💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • India, Uzbekistan elevate strategic relationship

    India, Uzbekistan elevate strategic relationship

    Why in the News

    India and Uzbekistan have elevated their ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and set a target of 5 billion dollars in annual trade by 2030.

    What is a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership?

    1. The top tier: It is the highest category in India’s graded system of bilateral partnerships, above a strategic partnership, and it signals cooperation across security, economic and technology domains rather than in a single sector.
    2. What it actually commits: The designation carries no treaty obligation, and it works by creating standing institutional machinery and periodic political level review.

    What was actually signed?

    1. Eleven agreements: The instruments cover mining, culture, education, tourism and ayurveda among other areas.
    2. A payments link: A commercial pact between National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) International Payments Limited (NIPL), the international arm of the operator of India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI), and Uzbekistan’s National Interbank Processing Centre JSC will let Indian UPI applications scan Uzbekistan’s national QR code, the UZQR, for merchant payments.
    3. Buddhist heritage: A Letter of Intent covers restoration and conservation of the Fayaz Tepa and Kara Tepa Buddhist sites in southern Uzbekistan, ancient monasteries marking the spread of Buddhism along the Silk Road.
    4. An environmental grant: India announced a grant of 1 million dollars for afforestation in the Aral Sea region.
    5. Education instruments: 100 Lal Bahadur Shastri scholarships for Hindi language study and an Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) Sanskrit Chair at the Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies were announced.

    Why does the resource agenda dominate the package?

    1. Uranium supply: The two sides agreed to establish a framework for the long term supply of uranium from Uzbekistan to India, with the agreement stated to be close to signature.
    2. Why the fuel matters: India’s domestic uranium is limited in quantity and grade, so fuel for its pressurised heavy water reactors depends on imported supply arrangements.
    3. Critical minerals: Both agreed to expand cooperation through joint projects in geological exploration, mining, mineral processing and the development of integrated value chains.
    4. What joint exploration changes: An equity route into a deposit is different from a purchase contract, since it converts a buyer into a part owner of the supply.

    What economic base does the trade target rest on?

    1. Current volume: Bilateral trade stood close to 1 billion dollars in 2025-26.
    2. The gap to be closed: The 5 billion dollar goal by 2030 requires roughly a fivefold increase in under five years.
    3. India’s standing: India is among the top 10 trading partners of Uzbekistan.
    4. Sectors named for expansion: Trade and investment, infrastructure, innovation, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, health, information technology, digital public infrastructure and education.

    How is the partnership being institutionalised?

    1. The joint commission is upgraded: The existing joint commission moves from the level of secretaries to ministerial level.
    2. A new council: A Coordination Council at the level of Foreign Ministers will provide direction across all aspects of the cooperation.
    3. The regional format: Both reaffirmed engagement within the Central Asia-India format at the level of Heads of State.
    4. A stated order preference: Both stressed the need for a free, open and rules based international order, built on their existing multilateral cooperation.

    What is the security content of the elevation?

    1. Defence industries, not procurement: Both sides will promote direct linkages, co-production and co-development between their defence industries rather than a buyer and seller relationship.
    2. Named threats: Terrorism, extremism and separatism were identified as serious challenges to the entire region, with zero tolerance stated as the shared position.

    Challenges to India’s partnership with Uzbekistan

    1. No usable overland route: India has no land access to Central Asia, since the direct corridor runs through Pakistan, which does not permit transit trade towards Afghanistan and beyond. Eg. Indian cargo to the region moves through Iran’s Chabahar port and then by road, lengthening both transit time and cost. Fix. Complete the Chabahar to Zahedan rail link and operationalise the International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC) with an Uzbek transit agreement attached.
    2. Chinese economic primacy in the region: China is Uzbekistan’s largest trading partner and infrastructure financier, so an Indian trade target competes for market share already held. Eg. The China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway under construction gives Chinese goods a shorter route into the region. Fix. Concentrate on segments where India holds a cost advantage, pharmaceuticals, information technology services and digital public infrastructure, rather than on generalised volume.
    3. A supply framework is not a delivery route: Uranium supply still needs a transport corridor and safeguards arrangements acceptable to the supplier before a contract means anything. Eg. Consignments from Central Asia reach India by sea after long overland movement, which raises both cost and handling risk. Fix. Tie the supply agreement to a designated transit corridor and a fixed price formula rather than negotiating logistics consignment by consignment.
    4. Settlement frictions cap small trade: The Uzbek som is thinly traded and correspondent banking links between the two countries are limited, so settlement costs weigh heavily on modest volumes. Eg. Indian exporters to Central Asia routinely settle through third country banks in the Gulf. Fix. Extend the rupee vostro account arrangement to Uzbek banks alongside the retail payments pact.
    5. Russian primacy narrows the defence agenda: Uzbekistan’s military procurement, training and doctrine remain oriented towards Russia, which limits the room for co-development with a third partner. Eg. Uzbekistan suspended its Collective Security Treaty Organization membership in 2012 and retained its bilateral defence relationship with Russia. Fix. Focus co-production on segments Russia does not supply, such as light armoured vehicles, small arms and unmanned systems.

    Conclusion

    What to watch is the signature of the uranium supply agreement and the first meeting of the new Coordination Council, since these are the two commitments that either produce a document or do not. The wider test is whether an announced trade target survives without a preferential trade instrument or a working transit route behind it.

    Back2Basics

    1. Doubly landlocked: It is one of only two doubly landlocked countries in the world, along with Liechtenstein, so its exports must cross at least two international borders to reach a seaport.
    2. Neighbours: It borders Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan.
    3. Resource base: It is among the world’s leading uranium producers and holds substantial gold, natural gas and copper reserves.
    4. The Aral Sea: The Aral Sea, shared with Kazakhstan, shrank drastically after Soviet era diversion of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers for cotton irrigation.

    “[2024, GS2, 10 marks] Critically analyse India’s evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics.”

  • State of exception

    State of exception

    Why in the News

    The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has expressed “grave concern” at reports of the law enforcement apparatus resorting to violence, physical and otherwise, against minority ethnic and ethno religious groups, Dalits and non citizens. This is India’s first review by the Committee since 2007, and India ratified the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in 1968. The Committee also recorded that India has not provided detailed and updated information on the state’s inquiries and sanctions arising from allegations of such violence. The government’s position before the Committee is that caste bias falls outside Article 1 of the Convention because caste is not synonymous with race. The Committee has read the Convention as covering all forms of discrimination based on inherited status. The tension is between a state defending a definitional boundary to keep caste a domestic matter and a treaty body reading descent into the Convention to bring caste inside international scrutiny.

