💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship September Batch
September 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

The Crisis In The Middle East

U.K, Australia and Canada recognise Palestine state in seismic shift

Introduction

On September 22, 2025, Britain, Australia, and Canada formally recognised Palestine as a sovereign state, a step that Portugal and potentially France are expected to follow at the UN General Assembly. This unprecedented shift, especially by G-7 members like the U.K. and Canada, alters decades of Western foreign policy and signals mounting pressure on Israel after nearly two years of the Gaza war that began with Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack. While hailed as historic by Palestinians, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the move as an “absurd reward for terrorism.”

Why is this development historic?

  1. First G-7 recognition: U.K. and Canada became the first G-7 nations to officially recognise Palestine, breaking with the long-standing Western alignment with Israel.
  2. Sharp contrast with past policy: For decades, Western countries had deferred recognition pending a negotiated two-state solution; this marks a direct policy shift.
  3. Conflict backdrop: The recognition comes amid international outrage over prolonged violence in Gaza since 2023, highlighting the urgency for peace.
  4. Special burden: The U.K.’s Deputy PM admitted Britain carries a “special responsibility” due to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which paved the way for Israel’s creation.

Why did the U.K., Australia, and Canada take this step?

  1. Reviving peace hopes: Leaders like Keir Starmer emphasised the recognition as a way to keep the two-state solution alive.
  2. International pressure: Growing calls for humanitarian accountability in Gaza pushed these governments to act.
  3. Alignment with Europe: Portugal announced recognition the same day, and France is expected to follow, indicating a coordinated Western European push.

What has been Israel’s reaction?

  1. Harsh opposition: PM Netanyahu warned that calls for Palestinian statehood “endanger Israel’s existence.”
  2. Terrorism narrative: Israel frames recognition as a “reward for terrorism” in reference to Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack.
  3. UN strategy: Netanyahu vowed to fight this recognition diplomatically at the ongoing UN General Assembly.

What role does history play in this debate?

  1. Balfour Declaration, 1917: U.K.’s role in facilitating Israel’s creation still casts a shadow over West Asia’s conflict.
  2. Decades of stalemate: Palestinian statehood has been promised but deferred since the Oslo Accords of the 1990s.
  3. Burden of colonial legacy: Britain’s recognition is seen as part-redressal for its historical role.

How does this reshape global geopolitics?

  1. U.S.–Western divide: Recognition creates divergence between U.S. policy (still opposed) and its closest allies like the U.K. and Canada, weakening the coherence of the Western bloc.
  2. Global South solidarity: Developing nations, many of whom already recognise Palestine, view this as overdue Western alignment, strengthening South–North convergence on justice and decolonisation.
  3. UN spotlight: With the General Assembly opening, Palestine’s legitimacy is expected to dominate the global agenda, elevating the conflict as a test case for multilateralism.
  4. Regional fault lines: Arab states may gain renewed diplomatic leverage, while Israel risks isolation beyond its traditional U.S. support base, potentially altering Middle East power balances.
  5. Strategic recalibration for India and Asia: Asian powers like India and China will have to navigate between historical solidarity with Palestine and strong bilateral partnerships with Israel, testing their strategic autonomy.
  6. Narrative of international law and legitimacy: Recognition by major Western democracies strengthens the normative argument for Palestinian statehood, challenging Israel’s framing of the issue as a security-only concern.

Conclusion

The recognition of Palestine by the U.K., Australia, and Canada is more than symbolic; it could catalyse a chain reaction of Western nations acknowledging Palestinian sovereignty. While it reignites hope for a two-state solution, it also risks deepening fault lines with Israel and the U.S.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2018] India’s relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back.” Discuss

Linkage: The recognition of Palestine by U.K., Australia, and Canada highlights how global powers are recalibrating their West Asia policies, creating new pressures on countries like India. While India recognised Palestine in 1988, it has simultaneously built deep and diverse ties with Israel in defence, agriculture, and technology. This mirrors the PYQ’s core theme—India’s Israel relationship is now structurally entrenched, even as balancing Palestine’s cause remains a diplomatic necessity.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Economic Indicators and Various Reports On It- GDP, FD, EODB, WIR etc

Why low inflation is the problem

Introduction

Inflation in India has sharply declined in recent months, with CPI inflation at 2.27% (Aug 2024) and WPI inflation at just 0.52%. While households welcome subdued prices, this development has unsettled the government’s fiscal math. Nominal GDP growth, which forms the base for budget projections, has weakened. As a result, targets for revenue, deficit, and debt are under stress. This shift highlights the complex relationship between inflation, nominal GDP, and fiscal sustainability.

The Problem with Low Inflation

Why is low inflation in the news?

India is currently witnessing one of the weakest inflation trajectories in recent years, with both CPI and WPI at historic lows. This is striking because inflation had been consistently higher earlier, often troubling households and RBI alike. Now, for the first time in years, inflation is falling so low that it is below the government’s own expectations, threatening fiscal stability. While consumers benefit from cheaper goods, the government risks losing lakhs of crores in projected revenue.

Breaking Down the Fiscal Arithmetic

What is the link between inflation and government finances?

  1. GDP measure: Nominal GDP = monetary value of goods/services at current prices, before adjusting for inflation.
  2. Government’s reliance: Budget estimates are framed on nominal GDP, not real GDP.
  3. Importance: Nominal GDP forms the denominator for deficit and debt ratios, making it central to fiscal health.

How is low inflation disrupting budget math?

  1. Union Budget FY25-26 assumption: Nominal GDP growth at 10.5%, implying GDP of ₹357 lakh crore.
  2. Reality: Q1 nominal GDP growth just 8%, well below target.
  3. Revenue impact: FY26 central govt. net tax revenue projected at ₹33.1 lakh crore; lower inflation could cut receipts by ₹57,314 crore.

Why is nominal GDP growth so crucial?

  1. Fiscal deficit & debt ratio: Targets (fiscal deficit 4.4%, debt-GDP ratio 56.1%) are achievable only if nominal GDP grows as expected.
  2. Current scenario: With weak inflation, nominal GDP falls, making deficit/debt appear larger relative to GDP.
  3. Result: Fiscal stress and need for adjustments in spending or borrowing.

Is low inflation always bad?

  1. Positive side: Consumers enjoy stable prices, reduced cost of living, relief from food price spikes.
  2. Negative side: Weak inflation = lower nominal GDP = poor revenue realization for the government.
  3. RBI view: Deputy Governor (May 2024) warned that while lower prices help consumers, oversupply and weak pricing power can dampen private investment and industrial margins.

What are the long-term risks?

  1. Corporate health: Lower pricing power can affect profits, discouraging capex.
  2. Employment: Weak demand growth can limit job creation.
  3. Cycle of slowdown: Weak inflation → lower nominal GDP → fiscal squeeze → reduced spending → slower growth.

Conclusion

Low inflation, though a blessing for households, poses structural challenges for India’s fiscal health. When inflation falls below government assumptions, it erodes revenue potential and distorts deficit ratios, threatening fiscal sustainability. Policymakers thus face the paradox of balancing consumer welfare with fiscal prudence. For India, the task ahead is not merely curbing inflation but maintaining it at an optimal, stable level to sustain growth, revenue, and investment.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2019] Do you agree with the view that steady GDP growth and low inflation have left the Indian economy in good shape? Give reasons in support of your arguments.

Linkage: The question assumes that low inflation alongside steady GDP growth indicates economic strength. However, as the article shows, low inflation with weak nominal GDP growth can actually strain fiscal math, reduce revenues, and slow investment. Thus, while consumers benefit, the economy may not necessarily be in “good shape” if fiscal sustainability and growth momentum are undermined.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Agmark, Hallmark, ISI, BIS, BEE and Other Ratings

Centre to simplify Quality Control Order (QCO) framework

Why in the News?

A NITI Aayog panel has proposed easing India’s Quality Control Orders (QCOs) by simplifying certification, assessments, and inspections to support MSMEs amid domestic and global criticism.

About Quality Control Orders (QCOs):

  • Overview: Issued under the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Act, 2016, QCOs make Indian Standards compulsory for specific products in public interest (health, environment, security, fair trade).
  • Voluntary vs. Mandatory: Normally BIS certification is voluntary, but under QCOs manufacturers/importers must obtain a BIS licence or Certificate of Conformity before production, imports, or sales.
  • Standard Mark: Products under QCOs carry the ISI mark (or Hallmark for jewellery) to indicate conformity.
  • Legal Backing: Governed by BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018; violation punishable with fines or imprisonment.
  • Imports: Applies equally to foreign manufacturers via the Foreign Manufacturers Certification Scheme (FMCS).
  • Coverage: Of ~23,000 BIS standards, only 187 QCOs covering 770 products exist; 84 QCOs covering 343 products issued in the last three years.
  • Example: QCOs for compressors & ACs (2023) boosted compressor output from <2 million (2021–22) to 8 million (2023–24); ACs to 12 million+ units.

