💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship September Batch
Talk to Mentor

Type: Explained

These Newscards correspond to the explained section of various newspapers. They become immensely important for both prelims and mains and special attention needs to be paid to them

Bills/Act/LawsDOMREthicsExplainedHistorical SitesIOCRop-ed snapPIBPlaces in newsPrelims OnlySC JudgementsSchemesSpeciesStatesworld map

Aadhaar Card Issues

Decisive step (Including Aadhar as 12th document for voter verification)

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Federalism

Introduction

The right to vote is one of the most fundamental expressions of citizenship in a democracy. However, procedural rigidity in electoral roll revisions often results in the exclusion of genuine electors. Recently, the Supreme Court intervened decisively in Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, directing the inclusion of Aadhaar as one of the 12 valid documents for voter verification. With over 65 lakh voters already struck off from Bihar’s draft rolls, this judgment is a crucial corrective step ensuring that the processes of democracy do not become instruments of exclusion.

Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision

  1. Judicial clarity: The Supreme Court dismantled the ECI’s argument that Aadhaar is proof of residency, not citizenship, by highlighting that most other accepted documents (e.g., ration card, driving license) also do not conclusively establish citizenship.
  2. Preventing mass exclusion: With nearly 90% of Bihar’s population holding Aadhaar versus only 2% holding passports, excluding Aadhaar would have disenfranchised a vast number of eligible voters, especially the poor and marginalised.
  3. Correcting anomalies: The Hindu’s statistical analysis of the exclusion revealed disproportionate impacts and that women were removed in large numbers, death rates appeared statistically improbable, and questionable “permanent shifts” particularly affected migrants and married women.

Implications of the Judgment for Voter Inclusivity

  1. Lifeline for excluded electors: Over 65 lakh voters struck off the draft rolls now have a viable route back through Aadhaar verification.
  2. Support for existing electors: Even those already on the rolls needing document verification benefit from Aadhaar’s inclusion.
  3. Validation of civil society concerns: The Court’s order vindicates activists and political groups who warned that excluding Aadhaar contradicted earlier judicial guidance and created practical hurdles.

Challenges Exposed in the Election Commission’s Process

  1. Questionable reasoning: The ECI insisted Aadhaar was inadmissible, despite its wide acceptance in governance systems.
  2. Haste over accuracy: The rushed SIR process compromised diligence, undermining the credibility of voter rolls.
  3. Patterns of exclusion: Disproportionate impact on marginalised groups like migrant workers and married women reveals systemic flaws.

National Precedent Established by the Ruling

  1. Uniform standards: This ruling is not limited to Bihar but extends to future electoral revisions across India.
  2. Balance between accuracy and inclusivity: It forces the ECI to reorient its approach towards humane, diligent verification.
  3. Strengthening democracy: Electoral rolls form the foundation of free and fair elections; inclusivity ensures democratic legitimacy.

Future Expectations from the Election Commission of India

  1. House-to-house verification: A more thorough, grassroots-level approach to ensure accuracy.
  2. Inclusive procedures: Processes must prevent the disenfranchisement of genuine voters, especially the vulnerable.
  3. Aligning with practical realities: Aadhaar, as the most widely held identity document, should be part of India’s democratic processes.

Way Forward

  • Strengthening Verification Mechanisms
    1. Conduct comprehensive house-to-house verification to avoid wrongful deletions.
    2. Use technology-enabled checks (biometric authentication with Aadhaar, but with strong safeguards for privacy).
  • Ensuring Inclusivity
    1. Simplify documentation requirements for vulnerable groups (migrants, women, senior citizens).
    2. Provide doorstep assistance for voter registration in rural and marginalised areas.
  • Institutional Strengthening of ECI
    1. Enhance independence, transparency, and accountability of the Election Commission.
    2. Establish an independent audit mechanism to regularly review voter roll revisions.
  • Legal and Policy Reforms
    1. Consider amendments to the Representation of People Act to clarify permissible use of Aadhaar and protect against misuse.
    2. Align electoral processes with Supreme Court jurisprudence on Aadhaar to balance convenience with rights.
  • Public Awareness and Participation
    1. Encourage civil society participation in monitoring electoral rolls.
    2. Launch mass awareness campaigns to educate voters on their rights and available documentation.
  • Long-Term Electoral Reform Agenda
    1. Explore remote voting mechanisms for migrant workers.
    2. Move towards integrated digital electoral rolls across states for consistency.
    3. Institutionalise regular, transparent consultations between ECI, political parties, and judiciary.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s directive to include Aadhaar in voter verification is more than a legal clarification; it is a democratic safeguard. By preventing procedural exclusion and ensuring accessibility, the judgment reaffirms India’s commitment to universal suffrage. For the ECI, the challenge now lies in balancing diligence with inclusivity, creating an electoral roll that truly reflects India’s diverse citizenry.

Value Addition

Constitutional & Legal Dimensions:

  • Article 326: Guarantees universal adult suffrage, forming the foundation of electoral democracy.
  • Article 14 & 21: Ensure equality and due process — mass exclusion from voter rolls would violate these.
  • Representation of People Act, 1951: Governs electoral rolls, voter eligibility, and disqualification.

Case Laws:

  1. PUCL v. Union of India (2003) – Recognised “right to know” of voters.
  2. Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) – Stressed on the principle of electoral integrity.
  3. Supreme Court Aadhaar Judgments (2018) – Aadhaar can be used for welfare and verification, but cannot be made mandatory for all purposes.

Committees & Reports:

  1. Indrajit Gupta Committee (1998): Highlighted need for free and fair elections as cornerstone of democracy.
  2. Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008): Stressed inclusivity and transparency in voter registration.
  3. Law Commission of India (255th Report, 2015): Recommended linkage of voter databases with Aadhaar for accuracy, subject to safeguards.

Democratic Governance & Inclusivity:

  1. Inclusivity vs. Accuracy: Electoral reforms must balance weeding out bogus voters with preventing disenfranchisement of genuine citizens.
  2. Marginalised Communities: Migrants, women, and the poor are disproportionately affected by procedural rigidity — their access must be prioritised.

Comparative Insight:

  1. USA: Struggles with strict voter ID laws that disproportionately affect minorities.
  2. Canada: Allows multiple identification options to avoid disenfranchisement.
  3. India’s Aadhaar: A unique digital identity tool with near-universal coverage (~90%), giving India an advantage in inclusive electoral reforms.

Ethical Perspective (GS 4 angle)

  1. Principle of Justice: Fair opportunity for every citizen to vote.
  2. Procedural Fairness: Electoral rules must not arbitrarily exclude individuals.
  3. Democratic Accountability: ECI must uphold public trust by ensuring inclusivity in its procedures.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2017] To enhance the quality of democracy in India the Election Commission of India has proposed electoral reforms in 2016. What are the suggested reforms and how far are they significant to make democracy successful?

Linkage: The Supreme Court’s directive on including Aadhaar as a valid voter verification document directly relates to the broader debate on electoral reforms. Just as the ECI’s 2016 reform proposals sought to strengthen inclusivity and transparency, this judgment ensures that procedural rigidity does not erode democratic participation. Both highlight the evolving role of the ECI in balancing accuracy, accessibility, and fairness in India’s electoral process.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-Nepal

Why is Kathmandu Burning

Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: India & Its Neighborhood - Relations

Introduction

On September 8–9, 2025, Nepal plunged into chaos as protests led by Generation Z escalated into violent clashes with security forces. What began as outrage against corruption and a controversial ban on 26 social media platforms quickly spiraled into a mass uprising that engulfed Kathmandu in flames. Former Prime Ministers’ homes were torched, ministers stripped and paraded, and jails broken open. With PM K P Sharma Oli’s resignation and President Ram Chandra Poudel in hiding, the nation faced a constitutional vacuum, raising concerns about the Army’s role and India’s strategic interests. This is the first major political uprising in Nepal led entirely by Gen Z — teenagers and youth born between 1996–2012. Unlike the Maoist insurgency of the past, this revolt was spontaneous, digitally mobilized, and directed against all senior political leaders.

Generation Z and the Rise of Political Discontent

  1. Generation Z Mobilisation: The uprising was driven by youth anger at corruption, lack of jobs, and entrenched political elites since 2008.
  2. Digital Trigger: Outrage exploded after the government banned 26 social media platforms (Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, X, etc.), cutting off their main channel of solidarity.
  3. Symbolic Rage: Anger was also directed at “Nepo Kids” — the privileged lifestyles of politicians’ children.
  4. Immediate Demands: Reinstatement of social media (achieved), broader demand for accountability and jobs.

The Escalation of Protests into Violence

  1. State Response: Security forces fired on protesters, killing 19 young people, triggering mass fury.
  2. Attack on Leaders: Houses of five former Prime Ministers were torched (Oli, Prachanda, Madhav Kumar Nepal, Jhala Nath Khanal, Sher Bahadur Deuba).
  3. Fatalities: Rajyalaxmi Chitrakar (wife of ex-PM Khanal) died from burns; former PM Deuba and his wife (Foreign Minister Arzu Deuba) were assaulted.
  4. Dramatic Incidents: Protesters freed Rabi Lamichhane, a jailed critic of Oli, by burning Nakkhu Jail.
  5. Humiliation of Ministers: Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Paudel and MP Eknath Dhakal were stripped and paraded.

Leadership Vacuum and Constitutional Crisis

  1. PM’s Resignation: K P Sharma Oli resigned; President Poudel went into hiding.
  2. Army’s Stance: Army Chief Gen. Ashok Raj Sigdel urged calm, took charge of security, but avoided assuming political power.
  3. Possibility of Interim Government: Likely after negotiations with figures like Kathmandu Mayor Balen Shah, a Gen Z icon.
  4. Constitutional Crisis: Possibility of Parliament dissolution and collapse of 2015 Constitution.

The Expanding Role of the Nepal Army

  1. Security Role: The Army has assumed charge of law and order.
  2. Political Caution: Unlike in past coups, the Army seems hesitant to directly seize political power.
  3. Facilitator Role: Likely to mediate between political leaders, ensure reconciliation, and protect civilian lives.

Opposition in Disarray Amidst Youth Revolt

  1. Targeted Equally: All senior leaders, across party lines, faced wrath of protesters.
  2. Rising Leaders: Balen Shah (Mayor of Kathmandu, ex-rapper) and Rabi Lamichhane (RSP leader, ex-TV anchor) emerged as youth-backed alternatives.
  3. Monarchy Revival?: Former King Gyanendra Shah offered condolences, appealed for dialogue, subtly signaling a willingness to return to relevance.

India’s Strategic Concerns Amidst Nepal’s Crisis

  1. Strategic Concern: India is deeply worried, given historical ties, open border, and Nepali diaspora in India.
  2. Delicate Position: India is seen as partisan since it backed Maoists and republicanism in 2008.
  3. Official Statement: PM Narendra Modi chaired the CCS meeting, stressing “stability, peace, and prosperity of Nepal” as vital for India.

Conclusion

Nepal’s Gen Z uprising marks the collapse of public trust in traditional politics and signals a generational shift. The combination of digital mobilization, corruption fatigue, and joblessness has produced an explosion that could reshape Nepal’s political order. For India, the crisis is both a challenge and an opportunity, a chance to rebuild goodwill through balanced diplomacy, while avoiding the mistakes of the past. The coming weeks will determine whether Nepal stabilizes through reconciliation or descends into prolonged instability.

Value Addition

Similarities between the recent Nepal Gen Z uprising (2025) and the Bangladesh student–youth revolution (July 2024) that toppled Sheikh Hasina’s government

  • Youth at the Centre
    1. Nepal: Led by Gen Z (born 1996–2012), angry at corruption, nepotism, and joblessness.
    2. Bangladesh: Led by students and young professionals, who launched protests against the quota system in government jobs, symbolising a deeper anger at authoritarianism.
    3. Similarity: In both, young people with no political baggage spearheaded the movement, showing a generational rejection of “old guard” politics.
  • Trigger through State Suppression
    1. Nepal: Anger exploded after government banned 26 social media platforms, silencing digital expression. Police firing killed 19 protesters, escalating violence.
    2. Bangladesh: Crackdowns on student protests with police brutality, tear gas, and arrests deepened the rage, leading to street battles.
    3. Similarity: In both cases, excessive state repression transformed peaceful protests into mass uprisings.
  • Anti-Elite and Anti-Nepotism Sentiment
    1. Nepal: Rage directed at “Nepo Kids”, children of politicians flaunting wealth and privilege.
    2. Bangladesh: Rage at the dynastic, 15-year-long rule of Sheikh Hasina, seen as nepotistic and authoritarian.
    3. Similarity: Both were anti-nepotism revolts, targeting corruption and political entrenchment.
  • Use of Digital Platforms for Mobilisation
    1. Nepal: Movement grew around Facebook pages like Next Generation Nepal, until banned.
    2. Bangladesh: Students used Facebook, X, and YouTube to coordinate protests, live-stream crackdowns, and rally global support.
    3. Similarity: Social media was the fuel of mobilisation, and attempts to suppress it only intensified anger.
  • Collapse of Established Order
    1. Nepal: PM K P Sharma Oli resigned, President went into hiding, houses of former PMs burned, Parliament dysfunctional.
    2. Bangladesh: PM Sheikh Hasina fled the country, Awami League leaders attacked, and Parliament dissolved.
    3. Similarity: Both witnessed a sudden collapse of political order, with leadership vacuum and uncertainty about interim arrangements.
  • Regional & International Concerns
    1. Nepal: India held a CCS meeting, worried about instability on its borders; China also watching closely.
    2. Bangladesh: India was concerned due to historic ties with Hasina, while the West pushed for democratic restoration.
    3. Similarity: In both, India was caught in a delicate diplomatic dilemma — balancing neutrality while protecting its strategic interests.

Conclusion

Both revolutions represent a South Asian pattern of youth-led, anti-elite uprisings, where corruption, joblessness, authoritarianism, and digital repression pushed Gen Z to revolt. They show that in fragile democracies, youth disillusionment can quickly destabilize entrenched regimes. For India, these crises in its immediate neighbourhood are warnings: political stability next door is fragile, and managing relations requires delicate, balanced diplomacy.

Value Addition (II)

  • Comparative Lens: Similar to Arab Spring (2011) — youth-led, social media-driven protests.
  • Theory: Youth Bulge Hypothesis — large unemployed youth populations often drive political instability.
  • Reports: UNDP South Asia Human Development Report highlights youth aspirations and governance deficits.
  • Ethics (GS4): Crisis of legitimacy in governance when corruption and inequality erode public trust.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2012] Discuss the contentious issues that have caused the prolonged constitutional logjam in Nepal.

Linkage: The 2012 question on Nepal’s constitutional logjam highlighted elite disputes over federalism and governance. The 2025 Gen Z uprising reflects how these unresolved issues have now spilled onto the streets, creating a constitutional vacuum. What was once a parliamentary deadlock has transformed into a popular revolt against the entire political class, deepening Nepal’s democratic fragility.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Women empowerment issues – Jobs,Reservation and education

The ‘domestic sphere’ in a new India

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 1: Role Of Women & Women Organization

Introduction

Women in India continue to bear a disproportionate burden within the “domestic sphere,” both through unpaid household labour and through systemic silence around violence inside the home. Even as the government projects slogans like “nari shakti” and “women-led development,” the stark realities of dowry deaths, marital rape, unequal division of work, and undervaluation of women’s unpaid labour reveal deep contradictions. The recent Time Use Survey (TUS) 2024 and other official data bring to light these inequities, while political narratives attempt to glorify them as cultural strengths.

Why in the News?

The debate on the “domestic sphere” resurfaced after a controversial statement in August 2025 by RSS chief, who urged families to have at least three children for the “survival of civilisation.” This comment, reducing women to reproduction machines, stands in sharp contrast to the silence of ruling elites on domestic violence, dowry deaths (7,000 annually between 2017–2022), and marital rape. Simultaneously, the TUS 2024 exposed glaring gender disparities in unpaid work: women spend 7 hours daily in domestic services versus men’s 26 minutes. Despite this, the government’s framing celebrated men’s 15 minutes of caregiving as proof of “Indian family values.” This dissonance makes the issue urgent and deeply political.

Women and Violence Within Homes

  1. Dowry deaths: An average of 7,000 women annually (2017–2022) have died in dowry-related violence, totalling 35,000 lives lost.
  2. Domestic violence: NFHS-5 revealed 30% women reported intimate partner violence, but only 14% lodged police complaints.
  3. Silence of leadership: While majoritarian rhetoric aggressively targets “love jihad,” it remains mute on intra-community domestic crimes, revealing selective morality.

Historical and Contemporary Debates on Marriage and Gender Rights

  1. Ambedkar vs. orthodoxy: Ambedkar’s Hindu Code Bills sought divorce rights and caste-free marriages; opposed fiercely by conservative forces.
  2. Institution of marriage: Current opposition to criminalising marital rape reflects a continuity of Manusmriti-inspired ideals of sacramental marriage.
  3. Honour crimes: Cultural pressures still compel women to “adjust” in violent marriages, sustaining patriarchal structures.

Time Use Survey 2024 – Striking Findings

  1. Employment gap: Only 25% of women (15–59 yrs) in employment-related work, compared to 75% men, with women working fewer hours.
  2. Unpaid domestic work: 93% of women spend 7 hours daily; 70% of men do none.
  3. Care work: 41% of women vs. 21% of men engage in unpaid caregiving; men average barely 16 minutes daily.
  4. Total working hours: Women overall work longer hours than men but get less leisure, sleep, and nutrition time.

Government Narrative vs. Reality

  1. Official glorification: PIB (Feb 25, 2025) framed caregiving as reflecting the “Indian social fabric,” overlooking systemic gender exploitation.
  2. Policy translation: Anganwadi, mid-day meal, and ASHA workers, essentially extending domestic roles into the public sphere, are classified as “volunteers” with honorariums, not wages.
  3. Undervaluation: SBI 2023 study estimated ₹22.5 lakh crore annually (7% of GDP) as the value of women’s unpaid work, which subsidises male wages by reducing subsistence costs.

Towards an Alternative Approach

  1. Violence-free homes: Stronger social and legal frameworks against domestic violence and marital rape.
  2. Equal right to work: Recognition of men and women as equal primary workers with equal wages.
  3. Public provisioning: State-backed universal childcare, elderly care, quality health and education.
  4. Cultural reform: Move from “adjustment” to shared responsibility in domestic work.
  5. Recognition for scheme workers: Anganwadi, ASHA, mid-day meal staff to receive minimum wages and benefits as government employees.

Conclusion

The “domestic sphere” is not a private matter but a deeply political one, shaping both India’s democracy and economy. Unless women’s unpaid work, safety within homes, and dignity are recognised, slogans of empowerment will remain hollow. True nari shakti lies not in numerical glorification of caregiving, but in building a society where women’s labour, both paid and unpaid, receives justice.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2019] “Empowering women is the key to control population growth”. Discuss.

Linkage: Empowerment of women through education, health access, and economic participation is directly correlated with declining fertility rates, as seen in states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

When women exercise agency over reproductive choices, population growth transitions from being a demographic challenge to a managed outcome.

Thus, population stabilisation in India is less about coercive policies and more about gender justice and empowerment-driven development.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Higher Education – RUSA, NIRF, HEFA, etc.

Ranking Pitfalls: India Rankings (2025) based on NIRF

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

Introduction

India’s higher education system is one of the largest in the world, and since 2016, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) has aimed to provide a structured evaluation of institutions. With participation expanding from 3,565 institutions in its inception year to 14,163 in 2025, and categories rising from four to seventeen, the NIRF has created a sense of competition and accountability. However, critical flaws remain: skewed weightage for subjective parameters, inadequate measurement of inclusivity, and overemphasis on reputational factors. These shortcomings risk reducing the exercise into a branding tool rather than a driver of equity and quality in higher education.

Why is NIRF in the News?

India Rankings 2025 has once again been dominated by legacy public institutions, underscoring persistent inequalities in India’s higher education landscape. Despite its expanded coverage, the framework continues to rely on flawed methodologies, including subjective peer perception and incomplete outreach and inclusivity parameters. Of particular concern is the neglect of socio-economically disadvantaged groups and students with disabilities in the inclusivity metric. The stakes are high: without reform, NIRF risks entrenching elitism and doing little to democratise access to quality education.

Is NIRF making higher education more equitable?

  1. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): Currently limited to regional and gender diversity while omitting socio-economic disadvantage and disability.
  2. Troubling trends: Only JNU and AIIMS, Delhi scored above 70 in OI among the top 10, exposing the marginalisation of weaker sections.
  3. Reservation policies: Central institutions still fail to adequately fill OBC, SC, and ST vacancies, undermining affirmative action.

Are the ranking parameters robust and fair?

  1. Five key parameters: Teaching & resources (30%), research (30%), graduation outcomes (20%), outreach & inclusivity (10%), peer perception (10%).
  2. Peer perception flaw: Criticised by Education Minister; reputation-based, subjective, and often biased against state-run or suburban institutions.
  3. Self-declared data: Heavy reliance risks manipulation; false submissions remain unpunished.
  4. Bibliometric dependence: While verifiable, this excludes non-English and socially relevant research output.

What challenges persist in India’s higher education system?

  1. Regional imbalance: Few top-quality institutions outside metropolitan hubs.
  2. Faculty shortage: Outside the top 100 institutions, a dearth of PhD-qualified teachers continues.
  3. Weak research culture: 58% of management institutions reported zero research publications.
  4. Mentorship gap: Legacy institutions rarely mentor emerging universities.

How can NIRF evolve beyond rankings?

  1. Policy tool, not ritual: Insights must inform reforms instead of being an annual exercise.
  2. Stronger inclusivity metrics: Incorporating socio-economic and disability parameters alongside gender and region.
  3. Accountability: Penalising institutions submitting false data.
  4. Capacity building: Encouraging collaboration between established and upcoming institutions.
  5. Affirmative action: Monitoring recruitment policies and enforcing reservations in faculty hiring.

Conclusion

The NIRF has created awareness about institutional performance and expanded its scope significantly. Yet, unless it addresses fundamental flaws, especially inclusivity, fairness in assessment, and accountability, it risks becoming a branding exercise. For India’s higher education system to truly progress, rankings must serve as instruments of reform, driving equity, excellence, and social justice.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2015] The quality of higher education in India requires major improvement to make it internationally competitive. Do you think that the entry of foreign educational institutions would help improve the quality of technical and higher education in the country? Discuss.

Linkage: The NIRF 2025 rankings expose gaps in research output, inclusivity, and global competitiveness of Indian institutions. While reforms in ranking parameters can drive internal improvements, the entry of foreign universities may create healthy competition and raise benchmarks. Thus, the PYQ directly connects with debates on how India can achieve globally competitive higher education through both domestic reforms and external participation.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Wildlife Conservation Efforts

The making of an ecological disaster in the Nicobar

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

The Great Nicobar Island Project, with an estimated expenditure of ₹72,000 crore, has sparked unprecedented controversy. Instead of strengthening India’s ecological security and inclusive growth, the project threatens to uproot indigenous communities such as the Nicobarese and the Shompen, destroy one of the world’s richest biodiversity hotspots, and expose the island to severe natural disaster risks. By bypassing constitutional bodies, statutory protections, and scientific warnings, the project raises fundamental questions about governance, justice, and sustainability in India’s developmental trajectory.

Uprooting Tribal Communities

  1. Nicobarese displacement: The project site overlaps with ancestral villages of the Nicobarese, already displaced once by the 2004 tsunami. Their hope of return will now be permanently extinguished.
  2. Shompen threat: The Shompen, classified as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), face cultural and ecological extinction as their reserve land is denotified and forests destroyed.
  3. Violation of tribal safeguards: Article 338A mandates consultation with the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, which was bypassed. The Tribal Council’s objections were ignored after being “rushed” into signing a no-objection letter, later revoked.

Mockery of Legal and Regulatory Safeguards

  1. Social Impact Assessment failure: The 2013 Act on Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation excluded Nicobarese and Shompen from consideration, denying them stakeholder status.
  2. Forest Rights Act ignored: The Shompen’s authority to regulate and protect forests was bypassed.
  3. Constitutional neglect: Bodies like NCST and local tribal councils were side-lined, undermining democratic accountability.

The Farce of Compensatory Afforestation

  1. Massive tree felling: The Ministry projects 8.5 lakh trees may be cut, but independent estimates put the figure between 32–58 lakh.
  2. Afforestation mismatch: Compensatory afforestation is planned in Haryana, thousands of kilometres away, with a completely different ecology.
  3. Mining contradiction: A quarter of this afforestation land has been auctioned for mining, nullifying the mitigation strategy.
  4. CRZ violation: Port site falls under CRZ 1A, which prohibits construction due to turtle nesting sites and coral reefs.

Ecological and Wildlife Concerns

  1. Nicobar long-tailed macaque: Primatologists’ warnings on its survival risks were ignored.
  2. Sea turtle nesting mis-assessed: Surveys were conducted off-season, compromising accuracy.
  3. Dugong impact underestimated: Drone-based surveys only covered shallow waters.
  4. Biased assessments: Reports were allegedly conducted under duress, undermining credibility.

A Disaster-Prone Location

  1. Tsunami precedent: In 2004, the island subsided by 15 feet.
  2. Seismic zone risk: A 6.2 magnitude earthquake in July 2025 reinforced its vulnerability.
  3. Jeopardising investment: Infrastructure and lives face catastrophic risk from earthquakes and tsunamis.

Conclusion

The Great Nicobar Project symbolizes an ecological and humanitarian misadventure where short-term ambitions eclipse constitutional morality, environmental prudence, and tribal justice. The survival of the Nicobarese and Shompen, along with an irreplaceable ecosystem, hangs in the balance. True development must integrate ecological sustainability and social justice rather than sacrifice them at the altar of misplaced mega-infrastructure.

Value Addition

Way Forward

  • Inclusive Development with Tribal Consent
    • Ensure free, prior, and informed consent of Nicobarese and Shompen communities in line with the Niyamgiri judgment (2013).
    • Empower tribal councils in decision-making as mandated by the Forest Rights Act (2006).
  • Strengthening Legal and Institutional Safeguards
    • Consult the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) and respect constitutional provisions under Article 338A.
    • Strengthen Social Impact Assessments with participation of affected communities.
  • Rethinking Compensatory Afforestation
    • Undertake afforestation within island ecosystems, not in distant states like Haryana.
    • Promote ecosystem restoration rather than mere plantation drives.
  • Ecologically Sensitive Area Protection
    • Enforce CRZ 1A norms protecting turtle nesting sites, coral reefs, and coastal biodiversity.
    • Recognise Great Nicobar as an Ecologically Sensitive Zone (ESZ) under Environment Protection Act.
  • Disaster-Resilient Planning
    • Recognise that Great Nicobar lies in Seismic Zone V and redesign infrastructure accordingly.
    • Adopt a low-impact development model suited for fragile ecosystems (eco-tourism, research hubs, small-scale renewable energy).
  • Alternative Growth Models
    • Focus on sustainable livelihoods for locals (fisheries, forest produce, heritage tourism).
    • Leverage the island’s location for strategic security through minimal-impact naval installations, avoiding large-scale civilian displacement.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2017] ‘Climate Change’ is a global problem. How India will be affected by climate change? How Himalayan and coastal states of India will be affected by climate change?

Linkage: The Great Nicobar Project directly links to this PYQ as it illustrates how climate change impacts combine with ill-planned development to heighten risks. Rising sea levels and intensifying cyclones threaten India’s coastal states, while Great Nicobar, lying in a seismically active and tsunami-prone zone, showcases the compounded vulnerability of fragile ecosystems and communities. Thus, it exemplifies how coastal regions face existential risks when climate change interacts with unsustainable projects.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Primary and Secondary Education – RTE, Education Policy, SEQI, RMSA, Committee Reports, etc.

How much is spent on children’s education in India

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

Introduction

India has long struggled with gender inequities in education. Despite government efforts like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao and steady progress in enrolment, where girls now form 48% of the school population and even surpass men in gross enrolment ratios in higher education, financial investment by families continues to tilt in favor of boys. The 80th round of the National Sample Survey (Comprehensive Modular Survey on Education) reveals that boys consistently receive higher expenditure allocations across school stages and states, highlighting deep-rooted social biases in household decision-making.

Significance of the recent NSS report

  1. New evidence: The 2024 survey covered 52,085 households and data for 57,742 students, making it one of the most comprehensive datasets on education expenditure.
  2. Contradiction with enrolment success: Despite progress in closing gender enrolment gaps, the spending patterns show that financial priorities still favor boys.
  3. Striking gap: In urban India, families spend ₹2,791 less per girl compared to boys, while in rural India, boys get 18% more spent on them.
  4. Long-term concern: Such expenditure biases translate into inequities in learning outcomes, employability, and overall empowerment.

Gender patterns in household spending on education

  1. All stages of schooling: Per-student expenditure on girls is consistently lower than boys from pre-primary to higher secondary.
  2. Rural-urban divide: Rural families spend ₹1,373 more on boys; urban families spend 30% more on boys by higher secondary level.
  3. Course fees: Families pay on average 21.5% more in fees for boys.

Private vs government schooling:

  1. 58.4% of girls are in government schools.
  2. 34% of boys access private unaided schools compared to 29.5% of girls.
  3. Tuition classes: While enrollment in coaching is similar (26% girls vs 27.8% boys), expenditure differs, by higher secondary, families spend 22% more on tuition for boys.

State-level variations in educational expenditure

  1. Delhi, MP, Rajasthan, Punjab: More than 10 percentage points gender gap in private school enrolment.
  2. Tamil Nadu and Kerala: Gender parity—boys and girls access government and private schools almost equally.
  3. Northeast States: Reverse trend—more girls enrolled in private schools.
  4. Telangana, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal: Families spend vastly more on boys at higher secondary level.
    • Example: In Tamil Nadu, families spend ₹35,973 on boys vs ₹19,412 on girls.
  5. Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh: More spending on girls at higher secondary, partly due to safety-related transport costs.

Gender gap in private coaching expenditure

  1. Himachal Pradesh: Families spend ₹9,813 per boy vs ₹1,550 per girl on higher secondary tuition.
  2. Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu: Also show significant tuition expenditure gaps.
  3. Implication: Coaching is seen as a gateway to competitive exams and better career prospects—girls being left out deepens structural disadvantages.

Broader implications for gender equality

  1. Hidden inequality: Enrolment parity does not mean equity in quality or investment.
  2. Future workforce impact: Lower spending on girls limits their human capital development and perpetuates the gender pay gap.
  3. Policy blind spots: Subsidies and scholarships exist, but social norms continue to undervalue daughters’ education.

Way Forward

Bridging the gender gap in educational expenditure requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses not just affordability but also deep-rooted social norms.

  1. Strengthening targeted subsidies: Expansion of schemes like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao, free bicycles for girls, and conditional cash transfers for secondary and higher education can encourage families to invest equally in daughters.
  2. Equalising access to quality education: Improving the quality of government schools and providing digital learning resources will reduce the need for costly private schooling and tuitions, thereby narrowing gendered disparities.
  3. Awareness and behavioural change: Community-level campaigns must challenge patriarchal mindsets that undervalue girls’ education. Civil society and self-help groups can be leveraged to reshape family-level decision-making.
  4. Transport and safety interventions: Ensuring safe and affordable transport for girls, particularly in higher secondary education, will address a key cost component that discourages investment.
  5. Monitoring and accountability: Data from National Sample Survey and Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE+) should be used to regularly monitor gendered expenditure gaps and inform evidence-based policies.
  6. Integrating ethics and social responsibility: Education policies must go hand in hand with fostering a sense of justice, fairness, and equal opportunity, so that families see daughters as equal bearers of human capital.

Conclusion

The NSS findings show that while India has moved forward in closing the gender gap in enrolment, it still struggles with a silent financial discrimination in household educational spending. Unless families start valuing daughters’ education equally, not just in words but also in investment, true gender equality in education will remain elusive. Corrective measures through policy nudges, financial incentives, and awareness campaigns are essential to bridge this invisible divide.

Value Addition

Key Concepts

  1. Gender Parity Index (GPI): Ratio of female-to-male values in education indicators; India has achieved near-parity in enrolment but lags in investment equity.
  2. Human Capital Theory: Education as an investment leading to productivity and growth; unequal spending weakens women’s contribution to the economy.
  3. Intersectionality: Gender bias in expenditure intersects with class, caste, and rural-urban divides, amplifying inequalities.

Data and Reports

  1. National Sample Survey (2024): Reveals consistent gaps in household expenditure on girls’ education across stages and regions.
  2. World Economic Forum Gender Gap Report (2024): India slipped in rankings, with education a major drag despite enrolment progress.
  3. ASER Report (Annual Status of Education Report): Points to quality issues in rural schools, often affecting girls disproportionately.
  4. UNESCO (Global Education Monitoring Report, 2023): Highlights that globally, girls are more likely to be excluded from secondary and higher education due to cost factors.

Government Policies and Schemes

  1. National Education Policy (NEP) 2020: Emphasises inclusive, equitable education and gender-sensitive curricula.
  2. Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao (2015): Social mobilisation for improving girls’ survival, protection, and education.
  3. National Scheme of Incentives to Girls for Secondary Education (NSIGSE): Financial support to reduce dropouts.
  4. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV): Residential schooling for disadvantaged girls in Classes 6–12.

Comparative International Experience

  1. Bangladesh: Successful in reducing gender disparity through stipend schemes for girls, free textbooks, and subsidies—leading to higher female enrolment in secondary education.
  2. Nordic Countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland): Achieved near-complete gender equity in education by ensuring free schooling, universal childcare, and strong social security systems that reduce household bias.
  3. Rwanda: Introduced Gender-Responsive Budgeting—allocating funds specifically to address gender gaps in education, which India can emulate.

Quotes (Useful for Essay/Ethics/GS answers)

  1. “If you educate a man you educate an individual, but if you educate a woman you educate a family.” — Charles M. Cooper
  2. “Investment in girls’ education is not charity, it is the smartest investment a country can make.” — UN Secretary-General António Guterres

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2022] The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children’s education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse.

Linkage: The NSS 80th round shows families spend 18–30% more on boys than girls, privileging them in private schools and coaching despite RTE’s universal access. This proves that incentive-based provisions under the RTE Act remain inadequate without tackling deep-rooted gender norms. Hence, awareness generation, gender-responsive budgeting, and social mobilisation are essential complements to legal entitlements.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Disasters and Disaster Management – Sendai Framework, Floods, Cyclones, etc.

Why Punjab keeps flooding

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Disaster Management

Introduction

Punjab, often called the “food bowl of India,” is paradoxically one of the most flood-prone states in the country. Drained by three perennial rivers, the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej, along with seasonal tributaries and hill streams, Punjab has historically thrived on its fertile floodplains. Yet, the very rivers that make its land abundant also bring recurring devastation. The 2025 floods, among the worst in recent memory, have once again underlined the dual challenge of geography and governance. With 3.8 lakh people affected, 11.7 lakh hectares of farmland destroyed, and 43 lives lost, the floods highlight not just natural vulnerability but also systemic mismanagement.

Why Punjab’s Floods Are Back in the Spotlight

Punjab is currently experiencing one of the most destructive floods in decades, with unprecedented rainfall in Himachal Pradesh, J&K, and Punjab itself swelling rivers beyond capacity. What makes this year’s floods significant is the scale: all 23 districts have been declared flood-hit, and the breach of Madhopur barrage gates has worsened devastation. While heavy rains are not new, institutional failures, especially in dam management by the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), and delayed warnings have amplified the crisis, making the situation worse than previous floods of 1955, 1988, 1993, 2019, and 2023.

Rivers as Both Boon and Bane

  1. Three perennial rivers – Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej traverse Punjab, carrying immense alluvium and making the state highly fertile.
  2. Seasonal rivers and choes – Rivers like Ghaggar and hill streams add to Punjab’s complex hydrology.
  3. Agricultural abundance – Punjab produces nearly 20% of India’s wheat and 12% of its rice, despite occupying only 1.5% of landmass.
  4. Recurring floods – Heavy monsoons, particularly in upstream catchments (Himachal and J&K), frequently overwhelm dhussi bundhs (earthen embankments), as seen in 1955, 1988, 1993, 2019, 2023, and now 2025.

Why Do Dams Intensify Flooding

  1. Upstream dams – Bhakra (Sutlej), Pong (Beas), and Thein/Ranjit Sagar (Ravi) play a central role in regulating river flow.
  2. Rule curve dilemma – The BBMB maintains high reservoir levels in July–August for irrigation and power, leaving little cushion for sudden heavy inflows.
  3. Sudden releases – Emergency releases during extreme rainfall cause flash floods downstream, as seen with Pong dam’s unprecedented 20% higher inflows than 2023.
  4. Governance issue – Punjab feels marginalized in BBMB decisions, especially after 2022 rule changes allowing all-India officers to head the Board.

Human Factors Worsening the Crisis

  1. Barrage failures – On August 26, two gates of the Madhopur barrage collapsed after Thein dam releases, flooding Pathankot, Gurdaspur, and Amritsar.
  2. Weak embankments – Illegal mining has eroded dhussi bundhs, reducing their ability to withstand pressure.
  3. Poor coordination – Lack of communication between upstream and downstream departments delayed gate operations.
  4. Neglected desilting – Experts estimate that ₹4,000–5,000 crore investment in desilting and embankment strengthening could prevent far greater losses.

Larger Governance Failures

  1. BBMB’s narrow mandate – Prioritizes irrigation and power, neglecting flood management.
  2. Delayed warnings – Punjab officials allege sudden releases with little time for evacuation.
  3. Political tensions – Punjab’s Water Resources Minister accused the Centre of ignoring Punjab’s plight.
  4. Environmentalists’ view – Experts stress that flood cushions, transparent decision-making, and scientific dam operations are essential to prevent repeated tragedies.

Conclusion

Punjab’s floods are not just a story of heavy rain but of fragile governance structures. Nature may trigger floods, but poor dam management, illegal mining, weak embankments, and lack of timely communication convert them into disasters. Strengthening embankments, enforcing transparent dam operations, and giving Punjab a greater role in BBMB are urgent needs. Unless governance catches up with geography, Punjab will continue to oscillate between abundance and devastation.

UPSC Relevance

[UPSC 2024] Flooding in urban areas is an emerging climate-induced disaster. Discuss the causes of this disaster. Mention the features of two such major floods in the last two decades in India. Describe the policies and frameworks in India that aim at tackling such floods.

Linkage: The Punjab floods of 2025 mirror the challenges of urban floods like Mumbai (2005) and Chennai (2015), where extreme rainfall combined with poor drainage, unplanned construction, and dam mismanagement turned heavy rain into catastrophe. Frameworks like the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the Sendai Framework (2015–30), and National Disaster Management Plan (2019) provide guiding structures, yet governance lapses and weak local preparedness continue to make both rural and urban areas equally vulnerable to flooding.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

A new leaf- environmental compliance needs to be monitored at all levels

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

India’s environmental regulation has long suffered from weak enforcement due to manpower and capacity deficits. The Environment Audit Rules, 2025 seek to fix this by authorising private accredited auditors to monitor compliance, ensuring industries and companies adhere to environmental norms and emerging frameworks like carbon accounting and green credits.

Why in the News

The rules are significant because, for the first time, private agencies have been formally allowed to audit environmental compliance, a task previously limited to statutory boards. This shift addresses the chronic resource crunch in pollution control authorities and ties compliance to future-ready mechanisms such as the Green Credit Rules.

The Expanding Framework of Environmental Monitoring

  1. Current institutional structure: Supported by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the Regional Offices of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), and the State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs)/Pollution Control Committees (PCCs).
  2. Persistent limitations: Severe shortage of manpower, resources, capacity, and infrastructure has hampered effective monitoring.
  3. Press statement: The Ministry itself acknowledged that these deficits weaken enforcement across “the vast number of projects and industries operating nationwide.”

The Role of Private Environmental Auditors

  1. Accreditation system: Private agencies can now get licensed as environmental auditors.
  2. Comparable to Chartered Accountants: Much like financial auditors, they will assess compliance with environmental laws and best practices in pollution abatement.
  3. Wider application: Their audits will also be relevant for emerging frameworks such as the Green Credit Rules.

Integrating Green Credit and Carbon Accounting

  1. Green Credit Rules: Individuals and organisations can earn tradeable credits for activities such as afforestation, water conservation, and waste management.
  2. Corporate responsibility: Companies must now account for direct and indirect carbon emissions, requiring sophisticated auditing frameworks.
  3. Gap in state capacity: SPCBs are not equipped to handle complex emission accounting, hence the shift towards specialised auditors.

Risks of Diluting Core Responsibilities

  1. Neglect at the grassroots: Environmental violations are often most blatant at district, block, and panchayat levels.
  2. Lack of trained staff: Local monitoring agencies remain understaffed and undertrained, allowing many violations to go unchecked.
  3. Need for empowerment: Any new regime must strengthen, not sideline, grassroots institutions.

Future of Environmental Regulation in India

  1. Beyond policing: Environmental regulation is no longer about enforcement alone but about aligning with global climate goals.
  2. Preparing for the future: Systems must adapt to integrate climate accounting, sustainability audits, and market-based mechanisms like credits.
  3. Balancing act: New reforms must bridge manpower deficits without undermining accountability.

Conclusion

The Environment Audit Rules, 2025 represent a decisive shift in India’s environmental governance by institutionalising private auditing in compliance monitoring. While this can bridge long-standing deficits in manpower and expertise, the real test lies in ensuring grassroots empowerment and preventing dilution of State responsibility. Environmental protection cannot be outsourced entirely; instead, it must evolve into a multi-stakeholder responsibility that balances accountability, innovation, and inclusivity.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2013]: Enumerate the National Water Policy of India. Taking river Ganges as an example, discuss the strategies which may be adopted for river water pollution control and management. What are the legal provisions for management and handling of hazardous wastes in India?

Linkage: The UPSC 2013 question on National Water Policy, Ganga pollution control, and hazardous waste laws links well with the Environment Audit Rules, 2025, as both highlight the gap between legal provisions and effective enforcement. The new rules strengthen monitoring by accrediting private auditors, addressing the chronic manpower deficits that plagued river pollution and waste management efforts. They represent an evolution from mere policy frameworks to robust compliance mechanisms.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Freedom of Speech – Defamation, Sedition, etc.

Should Commercial speech on digital platform be regulated

Explained | Governance | Mains Paper 2: Governance, Transparency & Accountability, Citizens Charters

Introduction

On August 25, 2025, the Supreme Court of India asked the Union government to frame guidelines for regulating social media content, noting that influencers often commercialise speech in ways that offend vulnerable groups. The case arose from derogatory remarks made by comedians about persons with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. While well-intentioned, the order has raised concerns about overregulation of free speech.

Why in the news

The Supreme Court of India’s intervention is significant because it directs the executive to draft specific rules for social media despite existing laws such as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) already providing mechanisms. For the first time, the Court has nudged the government toward formal regulation triggered by a single incident, raising alarms of censorship and judicial overreach.

The presence or absence of a regulatory vacuum

  1. Existing provisions: FIRs can be filed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. The IT Act already empowers courts or the executive to order takedowns.
  2. Opaque enforcement: Takedowns often occur without notifying the affected individual, undermining natural justice.
  3. Critics’ view: No regulatory vacuum exists; additional rules may be an overreaction to a single case.

The question of dignity as a ground for restricting free speech

  1. Constitutional limits: Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India exhaustively lists permissible restrictions, security of the state, public order, decency, morality, etc. Dignity is not among them.
  2. Judicial precedents: In Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016), the Supreme Court of India upheld criminal defamation, indirectly protecting individual dignity, but did not treat dignity as an independent ground.
  3. Slippery slope risk: Recognising dignity as a separate basis for restriction could legitimise expansive censorship.

The risk of silencing uncomfortable speech

  1. Chilling effect: Overbroad regulations may deter comedians, satirists, and artists from bold expression.
  2. Supreme Court stance: In March 2025, in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat, the Court quashed charges against a Member of Parliament, reaffirming that Article 19(1)(a) protects even disturbing or offensive views.
  3. Censorship creep: Proposals like the Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill may expand state control over independent creators.

The place of commercial speech in free expression

  1. Judicial recognition: In Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (1962) and Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (1995), the Supreme Court of India affirmed that commercial speech falls under Article 19(1)(a).
  2. Commerce and speech: Just as newspapers rely on advertisements, comedians and influencers rely on monetisation. Profit motive does not make speech less deserving of protection.
  3. Criticism: Comedy and satire do not neatly fall into the narrow category of “commercial speech,” traditionally reserved for advertisements.

Judicial polyvocality and consistency of precedent

  1. Court’s nature: Divergent views are part of common law, but binding precedent ensures continuity.
  2. Problem here: Directing the executive to draft rules risks giving regulations undue legitimacy and making constitutional challenges harder.
  3. Judicial discipline: When coordinate Benches depart from earlier rulings, proper procedure is referral to a larger Bench.

Safeguards needed in future regulations

  1. Transparent review: Any regulation must ensure robust review mechanisms and fairness in takedown procedures.
  2. Broad consultation: Stakeholder engagement should extend beyond industry associations to include civil society and affected communities.
  3. Opacity concerns: Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and its rules (2009) are already opaque; future regulations must not repeat these flaws.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s intention to protect dignity is laudable, but creating fresh regulations risks undermining the freedom of expression. India already has legal frameworks to tackle offensive content. Expanding restrictions based on vague concepts like dignity may lead to excessive censorship, weaken democratic discourse, and erode artistic freedom.

Value Addition

Social Media Regulation in India

Existing legal framework:

  1. Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) – Section 69A empowers the government to block content in the interest of sovereignty, security, or public order.
  2. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 – impose obligations on intermediaries (traceability, grievance redressal, content takedown within 24 hours).
  3. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) – contains provisions criminalising hate speech, obscenity, and defamation.

Judicial interventions:

  1. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – struck down Section 66A of the IT Act for being vague and unconstitutional.
  2. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016) – upheld criminal defamation, linking dignity and reputation to Article 21.
  3. Concerns: Opaque takedown orders, executive overreach, limited transparency, chilling effect on creators.

Comparative Global Perspective

  • European Union (EU):
    • Digital Services Act (DSA), 2022 – imposes strict obligations on platforms to remove illegal content, ensures algorithmic transparency, and penalises non-compliance heavily.
    • Focus on user rights, platform accountability, and transparency reports.
  • United States:
    • Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 1996 – grants platforms immunity for third-party content but allows them to moderate in “good faith.”
    • Debate ongoing about reforming Section 230 to tackle misinformation and hate speech.
  • United Kingdom: Online Safety Act, 2023 – places a “duty of care” on platforms to protect children and curb illegal content.
  • Australia: Online Safety Act, 2021 – empowers the eSafety Commissioner to order removal of harmful content (cyberbullying, image-based abuse, terrorist material).
  • China: Heavily restrictive model – extensive censorship, mandatory real-name verification, and state monitoring of digital platforms.
  • Global South: Many countries (e.g., Nigeria, Pakistan) have passed restrictive social media laws under the pretext of national security, raising concerns about authoritarian misuse.

International Bodies and Global Norms

  • United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC): Stresses that restrictions on online speech must comply with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) – legality, necessity, and proportionality.
  • UNESCO: Advocates for a multi-stakeholder approach to digital governance, focusing on protecting human rights, access to information, and pluralism.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development): Encourages transparency and accountability frameworks for digital platforms.
  • Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT): A tech industry-led initiative to remove extremist content online.

Good Examples

  • Germany: Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), 2017 – requires platforms to remove “manifestly unlawful” content (hate speech, fake news) within 24 hours. Criticised for overblocking but effective in quick takedowns.
  • France: Passed “Avia Law” (2020) against online hate but was struck down by the Constitutional Council for disproportionate restrictions. Illustrates the tension between free speech and regulation.
  • EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) indirectly regulates platforms by holding them accountable for data privacy and targeted advertising.

Way Forward for India

  • Principle-based framework: Regulations should follow constitutional safeguards (Article 19(2)), ensure proportionality, and avoid vague categories like “dignity.”
  • Transparency and due process: Mandatory publication of takedown orders, notice to affected parties, and avenues for appeal.
  • Independent oversight: Instead of executive dominance, an independent regulator (like an ombudsman or tribunal) could review takedown requests.
  • Stakeholder-driven approach: Consultation must involve civil society, creators, tech companies, and vulnerable communities.
  • Digital literacy: Public campaigns to counter hate speech and misinformation organically, rather than relying solely on punitive regulation.
  • Learning from global practices: India could adapt elements of the EU’s Digital Services Act (transparency), US’s Section 230 immunity, and Australia’s safety-first approach, while avoiding China’s over-control.

UPSC Relevance

[UPSC 2013] Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.

Linkage: Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 was struck down in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) for being vague and violating Article 19(1)(a) beyond the limits of Article 19(2). The present debate on regulating commercial speech on digital platforms raises a similar concern, as introducing “dignity” as a restriction risks the same arbitrariness. Both highlight the constitutional need for clear, proportionate, and narrowly defined limits on free speech in India.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-China

India-China: the making of a border

Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: India & Its Neighborhood - Relations

Introduction

The India–China boundary, stretching for about 3,488 km, is one of the longest disputed borders in the world. Unlike clearly demarcated international frontiers, this boundary runs through the Himalayas and remains unsettled in large parts. The two major areas of dispute are Aksai Chin in the western sector, occupied by China but claimed by India, and Arunachal Pradesh (particularly the Tawang tract) in the eastern sector, claimed by China but under Indian control. Rooted in the legacies of the British and Manchu empires, the boundary was never precisely defined. After independence, India relied on British-era maps while China pressed for historical and strategic claims. This divergence led to the 1962 war and continues to shape relations between the two Asian powers.

Why the India–China border issue matters

The unresolved India–China border remains a major geopolitical challenge in Asia. Unlike other international boundaries, this border runs through inhospitable Himalayan terrain where neither country historically maintained a permanent presence. The 1962 war, following India’s rejection of Chinese proposals, left scars of mistrust. Later attempts, such as Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 Beijing visit, restored engagement but not resolution. The dispute is about sovereignty, strategy, and national prestige, making it a flashpoint with global implications.

The imperial legacy and a contested border

  1. Colonial inheritance: The India–China border was a product of the British and Manchu empires, drawn imprecisely through the Himalayas.
  2. Absence of settlement: After independence, India relied on colonial maps and dismissed Chinese calls for negotiations.
  3. Strategic miscalculation: India’s faith in maps was not supported by control on the ground, leaving space for China’s proactive steps in Aksai Chin.

The emergence of conflict in Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh

  1. Chinese presence in Aksai Chin: China constructed a highway from Xinjiang to Tibet through Aksai Chin, asserting de facto control.
  2. Indian assertion in Tawang: India occupied Tawang citing the 1914 Simla Convention and the McMahon Line signed with an independent Tibet.
  3. Proposals for compromise: In 1959, Beijing suggested a Line of Actual Control (LAC) with a 20 km troop pullback; in 1960, Zhou Enlai proposed a swap—Aksai Chin for Arunachal recognition.
  4. Breakdown and war: India rejected these offers; attempts to reclaim Aksai Chin triggered the 1962 war, where India lost ground in Ladakh but retained the McMahon Line in the east.

Post-war developments and early engagement

  1. Dormancy period: After 1962, both sides avoided border contact for more than a decade.
  2. China Study Group: In 1975, India formed this high-level body to map the border with satellite imagery and direct patrolling.
  3. Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s outreach: In 1979, Vajpayee visited Beijing, the first senior Indian leader to do so since 1962, initiating cautious normalisation.
  4. Revival of Chinese proposals: Deng Xiaoping in 1980 reiterated Zhou’s swap idea, but India, led by Indira Gandhi, rejected it due to mistrust.

The stalemate in negotiations during the 1980s

  1. Unproductive talks: From 1981, both sides engaged in negotiations—India sought sector-wise talks, while China insisted on a package deal.
  2. Demand for Tawang: By 1985, Beijing linked concessions in Ladakh with Indian concessions over Tawang, central to China’s Tibet policy.
  3. Operation Falcon: In 1986, India forward-deployed troops at Namka Chu, displaying improved military preparedness since 1962.
  4. De-escalation: Both sides eventually pulled back, but the demand for Tawang revealed fundamental divergence.

Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 visit and a new framework

  1. Strategic reset: Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to Beijing marked a shift from linking normalisation to border resolution.
  2. Framework for dialogue: Both sides agreed to restore relations while deferring the border issue to a Joint Working Group (JWG).
  3. Principle of accommodation: Premier Li Peng emphasised “mutual understanding and mutual accommodation (MUMA),” while Gandhi sought a “fair and reasonable” settlement.
  4. Peace as priority: Peace and tranquillity were prioritised, enabling cooperation in other fields despite the unsettled boundary.

Conclusion

The India–China border dispute is a story of missed chances, mistrust, and strategic recalibration. From Aksai Chin to Tawang, an imperial legacy evolved into a sovereignty dilemma. While Deng Xiaoping and Rajiv Gandhi shifted the relationship towards peace, fundamental differences endure. History shows that strategic patience, military preparedness, and calibrated diplomacy remain the keys to managing this difficult relationship.

Value Addition

Institutional Mechanisms

  1. China Study Group (1975): Established by India to monitor the border with satellite mapping and patrolling points.
  2. Joint Working Group (1988): Created after Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to sustain structured dialogue on the boundary issue.
  3. Later confidence-building agreements (1993, 1996, 2005): Though not in this article, they flowed from this trajectory and institutionalised border management.

Policy Evolution

  1. Jawaharlal Nehru: Over-reliance on colonial maps and dismissal of negotiations.
  2. Atal Bihari Vajpayee: Cautious outreach to normalise ties in 1979 despite tensions.
  3. Indira Gandhi: Strong mistrust post-1962, refusal to accept “territorial swaps.”
  4. Rajiv Gandhi: Pragmatic reset in 1988, separating normalisation from boundary resolution.

Line of Actual Control (LAC)

  1. Definition: The de facto boundary separating Indian and Chinese forces, first formally acknowledged in 1959 by China.
  2. Nature: Not mutually agreed or demarcated on the ground, leading to “differing perceptions.”
  3. Relevance: Key to understanding recurring standoffs such as Galwan (2020), though beyond this article’s timeframe.

Case Study Relevance

  1. Aksai Chin: Illustrates how geography and strategic imperatives (road connectivity to Tibet) drive China’s claims.
  2. Tawang: Demonstrates cultural and religious dimensions (Tibetan Buddhism, Dalai Lama’s birthplace links).
  3. Operation Falcon (1986): A case study in how improved military readiness altered China’s calculus.
  4. Rajiv Gandhi’s 1988 visit: A model of pragmatic diplomacy—normalisation without immediate resolution.

Way Forward

  1. Institutional strengthening: Reviving and empowering mechanisms like the Joint Working Group and Special Representatives dialogue.
  2. Confidence-building: Expanding agreements on patrolling norms, hotlines, and disengagement to avoid clashes.
  3. Strategic balance: Maintaining military preparedness (as shown in Operation Falcon) while keeping diplomacy open.
  4. Engagement beyond the border: Deepening cooperation in trade, technology, and multilateral forums to build trust.
  5. Mutual accommodation: Drawing from Deng Xiaoping and Rajiv Gandhi’s vision of a “fair, reasonable, mutually acceptable” settlement to guide long-term resolution.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2017] ‘China is using its economic relations and positive trade surplus as tools to develop potential military power status in Asia’, In the light of this statement, discuss its impact on India as her neighbor.

Linkage: China’s occupation of Aksai Chin and insistence on Tawang show how strategic control is tied to economic leverage, such as road connectivity and infrastructure. Its trade surplus with India fuels military modernisation along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). For India, this creates a dual challenge of managing unresolved borders while countering China’s economic–military power projection in Asia.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Judicial Reforms

[4th September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Concealing a judge’s dissent, eroding judiciary’s authority

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy. Comment.

Linkage: The 2023 PYQ on judicial independence as a prerequisite of democracy directly relates to the Collegium debate. Concealing Justice Nagarathna’s dissent shows how opacity undermines independence by eroding legitimacy and public trust. True independence requires not just freedom from external control but also internal transparency and accountability.

Mentor’s Comment

Transparency in judicial appointments is once again under scrutiny. The recent revelation of Justice B.V. Nagarathna’s dissent on a Collegium recommendation, concealed from the public, has sparked fresh debate on the opacity of India’s judicial system. This piece examines why concealing dissent undermines the judiciary’s legitimacy, what is at stake for democracy, and how reforms could restore accountability in the higher judiciary.

Introduction

Constitutional democracies, as South African jurist Etienne Mureinik observed, thrive on a “culture of justification”, the principle that every exercise of public power must be explained and defended. Indian judges have often invoked this idea to hold governments accountable. Yet, when it comes to the judiciary’s own functioning, particularly the Collegium system of judicial appointments, this principle falters. The recent concealment of Justice B.V. Nagarathna’s dissent on the elevation of Justice Vipul M. Pancholi illustrates the problem starkly: the public is denied access to crucial reasoning behind decisions that shape the judiciary itself.

Why is this news significant?

The dissent of a sitting Supreme Court judge on a Collegium recommendation has surfaced through media leaks, not official disclosure. This is striking because the official resolution uploaded on the Court’s website suggested unanimity. The lack of transparency is troubling not just for one appointment but for the credibility of the entire judicial system. For a country where judges decide on critical questions of liberty and constitutional balance, secrecy corrodes legitimacy and deepens the democratic deficit.

Opacity as the defining feature of the Collegium system

  1. Judge-made law: The Collegium emerged from the Second Judges Case (1993) and was reinforced in the Third Judges Case (1998).
  2. Private deliberations: Decisions are made by the five senior-most judges of the Supreme Court behind closed doors.
  3. Minimal disclosure: Until 2017, no explanations were given. Later, skeletal resolutions were published, with only brief reasons disclosed in 2018 before the practice was abandoned.
  4. Resistance to transparency: Concerns of reputational harm and political interference are cited as justifications for secrecy.

The critical importance of Justice Nagarathna’s dissent

  1. Grave objections concealed: Reports suggest her reservations were serious, but neither her note nor the majority’s reasoning is accessible to the public.
  2. Unclear role of the executive: It is uncertain whether her dissent was even communicated to the Union government, which cleared the appointment within 48 hours.
  3. Democratic deficit: When even dissent within the highest court is hidden, the culture of justification collapses.

Balancing transparency with fairness in judicial appointments

International examples:

  1. Britain: Judicial Appointments Commission publishes criteria and detailed assessment reports.
  2. South Africa: Judicial Service Commission conducts public interviews of candidates.
  3. Indian reality: Transparency is avoided, and even dissent becomes visible only through leaks.
  4. Balancing act: Protecting reputations requires sensitive disclosure, not complete secrecy.

Democratic stakes of a secretive Collegium process

  1. Shaping constitutional outcomes: Judges appointed today decide on civil liberties, executive powers, and Union–State relations.
  2. Institutional legitimacy: Without openness, citizens lose trust in the judiciary.
  3. Contradiction of standards: Courts demand accountability from governments but exempt themselves.

The urgent need for reform in the Collegium system

  1. Self-accountability: A judiciary that explains its decisions strengthens, not weakens, its independence.
  2. Preserving legitimacy: Concealment erodes public trust, while openness anchors authority in people’s confidence.
  3. Past failures: Transparency initiatives have been sporadic and quickly rolled back.
  4. Future imperative: Without reform, the judiciary risks losing moral authority, the very foundation of its role in democracy.

Conclusion

The concealment of Justice Nagarathna’s dissent is not an isolated event but a symptom of the deeper opacity in judicial appointments. If the judiciary insists on accountability from other state organs, it must hold itself to the same standards. A transparent Collegium process will not diminish judicial independence; it will enhance legitimacy, anchor democracy in trust, and ensure that the culture of justification applies to all.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Port Infrastructure and Shipping Industry – Sagarmala Project, SDC, CEZ, etc.

India’s recent maritime reforms need course correction

Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

Introduction

India’s maritime laws, some over a century old, were recently overhauled through the Ports Bill, Merchant Shipping Act, Coastal Shipping Act, and Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill (2025). The reforms aim to modernise governance, boost ease of doing business, and enhance India’s maritime role. Yet, concerns remain over centralisation, weakened ownership safeguards, excessive discretion, and burdens on smaller players, raising questions about federal balance.

Why Is This News Significant

The Ports Bill, 2025 centralises decision-making under a Maritime State Development Council, curbing State autonomy in port development. The Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign ownership of Indian-flagged vessels, ending the earlier full Indian ownership rule. Critics argue these changes favour big corporations and the Centre, while sidelining coastal States and small operators, with implications for India’s maritime sovereignty.

Progress and Pitfalls of Maritime Modernisation

  1. Comprehensive reform: New laws collectively update fragmented, outdated frameworks, covering shipping finance, offshore operations, safety, liability, and training.
  2. Ease of business: The Ports Act aims to create coherence in regulation, promoting sustainable development and investment.
  3. Legislative haste: Bills passed without serious debate or standing committee review, raising concerns about lack of consensus and scrutiny.

The Ports Act and the Federal Balance

  1. Centralisation of authority: Maritime State Development Council empowers the Centre to dictate State maritime policies.
  2. Erosion of fiscal autonomy: Coastal States cannot adjust frameworks independently; central plans like Sagarmala and Gati Shakti override local priorities.
  3. Federal subordination: Critics argue this undermines cooperative federalism, reducing States to implementers of central schemes.

Eroding Safeguards in Shipping Ownership

  1. Loophole in Indian-flag ownership: Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign/OCI ownership; exact thresholds left to government discretion.
  2. Risk of flag-of-convenience: Executive may dilute ownership norms, letting foreign operators control Indian ships indefinitely.
  3. BBCD mechanism: Bareboat Charter-Cum-Demise leasing recognised, but risks foreign lessors retaining de facto control.

Small Operators and Dispute Resolution Challenges

  1. Vague compliance norms: Discretionary powers could overwhelm smaller port operators with compliance burdens.
  2. Clause 17 controversy: Bars civil courts from port-related disputes; relies on internal committees lacking impartiality.
  3. Investment deterrence: Absence of independent judicial oversight could erode investor confidence.

Coastal Shipping: Protecting or Undermining Local Players?

  1. Cabotage protection: Only Indian-flagged vessels can engage in coastal trade — in principle, safeguarding domestic players.
  2. DG Shipping’s sweeping powers: Licences to foreign vessels on broad grounds like “national security” or “strategic alignment.”
  3. Impact on fishing industry: Smaller players face heavy reporting burdens without clarity on data use or safeguards.
  4. Central dominance: National Coastal and Inland Shipping Strategic Plan reduces State-level say in coastal regulation.

Conclusion

India’s maritime reforms are necessary but flawed. The package risks over-centralisation, weakened sovereignty, and burdens on smaller operators, even as it promises modernisation. True reform requires transparent ownership rules, impartial dispute resolution, and genuine cooperative federalism. Otherwise, the reforms may deliver short-term ease of business but compromise India’s federal balance and maritime security.

Value Addition

Key Provisions of the Indian Ports Bill, 2025 (replacing Indian Ports Act, 1908)

  1. State Maritime Boards:
    • Statutory recognition: Boards set up by coastal States now have a legal mandate.
    • Functions: Planning & developing port infrastructure, granting licenses, fixing tariffs, ensuring compliance with safety, security, and environmental norms.
  2. Maritime State Development Council (MSDC):
    • Composition: Chaired by Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways; includes State Ministers, Navy & Coast Guard representatives, and Union Ministry officials.
    • Role: Issues guidelines on port data, ensures tariff transparency, advises Centre on national maritime plans, legislative adequacy, and connectivity.
  3. Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC):
    • Jurisdiction: Resolves disputes between non-major ports, concessionaires, users, and service providers.
    • Appeals: Lie with High Courts; civil courts barred.
    • Flexibility: Agreements may allow arbitration or alternative dispute resolution.
  4. Tariffs:
    • Major Ports: Fixed by Board of Major Port Authority/Company Board.
    • Non-Major Ports: Fixed by State Maritime Boards or their concessionaires.
  5. Port Officers:
    • Conservator: Chief port officer with powers over anchoring, berthing, movement, obstruction clearance, and fee recovery.
    • New functions: Preventing disease spread, assessing damage, adjudicating penalties.
  6. Safety and Environmental Protection:
    • MARPOL & Ballast Water Management Convention compliance mandatory.
    • New obligations: Waste reception facilities, emergency preparedness, pollution containment, and regular central audits.
  7. Offences and Penalties:
    • Continuity: Retains offences under 1908 Act (non-compliance, impeding navigation, damage to port property).
    • Decriminalisation: Certain offences now carry monetary fines; first-time violations can be compounded.
  8. New offences:
    • Imprisonment up to 6 months for endangering vessel safety, disturbing seabed.
    • Monetary penalties for unnotified port operations, failure to report/manage pollution, or ignoring DRC orders.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2022] What are the maritime security challenges in India? Discuss the organisational, technical and procedural initiatives taken to improve maritime security.

Linkage: India’s maritime reforms (2025) strengthen security through MARPOL compliance, waste management, and statutory State Maritime Boards, but also create vulnerabilities. Dilution of vessel ownership, centralisation via MSDC, and weak dispute resolution raise concerns of sovereignty and resilience. Thus, reforms reflect both organisational advances and new security risks, linking directly to India’s maritime security challenges.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Minority Issues – SC, ST, Dalits, OBC, Reservations, etc.

Should reservations exceed the 50% cap?

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Laws, Institutions & Bodies Constituted For The Vulnerable Sections

Introduction

Reservations have always stood at the crossroads of social justice and equality of opportunity in India. While Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India empower the state to address historical discrimination, the judicially imposed 50% cap has often clashed with demands for greater inclusivity. Recent developments, from Maharashtra’s acceptance of Maratha demands to calls for caste census and creamy layer reform, have amplified questions on whether the reservation system remains equitable, representative, and sustainable.

The Current Moment of Reckoning

The debate has reached a critical juncture because:

  1. Political promises like Bihar opposition leader Tejashwi Yadav’s proposal for 85% reservations directly challenge the 50% ceiling.
  2. Judicial scrutiny continues, with the Supreme Court questioning whether creamy layer exclusion should extend to SCs and STs.
  3. Empirical concerns such as 40–50% of reserved seats remaining unfilled, and the Rohini Commission’s revelation that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by 25% castes, highlight structural inequities.

This combination of political assertion, judicial intervention, and social critique makes the issue highly consequential.

Articles 15 and 16: The constitutional basis of equality and reservation

  1. Equality mandate: Article 15 guarantees equality in state actions, including education; Article 16 guarantees equality in public employment.
  2. Special provisions: Both allow the state to make reservations for OBCs, SCs, and STs.
  3. Present levels: At the central level, reservations stand at 59.5% (OBC – 27%, SC – 15%, ST – 7.5%, EWS – 10%).

Judicial rulings on reservation and equality

  1. Balaji vs State of Mysore (1962): Reservations must be “within reasonable limits” and capped at 50%; seen as upholding formal equality.
  2. N.M. Thomas (1975): Saw reservations as a continuation of equality of opportunity (substantive equality), but gave no ruling on the cap.
  3. Indra Sawhney (1992): Upheld 27% OBC quota, reaffirmed 50% ceiling, and introduced creamy layer exclusion for OBCs.
  4. Janhit Abhiyan (2022): Validated 10% EWS quota; held that 50% limit applies only to backward classes.
  5. Davinder Singh (2024): Suggested considering creamy layer exclusion for SCs and STs.

Challenges to the 50% ceiling on reservations

  1. Population logic: Backward classes form a larger share than reflected in current quotas; caste census demanded to get exact numbers.
  2. Unfilled vacancies: 40–50% of reserved seats for OBC/SC/ST remain unfilled at the central level.
  3. Sub-caste concentration: Rohini Commission showed extreme skew in OBC benefits—about 1,000 communities have zero representation.

The problem of concentration of reservation benefits

  1. OBCs: 97% benefits go to ~25% sub-castes.
  2. SCs/STs: Similar skew; absence of creamy layer exclusion means relatively better-off sub-castes capture opportunities.
  3. Policy vacuum: Despite judicial nudges, the Centre reaffirmed in August 2024 that creamy layer does not apply to SC/ST.

The way forward for India’s reservation system

  1. Balancing equality: Increasing quota to 85% may violate equality of opportunity, but substantive equality demands better targeting.
  2. Caste census 2027: Could offer empirical basis for restructured reservation.
  3. Sub-categorisation: Rohini Commission’s recommendations need urgent implementation.
  4. Two-tier system: Priority for the most marginalised within SC/STs could prevent elite capture.
  5. Beyond reservation: Skill development and private sector opportunities are crucial, given shrinking public jobs.

Conclusion

India’s reservation policy is at an inflection point. Expanding quotas without reforming their structure risks perpetuating inequity within communities. A nuanced approach, backed by caste census data, sub-categorisation, and skill-building, can ensure that reservations remain a tool for empowerment rather than a political slogan. The challenge lies in balancing constitutional guarantees of equality with the imperative of social justice in a diverse democracy.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2019] Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of policy process, Discuss.

Linkage: The 2019 question highlights how welfare schemes for vulnerable sections often fail due to lack of awareness and skewed access. The same issue is reflected in India’s reservation policy: despite constitutional backing, 40–50% of reserved seats remain unfilled, and the Rohini Commission revealed that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by just 25% sub-castes, leaving nearly 1,000 communities with no representation at all. This shows that affirmative action, much like welfare schemes, risks becoming ineffective unless equitable distribution, sub-categorisation, awareness generation, and active participation of the most marginalised are ensured.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Policy Wise: India’s Power Sector

Decoding the SC order on regulatory assets

Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

Introduction

India’s electricity sector faces a chronic mismatch between the cost of supply and the revenue collected, leaving distribution companies (DISCOMs) financially stressed. To bridge this gap, regulatory assets, unrecovered costs deferred for future recovery, have become common. The Supreme Court has now ordered DISCOMs and regulators to clear these within strict timelines and capped their creation, marking a crucial step towards financial discipline and consumer protection in the power sector.

Significance of the Supreme Court’s Directive

The Supreme Court directed State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) and DISCOMs to clear existing regulatory assets within four years and any new ones within three years, while capping their creation at 3% of Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR). The Court also mandated transparent recovery roadmaps and intensive audits for non-compliant DISCOMs.The judgment is significant because it marks the first time the Supreme Court has set explicit timelines and caps for the liquidation of regulatory assets. With Delhi DISCOMs alone carrying regulatory assets worth over ₹58,000 crore, and Tamil Nadu reporting ₹89,375 crore in FY 2021-22, the scale of the problem is massive. The ruling highlights how the misuse of regulatory assets has become systemic, leading to debt accumulation, delayed payments to generators, and poor grid modernisation.

Understanding Regulatory Assets

  1. Definition: Regulatory assets are deferred costs created when the Average Cost of Supply (ACS) is higher than the ARR, allowing DISCOMs to recover the gap later instead of burdening consumers immediately.
  2. Example: If ACS = ₹7.20/unit and ARR = ₹7.00/unit, the shortfall of ₹0.20 per unit across 10 billion units leads to a revenue gap of ₹2,000 crore, which becomes a regulatory asset.
  3. Consumer relief: Prevents immediate tariff shocks but leads to deferred steep tariff hikes later, often with interest.

Causes of the Average Cost of Supply (ACS)- Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR) Gap

  1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Tariffs often kept artificially low for political reasons.
  2. Delayed subsidies: State governments fail to release subsidies for agriculture or low-income households on time, worsening DISCOM finances.
  3. Fuel price shocks: Sudden increases in coal/gas prices inflate procurement costs.
  4. Historical evidence: Punjab’s 2004–05 case of ₹487 crore revenue gap set the precedent for regulatory assets in India.

Impact of regulatory assets on consumers and DISCOMs

  1. Consumers:
    • Immediate stability in tariffs but eventual steeper hikes.
    • Example: Delhi DISCOMs must recover ₹16,580 crore annually in four years, implying an additional ₹5.5/unit on average.
  2. DISCOMs:
    • Persistent cash flow crises as revenue doesn’t cover costs.
    • Forced to borrow → higher debt burden.
    • Limited capacity to modernise grids, integrate renewables, or improve services.
    • Creates a vicious cycle of financial and operational distress.

Regulatory Assets and Grid Modernisation

  1. Yes: Large unrecovered costs reduce capital available for investment in infrastructure.
  2. Renewable integration challenge: Financially weak DISCOMs are unable to invest in flexible grids or storage solutions.
  3. Consumer service compromise: Lower quality of supply, billing inefficiencies, and lack of digital modernisation.

Way forward

  1. Cost-reflective tariffs: Rationalise tariffs while shielding vulnerable consumers with targeted subsidies.
  2. Timely subsidy release: State governments must ensure fiscal discipline.
  3. Automatic fuel cost adjustments: Tariffs should respond dynamically to input cost fluctuations.
  4. Annual true-up exercises: Prevent backlog accumulation by reconciling projections with actual costs.
  5. Regulatory discipline: Enforce caps, transparency, and timelines to ensure regulatory assets remain exceptional, not structural.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s directive signals a turning point for India’s power sector. It underlines the urgent need for financial discipline, timely subsidies, and transparent tariff setting. If implemented well, this move could break the cycle of deferred costs and inefficiencies, ensuring that electricity supply remains both affordable for consumers and financially viable for utilities. For policymakers, it serves as a reminder that delaying reforms through regulatory tools only compounds systemic risks.

Value Addition

Importance of DISCOMs in India’s Power Sector

  1. DISCOMs are the last-mile link in the electricity chain, responsible for delivering power to households, industries, and agriculture.
  2. Their financial health directly impacts energy access, affordability, and quality of supply.

Current Financial Stress

  1. AT&C Losses: Aggregate Technical & Commercial losses remain high at ~16–20% (against a target of 12–15%).
  2. Revenue Gap: ACS > ARR leads to losses per unit supplied.
  3. Debt Burden: Many DISCOMs rely on borrowing to bridge gaps, adding to systemic financial stress.

Key Causes of DISCOM Distress

  1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Political pressure keeps tariffs lower than actual supply cost.
  2. Delayed subsidies: State governments often delay releasing agricultural/poor household subsidies.
  3. Cross-subsidisation: Industrial and commercial consumers are charged higher rates to subsidise other sectors, affecting competitiveness.
  4. Fuel price volatility: Sudden spikes in coal/gas prices worsen procurement costs.

Government Initiatives for DISCOMs

  1. UDAY (2015): Transferred debt to State governments, targeted efficiency improvements.
  2. Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) (2021): RDSS, focuses on smart meters, loss reduction, and IT-based monitoring.
  3. Electricity Amendment Bill (2022) (proposed): Aims to promote competition, allow multiple distributors in the same area, and reduce monopolies.

DISCOMs and Energy Transition

  1. Financially weak DISCOMs struggle to integrate renewable energy and invest in smart grids, storage, and modernisation.
  2. This hampers India’s 2030 renewable energy targets (500 GW capacity, 50% non-fossil share).

Global Comparisons

  1. Many countries (e.g., UK, Germany) have cost-reflective tariff mechanisms and automatic adjustment clauses to prevent accumulation of arrears.
  2. India’s reliance on regulatory assets is unusual, reflecting deeper political economy challenges.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2021] “Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy is the sine qua non to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).’’ Comment on the progress made in India in this regard.

Linkage: The Supreme Court’s directive on regulatory assets directly ties to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by addressing the financial distress of DISCOMs, which undermines both affordability for consumers and sustainability for utilities. India has expanded electricity access impressively, but the persistence of unrecovered costs, delayed subsidies, and non-cost-reflective tariffs highlight the fragility of the system. The judgment pushes for financial discipline, timely subsidy release, and transparent tariff recovery, ensuring that progress towards universal, reliable, and modern energy access is not compromised by systemic inefficiencies.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-SCO

Unmistakable shift (India signalled a change in foreign policy stance at SCO Summit)

Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

Introduction

India’s foreign policy has historically oscillated between balancing great power politics and safeguarding its strategic autonomy. The 2025 SCO Summit in China witnessed a landmark moment: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s first bilateral engagement with Chinese President Xi Jinping since the 2020 military standoff. The visit not only revived dormant dialogues but also underscored India’s shifting posture in a multipolar world marked by U.S. sanctions, instability in West Asia, and contestations within Eurasia.

Significance of Indian Prime Minister’s Visit to China

  1. Seven-year gap: PM Modi had not travelled to China since 2017, making this a major diplomatic breakthrough.
  2. First bilateral since standoff: Meeting with Xi Jinping was the first since the 2020 military confrontation along the LAC.
  3. Three-year SCO absence: Modi’s return to SCO after three years shows India’s willingness to re-engage with a grouping seen as anti-Western.
  4. Optics of bonhomie: Images with Xi and Putin evoked memories of the inactive Russia-India-China trilateral, signalling recalibration.

Revival of India-China Bilateral Engagement

  1. Troop disengagement: Both leaders endorsed the normalisation process initiated in October 2024.
  2. Boundary resolution: Agreed to fast-track talks between Special Representatives.
  3. Connectivity revival: Resumption of direct flights and visa facilitation announced.
  4. Economic ties: Leaders stressed on building trade relations to stabilise world commerce.
  5. Mutual trust rhetoric: Modi stressed ties based on “mutual trust, respect and sensitivity”, while Xi used the metaphor of “Dragon and Elephant” coming together.

External Drivers of India’s Foreign Policy Recalibration

  1. U.S. tariffs and sanctions: American restrictions and mistrust of the Trump administration nudged India to diversify partnerships.
  2. Strategic compulsion: India managed to side-step concerns like China’s support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, UNSC/NSG opposition, and shielding of terrorists.
  3. Multipolar optics: India’s engagement at SCO signals balancing between West and Eurasia.

Key Outcomes of the 2025 SCO Summit

  1. Tianjin declaration: Strong language against cross-border terrorism, including condemnation of the Pahalgam attack (India) and Balochistan attacks (Pakistan).
  2. West Asian crisis: SCO united on humanitarian crisis in Gaza and condemned U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran.
  3. China’s push: Xi proposed an SCO Development Bank.
  4. India’s push: Modi proposed a Civilisational Dialogue among SCO members.
  5. India’s reservation: Continued opposition to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) paragraph.

Missed Diplomatic Opportunities at the Summit

  1. Skipped SCO Plus: Indian Prime Minister did not attend the extended “SCO Plus” Summit, limiting engagement with neighbourhood and Global South leaders.
  2. Regional bonding gap: While optics were strong, substantive regional outreach was diluted.

Conclusion

The SCO Summit underscored India’s willingness to recalibrate its foreign policy in a changing world order. Modi’s visit after years of distance marked a thaw with China, greater Eurasian engagement, and assertion of India’s independent foreign policy despite U.S. pressures. However, missed opportunities in broader outreach and unresolved trust deficits with China remain cautionary notes.

Value Addition

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)

Historical Background

  1. Successor to: SCO is the successor to the Shanghai Five, formed in 1996 between China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan.
  2. Formation: Established in 2001 in Shanghai by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
  3. Expansion: India and Pakistan joined as full members in 2017; Iran became a member in 2023.
  4. Observers & Dialogue Partners: Afghanistan, Belarus, Mongolia, and others engage as observers; several countries (e.g., Turkey, Sri Lanka) are dialogue partners.

Strategic Importance of SCO for India

  1. Geopolitical Balancing: Provides a platform to engage with China and Russia while maintaining ties with the West (Quad, U.S.).
  2. Regional Security: Key forum for counter-terrorism cooperation, especially in light of cross-border terrorism and instability in Afghanistan.
  3. Eurasian Connectivity: Enhances India’s presence in Central Asia, a region rich in energy resources.
  4. Multipolar World Order: Strengthens India’s narrative of strategic autonomy and non-alignment in new form.

Key SCO Mechanisms

  1. Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS): Headquartered in Tashkent, focuses on counter-terrorism intelligence sharing.
  2. Economic Cooperation: Proposals for SCO Development Bank, regional trade, and connectivity projects (though India resists BRI-linked initiatives).
  3. Cultural and Civilisational Dialogues: Shared platforms for people-to-people exchanges, education, and cultural diplomacy.

India’s Challenges within SCO

  1. China Factor: Difficult to expand cooperation given border disputes and China’s Pakistan tilt.
  2. Pakistan Factor: Its membership often leads to diplomatic blockages on issues like terrorism.
  3. BRI Opposition: India consistently refuses to endorse the Belt and Road Initiative, creating friction.
  4. Russia-China Axis: Russia’s growing dependence on China may dilute India’s influence in the bloc.

Contemporary Relevance

  1. Energy and Trade: Central Asia is crucial for energy diversification; SCO provides a gateway.
  2. Geopolitical Flux: With U.S.-China rivalry and West Asia instability, SCO’s role in Eurasian stability gains importance.
  3. Soft Power Opportunity: India uses SCO to promote civilisational dialogue, yoga, Ayurveda, and cultural diplomacy.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2021] Critically examine the aims and objectives of SCO. What importance does it hold for India?

Linkage: The article directly illustrates the objectives of SCO—counter-terrorism (Tianjin declaration), multipolarity, and Eurasian stability. It highlights India’s balancing act—reviving ties with China, opposing BRI, and pushing for civilisational dialogue. Thus, the SCO Summit outcomes reflect both the scope and constraints of SCO’s importance for India in strategic, economic, and security domains.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Global Geological And Climatic Events

Geography uncover why some rivers stay single while others split

Explained | Geography | Mains Paper 1: Geographical Features & Their Location

Introduction

For decades, scientists wondered why some rivers flow as single channels while others split into braided systems. Researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), after studying 84 rivers over 36 years using satellite data, have uncovered the mechanism. Their findings resolve a geomorphological puzzle and offer fresh insights for managing rivers amid climate change, rising floods, and human interventions.

Why is this discovery significant?

The UCSB study shows that erosion, not equilibrium, drives multi-threading. Single-thread rivers balance erosion and deposition, while braided rivers erode banks faster than they deposit, making them unstable. This overturns earlier models assuming fixed depth and width. In an era of extreme weather, such insights are vital for flood prediction, ecosystem restoration, and sustainable infrastructure.

Understanding the dynamics of single-thread and multi-thread rivers

  1. Single-thread rivers: They maintain equilibrium between bank erosion and bar accretion, ensuring stable width.
  2. Multi-thread rivers: They are characterised by imbalance, where erosion exceeds deposition, causing channels to widen and split repeatedly.
  3. Example: Brahmaputra’s braided channels erode laterally at a rapid pace, making them inherently unstable.

Scientific breakthrough in decoding river channel behavior

  1. Data analysed: 84 rivers across climates and terrains, spanning 36 years (1985–2021).
  2. Technology used: Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) on satellite images, generating 4 lakh+ measurements of erosion and accretion.
  3. Outcome: Identification of patterns showing why some rivers remain stable and others split into multiple channels.

The ecological role of vegetation in shaping river morphology

  1. Earlier belief: Vegetated banks were considered essential for meandering rivers.
  2. Stanford study finding: Vegetation alters river bend migration:
  3. Vegetated bends → Move outward, creating levees, limiting sinuosity.
  4. Unvegetated bends → Drift downstream, forming different sedimentary deposits.
  5. Implication: River evolution is not only hydrological but also ecological.

Implications for India’s river systems: Ganga and Brahmaputra in focus

  • Case studies: Ganga near Patna, Farakka, Paksey; Brahmaputra near Pandu, Pasighat, Bahadurabad.
  • Findings: Multi-thread rivers like Brahmaputra are inherently unstable due to rapid lateral erosion.
  • Problem: Artificial confinement by embankments has worsened risks in India.
  • Implication: Flood forecasting models (rating curves) need frequent updates as channel shapes shift.

Nature-based solutions and strategies for sustainable river management

  1. Remove artificial embankments
  2. Restore natural floodplains
  3. Create vegetated buffer zones along banks
  4. Reactivate abandoned channels
  5. Build wetlands in braided sections
  6. Advantages: Lower cost of restoration, better flood absorption, reduced disaster risk.

Conclusion

The new understanding of why rivers split reshapes our approach to flood management, river restoration, and ecological conservation. For India, where rivers like the Ganga and Brahmaputra are lifelines but also sources of recurrent floods, this research is a wake-up call. Emphasising natural solutions over artificial confinement could pave the way for sustainable water governance in the climate change era.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2016] Major cities of India are becoming more vulnerable to flood conditions. Discuss.

Linkage: The recent UCSB study highlights that multi-thread rivers like the Ganga and Brahmaputra are inherently unstable because erosion outpaces deposition, causing channels to split and shift rapidly. In India, this instability is often worsened by human interventions such as embankments, damming, and encroachment, which artificially confine rivers. As these channels change, urban centres located along floodplains (Patna, Guwahati, Kolkata, etc.) become highly flood-prone. The research also suggests that relying on outdated models assuming rivers are stable leads to poor flood prediction in cities. Thus, insights from this study strengthen the argument that urban flooding in India is not only due to unplanned urbanisation but also due to the geomorphological instability of river systems and flawed management practices.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Noise pollution is rising but policy is falling silent

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

Noise pollution in India has emerged as a silent but significant public health crisis. With urban decibel levels routinely breaching permissible limits near schools, hospitals, and residential zones, the constitutional promise of dignity and peace is being eroded. Despite a robust legal framework in place since 2000, fragmented enforcement, civic fatigue, and policy inertia have left the issue largely unaddressed. Unlike Europe, where noise-induced illnesses shape policymaking, India remains institutionally and politically silent.

Why is noise pollution in the news?

Noise pollution has resurfaced as a pressing issue because of increasing violations in silence zones, lack of updated enforcement mechanisms, and alarming ecological findings. The Central Pollution Control Board’s National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network (NANMN), launched in 2011 as a flagship real-time monitoring system, has become a passive repository with little accountability. In 2024, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that excessive noise is a violation of Article 21. A 2025 ecological study added urgency, revealing that even one night of urban noise disrupts bird song and communication.

Weaknesses in India’s noise monitoring system

  1. Flawed sensor placement: Many noise monitors are mounted 25–30 feet high, violating CPCB’s 2015 guidelines and recording misleading data.
  2. Data without enforcement: NANMN has been reduced to a dashboard of figures with no link to penalties or compliance.
  3. Fragmented institutions: State Pollution Control Boards, traffic police, and municipalities act in silos, preventing unified action.
  4. Opacity in data: RTI queries remain unanswered, and States like Uttar Pradesh have not released first-quarter 2025 data.

Noise pollution as a constitutional and legal challenge

  1. Right to life with dignity (Article 21): Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2024 that unchecked urban noise directly undermines mental well-being.
  2. Directive Principle (Article 48A): The State has a duty to protect and improve the environment, but silence on noise policy reflects neglect.
  3. Failure of Silence Zones: Hospitals and schools often record 65–70 dB(A) against the permissible 50 dB(A) daytime and 40 dB(A) nighttime limits set by WHO.

Human and ecological costs of unchecked urban noise

  1. Mental health erosion: Chronic noise exposure causes disturbed sleep cycles, hypertension, and reduced cognitive function.
  2. Children and elderly at risk: Sensitive groups face aggravated anxiety and cardiovascular problems.
  3. Biodiversity disruption: 2025 Auckland study shows even one night of noise alters bird song complexity, affecting species survival and ecological communication.
  4. Cultural normalisation: Honking, drilling, and loudspeakers have become ambient irritants, tolerated rather than resisted.

Fragmented governance and symbolic compliance

  1. Weak legal update: Noise Pollution Rules, 2000 have not been revised to reflect rapid urbanisation and logistics-heavy economies.
  2. Institutional silos: No coordination between police, local bodies, and SPCBs, leaving sporadic enforcement drives without systemic change.
  3. Judicial reminders: Despite Noise Pollution (V), In Re (2005, reaffirmed in 2024), state capacity to enforce remains symbolic.

Towards a national acoustic policy and cultural change

  1. Decentralise monitoring: Grant local governments access to real-time NANMN data.
  2. Link data with penalties: Without enforcement, monitoring becomes performative.
  3. National acoustic policy: Define permissible decibel limits across zones with periodic audits.
  4. Urban planning reforms: Embed acoustic resilience into city designs, zoning, and transport planning.
  5. Sonic empathy campaigns: Similar to seatbelt norms, honking reduction must be internalised through community education.

Conclusion

Noise pollution is not an invisible irritant, it is a public health emergency, an ecological disruptor, and a constitutional concern. Without a rights-based framework that treats silence as essential to dignity, India’s urban future risks becoming unliveable. The challenge is not only regulatory but also cultural: fostering a shared ethic of sonic empathy. Silence must not be imposed, but enabled through design, governance, and civic will.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] What is oil pollution? What are its impacts on the marine ecosystem? In what way is oil pollution particularly harmful for a country like India?

Linkage: Both oil and noise pollution are invisible pollutants with severe but often neglected impacts — oil disrupts marine ecosystems while noise erodes mental health and biodiversity.

Like India’s vulnerability to oil spills due to its long coastline, rapid urbanisation makes it highly exposed to noise hazards. In both cases, regulatory frameworks exist but enforcement is fragmented, highlighting a gap between law and practice.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

J&K – The issues around the state

The importance of India’s federal design

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Federalism

Introduction

India’s federal design is unique, balancing a strong Union with an inclusive representation of States. The abrogation of Article 370 and the downgrading of Jammu and Kashmir into a Union Territory in 2019 raised critical constitutional and political debates. The Supreme Court’s December 2023 ruling upheld the abrogation but directed restoration of statehood. While elections were held in October 2024, the absence of progress on restoring statehood highlights a sharp tension between constitutional intent and political practice. The issue has become a litmus test of Indian federalism, bringing into focus the balance between unity, diversity, and democratic representation.

The Demand for Restoration of Statehood to Jammu and Kashmir

  1. Supreme Court Intervention: Recently, the Court sought a detailed response from the Centre on the timeline for restoring statehood to J&K.
  2. Sharp Contrast: While elections were held in 2024, statehood has not been restored, despite the Court’s explicit direction.
  3. Federal Implications: Critics argue that prolonged delay undermines federalism, part of the Constitution’s basic structure, and weakens democratic rights of J&K’s citizens.
  4. Striking Point: For the first time, a full-fledged State was downgraded into a Union Territory, setting a precedent that challenges constitutional norms.

Constitutional Processes for the Creation of States

  1. Admission: Admission of new States requires an organised political unit; e.g., J&K’s Instrument of Accession (1947).
  2. Establishment: Territory can be acquired under international law, as in the case of Goa and Sikkim.
  3. Formation: Article 3 empowers Parliament to reorganise existing States by altering boundaries, names, or creating new ones.

India’s Federal Design and Its Unique Character

  1. Union of States: Article 1 describes India as a Union of States, signifying indivisibility while denying the right of secession.
  2. Composite Culture: The dual identity of India and Bharat reflects political unity and cultural plurality.
  3. Unitary Tilt: The word Union ensures a strong Centre, but representation of States through the Rajya Sabha balances federalism.
  4. Basic Structure Doctrine: Federalism is recognised as part of the Basic Structure, making it inviolable.

Constitutional Imperatives for Restoring Statehood

  1. Violation of Federal Features: The Union can reorganise States but cannot permanently strip a State into a Union Territory.
  2. Supreme Court’s Directive: In December 2023, the Court mandated restoration of statehood along with Assembly elections.
  3. Representation at the Centre: Permanent representation of States in the Rajya Sabha is essential to sustain India’s federalism.
  4. Erosion of Trust: Prolonged delay risks alienating citizens and eroding India’s image as a welfare-oriented union.

The Road Ahead for Jammu and Kashmir

  1. Elections Held: A 90-member Assembly election was conducted in October 2024.
  2. Centre’s Silence: No concrete roadmap has been shared for restoring statehood, despite judicial directions.
  3. Critics’ Argument: Restoring statehood would empower the elected government, reducing the powers of the Lieutenant Governor, which the Union may be reluctant to cede.
  4. Constitutional Morality: Failure to restore statehood risks weakening the principle of cooperative federalism.

Conclusion

The demand for restoration of J&K’s statehood is not a mere political debate but a constitutional necessity. India’s federal design hinges upon the delicate balance between a strong Union and empowered States. If the Union delays restoration indefinitely, it risks setting a precedent that erodes the sanctity of federalism and weakens democratic representation. Upholding statehood is thus not only about J&K but about preserving the essence of India’s constitutional federation.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2014] Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features, but it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre, a feature that militates against the concept of strong federalism. Discuss.

Linkage: The recent controversy over the restoration of statehood to Jammu & Kashmir directly exemplifies the asymmetry in India’s federal design. While federalism is a part of the Basic Structure, the downgrading of a full-fledged State into a Union Territory shows the unitary tilt of the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s directive to restore statehood reflects the tension between a strong Centre ensuring unity and the need to preserve the spirit of cooperative federalism, echoing the very debate raised in the 2014 question.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

Data shows seas rising faster around Maldives, Lakshadweep than believed

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

Sea-level rise is one of the most significant consequences of global warming, threatening ecosystems, economies, and human settlements. In the Indian Ocean, recent findings based on coral microatolls suggest that sea levels began rising rapidly as early as the 1950s, decades before satellite and tide-gauge data had indicated. This challenges existing assumptions in climate change studies and raises critical questions about preparedness for vulnerable island states like Maldives, Lakshadweep, and the Chagos archipelago.

Coral Microatolls as Natural Recorders of Sea-Level History

  • Unique natural recorders: Coral microatolls are disk-shaped colonies that stop growing upwards once constrained by the lowest tide, making their surface a natural reflection of long-term sea-level change.
  • Longevity and accuracy: They can survive for decades or centuries, providing high-resolution, continuous data.
  • Study site: Research conducted on Mahutigalaa reef, Huvadhoo Atoll (Maldives), measured a Porites microatoll covering 1930–2019.

Acceleration and Scale of Sea-Level Rise in the Indian Ocean

  • Accelerated rise: Data showed a 0.3 metre increase over 90 years.
  • Rates of rise:
    • 1930–1959: 1–1.84 mm/year
    • 1960–1992: 2.76–4.12 mm/year
    • 1990–2019: 3.91–4.87 mm/year
  • Striking revelation: Sea-level rise began in the late 1950s, not around 1990 as earlier assumed.
  • Cumulative impact: Maldives, Lakshadweep, and Chagos have witnessed 30–40 cm rise in half a century, worsening flooding and erosion risks.

Climate Variability and Environmental Signals Captured in Corals

  • Climate variability: Slow or interrupted coral growth coincided with El Niño and negative Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) events.
  • Astronomical influence: The 18.6-year lunar nodal cycle was reflected in the growth bands, showing tidal and sea-level oscillations.
  • Tectonic stability: Critical factor ensuring that coral growth data reflects sea-level change rather than land movement.

Regional Significance of Findings for the Indian Ocean Basin

  • Above-average warming: The Indian Ocean is heating faster than the global average, amplifying sea-level fluctuations.
  • Strategic gaps: Despite its ecological and geopolitical importance, the central Indian Ocean is one of the least-monitored basins.
  • Regional variations: Coastal areas saw recent acceleration, but the central basin experienced earlier, stronger rise, influenced by shifts in Southern Hemisphere westerlies, ocean heat uptake, and the Intertropical Convergence Zone.

Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Imperatives for Island Nations

  • Existential threat: Infrastructure and communities are concentrated just above sea level in Maldives and Lakshadweep.
  • Adaptation strategies: Understanding historic timing and magnitude of sea-level rise is vital for coastal planning, disaster preparedness, and climate resilience.
  • Scientific value: Microatolls cannot replace tide gauges or satellites but offer a vital complementary tool to refine projections in data-sparse regions.

Conclusion

The discovery that sea-level rise in the Maldives and Lakshadweep began decades earlier than thought is a wake-up call for policymakers and communities. Coral microatolls, silent sentinels of the ocean, have revealed the urgency of accelerating adaptation and resilience measures. As the Indian Ocean warms faster than global averages, the survival of low-lying nations will depend on proactive international cooperation and evidence-based planning.

 

Value Addition

Global Reports and Scientific Frameworks

  • IPCC AR6 (2021–22): Predicts global mean sea level rise of 0.28–1.01 m by 2100, depending on emission scenarios.
  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO): State of the Global Climate 2023: Confirms Indian Ocean warming faster than the global average, intensifying regional sea-level anomalies.
  • UNFCCC & Paris Agreement: Commitments to limit warming below 2°C directly shape adaptation strategies for vulnerable island nations.

Case Studies for Enrichment

  • Maldives: Declared intent to become a carbon-neutral nation by 2030; adaptation measures include artificial islands and elevated infrastructure.
  • Kiribati (Pacific Island): Purchased land in Fiji to relocate populations – showcases climate migration.
  • Lakshadweep Islands: Reports of shoreline erosion, freshwater lens salinity, and threat to tourism livelihoods.

Scientific Concepts for Enrichment

  • Thermal Expansion: Ocean water expands as it warms, contributing ~50% to global sea-level rise.
  • Cryosphere–Ocean Linkages: Melting of Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets accelerates rise beyond thermal expansion.
  • Lunar Nodal Cycle (18.6 years): Natural oscillation in tides influencing local sea-level variability, as confirmed in microatoll data.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has predicted a global sea level rise of about one metre by AD 2100. What would be its impact in India and the other countries in the Indian Ocean region?

Linkage: The article’s findings on coral microatolls show that sea-level rise in the Maldives, Lakshadweep, and Chagos began as early as the 1950s, much earlier than assumed. This reinforces IPCC projections of accelerated rise, highlighting existential risks for low-lying islands. For India and the wider Indian Ocean region, the impacts include intensified coastal erosion, loss of habitats, and the need for urgent adaptation strategies.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Higher Education – RUSA, NIRF, HEFA, etc.

Detoxifying India’s entrance examination system

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

Introduction

Entrance examinations in India were envisioned as a filter for talent, ensuring merit-based access to elite institutions. However, over time, they have morphed into an industry-driven rat race. From ₹7 lakh coaching fees to student suicides, the costs are both economic and human. With growing disparities in access, an illusory notion of meritocracy, and mounting psychological toll, rethinking admissions is not a choice but a necessity.

The Coaching Crisis and Its Toll

  1. Massive Aspirant Pool: Over 15 lakh students appear for JEE alone, making coaching almost unavoidable.
  2. High Costs: Coaching fees of ₹6–7 lakh for two years price out poor students.
  3. Early Sacrifices: Students as young as 14 years study Irodov & Krotov (beyond B.Tech level), sacrificing holistic growth.
  4. Mental Health Crisis: Rising stress, depression, alienation; some governments now regulate coaching centres.
  5. Core Issue: The examination system itself is flawed, creating overqualified candidates and distorted merit.

Why Meritocracy is an Illusion

  1. Tiny Differences, Big Stakes: Distinguishing between 91% vs 97% in Class 12, or 99.9 percentile in JEE is unreasonable.
  2. Adequate Benchmark Exists: A 70–80% score in Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics is sufficient for B.Tech readiness.
  3. False Hierarchies: Overemphasis on marginal score differences creates elitism and exclusion.
  4. Privilege Bias: Wealthier families access top coaching, creating an illusory meritocracy.
  5. Philosophical Insight: Harvard’s Michael Sandel critiques meritocratic obsession, proposing lotteries for elite admissions.

Global Inspirations for Reform

  1. Dutch Lottery System:
    • Introduced in 1972, reinstated in 2023 for medical school.
    • Weighted lottery: minimum eligibility required, higher grades = higher chances.
    • Promotes diversity, fairness, and reduced pressure.
  2. China’s “Double Reduction Policy” (2021):
    • Banned for-profit coaching overnight.
    • Reduced financial burden and youth stress.
    • Addressed unchecked growth of the coaching industry.

Proposed Solutions for India

  1. Lottery-based Allocation:
    • Threshold of 80% in PCM for eligibility.
    • Weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%): A weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%) means all eligible students enter a lottery, but those with higher marks get proportionally better chances of selection.
    • Reservations integrated (gender, rural, region).
  2. Rural Empowerment: 50% IIT seats for rural govt school students to promote social mobility.
  3. Coaching Reform: Ban/nationalise coaching, provide free online lectures & study material.
  4. Diversity & Integration: Student exchange between IITs to break hierarchies.
  5. Faculty transfers to standardise academic quality.

Conclusion

India’s choice is stark: continue a toxic rat race that scars its brightest minds, or embrace a fair, equitable system that nurtures youth. Scrapping or reforming entrance exams through lotteries, trust in Class 12 boards, rural reservations, and coaching reforms can detoxify the system. The aim must not only be producing engineers and doctors but ensuring the emotional, social, and moral growth of India’s future citizens.

Value Addition

Committee Recommendations & Policy Inputs

  • Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) – Stressed on reducing rote-based entrance exams and aligning admissions with broader educational goals.
  • Kothari Commission (1964–66) – Recommended a common school system to minimise disparities in access, echoing today’s concerns about coaching and inequality.
  • National Knowledge Commission (2005) – Suggested multiple modes of testing and reducing dependence on a single high-stakes exam.
  • Yashpal Committee (2009) – Criticised the “overburden of entrance exams” and highlighted the need for a more holistic, less mechanical admission process.
  • NEP 2020 – Calls for a holistic and flexible education system, moving away from rote-based, high-pressure exams towards fairer assessment models.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objectives of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

Linkage: The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 seeks to curb frauds like paper leaks and impersonation to restore exam credibility. The article extends this concern by highlighting systemic unfairness — coaching dependence, stress, and privilege-driven access. Together, they underline that ensuring fairness in exams requires not just legal safeguards but also structural reforms in India’s entrance system.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.