    What is the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination?

    1. A treaty body: CERD is a body of independent experts that monitors how states that have ratified ICERD implement it.
    2. Periodic review: States file periodic reports and the Committee issues concluding observations recording its concerns and its recommendations.
    3. No enforcement power: Concluding observations are not binding and carry no sanction, so their effect runs through the reporting obligation and reputational exposure.

    Why does the caste and race question decide the Committee’s jurisdiction?

    1. The government’s reading: Article 1 of ICERD defines racial discrimination by race, colour, descent, and national or ethnic origin, and the government argues that caste is not race and therefore sits outside that definition.
    2. The Committee’s reading: The Committee treats discrimination based on inherited status as covered, which brings caste within the Convention through the descent limb rather than the race limb.
    3. What actually turns on it: If caste falls outside Article 1, India owes the Committee no account of caste discrimination at all, so the argument is jurisdictional rather than semantic.
    4. The scale of what the technicality would exclude: The position would place the situation of 200 million Dalits beyond the reach of international review. The underlying facts would remain undisputed.

    What specific practices did the Committee flag?

    1. Manual cleaning of sewers: The practice continues despite a law prohibiting it.
    2. Treatment of Rohingya Muslims: Hate speech against them, their poor living conditions, and their mass refoulement, meaning return to a territory where they face persecution.
    3. Citizenship deprivation: Mass deprivation of citizenship through the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
    4. Electoral roll deletions: Large scale deletions arising from the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
    5. Statutes used against civil society: Use of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to hamper the work of civil society organisations.
    6. A gap in the criminal code: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 does not expressly criminalise racist hate speech.
    7. Exemptions in forest law: The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act, 2023 exempts “national security” projects from consultative decision making.

    Why is the data gap the enabling condition?

    1. Enumeration is overdue: A much delayed Census means suitably disaggregated data on disenfranchised communities does not exist in current form.
    2. Crime data arrives late: Slow release of National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data delays any independent check on recorded offences against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
    3. Special measures run on stale figures: Affirmative action is being implemented on 2011 Census data, which can mask a regression in the socioeconomic status of Scheduled Tribes and Adivasis.
    4. The effect is no longer administrative: The absence of data has moved past lethargy into actively impeding independent verification of the state’s own claims about fighting caste and faith based discrimination.

    What has happened to the domestic accountability machinery?

    1. Accreditation at risk: The Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), the peer body that accredits national human rights institutions against the Paris Principles, recommended a downgrade of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) last year.
    2. The stated grounds: The appointment of police officers to investigative roles within the Commission, and a lack of pluralism in its composition.
    3. The consequence: With the domestic institution weakened, a treaty body review becomes the surviving external check rather than a supplement to a working domestic one.

    Domestic matter or international accountability?

    1. The sovereignty claim: The government treats the caste question as an internal matter and has dismissed the Committee’s concerns as politically motivated.
    2. The counter position: A definitional objection raised at the treaty body removes an entire class of discrimination from review without disputing that the discrimination occurs.
    3. Who is left carrying it: With the state contesting jurisdiction, the work of raising these issues in multilateral fora falls to civil society organisations, which are themselves the subject of the Committee’s concern about the use of regulatory and criminal law against them.

    What does the road ahead require?

    1. Institutional independence: Restoring the independence of the NHRC, beginning with the composition and appointment concerns that triggered the accreditation review.
    2. Criminal law: Expressly criminalising racist hate speech, which the current code does not do.
    3. Affirmative action: Supportive affirmative action, extended rather than narrowed, for the communities the measures are meant to reach.
    4. Data: Collecting and publishing disaggregated data on the affected communities.
    5. Electoral process: Improving the transparency of electoral roll revisions.
    6. Enforcement: Strengthening enforcement of existing protective law overall.

    Challenges to treaty body review as a check on caste discrimination

    1. No individual complaint route: India has not made the declaration under Article 14 of ICERD, so an individual or a group in India cannot petition the Committee directly. Eg. States that have made the Article 14 declaration allow individual communications, and India’s absence from that list leaves domestic courts as the only forum. Fix. Make the Article 14 declaration, which is a unilateral act requiring no amendment to the Convention.
    2. The evidence base is state controlled: The Committee reviews what the state chooses to report, so a gap in official data becomes a gap in the review itself. Eg. Shadow reports by non governmental organisations are the main corrective, which is why restrictions on their foreign funding directly shape what the Committee sees. Fix. Require the state report to be tabled domestically before submission, so its omissions are contested at home first.
    3. Long reporting gaps defeat periodicity: The Convention requires reports every two years and states file many years late with no consequence. Eg. Several states parties carry reports overdue by more than a decade on the Committee’s own schedule. Fix. Apply the review in the absence of a report procedure on a fixed timetable, so a missing report does not postpone scrutiny.
    4. Recommendations have no domestic legal effect: A concluding observation creates no right enforceable in an Indian court, since a treaty requires enabling legislation under Article 253 of the Constitution to become domestic law. Eg. Courts have used unincorporated treaty obligations as an interpretive aid rather than as a source of enforceable rights, as in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997). Fix. Route the recommendations through the NHRC’s statutory annual report to Parliament, so each produces a documented government response.

    Conclusion

    The dispute is not over whether the discrimination occurs but over whether an international body may examine it, and the two positions cannot both hold: a Convention read to cover inherited status, and a state reading that places caste outside its scope. What keeps the disagreement unresolvable is that the evidence which would settle either claim is the same disaggregated data the state has not produced.

    Back2Basics

    1. Statutory basis: It was constituted under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
    2. Composition: It is chaired by a former Chief Justice of India or a former judge of the Supreme Court, with members including a serving or former Chief Justice of a High Court and persons with knowledge of human rights.
    3. Powers: It inquires into complaints of human rights violation, exercises the powers of a civil court during inquiry, and may visit places of detention.
    4. Recommendatory character: Its findings are recommendations to the government concerned, which must report the action taken, and the Commission cannot enforce them itself.

    “[2023, GS1, 15 marks] Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static?”

  • Govt. notifies IST as common time reference across India; gives 180 days for compliance

    Why in the News

    The Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution has notified the Legal Metrology (Indian Standard Time) Rules, 2026, making Indian Standard Time (IST) the single reference for legal, administrative, commercial and other official purposes across the country. The Rules come into force 180 days after their publication in the Official Gazette, which gives government departments, businesses and institutions a compliance window to align their systems. The step follows the spread of digital and technology based systems whose records depend on accurate and synchronised time stamps, from banking and payments to telecommunications, railways, power grids and computer networks. A stated feature of the Rules is the reduction of dependence on foreign satellite based time sources that several critical systems currently rely on. The tension is that a legal mandate can fix which clock is authoritative and cannot by itself supply a domestic time signal accurate and reachable enough for the systems being asked to switch.

    What are the Legal Metrology (Indian Standard Time) Rules, 2026?

    1. A single legal reference: The Rules make IST the sole time reference for legal, administrative, commercial and other official purposes across India.
    2. Regulated as a measurement: The nodal authority is the Department of Consumer Affairs, so time is governed as a unit of measurement under legal metrology rather than as a scientific standard alone.
    3. Deferred commencement: Enforcement begins only after the compliance window closes, so existing systems are given time to re-synchronise instead of being placed in immediate default.

    Why does a single time reference matter for the systems that use it?

    1. Financial records: A common reference supports accurate time stamping of banking and digital payment transactions, which is what establishes the order of two competing entries.
    2. Transport coordination: It underpins coordination among railways, airports and other transport systems that run on shared schedules.
    3. Communication networks: Reliable functioning of telecommunication and internet networks depends on synchronised clocks across switching and routing equipment.
    4. Power systems: Precise timekeeping in power systems is what allows a grid disturbance to be sequenced and attributed after the event.
    5. Legal and government records: The upkeep of government and legal records rests on a timestamp that can be relied on as evidence.
    6. Emergency services: Coordination of emergency and other time critical services requires every responding agency to work off the same reference.

    Why are foreign satellite based time sources the actual target?

    1. The current dependence: Several critical systems draw their time signal from foreign satellite constellations rather than from a domestic source.
    2. Divergent sources produce divergent records: Inconsistencies between different time sources affect the coordination and the recording of transactions and operations.
    3. Sovereignty over the signal: A time signal controlled outside the country can be degraded or withdrawn, which places the legal record of a domestic transaction outside national control.
    4. Dissemination is being built: Infrastructure is being created to disseminate accurate IST through Indian institutions and legal metrology laboratories.

    Challenges to enforcing a single legal time reference

    1. Legacy equipment cannot be re-synchronised by notification: Older industrial and utility controllers carry their own internal clocks and no interface to accept an external time input. Eg. Supervisory control equipment in several State distribution utilities still runs on locally set device clocks. Fix. Make an external time input a condition of equipment certification, so replacement cycles carry the requirement instead of a one time drive.
    2. Millisecond accuracy needs a physical network, not a rule: A mandate names the reference and does not deliver the signal at the precision that payment switches and grid protection equipment need. Eg. India’s national time reaches most users through public internet time servers rather than through dedicated links. Fix. Extend optical fibre and radio based time dissemination to regional laboratories before the compliance window closes.
    3. Enforcement capacity sits with State departments: State legal metrology staff who inspect weights and measures are being asked to verify a technical time standard they hold no instruments for. Eg. State legal metrology departments already report inspector shortfalls for routine verification of weighing and measuring instruments. Fix. Fund a reference clock and calibration equipment at each State laboratory as part of the rollout rather than after it.
    4. One legal time does not answer the longitudinal spread: A single reference across a country spanning nearly 30 degrees of longitude leaves the northeast with early sunrise and working hours misaligned with daylight. Eg. Assam has repeatedly sought a separate tea garden time an hour ahead of IST for its plantation working hours. Fix. Meet the demand through statutory flexibility in working hours, since the Rules foreclose a second legal time.

    Conclusion

    What to watch through the compliance window is whether the domestic dissemination network is live before enforcement begins, since a mandate that outruns its infrastructure converts every unsynchronised system into a default. The wider question is whether a legal standard alone can displace a foreign signal that critical systems adopted because it was cheaper and easier to reach.

    Back2Basics

    1. Reference meridian: IST is set to the 82.5 degrees East longitude, which passes near Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh.
    2. Offset: It runs 5 hours 30 minutes ahead of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the global time scale maintained by atomic clocks.
    3. Custodian: The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, maintains and disseminates India’s national time using caesium atomic clocks.
    4. Single zone: India uses one time zone for the entire country, unlike several states of comparable longitudinal span that use more than one.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2017] Consider the following statements: 1. The Standard Mark of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is mandatory for automotive tyres and tubes. 2. AGMARK is a quality Certification Mark issued by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ANSWER: (a)”

  • All workers shifted to VB-G RAM G; e-KYC is not mandatory, says Centre

    Why in the News

    The Union Ministry of Rural Development has said that every worker registered under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has been migrated to the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin), or VB-G RAM G, irrespective of whether electronic Know Your Customer (e-KYC) verification of the job card is complete. The statement answers reporting that the job cards of 57 lakh active workers have not completed that verification. The Ministry has not disputed those numbers and says e-KYC is a database authentication measure rather than a precondition for exercising the statutory right to demand employment. The tension is that a verification requirement introduced to clean the worker database sits directly on top of a right that is meant to be exercisable on demand.

    What did the Ministry actually commit to?

    1. Migration is unconditional: Every worker registered under MGNREGA has been moved to the new mission regardless of e-KYC status.
    2. Pending verification does not block work: A pending e-KYC does not prevent a worker from demanding or from receiving employment.
    3. An exception route exists: An exception mechanism is available to facilitate the employment demand and the provision of work for workers whose verification is pending.
    4. The right is characterised as statutory: The Ministry’s position is that e-KYC authenticates the database and does not condition the statutory entitlement.

    What do the coverage numbers show?

    1. The verified total is large: e-KYC has been completed for 15.89 crore workers overall.
    2. Active worker coverage is near complete: 10.27 crore of 10.84 crore active workers have been verified, approximately 95 percent.
    3. The residual is the disputed group: 57 lakh active workers remain unverified, a figure the government has not contested.
    4. Employment provision is reported separately: Around 2.11 crore workers have so far been offered employment under the new mission, and the Ministry states that every worker who demanded employment was offered work as per demand.

    Where does responsibility for the verification sit?

    1. The task is with the States: e-KYC of workers is the responsibility of the concerned State and Union Territory governments.
    2. The stated purpose is database integrity: It is being undertaken to strengthen authentication and maintain an accurate and credible worker database.
    3. The Ministry characterises it as trivial: The process can ordinarily be completed in less than 30 seconds.
    4. The Centre’s role is advisory and supervisory: States have been advised to expeditiously complete verification of all active workers, with the Ministry monitoring the exercise.

    Challenges to biometric authentication of rural workers

    1. Fingerprint authentication fails for manual labourers: Sustained manual work erodes fingerprint ridges, so the biometric most commonly used for authentication is least reliable for the population the scheme is designed for. Eg. Authentication failures among elderly and manual workers were a documented cause of denied ration entitlements after Aadhaar seeding of the Public Distribution System. Fix. Make iris and face authentication, and offline verification against a signed identity document, equally valid at the field level.
    2. Connectivity gaps convert a 30 second process into a multi day one: Online authentication in low network blocks requires repeat visits to a common service centre at the worker’s own cost. Eg. Workers in remote blocks routinely travel to block headquarters for banking correspondent services because village level connectivity is intermittent. Fix. Permit offline capture at the gram panchayat with batch upload, so the worker’s trip does not depend on live connectivity.
    3. Database cleaning has historically deleted genuine workers: Bulk verification drives produce deletions of active job cards recorded as duplicates or as non existent. Eg. Crores of job cards were deleted during MGNREGA database cleaning exercises, with State level audits later finding genuine workers among them. Fix. Require a written, appealable deletion order served on the worker before a job card is removed.
    4. The exception mechanism is only as good as its field awareness: A right that survives on paper still fails where the panchayat functionary treats verification as mandatory. Eg. Aadhaar Based Payment System rollout saw wage payments stall for workers whose seeding was incomplete despite instructions that work could not be denied. Fix. Issue the exception route as a numbered circular to every gram panchayat with a stated escalation officer, rather than as a press statement.

    Conclusion

    The Ministry’s clarification settles the legal position and leaves the administrative one open, since the entitlement is denied at the panchayat counter rather than in the policy document. What to watch is whether the exception mechanism is actually invoked for the unverified workers in the coming employment season, measured by work provided to them rather than by the verification percentage.

    Back2Basics

    1. Statute: Enacted in 2005 and administered by the Ministry of Rural Development, it is the legal basis of the rural employment guarantee.
    2. The guarantee: It provides at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every rural household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work.
    3. Demand driven design: Work must be provided within 15 days of a demand being registered, failing which the worker is entitled to an unemployment allowance from the State.
    4. Delivery unit: The job card issued to a household is the document that records registration, demand and days of work provided.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2011] Among the following who are eligible to benefit from the “Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act”? (a) Adult members of only the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe households (b) Adult members of below poverty line (BPL) households (c) Adult members of households of all backward communities (d) Adult members of any household ANSWER: (d)”

  • Delay in prorogation of Parliament leading to suspicion: Ramesh

    Why in the News

    The Monsoon Session of Parliament has not been prorogued 17 days after both Houses were adjourned sine die, so the session remains technically alive. The consequence is that the government can reconvene Parliament without issuing a fresh presidential summons, and speculation has followed about a Special Session to revive the Delimitation Bill. The Congress has formally objected, calling the delay mystifying and saying it suggests mischief. The tension is that a step treated as a formality decides who controls the timing of the next sitting, and that control currently rests entirely with the executive.

    What is prorogation?

    1. Definition: Prorogation formally terminates a session of Parliament, as distinct from an adjournment, which only ends a sitting.
    2. Who exercises it: It is done by the President, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers, and a fresh session after it requires a fresh summons.
    3. Adjournment sine die is not the same thing: Adjournment sine die ends the sittings of a session without fixing a date to reassemble, and the presiding officer may still call the House back until prorogation is notified.
    4. Effect on business: Pending Bills do not lapse on prorogation. Pending notices, motions and questions before the House do lapse.

    What has actually happened with the Monsoon Session?

    1. The sittings ended in mid August: Both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha were adjourned sine die on 13 August, bringing the Monsoon Session to a close in practical terms.
    2. The session was never formally ended: Prorogation has not been notified 17 days after the last meeting of the House.
    3. The gap has a functional value: Keeping the session alive allows the government to reconvene Parliament without a fresh presidential summons.
    4. A specific legislative purpose is suspected: The delay has generated speculation about a Special Session to revive the Delimitation Bill.

    What is the Opposition objecting to?

    1. The objection is to the silence, not the delay alone: The Congress communications chief said the continued delay leads to suspicions that mischief is afoot.
    2. The numbers argument is being made publicly: The party’s position is that the Union Home Minister does not command the two thirds majority the legislation would need, and is engaging in bluff.
    3. The objection was raised at the highest level: The Congress president wrote to the Prime Minister restating the party’s position on delimitation and on the expansion of the Lok Sabha.

    What are the Congress’s linked demands?

    1. A freeze on Lok Sabha strength: The party has asked that the existing strength of the Lower House be frozen at 543 seats for the next 15 years.
    2. Implementation of women’s reservation: It has sought implementation of the legislation reserving a third of the seats for women Members of Parliament in time for the 2029 Lok Sabha election.

    Challenges in the exercise of the prorogation and summoning power

    1. The Constitution fixes no minimum number of sitting days: Article 85 requires only that six months not elapse between two sessions, which sets a floor on gaps and none on work. Eg. The Lok Sabha has in several recent years sat for fewer than 70 days against the roughly 130 days it averaged in the 1950s. Fix. Enact a fixed parliamentary calendar prescribing a minimum number of annual sitting days, as the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution recommended.
    2. Summoning is effectively an executive decision: The President acts on ministerial advice, so the government decides when the legislature that scrutinises it will meet. Eg. Legislatures in several States have met for single day sessions to satisfy the six month requirement. Fix. Give a fixed proportion of members the power to requisition a sitting, as several parliamentary systems provide.
    3. Long inter session gaps enable government by ordinance: Where the House is not in session, the executive can legislate through ordinances under Article 123 and seek approval later. Eg. Ordinances have been repromulgated across successive gaps, a practice the Supreme Court criticised in Krishna Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar (2017). Fix. Require an ordinance to be laid with a written statement of the immediate necessity that justified bypassing the House.
    4. Deferred prorogation leaves members in an undefined status: With the session alive but not sitting, notices and motions neither lapse nor come up for disposal. Eg. Questions and motions admitted for a session that is neither prorogued nor reconvened simply remain pending without a listing date. Fix. Provide by rule that prorogation follows adjournment sine die within a fixed number of days unless the House is recalled.

    Conclusion

    The dispute is not about whether the government may keep a session alive, since the power plainly permits it, but about whether a power designed as a formal closing step can be held open to preserve an option over legislation. What to watch is whether a Special Session is convened before prorogation is notified, since that would confirm the delay was a legislative strategy rather than an administrative lapse.

    Back2Basics

    1. Definition: Delimitation is the redrawing of the boundaries and the reallocation of the number of seats of Lok Sabha and State Assembly constituencies to reflect changes in population.
    2. Constitutional basis: Article 82 requires readjustment after every census, on principles Parliament determines by law.
    3. Machinery: A Delimitation Commission is constituted under a Delimitation Act, and its orders cannot be questioned in any court.
    4. The current freeze: The 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2001 froze the number of Lok Sabha seats allocated to each State on the 1971 census figures until the first census taken after 2026.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] With reference to the Parliament of India, consider the following statements: 1. Prorogation of a House by the President of India does not require the advice of the Council of Ministers. 2. Prorogation of a House is generally done after the House is adjourned sine die, but there is no bar to the President of India proroguing the House which is in session. 3. Dissolution of the Lok Sabha is done by the President of India who, save in exceptional circumstances, does so on the advice of the Council of Ministers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 (c) 2 and 3* (d) 3 only ANSWER: (c)”

  • OBC creamy layer and the income test

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court will consider setting up a Bench to hear the Centre’s application seeking clarification on its judgment on the income test used to identify the creamy layer among the Other Backward Classes (OBC). The judgment, Union of India vs Rohith Nathan, was delivered by a Division Bench on 11 March. It held that salary income cannot be used to exclude OBC candidates whose parents work in public sector undertakings or in private employment where the equivalence of those posts with government service has not been established. The Centre says implementing that reading retrospectively is “extremely difficult” and would have a “cascading effect” on services settled from 2012 onwards, with the impact extending to all categories including the Unreserved category. The contest has therefore moved from what the income test means to how far back the corrected meaning reaches.

    What is the creamy layer income and wealth test?

    1. Origin: The creamy layer concept among OBCs emerged from the Supreme Court’s 1992 ruling in the Indra Sawhney case, which paved the way for OBC reservations, and was meant to exclude families that had accumulated social and economic privilege.
    2. The governing instrument: The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) issued an Office Memorandum in September 1993 laying down the exclusion categories, including children of senior constitutional, judicial, government and armed forces officers.
    3. The test itself: A candidate falls in the creamy layer if the parents’ gross family income exceeds the prescribed limit for three consecutive years, or if the family holds wealth above the exemption limit under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
    4. What the 1993 Memorandum left out: Income from salaries and from agricultural land was consciously excluded from the calculation, with income from property, business or capital gains counted instead. The income limit was Rs 1 lakh in 1993 and now stands at Rs 8 lakh, last revised in 2017.

    What did the Court hold in Union of India vs Rohith Nathan?

    1. Parity across employment categories: OBC candidates whose parents work in public sector undertakings or the private sector, where post equivalence with government service is not established, cannot be treated differently from OBC candidates in other categories.
    2. The income test is a residual filter: The income and wealth component of the exclusion exercise must be seen and operated as a “residual filter”, not as the primary basis for exclusion.
    3. The test applies equally until equivalence exists: Until the government establishes equivalence between public sector undertaking posts and government service posts, the income and wealth test must continue to apply equally to both.
    4. A specific remedy was ordered: The Centre was directed to implement this reading within six months by creating supernumerary posts for the petitioners and allotting them services according to their ranks in their respective Civil Services Examination years.

    How did the discrimination arise between the 1993 Memorandum and the 2004 letter?

    1. The 2004 letter reopened a settled exclusion: The DoPT issued a letter in October 2004 to clarify interpretive issues, and paragraph 9 of it dealt with OBCs whose parents held posts in Central or State public sector undertakings without established equivalence.
    2. It appeared to reverse the salary exclusion: The letter suggested that salary income was to be counted in testing whether the family crossed the threshold for three consecutive years, in circumstances the letter did not clearly specify.
    3. Two identically placed groups were tested differently: Children of government servants were tested without salary income. Children of public sector and private employees were tested with it, which the Court called “hostile discrimination”.
    4. The Court stated the equality failure directly: Excluding children of public sector or private employees on the basis of salary income alone, without reference to whether the post was Group A or B or Group C or D, amounted to equals being treated unequally.

    Who was affected by the old reading?

    1. The petitioners were serving aspirants: At least 50 OBC candidates who had appeared in the Civil Services Examination since 2015 were excluded from consideration for OBC reserved posts.
    2. The exclusion turned on one variable: They were classified as creamy layer solely on the basis of their parents’ income, with the parents working in public sector undertakings or the private sector.
    3. The dispute is not recent: The batch of cases had been pending for close to a decade before judgment.

    Why does the Centre call retrospective implementation extremely difficult?

    1. The reach extends beyond the reserved category: Reopening allocations settled from 2012 onwards would affect all categories, including the Unreserved category.
    2. Adjustment generates its own claims: The DoPT reports an increasing number of claims for adjustment and consequent disputes over seniority.
    3. The remedy could produce fresh unfairness: The Centre argues the supernumerary posts exercise could itself be unfair to a different category of OBC candidates.
    4. The precedent has already multiplied: 22 other judgments have applied the principles laid down in the ruling, and 12 new cases have been filed by candidates who had not previously approached the courts, seeking reconsideration of their non creamy layer status.

    What has the government actually done since the ruling?

    1. The file moved between ministries: The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions wrote to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment on 3 June seeking advice on implementing the directions.
    2. The referral rested on a rules point: The Personnel Ministry cited the Allocation of Business Rules, under which the Social Justice Ministry formulates policy on reservations, and sought advice on the instructions the DoPT should notify.
    3. The stated position changed within days: As of 19 August the Centre told the Central Administrative Tribunal, in an identical matter, that it was in the process of implementing the judgment. The DoPT then filed an application setting out why the directions were not workable retrospectively.
    4. A parallel application seeks an interim carve out: The Centre has asked to continue allotting services on the old reading of the income test for Civil Services Examination 2025 candidates, since more than 950 of them were recommended on that basis and were about to begin their Foundation Course.

    What is contested about the Centre’s position?

    1. The timing of the objection is questioned: The affected candidates ask why the DoPT did not raise these implementation difficulties earlier in a litigation that ran for close to a decade.
    2. The scope of the old practice is disputed: The candidates say the reading the Court found discriminatory was applied only by the DoPT, and applied arbitrarily at that.
    3. The Centre defends salary as a distinguishing factor: It argues that salary income may in some cases be the “sole intelligible differentia” between two OBC candidates from similar social backgrounds.
    4. It raises an outer limit case: Without salary consideration, candidates whose parents earn up to Rs 1 crore could be treated as non creamy layer.

