Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Type: DOMR

  • Dozen Bengal Tribunal judges flag their EC portal: ‘Can’t serve notices, hold hearings or restore deleted voters’

    Why in the News

    The appeal route the Supreme Court built for 27 lakh voters deleted in West Bengal’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) promises a hearing, but its tribunals cannot serve notices, hold hearings or restore voters on their portal. Judges of more than a dozen of the 19 tribunals recorded these gaps in August, in minutes sent to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the Calcutta High Court’s Chief Justice.

    How did the appeal tribunals come about?

    1. What they are: Single-member bodies of retired High Court judges that hear a deleted voter’s appeal against removal from the roll, like an appeals court for the voter list.
    2. Court takes over: Invoking Article 142 (its power to pass any order needed for “complete justice”), the Court on February 20 ordered judicial officers to decide electors’ eligibility.
    3. Flagged by software: The ECI’s centralised software listed 60.06 lakh electors for “logical discrepancies” (mismatches its algorithm found in their records) or as “unmapped”.
    4. Deleted before polls: Judicial officers deleted 27.16 lakh of them weeks before the April polls. The Court then ordered the tribunals on March 10.
    5. The takeaway: The tribunals are the only check on deletions made in haste before an election, so their tools decide whether that check works.

    What did the judges say the portal cannot do?

    1. Serving notices: The portal, built by the ECI’s IT division, cannot serve notice, even after repeated requests. A notice format the judges approved in May was never used.
    2. Securing documents: Tribunals cannot obtain additional documents through it, so they email district officials, who respond poorly.
    3. Hearings and restoration: There is no facility for virtual hearings. A voter cannot be restored on the portal once an appeal is disposed of, even on a judicial direction.
    4. Order copies: Appellants cannot get a certified or downloadable copy of the order, so they cannot learn why they were deleted or included.
    5. Physical appeals: Appeals filed on paper with district officers are not digitised or properly recorded, which the judges warned would mean “injustice”.

    Why do the portal gaps undermine the appeal process?

    1. Court’s conditions unmet: The Court’s April 1 order told tribunals to give reasons and revisit records. The judges said that without these tools voters lose due process, a fair hearing.
    2. Ignored warning: On May 22, a tribunal judge told the Chief Justice that missing notices were slowing appeal decisions and wrong disposal figures were reaching the press.
    3. Slow disposal: Only 1.26 lakh of 38.31 lakh appeals had been decided by early September, the ECI told the Supreme Court.
    4. Repeat failure: Before the polls, the Court recorded an “urgent concern” over an ECI mistake in the judicial officers’ portal.
    5. Central control of software: Two Election Commissioners had objected that ECINET, the ECI’s main digital system, restricted field officers’ access.

    Did the deletions decide the election?

    1. Result and claim: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the April polls by a landslide, and the Trinamool Congress (TMC) blamed deletions for its defeat.
    2. Seats in question: Deletions exceeded the victory margin in 49 of 293 seats.
    3. Even split: The BJP won 26 of those seats and the TMC 21, so the claim is more political than empirical.

    Challenges

    1. Software over court orders: A portal’s design, not the Court’s order, now sets what a judicial body can do.
    2. No deadline for appeals: Rolls freeze when nominations close, so an appeal won later cannot restore a vote for that election.
    3. Opaque flagging: “Logical discrepancies” have no published definition, so a voter cannot know what to rebut.

    Way Forward

    1. Portal fix under supervision: The ECI should add notice, document, hearing, restoration and order-download functions by a deadline the Calcutta High Court sets.
    2. Digitise paper appeals: District officers should upload every physical appeal, as the ECI’s own notification requires.
    3. Public disposal data: The ECI should publish tribunal-wise disposal figures every week.

    Conclusion

    The Court built an appeal route for deleted voters, but whether it works depends on a portal the ECI controls and has not fixed. Whether either court orders those functions added will decide if the remaining appeals are heard before the rolls next decide an election.

    Key numbers

    1. Appeals by deleted voters: 22.21 lakh, ECI submission to the Supreme Court, September 2026.
    2. Appeals against inclusions: 16.10 lakh, seeking deletion of listed voters, same submission.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • ECI must not force voters to lie. Solution may lie in a Form 6X

    Why in the News

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) has moved from deleting names in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) to re-enrolling the eligible voters it removed, but through Form 6, a form meant only for first-time voters. Its new instructions order a special enrolment drive in 20 States and Union Territories after about 13 crore names left the draft rolls.

    What is the ECI’s corrective drive?

    1. What it is: A drive restoring eligible voters that the SIR, a door-to-door re-check of voters, wrongly removed. It is like fixing a register that dropped real members.
    2. How it works: Officials compare pre-SIR and post-SIR rolls, visit missing voters at home and help them enrol. Political parties may assist.
    3. When ordered: Instructions issued on September 29 were reinforced at an October 1 meeting with Chief Electoral Officers, the ECI’s top officer in each State.
    4. Two target groups: The drive targets young voters left unenrolled and long-registered voters deleted from the rolls.
    5. The takeaway: The ECI has in effect admitted wrongful deletions, so the legal route back now matters.

    Why must the ECI account for young voters?

