Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Type: Explained

These Newscards correspond to the explained section of various newspapers. They become immensely important for both prelims and mains and special attention needs to be paid to them

  • Before SC Collegium: Can Acting CJs of HCs send names for judge appointments?

    Why in the News

    A controversy over the conduct of Rajasthan High Court’s Acting Chief Justice, Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, has revived a recurring question before the Supreme Court Collegium: whether recommendations for High Court judge appointments sent by an Acting Chief Justice should be treated on the same footing as those sent by a permanent Chief Justice. The Collegium, headed by CJI Surya Kant and comprising Justices Vikram Nath, B.V. Nagarathna, M.M. Sundresh and P.S. Narasimha, must now consider at least four names recommended by Justice Sharma, who has held the acting post for almost a year. Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta, a former Rajasthan High Court judge, has written three letters to the CJI seeking Sharma’s replacement by a chief justice from outside the state, alleging manipulation of case listings and misuse of administrative powers, allegations the CJI has said must go through institutional channels rather than the media.

    Why does an Acting Chief Justice’s recommendation raise a genuine question for the Collegium?

    1. Convention discourages it, but does not bar it: Acting Chief Justices conventionally do not make recommendations for judicial appointments because of their typically short tenures, though the Collegium has in the past accepted such recommendations in exceptional cases.
    2. One view favours considering recommendations on merit: Sources say part of the Collegium holds that names sent by an Acting Chief Justice should not be returned solely because of the official’s title, and should instead be assessed on merit.
    3. A competing view warns against normalising long acting tenures: The opposing view cautions that accepting names from Acting Chief Justices removes the pressure to appoint a permanent Chief Justice promptly, since there would be no apparent urgency.
    4. Justice Sharma’s tenure and lineage make this case unusual: Justice Sharma has been Acting Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court for almost a year since September 2025, and Rajasthan is also his parent High Court, factors cited in support of considering his recommendations.

    What precedent exists for how the Collegium has handled Acting Chief Justice recommendations?

    1. The Bombay High Court precedent split the Collegium’s consultees: When Justice Dharmadhikari was Acting Chief Justice of Bombay High Court in 2020, he prepared a list of 22 names; two consultee judges objected in writing that no Acting Chief Justice could properly vet 22 candidates in so short a tenure, while a third consultee judge disagreed, noting Dharmadhikari’s long service on that High Court.
    2. The Collegium still forwarded most of the list: Despite the objections, the Collegium headed by then CJI S.A. Bobde sent 18 of the 22 recommended names to the Centre, relying on the third consultee’s affirmative response.
    3. A comparable case arose in Rajasthan in 2022: The Centre raised objections to at least 12 names sent by then Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice Akil Kureshi on the ground that they were made at the fag end of his tenure, and the Collegium headed by then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud ultimately cleared 8 of the 12 names after the Centre did not specify objections to particular candidates.

    What does the present Rajasthan controversy add to the recurring question?

    1. The dispute is no longer only about tenure length: Justice Mehta’s letters to the CJI allege manipulation of case listings and threats to fellow judges citing closeness to the CJI, extending the question from whether an Acting Chief Justice’s recommendations should count to whether the officeholder’s conduct in the post is itself compromised.
    2. Justice Sharma’s career path preceded his return to Rajasthan: He served as a Rajasthan High Court judge from 2016, moved to Patna High Court in 2022, was sent to Punjab and Haryana High Court after the Collegium declined his 2023 request to return to Rajasthan on health grounds, and was brought back to Rajasthan under a 2025 resolution.
    3. The Collegium has so far deferred adjudication: CJI Surya Kant responded to the allegations by stating that claims against a sitting judge cannot be adjudicated through the media and must go through institutional channels, leaving the underlying question of Justice Sharma’s four recommended names still pending.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court Collegium must now decide, in the specific case of Justice Sharma’s four recommendations, a question it has answered inconsistently in the past: whether an Acting Chief Justice’s nominations for High Court judgeships carry the same weight as a permanent Chief Justice’s. How it resolves this, against the backdrop of allegations against Justice Sharma’s own conduct in office, will shape whether prolonged acting tenures continue to carry recommending power in future.

    Back2Basics

    1. Supreme Court Collegium: An extra-constitutional, judicially evolved mechanism comprising the Chief Justice of India and the four senior-most Supreme Court judges, which recommends appointments and transfers of judges to the higher judiciary.
    2. Acting Chief Justice: Appointed under Article 223 of the Constitution by the President when a High Court’s Chief Justice post falls vacant or the incumbent is unable to perform duties, distinct from a permanent Chief Justice appointment.
    3. Consultee judges: Sitting or former judges, typically with prior experience of the High Court concerned, whom the Collegium consults on the suitability of recommended names before finalising a list.

    (GS2-05, 2025) Discuss the evolution of collegium system in India. Critically examine the advantages and disadvantages of the system on appointment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India and that of the USA.

  • How social media hooks children — Meta’s $17-billion settlement over addictive design

    Why in the News

    Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to pay up to $17.1 billion in penalties to 47 US states, Washington DC and other territories, and to make binding changes to its products, over claims that it endangered children through addictive design and violated child privacy norms. The settlement follows a March jury verdict in KGM v. Meta et al, where a Los Angeles jury held Meta and Google liable for $6 million in damages after finding that platform features contributed to a young user’s mental health harm. Indian regulators are studying the settlement as a possible template even as the Centre weighs age-based restrictions, usage limits and stronger parental consent requirements for children’s access to social media, discussions that remain at an early stage.

    What has Meta agreed to change, and why does the design focus matter?

    1. A default two-hour daily cap across both apps: Meta will impose a combined two-hour daily limit on Facebook and Instagram for under-18 users, cumulative across multiple accounts, changeable only by a verified parent, with direct messaging excluded.
    2. Time-boxed access at night and during school hours: Teen users will be blocked from most parts of the platforms between midnight and 6 am, with most push notifications disabled between 10 pm and 7 am and muted between 8 am and 3 pm on school weekdays.
    3. Engagement features are curbed by default: The settlement provides a non-personalised feed option, hides like and reaction counts by default, restricts cosmetic-procedure filters, and requires usage prompts after every 15 minutes of continuous scrolling.
    4. Compliance is externally audited: Meta must hire an independent auditor to assess compliance with the safeguards for five years, addressing an issue exposed at the KGM trial, where only 1.1 percent of teen users had activated an existing optional daily-use limit.