    Challenges to the creamy layer exclusion

    1. Post equivalence has never been completed: The entire dispute exists because the government has not established which public sector undertaking posts correspond to which government service grades, decades after the requirement was written in. Eg. The 1993 Office Memorandum itself made the income test conditional on equivalence, and the 2004 letter was issued precisely because equivalence was still absent. Fix. Set a statutory deadline for the Department of Public Enterprises to notify a grade to grade equivalence table, after which the income test lapses for unequated posts.
    2. The income ceiling is revised by discretion, not by rule: With no indexation formula, the threshold stays static through years of inflation and then jumps, so the excluded population changes for reasons unrelated to backwardness. Eg. The ceiling moved from Rs 1 lakh in 1993 to Rs 8 lakh in 2017 through irregular administrative revisions. Fix. Link the ceiling to a published price or income index with automatic annual revision.
    3. Verification of income claims is weak: Certificates rest on self declaration and local revenue verification, which produces both wrongful exclusion and wrongful inclusion. Eg. Recruitment bodies routinely cancel candidatures years after selection on the ground of a defective non creamy layer certificate. Fix. Validate income declarations against the income tax database at the certificate issuing stage rather than at the appointment stage.
    4. There is no data on who captures the benefit: Without caste and sub caste wise data on selections, the argument that a small set of OBC families corners reserved posts cannot be tested either way. Eg. The Rohini Commission on sub categorisation of OBCs worked without a comprehensive survey of the actual distribution of benefits across OBC communities. Fix. Publish anonymised, sub caste wise selection data for central services on a fixed annual cycle.
    5. Central and State lists diverge: A community treated as OBC by a State may not be on the central list, and the income test is administered differently across the two. Eg. Candidates have been denied central reservation benefits despite holding a State issued OBC certificate. Fix. Publish a reconciled concordance between the central list and each State list, updated whenever either changes.

    Conclusion

    An equality finding that identifies discrimination and then applies only prospectively leaves the identified wrong unremedied for everyone it already hit, and that is the contradiction the clarification application asks the Court to resolve. What to watch is whether a Bench is constituted, and whether it permits the interim carve out for the 2025 examination cohort until the wider question of reach is decided.

    Back2Basics

    1. Constitutional basis: It was established under Article 323A, which permits Parliament to provide for adjudication of service disputes of public servants by tribunals.
    2. Governing statute: It functions under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and began working in 1985.
    3. Jurisdiction: It hears recruitment and service matters of persons appointed to All India Services, central civil services and posts under the Union.
    4. Appeals: Its orders are challengeable before the High Court, following the Supreme Court’s ruling in L. Chandra Kumar vs Union of India (1997).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2023] Consider the following statements : Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgements that the reservation policies made under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration. Statement-II : Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term ‘efficiency of administration’. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct ANSWER: (c)”

  • In a first, Rlys to build 6 freight lines with pvt firms using highways’ hybrid funding model

    Why in the News

    The Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee under the Ministry of Finance has approved six railway lines spanning 647 km along freight corridors, to be built under the Hybrid Annuity Model. This is the first time Indian Railways will implement a project under the model, which was developed for the highways sector to split project costs and risks between the government and the private builder. The Committee had earlier given in principle approval to the same projects under the Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) model, and switched to the Hybrid Annuity Model after market feedback. The tension is that attracting private capital required Indian Railways to keep the traffic and tariff risk on its own books, so the financing burden moves. The demand risk does not move with it.

    How does the Hybrid Annuity Model work here?

    1. The construction cost is split: Indian Railways pays 40 percent of the bid project cost as a grant during the construction period. The private party finances the remaining 60 percent.
    2. Repayment begins after commissioning: Once the line is operational, Indian Railways repays the private party’s 60 percent through annuity instalments, plus interest on the annuity.
    3. Maintenance is paid separately: Indian Railways also makes regular payments to the concessionaire for maintenance of stations, tracks and other assets.
    4. Operations stay public: Indian Railways operates the trains and collects all freight revenue.

    Which lines were cleared and what will they carry?

    1. Four of the six lines are in Odisha: These are the 49.58 km Balaram-Putgadia-Tentuloi inner corridor, the 112.56 km Budhapank-Tentuloi-Luburi outer corridor, the 101.26 km Jajpur-Keonjhar Road-Aradi-Dhamara Port line, and the 48.96 km line from Tikiri Station to the Waltair bauxite mines.
    2. Telangana carries the longest line: The 207.80 km Manuguru to Ramagundam line is the single largest of the six.
    3. Jharkhand carries the sixth: The 126.52 km Pakur to Godda line completes the set.
    4. Coal dominates the freight mix: The key commodities on these routes are primarily coal, along with iron ore, bauxite, coke, chemical manure, cement and food grains.

    What does the switch away from DBFOT change?

    1. Risk allocation moved to the public side: The Ministry of Railways would bear the traffic and tariff risks under the proposed structure, per the minutes of the Committee meeting held on 1 August.
    2. The private party is insulated from demand shortfalls: If freight loading or revenue falls below target, the private party is not penalised.
    3. Bid conditions remain to be fixed: The request for proposal will specify the minimum tenure of the agreement, the roles of the engineering, procurement and construction contractor, and the circumstances in which such arrangements are permitted.

    What is the money and the sequence?

    1. Two cost figures govern the projects: The total bid project cost of the six lines is Rs 15,976 crore, and the total capital cost covering the entire concession period is Rs 40,866 crore.
    2. The concession runs 17 to 19 years: That period covers construction, operation and the annuity repayments.
    3. Approval is not yet final: The projects go to the Union Cabinet before bids are invited.
    4. The build starts at the end of the decade: Bidding is expected in the 2027-28 financial year and construction of all six projects is proposed to commence from April 2028.

    Where does this sit in the Railways’ private investment record?

    1. Completed projects are modest in value: 18 projects worth Rs 16,686 crore have been completed through the public private partnership model in Indian Railways.
    2. Seven are under implementation: These are worth Rs 16,362 crore and include coal and port connectivity projects.
    3. The pipeline is far larger than the record: 49 other projects, costing around Rs 1.80 lakh crore, await execution under the partnership mode.
    4. The policy menu was widened deliberately: Indian Railways recently added the Hybrid Annuity Model and the Development Partner Model to its participative policy, to overcome financial bottlenecks and attract long term private capital.

    Challenges to the Hybrid Annuity Model in railways

    1. Annuity payments create long dated committed liabilities: Deferring 60 percent of the cost converts a capital expenditure decision into a fixed claim on operating revenue for nearly two decades. Eg. The National Highways Authority of India’s annuity and deferred payment obligations under its hybrid annuity projects have become a standing charge on its balance sheet. Fix. Publish a consolidated annuity liability statement alongside the Railway budget so the future claim is visible when the project is sanctioned.
    2. Freight demand is concentrated in a single commodity: Corridors built primarily for coal are exposed to a policy driven decline in thermal coal movement over the concession period. Eg. Coal accounts for roughly half of Indian Railways’ freight tonnage and a larger share of its freight earnings. Fix. Structure the corridors for multi commodity handling and terminal access rather than dedicated colliery to plant movement.
    3. Land acquisition and forest clearance drive the delay risk: Mineral corridors in Odisha and Jharkhand cross forest land and scheduled areas where consent and clearance timelines are unpredictable. Eg. Rail connectivity projects to mining belts have run past a decade waiting on forest clearance and rehabilitation settlements. Fix. Make financial closure conditional on prior possession of a defined share of the alignment, as the highways sector now requires.
    4. Dispute resolution has been the weak link in the highways precedent: Disagreements over cost variation, change of scope and delay attribution have taken years in arbitration. Eg. Arbitration claims against the highways authority have run into tens of thousands of crore rupees across concession disputes. Fix. Provide for a standing independent engineer with binding interim determinations written into the concession agreement.

    Conclusion

    The design question the model leaves open is whether shifting the financing burden to private balance sheets actually reduces the state’s exposure or merely reschedules it. Demand risk is retained on the public balance sheet either way. What to watch is the bid response once the Union Cabinet clears the projects and the request for proposal is issued, since the number of qualified bidders is the only real test of whether the risk split is priced as attractive.

    Back2Basics

    1. Location: It functions under the Department of Economic Affairs in the Ministry of Finance.
    2. Mandate: It appraises and approves central sector public private partnership projects above a specified cost threshold.
    3. Composition: It is chaired by the Secretary, Department of Economic Affairs, with the sponsoring ministry and the planning and legal departments represented.
    4. Process: It grants in principle approval at the project structuring stage and final approval before the project is placed before the Union Cabinet.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2022, GS3, 10 marks] Why is Public Private Partnership (PPP) required in infrastructural projects? Examine the role of PPP model in the redevelopment of Railway Stations in India.”

  • Worries behind India’s robust GDP, inflation data

    Why in the News

    Six months into the West Asia war, India’s headline macroeconomic numbers have held up against the deterioration forecast for them. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for the first quarter is put at 7 to 7.5 percent, retail inflation sits near the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) target of 4 percent, and the current account deficit is 0.3 percent of GDP. The forecasts had assumed the opposite, since the war was expected to raise crude oil prices and cut foreign investment, and El Nino conditions (a periodic warming of the eastern Pacific that shifts monsoon rainfall over India) threatened food production. The tension is that each of the three headline numbers rests on a support that can reverse within a quarter, so the resilience is a matter of composition rather than of structure.

    Why were the macro numbers expected to deteriorate?

    1. The war was expected to work through crude and capital: Higher crude oil prices and a reduction in foreign investment were the two channels analysts identified after the United States and Israel went to war with Iran.
    2. Inflation was projected to triple: The rate was expected to rise from 2 percent in 2025-26 to near 6 percent, moving from the lower end of the RBI’s comfort zone to its upper limit.
    3. The rupee carried the visible damage: The war exposed persistent weaknesses in the economy, expressed most sharply in the fall of the rupee’s exchange rate.
    4. Household consumption was asked to adjust: The Prime Minister appealed to citizens to stop gold purchases and reduce fuel consumption, among other measures.

    What is actually holding up the growth number?

    1. Monetary easing has begun to transmit: The repo rate, the rate at which the RBI lends to commercial banks, was cut by 125 basis points between December 2024 and December 2025, and transmission into faster growth typically takes a couple of quarters.
    2. Indirect tax cuts raised purchasing power: Cuts in the Goods and Services Tax in 2025 lowered prices and lifted economic activity.
    3. Exports to the United States recovered: India’s exports rose as the tariffs imposed by the United States were removed.
    4. Manufacturers produced ahead of demand: Firms front loaded production because they were anxious about future energy availability.
    5. The estimates cluster above 7 percent: A research database of 100 growth indicators points to 7 to 7.5 percent for April, May and June, and one domestic bank’s research team projects 8 percent.

    Why is headline inflation low, and what does the average conceal?

    1. The headline rate is contained but rising: Monthly retail inflation has moved up since October and remains near the RBI’s 4 percent target level.
    2. The restraint is not the usual kind: Inflation ordinarily stays muted because growth is muted, and here it has stayed muted despite supply pressures and with demand holding up.
    3. Goods inflation is already at 5.4 percent: Food inflation and non food goods inflation together averaged 5.4 percent year on year in July.
    4. Services inflation is doing the masking: Services inflation is at 2.5 percent, and a rise from that level, reflecting growth better, would push the headline number up quickly.

    How is the current account deficit being held at 0.3 percent of GDP?

    1. The current account measures net flows on trade: It is the net amount of money moving in or out of India as it trades goods and services with the world, and a country importing more than it exports runs a deficit on it.
    2. The goods side is deteriorating: The goods trade deficit is growing, which is the normal consequence of fast growth and costlier imports.
    3. Services and remittances are funding the gap: Rising services exports and remittances from Indians working abroad are offsetting the increase in the goods deficit.
    4. The funding source is itself uncertain: Services exports have grown at a softer pace this year, and the effect of artificial intelligence on services export growth is unsettled.

    What do the credit numbers signal beneath the growth rate?

    1. Credit growth is partly guaranteed rather than commercial: A new government credit guarantee scheme for small firms accounts for part of the rise in loans.
    2. Working capital demand reflects costlier inputs: Borrowing has risen because higher commodity prices have raised working capital needs.
    3. Gold loan growth is a stress marker: The proliferation of gold loans functions as an indicator of household financial distress rather than of expansion.
    4. Front loading borrows from the next quarter: Manufacturing brought forward can be followed by a lull, and agricultural growth can weaken if El Nino strengthens.

    Challenges to sustaining India’s growth and inflation mix

    1. Import dependence on crude oil transmits every external shock: India imports the large majority of the crude oil it consumes, so a price shock lands directly on the trade balance and on the fuel component of retail inflation. Eg. The 2022 crude price surge after the Ukraine war pushed retail inflation above the RBI’s 6 percent upper tolerance band for three consecutive quarters. Fix. Expand the strategic petroleum reserve and diversify long term crude contracts away from a single supplier region.
    2. Exchange rate depreciation feeds imported inflation: A weaker rupee raises the domestic price of imported fuel, edible oil, fertiliser and electronics regardless of domestic demand conditions. Eg. Edible oil prices in India track palm oil import costs from Indonesia and Malaysia, where India buys the bulk of its supply. Fix. Deepen the domestic oilseed and fertiliser production base so that the depreciation pass through covers a smaller import basket.
    3. Services led growth generates limited employment: The sector’s share of output far exceeds its share of jobs, so a growth rate driven by services does not translate into proportionate hiring. Eg. Information technology services contribute a large share of exports. They employ a small fraction of the non farm workforce. Fix. Tie production and export incentives to verified employment creation rather than to output or investment alone.
    4. Private capital expenditure has not led the cycle: Growth supported by rate cuts, tax cuts and front loaded production rests on policy stimulus rather than on a durable investment upturn. Eg. Central government capital expenditure has carried the investment cycle since the pandemic, with private corporate investment recovering later and unevenly. Fix. Resolve land, contract enforcement and clearance delays that raise the fixed cost of a new private project.

    Conclusion

    The headline numbers are steady because one sector is covering for the others. That is a composition rather than a structure, and a composition can change inside a quarter. The marker to watch is whether services inflation rises at the same time as services exports weaken, since that pairing would force the central bank to raise rates and take the growth number with it.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2021, GS3, 10 marks] Explain the difference between computing methodology of India’s Gross Domestic Product(GDP) before the year 2015 and after the year 2015.”

  • Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana crop insurance record

    Why in the News

    PIB set out the coverage and claims record of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). PMFBY is the national crop insurance scheme.

    Core facts

    1. What it is: PMFBY provides crop insurance against non preventable natural risks. Cover runs from pre sowing to post harvest.
    2. Coverage record: About 56.96 crore farmer applications were insured since inception.
    3. Claims paid: About Rs 1,54,469 crore was paid in claims since inception.
    4. Farmer premium: Farmers pay 2 percent for Kharif crops, 1.5 percent for Rabi crops and 5 percent for commercial and horticultural crops. The government pays the balance premium.
    5. Design principle: The scheme follows a One Nation, One Crop, One Premium approach. It removed premium capping so full admissible claims are paid.
    6. Technology: Loss assessment uses remote sensing, drones and smartphones. Key systems are YES-TECH (Yield Estimation System based on Technology) and CROPIC (Collection of Real time Observations and Photographs of Crops).

    Static Context

    1. Launch: PMFBY was launched in 2016. It replaced earlier crop insurance schemes.
    2. Voluntary since 2020: Enrolment became voluntary for all farmers from the 2020 revamp. It was earlier compulsory for loanee farmers.
    3. Delivery platform: The National Crop Insurance Portal (NCIP) digitises enrolment, premium flow and claims.
    4. Implementing ministry: The scheme is run by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.

    Prelims angle

    1. Premium hook: Farmer premium is 2 percent Kharif, 1.5 percent Rabi, 5 percent commercial and horticultural. A uniform 2 percent for all crops is incorrect.
    2. Scope hook: The scheme covers post harvest losses from cyclones and unseasonal rain, and localised risks such as hailstorm and landslide.
    3. Tech hook: YES-TECH for yield estimation and CROPIC for photograph based crop verification.
    4. Year hook: Launched in 2016, voluntary since 2020.

    Mains angle

    GS3 (agricultural risk, crop insurance, subsidies). A question can ask how crop insurance protects small and marginal farmers against climate risk.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2016, GS3, 12.5 marks] Give the vulnerability of Indian agriculture to vagaries of nature, discuss the need for crop insurance and bring out the salient features of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). [2016] With reference to ‘Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana’, consider the following statements: 1. Under this scheme, farmers will have to pay a uniform premium of two percent for any crop they cultivate in any season of the year. 2. This scheme covers post-harvest losses arising out of cyclones and unseasonal rains. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Answer: (b)”

  • Per Drop More Crop expands water efficient micro irrigation

    Why in the News

    PIB detailed the reach of the Per Drop More Crop (PDMC) component of national irrigation policy. Revised guidelines widen the water management activities that states can fund.

    Core facts

    1. What it is: Per Drop More Crop promotes drip and sprinkler irrigation. The aim is higher water use efficiency at the farm.
    2. Coverage record: About 83.06 lakh hectares were brought under micro irrigation from 2015-16 to 2023-24. About 30.55 lakh hectares of that were added in the last three years.
    3. Central assistance: About Rs 18,714.69 crore was released to states since inception.
    4. Subsidy pattern: Assistance is 55 percent for small and marginal farmers and 45 percent for other farmers. Northeastern and Himalayan states get 25 percent higher unit cost support.
    5. Revised guidelines: States can now plan micro level water management works such as diggi construction and water harvesting under the scheme.
    6. Figure caveat: Some current media figures cite about 115 lakh hectares and 12.30 lakh farmers. Those could not be verified on a fetchable PIB detail page, so the PIB verified figure of 83.06 lakh hectares is used above.

    Static Context

    1. Parent scheme history: PDMC ran under the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY) from 2015-16 to 2021-22. Since 2022-23 it runs under the Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY).
    2. Micro Irrigation Fund: The Micro Irrigation Fund (MIF) was created with the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). Its initial corpus was Rs 5,000 crore.
    3. Interest support: The Fund gives states a 3 percent interest subvention on loans for micro irrigation expansion.
    4. PMKSY mandate: PMKSY, launched in 2015, follows the goal of Har Khet Ko Paani and improved on farm water use.

    Prelims angle

    1. Umbrella hook: PDMC now sits under RKVY, earlier under PMKSY.
    2. Fund hook: The Micro Irrigation Fund is with NABARD, corpus Rs 5,000 crore.
    3. Concept hook: Micro irrigation cuts fertiliser and nutrient loss and can check groundwater depletion. It is not the only means of dryland irrigation.

    Mains angle

    GS3 (types of irrigation and irrigation systems). A question can ask how micro irrigation addresses India’s water stress and how coverage can be widened.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2021, GS3, 10 marks] How and to what extent would micro-irrigation help in solving India’s water crisis? [2016, GS3, 12.5 marks] What is water-use efficiency? Describe the role of micro-irrigation in increasing the water-use efficiency. [2011] With reference to micro-irrigation, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Fertilizer/nutrient loss can be reduced. 2. It is the only means of irrigation in dry land farming. 3. In some areas of farming, receding of the groundwater table can be checked. (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Answer: (c)”