    1. Long-standing commitment: The ECI long urged every new adult to register at once. The Union Cabinet’s 2011 decision to mark 25 January as National Voters’ Day reflected this.
    2. Four qualifying dates: A 2022 reform allowed enrolment on four qualifying dates a year, one per quarter, each a date on which eligibility is counted. Seventeen-year-olds could apply in advance.
    3. The 2024 lapse: The ECI must explain how many young people eligible from 2024 stayed unenrolled, and why. A corrective drive is no substitute for that explanation.

    Why is Form 6 the wrong route for deleted voters?

    1. A form for new voters: Form 6 is the “Application Form for New Voters”. Its declaration reads, “I am applying for inclusion in Electoral Roll for the first time.”
    2. A false statement: Someone who has voted for 20 or 30 years cannot sign this honestly, yet a first-time applicants’ form is being used to restore them.
    3. Penalty for voters: Under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, a false declaration is punishable with up to a year in prison, a fine, or both.
    4. Risk for officials: Under Sections 45 and 49 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), knowingly prompting or helping an offence is abetment, punishable like the offence itself.
    5. Voters who objected: Some registered voters reportedly protested but were made to file Form 6 anyway.

    How would a restoration form work?

    1. Restoration, not registration: First-time voters would register through Form 6. Wrongly deleted voters would be restored through a new Form 6X.
    2. What it would ask: The voter gives the old Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) number, the voter ID, and earlier roll details.
    3. Checks before restoring: Officials verify whether the person is still eligible, has shifted, is registered elsewhere or has become disqualified.
    4. No litigation needed: The electoral machinery already holds these records, so voters should not have to go to court to recover their vote.

    Challenges

    1. Weak legal footing: An entry restored on a false declaration is open to later challenge.
    2. Burden on the wronged: The ECI deleted the names, yet each deleted voter must apply again.
    3. Field capacity: Home visits depend on Booth Level Officers (BLOs) already stretched by the SIR.

    Way Forward

    1. Notify Form 6X: The Law Ministry should amend the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, a change the author says takes a few hours.
    2. Quarterly enrolment data: The ECI should publish applications, enrolments, rejections and pendency each quarter, and account for young citizens who missed elections.
    3. Accountability: The ECI should publish the drive’s results, explain the failures behind it, and hold obstructing officials to account.

    Conclusion

    The ECI has conceded wrongful deletions but routes the remedy through a declaration that is untrue for every voter it serves. Whether a separate restoration route is created before the drive closes will decide if restored voters carry legal risk.

    Electoral roll revision in India

    1. Special Intensive Revision: A time-bound, door-to-door enumeration in which BLOs physically verify every entry, unlike the routine annual summary revision.
    2. Purpose: It removes deceased, duplicate or shifted entries and adds newly eligible citizens.
    3. Constitutional basis: Article 324 gives the ECI superintendence, direction and control over preparing electoral rolls.
    4. History: The first intensive revisions ran from 1952 to 1956, and about 14 have been held in all.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • The knock on the Supreme Court’s door

    Why in the News

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) was designed as a multi-member body whose members check one another, but during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls it often became a one-man show. An Indian Express investigation documented this shift. Two Supreme Court judges, one sitting and one retired, have now called the SIR a threat to the right to vote, putting the Court’s own silence on test.

    What is the SIR, and what went wrong in how the ECI ran it?

    1. What the SIR is: An intensive revision prepares the voter roll afresh through house-to-house checks, rather than updating the existing list.
    2. Multi-member design: The ECI has more than one member so that no single officer decides alone, like a bench rather than a single judge.
    3. Internal checks weakened: The investigation found decisions taken by one person, which undermines the checks and balances inside the Commission.
    4. Burden on the voter: The ECI abandoned its record of inclusiveness. Vulnerable voters had to prove eligibility, facing a “hurdle race” at every SIR stage.
    5. The takeaway: When the body that guards the voter list excludes voters, the right to vote itself is at stake.

    Why do two judges call the SIR a threat to the right to vote?

    1. Sitting judge’s view: Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said the SIR’s mass disenfranchisement, or stripping citizens of the vote, violates the Constitution.
    2. Vote as the soul: He said cutting a citizen off from the vote is like “taking out the soul from the body”.
    3. Constituent Assembly’s choice: He recalled that the freedom struggle made universal adult franchise a natural choice and an essential part of democracy.
    4. Equal vote, equal value: Giving every citizen an equal vote, whatever their identity or social position, was the new nation’s first step towards equality.
    5. Retired judge’s view: Former Supreme Court judge Rohinton Fali Nariman said the SIR’s removal of voters puts the right to vote, the “heart of our democracy”, in “great peril”.

    Is the Supreme Court itself now on test?

    1. Troubling silence: The Court gave the ECI the benefit of every doubt during the SIR. The judges’ remarks reflect a disquiet the Court must now address.
    2. Pending cases: The Court is hearing cases on how the SIR was conducted and on the ECI’s appointment process and functioning.
    3. Form 6 changes: The Court has said it did not approve changes to Form 6, the application for registering new voters, which made registration harder.
    4. Internal decision-making: The Court wants answers from the ECI on how decisions were taken inside the Commission.
    5. Article 324 record: The Court has a strong record of upholding Article 324, which secures the ECI. Keeping that record requires it to keep questioning the ECI.

    Challenges

    1. Statutory right only: The right to vote is a statutory right, which weakens a voter’s challenge to deletion. Eg. Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006).
    2. Executive-led appointments: The selection panel for Election Commissioners carries a government majority, which feeds doubts about independence.
    3. Document burden: Migrants, the poor and married women who moved often lack the papers the SIR demands.
    4. No recorded dissent: Decisions taken by one member leave no public record of the other members’ views.

    Way Forward

    1. Collective decisions: The ECI should take every SIR decision by a recorded vote of all its members.
    2. Notice before deletion: No name should leave the roll without individual notice and a hearing.
    3. Wider documents: The ECI should accept commonly held identity documents, including Aadhaar, as proof for inclusion.
    4. Time-bound hearings: The Supreme Court should fix a schedule to decide the SIR petitions before the next revised rolls are final.

    Conclusion

    The SIR has turned a body built to include voters into one accused of excluding them, and the Court’s restraint has let that drift continue. Whether the Court tests how the Commission reached its decisions will show if it still acts as the voter’s last guard.

    Back2Basics: Article 324

    1. Core power: Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction and control of electoral rolls and elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President in the ECI.
    2. Composition: The ECI has a Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and such other Election Commissioners as the President fixes. It has been multi-member since 1993.
    3. Removal protection: The CEC can be removed only like a Supreme Court judge.
    4. Residuary power: The Court has read Article 324 as letting the ECI act where law is silent, but never against a statute.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Only 9% use public transport to go to work

    Why in the News

    For the first time, India has a national survey of how households travel, and it finds that only 9% of Indians use public transport to get to work. The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) ran the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), which also shows women relying on buses far more than men.

    What is the National Household Travel Survey, and why was it needed?

    1. What it is: The NHTS is the first nationwide survey of how people travel, including how they get to work and what it costs them.
    2. Coverage: It ran for a year, from July 2025 to June 2026.
    3. Sample size: It drew on responses from 20 lakh people across villages and urban blocks nationwide.
    4. Why it was needed: MoSPI wants evidence for regional transport planning, to find gaps, plan better routes and set how often buses and trains run.
    5. The takeaway: Cities and States can now plan transport on measured travel patterns rather than estimates.

    How do Indians get to work, and at what cost?

    1. Private vehicles dominate: 43% of Indians ride two-wheelers to work, and only 3% use cars.
    2. Public transport split: Among those travelling more than a kilometre to work, 6.7% take buses. The rest of the 9% use monorail, tram or rail.
    3. Rail-based transit: Metro, suburban rail, monorail and trams carry 5% of urban work commutes nationally. Usage is far higher in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Delhi.
    4. Urban commuting cost: Urban workers spend Rs 1,044 a month to get to work, against Rs 612 in rural areas, so city commutes cost far more.
    5. National average: The average monthly spend on the work commute is Rs 785.

    What does the survey say about women and free bus travel?

    1. Women ride buses more: 21.7% of urban women with commutes over a kilometre take a bus, against 6.9% of urban men, about three times as many.
    2. What counts as a bus: The category covers public, private, company and intercity buses.
    3. State variation: Women’s bus use is highest in Keralam and Tamil Nadu, followed by Karnataka and Telangana.
    4. Free travel policy: These figures support the decision of several States to offer free bus travel to women, since buses are already women’s main public mode.

    Challenges

    1. Weak last-mile links: Poor feeder services and footpaths push commuters to two-wheelers even where a metro exists.
    2. Thin bus fleets: Many cities run far fewer buses than their population needs, so waits are long and buses crowded.
    3. Fiscal strain of free rides: States must repay State transport undertakings, the State-owned bus operators, for free rides, which can delay fleet expansion.
    4. Women’s safety: Harassment and poorly lit stops deter women from using buses at night.

    Way Forward

    1. Bus fleet expansion: Scale up electric bus deployment under the PM-eBus Sewa scheme in cities with low bus use.
    2. Integrated planning: Use NHTS data in each city’s Comprehensive Mobility Plan, its long-term transport plan, to link buses, metro and walking routes.
    3. Safety measures: Fund CCTV, panic buttons and lit bus stops through the Nirbhaya Fund.
    4. Regular surveys: MoSPI should repeat the NHTS periodically so changes in travel can be tracked.

    Conclusion

    India’s first travel survey shows that the country commutes mainly on private two-wheelers, with buses serving women far more than men. Whether States and cities use the data to expand buses and link them to rail is what will decide if public transport’s share rises.

    Key numbers

    1. Urban women taking buses to work, by State: Keralam 46.8%, Tamil Nadu 41.1%, Karnataka 34.9%, Telangana 28.9%.
    2. Rail-based share of urban work commutes, by State: Maharashtra 20.7%, West Bengal 16.5%, Delhi 14.4%.
    3. Urban premium on commuting cost: 71% above rural spending.
    4. NHTS sample: 14,274 villages and 10,377 urban blocks.

    Back2Basics: Free bus travel for women

    1. What it is: Several State governments let women ride State-run buses free, with the State paying the transport corporation.
    2. Delhi: Free travel for women on Delhi Transport Corporation and cluster buses began in 2019.
    3. Tamil Nadu and Karnataka: Tamil Nadu began free town bus travel for women in 2021. Karnataka’s Shakti scheme followed in 2023.
    4. Telangana: The Mahalakshmi scheme gives women free travel on State-run buses from December 2023.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] In what way(s) does the Vizhinjam International Seaport represent a structural shift in India’s maritime trade and logistics policy? 1. By functioning exclusively as a domestic cargo hub to reduce reliance on coastal shipping and eliminate the need for foreign collaborations. 2. By focusing primarily on passenger cruise tourism and heritage shipping to increase Kerala’s profile as a maritime heritage destination. 3. By leveraging its natural deep draft and strategic location to reduce dependence on foreign trans-shipment ports, enhance revenue retention, and reposition India in regional maritime trade. Select the answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 (c) 2 and 3 (d) 3 only ANSWER: D”

  • Coal stocks critically low as power demand rises in India

    Why in the News

    The official position is that India faces no coal shortage, only a surge in power demand, but Central Electricity Authority (CEA) data show 84 of the country’s 191 thermal power plants critically low on stock. The Union Coal and Mines Minister holds that position as power demand grows at its fastest pace in a decade. A weak monsoon has made the grid lean harder on coal.

    What does a “critically low” coal stock mean, and why does it matter?

    1. What it is: Every coal-fired plant must keep a normative stock, a buffer of coal sized to its daily burn, like a household keeping a week’s rations.
    2. When a plant turns critical: The CEA marks a plant critical when its stock falls below 25% of the normative level, or lasts less than three days.
    3. Scale of the problem: More than 44% of thermal plants were critical as of September 30.
    4. Shortage or demand: Whether the cause is short supply or high demand, the plant faces the same result: coal running out.
    5. The takeaway: Coal generates nearly four-fifths of India’s energy, so thin stocks put most power supply at risk.

    Why has power demand surged?

    1. Record growth: Power demand rose 10% in 2026, the highest year-on-year increase in a decade.
    2. Heat drives demand: The International Energy Agency (IEA) links the rise to unprecedented heat. Demand in 2025 rose and fell with each month’s peak temperature.
    3. Cooling appliances: The IEA attributes the surge to wider ownership of fans and air conditioners, which run hardest when it is hottest.
    4. Hottest August: The India Meteorological Department (IMD) recorded this August as India’s hottest since nationwide records began in 1901, with a mean of 28.01°C.
    5. All-time peak: Peak demand hit a record 270.8 GW on May 21 this year.

    How has a weak monsoon added to the pressure?

    1. Supply shortfall: Power shortages in September 2026 were the highest since August 2023, according to a Reuters report.
    2. Hydropower decline: Lower hydropower output pushed the grid to rely more on coal plants.
    3. Pacific warming: El Nino, a warming of the central and eastern Pacific, weakens monsoon winds over India. The monsoon was weaker in each of the last six strong-event years.
    4. June deficit: June 2026’s rainfall departure, meaning actual rain against the long-term average, was the worst for June since 2014, also a strong El Nino year.
    5. Relief is partial: Cooler months will ease demand, but lower pressure on stocks does not mean the supply shortage has eased.

    Challenges

    1. Coal transport bottlenecks: Plants far from mines depend on railway rakes, so stocks fall fast when movement slows. Eg. Passenger trains were cancelled to move coal in 2022.
    2. Hydropower volatility: Dams fail as a backup in drought years, exactly when cooling demand peaks.
    3. Evening peak gap: Solar output ends at sunset, leaving coal to meet the evening air-conditioning load.
    4. Costly imports: Blending imported coal raises generation costs, which strains distribution companies (discoms).

    Way Forward

    1. Pre-summer stocking: The Ministry of Power should require plants to build full normative stocks before the hot season.
    2. Rail priority: Indian Railways should guarantee coal rakes to plants nearing the critical mark.
    3. Storage build-out: Add pumped storage and battery storage so daytime solar can serve the evening peak.
    4. Efficient cooling: Tighten energy-efficiency star ratings for air conditioners to slow peak demand growth.

    Conclusion

    The dispute over whether India faces a coal shortage or a demand surge matters less than the fact that a hotter, drier climate is outrunning the grid’s buffers. Whether stocks recover before the next summer peak is the measure to watch.

    Key numbers

    1. Coal’s share of energy generated: 79% in 2024-25 (*Energy Statistics India*, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation).
    2. Hottest August, departure from normal: 0.67°C above the normal of 27.34°C (IMD, 2026).
    3. 2025 temperature range tracked by demand: maximum of 25.53°C in January to an annual peak of 35.97°C in April.

    Back2Basics: Central Electricity Authority (CEA)

    1. Legal basis: The CEA is a statutory body under the Electricity Act, 2003, attached to the Ministry of Power.
    2. Planning role: It prepares the National Electricity Plan and advises the Union government on power policy.
    3. Standards: It sets technical standards for building, running and connecting power plants and grids.
    4. Data role: It collects and publishes power-sector data, including daily coal stocks at thermal plants.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] In what way(s) does the Vizhinjam International Seaport represent a structural shift in India’s maritime trade and logistics policy? 1. By functioning exclusively as a domestic cargo hub to reduce reliance on coastal shipping and eliminate the need for foreign collaborations. 2. By focusing primarily on passenger cruise tourism and heritage shipping to increase Kerala’s profile as a maritime heritage destination. 3. By leveraging its natural deep draft and strategic location to reduce dependence on foreign trans-shipment ports, enhance revenue retention, and reposition India in regional maritime trade. Select the answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 (c) 2 and 3 (d) 3 only ANSWER: D”

  • EC releases video for EROs on SIR notice disposal; no written instructions so far

    Why in the News

    Notice cases in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which earlier needed documents or a hearing order to settle, can now be cleared by Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) without a hearing or documents. The Election Commission (EC) has added these options to its ERONET portal but is explaining them only through a demonstration video, with no written instructions.

    What has changed in disposing of SIR notices?

    1. What a notice case is: Electors flagged for “no mapping” or “logical discrepancies” (doubtful entries) in the draft roll are served notices. They must produce one of 12 documents prescribed by the EC.
    2. Who decides: The ERO has final authority over a constituency’s electoral roll. ERONET is the portal through which EROs record each decision.
    3. Three new options:
      • where the Booth Level Officer (BLO) has uploaded documents, the ERO can mark an elector “found OK” without a hearing order;
      • where no documents were collected, the ERO can mark the elector eligible after uploading a hearing order;
      • where notices are yet to be generated, the ERO can choose “without hearing” or “with hearing”.
    4. Earlier rule: A hearing order was needed only to mark an elector “found not eligible”, with the reason recorded.
    5. The takeaway: EROs can now clear cases faster, but the legal basis rests on a video rather than a written order.

    Why does the absence of written instructions matter?

    1. Video only: The EC’s Information Technology Department made an eight-minute video, recorded on October 1, and showed it to Delhi EROs at a meeting.
    2. Shifting instructions: One ERO said instructions had come “some written and some oral”, and many were withdrawn. Eg. Delhi EROs were told to identify “suspected foreigners”, then told not to.
    3. Statutory authority: The same ERO said he will wait for written orders, because the Representation of the People (RP) Act, 1950 vests decisions in him.
    4. Centralisation charge: Critics allege bringing ERONET under ECINET, the EC’s integrated digital platform, curtailed field officers’ powers. EROs had sought these options since the notice phase began.

    Where do the options apply, and how much can they change?

    1. Coverage: The options apply in the 10 States and Union Territories (UTs) where the third phase of the SIR is still under way.
    2. Too late for some: Final rolls were already published elsewhere. In West Bengal, 27 lakh of the 60 lakh electors served notices were left out of the final roll.
    3. Scale: Over nine crore notices have been served in the second and third phases.
    4. Limited use where hearings are fixed: The options matter little where every notice already carries a hearing venue and time. Eg. All of Delhi’s notices do.
    5. No reversal: EROs cannot reverse a case once an elector is marked ineligible. Over 350 Delhi electors were marked so, and the Delhi Chief Electoral Officer cautioned EROs against unverified use of the options.

    Challenges

    1. Natural justice: An ineligible marking cannot be reversed, so marking without a fresh hearing can wrongly exclude voters.
    2. Unequal treatment: Electors in States already finalised never got the faster route.
    3. Legal uncertainty: Decisions made on a video, not a written order, are open to later legal challenge.
    4. Field capacity: BLOs collecting documents door to door face heavy workloads.

    Way Forward

    1. Written order: The EC should issue a written order stating when each option may be used.
    2. Review window: Allow an ERO to review an ineligible marking on fresh documents.
    3. Finalised States: Let excluded electors apply afresh through a simple inclusion form.
    4. Public data: Publish constituency-wise counts of cases cleared under each option.

    Conclusion

    The new options speed up disposal of notices but leave EROs exercising statutory powers on unwritten guidance. Whether the EC issues a written order before the remaining final rolls are published, starting this month, will decide if these decisions hold.

    Key numbers

    1. Delhi notices: 33.1 lakh, all with hearing venue and time; notice phase runs till 30 November.
    2. Final roll dates: Delhi on 4 December; Haryana, Maharashtra and Telangana in November; Tripura in February 2027.

    Back2Basics: Electoral Registration Officer (ERO)

    1. Legal basis: Section 13B of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 provides an ERO for every Assembly constituency.
    2. Appointment: The EC designates an officer of the government or a local authority, in consultation with the State government.
    3. Role: The ERO prepares and revises the constituency’s electoral roll and decides claims and objections.
    4. Hierarchy: EROs work under the District Election Officer and the State’s Chief Electoral Officer.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Subhash Chandra’s IBC deal: ED probe focuses on big haircuts, proxy bidders

    Why in the News

    The insolvency law was meant to take failed companies away from their promoters, but investigators allege promoters are using the process itself to buy back their companies at deep discounts. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has made such frauds its first operational priority, after Zee founder Subhash Chandra settled bank claims of over ₹22,000 crore for ₹6.5 crore.

    How is the insolvency process meant to work?

    1. What it is: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 gives creditors a time-bound process to rescue or sell a defaulting company. It works like a court-supervised auction of a failed business.
    2. Who decides: In the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), a resolution professional (RP) replaces management. A Committee of Creditors (CoC) approves a resolution plan by a 66% vote.
    3. Haircut: A haircut is the share of admitted claims creditors give up under a plan. A 94% haircut returns ₹6 per ₹100 owed.
    4. The takeaway: A process designed to end promoter control can become a cheap route back to it.

    What has the ED flagged?

    1. New priority: At an internal conference in Bengaluru, ED officers named “unearthing frauds under IBC and PMLA” the agency’s first operational thrust area. PMLA is the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.
    2. Specific target: The ED will examine “collusive resolution cases involving disproportionately large haircuts through which promoters re-acquire assets”.
    3. Earlier probes: Over two years, the ED has probed about a dozen cases alleging five forms of manipulation:
      • promoter-linked entities dominating creditor committees;
      • proxy bidders used to regain companies;
      • compromised resolution professionals;
      • assets moved out before or during the CIRP;
      • bids allegedly suppressed.

    How do promoters allegedly regain control?

    1. Alchemist: A group firm allegedly held 97% of CoC votes and the RP was a former group employee. The ED alleged the aim was immunity from past offences under Section 32A.
    2. Tribunal finding: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) held the Alchemist CIRP vitiated by “fraud and collusion”. The Calcutta High Court later ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation probe.
    3. Sunstar Overseas: The company allegedly financed its own takeover through Umaiza Infracon LLP, a shell with no funds of its own, at an almost 85% haircut.
    4. Richa Industries: Saariga Constructions, allegedly set up by promoters through a former employee acting as a benamidar (front holder), bought CoC votes. Banks took a haircut of about 94%.

    How are assets allegedly stripped before or during insolvency?

    1. Amtek Auto: Fifteen group companies with claims over ₹34,000 crore were resolved at an average haircut of about 81%.
    2. Shell network: In Amtek, the ED identified about 500 shell companies allegedly holding properties bought with siphoned funds.
    3. Undervalued sales: In Angle Infrastructure, two acres were allegedly sold for ₹31 crore against a valuation of ₹160 crore. The RP denied it.
    4. Assets moved out: In Bhasin Infotech, 384 commercial units were allegedly shifted beyond the CIRP through “sham” and “backdated” agreements.

    Challenges

    1. Proxy loophole: Section 29A bars defaulting promoters from bidding, but benami fronts and shells evade it.
    2. Immunity risk: Section 32A’s protection for approved plans can shield a collusive buyer if fraud surfaces late.
    3. RP independence: Resolution professionals with links to promoters face weak checks before appointment.

    Way Forward

    1. Beneficial ownership checks: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) should require resolution applicants to disclose ultimate owners.
    2. Haircut trigger: Mandate an independent forensic audit when a haircut crosses a set threshold.
    3. RP vetting: The IBBI should screen RPs for prior links with the debtor group.
    4. Agency coordination: Set an information-sharing protocol between the ED, the IBBI and the NCLT.

    Conclusion

    Deep haircuts now draw scrutiny as possible fraud, not only as the cost of failure. Whether the IBBI tightens checks on bidder ownership and RP independence will decide if promoters can still buy back what they lost.

    Key numbers

    1. Richa Industries recovery: ₹40.29 crore against admitted claims of ₹696 crore (October 2025).
    2. Sunstar Overseas sale: ₹196 crore against admitted claims of ₹1,274.14 crore.

    Back2Basics: Section 32A of the IBC

    1. What it does: It ends a company’s liability for offences committed before the CIRP once the NCLT approves a resolution plan.
    2. Asset protection: The company’s property cannot then be attached for those earlier offences.
    3. Condition: The protection applies only where control passes to a new owner who is not a promoter, related party or abettor of the offence.
    4. Origin: Inserted in 2020, it gives genuine buyers a clean start; offenders stay personally liable.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] Consider the following statements: Statement-I: Syndicated lending spreads the risk of borrower default across multiple lenders. Statement-II: The syndicated loan can be a fixed amount/lump sum of funds, but cannot be a credit line. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect* (d) Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct ANSWER:”

  • Centre frames rules to standardise recruitment to various tribunal posts

    Why in the News

    Appointments to 16 tribunals and appellate bodies will move from separate arrangements to one uniform set of recruitment and eligibility rules, run by an independent National Tribunals Commission (NTC). The Union Law Ministry has issued the National Tribunals Commission and Qualification, Selection and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members of Tribunals Rules, 2026.

    What is the National Tribunals Commission, and why was it created?

    1. What it is: The NTC selects and oversees the people who run tribunals, specialised bodies deciding disputes outside regular courts. It works like a common recruitment board for all of them.
    2. Court trigger: The Supreme Court struck down parts of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 for violating separation of powers and judicial independence. Parliament then created the independent, expert commission it ordered through the Tribunals Reforms Bill in August.
    3. Its aim: The NTC seeks efficient appointments that are free of executive pressure (independence), open (transparency) and the same across tribunals (uniformity).
    4. Composition: Headquartered in Delhi, it has four members, half judicial and half technical, under a chairperson who is a retired Supreme Court judge or retired High Court Chief Justice.
    5. The takeaway: Choosing tribunal heads and members now rests with the independent commission the Court itself demanded.

    What do the 2026 Rules standardise?

    1. Uniform eligibility: The rules set common recruitment and eligibility standards for tribunal posts in place of separate arrangements.
    2. Service conditions: They prescribe service conditions and remuneration for commission and tribunal office-holders.
    3. Commission pay: The NTC chairperson gets ₹2.5 lakh a month and each member ₹2.25 lakh.
    4. Tribunal parity: Tribunal chairpersons and members get similar pay, with specified exceptions.

    How do the rules handle vacancies, selection and misconduct?

    1. Advance filling: Recruitment for a vacancy must begin at least six months before it arises, so tribunals do not sit empty.
    2. Selection method: Search-cum-selection committees, panels that shortlist and pick candidates, will assess candidates through expert evaluation, personal interaction and, where needed, writing exercises.
    3. Misconduct inquiry: A formal inquiry mechanism will handle complaints of misconduct against members.

    Challenges

    1. Ministry-framed rules: The executive that litigates before tribunals has written their service rules, which keeps independence concerns alive.
    2. Litigation history: Earlier tenure and age rules were repeatedly struck down. Eg. Madras Bar Association vs Union of India (2021).
    3. Parent-ministry dependence: Tribunals still rely on sponsoring ministries for budgets and staff, which weakens their autonomy.
    4. Chronic vacancies: Tribunals have long worked with unfilled posts, and a deadline alone does not guarantee timely selection.

    Way Forward

    1. Financial autonomy: Give the NTC its own budget and secretariat, as L. Chandra Kumar (1997) envisaged a single supervising agency.
    2. Public vacancy tracker: The NTC should publish vacancies and selection timelines for every tribunal.
    3. Annual report: Require the NTC to report yearly to Parliament on appointments and inquiries.
    4. Stable tenure: Fix tenures long enough to attract serving judges and experts.

    Conclusion

    The Rules are now issued, but no date is set for the commission’s first appointments. Whether the NTC fills tribunal vacancies on time without ministry interference will decide if this reform succeeds where earlier ones failed.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2009] Consider the following statements : 1. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was set up during the Prime Ministership of Lal Bahadur Shastri. 2. The Members for CAT are drawn from both judicial and administrative streams. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer: B”

  • Obstacle race

    Why in the News

    Opposition parties, student groups and citizens protested in Delhi, Mumbai and elsewhere on Gandhi Jayanti, demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. They charge that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), meant to “clean” electoral rolls, has become a serial disenfranchisement of lakhs of citizens.

    What is the SIR, and how does it shift the burden onto voters?

    1. What it is: The SIR is the Election Commission of India (ECI)‘s fresh, door-to-door re-verification of every elector. It is like making every member of a club re-apply for membership.
    2. Nationwide expansion: After a Supreme Court verdict upheld the SIR, the ECI extended the Bihar method to every State and Union Territory (UT). It added an undefined “logical discrepancies” exclusion ground, first used in West Bengal.
    3. Burden reversed: Electors must prove their eligibility, so many are deleted first and verified later. Deleted voters return only as fresh applicants in the claims phase, and only if they notice the deletion.
    4. Easy deletion: Mass deletion requests are easy to file and quick to process. Getting back on the roll is onerous.
    5. The takeaway: A process meant to purify the rolls now removes eligible voters first and leaves them to fight their way back.

    How large have the deletions become?

    1. Scale of removal: Nearly 13.4 crore electors have been removed from draft rolls, about 14% of the electorate before revision.
    2. Rising each phase: Each phase has deleted more than the last, from 8.3% in Bihar to 17% in the third phase.

    Which procedural changes are contested?

    1. Dissent inside the ECI: Members of the Commission itself objected to procedural changes that are plainly illegal.
    2. Form 6 altered: Form 6, the voter enrolment form, now asks whether the applicant, parents or grandparents were on the last SIR roll. The Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 were never amended.
    3. West Bengal requests: 16.1 lakh requests were filed to delete electors whom judicial officers had already cleared.
    4. Central database: A centralised roll database in New Delhi made such bulk requests possible.

    How were the protests handled?

    1. Delhi clampdown: The government refused permission, imposed prohibitory orders banning gatherings, shut the Internet near Jantar Mantar, closed 11 Metro stations and detained over 700 protesters.
    2. Mumbai defiance: Police denied permission for a gathering at Shivaji Park, but protesters assembled anyway.

    Is restoration enough, and who is accountable?

    1. Implicit admission: The ECI has asked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), the field staff who verify electors, to restore deleted voters. This concedes that the process disenfranchised many.
    2. Majority could act: Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi form the ECI’s majority and could have overruled the CEC.
    3. Stake for democracy: As carried out, the SIR obstructs universal adult franchise, every adult citizen’s right to vote, and electoral democracy itself.

    Challenges

    1. Hearing before deletion: Deleting first denies due process. Eg. Lal Babu Hussein (1995) barred removal without notice and hearing.
    2. Paperless electors: Migrants, the poor and women who moved after marriage struggle to produce documents tracing parents on old rolls.
    3. Opaque criteria: “Logical discrepancies” has no published definition, so electors cannot know why they were struck off.
    4. Weak collective check: A three-member Commission whose majority stays silent offers no internal correction.

    Way Forward

    1. Notice first: The ECI should issue individual notice and hold a hearing before any name leaves the roll.
    2. Rules before forms: The Union Law Ministry should amend the 1960 Rules before any form changes.
    3. Constituency data: Publish deletions by constituency and ground, so anomalies surface early.
    4. Recorded decisions: The Commission should take SIR decisions by recorded vote of all three members.

    Conclusion

    A clean roll and an inclusive roll remain at odds, and the SIR has resolved that tension against the voter. How many deleted electors the BLO restoration drive actually returns before the final rolls will show whether the correction is real.

    Key numbers

    1. Second phase deletions: 12.9% of electors across 12 States and UTs.
    2. SIR coverage so far: 30 States and UTs.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Season’s end

    Why in the News

    The India Meteorological Department (IMD) forecast a “below normal” monsoon, but the season ended “deficient” at 87% of normal, the outcome its own models had pointed to. Large regional misses and State drought declarations now question whether the IMD is too conservative in warning of shortfalls.

    How does the IMD forecast the monsoon, and what did it predict?

    1. What a seasonal forecast is: Two IMD forecasts, in April and May, estimate the season’s rain as a share of the Long Period Average (LPA), the long term mean used as “normal”. It is like a weather report for four months.
    2. Forecast categories: “Below normal” means 90% to 95% of average rain. Anything lower is “deficient”.
    3. El Niño: In an El Niño year the Central Equatorial Pacific warms, which suppresses monsoon rain. Global models agreed that one of the strongest El Niño events was coming.
    4. A cautious call: The IMD’s models pointed to “deficient” rain, yet it chose to forecast “below normal”.
    5. The takeaway: By picking the milder category, the IMD gave less warning of a shortfall its own science saw coming.

    How far did the season miss the forecast?

    1. National total: The monsoon ended at 759 mm against a normal of 869 mm.
    2. Technical victory: IMD forecasts allow an error window of 4% to 5%. The final figure sits inside it, so the IMD can claim only a technical success.
    3. June shortfall: June got 65% of its normal rain against a forecast of 92%.
    4. Northeast: The northeast, expected to be “normal”, had its driest season since 1901, falling 26% short.
    5. South and the rest: The south peninsula ran 23% short. Central and north west India finished close to predictions, helped by ocean conditions.

    Why are regional forecasts getting harder?

    1. Climate change: Warming makes rain patterns less regular and harder to forecast.
    2. Western disturbances: These extra-tropical rain bearing systems, which reach India from the west, are bringing more rain in the monsoon months, helping the north west.
    3. Southern volatility: Southern India is more vulnerable to El Niño triggered volatility in rainfall.
    4. Kharif sowing: Sowing of kharif (monsoon season) crops trailed last year’s by 16% in early July. By early September the gap had narrowed to under 2%.

    Why does a cautious forecast matter for drought response?

    1. Karnataka: The State has declared drought in over 100 taluks.
    2. Maharashtra: The State has declared drought in 265 of 358 taluks.
    3. National threshold: The national deficit of about 12% is below the Centre’s 20% threshold for “agricultural drought”, so the national figure masks local distress.
    4. Dry months ahead: The IMD expects El Niño to bring below normal rain from October to December, threatening soil moisture and reservoir recharge.
    5. Crop signals: The Cabinet raised the support price, the price the government guarantees farmers, by ₹25 a quintal for wheat and ₹413 for mustard. The larger mustard rise nudges crop diversification.

    Challenges

    1. Coarse resolution: National forecasts hide district level extremes that drive crop planning.
    2. Institutional caution: A forecaster judged on staying within its band may prefer the milder call.
    3. Shifting drivers: Pacific warming and extra-tropical systems interact differently each year, weakening models built on past patterns.
    4. Threshold mismatch: A single national drought test can miss distress concentrated in a few States.

    Way Forward

    1. Sub-regional systems: The IMD should improve its sub-regional forecast systems and issue unwelcome forecasts plainly.
    2. Show the models: The IMD should publish what its models project alongside its official category.
    3. Regional probabilities: Forecasts should state the probability of deficient rain for each region.
    4. Early contingency plans: States should use district forecasts to trigger alternative crop plans.

    Conclusion

    This monsoon showed that a forecast can be accurate for the country and still fail the regions that most needed a warning. The test now is whether the IMD’s outlook for the coming months warns districts early enough to act.

    Key numbers

    1. July rain: About 1 percentage point above the “below 94%” forecast.
    2. August rain: 84% of the LPA, in line with the “below 94%” forecast.
    3. September rain: 92.4%, a little above the forecast of “below 91%”.

    Back2Basics: Types of drought

    1. Meteorological drought: A significant rainfall deficiency over a period, usually 25% or more below normal. Eg. Marathwada (2015).
    2. Agricultural drought: Too little soil moisture for crops, cutting yields. Eg. Bundelkhand (2016).
    3. Hydrological drought: Falling river flows, reservoir storage and groundwater after prolonged rain deficits. Eg. Cauvery basin (2016).
    4. Socioeconomic drought: Water scarcity that disrupts livelihoods and food security. Eg. Vidarbha (2012 to 2013).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2017] With reference to ‘Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD)’ sometimes mentioned in the news while forecasting Indian monsoon, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. IOD phenomenon is characterized by a difference in sea surface temperature between tropical Western Indian Ocean and tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean. 2. An IOD phenomenon can influence an El Nino’s impact on the monsoon. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer: B”