative federalism, has shifted toward centralised discretion, resulting in mismatches between actual losses and approved relief. The Wayanad landslides demonstrate the urgent need for rules-based, automatic, and scientifically triggered fund release mechanisms. Strengthening fiscal autonomy, updating norms, and adopting global best practices are essential for a resilient, federal, and future-ready disaster management system.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] Discuss the recent measures initiated in disaster management by the Government of India departing from the earlier reactive approach.

    Linkage: The question aligns with the article’s focus on outdated, reactive SDRF-NDRF procedures and delays exposed during the Wayanad disaster. It reinforces the need for proactive, rules-based, science-triggered disaster financing and stronger federal coordination.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • G20 : Economic Cooperation ahead

    Without great powers on board, G20 is a drift

    Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Introduction

    The G20 emerged from the ashes of the 2008 crisis as the principal platform steering global financial stability, representing both advanced and rising powers. Over time, however, geopolitical rifts, protectionist shifts, and weakened multilateralism have steadily eroded its efficacy. The absence of great powers, divergent national priorities, and competing minilaterals now raise questions about the G20’s ability to act as an anchor for global economic coordination.

    Why in the News

    The G20 has entered a phase of visible fragmentation as major powers like the US, China, and Russia increasingly skip or downgrade their participation, marking a sharp contrast to its central role during the 2008 global financial crisis. Trump chose to boycott the 2025 G20 summit, which was hosted by South Africa in Johannesburg. The earlier summits, including Bali 2022 and New Delhi 2023, were marked by absence of key leaders such as Putin and Xi, signalling an unprecedented weakening of multilateral cooperation. The article highlights how the G20, once elevated to the “premier forum for international economic cooperation,” is now reduced to a middle-power platform with diminishing relevance. This drift, caused by unilateralism, great-power tensions, and rival blocs, is a major setback for global governance.

    How Did the G20 Rise From Crisis to Centrality?

    1. Global Financial Crisis (2008): Elevated from a finance ministers’ forum to a leaders’ summit after the Lehman collapse, recognising the need for collective economic stabilisation.
    2. US-EU Leadership: President Bush convened the first summit; European leaders pushed to formalise it as the central platform for crisis response.
    3. Inclusive Membership: Plural representation of middle powers, India, China, Brazil, Indonesia, gave the G20 legitimacy beyond the G7.

    Why Is the G20 Losing Relevance Today?

    1. Great-Power Withdrawal: Absence of Xi and Putin (2023) indicates declining commitment by major actors.
    2. Shift to Bilateralism: 2022 Bali summit dominated by US-China bilateral diplomacy, overshadowing collective agenda.
    3. Competing Priorities: US focus on securitising trade; China’s rivalry; Russia’s Ukraine conflict, reducing appetite for multilateral compromise.
    4. Fragmentation: Emergence of parallel groups like G2 ideas, Quad, IPEF, diluting G20 centrality.

    What Role Did Unilateralism Play in Weakening the G20?

    1. America First (Trump Era):
      1. Protectionist shift and retreat from multilateral commitments.
      2. Trade war with China and sanctions redirected US focus to bilateral power play.
      3. Undermined collective financial architecture, making G20 coordination difficult.
    2. Return of Great-Power Rivalry:
      1. US-China confrontation replaced cooperative economic agenda.
      2. Russia’s isolation post-Ukraine war created a split within member states.

    How Did the Absence of the Big Three Impact Multilateral Decision-Making?

    1. Reduced Negotiating Power: Without the US, China, and Russia at full participation, G20 communiqués lost substance.
    2. Lowered Stakes: Middle powers alone cannot push structural financial reforms.
    3. Decline in Issue Ambition: Meetings shifted from global macroeconomic governance to modest incremental outcomes.
    4. Loss of Crisis-Time Authority: Unlike 2008-09 summits which produced coordinated fiscal and financial action, recent meetings lacked decisive outcomes.

    What Does the G20 Drift Mean for India?

    1. Opportunity Shrinks: India’s earlier success, G20 admitting AU under its presidency, may not translate into sustained influence without great-power participation.
    2. Rise of Minilaterals: Quad, I2U2, IPEF may overshadow the G20’s relevance for India’s long-term strategic and economic diplomacy.
    3. Squeezed between Powers: India must balance ties with the US, China, and Russia while leading middle-power groupings.
    4. Reduced Global Economic Voice: Weak G20 undermines India’s push for reforms in global financial architecture and voice of Global South.

    Conclusion

    The G20’s drift reflects the broader fragmentation of global governance, marked by strategic rivalry, unilateral policies, and weakened collective will. Without full engagement of great powers, the forum risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive. For India, the challenge is balancing leadership of the Global South with managing rival great-power agendas in an increasingly divided world.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] ‘Virus of Conflict is affecting the functioning of the SCO’. In the light of the above statement point out the role of India in mitigating problems.

    Linkage: Great-power rivalry within SCO mirrors the G20’s paralysis, where conflicting interests of major powers weaken collective decision-making. India’s balancing role in SCO highlights how middle powers attempt to preserve multilateral relevance amid widening geopolitical fractures.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Historical and Archaeological Findings in News

    Is Macaulay to blame for the colonial mindset or is he a convenient in politics?

    Explained | History | Mains Paper 1: Modern Indian History

    INTRODUCTION

    The original article presents two contrasting viewpoints on the legacy of Thomas Babington Macaulay and the larger question of whether India still carries a “colonial mindset.” One side argues that India must overcome colonial-era mental frameworks in governance and education, while the other contends that modern education, introduced during Macaulay’s era, opened unprecedented avenues for mobility, equality, and intellectual emancipation. The debate extends far beyond Macaulay himself, touching upon structural, cultural, and linguistic dimensions of Indian society.