    Why do experts see the design-focused approach as more significant than the payout?

    1. The settlement forces architectural change, not just policy change: A US legal academic notes this is the first US instance of a major platform being forced to change the “architecture of its product” rather than only its stated policies, arguing the design changes matter more than the settlement figure.
    2. Default settings determine real-world reach: A researcher at Common Sense Media expects the universal, default time and night-mode limits to have real effect, while the optional recommendation and engagement changes will reach fewer teens because a parent must actively enable them.
    3. Compliance is not the same as harm reduction: A policy scholar cautions that measuring compliance with a feature checklist is different from measuring actual outcomes, and argues independent researchers need real data access on sleep, wellbeing and compulsive-use patterns to know if the changes work.
    4. Recommendation algorithms remain the open question: Critics note the changes do not fully address the recommendation systems that encourage continued scrolling, with one researcher’s biggest unresolved question being how removing algorithmic recommendations changes what teens are shown and re-engage with.

    What evidence links social media design to youth mental health harm?

    1. Large-scale studies link engagement to anxiety and depression: A 2024 meta-analysis of 143 studies involving over one million adolescents found greater social media engagement associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression.
    2. Specific design features have identifiable mechanisms of harm: A Johns Hopkins researcher identifies appearance-based social comparison, visible like counts and overnight notifications as features with clear mechanisms of psychological impact.
    3. Reducing use shows measurable benefit: A 2025 randomised controlled trial of 220 young people found that cutting smartphone-based social media use to about one hour a day for three weeks reduced depression, anxiety and fear of missing out, and improved sleep; a 2026 trial found a similar reduction in loneliness after cutting use by about 78 minutes a day.
    4. Academic performance is also affected: A 2025 systematic review of 34 studies found off-task social media and smartphone use generally associated with lower academic achievement among children and adolescents.

    What does the settlement leave unresolved, and what does it mean for India?

    1. A financial incentive, not a mandate, for industry-wide adoption: About 30 percent of the $17 billion payout is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting comparable safeguards and matching payments, with stricter limits following only if Snap, TikTok and YouTube all comply.
    2. No admission of wrongdoing or binding precedent: The consent judgment explicitly states the settlement does not establish a standard of care or serve as precedent in any non-participating US state or international jurisdiction, including India.
    3. A legal question on platform liability remains open in the US: A Stanford law professor notes Meta’s attempt to invoke Section 230 immunity against design-based claims could still reach the US Supreme Court, since the settlement does not resolve roughly 2,900 other pending cases.
    4. India’s own discussions remain preliminary: The Centre is weighing age-based restrictions, usage-hour limits and stronger parental consent requirements for children’s social media access, but these discussions are still at an early stage, with the US settlement offered as a possible design-regulation template.

    Back2Basics

    1. Section 230: A provision of the US Communications Decency Act, 1996, that shields online platforms from liability for content posted by users, now being tested against claims that target a platform’s product design rather than the content it hosts.
    2. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023: India’s framework law on personal data processing, which includes provisions requiring verifiable parental consent before processing a child’s personal data.
    3. Multidistrict litigation: A US federal court procedure that consolidates similar lawsuits filed in different districts, such as the roughly 2,900 other cases against social media platforms, for coordinated pre-trial proceedings.

    (GS3-22, 2024, 10 marks, Microtheme: Data Protection) “Describe the context and salient features of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023”

  • Bihar decides to drop ‘fail’ from Class 10, 12 marksheets

    Why in the News

    Bihar’s Education Department has decided that Class 10 and 12 marksheets issued by the Bihar School Examination Board will no longer carry the word “fail,” replacing it with “Kaushal ke liye patra” (eligible for skills). The state’s Education Minister announced the change at a review meeting, saying the Board would amend its rules and issue instructions, and that a student’s inability to secure expected marks should not be treated as a reflection of talent. The change follows other recent moves in Bihar’s school system aimed at reducing conventional classroom pressure, including a shorter “no bag day” on Saturdays, and comes as the department also plans special preparatory classes for students appearing for supplementary examinations.

    What is changing on Bihar’s Class 10 and 12 marksheets, and why now?

    1. A terminology change, not a grading change: The word “fail” will be replaced with “Kaushal ke liye patra (eligible for skills)” on marksheets, while the underlying pass criteria and examination structure are unchanged.
    2. Mental health is the stated rationale: The Education Minister said the change is meant to protect student morale, framing a failing mark as a gap in results rather than a judgment on a student’s ability.
    3. Supplementary examination support is being added alongside: The department will run special preparatory classes for a month for students appearing in the Matric supplementary examination, aimed at improving their chances of clearing it.
    4. The change follows a wider set of reforms: Bihar has also introduced a shorter “no bag day” on Saturdays, from 9:30 am to 1 pm instead of 9:30 am to 4 pm, to expose students to theatre, music and other creative activities.

    What does Bihar’s own recent school reform pattern reveal?

    1. Reduced classroom time is a recurring theme: The Saturday “no bag day” order, issued under the Chief Minister’s announcement, cuts formal instruction time in favour of non-academic activity, mirroring the marksheet change’s emphasis on reducing pressure over reducing rigour.
    2. Teacher workload is being reallocated, not reduced: Teachers are now required to spend an additional hour after classroom duties on lesson planning, laboratory management and remedial classes, shifting effort toward preparation and remediation.
    3. The announcement doubled as a Teachers’ Day preview: The same review meeting discussed the September 5 Teachers’ Day function, where one teacher per district will receive a state award, tying the marksheet change to a broader push to recognise and support the teaching workforce.

    Challenges to a terminology-only fix for exam-related student distress

    1. Renaming does not remove the underlying selection pressure: A student who does not clear the exam still cannot progress to the next stage or apply for further study, so the anxiety around the outcome persists even if the label softens. Eg. Kerala and several other states have separately debated “no detention” policies without resolving the same underlying pressure around board exam outcomes. Fix. Pair the marksheet change with post-result counselling support and multiple re-attempt windows so students have a genuine path forward, not only a softer label.
    2. Selective terminology change can obscure rather than address failure rates: Removing the word “fail” without addressing why students underperform risks treating the symptom, language, rather than the cause, such as teaching quality or foundational learning gaps. Eg. Bihar has run remedial classes only for the supplementary examination cohort, not as a standing intervention through the academic year. Fix. Extend structured remedial teaching to the full academic year rather than limiting it to a pre-supplementary exam crash course.

    Conclusion

    Bihar’s decision replaces the word “fail” with a skills-oriented label on its board marksheets, framed as a mental health measure, while leaving the underlying pass-fail structure and supplementary examination process intact. Whether the change eases student distress or merely renames it will depend on whether the state follows through with sustained academic support rather than a one-time terminology.

  • Gen Z Adivasis ask for more

    Why in the News

    Tribal students at the Manjari Scheduled Tribes (ST) hostel near Pune have been on a hunger strike for over two weeks, part of protests at 25 locations across Maharashtra since August 12, demanding that the state act on 14 charges, chief among them a Supreme Court-mandated 2017 order to fill 12,500 government job positions reserved for tribals. The immediate trigger was an August 5 state order capping the age limit for staying in tribal hostels at 26 years, which the government raised to 30 on August 14 after protests began. The agitation gained force after three tribal schoolgirls died of snakebite at a Gadchiroli ashram school that had no beds. The state has held four rounds of talks and withdrawn the age cap, but has given the protesters no timeline on the pending job vacancies, and students say the same demands recur every year.

    What are the students protesting, and what triggered this round?

    1. Fourteen charges, only one conceded early: The students placed 14 demands before the government, of which it first agreed only to scrap the hostel age limit for admission.
    2. A punitive age cap sparked the protest: The August 5 order capping hostel stay at 26 years threatened students who use the hostel to prepare for competitive exams and city jobs, and was raised to 30 only after protests spread.
    3. Snakebite deaths widened the demands: Three tribal schoolgirls died of snakebite at an ashram school in Gadchiroli that had no beds, after which protesters added a demand for 1 crore compensation and health insurance for the families.
    4. Invasive hostel practices are also contested: The students want Government Resolutions restricting assembly, protests and union participation withdrawn, and an end to compulsory practices such as pregnancy tests in female hostels.

    Why has the 2017 Supreme Court-mandated job quota gone unfilled for nine years?

    1. A binding order without a deadline mechanism: The Supreme Court directed in 2017 that 12,500 government job positions be filled for tribals, but nine years on the vacancies remain open with no fixed completion date.
    2. The state cites inter-departmental delay: A government official said filling the vacancies “cannot be done overnight” because multiple departments are involved, without naming a target date.
    3. Hostel capacity has not kept pace with demand: The state runs 490 tribal hostels housing 59,020 students, and students say the government has not expanded this capacity for several years even as demand for seats in city hostels has grown.

    What does the state’s handling of the protest reveal about tribal welfare governance?

    1. Concessions follow political pressure, not review: The age cap was withdrawn only after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi gave the protesters a platform at a Pune rally and wrote to the Chief Minister, not through an internal policy review.
    2. Design choices override student preference: The state defends centrally cooked meals for hostels as easier to monitor, while students say food travelling up to 100 km from central kitchens often spoils by the time it reaches them.
    3. The protest is a recurring one: Students say they have held similar protests for four consecutive years over the same unmet demands, including hostel safety and hygiene.
    4. The hunger strike has produced a medical emergency: Two of the six students on hunger strike, weak after 14 days without food, needed to be moved for hospital treatment as their blood pressure and blood sugar dropped.

    Challenges to filling the Scheduled Tribes job quota

    1. No enforcement timeline attached to the court order: A Supreme Court direction to fill a quota carries no built-in penalty for delay, so the executive can let vacancies persist for years without consequence. Eg. The 2017 order remains unimplemented nine years later even as the state government publicly reaffirms it will comply. Fix. Require the state to file a compliance affidavit before the Court every six months, naming the number of posts filled and the department responsible for the remainder.
    2. Fragmented departmental ownership slows recruitment: Filling a quota spread across “many departments” leaves no single authority accountable for the shortfall. Eg. A state official cited inter-departmental coordination as the reason recruitment “cannot be done overnight.” Fix. Designate one nodal department to consolidate vacancy data and recruitment timelines across departments and report progress publicly.

    Conclusion

    The Manjari hunger strike has forced the Maharashtra government to withdraw one contested order and promise action on the rest, but the core grievance, a Supreme Court-mandated tribal job quota unfilled nine years on, remains unresolved without a stated timeline. Whether this round of protest produces a written, binding commitment or another round of verbal assurance will determine if the annual cycle of protest continues.

  • Echoes of past, warning for future

    Echoes of past, warning for future

    Why in the News

    A flash flood in Nepal’s Bhotekoshi Trishuli river system has killed more than 350 people, left several hundred more missing, and damaged 35 motorable bridges, 45 suspension bridges and about 40 kilometres of roads across the affected corridor, Nepalese authorities said. Satellite imagery analysed by global agencies, including the Indian Space Research Organisation, points to a glacier collapse or rock and ice avalanche in Tibet that briefly blocked the river before a sudden, destructive release downstream. An earthquake was initially suspected as the trigger, but subsequent analysis has not supported that theory. The exact sequence, whether an ice block broke away from the glacier or a lake within the glacier breached, remains contested, and the disaster is the latest in a run of Himalayan cascade events that repeated monitoring gaps have failed to prevent.

    What is a Glacial Lake Outburst Flood?

    1. About: A Glacial Lake Outburst Flood is the sudden, large scale release of water when a lake formed by a melting glacier breaches, either because a block of glacial ice or rock falls into it or because accumulated stress in its containing moraine gives way.
    2. Mechanism: The resulting wave can overtop and breach the lake’s frontal moraine, releasing water, rock and debris that erode river banks, uproot trees and trigger further landslides as it moves downstream.
    3. A related event type: A cascade can also begin without a lake, when a large block of glacial ice or rock breaks away and falls directly into a river, as is currently suspected in the Nepal disaster.

    What is understood so far about what caused the Nepal disaster?

    1. A rock and ice avalanche is the leading explanation: The event is currently understood to have been triggered by a large block of glacier breaking off in the upper reaches of the Bhotekoshi river, known as the Trishuli in its lower course, though what caused the break is not yet clear.
    2. Heavy rainfall has been ruled out: No heavy rainfall was recorded in the area, which rules out an extratropical Western Disturbance as the trigger despite north India and the Himalayan region being under its influence at the time.
    3. The earthquake reading was reclassified: The United States Geological Survey first reported a 4.4 magnitude earthquake, then revised its assessment to say the seismic signal, later corrected to 5.2 magnitude, was generated by a glacial collapse and debris flow rather than an actual earthquake.
    4. Scientists are divided on the exact mechanism: One glaciologist has pointed out that no ice blocks are visible in videos of the disaster and suggested a breach in a “supra glacial lake” (a lake that forms within a glacier rather than at its foot, increasingly common as glaciers melt under climate change) as the more likely cause, a view a former national disaster management official has echoed.

    How does the Nepal disaster compare with past Himalayan cascade disasters?

    1. Kedarnath, 2013: Unusually heavy rainfall melted the Chorabari glacier and swelled the Mandakini river, causing flash floods and landslides across Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and western Nepal that left nearly 6,000 people presumed dead, the most devastating of the four.
    2. Chamoli, 2021: A rock and ice avalanche broke away from a glacier, an estimated 27 million cubic metres of material, and fell into the Rishiganga river in Uttarakhand, killing more than 200 people.
    3. Sikkim, 2023: The collapse of nearly 14.7 million cubic metres of frozen moraine into the South Lhonak glacial lake generated a 20 metre high wave that breached the lake’s frontal moraine, releasing about 50 million cubic metres of water, eroding roughly 270 million cubic metres of sediment and triggering 45 secondary landslides that killed at least 55 people.
    4. Dharali, 2025: Days of continuous rain combined with terrain at nearly 6,900 metres above sea level triggered mudslides, debris slides and flash floods in Uttarakhand that killed at least 69 people.

    Why does the Himalayan region keep producing these cascading disasters?

    1. The ecosystem is already destabilised: A glaciologist heading a Himalayan research organisation’s Cryosphere group has described the entire Himalayan region as “out of balance” because of population pressure and climate change, with newer areas being exposed as glaciers retreat.
    2. A single trigger becomes a multi hazard chain: What begins as one event, extreme rainfall, a landslide or a lake overflow, quickly compounds into a chain reaction of bank erosion, added debris and further landslides, because the surging water in a narrow mountain valley has no way to disperse until the terrain flattens.
    3. The region is also earthquake prone: The Himalaya is among the most seismically dangerous regions in the world, and Nepal itself suffered a 7.2 magnitude earthquake in 2015, so rainfall, a landslide or seismic activity can each independently trigger a similar cascade.

    What early warning cooperation exists across the Himalayan region?

    1. Two regional mechanisms already exist: The World Meteorological Organisation’s South Asia Hydromet Forum brings together the region’s meteorological and hydrological agencies, while the South Asia Flash Flood Guidance System provides regional flood forecasting and guidance.
    2. These systems remain under scaled for the risk: Both need to be scaled up to allow greater sharing of data, forecasting expertise and early warning systems among Himalayan countries, since the current disaster crossed from Tibet into Nepal without any shared alert reaching people downstream in time.
    3. India and China share common ground despite other differences: The two countries are often aligned in climate negotiations despite their broader geopolitical disagreements, a common outlook that has not yet been converted into a shared India China Nepal early warning system for glacial and flood risk.

    Challenges to Himalayan glacier and flood monitoring

    1. The scale of what needs monitoring is enormous: The Indian Himalaya alone holds nearly 7,500 glacial lakes and about 15,000 glaciers, only some of which are tracked through remote sensing. Eg. Ground verification requires site visits that are feasible only between July and September because of terrain and weather. Fix. The National Disaster Management Authority’s National GLOF Risk Mitigation Programme, launched after the Sikkim disaster with an outlay of Rs 150 crore, is installing early warning systems at high risk glacial lakes across Sikkim, Uttarakhand, Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, though it currently covers only 195 lakes against thousands identified.
    2. Early warning carries its own risk of being ignored or causing panic: Forecasting a glacier collapse accurately remains extremely difficult, and a warning that proves false can be counterproductive if residents who lack alternatives choose not to move regardless. Eg. Communities living near glacial lakes have historically stayed in place through repeated flood warnings because they have nowhere else to go. Fix. Pair early warning systems with pre identified relocation sites and compensation, so a warning carries a real alternative rather than only an instruction to move.
    3. Construction in vulnerable zones continues unchecked: Dams and hydropower projects sited in glacial and flood prone terrain are consistently among the first structures destroyed in these events. Eg. A hydropower project in Sikkim was pulverised by the 2023 South Lhonak glacial lake outburst flood. Fix. Enforce construction codes that bar large dams and settlements from mapped high risk zones and require glacier health assessments before project clearance.

    Conclusion

    The exact cause of the Nepal flood is still being verified, but it fits an established pattern of Himalayan cascade disasters that recur every few years across India and Nepal. What remains unresolved is less the mechanism of any single event than the region’s continuing gaps in glacier monitoring, construction regulation in vulnerable terrain and cross border early warning, none of which past disasters have closed.

    PYQ

    [2014] “Bring out the relationship between the shrinking Himalayan glaciers and the symptoms of climate change in the Indian sub-continent.”

  • FM: Closer India-Canada economic ties important amid global uncertainty

    FM: Closer India-Canada economic ties important amid global uncertainty

    Why in the News

    The Union Finance Minister has said closer economic cooperation between India and Canada carries greater significance amid a rapidly changing global landscape marked by geopolitical uncertainty, and called for stronger partnerships to build resilient, sustainable and inclusive economies. The remarks came after the inaugural India Canada Economic and Financial Dialogue, the first such dialogue between the two countries. The Finance Minister said the dialogue reflects a shared ambition to move beyond traditional trade in goods and services toward a deeper partnership covering investment, finance, capital markets and regulatory cooperation.

    What is the India Canada Economic and Financial Dialogue?

    1. About: It is a bilateral mechanism between the Indian and Canadian finance ministries to coordinate on macroeconomic policy, financial sector cooperation and multilateral economic issues, launched with its inaugural round.
    2. Scope of discussions: The inaugural round covered three areas, macroeconomic developments and domestic policy priorities in both countries, avenues for financial sector cooperation, and broader international and multilateral cooperation on shared interests.
    3. Anchored in a wider strategic goal: The Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart have set an ambitious goal for strengthening bilateral ties, and the dialogue is meant to give that goal fresh momentum and direction.

    What case did the Finance Minister make for closer India Canada cooperation?

    1. Global uncertainty is the backdrop: The Finance Minister described the world as going through a profound transformation with constantly evolving geopolitical and economic realities, making resilient partnerships more important.
    2. India’s economy was presented as a stable partner: The Finance Minister highlighted India’s “remarkable macroeconomic resilience” and pointed to complementarities between the two economies as grounds for expanding investment and economic cooperation.

    What specific areas of financial cooperation did the two sides identify?

    1. Cross border payments and financial stability: The two sides explored cooperation on cross border payment systems and measures to safeguard financial stability.
    2. Fintech and capital markets: Discussions also covered cooperation in financial technology and capital markets, part of the plan to move beyond goods and services trade into deeper financial integration.

    Conclusion

    The inaugural dialogue has set out macroeconomic policy coordination, financial sector cooperation and multilateral engagement as its three working areas. No date has been set for the next round, but the framework is intended to carry forward the broader bilateral goal the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart have set for the relationship.

  • India’s return to its Central Asian neighbourhood

    India’s return to its Central Asian neighbourhood

    Why in the News

    The Prime Minister is set to travel to Central Asia, beginning with a state visit to Uzbekistan and followed by participation in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit of Heads of State in Bishkek, the Kyrgyz capital once called Frunze in Soviet times. The visit follows a decade long build up in India’s outreach to the region, a landmark 2015 tour of all five Central Asian states, India’s entry into the SCO as a full member in 2017, and the invitation extended to all five Central Asian leaders as chief guests for Republic Day in 2022. Central Asia sits between Russia and China, both of which still shape its politics and economy, while Pakistan seeks to claim the region’s historical and religious lineage as its own. The visit tests how far India can convert a civilisational and diplomatic relationship into a substantive one without a shared land border.

    Why does India treat Central Asia as its neighbourhood despite the absence of a land border?

    1. A civilisational link substitutes for geography: Central Asia shares deep ties with India in culture, religion, language and architecture, and India is separated from Tajikistan only by the narrow Wakhan corridor inside Afghanistan.
    2. Pakistan contests this claim: Pakistan seeks to use religious affinity to claim the region’s historical lineage for itself and to cut India off from these connections, an approach that has not succeeded so far.
    3. The region is turning outward: Central Asian states are increasingly looking beyond Russia and China for development partners, and view India’s plural, moderate and democratic experience with admiration rather than suspicion.

    How has India built its Central Asia engagement over the past decade?

    1. The 2015 visit ended a policy of deference: The Prime Minister’s 2015 tour of all five Central Asian states marked the end of India’s earlier practice of deferring to Russia in what it treated as Moscow’s periphery.
    2. SCO membership followed in 2017: India was admitted to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation as a full member in 2017, the same year Pakistan was admitted, sponsored respectively by Russia and China.
    3. A dialogue mechanism followed the pandemic: An unprecedented invitation to all five Central Asian leaders as Republic Day chief guests in 2022 was forced online by the COVID 19 pandemic, but still produced the India Central Asia Dialogue as a standing mechanism for cooperation.

    Why does the visit begin with Uzbekistan?

    1. Uzbekistan has been the region’s most dynamic reformer: Ties with Uzbekistan have improved steadily under its president since 2016, and the country is regarded as the most forward looking in the region on diversifying its foreign policy.
    2. Its counter terrorism record matters to India: Uzbekistan has taken an uncompromising line against terrorism and extremism, and its close knowledge of and pragmatic approach to Afghanistan and the Taliban is of direct value to India.
    3. It anchors India’s alternative connectivity plans: India has held detailed talks with Uzbekistan on alternative rail and road routes through Iran and Afghanistan, links that need to be revisited given recent developments in both countries.

    What other powers is India competing with in the region?

    1. Russia and China remain the dominant powers: Central Asia is landlocked between the two, and both continue to shape the region’s politics and economy even as their relative influence shifts, Russia’s weakening and China’s growing.
    2. Turkiye and Iran hold cultural and economic sway: Both countries are described as dominant influences in the region alongside Russia and China.
    3. The United States and European Union are entering the space: Both are working their way into Central Asia as Russia’s grip loosens.
    4. Radicalisation spillover from Afghanistan is a shared anxiety: China fears the spread of radicalisation into its border regions from Afghanistan, an anxiety the region shares along with memories of attacks such as the 2024 Crocus City Hall attack in Moscow.

    What is India’s position inside the SCO?

    1. The SCO has grown well beyond its founding core: What began as the “Shanghai Five” grouping in 1996 has grown, in its 25th year, to 10 members, 15 dialogue partners and two observers.
    2. India engages the SCO on geography, not ideology: India has been a regular participant at SCO Head of State meetings except in 2024, and has pushed ideas on economic, technological and civilisational cooperation, including a vision of security, connectivity and opportunity put forward at last year’s Tianjin summit.
    3. India offers a counterweight within the SCO’s China Pakistan dyad: Negotiating inside the SCO against a China Pakistan axis is demanding, and for a country as dependent on China as Kyrgyzstan, India’s presence in the SCO offers a genuine alternative.

    Challenges to India’s Central Asia outreach

    1. Weak physical connectivity limits how far ties can grow: India has no direct land or transit route into Central Asia, so trade and people movement rely on routes through third countries. Eg. Talks on alternative rail and road links through Iran and Afghanistan remain unfinished even after years of discussion. Fix. Operationalise the Chabahar port route and conclude a transit framework with Uzbekistan and other Central Asian states independent of Afghan transit uncertainty.
    2. China’s economic footprint outpaces India’s: China’s connectivity and trade financing in the region dwarf India’s presence in infrastructure and investment. Eg. China has built rail links and pipeline corridors connecting Central Asia directly to its own territory, a scale of investment India has not matched. Fix. Use lines of credit and the India Central Asia Dialogue to fund discrete, deliverable projects in energy, health and digital infrastructure rather than compete on scale.
    3. Russia’s traditional primacy still shapes the region’s security choices: Most Central Asian states retain security arrangements with Russia through the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, limiting how far they can diversify. Eg. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan continue to host Russian military bases. Fix. Build India’s security cooperation around counter terrorism training and disaster response, areas that do not compete with existing Russian linked security arrangements.

    Conclusion

    The visit signals a deliberate, structured attempt to convert a civilisational relationship into a strategic one, anchored first in Uzbekistan and then in the SCO platform. Connectivity gaps and the entrenched primacy of Russia and China in the region mean this return builds incrementally rather than displacing existing power structures. How far India can embed itself economically and strategically in Central Asia will depend on sustained follow through on the India Central Asia Dialogue rather than on the visit itself.

    Back2Basics

    What is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation?

    1. Origin: It began in 1996 as the “Shanghai Five”, grouping China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and was renamed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in 2001 when Uzbekistan joined.
    2. Mandate: It focuses on regional security, counter terrorism, economic cooperation and connectivity among its Eurasian member states.
    3. Headquarters: Its secretariat is based in Beijing.

    [2024] “Critically analyse India’s evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics.”

  • India-China boundary talks: Some progress, but a long road ahead

    India-China boundary talks: Some progress, but a long road ahead

    Why in the News

    An eight point consensus has emerged from the 25th round of talks between the Special Representatives of India and China, the National Security Advisor and the Chinese Foreign Minister, held in Beijing. The talks come ahead of the expected visit of the President of China to India for the BRICS Summit. The outcomes include agreement to advance a framework for settling the boundary question through an Expert Group and a Working Group, and to establish two new hotlines in the Eastern and Middle Sectors. Whether this procedural progress marks the start of genuine boundary delimitation, or repeats a decades long pattern of confidence building measures that stall before they mature, remains contested.

    What is the Special Representatives mechanism on the India China boundary?

    1. A political level channel: The Special Representatives mechanism is the designated political level channel, held at the level of the National Security Advisor and the Foreign Minister, tasked with negotiating a framework for settlement of the boundary question.
    2. The current round: The 25th round of talks was held in Beijing between the National Security Advisor and the Chinese Foreign Minister.
    3. Its relationship to implementation bodies: It operates alongside implementation level mechanisms such as the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India China Border Affairs (WMCC), which handles border management and now houses the Expert Group and Working Group tasked with delimitation and management.

    What did the 25th round of talks agree to?

    1. Reaffirming peace along the border: The outcomes concern maintenance of peace and tranquillity in the border areas, and advancing negotiations on a framework for settlement of the boundary question in accordance with previous agreements.
    2. New task for the Expert Group and Working Group: There is a specific reference to advancing discussions through an Expert Group and a Working Group respectively, to explore an early harvest of boundary delimitation in appropriate sectors, and effective border management.
    3. Implementing an earlier understanding: The two sides agreed to implement last year’s understanding on additional General Level Mechanism or Senior Highest Military Commander meetings, along with establishing two hotlines in the Eastern and Middle Sectors.

    How has the border personnel meeting mechanism evolved since 1992?

    1. Origins in the Joint Working Group: In 1992, the Joint Working Group on the Boundary Question decided on confidence building measures such as Border Personnel Meetings, complementing forward movement on border trade.
    2. A subgroup that grew into an institutional mechanism: A subgroup of the Joint Working Group was created following the 1993 border peace and tranquillity agreement, the India China Expert Group of Diplomatic and Military Officials, which became the precursor to the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India China Border Affairs, set up in 2012.
    3. New meeting points identified after 1995: After the success achieved in 1995 on disengagement at Sumdorong Chu, Lipulekh in the Middle Sector and Dichu in the Eastern Sector were identified as additional military meeting points.
    4. Not every point could be operationalised: The plan for meetings at Lipulekh was abandoned for want of infrastructure and because of adverse weather conditions. A trial meeting at Dichu, in the Kibithu sector of Arunachal Pradesh’s Anjaw district and the site of a notable 1962 battle in which the Kumaon Regiment fought, was finalised, but the chosen site on Madan Ridge proved contentious and no further meetings took place there.
    5. The proposal was revived only in 2014: It was then decided to hold regular meetings at Wacha, opposite Damai on the Chinese side, in the same Kibithu sector, in addition to existing venues across Bum La in Arunachal Pradesh and Nathu La in Sikkim.

    What do the new hotlines add to existing India China contact channels?

    1. The understanding they build on: Last year, the two sides had reached agreement in principle on working towards additional General Level or Senior Highest Military Commander meetings in the Eastern and Middle Sectors, similar to the existing mechanism in the Western Sector at Chushul and Moldo.
    2. Existing channels already in place: Hotlines already exist at Daulat Beg Oldie and Chushul, with informal communication at Demchok in the Western Sector, and similar hotlines at Nathu La in Sikkim and at Bum La and Kibithu in the Eastern Sector.
    3. What the new hotlines could achieve: The two additional hotline channels agreed for the Eastern and Middle Sectors could strengthen this existing capacity and help defuse local tensions.

    What broader thaw in ties has this round of talks followed?

    1. Political level consensus behind the process: The Special Representatives are working to realise the consensus reached between the Prime Minister and the President of China at Kazan in October 2024, and at Tianjin in August 2025, on improving ties.
    2. Other signs of normalisation: The resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, the restoration of direct flights, and the resumption of border trade are meaningful steps in the same direction.

    What tensions temper optimism about this round of talks?

    1. It would be premature to call this delimitation: It would be premature to suggest that substantive boundary delimitation has already begun in earnest, since the Expert Group and the Working Group under the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination are only now explicitly tasked with finalising their respective terms of reference, meaning the framework is being created and the process is being activated only incrementally.
    2. The road ahead is long: The task of achieving an early and substantial harvest of boundary delimitation and border management may be long and arduous, requiring patient negotiations.
    3. Piecemeal progress against an unsettled whole: There is also the question of piecemeal progress against a more holistic settlement of differences along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), since neither the Sikkim subsector nor the Middle Sector are free from their own unresolved differences.
    4. Negotiators need to be equal to a vexed history: The negotiators must be empowered to engage in meaningful discussions and must have sufficient experience in handling a matter that has proved difficult for previous generations.

    Conclusion

    This round of Special Representative talks has advanced the procedural architecture for the India China boundary question, through new hotlines and a formal mandate for the Expert Group and Working Group, ahead of the expected visit of the President of China for the BRICS Summit. Genuine boundary delimitation has not yet begun, and the decades long history of the border personnel meeting mechanism shows that such confidence building steps can stall for years before they mature. Whether the newly mandated Expert Group and Working Group convert this round’s procedural momentum into an actual settlement remains to be seen.

    Back2Basics: Line of Actual Control (LAC)

    1. Definition: The LAC separates Indian controlled territory from Chinese controlled territory along the unsettled boundary between the two countries.
    2. Three sectors: It is divided into three sectors, the Eastern Sector covering Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim, the Middle Sector covering Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, and the Western Sector covering Ladakh.

    “[2024, GS3, 15 marks] India has a long and troubled border with China and Pakistan fraught with contentious issues. Examine the conflicting issues and security challenges along the border. Also give out the development being undertaken in these areas under the Border Area Development Programme (BADP) and Border Infrastructure and Management (BIM) Scheme.”

  • Insurers can invest in NDB’s onshore rupee bonds, says IRDAI

    Insurers can invest in NDB’s onshore rupee bonds, says IRDAI

    Why in the News

    The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has permitted insurers to invest in Maharajah INR Bonds, the onshore rupee bonds of the New Development Bank (NDB). The approval follows a representation from the NDB seeking clearance for the bonds, under which the bank proposes to raise Rs 25,000 crore over a five year period. The move assumes significance ahead of next month’s BRICS Summit in New Delhi.

    What is a Maharajah INR Bond?

    1. Definition: It is an onshore rupee bond issued in the Indian market by the New Development Bank.
    2. Purpose: Proceeds are intended to be raised over a five year period, totalling Rs 25,000 crore, for general corporate purposes and for financing or onward lending to sustainable development, sustainable infrastructure, and green and social projects in India.
    3. Legal classification: IRDAI has clarified that the proposed onshore rupee bond issuances by the NDB fall under the definition of securities under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.

    What has IRDAI approved and why does it matter now?

    1. The approval itself: IRDAI communicated its approval to insurers through a circular, permitting them to invest in the NDB’s Maharajah INR Bonds.
    2. What triggered it: The approval follows a representation from the NDB seeking clearance for the bond programme.
    3. Its timing: The approval assumes significance ahead of next month’s BRICS Summit in New Delhi, where the New Development Bank’s fundraising plans are likely to draw attention.

    Under what conditions can insurers invest, and what is the intent behind the approval?

    1. Widening the investment universe: IRDAI is permitting the investment to give insurers more scope for investments.
    2. Regulatory treatment: The investment will be treated as part of insurers’ approved investments and remains subject to norms laid down by the Government of India and to SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) approval, among other conditions.
    3. Who stands behind the bonds: The New Development Bank is a multilateral development bank established by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the BRICS grouping.

    Conclusion

    IRDAI’s approval is a procedural but enabling step that widens the pool of domestic capital available to the New Development Bank ahead of the BRICS Summit in New Delhi. How much of the proposed Rs 25,000 crore is actually raised will depend on the bond issuance itself and on insurer appetite once it opens.

    Back2Basics: New Development Bank

    1. Formation: The New Development Bank was established in 2014 under the founding agreement of the BRICS grouping and became operational the following year.
    2. Headquarters: It is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
    3. Mandate: It mobilises resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in BRICS and other emerging and developing economies.
    4. Membership: It has since expanded its membership beyond its five founding countries to include other developing nations.

    [2014] “India has recently signed to become founding a New Development Bank (NDB) and also the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). How will the role of the two Banks be different? Discuss the significance of these two Banks for India.”

  • Can India build a strategic fuel system?

    Why in the News

    Disruptions related to West Asia have exposed a vulnerability in India’s energy security system. India imports large quantities of crude oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), but its ability to store, move and release these fuels during a prolonged disruption differs sharply by fuel. Against this, the government is considering a decade long strategic fuel programme that would add about 28 MT (million tonnes) of crude oil storage, 9 MT of LNG storage and 4 MT of LPG storage. The programme remains under consideration and should be treated as a proposed target rather than committed capacity.

    What is India’s proposed strategic fuel storage programme?

    1. Scale of the proposal: The decade long programme would add about 28 MT of crude oil storage, 9 MT of LNG storage and 4 MT of LPG storage, roughly 41 MT of combined new capacity.
    2. Purpose: The reserves are intended to provide nearly two months of crude oil and LNG demand cover and about six weeks of LPG demand cover during a prolonged supply disruption.
    3. Status: The programme remains under consideration and is a proposed target, not committed capacity.

    How much strategic fuel storage does India already have?

    1. Crude storage is the most developed: Phase I of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve provides 5.33 MT of underground capacity, with actual storage of about 3.37 MT, or roughly 63 to 64 percent utilisation, across Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru and Padur. A further 6.5 MT has been approved under Phase II at Chandikhol and Padur.
    2. Execution has lagged on Chandikhol: Work on the Chandikhol project remains slow amid ongoing land acquisition requirements and the finalisation of commercial public private partnership frameworks.
    3. LPG storage is a fraction of the proposed target: The Visakhapatnam and Mangaluru caverns together provide about 0.14 MT of capacity, so a proposed 4 MT reserve would represent roughly a thirty fold increase in underground LPG capacity.
    4. Natural gas has no underground storage at all: India currently has no operational underground gas storage facility, and its gas security instead depends on domestic production, LNG imports, import terminals, commercial inventories and pipelines.
    5. Capacity is not the same as usable inventory: A facility has a physical capacity, but the fuel it actually holds can vary, and not all inventory is immediately accessible. During a crisis, the critical measure is how much fuel is available and at what withdrawal rate it can reach consumers.

    What does the proposed 9 MT of LNG storage actually mean?

    1. Regasification capacity is not the same as strategic inventory: India already has substantial LNG import and regasification infrastructure, but a regasification terminal’s capacity to convert LNG into natural gas does not itself constitute strategic inventory.
    2. LNG storage and underground gas storage work differently: LNG is stored as a cryogenic liquid at around 162 degrees Celsius below zero, requiring specialised insulated tanks and management of boil off gas. Underground gas storage instead regasifies the LNG first and injects the resulting natural gas into a depleted reservoir or cavern.
    3. A narrower stress test already exists: A study by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) and the International Copper and Fertiliser (ICF) group examined how much additional LNG infrastructure would be needed to supply priority consumers for a stress period of 20 days by 2030, estimating a requirement of about 0.56 to 0.6 MT of LNG equivalent, achievable with roughly eight additional LNG tanks at a combined cost of about 1 billion dollars.
    4. The proposed reserve is an order of magnitude larger: Against the same study’s projection of roughly 58 MT of annual LNG imports, the proposed 9 MT works out to about 56 days of import cover, which is the basis for describing it as nearly two months of LNG import cover, not two months of India’s total gas consumption.

    Does all of India’s gas storage have to take the form of LNG tanks?

    1. A portfolio approach is possible: India could eventually use a combination of surface LNG tanks and underground natural gas storage rather than LNG tanks alone.
    2. A parallel proposal targets import terminals directly: A separate proposal from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas would require LNG import terminals to maintain storage capacity 10 percent above their normal operating requirement, with the additional capacity available to the government during supply or price disruptions.
    3. Depleted reservoirs offer the largest potential volumes: Depleted oil and gas reservoirs, which account for 74 percent of global working gas volume, could provide much larger volumes of underground gas storage, while salt caverns allow faster injection and withdrawal, making them more suited to shorter duration balancing.
    4. India has candidate geology but not yet usable storage: India’s sedimentary basins, including Krishna, Godavari, Cambay, Mumbai Offshore and Rajasthan, offer potential locations, but moving from geological potential to usable storage requires subsurface investigation, site selection, engineering, construction, testing, filling and pipeline integration. Rajasthan’s salt bearing formations have similarly been investigated for solution mined caverns, with suitability depending on depth, thickness, purity, geometry, groundwater and mechanical properties.

    What does the United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve show about storage as a system?

    1. Scale achieved through salt caverns: The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve holds an authorised capacity of 714 million barrels across 60 salt caverns.
    2. Storage works only as part of an infrastructure system: The American reserve functions as an integrated network of caverns, pipelines, marine terminals and refineries, showing that strategic storage is fundamentally an infrastructure system and not simply an underground space.

    How mature are India’s crude and LPG storage systems?

    1. Crude is the most mature component: India already operates underground crude caverns and has developed the associated engineering capabilities.
    2. LPG presents a much larger scaling challenge: LPG storage is technically proven in India, but a proposed 4 MT reserve would require a substantial network of new caverns or other storage facilities, together with import terminals, pipelines, pumping systems and bottling infrastructure.
    3. The Mangaluru cavern illustrates the complexity involved: Underground construction requires geological and hydrogeological investigation, rock mechanics analysis and groundwater management, particularly where work takes place alongside operating surface facilities.

    How is India strengthening the logistics that move fuel once it is stored?

    1. India is investing to reduce reliance on foreign shipping: State run oil refiners and the Shipping Corporation of India plan to invest 1.5 to 2 billion dollars in a joint venture to acquire 59 ships.
    2. Sourcing is being diversified too: Indian Oil is expanding sourcing through new 2027 agreements with Algeria and increased purchases from the United States, while exploring direct stakes in Very Large Gas Carriers to secure greater control over its supply chain.
    3. New pipelines are expanding delivery, not storage: The PNGRB has authorised approximately 1,800 km of new LPG pipelines across six States, involving investment of around 0.7 billion dollars. These pipelines improve connections between supply sources and inland markets and reduce dependence on road movement, but they do not themselves add strategic storage.
    4. Every storage form depends on connectivity to be useful: Underground gas storage is useful only if it can inject into and withdraw from the gas grid at the required rate. LNG tanks are useful only when regasification and downstream pipelines can move the gas onward, and LPG caverns require connections to bottling and distribution systems.

    Who pays for building and running the strategic reserves?

    1. The reported cost remains unconfirmed: A reported 42 billion dollar programme, which the government has yet to confirm, combines infrastructure capital expenditure with the cost of purchasing and maintaining strategic fuel inventories, with more than half expected to go towards storage infrastructure and the balance towards purchasing and filling the reserves.
    2. A cess has been ruled out: Financing is a genuine challenge, and the government has rejected reports that a cess would be charged to pay for the reserves.
    3. Replenishment carries its own cost and risk: Stocks released during a crisis would need to be replenished, potentially when commodity and freight prices are higher, so the policy needs to settle who owns and finances the inventory, minimum stock obligations, emergency release authority, and who bears replenishment and price risk.
    4. A mixed commercial and strategic model could ease the burden: A model that combines commercial and strategic use of the same capacity could reduce the public financing burden, provided the commercially used capacity remains available during emergencies.

    Is storage capacity alone enough for India’s energy security?

    1. Building capacity is only part of the equation: A strategic reserve is effective only if India can access the fuel, transport it inland, and replenish stocks after a release.
    2. Energy security depends on an integrated framework: Reserves buy time, shipping brings the next cargo, pipelines deliver fuel inland, and governance decides how emergency releases are executed, so the real test of the programme is its ability to coordinate all these elements at once when a crisis hits.

    Conclusion

    India’s existing storage differs sharply by fuel, with crude the most developed, LPG a limited underground footprint, and natural gas without any operational underground facility. The proposed 28 MT of crude, 9 MT of LNG and 4 MT of LPG storage would mark a major expansion, but the programme remains under consideration, and its value will depend as much on shipping, pipelines and financing arrangements as on the storage capacity itself.

    Back2Basics: Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB)

    1. Governing law: PNGRB was set up under the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006.
    2. Jurisdiction: It regulates the downstream petroleum and natural gas sector, including refining, processing, storage, transport, distribution, marketing and sale of petroleum products and natural gas, excluding production and exploration.
    3. Mandate: It authorises and lays down technical and safety standards for gas and LPG pipelines and city gas distribution networks, and protects consumer interests while promoting competitive markets.
    4. Relevance here: It is the regulator behind the LPG pipeline authorisations and the LNG stress test study referenced in this item.

    [2025] “Energy security constitutes the dominant kingpin of India’s foreign policy, and is linked with India’s overarching influence in Middle Eastern countries.” How would you integrate energy security with India’s foreign policy trajectories in the coming years?”