Challenges Related to QCOs:

  • High Costs: Certification involves inspections, documents, and assessments—burdening MSMEs.
  • Non-Tariff Barrier Issues: US, EU, UK, NZ claim India’s QCOs exceed global norms. USTR (2025) flagged BIS marks even for chemicals, requiring site visits.
  • Industry Pushback: MSMEs fear inflationary costs; imports of cheaper raw materials/components restricted.
  • Limited Enforcement: Only 187 of 23,000 standards notified, mainly steel, electronics, chemicals.
  • Implementation Delays: Licence approvals slow; procedures disrupt production and supply chains.
  • Conflicting Views: Some MSMEs benefit (e.g., Birla Aircon turnover jumped ₹7 crore to ₹42 crore after QCO on water coolers), others call it “malign intervention” (NITI Aayog VC Suman Berry).

Steps Taken by Government:

  • Digitisation: Simplified certification covering 750+ products; licences granted in 30 days.
  • MSME Outreach:
    • Jan Sunwai: Online open-house thrice weekly.
    • Manak Manthan: BIS field initiative for MSME support.
    • Regional Conferences: Led by Department of Consumer Affairs to resolve issues.
  • Capacity Building: Of 50,753 BIS certifications, ~40,000 (≈80%) issued to MSMEs; 24,625 voluntarily obtained for credibility/exports.
  • Trade Readiness: Govt projects QCOs as tools to raise quality and global competitiveness.
  • WTO Consistency: Justified if linked to health, safety, environment, deceptive trade, or security, in line with WTO Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement.
[UPSC 2017] With reference to `Quality Council of India (QCI)’, consider the following statements:

1. QCI was set up jointly by the Government of India and the Indian Industry.

2. Chairman of QCI is appointed by the Prime Minister on the recommendations of the industry to the Government.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2* (d) Neither 1 nor 2

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

International Space Agencies – Missions and Discoveries

Extreme Nuclear Transients (ENTs) and the Big Bang

Extreme Nuclear Transient

Why in the News?

New research by the University of Hawaii has discovered Extreme Nuclear Transients (ENTs), the most powerful explosions since the Big Bang, surpassing even gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in energy output.

Back2Basics: Big Bang

  • Proponent: In 1927 by Georges Lemaître.
  • Timeline: Universe originated ~13.7–13.8 billion years ago from a singularity.
  • Phases: Began with cosmic inflation, followed by expansion, cooling, and formation of matter, light, and four fundamental forces.
  • Cosmic Evolution: Led to atoms, stars, galaxies, and planets; universe still expanding.
  • Evidence: Supported by cosmic microwave background radiation and Hubble’s observations of galaxy redshifts.

About Extreme Nuclear Transients (ENTs):

  • Discovery: First reported by astronomers at the University of Hawaii’s Institute for Astronomy (IfA).
  • Cause: Triggered when massive stars (≥3 times Sun’s mass) are torn apart by supermassive black holes at galactic centers.
  • Energy Output: Release ten times more energy than gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), earlier considered the brightest cosmic events.
  • Duration: Remain luminous in radio wavelengths for years, unlike short-lived bursts.

How ENTs differ from other cosmic events?

  • Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs): They come from collapsing stars or mergers; short-lived but highly energetic. ENTs are more powerful and last longer.
  • Tidal Disruption Events (TDEs): TDEs also shred stars, but ENTs involve larger black holes and massive stars, making them rarer.
  • Fast X-ray Transients (FXTs): They are faint, brief X-ray bursts from trapped jets in supernovae. ENTs are brighter, multi-wavelength, and more energetic.

Scientific Importance of ENTs:

  • Most Energetic Events: Represent the most powerful class of transients ever observed.
  • Black Hole Studies: Offer insights into supermassive black hole dynamics and their role in galactic evolution.
  • Early Universe Clues: Help probe massive stars soon after galaxy formation.
  • Future Observations: Key targets for next-generation telescopes like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.
[UPSC 2012] Which of the following is/are cited by the scientists as evidence for the continued expansion of the universe?

1. Detection of microwaves in space

2. Observation of redshift phenomenon in space

3. Movement of asteroids in space

4. Occurrence of supernova explosions in space

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1 and 2 * (b) 2 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 (d) None of the above.

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Innovations in Sciences, IT, Computers, Robotics and Nanotechnology

How different are Supercomputers to normal computers?

Why in the News?

This newscard is an excerpt from the original article published in The Hindu.

What is a Supercomputer?

  • Overview: A high-performance computing system capable of trillions to quintillions of calculations per second.
  • Parallel Computing: Uses thousands of processors working together instead of relying on a single fast processor.
  • Applications: Climate modelling, nuclear simulations, black hole research, drug discovery, and artificial intelligence training.
  • Performance Measure: FLOPs (floating-point operations per second); advanced machines now achieve exaflop levels (10¹⁸ calculations/sec).

How Supercomputers Differ from Normal Computers

  • Speed: Laptops perform billions of FLOPs; supercomputers perform quintillions.
  • Parallelism: PCs use one or few processors; supercomputers employ thousands to millions of cores.
  • Structure: Built of interconnected nodes (processor + memory bundles) linked by ultra-fast networks.
  • Storage: Manage petabytes of data, unlike gigabytes/terabytes in personal devices.
  • Cooling & Power: Need specialised cooling (water/immersion) and consume electricity equal to a small town.
  • Usage: PCs run interactive apps; supercomputers run scheduled jobs remotely for scientists and researchers.

India’s journey in Supercomputing:

  • Early Efforts: Began with C-DAC’s PARAM 8000 (1991) after Western import restrictions.
  • National Supercomputing Mission (2015): Jointly by DST & Ministry of Electronics and IT; implemented by C-DAC and IISc to build 70+ systems.
  • Major Systems (2025):
    • AIRAWAT-PSAI (C-DAC, Pune) – fastest in India (8.5 PF, global rank 136).
    • PARAM Siddhi-AI – global AI leader.
    • Pratyush (IITM, Pune) – weather & climate (3.76 PF).
    • Mihir (NCMRWF, Noida) – medium-range weather (2.57 PF).
    • PARAM Pravega (IISc, Bengaluru) – academic use (>3.3 PF).
  • Indigenous Push: PARAM Rudra (2024) with Indian servers and software stack.
  • Applications: Monsoon forecasting, Himalayan research, defence simulations, AI, drug design, materials science.
  • Current Capacity: 34+ supercomputers with ~35 petaflops; plans for exascale systems underway.
[UPSC 2014] Param Padma, which was in the news recently, is:

(a) a new Civilian Award instituted by the Government of India

(b) the name of a supercomputer developed by India *

(c) the name given to a proposed network of canals linking northern and southern rivers of India

(d) a software programme to facilitate e-governance in Madhya Pradesh

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Biofuel Policy

Is it feasible to blend Isobutanol and Diesel? 

Why in the News?

The Union Transport Minister has announced that the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is studying the feasibility of blending Isobutanol with Diesel after ethanol–diesel blending attempts failed.

About Isobutanol:

  • What is it: A four-carbon alcohol (C₄H₁₀O), clear, flammable, and traditionally used as a solvent in paints, coatings, and chemical industries.
  • Production: Derived either from petrochemical processes or by fermenting sugarcane, molasses, and grains with engineered microbes.
  • Fuel Properties:
    • Higher energy density than ethanol, closer to diesel.
    • Lower hygroscopicity (absorbs less water), reducing rust and corrosion in engines and pipelines.
    • Higher flash point than ethanol, making it safer for storage and transport.

Isobutanol–Diesel Blending and Benefits:

  • Compatibility: Unlike ethanol, isobutanol blends well with diesel without extra chemicals.
  • Economic Feasibility: Can be produced in existing ethanol plants with minor changes.
  • Agricultural Support: Creates demand for sugarcane by-products, helping farmers and managing sugar surplus.
  • Energy Security: Reduces reliance on imported fossil fuels and saves foreign exchange.
  • Global First: Pilot studies may make India the first country to use isobutanol–diesel blends.

Challenges and Risks:

  • Combustion Issues: Has a lower cetane number than diesel, causing poor combustion quality.
  • Engine Risks: Can trigger diesel knock (uneven burning, power loss, engine damage).
  • Mixing Limitations: Blending challenges exist but can be partly solved with biodiesel addition.
  • Cost Factor: Requires additives to restore cetane number, increasing costs.
  • Blending Limit: Experts suggest ≤10% blending to avoid harm.
  • Pilot Phase: Testing will take ~18 months before possible large-scale adoption.
[UPSC 2020] With reference to green hydrogen, consider the following statements:

1. It can be used directly as a fuel for internal combustion.

2. It can be blended with natural gas and used as fuel for heat or power generation.

3. It can be used in the hydrogen fuel cell to run vehicles.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three* (d) None

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Air Pollution

‘Smog-eating’ photocatalytic coatings on roads to curb pollution

Why in the News?

Delhi government has announced a feasibility study to test photocatalytic coatings on roads, pavements, and public spaces to bring visible improvements in air quality.

About Smog:

  • Overview: Combination of smoke and fog, forming smoky fog with soot, gases, and moisture.
  • Components: Includes soot particulates, sulphur dioxide (SO), nitrogen dioxide (NO), hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O).
  • Types:

    1. Sulfurous Smog (London Smog) – Caused by burning coal and sulphur-bearing fuels; worsened by dampness and particulates.
    2. Photochemical Smog (Los Angeles Smog) – Produced when NOₓ and hydrocarbons react under sunlight, forming ozone; appears as a brownish haze with respiratory effects.
  • Pollutants:

    1. Primary pollutants: Directly emitted (NO₂, SO₂, hydrocarbons).
    2. Secondary pollutants:  Formed via reactions (ozone, acid rain).
  • Haze vs. Smog: Haze = dry particles reducing visibility; Smog = pollutants with condensation.
  • Effects: Respiratory distress, eye irritation, plant damage, reduced visibility, carcinogenic risk, worsened by inversion layers and low rainfall.

What are “Smog-Eating” Coatings?

  • Technology: Photocatalytic coatings using titanium dioxide (TiO) on roads, pavements, and public surfaces.
  • Function: Under sunlight, TiO₂ breaks down pollutants like NO and hydrocarbons into less harmful compounds.
  • Advantages: Low-cost, stable, compatible with traditional materials, effective in depollution and creating self-cleaning surfaces.

Delhi Government Plan

  • Plan: If viable, Cabinet proposal for citywide rollout at busy corridors, markets, and public spaces.
  • Evaluation: Study to assess cost-effectiveness, safety, and sustainability while shortlisting suppliers.
  • Strategic Context: Part of a 24×7, year-round environmental action plan using technology-driven interventions.
[UPSC 2013] Photochemical smog is a resultant of the reaction among-

(a) NO₂, O₃ and peroxyacetyl nitrate in the prescence of sunlight *

(b) CO₂, O₂, and peroxyacetyl nitrate in the presence of sunlight

(c) CO, CO₂, and NO₂ at low temperature

(d) high concentration of NO₂, O₃ and CO in the evening

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Terrorism and Challenges Related To It

[20th September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The Saudi-Pakistan pact is a dodgy insurance policy

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2018] In what ways would the ongoing US–Iran Nuclear Pact controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to this situation?

Linkage: The Saudi–Pakistan SMDA, like the earlier US–Iran Nuclear Pact controversy, reshapes West Asian alignments and directly impacts India’s energy security, diaspora safety, and regional stability. Just as India had to balance between Iran, the U.S., and Gulf partners in 2018, it must now carefully hedge between Riyadh and Islamabad while safeguarding its own strategic interests.

Mentor’s Comment

The Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) signed between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in September 2025 has been described as a pact of optics rather than substance. Its timing, context, and asymmetrical calculations raise questions on whether it strengthens West Asian security or merely signals short-term adjustments. For UPSC aspirants, this episode provides insights into the shifting geopolitics of South West Asia, Pakistan’s strategic opportunism, Saudi Arabia’s security dilemmas, and India’s balancing role.

Introduction

On 17 September 2025, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Pakistani Premier Shahbaz Sharif signed the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) in Riyadh, with Field Marshal Asim Munir in attendance. While presented as a landmark pact, its real significance lies in the optics of security reassurance amid the shifting sands of Middle Eastern politics. Both nations have a chequered past of military cooperation, rooted in shared faith but divided by divergent threat perceptions. The agreement’s asymmetrical benefits, U.S. undertones, and implications for India make it geopolitically consequential.

Why is the SMDA in the news and why is it significant?

  1. First major pact in decades: The last high-point of Saudi–Pakistan defence ties was in the 1979–89 period, when 20,000 Pakistani troops protected Saudi Arabia and the Holy Harams.
  2. Optical reassurance: The SMDA is viewed more as a symbolic gesture than a substantive alliance, designed to show unity amidst rising threats from Iran, Yemen, and Israel.
  3. Geopolitical urgency: Triggered by the September 9 Israeli air strike in Doha (Qatar), the pact signals waning U.S. credibility as a security guarantor for the Gulf.
  4. Big deal: Pakistan is now a declared nuclear state, raising speculation of nuclear cooperation with Riyadh, though practical transfer remains improbable.

What has been the history of Saudi-Pakistan defence cooperation?

  1. Golden phase (1979–89): 20,000 Pakistani soldiers stationed in Saudi Arabia to protect the monarchy and act against Iran and Yemen.
  2. Saudi view: Treated Pakistani forces as paid Praetorian Guards, limiting their autonomy.
  3. Pakistani view: Resented lack of command; exclusion of Shia troops created tensions.
  4. 1990 onwards: Pakistan refused Saudi requests during major crises (Iraq’s Kuwait invasion, Yemeni war), limiting its role to protecting the Holy Harams.

How has the United States influenced the SMDA?

  1. Pentagon as the guarantor: U.S. historically underpinned Saudi–Pak defence ties “over-the-horizon.”
  2. Trump’s role: In June 2025, Field Marshal Munir’s “private lunch” with Trump in Washington signalled Washington’s blessing.
  3. Israeli factor: Saudi Arabia wanted a U.S. defence pact and nuclear technology in exchange for recognising Israel. The Hamas attack on Israel in Oct 2023 derailed the plan, leaving the SMDA as a consolation prize.
  4. Credibility gap: The U.S. failure to defend Qatar against Israeli strikes exposed fragility in Gulf security guarantees.

What are Riyadh’s calculations from the SMDA?

  1. Avoid Arab troops: Past experience with Arab/Turkish troops created risks of “political pollination.
  2. Massive arms imports: Saudi Arabia has ordered $100 billion worth of U.S. weapons in 2025.
  3. Nuclear hedge: Pakistan’s nuclear capability could deter Iran if it goes nuclear.
  4. Chinese factor: Pakistan’s ties with China may complicate Riyadh’s trust.
  5. Realistic expectation: Riyadh foresees smaller Pakistani footprints than before, given past frictions.

What are Islamabad’s calculations from the SMDA?

  1. Asymmetrical gains: No intention to fight Saudi wars against Iran, Yemen, or Israel.
  2. Strategic opportunism: Exploit Saudi insecurity to gain funds, oil, defence hardware, and training.
  3. Personal aggrandisement:Pakistan’s military elite aim to monetise “IOUs” from Riyadh and Washington.
  4. Regional calculus: Hopes trilateral axis will offset its strategic disadvantage against India.

What does the SMDA mean for India?

  1. Energy linkages: India is the third-largest oil importer and among Saudi’s top trade partners.
  2. Diaspora factor: Largest expatriate community in Saudi Arabia, valued for skills and neutrality.
  3. Diplomatic capital: Post-2014 outreach has created defence and intelligence-sharing frameworks.
  4. Saudi balancing act: Riyadh assured Reuters that ties with India remain “robust,” acknowledging India’s nuclear status and geoeconomic heft.
  5. Implication: India must remain vigilant, building greater Arabian Sea synergies to counterbalance tactical moves by Pakistan.

Conclusion

The Saudi–Pakistan pact is less a robust security alliance and more a political insurance policy, crafted in haste amid shifting regional dynamics. While it temporarily reassures Riyadh and monetarily benefits Islamabad, its sustainability remains doubtful due to divergent threat perceptions, nuclear sensitivities, and overlapping U.S.–China rivalries. For India, the SMDA underscores the need to strengthen its energy diplomacy, diaspora leverage, and strategic partnerships with Riyadh, while maintaining watchfulness over Pakistan’s manoeuvres.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Health Sector – UHC, National Health Policy, Family Planning, Health Insurance, etc.

A climate-health vision with lessons from India

Introduction

At the Global Conference on Climate and Health (July 2025, Brazil), 90 countries shaped the Belém Health Action Plan, which will guide the climate-health agenda at COP30 (Nov 2025). Ironically, India, despite having some of the most instructive welfare experiences linking climate and health, was not officially represented, a missed opportunity to emerge as a global exemplar.

India’s non-health interventions like the Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN), Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA), and Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) offer rich lessons for operationalising an integrated climate-health framework. They reveal that intentional, intersectoral action can yield multiple dividends: improved nutrition, reduced pollution, restored ecosystems, and healthier communities.

Why is this news significant?

India’s absence at Belém stands out because for the first time a global platform is drafting a climate-health action plan. While India has often been viewed through the prism of its energy transition challenges, this moment presented a chance to highlight its homegrown welfare successes with global resonance. The paradox is striking: even without designing policies as “climate policies,” India has reaped climate-health co-benefits, unlike many countries still struggling to integrate the two. Yet, persistent failures like high LPG refill costs in PMUY and siloed governance highlight the scale of unfinished work.

What is the Belém Health Action Plan (BHAP)?

  • The BHAP is a strategic framework being finalized ahead of COP30 (Nov 2025, Belém, Brazil) intended to integrate health into climate change adaptation.
  • It emphasizes health equity, climate justice, and social participation alongside strengthening health systems to be resilient in face of climate change.

Key Features / Action Lines

Some of its priority action lines include:

  • Surveillance & Monitoring:
    • Linking climate/environmental data with health surveillance, early warning systems (for heatwaves, epidemics, etc.).
    • Real-time data, local / community-level monitoring.
  • Evidence-Based Policy Strategy & Capacity Building:
    • Training health workforce, integrating mental health & psychosocial support measures.
    • Gender-responsive, inclusive policies, recognizing most vulnerable groups (women, Indigenous people, persons with disabilities).
  • Innovation & Production:
    • Resilient infrastructure and services (e.g. climate-adapted health facilities), sustainable supply chains.
    • Focus on blended financing and mobilizing investments to make health systems adaptive and equitable.
  • Cross-cutting priorities:
    • Health equity & climate justice: ensuring that adaptation efforts do not further marginalize vulnerable groups.
    • Leadership & governance: accountability, social participation from civil society, clear institutional roles.

What lessons do India’s welfare programmes offer for climate-health synergy?

  1. PM POSHAN: Covers 11 crore children in 11 lakh schools, linking nutrition, agriculture, and education. Promotion of millets strengthens climate-resilient food systems.
  2. Swachh Bharat Abhiyan: Improved sanitation, public health, and environmental sustainability, while embedding dignity and cultural symbolism via Gandhi’s vision.
  3. MNREGA: Enhanced livelihood security while simultaneously restoring degraded ecosystems through water conservation and afforestation.
  4. PM Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY): Transition to clean cooking fuel cut household air pollution — a leading cause of respiratory illness — while reducing carbon emissions.

How has leadership and community engagement shaped outcomes?

  1. Political leadership: Direct involvement of the Prime Minister gave Swachh Bharat and PMUY inter-ministerial traction and public legitimacy.
  2. Community engagement: PM POSHAN leveraged parent-teacher committees, Swachh Bharat invoked cultural pride in cleanliness, ensuring local ownership.
  3. Cultural anchoring: Climate action framed as health protection resonates more deeply than carbon metrics.

What structural challenges persist in implementation?

  1. Administrative silos: Divergent sectoral mandates limit integrated outcomes.
  2. High refill costs in PMUY: Oil marketing interests often outweigh beneficiary affordability.
  3. Social barriers: Gender norms and cultural practices limit uptake of clean fuel and sanitation.
  4. Output vs. outcome gap: Programmes measure immediate coverage but not long-term health-climate impact.

What framework does India’s experience suggest for climate-health governance?

  1. Strategic prioritisation: Frame climate action as immediate health security, not distant environmental risk.
  2. Procedural integration: Embed health impact assessments into energy, transport, and urban policies.
  3. Participatory implementation: Leverage ASHA workers, SHGs, Panchayats as health-climate advocates.

Why is this vision critical for the future?

  1. High stakes: Delinking climate and health crises leads to fragmented solutions with escalating costs.
  2. Transformative potential: An intersectoral, whole-of-society approach could position India as a global leader in climate-health governance.
  3. Clear choice: Continue piecemeal efforts or pioneer a bold model aligning welfare with planetary health.

Conclusion

India’s welfare architecture has shown that policies designed for social welfare can unintentionally become climate-health interventions. The challenge now is to make this synergy intentional and institutionalised, with robust political framing, procedural integration, and community mobilisation. At a time when the world is drafting a global climate-health action plan, India’s absence from the table is a wake-up call: to convert scattered lessons into a coherent model of governance that others can emulate.

Value Addition

Key Concepts

  1. Climate-Health Nexus: Environmental policies often have unintended health impacts; health policies also influence climate outcomes.
  2. Co-Benefits Approach: One intervention (e.g., PMUY for clean cooking fuel) yields multiple dividends (better health, women’s empowerment, reduced emissions).
  3. Whole-of-Society Approach: Intersectoral coordination between ministries, communities, and local bodies ensures impact.
  4. Output vs Outcome Gap: Many Indian schemes achieve outputs (LPG connections, toilets built) but outcomes (sustained use, cleaner air, health equity) remain weak.

Important Data / Reports

  1. WHO Report (2021): Air pollution causes 7 million premature deaths annually worldwide.
  2. Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change (2022): South Asia faces one of the highest global burdens of climate-related health risks.
  3. India’s National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2021): Despite welfare schemes, 35.5% of children under 5 are stunted and 32.1% are underweight, showing links between nutrition, climate resilience, and health.
  4. UNDP (2023): Every $1 invested in resilience and adaptation yields $4 in avoided losses.
  5. Global Conference on Climate & Health (Belém Plan, 2025): First global blueprint on climate-health integration.

PYQ Linkage:

[UPSC 2017] ‘Climate Change’ is a global problem. How India will be affected by climate change? How Himalayan and coastal states of India will be affected by climate change?

Linkage: India’s welfare schemes like PM POSHAN, PMUY, Swachh Bharat and MNREGA demonstrate that non-health interventions can mitigate climate impacts while improving public health. The Himalayan and coastal states, most vulnerable to warming, floods, and sea-level rise, can benefit from such intersectoral, resilience-building models. Thus, India’s climate-health vision provides practical pathways to address both regional vulnerabilities and national climate commitments.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-Nepal

Turmoil, tragedy, and tenacity in Nepal

Introduction

In early September 2025, Nepal was rocked by its most intense youth uprising since the end of monarchy in 2008. Peaceful demonstrations against corruption and inequality, largely organised online, escalated into violent clashes, leaving 73 dead and vital government institutions in flames. The resignation of Oli and the appointment of Sushila Karki as interim Prime Minister has opened a critical transition. The protests underscore the growing role of Gen Z digital activism in reshaping political landscapes.

Timeline of the protests

  1. 4 Sept 2025: Government orders registration/ban of 26 social media platforms (trigger).
  2. Early Sept (pre-8): Weeks of online organising; #NepoBabies and related trends circulate.
  3. 8 Sept 2025 (Day 1): Large peaceful gatherings at Maitighar Mandala; clashes erupt; official reports of first deaths (≈19 reported that night).
  4. 9 Sept 2025 (Day 2): Violence spreads; Parliament, Supreme Court, Singha Durbar attacked and some set on fire; casualty and injury figures climb.
  5. 10–12 Sept 2025: Army deployed to secure cities; Home Minister and Oli resign; negotiations with youth representatives begin.
  6. 12–14 Sept 2025: Sushila Karki sworn in as interim prime minister; Parliament dissolved; elections scheduled for March (caretaker mandate announced).

How did legal restraints on digital space ignite a national revolt?

  1. Trigger — Social Media Ban: On 4 September 2025, the government ordered the blocking/registration of 26 social media platforms, including X, Facebook, and Instagram.
  2. Impact: This cut off Gen-Z’s primary space for organisation, expression, and economic activity, seen as a direct assault on civic freedom.
  3. Outcome: Scattered anger was transformed into coordinated protests.
  4. Example: Youth groups used Discord and TikTok to plan assemblies at Maitighar Mandala and coordinate marches towards Parliament.

What were the structural grievances behind the uprising?

  1. Corruption & Elitism: Perceptions of elite capture, misuse of resources, and impunity fuelled resentment.
  2. Symbol of Rage: The #NepoKids / #NepoBabies campaign exposed politicians’ children flaunting luxury while ordinary youth faced precarity.
  3. Example: Viral clips contrasting lavish lifestyles with student unemployment intensified outrage.
  4. Data: Transparency International (2025): Nepal ranked 107/180 on the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI score: 34).

Why did peaceful protests become deadly and destructive?

  1. Escalation: Initially peaceful gatherings on 8 September were dispersed using tear gas and reportedly live ammunition.
  2. Violence: Retaliatory riots followed; demonstrators targeted symbols of state power.
  3. Example: On 9 September, Parliament, Supreme Court, and Singha Durbar were set ablaze; crucial judicial records were damaged.
  4. Data: 72–73 deaths reported, with hundreds injured, mostly between ages 19–24.

What immediate political fallout followed the unrest?

  1. Leadership Change: Home Minister resigned on 8 Sept; PM K.P. Sharma Oli stepped down on 9 Sept.
  2. Caretaker Transition: The Army mediated negotiations; Parliament was dissolved.
  3. Interim PM: Sushila Karki, former Chief Justice, sworn in on 12 Sept 2025, mandated to hold elections within six months.
    • Karki visited hospitals, assured investigations, and pledged accountability and timely polls.

How did digital tools shape both mobilisation and misinformation?

  1. Mobilisation: Platforms like Discord, TikTok, and hashtags enabled rapid outreach, meme-culture, and youth identity in protests.
  2. Creativity: Anime/manga flags and viral videos energised Gen-Z demonstrations.
  3. Misinformation: False reports and AI-generated images (e.g., Pashupati Temple “burning”) created panic and confusion.
  4. Example: Fake claims about a senior politician’s family being killed circulated widely before being disproved.

What are the main challenges facing Nepal’s interim rulers?

  1. Legitimacy Concerns: Traditional political parties, deposed MPs, and royalist factions question the constitutional mandate of the interim set-up.
  2. Balancing Act: The government must address youth expectations of anti-corruption and inclusivity while ensuring political buy-in from entrenched elites.
  3. Stability: Conducting free and fair elections by March 2026 without undermining the democratic spirit of Gen-Z protests remains the foremost task.
  4. Example: Political parties and royalists have already raised doubts over Karki’s legitimacy despite broad youth support.

Implications for Nepal (domestic)

  • Political Legitimacy and Party Renewal
    • The protests revealed a deep erosion of trust in established parties.
    • Unless political parties reform and integrate youth aspirations into institutional politics, cycles of protest could continue.
    • Revamping youth wings and embracing inclusivity may be crucial for long-term stability.
    • (Echoes analysts’ calls for parties to redefine themselves in light of 1990 and 2006 lessons.)
  • Rule of Law and Accountability
    • Strong demands exist for independent investigations into the use of excessive force and arson during protests.
    • The credibility of Nepal’s democracy depends on whether security forces and political elites are held accountable.
    • Sushila Karki’s pledge to investigate abuses and compensate victims sets both a legal and moral benchmark.
  • Economic and Social Policy Pressure
    • With youth unemployment at 20%, migration pressures, and widening inequality, socio-economic grievances remain central.
    • The interim government faces urgent pressure to deliver short-term relief (jobs, anti-corruption crackdowns) while laying the groundwork for structural reforms in education, employment, and inclusivity.
    • Failure to deliver may reignite unrest and deepen distrust in democratic institutions.

Implications for South Asia (regional)

  • Contagion Risk and Inspiration:
    • The Nepali uprising reflects a wider Gen-Z dissent pattern in Asia.
    • Similar youth-led movements in Sri Lanka (2022), Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines have challenged entrenched elites.
    • Nepal’s protests may inspire emulation across borders, intensifying regional instability.
  • Cross-Border Diplomacy & Stability:
    • Political turbulence in Kathmandu could strain bilateral relations with neighbours.
    • Instability may disrupt migration flows, remittances, and border trade.
    • Governments in South Asia may reassess youth policy, unemployment measures, and digital freedoms to preempt unrest.
  • Policy Lessons on Digital Platforms:
    • Nepal’s ban highlights the risks of hard regulation of social media.
    • Neighbouring states will closely observe whether bans quell dissent or provoke backlash.
    • The episode may shape future regional digital governance frameworks balancing free expression with misinformation control.

Conclusion

Nepal’s Gen Z uprising is both tragic and transformative. It highlights the power of digital natives to hold governments accountable, but also the dangers of violence and misinformation. The coming months will test whether Nepal can channel this energy into transparent, inclusive governance or relapse into instability.

PYQ Linkage:

[UPSC 2012] Discuss the contentious issues that have caused the prolonged

constitutional logjam in Nepal.

Linkage: The 2025 Gen Z protests in Nepal show that unresolved constitutional questions of inclusiveness, accountability, and representation remain central even after the 2015 Constitution. The uprising exposed youth anger at elite capture and exclusion of caste, ethnic, and gender groups — echoing the very fault lines that prolonged Nepal’s constitutional logjam post-2008 monarchy abolition. Thus, the recent turmoil is a continuation of the older struggle for a truly inclusive and accountable Nepali state.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Supreme Court cites Preamble to reject a plea

Why in the News?

The Supreme Court rejected a plea against a religious leader inaugurating Mysuru Dasara, reminding that the Preamble upholds secularism, liberty, equality, and fraternity as core ideals of unity.

Backgrounder:

  • The Karnataka government invited Banu Mushtaq, 2025 International Booker Prize winner, to inaugurate Mysuru Dasara Festival and perform the pooja.
  • A 2023 video resurfaced where she questioned the worship of Goddess Bhuvaneshwari, sparking controversy.
  • BJP and others opposed the invite, for her selective criticism of Hindu rituals and demanded withdrawal of the invite sent to her.

Supreme Court’s Observations:

  • Secular Character: The Court reminded that the Preamble enshrines secularism, liberty, equality, and fraternity as unifying ideals.
  • State’s Neutrality: Dasara inauguration was a State event, not a private ritual. The State “maintains no religion of its own” (echoing M. Ismail Faruqui, 1994).
  • Key Precedents Recalled:
    • Kesavananda Bharati (1973) & S.R. Bommai (1994): Secularism = basic feature of the Constitution.
    • R.C. Poudyal (1994): Even before “secular” was inserted (42nd Amendment, 1976), the Constitution upheld equal treatment of all faiths.
    • Dr. Balram Singh v. UOI (2024): State can intervene to curb religious practices impeding equality & development.

Preamble

About the Preamble:

  • Nature: Introductory statement; reflects philosophy, vision, and objectives.
  • Origin: Based on Objectives Resolution (Nehru, 1946); adopted 1947.
  • Declarations: India as Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic ensuring Justice, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.
  • Symbolism:

    1. Source of Authority: “We, the People of India.”
    2. Nature of State: Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic.

Amendment of the Preamble:

  • Permissible: Supreme Court (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973) has held that Preamble is part of Constitution and can be amended without violating Basic Structure.
  • Only Amendment: 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 (during Emergency).
    • Added “Socialist” and “Secular” between Sovereign and Democratic.
    • Added “Integrity” to Unity of the Nation.

Key Judicial Pronouncements:

  • Berubari Union Case (1960): Preamble not a part of the Constitution; only a tool for interpretation.
  • Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): Overruled Berubari; Preamble is part of the Constitution, embodies basic structure but cannot override provisions.
  • S.R. Bommai Case (1994): Secularism upheld as basic feature of the Constitution.
  • LIC of India Case (1995): Reaffirmed Preamble as integral, but non-justiciable (not enforceable in court).
[UPSC 2020] The Preamble to the Constitution of India is:

Options: (a) a part of the Constitution but has no legal effect

(b) not a part of the Constitution and has no legal effect either

(c) part of the Constitution and has the same legal effect as any other part

(d) a part of the Constitution but has no legal effect independently of other parts*

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Electoral Reforms In India

Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPP)

Why in the News?

The Election Commission de-listed 474 Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPP) for not contesting polls in six years, as part of its electoral clean-up drive.

Delisting of Political Parties:

  • ECI’s Powers: Governed by Section 29A, RP Act, 1951.
    • No explicit power with ECI to de-register a party once registered, except for fraud or anti-Constitutional allegiance.
  • Judicial Interpretation:
    • INC vs Institute of Social Welfare (2002): SC ruled that ECI cannot de-register parties, only delist or declare inactive, which removes privileges but NOT their legal entity.

About Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs):

  • Constitutional Right: Right to form political associations is guaranteed under Article 19(1)(c).
  • Registration: RUPPs are political associations registered with the Election Commission of India (ECI) under Section 29A, Representation of the People Act, 1951.
  • Not recognised: As either State or National parties because they have not secured the required vote share or seats in past elections.
  • Privileges & Benefits:
    • Tax exemption under Section 13A, Income Tax Act, 1961.
    • Eligibility for common poll symbols during elections (under Symbols Order, 1968).
    • Can nominate up to 20 star campaigners.
  • Obligations:
    • Must contest elections periodically.
    • File annual audit accounts and contribution reports.
    • Disclose donations above ₹20,000.
    • Ensure no donations above ₹2,000 are taken in cash.
  • Issues: Many RUPPs exploit privileges without contesting elections, crowding out genuine contesting parties and confusing voters.

What are Recognised Political Parties?

  • Types: Recognised parties are classified as National Parties or State Parties.
  • Privileges:
    • Exclusive reserved symbols.
    • Free copies of electoral rolls.
    • Broadcasting time on Doordarshan/All India Radio.
    • Consultation rights with ECI in election matters.
  • Recognition depends on vote share or seats won in Lok Sabha/Assembly elections.

Conditions for Recognition:

National Party State Party
Secures 6% of valid votes in Lok Sabha/Assembly elections in any 4 or more states + wins 4 Lok Sabha seats. Secures 6% of valid votes in the state Assembly election + wins 2 Assembly seats.
Wins 2% of Lok Sabha seats (currently 11 seats) from at least 3 states. Secures 6% of valid votes in the state’s Lok Sabha election + wins 1 Lok Sabha seat.
Recognised as a State Party in 4 or more states. Wins 3% of Assembly seats or 3 seats (whichever is higher) in the state Assembly.
Wins 1 Lok Sabha seat for every 25 seats allotted to that state.
Secures 8% of total valid votes in the state’s Assembly or Lok Sabha election (added in 2011).

 

[UPSC 2001] Consider the following statements regarding the political parties in India:

1. The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides for the registration of political parties.

2. Registration of political parties is carried out by the Election Commission.

3. A national level political party is one which is recognised in four or more States.

4. During the 1999 general elections, there were six National and 48 State level parties recognised by the Election Commission.

Options: (a) I, II and IV (b) I and III (c) II and IV (d) I, II, III and IV*

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

ISRO Missions and Discoveries

Gaganyaan Analog Experiments (Gyanex)

Why in the News?

Gyanex (Gaganyaan Analog Experiments) ground-based astronaut simulations are being conducted by ISRO with ICMR and Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Bengaluru, to prepare Indian astronauts for the 2027 Gaganyaan mission.

What are Gaganyaan Analog Experiments (Gyanex)?

  • Purpose: India’s first systematic programme in space medicine and astronaut psychology, preparing protocols for Gaganyaan and future missions like space stations and lunar expeditions.
  • Setup: Conducted at the Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Bengaluru, with ICMR support. Astronauts and defence personnel live in a mock spacecraft simulator under confinement, consuming DRDO-developed space food.
  • Activities: Strict space-like routines involving scientific experiments, resource management, schedules, and limited supplies. Tests also cover communication with time-delay simulation.
  • Gyanex-1: Group Captain Angad Pratap and two others confined for 10 days; completed 11 experiments on psychology, biomedicine, and communications.
  • Microgravity Simulation: Weightlessness cannot be reproduced on Earth; instead, 7-day bed-confinement at 6° head tilt studied microgravity effects.
  • Other Indian Analog Missions:
    • Ladakh Human Analog Mission (Nov 2024): Simulated interplanetary survival in cold, barren terrain.
    • HOPE Habitat at Tso Kar (Aug 2025): Tested 8 m habitat + 5 m utility module in Mars-like conditions of low pressure, saline permafrost, and high UV radiation.

About Gaganyaan Mission:

  • Overview: India’s first human spaceflight mission, initiated in 2007, to send 3 astronauts into Low Earth Orbit (400 km) for 3 days, followed by Arabian Sea splashdown.
  • Rocket: Human-Rated LVM3 (HLVM3), adapted from GSLV Mk3, certified in 2025 for safe human use.
  • Significance: India to become the 4th nation (after US, Russia, China) with crewed spaceflight capability.
  • Latest Timeline (as of Sept 2025):
    • Dec 2025: First uncrewed mission (G1) with humanoid Vyommitra.
    • 2026: Two more uncrewed flights for life-support, avionics, and escape tests.
    • Early 2027: First crewed mission – 3 astronauts in orbit for 3 days.
  • Progress so far:
    • 80–85% development complete: avionics, parachutes, crew safety systems validated.
    • Integrated Air Drop Test (Aug 2025): Confirmed crew module deceleration.
    • Crew Escape System: Multiple ground and flight tests successful.
    • Recovery: Indian Navy and Australian Space Agency conducting splashdown drills.
    • Four IAF test pilots shortlisted: Shubhanshu Shukla, Prasanth Balakrishnan Nair, Angad Pratap, Ajit Krishnan.
    • All trained in Russia, now in advanced Indian training. Final crew of three will be chosen for maiden flight.
[UPSC 2016] Consider the following statements: The Mangalyaan launched by ISRO

1. is also called the Mars Orbiter Mission

2. made India the second country to have a spacecraft orbit the Mars after USA

3. made India the only country to be successful in making its spacecraft orbit the Mars in its first attempt.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only * (d) 1, 2 and 3

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Water Management – Institutional Reforms, Conservation Efforts, etc.

Ecological Impact of the ELSA 3 Shipwreck in the Arabian Sea

Why in the News?

The sinking of the ELSA 3 ship off the Kerala coast in May led to a significant ecological disruption in the south-eastern Arabian Sea, a new study has confirmed.

Ecological Impact of the ELSA 3 Shipwreck in the Arabian Sea

About the Pollution and Contaminants:

  • Oil Slick: Wreck of ELSA 3 released petroleum pollutants, initially forming a slick of about 2 square miles.
  • Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Compounds like naphthalene, fluorene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene detected; toxic, carcinogenic, and bioaccumulative.
  • Naphthalene Marker: High levels confirmed continuous leakage from fuel tanks.
  • Trace Metals: Nickel, lead, copper, vanadium found in elevated levels in water and sediments, worsening toxicity.
  • Distribution: Oil spread shifted with sea turbulence—first mid-depth concentration, later visible on the surface.

Ecological Impacts of the Oil Spill:

  • Plankton: Zooplankton showed pollutant accumulation, marking entry into the marine food chain.
  • Fish Eggs & Larvae: Collected in the southwest monsoon spawning season displayed decay and mortality, threatening commercial species recruitment.
  • Benthic Organisms: Sensitive species declined within days; only pollution-tolerant worms and bivalves survived, reflecting seabed stress.
  • Higher Fauna: Brown Noddy seabird (Anous stolidus) recorded with oil-soaked plumage, highlighting risks to birds and larger marine life.
  • Overall Effect: A multi-level disruption from plankton to fish stocks to seabirds.

Microbial Response and Bioremediation:

  • Bacterial Diversity: Metagenomic studies found hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria near the wreck.
  • Key Strains: Neptunomonas acidivorans, Halomonas tabrizica, Acinetobacter baumannii detected.
  • Implications: Their presence reflects both severe contamination and natural bioremediation potential.
  • Outlook: Microbial action may reduce pollution gradually, but contamination in the Arabian Sea remains significant.
[UPSC 2017] In the context of solving pollution problems what is/are the advantage/disadvantages of bioremediation technique?

1. It is a technique for cleaning up pollution by enhancing the same biodegradation process that occurs in nature.

2. Any contaminant with heavy metals such as cadmium and lead can be readily and completely treated by bioremediation using microorganisms.

3. Genetic engineering can be used to create microorganisms specifically designed for bioremediation.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Options: (a) 1 only, (b) 2 and 3 only, (c) 1 and 3 only* (d) 1, 2 and 3

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Food Procurement and Distribution – PDS & NFSA, Shanta Kumar Committee, FCI restructuring, Buffer stock, etc.

[19th Septmeber 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Equalising Primary Food Consumption in India

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2019] What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make food grain distribution system more effective?

Linkage: The article’s proposal to restructure the PDS by trimming excess cereal entitlements and expanding pulse distribution directly links with UPSC 2019’s question. It highlights how reformative steps—like targeted subsidies, rationalised stocking by FCI, and focus on nutritional security beyond cereals—can make the food grain distribution system more effective. Thus, it connects poverty reduction with sustainable and equitable food security reforms.

Mentor’s Comment

The recent NSS household consumption survey, coupled with World Bank estimates, has painted a contrasting picture of India’s poverty and food deprivation. While global narratives celebrate the near-eradication of extreme poverty, ground-level consumption data tells a more sobering story, half of rural India still struggles to afford two simple thalis a day. This article unpacks the deeper meaning of food security beyond calorie intake, critiques the existing Public Distribution System (PDS), and explores how restructuring subsidies, especially towards pulses, can equalise food consumption in India. For UPSC aspirants, the debate is not only about statistics but also about welfare priorities, distributional justice, and the role of the state in ensuring dignified living standards.

Introduction

India has long battled poverty and hunger, but the release of the 2024 NSS Household Consumption Survey and the World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Brief (2025) has reshaped the debate. The World Bank report claims that extreme poverty has fallen from 16.2% in 2011-12 to just 2.3% in 2022-23, a historic achievement if true. Yet, when food consumption is measured through the “thali index” rather than calorie-based poverty lines, stark disparities emerge: 50% of rural India and 20% of urban India could not afford two thalis a day in 2023-24. This contradiction raises a crucial policy question—how can India ensure not just calorie intake but nutritional adequacy and equal access to primary food consumption?

The contrasting narratives of poverty in India

  1. World Bank Estimate: Extreme poverty has “virtually disappeared,” with only 2.3% living below $2.15/day.
  2. Thali Index Reality: Despite rising incomes, half of rural India could not afford two balanced meals (thalis) daily in 2023-24.
  3. Deprivation Gap: The difference arises because food is residual expenditure after households spend on essentials like rent, health, and transport.

Why measure poverty through the thali meal?

  1. Beyond Calories: Traditional poverty lines only measure calorific intake, ignoring nutrition and satisfaction.
  2. Balanced Meal: A thali (rice, dal, roti, vegetables, curd, salad) represents a self-contained, nutritious unit of food consumption.
  3. Cost Factor: Crisil estimates a home-cooked thali costs ₹30. Many households fall short of affording even two thalis/day per person.

How effective is the Public Distribution System?

  1. Food Deprivation with PDS: Even after including PDS food supplies, deprivation persists—40% rural and 10% urban cannot afford two thalis daily.
  2. Subsidy Distribution: In rural India, a person in the 90–95% expenditure class receives 88% of the subsidy given to the poorest 5%, despite much higher consumption capacity.
  3. Urban Progressivity: The PDS is more progressive in urban areas, but still, 80% receive subsidised or free food, including those not in need.

Why are cereals not enough

  1. Equalised Cereal Consumption: Both the poorest and richest consume similar amounts of rice and wheat, showing PDS success but also its limits.
  2. Expenditure Share: Cereals now account for only 10% of average household expenditure, so increasing cereal subsidy has diminishing returns.
  3. Need for Protein: Pulses consumption is half in the poorest 5% compared to the richest 5%, highlighting protein inequality.

Policy path: Equalising food consumption through pulses

  1. Expand PDS Coverage: Redirect subsidies towards pulses, the main protein source for many Indians.
  2. Rationalise Cereals Subsidy: Trim excess rice/wheat entitlements, especially for better-off groups, reducing stocking costs for FCI.
  3. Compact and Targeted PDS: By focusing on pulses and eliminating subsidies beyond the “two thali/day” norm, the system becomes both cost-effective and equitable.
  4. Global Significance: Achieving equalised food consumption across social classes would be a unique welfare success story worldwide.

Conclusion

The thali index reveals a hidden crisis of food deprivation that headline poverty numbers obscure. While cereal consumption has been equalised through decades of PDS efforts, the next frontier lies in ensuring protein security via pulses distribution. Rationalising subsidies and targeting them effectively can not only optimise public spending but also equalise primary food consumption across India, a feat that would stand as a benchmark in global welfare policy.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Breakthrough

How the DeepSeek-R1 AI model was taught to teach itself to reason

Introduction

Reasoning, the ability to reflect, verify, self-correct, and adapt, has historically been considered uniquely human. From mathematics to moral decision-making, reasoning shapes every facet of human civilisation. Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have shown glimpses of reasoning, but these were achieved with human-provided examples, introducing cost, bias, and limits. In September 2024, researchers at DeepSeek unveiled their model R1, which demonstrated reasoning through reinforcement learning (trial and error with rewards), without supervised fine-tuning. This represents a paradigm shift in how machines may learn, reason, and potentially evolve intelligence.

Why is DeepSeek-R1 in the News?

For the first time, an AI model has taught itself to reason without human-crafted examples. The results were dramatic: DeepSeek-R1 improved from 15.6% to 86.7% accuracy in solving American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) problems, even surpassing the average performance of top human students. It also demonstrated reflection (“wait… let’s try again”) and verification—human-like traits of reasoning. The scale and quality of progress mark this as a milestone in AI research, contrasting sharply with traditional methods that heavily relied on human-labelled data.

What is Reinforcement Learning in AI?

  1. Definition: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a trial-and-error method where a system receives rewards for correct answers and penalties for wrong ones.
  2. DeepSeek’s Application: Instead of providing reasoning steps, the model was only rewarded for correct final answers.
  3. Outcome: Over time, R1 developed reflective chains of reasoning, dynamically adjusting “thinking time” based on task complexity.

How Did DeepSeek-R1 Achieve Self-Reasoning?

  1. R1-Zero Phase: Started with solving maths/coding problems, producing reasoning inside <think> tags and answers in <answer> tags.
  2. Trial-and-Error Learning: Wrong reasoning paths were discouraged, correct ones reinforced.
  3. Emergence of Reflection: Model started using “wait” or “let’s try again,” indicating self-correction.

What Were the Major Successes?

  1. Mathematical Benchmarks: R1-Zero improved from 15.6% to 77.9%, and with fine-tuning, to 86.7% on AIME.
  2. General Knowledge & Instruction Following: 25% improvement on AlpacaEval 2.0 and 17% on Arena-Hard.
  3. Efficiency: Adaptive thinking chains—shorter for easy tasks, longer for difficult ones—conserving computational resources.
  4. Alignment: Improved readability, language consistency, and safety.

What Are the Limitations and Risks

  1. High Energy Costs: Reinforcement learning is computationally expensive.
  2. Human Role Not Fully Eliminated: Open-ended tasks (e.g., writing) still require human-labelled data for reward models.
  3. Ethical Concerns: Ability to “reflect” raises risks of generating manipulative or unsafe content.
  4. Need for Stronger Safeguards: As AI reasoning grows, so does the risk of misuse.

Why Does this Matter for the Future of AI?

  1. Reduces Dependence on Human Labour: Cuts costs and addresses exploitative conditions in data annotation.
  2. Potential for Creativity: If reasoning can emerge from incentives, could creativity and understanding follow?
  3. Shift in AI Training Paradigm: From “learning by example” to “learning by exploration.”
  4. Global Implications: Impacts education, coding, mathematics, governance, and ethics of AI.

Conclusion

DeepSeek-R1 marks a turning point in AI evolution. By demonstrating reasoning through reinforcement learning alone, it challenges the notion that human-labelled data is indispensable. Yet, this very capability opens new debates—about creativity, autonomy, and control. For policymakers and citizens alike, the task is to harness AI’s promise while ensuring safety, fairness, and ethical integrity.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2023] Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does Al help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of Al in healthcare?

Linkage: The breakthrough of DeepSeek-R1 shows how AI can now reason through reinforcement learning without human-labelled data, making it more efficient and adaptive. Such reasoning ability can enhance clinical diagnosis by enabling AI to self-correct and refine decision-making in complex medical cases. However, as with healthcare AI generally, the privacy threat persists if sensitive patient data is fed into models without strong safeguards.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-China

Should India overlook boundary issues while normalizing ties with China?

Introduction

The India-China relationship has historically oscillated between cautious cooperation and sharp confrontation. The latest Modi–Xi meeting on the sidelines of the SCO Summit reopened bilateral trade, air connectivity, and emphasised peace at the border. Yet, the memory of the 2020 Galwan clashes looms large. At stake is the central question: Can India afford to set aside the boundary dispute for the sake of wider cooperation, or would that compromise its strategic autonomy and long-term security?

Why is this debate in the news?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s China visit marks the first high-level attempt in five years to restore normalcy after Galwan. The move is significant as it reflects India’s willingness to restart engagement despite recent military tensions and China’s continued strategic partnership with Pakistan. The revival of trade and connectivity signals pragmatism, but it raises the question of whether unresolved boundary tensions can remain compartmentalised. This sharp contrast with the hostility of recent years makes the issue both urgent and unprecedented.

Can India normalise ties without resolving the boundary issue?

  1. Historical Precedent (1988, 1990s): Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to Beijing in 1988 initiated the idea of cooperation in other domains while border talks continued separately. Both sides agreed to maintain peace and tranquility along the LAC despite unresolved sovereignty disputes.
  2. Galwan Disruption (2020): The deadly clash exposed the fragility of this arrangement and highlighted China’s aggressive posture, a setback far greater than earlier skirmishes.
  3. Current Diplomatic Push: Since 2020, both countries have restored disengagement through buffer zones, with the 2024 Border Patrol Agreement marking an important breakthrough, including restoration of patrol rights in Demchok and Depsang.

What explains China’s actions and insecurities?

  1. Article 370 Effect: Chinese analysts linked Galwan to India’s constitutional move in Jammu & Kashmir, which Beijing opposed.
  2. Economic Competition: During the U.S.-China trade war, Beijing feared India aligning with Washington to grab supply-chain opportunities.
  3. India’s Growth Factor: China increasingly perceives India’s demographic dividend and economic rise as a potential threat, at a time when its own population is shrinking.
  4. Manufacturing Prowess: Despite insecurities, China’s dominance is overwhelming—accounting for 45% of global manufacturing output, highlighted by India’s Economic Survey 2024-25.

How fragile is the current normalisation?

  1. Possibility of Galwan-2: Any fresh military clash could derail progress entirely, as mistrust remains deep-rooted.
  2. Chinese Perception of India: Beijing no longer treats India as a peer but as a regional player to be managed, often subordinated to its ties with Pakistan.
  3. Infrastructure Build-up: China continues rapid military expansion on the Tibetan plateau, forcing India to invest heavily in its own LAC infrastructure.
  4. Diplomatic Asymmetry: Even as dialogue continues, China shows little real interest in a final border settlement.

Can India-China cooperation coexist with China’s South Asia strategy?

  1. China’s Trilateral Mechanisms: Beijing is building frameworks like Pakistan-China-Afghanistan and Pakistan-China-Bangladesh, which aim to sideline India.
  2. Strategic Rivalry: China views India as a long-term competitor; India counters with its own diplomatic cards.
  3. Interdependence Factor: Despite rivalry, both economies remain connected—India dependent on China’s manufacturing, and China wary of India’s market potential.

Conclusion

India cannot afford to overlook the boundary issue entirely, as sovereignty and security form the bedrock of foreign policy. Yet, pragmatic engagement, through trade, connectivity, and multilateral platforms, remains equally important. A calibrated approach that safeguards territorial integrity while leveraging cooperation where possible may be the most realistic path forward.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2014] With respect to the South China Sea, maritime territorial disputes and rising tension affirm the need for safeguarding maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation and ever flight throughout the region. In this context, discuss the bilateral issues between India and China.

Linkage: The South China Sea tensions highlight China’s assertive behaviour in territorial disputes, which parallels its aggressive stance on the India-China boundary issue, especially after Galwan. Just as freedom of navigation is contested in the maritime domain, peace and tranquility along the LAC is fragile despite agreements like the 2024 Border Patrol pact. Thus, bilateral issues centre on sovereignty, security dilemmas, and China’s attempts to limit India’s strategic space in both continental and regional contexts.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Iran’s Nuclear Program & Western Sanctions

US revokes sanctions waiver on Chabahar Port

Why in the News?

The U.S. has ended the 2018 waiver that let India use Iran’s Chabahar Port for Afghanistan’s reconstruction, revoking it within 10 days.

US revokes sanctions waiver on Chabahar Port

About Chabahar Port:

  • Location: Deep-water port in Sistan-Baluchistan province of Iran, on the Gulf of Oman at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Unique Feature: The only Iranian port with direct access to the Indian Ocean.
  • Distances: Kandla Port, Gujarat – 550 nautical miles, Mumbai – 786 nautical miles from Chabahar.
  • Structure: Comprises Shahid Beheshti and Shahid Kalantari terminals.
  • Connectivity Potential: Its proximity to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India and position on the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) gives it the ability to become a major commercial hub.
  • INSTC: A multi-modal route linking the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf to the Caspian Sea via Iran, and onward to northern Europe via Russia.

India’s Engagements for Chabahar Port:

  • Tripartite Agreement (2016): India, Iran, and Afghanistan agreed to develop the Shahid Beheshti terminal, marking India’s first foreign port project.
  • Infrastructure Goals: Develop the port and build a rail line to Zahedan, bypassing Pakistan to reach Afghanistan and Central Asia.
  • Recent Developments: In May 2024, India Ports Global Ltd (IPGL) signed a 10-year lease to operate Shahid Beheshti.
  • Commitments: India pledged $120 million in equipment and a $250 million credit line.
  • Operations: India supplied 6 harbour cranes; facilitated shipments of 2.5 million tonnes of wheat and 2,000 tonnes of pulses to Afghanistan.

Implications of US Sanctions for India:

  • Economic Setback: Jeopardises India’s ₹200 crore investment and future projects.
  • Connectivity Loss: Cuts India’s only direct maritime gateway to Afghanistan, Central Asia, and INSTC.
  • Strategic Impact: Weakens India’s counter to China’s Gwadar Port in Pakistan under CPEC.
  • Diplomatic Strain: Risks tensions with Iran (strategic partner) and the United States (major trade partner).
  • Operational Challenges: Sanctions may deter shippers, insurers, and suppliers, slowing port activity.
[UPSC 2017] What is the importance of developing Chabahar Port by India?

Options: (a) India’s trade with African countries will enormously increase.

(b) India’s relations with oil-producing Arab countries will be strengthened.

(c) India will not depend on Pakistan for access to Afghanistan and Central Asia *

(d) Pakistan will facilitate and protect the installation of a gas pipeline between Iraq and India

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

7 Natural Heritage Sites from India added to UNESCO’s Tentative List

Why in the News?

Seven natural heritage sites from India were added to UNESCO’s Tentative List of World Heritage Sites, raising India’s tally from 62 to 69 places.

About the 7 newly added UNESCO Tentative List Sites:

Site

Detailed Facts

Deccan Traps (Panchgani & Mahabaleshwar, Maharashtra) • One of the world’s largest volcanic provinces (~66 mya)
Basalt lava flows covering ~500,000 sq. km
Step-like “trap” topography, fossil beds, red bole layers
• Linked to end-Cretaceous mass extinction
• Part of Western Ghats; within Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary
St. Mary’s Island Cluster (Udupi, Karnataka) Four islands in Arabian Sea near Udupi
• Famous for hexagonal/polygonal rhyolitic lava columns (~85–88 mya)
• Formed during breakup of India–Madagascar
• Declared National Geo-heritage Monument (2016)
Rare acidic lava formations, unique in India
Meghalayan Age Caves (East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya) Mawmluh Cave is type locality for Meghalayan Age (~4,200 years ago)
• Records global drought event in late Holocene
• Meghalaya has longest sandstone cave (Krem Puri – 24.5 km)
Karst systems preserve stalagmites, paleoclimate archives
• Culturally significant to Khasi tribes; threatened by mining
Naga Hill Ophiolite (Nagaland) • 200 km belt of uplifted oceanic crust & mantle rocks
• Composed of gabbro, peridotite, basalt
• Formed at supra-subduction / mid-ocean ridge zones
• Later thrust onto Indian continental plate
• Only major ophiolite exposure in India; National Geological Monument
Erra Matti Dibbalu (Red Sand Hills, Andhra Pradesh) Quaternary-age coastal red sand mounds (~12,000–18,500 years old)
• Spread over 5 km near Visakhapatnam
• Derived from ancient Khondalite rocks
Record climate shifts, sea-level oscillations, monsoon history
Mesolithic–Neolithic artefacts found; National Geo-heritage Monument
Tirumala Hills (Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh) • Famous for Eparchaean Unconformity (1.5 billion-year gap)
• Boundary between Archaean gneiss & Proterozoic quartzites
• Hosts Silathoranam natural arch, rare erosional landform
• Hills rise to ~900 m; part of Cuddapah Basin
• Combines geological, tectonic, and spiritual significance
Varkala Cliff (Kerala) • Coastal cliff escarpment up to 80 m high
• Exposes Mio-Pliocene Warkalli Formation (1.3–25 mya)
Fossiliferous sedimentary rocks beside sea (rare in India)
Natural springs and aquifers emerge from cliff face
• Declared National Geological Monument; major tourism hub (Papanasam Beach)

Back2Basics: UNESCO’s Tentative List

  • What is it: An inventory of cultural and natural sites that a member country plans to nominate for future World Heritage status.
  • Requirement: A site must stay on this list for at least one year before nomination.
  • Purpose: Allows UNESCO to assess Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and plan conservation.
  • Note: Not all sites on the Tentative List become World Heritage Sites.
  • World Heritage Sites (WHS): Cultural, natural, or mixed sites recognised under the 1972 World Heritage Convention for their OUV.
  • Categories of WHS:
    • Cultural: Temples, monuments, forts, archaeological remains.
    • Natural: National parks, caves, biodiversity zones.
    • Mixed: Sacred landscapes with both cultural and natural value.
  • 10 Criteria for Selection: A site must satisfy at least one of these:
    • Cultural (i–vi): Masterpiece of human genius; interchange of values; unique cultural testimony; outstanding architecture/landscape; example of settlement/land use; linked to events, traditions, or ideas of universal significance.
    • Natural (vii–x): Exceptional natural beauty; example of Earth’s history; ecological or biological processes; key habitats for in-situ biodiversity conservation and threatened species.
  • India: It is currently a member of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee (2021–2025 term); Has 42 World Heritage Sites (34 cultural, 7 natural, 1 mixed).
[UPSC 2024] Consider the following properties included in the World Heritage List released by UNESCO:

1. Shantiniketan 2. Rani-ki-Vav 3. Sacred Ensembles of the Hoysalas 4. Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodhgaya

How many of the above properties were included in 2023?

Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two* (c) Only three (d) All four

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Historical and Archaeological Findings in News

National Maritime Heritage Complex at Lothal

Why in the News?

The PM has recently inspected the progress of the National Maritime Heritage Complex (NMHC) at Lothal in the Ahmedabad district.

dhol.jpg

About National Maritime Heritage Complex at Lothal:

  • Location: Lothal, Ahmedabad district, Gujarat, in the Bhal region near the Gulf of Khambhat.
  • Developer: Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Government of India.
  • Objective: To showcase India’s 5,000-year-old maritime history, especially the role of Lothal as the world’s earliest dockyard during the Indus Valley Civilization.
  • Historical Significance of Lothal:
    • Built around 2200 BCE as a major Harappan trade and craft centre for beads, gems, and ornaments.
    • Lothal in Gujarati means “Mound of the Dead”, similar to Mohenjo-daro.
    • Excavated by S.R. Rao (1955–1960).
    • Dockyard confirmed through studies (size: 222 x 37 m), once linked with Sabarmati’s old course.
    • Evidence of Lock Gates and Sluice System to regulate flow of water.
    • Trade connections extended to Mesopotamia and other ancient regions.
    • Nominated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site (2014); only known port-town of the Indus Valley Civilization.
  • Features of the Complex:
    • Exhibition halls, maritime park, amphitheater, museum, and research/educational facilities.
    • Will highlight ancient trade routes, shipbuilding traditions, and navigation techniques.
    • Expected to be a major hub for cultural tourism and heritage education.
[UPSC 2021] Which one of the following ancient towns is well-known for its elaborate system of water harvesting and management by building a series of dams and channelling water into connected reservoirs?

(a) Dholavira*  (b) Kalibangan (c) Rakhigarhi (d) Ropar

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.