    WHY IN THE NEWS

    Recent political speeches invoking the need to shed the “colonial mindset” have revived discussions originally linked to Macaulay’s educational policies. This has become a major talking point because India is undergoing curricular reforms, language policy changes, and institutional restructuring aimed at “decolonising” governance. The article’s sharply divergent interpretations of Macaulay’s role illustrate how deeply contested India’s intellectual foundations remain, signalling a transition moment in national identity formation.

    Colonial Mindset and Institutional Continuity

    1. Bureaucratic culture: India’s administrative behaviour still follows colonial-era norms which are hierarchical functioning, rigid procedure, and deference to authority.
    2. Governance style: Parliamentary debate formats, legal drafting, and official communication structures reflect patterns institutionalised in the 19th century.
    3. State-society distance: Colonial governance cultivated separation between rulers and the public; remnants of this continue to shape administrative attitudes today.

    Language Politics and the Question of English

    1. Symbolic centrality: English remains associated with power, aspiration, and official legitimacy, a legacy reinforced since Macaulay’s time.
    2. Cultural alienation: Critics argue that English-medium dominance creates distance from Indian culture and languages.
    3. Functional utility: Supporters highlight that English acts as a bridge across states, classes, and caste barriers, enabling mobility in education and employment.

    Access to Knowledge: Who Controlled Learning?

    1. Caste-linked exclusion: Traditional Sanskritic education was historically limited to higher castes, restricting intellectual opportunities for marginalised groups.
    2. Modern education’s rupture: English-medium education introduced during and after Macaulay’s reforms allowed many excluded communities, especially lower castes, to enter learning spaces earlier denied to them.
    3. Emergence of new elites: Modern schooling produced a new professional class that reshaped politics, administration, and social reform movements.

    Cultural Legitimacy and Competing Knowledge Traditions

    1. Hierarchy of knowledge: Colonial frameworks often positioned Western science and literature as superior, affecting how India valued its own traditions.
    2. Reclaiming indigenous systems: The current push for “decolonising education” attempts to restore space for Indian languages, philosophies, and scientific knowledge.
    3. Plural intellectual heritage: The article stresses that Indian modernity today requires balancing global knowledge with regional identities, rather than choosing one over the other.

    Political Use of Historical Figures: The Macaulay Symbol

    1. Simplification of history: Macaulay is used as a political metaphor, either as a symbol of cultural loss or as an emblem of liberation through modernity.
    2. Narrative battles: Both sides selectively highlight aspects of his legacy to advance contrasting visions of nationalism and development.
    3. Identity construction: The debate signifies broader attempts to define what should constitute “Indian” knowledge and national pride.

    CONCLUSION

    The debate around Macaulay is not merely about a historical figure but about India’s contemporary struggle between decolonisation, modernity, and social justice. The article shows that India’s identity debates hinge on deeper questions: who gets access to knowledge, which languages define opportunity, how institutions remember their past, and what kind of society India aspires to build. A nuanced understanding requires moving beyond binaries, embracing global knowledge while valuing indigenous intellectual traditions.

    Value Addition
    Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859)

    • A British historian, politician, and member of the Governor-General’s Council in India (1834-1838).
    • Key architect of British cultural, educational, and legal policy during early colonial rule.

    Major Contributions / Reforms

    Macaulay’s Minute on Education (1835)

    1. Pushed for English-medium education replacing Persian & Sanskrit as official languages of instruction.
    2. Advocated creating a class of “persons Indian in blood and colour but English in taste, morals and intellect.”
    3. Led to Anglicist victory over Orientalists.
    4. Directly shaped India’s modern schooling structure.

    Introduction of English Education

    1. Helped expand Western science, literature, and rational thought in India.
    2. Facilitated spread of modern professions, law, medicine, engineering, administration.
    3. Enabled mobility for communities excluded from traditional Sanskritic learning.

    Indian Penal Code (IPC)

    1. Macaulay chaired the First Law Commission (1834).
    2. Drafted the IPC (completed 1837, enacted 1860), foundation of India’s criminal law for 163 years.
    3. Promoted uniform, codified, written law replacing diverse customary systems.

    Civil Services Ethos

    1. Strengthened the model of a centralised, rule-bound bureaucracy.
    2. Contributed to long-term continuity of British administrative culture in independent India.

    Cultural-Epistemic Impact

    1. Elevated Western knowledge as superior to traditional Indian systems.
    2. Influenced linguistic hierarchies, English became linked to power, prestige, and opportunity.
    3. Triggered long-term debates on colonial mindset, cultural legitimacy, and identity.

    Criticisms (For Balance in Mains Answers)

    1. Dismissed Indian literature as inferior (“A single shelf of a good European library is worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia.”).
    2. Accused of fostering elitism and alienation through English dominance.
    3. Reinforced cultural and epistemic hierarchies privileging the West.

    Positive Interpretations 

    1. English education enabled lower castes to bypass restricted Sanskritic order.
    2. Opened pathways to modernity, science, constitutionalism and global mobility.
    3. Created early Indian public sphere, newspapers, debates, modern nationalism.

    Conclusion for Mains

    Macaulay’s legacy is complex, he entrenched a colonial mindset but also enabled modern intellectual and social transformation. His ideas continue to influence India’s education, law and cultural debates even today.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2014] Examine critically the various facets of economic policies of the British in India from mid-eighteenth century till independence. 

    Linkage: The question aligns with the article’s themes of colonial economic restructuring, knowledge hierarchies, and institutional continuity introduced under British rule. It is relevant because British economic policies shaped the social, cultural and educational divides that the article highlights through the Macaulay debate.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor